Understanding Medical Standards for Entrance Into Military Service and Disqualifying Dermatologic Conditions

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 10/06/2023 - 13:43
Display Headline
Understanding Medical Standards for Entrance Into Military Service and Disqualifying Dermatologic Conditions
IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE ASSOCIATION OF MILITARY DERMATOLOGISTS

Purpose of Medical Standards in the US Military

Young adults in the United States traditionally have viewed military service as a viable career given its stable salary, career training, opportunities for progression, comprehensive health care coverage, tuition assistance, and other benefits; however, not all who desire to serve in the US Military are eligible to join. The Department of Defense (DoD) maintains fitness and health requirements (ie, accession standards), which are codified in DoD Instruction 6130.03, Volume 1,1 that help ensure potential recruits can safely and fully perform their military duties. These accession standards change over time with the evolving understanding of diseases, medical advances, and accrued experience conducting operations in various environments. Accession standards serve to both preserve the health of the applicant and to ensure military mission success.

Dermatologic diseases have been prevalent in conflicts throughout US military history, representing a considerable source of morbidity to service members, inability of service members to remain on active duty, and costly use of resources. Hospitalizations of US Army soldiers for skin conditions led to the loss of more than 2 million days of service in World War I.2 In World War II, skin diseases made up 25% and 75% of all temperate and tropical climate visits, respectively. Cutaneous diseases were the most frequently addressed category for US service members in Vietnam, representing more than 1.5 million visits and nearly 10% of disease-related evacuations.2 Skin disease remains vital in 21st-century conflict. At a military hospital in Afghanistan, a review of 2421 outpatient medical records from June through July 2007 identified that dermatologic conditions resulted in 20% of military patient evaluations, 7% of nontraumatic hospital admissions, and 2% of total patient evacuations, at an estimated cost of $80,000 per evacuee.3 Between 2003 and 2006, 918 service members were evacuated for dermatologic reasons from combat zones in Afghanistan and Iraq.4

Unpredictable military environments may result in flares of a previously controlled condition, new skin diseases, or infection with endemic diseases. Mild cases of common conditions such as psoriasis or atopic dermatitis can present an unacceptable risk for severe flare in the setting of deployed military operations.5 Personnel may face extremes in temperature and humidity and work long hours under stress with limited or nonexistent opportunities for hygiene or self-care. Shared equipment and close living quarters permit the spread of infectious diseases and complicate the treatment of infestations. Military equipment and supplies such as gas masks and insect repellents can contain compounds that act as irritants or sensitizing agents, leading to contact dermatitis or urticaria. When dermatologic conditions develop or flare, further challenges are associated with evaluation and management. Health care resources vary considerably by location, with potential limitations in the availability of medications; supplies; refrigeration capabilities; and laboratory, microbiology, and histology services. Furthermore, dermatology referrals and services typically are not feasible in most deployed settings,3 though teledermatology has been available in the armed forces since 2002.

Deployed environments compound the consequences of dermatologic conditions and can impact the military mission. Military units deploy with the number of personnel needed to complete a mission and cannot replace members who become ill or injured or are medically evacuated. Something seemingly trivial, such as poor sleep due to pruritic dermatitis, may impair daytime alertness with potentially grave consequences in critical tasks such as guard or flying duties. The evacuation of a service member can compromise those left behind, and losing a service member with a unique required skill set may jeopardize a unit’s chance of success. Additionally, the impact of an evacuation itself extends beyond its direct cost and effects on the service member’s unit. The military does not maintain dedicated medical evacuation aircraft, instead repurposing aircraft in the deployed setting as needed.6 Evacuations can delay flights initially scheduled to move troops, ammunition, food, or other supplies and equipment elsewhere.

Disqualifying Skin and Soft Tissue Conditions

Current accession standards, which are listed in a publicly released document (DoD Instruction 6130.03, Volume 1), are updated based on medical, societal, and technical advances.1 These standards differ from retention standards, which apply to members actively serving in the military. Although the DoD creates a minimum standard for the entire military, the US Army, Navy, and Air Force adopt these standards and adjust as required for each branch’s needs. An updated copy can be found on the DoD Directives Division website (https://www.esd.whs.mil/dd/) or Med Standards, a third-party mobile application (app) available as a free download for Apple iOS and Android devices (https://www.doc-apps.com/). The app also includes each military branch’s interpretation of the requirements.

The accession standards outline medical conditions that, if present or verified in an applicant’s medical history, preclude joining the military (eTable). These standards are organized into general systems, with a section dedicated to dermatologic (skin and soft tissue) conditions.1 When a candidate has a potentially disqualifying medical condition identified by a screening questionnaire, medical record review, or military entrance physical examination, a referral for a determination of fitness for duty may be required. Medical accession standards are not solely driven by the diagnosis but also by the extent, nature, and timing of medical management. Procedures or prescriptions requiring frequent clinical monitoring, special handling, or severe dietary restrictions may deem the applicant’s condition potentially unsuitable. The need for immunosuppressive, anticoagulant, or refrigerated medications can impact a patient’s eligibility due to future deployment requirements and suitability for prolonged service, especially if treated for any substantial length of time. Chronic dermatologic conditions that are unresponsive to treatment, are susceptible to exacerbation despite treatment, require regular follow-up care, or interfere with the wear of military gear may be inconsistent with future deployment standards. Although the dermatologist should primarily focus on the skin and soft tissue conditions section of the accession standards, some dermatologic conditions can overlap with other medical systems and be located in a different section; for example, the section on lower extremity conditions includes a disqualifying condition of “[c]urrent ingrown toenails, if infected or symptomatic.”1

Waiver Process

Medical conditions listed in the accession standards are deemed ineligible for military service; however, applicants can apply for a waiver.1 The goal is for service members to be well controlled without treatment or with treatment widely available at military clinics and hospitals. Waivers ensure that service members are “[m]edically capable of performing duties without aggravating physical defects or medical conditions,” are “[m]edically adaptable to the military environment without geographical area limitations,” and are “free of medical conditions or physical defects that may reasonably be expected to require excessive time lost from duty for necessary treatment or hospitalization, or may result in separation from the Military Service for unfitness.”1 The waiver process requires an evaluation from specialists with verification and documentation but does not guarantee approval. Although each military branch follows the same guidelines for disqualifying medical conditions, the evaluation and waiver process varies.

