User login
Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections in Adults: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention
Every day in the United States, approximately 4% of patients in acute care hospitals have at least one hospital-acquired infection (HAI).1,2 Among the top 10 causes of death in the United States, HAIs are associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and hospital length of stay (LOS).2 The direct medical cost of treating HAIs is substantial for both hospitals and patients.3,4 Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are a leading cause of HAI, and 70%-80% of these are catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs).5,6 In 2016, 26,983 CAUTIs occurred in acute care hospitals.7 The high incidence of CAUTI can substantially contribute to morbidity, length of stay, and mortality.8-11
The recognition that a substantial proportion of HAIs may be preventable, including 55%-70% of CAUTIs,12 has resulted in implementing multiple strategies to reduce CAUTI rates.13-17 These include simple prevention interventions such as avoiding placement of unnecessary indwelling urinary catheters and early removal of urinary catheters when they are no longer clinically indicated. Hospitalists are responsible for the care of many, if not most, inpatients with indwelling urinary catheters and are integral in antimicrobial stewardship efforts surrounding CAUTIs.18 Diagnostic stewardship, including appropriate urine specimen ordering, collection, processing, and reporting, works synergistically with antimicrobial stewardship and allows for appropriate antibiotic prescribing in symptomatic patients.19
DEFINITIONS
CAUTIs can be defined using either clinical or surveillance definitions. Clinical definitions are used at the bedside and take individual clinical characteristics into consideration, but vary among clinicians since there is no gold standard. Abnormal laboratory urinary findings in the absence of symptoms are not sufficient for the diagnosis of UTI, including CAUTI. Surveillance definitions, such as those used by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,20 are designed to be simple, easily applicable in any healthcare setting, and standardized to all patients. Surveillance definitions generally include at least one systemic or local symptom (such as fever or dysuria) and positive urine culture in a patient with an indwelling urinary catheter (or within 48 hours after its removal).
Pyuria is leukocytes or white blood cells (WBCs) in a urine specimen, with a threshold of >10 WBCs/high-power field using urine microscopy. The predictive value of different thresholds of pyuria for UTI is unclear.
Bacteriuria denotes the presence (on microscopy or culture) of bacteria in the urine. In a patient without signs or symptoms of a UTI, this is termed asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB). A full discussion of bacteriuria, a major reason for inappropriate antibiotic use, is beyond the scope of this article but is discussed in a recent guideline.21
Urinary tract infections are usually characterized by a clinical syndrome along with evidence of pyuria and/or bacteriuria. The two major clinical syndromes that are observed are lower UTI (cystitis or bladder infections) and upper UTI (pyelonephritis or kidney infections). Rarely, patients may develop asymptomatic bacteremic UTI, where blood and urine cultures grow the same pathogen in the absence of clinical symptoms. (Table 1 summarizes the key points for these definitions).
CAUSES AND RISK FACTORS FOR CAUTI
Bacterial biofilm can form on the inner and outer surfaces of an indwelling urinary catheter following its insertion and can be associated with bacteriuria and CAUTI.22,23 The biofilm comprises bacteria from the periurethral area that migrate upwards from a colonized drainage system. Bacteria present in the biofilm tend to exhibit slow growth, are protected from antibiotic exposure, and have less susceptibility to these agents.22-24 When a mature biofilm has formed, catheter removal may be necessary for source control and to facilitate effective antimicrobial treatment. The pathogens that most commonly cause CAUTIs are Escherichia coli (23.9%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (10.3%), and Klebsiella pneumoniae/oxytoca (10.1%).25 Although urine cultures often grow yeast, particularly Candida spp., nonbacterial pathogens rarely cause UTI.
The risk of developing a CAUTI is directly related to catheter dwell time.26,27 For catheterized patients, the rate of development of catheter-associated bacteriuria is approximately 3% to 7% per day14,28 and is more common in the elderly and females. The likelihood of bacteriuria approaches 100% if a patient has an indwelling urinary catheter for ≥30 days,27,29,30 which is part of the rationale for why a urine culture alone is not sufficient to diagnose a CAUTI. While bacteriuria is a risk factor for UTI, the frequency of progression from bacteriuria to CAUTI is low and treating ASB does not decrease the risk of future CAUTI. Other risk factors for the development of CAUTI include urinary tract instrumentation, diabetes mellitus, and malnutrition.31,32
The two most important factors that lead to the development of CAUTIs and have been the main focus of quality improvement areas are unnecessary urinary catheter placement and inappropriate delay in removing a catheter when it is no longer needed.26,33 Unfortunately, 38% of attending physicians are unaware that their patients have a urinary catheter in place.34 Furthermore, in 20% to 50% of cases, there is no clear indication for catheter placement.2,34
DIAGNOSIS OF CAUTI
A CAUTI diagnosis is typically one of exclusion, as most patients present with fever and no apparent alternative source.14,29 Since catheterized patients may not exhibit common cystitis symptoms,29 most who develop CAUTI present with fever alone. However, most fevers in patients with bacteriuria and catheters are not CAUTIs and can be attributed to other sources. If a patient with an indwelling urinary catheter develops a fever and there is a suspicion of a CAUTI, careful evaluation is warranted for alternative sources of infection. This particularly applies to patients with severe systemic illness, such as hypotension or systemic inflammatory response syndrome, since these are unusual manifestations of CAUTI. The presence of either cloudy or malodorous urine does not indicate a UTI, and should not be the sole rationale for obtaining a urine culture.
Diagnostic workup of fever should include a clinical assessment of the patient. Indeed, professional guidelines recommend against obtaining a urine culture routinely for fever, unless invasive UTI risk is elevated, such as in patients with neutropenia, history of renal transplantation, or recent genitourinary surgery.35 Diagnostic stewardship, focusing on the appropriate use of urine cultures, can reduce CAUTI rates.36 For catheterized patients, hospitals are increasingly adopting reflex urine culture, where urine is simultaneously collected for a urinalysis and urine culture, but a urine culture is performed only if the urinalysis is positive for a predetermined threshold for pyuria, leukocyte esterase, or both. However, the use of reflex urine cultures remains an area of debate.37 In addition, the Infectious Diseases Society of America recommends against screening for or treating ASB in patients with either short-term (<30 days) or long-term indwelling urethral catheters.21
Ideally, a urine culture should be obtained by collecting a midstream sample. In catheterized patients, a sample should be obtained after removal of the catheter; or, in patients with a clinical indication for ongoing catheterization, a sample should be obtained after a new catheter has been placed.14 If an indwelling urinary catheter must be continued, the recommendation is to disinfect the drainage system’s aspiration port and then obtain a urine culture. Urine should never be obtained from a catheter collection bag. (Table 2 summarizes best practices for diagnosis of CAUTI).
TREATMENT OF CAUTI
For all CAUTIs, an indwelling urinary catheter should be removed as soon as possible. If an indwelling urinary catheter remains necessary, but the existing catheter has been in place longer than two weeks, a new catheter should be placed before initiating antibiotic therapy14 to accelerate symptom resolution and reduce the likelihood of relapse or recurrence.32
Urinary tract agents such as fosfomycin and nitrofurantoin are recommended as first-line agents for simple cystitis in women and can be used in patients with lower UTI and sufficient renal function to achieve adequate drug concentration in urine. Upper UTIs require antibiotics with good penetration into renal parenchyma such as ceftriaxone. If empiric antimicrobial therapy is needed before culture results are available, then previous urine culture results, local antibiograms, or practice guidelines can guide selection. Definitive antimicrobial therapy should be based on urine culture results. It is important to narrow empiric therapy14 to reduce risk of Clostridioides difficile infection and emergence of other resistant bacteria. Fluoroquinolones should be avoided for lower UTIs because of these risks and multiple United States Food and Drug Administration warnings.38-40
The optimal duration of antimicrobial therapy for a CAUTI is unclear;14 however, most patients can be treated with a relatively short duration of therapy (≤7 days) if they respond promptly to therapy. Patients with a slow response to therapy may require 10-14 days of treatment.14 (Table 2 summarizes best practices for the treatment of CAUTI).
STRATEGIES FOR CAUTI PREVENTION
Since CAUTI is predicated on the presence of an indwelling urinary catheter, the simplest way to reduce CAUTI is to avoid placing or retaining unnecessary catheters. Some examples of appropriate indications9 for placement and maintenance of an indwelling urinary catheter are listed below:
1. Accurate measurement of urinary output in severely ill patients;
2. Improved comfort for patients receiving end-of-life care;
3. Acute urinary retention or bladder outlet obstruction;
4. Need for a period of prolonged immobilization (eg, potentially unstable lumbar or thoracic spine, or has multiple traumatic injuries);
5. Selected surgical procedures, such as urologic procedures and those that are expected to have a prolonged duration, require intraoperative monitoring of urine output, require the administration of either large volumes of intravenous infusions or diuretics;
6. To promote healing of open perineal or sacral wounds in patients with incontinence;
7. Neurogenic bladder; and
8. Hematuria with clots.
To increase the timely removal of urinary catheters that are no longer indicated, daily assessment of catheter necessity must be an integral part of clinicians’ workflow.32,33 Alternatives, such as external catheters or intermittent catheterization, should be considered before indwelling urinary catheter placement since both options are associated with a reduced CAUTI risk.41-44 Although indwelling urinary catheters can be seen as being more convenient for both patients and healthcare providers, many patients have expressed a preference for the use of intermittent catheterization compared with indwelling urinary catheterization.43
For urinary retention, bladder scanning can noninvasively assess the amount of residual urine in a patient’s bladder and can avoid unnecessary insertion of an indwelling urinary catheter. However, if indwelling urinary catheters are ultimately needed, they must be inserted and maintained appropriately. Of note, the use of antibiotic-impregnated catheters has not been shown to reduce CAUTI rates significantly.45
CAUTI prevention requires a multidisciplinary collaborative approach. Nurse-driven protocols and checklists to remove indwelling urinary catheters that are no longer indicated can be very effective.46,47 Automatic stop orders and catheter removal reminders are useful for reducing the duration of catheter placement.26,48 Both of these approaches require appropriate, consistent documentation with input from bedside nurses, physicians, advanced practice providers, and information technology. (Table 3 summarizes best practices for the prevention of CAUTI).
