User login
Plenary sessions at ANA 2017 cover wide spectrum of neurologic topics
The six plenary sessions of the annual meeting of the American Neurological Association, taking place Oct. 15-17 in San Diego, promise to cover a broad range of research areas, including neuronal circuits and behavior, global neurology, precision medicine, antisense oligonucleotide therapies, and molecular imaging.
The morning of Oct. 15 starts off with the plenary session, “Linking Circuits to Behavior: Promise & Peril,” which seeks to impart how technologies such as optogenetics enable manipulation of discrete neural populations but require careful consideration of the methods for interpreting the resulting data in order to translate it to human functional neuroimaging for potential therapeutic use.
Later, in the afternoon of Oct. 15, the traditional Derek Denny-Brown Young Neurological Scholar Symposium will showcase the presentations from the two clinical science winners and one basic science winner of the Derek Denny-Brown Young Neurological Scholar Awards, as well as the 2017 Distinguished Neurology Teacher Award, the 2017 Grass Foundation ANA Award in Neuroscience, and the 2017 Wolfe Neuropathy Research Prize. The Derek Denny-Brown Young Neurological Scholar Award recognizes neurologists and neuroscientists in the first 10 years of their career at the assistant/associate faculty (equivalent) level who have made outstanding basic and clinical scientific advances toward the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and cure of neurologic diseases. This year, award winner Keven N. Sheth, MD, of Yale University, New Haven, Conn., will present on “Instructive, Pragmatic, and Successful Trials in Acute Brain Injury: Making Intracerebral Hemorrhage the LEAST Devastating Form of Stroke”; Leslie E. Skolarus, MD, of the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, will present on “Reducing the Burden of Stroke in a Disadvantaged Community”; and Conrad Chris Weihl, MD, PhD, of Washington University in St. Louis will present on “Connecting Protein Quality Control Pathways in Skeletal Muscle and Muscle Disease.” The 2017 Distinguished Neurology Teacher Award goes to Zachary Nathaniel London, MD, of the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. The winner of this year’s Grass Foundation ANA Award in Neuroscience, which goes to an outstanding young physician-scientist conducting research in basic or clinical neuroscience, is Clotilde Lagier-Tourenne, MD, PhD, of Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, who will discuss “Modeling C9ORF72 Disease: A Crucial Step for Therapeutic Development in ALS and Frontotemporal Dementia.” The symposium’s final presentation will have Stefanie Geisler, MD, of Washington University in St. Louis, talk about “Targeting a Core Axonal Degeneration Program to Treat Vincristine and Bortezomib-Induced Axonal Degeneration.” Dr. Geisler won the Wolfe Neuropathy Research Prize, which honors outstanding investigators who identify a new cause or treatment of axonal peripheral neuropathy.
The morning plenary session on Oct. 16 will focus on translational neuroscience efforts that are paying off with discoveries and insights into neurologic disorders that have higher prevalence or greater relevance to low- and middle-income countries. Presentations on these efforts will include discussion of the causation and prevention of Konzo, a distinct upper–motor neuron disease associated with cassava cyanogenic poisoning in sub-Saharan Africa; a case-control study on the impact of multiple mycotoxins on the development of Nodding syndrome in northern Uganda; efforts to address neurologic manifestations of sexually transmitted virus infections in Peru; a longitudinal cohort study of neurologic sequelae in Ebola virus disease survivors in Liberia; efforts to protect against cerebral malaria; the epidemiology of peripheral neuropathy in urban and rural Bangladeshi type 2 diabetes patients; and the use of smartphones and teleconsultations to improve care for people with epilepsy in low- and middle-income countries.
“Precision Medicine in Neurologic Disease” is the theme of four presentations in the afternoon plenary session on Oct. 16. Huda Y. Zoghbi, MD, of Baylor University, and Texas Children’s Hospital in Houston will talk about how her work in animal models of disease has enabled new insights into the effect that certain regulator proteins have on levels of disease-driving proteins such as tau and alpha-synuclein in neurodegenerative diseases. Amy Wagers, PhD, of Harvard Medical School, Boston, will describe her lab’s use of the gene-editing potential of the CRISPR-Cas9 system to fix frame-disrupting mutations in the Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene, DMD, which encodes dystrophin, and produce functional dystrophin expression in muscle stem cells in a mouse model of the disease, which partially recovered functional deficiencies of dystrophic muscle. Donald Berry, PhD, of the University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston plans to discuss the importance of adaptive platform trials – which match therapies to patients – from oncology to neurologic therapy trials and the lessons learned from two major ongoing oncology treatment trials. Cristina Sampaio, MD, PhD, of the CHDI Foundation, aims to inform attendees of the power of prognostic and predictive biomarker-guided trials in neurology to improve the likelihood of success of drug development. Three high-scoring abstracts in the field of precision medicine also will be presented.
The final day of the meeting brings a morning plenary session on “Antisense Oligonucleotide Treatment of Genetic Neurological Diseases” that will focus on the use of antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) to silence specific genes or alter their pre-mRNA splicing in Duchenne muscular dystrophy, spinal muscular atrophy, Huntington’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and tauopathies. Additional presentations will focus on abstracts about blood and salivary biomarkers in Huntington’s disease and the early efficacy and safety results of an ASO in patients with hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis with polyneuropathy.
The expanding use and development of methods to assess brain pathology in vivo sets the scene for the meeting’s final plenary session, “Molecular Imaging in Neurologic Disease” in the afternoon of Oct. 17. The use of positron emission tomography and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) tracers for glucose metabolism, the dopamine system, amyloid-beta, tau, synaptic markers, and activated microglia has grown substantially to investigate disease mechanisms, develop new therapeutics, and provide diagnostic and prognostic clinical care. Reisa Sperling, MD, of Harvard Medical School, Boston, will provide an overview of the direction of PET ligand use and development in diagnosing early Alzheimer’s disease. Nicolaas I. Bohnen, MD, PhD, of the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, will describe a hypothesis for how hypercholinergic activity in the brain of Parkinson’s disease patients may for a time compensate for the loss of striatal dopamine and influence the appearance of a tremor-predominant motor phenotype in patients. Richard E. Carson, PhD, of Yale University will focus on the development of PET ligands to monitor synaptic density loss in neuropsychiatric disorders. Noninvasive imaging has also begun to influence research in the detection of neuroinflammation in a wide variety of conditions, with most research focusing on tracers for activated microglia and astrocytes, according to speaker Martin Pomper, MD, PhD, of Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore. The session will conclude with three molecular imaging abstract presentations.
The six plenary sessions of the annual meeting of the American Neurological Association, taking place Oct. 15-17 in San Diego, promise to cover a broad range of research areas, including neuronal circuits and behavior, global neurology, precision medicine, antisense oligonucleotide therapies, and molecular imaging.
The morning of Oct. 15 starts off with the plenary session, “Linking Circuits to Behavior: Promise & Peril,” which seeks to impart how technologies such as optogenetics enable manipulation of discrete neural populations but require careful consideration of the methods for interpreting the resulting data in order to translate it to human functional neuroimaging for potential therapeutic use.
