User login
In Case You Missed It: COVID
Off-label meds: Promising long COVID treatments?
Those with long COVID for years now are engaging in robust online conversations about a range of treatments not formally approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the condition, reporting good and bad results.
High on the current list: low-dose naltrexone (LDN). A version of drug developed to help addicts has been shown to help some long COVID patients.
But evidence is building for other treatments, many of them targeted to treat brain fog or one of the other long-term symptoms in individuals 3 months or more after acute COVID infection.
Some patients are taking metformin, which studies have found to be effective at lowering long COVID risk. Paxlovid is being tested for long COVID. Antivirals are also on the list.
Alba Azola, MD, said she has treated long COVID patients with brain fog and dizziness who have postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS).
Dr. Azola said she asked the staff at Johns Hopkins Medicine in Baltimore, where she is a rehabilitation specialist, to teach her how to treat the condition. Since there is no approved treatment for POTS, that meant using off-label drugs, she said.
“It was super scary as a provider to start doing that, but my patients were suffering so much,” she said, noting the wait for patients to get into the POTS clinic at Hopkins was 2 years.
Dr. Azola was the lead author on guidelines published by the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (AAPM&R) last September on how to treat autonomic dysfunction, a common symptom of long COVID.
The guidelines she helped write include drugs designed for blood pressure – such as midodrine – and steroids.
Dr. Azola noted the medications are prescribed on a case-by-case basis because the same drug that works for one patient may have awful side effects for another patient, she said. At the same time, some of these drugs have helped her patients go back to living relatively normal lives.
The first time JD Davids of Brooklyn, N.Y., took LDN, it was for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and he couldn’t tolerate it. He had nightmares. But when he took it for long COVID, he started out at a low dose and worked his way up, at his doctor’s advice.
“It’s been a game-changer,” said Mr. Davids, cofounder of Long COVID Justice, an activist group. He has ME/CFS and several other chronic conditions, including long COVID. But, since he started taking LDN for long COVID, Mr. Davids said he has more energy and less pain.
Technically, evidence is required to show off-label drug use could be effective in treating conditions for which the drug is not formally approved. Research suggests that 20%-30% of drugs are prescribed off-label.
No formal data exist on how widespread the use of off-label drugs for long COVID may be. But LDN is a major topic of discussion on public patient groups on Facebook.
A recent study in The Lancet Infectious Diseases suggested that the diabetes drug metformin could be helpful. (The same study found no benefit from ivermectin, a drug since dismissed as a possible COVID treatment.)
Patients who testified at a virtual FDA hearing on drug development in April reported using vitamins, herbal supplements, over-the-counter medications and off-label drugs such as gabapentin and beta-blockers. Both of those drugs were on a list of potential treatments published in a January Nature Review article, along with LDN and Paxlovid.
Currently, Paxlovid is approved for acute COVID, and is in clinical trials as a treatment for long COVID as part of the federal government’s RECOVER Initiative. While only small studies of LDN have been conducted for long COVID, doctors are already prescribing the treatment. Mr. Davids said his primary care doctor recommended it.
Some doctors, such as Michael Peluso, MD, are comparing the trend to the early days of the AIDS epidemic, when the federal government was slow to recognize the viral disease. Patients banded together to protest and gain access to experimental treatments.
Dr. Peluso, who treats long COVID patients at the University of California, San Francisco, said that without any approved treatment, patients are turning to one another to find out what works.
“A lot of people experiencing long COVID are looking for ways to feel better now, rather than waiting for the science or the guidelines to catch up,” he said in an interview.
In some cases, the drugs are backed by small studies, he said.
“While we still need clinical trials to prove what will work, the drugs tested in these trials are also being informed by anecdotes shared by patients,” Dr. Peluso said.
Gail Van Norman, MD, of the University of Washington, Seattle, also said the long COVID situation today is reminiscent of the AIDS movement, which was “one of the times in history where we saw a real response to patient advocacy groups in terms of access to drugs.” Since then, the FDA has set up multiple programs to expand access to experimental drugs, added Dr. Van Norman, author of a recent study on off-label drug use.
But off-label use needs to be supervised by a physician, she and others said. Many patients get their information from social media, which Dr. Van Norman sees as a double-edged sword. Patients can share information, do their own research online, and alert practitioners to new findings, she said. But social media also promotes misinformation.
“People with no expertise have the same level of voice, and they are magnified,” Dr. Van Norman said.
The FDA requires doctors to have some evidence to support off-label use, she said. Doctors should talk to patients who want to try-off label drugs about what has been studied and what has not been studied.
“If I had [long COVID], I would be asking questions about all these drugs,” Dr. Van Norman said.
Mr. Davids has been asking questions like this for years. Diagnosed in 2019 with ME/CFS, he developed long COVID during the pandemic. Once he began started taking LDN, he started feeling better.
As someone with multiple chronic illnesses, Mr. Davids has tried a lot of treatments – he’s currently on two intravenous drugs and two compounded drugs, including LDN. But when his doctor first suggested it, he was wary.
“I’ve worked with her to help increase the dosage slowly over time,” he said. “It’s very important for many people to start low and slow and work their way up.”
He hears stories of people who can’t get it from their physicians. Some, he said, think it may be because of the association of the drug with opioid abuse.
Mr. Davids said long COVID patients have no other choice but to turn to alternative treatments.
“I think we’ve been ill-served by our research establishment,” he said. “It is not set up for complex chronic conditions.”
Mr. Davids said he doesn’t know if LDN helps with underlying conditions or treats the symptoms – such as pain and fatigue – that keep him from doing things such as typing.
“My understanding is that it may be doing both,” he said. “I sure am happy that it allows me to do things like keep my job.”
Dr. Azola and others said patients need to be monitored closely if they are taking an off-label drug. She recommends primary care doctors become familiar with them so they can offer patients some relief.
“It’s about the relationship between the patient and the provider and the provider being comfortable,” she said. “l was very transparent with my patients.”
A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.
Those with long COVID for years now are engaging in robust online conversations about a range of treatments not formally approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the condition, reporting good and bad results.
High on the current list: low-dose naltrexone (LDN). A version of drug developed to help addicts has been shown to help some long COVID patients.
But evidence is building for other treatments, many of them targeted to treat brain fog or one of the other long-term symptoms in individuals 3 months or more after acute COVID infection.
Some patients are taking metformin, which studies have found to be effective at lowering long COVID risk. Paxlovid is being tested for long COVID. Antivirals are also on the list.
Alba Azola, MD, said she has treated long COVID patients with brain fog and dizziness who have postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS).
Dr. Azola said she asked the staff at Johns Hopkins Medicine in Baltimore, where she is a rehabilitation specialist, to teach her how to treat the condition. Since there is no approved treatment for POTS, that meant using off-label drugs, she said.
“It was super scary as a provider to start doing that, but my patients were suffering so much,” she said, noting the wait for patients to get into the POTS clinic at Hopkins was 2 years.
Dr. Azola was the lead author on guidelines published by the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (AAPM&R) last September on how to treat autonomic dysfunction, a common symptom of long COVID.
The guidelines she helped write include drugs designed for blood pressure – such as midodrine – and steroids.
Dr. Azola noted the medications are prescribed on a case-by-case basis because the same drug that works for one patient may have awful side effects for another patient, she said. At the same time, some of these drugs have helped her patients go back to living relatively normal lives.
The first time JD Davids of Brooklyn, N.Y., took LDN, it was for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and he couldn’t tolerate it. He had nightmares. But when he took it for long COVID, he started out at a low dose and worked his way up, at his doctor’s advice.
“It’s been a game-changer,” said Mr. Davids, cofounder of Long COVID Justice, an activist group. He has ME/CFS and several other chronic conditions, including long COVID. But, since he started taking LDN for long COVID, Mr. Davids said he has more energy and less pain.
Technically, evidence is required to show off-label drug use could be effective in treating conditions for which the drug is not formally approved. Research suggests that 20%-30% of drugs are prescribed off-label.
No formal data exist on how widespread the use of off-label drugs for long COVID may be. But LDN is a major topic of discussion on public patient groups on Facebook.
A recent study in The Lancet Infectious Diseases suggested that the diabetes drug metformin could be helpful. (The same study found no benefit from ivermectin, a drug since dismissed as a possible COVID treatment.)
Patients who testified at a virtual FDA hearing on drug development in April reported using vitamins, herbal supplements, over-the-counter medications and off-label drugs such as gabapentin and beta-blockers. Both of those drugs were on a list of potential treatments published in a January Nature Review article, along with LDN and Paxlovid.
Currently, Paxlovid is approved for acute COVID, and is in clinical trials as a treatment for long COVID as part of the federal government’s RECOVER Initiative. While only small studies of LDN have been conducted for long COVID, doctors are already prescribing the treatment. Mr. Davids said his primary care doctor recommended it.
Some doctors, such as Michael Peluso, MD, are comparing the trend to the early days of the AIDS epidemic, when the federal government was slow to recognize the viral disease. Patients banded together to protest and gain access to experimental treatments.
Dr. Peluso, who treats long COVID patients at the University of California, San Francisco, said that without any approved treatment, patients are turning to one another to find out what works.
“A lot of people experiencing long COVID are looking for ways to feel better now, rather than waiting for the science or the guidelines to catch up,” he said in an interview.
In some cases, the drugs are backed by small studies, he said.
“While we still need clinical trials to prove what will work, the drugs tested in these trials are also being informed by anecdotes shared by patients,” Dr. Peluso said.
Gail Van Norman, MD, of the University of Washington, Seattle, also said the long COVID situation today is reminiscent of the AIDS movement, which was “one of the times in history where we saw a real response to patient advocacy groups in terms of access to drugs.” Since then, the FDA has set up multiple programs to expand access to experimental drugs, added Dr. Van Norman, author of a recent study on off-label drug use.
But off-label use needs to be supervised by a physician, she and others said. Many patients get their information from social media, which Dr. Van Norman sees as a double-edged sword. Patients can share information, do their own research online, and alert practitioners to new findings, she said. But social media also promotes misinformation.
“People with no expertise have the same level of voice, and they are magnified,” Dr. Van Norman said.
The FDA requires doctors to have some evidence to support off-label use, she said. Doctors should talk to patients who want to try-off label drugs about what has been studied and what has not been studied.
“If I had [long COVID], I would be asking questions about all these drugs,” Dr. Van Norman said.
Mr. Davids has been asking questions like this for years. Diagnosed in 2019 with ME/CFS, he developed long COVID during the pandemic. Once he began started taking LDN, he started feeling better.
As someone with multiple chronic illnesses, Mr. Davids has tried a lot of treatments – he’s currently on two intravenous drugs and two compounded drugs, including LDN. But when his doctor first suggested it, he was wary.
“I’ve worked with her to help increase the dosage slowly over time,” he said. “It’s very important for many people to start low and slow and work their way up.”
He hears stories of people who can’t get it from their physicians. Some, he said, think it may be because of the association of the drug with opioid abuse.
Mr. Davids said long COVID patients have no other choice but to turn to alternative treatments.
“I think we’ve been ill-served by our research establishment,” he said. “It is not set up for complex chronic conditions.”
Mr. Davids said he doesn’t know if LDN helps with underlying conditions or treats the symptoms – such as pain and fatigue – that keep him from doing things such as typing.
“My understanding is that it may be doing both,” he said. “I sure am happy that it allows me to do things like keep my job.”
Dr. Azola and others said patients need to be monitored closely if they are taking an off-label drug. She recommends primary care doctors become familiar with them so they can offer patients some relief.
“It’s about the relationship between the patient and the provider and the provider being comfortable,” she said. “l was very transparent with my patients.”
A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.
Those with long COVID for years now are engaging in robust online conversations about a range of treatments not formally approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the condition, reporting good and bad results.
High on the current list: low-dose naltrexone (LDN). A version of drug developed to help addicts has been shown to help some long COVID patients.
But evidence is building for other treatments, many of them targeted to treat brain fog or one of the other long-term symptoms in individuals 3 months or more after acute COVID infection.
Some patients are taking metformin, which studies have found to be effective at lowering long COVID risk. Paxlovid is being tested for long COVID. Antivirals are also on the list.
Alba Azola, MD, said she has treated long COVID patients with brain fog and dizziness who have postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS).
Dr. Azola said she asked the staff at Johns Hopkins Medicine in Baltimore, where she is a rehabilitation specialist, to teach her how to treat the condition. Since there is no approved treatment for POTS, that meant using off-label drugs, she said.
“It was super scary as a provider to start doing that, but my patients were suffering so much,” she said, noting the wait for patients to get into the POTS clinic at Hopkins was 2 years.
Dr. Azola was the lead author on guidelines published by the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (AAPM&R) last September on how to treat autonomic dysfunction, a common symptom of long COVID.
The guidelines she helped write include drugs designed for blood pressure – such as midodrine – and steroids.
Dr. Azola noted the medications are prescribed on a case-by-case basis because the same drug that works for one patient may have awful side effects for another patient, she said. At the same time, some of these drugs have helped her patients go back to living relatively normal lives.
The first time JD Davids of Brooklyn, N.Y., took LDN, it was for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and he couldn’t tolerate it. He had nightmares. But when he took it for long COVID, he started out at a low dose and worked his way up, at his doctor’s advice.
“It’s been a game-changer,” said Mr. Davids, cofounder of Long COVID Justice, an activist group. He has ME/CFS and several other chronic conditions, including long COVID. But, since he started taking LDN for long COVID, Mr. Davids said he has more energy and less pain.
Technically, evidence is required to show off-label drug use could be effective in treating conditions for which the drug is not formally approved. Research suggests that 20%-30% of drugs are prescribed off-label.
No formal data exist on how widespread the use of off-label drugs for long COVID may be. But LDN is a major topic of discussion on public patient groups on Facebook.
A recent study in The Lancet Infectious Diseases suggested that the diabetes drug metformin could be helpful. (The same study found no benefit from ivermectin, a drug since dismissed as a possible COVID treatment.)
Patients who testified at a virtual FDA hearing on drug development in April reported using vitamins, herbal supplements, over-the-counter medications and off-label drugs such as gabapentin and beta-blockers. Both of those drugs were on a list of potential treatments published in a January Nature Review article, along with LDN and Paxlovid.
Currently, Paxlovid is approved for acute COVID, and is in clinical trials as a treatment for long COVID as part of the federal government’s RECOVER Initiative. While only small studies of LDN have been conducted for long COVID, doctors are already prescribing the treatment. Mr. Davids said his primary care doctor recommended it.
Some doctors, such as Michael Peluso, MD, are comparing the trend to the early days of the AIDS epidemic, when the federal government was slow to recognize the viral disease. Patients banded together to protest and gain access to experimental treatments.
Dr. Peluso, who treats long COVID patients at the University of California, San Francisco, said that without any approved treatment, patients are turning to one another to find out what works.
“A lot of people experiencing long COVID are looking for ways to feel better now, rather than waiting for the science or the guidelines to catch up,” he said in an interview.
In some cases, the drugs are backed by small studies, he said.
“While we still need clinical trials to prove what will work, the drugs tested in these trials are also being informed by anecdotes shared by patients,” Dr. Peluso said.
Gail Van Norman, MD, of the University of Washington, Seattle, also said the long COVID situation today is reminiscent of the AIDS movement, which was “one of the times in history where we saw a real response to patient advocacy groups in terms of access to drugs.” Since then, the FDA has set up multiple programs to expand access to experimental drugs, added Dr. Van Norman, author of a recent study on off-label drug use.
But off-label use needs to be supervised by a physician, she and others said. Many patients get their information from social media, which Dr. Van Norman sees as a double-edged sword. Patients can share information, do their own research online, and alert practitioners to new findings, she said. But social media also promotes misinformation.
“People with no expertise have the same level of voice, and they are magnified,” Dr. Van Norman said.
The FDA requires doctors to have some evidence to support off-label use, she said. Doctors should talk to patients who want to try-off label drugs about what has been studied and what has not been studied.
“If I had [long COVID], I would be asking questions about all these drugs,” Dr. Van Norman said.
Mr. Davids has been asking questions like this for years. Diagnosed in 2019 with ME/CFS, he developed long COVID during the pandemic. Once he began started taking LDN, he started feeling better.
As someone with multiple chronic illnesses, Mr. Davids has tried a lot of treatments – he’s currently on two intravenous drugs and two compounded drugs, including LDN. But when his doctor first suggested it, he was wary.