Importantly, CAUTI prevention supports broader antimicrobial stewardship. Over 55% of inpatients receive at least one dose of an antibiotic during their hospital stay.48,49 In 2015, the White House released the National Action Plan for Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria with the goals of slowing the emergence of resistant bacteria, preventing the spread of antibiotic-resistant infections, and setting a target of a 20% reduction in the inappropriate use of antibiotics for hospitalized patients.50 Hospitalists care for a substantial number of inpatients and, in turn, can drive actions to decrease CAUTIs, and promote stewardship efforts. Through actions to decrease CAUTIs, hospitalists can promote these stewardship efforts.
CONCLUSIONS
CAUTI is one of the most common types of HAI and is associated with increased morbidity, hospital length of stay, and patient costs. Most CAUTIs are preventable by limiting the placement of unnecessary catheters to instances of true necessity and removing catheters when they are no longer clinically indicated. Proper technique for the insertion and maintenance of catheters is also important for reducing CAUTI rates. Hospitalists care for a substantial number of inpatients and can make major contributions to the appropriate diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of CAUTIs.
1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Estimates of healthcare-associated infections. http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dhqp/hai.html. Accessed September 27, 2018.
2. Calfee D. Crisis in hospital-acquired, healthcare-associated infections. Annu Rev Med. 2012;63(1):359-371. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-med-081210-144458.
3. Scott R. 2009. The direct medical costs of healthcare-associated infections in U.S. hospitals and the benefits of prevention. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta. http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dhqp/pdf/Scott_CostPaper.pdf. Accessed September 27, 2018.
4. Zimlachman E, Henderson D, Tamir O, et al. Health care associated infections. A meta-analysis of costs and financial impact on the US health care system. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(22):2039-2046. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.9763.
5. Nicolle LE. Catheter-acquired urinary tract infection: the once and future guidelines. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31(4):327-329. https://doi.org/10.1086/651092.
6. Weber DJ, Sickbert-Bennett EE, Gould CV, et al. Incidence of catheter-associated and noncatheter-associated urinary tract infections in a healthcare system. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011;32(8):822-823. https://doi.org/10.1086/661107.
7. Healthcare-associated infections. National and state HAI progress reports or SIR reports. https://www.cdc.gov/hai/data/archive/archive.html. Accessed May 6, 2019.
8. Saint S. Clinical and economic consequences of nosocomial catheter-related bacteriuria. Am J Infect Control. 2000;28(1):68-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-6553(00)90015-4.
9. Platt R, Polk BF, Murdock B, Rosner B. Mortality associated with nosocomial urinary-tract infection. N Engl J Med. 1982;307(11):637-642. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198209093071101.
10. Tambyah PA, Knasinski V, Maki DG. The direct costs of nosocomial catheter-associated urinary tract infection in the era of managed care. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2002;23(1):27-31.
11. Chant C, Smith OM, Marshall JC, Friedrich JO. Relationship of catheter-associated urinary tract infection to mortality and length of stay in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(5):1167-1173. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e31820a8581.
12. Umscheid CA, Mitchell MD, Doshi JA, et al. Estimating the proportion of healthcare-associated infections that are reasonably preventable and the related mortality and costs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011;32(2):101-114. https://doi.org/10.1086/657912.
13. Gould C, Umscheid C, Agarwal R, et al. Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC): guideline for the prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections, 2009. http://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/pdf/CAUTI/CAUTIguideline2009final.pdf. Accessed November 1, 2018.
14. Hooton TM, Bradley SF, Cardenas DD, et al. Diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of catheter-associated urinary tract infection in adults: 2009 International Clinical Practice Guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50(5):625-663. https://doi.org/10.1086/650482.
15. Conway LJ, Larson EL. Guidelines to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection: 1980 to 2010. Heart Lung. 2011;41(3):271-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2011.08.001.
16. Greene L, Marx J, Oriola S. APIC elimination guide: guide to the elimination of catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs). http://www.apic.org/Content/NavigationMenu/PracticeGuidance/APICEliminationGuides/CAUTI_Guide_0609.pdf. Accessed October 15, 2018.
17. Yokoe DS, Mermel LA, Anderson DJ, et al. A compendium of strategies to prevent healthcare-associated infections in acute care hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008;29(S1):S12-S21.
18. Wiley Z, Kobaidze K, Sexton ME, Jacob JT. Hospitalists as integral stakeholders in antimicrobial stewardship. Curr Treat Options Infect Dis. 2018;10(2):240-248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40506-018-0162-z.
19. Claeys KC, Blanco N, Morgan DJ, Leekha S, Sullivan KV. Advances and challenges in the diagnosis and treatment of urinary tract infections: the need for diagnostic stewardship. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2019;21(4):11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11908-019-0668-7.
20. Horan T, Andrus M, Dudeck M. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control. 2008;36(5):309-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2008.03.002.
21. Nicolle LE, Gupta K, Bradley S, et al. Clinical practice guideline for the management of asymptomatic bacteriuria: 2019 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;68(10):e83-e110.
22. Donlan R. Biofilms and device-associated infections. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7(2):277-281. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid0702.010226.
23. Choe HS, Son SW, Choi HA, et al. Analysis of the distribution of bacteria within urinary catheter biofilms using four different molecular techniques. Am J Infect Control. 2012;40(9):e249-e254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2012.05.010.
24. Mohajer M, Darouiche R. Prevention and treatment of urinary catheter-associated infections. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2013;15(2):116-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11908-013-0316-6.
25. Weiner LM, Webb AK, Limbago B, et al. Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2011-2014. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016;37(11):1288-1301. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2016.174.
26. Tambyah PA, Oon J. Catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2012;25(4):365-370. https://doi.org/10.1097/QCO.0b013e32835565cc.
27. Warren JW, Tenney JH, Hoopes JM, Muncie HL, Anthony WC. A prospective microbiologic study of bacteriuria in patients with chronic indwelling urethral catheters. J Infect Dis. 1982;146(6):719-723. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/146.6.719.
28. Lo E, Nicolle L, Coffin S, et al. Strategies to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014;35(5):464-479. https://doi.org/10.1086/675718.
29. Nicolle LE. Urinary catheter-associated infections. Infect Dis Clin N Am. 2012;26(1):13-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idc.2011.09.009.
30. Titsworth WL, Hester J, Correia T, et al. Reduction of catheter-associated urinary tract infections among patients in a neurological intensive care unit: a single institution’s success. J Neurosurg. 2012;116(4):911-920. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.11.JNS11974.
31. Lobdell KW, Stamou S, Sanchez JA. Hospital-acquired infections. Surg Clin N Am. 2012;92(1):65-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2011.11.003.
32. Gray M. Reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infection in the critical care unit. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2010;21(3):247-257.
33. Fakih MG, Watson SR, Greene T, et al. Reducing inappropriate urinary catheter use. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(3):255-260. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2011.627.
34. Saint S, Wiese J, Amory JK, Bernstein ML, et al. Are physicians aware of which of their patients have an indwelling urinary catheters? Am J Med. 2000;109(6):476-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00531-3.
35. O’Grady NP, Barie PS, Bartlett JG, et al. Guidelines for evaluation of new fever in critically ill adult patients: 2008 update from the American College of Critical Care Medicine and the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(4):1330-1349. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e318169eda9.
36. Mullin K, Kovacs C, Fatica C, et al. A multifaceted approach to reduction of catheter-associated urinary tract infections in the intensive care unit with an emphasis on “stewardship of culturing.” Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017;38(2):186-188. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2016.266.
37. Humphries R, Bard J. Point-counterpoint: reflex cultures reduce laboratory workload and improve antimicrobial stewardship in patients suspected of having urinary tract infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54(2):254-258. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.03021-15.
38. Voelker R. New fluoroquinolone warning. JAMA. 2016;315(23):2514. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.7290.
39. Tillotson S. FDA and the safe and appropriate antibiotic use of fluoroquinolones. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(3):PE11-E12.
40. Tanne J. FDA adds “black box” warning label to fluoroquinolone antibiotics. BMJ 2008;337:a816. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a816.