Later, in the afternoon of Oct. 15, the traditional Derek Denny-Brown Young Neurological Scholar Symposium will showcase the presentations from the two clinical science winners and one basic science winner of the Derek Denny-Brown Young Neurological Scholar Awards, as well as the 2017 Distinguished Neurology Teacher Award, the 2017 Grass Foundation ANA Award in Neuroscience, and the 2017 Wolfe Neuropathy Research Prize. The Derek Denny-Brown Young Neurological Scholar Award recognizes neurologists and neuroscientists in the first 10 years of their career at the assistant/associate faculty (equivalent) level who have made outstanding basic and clinical scientific advances toward the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and cure of neurologic diseases. This year, award winner Keven N. Sheth, MD, of Yale University, New Haven, Conn., will present on “Instructive, Pragmatic, and Successful Trials in Acute Brain Injury: Making Intracerebral Hemorrhage the LEAST Devastating Form of Stroke”; Leslie E. Skolarus, MD, of the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, will present on “Reducing the Burden of Stroke in a Disadvantaged Community”; and Conrad Chris Weihl, MD, PhD, of Washington University in St. Louis will present on “Connecting Protein Quality Control Pathways in Skeletal Muscle and Muscle Disease.” The 2017 Distinguished Neurology Teacher Award goes to Zachary Nathaniel London, MD, of the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. The winner of this year’s Grass Foundation ANA Award in Neuroscience, which goes to an outstanding young physician-scientist conducting research in basic or clinical neuroscience, is Clotilde Lagier-Tourenne, MD, PhD, of Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, who will discuss “Modeling C9ORF72 Disease: A Crucial Step for Therapeutic Development in ALS and Frontotemporal Dementia.” The symposium’s final presentation will have Stefanie Geisler, MD, of Washington University in St. Louis, talk about “Targeting a Core Axonal Degeneration Program to Treat Vincristine and Bortezomib-Induced Axonal Degeneration.” Dr. Geisler won the Wolfe Neuropathy Research Prize, which honors outstanding investigators who identify a new cause or treatment of axonal peripheral neuropathy.
The morning plenary session on Oct. 16 will focus on translational neuroscience efforts that are paying off with discoveries and insights into neurologic disorders that have higher prevalence or greater relevance to low- and middle-income countries. Presentations on these efforts will include discussion of the causation and prevention of Konzo, a distinct upper–motor neuron disease associated with cassava cyanogenic poisoning in sub-Saharan Africa; a case-control study on the impact of multiple mycotoxins on the development of Nodding syndrome in northern Uganda; efforts to address neurologic manifestations of sexually transmitted virus infections in Peru; a longitudinal cohort study of neurologic sequelae in Ebola virus disease survivors in Liberia; efforts to protect against cerebral malaria; the epidemiology of peripheral neuropathy in urban and rural Bangladeshi type 2 diabetes patients; and the use of smartphones and teleconsultations to improve care for people with epilepsy in low- and middle-income countries.
“Precision Medicine in Neurologic Disease” is the theme of four presentations in the afternoon plenary session on Oct. 16. Huda Y. Zoghbi, MD, of Baylor University, and Texas Children’s Hospital in Houston will talk about how her work in animal models of disease has enabled new insights into the effect that certain regulator proteins have on levels of disease-driving proteins such as tau and alpha-synuclein in neurodegenerative diseases. Amy Wagers, PhD, of Harvard Medical School, Boston, will describe her lab’s use of the gene-editing potential of the CRISPR-Cas9 system to fix frame-disrupting mutations in the Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene, DMD, which encodes dystrophin, and produce functional dystrophin expression in muscle stem cells in a mouse model of the disease, which partially recovered functional deficiencies of dystrophic muscle. Donald Berry, PhD, of the University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston plans to discuss the importance of adaptive platform trials – which match therapies to patients – from oncology to neurologic therapy trials and the lessons learned from two major ongoing oncology treatment trials. Cristina Sampaio, MD, PhD, of the CHDI Foundation, aims to inform attendees of the power of prognostic and predictive biomarker-guided trials in neurology to improve the likelihood of success of drug development. Three high-scoring abstracts in the field of precision medicine also will be presented.
The final day of the meeting brings a morning plenary session on “Antisense Oligonucleotide Treatment of Genetic Neurological Diseases” that will focus on the use of antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) to silence specific genes or alter their pre-mRNA splicing in Duchenne muscular dystrophy, spinal muscular atrophy, Huntington’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and tauopathies. Additional presentations will focus on abstracts about blood and salivary biomarkers in Huntington’s disease and the early efficacy and safety results of an ASO in patients with hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis with polyneuropathy.
The expanding use and development of methods to assess brain pathology in vivo sets the scene for the meeting’s final plenary session, “Molecular Imaging in Neurologic Disease” in the afternoon of Oct. 17. The use of positron emission tomography and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) tracers for glucose metabolism, the dopamine system, amyloid-beta, tau, synaptic markers, and activated microglia has grown substantially to investigate disease mechanisms, develop new therapeutics, and provide diagnostic and prognostic clinical care. Reisa Sperling, MD, of Harvard Medical School, Boston, will provide an overview of the direction of PET ligand use and development in diagnosing early Alzheimer’s disease. Nicolaas I. Bohnen, MD, PhD, of the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, will describe a hypothesis for how hypercholinergic activity in the brain of Parkinson’s disease patients may for a time compensate for the loss of striatal dopamine and influence the appearance of a tremor-predominant motor phenotype in patients. Richard E. Carson, PhD, of Yale University will focus on the development of PET ligands to monitor synaptic density loss in neuropsychiatric disorders. Noninvasive imaging has also begun to influence research in the detection of neuroinflammation in a wide variety of conditions, with most research focusing on tracers for activated microglia and astrocytes, according to speaker Martin Pomper, MD, PhD, of Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore. The session will conclude with three molecular imaging abstract presentations.
The six plenary sessions of the annual meeting of the American Neurological Association, taking place Oct. 15-17 in San Diego, promise to cover a broad range of research areas, including neuronal circuits and behavior, global neurology, precision medicine, antisense oligonucleotide therapies, and molecular imaging.
The morning of Oct. 15 starts off with the plenary session, “Linking Circuits to Behavior: Promise & Peril,” which seeks to impart how technologies such as optogenetics enable manipulation of discrete neural populations but require careful consideration of the methods for interpreting the resulting data in order to translate it to human functional neuroimaging for potential therapeutic use.
Later, in the afternoon of Oct. 15, the traditional Derek Denny-Brown Young Neurological Scholar Symposium will showcase the presentations from the two clinical science winners and one basic science winner of the Derek Denny-Brown Young Neurological Scholar Awards, as well as the 2017 Distinguished Neurology Teacher Award, the 2017 Grass Foundation ANA Award in Neuroscience, and the 2017 Wolfe Neuropathy Research Prize. The Derek Denny-Brown Young Neurological Scholar Award recognizes neurologists and neuroscientists in the first 10 years of their career at the assistant/associate faculty (equivalent) level who have made outstanding basic and clinical scientific advances toward the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and cure of neurologic diseases. This year, award winner Keven N. Sheth, MD, of Yale University, New Haven, Conn., will present on “Instructive, Pragmatic, and Successful Trials in Acute Brain Injury: Making Intracerebral Hemorrhage the LEAST Devastating Form of Stroke”; Leslie E. Skolarus, MD, of the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, will present on “Reducing the Burden of Stroke in a Disadvantaged Community”; and Conrad Chris Weihl, MD, PhD, of Washington University in St. Louis will present on “Connecting Protein Quality Control Pathways in Skeletal Muscle and Muscle Disease.” The 2017 Distinguished Neurology Teacher Award goes to Zachary Nathaniel London, MD, of the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. The winner of this year’s Grass Foundation ANA Award in Neuroscience, which goes to an outstanding young physician-scientist conducting research in basic or clinical neuroscience, is Clotilde Lagier-Tourenne, MD, PhD, of Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, who will discuss “Modeling C9ORF72 Disease: A Crucial Step for Therapeutic Development in ALS and Frontotemporal Dementia.” The symposium’s final presentation will have Stefanie Geisler, MD, of Washington University in St. Louis, talk about “Targeting a Core Axonal Degeneration Program to Treat Vincristine and Bortezomib-Induced Axonal Degeneration.” Dr. Geisler won the Wolfe Neuropathy Research Prize, which honors outstanding investigators who identify a new cause or treatment of axonal peripheral neuropathy.
