User login
More STEP data: Semaglutide cuts weight, cravings, beats liraglutide
The STEP 5 clinical trial extends favorable weight loss from 1 year out to 2 years for the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonist semaglutide (Wegovy, Novo Nordisk), given as a once-weekly 2.4-mg subcutaneous injection, and some food cravings were improved in a subgroup analysis.
In another study, STEP 8, weight loss was greater at 68 weeks with semaglutide subcutaneous injection than with a 3-mg daily subcutaneous injection of another GLP-1 agonist, liraglutide (Saxenda, Novo Nordisk), approved earlier for weight loss.
Researchers presented these promising outcomes, with no new safety signals, at ObesityWeek® 2021.
However, there is more to learn about the drug class, researchers agree. Follow-up is still relatively short for a chronic disease and many patients have gastrointestinal side effects with semaglutide, one expert cautions.
The key findings were:
In STEP 5, combined with lifestyle intervention (a reduced-calorie meal plan and advice about physical activity), weekly injection of 2.4 mg semaglutide led to:
- 15.2% weight loss, compared with 2.6% weight loss with placebo at 2 years (P < .0001);
- 77% of patients losing at least 5% of their weight, compared with 34% of patients in the placebo group at 2 years (P < .0001);
- Significantly greater improvement in overall control of cravings, and craving for savory foods, in a subset of patients, versus placebo, but questionnaire scores for positive mood and craving for sweet foods were similar in both groups.
- In STEP 8, mean body weight at 68 weeks was 15.8% lower with 2.4 mg/week subcutaneous semaglutide plus lifestyle changes versus 6.4% lower with 3.0 mg/day subcutaneous liraglutide plus lifestyle changes (P < .001).
Can treat to a target weight-loss range
The undiminished weight loss efficacy in the 2-year data for STEP 5 “portends well,” said W. Timothy Garvey, MD, following his presentation of the results.
“I think this is a new era in obesity care,” said Dr. Garvey, director of the diabetes research center at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. Semaglutide “essentially doubles weight loss efficacy” compared to the other approved pharmacotherapies for obesity.
With this degree of potential weight loss, clinicians “can use weight as a biomarker and treat to a target [weight-loss] range,” he said.
Expounding on this in an interview, Dr. Garvey noted that, as stated in the 2016 American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) and American College of Endocrinology (ACE) clinical practice guidelines for medical care of patients with obesity, of which he was lead author, “the objective of care in obesity is to increase health of patients and prevent or treat complications.”
Semaglutide “can treat to a range of weight loss of 10% to 20% in the majority of patients,” which is associated with improvements in cardiovascular and metabolic risk factors.
In STEP 5, of the 51% of patients in the semaglutide group who had prediabetes at enrollment, 80% had normal glycemia at 2 years; however, the trial was not powered nor designed to investigate this.
More data are needed to inform long-term care decisions. The ongoing SELECT cardiovascular outcomes trial of semaglutide, with expected primary study completion on Sept. 28, 2023, should provide more information.
Weight loss plus reduced cravings
In another presentation, Sean Wharton, MD, PharmD, said, “In adults with overweight or obesity, substantial weight loss with semaglutide 2.4 mg was accompanied by short- and long-term improvements in control of eating.”
“Most patients living with obesity who are attempting to decrease calories will have food cravings, based on the biological parameters of weight preservation,” Dr. Wharton, medical director at the Wharton Medical Clinic, in Hamilton, Ont., explained in an email.
The degree of craving varies from patient to patient, likely based on genetics, he added. Research in this field is still emerging.
“I believe that semaglutide 2.4 mg is a game-changer in the field of weight management, and it will change the dialogue for insurance plans and with policymakers regarding coverage for this medication,” said Dr. Wharton.
“The data from the STEP programs are very strong. I am certainly hoping for a change to bias against covering these medications that we have seen in the past,” he said.
Clinically meaningful weight loss
When presenting the STEP 8 findings, Domenica M. Rubino, MD, said: “Participants were significantly more likely to achieve clinically meaningful weight loss thresholds with semaglutide 2.4 mg versus liraglutide 3.0 mg, accompanied by greater improvements in cardiometabolic risk factors.”
For example, patients can have better mobility, which is important for quality of life, Dr. Rubino, director of the Washington Center for Weight Management and Research, Arlington, Virginia, noted.
A smaller percentage of patients respond to liraglutide, she added. Clinicians need to individualize treatment.
When asked, “How do you choose which medical therapy?” Dr. Rubino responded: “We sit and talk.” Finding the medical therapy that fits the patient depends on things such as the patient’s insurance coverage and ability to tolerate side effects such as dehydration, diarrhea, and nausea.
When asked, “How do you switch from liraglutide to semaglutide?” she noted that there are no current guidelines for this. “You have to be careful. Start on the lowest dose of Wegovy. Be cautious, conservative.”
Still early days, caveats remain
“The STEP trials as a group appear to be making the case that obesity may now be considered a medically manageable disease, based on the experience with semaglutide,” Julie R. Ingelfinger, MD, who was not involved with the research, commented in an email.
“STEP 5 and 8 may suggest that weight loss occurs and is sustainable in overweight persons without diabetes with one or more comorbidities or in obese persons without diabetes,” added Dr. Ingelfinger, professor of pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, consultant in pediatric nephrology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, and deputy editor, The New England Journal of Medicine.
However, “even 2 years, in the case of STEP 5, and ~68 weeks in the case of STEP 8, may not be long enough to know whether semaglutide is as promising as these brief summaries (abstracts) suggest,” she cautioned.
“Obesity is a chronic condition, and very long-term therapy and management are required,” Dr. Ingelfinger continued.
“Further, it is hard to generalize when gastrointestinal adverse events are common in a study,” she said. For example, in STEP 8, they were just as common with semaglutide as with the comparator liraglutide, she noted.
“The racial and ethnic representativeness of these studies does not reflect population distributions in the U.S., limiting generalization,” she continued.
“So, there remain caveats in interpreting these data.”
STEP 5 weight loss efficacy and safety at 2 years
Garvey reported that STEP 5 was a phase 3b trial that randomized 304 adults in the United States, Canada, Hungary, Italy, and Spain, who were 18 years and older, with a body mass index (BMI) ≥27 kg/m2 with at least one weight-related comorbidity (hypertension, dyslipidemia, obstructive sleep apnea, or cardiovascular disease) or a BMI ≥30 kg/m2, without type 2 diabetes, to receive semaglutide or placebo plus lifestyle intervention.
Most participants were women (78%) and White (93%). On average, they were 47 years old, weighed 106 kg (223.7 pounds), had a BMI of 38.5 kg/m2, a waist circumference of 115.7 cm (45.6 inches), and an A1c of 5.7%.
A total of 87% of patients in the semaglutide group and 73% of patients in the placebo group completed the trial.
At 104 weeks, participants were more likely to lose ≥10%, ≥15%, and ≥20% of body weight with semaglutide versus placebo (61.8% vs. 13.3%, 52.1% vs. 7.0%, and 36.1% vs. 2.3%, respectively; P < .0001 for all).
Patients in the semaglutide group had greater health improvements in cardiovascular risk factors (waist circumference, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and C-reactive protein) and metabolic risk factors (A1c, fasting plasma glucose, fasting serum insulin, and triglycerides) than those in the placebo group (P < .05 for all).
Safety and tolerability were consistent with adverse events seen with this drug class, with no new safety signals.
