Fluarix Quadrivalent effective in very young, simplifies flu shots for all ages

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 17:26

 

Fluarix Quadrivalent is highly effective against moderate and severe flu strains in children aged 6-35 months, and has the potential to simplify influenza vaccinations for all ages, according the results of a phase 3 clinical trial presented at a meeting of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.

“Fluarix Quadrivalent, at the 0.5-mL dose in young children 6 to 35 months of age, demonstrated efficacy of 63.2% against moderate to severe influenza and 49.8% against any severity influenza disease” stated Leonard Friedland, MD, director of scientific affairs and public health, Vaccines North America, GlaxoSmithKline. Dr. Friedland, a pediatrician in Pennsylvania, said that a standard 0.5-mL dose of Fluarix Quadrivalent has practice-changing implications for physicians. “The use of a 0.5-mL dose (15 mcg per strain) for all persons aged 6 months and older potentially simplifies influenza vaccination by allowing the same vaccine dose to be used for all eligible individuals.”

This negative-stained transmission electron micrograph depicts the ultrastructural details of an influenza virus particle, or a virion.
Cynthia Goldsmith/CDC photo #10073
This negative-stained transmission electron micrograph depicts the ultrastructural details of an influenza virus particle, or a virion.

The high efficacy of Fluarix against almost half of all influenza strains, regardless of severity, and in preventing moderate to severe influenza, correlated with a reduction in health care utilization by pediatric influenza patients, he said. Visits to general practitioners and emergency departments decreased by 47% and 79%, respectively, in children aged 6-35 months. Influenza-associated antibiotic use in these pediatric influenza patients also decreased by 50%.

These findings were the result of D-QIV-004, a phase 3, observer-blinded, randomized trial of 12,018 children aged 6-35 months. These children were split into five cohorts, each in a different influenza season. The study spanned 13 countries and ran from October 2011 to December 2014. To determine the safety of Fluarix, the study utilized noninfluenza vaccine comparator vaccines that were age appropriate, including Prevnar 13, Havrix, and Varivax.

A majority of the children in the study (98%) were vaccine unprimed (had never received two doses of seasonal influenza vaccine) and received two doses of Fluarix. The remaining children received one dose.

On Jan. 11, 2018, the Food and Drug Administration expanded the indication of Fluarix Quadrivalent to include use in persons 6 months and older. Previously, it was approved only for persons 3 years and older.

 

 


“These study results support universal vaccination of all individuals from 6 months of age [with Fluarix] to prevent influenza.” Dr. Friedland concluded.

For live updates and information concerning influenza, visit the CDC website.

ilacy@frontlinemedcom.com

SOURCE: D-QIV-004.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

Fluarix Quadrivalent is highly effective against moderate and severe flu strains in children aged 6-35 months, and has the potential to simplify influenza vaccinations for all ages, according the results of a phase 3 clinical trial presented at a meeting of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.

“Fluarix Quadrivalent, at the 0.5-mL dose in young children 6 to 35 months of age, demonstrated efficacy of 63.2% against moderate to severe influenza and 49.8% against any severity influenza disease” stated Leonard Friedland, MD, director of scientific affairs and public health, Vaccines North America, GlaxoSmithKline. Dr. Friedland, a pediatrician in Pennsylvania, said that a standard 0.5-mL dose of Fluarix Quadrivalent has practice-changing implications for physicians. “The use of a 0.5-mL dose (15 mcg per strain) for all persons aged 6 months and older potentially simplifies influenza vaccination by allowing the same vaccine dose to be used for all eligible individuals.”

This negative-stained transmission electron micrograph depicts the ultrastructural details of an influenza virus particle, or a virion.
Cynthia Goldsmith/CDC photo #10073
This negative-stained transmission electron micrograph depicts the ultrastructural details of an influenza virus particle, or a virion.