The morning plenary session on Oct. 16 will focus on translational neuroscience efforts that are paying off with discoveries and insights into neurologic disorders that have higher prevalence or greater relevance to low- and middle-income countries. Presentations on these efforts will include discussion of the causation and prevention of Konzo, a distinct upper–motor neuron disease associated with cassava cyanogenic poisoning in sub-Saharan Africa; a case-control study on the impact of multiple mycotoxins on the development of Nodding syndrome in northern Uganda; efforts to address neurologic manifestations of sexually transmitted virus infections in Peru; a longitudinal cohort study of neurologic sequelae in Ebola virus disease survivors in Liberia; efforts to protect against cerebral malaria; the epidemiology of peripheral neuropathy in urban and rural Bangladeshi type 2 diabetes patients; and the use of smartphones and teleconsultations to improve care for people with epilepsy in low- and middle-income countries.
“Precision Medicine in Neurologic Disease” is the theme of four presentations in the afternoon plenary session on Oct. 16. Huda Y. Zoghbi, MD, of Baylor University, and Texas Children’s Hospital in Houston will talk about how her work in animal models of disease has enabled new insights into the effect that certain regulator proteins have on levels of disease-driving proteins such as tau and alpha-synuclein in neurodegenerative diseases. Amy Wagers, PhD, of Harvard Medical School, Boston, will describe her lab’s use of the gene-editing potential of the CRISPR-Cas9 system to fix frame-disrupting mutations in the Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene, DMD, which encodes dystrophin, and produce functional dystrophin expression in muscle stem cells in a mouse model of the disease, which partially recovered functional deficiencies of dystrophic muscle. Donald Berry, PhD, of the University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston plans to discuss the importance of adaptive platform trials – which match therapies to patients – from oncology to neurologic therapy trials and the lessons learned from two major ongoing oncology treatment trials. Cristina Sampaio, MD, PhD, of the CHDI Foundation, aims to inform attendees of the power of prognostic and predictive biomarker-guided trials in neurology to improve the likelihood of success of drug development. Three high-scoring abstracts in the field of precision medicine also will be presented.
The final day of the meeting brings a morning plenary session on “Antisense Oligonucleotide Treatment of Genetic Neurological Diseases” that will focus on the use of antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) to silence specific genes or alter their pre-mRNA splicing in Duchenne muscular dystrophy, spinal muscular atrophy, Huntington’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and tauopathies. Additional presentations will focus on abstracts about blood and salivary biomarkers in Huntington’s disease and the early efficacy and safety results of an ASO in patients with hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis with polyneuropathy.
The expanding use and development of methods to assess brain pathology in vivo sets the scene for the meeting’s final plenary session, “Molecular Imaging in Neurologic Disease” in the afternoon of Oct. 17. The use of positron emission tomography and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) tracers for glucose metabolism, the dopamine system, amyloid-beta, tau, synaptic markers, and activated microglia has grown substantially to investigate disease mechanisms, develop new therapeutics, and provide diagnostic and prognostic clinical care. Reisa Sperling, MD, of Harvard Medical School, Boston, will provide an overview of the direction of PET ligand use and development in diagnosing early Alzheimer’s disease. Nicolaas I. Bohnen, MD, PhD, of the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, will describe a hypothesis for how hypercholinergic activity in the brain of Parkinson’s disease patients may for a time compensate for the loss of striatal dopamine and influence the appearance of a tremor-predominant motor phenotype in patients. Richard E. Carson, PhD, of Yale University will focus on the development of PET ligands to monitor synaptic density loss in neuropsychiatric disorders. Noninvasive imaging has also begun to influence research in the detection of neuroinflammation in a wide variety of conditions, with most research focusing on tracers for activated microglia and astrocytes, according to speaker Martin Pomper, MD, PhD, of Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore. The session will conclude with three molecular imaging abstract presentations.
Carpal tunnel syndrome may flag cardiac amyloidosis in elderly
DALLAS – Older patients with carpal tunnel syndrome that requires release surgery appear to have a relatively high prevalence of amyloidosis that, in some, involves their heart, suggesting that routine screening for amyloidosis is warranted in elderly patients undergoing the surgery.
Routine Congo red staining of a tenosynovial biopsy taken at the time of carpal tunnel release surgery in a single-center experience with 96 patients showed that 10 (10%) were positive for amyloidosis, Mazen Hanna, MD, said at the annual scientific meeting of the Heart Failure Society of America.
Clinicians “should be aware of the association between carpal tunnel syndrome [CTS] and amyloidosis.” When a 60-year old shows up with bilateral CTS without a clear cause, it’s reasonable to suspect amyloidosis, he suggested.
The prospective study run by Dr. Hanna and his associates included men at least 50 years old and women at least 60 years old who underwent CTS release surgery at the Cleveland Clinic during May 2016–June 2017. Enrollment excluded patients with known amyloidosis or rheumatoid arthritis. The patients averaged 68 years of age, 51% were men, and 85% had bilateral CTS that required surgery. The surgeons removed a tenosynovial biopsy at the time of surgery from each of the 96 patients, a “low-risk procedure,” Dr. Hanna said.
The 10 patients with positive staining for amyloid underwent a work-up that included a comprehensive physical examination, a series of blood tests for cardiac biomarkers, an ECG, echocardiography including assessment of cardiac strain, and a technetium-99m pyrophosphate scan. This identified two patients with cardiac involvement. The examinations identified one case by the echocardiographic strain findings and the second case by the technetium pyrophosphate scan. Seven of the 10 patients with amyloid had a history of prior carpal tunnel release surgery.
The researchers also used mass spectroscopy to identify the amyloid type. Seven patients had the transthyretin subtype, including one patient with cardiac involvement; two patients had light chain amyloidosis, including the second patient with cardiac involvement. The tenth patient had inconclusive results but the researchers presumed the amyloid was of the transthyretin type, Dr. Hanna said.
The eight patients identified with amyloid but no cardiac involvement at baseline will continue to receive annual work ups to see whether their hearts become affected over time. The protocol delays a repeat technetium pyrophosphate scan until the 4th year following study entry.
The potential usefulness of early identification and treatment of cardiac amyloidosis received support in results from another study reported at the meeting. Researchers from Columbia University Medical Center, New York, and New York Presbyterian Hospital reported their retrospective, nonrandomized experience with 126 patients who had been diagnosed with transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis. Thirty of these patients had received treatment with a transthyretin-stabilizing drug, either the investigational agent tafamidis or diflunisal, while the other 96 patients received no stabilizing treatment. During a median follow-up of 2 years, patients treated with a stabilizing agent had a statistically significant 68% reduced rate of either death or orthotopic heart transplant, compared with the untreated patients in a multivariate analysis that controlled for various baseline differences between the treated and untreated patients.
mzoler@frontlinemedcom.com
On Twitter @mitchelzoler
DALLAS – Older patients with carpal tunnel syndrome that requires release surgery appear to have a relatively high prevalence of amyloidosis that, in some, involves their heart, suggesting that routine screening for amyloidosis is warranted in elderly patients undergoing the surgery.