Considerations for Civilian Dermatologists

For several reasons, accurate and detailed medical documentation is essential for patients who pursue military service. Applicants must complete detailed health questionnaires and may need to provide copies of health records. The military electronic health record connects to large civilian health information exchanges and pulls primary documentation from records at many hospitals and clinics. Although applicants may request supportive clarification from their dermatologists, the military relies on primary medical documentation throughout the recruitment process. Accurate diagnostic codes reduce ambiguity, as accession standards are organized by diagnosis; for example, an unspecified history of psoriasis disqualifies applicants unless documentation supports nonrecurrent childhood guttate psoriasis.1 Clear documentation of symptom severity, response to treatment, or resolution of a condition may elucidate suitability for service when matching a potentially disqualifying condition to a standard is not straightforward. Correct documentation will ensure that potential service members achieve a waiver when it is appropriate. If they are found to be unfit, it may save a patient from a bad outcome or a military unit from mission failure.

Dermatologists in the United States can reference current military medical accession standards to guide patients when needed. For example, a prospective recruit may be hesitant to start isotretinoin for severe nodulocystic acne, concerned that this medication may preclude them from joining the military. The current standards state that “[a]pplicants under treatment with systemic retinoids . . . do not meet the standard until 4 weeks after completing therapy,” while active severe nodulocystic acne is a disqualifying condition.1 Therefore, the patient could proceed with isotretinoin therapy and, pending clinical response, meet accession standards as soon as 4 weeks after treatment. A clear understanding of the purpose of these standards, including protecting the applicant’s health and maximizing the chance of combat mission accomplishment, helps to reinforce responsibilities when caring for patients who wish to serve.

Disqualifying Skin and Soft Tissue Conditions From the US Department of Defense

Disqualifying Skin and Soft Tissue Conditions From the US Department of Defense

References
  1. US Department of Defense. DoD Instruction 6130.03, Volume 1. Medical Standards for Military Service: Appointment, Enlistment, or Induction. Updated November 16, 2022. Accessed May 22, 2023. https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/613003_vol1.PDF?ver=7fhqacc0jGX_R9_1iexudA%3D%3D
  2. Becker LE, James WD. Historical overview and principles of diagnosis. In: Becker LE, James WD. Military Dermatology. Office of the Surgeon General, US Department of the Army; 1994: 1-20.
  3. Arnold JG, Michener MD. Evaluation of dermatologic conditions by primary care providers in deployed military settings. Mil Med. 2008;173:882-888. doi:10.7205/MILMED.173.9.882
  4. McGraw TA, Norton SA. Military aeromedical evacuations from central and southwest Asia for ill-defined dermatologic diseases. Arch Dermatol. 2009;145:165-170.
  5. Gelman AB, Norton SA, Valdes-Rodriguez R, et al. A review of skin conditions in modern warfare and peacekeeping operations. Mil Med. 2015;180:32-37.
  6. Fang R, Dorlac GR, Allan PF, et al. Intercontinental aeromedical evacuation of patients with traumatic brain injuries during Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;28:E11.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Lauren Day Kent is from the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland. Drs. Riegleman, Colston, and McCann are from the Department of Dermatology, San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium, Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland, Lackland AFB, Texas.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

The views expressed are those of the authors and do not reflect the official views or policy of the Department of Defense or its Components. The authors do not have any financial interest in the companies whose materials are discussed in this presentation, and no federal endorsement of the companies and materials is intended.

The eTable is available in the Appendix online at www.mdedge.com/dermatology.

Correspondence: Kelly Riegleman, MD, 1100 Wilford Hall Loop, Bldg 4554, Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland, Lackland AFB, TX 78236 (kelly.l.riegleman.mil@health.mil).

Issue
Cutis - 112(1)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
28-30,E1-E2
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Lauren Day Kent is from the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland. Drs. Riegleman, Colston, and McCann are from the Department of Dermatology, San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium, Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland, Lackland AFB, Texas.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

The views expressed are those of the authors and do not reflect the official views or policy of the Department of Defense or its Components. The authors do not have any financial interest in the companies whose materials are discussed in this presentation, and no federal endorsement of the companies and materials is intended.

The eTable is available in the Appendix online at www.mdedge.com/dermatology.

Correspondence: Kelly Riegleman, MD, 1100 Wilford Hall Loop, Bldg 4554, Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland, Lackland AFB, TX 78236 (kelly.l.riegleman.mil@health.mil).

Author and Disclosure Information

Lauren Day Kent is from the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland. Drs. Riegleman, Colston, and McCann are from the Department of Dermatology, San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium, Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland, Lackland AFB, Texas.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

The views expressed are those of the authors and do not reflect the official views or policy of the Department of Defense or its Components. The authors do not have any financial interest in the companies whose materials are discussed in this presentation, and no federal endorsement of the companies and materials is intended.

The eTable is available in the Appendix online at www.mdedge.com/dermatology.

Correspondence: Kelly Riegleman, MD, 1100 Wilford Hall Loop, Bldg 4554, Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland, Lackland AFB, TX 78236 (kelly.l.riegleman.mil@health.mil).

Article PDF
Article PDF
IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE ASSOCIATION OF MILITARY DERMATOLOGISTS
IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE ASSOCIATION OF MILITARY DERMATOLOGISTS

Purpose of Medical Standards in the US Military

Young adults in the United States traditionally have viewed military service as a viable career given its stable salary, career training, opportunities for progression, comprehensive health care coverage, tuition assistance, and other benefits; however, not all who desire to serve in the US Military are eligible to join. The Department of Defense (DoD) maintains fitness and health requirements (ie, accession standards), which are codified in DoD Instruction 6130.03, Volume 1,1 that help ensure potential recruits can safely and fully perform their military duties. These accession standards change over time with the evolving understanding of diseases, medical advances, and accrued experience conducting operations in various environments. Accession standards serve to both preserve the health of the applicant and to ensure military mission success.

