Commentary

Past, Present, and Future of Pediatric Atopic Dermatitis Management

Author and Disclosure Information

PRACTICE POINTS

  • Pediatric atopic dermatitis (AD) therapeutics have rapidly evolved over the last decade and dermatologists should be aware of new tools in their treatment arsenal.
  • New topical nonsteroidal agents serve as useful alternatives to topical corticosteroids through mitigating adverse effects from current standard therapy and potentially simplifying topical regimens.
  • Monoclonal antibodies and Janus kinase inhibitors are part of an important set of new systemic therapeutics for pediatric AD.
  • Long-term data on these new therapeutics is required to better understand their impact on pediatric AD comorbidities and impact on the longitudinal disease course.


 

References

Atopic dermatitis (AD), or eczema, is a common inflammatory skin disease notorious for its chronic, relapsing, and often frustrating disease course. Although as many as 25% of children in the United States are affected by this condition and its impact on the quality of life of affected patients and families is profound,1-3 therapeutic advances in the pediatric population have been fairly limited until recently.

Over the last 10 years, there has been robust investigation into pediatric AD therapeutics, with many topical and systemic medications either recently approved or under clinical investigation. These developments are changing the landscape of the management of pediatric AD and raise a set of fascinating questions about how early and aggressive intervention might change the course of this disease. We discuss current limitations in the field that may be addressed with additional research.

New Topical Medications

In the last several years, there has been a rapid increase in efforts to develop new topical agents to manage AD. Until the beginning of the 21st century, the dermatologist’s arsenal was limited to topical corticosteroids (TCs). In the early 2000s, attention shifted to topical calcineurin inhibitors as nonsteroidal alternatives when the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved topical tacrolimus and pimecrolimus for AD. In 2016, crisaborole (a phosphodiesterase-4 [PDE4] inhibitor) was approved by the FDA for use in mild to moderate AD in patients 2 years and older, marking a new age of development for topical AD therapies. In 2021, the FDA approved ruxolitinib (a topical Janus kinase [JAK] 1/2 inhibitor) for use in mild to moderate AD in patients 12 years and older.

Roflumilast (ARQ-151) and difamilast (OPA-15406)(members of the PDE4 inhibitor class) are undergoing investigation for pediatric AD. A phase 3 clinical trial for roflumilast for AD is underway (ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier: NCT04845620); it is already approved for psoriasis in patients 12 years and older. A phase 3 trial of difamilast (NCT03911401) was recently completed, with results supporting the drug’s safety and efficacy in AD management.4 Efforts to synthesize new better-targeted PDE4 inhibitors are ongoing.5

Tapinarof (a novel aryl hydrocarbon receptor-modulating agent) is approved for psoriasis in adults, and a phase 3 trial for management of pediatric AD is underway (NCT05032859) after phase 2 trials revealed promising results.6

Lastly, the microbiome is a target for AD topical therapies. A recently completed phase 1 trial of bacteriotherapy with Staphylococcus hominis A9 transplant lotion showed promising results (NCT03151148).7 Although this bacteriotherapy technique is early in development and has been studied only in adult patients, results are exciting because they represent a gateway to a largely unexplored realm of potential future therapies.

Standard of Care—How will these new topical therapies impact our standard of care for pediatric AD patients? Topical corticosteroids are still a pillar of topical AD therapy, but the potential for nonsteroidal topical agents as alternatives and used in combination therapeutic regimens has expanded exponentially. It is uncertain how we might individualize regimens tailored to patient-specific factors because the standard approach has been to test drugs as monotherapy, with vehicle comparisons or with reference medications in Europe.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Atopic dermatitis: Meta-analysis demonstrates efficacy of allergen immunotherapy
MDedge Dermatology
Meta-analysis demonstrates long-term atopic dermatitis prevention with L. rhamnosus probiotic
MDedge Dermatology
Dampness and mold increase risk for atopic dermatitis
MDedge Dermatology
Alcohol use disorder and atopic dermatitis: Is there a link?
MDedge Dermatology
Dupilumab-associated ocular surface disease in patients with AD: Unraveling the link
MDedge Dermatology
Remote assessment of atopic dermatitis is feasible with patient-provided images: Study
MDedge Dermatology
Commentary: Complementary treatments for AD, November 2022
MDedge Dermatology
An integrative approach to atopic dermatitis features a long list of options
MDedge Dermatology
Online support tool improves AD self-management
MDedge Dermatology
Rapid action or sustained effect? Methotrexate vs. ciclosporin for pediatric AD
MDedge Dermatology