User login
The Trump administration early on Jan. 11 initiated a pivotal change in the Medicaid program, announcing that
The announcement came in a 10-page memo with detailed directions about how states can reshape the federal-state health program for low-income people.
The document says who should be excluded from the new work requirements – including children and people being treated for opioid abuse – and offers suggestions as to what counts as “work.” Besides employment, it can include job training, volunteering, or caring for a close relative.
“Medicaid needs to be more flexible so that states can best address the needs of this population,” Seema Verma, administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, said in a press release. “Our fundamental goal is to make a positive and lasting difference in the health and wellness of our beneficiaries.”
Adding a work requirement to Medicaid would mark one of the biggest changes to the program since its inception in 1966. It is likely to prompt a lawsuit from patient advocacy groups, which claim the requirement is inconsistent with Medicaid’s objectives and would require an act of Congress.
Republicans have been pushing for the change since the Affordable Care Act added millions of so called “able-bodied” adults to Medicaid. It allowed states to provide coverage to anyone earning up to 138% of the federal poverty level (about $16,600 for an individual).
The Obama administration turned down several state requests to add a work requirement.
Ten states have applied for a federal waiver to add a work requirement – Arizona, Arkansas, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Utah and Wisconsin. Officials in several other states have said they are interested in the idea.
An HHS official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the official had not been authorized to discuss the developments, said the agency may approve Kentucky’s request as early asJan. 12. Gov. Matt Bevin, a Republican, first sought to add such a provision in 2016. The current request would require able-bodied adults without dependents to work at least 20 hours a week.
Kentucky, which has some of the poorest counties in the country, has seen its Medicaid enrollment double in the past 3 years after the state expanded eligibility under the ACA.
While more than 74 million people are enrolled in Medicaid, only a small fraction would be affected by the work requirement. That’s because children – who make up nearly half of Medicaid enrollees – are excluded. So are the more than 10 million people on Medicaid because they have a disability.
More than 4 in 10 adults with Medicaid coverage already work full time, and most others either go to school, take care of a relative, or are too sick to work.
Still, critics fear a work requirement could have a chilling effect on people signing up for Medicaid or make it harder for people to get coverage.
But work requirements have strong public backing. About 70% of Americans say they support states imposing a work requirement on non-disabled adults, according to a Kaiser Family Foundation poll last year.
The Trump administration, along with many Republican leaders in Congress, has long supported such a move. The failed efforts in the House to replace Obamacare included a work requirement for Medicaid.
In its guidance to states, CMS said they should consider how some communities have high unemployment rates and whether enrollees need to care for young children and elderly families.
CMS also advised states to make work requirements for Medicaid similar than those used with food stamps to “reduce the burden on both states and beneficiaries.”
“This new guidance paves the way for states to demonstrate how their ideas will improve the health of Medicaid beneficiaries, as well as potentially improve their economic well-being,” Brian Neale, CMS deputy administrator and director for the Center for Medicaid and CHIP Services, said in the press release.
Ms. Verma, who has said she doesn’t think Medicaid should become a way of life for people who are not disabled, said the new guidance shows how the administration is trying to give states more flexibility in running Medicaid.
“Our policy guidance was in response to states that asked us for the flexibility they need to improve their programs and to help people in achieving greater well-being and self-sufficiency,” she said.
Ms. Verma, who worked with Kentucky and Indiana on their work requirement waivers as a health consultant before joining the Trump administration, recused herself from the decision on those states’ waiver requests.
Kaiser Health News is a nonprofit news service covering health issues. It is an editorially independent program of the Kaiser Family Foundation that is not affiliated with Kaiser Permanente.
The Trump administration early on Jan. 11 initiated a pivotal change in the Medicaid program, announcing that
The announcement came in a 10-page memo with detailed directions about how states can reshape the federal-state health program for low-income people.
The document says who should be excluded from the new work requirements – including children and people being treated for opioid abuse – and offers suggestions as to what counts as “work.” Besides employment, it can include job training, volunteering, or caring for a close relative.
“Medicaid needs to be more flexible so that states can best address the needs of this population,” Seema Verma, administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, said in a press release. “Our fundamental goal is to make a positive and lasting difference in the health and wellness of our beneficiaries.”
Adding a work requirement to Medicaid would mark one of the biggest changes to the program since its inception in 1966. It is likely to prompt a lawsuit from patient advocacy groups, which claim the requirement is inconsistent with Medicaid’s objectives and would require an act of Congress.
Republicans have been pushing for the change since the Affordable Care Act added millions of so called “able-bodied” adults to Medicaid. It allowed states to provide coverage to anyone earning up to 138% of the federal poverty level (about $16,600 for an individual).
The Obama administration turned down several state requests to add a work requirement.
Ten states have applied for a federal waiver to add a work requirement – Arizona, Arkansas, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Utah and Wisconsin. Officials in several other states have said they are interested in the idea.
An HHS official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the official had not been authorized to discuss the developments, said the agency may approve Kentucky’s request as early asJan. 12. Gov. Matt Bevin, a Republican, first sought to add such a provision in 2016. The current request would require able-bodied adults without dependents to work at least 20 hours a week.
Kentucky, which has some of the poorest counties in the country, has seen its Medicaid enrollment double in the past 3 years after the state expanded eligibility under the ACA.