Routine Congo red staining of a tenosynovial biopsy taken at the time of carpal tunnel release surgery in a single-center experience with 96 patients showed that 10 (10%) were positive for amyloidosis, Mazen Hanna, MD, said at the annual scientific meeting of the Heart Failure Society of America.
Clinicians “should be aware of the association between carpal tunnel syndrome [CTS] and amyloidosis.” When a 60-year old shows up with bilateral CTS without a clear cause, it’s reasonable to suspect amyloidosis, he suggested.
The prospective study run by Dr. Hanna and his associates included men at least 50 years old and women at least 60 years old who underwent CTS release surgery at the Cleveland Clinic during May 2016–June 2017. Enrollment excluded patients with known amyloidosis or rheumatoid arthritis. The patients averaged 68 years of age, 51% were men, and 85% had bilateral CTS that required surgery. The surgeons removed a tenosynovial biopsy at the time of surgery from each of the 96 patients, a “low-risk procedure,” Dr. Hanna said.
The 10 patients with positive staining for amyloid underwent a work-up that included a comprehensive physical examination, a series of blood tests for cardiac biomarkers, an ECG, echocardiography including assessment of cardiac strain, and a technetium-99m pyrophosphate scan. This identified two patients with cardiac involvement. The examinations identified one case by the echocardiographic strain findings and the second case by the technetium pyrophosphate scan. Seven of the 10 patients with amyloid had a history of prior carpal tunnel release surgery.
The researchers also used mass spectroscopy to identify the amyloid type. Seven patients had the transthyretin subtype, including one patient with cardiac involvement; two patients had light chain amyloidosis, including the second patient with cardiac involvement. The tenth patient had inconclusive results but the researchers presumed the amyloid was of the transthyretin type, Dr. Hanna said.
The eight patients identified with amyloid but no cardiac involvement at baseline will continue to receive annual work ups to see whether their hearts become affected over time. The protocol delays a repeat technetium pyrophosphate scan until the 4th year following study entry.
The potential usefulness of early identification and treatment of cardiac amyloidosis received support in results from another study reported at the meeting. Researchers from Columbia University Medical Center, New York, and New York Presbyterian Hospital reported their retrospective, nonrandomized experience with 126 patients who had been diagnosed with transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis. Thirty of these patients had received treatment with a transthyretin-stabilizing drug, either the investigational agent tafamidis or diflunisal, while the other 96 patients received no stabilizing treatment. During a median follow-up of 2 years, patients treated with a stabilizing agent had a statistically significant 68% reduced rate of either death or orthotopic heart transplant, compared with the untreated patients in a multivariate analysis that controlled for various baseline differences between the treated and untreated patients.
mzoler@frontlinemedcom.com
On Twitter @mitchelzoler
DALLAS – Older patients with carpal tunnel syndrome that requires release surgery appear to have a relatively high prevalence of amyloidosis that, in some, involves their heart, suggesting that routine screening for amyloidosis is warranted in elderly patients undergoing the surgery.
Routine Congo red staining of a tenosynovial biopsy taken at the time of carpal tunnel release surgery in a single-center experience with 96 patients showed that 10 (10%) were positive for amyloidosis, Mazen Hanna, MD, said at the annual scientific meeting of the Heart Failure Society of America.
Clinicians “should be aware of the association between carpal tunnel syndrome [CTS] and amyloidosis.” When a 60-year old shows up with bilateral CTS without a clear cause, it’s reasonable to suspect amyloidosis, he suggested.
The prospective study run by Dr. Hanna and his associates included men at least 50 years old and women at least 60 years old who underwent CTS release surgery at the Cleveland Clinic during May 2016–June 2017. Enrollment excluded patients with known amyloidosis or rheumatoid arthritis. The patients averaged 68 years of age, 51% were men, and 85% had bilateral CTS that required surgery. The surgeons removed a tenosynovial biopsy at the time of surgery from each of the 96 patients, a “low-risk procedure,” Dr. Hanna said.
The 10 patients with positive staining for amyloid underwent a work-up that included a comprehensive physical examination, a series of blood tests for cardiac biomarkers, an ECG, echocardiography including assessment of cardiac strain, and a technetium-99m pyrophosphate scan. This identified two patients with cardiac involvement. The examinations identified one case by the echocardiographic strain findings and the second case by the technetium pyrophosphate scan. Seven of the 10 patients with amyloid had a history of prior carpal tunnel release surgery.
The researchers also used mass spectroscopy to identify the amyloid type. Seven patients had the transthyretin subtype, including one patient with cardiac involvement; two patients had light chain amyloidosis, including the second patient with cardiac involvement. The tenth patient had inconclusive results but the researchers presumed the amyloid was of the transthyretin type, Dr. Hanna said.
The eight patients identified with amyloid but no cardiac involvement at baseline will continue to receive annual work ups to see whether their hearts become affected over time. The protocol delays a repeat technetium pyrophosphate scan until the 4th year following study entry.
The potential usefulness of early identification and treatment of cardiac amyloidosis received support in results from another study reported at the meeting. Researchers from Columbia University Medical Center, New York, and New York Presbyterian Hospital reported their retrospective, nonrandomized experience with 126 patients who had been diagnosed with transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis. Thirty of these patients had received treatment with a transthyretin-stabilizing drug, either the investigational agent tafamidis or diflunisal, while the other 96 patients received no stabilizing treatment. During a median follow-up of 2 years, patients treated with a stabilizing agent had a statistically significant 68% reduced rate of either death or orthotopic heart transplant, compared with the untreated patients in a multivariate analysis that controlled for various baseline differences between the treated and untreated patients.
mzoler@frontlinemedcom.com
On Twitter @mitchelzoler
AT THE HFSA ANNUAL SCIENTIFIC MEETING
Key clinical point:
Major finding: Ten of 96 patients undergoing carpal tunnel release surgery had amyloidosis, and two had cardiac involvement.
Data source: Prospective, single-center series of 96 patients undergoing carpal tunnel release surgery.
Disclosures: Dr. Hanna had no disclosures.
Tips for Living With Ataxia
Click here to download the PDF. 
Click here to download the PDF.
Click here to download the PDF.
Painful autoimmune neuropathy may mimic Guillain-Barré syndrome
Patients with an acute transient immune response that is directed against small nerve fibers can display features similar to those of Guillain-Barré syndrome, according to Nobuhiro Yuki, PhD, and associates.
The investigators described three Chinese patients with severe pain in their extremities weeks after infectious illness. Pain greatly improved in two of the patients within days (up to 1 week) of treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin. One patient who refused intravenous immunoglobulin gradually improved with 3 weeks of prednisolone treatment but did not improve as much as the other two.
The investigators found that intrathecal injections of the sera from the acute phase of these patients’ illnesses into nociceptive thermal mouse models induced a transient thermal hypersensitivity, whereas sera from 25 patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and 25 patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy who served as disease controls did not. The intrathecal injections of sera from a healthy donor or from the first two of the three described patients after recovery did not affect thermal sensitivity.
Also, patients’ sera in the acute phase strongly and widely stained small nerve fibers in the dermis of the foot pads of the mice and colocalized with a nerve marker. The sera did not react against myelinated fibers from mouse sciatic nerves. Serum IgG antibodies immunostained the dorsal horn of the lumber spinal cord during the acute phase in all patients, but none of the patients showed reactivity in the convalescent phase.