Control of eating questionnaire findings at 2 years in STEP 5
Dr. Wharton and colleagues assessed changes in responses to the Control of Eating questionnaire at baseline and at 20, 52, and 104 weeks in patients from the U.S. and Canada in the STEP 5 trial (88 patients in the semaglutide group and 86 patients in the placebo group).
The questionnaire consisted of 19 questions grouped into four categories: control of food cravings, craving for savory foods (salty and spicy, dairy, or starchy foods), craving for sweet foods (chocolate, sweet foods, or fruit/fruit juice), and positive mood.
At week 104, patients in the semaglutide group had significantly greater improvements in scores for craving for salty and spicy, dairy, and starchy foods, and resisting cravings.
Semaglutide versus liraglutide, 68-week efficacy and safety in STEP 8
STEP 8 randomized 338 U.S. adults without diabetes and a BMI of ≥27 kg/m2 plus one or more weight-related comorbidities or a BMI of ≥30 kg/m2 3:1 to semaglutide 2.4 mg once weekly (n = 126) or matching placebo, or 3:1 liraglutide 3.0 mg once daily (n = 127) or matching placebo, plus lifestyle intervention.
Most participants were women (78%) and were a mean age of 49, had a mean body weight of 104.5 kg, and had a mean BMI of 37.5 kg/m2.
In STEP 8, more participants achieved ≥10%, ≥15%, and ≥20% weight loss with semaglutide than with liraglutide (70.9% vs. 25.6%, 55.6% vs. 12.0%, and 38.5% vs. 6.0%, respectively; P < .001 for all odds ratios).
Semaglutide improved waist circumference, A1c, and C-reactive protein versus liraglutide (unadjusted P < .001 for all).
Gastrointestinal adverse events were reported by 84% and 83% of participants receiving semaglutide and liraglutide, respectively. Most events were mild/moderate and transient, with prevalence declining over time.
Fewer participants stopped treatment due to adverse events with semaglutide than liraglutide (3.2% vs. 12.6%).
Dr. Garvey has reported serving as a site principal investigator for multicentered clinical trials sponsored by his university and funded by Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, and Pfizer. Dr. Wharton has reported financial ties to Novo Nordisk, Bausch Health Canada, Eli Lily, and Boehringer Ingelheim Canada. Dr. Rubino has reported ties to Boehringer Ingelheim and AstraZeneca. Dr. Ingelfinger has reported no relevant financial relationships.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
The STEP 5 clinical trial extends favorable weight loss from 1 year out to 2 years for the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonist semaglutide (Wegovy, Novo Nordisk), given as a once-weekly 2.4-mg subcutaneous injection, and some food cravings were improved in a subgroup analysis.
In another study, STEP 8, weight loss was greater at 68 weeks with semaglutide subcutaneous injection than with a 3-mg daily subcutaneous injection of another GLP-1 agonist, liraglutide (Saxenda, Novo Nordisk), approved earlier for weight loss.
Researchers presented these promising outcomes, with no new safety signals, at ObesityWeek® 2021.
However, there is more to learn about the drug class, researchers agree. Follow-up is still relatively short for a chronic disease and many patients have gastrointestinal side effects with semaglutide, one expert cautions.
The key findings were:
In STEP 5, combined with lifestyle intervention (a reduced-calorie meal plan and advice about physical activity), weekly injection of 2.4 mg semaglutide led to:
- 15.2% weight loss, compared with 2.6% weight loss with placebo at 2 years (P < .0001);
- 77% of patients losing at least 5% of their weight, compared with 34% of patients in the placebo group at 2 years (P < .0001);
- Significantly greater improvement in overall control of cravings, and craving for savory foods, in a subset of patients, versus placebo, but questionnaire scores for positive mood and craving for sweet foods were similar in both groups.
- In STEP 8, mean body weight at 68 weeks was 15.8% lower with 2.4 mg/week subcutaneous semaglutide plus lifestyle changes versus 6.4% lower with 3.0 mg/day subcutaneous liraglutide plus lifestyle changes (P < .001).
Can treat to a target weight-loss range
The undiminished weight loss efficacy in the 2-year data for STEP 5 “portends well,” said W. Timothy Garvey, MD, following his presentation of the results.
“I think this is a new era in obesity care,” said Dr. Garvey, director of the diabetes research center at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. Semaglutide “essentially doubles weight loss efficacy” compared to the other approved pharmacotherapies for obesity.
With this degree of potential weight loss, clinicians “can use weight as a biomarker and treat to a target [weight-loss] range,” he said.
Expounding on this in an interview, Dr. Garvey noted that, as stated in the 2016 American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) and American College of Endocrinology (ACE) clinical practice guidelines for medical care of patients with obesity, of which he was lead author, “the objective of care in obesity is to increase health of patients and prevent or treat complications.”
Semaglutide “can treat to a range of weight loss of 10% to 20% in the majority of patients,” which is associated with improvements in cardiovascular and metabolic risk factors.
In STEP 5, of the 51% of patients in the semaglutide group who had prediabetes at enrollment, 80% had normal glycemia at 2 years; however, the trial was not powered nor designed to investigate this.
More data are needed to inform long-term care decisions. The ongoing SELECT cardiovascular outcomes trial of semaglutide, with expected primary study completion on Sept. 28, 2023, should provide more information.
Weight loss plus reduced cravings
In another presentation, Sean Wharton, MD, PharmD, said, “In adults with overweight or obesity, substantial weight loss with semaglutide 2.4 mg was accompanied by short- and long-term improvements in control of eating.”
“Most patients living with obesity who are attempting to decrease calories will have food cravings, based on the biological parameters of weight preservation,” Dr. Wharton, medical director at the Wharton Medical Clinic, in Hamilton, Ont., explained in an email.
The degree of craving varies from patient to patient, likely based on genetics, he added. Research in this field is still emerging.
“I believe that semaglutide 2.4 mg is a game-changer in the field of weight management, and it will change the dialogue for insurance plans and with policymakers regarding coverage for this medication,” said Dr. Wharton.
“The data from the STEP programs are very strong. I am certainly hoping for a change to bias against covering these medications that we have seen in the past,” he said.
Clinically meaningful weight loss
When presenting the STEP 8 findings, Domenica M. Rubino, MD, said: “Participants were significantly more likely to achieve clinically meaningful weight loss thresholds with semaglutide 2.4 mg versus liraglutide 3.0 mg, accompanied by greater improvements in cardiometabolic risk factors.”
For example, patients can have better mobility, which is important for quality of life, Dr. Rubino, director of the Washington Center for Weight Management and Research, Arlington, Virginia, noted.
A smaller percentage of patients respond to liraglutide, she added. Clinicians need to individualize treatment.
When asked, “How do you choose which medical therapy?” Dr. Rubino responded: “We sit and talk.” Finding the medical therapy that fits the patient depends on things such as the patient’s insurance coverage and ability to tolerate side effects such as dehydration, diarrhea, and nausea.
When asked, “How do you switch from liraglutide to semaglutide?” she noted that there are no current guidelines for this. “You have to be careful. Start on the lowest dose of Wegovy. Be cautious, conservative.”
Still early days, caveats remain
“The STEP trials as a group appear to be making the case that obesity may now be considered a medically manageable disease, based on the experience with semaglutide,” Julie R. Ingelfinger, MD, who was not involved with the research, commented in an email.
“STEP 5 and 8 may suggest that weight loss occurs and is sustainable in overweight persons without diabetes with one or more comorbidities or in obese persons without diabetes,” added Dr. Ingelfinger, professor of pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, consultant in pediatric nephrology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, and deputy editor, The New England Journal of Medicine.