While more than 74 million people are enrolled in Medicaid, only a small fraction would be affected by the work requirement. That’s because children – who make up nearly half of Medicaid enrollees – are excluded. So are the more than 10 million people on Medicaid because they have a disability.
More than 4 in 10 adults with Medicaid coverage already work full time, and most others either go to school, take care of a relative, or are too sick to work.
Still, critics fear a work requirement could have a chilling effect on people signing up for Medicaid or make it harder for people to get coverage.
But work requirements have strong public backing. About 70% of Americans say they support states imposing a work requirement on non-disabled adults, according to a Kaiser Family Foundation poll last year.
The Trump administration, along with many Republican leaders in Congress, has long supported such a move. The failed efforts in the House to replace Obamacare included a work requirement for Medicaid.
In its guidance to states, CMS said they should consider how some communities have high unemployment rates and whether enrollees need to care for young children and elderly families.
CMS also advised states to make work requirements for Medicaid similar than those used with food stamps to “reduce the burden on both states and beneficiaries.”
“This new guidance paves the way for states to demonstrate how their ideas will improve the health of Medicaid beneficiaries, as well as potentially improve their economic well-being,” Brian Neale, CMS deputy administrator and director for the Center for Medicaid and CHIP Services, said in the press release.
Ms. Verma, who has said she doesn’t think Medicaid should become a way of life for people who are not disabled, said the new guidance shows how the administration is trying to give states more flexibility in running Medicaid.
“Our policy guidance was in response to states that asked us for the flexibility they need to improve their programs and to help people in achieving greater well-being and self-sufficiency,” she said.
Ms. Verma, who worked with Kentucky and Indiana on their work requirement waivers as a health consultant before joining the Trump administration, recused herself from the decision on those states’ waiver requests.
Kaiser Health News is a nonprofit news service covering health issues. It is an editorially independent program of the Kaiser Family Foundation that is not affiliated with Kaiser Permanente.
The Trump administration early on Jan. 11 initiated a pivotal change in the Medicaid program, announcing that
The announcement came in a 10-page memo with detailed directions about how states can reshape the federal-state health program for low-income people.
The document says who should be excluded from the new work requirements – including children and people being treated for opioid abuse – and offers suggestions as to what counts as “work.” Besides employment, it can include job training, volunteering, or caring for a close relative.
“Medicaid needs to be more flexible so that states can best address the needs of this population,” Seema Verma, administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, said in a press release. “Our fundamental goal is to make a positive and lasting difference in the health and wellness of our beneficiaries.”
Adding a work requirement to Medicaid would mark one of the biggest changes to the program since its inception in 1966. It is likely to prompt a lawsuit from patient advocacy groups, which claim the requirement is inconsistent with Medicaid’s objectives and would require an act of Congress.
Republicans have been pushing for the change since the Affordable Care Act added millions of so called “able-bodied” adults to Medicaid. It allowed states to provide coverage to anyone earning up to 138% of the federal poverty level (about $16,600 for an individual).
The Obama administration turned down several state requests to add a work requirement.
Ten states have applied for a federal waiver to add a work requirement – Arizona, Arkansas, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Utah and Wisconsin. Officials in several other states have said they are interested in the idea.
An HHS official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the official had not been authorized to discuss the developments, said the agency may approve Kentucky’s request as early asJan. 12. Gov. Matt Bevin, a Republican, first sought to add such a provision in 2016. The current request would require able-bodied adults without dependents to work at least 20 hours a week.
Kentucky, which has some of the poorest counties in the country, has seen its Medicaid enrollment double in the past 3 years after the state expanded eligibility under the ACA.
While more than 74 million people are enrolled in Medicaid, only a small fraction would be affected by the work requirement. That’s because children – who make up nearly half of Medicaid enrollees – are excluded. So are the more than 10 million people on Medicaid because they have a disability.
More than 4 in 10 adults with Medicaid coverage already work full time, and most others either go to school, take care of a relative, or are too sick to work.
Still, critics fear a work requirement could have a chilling effect on people signing up for Medicaid or make it harder for people to get coverage.
But work requirements have strong public backing. About 70% of Americans say they support states imposing a work requirement on non-disabled adults, according to a Kaiser Family Foundation poll last year.
The Trump administration, along with many Republican leaders in Congress, has long supported such a move. The failed efforts in the House to replace Obamacare included a work requirement for Medicaid.
In its guidance to states, CMS said they should consider how some communities have high unemployment rates and whether enrollees need to care for young children and elderly families.
CMS also advised states to make work requirements for Medicaid similar than those used with food stamps to “reduce the burden on both states and beneficiaries.”
“This new guidance paves the way for states to demonstrate how their ideas will improve the health of Medicaid beneficiaries, as well as potentially improve their economic well-being,” Brian Neale, CMS deputy administrator and director for the Center for Medicaid and CHIP Services, said in the press release.
Ms. Verma, who has said she doesn’t think Medicaid should become a way of life for people who are not disabled, said the new guidance shows how the administration is trying to give states more flexibility in running Medicaid.
“Our policy guidance was in response to states that asked us for the flexibility they need to improve their programs and to help people in achieving greater well-being and self-sufficiency,” she said.
Ms. Verma, who worked with Kentucky and Indiana on their work requirement waivers as a health consultant before joining the Trump administration, recused herself from the decision on those states’ waiver requests.
Kaiser Health News is a nonprofit news service covering health issues. It is an editorially independent program of the Kaiser Family Foundation that is not affiliated with Kaiser Permanente.