Patients’ IgG antibodies reacted against surface antigens from the neuron cell body and axon from patients’ sera, but none of the patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth or chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy presented a similar reaction against dorsal root ganglion neurons.
“Our case series and the cases identified in the literature suggest that an acute immune response can be directed against small fibers and exhibit similarities to Guillain-Barré syndrome, including acute preceding infectious illness, a monophasic course, and albuminocytologic dissociation,” the researchers concluded. “It is also worth pointing out that patients with ‘acute small fiber sensory neuropathy’ subsequent to infection or vaccination do not always complain of pain, suggesting a different disease entity.”
Read the full study in Muscle & Nerve (2017. doi: 10.1002/mus.25738).
Patients with an acute transient immune response that is directed against small nerve fibers can display features similar to those of Guillain-Barré syndrome, according to Nobuhiro Yuki, PhD, and associates.
The investigators described three Chinese patients with severe pain in their extremities weeks after infectious illness. Pain greatly improved in two of the patients within days (up to 1 week) of treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin. One patient who refused intravenous immunoglobulin gradually improved with 3 weeks of prednisolone treatment but did not improve as much as the other two.
The investigators found that intrathecal injections of the sera from the acute phase of these patients’ illnesses into nociceptive thermal mouse models induced a transient thermal hypersensitivity, whereas sera from 25 patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and 25 patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy who served as disease controls did not. The intrathecal injections of sera from a healthy donor or from the first two of the three described patients after recovery did not affect thermal sensitivity.
Also, patients’ sera in the acute phase strongly and widely stained small nerve fibers in the dermis of the foot pads of the mice and colocalized with a nerve marker. The sera did not react against myelinated fibers from mouse sciatic nerves. Serum IgG antibodies immunostained the dorsal horn of the lumber spinal cord during the acute phase in all patients, but none of the patients showed reactivity in the convalescent phase.
Patients’ IgG antibodies reacted against surface antigens from the neuron cell body and axon from patients’ sera, but none of the patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth or chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy presented a similar reaction against dorsal root ganglion neurons.
“Our case series and the cases identified in the literature suggest that an acute immune response can be directed against small fibers and exhibit similarities to Guillain-Barré syndrome, including acute preceding infectious illness, a monophasic course, and albuminocytologic dissociation,” the researchers concluded. “It is also worth pointing out that patients with ‘acute small fiber sensory neuropathy’ subsequent to infection or vaccination do not always complain of pain, suggesting a different disease entity.”
Read the full study in Muscle & Nerve (2017. doi: 10.1002/mus.25738).
Patients with an acute transient immune response that is directed against small nerve fibers can display features similar to those of Guillain-Barré syndrome, according to Nobuhiro Yuki, PhD, and associates.
The investigators described three Chinese patients with severe pain in their extremities weeks after infectious illness. Pain greatly improved in two of the patients within days (up to 1 week) of treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin. One patient who refused intravenous immunoglobulin gradually improved with 3 weeks of prednisolone treatment but did not improve as much as the other two.
The investigators found that intrathecal injections of the sera from the acute phase of these patients’ illnesses into nociceptive thermal mouse models induced a transient thermal hypersensitivity, whereas sera from 25 patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and 25 patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy who served as disease controls did not. The intrathecal injections of sera from a healthy donor or from the first two of the three described patients after recovery did not affect thermal sensitivity.
Also, patients’ sera in the acute phase strongly and widely stained small nerve fibers in the dermis of the foot pads of the mice and colocalized with a nerve marker. The sera did not react against myelinated fibers from mouse sciatic nerves. Serum IgG antibodies immunostained the dorsal horn of the lumber spinal cord during the acute phase in all patients, but none of the patients showed reactivity in the convalescent phase.
Patients’ IgG antibodies reacted against surface antigens from the neuron cell body and axon from patients’ sera, but none of the patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth or chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy presented a similar reaction against dorsal root ganglion neurons.
“Our case series and the cases identified in the literature suggest that an acute immune response can be directed against small fibers and exhibit similarities to Guillain-Barré syndrome, including acute preceding infectious illness, a monophasic course, and albuminocytologic dissociation,” the researchers concluded. “It is also worth pointing out that patients with ‘acute small fiber sensory neuropathy’ subsequent to infection or vaccination do not always complain of pain, suggesting a different disease entity.”
Read the full study in Muscle & Nerve (2017. doi: 10.1002/mus.25738).
FROM MUSCLE & NERVE
New trial shows thymectomy benefits myasthenia gravis
The effectiveness of thymectomy as a cure for myasthenia gravis has long been debated, but the publication of Myasthenia Gravis Thymectomy Treatment (MGTX) trial results, showing that thymectomy improved outcomes over 3 years in patients with nonthymomatous myasthenia gravis, has gone a long way toward settling the debate, Joshua R. Sonett, MD, and his coauthors noted in a feature expert opinion (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;154:306-9).
The MGTX trial randomized patients with nonthymomatous MG into two treatment groups: medical therapy alone or thymectomy with medical therapy (N Engl J Med. 2016;375:511-22). For uniformity, the study mandated one type of thymectomy, an extended transsternal approach. The study was 12 years in the making, with 6 years of patient accrual followed by 3 years of surveillance, Dr. Sonett and his coauthors noted.
Those markers include an average quantitative myasthenia score of 6.15 for the thymectomy group vs. 8.99 for the medical therapy group (P less than .0001); a lower dose of prednisone to attain improved neurologic status (44 mg vs. 60 mg; P less than .001); time-weighted average score on the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living scale (2.24 vs. 3.41; P = .008); azathioprine use (17% vs. 48%; P less than .001); percentage of patients who had minimal-manifestation status at month 36 (67% vs. 47%; P = .03); and hospitalization for myasthenia-related symptoms (9% vs. 37%). “Interestingly,” the researchers wrote, “despite these quantitative results, no difference was seen in the quality of life measured surveys.”
An ancillary study, Bio-MGTX, was performed simultaneously to investigate pathologic and serum markers. “Many questions still need to be answered in regard to the role of thymectomy in MG,” Dr. Sonett and his coauthors maintained. They include an analysis of radiologic predictors of success with thymectomy, and the role of thymectomy in seronegative MG, ocular MG and elderly patients.
“Future studies may be directed at achieving a more rapid and consistent time to a complete symptom response,” they said.
The MGTX trial does support the use of high-dose prednisone induction combined with thymectomy to achieve higher complete early remission rates, but Bio-MGTX data may help to refine induction protocols. “The debate will likely continue in regard to widespread adoption of extended transsternal maximal thymectomy,” the researchers wrote. “What was categorically measured in this trial was the effect of maximal thymectomy, as sternotomy offers no particular independent therapeutic benefit.”
The structure of the MGTX trial despite its small cohort (126) “enabled the medical and surgical community to definitively answer an important question,” they noted. Nonetheless, further investigation of the role of thymectomy in MG is “sorely needed.”
Patients may need up to 3 years to achieve an optimal response, and complete cure in a shorter time frame should be the goal for each patient. Multimodal therapy should be the basis of MG treatment. “Continued progress in the management of MG will require diligent, multidisciplinary teams designing and completing prospective studies like the MGTX,” the researchers wrote.
Dr. Sonett and his coauthors had no financial relationships to disclose. The MGTX trial was funded by the U.S. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. There was no commercial support for the trial.