However, “even 2 years, in the case of STEP 5, and ~68 weeks in the case of STEP 8, may not be long enough to know whether semaglutide is as promising as these brief summaries (abstracts) suggest,” she cautioned.
“Obesity is a chronic condition, and very long-term therapy and management are required,” Dr. Ingelfinger continued.
“Further, it is hard to generalize when gastrointestinal adverse events are common in a study,” she said. For example, in STEP 8, they were just as common with semaglutide as with the comparator liraglutide, she noted.
“The racial and ethnic representativeness of these studies does not reflect population distributions in the U.S., limiting generalization,” she continued.
“So, there remain caveats in interpreting these data.”
STEP 5 weight loss efficacy and safety at 2 years
Garvey reported that STEP 5 was a phase 3b trial that randomized 304 adults in the United States, Canada, Hungary, Italy, and Spain, who were 18 years and older, with a body mass index (BMI) ≥27 kg/m2 with at least one weight-related comorbidity (hypertension, dyslipidemia, obstructive sleep apnea, or cardiovascular disease) or a BMI ≥30 kg/m2, without type 2 diabetes, to receive semaglutide or placebo plus lifestyle intervention.
Most participants were women (78%) and White (93%). On average, they were 47 years old, weighed 106 kg (223.7 pounds), had a BMI of 38.5 kg/m2, a waist circumference of 115.7 cm (45.6 inches), and an A1c of 5.7%.
A total of 87% of patients in the semaglutide group and 73% of patients in the placebo group completed the trial.
At 104 weeks, participants were more likely to lose ≥10%, ≥15%, and ≥20% of body weight with semaglutide versus placebo (61.8% vs. 13.3%, 52.1% vs. 7.0%, and 36.1% vs. 2.3%, respectively; P < .0001 for all).
Patients in the semaglutide group had greater health improvements in cardiovascular risk factors (waist circumference, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and C-reactive protein) and metabolic risk factors (A1c, fasting plasma glucose, fasting serum insulin, and triglycerides) than those in the placebo group (P < .05 for all).
Safety and tolerability were consistent with adverse events seen with this drug class, with no new safety signals.
Control of eating questionnaire findings at 2 years in STEP 5
Dr. Wharton and colleagues assessed changes in responses to the Control of Eating questionnaire at baseline and at 20, 52, and 104 weeks in patients from the U.S. and Canada in the STEP 5 trial (88 patients in the semaglutide group and 86 patients in the placebo group).
The questionnaire consisted of 19 questions grouped into four categories: control of food cravings, craving for savory foods (salty and spicy, dairy, or starchy foods), craving for sweet foods (chocolate, sweet foods, or fruit/fruit juice), and positive mood.
At week 104, patients in the semaglutide group had significantly greater improvements in scores for craving for salty and spicy, dairy, and starchy foods, and resisting cravings.
Semaglutide versus liraglutide, 68-week efficacy and safety in STEP 8
STEP 8 randomized 338 U.S. adults without diabetes and a BMI of ≥27 kg/m2 plus one or more weight-related comorbidities or a BMI of ≥30 kg/m2 3:1 to semaglutide 2.4 mg once weekly (n = 126) or matching placebo, or 3:1 liraglutide 3.0 mg once daily (n = 127) or matching placebo, plus lifestyle intervention.
Most participants were women (78%) and were a mean age of 49, had a mean body weight of 104.5 kg, and had a mean BMI of 37.5 kg/m2.
In STEP 8, more participants achieved ≥10%, ≥15%, and ≥20% weight loss with semaglutide than with liraglutide (70.9% vs. 25.6%, 55.6% vs. 12.0%, and 38.5% vs. 6.0%, respectively; P < .001 for all odds ratios).
Semaglutide improved waist circumference, A1c, and C-reactive protein versus liraglutide (unadjusted P < .001 for all).
Gastrointestinal adverse events were reported by 84% and 83% of participants receiving semaglutide and liraglutide, respectively. Most events were mild/moderate and transient, with prevalence declining over time.
Fewer participants stopped treatment due to adverse events with semaglutide than liraglutide (3.2% vs. 12.6%).
Dr. Garvey has reported serving as a site principal investigator for multicentered clinical trials sponsored by his university and funded by Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, and Pfizer. Dr. Wharton has reported financial ties to Novo Nordisk, Bausch Health Canada, Eli Lily, and Boehringer Ingelheim Canada. Dr. Rubino has reported ties to Boehringer Ingelheim and AstraZeneca. Dr. Ingelfinger has reported no relevant financial relationships.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
The STEP 5 clinical trial extends favorable weight loss from 1 year out to 2 years for the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonist semaglutide (Wegovy, Novo Nordisk), given as a once-weekly 2.4-mg subcutaneous injection, and some food cravings were improved in a subgroup analysis.
In another study, STEP 8, weight loss was greater at 68 weeks with semaglutide subcutaneous injection than with a 3-mg daily subcutaneous injection of another GLP-1 agonist, liraglutide (Saxenda, Novo Nordisk), approved earlier for weight loss.
Researchers presented these promising outcomes, with no new safety signals, at ObesityWeek® 2021.
However, there is more to learn about the drug class, researchers agree. Follow-up is still relatively short for a chronic disease and many patients have gastrointestinal side effects with semaglutide, one expert cautions.
The key findings were:
In STEP 5, combined with lifestyle intervention (a reduced-calorie meal plan and advice about physical activity), weekly injection of 2.4 mg semaglutide led to:
- 15.2% weight loss, compared with 2.6% weight loss with placebo at 2 years (P < .0001);
- 77% of patients losing at least 5% of their weight, compared with 34% of patients in the placebo group at 2 years (P < .0001);
- Significantly greater improvement in overall control of cravings, and craving for savory foods, in a subset of patients, versus placebo, but questionnaire scores for positive mood and craving for sweet foods were similar in both groups.
- In STEP 8, mean body weight at 68 weeks was 15.8% lower with 2.4 mg/week subcutaneous semaglutide plus lifestyle changes versus 6.4% lower with 3.0 mg/day subcutaneous liraglutide plus lifestyle changes (P < .001).
Can treat to a target weight-loss range
The undiminished weight loss efficacy in the 2-year data for STEP 5 “portends well,” said W. Timothy Garvey, MD, following his presentation of the results.
“I think this is a new era in obesity care,” said Dr. Garvey, director of the diabetes research center at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. Semaglutide “essentially doubles weight loss efficacy” compared to the other approved pharmacotherapies for obesity.
With this degree of potential weight loss, clinicians “can use weight as a biomarker and treat to a target [weight-loss] range,” he said.
Expounding on this in an interview, Dr. Garvey noted that, as stated in the 2016 American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) and American College of Endocrinology (ACE) clinical practice guidelines for medical care of patients with obesity, of which he was lead author, “the objective of care in obesity is to increase health of patients and prevent or treat complications.”
Semaglutide “can treat to a range of weight loss of 10% to 20% in the majority of patients,” which is associated with improvements in cardiovascular and metabolic risk factors.
In STEP 5, of the 51% of patients in the semaglutide group who had prediabetes at enrollment, 80% had normal glycemia at 2 years; however, the trial was not powered nor designed to investigate this.
More data are needed to inform long-term care decisions. The ongoing SELECT cardiovascular outcomes trial of semaglutide, with expected primary study completion on Sept. 28, 2023, should provide more information.