41. Wyndaele JJ, Brauner A, Geerlings SE, et al. Clean intermittent catheterization and urinary tract infection: review and guide for future research. BJU Intern. 2012;110(11c):E910-E917. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11549.x.
42. Hakwoort RA, Thijs SD, Bouwmeester FW, et al. Comparing clean intermittent catheterization and transurethral indwelling catheterization for incomplete voiding after vaginal prolapse surgery: a multicenter randomized trial. BJOG. 2011;118(9):1055-1060. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.02935.x.
43. Hakvoort RA, Nieuwkerk PT, Burger MP, et al. Patient preferences for clean intermittent catheterization and transurethral indwelling catheterization for treatment of abnormal post-void residual bladder volume after vaginal prolapsed surgery. BJOG. 2011;118(11):1324-1328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03056.x.
44. Saint S, Kaufman SR, Roger M, et al. Condom versus indwelling urinary catheters: a randomized trial. JAGS. 2006;54(7):1055-1061. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00785.x.
45. Pickard R, Lam T, MacLennan G, et al. Antimicrobial catheters for reduction of symptomatic urinary tract infection in adults requiring short-term catheterization in hospital: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;380(9857):1927-1935. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61380-4.
46. Parry M, Grant B, Sestovic M. Successful reduction in catheter-associated urinary tract infections: focus on nurse-directed catheter removal. Am J Infect Control. 2013;41(12):1178-1181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2013.03.296.
47. Fuchs MA, Sexton DJ, Thornlow DK, Champagne MT. Evaluation of an evidence-based, nurse-driven checklist to prevent hospital-acquired catheter-associated urinary tract infections in intensive care units. J Nurs Care Qual. 2011;26(2):101-109. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0b013e3181fb7847.
48. Meddings J, Rogers MA, Macy M, Saint S. Systematic review and meta-analysis: reminder systems to reduce catheter-associated urinary tract infections and urinary catheter use in hospitalized patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;51(5):550-560. https://doi.org/10.1086/655133.
49. Baggs J, Fridkin SK, Pollack LA, Srinivasan A, Jernigan JA. Estimating national trends in inpatient antibiotic use among US hospitals from 2006 to 2012. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(11):1639-1648. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.5651.
50. National Action Plan for Combating Antibiotic-resistant Bacteria. 2015. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/docs/national_action_plan_for_combatin
Every day in the United States, approximately 4% of patients in acute care hospitals have at least one hospital-acquired infection (HAI).1,2 Among the top 10 causes of death in the United States, HAIs are associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and hospital length of stay (LOS).2 The direct medical cost of treating HAIs is substantial for both hospitals and patients.3,4 Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are a leading cause of HAI, and 70%-80% of these are catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs).5,6 In 2016, 26,983 CAUTIs occurred in acute care hospitals.7 The high incidence of CAUTI can substantially contribute to morbidity, length of stay, and mortality.8-11
The recognition that a substantial proportion of HAIs may be preventable, including 55%-70% of CAUTIs,12 has resulted in implementing multiple strategies to reduce CAUTI rates.13-17 These include simple prevention interventions such as avoiding placement of unnecessary indwelling urinary catheters and early removal of urinary catheters when they are no longer clinically indicated. Hospitalists are responsible for the care of many, if not most, inpatients with indwelling urinary catheters and are integral in antimicrobial stewardship efforts surrounding CAUTIs.18 Diagnostic stewardship, including appropriate urine specimen ordering, collection, processing, and reporting, works synergistically with antimicrobial stewardship and allows for appropriate antibiotic prescribing in symptomatic patients.19
DEFINITIONS
CAUTIs can be defined using either clinical or surveillance definitions. Clinical definitions are used at the bedside and take individual clinical characteristics into consideration, but vary among clinicians since there is no gold standard. Abnormal laboratory urinary findings in the absence of symptoms are not sufficient for the diagnosis of UTI, including CAUTI. Surveillance definitions, such as those used by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,20 are designed to be simple, easily applicable in any healthcare setting, and standardized to all patients. Surveillance definitions generally include at least one systemic or local symptom (such as fever or dysuria) and positive urine culture in a patient with an indwelling urinary catheter (or within 48 hours after its removal).
Pyuria is leukocytes or white blood cells (WBCs) in a urine specimen, with a threshold of >10 WBCs/high-power field using urine microscopy. The predictive value of different thresholds of pyuria for UTI is unclear.
Bacteriuria denotes the presence (on microscopy or culture) of bacteria in the urine. In a patient without signs or symptoms of a UTI, this is termed asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB). A full discussion of bacteriuria, a major reason for inappropriate antibiotic use, is beyond the scope of this article but is discussed in a recent guideline.21
Urinary tract infections are usually characterized by a clinical syndrome along with evidence of pyuria and/or bacteriuria. The two major clinical syndromes that are observed are lower UTI (cystitis or bladder infections) and upper UTI (pyelonephritis or kidney infections). Rarely, patients may develop asymptomatic bacteremic UTI, where blood and urine cultures grow the same pathogen in the absence of clinical symptoms. (Table 1 summarizes the key points for these definitions).
CAUSES AND RISK FACTORS FOR CAUTI
Bacterial biofilm can form on the inner and outer surfaces of an indwelling urinary catheter following its insertion and can be associated with bacteriuria and CAUTI.22,23 The biofilm comprises bacteria from the periurethral area that migrate upwards from a colonized drainage system. Bacteria present in the biofilm tend to exhibit slow growth, are protected from antibiotic exposure, and have less susceptibility to these agents.22-24 When a mature biofilm has formed, catheter removal may be necessary for source control and to facilitate effective antimicrobial treatment. The pathogens that most commonly cause CAUTIs are Escherichia coli (23.9%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (10.3%), and Klebsiella pneumoniae/oxytoca (10.1%).25 Although urine cultures often grow yeast, particularly Candida spp., nonbacterial pathogens rarely cause UTI.
The risk of developing a CAUTI is directly related to catheter dwell time.26,27 For catheterized patients, the rate of development of catheter-associated bacteriuria is approximately 3% to 7% per day14,28 and is more common in the elderly and females. The likelihood of bacteriuria approaches 100% if a patient has an indwelling urinary catheter for ≥30 days,27,29,30 which is part of the rationale for why a urine culture alone is not sufficient to diagnose a CAUTI. While bacteriuria is a risk factor for UTI, the frequency of progression from bacteriuria to CAUTI is low and treating ASB does not decrease the risk of future CAUTI. Other risk factors for the development of CAUTI include urinary tract instrumentation, diabetes mellitus, and malnutrition.31,32
The two most important factors that lead to the development of CAUTIs and have been the main focus of quality improvement areas are unnecessary urinary catheter placement and inappropriate delay in removing a catheter when it is no longer needed.26,33 Unfortunately, 38% of attending physicians are unaware that their patients have a urinary catheter in place.34 Furthermore, in 20% to 50% of cases, there is no clear indication for catheter placement.2,34
DIAGNOSIS OF CAUTI
A CAUTI diagnosis is typically one of exclusion, as most patients present with fever and no apparent alternative source.14,29 Since catheterized patients may not exhibit common cystitis symptoms,29 most who develop CAUTI present with fever alone. However, most fevers in patients with bacteriuria and catheters are not CAUTIs and can be attributed to other sources. If a patient with an indwelling urinary catheter develops a fever and there is a suspicion of a CAUTI, careful evaluation is warranted for alternative sources of infection. This particularly applies to patients with severe systemic illness, such as hypotension or systemic inflammatory response syndrome, since these are unusual manifestations of CAUTI. The presence of either cloudy or malodorous urine does not indicate a UTI, and should not be the sole rationale for obtaining a urine culture.
Diagnostic workup of fever should include a clinical assessment of the patient. Indeed, professional guidelines recommend against obtaining a urine culture routinely for fever, unless invasive UTI risk is elevated, such as in patients with neutropenia, history of renal transplantation, or recent genitourinary surgery.35 Diagnostic stewardship, focusing on the appropriate use of urine cultures, can reduce CAUTI rates.36 For catheterized patients, hospitals are increasingly adopting reflex urine culture, where urine is simultaneously collected for a urinalysis and urine culture, but a urine culture is performed only if the urinalysis is positive for a predetermined threshold for pyuria, leukocyte esterase, or both. However, the use of reflex urine cultures remains an area of debate.37 In addition, the Infectious Diseases Society of America recommends against screening for or treating ASB in patients with either short-term (<30 days) or long-term indwelling urethral catheters.21
Ideally, a urine culture should be obtained by collecting a midstream sample. In catheterized patients, a sample should be obtained after removal of the catheter; or, in patients with a clinical indication for ongoing catheterization, a sample should be obtained after a new catheter has been placed.14 If an indwelling urinary catheter must be continued, the recommendation is to disinfect the drainage system’s aspiration port and then obtain a urine culture. Urine should never be obtained from a catheter collection bag. (Table 2 summarizes best practices for diagnosis of CAUTI).