In the MGTX trial, patients in the thymectomy group still needed a high average dose of prednisone, and the rates of remission may decrease over time, Michael K. Hsin, MD, of Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, wrote in his invited commentary (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;154:310-1). But he added that the trial did finally answer in a positive manner whether thymectomy could serve a beneficial role.
He also noted that the MGTX trial left at least four questions unanswered:
• The long-term effect of thymectomy on MG status with regard to future relapse.
• The role of surgery in the era of advances in medical treatment, including azathioprine to reduce the prednisone dose and emergence of stem-cell transplantation.
• The extent to which MGTX findings can be applied to acetylcholine receptor-negative pediatric patients.
• Whether alternative techniques to extended transsternal thymectomy can achieve comparable results.
Dr. Hsin had no financial relationships to disclose.
In the MGTX trial, patients in the thymectomy group still needed a high average dose of prednisone, and the rates of remission may decrease over time, Michael K. Hsin, MD, of Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, wrote in his invited commentary (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;154:310-1). But he added that the trial did finally answer in a positive manner whether thymectomy could serve a beneficial role.
He also noted that the MGTX trial left at least four questions unanswered:
• The long-term effect of thymectomy on MG status with regard to future relapse.
• The role of surgery in the era of advances in medical treatment, including azathioprine to reduce the prednisone dose and emergence of stem-cell transplantation.
• The extent to which MGTX findings can be applied to acetylcholine receptor-negative pediatric patients.
• Whether alternative techniques to extended transsternal thymectomy can achieve comparable results.
Dr. Hsin had no financial relationships to disclose.
In the MGTX trial, patients in the thymectomy group still needed a high average dose of prednisone, and the rates of remission may decrease over time, Michael K. Hsin, MD, of Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, wrote in his invited commentary (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;154:310-1). But he added that the trial did finally answer in a positive manner whether thymectomy could serve a beneficial role.
He also noted that the MGTX trial left at least four questions unanswered:
• The long-term effect of thymectomy on MG status with regard to future relapse.
• The role of surgery in the era of advances in medical treatment, including azathioprine to reduce the prednisone dose and emergence of stem-cell transplantation.
• The extent to which MGTX findings can be applied to acetylcholine receptor-negative pediatric patients.
• Whether alternative techniques to extended transsternal thymectomy can achieve comparable results.
Dr. Hsin had no financial relationships to disclose.
The effectiveness of thymectomy as a cure for myasthenia gravis has long been debated, but the publication of Myasthenia Gravis Thymectomy Treatment (MGTX) trial results, showing that thymectomy improved outcomes over 3 years in patients with nonthymomatous myasthenia gravis, has gone a long way toward settling the debate, Joshua R. Sonett, MD, and his coauthors noted in a feature expert opinion (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;154:306-9).
The MGTX trial randomized patients with nonthymomatous MG into two treatment groups: medical therapy alone or thymectomy with medical therapy (N Engl J Med. 2016;375:511-22). For uniformity, the study mandated one type of thymectomy, an extended transsternal approach. The study was 12 years in the making, with 6 years of patient accrual followed by 3 years of surveillance, Dr. Sonett and his coauthors noted.
Those markers include an average quantitative myasthenia score of 6.15 for the thymectomy group vs. 8.99 for the medical therapy group (P less than .0001); a lower dose of prednisone to attain improved neurologic status (44 mg vs. 60 mg; P less than .001); time-weighted average score on the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living scale (2.24 vs. 3.41; P = .008); azathioprine use (17% vs. 48%; P less than .001); percentage of patients who had minimal-manifestation status at month 36 (67% vs. 47%; P = .03); and hospitalization for myasthenia-related symptoms (9% vs. 37%). “Interestingly,” the researchers wrote, “despite these quantitative results, no difference was seen in the quality of life measured surveys.”
An ancillary study, Bio-MGTX, was performed simultaneously to investigate pathologic and serum markers. “Many questions still need to be answered in regard to the role of thymectomy in MG,” Dr. Sonett and his coauthors maintained. They include an analysis of radiologic predictors of success with thymectomy, and the role of thymectomy in seronegative MG, ocular MG and elderly patients.
“Future studies may be directed at achieving a more rapid and consistent time to a complete symptom response,” they said.
The MGTX trial does support the use of high-dose prednisone induction combined with thymectomy to achieve higher complete early remission rates, but Bio-MGTX data may help to refine induction protocols. “The debate will likely continue in regard to widespread adoption of extended transsternal maximal thymectomy,” the researchers wrote. “What was categorically measured in this trial was the effect of maximal thymectomy, as sternotomy offers no particular independent therapeutic benefit.”
The structure of the MGTX trial despite its small cohort (126) “enabled the medical and surgical community to definitively answer an important question,” they noted. Nonetheless, further investigation of the role of thymectomy in MG is “sorely needed.”
Patients may need up to 3 years to achieve an optimal response, and complete cure in a shorter time frame should be the goal for each patient. Multimodal therapy should be the basis of MG treatment. “Continued progress in the management of MG will require diligent, multidisciplinary teams designing and completing prospective studies like the MGTX,” the researchers wrote.
Dr. Sonett and his coauthors had no financial relationships to disclose. The MGTX trial was funded by the U.S. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. There was no commercial support for the trial.
The effectiveness of thymectomy as a cure for myasthenia gravis has long been debated, but the publication of Myasthenia Gravis Thymectomy Treatment (MGTX) trial results, showing that thymectomy improved outcomes over 3 years in patients with nonthymomatous myasthenia gravis, has gone a long way toward settling the debate, Joshua R. Sonett, MD, and his coauthors noted in a feature expert opinion (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;154:306-9).
The MGTX trial randomized patients with nonthymomatous MG into two treatment groups: medical therapy alone or thymectomy with medical therapy (N Engl J Med. 2016;375:511-22). For uniformity, the study mandated one type of thymectomy, an extended transsternal approach. The study was 12 years in the making, with 6 years of patient accrual followed by 3 years of surveillance, Dr. Sonett and his coauthors noted.
Those markers include an average quantitative myasthenia score of 6.15 for the thymectomy group vs. 8.99 for the medical therapy group (P less than .0001); a lower dose of prednisone to attain improved neurologic status (44 mg vs. 60 mg; P less than .001); time-weighted average score on the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living scale (2.24 vs. 3.41; P = .008); azathioprine use (17% vs. 48%; P less than .001); percentage of patients who had minimal-manifestation status at month 36 (67% vs. 47%; P = .03); and hospitalization for myasthenia-related symptoms (9% vs. 37%). “Interestingly,” the researchers wrote, “despite these quantitative results, no difference was seen in the quality of life measured surveys.”
An ancillary study, Bio-MGTX, was performed simultaneously to investigate pathologic and serum markers. “Many questions still need to be answered in regard to the role of thymectomy in MG,” Dr. Sonett and his coauthors maintained. They include an analysis of radiologic predictors of success with thymectomy, and the role of thymectomy in seronegative MG, ocular MG and elderly patients.
“Future studies may be directed at achieving a more rapid and consistent time to a complete symptom response,” they said.
The MGTX trial does support the use of high-dose prednisone induction combined with thymectomy to achieve higher complete early remission rates, but Bio-MGTX data may help to refine induction protocols. “The debate will likely continue in regard to widespread adoption of extended transsternal maximal thymectomy,” the researchers wrote. “What was categorically measured in this trial was the effect of maximal thymectomy, as sternotomy offers no particular independent therapeutic benefit.”