Weight loss plus reduced cravings
In another presentation, Sean Wharton, MD, PharmD, said, “In adults with overweight or obesity, substantial weight loss with semaglutide 2.4 mg was accompanied by short- and long-term improvements in control of eating.”
“Most patients living with obesity who are attempting to decrease calories will have food cravings, based on the biological parameters of weight preservation,” Dr. Wharton, medical director at the Wharton Medical Clinic, in Hamilton, Ont., explained in an email.
The degree of craving varies from patient to patient, likely based on genetics, he added. Research in this field is still emerging.
“I believe that semaglutide 2.4 mg is a game-changer in the field of weight management, and it will change the dialogue for insurance plans and with policymakers regarding coverage for this medication,” said Dr. Wharton.
“The data from the STEP programs are very strong. I am certainly hoping for a change to bias against covering these medications that we have seen in the past,” he said.
Clinically meaningful weight loss
When presenting the STEP 8 findings, Domenica M. Rubino, MD, said: “Participants were significantly more likely to achieve clinically meaningful weight loss thresholds with semaglutide 2.4 mg versus liraglutide 3.0 mg, accompanied by greater improvements in cardiometabolic risk factors.”
For example, patients can have better mobility, which is important for quality of life, Dr. Rubino, director of the Washington Center for Weight Management and Research, Arlington, Virginia, noted.
A smaller percentage of patients respond to liraglutide, she added. Clinicians need to individualize treatment.
When asked, “How do you choose which medical therapy?” Dr. Rubino responded: “We sit and talk.” Finding the medical therapy that fits the patient depends on things such as the patient’s insurance coverage and ability to tolerate side effects such as dehydration, diarrhea, and nausea.
When asked, “How do you switch from liraglutide to semaglutide?” she noted that there are no current guidelines for this. “You have to be careful. Start on the lowest dose of Wegovy. Be cautious, conservative.”
Still early days, caveats remain
“The STEP trials as a group appear to be making the case that obesity may now be considered a medically manageable disease, based on the experience with semaglutide,” Julie R. Ingelfinger, MD, who was not involved with the research, commented in an email.
“STEP 5 and 8 may suggest that weight loss occurs and is sustainable in overweight persons without diabetes with one or more comorbidities or in obese persons without diabetes,” added Dr. Ingelfinger, professor of pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, consultant in pediatric nephrology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, and deputy editor, The New England Journal of Medicine.
However, “even 2 years, in the case of STEP 5, and ~68 weeks in the case of STEP 8, may not be long enough to know whether semaglutide is as promising as these brief summaries (abstracts) suggest,” she cautioned.
“Obesity is a chronic condition, and very long-term therapy and management are required,” Dr. Ingelfinger continued.
“Further, it is hard to generalize when gastrointestinal adverse events are common in a study,” she said. For example, in STEP 8, they were just as common with semaglutide as with the comparator liraglutide, she noted.
“The racial and ethnic representativeness of these studies does not reflect population distributions in the U.S., limiting generalization,” she continued.
“So, there remain caveats in interpreting these data.”
STEP 5 weight loss efficacy and safety at 2 years
Garvey reported that STEP 5 was a phase 3b trial that randomized 304 adults in the United States, Canada, Hungary, Italy, and Spain, who were 18 years and older, with a body mass index (BMI) ≥27 kg/m2 with at least one weight-related comorbidity (hypertension, dyslipidemia, obstructive sleep apnea, or cardiovascular disease) or a BMI ≥30 kg/m2, without type 2 diabetes, to receive semaglutide or placebo plus lifestyle intervention.
Most participants were women (78%) and White (93%). On average, they were 47 years old, weighed 106 kg (223.7 pounds), had a BMI of 38.5 kg/m2, a waist circumference of 115.7 cm (45.6 inches), and an A1c of 5.7%.
A total of 87% of patients in the semaglutide group and 73% of patients in the placebo group completed the trial.
At 104 weeks, participants were more likely to lose ≥10%, ≥15%, and ≥20% of body weight with semaglutide versus placebo (61.8% vs. 13.3%, 52.1% vs. 7.0%, and 36.1% vs. 2.3%, respectively; P < .0001 for all).
Patients in the semaglutide group had greater health improvements in cardiovascular risk factors (waist circumference, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and C-reactive protein) and metabolic risk factors (A1c, fasting plasma glucose, fasting serum insulin, and triglycerides) than those in the placebo group (P < .05 for all).
Safety and tolerability were consistent with adverse events seen with this drug class, with no new safety signals.
Control of eating questionnaire findings at 2 years in STEP 5
Dr. Wharton and colleagues assessed changes in responses to the Control of Eating questionnaire at baseline and at 20, 52, and 104 weeks in patients from the U.S. and Canada in the STEP 5 trial (88 patients in the semaglutide group and 86 patients in the placebo group).
The questionnaire consisted of 19 questions grouped into four categories: control of food cravings, craving for savory foods (salty and spicy, dairy, or starchy foods), craving for sweet foods (chocolate, sweet foods, or fruit/fruit juice), and positive mood.
At week 104, patients in the semaglutide group had significantly greater improvements in scores for craving for salty and spicy, dairy, and starchy foods, and resisting cravings.
Semaglutide versus liraglutide, 68-week efficacy and safety in STEP 8
STEP 8 randomized 338 U.S. adults without diabetes and a BMI of ≥27 kg/m2 plus one or more weight-related comorbidities or a BMI of ≥30 kg/m2 3:1 to semaglutide 2.4 mg once weekly (n = 126) or matching placebo, or 3:1 liraglutide 3.0 mg once daily (n = 127) or matching placebo, plus lifestyle intervention.
Most participants were women (78%) and were a mean age of 49, had a mean body weight of 104.5 kg, and had a mean BMI of 37.5 kg/m2.
In STEP 8, more participants achieved ≥10%, ≥15%, and ≥20% weight loss with semaglutide than with liraglutide (70.9% vs. 25.6%, 55.6% vs. 12.0%, and 38.5% vs. 6.0%, respectively; P < .001 for all odds ratios).
Semaglutide improved waist circumference, A1c, and C-reactive protein versus liraglutide (unadjusted P < .001 for all).
Gastrointestinal adverse events were reported by 84% and 83% of participants receiving semaglutide and liraglutide, respectively. Most events were mild/moderate and transient, with prevalence declining over time.
Fewer participants stopped treatment due to adverse events with semaglutide than liraglutide (3.2% vs. 12.6%).
Dr. Garvey has reported serving as a site principal investigator for multicentered clinical trials sponsored by his university and funded by Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, and Pfizer. Dr. Wharton has reported financial ties to Novo Nordisk, Bausch Health Canada, Eli Lily, and Boehringer Ingelheim Canada. Dr. Rubino has reported ties to Boehringer Ingelheim and AstraZeneca. Dr. Ingelfinger has reported no relevant financial relationships.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
Liraglutide effective against weight regain after gastric bypass
The glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist liraglutide (Saxenda, Novo Nordisk) was safe and effective for treating weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), in a randomized controlled trial.
That is, 132 patients who had lost at least 25% of their initial weight after RYGB and then gained at least 10% back were randomized 2:1 to receive liraglutide plus frequent lifestyle advice from a registered dietitian or lifestyle advice alone.
After a year, 69%, 48%, and 24% of patients who had received liraglutide lost at least 5%, 10%, and 15% of their study entry weight, respectively. In contrast, only 5% of patients in the control group lost at least 5% of their weight and none lost at least 10% of their weight.