TREATMENT OF CAUTI
For all CAUTIs, an indwelling urinary catheter should be removed as soon as possible. If an indwelling urinary catheter remains necessary, but the existing catheter has been in place longer than two weeks, a new catheter should be placed before initiating antibiotic therapy14 to accelerate symptom resolution and reduce the likelihood of relapse or recurrence.32
Urinary tract agents such as fosfomycin and nitrofurantoin are recommended as first-line agents for simple cystitis in women and can be used in patients with lower UTI and sufficient renal function to achieve adequate drug concentration in urine. Upper UTIs require antibiotics with good penetration into renal parenchyma such as ceftriaxone. If empiric antimicrobial therapy is needed before culture results are available, then previous urine culture results, local antibiograms, or practice guidelines can guide selection. Definitive antimicrobial therapy should be based on urine culture results. It is important to narrow empiric therapy14 to reduce risk of Clostridioides difficile infection and emergence of other resistant bacteria. Fluoroquinolones should be avoided for lower UTIs because of these risks and multiple United States Food and Drug Administration warnings.38-40
The optimal duration of antimicrobial therapy for a CAUTI is unclear;14 however, most patients can be treated with a relatively short duration of therapy (≤7 days) if they respond promptly to therapy. Patients with a slow response to therapy may require 10-14 days of treatment.14 (Table 2 summarizes best practices for the treatment of CAUTI).
STRATEGIES FOR CAUTI PREVENTION
Since CAUTI is predicated on the presence of an indwelling urinary catheter, the simplest way to reduce CAUTI is to avoid placing or retaining unnecessary catheters. Some examples of appropriate indications9 for placement and maintenance of an indwelling urinary catheter are listed below:
1. Accurate measurement of urinary output in severely ill patients;
2. Improved comfort for patients receiving end-of-life care;
3. Acute urinary retention or bladder outlet obstruction;
4. Need for a period of prolonged immobilization (eg, potentially unstable lumbar or thoracic spine, or has multiple traumatic injuries);
5. Selected surgical procedures, such as urologic procedures and those that are expected to have a prolonged duration, require intraoperative monitoring of urine output, require the administration of either large volumes of intravenous infusions or diuretics;
6. To promote healing of open perineal or sacral wounds in patients with incontinence;
7. Neurogenic bladder; and
8. Hematuria with clots.
To increase the timely removal of urinary catheters that are no longer indicated, daily assessment of catheter necessity must be an integral part of clinicians’ workflow.32,33 Alternatives, such as external catheters or intermittent catheterization, should be considered before indwelling urinary catheter placement since both options are associated with a reduced CAUTI risk.41-44 Although indwelling urinary catheters can be seen as being more convenient for both patients and healthcare providers, many patients have expressed a preference for the use of intermittent catheterization compared with indwelling urinary catheterization.43
For urinary retention, bladder scanning can noninvasively assess the amount of residual urine in a patient’s bladder and can avoid unnecessary insertion of an indwelling urinary catheter. However, if indwelling urinary catheters are ultimately needed, they must be inserted and maintained appropriately. Of note, the use of antibiotic-impregnated catheters has not been shown to reduce CAUTI rates significantly.45
CAUTI prevention requires a multidisciplinary collaborative approach. Nurse-driven protocols and checklists to remove indwelling urinary catheters that are no longer indicated can be very effective.46,47 Automatic stop orders and catheter removal reminders are useful for reducing the duration of catheter placement.26,48 Both of these approaches require appropriate, consistent documentation with input from bedside nurses, physicians, advanced practice providers, and information technology. (Table 3 summarizes best practices for the prevention of CAUTI).
Importantly, CAUTI prevention supports broader antimicrobial stewardship. Over 55% of inpatients receive at least one dose of an antibiotic during their hospital stay.48,49 In 2015, the White House released the National Action Plan for Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria with the goals of slowing the emergence of resistant bacteria, preventing the spread of antibiotic-resistant infections, and setting a target of a 20% reduction in the inappropriate use of antibiotics for hospitalized patients.50 Hospitalists care for a substantial number of inpatients and, in turn, can drive actions to decrease CAUTIs, and promote stewardship efforts. Through actions to decrease CAUTIs, hospitalists can promote these stewardship efforts.
CONCLUSIONS
CAUTI is one of the most common types of HAI and is associated with increased morbidity, hospital length of stay, and patient costs. Most CAUTIs are preventable by limiting the placement of unnecessary catheters to instances of true necessity and removing catheters when they are no longer clinically indicated. Proper technique for the insertion and maintenance of catheters is also important for reducing CAUTI rates. Hospitalists care for a substantial number of inpatients and can make major contributions to the appropriate diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of CAUTIs.
Every day in the United States, approximately 4% of patients in acute care hospitals have at least one hospital-acquired infection (HAI).1,2 Among the top 10 causes of death in the United States, HAIs are associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and hospital length of stay (LOS).2 The direct medical cost of treating HAIs is substantial for both hospitals and patients.3,4 Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are a leading cause of HAI, and 70%-80% of these are catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs).5,6 In 2016, 26,983 CAUTIs occurred in acute care hospitals.7 The high incidence of CAUTI can substantially contribute to morbidity, length of stay, and mortality.8-11
The recognition that a substantial proportion of HAIs may be preventable, including 55%-70% of CAUTIs,12 has resulted in implementing multiple strategies to reduce CAUTI rates.13-17 These include simple prevention interventions such as avoiding placement of unnecessary indwelling urinary catheters and early removal of urinary catheters when they are no longer clinically indicated. Hospitalists are responsible for the care of many, if not most, inpatients with indwelling urinary catheters and are integral in antimicrobial stewardship efforts surrounding CAUTIs.18 Diagnostic stewardship, including appropriate urine specimen ordering, collection, processing, and reporting, works synergistically with antimicrobial stewardship and allows for appropriate antibiotic prescribing in symptomatic patients.19
DEFINITIONS
CAUTIs can be defined using either clinical or surveillance definitions. Clinical definitions are used at the bedside and take individual clinical characteristics into consideration, but vary among clinicians since there is no gold standard. Abnormal laboratory urinary findings in the absence of symptoms are not sufficient for the diagnosis of UTI, including CAUTI. Surveillance definitions, such as those used by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,20 are designed to be simple, easily applicable in any healthcare setting, and standardized to all patients. Surveillance definitions generally include at least one systemic or local symptom (such as fever or dysuria) and positive urine culture in a patient with an indwelling urinary catheter (or within 48 hours after its removal).
Pyuria is leukocytes or white blood cells (WBCs) in a urine specimen, with a threshold of >10 WBCs/high-power field using urine microscopy. The predictive value of different thresholds of pyuria for UTI is unclear.
Bacteriuria denotes the presence (on microscopy or culture) of bacteria in the urine. In a patient without signs or symptoms of a UTI, this is termed asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB). A full discussion of bacteriuria, a major reason for inappropriate antibiotic use, is beyond the scope of this article but is discussed in a recent guideline.21
Urinary tract infections are usually characterized by a clinical syndrome along with evidence of pyuria and/or bacteriuria. The two major clinical syndromes that are observed are lower UTI (cystitis or bladder infections) and upper UTI (pyelonephritis or kidney infections). Rarely, patients may develop asymptomatic bacteremic UTI, where blood and urine cultures grow the same pathogen in the absence of clinical symptoms. (Table 1 summarizes the key points for these definitions).
CAUSES AND RISK FACTORS FOR CAUTI
Bacterial biofilm can form on the inner and outer surfaces of an indwelling urinary catheter following its insertion and can be associated with bacteriuria and CAUTI.22,23 The biofilm comprises bacteria from the periurethral area that migrate upwards from a colonized drainage system. Bacteria present in the biofilm tend to exhibit slow growth, are protected from antibiotic exposure, and have less susceptibility to these agents.22-24 When a mature biofilm has formed, catheter removal may be necessary for source control and to facilitate effective antimicrobial treatment. The pathogens that most commonly cause CAUTIs are Escherichia coli (23.9%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (10.3%), and Klebsiella pneumoniae/oxytoca (10.1%).25 Although urine cultures often grow yeast, particularly Candida spp., nonbacterial pathogens rarely cause UTI.
The risk of developing a CAUTI is directly related to catheter dwell time.26,27 For catheterized patients, the rate of development of catheter-associated bacteriuria is approximately 3% to 7% per day14,28 and is more common in the elderly and females. The likelihood of bacteriuria approaches 100% if a patient has an indwelling urinary catheter for ≥30 days,27,29,30 which is part of the rationale for why a urine culture alone is not sufficient to diagnose a CAUTI. While bacteriuria is a risk factor for UTI, the frequency of progression from bacteriuria to CAUTI is low and treating ASB does not decrease the risk of future CAUTI. Other risk factors for the development of CAUTI include urinary tract instrumentation, diabetes mellitus, and malnutrition.31,32
The two most important factors that lead to the development of CAUTIs and have been the main focus of quality improvement areas are unnecessary urinary catheter placement and inappropriate delay in removing a catheter when it is no longer needed.26,33 Unfortunately, 38% of attending physicians are unaware that their patients have a urinary catheter in place.34 Furthermore, in 20% to 50% of cases, there is no clear indication for catheter placement.2,34
DIAGNOSIS OF CAUTI
A CAUTI diagnosis is typically one of exclusion, as most patients present with fever and no apparent alternative source.14,29 Since catheterized patients may not exhibit common cystitis symptoms,29 most who develop CAUTI present with fever alone. However, most fevers in patients with bacteriuria and catheters are not CAUTIs and can be attributed to other sources. If a patient with an indwelling urinary catheter develops a fever and there is a suspicion of a CAUTI, careful evaluation is warranted for alternative sources of infection. This particularly applies to patients with severe systemic illness, such as hypotension or systemic inflammatory response syndrome, since these are unusual manifestations of CAUTI. The presence of either cloudy or malodorous urine does not indicate a UTI, and should not be the sole rationale for obtaining a urine culture.