“I’ve worked with her to help increase the dosage slowly over time,” he said. “It’s very important for many people to start low and slow and work their way up.”
He hears stories of people who can’t get it from their physicians. Some, he said, think it may be because of the association of the drug with opioid abuse.
Mr. Davids said long COVID patients have no other choice but to turn to alternative treatments.
“I think we’ve been ill-served by our research establishment,” he said. “It is not set up for complex chronic conditions.”
Mr. Davids said he doesn’t know if LDN helps with underlying conditions or treats the symptoms – such as pain and fatigue – that keep him from doing things such as typing.
“My understanding is that it may be doing both,” he said. “I sure am happy that it allows me to do things like keep my job.”
Dr. Azola and others said patients need to be monitored closely if they are taking an off-label drug. She recommends primary care doctors become familiar with them so they can offer patients some relief.
“It’s about the relationship between the patient and the provider and the provider being comfortable,” she said. “l was very transparent with my patients.”
A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.
New air monitor can detect COVID virus in 5 minutes
The project was a collaboration among researchers from the university’s engineering and medical schools; the results were published in Nature Communications.
One of the challenges the team had to overcome is that detecting the virus in a roomful of air “is like finding a needle in a haystack,” researcher and associate engineering professor Rajan Chakrabarty, PhD, said in a statement.
The team overcame that challenge using a technology called wet cyclone that samples the equivalent of 176 cubic feet of air in 5 minutes. A light on the device turns from green to red when the virus is detected, which the researchers said indicates that increased air circulation is needed.
The device stands just 10 inches tall and 1 foot wide and is considered a proof of concept. The next step would be to implement the technology into a prototype to see how a commercial or household design could be achieved. The researchers foresee potential for the device to be used in hospitals and schools, as well as to be able to detect other respiratory viruses such as influenza and respiratory syncytial virus.
Current methods used for detecting viruses in the air take between 1 and 24 hours to collect and analyze samples. The existing methods usually require skilled labor, resulting in a process that doesn’t allow for real-time information that could translate into reducing risk or the spread of the virus, the researchers wrote.
The team tested their device both in laboratory experiments where they released aerosolized SARS-CoV-2 into a room-sized chamber, as well as in the apartments of two people who were COVID positive.
“There is nothing at the moment that tells us how safe a room is,” Washington University neurology professor John Cirrito, PhD, said in a statement. “If you are in a room with 100 people, you don’t want to find out 5 days later whether you could be sick or not. The idea with this device is that you can know essentially in real time, or every 5 minutes, if there is a live virus in the air.”
Their goal is to develop a commercially available air quality monitor, the researchers said.
The study authors reported that they had no conflicts of interest.
A version of this article appeared on WebMD.com.
The project was a collaboration among researchers from the university’s engineering and medical schools; the results were published in Nature Communications.
One of the challenges the team had to overcome is that detecting the virus in a roomful of air “is like finding a needle in a haystack,” researcher and associate engineering professor Rajan Chakrabarty, PhD, said in a statement.
The team overcame that challenge using a technology called wet cyclone that samples the equivalent of 176 cubic feet of air in 5 minutes. A light on the device turns from green to red when the virus is detected, which the researchers said indicates that increased air circulation is needed.
The device stands just 10 inches tall and 1 foot wide and is considered a proof of concept. The next step would be to implement the technology into a prototype to see how a commercial or household design could be achieved. The researchers foresee potential for the device to be used in hospitals and schools, as well as to be able to detect other respiratory viruses such as influenza and respiratory syncytial virus.
Current methods used for detecting viruses in the air take between 1 and 24 hours to collect and analyze samples. The existing methods usually require skilled labor, resulting in a process that doesn’t allow for real-time information that could translate into reducing risk or the spread of the virus, the researchers wrote.
The team tested their device both in laboratory experiments where they released aerosolized SARS-CoV-2 into a room-sized chamber, as well as in the apartments of two people who were COVID positive.
“There is nothing at the moment that tells us how safe a room is,” Washington University neurology professor John Cirrito, PhD, said in a statement. “If you are in a room with 100 people, you don’t want to find out 5 days later whether you could be sick or not. The idea with this device is that you can know essentially in real time, or every 5 minutes, if there is a live virus in the air.”
Their goal is to develop a commercially available air quality monitor, the researchers said.
The study authors reported that they had no conflicts of interest.
A version of this article appeared on WebMD.com.
The project was a collaboration among researchers from the university’s engineering and medical schools; the results were published in Nature Communications.
One of the challenges the team had to overcome is that detecting the virus in a roomful of air “is like finding a needle in a haystack,” researcher and associate engineering professor Rajan Chakrabarty, PhD, said in a statement.
The team overcame that challenge using a technology called wet cyclone that samples the equivalent of 176 cubic feet of air in 5 minutes. A light on the device turns from green to red when the virus is detected, which the researchers said indicates that increased air circulation is needed.
The device stands just 10 inches tall and 1 foot wide and is considered a proof of concept. The next step would be to implement the technology into a prototype to see how a commercial or household design could be achieved. The researchers foresee potential for the device to be used in hospitals and schools, as well as to be able to detect other respiratory viruses such as influenza and respiratory syncytial virus.
Current methods used for detecting viruses in the air take between 1 and 24 hours to collect and analyze samples. The existing methods usually require skilled labor, resulting in a process that doesn’t allow for real-time information that could translate into reducing risk or the spread of the virus, the researchers wrote.
The team tested their device both in laboratory experiments where they released aerosolized SARS-CoV-2 into a room-sized chamber, as well as in the apartments of two people who were COVID positive.
“There is nothing at the moment that tells us how safe a room is,” Washington University neurology professor John Cirrito, PhD, said in a statement. “If you are in a room with 100 people, you don’t want to find out 5 days later whether you could be sick or not. The idea with this device is that you can know essentially in real time, or every 5 minutes, if there is a live virus in the air.”
Their goal is to develop a commercially available air quality monitor, the researchers said.
The study authors reported that they had no conflicts of interest.
A version of this article appeared on WebMD.com.
FROM NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Infection-related chronic illness: A new paradigm for research and treatment
Experience with long COVID has shone a spotlight on persistent Lyme disease and other often debilitating chronic illnesses that follow known or suspected infections – and on the urgent need for a common and well-funded research agenda, education of physicians, growth of multidisciplinary clinics, and financially supported clinical care.
“We critically need to understand the epidemiology and pathogenesis of chronic symptoms, and identify more effective ways to manage, treat, and potentially cure these illnesses,” Lyle Petersen, MD, MPH, director of the division of vector-borne diseases at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said at the start of a 2-day National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) workshop, “Toward a Common Research Agenda in Infection-Associated Chronic Illnesses.”
Thinking about infection-associated chronic illnesses as an entity – one predicated on commonalities in chronic symptoms and in leading hypotheses for causes – represents a paradigm shift that researchers and patient advocates said can avoid research redundancies and is essential to address what the NASEM calls an overlooked, growing public health problem.
An estimated 2 million people in the United States are living with what’s called posttreatment Lyme disease (PTLD) – a subset of patients with persistent or chronic Lyme disease – and an estimated 1.7-3.3 million people in the United States have diagnoses of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). More than 700,000 people are living with multiple sclerosis. And as of January 2023, 11% of people in the United States reported having long COVID symptoms; the incidence of long COVID is currently estimated at 10%-30% of nonhospitalized cases of COVID-19.
These illnesses “have come under one umbrella,” said Avindra Nath, MD, clinical director of the National Institute of Neurologic Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), Bethesda, Md.
To date, common ground in the literature has grown largely around long COVID and ME/CFS, the latter of which is often associated with a prior, often unidentified infection.
Symptoms of both have been “rigorously” studied and shown to have overlaps, and the illnesses appear to share underlying biologic abnormalities in metabolism and the gut microbiome, as well as viral reactivation and abnormalities in the immune system, central and autonomic nervous systems, and the cardiovascular and pulmonary systems, said Anthony L. Komaroff, MD, professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and a senior physician at Brigham & Women’s Hospital, both in Boston. (An estimated half of patients with long COVID meet the diagnostic criteria for ME/CFS.)
Although less thoroughly researched, similar symptoms are experienced by a subset of people following a variety of viral, bacterial, and protozoal infections, Dr. Komaroff said. To be determined, he said, is whether the pathophysiology believed to be shared by long COVID and ME/CFS is also shared with other postinfectious syndromes following acute illness with Ebola, West Nile, dengue, mycoplasma pneumonia, enteroviruses, and other pathogens, he said.
Persistent infection, viral reactivation
RNA viral infections can lead to persistent inflammation and dysregulated immunity, with or without viral persistence over time, Timothy J. Henrich, MD, MMSc, associate professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, said in a keynote address.
Research on Ebola survivors has documented long-lasting inflammation and severe immune dysfunction 2 years after infection, for instance. And it’s well known that HIV-1 leads to aberrant immune responses, inflammation, and organ damage despite antiretroviral therapy, said Dr. Henrich, who leads a laboratory/research group that studies approaches to HIV-1 cure and PET-based imaging approaches to characterize viral reservoirs and immune sequelae.
Viral persistence, which can be difficult to measure, has also been documented in Ebola survivors. And in patients living with HIV-1, HIV-1 RNA and protein expression have been shown to persist, again despite antiretroviral therapy. The UCSF Long-Term Immunological Impact of Novel Coronavirus (LIINC) study, for which Dr. Henrich is the principal investigator, found spike RNA in colorectal tissue more than 22 months post COVID, and other research documented viral protein in gut tissue for up to 6 months, he said.
“I think we’re appreciating now, in at least the scientific and treatment community, that there’s a potential for ‘acute’ infections to exhibit some degree of persistence leading to clinical morbidity,” said Dr. Henrich, one of several speakers to describe reports of pathogen persistence. Regarding long COVID, its “etiology is likely heterogeneous,” he said, but persistence of SARS-CoV-2 “may lay behind” other described mechanisms, from clotting/microvascular dysfunction to inflammation and tissue damage to immune dysregulation.
Reactivation of existing latent viral infections in the setting of new acute microbial illness may also play an etiologic role in chronic illnesses, Dr. Henrich said. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation has been shown in some studies, including their UCSF COVID-19 cohort, to be associated with long COVID.
“Physicians have been trained to be skeptical about the role [of latent viral infections],” Michael Peluso, MD, an infectious disease physician and assistant professor at UCSF, said during a talk on viral reactivation. This skepticism needs to be “reexamined and overcome,” he said.
Herpesviruses have frequently been associated with ME/CFS, he noted. And evidence of a strong association between EBV and multiple sclerosis came recently from a prospective study of 10 million military recruits that found a 32-fold increased risk of MS after EBV infection but no increase after infection with other viruses, Dr. Peluso and Dr. Henrich both noted.
Research needs, treatment trials
Research needs are vast: The need to learn more about the mechanisms of pathogen persistence and immune evasion, for instance, and the need for more biomarker studies, more imaging studies and tissue analyses, more study of microbiome composition and activity, and continued development and application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing.
Workshop participants also spoke of the need to better understand the molecular mimicry that can occur between pathogen-produced proteins and self-antigens, for instance, and the effects of inflammation and infection-related immune changes on neuronal and microglial function in the brain.
“We should perform similar forms of analysis [across] patients with different infection-associated chronic conditions,” said Amy Proal, PhD, president of the PolyBio Research Foundation, which funds research on infection-associated chronic infections. And within individual conditions and well-characterized study groups “we should perform many different forms of analysis … so we can define endotypes and get more solid biomarkers so that industry [will have more confidence] to run clinical trials.”
In the meantime, patients need fast-moving treatment trials for long COVID, long Lyme, and other infection-associated chronic illnesses, speakers emphasized. “We all agree that treatment trials are overdue,” said the NINDS’ Dr. Nath. “We can’t afford to wait for another decade until we understand all the mechanisms, but rather we can do clinical trials based on what we understand now and study the pathophysiology in the context of the clinical trials.”
Just as was done with HIV, said Steven G. Deeks, MD, professor of medicine at UCSF, researchers must “practice experimental medicine” and select pathways and mechanisms of interest, interrupt those pathways in a controlled manner, and assess impact. “Much of this can be done by repurposing existing drugs,” he said, like antivirals for persistent viral infection, EBV-directed therapies for EBV reactivation, anti-inflammatory drugs for inflammation, B–cell-directed therapies for autoantibodies, and antiplatelet drugs for microvascular disease.
When done correctly, he said, such “probe” studies can deepen mechanistic understandings, lead to biomarkers, and provide proof-of-concept that “will encourage massive investment in developing new therapies” for long COVID and other infection-associated chronic illnesses.
Trials of treatments for long COVID “are starting, so I’m optimistic,” said Dr. Deeks, an expert on HIV pathogenesis and treatment and a principal investigator of the Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery (RECOVER) study. Among the trials: A study of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) for neurologic long COVID; a study of an anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibody that can deplete tissue/cellular reservoirs of viral particles (replicating or not); and a study evaluating baricitinib (Olumiant), a Janus kinase inhibitor, for neurocognitive impairment and cardiopulmonary symptoms of long COVID.
Alessio Fasano, MD, professor of pediatrics at Harvard Medical School and professor of nutrition at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, described at the workshop how he began investigating the use of larazotide acetate – an inhibitor of the protein zonulin, which increases intestinal permeability – in children with COVID-19 Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome (MIS-C) after learning that SARS-CoV-2 viral particles persist in the gastrointestinal tract, causing dysbiosis and zonulin upregulation.
In an ongoing phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, the agent thus far has expedited the resolution of gastrointestinal symptoms and clearance of spike protein from the circulation, he said. A phase 2 trial of the agent for pediatric patients with long COVID and SARS-CoV-2 antigenemia is underway. “What if we were to stop [chains of events] by stopping the passage of elements from the virus into circulation?’ he said.
In the realm of Lyme disease, a recently launched Clinical Trials Network for Lyme and Other Tick-Borne Diseases has awarded pilot study grants to evaluate treatments aimed at a variety of possible disease mechanisms that, notably, are similar to those of other chronic illnesses: persistence of infection or remnants of infection, immune dysregulation and autoimmune reactions, neural dysfunction, and gut microbiome changes. (Microclots and mitochondrial dysfunction have not been as well studied in Lyme.)
Current and upcoming studies include evaluations of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation for those with persistent Lyme fatigue, transcranial direct current stimulation with cognitive retraining for Lyme brain fog, and tetracycline for PTLD, said Brian Fallon, MD, MPH, professor of clinical psychiatry at Columbia University, New York, who directs the Lyme & Tick-Borne Diseases Research Center and the coordinating center of the new network.
Moving forward, he said, it is important to loosen exclusion criteria and include patients with “probable or possible” Lyme and those with suspected infections with other tick-borne pathogens. All told, these patients comprise a large portion of those with chronic symptoms and have been neglected in an already thin research space, Dr. Fallon said, noting that “there haven’t been any clinical trials of posttreatment Lyme disease in ages – in 10-15 years.”
(PTLD refers to symptoms lasting for more than 6 months after the completion of standard Infectious Diseases Society of America–recommended antibiotic protocols. It occurs in about 15% of patients, said John Aucott, MD, director of the Johns Hopkins Lyme Disease Research Center, Baltimore, a member of the new clinical trials network.)
Calls for a new NIH center and patient involvement
Patients and patient advocacy organizations have played a vital role in research thus far: They’ve documented post-COVID symptoms that academic researchers said they would not otherwise have known of. Leaders of the Patient-Led Research Collaborative have coauthored published reviews with leading long COVID experts. And patients with tick-borne illnesses have enrolled in the MyLymeData patient registry run by LymeDisease.org, which has documented patient-experienced efficacy of alternative treatments and described antibiotic responders and nonresponders.
At the workshop, they shared findings alongside academic experts, and researchers called for their continued involvement. “Patient engagement at every step of the research process is critical,” Dr. Nath said.
“We need to ensure that research is reflective of lived experiences … and [that we’re] accelerating clinical trials of therapeutics that are of priority to the patient community,” said Lisa McCorkell, cofounder of the long COVID-focused Patient-Led Research Collaborative.
Ms. McCorkell also called for the creation of an office for infection-associated chronic illnesses in the NIH director’s office. Others voiced their support. “I think it’s a great idea to have an NIH center for infection-associated chronic illnesses,” said Dr. Fallon. “I think it would have a profound impact.”
