Clinical Review

Patient-Specific Implants in Severe Glenoid Bone Loss

Author and Disclosure Information

TAKE-HOME POINTS

  • With the increasing number of arthroplasties performed, and the expanding indication for shoulder arthroplasty, the number of revision shoulder arthroplasties is also increasing.
  • Complex glenoid bone defects are sometimes encountered in revision shoulder arthroplasties.
  • Glenoid reconstructions with bone graft have reported encouraging short- to mid-term results, but the high number of complications is a concern.
  • Using the CAD/CAM technology patient-specific glenoid components have been created to reconstruct the glenoid vault in cases of severe glenoid bone loss.
  • Short-term clinical and radiographic results of patient-specific glenoid components are encouraging, however longer-term follow-up are needed to confirm the efficacy of this type of reconstruction.


 

References

ABSTRACT

Complex glenoid bone deformities present the treating surgeon with a complex reconstructive challenge. Although glenoid bone loss can be encountered in the primary setting (degenerative, congenital, post-traumatic), severe glenoid bone loss is encountered in most revision total shoulder arthroplasties. Severe glenoid bone loss is treated with various techniques including hemiarthroplasty, eccentric reaming, and glenoid reconstruction with bone autografts and allografts. Despite encouraging short- to mid-term results reported with these reconstruction techniques, the clinical and radiographic outcomes remain inconsistent and the high number of complications is a concern. To overcome this problem, more recently augmented components and patient specific implants were introduced. Using the computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing technology patient-specific implants have been created to reconstruct the glenoid vault in cases of severe glenoid bone loss.

In this article we describe a patient specific glenoid implant, its indication, technical aspects and surgical technique, based on the author's experience as well as a review of the current literature on custom glenoid implants.

Continue to: Total shoulder arthroplasty...

Pages

Recommended Reading

Superior Capsular Reconstruction: Clinical Outcomes After Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up
MDedge Surgery
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Total Shoulder Arthroplasty With a Hybrid Dual-Radii Glenoid Component
MDedge Surgery
Predicting 1-Year Postoperative Visual Analog Scale Pain Scores and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Function Scores in Total and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
MDedge Surgery
For women with RA, small-joint surgery rate nearly twice that of men
MDedge Surgery
Biceps Tenodesis: A Comparison of Tendon-to-Bone and Tendon-to-Tendon Healing in a Rat Model
MDedge Surgery
Management of Isolated Greater Tuberosity Fractures: A Systematic Review
MDedge Surgery
In Throwers With Posterior Instability, Rotator Cuff Tears Are Common but Do Not Affect Surgical Outcomes
MDedge Surgery
Shoulder Arthroplasty in Cases of Significant Bone Loss: An Overview
MDedge Surgery
Convertible Glenoid Components Facilitate Revisions to Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Easier: Retrospective Review of 13 Cases
MDedge Surgery
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Using a Bone-Sparing, Precision Multiplanar Humeral Prosthesis
MDedge Surgery