Diagnostic workup of fever should include a clinical assessment of the patient. Indeed, professional guidelines recommend against obtaining a urine culture routinely for fever, unless invasive UTI risk is elevated, such as in patients with neutropenia, history of renal transplantation, or recent genitourinary surgery.35 Diagnostic stewardship, focusing on the appropriate use of urine cultures, can reduce CAUTI rates.36 For catheterized patients, hospitals are increasingly adopting reflex urine culture, where urine is simultaneously collected for a urinalysis and urine culture, but a urine culture is performed only if the urinalysis is positive for a predetermined threshold for pyuria, leukocyte esterase, or both. However, the use of reflex urine cultures remains an area of debate.37 In addition, the Infectious Diseases Society of America recommends against screening for or treating ASB in patients with either short-term (<30 days) or long-term indwelling urethral catheters.21
Ideally, a urine culture should be obtained by collecting a midstream sample. In catheterized patients, a sample should be obtained after removal of the catheter; or, in patients with a clinical indication for ongoing catheterization, a sample should be obtained after a new catheter has been placed.14 If an indwelling urinary catheter must be continued, the recommendation is to disinfect the drainage system’s aspiration port and then obtain a urine culture. Urine should never be obtained from a catheter collection bag. (Table 2 summarizes best practices for diagnosis of CAUTI).
TREATMENT OF CAUTI
For all CAUTIs, an indwelling urinary catheter should be removed as soon as possible. If an indwelling urinary catheter remains necessary, but the existing catheter has been in place longer than two weeks, a new catheter should be placed before initiating antibiotic therapy14 to accelerate symptom resolution and reduce the likelihood of relapse or recurrence.32
Urinary tract agents such as fosfomycin and nitrofurantoin are recommended as first-line agents for simple cystitis in women and can be used in patients with lower UTI and sufficient renal function to achieve adequate drug concentration in urine. Upper UTIs require antibiotics with good penetration into renal parenchyma such as ceftriaxone. If empiric antimicrobial therapy is needed before culture results are available, then previous urine culture results, local antibiograms, or practice guidelines can guide selection. Definitive antimicrobial therapy should be based on urine culture results. It is important to narrow empiric therapy14 to reduce risk of Clostridioides difficile infection and emergence of other resistant bacteria. Fluoroquinolones should be avoided for lower UTIs because of these risks and multiple United States Food and Drug Administration warnings.38-40
The optimal duration of antimicrobial therapy for a CAUTI is unclear;14 however, most patients can be treated with a relatively short duration of therapy (≤7 days) if they respond promptly to therapy. Patients with a slow response to therapy may require 10-14 days of treatment.14 (Table 2 summarizes best practices for the treatment of CAUTI).
STRATEGIES FOR CAUTI PREVENTION
Since CAUTI is predicated on the presence of an indwelling urinary catheter, the simplest way to reduce CAUTI is to avoid placing or retaining unnecessary catheters. Some examples of appropriate indications9 for placement and maintenance of an indwelling urinary catheter are listed below:
1. Accurate measurement of urinary output in severely ill patients;
2. Improved comfort for patients receiving end-of-life care;
3. Acute urinary retention or bladder outlet obstruction;
4. Need for a period of prolonged immobilization (eg, potentially unstable lumbar or thoracic spine, or has multiple traumatic injuries);
5. Selected surgical procedures, such as urologic procedures and those that are expected to have a prolonged duration, require intraoperative monitoring of urine output, require the administration of either large volumes of intravenous infusions or diuretics;
6. To promote healing of open perineal or sacral wounds in patients with incontinence;
7. Neurogenic bladder; and
8. Hematuria with clots.
To increase the timely removal of urinary catheters that are no longer indicated, daily assessment of catheter necessity must be an integral part of clinicians’ workflow.32,33 Alternatives, such as external catheters or intermittent catheterization, should be considered before indwelling urinary catheter placement since both options are associated with a reduced CAUTI risk.41-44 Although indwelling urinary catheters can be seen as being more convenient for both patients and healthcare providers, many patients have expressed a preference for the use of intermittent catheterization compared with indwelling urinary catheterization.43
For urinary retention, bladder scanning can noninvasively assess the amount of residual urine in a patient’s bladder and can avoid unnecessary insertion of an indwelling urinary catheter. However, if indwelling urinary catheters are ultimately needed, they must be inserted and maintained appropriately. Of note, the use of antibiotic-impregnated catheters has not been shown to reduce CAUTI rates significantly.45
CAUTI prevention requires a multidisciplinary collaborative approach. Nurse-driven protocols and checklists to remove indwelling urinary catheters that are no longer indicated can be very effective.46,47 Automatic stop orders and catheter removal reminders are useful for reducing the duration of catheter placement.26,48 Both of these approaches require appropriate, consistent documentation with input from bedside nurses, physicians, advanced practice providers, and information technology. (Table 3 summarizes best practices for the prevention of CAUTI).
Importantly, CAUTI prevention supports broader antimicrobial stewardship. Over 55% of inpatients receive at least one dose of an antibiotic during their hospital stay.48,49 In 2015, the White House released the National Action Plan for Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria with the goals of slowing the emergence of resistant bacteria, preventing the spread of antibiotic-resistant infections, and setting a target of a 20% reduction in the inappropriate use of antibiotics for hospitalized patients.50 Hospitalists care for a substantial number of inpatients and, in turn, can drive actions to decrease CAUTIs, and promote stewardship efforts. Through actions to decrease CAUTIs, hospitalists can promote these stewardship efforts.
CONCLUSIONS
CAUTI is one of the most common types of HAI and is associated with increased morbidity, hospital length of stay, and patient costs. Most CAUTIs are preventable by limiting the placement of unnecessary catheters to instances of true necessity and removing catheters when they are no longer clinically indicated. Proper technique for the insertion and maintenance of catheters is also important for reducing CAUTI rates. Hospitalists care for a substantial number of inpatients and can make major contributions to the appropriate diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of CAUTIs.
1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Estimates of healthcare-associated infections. http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dhqp/hai.html. Accessed September 27, 2018.
2. Calfee D. Crisis in hospital-acquired, healthcare-associated infections. Annu Rev Med. 2012;63(1):359-371. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-med-081210-144458.
3. Scott R. 2009. The direct medical costs of healthcare-associated infections in U.S. hospitals and the benefits of prevention. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta. http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dhqp/pdf/Scott_CostPaper.pdf. Accessed September 27, 2018.
4. Zimlachman E, Henderson D, Tamir O, et al. Health care associated infections. A meta-analysis of costs and financial impact on the US health care system. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(22):2039-2046. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.9763.
5. Nicolle LE. Catheter-acquired urinary tract infection: the once and future guidelines. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31(4):327-329. https://doi.org/10.1086/651092.
6. Weber DJ, Sickbert-Bennett EE, Gould CV, et al. Incidence of catheter-associated and noncatheter-associated urinary tract infections in a healthcare system. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011;32(8):822-823. https://doi.org/10.1086/661107.
7. Healthcare-associated infections. National and state HAI progress reports or SIR reports. https://www.cdc.gov/hai/data/archive/archive.html. Accessed May 6, 2019.
8. Saint S. Clinical and economic consequences of nosocomial catheter-related bacteriuria. Am J Infect Control. 2000;28(1):68-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-6553(00)90015-4.
9. Platt R, Polk BF, Murdock B, Rosner B. Mortality associated with nosocomial urinary-tract infection. N Engl J Med. 1982;307(11):637-642. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198209093071101.
10. Tambyah PA, Knasinski V, Maki DG. The direct costs of nosocomial catheter-associated urinary tract infection in the era of managed care. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2002;23(1):27-31.
11. Chant C, Smith OM, Marshall JC, Friedrich JO. Relationship of catheter-associated urinary tract infection to mortality and length of stay in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(5):1167-1173. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e31820a8581.
12. Umscheid CA, Mitchell MD, Doshi JA, et al. Estimating the proportion of healthcare-associated infections that are reasonably preventable and the related mortality and costs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011;32(2):101-114. https://doi.org/10.1086/657912.
13. Gould C, Umscheid C, Agarwal R, et al. Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC): guideline for the prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections, 2009. http://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/pdf/CAUTI/CAUTIguideline2009final.pdf. Accessed November 1, 2018.
14. Hooton TM, Bradley SF, Cardenas DD, et al. Diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of catheter-associated urinary tract infection in adults: 2009 International Clinical Practice Guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50(5):625-663. https://doi.org/10.1086/650482.
15. Conway LJ, Larson EL. Guidelines to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection: 1980 to 2010. Heart Lung. 2011;41(3):271-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2011.08.001.