“Liraglutide 3.0 mg/day, with lifestyle modification, was significantly more effective than placebo in treating weight regain after RYGB without increased risk of serious adverse events,” Holly F. Lofton, MD, summarized this week in an oral session at ObesityWeek®, the annual meeting of The Obesity Society.
Dr. Lofton, a clinical associate professor of surgery and medicine, and director, weight management program, NYU, Langone Health, explained to this news organization that she initiated the study after attending a “packed” session about post bariatric surgery weight regain at a prior American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery conference.
“The lecturers recommended conservative measures (such as reiterating the diet recommendations, exercise, [and] counseling), and revisional surgeries,” she said in an email, but at the time “there was no literature that provided direction on which pharmacotherapies are best for this population.”
It was known that decreases in endogenous GLP-1 levels coincide with weight regain, and liraglutide (Saxenda) was the only GLP-1 agonist approved for chronic weight management at the time, so she devised the current study protocol.
The findings are especially helpful for patients who are not candidates for bariatric surgery revisions, she noted. Further research is needed to investigate the effect of newer GLP-1 agonists, such as semaglutide (Wegovy), on weight regain following different types of bariatric surgery.
Asked to comment, Wendy C. King, PhD, who was not involved with this research, said that more than two-thirds of patients treated with 3 mg/day subcutaneous liraglutide injections in the current study lost at least 5% of their initial weight a year later, and 20% of them attained a weight as low as, or lower than, their lowest weight after bariatric surgery (nadir weight).
“The fact that both groups received lifestyle counseling from registered dietitians for just over a year, but only patients in the liraglutide group lost weight, on average, speaks to the difficulty of losing weight following weight regain post–bariatric surgery,” added Dr. King, an associate professor of epidemiology at the University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
This study “provides data that may help clinicians and patients understand the potential effect of adding liraglutide 3.0 mg/day to their weight loss efforts,” she told this news organization in an email.
However, “given that 42% of those on liraglutide reported gastrointestinal-related side effects, patients should also be counseled on this potential outcome and given suggestions for how to minimize such side effects,” Dr. King suggested.
Weight regain common, repeat surgery entails risk
Weight regain is common even years after bariatric surgery. Repeat surgery entails some risk, and lifestyle approaches alone are rarely successful in reversing weight regain, Dr. Lofton told the audience.
The researchers enrolled 132 adults who had a mean weight of 134 kg (295 pounds) when they underwent RYGB, and who lost at least 25% of their initial weight (mean weight loss of 38%) after the surgery, but who also regained at least 10% of their initial weight.
At enrollment of the current study (baseline), the patients had had RYGB 18 months to 10 years earlier (mean 5.7 years earlier) and now had a mean weight of 99 kg (218 pounds) and a mean BMI of 35.6 kg/m2. None of the patients had diabetes.
The patients were randomized to receive liraglutide (n = 89, 84% women) or placebo (n = 43, 88% women) for 56 weeks.
They were a mean age of 48 years, and about 59% were White and 25% were Black.
All patients had clinic visits every 3 months where they received lifestyle counseling from a registered dietitian.
At 12 months, patients in the liraglutide group had lost a mean of 8.8% of their baseline weight, whereas those in the placebo group had gained a mean of 1.48% of their baseline weight.
There were no significant between-group differences in cardiometabolic variables.
None of the patients in the control group attained a weight that was as low as their nadir weight after RYGB.
The rates of nausea (25%), constipation (16%), and abdominal pain (10%) in the liraglutide group were higher than in the placebo group (7%, 14%, and 5%, respectively) but similar to rates of gastrointestinal side effects in other trials of this agent.
Dr. Lofton has disclosed receiving consulting fees and being on a speaker bureau for Novo Nordisk and receiving research funds from Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, and Novo Nordisk. Dr. King has reported no relevant financial relationships.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
The glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist liraglutide (Saxenda, Novo Nordisk) was safe and effective for treating weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), in a randomized controlled trial.
That is, 132 patients who had lost at least 25% of their initial weight after RYGB and then gained at least 10% back were randomized 2:1 to receive liraglutide plus frequent lifestyle advice from a registered dietitian or lifestyle advice alone.
After a year, 69%, 48%, and 24% of patients who had received liraglutide lost at least 5%, 10%, and 15% of their study entry weight, respectively. In contrast, only 5% of patients in the control group lost at least 5% of their weight and none lost at least 10% of their weight.
“Liraglutide 3.0 mg/day, with lifestyle modification, was significantly more effective than placebo in treating weight regain after RYGB without increased risk of serious adverse events,” Holly F. Lofton, MD, summarized this week in an oral session at ObesityWeek®, the annual meeting of The Obesity Society.
Dr. Lofton, a clinical associate professor of surgery and medicine, and director, weight management program, NYU, Langone Health, explained to this news organization that she initiated the study after attending a “packed” session about post bariatric surgery weight regain at a prior American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery conference.
“The lecturers recommended conservative measures (such as reiterating the diet recommendations, exercise, [and] counseling), and revisional surgeries,” she said in an email, but at the time “there was no literature that provided direction on which pharmacotherapies are best for this population.”
It was known that decreases in endogenous GLP-1 levels coincide with weight regain, and liraglutide (Saxenda) was the only GLP-1 agonist approved for chronic weight management at the time, so she devised the current study protocol.
The findings are especially helpful for patients who are not candidates for bariatric surgery revisions, she noted. Further research is needed to investigate the effect of newer GLP-1 agonists, such as semaglutide (Wegovy), on weight regain following different types of bariatric surgery.
Asked to comment, Wendy C. King, PhD, who was not involved with this research, said that more than two-thirds of patients treated with 3 mg/day subcutaneous liraglutide injections in the current study lost at least 5% of their initial weight a year later, and 20% of them attained a weight as low as, or lower than, their lowest weight after bariatric surgery (nadir weight).
“The fact that both groups received lifestyle counseling from registered dietitians for just over a year, but only patients in the liraglutide group lost weight, on average, speaks to the difficulty of losing weight following weight regain post–bariatric surgery,” added Dr. King, an associate professor of epidemiology at the University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
This study “provides data that may help clinicians and patients understand the potential effect of adding liraglutide 3.0 mg/day to their weight loss efforts,” she told this news organization in an email.
However, “given that 42% of those on liraglutide reported gastrointestinal-related side effects, patients should also be counseled on this potential outcome and given suggestions for how to minimize such side effects,” Dr. King suggested.
Weight regain common, repeat surgery entails risk
Weight regain is common even years after bariatric surgery. Repeat surgery entails some risk, and lifestyle approaches alone are rarely successful in reversing weight regain, Dr. Lofton told the audience.
The researchers enrolled 132 adults who had a mean weight of 134 kg (295 pounds) when they underwent RYGB, and who lost at least 25% of their initial weight (mean weight loss of 38%) after the surgery, but who also regained at least 10% of their initial weight.
At enrollment of the current study (baseline), the patients had had RYGB 18 months to 10 years earlier (mean 5.7 years earlier) and now had a mean weight of 99 kg (218 pounds) and a mean BMI of 35.6 kg/m2. None of the patients had diabetes.
The patients were randomized to receive liraglutide (n = 89, 84% women) or placebo (n = 43, 88% women) for 56 weeks.
They were a mean age of 48 years, and about 59% were White and 25% were Black.
All patients had clinic visits every 3 months where they received lifestyle counseling from a registered dietitian.
