Conference Coverage

Hip Replacements in Middle-Age Nearly Double From 2002-2011, Outpacing Growth in Elderly Population


 

References

LAS VEGAS—The number of total hip replacements (THRs) nearly doubled among middle-age patients between 2002 and 2011, primarily due to the expansion of the middle-age population in the United States, according to a study presented at the 2015 Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS). Continued growth in utilization of hip replacement surgery in patients ages 45 to 64 years, an increase in revision surgeries for this population as they age, and a nearly 30% decline in the number of surgeons who perform THR could have significant implications for future health care costs, THR demand, and access, researchers said.

The researchers used the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) to identify primary THRs performed between 2002 and 2011 in patients ages 45 to 64 years, as well as related hospital charges. Population data and projections were obtained from the US Census Bureau and surgeon workforce estimates from the AAOS.

In 2011, 42.3% of THRs were performed in patients ages 45 to 64 years compared to 33.9% in 2002. Utilization of THR in this age group increased 89.2% from 2002 to 2011, from approximately 68,000 THRs in 2002 to 128,000 THRs in 2011. The overall population increased 21.3%. In addition, the authors found that:

• Growth of THR utilization in the 45- to 64-year-old age group grew 2.4 times faster than it did in the Medicare-aged population (age > 65 years).

• A rise in the prevalence of obesity, a known risk factor for hip osteoarthritis, among middle-age Americans was not significantly associated with increased THR utilization.

• Mean hospital charges in the THR 45- to 64-year-old age group declined 5.7% from 2002 to 2011, and declined 2.5% in the Medicare population (age > 65 years).

• Mean physician reimbursement per THR, in 2011 US dollars, declined 26.2% over the same period.

• Concurrently, the number of physicians reporting that they performed THR surgeries declined 28.2%.

“The purpose of this study was to identify potential drivers of THR utilization in the middle-age patient segment,” said lead study author Alexander S. McLawhorn, MD, MBA, an orthopedic surgery resident at the Hospital for Special Surgery in New York City. “Our multivariable statistical model suggested that the observed growth was best explained by an expansion of the middle-age population in the US. This particular age group is projected to continue expanding, and as such the demand for THR in this active group of patients will likely continue to rise as well. Our results underscore concerns about consumption of premium-priced implants in younger patients and the future revision burden this trend implies in the face of a dwindling number of physicians who specialize in hip arthroplasty surgery.”

Recommended Reading

Bisphosphonates associated with improved hip, knee implant survival
MDedge Surgery
Prearthroplasty exercise benefits short lived
MDedge Surgery
Osteoarthritis patients survive longer after hip resurfacing than replacement
MDedge Surgery
Aspirin better than heparin at VTE prevention after total hip arthroplasty
MDedge Surgery
Orthopaedic surgeons’ ‘Choosing Wisely’ list centers on osteoarthritis treatments
MDedge Surgery
Failure of Total Hip Arthroplasty Secondary to Infection Caused by Brucella abortus and the Risk of Transmission to Operative Staff
MDedge Surgery
Harrington Rod Revision After Failed Total Hip Arthroplasty Due to Missed Acetabular Metastasis
MDedge Surgery
Hip Replacement Patients May Safely Drive as Early As Two Weeks Following Surgery
MDedge Surgery
Nearly Half of Patients Have Delirium Before and After Hip Fracture Surgery, Diminishing Outcomes and Increasing Health Care Costs
MDedge Surgery
Routine Bisphosphonate Treatment for Women Older Than 65 Years Who Sustain a Wrist Fracture Could Prevent Nearly 95,000 Hip Fractures, But at a Significant Cost
MDedge Surgery