Dermatologic diseases have been prevalent in conflicts throughout US military history, representing a considerable source of morbidity to service members, inability of service members to remain on active duty, and costly use of resources. Hospitalizations of US Army soldiers for skin conditions led to the loss of more than 2 million days of service in World War I.2 In World War II, skin diseases made up 25% and 75% of all temperate and tropical climate visits, respectively. Cutaneous diseases were the most frequently addressed category for US service members in Vietnam, representing more than 1.5 million visits and nearly 10% of disease-related evacuations.2 Skin disease remains vital in 21st-century conflict. At a military hospital in Afghanistan, a review of 2421 outpatient medical records from June through July 2007 identified that dermatologic conditions resulted in 20% of military patient evaluations, 7% of nontraumatic hospital admissions, and 2% of total patient evacuations, at an estimated cost of $80,000 per evacuee.3 Between 2003 and 2006, 918 service members were evacuated for dermatologic reasons from combat zones in Afghanistan and Iraq.4

Unpredictable military environments may result in flares of a previously controlled condition, new skin diseases, or infection with endemic diseases. Mild cases of common conditions such as psoriasis or atopic dermatitis can present an unacceptable risk for severe flare in the setting of deployed military operations.5 Personnel may face extremes in temperature and humidity and work long hours under stress with limited or nonexistent opportunities for hygiene or self-care. Shared equipment and close living quarters permit the spread of infectious diseases and complicate the treatment of infestations. Military equipment and supplies such as gas masks and insect repellents can contain compounds that act as irritants or sensitizing agents, leading to contact dermatitis or urticaria. When dermatologic conditions develop or flare, further challenges are associated with evaluation and management. Health care resources vary considerably by location, with potential limitations in the availability of medications; supplies; refrigeration capabilities; and laboratory, microbiology, and histology services. Furthermore, dermatology referrals and services typically are not feasible in most deployed settings,3 though teledermatology has been available in the armed forces since 2002.

Deployed environments compound the consequences of dermatologic conditions and can impact the military mission. Military units deploy with the number of personnel needed to complete a mission and cannot replace members who become ill or injured or are medically evacuated. Something seemingly trivial, such as poor sleep due to pruritic dermatitis, may impair daytime alertness with potentially grave consequences in critical tasks such as guard or flying duties. The evacuation of a service member can compromise those left behind, and losing a service member with a unique required skill set may jeopardize a unit’s chance of success. Additionally, the impact of an evacuation itself extends beyond its direct cost and effects on the service member’s unit. The military does not maintain dedicated medical evacuation aircraft, instead repurposing aircraft in the deployed setting as needed.6 Evacuations can delay flights initially scheduled to move troops, ammunition, food, or other supplies and equipment elsewhere.

Disqualifying Skin and Soft Tissue Conditions

Current accession standards, which are listed in a publicly released document (DoD Instruction 6130.03, Volume 1), are updated based on medical, societal, and technical advances.1 These standards differ from retention standards, which apply to members actively serving in the military. Although the DoD creates a minimum standard for the entire military, the US Army, Navy, and Air Force adopt these standards and adjust as required for each branch’s needs. An updated copy can be found on the DoD Directives Division website (https://www.esd.whs.mil/dd/) or Med Standards, a third-party mobile application (app) available as a free download for Apple iOS and Android devices (https://www.doc-apps.com/). The app also includes each military branch’s interpretation of the requirements.

The accession standards outline medical conditions that, if present or verified in an applicant’s medical history, preclude joining the military (eTable). These standards are organized into general systems, with a section dedicated to dermatologic (skin and soft tissue) conditions.1 When a candidate has a potentially disqualifying medical condition identified by a screening questionnaire, medical record review, or military entrance physical examination, a referral for a determination of fitness for duty may be required. Medical accession standards are not solely driven by the diagnosis but also by the extent, nature, and timing of medical management. Procedures or prescriptions requiring frequent clinical monitoring, special handling, or severe dietary restrictions may deem the applicant’s condition potentially unsuitable. The need for immunosuppressive, anticoagulant, or refrigerated medications can impact a patient’s eligibility due to future deployment requirements and suitability for prolonged service, especially if treated for any substantial length of time. Chronic dermatologic conditions that are unresponsive to treatment, are susceptible to exacerbation despite treatment, require regular follow-up care, or interfere with the wear of military gear may be inconsistent with future deployment standards. Although the dermatologist should primarily focus on the skin and soft tissue conditions section of the accession standards, some dermatologic conditions can overlap with other medical systems and be located in a different section; for example, the section on lower extremity conditions includes a disqualifying condition of “[c]urrent ingrown toenails, if infected or symptomatic.”1

Waiver Process

Medical conditions listed in the accession standards are deemed ineligible for military service; however, applicants can apply for a waiver.1 The goal is for service members to be well controlled without treatment or with treatment widely available at military clinics and hospitals. Waivers ensure that service members are “[m]edically capable of performing duties without aggravating physical defects or medical conditions,” are “[m]edically adaptable to the military environment without geographical area limitations,” and are “free of medical conditions or physical defects that may reasonably be expected to require excessive time lost from duty for necessary treatment or hospitalization, or may result in separation from the Military Service for unfitness.”1 The waiver process requires an evaluation from specialists with verification and documentation but does not guarantee approval. Although each military branch follows the same guidelines for disqualifying medical conditions, the evaluation and waiver process varies.

Considerations for Civilian Dermatologists

For several reasons, accurate and detailed medical documentation is essential for patients who pursue military service. Applicants must complete detailed health questionnaires and may need to provide copies of health records. The military electronic health record connects to large civilian health information exchanges and pulls primary documentation from records at many hospitals and clinics. Although applicants may request supportive clarification from their dermatologists, the military relies on primary medical documentation throughout the recruitment process. Accurate diagnostic codes reduce ambiguity, as accession standards are organized by diagnosis; for example, an unspecified history of psoriasis disqualifies applicants unless documentation supports nonrecurrent childhood guttate psoriasis.1 Clear documentation of symptom severity, response to treatment, or resolution of a condition may elucidate suitability for service when matching a potentially disqualifying condition to a standard is not straightforward. Correct documentation will ensure that potential service members achieve a waiver when it is appropriate. If they are found to be unfit, it may save a patient from a bad outcome or a military unit from mission failure.

Dermatologists in the United States can reference current military medical accession standards to guide patients when needed. For example, a prospective recruit may be hesitant to start isotretinoin for severe nodulocystic acne, concerned that this medication may preclude them from joining the military. The current standards state that “[a]pplicants under treatment with systemic retinoids . . . do not meet the standard until 4 weeks after completing therapy,” while active severe nodulocystic acne is a disqualifying condition.1 Therefore, the patient could proceed with isotretinoin therapy and, pending clinical response, meet accession standards as soon as 4 weeks after treatment. A clear understanding of the purpose of these standards, including protecting the applicant’s health and maximizing the chance of combat mission accomplishment, helps to reinforce responsibilities when caring for patients who wish to serve.

