Clinical Edge Journal Scan

Clinical Edge Journal Scan Commentary: Prenatal Testing February 2022

Dr. Longman scans the journals, so you don’t have to!

Author and Disclosure Information

 

Ryan Longman, MD

The field of obstetrics has always aimed to optimize the ability to screen pregnancies for aneuploidy; trisomy 21, trisomy 18, and trisomy 13. A recent study by Saito et al. in The Journal of Obstetric and Gynaecologic Research examined this issue. They did a retrospective analysis to evaluate the utility of adding a first trimester ultrasound screen to women that received positive NIPT results. The first trimester ultrasound included not only an evaluation for ultrasound markers of fetal aneuploidy but also a thorough anatomical assessment of the fetus for structural defects. They found that by adding the first trimester ultrasound, the positive predictive value (PPV) of NIPT for trisomy 18 increased (PPV for trisomy 13 and 21 were already 100% using NIPT alone). Although this finding is academically interesting and may aid in counseling patients with a positive result for trisomy 18 on NIPT, society recommendations are for diagnostic genetic testing with either chorionic villus sampling (CVS) or amniocentesis when abnormal results are found on NIPT, regardless of fetal ultrasound findings.

Prenatal ultrasound detects structural fetal abnormalities in about 3% of pregnancies. When structural fetal abnormalities are found on prenatal ultrasound, diagnostic genetic testing with either CVS or amniocentesis are recommended. Classically, this has meant fetal karyotype and chromosomal microarray testing (CMA). Recently, a new type of genetic testing has become available on fetal samples, whole-exome sequencing (WES). Smogavec et al. assesses this new technology and its ability to detect fetal genetic abnormalities. They retrospectively studied 90 fetuses with abnormalities detected on prenatal ultrasound that had normal CMA results and negative fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis testing for aneuploidy. They found WES testing added a 34.4% increased rate of detection of fetal genetic abnormalities. WES is a powerful tool for genetic diagnosis in fetuses with structural anomalies and should be considered anytime a karyotype or CMA is normal in a fetus with structural anomalies.

Lastly, prenatal genetic diagnosis at an early gestational age is critical for medical management of fetuses with anomalies. In a cohort study, Chen et al . assess the simultaneous combined use of CNV-seq and WES on testing turnaround time. They found by running the testing simultaneously, rather than sequentially, this would decrease testing time from over a month to less than 2 weeks. This strategy of testing could potentially decrease the time from detection of a fetal anomaly on ultrasound to a genetic diagnosis allowing for earlier counseling and medical guidance.

Recommended Reading

Growth-restricted fetuses have smaller cardiovascular biometrics already in mid-trimester of pregnancy
MDedge ObGyn
Fetal abdominal overgrowth already present at 20-24 gestational weeks in high-risk women with GDM
MDedge ObGyn
Crown-chin length to crown-rump length ratio could help screen skeletal dysplasia in first trimester
MDedge ObGyn
Rapid intrapartum test for maternal GBS colonization fails to reduce rate of antibiotics administered
MDedge ObGyn
Testing fetal structural anomalies using simultaneous CNV-seq and whole-exome sequencing
MDedge ObGyn
Combining ultrasound examination with NIPT improves positive predictive value for trisomy 18
MDedge ObGyn
Short femur length diagnosed in prenatal screening might require intensified pregnancy monitoring
MDedge ObGyn
Prenatal diagnosis of FGR with polyhydramnios is rare but with a high mortality rate
MDedge ObGyn
Singleton exome sequencing reveals disease-causing variants in fetuses with ultrasound anomalies
MDedge ObGyn
Risk factor-based screening inadequately discriminate parturients with and without elevated lead levels
MDedge ObGyn