The other great need, of course, is funding. “We have ideas, we have drugs that can be repurposed, we have a highly informed and engaged community that will enroll in and be retained in studies, and we have outcomes we can measure,” Dr. Deeks said. “What we’re missing is industry engagement and funding. We need massive engagement from the NIH.”
Real-world treatment needs
In the meantime, patients are seeking treatment, and “clinicians need to have uncertainty tolerance” and try multiple treatments simultaneously, said David Putrino, PT, PhD, director of rehabilitation innovation for the Mount Sinai Health System and professor of rehabilitation and human performance at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York. He oversees a multidisciplinary hybrid clinical care research center that has seen over 1,500 patients with long COVID and is beginning to see patients with other infection-associated chronic illnesses.
It’s a model that should be replicated to help fill the “enormous unmet clinical need” of patients with infection-associated chronic illness, said Peter Rowe, MD, professor of pediatrics at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and an expert on ME/CFS. And “as we request [more research funding], we will also need [financial] support for clinical care,” he emphasized, to provide equitable access for patients and to attract treating physicians.
Moreover, said Linda Geng, MD, PhD, the culture of stigma needs to change. Right now, patients with long COVID often feel dismissed not only by friends, families, and coworkers, but by clinicians who find it find it hard “to grasp that this is real and a biological condition.”
And it’s not just conditions such as long COVID that are stigmatized, but treatments as well, she said. For instance, some clinicians view low-dose naltrexone, a treatment increasingly being used for inflammation, with suspicion because it is used for opioid use disorder and alcohol use disorder – or because the “low-dose” label summons mistrust of homeopathy. “Even with therapies, there are preconceived notions and biases,” said Dr. Geng, cofounder and codirector of the Stanford (Calif.) Long COVID program.
“What almost killed me,” said Meghan O’Rourke, who has ongoing effects from long-undiagnosed tick-borne illness, “was the invisibility of the illness.” Ms. O’Rourke teaches at Yale University and is the author of “The Invisible Kingdom: Reimagining Chronic Illness.”
Teaching young physicians about these illnesses would help, she and others said. During a question and answer session, Dr. Putrino shared that the Icahn School of Medicine has recently committed to “create a complex chronic illness medical curriculum” that will impact medical education from the first year of medical school through residencies. Dr. Putrino said his team is also working on materials to help other clinics develop care models similar to those at his Mount Sinai clinic.
The NASEM workshop did not collect or require disclosures of its participants.
Experience with long COVID has shone a spotlight on persistent Lyme disease and other often debilitating chronic illnesses that follow known or suspected infections – and on the urgent need for a common and well-funded research agenda, education of physicians, growth of multidisciplinary clinics, and financially supported clinical care.
“We critically need to understand the epidemiology and pathogenesis of chronic symptoms, and identify more effective ways to manage, treat, and potentially cure these illnesses,” Lyle Petersen, MD, MPH, director of the division of vector-borne diseases at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said at the start of a 2-day National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) workshop, “Toward a Common Research Agenda in Infection-Associated Chronic Illnesses.”
Thinking about infection-associated chronic illnesses as an entity – one predicated on commonalities in chronic symptoms and in leading hypotheses for causes – represents a paradigm shift that researchers and patient advocates said can avoid research redundancies and is essential to address what the NASEM calls an overlooked, growing public health problem.
An estimated 2 million people in the United States are living with what’s called posttreatment Lyme disease (PTLD) – a subset of patients with persistent or chronic Lyme disease – and an estimated 1.7-3.3 million people in the United States have diagnoses of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). More than 700,000 people are living with multiple sclerosis. And as of January 2023, 11% of people in the United States reported having long COVID symptoms; the incidence of long COVID is currently estimated at 10%-30% of nonhospitalized cases of COVID-19.
These illnesses “have come under one umbrella,” said Avindra Nath, MD, clinical director of the National Institute of Neurologic Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), Bethesda, Md.
To date, common ground in the literature has grown largely around long COVID and ME/CFS, the latter of which is often associated with a prior, often unidentified infection.
Symptoms of both have been “rigorously” studied and shown to have overlaps, and the illnesses appear to share underlying biologic abnormalities in metabolism and the gut microbiome, as well as viral reactivation and abnormalities in the immune system, central and autonomic nervous systems, and the cardiovascular and pulmonary systems, said Anthony L. Komaroff, MD, professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and a senior physician at Brigham & Women’s Hospital, both in Boston. (An estimated half of patients with long COVID meet the diagnostic criteria for ME/CFS.)
Although less thoroughly researched, similar symptoms are experienced by a subset of people following a variety of viral, bacterial, and protozoal infections, Dr. Komaroff said. To be determined, he said, is whether the pathophysiology believed to be shared by long COVID and ME/CFS is also shared with other postinfectious syndromes following acute illness with Ebola, West Nile, dengue, mycoplasma pneumonia, enteroviruses, and other pathogens, he said.
Persistent infection, viral reactivation
RNA viral infections can lead to persistent inflammation and dysregulated immunity, with or without viral persistence over time, Timothy J. Henrich, MD, MMSc, associate professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, said in a keynote address.
Research on Ebola survivors has documented long-lasting inflammation and severe immune dysfunction 2 years after infection, for instance. And it’s well known that HIV-1 leads to aberrant immune responses, inflammation, and organ damage despite antiretroviral therapy, said Dr. Henrich, who leads a laboratory/research group that studies approaches to HIV-1 cure and PET-based imaging approaches to characterize viral reservoirs and immune sequelae.
Viral persistence, which can be difficult to measure, has also been documented in Ebola survivors. And in patients living with HIV-1, HIV-1 RNA and protein expression have been shown to persist, again despite antiretroviral therapy. The UCSF Long-Term Immunological Impact of Novel Coronavirus (LIINC) study, for which Dr. Henrich is the principal investigator, found spike RNA in colorectal tissue more than 22 months post COVID, and other research documented viral protein in gut tissue for up to 6 months, he said.
“I think we’re appreciating now, in at least the scientific and treatment community, that there’s a potential for ‘acute’ infections to exhibit some degree of persistence leading to clinical morbidity,” said Dr. Henrich, one of several speakers to describe reports of pathogen persistence. Regarding long COVID, its “etiology is likely heterogeneous,” he said, but persistence of SARS-CoV-2 “may lay behind” other described mechanisms, from clotting/microvascular dysfunction to inflammation and tissue damage to immune dysregulation.
Reactivation of existing latent viral infections in the setting of new acute microbial illness may also play an etiologic role in chronic illnesses, Dr. Henrich said. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation has been shown in some studies, including their UCSF COVID-19 cohort, to be associated with long COVID.
“Physicians have been trained to be skeptical about the role [of latent viral infections],” Michael Peluso, MD, an infectious disease physician and assistant professor at UCSF, said during a talk on viral reactivation. This skepticism needs to be “reexamined and overcome,” he said.
Herpesviruses have frequently been associated with ME/CFS, he noted. And evidence of a strong association between EBV and multiple sclerosis came recently from a prospective study of 10 million military recruits that found a 32-fold increased risk of MS after EBV infection but no increase after infection with other viruses, Dr. Peluso and Dr. Henrich both noted.
Research needs, treatment trials
Research needs are vast: The need to learn more about the mechanisms of pathogen persistence and immune evasion, for instance, and the need for more biomarker studies, more imaging studies and tissue analyses, more study of microbiome composition and activity, and continued development and application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing.
Workshop participants also spoke of the need to better understand the molecular mimicry that can occur between pathogen-produced proteins and self-antigens, for instance, and the effects of inflammation and infection-related immune changes on neuronal and microglial function in the brain.
“We should perform similar forms of analysis [across] patients with different infection-associated chronic conditions,” said Amy Proal, PhD, president of the PolyBio Research Foundation, which funds research on infection-associated chronic infections. And within individual conditions and well-characterized study groups “we should perform many different forms of analysis … so we can define endotypes and get more solid biomarkers so that industry [will have more confidence] to run clinical trials.”
In the meantime, patients need fast-moving treatment trials for long COVID, long Lyme, and other infection-associated chronic illnesses, speakers emphasized. “We all agree that treatment trials are overdue,” said the NINDS’ Dr. Nath. “We can’t afford to wait for another decade until we understand all the mechanisms, but rather we can do clinical trials based on what we understand now and study the pathophysiology in the context of the clinical trials.”
Just as was done with HIV, said Steven G. Deeks, MD, professor of medicine at UCSF, researchers must “practice experimental medicine” and select pathways and mechanisms of interest, interrupt those pathways in a controlled manner, and assess impact. “Much of this can be done by repurposing existing drugs,” he said, like antivirals for persistent viral infection, EBV-directed therapies for EBV reactivation, anti-inflammatory drugs for inflammation, B–cell-directed therapies for autoantibodies, and antiplatelet drugs for microvascular disease.
When done correctly, he said, such “probe” studies can deepen mechanistic understandings, lead to biomarkers, and provide proof-of-concept that “will encourage massive investment in developing new therapies” for long COVID and other infection-associated chronic illnesses.
Trials of treatments for long COVID “are starting, so I’m optimistic,” said Dr. Deeks, an expert on HIV pathogenesis and treatment and a principal investigator of the Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery (RECOVER) study. Among the trials: A study of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) for neurologic long COVID; a study of an anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibody that can deplete tissue/cellular reservoirs of viral particles (replicating or not); and a study evaluating baricitinib (Olumiant), a Janus kinase inhibitor, for neurocognitive impairment and cardiopulmonary symptoms of long COVID.
Alessio Fasano, MD, professor of pediatrics at Harvard Medical School and professor of nutrition at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, described at the workshop how he began investigating the use of larazotide acetate – an inhibitor of the protein zonulin, which increases intestinal permeability – in children with COVID-19 Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome (MIS-C) after learning that SARS-CoV-2 viral particles persist in the gastrointestinal tract, causing dysbiosis and zonulin upregulation.
In an ongoing phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, the agent thus far has expedited the resolution of gastrointestinal symptoms and clearance of spike protein from the circulation, he said. A phase 2 trial of the agent for pediatric patients with long COVID and SARS-CoV-2 antigenemia is underway. “What if we were to stop [chains of events] by stopping the passage of elements from the virus into circulation?’ he said.
In the realm of Lyme disease, a recently launched Clinical Trials Network for Lyme and Other Tick-Borne Diseases has awarded pilot study grants to evaluate treatments aimed at a variety of possible disease mechanisms that, notably, are similar to those of other chronic illnesses: persistence of infection or remnants of infection, immune dysregulation and autoimmune reactions, neural dysfunction, and gut microbiome changes. (Microclots and mitochondrial dysfunction have not been as well studied in Lyme.)
Current and upcoming studies include evaluations of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation for those with persistent Lyme fatigue, transcranial direct current stimulation with cognitive retraining for Lyme brain fog, and tetracycline for PTLD, said Brian Fallon, MD, MPH, professor of clinical psychiatry at Columbia University, New York, who directs the Lyme & Tick-Borne Diseases Research Center and the coordinating center of the new network.
Moving forward, he said, it is important to loosen exclusion criteria and include patients with “probable or possible” Lyme and those with suspected infections with other tick-borne pathogens. All told, these patients comprise a large portion of those with chronic symptoms and have been neglected in an already thin research space, Dr. Fallon said, noting that “there haven’t been any clinical trials of posttreatment Lyme disease in ages – in 10-15 years.”
(PTLD refers to symptoms lasting for more than 6 months after the completion of standard Infectious Diseases Society of America–recommended antibiotic protocols. It occurs in about 15% of patients, said John Aucott, MD, director of the Johns Hopkins Lyme Disease Research Center, Baltimore, a member of the new clinical trials network.)
Calls for a new NIH center and patient involvement
Patients and patient advocacy organizations have played a vital role in research thus far: They’ve documented post-COVID symptoms that academic researchers said they would not otherwise have known of. Leaders of the Patient-Led Research Collaborative have coauthored published reviews with leading long COVID experts. And patients with tick-borne illnesses have enrolled in the MyLymeData patient registry run by LymeDisease.org, which has documented patient-experienced efficacy of alternative treatments and described antibiotic responders and nonresponders.
At the workshop, they shared findings alongside academic experts, and researchers called for their continued involvement. “Patient engagement at every step of the research process is critical,” Dr. Nath said.
“We need to ensure that research is reflective of lived experiences … and [that we’re] accelerating clinical trials of therapeutics that are of priority to the patient community,” said Lisa McCorkell, cofounder of the long COVID-focused Patient-Led Research Collaborative.
Ms. McCorkell also called for the creation of an office for infection-associated chronic illnesses in the NIH director’s office. Others voiced their support. “I think it’s a great idea to have an NIH center for infection-associated chronic illnesses,” said Dr. Fallon. “I think it would have a profound impact.”
The other great need, of course, is funding. “We have ideas, we have drugs that can be repurposed, we have a highly informed and engaged community that will enroll in and be retained in studies, and we have outcomes we can measure,” Dr. Deeks said. “What we’re missing is industry engagement and funding. We need massive engagement from the NIH.”
Real-world treatment needs
In the meantime, patients are seeking treatment, and “clinicians need to have uncertainty tolerance” and try multiple treatments simultaneously, said David Putrino, PT, PhD, director of rehabilitation innovation for the Mount Sinai Health System and professor of rehabilitation and human performance at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York. He oversees a multidisciplinary hybrid clinical care research center that has seen over 1,500 patients with long COVID and is beginning to see patients with other infection-associated chronic illnesses.
It’s a model that should be replicated to help fill the “enormous unmet clinical need” of patients with infection-associated chronic illness, said Peter Rowe, MD, professor of pediatrics at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and an expert on ME/CFS. And “as we request [more research funding], we will also need [financial] support for clinical care,” he emphasized, to provide equitable access for patients and to attract treating physicians.
Moreover, said Linda Geng, MD, PhD, the culture of stigma needs to change. Right now, patients with long COVID often feel dismissed not only by friends, families, and coworkers, but by clinicians who find it find it hard “to grasp that this is real and a biological condition.”
And it’s not just conditions such as long COVID that are stigmatized, but treatments as well, she said. For instance, some clinicians view low-dose naltrexone, a treatment increasingly being used for inflammation, with suspicion because it is used for opioid use disorder and alcohol use disorder – or because the “low-dose” label summons mistrust of homeopathy. “Even with therapies, there are preconceived notions and biases,” said Dr. Geng, cofounder and codirector of the Stanford (Calif.) Long COVID program.
“What almost killed me,” said Meghan O’Rourke, who has ongoing effects from long-undiagnosed tick-borne illness, “was the invisibility of the illness.” Ms. O’Rourke teaches at Yale University and is the author of “The Invisible Kingdom: Reimagining Chronic Illness.”
Teaching young physicians about these illnesses would help, she and others said. During a question and answer session, Dr. Putrino shared that the Icahn School of Medicine has recently committed to “create a complex chronic illness medical curriculum” that will impact medical education from the first year of medical school through residencies. Dr. Putrino said his team is also working on materials to help other clinics develop care models similar to those at his Mount Sinai clinic.
The NASEM workshop did not collect or require disclosures of its participants.
Experience with long COVID has shone a spotlight on persistent Lyme disease and other often debilitating chronic illnesses that follow known or suspected infections – and on the urgent need for a common and well-funded research agenda, education of physicians, growth of multidisciplinary clinics, and financially supported clinical care.
“We critically need to understand the epidemiology and pathogenesis of chronic symptoms, and identify more effective ways to manage, treat, and potentially cure these illnesses,” Lyle Petersen, MD, MPH, director of the division of vector-borne diseases at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said at the start of a 2-day National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) workshop, “Toward a Common Research Agenda in Infection-Associated Chronic Illnesses.”
Thinking about infection-associated chronic illnesses as an entity – one predicated on commonalities in chronic symptoms and in leading hypotheses for causes – represents a paradigm shift that researchers and patient advocates said can avoid research redundancies and is essential to address what the NASEM calls an overlooked, growing public health problem.
An estimated 2 million people in the United States are living with what’s called posttreatment Lyme disease (PTLD) – a subset of patients with persistent or chronic Lyme disease – and an estimated 1.7-3.3 million people in the United States have diagnoses of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). More than 700,000 people are living with multiple sclerosis. And as of January 2023, 11% of people in the United States reported having long COVID symptoms; the incidence of long COVID is currently estimated at 10%-30% of nonhospitalized cases of COVID-19.