Disqualifying Skin and Soft Tissue Conditions From the US Department of Defense

Disqualifying Skin and Soft Tissue Conditions From the US Department of Defense

Purpose of Medical Standards in the US Military

Young adults in the United States traditionally have viewed military service as a viable career given its stable salary, career training, opportunities for progression, comprehensive health care coverage, tuition assistance, and other benefits; however, not all who desire to serve in the US Military are eligible to join. The Department of Defense (DoD) maintains fitness and health requirements (ie, accession standards), which are codified in DoD Instruction 6130.03, Volume 1,1 that help ensure potential recruits can safely and fully perform their military duties. These accession standards change over time with the evolving understanding of diseases, medical advances, and accrued experience conducting operations in various environments. Accession standards serve to both preserve the health of the applicant and to ensure military mission success.

Dermatologic diseases have been prevalent in conflicts throughout US military history, representing a considerable source of morbidity to service members, inability of service members to remain on active duty, and costly use of resources. Hospitalizations of US Army soldiers for skin conditions led to the loss of more than 2 million days of service in World War I.2 In World War II, skin diseases made up 25% and 75% of all temperate and tropical climate visits, respectively. Cutaneous diseases were the most frequently addressed category for US service members in Vietnam, representing more than 1.5 million visits and nearly 10% of disease-related evacuations.2 Skin disease remains vital in 21st-century conflict. At a military hospital in Afghanistan, a review of 2421 outpatient medical records from June through July 2007 identified that dermatologic conditions resulted in 20% of military patient evaluations, 7% of nontraumatic hospital admissions, and 2% of total patient evacuations, at an estimated cost of $80,000 per evacuee.3 Between 2003 and 2006, 918 service members were evacuated for dermatologic reasons from combat zones in Afghanistan and Iraq.4

Unpredictable military environments may result in flares of a previously controlled condition, new skin diseases, or infection with endemic diseases. Mild cases of common conditions such as psoriasis or atopic dermatitis can present an unacceptable risk for severe flare in the setting of deployed military operations.5 Personnel may face extremes in temperature and humidity and work long hours under stress with limited or nonexistent opportunities for hygiene or self-care. Shared equipment and close living quarters permit the spread of infectious diseases and complicate the treatment of infestations. Military equipment and supplies such as gas masks and insect repellents can contain compounds that act as irritants or sensitizing agents, leading to contact dermatitis or urticaria. When dermatologic conditions develop or flare, further challenges are associated with evaluation and management. Health care resources vary considerably by location, with potential limitations in the availability of medications; supplies; refrigeration capabilities; and laboratory, microbiology, and histology services. Furthermore, dermatology referrals and services typically are not feasible in most deployed settings,3 though teledermatology has been available in the armed forces since 2002.

Deployed environments compound the consequences of dermatologic conditions and can impact the military mission. Military units deploy with the number of personnel needed to complete a mission and cannot replace members who become ill or injured or are medically evacuated. Something seemingly trivial, such as poor sleep due to pruritic dermatitis, may impair daytime alertness with potentially grave consequences in critical tasks such as guard or flying duties. The evacuation of a service member can compromise those left behind, and losing a service member with a unique required skill set may jeopardize a unit’s chance of success. Additionally, the impact of an evacuation itself extends beyond its direct cost and effects on the service member’s unit. The military does not maintain dedicated medical evacuation aircraft, instead repurposing aircraft in the deployed setting as needed.6 Evacuations can delay flights initially scheduled to move troops, ammunition, food, or other supplies and equipment elsewhere.

Disqualifying Skin and Soft Tissue Conditions

Current accession standards, which are listed in a publicly released document (DoD Instruction 6130.03, Volume 1), are updated based on medical, societal, and technical advances.1 These standards differ from retention standards, which apply to members actively serving in the military. Although the DoD creates a minimum standard for the entire military, the US Army, Navy, and Air Force adopt these standards and adjust as required for each branch’s needs. An updated copy can be found on the DoD Directives Division website (https://www.esd.whs.mil/dd/) or Med Standards, a third-party mobile application (app) available as a free download for Apple iOS and Android devices (https://www.doc-apps.com/). The app also includes each military branch’s interpretation of the requirements.

The accession standards outline medical conditions that, if present or verified in an applicant’s medical history, preclude joining the military (eTable). These standards are organized into general systems, with a section dedicated to dermatologic (skin and soft tissue) conditions.1 When a candidate has a potentially disqualifying medical condition identified by a screening questionnaire, medical record review, or military entrance physical examination, a referral for a determination of fitness for duty may be required. Medical accession standards are not solely driven by the diagnosis but also by the extent, nature, and timing of medical management. Procedures or prescriptions requiring frequent clinical monitoring, special handling, or severe dietary restrictions may deem the applicant’s condition potentially unsuitable. The need for immunosuppressive, anticoagulant, or refrigerated medications can impact a patient’s eligibility due to future deployment requirements and suitability for prolonged service, especially if treated for any substantial length of time. Chronic dermatologic conditions that are unresponsive to treatment, are susceptible to exacerbation despite treatment, require regular follow-up care, or interfere with the wear of military gear may be inconsistent with future deployment standards. Although the dermatologist should primarily focus on the skin and soft tissue conditions section of the accession standards, some dermatologic conditions can overlap with other medical systems and be located in a different section; for example, the section on lower extremity conditions includes a disqualifying condition of “[c]urrent ingrown toenails, if infected or symptomatic.”1

Waiver Process

Medical conditions listed in the accession standards are deemed ineligible for military service; however, applicants can apply for a waiver.1 The goal is for service members to be well controlled without treatment or with treatment widely available at military clinics and hospitals. Waivers ensure that service members are “[m]edically capable of performing duties without aggravating physical defects or medical conditions,” are “[m]edically adaptable to the military environment without geographical area limitations,” and are “free of medical conditions or physical defects that may reasonably be expected to require excessive time lost from duty for necessary treatment or hospitalization, or may result in separation from the Military Service for unfitness.”1 The waiver process requires an evaluation from specialists with verification and documentation but does not guarantee approval. Although each military branch follows the same guidelines for disqualifying medical conditions, the evaluation and waiver process varies.

Considerations for Civilian Dermatologists

For several reasons, accurate and detailed medical documentation is essential for patients who pursue military service. Applicants must complete detailed health questionnaires and may need to provide copies of health records. The military electronic health record connects to large civilian health information exchanges and pulls primary documentation from records at many hospitals and clinics. Although applicants may request supportive clarification from their dermatologists, the military relies on primary medical documentation throughout the recruitment process. Accurate diagnostic codes reduce ambiguity, as accession standards are organized by diagnosis; for example, an unspecified history of psoriasis disqualifies applicants unless documentation supports nonrecurrent childhood guttate psoriasis.1 Clear documentation of symptom severity, response to treatment, or resolution of a condition may elucidate suitability for service when matching a potentially disqualifying condition to a standard is not straightforward. Correct documentation will ensure that potential service members achieve a waiver when it is appropriate. If they are found to be unfit, it may save a patient from a bad outcome or a military unit from mission failure.