The high efficacy of Fluarix against almost half of all influenza strains, regardless of severity, and in preventing moderate to severe influenza, correlated with a reduction in health care utilization by pediatric influenza patients, he said. Visits to general practitioners and emergency departments decreased by 47% and 79%, respectively, in children aged 6-35 months. Influenza-associated antibiotic use in these pediatric influenza patients also decreased by 50%.

These findings were the result of D-QIV-004, a phase 3, observer-blinded, randomized trial of 12,018 children aged 6-35 months. These children were split into five cohorts, each in a different influenza season. The study spanned 13 countries and ran from October 2011 to December 2014. To determine the safety of Fluarix, the study utilized noninfluenza vaccine comparator vaccines that were age appropriate, including Prevnar 13, Havrix, and Varivax.

A majority of the children in the study (98%) were vaccine unprimed (had never received two doses of seasonal influenza vaccine) and received two doses of Fluarix. The remaining children received one dose.

On Jan. 11, 2018, the Food and Drug Administration expanded the indication of Fluarix Quadrivalent to include use in persons 6 months and older. Previously, it was approved only for persons 3 years and older.

 

 


“These study results support universal vaccination of all individuals from 6 months of age [with Fluarix] to prevent influenza.” Dr. Friedland concluded.

For live updates and information concerning influenza, visit the CDC website.

ilacy@frontlinemedcom.com

SOURCE: D-QIV-004.

 

Fluarix Quadrivalent is highly effective against moderate and severe flu strains in children aged 6-35 months, and has the potential to simplify influenza vaccinations for all ages, according the results of a phase 3 clinical trial presented at a meeting of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.

“Fluarix Quadrivalent, at the 0.5-mL dose in young children 6 to 35 months of age, demonstrated efficacy of 63.2% against moderate to severe influenza and 49.8% against any severity influenza disease” stated Leonard Friedland, MD, director of scientific affairs and public health, Vaccines North America, GlaxoSmithKline. Dr. Friedland, a pediatrician in Pennsylvania, said that a standard 0.5-mL dose of Fluarix Quadrivalent has practice-changing implications for physicians. “The use of a 0.5-mL dose (15 mcg per strain) for all persons aged 6 months and older potentially simplifies influenza vaccination by allowing the same vaccine dose to be used for all eligible individuals.”

This negative-stained transmission electron micrograph depicts the ultrastructural details of an influenza virus particle, or a virion.
Cynthia Goldsmith/CDC photo #10073
This negative-stained transmission electron micrograph depicts the ultrastructural details of an influenza virus particle, or a virion.

The high efficacy of Fluarix against almost half of all influenza strains, regardless of severity, and in preventing moderate to severe influenza, correlated with a reduction in health care utilization by pediatric influenza patients, he said. Visits to general practitioners and emergency departments decreased by 47% and 79%, respectively, in children aged 6-35 months. Influenza-associated antibiotic use in these pediatric influenza patients also decreased by 50%.

These findings were the result of D-QIV-004, a phase 3, observer-blinded, randomized trial of 12,018 children aged 6-35 months. These children were split into five cohorts, each in a different influenza season. The study spanned 13 countries and ran from October 2011 to December 2014. To determine the safety of Fluarix, the study utilized noninfluenza vaccine comparator vaccines that were age appropriate, including Prevnar 13, Havrix, and Varivax.

A majority of the children in the study (98%) were vaccine unprimed (had never received two doses of seasonal influenza vaccine) and received two doses of Fluarix. The remaining children received one dose.

On Jan. 11, 2018, the Food and Drug Administration expanded the indication of Fluarix Quadrivalent to include use in persons 6 months and older. Previously, it was approved only for persons 3 years and older.

 

 


“These study results support universal vaccination of all individuals from 6 months of age [with Fluarix] to prevent influenza.” Dr. Friedland concluded.