At 12 months, patients in the liraglutide group had lost a mean of 8.8% of their baseline weight, whereas those in the placebo group had gained a mean of 1.48% of their baseline weight.
There were no significant between-group differences in cardiometabolic variables.
None of the patients in the control group attained a weight that was as low as their nadir weight after RYGB.
The rates of nausea (25%), constipation (16%), and abdominal pain (10%) in the liraglutide group were higher than in the placebo group (7%, 14%, and 5%, respectively) but similar to rates of gastrointestinal side effects in other trials of this agent.
Dr. Lofton has disclosed receiving consulting fees and being on a speaker bureau for Novo Nordisk and receiving research funds from Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, and Novo Nordisk. Dr. King has reported no relevant financial relationships.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
The glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist liraglutide (Saxenda, Novo Nordisk) was safe and effective for treating weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), in a randomized controlled trial.
That is, 132 patients who had lost at least 25% of their initial weight after RYGB and then gained at least 10% back were randomized 2:1 to receive liraglutide plus frequent lifestyle advice from a registered dietitian or lifestyle advice alone.
After a year, 69%, 48%, and 24% of patients who had received liraglutide lost at least 5%, 10%, and 15% of their study entry weight, respectively. In contrast, only 5% of patients in the control group lost at least 5% of their weight and none lost at least 10% of their weight.
“Liraglutide 3.0 mg/day, with lifestyle modification, was significantly more effective than placebo in treating weight regain after RYGB without increased risk of serious adverse events,” Holly F. Lofton, MD, summarized this week in an oral session at ObesityWeek®, the annual meeting of The Obesity Society.
Dr. Lofton, a clinical associate professor of surgery and medicine, and director, weight management program, NYU, Langone Health, explained to this news organization that she initiated the study after attending a “packed” session about post bariatric surgery weight regain at a prior American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery conference.
“The lecturers recommended conservative measures (such as reiterating the diet recommendations, exercise, [and] counseling), and revisional surgeries,” she said in an email, but at the time “there was no literature that provided direction on which pharmacotherapies are best for this population.”
It was known that decreases in endogenous GLP-1 levels coincide with weight regain, and liraglutide (Saxenda) was the only GLP-1 agonist approved for chronic weight management at the time, so she devised the current study protocol.
The findings are especially helpful for patients who are not candidates for bariatric surgery revisions, she noted. Further research is needed to investigate the effect of newer GLP-1 agonists, such as semaglutide (Wegovy), on weight regain following different types of bariatric surgery.
Asked to comment, Wendy C. King, PhD, who was not involved with this research, said that more than two-thirds of patients treated with 3 mg/day subcutaneous liraglutide injections in the current study lost at least 5% of their initial weight a year later, and 20% of them attained a weight as low as, or lower than, their lowest weight after bariatric surgery (nadir weight).
“The fact that both groups received lifestyle counseling from registered dietitians for just over a year, but only patients in the liraglutide group lost weight, on average, speaks to the difficulty of losing weight following weight regain post–bariatric surgery,” added Dr. King, an associate professor of epidemiology at the University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
This study “provides data that may help clinicians and patients understand the potential effect of adding liraglutide 3.0 mg/day to their weight loss efforts,” she told this news organization in an email.
However, “given that 42% of those on liraglutide reported gastrointestinal-related side effects, patients should also be counseled on this potential outcome and given suggestions for how to minimize such side effects,” Dr. King suggested.
Weight regain common, repeat surgery entails risk
Weight regain is common even years after bariatric surgery. Repeat surgery entails some risk, and lifestyle approaches alone are rarely successful in reversing weight regain, Dr. Lofton told the audience.
The researchers enrolled 132 adults who had a mean weight of 134 kg (295 pounds) when they underwent RYGB, and who lost at least 25% of their initial weight (mean weight loss of 38%) after the surgery, but who also regained at least 10% of their initial weight.
At enrollment of the current study (baseline), the patients had had RYGB 18 months to 10 years earlier (mean 5.7 years earlier) and now had a mean weight of 99 kg (218 pounds) and a mean BMI of 35.6 kg/m2. None of the patients had diabetes.
The patients were randomized to receive liraglutide (n = 89, 84% women) or placebo (n = 43, 88% women) for 56 weeks.
They were a mean age of 48 years, and about 59% were White and 25% were Black.
All patients had clinic visits every 3 months where they received lifestyle counseling from a registered dietitian.
At 12 months, patients in the liraglutide group had lost a mean of 8.8% of their baseline weight, whereas those in the placebo group had gained a mean of 1.48% of their baseline weight.
There were no significant between-group differences in cardiometabolic variables.
None of the patients in the control group attained a weight that was as low as their nadir weight after RYGB.
The rates of nausea (25%), constipation (16%), and abdominal pain (10%) in the liraglutide group were higher than in the placebo group (7%, 14%, and 5%, respectively) but similar to rates of gastrointestinal side effects in other trials of this agent.
Dr. Lofton has disclosed receiving consulting fees and being on a speaker bureau for Novo Nordisk and receiving research funds from Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, and Novo Nordisk. Dr. King has reported no relevant financial relationships.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
FROM OBESITY WEEK 2021
‘If obesity were diabetes or cancer, how would you approach it?’
“When considering the challenges of obesity, ask yourself: ‘If it were diabetes, cancer, HIV, or Alzheimer’s, how would you discuss it, approach it, assess it, treat it?’” Lee M. Kaplan, MD, PhD, asked the audience of health care professionals during ObesityWeek®, the annual meeting of The Obesity Society.
“And then do it for obesity, using the full spectrum of tools at our disposal,” he advised.
This was the takeaway that Dr. Kaplan, director of the Obesity, Metabolism, and Nutrition Institute at Massachusetts General Hospital and associate professor, Harvard Medical School, Boston, left the audience with at the end of his lecture entitled, “What does the future of obesity care look like?”
Invited to summarize his main points, Dr. Kaplan told this news organization in an interview that practitioners caring for patients with obesity need to first “recognize that obesity is a disease” caused by dysfunction of the metabolic system that regulates body fat – in the same way immune dysregulation can lead to asthma.
Second, “we are finally developing noninvasive therapies that are more effective,” he noted, referring to the recently approved semaglutide, and even more potent weight-loss therapies that could be on the market within 3 years, so that weight-loss outcomes with pharmacotherapy are approaching those with bariatric surgery.
Third, it is important that patients with obesity get “broad and equitable access” to treatment, and health care practitioners need to be on the same page and have a “shared understanding” of which treatments are appropriate for individual patients, “just as we do for other diseases.”
Need for a shared understanding
“Dr. Kaplan really brought home the idea that we all need a shared understanding of what obesity is – and what it is not,” agreed symposium moderator Donna H. Ryan, MD, in an email.
“He underscored the biologic basis of obesity,” noted Dr. Ryan, professor emerita at Pennington Biomedical Research Center in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, and associate editor-in-chief of Obesity, the official journal of The Obesity Society.
“It is a dysregulation of the body’s weight (especially adipose tissue) regulatory system,” she continued. “The body responds to powerful environmental pressures that produce excess energy balance, and we store that as fat and defend our highest fat mass. This makes obesity a disease, a chronic disease that requires a medical approach to reverse. It’s not a cosmetic problem, it’s a medical problem,” she emphasized.
There is so much misinformation out there about obesity, according to Dr. Ryan.
“People think it’s a lack of willpower, and even patients blame themselves for not being able to lose weight and keep it off. It’s not their fault! It’s biology.”
Although the supplement industry and fad diets falsely promise fast results, there is no magic diet, she continued.