These illnesses “have come under one umbrella,” said Avindra Nath, MD, clinical director of the National Institute of Neurologic Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), Bethesda, Md.
To date, common ground in the literature has grown largely around long COVID and ME/CFS, the latter of which is often associated with a prior, often unidentified infection.
Symptoms of both have been “rigorously” studied and shown to have overlaps, and the illnesses appear to share underlying biologic abnormalities in metabolism and the gut microbiome, as well as viral reactivation and abnormalities in the immune system, central and autonomic nervous systems, and the cardiovascular and pulmonary systems, said Anthony L. Komaroff, MD, professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and a senior physician at Brigham & Women’s Hospital, both in Boston. (An estimated half of patients with long COVID meet the diagnostic criteria for ME/CFS.)
Although less thoroughly researched, similar symptoms are experienced by a subset of people following a variety of viral, bacterial, and protozoal infections, Dr. Komaroff said. To be determined, he said, is whether the pathophysiology believed to be shared by long COVID and ME/CFS is also shared with other postinfectious syndromes following acute illness with Ebola, West Nile, dengue, mycoplasma pneumonia, enteroviruses, and other pathogens, he said.
Persistent infection, viral reactivation
RNA viral infections can lead to persistent inflammation and dysregulated immunity, with or without viral persistence over time, Timothy J. Henrich, MD, MMSc, associate professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, said in a keynote address.
Research on Ebola survivors has documented long-lasting inflammation and severe immune dysfunction 2 years after infection, for instance. And it’s well known that HIV-1 leads to aberrant immune responses, inflammation, and organ damage despite antiretroviral therapy, said Dr. Henrich, who leads a laboratory/research group that studies approaches to HIV-1 cure and PET-based imaging approaches to characterize viral reservoirs and immune sequelae.
Viral persistence, which can be difficult to measure, has also been documented in Ebola survivors. And in patients living with HIV-1, HIV-1 RNA and protein expression have been shown to persist, again despite antiretroviral therapy. The UCSF Long-Term Immunological Impact of Novel Coronavirus (LIINC) study, for which Dr. Henrich is the principal investigator, found spike RNA in colorectal tissue more than 22 months post COVID, and other research documented viral protein in gut tissue for up to 6 months, he said.
“I think we’re appreciating now, in at least the scientific and treatment community, that there’s a potential for ‘acute’ infections to exhibit some degree of persistence leading to clinical morbidity,” said Dr. Henrich, one of several speakers to describe reports of pathogen persistence. Regarding long COVID, its “etiology is likely heterogeneous,” he said, but persistence of SARS-CoV-2 “may lay behind” other described mechanisms, from clotting/microvascular dysfunction to inflammation and tissue damage to immune dysregulation.
Reactivation of existing latent viral infections in the setting of new acute microbial illness may also play an etiologic role in chronic illnesses, Dr. Henrich said. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation has been shown in some studies, including their UCSF COVID-19 cohort, to be associated with long COVID.
“Physicians have been trained to be skeptical about the role [of latent viral infections],” Michael Peluso, MD, an infectious disease physician and assistant professor at UCSF, said during a talk on viral reactivation. This skepticism needs to be “reexamined and overcome,” he said.
Herpesviruses have frequently been associated with ME/CFS, he noted. And evidence of a strong association between EBV and multiple sclerosis came recently from a prospective study of 10 million military recruits that found a 32-fold increased risk of MS after EBV infection but no increase after infection with other viruses, Dr. Peluso and Dr. Henrich both noted.
Research needs, treatment trials
Research needs are vast: The need to learn more about the mechanisms of pathogen persistence and immune evasion, for instance, and the need for more biomarker studies, more imaging studies and tissue analyses, more study of microbiome composition and activity, and continued development and application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing.
Workshop participants also spoke of the need to better understand the molecular mimicry that can occur between pathogen-produced proteins and self-antigens, for instance, and the effects of inflammation and infection-related immune changes on neuronal and microglial function in the brain.
“We should perform similar forms of analysis [across] patients with different infection-associated chronic conditions,” said Amy Proal, PhD, president of the PolyBio Research Foundation, which funds research on infection-associated chronic infections. And within individual conditions and well-characterized study groups “we should perform many different forms of analysis … so we can define endotypes and get more solid biomarkers so that industry [will have more confidence] to run clinical trials.”
In the meantime, patients need fast-moving treatment trials for long COVID, long Lyme, and other infection-associated chronic illnesses, speakers emphasized. “We all agree that treatment trials are overdue,” said the NINDS’ Dr. Nath. “We can’t afford to wait for another decade until we understand all the mechanisms, but rather we can do clinical trials based on what we understand now and study the pathophysiology in the context of the clinical trials.”
Just as was done with HIV, said Steven G. Deeks, MD, professor of medicine at UCSF, researchers must “practice experimental medicine” and select pathways and mechanisms of interest, interrupt those pathways in a controlled manner, and assess impact. “Much of this can be done by repurposing existing drugs,” he said, like antivirals for persistent viral infection, EBV-directed therapies for EBV reactivation, anti-inflammatory drugs for inflammation, B–cell-directed therapies for autoantibodies, and antiplatelet drugs for microvascular disease.
When done correctly, he said, such “probe” studies can deepen mechanistic understandings, lead to biomarkers, and provide proof-of-concept that “will encourage massive investment in developing new therapies” for long COVID and other infection-associated chronic illnesses.
Trials of treatments for long COVID “are starting, so I’m optimistic,” said Dr. Deeks, an expert on HIV pathogenesis and treatment and a principal investigator of the Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery (RECOVER) study. Among the trials: A study of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) for neurologic long COVID; a study of an anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibody that can deplete tissue/cellular reservoirs of viral particles (replicating or not); and a study evaluating baricitinib (Olumiant), a Janus kinase inhibitor, for neurocognitive impairment and cardiopulmonary symptoms of long COVID.
Alessio Fasano, MD, professor of pediatrics at Harvard Medical School and professor of nutrition at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, described at the workshop how he began investigating the use of larazotide acetate – an inhibitor of the protein zonulin, which increases intestinal permeability – in children with COVID-19 Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome (MIS-C) after learning that SARS-CoV-2 viral particles persist in the gastrointestinal tract, causing dysbiosis and zonulin upregulation.
In an ongoing phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, the agent thus far has expedited the resolution of gastrointestinal symptoms and clearance of spike protein from the circulation, he said. A phase 2 trial of the agent for pediatric patients with long COVID and SARS-CoV-2 antigenemia is underway. “What if we were to stop [chains of events] by stopping the passage of elements from the virus into circulation?’ he said.
In the realm of Lyme disease, a recently launched Clinical Trials Network for Lyme and Other Tick-Borne Diseases has awarded pilot study grants to evaluate treatments aimed at a variety of possible disease mechanisms that, notably, are similar to those of other chronic illnesses: persistence of infection or remnants of infection, immune dysregulation and autoimmune reactions, neural dysfunction, and gut microbiome changes. (Microclots and mitochondrial dysfunction have not been as well studied in Lyme.)
Current and upcoming studies include evaluations of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation for those with persistent Lyme fatigue, transcranial direct current stimulation with cognitive retraining for Lyme brain fog, and tetracycline for PTLD, said Brian Fallon, MD, MPH, professor of clinical psychiatry at Columbia University, New York, who directs the Lyme & Tick-Borne Diseases Research Center and the coordinating center of the new network.
Moving forward, he said, it is important to loosen exclusion criteria and include patients with “probable or possible” Lyme and those with suspected infections with other tick-borne pathogens. All told, these patients comprise a large portion of those with chronic symptoms and have been neglected in an already thin research space, Dr. Fallon said, noting that “there haven’t been any clinical trials of posttreatment Lyme disease in ages – in 10-15 years.”
(PTLD refers to symptoms lasting for more than 6 months after the completion of standard Infectious Diseases Society of America–recommended antibiotic protocols. It occurs in about 15% of patients, said John Aucott, MD, director of the Johns Hopkins Lyme Disease Research Center, Baltimore, a member of the new clinical trials network.)
Calls for a new NIH center and patient involvement
Patients and patient advocacy organizations have played a vital role in research thus far: They’ve documented post-COVID symptoms that academic researchers said they would not otherwise have known of. Leaders of the Patient-Led Research Collaborative have coauthored published reviews with leading long COVID experts. And patients with tick-borne illnesses have enrolled in the MyLymeData patient registry run by LymeDisease.org, which has documented patient-experienced efficacy of alternative treatments and described antibiotic responders and nonresponders.
At the workshop, they shared findings alongside academic experts, and researchers called for their continued involvement. “Patient engagement at every step of the research process is critical,” Dr. Nath said.
“We need to ensure that research is reflective of lived experiences … and [that we’re] accelerating clinical trials of therapeutics that are of priority to the patient community,” said Lisa McCorkell, cofounder of the long COVID-focused Patient-Led Research Collaborative.
Ms. McCorkell also called for the creation of an office for infection-associated chronic illnesses in the NIH director’s office. Others voiced their support. “I think it’s a great idea to have an NIH center for infection-associated chronic illnesses,” said Dr. Fallon. “I think it would have a profound impact.”
The other great need, of course, is funding. “We have ideas, we have drugs that can be repurposed, we have a highly informed and engaged community that will enroll in and be retained in studies, and we have outcomes we can measure,” Dr. Deeks said. “What we’re missing is industry engagement and funding. We need massive engagement from the NIH.”
Real-world treatment needs
In the meantime, patients are seeking treatment, and “clinicians need to have uncertainty tolerance” and try multiple treatments simultaneously, said David Putrino, PT, PhD, director of rehabilitation innovation for the Mount Sinai Health System and professor of rehabilitation and human performance at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York. He oversees a multidisciplinary hybrid clinical care research center that has seen over 1,500 patients with long COVID and is beginning to see patients with other infection-associated chronic illnesses.
It’s a model that should be replicated to help fill the “enormous unmet clinical need” of patients with infection-associated chronic illness, said Peter Rowe, MD, professor of pediatrics at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and an expert on ME/CFS. And “as we request [more research funding], we will also need [financial] support for clinical care,” he emphasized, to provide equitable access for patients and to attract treating physicians.
Moreover, said Linda Geng, MD, PhD, the culture of stigma needs to change. Right now, patients with long COVID often feel dismissed not only by friends, families, and coworkers, but by clinicians who find it find it hard “to grasp that this is real and a biological condition.”
And it’s not just conditions such as long COVID that are stigmatized, but treatments as well, she said. For instance, some clinicians view low-dose naltrexone, a treatment increasingly being used for inflammation, with suspicion because it is used for opioid use disorder and alcohol use disorder – or because the “low-dose” label summons mistrust of homeopathy. “Even with therapies, there are preconceived notions and biases,” said Dr. Geng, cofounder and codirector of the Stanford (Calif.) Long COVID program.
“What almost killed me,” said Meghan O’Rourke, who has ongoing effects from long-undiagnosed tick-borne illness, “was the invisibility of the illness.” Ms. O’Rourke teaches at Yale University and is the author of “The Invisible Kingdom: Reimagining Chronic Illness.”
Teaching young physicians about these illnesses would help, she and others said. During a question and answer session, Dr. Putrino shared that the Icahn School of Medicine has recently committed to “create a complex chronic illness medical curriculum” that will impact medical education from the first year of medical school through residencies. Dr. Putrino said his team is also working on materials to help other clinics develop care models similar to those at his Mount Sinai clinic.
The NASEM workshop did not collect or require disclosures of its participants.
FROM A NATIONAL ACADEMIES OF SCIENCE, ENGINEERING, AND MEDICINE WORKSHOP
Long COVID patients turn to doctors for help with disability claims
As millions of Americans face another year of long COVID, some are finding they are unable to return to work or cannot work as they did before they got sick and are turning to doctors for help with documenting their disability.
For those who can return to work, a doctor’s diagnosis of long COVID is key to gaining access to workplace accommodations, such as working flex hours or remotely. For those who cannot work, a note from the doctor is the first step to collecting disability payments.
With no definitive blood tests or scans for long COVID that could confirm a diagnosis, some say doctors may feel uncomfortable in this role, which puts them in a tough spot, said Wes Ely, MD, MPH, codirector of the critical illness, brain dysfunction and survivorship center at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn.
Doctors typically are not taught to deal with vagueness in diagnostics.
“Long COVID falls straight into the gray zone,” he said. There are no tests and a long list of common symptoms. “It makes a lot of doctors feel super insecure,” he said.
Now, patients and their advocates are calling for doctors to be more open-minded about how they assess those with long COVID and other chronic illnesses. Although their disability may not be visible, many with long COVID struggle to function. If they need help, they say, they need a doctor to confirm their limitations – test results or no test results.
Better documentation of patient-reported symptoms would go a long way, according to a perspective published in The New England Journal of Medicine.
“There’s a long history of people with disabilities being forced to ask doctors to legitimize their symptoms,” said study author Zackary Berger, MD, PhD, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md. Dr. Berger believes doctors should learn to listen more closely to patients, turn their narratives into patient notes, and use the new International Classification of Diseases 10 (ICD-10) code, a worldwide system for identifying and generating data on diseases, when they diagnose long COVID. He also thinks doctors should become advocates for their patients.
The Americans With Disabilities Act allows employers to request medical proof of disability, “and thereby assigns physicians the gate-keeping role of determining patients’ eligibility for reasonable accommodations,” according to the analysis. Those accommodations may mean a handicapped parking space or extra days working remotely.
Without a definitive diagnostic test, long COVID joins fibromyalgia and ME/CFS (myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome), which lack biomarkers or imaging tests to support a diagnosis, they write.
“These diagnoses are therefore contentious, and government agencies, employers, and many physicians do not accept these conditions as real,” they write.
Physicians make a good faith effort in trying to understand long COVID, but both doctors and the courts like to see evidence, said Michael Ashley Stein, JD, PHD, director of the Harvard Law School Project on Disability. Dr. Stein and others say that doctors should listen closely to their patients’ descriptions of their symptoms.
“In the absence of agreed-upon biomarkers, doctors need to listen to their patients and look for other [indications] and other consistent evidence of conditions, and then work from there rather than dismiss the existence of these conditions,” he said.
Dr. Ely said he and others were taught in medical school that if it doesn’t come up on a diagnostic test, there’s no problem. “I am absolutely complicit,” he said. “I’m part of the community that did that for so many years.”
Dr. Ely agreed that the demand for clinical test results does not work for long COVID and chronic diseases such as ME/CFS. People come in with complaints and they get a typical medical workup with labs, he said, and the labs look normal on paper.
“And [the doctor is] thinking: ‘I don’t know what is wrong with this person and there’s nothing on paper I can treat. I don’t know if I even believe in long COVID.’ ”
At the same time, patients might need support from a doctor to get accommodations at work under the ADA, such as flexible hours. Or doctors’ notes may be required if a patient is trying to collect private disability insurance, workers compensation, or federal disability payments through Social Security.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines on diagnosing long COVID, updated last December, point out that normal laboratory or imaging findings do not rule out long COVID.
In addition, 12 key symptoms of long COVID were identified in May by scientists working with the RECOVER Initiative, the federal government’s long COVID research program. These symptoms include fatigue, brain fog, dizziness, gastrointestinal symptoms, loss of or change in smell or taste, chest pain, and abnormal movements.
Still, patients with long COVID seeking help also face the “disability con,” a term coined by the second author of the NEJM article, Doron Dorfman, a professor at Seton Hall Law School in Newark, N.J.
“Nowadays, when people think disability, they immediately think fraud,” he said.
Prof. Dorfman thinks the perception that many people are faking disabilities to gain an unfair advantage is the biggest barrier for anyone seeking help. The disability system is “preventing people who deserve legal rights from actually obtaining them,” he said.
He urged doctors to believe their patients. One way is to try to “translate the person’s narrative into medical language.”
His coauthor Dr. Berger did not agree with the argument that doctors cannot diagnose without tests.
“Any clinician knows that lab tests are not everything,” he said. “There are conditions that don’t have specific biomarkers that we diagnose all the time.” He cited acquired pneumonia and urinary tract infections as examples.
Benefits lawyers have taken note of the complexities for people with long COVID who seek help through the ADA and federal disability program.
One law firm noted: “The government safety net is not designed to help an emerging disease with no clear diagnosis or treatment plans. Insurance carriers are denying claims, and long-term disability benefits are being denied.”