Dermatologists in the United States can reference current military medical accession standards to guide patients when needed. For example, a prospective recruit may be hesitant to start isotretinoin for severe nodulocystic acne, concerned that this medication may preclude them from joining the military. The current standards state that “[a]pplicants under treatment with systemic retinoids . . . do not meet the standard until 4 weeks after completing therapy,” while active severe nodulocystic acne is a disqualifying condition.1 Therefore, the patient could proceed with isotretinoin therapy and, pending clinical response, meet accession standards as soon as 4 weeks after treatment. A clear understanding of the purpose of these standards, including protecting the applicant’s health and maximizing the chance of combat mission accomplishment, helps to reinforce responsibilities when caring for patients who wish to serve.

Disqualifying Skin and Soft Tissue Conditions From the US Department of Defense

Disqualifying Skin and Soft Tissue Conditions From the US Department of Defense

References
  1. US Department of Defense. DoD Instruction 6130.03, Volume 1. Medical Standards for Military Service: Appointment, Enlistment, or Induction. Updated November 16, 2022. Accessed May 22, 2023. https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/613003_vol1.PDF?ver=7fhqacc0jGX_R9_1iexudA%3D%3D
  2. Becker LE, James WD. Historical overview and principles of diagnosis. In: Becker LE, James WD. Military Dermatology. Office of the Surgeon General, US Department of the Army; 1994: 1-20.
  3. Arnold JG, Michener MD. Evaluation of dermatologic conditions by primary care providers in deployed military settings. Mil Med. 2008;173:882-888. doi:10.7205/MILMED.173.9.882
  4. McGraw TA, Norton SA. Military aeromedical evacuations from central and southwest Asia for ill-defined dermatologic diseases. Arch Dermatol. 2009;145:165-170.
  5. Gelman AB, Norton SA, Valdes-Rodriguez R, et al. A review of skin conditions in modern warfare and peacekeeping operations. Mil Med. 2015;180:32-37.
  6. Fang R, Dorlac GR, Allan PF, et al. Intercontinental aeromedical evacuation of patients with traumatic brain injuries during Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;28:E11.
References
  1. US Department of Defense. DoD Instruction 6130.03, Volume 1. Medical Standards for Military Service: Appointment, Enlistment, or Induction. Updated November 16, 2022. Accessed May 22, 2023. https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/613003_vol1.PDF?ver=7fhqacc0jGX_R9_1iexudA%3D%3D
  2. Becker LE, James WD. Historical overview and principles of diagnosis. In: Becker LE, James WD. Military Dermatology. Office of the Surgeon General, US Department of the Army; 1994: 1-20.
  3. Arnold JG, Michener MD. Evaluation of dermatologic conditions by primary care providers in deployed military settings. Mil Med. 2008;173:882-888. doi:10.7205/MILMED.173.9.882
  4. McGraw TA, Norton SA. Military aeromedical evacuations from central and southwest Asia for ill-defined dermatologic diseases. Arch Dermatol. 2009;145:165-170.
  5. Gelman AB, Norton SA, Valdes-Rodriguez R, et al. A review of skin conditions in modern warfare and peacekeeping operations. Mil Med. 2015;180:32-37.
  6. Fang R, Dorlac GR, Allan PF, et al. Intercontinental aeromedical evacuation of patients with traumatic brain injuries during Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;28:E11.
Issue
Cutis - 112(1)
Issue
Cutis - 112(1)
Page Number
28-30,E1-E2
Page Number
28-30,E1-E2
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Understanding Medical Standards for Entrance Into Military Service and Disqualifying Dermatologic Conditions
Display Headline
Understanding Medical Standards for Entrance Into Military Service and Disqualifying Dermatologic Conditions
Sections
Inside the Article

Practice Points

  • Dermatologic diseases have played a substantial role in conflicts throughout US military history, representing a considerable source of morbidity to service members, loss of active-duty service members trained with necessary skills, and costly use of resources.
  • The strict standards are designed to protect the health of the individual and maximize mission success.
  • The Department of Defense has a publicly available document (DoD Instruction 6130.03, Volume 1) that details conditions that are disqualifying for entrance into the military. Dermatologists can reference this to provide guidance to adolescents and young adults interested in joining the military.
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
Open Access (article Unlocked/Open Access)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Article PDF Media

How to Address Scar Pincushioning and Webbing of the Nasal Dorsum Using Surgical Defatting and Z-plasty

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 08/09/2022 - 16:51
Display Headline
How to Address Scar Pincushioning and Webbing of the Nasal Dorsum Using Surgical Defatting and Z-plasty

Practice Gap

Nonmelanoma skin cancer is the most common cancer, typically growing in sun-exposed areas. As such, the nasal area is a common site of onset, constituting approximately 25% of cases. Surgical excision of these cancers generally has a high cure rate.1

Although complete excision of the tumor is the primary goal of the dermatologic surgeon, achieving a cosmetically satisfactory scar also is important. As a prominent feature of the face, any irregularities to the nose are easily noticeable.2 The subsequent scar may exhibit features that are less than ideal and cause notable stress to the patient.

When a scar presents with several complications, using a single surgical technique may not sufficiently address all defects. As a result, it can be challenging for the surgeon to decide which combination of methods among the myriad of nonsurgical and surgical options for scar revision will produce the best cosmetic outcome.

Case and Technique

A 76-year-old man presented 1 year after he underwent Mohs micrographic surgery for squamous cell carcinoma on the nasal dorsum. The tumor cleared after 1 stage and was repaired using a bilateral V-Y advancement flap. Postoperatively, the patient developed pincushioning of the flap, atrophic scarring inferior to the flap, and webbing of the pivotal restraint point at the nasal root (Figures 1A and 1B). We opted to address the pincushioning and nasal root webbing by defatting the flap and performing Z-plasty, respectively.

A and B, Primary scar following bilateral V-Y advancement showing pincushioning, atrophic scarring, and webbing. C, Scar 4 months after surgical defatting and Z-plasty.
FIGURE 1. A and B, Primary scar following bilateral V-Y advancement showing pincushioning, atrophic scarring, and webbing. C, Scar 4 months after surgical defatting and Z-plasty.