For live updates and information concerning influenza, visit the CDC website.

ilacy@frontlinemedcom.com

SOURCE: D-QIV-004.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

FROM AN ACIP MEETING

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: The high efficacy of Fluarix against almost half of all influenza strains, regardless of severity, as well as preventing moderate to severe influenza, reduced health care utilization by pediatric influenza patients.

Major finding: Fluarix Quadrivalent was effective against moderate to severe influenza in 63.2% and against any severity of influenza in 49.8% of children aged 6-35 months.

Study details: A phase 3, observer-blinded, randomized trial of 12,018 children aged 6-35 months, in which the children were split into five cohorts, each in a different influenza season from October 2011 to December 2014.

Disclosures: No disclosures were reported.

Source: The D-QIV-004 study.

Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

ACIP unanimously recommends HEPLISAV-B

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 17:25

 

At a meeting of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, members unanimously voted to include HEPLISAV-B on the ACIP list of recommended products to vaccinate adults against hepatitis B.

“I think this is a huge advance, and a step forward “ said David S. Stephens, MD, of Emory University, Atlanta, who is a voting member of ACIP.

CDC News icon
HEPLISAV-B was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in November 2017, but this recommendation by the ACIP reinforces its usefulness as a vaccine against hepatitis B virus (HBV) in adults. It is a two-dose vaccine intended for administration over the course of a month. This stands in contrast to prior HBV vaccines, which use a three-dose approach. One of the factors that may make HEPLISAV-B effective after two doses is the use of the 1018 adjuvant, which binds Toll-like receptor 9 to stimulate a directed immune response to hepatitis B surface antigen.

According to Sarah Schillie, MD, of ACIP’s Hepatitis Work Group, the reduction from three doses to two also will improve vaccine series completion rates, providing more effective protection. This could be very important for health care professionals, with only about 60% of treated individuals fulfilling the three doses necessary for complete HBV protection.

 

 


Although fewer doses are needed with HEPLISAV-B, it displays similar immunogenicity to similar vaccines (90.0%-100% vs. 70.5%-90.2%). It is also more effective, compared with similar vaccines in those with type II diabetes (90.0% vs. 65.1%) and chronic kidney disease (89.9% vs. 81.1%).

HEPLISAV-B uses an adjuvant, but it appears to be safe and well tolerated. The rate of mild (45.6% vs. 45.7%) and serious (5.4% vs. 6.3%) reactions were similar among HEPLISAV-B and comparable vaccines, although cardiovascular events were more common with this vaccine than with others (0.27% vs. 0.14%).

Dr. Stephens, who supported the recommendation of HEPLISAV-B, voiced reservations about these findings. “I am concerned about the myocardial infarction signal and the use of this new adjuvant and certainly urge us to look at the postmarketing data carefully.”

While the reported incidence rate of acute HBV cases consistently fell during 2000-2015, it began to rise again at the end of 2015. This is linked with concomitant rise in injection drug use, which also is a risk factor in transmitting HBV. Over the same period, the incidence of HBV was highest in people aged 30-49 years. With these factors to consider, the vote by ACIP for HEPLISAV-B as a recommended vaccine is timely and may help reduce HBV infections in adults.
Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

At a meeting of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, members unanimously voted to include HEPLISAV-B on the ACIP list of recommended products to vaccinate adults against hepatitis B.

“I think this is a huge advance, and a step forward “ said David S. Stephens, MD, of Emory University, Atlanta, who is a voting member of ACIP.

CDC News icon
HEPLISAV-B was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in November 2017, but this recommendation by the ACIP reinforces its usefulness as a vaccine against hepatitis B virus (HBV) in adults. It is a two-dose vaccine intended for administration over the course of a month. This stands in contrast to prior HBV vaccines, which use a three-dose approach. One of the factors that may make HEPLISAV-B effective after two doses is the use of the 1018 adjuvant, which binds Toll-like receptor 9 to stimulate a directed immune response to hepatitis B surface antigen.