“But we have made progress based on understanding the biologic basis of obesity and have new medications that offer real hope for patients.”
“With 42% of U.S. adults having a BMI that qualifies as obesity, we need a concerted and broad effort to address this problem, and that starts with everybody on the same page as to what obesity is ... a shared understanding of the biologic basis of obesity. It’s time to take obesity seriously,” she summarized, echoing Dr. Kaplan.
A question of biology
“Obesity results from inappropriate pathophysiological regulation of body fat mass,” when the body defends adiposity, Dr. Kaplan explained at the start of his lecture.
The treatment strategy for obesity has always been a stepwise approach starting with lifestyle changes, then pharmacotherapy, then possibly bariatric surgery – each step with a potentially greater chance of weight loss. But now, he explained, medicine is on the verge of having an armamentarium of more potent weight-loss medications.
Compared with phentermine/topiramate, orlistat, naltrexone/bupropion, and liraglutide – which roughly might provide 5% to 10% weight loss, the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonist semaglutide 2.4 mg/week (Wegovy, Novo Nordisk), approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Association in June, provides almost double this potential weight loss.
And two new agents that could provide “never seen before weight loss” of 25% could potentially enter the marketplace by 2025: the amylin agonist cagrilintide (Novo Nordisk) and the twincretin tirzepatide (Eli Lilly) (a combined glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide [GIP] and GLP-1 receptor agonist).
In addition, when liraglutide comes off patent, a generic version could potentially be introduced, and combined generic liraglutide plus generic phentermine/topiramate could be a less expensive weight-loss treatment option in the future, he noted.
One size does not fit all
Importantly, weight loss varies widely among individual patients.
A graph of potential weight loss with different treatments (for example, bariatric surgery or liraglutide) versus the percentage of patients that attain the weight losses is roughly bell-shaped, Dr. Kaplan explained. For example, in the STEP1 trial of semaglutide, roughly 7.1% of patients lost less than 5% of their initial weight, 25% of patients lost 20% to 30%, and 10.8% of patients lost 30% or more; that is, patients at the higher end had weight loss comparable to that seen with bariatric surgery
Adding pharmacotherapy after bariatric surgery could be synergistic. For example, in the GRAVITAS study of patients with type 2 diabetes who had gastric bypass surgery, those who received liraglutide after surgery had augmented weight loss compared with those who received placebo.
People at a cocktail party might come up to him and say, “I’d like to lose 5 pounds, 10 pounds,” Dr. Kaplan related in the Q&A session.
“That’s not obesity,” he emphasized. Obesity is excess body fat that poses a risk to health. A person with obesity may have 50 or more excess pounds, and the body is trying to defend this weight.
“If we want to treat obesity more effectively, we have to fully understand why it is a disease and how that disease differs from the cultural desire for thinness,” he reiterated.
“We have to keep the needs and goals of all people living with obesity foremost in our minds, even if many of them have been previously misled by the bias, stigma, blame, and discrimination that surrounds them.”
“We need to re-evaluate what we think we know about obesity and open our minds to new ideas,” he added.
Dr. Kaplan has reported financial ties to Eli Lilly, Gelesis, GI Dynamics, IntelliHealth, Johnson & Johnson, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Ryan has ties to numerous Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, and several other pharmaceutical companies, including having an ownership interest in Gila Therapeutics, Xeno Biosciences, Epitomee, Calibrate, Roman, and Scientific Intake.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
“When considering the challenges of obesity, ask yourself: ‘If it were diabetes, cancer, HIV, or Alzheimer’s, how would you discuss it, approach it, assess it, treat it?’” Lee M. Kaplan, MD, PhD, asked the audience of health care professionals during ObesityWeek®, the annual meeting of The Obesity Society.
“And then do it for obesity, using the full spectrum of tools at our disposal,” he advised.
This was the takeaway that Dr. Kaplan, director of the Obesity, Metabolism, and Nutrition Institute at Massachusetts General Hospital and associate professor, Harvard Medical School, Boston, left the audience with at the end of his lecture entitled, “What does the future of obesity care look like?”
Invited to summarize his main points, Dr. Kaplan told this news organization in an interview that practitioners caring for patients with obesity need to first “recognize that obesity is a disease” caused by dysfunction of the metabolic system that regulates body fat – in the same way immune dysregulation can lead to asthma.
Second, “we are finally developing noninvasive therapies that are more effective,” he noted, referring to the recently approved semaglutide, and even more potent weight-loss therapies that could be on the market within 3 years, so that weight-loss outcomes with pharmacotherapy are approaching those with bariatric surgery.
Third, it is important that patients with obesity get “broad and equitable access” to treatment, and health care practitioners need to be on the same page and have a “shared understanding” of which treatments are appropriate for individual patients, “just as we do for other diseases.”
Need for a shared understanding
“Dr. Kaplan really brought home the idea that we all need a shared understanding of what obesity is – and what it is not,” agreed symposium moderator Donna H. Ryan, MD, in an email.
“He underscored the biologic basis of obesity,” noted Dr. Ryan, professor emerita at Pennington Biomedical Research Center in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, and associate editor-in-chief of Obesity, the official journal of The Obesity Society.
“It is a dysregulation of the body’s weight (especially adipose tissue) regulatory system,” she continued. “The body responds to powerful environmental pressures that produce excess energy balance, and we store that as fat and defend our highest fat mass. This makes obesity a disease, a chronic disease that requires a medical approach to reverse. It’s not a cosmetic problem, it’s a medical problem,” she emphasized.
There is so much misinformation out there about obesity, according to Dr. Ryan.
“People think it’s a lack of willpower, and even patients blame themselves for not being able to lose weight and keep it off. It’s not their fault! It’s biology.”
Although the supplement industry and fad diets falsely promise fast results, there is no magic diet, she continued.
“But we have made progress based on understanding the biologic basis of obesity and have new medications that offer real hope for patients.”
“With 42% of U.S. adults having a BMI that qualifies as obesity, we need a concerted and broad effort to address this problem, and that starts with everybody on the same page as to what obesity is ... a shared understanding of the biologic basis of obesity. It’s time to take obesity seriously,” she summarized, echoing Dr. Kaplan.
A question of biology
“Obesity results from inappropriate pathophysiological regulation of body fat mass,” when the body defends adiposity, Dr. Kaplan explained at the start of his lecture.
The treatment strategy for obesity has always been a stepwise approach starting with lifestyle changes, then pharmacotherapy, then possibly bariatric surgery – each step with a potentially greater chance of weight loss. But now, he explained, medicine is on the verge of having an armamentarium of more potent weight-loss medications.
Compared with phentermine/topiramate, orlistat, naltrexone/bupropion, and liraglutide – which roughly might provide 5% to 10% weight loss, the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonist semaglutide 2.4 mg/week (Wegovy, Novo Nordisk), approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Association in June, provides almost double this potential weight loss.
And two new agents that could provide “never seen before weight loss” of 25% could potentially enter the marketplace by 2025: the amylin agonist cagrilintide (Novo Nordisk) and the twincretin tirzepatide (Eli Lilly) (a combined glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide [GIP] and GLP-1 receptor agonist).
In addition, when liraglutide comes off patent, a generic version could potentially be introduced, and combined generic liraglutide plus generic phentermine/topiramate could be a less expensive weight-loss treatment option in the future, he noted.
One size does not fit all
Importantly, weight loss varies widely among individual patients.