Pincushioning—Pincushioning of a flap arises due to contraction and lymphedema at the edge of the repair. It is seen more often in nasal repairs due to the limited availability of surrounding skin and changes in skin texture from rhinion to tip.3 To combat this in our patient, an incision was made around the site of the original flap, surrounding tissue was undermined, and the flap was reflected back. Subcutaneous tissue was removed with scissors. The flap was then laid back into the defect, and the subcutaneous tissue and dermis were closed with interrupted buried vertical mattress sutures. The epidermis was closed in a simple running fashion.

Webbing—Webbing of a scar also may develop from the contractile wound-healing process.4 Z-plasty commonly is used to camouflage a linear or contracted scar, increase skin availability in an area, or alter scar direction to better align with skin-tension lines.5,6 In our patient, we incised the webbing of the nasal root along the vertical scar. Two arms were drawn at each end of the scar at a 60° angle (Figure 2); the side arms were drawn equal in length and incised vertically. Full-thickness skin flaps were then undermined at the level of subcutaneous fat, creating 2 triangular flaps. Adequate undermining of the surrounding subcutaneous tissue was performed to achieve proper mobilization of the flaps, which allowed for flap transposition to occur without tension and therefore for proper redirection of the scar.6 The flaps were secured using buried vertical mattress sutures and simple running sutures. Using too many buried interrupted sutures can cause vascular compromise of the fragile tips of the Z and should be avoided.3

Preoperative drawing of Z-plasty with a 60° angle.
FIGURE 2. Preoperative drawing of Z-plasty with a 60° angle.

At 4-month postoperative follow-up, the cosmetic outcome was judged satisfactory (Figure 1C).

 

 

Practice Implications

In our patient, pincushioning of the flap was easily addressed by defatting the area. However, doing just this would not have sufficed and necessitated another surgical technique—the Z-plasty—which needed to be designed carefully. The larger the angle between the side arms and central limb, the greater directional change and scar length that is gained (Figure 3). As a result, longer limbs and a greater angle could advantageously break up the scar line but consequently would lengthen the scar considerably. Therefore, if the scar was longer or the skin was inelastic, multiple Z-plasty procedures may have been preferred.

Variations of Z-plasty using different angles and their subsequent change in scar length and orientation of the central limb
FIGURE 3. Variations of Z-plasty using different angles and their subsequent change in scar length and orientation of the central limb

Additionally, for each central limb, both mirror-image options for peripheral arms were considered, with the optimal choice being the one that allowed for final scar lines to mimic relaxed skin-tension lines. Accuracy of the incisions was critical and was assessed by drawing a line between the free ends of the lateral limbs of the Z; this line should pass perpendicularly through the midpoint of the central limb. Last, as with other transposition flap options, Z-plasty has the potential to create a trapdoor or pincushion effect; we reduced this risk by wide undermining to establish an even contraction plate.6

When planning the revision, we considered multiple approaches to achieve the best aesthetic outcome in 1 stage. Had there been notable depression in the scar, we may have used a full-thickness skin graft. If the skin surface was lumpy and uneven, dermabrasion or a laser may have been utilized. Another consideration was to avoid using intralesional steroids, which could have made the already atrophied portions of the scar worse.

Overall, the surgical plan that we chose took into consideration the patient’s nasal anatomic structure, the combination of scar defects, the patient’s desires, and the tools available.

Final Thoughts

The ideal scar is inconspicuous, does not impair the function of surrounding structures, and blends well with adjacent skin.5 Consequently, the combination of pincushioning and webbing of a scar, especially in the nasal area, can pose a surgical challenge to the surgeon and can cause severe anxiety in the patient. In those circumstances, a single surgical technique is not likely to produce the revision with the best cosmetic outcome. Therefore, the synergy of 2 or more surgical techniques with proper planning and meticulous selection may be necessary. A broad knowledge of various scar revision techniques increases the surgeon’s capability to create the ideal scar.

Acknowledgment—The authors thank the case patient for granting permission to publish this information.

References
  1. Arginelli F, Salgarelli AC, Ferrari B, et al. Crescentic flap for the reconstruction of the nose after skin cancer resection. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016;44:703-707. doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2016.02.008
  2. Helml G, von Gregory HF, Amr A, et al. One-stage nasal soft tissue reconstruction with local flaps. Facial Plast Surg. 2014;30:260-267. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1376871
  3. Woodard CR. Complications in facial flap surgery. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2013;21:599-604. doi:10.1016/j.fsc.2013.07.009
  4. Brissett AE, Sherris DA. Scar contractures, hypertrophic scars, and keloids. Facial Plast Surg. 2001;17:263-272. doi:10.1055/s-2001-18827
  5. Pérez-Bustillo A, González-Sixto B, Rodríguez-Prieto MA. Surgical principles for achieving a functional and cosmetically acceptable scar. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2013;104:17-28. doi:10.1016/j.ad.2011.12.010
  6. Aasi SZ. Z-plasty made simple. Dermatol Res Pract. 2010;2010:982623. doi:10.1155/2010/982623
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

From the Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas. Drs. Nguyen and Li are from the School of Medicine, and Drs. Powell and Orengo are from the Department of Dermatology.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Christopher N. Nguyen MD, Department of Dermatology, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030 (christopher.nguyen42@gmail.com).

Issue
Cutis - 110(2)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
86-87
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

From the Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas. Drs. Nguyen and Li are from the School of Medicine, and Drs. Powell and Orengo are from the Department of Dermatology.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Christopher N. Nguyen MD, Department of Dermatology, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030 (christopher.nguyen42@gmail.com).

Author and Disclosure Information

From the Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas. Drs. Nguyen and Li are from the School of Medicine, and Drs. Powell and Orengo are from the Department of Dermatology.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Christopher N. Nguyen MD, Department of Dermatology, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030 (christopher.nguyen42@gmail.com).

Article PDF
Article PDF

Practice Gap

Nonmelanoma skin cancer is the most common cancer, typically growing in sun-exposed areas. As such, the nasal area is a common site of onset, constituting approximately 25% of cases. Surgical excision of these cancers generally has a high cure rate.1

Although complete excision of the tumor is the primary goal of the dermatologic surgeon, achieving a cosmetically satisfactory scar also is important. As a prominent feature of the face, any irregularities to the nose are easily noticeable.2 The subsequent scar may exhibit features that are less than ideal and cause notable stress to the patient.

When a scar presents with several complications, using a single surgical technique may not sufficiently address all defects. As a result, it can be challenging for the surgeon to decide which combination of methods among the myriad of nonsurgical and surgical options for scar revision will produce the best cosmetic outcome.