16. Greene L, Marx J, Oriola S. APIC elimination guide: guide to the elimination of catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs). http://www.apic.org/Content/NavigationMenu/PracticeGuidance/APICEliminationGuides/CAUTI_Guide_0609.pdf. Accessed October 15, 2018.
17. Yokoe DS, Mermel LA, Anderson DJ, et al. A compendium of strategies to prevent healthcare-associated infections in acute care hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008;29(S1):S12-S21.
18. Wiley Z, Kobaidze K, Sexton ME, Jacob JT. Hospitalists as integral stakeholders in antimicrobial stewardship. Curr Treat Options Infect Dis. 2018;10(2):240-248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40506-018-0162-z.
19. Claeys KC, Blanco N, Morgan DJ, Leekha S, Sullivan KV. Advances and challenges in the diagnosis and treatment of urinary tract infections: the need for diagnostic stewardship. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2019;21(4):11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11908-019-0668-7.
20. Horan T, Andrus M, Dudeck M. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control. 2008;36(5):309-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2008.03.002.
21. Nicolle LE, Gupta K, Bradley S, et al. Clinical practice guideline for the management of asymptomatic bacteriuria: 2019 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;68(10):e83-e110.
22. Donlan R. Biofilms and device-associated infections. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7(2):277-281. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid0702.010226.
23. Choe HS, Son SW, Choi HA, et al. Analysis of the distribution of bacteria within urinary catheter biofilms using four different molecular techniques. Am J Infect Control. 2012;40(9):e249-e254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2012.05.010.
24. Mohajer M, Darouiche R. Prevention and treatment of urinary catheter-associated infections. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2013;15(2):116-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11908-013-0316-6.
25. Weiner LM, Webb AK, Limbago B, et al. Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2011-2014. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016;37(11):1288-1301. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2016.174.
26. Tambyah PA, Oon J. Catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2012;25(4):365-370. https://doi.org/10.1097/QCO.0b013e32835565cc.
27. Warren JW, Tenney JH, Hoopes JM, Muncie HL, Anthony WC. A prospective microbiologic study of bacteriuria in patients with chronic indwelling urethral catheters. J Infect Dis. 1982;146(6):719-723. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/146.6.719.
28. Lo E, Nicolle L, Coffin S, et al. Strategies to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014;35(5):464-479. https://doi.org/10.1086/675718.
29. Nicolle LE. Urinary catheter-associated infections. Infect Dis Clin N Am. 2012;26(1):13-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idc.2011.09.009.
30. Titsworth WL, Hester J, Correia T, et al. Reduction of catheter-associated urinary tract infections among patients in a neurological intensive care unit: a single institution’s success. J Neurosurg. 2012;116(4):911-920. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.11.JNS11974.
31. Lobdell KW, Stamou S, Sanchez JA. Hospital-acquired infections. Surg Clin N Am. 2012;92(1):65-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2011.11.003.
32. Gray M. Reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infection in the critical care unit. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2010;21(3):247-257.
33. Fakih MG, Watson SR, Greene T, et al. Reducing inappropriate urinary catheter use. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(3):255-260. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2011.627.
34. Saint S, Wiese J, Amory JK, Bernstein ML, et al. Are physicians aware of which of their patients have an indwelling urinary catheters? Am J Med. 2000;109(6):476-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00531-3.
35. O’Grady NP, Barie PS, Bartlett JG, et al. Guidelines for evaluation of new fever in critically ill adult patients: 2008 update from the American College of Critical Care Medicine and the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(4):1330-1349. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e318169eda9.
36. Mullin K, Kovacs C, Fatica C, et al. A multifaceted approach to reduction of catheter-associated urinary tract infections in the intensive care unit with an emphasis on “stewardship of culturing.” Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017;38(2):186-188. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2016.266.
37. Humphries R, Bard J. Point-counterpoint: reflex cultures reduce laboratory workload and improve antimicrobial stewardship in patients suspected of having urinary tract infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54(2):254-258. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.03021-15.
38. Voelker R. New fluoroquinolone warning. JAMA. 2016;315(23):2514. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.7290.
39. Tillotson S. FDA and the safe and appropriate antibiotic use of fluoroquinolones. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(3):PE11-E12.
40. Tanne J. FDA adds “black box” warning label to fluoroquinolone antibiotics. BMJ 2008;337:a816. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a816.
41. Wyndaele JJ, Brauner A, Geerlings SE, et al. Clean intermittent catheterization and urinary tract infection: review and guide for future research. BJU Intern. 2012;110(11c):E910-E917. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11549.x.
42. Hakwoort RA, Thijs SD, Bouwmeester FW, et al. Comparing clean intermittent catheterization and transurethral indwelling catheterization for incomplete voiding after vaginal prolapse surgery: a multicenter randomized trial. BJOG. 2011;118(9):1055-1060. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.02935.x.
43. Hakvoort RA, Nieuwkerk PT, Burger MP, et al. Patient preferences for clean intermittent catheterization and transurethral indwelling catheterization for treatment of abnormal post-void residual bladder volume after vaginal prolapsed surgery. BJOG. 2011;118(11):1324-1328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03056.x.
44. Saint S, Kaufman SR, Roger M, et al. Condom versus indwelling urinary catheters: a randomized trial. JAGS. 2006;54(7):1055-1061. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00785.x.
45. Pickard R, Lam T, MacLennan G, et al. Antimicrobial catheters for reduction of symptomatic urinary tract infection in adults requiring short-term catheterization in hospital: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;380(9857):1927-1935. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61380-4.
46. Parry M, Grant B, Sestovic M. Successful reduction in catheter-associated urinary tract infections: focus on nurse-directed catheter removal. Am J Infect Control. 2013;41(12):1178-1181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2013.03.296.
47. Fuchs MA, Sexton DJ, Thornlow DK, Champagne MT. Evaluation of an evidence-based, nurse-driven checklist to prevent hospital-acquired catheter-associated urinary tract infections in intensive care units. J Nurs Care Qual. 2011;26(2):101-109. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0b013e3181fb7847.
48. Meddings J, Rogers MA, Macy M, Saint S. Systematic review and meta-analysis: reminder systems to reduce catheter-associated urinary tract infections and urinary catheter use in hospitalized patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;51(5):550-560. https://doi.org/10.1086/655133.
49. Baggs J, Fridkin SK, Pollack LA, Srinivasan A, Jernigan JA. Estimating national trends in inpatient antibiotic use among US hospitals from 2006 to 2012. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(11):1639-1648. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.5651.
50. National Action Plan for Combating Antibiotic-resistant Bacteria. 2015. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/docs/national_action_plan_for_combatin
1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Estimates of healthcare-associated infections. http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dhqp/hai.html. Accessed September 27, 2018.
2. Calfee D. Crisis in hospital-acquired, healthcare-associated infections. Annu Rev Med. 2012;63(1):359-371. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-med-081210-144458.
3. Scott R. 2009. The direct medical costs of healthcare-associated infections in U.S. hospitals and the benefits of prevention. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta. http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dhqp/pdf/Scott_CostPaper.pdf. Accessed September 27, 2018.
4. Zimlachman E, Henderson D, Tamir O, et al. Health care associated infections. A meta-analysis of costs and financial impact on the US health care system. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(22):2039-2046. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.9763.
5. Nicolle LE. Catheter-acquired urinary tract infection: the once and future guidelines. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31(4):327-329. https://doi.org/10.1086/651092.
6. Weber DJ, Sickbert-Bennett EE, Gould CV, et al. Incidence of catheter-associated and noncatheter-associated urinary tract infections in a healthcare system. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011;32(8):822-823. https://doi.org/10.1086/661107.
7. Healthcare-associated infections. National and state HAI progress reports or SIR reports. https://www.cdc.gov/hai/data/archive/archive.html. Accessed May 6, 2019.
8. Saint S. Clinical and economic consequences of nosocomial catheter-related bacteriuria. Am J Infect Control. 2000;28(1):68-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-6553(00)90015-4.
9. Platt R, Polk BF, Murdock B, Rosner B. Mortality associated with nosocomial urinary-tract infection. N Engl J Med. 1982;307(11):637-642. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198209093071101.
10. Tambyah PA, Knasinski V, Maki DG. The direct costs of nosocomial catheter-associated urinary tract infection in the era of managed care. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2002;23(1):27-31.
11. Chant C, Smith OM, Marshall JC, Friedrich JO. Relationship of catheter-associated urinary tract infection to mortality and length of stay in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(5):1167-1173. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e31820a8581.
12. Umscheid CA, Mitchell MD, Doshi JA, et al. Estimating the proportion of healthcare-associated infections that are reasonably preventable and the related mortality and costs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011;32(2):101-114. https://doi.org/10.1086/657912.
13. Gould C, Umscheid C, Agarwal R, et al. Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC): guideline for the prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections, 2009. http://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/pdf/CAUTI/CAUTIguideline2009final.pdf. Accessed November 1, 2018.
14. Hooton TM, Bradley SF, Cardenas DD, et al. Diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of catheter-associated urinary tract infection in adults: 2009 International Clinical Practice Guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50(5):625-663. https://doi.org/10.1086/650482.