A graph of potential weight loss with different treatments (for example, bariatric surgery or liraglutide) versus the percentage of patients that attain the weight losses is roughly bell-shaped, Dr. Kaplan explained. For example, in the STEP1 trial of semaglutide, roughly 7.1% of patients lost less than 5% of their initial weight, 25% of patients lost 20% to 30%, and 10.8% of patients lost 30% or more; that is, patients at the higher end had weight loss comparable to that seen with bariatric surgery
Adding pharmacotherapy after bariatric surgery could be synergistic. For example, in the GRAVITAS study of patients with type 2 diabetes who had gastric bypass surgery, those who received liraglutide after surgery had augmented weight loss compared with those who received placebo.
People at a cocktail party might come up to him and say, “I’d like to lose 5 pounds, 10 pounds,” Dr. Kaplan related in the Q&A session.
“That’s not obesity,” he emphasized. Obesity is excess body fat that poses a risk to health. A person with obesity may have 50 or more excess pounds, and the body is trying to defend this weight.
“If we want to treat obesity more effectively, we have to fully understand why it is a disease and how that disease differs from the cultural desire for thinness,” he reiterated.
“We have to keep the needs and goals of all people living with obesity foremost in our minds, even if many of them have been previously misled by the bias, stigma, blame, and discrimination that surrounds them.”
“We need to re-evaluate what we think we know about obesity and open our minds to new ideas,” he added.
Dr. Kaplan has reported financial ties to Eli Lilly, Gelesis, GI Dynamics, IntelliHealth, Johnson & Johnson, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Ryan has ties to numerous Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, and several other pharmaceutical companies, including having an ownership interest in Gila Therapeutics, Xeno Biosciences, Epitomee, Calibrate, Roman, and Scientific Intake.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
“When considering the challenges of obesity, ask yourself: ‘If it were diabetes, cancer, HIV, or Alzheimer’s, how would you discuss it, approach it, assess it, treat it?’” Lee M. Kaplan, MD, PhD, asked the audience of health care professionals during ObesityWeek®, the annual meeting of The Obesity Society.
“And then do it for obesity, using the full spectrum of tools at our disposal,” he advised.
This was the takeaway that Dr. Kaplan, director of the Obesity, Metabolism, and Nutrition Institute at Massachusetts General Hospital and associate professor, Harvard Medical School, Boston, left the audience with at the end of his lecture entitled, “What does the future of obesity care look like?”
Invited to summarize his main points, Dr. Kaplan told this news organization in an interview that practitioners caring for patients with obesity need to first “recognize that obesity is a disease” caused by dysfunction of the metabolic system that regulates body fat – in the same way immune dysregulation can lead to asthma.
Second, “we are finally developing noninvasive therapies that are more effective,” he noted, referring to the recently approved semaglutide, and even more potent weight-loss therapies that could be on the market within 3 years, so that weight-loss outcomes with pharmacotherapy are approaching those with bariatric surgery.
Third, it is important that patients with obesity get “broad and equitable access” to treatment, and health care practitioners need to be on the same page and have a “shared understanding” of which treatments are appropriate for individual patients, “just as we do for other diseases.”
Need for a shared understanding
“Dr. Kaplan really brought home the idea that we all need a shared understanding of what obesity is – and what it is not,” agreed symposium moderator Donna H. Ryan, MD, in an email.
“He underscored the biologic basis of obesity,” noted Dr. Ryan, professor emerita at Pennington Biomedical Research Center in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, and associate editor-in-chief of Obesity, the official journal of The Obesity Society.
“It is a dysregulation of the body’s weight (especially adipose tissue) regulatory system,” she continued. “The body responds to powerful environmental pressures that produce excess energy balance, and we store that as fat and defend our highest fat mass. This makes obesity a disease, a chronic disease that requires a medical approach to reverse. It’s not a cosmetic problem, it’s a medical problem,” she emphasized.
There is so much misinformation out there about obesity, according to Dr. Ryan.
“People think it’s a lack of willpower, and even patients blame themselves for not being able to lose weight and keep it off. It’s not their fault! It’s biology.”
Although the supplement industry and fad diets falsely promise fast results, there is no magic diet, she continued.
“But we have made progress based on understanding the biologic basis of obesity and have new medications that offer real hope for patients.”
“With 42% of U.S. adults having a BMI that qualifies as obesity, we need a concerted and broad effort to address this problem, and that starts with everybody on the same page as to what obesity is ... a shared understanding of the biologic basis of obesity. It’s time to take obesity seriously,” she summarized, echoing Dr. Kaplan.
A question of biology
“Obesity results from inappropriate pathophysiological regulation of body fat mass,” when the body defends adiposity, Dr. Kaplan explained at the start of his lecture.
The treatment strategy for obesity has always been a stepwise approach starting with lifestyle changes, then pharmacotherapy, then possibly bariatric surgery – each step with a potentially greater chance of weight loss. But now, he explained, medicine is on the verge of having an armamentarium of more potent weight-loss medications.
Compared with phentermine/topiramate, orlistat, naltrexone/bupropion, and liraglutide – which roughly might provide 5% to 10% weight loss, the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonist semaglutide 2.4 mg/week (Wegovy, Novo Nordisk), approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Association in June, provides almost double this potential weight loss.
And two new agents that could provide “never seen before weight loss” of 25% could potentially enter the marketplace by 2025: the amylin agonist cagrilintide (Novo Nordisk) and the twincretin tirzepatide (Eli Lilly) (a combined glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide [GIP] and GLP-1 receptor agonist).
In addition, when liraglutide comes off patent, a generic version could potentially be introduced, and combined generic liraglutide plus generic phentermine/topiramate could be a less expensive weight-loss treatment option in the future, he noted.
One size does not fit all
Importantly, weight loss varies widely among individual patients.
A graph of potential weight loss with different treatments (for example, bariatric surgery or liraglutide) versus the percentage of patients that attain the weight losses is roughly bell-shaped, Dr. Kaplan explained. For example, in the STEP1 trial of semaglutide, roughly 7.1% of patients lost less than 5% of their initial weight, 25% of patients lost 20% to 30%, and 10.8% of patients lost 30% or more; that is, patients at the higher end had weight loss comparable to that seen with bariatric surgery
Adding pharmacotherapy after bariatric surgery could be synergistic. For example, in the GRAVITAS study of patients with type 2 diabetes who had gastric bypass surgery, those who received liraglutide after surgery had augmented weight loss compared with those who received placebo.
People at a cocktail party might come up to him and say, “I’d like to lose 5 pounds, 10 pounds,” Dr. Kaplan related in the Q&A session.
“That’s not obesity,” he emphasized. Obesity is excess body fat that poses a risk to health. A person with obesity may have 50 or more excess pounds, and the body is trying to defend this weight.
“If we want to treat obesity more effectively, we have to fully understand why it is a disease and how that disease differs from the cultural desire for thinness,” he reiterated.
“We have to keep the needs and goals of all people living with obesity foremost in our minds, even if many of them have been previously misled by the bias, stigma, blame, and discrimination that surrounds them.”
“We need to re-evaluate what we think we know about obesity and open our minds to new ideas,” he added.
Dr. Kaplan has reported financial ties to Eli Lilly, Gelesis, GI Dynamics, IntelliHealth, Johnson & Johnson, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Ryan has ties to numerous Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, and several other pharmaceutical companies, including having an ownership interest in Gila Therapeutics, Xeno Biosciences, Epitomee, Calibrate, Roman, and Scientific Intake.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
FROM OBESITY WEEK 2020