Case and Technique

A 76-year-old man presented 1 year after he underwent Mohs micrographic surgery for squamous cell carcinoma on the nasal dorsum. The tumor cleared after 1 stage and was repaired using a bilateral V-Y advancement flap. Postoperatively, the patient developed pincushioning of the flap, atrophic scarring inferior to the flap, and webbing of the pivotal restraint point at the nasal root (Figures 1A and 1B). We opted to address the pincushioning and nasal root webbing by defatting the flap and performing Z-plasty, respectively.

A and B, Primary scar following bilateral V-Y advancement showing pincushioning, atrophic scarring, and webbing. C, Scar 4 months after surgical defatting and Z-plasty.
FIGURE 1. A and B, Primary scar following bilateral V-Y advancement showing pincushioning, atrophic scarring, and webbing. C, Scar 4 months after surgical defatting and Z-plasty.

Pincushioning—Pincushioning of a flap arises due to contraction and lymphedema at the edge of the repair. It is seen more often in nasal repairs due to the limited availability of surrounding skin and changes in skin texture from rhinion to tip.3 To combat this in our patient, an incision was made around the site of the original flap, surrounding tissue was undermined, and the flap was reflected back. Subcutaneous tissue was removed with scissors. The flap was then laid back into the defect, and the subcutaneous tissue and dermis were closed with interrupted buried vertical mattress sutures. The epidermis was closed in a simple running fashion.

Webbing—Webbing of a scar also may develop from the contractile wound-healing process.4 Z-plasty commonly is used to camouflage a linear or contracted scar, increase skin availability in an area, or alter scar direction to better align with skin-tension lines.5,6 In our patient, we incised the webbing of the nasal root along the vertical scar. Two arms were drawn at each end of the scar at a 60° angle (Figure 2); the side arms were drawn equal in length and incised vertically. Full-thickness skin flaps were then undermined at the level of subcutaneous fat, creating 2 triangular flaps. Adequate undermining of the surrounding subcutaneous tissue was performed to achieve proper mobilization of the flaps, which allowed for flap transposition to occur without tension and therefore for proper redirection of the scar.6 The flaps were secured using buried vertical mattress sutures and simple running sutures. Using too many buried interrupted sutures can cause vascular compromise of the fragile tips of the Z and should be avoided.3

Preoperative drawing of Z-plasty with a 60° angle.
FIGURE 2. Preoperative drawing of Z-plasty with a 60° angle.

At 4-month postoperative follow-up, the cosmetic outcome was judged satisfactory (Figure 1C).

 

 

Practice Implications

In our patient, pincushioning of the flap was easily addressed by defatting the area. However, doing just this would not have sufficed and necessitated another surgical technique—the Z-plasty—which needed to be designed carefully. The larger the angle between the side arms and central limb, the greater directional change and scar length that is gained (Figure 3). As a result, longer limbs and a greater angle could advantageously break up the scar line but consequently would lengthen the scar considerably. Therefore, if the scar was longer or the skin was inelastic, multiple Z-plasty procedures may have been preferred.

Variations of Z-plasty using different angles and their subsequent change in scar length and orientation of the central limb
FIGURE 3. Variations of Z-plasty using different angles and their subsequent change in scar length and orientation of the central limb

Additionally, for each central limb, both mirror-image options for peripheral arms were considered, with the optimal choice being the one that allowed for final scar lines to mimic relaxed skin-tension lines. Accuracy of the incisions was critical and was assessed by drawing a line between the free ends of the lateral limbs of the Z; this line should pass perpendicularly through the midpoint of the central limb. Last, as with other transposition flap options, Z-plasty has the potential to create a trapdoor or pincushion effect; we reduced this risk by wide undermining to establish an even contraction plate.6

When planning the revision, we considered multiple approaches to achieve the best aesthetic outcome in 1 stage. Had there been notable depression in the scar, we may have used a full-thickness skin graft. If the skin surface was lumpy and uneven, dermabrasion or a laser may have been utilized. Another consideration was to avoid using intralesional steroids, which could have made the already atrophied portions of the scar worse.

Overall, the surgical plan that we chose took into consideration the patient’s nasal anatomic structure, the combination of scar defects, the patient’s desires, and the tools available.

Final Thoughts

The ideal scar is inconspicuous, does not impair the function of surrounding structures, and blends well with adjacent skin.5 Consequently, the combination of pincushioning and webbing of a scar, especially in the nasal area, can pose a surgical challenge to the surgeon and can cause severe anxiety in the patient. In those circumstances, a single surgical technique is not likely to produce the revision with the best cosmetic outcome. Therefore, the synergy of 2 or more surgical techniques with proper planning and meticulous selection may be necessary. A broad knowledge of various scar revision techniques increases the surgeon’s capability to create the ideal scar.

Acknowledgment—The authors thank the case patient for granting permission to publish this information.

Practice Gap

Nonmelanoma skin cancer is the most common cancer, typically growing in sun-exposed areas. As such, the nasal area is a common site of onset, constituting approximately 25% of cases. Surgical excision of these cancers generally has a high cure rate.1

Although complete excision of the tumor is the primary goal of the dermatologic surgeon, achieving a cosmetically satisfactory scar also is important. As a prominent feature of the face, any irregularities to the nose are easily noticeable.2 The subsequent scar may exhibit features that are less than ideal and cause notable stress to the patient.

When a scar presents with several complications, using a single surgical technique may not sufficiently address all defects. As a result, it can be challenging for the surgeon to decide which combination of methods among the myriad of nonsurgical and surgical options for scar revision will produce the best cosmetic outcome.

Case and Technique

A 76-year-old man presented 1 year after he underwent Mohs micrographic surgery for squamous cell carcinoma on the nasal dorsum. The tumor cleared after 1 stage and was repaired using a bilateral V-Y advancement flap. Postoperatively, the patient developed pincushioning of the flap, atrophic scarring inferior to the flap, and webbing of the pivotal restraint point at the nasal root (Figures 1A and 1B). We opted to address the pincushioning and nasal root webbing by defatting the flap and performing Z-plasty, respectively.

A and B, Primary scar following bilateral V-Y advancement showing pincushioning, atrophic scarring, and webbing. C, Scar 4 months after surgical defatting and Z-plasty.
FIGURE 1. A and B, Primary scar following bilateral V-Y advancement showing pincushioning, atrophic scarring, and webbing. C, Scar 4 months after surgical defatting and Z-plasty.