About 16 million working-age Americans have long COVID, according to an update of a 2022 report by the Brookings Institute. Up to 4 million of these people are out of work because of the condition, the study found. The research is based on newly collected U.S. Census Bureau data that show 24% of those with long COVID report “significant activity limitations.”
Dr. Ely said he sees progress in this area. Many of these issues have come up at the committee convened by the National Academy of Science to look at the working definition of long COVID. NAS, a Washington research group, held a public meeting on their findings on June 22.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
As millions of Americans face another year of long COVID, some are finding they are unable to return to work or cannot work as they did before they got sick and are turning to doctors for help with documenting their disability.
For those who can return to work, a doctor’s diagnosis of long COVID is key to gaining access to workplace accommodations, such as working flex hours or remotely. For those who cannot work, a note from the doctor is the first step to collecting disability payments.
With no definitive blood tests or scans for long COVID that could confirm a diagnosis, some say doctors may feel uncomfortable in this role, which puts them in a tough spot, said Wes Ely, MD, MPH, codirector of the critical illness, brain dysfunction and survivorship center at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn.
Doctors typically are not taught to deal with vagueness in diagnostics.
“Long COVID falls straight into the gray zone,” he said. There are no tests and a long list of common symptoms. “It makes a lot of doctors feel super insecure,” he said.
Now, patients and their advocates are calling for doctors to be more open-minded about how they assess those with long COVID and other chronic illnesses. Although their disability may not be visible, many with long COVID struggle to function. If they need help, they say, they need a doctor to confirm their limitations – test results or no test results.
Better documentation of patient-reported symptoms would go a long way, according to a perspective published in The New England Journal of Medicine.
“There’s a long history of people with disabilities being forced to ask doctors to legitimize their symptoms,” said study author Zackary Berger, MD, PhD, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md. Dr. Berger believes doctors should learn to listen more closely to patients, turn their narratives into patient notes, and use the new International Classification of Diseases 10 (ICD-10) code, a worldwide system for identifying and generating data on diseases, when they diagnose long COVID. He also thinks doctors should become advocates for their patients.
The Americans With Disabilities Act allows employers to request medical proof of disability, “and thereby assigns physicians the gate-keeping role of determining patients’ eligibility for reasonable accommodations,” according to the analysis. Those accommodations may mean a handicapped parking space or extra days working remotely.
Without a definitive diagnostic test, long COVID joins fibromyalgia and ME/CFS (myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome), which lack biomarkers or imaging tests to support a diagnosis, they write.
“These diagnoses are therefore contentious, and government agencies, employers, and many physicians do not accept these conditions as real,” they write.
Physicians make a good faith effort in trying to understand long COVID, but both doctors and the courts like to see evidence, said Michael Ashley Stein, JD, PHD, director of the Harvard Law School Project on Disability. Dr. Stein and others say that doctors should listen closely to their patients’ descriptions of their symptoms.
“In the absence of agreed-upon biomarkers, doctors need to listen to their patients and look for other [indications] and other consistent evidence of conditions, and then work from there rather than dismiss the existence of these conditions,” he said.
Dr. Ely said he and others were taught in medical school that if it doesn’t come up on a diagnostic test, there’s no problem. “I am absolutely complicit,” he said. “I’m part of the community that did that for so many years.”
Dr. Ely agreed that the demand for clinical test results does not work for long COVID and chronic diseases such as ME/CFS. People come in with complaints and they get a typical medical workup with labs, he said, and the labs look normal on paper.
“And [the doctor is] thinking: ‘I don’t know what is wrong with this person and there’s nothing on paper I can treat. I don’t know if I even believe in long COVID.’ ”
At the same time, patients might need support from a doctor to get accommodations at work under the ADA, such as flexible hours. Or doctors’ notes may be required if a patient is trying to collect private disability insurance, workers compensation, or federal disability payments through Social Security.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines on diagnosing long COVID, updated last December, point out that normal laboratory or imaging findings do not rule out long COVID.
In addition, 12 key symptoms of long COVID were identified in May by scientists working with the RECOVER Initiative, the federal government’s long COVID research program. These symptoms include fatigue, brain fog, dizziness, gastrointestinal symptoms, loss of or change in smell or taste, chest pain, and abnormal movements.
Still, patients with long COVID seeking help also face the “disability con,” a term coined by the second author of the NEJM article, Doron Dorfman, a professor at Seton Hall Law School in Newark, N.J.
“Nowadays, when people think disability, they immediately think fraud,” he said.
Prof. Dorfman thinks the perception that many people are faking disabilities to gain an unfair advantage is the biggest barrier for anyone seeking help. The disability system is “preventing people who deserve legal rights from actually obtaining them,” he said.
He urged doctors to believe their patients. One way is to try to “translate the person’s narrative into medical language.”
His coauthor Dr. Berger did not agree with the argument that doctors cannot diagnose without tests.
“Any clinician knows that lab tests are not everything,” he said. “There are conditions that don’t have specific biomarkers that we diagnose all the time.” He cited acquired pneumonia and urinary tract infections as examples.
Benefits lawyers have taken note of the complexities for people with long COVID who seek help through the ADA and federal disability program.
One law firm noted: “The government safety net is not designed to help an emerging disease with no clear diagnosis or treatment plans. Insurance carriers are denying claims, and long-term disability benefits are being denied.”
About 16 million working-age Americans have long COVID, according to an update of a 2022 report by the Brookings Institute. Up to 4 million of these people are out of work because of the condition, the study found. The research is based on newly collected U.S. Census Bureau data that show 24% of those with long COVID report “significant activity limitations.”
Dr. Ely said he sees progress in this area. Many of these issues have come up at the committee convened by the National Academy of Science to look at the working definition of long COVID. NAS, a Washington research group, held a public meeting on their findings on June 22.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
As millions of Americans face another year of long COVID, some are finding they are unable to return to work or cannot work as they did before they got sick and are turning to doctors for help with documenting their disability.
For those who can return to work, a doctor’s diagnosis of long COVID is key to gaining access to workplace accommodations, such as working flex hours or remotely. For those who cannot work, a note from the doctor is the first step to collecting disability payments.
With no definitive blood tests or scans for long COVID that could confirm a diagnosis, some say doctors may feel uncomfortable in this role, which puts them in a tough spot, said Wes Ely, MD, MPH, codirector of the critical illness, brain dysfunction and survivorship center at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn.
Doctors typically are not taught to deal with vagueness in diagnostics.
“Long COVID falls straight into the gray zone,” he said. There are no tests and a long list of common symptoms. “It makes a lot of doctors feel super insecure,” he said.
Now, patients and their advocates are calling for doctors to be more open-minded about how they assess those with long COVID and other chronic illnesses. Although their disability may not be visible, many with long COVID struggle to function. If they need help, they say, they need a doctor to confirm their limitations – test results or no test results.
Better documentation of patient-reported symptoms would go a long way, according to a perspective published in The New England Journal of Medicine.
“There’s a long history of people with disabilities being forced to ask doctors to legitimize their symptoms,” said study author Zackary Berger, MD, PhD, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md. Dr. Berger believes doctors should learn to listen more closely to patients, turn their narratives into patient notes, and use the new International Classification of Diseases 10 (ICD-10) code, a worldwide system for identifying and generating data on diseases, when they diagnose long COVID. He also thinks doctors should become advocates for their patients.
The Americans With Disabilities Act allows employers to request medical proof of disability, “and thereby assigns physicians the gate-keeping role of determining patients’ eligibility for reasonable accommodations,” according to the analysis. Those accommodations may mean a handicapped parking space or extra days working remotely.
Without a definitive diagnostic test, long COVID joins fibromyalgia and ME/CFS (myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome), which lack biomarkers or imaging tests to support a diagnosis, they write.
“These diagnoses are therefore contentious, and government agencies, employers, and many physicians do not accept these conditions as real,” they write.
Physicians make a good faith effort in trying to understand long COVID, but both doctors and the courts like to see evidence, said Michael Ashley Stein, JD, PHD, director of the Harvard Law School Project on Disability. Dr. Stein and others say that doctors should listen closely to their patients’ descriptions of their symptoms.
“In the absence of agreed-upon biomarkers, doctors need to listen to their patients and look for other [indications] and other consistent evidence of conditions, and then work from there rather than dismiss the existence of these conditions,” he said.
Dr. Ely said he and others were taught in medical school that if it doesn’t come up on a diagnostic test, there’s no problem. “I am absolutely complicit,” he said. “I’m part of the community that did that for so many years.”
Dr. Ely agreed that the demand for clinical test results does not work for long COVID and chronic diseases such as ME/CFS. People come in with complaints and they get a typical medical workup with labs, he said, and the labs look normal on paper.
“And [the doctor is] thinking: ‘I don’t know what is wrong with this person and there’s nothing on paper I can treat. I don’t know if I even believe in long COVID.’ ”
At the same time, patients might need support from a doctor to get accommodations at work under the ADA, such as flexible hours. Or doctors’ notes may be required if a patient is trying to collect private disability insurance, workers compensation, or federal disability payments through Social Security.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines on diagnosing long COVID, updated last December, point out that normal laboratory or imaging findings do not rule out long COVID.
In addition, 12 key symptoms of long COVID were identified in May by scientists working with the RECOVER Initiative, the federal government’s long COVID research program. These symptoms include fatigue, brain fog, dizziness, gastrointestinal symptoms, loss of or change in smell or taste, chest pain, and abnormal movements.
Still, patients with long COVID seeking help also face the “disability con,” a term coined by the second author of the NEJM article, Doron Dorfman, a professor at Seton Hall Law School in Newark, N.J.
“Nowadays, when people think disability, they immediately think fraud,” he said.
Prof. Dorfman thinks the perception that many people are faking disabilities to gain an unfair advantage is the biggest barrier for anyone seeking help. The disability system is “preventing people who deserve legal rights from actually obtaining them,” he said.
He urged doctors to believe their patients. One way is to try to “translate the person’s narrative into medical language.”
His coauthor Dr. Berger did not agree with the argument that doctors cannot diagnose without tests.
“Any clinician knows that lab tests are not everything,” he said. “There are conditions that don’t have specific biomarkers that we diagnose all the time.” He cited acquired pneumonia and urinary tract infections as examples.
Benefits lawyers have taken note of the complexities for people with long COVID who seek help through the ADA and federal disability program.
One law firm noted: “The government safety net is not designed to help an emerging disease with no clear diagnosis or treatment plans. Insurance carriers are denying claims, and long-term disability benefits are being denied.”
About 16 million working-age Americans have long COVID, according to an update of a 2022 report by the Brookings Institute. Up to 4 million of these people are out of work because of the condition, the study found. The research is based on newly collected U.S. Census Bureau data that show 24% of those with long COVID report “significant activity limitations.”
Dr. Ely said he sees progress in this area. Many of these issues have come up at the committee convened by the National Academy of Science to look at the working definition of long COVID. NAS, a Washington research group, held a public meeting on their findings on June 22.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
FROM THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Nearly one in five in U.S. still hadn’t gotten COVID by end of 2022
, according to a new estimate.
The findings came from an analysis of blood donations. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention analyzed donor blood from 143,000 people every 3 months during 2022, looking for the presence of COVID antibodies that meant a person had previously been infected with the virus. The prevalence of antibodies from previous infections steadily rose throughout the year. Antibodies from prior infection were found in 49% of donors as of Feb. 15, 2022, 59% of donors as of May 15, 2022, 70% of donors as of Aug. 15, 2022, and 78% of donors as of Nov. 15, 2022.
Donor blood also was analyzed for the presence of antibodies known to come from COVID vaccination. When the vaccine-induced and infection-induced antibody data were combined, the CDC estimated that 97% of people had antibodies as of the end of the 2022.
In the report, CDC authors explained that while the presence of antibodies is related to protection from infection and to less severe disease, the level of antibodies that a person has can vary. The authors said that no standards have yet been set that show a minimum level of antibodies needed to provide protection.
As of July 3, more than 1.1 million people had died in the United States from COVID-19, according to CDC data. Deaths for the first half of 2023 are down dramatically, compared with the first 3 years of the pandemic, with just 41,538 death certificates this year listing the virus as an underlying or contributing cause. About two in three COVID deaths this year occurred in a hospital or nursing home, and 89% of people who died from the virus this year have been age 65 or older.
A version of this article first appeared on WebMD.com.
, according to a new estimate.
The findings came from an analysis of blood donations. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention analyzed donor blood from 143,000 people every 3 months during 2022, looking for the presence of COVID antibodies that meant a person had previously been infected with the virus. The prevalence of antibodies from previous infections steadily rose throughout the year. Antibodies from prior infection were found in 49% of donors as of Feb. 15, 2022, 59% of donors as of May 15, 2022, 70% of donors as of Aug. 15, 2022, and 78% of donors as of Nov. 15, 2022.
Donor blood also was analyzed for the presence of antibodies known to come from COVID vaccination. When the vaccine-induced and infection-induced antibody data were combined, the CDC estimated that 97% of people had antibodies as of the end of the 2022.
In the report, CDC authors explained that while the presence of antibodies is related to protection from infection and to less severe disease, the level of antibodies that a person has can vary. The authors said that no standards have yet been set that show a minimum level of antibodies needed to provide protection.
As of July 3, more than 1.1 million people had died in the United States from COVID-19, according to CDC data. Deaths for the first half of 2023 are down dramatically, compared with the first 3 years of the pandemic, with just 41,538 death certificates this year listing the virus as an underlying or contributing cause. About two in three COVID deaths this year occurred in a hospital or nursing home, and 89% of people who died from the virus this year have been age 65 or older.
A version of this article first appeared on WebMD.com.
, according to a new estimate.
The findings came from an analysis of blood donations. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention analyzed donor blood from 143,000 people every 3 months during 2022, looking for the presence of COVID antibodies that meant a person had previously been infected with the virus. The prevalence of antibodies from previous infections steadily rose throughout the year. Antibodies from prior infection were found in 49% of donors as of Feb. 15, 2022, 59% of donors as of May 15, 2022, 70% of donors as of Aug. 15, 2022, and 78% of donors as of Nov. 15, 2022.
Donor blood also was analyzed for the presence of antibodies known to come from COVID vaccination. When the vaccine-induced and infection-induced antibody data were combined, the CDC estimated that 97% of people had antibodies as of the end of the 2022.
In the report, CDC authors explained that while the presence of antibodies is related to protection from infection and to less severe disease, the level of antibodies that a person has can vary. The authors said that no standards have yet been set that show a minimum level of antibodies needed to provide protection.
As of July 3, more than 1.1 million people had died in the United States from COVID-19, according to CDC data. Deaths for the first half of 2023 are down dramatically, compared with the first 3 years of the pandemic, with just 41,538 death certificates this year listing the virus as an underlying or contributing cause. About two in three COVID deaths this year occurred in a hospital or nursing home, and 89% of people who died from the virus this year have been age 65 or older.
A version of this article first appeared on WebMD.com.
Long COVID ‘brain fog’ confounds doctors, but new research offers hope
Kate Whitley was petrified of COVID-19 from the beginning of the pandemic because she has Hashimoto disease, an autoimmune disorder that she knew put her at high risk for complications.
She was right to be worried. Two months after contracting the infection in September 2022, the 42-year-old Nashville resident was diagnosed with long COVID. For Ms. Whitley, the resulting brain fog has been the most challenging factor. She is the owner of a successful paper goods store, and she can’t remember basic aspects of her job. She can’t tolerate loud noises and gets so distracted that she has trouble remembering what she was doing.
Ms. Whitley doesn’t like the term “brain fog” because it doesn’t begin to describe the dramatic disruption to her life over the past 7 months.
Brain fog is among the most common symptoms of long COVID, and also one of the most poorly understood. A reported 46% of those diagnosed with long COVID complain of brain fog or a loss of memory. Many clinicians agree that the term is vague and often doesn’t truly represent the condition. That, in turn, makes it harder for doctors to diagnose and treat it. There are no standard tests for it, nor are there guidelines for symptom management or treatment.
“There’s a lot of imprecision in the term because it might mean different things to different patients,” said James C. Jackson, PsyD, a neuropsychiatrist at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn., and author of a new book, “Clearing the Fog: From Surviving to Thriving With Long COVID – A Practical Guide.”
Dr. Jackson, who began treating Ms. Whitley in February 2023, said that it makes more sense to call brain fog a brain impairment or an acquired brain injury (ABI) because it doesn’t occur gradually. COVID damages the brain and causes injury. For those with long COVID who were previously in the intensive care unit and may have undergone ventilation, hypoxic brain injury may result from the lack of oxygen to the brain.