The structure of the MGTX trial despite its small cohort (126) “enabled the medical and surgical community to definitively answer an important question,” they noted. Nonetheless, further investigation of the role of thymectomy in MG is “sorely needed.”
Patients may need up to 3 years to achieve an optimal response, and complete cure in a shorter time frame should be the goal for each patient. Multimodal therapy should be the basis of MG treatment. “Continued progress in the management of MG will require diligent, multidisciplinary teams designing and completing prospective studies like the MGTX,” the researchers wrote.
Dr. Sonett and his coauthors had no financial relationships to disclose. The MGTX trial was funded by the U.S. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. There was no commercial support for the trial.
FROM THE JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
Key clinical point: A recently published prospective randomized trial provides definitive evidence that thymectomy significantly improves outcomes of patients with myasthenia gravis.
Major finding: Patients who underwent thymectomy had an average quantitative myasthenia score of 6.15 vs. 8.99 for the medical therapy group, a significant difference.
Data source: Myasthenia Gravis Thymectomy Trial, a prospective trial of 126 patients randomized to thymectomy with medical therapy or medical therapy alone.
Disclosures: Dr. Sonett and his coauthors had no financial relationships to disclose. The MGTX trial was funded by the U.S. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. There was no commercial support for the trial.
Course and outcome of Guillain-Barré syndrome measured in ongoing study
The International Guillain-Barré Syndrome Outcome Study (IGOS) is actively recruiting patients with Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) to examine disease course and outcome, according to ClinicalTrials.gov.
IGOS is conducted by the members of the Inflammatory Neuropathy Consortium and Peripheral Nerve Society, and the researchers plan to identify clinical and biological determinants and predictors of disease course and outcome in individual patients with GBS as early as possible after onset of disease. It is a prospective study with standardized collection of clinical data and biomaterials from a large group of well-defined GBS patients during a long follow-up period. Patients will be divided into four cohorts: GBS patients with a follow-up of 1-3 years, normal controls, infectious controls, and other neurological diseases.
The primary outcome is to receive a disability score and Medical Research Council sum score within a 1-year time frame. Secondary outcomes include Overall Neuropathy Limitations Scale, Fatigue Severity Scale, EurQol EQ-5D health questionnaire, and Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale, all in a 1-year time frame. The information will be used to understand the diversity in clinical presentation and response to treatment of GBS and will also be used to develop new prognostic models to predict the clinical course and outcome accurately in individual patients with GBS.
Enrollment for the study started May 2012 and the researchers aim to enroll an estimated 4,000 participants. As of April 2017, the IGOS has enrolled more than 1,500 patients, according to the study’s website. The study is expected to be completed by January 2019. All patients with GBS or variants of GBS, including the Miller Fisher syndrome and overlap syndromes, are eligible for the study.
Currently, patients with GBS have not shown improvement over the last 20 years. It is estimated that 10%-20% of patients remain severely disabled and about 5% die from GBS.
Find the full summary here.
The International Guillain-Barré Syndrome Outcome Study (IGOS) is actively recruiting patients with Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) to examine disease course and outcome, according to ClinicalTrials.gov.
IGOS is conducted by the members of the Inflammatory Neuropathy Consortium and Peripheral Nerve Society, and the researchers plan to identify clinical and biological determinants and predictors of disease course and outcome in individual patients with GBS as early as possible after onset of disease. It is a prospective study with standardized collection of clinical data and biomaterials from a large group of well-defined GBS patients during a long follow-up period. Patients will be divided into four cohorts: GBS patients with a follow-up of 1-3 years, normal controls, infectious controls, and other neurological diseases.
The primary outcome is to receive a disability score and Medical Research Council sum score within a 1-year time frame. Secondary outcomes include Overall Neuropathy Limitations Scale, Fatigue Severity Scale, EurQol EQ-5D health questionnaire, and Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale, all in a 1-year time frame. The information will be used to understand the diversity in clinical presentation and response to treatment of GBS and will also be used to develop new prognostic models to predict the clinical course and outcome accurately in individual patients with GBS.
Enrollment for the study started May 2012 and the researchers aim to enroll an estimated 4,000 participants. As of April 2017, the IGOS has enrolled more than 1,500 patients, according to the study’s website. The study is expected to be completed by January 2019. All patients with GBS or variants of GBS, including the Miller Fisher syndrome and overlap syndromes, are eligible for the study.
Currently, patients with GBS have not shown improvement over the last 20 years. It is estimated that 10%-20% of patients remain severely disabled and about 5% die from GBS.
Find the full summary here.
The International Guillain-Barré Syndrome Outcome Study (IGOS) is actively recruiting patients with Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) to examine disease course and outcome, according to ClinicalTrials.gov.
IGOS is conducted by the members of the Inflammatory Neuropathy Consortium and Peripheral Nerve Society, and the researchers plan to identify clinical and biological determinants and predictors of disease course and outcome in individual patients with GBS as early as possible after onset of disease. It is a prospective study with standardized collection of clinical data and biomaterials from a large group of well-defined GBS patients during a long follow-up period. Patients will be divided into four cohorts: GBS patients with a follow-up of 1-3 years, normal controls, infectious controls, and other neurological diseases.
The primary outcome is to receive a disability score and Medical Research Council sum score within a 1-year time frame. Secondary outcomes include Overall Neuropathy Limitations Scale, Fatigue Severity Scale, EurQol EQ-5D health questionnaire, and Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale, all in a 1-year time frame. The information will be used to understand the diversity in clinical presentation and response to treatment of GBS and will also be used to develop new prognostic models to predict the clinical course and outcome accurately in individual patients with GBS.
Enrollment for the study started May 2012 and the researchers aim to enroll an estimated 4,000 participants. As of April 2017, the IGOS has enrolled more than 1,500 patients, according to the study’s website. The study is expected to be completed by January 2019. All patients with GBS or variants of GBS, including the Miller Fisher syndrome and overlap syndromes, are eligible for the study.
Currently, patients with GBS have not shown improvement over the last 20 years. It is estimated that 10%-20% of patients remain severely disabled and about 5% die from GBS.
Find the full summary here.
SUMMARY FROM CLINICALTRIALS.GOV
Gene therapy for spinal muscular atrophy shows promise in early study
BOSTON – Promising results were evident in an ongoing phase I study of a gene therapy for spinal muscular atrophy type 1 (SMA1), with children in the trial walking, talking, and moving.
After a single intravenous infusion of the therapy, AVXS-101, children in the industry-funded study achieved unexpected progress in terms of physical achievement ad survival, researchers reported at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.
Video clips showed children in the trial rolling, sitting unassisted, and showing normal levels of hand and fine motor control. No other children with SMA1 have been reported to reach any major motor milestone.
In one clip, an 18-month-old boy toddles down a hallway and carries an electronic toy to an elevator where he reaches up to press the button. “He’s basically completely back to normal. You see and examine him; it just about takes your breath away,” said the study’s lead investigator, Jerry R. Mendell, MD, a neurologist at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio.
All 15 patients in the study were alive as of the AAN presentation, with six older than aged 2 years. Previous studies have reported various life expectancies for SMA1 patients: A 2010 Korean study of 14 SMA1 patients reported that the average lifespan was 22.8 ± 2.0 months (Korean J Pediatr. 2010 Nov;53[11]:965-70), while a 2007 Hong Kong study (n = 22) found that only 30% survived to aged 4 years and all survivors were venilator-dependent (Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114[5]:e548-53).