Pincushioning—Pincushioning of a flap arises due to contraction and lymphedema at the edge of the repair. It is seen more often in nasal repairs due to the limited availability of surrounding skin and changes in skin texture from rhinion to tip.3 To combat this in our patient, an incision was made around the site of the original flap, surrounding tissue was undermined, and the flap was reflected back. Subcutaneous tissue was removed with scissors. The flap was then laid back into the defect, and the subcutaneous tissue and dermis were closed with interrupted buried vertical mattress sutures. The epidermis was closed in a simple running fashion.

Webbing—Webbing of a scar also may develop from the contractile wound-healing process.4 Z-plasty commonly is used to camouflage a linear or contracted scar, increase skin availability in an area, or alter scar direction to better align with skin-tension lines.5,6 In our patient, we incised the webbing of the nasal root along the vertical scar. Two arms were drawn at each end of the scar at a 60° angle (Figure 2); the side arms were drawn equal in length and incised vertically. Full-thickness skin flaps were then undermined at the level of subcutaneous fat, creating 2 triangular flaps. Adequate undermining of the surrounding subcutaneous tissue was performed to achieve proper mobilization of the flaps, which allowed for flap transposition to occur without tension and therefore for proper redirection of the scar.6 The flaps were secured using buried vertical mattress sutures and simple running sutures. Using too many buried interrupted sutures can cause vascular compromise of the fragile tips of the Z and should be avoided.3

Preoperative drawing of Z-plasty with a 60° angle.
FIGURE 2. Preoperative drawing of Z-plasty with a 60° angle.

At 4-month postoperative follow-up, the cosmetic outcome was judged satisfactory (Figure 1C).

 

 

Practice Implications

In our patient, pincushioning of the flap was easily addressed by defatting the area. However, doing just this would not have sufficed and necessitated another surgical technique—the Z-plasty—which needed to be designed carefully. The larger the angle between the side arms and central limb, the greater directional change and scar length that is gained (Figure 3). As a result, longer limbs and a greater angle could advantageously break up the scar line but consequently would lengthen the scar considerably. Therefore, if the scar was longer or the skin was inelastic, multiple Z-plasty procedures may have been preferred.

Variations of Z-plasty using different angles and their subsequent change in scar length and orientation of the central limb
FIGURE 3. Variations of Z-plasty using different angles and their subsequent change in scar length and orientation of the central limb

Additionally, for each central limb, both mirror-image options for peripheral arms were considered, with the optimal choice being the one that allowed for final scar lines to mimic relaxed skin-tension lines. Accuracy of the incisions was critical and was assessed by drawing a line between the free ends of the lateral limbs of the Z; this line should pass perpendicularly through the midpoint of the central limb. Last, as with other transposition flap options, Z-plasty has the potential to create a trapdoor or pincushion effect; we reduced this risk by wide undermining to establish an even contraction plate.6

When planning the revision, we considered multiple approaches to achieve the best aesthetic outcome in 1 stage. Had there been notable depression in the scar, we may have used a full-thickness skin graft. If the skin surface was lumpy and uneven, dermabrasion or a laser may have been utilized. Another consideration was to avoid using intralesional steroids, which could have made the already atrophied portions of the scar worse.

Overall, the surgical plan that we chose took into consideration the patient’s nasal anatomic structure, the combination of scar defects, the patient’s desires, and the tools available.

Final Thoughts

The ideal scar is inconspicuous, does not impair the function of surrounding structures, and blends well with adjacent skin.5 Consequently, the combination of pincushioning and webbing of a scar, especially in the nasal area, can pose a surgical challenge to the surgeon and can cause severe anxiety in the patient. In those circumstances, a single surgical technique is not likely to produce the revision with the best cosmetic outcome. Therefore, the synergy of 2 or more surgical techniques with proper planning and meticulous selection may be necessary. A broad knowledge of various scar revision techniques increases the surgeon’s capability to create the ideal scar.

Acknowledgment—The authors thank the case patient for granting permission to publish this information.

References
  1. Arginelli F, Salgarelli AC, Ferrari B, et al. Crescentic flap for the reconstruction of the nose after skin cancer resection. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016;44:703-707. doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2016.02.008
  2. Helml G, von Gregory HF, Amr A, et al. One-stage nasal soft tissue reconstruction with local flaps. Facial Plast Surg. 2014;30:260-267. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1376871
  3. Woodard CR. Complications in facial flap surgery. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2013;21:599-604. doi:10.1016/j.fsc.2013.07.009
  4. Brissett AE, Sherris DA. Scar contractures, hypertrophic scars, and keloids. Facial Plast Surg. 2001;17:263-272. doi:10.1055/s-2001-18827
  5. Pérez-Bustillo A, González-Sixto B, Rodríguez-Prieto MA. Surgical principles for achieving a functional and cosmetically acceptable scar. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2013;104:17-28. doi:10.1016/j.ad.2011.12.010
  6. Aasi SZ. Z-plasty made simple. Dermatol Res Pract. 2010;2010:982623. doi:10.1155/2010/982623
References
  1. Arginelli F, Salgarelli AC, Ferrari B, et al. Crescentic flap for the reconstruction of the nose after skin cancer resection. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016;44:703-707. doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2016.02.008
  2. Helml G, von Gregory HF, Amr A, et al. One-stage nasal soft tissue reconstruction with local flaps. Facial Plast Surg. 2014;30:260-267. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1376871
  3. Woodard CR. Complications in facial flap surgery. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2013;21:599-604. doi:10.1016/j.fsc.2013.07.009
  4. Brissett AE, Sherris DA. Scar contractures, hypertrophic scars, and keloids. Facial Plast Surg. 2001;17:263-272. doi:10.1055/s-2001-18827
  5. Pérez-Bustillo A, González-Sixto B, Rodríguez-Prieto MA. Surgical principles for achieving a functional and cosmetically acceptable scar. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2013;104:17-28. doi:10.1016/j.ad.2011.12.010
  6. Aasi SZ. Z-plasty made simple. Dermatol Res Pract. 2010;2010:982623. doi:10.1155/2010/982623
Issue
Cutis - 110(2)
Issue
Cutis - 110(2)
Page Number
86-87
Page Number
86-87
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
How to Address Scar Pincushioning and Webbing of the Nasal Dorsum Using Surgical Defatting and Z-plasty
Display Headline
How to Address Scar Pincushioning and Webbing of the Nasal Dorsum Using Surgical Defatting and Z-plasty
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Article PDF Media