According to Sarah Schillie, MD, of ACIP’s Hepatitis Work Group, the reduction from three doses to two also will improve vaccine series completion rates, providing more effective protection. This could be very important for health care professionals, with only about 60% of treated individuals fulfilling the three doses necessary for complete HBV protection.

 

 


Although fewer doses are needed with HEPLISAV-B, it displays similar immunogenicity to similar vaccines (90.0%-100% vs. 70.5%-90.2%). It is also more effective, compared with similar vaccines in those with type II diabetes (90.0% vs. 65.1%) and chronic kidney disease (89.9% vs. 81.1%).

HEPLISAV-B uses an adjuvant, but it appears to be safe and well tolerated. The rate of mild (45.6% vs. 45.7%) and serious (5.4% vs. 6.3%) reactions were similar among HEPLISAV-B and comparable vaccines, although cardiovascular events were more common with this vaccine than with others (0.27% vs. 0.14%).

Dr. Stephens, who supported the recommendation of HEPLISAV-B, voiced reservations about these findings. “I am concerned about the myocardial infarction signal and the use of this new adjuvant and certainly urge us to look at the postmarketing data carefully.”

While the reported incidence rate of acute HBV cases consistently fell during 2000-2015, it began to rise again at the end of 2015. This is linked with concomitant rise in injection drug use, which also is a risk factor in transmitting HBV. Over the same period, the incidence of HBV was highest in people aged 30-49 years. With these factors to consider, the vote by ACIP for HEPLISAV-B as a recommended vaccine is timely and may help reduce HBV infections in adults.

 

At a meeting of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, members unanimously voted to include HEPLISAV-B on the ACIP list of recommended products to vaccinate adults against hepatitis B.

“I think this is a huge advance, and a step forward “ said David S. Stephens, MD, of Emory University, Atlanta, who is a voting member of ACIP.

CDC News icon
HEPLISAV-B was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in November 2017, but this recommendation by the ACIP reinforces its usefulness as a vaccine against hepatitis B virus (HBV) in adults. It is a two-dose vaccine intended for administration over the course of a month. This stands in contrast to prior HBV vaccines, which use a three-dose approach. One of the factors that may make HEPLISAV-B effective after two doses is the use of the 1018 adjuvant, which binds Toll-like receptor 9 to stimulate a directed immune response to hepatitis B surface antigen.

According to Sarah Schillie, MD, of ACIP’s Hepatitis Work Group, the reduction from three doses to two also will improve vaccine series completion rates, providing more effective protection. This could be very important for health care professionals, with only about 60% of treated individuals fulfilling the three doses necessary for complete HBV protection.

 

 


Although fewer doses are needed with HEPLISAV-B, it displays similar immunogenicity to similar vaccines (90.0%-100% vs. 70.5%-90.2%). It is also more effective, compared with similar vaccines in those with type II diabetes (90.0% vs. 65.1%) and chronic kidney disease (89.9% vs. 81.1%).

HEPLISAV-B uses an adjuvant, but it appears to be safe and well tolerated. The rate of mild (45.6% vs. 45.7%) and serious (5.4% vs. 6.3%) reactions were similar among HEPLISAV-B and comparable vaccines, although cardiovascular events were more common with this vaccine than with others (0.27% vs. 0.14%).

Dr. Stephens, who supported the recommendation of HEPLISAV-B, voiced reservations about these findings. “I am concerned about the myocardial infarction signal and the use of this new adjuvant and certainly urge us to look at the postmarketing data carefully.”

While the reported incidence rate of acute HBV cases consistently fell during 2000-2015, it began to rise again at the end of 2015. This is linked with concomitant rise in injection drug use, which also is a risk factor in transmitting HBV. Over the same period, the incidence of HBV was highest in people aged 30-49 years. With these factors to consider, the vote by ACIP for HEPLISAV-B as a recommended vaccine is timely and may help reduce HBV infections in adults.
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

REPORTING FROM AN ACIP MEETING

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default