Even among those with milder cases of acute COVID, there’s some evidence that persistent neuroinflammation in the brain caused by an activated immune system may also cause damage.
In both cases, the results can be debilitating. Ms. Whitley also has dysautonomia – a disorder of the autonomic nervous system that can cause dizziness, sweating, and headaches along with fatigue and heart palpitations.
She said that she’s so forgetful that when she sees people socially, she’s nervous of what she’ll say. “I feel like I’m constantly sticking my foot in my mouth because I can’t remember details of other people’s lives,” she said.
Although brain disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease and other forms of dementia are marked by a slow decline, ABI occurs more suddenly and may include a loss of executive function and attention.
“With a brain injury, you’re doing fine, and then some event happens (in this case COVID), and immediately after that, your cognitive function is different,” said Dr. Jackson.
Additionally, ABI is an actual diagnosis, whereas brain fog is not.
“With a brain injury, there’s a treatment pathway for cognitive rehabilitation,” said Dr. Jackson.
Treatments may include speech, cognitive, and occupational therapy as well as meeting with a neuropsychiatrist for treatment of the mental and behavioral disorders that may result. Dr. Jackson said that while many patients aren’t functioning cognitively or physically at 100%, they can make enough strides that they don’t have to give up things such as driving and, in some cases, their jobs.
Other experts agree that long COVID may damage the brain. An April 2022 study published in the journal Nature found strong evidence that SARS-CoV-2 infection may cause brain-related abnormalities, for example, a reduction in gray matter in certain parts of the brain, including the prefrontal cortex, hypothalamus, and amygdala.
Additionally, white matter, which is found deeper in the brain and is responsible for the exchange of information between different parts of the brain, may also be at risk of damage as a result of the virus, according to a November 2022 study published in the journal SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine.
Calling it a “fog” makes it easier for clinicians and the general public to dismiss its severity, said Tyler Reed Bell, PhD, a researcher who specializes in viruses that cause brain injury. He is a fellow in the department of psychiatry at the University of California, San Diego. Brain fog can make driving and returning to work especially dangerous. Because of difficulty focusing, patients are much more likely to make mistakes that cause accidents.
“The COVID virus is very invasive to the brain,” Dr. Bell said.
Others contend this may be a rush to judgment. Karla L. Thompson, PhD, lead neuropsychologist at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill’s COVID Recovery Clinic, agrees that in more serious cases of COVID that cause a lack of oxygen to the brain, it’s reasonable to call it a brain injury. But brain fog can also be associated with other long COVID symptoms, not just damage to the brain.
Chronic fatigue and poor sleep are both commonly reported symptoms of long COVID that negatively affect brain function, she said. Sleep disturbances, cardiac problems, dysautonomia, and emotional distress could also affect the way the brain functions post COVID. Finding the right treatment requires identifying all the factors contributing to cognitive impairment.
Part of the problem in treating long COVID brain fog is that diagnostic technology is not sensitive enough to detect inflammation that could be causing damage.
Grace McComsey, MD, who leads the long COVID RECOVER study at University Hospitals Health System in Cleveland, said her team is working on identifying biomarkers that could detect brain inflammation in a way similar to the manner researchers have identified biomarkers to help diagnose chronic fatigue syndrome. Additionally, a new study published last month in JAMA for the first time clearly defined 12 symptoms of long COVID, and brain fog was listed among them. All of this contributes to the development of clear diagnostic criteria.
“It will make a big difference once we have some consistency among clinicians in diagnosing the condition,” said Dr. McComsey.
Ms. Whitley is thankful for the treatment that she’s received thus far. She’s seeing a cognitive rehabilitation therapist, who assesses her memory, cognition, and attention span and gives her tools to break up simple tasks, such as driving, so that they don’t feel overwhelming. She’s back behind the wheel and back to work.
But perhaps most importantly, Ms. Whitley joined a support group, led by Dr. Jackson, that includes other people experiencing the same symptoms she is. When she was at her darkest, they understood.
“Talking to other survivors has been the only solace in all this,” Ms. Whitley said. “Together, we grieve all that’s been lost.”
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
Kate Whitley was petrified of COVID-19 from the beginning of the pandemic because she has Hashimoto disease, an autoimmune disorder that she knew put her at high risk for complications.
She was right to be worried. Two months after contracting the infection in September 2022, the 42-year-old Nashville resident was diagnosed with long COVID. For Ms. Whitley, the resulting brain fog has been the most challenging factor. She is the owner of a successful paper goods store, and she can’t remember basic aspects of her job. She can’t tolerate loud noises and gets so distracted that she has trouble remembering what she was doing.
Ms. Whitley doesn’t like the term “brain fog” because it doesn’t begin to describe the dramatic disruption to her life over the past 7 months.
Brain fog is among the most common symptoms of long COVID, and also one of the most poorly understood. A reported 46% of those diagnosed with long COVID complain of brain fog or a loss of memory. Many clinicians agree that the term is vague and often doesn’t truly represent the condition. That, in turn, makes it harder for doctors to diagnose and treat it. There are no standard tests for it, nor are there guidelines for symptom management or treatment.
“There’s a lot of imprecision in the term because it might mean different things to different patients,” said James C. Jackson, PsyD, a neuropsychiatrist at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn., and author of a new book, “Clearing the Fog: From Surviving to Thriving With Long COVID – A Practical Guide.”
Dr. Jackson, who began treating Ms. Whitley in February 2023, said that it makes more sense to call brain fog a brain impairment or an acquired brain injury (ABI) because it doesn’t occur gradually. COVID damages the brain and causes injury. For those with long COVID who were previously in the intensive care unit and may have undergone ventilation, hypoxic brain injury may result from the lack of oxygen to the brain.
Even among those with milder cases of acute COVID, there’s some evidence that persistent neuroinflammation in the brain caused by an activated immune system may also cause damage.
In both cases, the results can be debilitating. Ms. Whitley also has dysautonomia – a disorder of the autonomic nervous system that can cause dizziness, sweating, and headaches along with fatigue and heart palpitations.
She said that she’s so forgetful that when she sees people socially, she’s nervous of what she’ll say. “I feel like I’m constantly sticking my foot in my mouth because I can’t remember details of other people’s lives,” she said.
Although brain disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease and other forms of dementia are marked by a slow decline, ABI occurs more suddenly and may include a loss of executive function and attention.
“With a brain injury, you’re doing fine, and then some event happens (in this case COVID), and immediately after that, your cognitive function is different,” said Dr. Jackson.
Additionally, ABI is an actual diagnosis, whereas brain fog is not.
“With a brain injury, there’s a treatment pathway for cognitive rehabilitation,” said Dr. Jackson.
Treatments may include speech, cognitive, and occupational therapy as well as meeting with a neuropsychiatrist for treatment of the mental and behavioral disorders that may result. Dr. Jackson said that while many patients aren’t functioning cognitively or physically at 100%, they can make enough strides that they don’t have to give up things such as driving and, in some cases, their jobs.
Other experts agree that long COVID may damage the brain. An April 2022 study published in the journal Nature found strong evidence that SARS-CoV-2 infection may cause brain-related abnormalities, for example, a reduction in gray matter in certain parts of the brain, including the prefrontal cortex, hypothalamus, and amygdala.
Additionally, white matter, which is found deeper in the brain and is responsible for the exchange of information between different parts of the brain, may also be at risk of damage as a result of the virus, according to a November 2022 study published in the journal SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine.
Calling it a “fog” makes it easier for clinicians and the general public to dismiss its severity, said Tyler Reed Bell, PhD, a researcher who specializes in viruses that cause brain injury. He is a fellow in the department of psychiatry at the University of California, San Diego. Brain fog can make driving and returning to work especially dangerous. Because of difficulty focusing, patients are much more likely to make mistakes that cause accidents.
“The COVID virus is very invasive to the brain,” Dr. Bell said.
Others contend this may be a rush to judgment. Karla L. Thompson, PhD, lead neuropsychologist at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill’s COVID Recovery Clinic, agrees that in more serious cases of COVID that cause a lack of oxygen to the brain, it’s reasonable to call it a brain injury. But brain fog can also be associated with other long COVID symptoms, not just damage to the brain.
Chronic fatigue and poor sleep are both commonly reported symptoms of long COVID that negatively affect brain function, she said. Sleep disturbances, cardiac problems, dysautonomia, and emotional distress could also affect the way the brain functions post COVID. Finding the right treatment requires identifying all the factors contributing to cognitive impairment.
Part of the problem in treating long COVID brain fog is that diagnostic technology is not sensitive enough to detect inflammation that could be causing damage.
Grace McComsey, MD, who leads the long COVID RECOVER study at University Hospitals Health System in Cleveland, said her team is working on identifying biomarkers that could detect brain inflammation in a way similar to the manner researchers have identified biomarkers to help diagnose chronic fatigue syndrome. Additionally, a new study published last month in JAMA for the first time clearly defined 12 symptoms of long COVID, and brain fog was listed among them. All of this contributes to the development of clear diagnostic criteria.
“It will make a big difference once we have some consistency among clinicians in diagnosing the condition,” said Dr. McComsey.
Ms. Whitley is thankful for the treatment that she’s received thus far. She’s seeing a cognitive rehabilitation therapist, who assesses her memory, cognition, and attention span and gives her tools to break up simple tasks, such as driving, so that they don’t feel overwhelming. She’s back behind the wheel and back to work.
But perhaps most importantly, Ms. Whitley joined a support group, led by Dr. Jackson, that includes other people experiencing the same symptoms she is. When she was at her darkest, they understood.
“Talking to other survivors has been the only solace in all this,” Ms. Whitley said. “Together, we grieve all that’s been lost.”
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
Kate Whitley was petrified of COVID-19 from the beginning of the pandemic because she has Hashimoto disease, an autoimmune disorder that she knew put her at high risk for complications.
She was right to be worried. Two months after contracting the infection in September 2022, the 42-year-old Nashville resident was diagnosed with long COVID. For Ms. Whitley, the resulting brain fog has been the most challenging factor. She is the owner of a successful paper goods store, and she can’t remember basic aspects of her job. She can’t tolerate loud noises and gets so distracted that she has trouble remembering what she was doing.
Ms. Whitley doesn’t like the term “brain fog” because it doesn’t begin to describe the dramatic disruption to her life over the past 7 months.
Brain fog is among the most common symptoms of long COVID, and also one of the most poorly understood. A reported 46% of those diagnosed with long COVID complain of brain fog or a loss of memory. Many clinicians agree that the term is vague and often doesn’t truly represent the condition. That, in turn, makes it harder for doctors to diagnose and treat it. There are no standard tests for it, nor are there guidelines for symptom management or treatment.
“There’s a lot of imprecision in the term because it might mean different things to different patients,” said James C. Jackson, PsyD, a neuropsychiatrist at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn., and author of a new book, “Clearing the Fog: From Surviving to Thriving With Long COVID – A Practical Guide.”
Dr. Jackson, who began treating Ms. Whitley in February 2023, said that it makes more sense to call brain fog a brain impairment or an acquired brain injury (ABI) because it doesn’t occur gradually. COVID damages the brain and causes injury. For those with long COVID who were previously in the intensive care unit and may have undergone ventilation, hypoxic brain injury may result from the lack of oxygen to the brain.
Even among those with milder cases of acute COVID, there’s some evidence that persistent neuroinflammation in the brain caused by an activated immune system may also cause damage.
In both cases, the results can be debilitating. Ms. Whitley also has dysautonomia – a disorder of the autonomic nervous system that can cause dizziness, sweating, and headaches along with fatigue and heart palpitations.
She said that she’s so forgetful that when she sees people socially, she’s nervous of what she’ll say. “I feel like I’m constantly sticking my foot in my mouth because I can’t remember details of other people’s lives,” she said.
Although brain disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease and other forms of dementia are marked by a slow decline, ABI occurs more suddenly and may include a loss of executive function and attention.
“With a brain injury, you’re doing fine, and then some event happens (in this case COVID), and immediately after that, your cognitive function is different,” said Dr. Jackson.
Additionally, ABI is an actual diagnosis, whereas brain fog is not.
“With a brain injury, there’s a treatment pathway for cognitive rehabilitation,” said Dr. Jackson.
Treatments may include speech, cognitive, and occupational therapy as well as meeting with a neuropsychiatrist for treatment of the mental and behavioral disorders that may result. Dr. Jackson said that while many patients aren’t functioning cognitively or physically at 100%, they can make enough strides that they don’t have to give up things such as driving and, in some cases, their jobs.
Other experts agree that long COVID may damage the brain. An April 2022 study published in the journal Nature found strong evidence that SARS-CoV-2 infection may cause brain-related abnormalities, for example, a reduction in gray matter in certain parts of the brain, including the prefrontal cortex, hypothalamus, and amygdala.
Additionally, white matter, which is found deeper in the brain and is responsible for the exchange of information between different parts of the brain, may also be at risk of damage as a result of the virus, according to a November 2022 study published in the journal SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine.
Calling it a “fog” makes it easier for clinicians and the general public to dismiss its severity, said Tyler Reed Bell, PhD, a researcher who specializes in viruses that cause brain injury. He is a fellow in the department of psychiatry at the University of California, San Diego. Brain fog can make driving and returning to work especially dangerous. Because of difficulty focusing, patients are much more likely to make mistakes that cause accidents.
“The COVID virus is very invasive to the brain,” Dr. Bell said.
Others contend this may be a rush to judgment. Karla L. Thompson, PhD, lead neuropsychologist at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill’s COVID Recovery Clinic, agrees that in more serious cases of COVID that cause a lack of oxygen to the brain, it’s reasonable to call it a brain injury. But brain fog can also be associated with other long COVID symptoms, not just damage to the brain.
Chronic fatigue and poor sleep are both commonly reported symptoms of long COVID that negatively affect brain function, she said. Sleep disturbances, cardiac problems, dysautonomia, and emotional distress could also affect the way the brain functions post COVID. Finding the right treatment requires identifying all the factors contributing to cognitive impairment.
Part of the problem in treating long COVID brain fog is that diagnostic technology is not sensitive enough to detect inflammation that could be causing damage.
Grace McComsey, MD, who leads the long COVID RECOVER study at University Hospitals Health System in Cleveland, said her team is working on identifying biomarkers that could detect brain inflammation in a way similar to the manner researchers have identified biomarkers to help diagnose chronic fatigue syndrome. Additionally, a new study published last month in JAMA for the first time clearly defined 12 symptoms of long COVID, and brain fog was listed among them. All of this contributes to the development of clear diagnostic criteria.
“It will make a big difference once we have some consistency among clinicians in diagnosing the condition,” said Dr. McComsey.
Ms. Whitley is thankful for the treatment that she’s received thus far. She’s seeing a cognitive rehabilitation therapist, who assesses her memory, cognition, and attention span and gives her tools to break up simple tasks, such as driving, so that they don’t feel overwhelming. She’s back behind the wheel and back to work.
But perhaps most importantly, Ms. Whitley joined a support group, led by Dr. Jackson, that includes other people experiencing the same symptoms she is. When she was at her darkest, they understood.
“Talking to other survivors has been the only solace in all this,” Ms. Whitley said. “Together, we grieve all that’s been lost.”
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
Understanding, Diagnosing, and Treating Long COVID
As the pandemic wanes, the public is clamoring for a return to normal. But individuals with long COVID face a challenging journey to get back to their baseline. Here’s what clinicians need to know to help patients with long COVID.
The COVID-19 pandemic is waning. The official federal public health emergency ended on May 11, 2023. Moreover, the public is ready to move on 3 years after the beginning of a pandemic that resulted in over a million deaths in the United States.
But not everyone can go back to normal. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that 1 in 13 US adults (7.5%) have long COVID symptoms. Many of these people feel as if they are the forgotten patients. While everyone else is moving on, a significant number of people have not returned to their baseline.
A group from Yale School of Medicine, myself included, reviewed a number of studies to gain a better understanding of 1) how long COVID manifests and 2) potential treatment options. Highlights of our evaluation are presented here.
Long COVID: The Basics
What exactly is long COVID-19, and how is it thought to develop?
The World Health Organization (WHO) defines long COVID as symptoms that persist 3 months postinfection, last for ≥ 2 months, and are not attributable to another cause.