15. Conway LJ, Larson EL. Guidelines to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection: 1980 to 2010. Heart Lung. 2011;41(3):271-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2011.08.001.
16. Greene L, Marx J, Oriola S. APIC elimination guide: guide to the elimination of catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs). http://www.apic.org/Content/NavigationMenu/PracticeGuidance/APICEliminationGuides/CAUTI_Guide_0609.pdf. Accessed October 15, 2018.
17. Yokoe DS, Mermel LA, Anderson DJ, et al. A compendium of strategies to prevent healthcare-associated infections in acute care hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008;29(S1):S12-S21.
18. Wiley Z, Kobaidze K, Sexton ME, Jacob JT. Hospitalists as integral stakeholders in antimicrobial stewardship. Curr Treat Options Infect Dis. 2018;10(2):240-248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40506-018-0162-z.
19. Claeys KC, Blanco N, Morgan DJ, Leekha S, Sullivan KV. Advances and challenges in the diagnosis and treatment of urinary tract infections: the need for diagnostic stewardship. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2019;21(4):11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11908-019-0668-7.
20. Horan T, Andrus M, Dudeck M. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control. 2008;36(5):309-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2008.03.002.
21. Nicolle LE, Gupta K, Bradley S, et al. Clinical practice guideline for the management of asymptomatic bacteriuria: 2019 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;68(10):e83-e110.
22. Donlan R. Biofilms and device-associated infections. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7(2):277-281. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid0702.010226.
23. Choe HS, Son SW, Choi HA, et al. Analysis of the distribution of bacteria within urinary catheter biofilms using four different molecular techniques. Am J Infect Control. 2012;40(9):e249-e254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2012.05.010.
24. Mohajer M, Darouiche R. Prevention and treatment of urinary catheter-associated infections. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2013;15(2):116-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11908-013-0316-6.
25. Weiner LM, Webb AK, Limbago B, et al. Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2011-2014. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016;37(11):1288-1301. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2016.174.
26. Tambyah PA, Oon J. Catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2012;25(4):365-370. https://doi.org/10.1097/QCO.0b013e32835565cc.
27. Warren JW, Tenney JH, Hoopes JM, Muncie HL, Anthony WC. A prospective microbiologic study of bacteriuria in patients with chronic indwelling urethral catheters. J Infect Dis. 1982;146(6):719-723. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/146.6.719.
28. Lo E, Nicolle L, Coffin S, et al. Strategies to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014;35(5):464-479. https://doi.org/10.1086/675718.
29. Nicolle LE. Urinary catheter-associated infections. Infect Dis Clin N Am. 2012;26(1):13-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idc.2011.09.009.
30. Titsworth WL, Hester J, Correia T, et al. Reduction of catheter-associated urinary tract infections among patients in a neurological intensive care unit: a single institution’s success. J Neurosurg. 2012;116(4):911-920. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.11.JNS11974.
31. Lobdell KW, Stamou S, Sanchez JA. Hospital-acquired infections. Surg Clin N Am. 2012;92(1):65-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2011.11.003.
32. Gray M. Reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infection in the critical care unit. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2010;21(3):247-257.
33. Fakih MG, Watson SR, Greene T, et al. Reducing inappropriate urinary catheter use. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(3):255-260. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2011.627.
34. Saint S, Wiese J, Amory JK, Bernstein ML, et al. Are physicians aware of which of their patients have an indwelling urinary catheters? Am J Med. 2000;109(6):476-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00531-3.
35. O’Grady NP, Barie PS, Bartlett JG, et al. Guidelines for evaluation of new fever in critically ill adult patients: 2008 update from the American College of Critical Care Medicine and the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(4):1330-1349. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e318169eda9.
36. Mullin K, Kovacs C, Fatica C, et al. A multifaceted approach to reduction of catheter-associated urinary tract infections in the intensive care unit with an emphasis on “stewardship of culturing.” Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017;38(2):186-188. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2016.266.
37. Humphries R, Bard J. Point-counterpoint: reflex cultures reduce laboratory workload and improve antimicrobial stewardship in patients suspected of having urinary tract infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54(2):254-258. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.03021-15.
38. Voelker R. New fluoroquinolone warning. JAMA. 2016;315(23):2514. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.7290.
39. Tillotson S. FDA and the safe and appropriate antibiotic use of fluoroquinolones. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(3):PE11-E12.
40. Tanne J. FDA adds “black box” warning label to fluoroquinolone antibiotics. BMJ 2008;337:a816. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a816.
41. Wyndaele JJ, Brauner A, Geerlings SE, et al. Clean intermittent catheterization and urinary tract infection: review and guide for future research. BJU Intern. 2012;110(11c):E910-E917. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11549.x.
42. Hakwoort RA, Thijs SD, Bouwmeester FW, et al. Comparing clean intermittent catheterization and transurethral indwelling catheterization for incomplete voiding after vaginal prolapse surgery: a multicenter randomized trial. BJOG. 2011;118(9):1055-1060. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.02935.x.
43. Hakvoort RA, Nieuwkerk PT, Burger MP, et al. Patient preferences for clean intermittent catheterization and transurethral indwelling catheterization for treatment of abnormal post-void residual bladder volume after vaginal prolapsed surgery. BJOG. 2011;118(11):1324-1328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03056.x.
44. Saint S, Kaufman SR, Roger M, et al. Condom versus indwelling urinary catheters: a randomized trial. JAGS. 2006;54(7):1055-1061. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00785.x.
45. Pickard R, Lam T, MacLennan G, et al. Antimicrobial catheters for reduction of symptomatic urinary tract infection in adults requiring short-term catheterization in hospital: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;380(9857):1927-1935. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61380-4.
46. Parry M, Grant B, Sestovic M. Successful reduction in catheter-associated urinary tract infections: focus on nurse-directed catheter removal. Am J Infect Control. 2013;41(12):1178-1181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2013.03.296.
47. Fuchs MA, Sexton DJ, Thornlow DK, Champagne MT. Evaluation of an evidence-based, nurse-driven checklist to prevent hospital-acquired catheter-associated urinary tract infections in intensive care units. J Nurs Care Qual. 2011;26(2):101-109. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0b013e3181fb7847.
48. Meddings J, Rogers MA, Macy M, Saint S. Systematic review and meta-analysis: reminder systems to reduce catheter-associated urinary tract infections and urinary catheter use in hospitalized patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;51(5):550-560. https://doi.org/10.1086/655133.
49. Baggs J, Fridkin SK, Pollack LA, Srinivasan A, Jernigan JA. Estimating national trends in inpatient antibiotic use among US hospitals from 2006 to 2012. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(11):1639-1648. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.5651.
50. National Action Plan for Combating Antibiotic-resistant Bacteria. 2015. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/docs/national_action_plan_for_combatin
© 2019 Society of Hospital Medicine
Conference highlights growing HAI concerns
The Fifth Decennial International Conference on Healthcare-Associated Infections 2010, held in March in Atlanta, featured experts from several different fields discussing the significant prevalence of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and strategies that may be implemented to reduce their occurrence.
HAIs precipitated by the use of such devices as central venous catheters (CVCs), mechanical ventilators, and indwelling urinary catheters received special emphasis as important sources of patient morbidity and mortality.
Naomi O’Grady of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) summarized the current available knowledge regarding the prevention of central-line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs). Strategies targeting appropriate line maintenance include:
- Chlorhexidine sponge dressings at the CVC insertion site in patients with short-term catheters;
- Cleanse catheter hubs and connectors with alcoholic-chlorhexidine (rather than alcohol alone) after each use; and
- Consider daily bathing of patients with chlorhexidine soap.
Speakers stressed that novel technologies, such as antimicrobial lock solutions and antiseptic- or antibiotic-impregnated catheters, should be considered when CLABSI rates remain high. Mark Shelly, MD, of Rochester, N.Y., emphasized awareness that CLABSIs occur frequently outside the ICU. “If you are only looking for CLABSI in the ICU, then you are missing more than half of the story,” Dr. Shelly said. Researchers from the National Health Safety Network (NHSN) provided more information about the substantial numbers of CLABSIs that occur on general medical wards.
Carolyn Gould, MD, MS, of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) confirmed that catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) are the most common type of HAI. CAUTIs occur at a frequency of >560,000 infections per year and cost as much as $500 million per year, she explained. Strategies to prevent CAUTIs include inserting urinary catheters only for appropriate indications and leaving them in place for the shortest possible duration.
In recent years, concern has grown about the prevalence of healthcare-associated Clostridium difficile infection (HA-CDI), which can lead to uncomplicated diarrhea, sepsis, or even death. Several speakers described strategies that reduce HA-CDI development, including the identification and removal of environmental sources of C. diff, accommodating CDI patients in a private room with contact precautions, and minimizing both the frequency and duration of antimicrobial therapy.
Uncertainty about the most reliable tests to confirm CDI was a topic of focus. Enzyme immunoassay (EIA) testing, cell cytotoxin assays, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing are readily available in most U.S. hospitals; however, PCR testing might prove to be the most advantageous since it is rapid, sensitive, and specific.