Hypotheses about the mechanisms of long COVID include the presence of a persistent viral reservoir, an imbalance in the viral and microbial ecosystems, reactivation of latent DNA viruses, and endothelial dysfunction.
Who is most at risk?
Females
Older individuals
Individuals with preexisting conditions, including hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and lung disease
Individuals who experienced > 5 symptoms within the first week of COVID-19 illness
Individuals with breakthrough infections after vaccination against COVID-19 appear to be at increased risk of at least 1 postacute condition
Additionally, as the risk of contracting COVID-19 is demonstrably higher in certain racial and ethnic populations, it stands to reason that more of these individuals will experience long COVID.
Long COVID symptoms: how long is long?
Long COVID symptoms may persist for 2 years after initial infection. One analysis from China showed that nearly 7 in 10 patients experienced at least 1 ongoing symptom 6 months following infection, with more than half reporting symptoms at 24 months. Dyspnea, anxiety, and depression are especially persistent.
In another analysis, 90% of individuals reported symptoms 35 weeks postinfection. Symptoms did not only occur in people who were hospitalized; they also occurred in people who had a “mild case.”
Clinical Manifestations of Long COVID
More than 50 symptoms have been identified as potentially associated with long COVID. The most common manifestations involve pulmonary, cardiac, and neuropsychiatric sequelae. There is no single test to determine if symptoms are due to long COVID.
Pulmonary
How it manifests
Chronic cough
Shortness of breath
Interstitial lung disease
Treatment options
Treatment options are variable and depend on predominant symptoms. Chronic cough should be managed based on primary etiology. Treatment for interstitial lung disease depends on whether the process continues to evolve or stabilizes. The role of antifibrotics in these patients is being investigated. Lung transplantation has largely been reserved for unresolved acute injury.
Cardiac
How it manifests
Postacute sequelae cardiovascular disease, where cardiovascular disorders are uncovered during diagnostic testing
Postacute sequelae cardiovascular syndrome, such as exercise intolerance, tachycardia and chest pain, and dyspnea
Other important considerations:
Cardiac symptoms can occur independent of preexisting conditions, severity, course of acute illness, and time from original diagnosis
Cardiac involvement can occur in any age group
One analysis revealed increased risk of stroke, arrythmias, pericarditis, myocarditis, and ischemic heart disease 1 year after COVID-19 infection
Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) and neurogenic orthostatic hypotension have also been observed
Treatment options
Treatment options are dictated by clinical manifestations and course. Patients who have autonomic dysfunction can be advised to increase salt and water intake since hypovolemia can worsen symptoms. Consider fludrocortisone and midodrine along with recumbent and semirecumbent exercises as tolerated, as exercise can sometimes worsen symptoms.
Neuropsychiatric
How it manifests
Patients can present with fatigue, memory disorders, headache, vertigo, myalgia, neuropathy, and smell and taste disorders, and there have been reports of cognitive decline postinfection.
Other important considerations:
A retrospective cohort study revealed that 34% of individuals had a new neurological or psychiatric diagnosis in the first 6 months after infection, including intracranial hemorrhage, ischemic stroke, parkinsonism, and dementia. Many COVID survivors experienced critical illness requiring mechanical ventilation, sedation, and paralytics, increasing the odds of developing postintensive care syndrome
Treatment options
Use of standard of care treatments, as well as neurocognitive rehabilitation and psychosocial support, is recommended for specific neuropsychiatric conditions. Patients with headache may benefit from treatment with amitriptyline or similar medications. Olfactory training and intranasal treatments can benefit those with loss of smell.
Future Directions
Two medications that may hold promise for treating individuals long COVID symptoms are currently undergoing early investigation.
Pyridostigmine may help improve peak exercise capacity
Pyridostigmine improved peak exercise oxygen uptake in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving 45 individuals. Participants were assigned to receive either pyridostigmine 60 mg orally or placebo, and the pyridostigmine group showed an improved peak exercise uptake via increased cardiac output and right ventricular filling pressures.
An investigational compound may improve fatigue-based symptoms
A 4-week protocol using the compound AXA1125 improved fatigue-based symptoms in patients with long COVID in a double-blind, randomized, controlled phase 2a pilot study involving 41 individuals. Investigators looked at average change in postexertional skeletal muscle phosphocreatine (PCr) recovery rate from baseline to day 28 after moderate exercise as well as fatigue levels. Although PCr recovery rate did not differ significantly between groups, use of the compound was linked with significant reduction in fatigue-based symptoms.
Summary
It is important to exercise caution when interpreting data involving individuals with long COVID. Most studies to date are retrospective and observational, definitions and assessments are not yet standardized, and long-term follow-up is lacking, among other factors.
Clinicians should remain vigilant, keeping the following in mind as they see patients who may be experiencing long COVID:
Those most at risk include females, older individuals, those with obesity, people with preexisting conditions, individuals who experienced multiple symptoms early in their COVID-19 illness, and those who had breakthrough infections after COVID-19 vaccination
Symptoms may persist up to 2 years after acute infection
The most common manifestations of long COVID involve pulmonary, cardiac, and neuropsychiatric complications
Two medications, pyridostigmine and the compound AXA1125, are under investigation and may hold promise in treating some symptoms
As the pandemic wanes, the public is clamoring for a return to normal. But individuals with long COVID face a challenging journey to get back to their baseline. Here’s what clinicians need to know to help patients with long COVID.
The COVID-19 pandemic is waning. The official federal public health emergency ended on May 11, 2023. Moreover, the public is ready to move on 3 years after the beginning of a pandemic that resulted in over a million deaths in the United States.
But not everyone can go back to normal. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that 1 in 13 US adults (7.5%) have long COVID symptoms. Many of these people feel as if they are the forgotten patients. While everyone else is moving on, a significant number of people have not returned to their baseline.
A group from Yale School of Medicine, myself included, reviewed a number of studies to gain a better understanding of 1) how long COVID manifests and 2) potential treatment options. Highlights of our evaluation are presented here.
Long COVID: The Basics
What exactly is long COVID-19, and how is it thought to develop?
The World Health Organization (WHO) defines long COVID as symptoms that persist 3 months postinfection, last for ≥ 2 months, and are not attributable to another cause.
Hypotheses about the mechanisms of long COVID include the presence of a persistent viral reservoir, an imbalance in the viral and microbial ecosystems, reactivation of latent DNA viruses, and endothelial dysfunction.
Who is most at risk?
Females
Older individuals
Individuals with preexisting conditions, including hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and lung disease
Individuals who experienced > 5 symptoms within the first week of COVID-19 illness
Individuals with breakthrough infections after vaccination against COVID-19 appear to be at increased risk of at least 1 postacute condition
Additionally, as the risk of contracting COVID-19 is demonstrably higher in certain racial and ethnic populations, it stands to reason that more of these individuals will experience long COVID.
Long COVID symptoms: how long is long?
Long COVID symptoms may persist for 2 years after initial infection. One analysis from China showed that nearly 7 in 10 patients experienced at least 1 ongoing symptom 6 months following infection, with more than half reporting symptoms at 24 months. Dyspnea, anxiety, and depression are especially persistent.
In another analysis, 90% of individuals reported symptoms 35 weeks postinfection. Symptoms did not only occur in people who were hospitalized; they also occurred in people who had a “mild case.”
Clinical Manifestations of Long COVID
More than 50 symptoms have been identified as potentially associated with long COVID. The most common manifestations involve pulmonary, cardiac, and neuropsychiatric sequelae. There is no single test to determine if symptoms are due to long COVID.
Pulmonary
How it manifests
Chronic cough
Shortness of breath
Interstitial lung disease
Treatment options
Treatment options are variable and depend on predominant symptoms. Chronic cough should be managed based on primary etiology. Treatment for interstitial lung disease depends on whether the process continues to evolve or stabilizes. The role of antifibrotics in these patients is being investigated. Lung transplantation has largely been reserved for unresolved acute injury.
Cardiac
How it manifests
Postacute sequelae cardiovascular disease, where cardiovascular disorders are uncovered during diagnostic testing
Postacute sequelae cardiovascular syndrome, such as exercise intolerance, tachycardia and chest pain, and dyspnea
Other important considerations:
Cardiac symptoms can occur independent of preexisting conditions, severity, course of acute illness, and time from original diagnosis
Cardiac involvement can occur in any age group
One analysis revealed increased risk of stroke, arrythmias, pericarditis, myocarditis, and ischemic heart disease 1 year after COVID-19 infection
Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) and neurogenic orthostatic hypotension have also been observed
Treatment options
Treatment options are dictated by clinical manifestations and course. Patients who have autonomic dysfunction can be advised to increase salt and water intake since hypovolemia can worsen symptoms. Consider fludrocortisone and midodrine along with recumbent and semirecumbent exercises as tolerated, as exercise can sometimes worsen symptoms.
Neuropsychiatric
How it manifests
Patients can present with fatigue, memory disorders, headache, vertigo, myalgia, neuropathy, and smell and taste disorders, and there have been reports of cognitive decline postinfection.
Other important considerations:
A retrospective cohort study revealed that 34% of individuals had a new neurological or psychiatric diagnosis in the first 6 months after infection, including intracranial hemorrhage, ischemic stroke, parkinsonism, and dementia. Many COVID survivors experienced critical illness requiring mechanical ventilation, sedation, and paralytics, increasing the odds of developing postintensive care syndrome
Treatment options
Use of standard of care treatments, as well as neurocognitive rehabilitation and psychosocial support, is recommended for specific neuropsychiatric conditions. Patients with headache may benefit from treatment with amitriptyline or similar medications. Olfactory training and intranasal treatments can benefit those with loss of smell.
Future Directions
Two medications that may hold promise for treating individuals long COVID symptoms are currently undergoing early investigation.
Pyridostigmine may help improve peak exercise capacity
Pyridostigmine improved peak exercise oxygen uptake in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving 45 individuals. Participants were assigned to receive either pyridostigmine 60 mg orally or placebo, and the pyridostigmine group showed an improved peak exercise uptake via increased cardiac output and right ventricular filling pressures.
An investigational compound may improve fatigue-based symptoms
A 4-week protocol using the compound AXA1125 improved fatigue-based symptoms in patients with long COVID in a double-blind, randomized, controlled phase 2a pilot study involving 41 individuals. Investigators looked at average change in postexertional skeletal muscle phosphocreatine (PCr) recovery rate from baseline to day 28 after moderate exercise as well as fatigue levels. Although PCr recovery rate did not differ significantly between groups, use of the compound was linked with significant reduction in fatigue-based symptoms.
Summary
It is important to exercise caution when interpreting data involving individuals with long COVID. Most studies to date are retrospective and observational, definitions and assessments are not yet standardized, and long-term follow-up is lacking, among other factors.
Clinicians should remain vigilant, keeping the following in mind as they see patients who may be experiencing long COVID:
Those most at risk include females, older individuals, those with obesity, people with preexisting conditions, individuals who experienced multiple symptoms early in their COVID-19 illness, and those who had breakthrough infections after COVID-19 vaccination
Symptoms may persist up to 2 years after acute infection
The most common manifestations of long COVID involve pulmonary, cardiac, and neuropsychiatric complications
Two medications, pyridostigmine and the compound AXA1125, are under investigation and may hold promise in treating some symptoms
As the pandemic wanes, the public is clamoring for a return to normal. But individuals with long COVID face a challenging journey to get back to their baseline. Here’s what clinicians need to know to help patients with long COVID.
The COVID-19 pandemic is waning. The official federal public health emergency ended on May 11, 2023. Moreover, the public is ready to move on 3 years after the beginning of a pandemic that resulted in over a million deaths in the United States.
But not everyone can go back to normal. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that 1 in 13 US adults (7.5%) have long COVID symptoms. Many of these people feel as if they are the forgotten patients. While everyone else is moving on, a significant number of people have not returned to their baseline.
A group from Yale School of Medicine, myself included, reviewed a number of studies to gain a better understanding of 1) how long COVID manifests and 2) potential treatment options. Highlights of our evaluation are presented here.
Long COVID: The Basics
What exactly is long COVID-19, and how is it thought to develop?
The World Health Organization (WHO) defines long COVID as symptoms that persist 3 months postinfection, last for ≥ 2 months, and are not attributable to another cause.
Hypotheses about the mechanisms of long COVID include the presence of a persistent viral reservoir, an imbalance in the viral and microbial ecosystems, reactivation of latent DNA viruses, and endothelial dysfunction.
Who is most at risk?
Females
Older individuals
Individuals with preexisting conditions, including hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and lung disease
Individuals who experienced > 5 symptoms within the first week of COVID-19 illness
Individuals with breakthrough infections after vaccination against COVID-19 appear to be at increased risk of at least 1 postacute condition
Additionally, as the risk of contracting COVID-19 is demonstrably higher in certain racial and ethnic populations, it stands to reason that more of these individuals will experience long COVID.
Long COVID symptoms: how long is long?
Long COVID symptoms may persist for 2 years after initial infection. One analysis from China showed that nearly 7 in 10 patients experienced at least 1 ongoing symptom 6 months following infection, with more than half reporting symptoms at 24 months. Dyspnea, anxiety, and depression are especially persistent.
In another analysis, 90% of individuals reported symptoms 35 weeks postinfection. Symptoms did not only occur in people who were hospitalized; they also occurred in people who had a “mild case.”
Clinical Manifestations of Long COVID
More than 50 symptoms have been identified as potentially associated with long COVID. The most common manifestations involve pulmonary, cardiac, and neuropsychiatric sequelae. There is no single test to determine if symptoms are due to long COVID.
Pulmonary
How it manifests
Chronic cough
Shortness of breath
Interstitial lung disease
Treatment options
Treatment options are variable and depend on predominant symptoms. Chronic cough should be managed based on primary etiology. Treatment for interstitial lung disease depends on whether the process continues to evolve or stabilizes. The role of antifibrotics in these patients is being investigated. Lung transplantation has largely been reserved for unresolved acute injury.
Cardiac
How it manifests
Postacute sequelae cardiovascular disease, where cardiovascular disorders are uncovered during diagnostic testing
Postacute sequelae cardiovascular syndrome, such as exercise intolerance, tachycardia and chest pain, and dyspnea
Other important considerations:
Cardiac symptoms can occur independent of preexisting conditions, severity, course of acute illness, and time from original diagnosis
Cardiac involvement can occur in any age group
One analysis revealed increased risk of stroke, arrythmias, pericarditis, myocarditis, and ischemic heart disease 1 year after COVID-19 infection
Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) and neurogenic orthostatic hypotension have also been observed
Treatment options
Treatment options are dictated by clinical manifestations and course. Patients who have autonomic dysfunction can be advised to increase salt and water intake since hypovolemia can worsen symptoms. Consider fludrocortisone and midodrine along with recumbent and semirecumbent exercises as tolerated, as exercise can sometimes worsen symptoms.
Neuropsychiatric
How it manifests
Patients can present with fatigue, memory disorders, headache, vertigo, myalgia, neuropathy, and smell and taste disorders, and there have been reports of cognitive decline postinfection.
Other important considerations:
A retrospective cohort study revealed that 34% of individuals had a new neurological or psychiatric diagnosis in the first 6 months after infection, including intracranial hemorrhage, ischemic stroke, parkinsonism, and dementia. Many COVID survivors experienced critical illness requiring mechanical ventilation, sedation, and paralytics, increasing the odds of developing postintensive care syndrome
Treatment options
Use of standard of care treatments, as well as neurocognitive rehabilitation and psychosocial support, is recommended for specific neuropsychiatric conditions. Patients with headache may benefit from treatment with amitriptyline or similar medications. Olfactory training and intranasal treatments can benefit those with loss of smell.
Future Directions
Two medications that may hold promise for treating individuals long COVID symptoms are currently undergoing early investigation.
Pyridostigmine may help improve peak exercise capacity
Pyridostigmine improved peak exercise oxygen uptake in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving 45 individuals. Participants were assigned to receive either pyridostigmine 60 mg orally or placebo, and the pyridostigmine group showed an improved peak exercise uptake via increased cardiac output and right ventricular filling pressures.
An investigational compound may improve fatigue-based symptoms
A 4-week protocol using the compound AXA1125 improved fatigue-based symptoms in patients with long COVID in a double-blind, randomized, controlled phase 2a pilot study involving 41 individuals. Investigators looked at average change in postexertional skeletal muscle phosphocreatine (PCr) recovery rate from baseline to day 28 after moderate exercise as well as fatigue levels. Although PCr recovery rate did not differ significantly between groups, use of the compound was linked with significant reduction in fatigue-based symptoms.