Neil Fishman, MD, of the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine in Philadelphia was one of several speakers to address the important role of antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) development. According to Dr. Fishman, ASP goals should be to “ensure the proper use of antimicrobials” and to “promote cost-effectiveness.” By taking actions that promote the appropriate use of antimicrobials, the following positive consequences can be anticipated:
- Improved clinical outcomes;
- Reduced risk of adverse drug effects; and
- A reduction in, or stabilization of, the rate of antimicrobial resistance.
Multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative Bacillus is a major challenge for hospitals worldwide. The CDC offers two guidelines for the optimal management and isolation of MDR organisms (MDRO): HICPAC 2006 (a management guideline) and HICPAC 2007 (MDRO isolation precaution guidelines). Consistent utilization of these guidelines is crucial to control the spread of MDRO.
The CDC’s Alexander Killen, MD, discussed the increasing proportion of MDR Acinetobacter and Enterobacteriaceae. Emerging issues among these organisms include the development of highly resistant strains, the incidence of which is increasing in nonacute-care settings.
The CDC’s Karen Anderson reported laboratory data on carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) in a long-term-care facility. Her team demonstrated that CRE colonization can persist for up to six months. She speculated that the transfer of resistance between different species occurs, as does patient-to-patient transmission.
The CDC recommends the use of surveillance cultures as part of enhanced precautions. Surveillance is to continue until no new cases are detected.
Karen Clarke, MD, MS, MPH
Ketino Kobaidze, MD, PhD
Mohamad Moussa, MD
Sheri Tejedor, MD
Emory University
School of Medicine, Atlanta
The Fifth Decennial International Conference on Healthcare-Associated Infections 2010, held in March in Atlanta, featured experts from several different fields discussing the significant prevalence of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and strategies that may be implemented to reduce their occurrence.
HAIs precipitated by the use of such devices as central venous catheters (CVCs), mechanical ventilators, and indwelling urinary catheters received special emphasis as important sources of patient morbidity and mortality.
Naomi O’Grady of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) summarized the current available knowledge regarding the prevention of central-line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs). Strategies targeting appropriate line maintenance include:
- Chlorhexidine sponge dressings at the CVC insertion site in patients with short-term catheters;
- Cleanse catheter hubs and connectors with alcoholic-chlorhexidine (rather than alcohol alone) after each use; and
- Consider daily bathing of patients with chlorhexidine soap.
Speakers stressed that novel technologies, such as antimicrobial lock solutions and antiseptic- or antibiotic-impregnated catheters, should be considered when CLABSI rates remain high. Mark Shelly, MD, of Rochester, N.Y., emphasized awareness that CLABSIs occur frequently outside the ICU. “If you are only looking for CLABSI in the ICU, then you are missing more than half of the story,” Dr. Shelly said. Researchers from the National Health Safety Network (NHSN) provided more information about the substantial numbers of CLABSIs that occur on general medical wards.
Carolyn Gould, MD, MS, of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) confirmed that catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) are the most common type of HAI. CAUTIs occur at a frequency of >560,000 infections per year and cost as much as $500 million per year, she explained. Strategies to prevent CAUTIs include inserting urinary catheters only for appropriate indications and leaving them in place for the shortest possible duration.
In recent years, concern has grown about the prevalence of healthcare-associated Clostridium difficile infection (HA-CDI), which can lead to uncomplicated diarrhea, sepsis, or even death. Several speakers described strategies that reduce HA-CDI development, including the identification and removal of environmental sources of C. diff, accommodating CDI patients in a private room with contact precautions, and minimizing both the frequency and duration of antimicrobial therapy.
Uncertainty about the most reliable tests to confirm CDI was a topic of focus. Enzyme immunoassay (EIA) testing, cell cytotoxin assays, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing are readily available in most U.S. hospitals; however, PCR testing might prove to be the most advantageous since it is rapid, sensitive, and specific.
Neil Fishman, MD, of the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine in Philadelphia was one of several speakers to address the important role of antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) development. According to Dr. Fishman, ASP goals should be to “ensure the proper use of antimicrobials” and to “promote cost-effectiveness.” By taking actions that promote the appropriate use of antimicrobials, the following positive consequences can be anticipated:
- Improved clinical outcomes;
- Reduced risk of adverse drug effects; and
- A reduction in, or stabilization of, the rate of antimicrobial resistance.
Multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative Bacillus is a major challenge for hospitals worldwide. The CDC offers two guidelines for the optimal management and isolation of MDR organisms (MDRO): HICPAC 2006 (a management guideline) and HICPAC 2007 (MDRO isolation precaution guidelines). Consistent utilization of these guidelines is crucial to control the spread of MDRO.
The CDC’s Alexander Killen, MD, discussed the increasing proportion of MDR Acinetobacter and Enterobacteriaceae. Emerging issues among these organisms include the development of highly resistant strains, the incidence of which is increasing in nonacute-care settings.
The CDC’s Karen Anderson reported laboratory data on carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) in a long-term-care facility. Her team demonstrated that CRE colonization can persist for up to six months. She speculated that the transfer of resistance between different species occurs, as does patient-to-patient transmission.
The CDC recommends the use of surveillance cultures as part of enhanced precautions. Surveillance is to continue until no new cases are detected.
Karen Clarke, MD, MS, MPH
Ketino Kobaidze, MD, PhD
Mohamad Moussa, MD
Sheri Tejedor, MD
Emory University
School of Medicine, Atlanta
The Fifth Decennial International Conference on Healthcare-Associated Infections 2010, held in March in Atlanta, featured experts from several different fields discussing the significant prevalence of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and strategies that may be implemented to reduce their occurrence.
HAIs precipitated by the use of such devices as central venous catheters (CVCs), mechanical ventilators, and indwelling urinary catheters received special emphasis as important sources of patient morbidity and mortality.
Naomi O’Grady of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) summarized the current available knowledge regarding the prevention of central-line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs). Strategies targeting appropriate line maintenance include:
- Chlorhexidine sponge dressings at the CVC insertion site in patients with short-term catheters;
- Cleanse catheter hubs and connectors with alcoholic-chlorhexidine (rather than alcohol alone) after each use; and
- Consider daily bathing of patients with chlorhexidine soap.
Speakers stressed that novel technologies, such as antimicrobial lock solutions and antiseptic- or antibiotic-impregnated catheters, should be considered when CLABSI rates remain high. Mark Shelly, MD, of Rochester, N.Y., emphasized awareness that CLABSIs occur frequently outside the ICU. “If you are only looking for CLABSI in the ICU, then you are missing more than half of the story,” Dr. Shelly said. Researchers from the National Health Safety Network (NHSN) provided more information about the substantial numbers of CLABSIs that occur on general medical wards.
Carolyn Gould, MD, MS, of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) confirmed that catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) are the most common type of HAI. CAUTIs occur at a frequency of >560,000 infections per year and cost as much as $500 million per year, she explained. Strategies to prevent CAUTIs include inserting urinary catheters only for appropriate indications and leaving them in place for the shortest possible duration.
In recent years, concern has grown about the prevalence of healthcare-associated Clostridium difficile infection (HA-CDI), which can lead to uncomplicated diarrhea, sepsis, or even death. Several speakers described strategies that reduce HA-CDI development, including the identification and removal of environmental sources of C. diff, accommodating CDI patients in a private room with contact precautions, and minimizing both the frequency and duration of antimicrobial therapy.
Uncertainty about the most reliable tests to confirm CDI was a topic of focus. Enzyme immunoassay (EIA) testing, cell cytotoxin assays, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing are readily available in most U.S. hospitals; however, PCR testing might prove to be the most advantageous since it is rapid, sensitive, and specific.
Neil Fishman, MD, of the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine in Philadelphia was one of several speakers to address the important role of antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) development. According to Dr. Fishman, ASP goals should be to “ensure the proper use of antimicrobials” and to “promote cost-effectiveness.” By taking actions that promote the appropriate use of antimicrobials, the following positive consequences can be anticipated:
- Improved clinical outcomes;
- Reduced risk of adverse drug effects; and
- A reduction in, or stabilization of, the rate of antimicrobial resistance.
Multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative Bacillus is a major challenge for hospitals worldwide. The CDC offers two guidelines for the optimal management and isolation of MDR organisms (MDRO): HICPAC 2006 (a management guideline) and HICPAC 2007 (MDRO isolation precaution guidelines). Consistent utilization of these guidelines is crucial to control the spread of MDRO.
The CDC’s Alexander Killen, MD, discussed the increasing proportion of MDR Acinetobacter and Enterobacteriaceae. Emerging issues among these organisms include the development of highly resistant strains, the incidence of which is increasing in nonacute-care settings.
The CDC’s Karen Anderson reported laboratory data on carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) in a long-term-care facility. Her team demonstrated that CRE colonization can persist for up to six months. She speculated that the transfer of resistance between different species occurs, as does patient-to-patient transmission.
The CDC recommends the use of surveillance cultures as part of enhanced precautions. Surveillance is to continue until no new cases are detected.
Karen Clarke, MD, MS, MPH
Ketino Kobaidze, MD, PhD
Mohamad Moussa, MD
Sheri Tejedor, MD
Emory University
School of Medicine, Atlanta