Summary
It is important to exercise caution when interpreting data involving individuals with long COVID. Most studies to date are retrospective and observational, definitions and assessments are not yet standardized, and long-term follow-up is lacking, among other factors.
Clinicians should remain vigilant, keeping the following in mind as they see patients who may be experiencing long COVID:
Those most at risk include females, older individuals, those with obesity, people with preexisting conditions, individuals who experienced multiple symptoms early in their COVID-19 illness, and those who had breakthrough infections after COVID-19 vaccination
Symptoms may persist up to 2 years after acute infection
The most common manifestations of long COVID involve pulmonary, cardiac, and neuropsychiatric complications
Two medications, pyridostigmine and the compound AXA1125, are under investigation and may hold promise in treating some symptoms
Agency issues advisory on mental health symptoms of long COVID
The nine mental health symptoms highlighted in the advisory are fatigue; cognitive impairment, including brain fog; anxiety; depression; obsessive-compulsive disorder; sleep disorders; PTSD; psychotic disorder; and start of a substance use disorder.
The advisory noted that social factors can contribute to the mental health problems for racial and ethnic minorities; people with limited access to health care; people who already have behavioral health conditions and physical disabilities; and people who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, or intersex.
“Long COVID has a range of burdensome physical symptoms and can take a toll on a person’s mental health. It can be very challenging for a person, whether they are impacted themselves, or they are a caregiver for someone who is affected,” Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra said in a statement. “This advisory helps to raise awareness, especially among primary care practitioners and clinicians who are often the ones treating patients with long COVID.”
The department says about 10% of people infected with COVID have at least one long COVID symptom. Physical symptoms include dizziness, stomach upset, heart palpitations, issues with sexual desire or capacity, loss of smell or taste, thirst, chronic coughing, chest pain, and abnormal movements.
“We know that people living with long COVID need help today, and providers need help understanding what long COVID is and how to treat it,” Admiral Rachel Levine, MD, assistant secretary for health, said in the statement. “This advisory helps bridge that gap for the behavioral health impacts of long COVID.”
A version of this article first appeared on WebMD.com.
The nine mental health symptoms highlighted in the advisory are fatigue; cognitive impairment, including brain fog; anxiety; depression; obsessive-compulsive disorder; sleep disorders; PTSD; psychotic disorder; and start of a substance use disorder.
The advisory noted that social factors can contribute to the mental health problems for racial and ethnic minorities; people with limited access to health care; people who already have behavioral health conditions and physical disabilities; and people who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, or intersex.
“Long COVID has a range of burdensome physical symptoms and can take a toll on a person’s mental health. It can be very challenging for a person, whether they are impacted themselves, or they are a caregiver for someone who is affected,” Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra said in a statement. “This advisory helps to raise awareness, especially among primary care practitioners and clinicians who are often the ones treating patients with long COVID.”
The department says about 10% of people infected with COVID have at least one long COVID symptom. Physical symptoms include dizziness, stomach upset, heart palpitations, issues with sexual desire or capacity, loss of smell or taste, thirst, chronic coughing, chest pain, and abnormal movements.
“We know that people living with long COVID need help today, and providers need help understanding what long COVID is and how to treat it,” Admiral Rachel Levine, MD, assistant secretary for health, said in the statement. “This advisory helps bridge that gap for the behavioral health impacts of long COVID.”
A version of this article first appeared on WebMD.com.
The nine mental health symptoms highlighted in the advisory are fatigue; cognitive impairment, including brain fog; anxiety; depression; obsessive-compulsive disorder; sleep disorders; PTSD; psychotic disorder; and start of a substance use disorder.
The advisory noted that social factors can contribute to the mental health problems for racial and ethnic minorities; people with limited access to health care; people who already have behavioral health conditions and physical disabilities; and people who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, or intersex.
“Long COVID has a range of burdensome physical symptoms and can take a toll on a person’s mental health. It can be very challenging for a person, whether they are impacted themselves, or they are a caregiver for someone who is affected,” Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra said in a statement. “This advisory helps to raise awareness, especially among primary care practitioners and clinicians who are often the ones treating patients with long COVID.”
The department says about 10% of people infected with COVID have at least one long COVID symptom. Physical symptoms include dizziness, stomach upset, heart palpitations, issues with sexual desire or capacity, loss of smell or taste, thirst, chronic coughing, chest pain, and abnormal movements.
“We know that people living with long COVID need help today, and providers need help understanding what long COVID is and how to treat it,” Admiral Rachel Levine, MD, assistant secretary for health, said in the statement. “This advisory helps bridge that gap for the behavioral health impacts of long COVID.”
A version of this article first appeared on WebMD.com.
International rights group calls out United States for allowing hospitals to push millions into debt
Human Rights Watch, the nonprofit that for decades has called attention to the victims of war, famine, and political repression around the world, is taking aim at U.S. hospitals for pushing millions of American patients into debt.
In a new report, the group calls for stronger government action to protect Americans from aggressive billing and debt collection by nonprofit hospitals, which Human Rights Watch said are systematically undermining patients’ human rights.
“Given the high prevalence of hospital-related medical debt in the U.S., this system is clearly not working,” concludes the report, which draws extensively on an ongoing investigation of medical debt by KFF Health News and NPR.
The report continues: “The U.S. model of subsidizing privately operated hospitals with tax exemptions in the hope that they will increase the accessibility of hospital care for un- and underinsured patients allows for abusive medical billing and debt collection practices and undermines human rights, including the right to health.”
Nationwide, about 100 million people – or 41% of adults – have some form of health care debt, a KFF survey conducted for the KFF Health News–NPR project found. And while patient debt is being driven by a range of medical and dental bills, polls and studies suggest hospitals are a major contributor.
About a third of U.S. adults with health care debt owed money for hospitalization, KFF’s polling found. Close to half of those owed at least $5,000. About a quarter owed $10,000 or more.
The scale of this crisis – which is unparalleled among wealthy nations – compelled Human Rights Watch to release the new report, said researcher Matt McConnell, its author. “Historically, Human Rights Watch has been an organization that has focused on international human rights issues,” he said. “But on medical debt, the U.S. is a real outlier. What you see is a system that privileges a few but creates large barriers to people accessing basic health rights.”
Hospital industry officials defend their work, citing hospitals’ broader work to help the communities they serve. “As a field, hospitals provide more benefit to their communities than any other sector in health care,” Melinda Hatton, general counsel at the American Hospital Association, wrote in a response to the Human Right Watch report.
Federal law requires private, tax-exempt hospitals – which make up more than half the nation’s medical centers – to provide care at no cost or at a discount to low-income patients. But reporting by KFF Health News and others has found that many hospitals make this aid difficult for patients to get.
At the same time, thousands of medical centers – including many tax-exempt ones – engage in aggressive debt collection tactics to pursue patients, including garnishing patients’ wages, placing liens on their homes, or selling their debt to third-party debt collectors.
Overall, KFF Health News found that most of the nation’s approximately 5,100 hospitals serving the general public have policies to use legal action or other aggressive tactics against patients. And one in five will deny nonemergency care to people with outstanding debt.
“Medical debt is drowning many low-income and working families while hospitals continue to benefit from nonprofit tax status as they pursue families for medical debt,” said Marceline White, executive director of Economic Action Maryland. The advocacy group has helped enact tighter rules to ensure Maryland hospitals make financial assistance more easily accessible and to restrict hospitals from some aggressive debt collection tactics, such as placing liens on patients’ homes.
Similar efforts are underway in other states, including Colorado, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, and Washington. But many patient and consumer advocates say stronger federal action is needed to expand patient protections.
The Human Rights Watch report – titled “In Sheep’s Clothing: United States’ Poorly Regulated Nonprofit Hospitals Undermine Health Care Access” – lists more than a dozen recommendations. These include:
- Congress should pass legislation to ensure that hospitals provide at least the same amount of charity care as they receive in public subsidies.
- The IRS should set uniform national standards on patients’ eligibility for financial assistance at nonprofit hospitals. Currently, hospitals are free to set their own standards, resulting in widespread variation, which can confuse patients.
- The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a federal watchdog agency, should crack down on debt collectors that do not ensure that patients have been screened for financial assistance before being pursued.
- The federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, which administers the two mammoth public insurance programs, should penalize hospitals that do not provide adequate financial assistance to patients.
“Nonprofit hospitals are contributing to medical debt and engaging in abusive billing and debt collection practices,” Mr. McConnell said. “The reason this keeps happening is the absence of clear guidelines and the federal government’s inadequate enforcement of existing regulations.”
KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF – the independent source for health policy research, polling, and journalism.
Human Rights Watch, the nonprofit that for decades has called attention to the victims of war, famine, and political repression around the world, is taking aim at U.S. hospitals for pushing millions of American patients into debt.
In a new report, the group calls for stronger government action to protect Americans from aggressive billing and debt collection by nonprofit hospitals, which Human Rights Watch said are systematically undermining patients’ human rights.
“Given the high prevalence of hospital-related medical debt in the U.S., this system is clearly not working,” concludes the report, which draws extensively on an ongoing investigation of medical debt by KFF Health News and NPR.
The report continues: “The U.S. model of subsidizing privately operated hospitals with tax exemptions in the hope that they will increase the accessibility of hospital care for un- and underinsured patients allows for abusive medical billing and debt collection practices and undermines human rights, including the right to health.”
Nationwide, about 100 million people – or 41% of adults – have some form of health care debt, a KFF survey conducted for the KFF Health News–NPR project found. And while patient debt is being driven by a range of medical and dental bills, polls and studies suggest hospitals are a major contributor.
About a third of U.S. adults with health care debt owed money for hospitalization, KFF’s polling found. Close to half of those owed at least $5,000. About a quarter owed $10,000 or more.
The scale of this crisis – which is unparalleled among wealthy nations – compelled Human Rights Watch to release the new report, said researcher Matt McConnell, its author. “Historically, Human Rights Watch has been an organization that has focused on international human rights issues,” he said. “But on medical debt, the U.S. is a real outlier. What you see is a system that privileges a few but creates large barriers to people accessing basic health rights.”
Hospital industry officials defend their work, citing hospitals’ broader work to help the communities they serve. “As a field, hospitals provide more benefit to their communities than any other sector in health care,” Melinda Hatton, general counsel at the American Hospital Association, wrote in a response to the Human Right Watch report.
Federal law requires private, tax-exempt hospitals – which make up more than half the nation’s medical centers – to provide care at no cost or at a discount to low-income patients. But reporting by KFF Health News and others has found that many hospitals make this aid difficult for patients to get.
At the same time, thousands of medical centers – including many tax-exempt ones – engage in aggressive debt collection tactics to pursue patients, including garnishing patients’ wages, placing liens on their homes, or selling their debt to third-party debt collectors.
Overall, KFF Health News found that most of the nation’s approximately 5,100 hospitals serving the general public have policies to use legal action or other aggressive tactics against patients. And one in five will deny nonemergency care to people with outstanding debt.
“Medical debt is drowning many low-income and working families while hospitals continue to benefit from nonprofit tax status as they pursue families for medical debt,” said Marceline White, executive director of Economic Action Maryland. The advocacy group has helped enact tighter rules to ensure Maryland hospitals make financial assistance more easily accessible and to restrict hospitals from some aggressive debt collection tactics, such as placing liens on patients’ homes.
Similar efforts are underway in other states, including Colorado, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, and Washington. But many patient and consumer advocates say stronger federal action is needed to expand patient protections.
The Human Rights Watch report – titled “In Sheep’s Clothing: United States’ Poorly Regulated Nonprofit Hospitals Undermine Health Care Access” – lists more than a dozen recommendations. These include:
- Congress should pass legislation to ensure that hospitals provide at least the same amount of charity care as they receive in public subsidies.
- The IRS should set uniform national standards on patients’ eligibility for financial assistance at nonprofit hospitals. Currently, hospitals are free to set their own standards, resulting in widespread variation, which can confuse patients.
- The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a federal watchdog agency, should crack down on debt collectors that do not ensure that patients have been screened for financial assistance before being pursued.
- The federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, which administers the two mammoth public insurance programs, should penalize hospitals that do not provide adequate financial assistance to patients.
“Nonprofit hospitals are contributing to medical debt and engaging in abusive billing and debt collection practices,” Mr. McConnell said. “The reason this keeps happening is the absence of clear guidelines and the federal government’s inadequate enforcement of existing regulations.”
KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF – the independent source for health policy research, polling, and journalism.
Human Rights Watch, the nonprofit that for decades has called attention to the victims of war, famine, and political repression around the world, is taking aim at U.S. hospitals for pushing millions of American patients into debt.
In a new report, the group calls for stronger government action to protect Americans from aggressive billing and debt collection by nonprofit hospitals, which Human Rights Watch said are systematically undermining patients’ human rights.
“Given the high prevalence of hospital-related medical debt in the U.S., this system is clearly not working,” concludes the report, which draws extensively on an ongoing investigation of medical debt by KFF Health News and NPR.
The report continues: “The U.S. model of subsidizing privately operated hospitals with tax exemptions in the hope that they will increase the accessibility of hospital care for un- and underinsured patients allows for abusive medical billing and debt collection practices and undermines human rights, including the right to health.”
Nationwide, about 100 million people – or 41% of adults – have some form of health care debt, a KFF survey conducted for the KFF Health News–NPR project found. And while patient debt is being driven by a range of medical and dental bills, polls and studies suggest hospitals are a major contributor.
About a third of U.S. adults with health care debt owed money for hospitalization, KFF’s polling found. Close to half of those owed at least $5,000. About a quarter owed $10,000 or more.
The scale of this crisis – which is unparalleled among wealthy nations – compelled Human Rights Watch to release the new report, said researcher Matt McConnell, its author. “Historically, Human Rights Watch has been an organization that has focused on international human rights issues,” he said. “But on medical debt, the U.S. is a real outlier. What you see is a system that privileges a few but creates large barriers to people accessing basic health rights.”
Hospital industry officials defend their work, citing hospitals’ broader work to help the communities they serve. “As a field, hospitals provide more benefit to their communities than any other sector in health care,” Melinda Hatton, general counsel at the American Hospital Association, wrote in a response to the Human Right Watch report.
Federal law requires private, tax-exempt hospitals – which make up more than half the nation’s medical centers – to provide care at no cost or at a discount to low-income patients. But reporting by KFF Health News and others has found that many hospitals make this aid difficult for patients to get.
At the same time, thousands of medical centers – including many tax-exempt ones – engage in aggressive debt collection tactics to pursue patients, including garnishing patients’ wages, placing liens on their homes, or selling their debt to third-party debt collectors.
Overall, KFF Health News found that most of the nation’s approximately 5,100 hospitals serving the general public have policies to use legal action or other aggressive tactics against patients. And one in five will deny nonemergency care to people with outstanding debt.
“Medical debt is drowning many low-income and working families while hospitals continue to benefit from nonprofit tax status as they pursue families for medical debt,” said Marceline White, executive director of Economic Action Maryland. The advocacy group has helped enact tighter rules to ensure Maryland hospitals make financial assistance more easily accessible and to restrict hospitals from some aggressive debt collection tactics, such as placing liens on patients’ homes.
Similar efforts are underway in other states, including Colorado, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, and Washington. But many patient and consumer advocates say stronger federal action is needed to expand patient protections.
The Human Rights Watch report – titled “In Sheep’s Clothing: United States’ Poorly Regulated Nonprofit Hospitals Undermine Health Care Access” – lists more than a dozen recommendations. These include:
- Congress should pass legislation to ensure that hospitals provide at least the same amount of charity care as they receive in public subsidies.
- The IRS should set uniform national standards on patients’ eligibility for financial assistance at nonprofit hospitals. Currently, hospitals are free to set their own standards, resulting in widespread variation, which can confuse patients.
- The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a federal watchdog agency, should crack down on debt collectors that do not ensure that patients have been screened for financial assistance before being pursued.
- The federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, which administers the two mammoth public insurance programs, should penalize hospitals that do not provide adequate financial assistance to patients.
“Nonprofit hospitals are contributing to medical debt and engaging in abusive billing and debt collection practices,” Mr. McConnell said. “The reason this keeps happening is the absence of clear guidelines and the federal government’s inadequate enforcement of existing regulations.”
KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF – the independent source for health policy research, polling, and journalism.