The open label phase I dose-escalating study recruited 15 patients (nine under aged 9 months; six 6 under aged 6 months) with SMA1 as defined by genetic criteria and onset between birth and 6 months. All received a one-time intravenous infusion of AVXS-101 after a 1-mg/1-kg dose of prednisolone the previous day. AVXS-101 is designed to boost levels of the SMN protein via delivery of a functional human SMN gene into motor neuron cells.
The first cohort of three patients received one dose. All survived to greater than aged 30 months, although one did require respiratory assistance at about 30 months, said Dr. Mendell, professor of pediatrics, neurology, pathology, and physiology and cell Biology at Ohio State University, Columbus.
Researchers moved to a larger dose, “the highest amount of virus that’s ever been given in any clinical trial,” Dr. Mendell said. The first patient has passed 30 months of age, and 9 patients have reached at least 20 months, he noted.
In this second cohort, all patients “are able to bring hand to mouth, which is obviously important for feeding. Eleven of the 12 have good head control, and 9 of the patients can roll over. And 11 can sit without assistance,” he said.
In addition, eight can sit more than 30 seconds, and two can crawl, stand, and walk independently. Eight of 12 patients are speaking, and 11 of 12 are feeding orally.
To date, five treatment-related adverse events in four patients have been reported – all asymptomatic increases in liver function enzymes, which resolved.
The study is funded by AveXis, the company developing this gene therapy. Dr. Mendell reported compensation for consulting and research support from AveXis and Sarepta Therapeutics.
BOSTON – Promising results were evident in an ongoing phase I study of a gene therapy for spinal muscular atrophy type 1 (SMA1), with children in the trial walking, talking, and moving.
After a single intravenous infusion of the therapy, AVXS-101, children in the industry-funded study achieved unexpected progress in terms of physical achievement ad survival, researchers reported at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.
Video clips showed children in the trial rolling, sitting unassisted, and showing normal levels of hand and fine motor control. No other children with SMA1 have been reported to reach any major motor milestone.
In one clip, an 18-month-old boy toddles down a hallway and carries an electronic toy to an elevator where he reaches up to press the button. “He’s basically completely back to normal. You see and examine him; it just about takes your breath away,” said the study’s lead investigator, Jerry R. Mendell, MD, a neurologist at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio.
All 15 patients in the study were alive as of the AAN presentation, with six older than aged 2 years. Previous studies have reported various life expectancies for SMA1 patients: A 2010 Korean study of 14 SMA1 patients reported that the average lifespan was 22.8 ± 2.0 months (Korean J Pediatr. 2010 Nov;53[11]:965-70), while a 2007 Hong Kong study (n = 22) found that only 30% survived to aged 4 years and all survivors were venilator-dependent (Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114[5]:e548-53).
The open label phase I dose-escalating study recruited 15 patients (nine under aged 9 months; six 6 under aged 6 months) with SMA1 as defined by genetic criteria and onset between birth and 6 months. All received a one-time intravenous infusion of AVXS-101 after a 1-mg/1-kg dose of prednisolone the previous day. AVXS-101 is designed to boost levels of the SMN protein via delivery of a functional human SMN gene into motor neuron cells.
The first cohort of three patients received one dose. All survived to greater than aged 30 months, although one did require respiratory assistance at about 30 months, said Dr. Mendell, professor of pediatrics, neurology, pathology, and physiology and cell Biology at Ohio State University, Columbus.
Researchers moved to a larger dose, “the highest amount of virus that’s ever been given in any clinical trial,” Dr. Mendell said. The first patient has passed 30 months of age, and 9 patients have reached at least 20 months, he noted.
In this second cohort, all patients “are able to bring hand to mouth, which is obviously important for feeding. Eleven of the 12 have good head control, and 9 of the patients can roll over. And 11 can sit without assistance,” he said.
In addition, eight can sit more than 30 seconds, and two can crawl, stand, and walk independently. Eight of 12 patients are speaking, and 11 of 12 are feeding orally.
To date, five treatment-related adverse events in four patients have been reported – all asymptomatic increases in liver function enzymes, which resolved.
The study is funded by AveXis, the company developing this gene therapy. Dr. Mendell reported compensation for consulting and research support from AveXis and Sarepta Therapeutics.
BOSTON – Promising results were evident in an ongoing phase I study of a gene therapy for spinal muscular atrophy type 1 (SMA1), with children in the trial walking, talking, and moving.
After a single intravenous infusion of the therapy, AVXS-101, children in the industry-funded study achieved unexpected progress in terms of physical achievement ad survival, researchers reported at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.
Video clips showed children in the trial rolling, sitting unassisted, and showing normal levels of hand and fine motor control. No other children with SMA1 have been reported to reach any major motor milestone.
In one clip, an 18-month-old boy toddles down a hallway and carries an electronic toy to an elevator where he reaches up to press the button. “He’s basically completely back to normal. You see and examine him; it just about takes your breath away,” said the study’s lead investigator, Jerry R. Mendell, MD, a neurologist at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio.
All 15 patients in the study were alive as of the AAN presentation, with six older than aged 2 years. Previous studies have reported various life expectancies for SMA1 patients: A 2010 Korean study of 14 SMA1 patients reported that the average lifespan was 22.8 ± 2.0 months (Korean J Pediatr. 2010 Nov;53[11]:965-70), while a 2007 Hong Kong study (n = 22) found that only 30% survived to aged 4 years and all survivors were venilator-dependent (Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114[5]:e548-53).
The open label phase I dose-escalating study recruited 15 patients (nine under aged 9 months; six 6 under aged 6 months) with SMA1 as defined by genetic criteria and onset between birth and 6 months. All received a one-time intravenous infusion of AVXS-101 after a 1-mg/1-kg dose of prednisolone the previous day. AVXS-101 is designed to boost levels of the SMN protein via delivery of a functional human SMN gene into motor neuron cells.
The first cohort of three patients received one dose. All survived to greater than aged 30 months, although one did require respiratory assistance at about 30 months, said Dr. Mendell, professor of pediatrics, neurology, pathology, and physiology and cell Biology at Ohio State University, Columbus.
Researchers moved to a larger dose, “the highest amount of virus that’s ever been given in any clinical trial,” Dr. Mendell said. The first patient has passed 30 months of age, and 9 patients have reached at least 20 months, he noted.
In this second cohort, all patients “are able to bring hand to mouth, which is obviously important for feeding. Eleven of the 12 have good head control, and 9 of the patients can roll over. And 11 can sit without assistance,” he said.
In addition, eight can sit more than 30 seconds, and two can crawl, stand, and walk independently. Eight of 12 patients are speaking, and 11 of 12 are feeding orally.
To date, five treatment-related adverse events in four patients have been reported – all asymptomatic increases in liver function enzymes, which resolved.
The study is funded by AveXis, the company developing this gene therapy. Dr. Mendell reported compensation for consulting and research support from AveXis and Sarepta Therapeutics.
AT AAN 2017
Nusinersen for early spinal muscular atrophy: Final findings beat interim results
BOSTON – Last December, the Food and Drug Administration approved nusinersen (Spinraza) as the only treatment for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) based in part on startling interim results from a study in infants that ended early so all participants could get access to the drug.
Now the final study results are in, and they’re even more impressive: Patients who took the drug were less than half as likely to die as were those in a sham control group, and motor function improved in more than half of infants who took the medication, compared with none in the sham group.
The findings are “incredibly exciting,” said Charlotte J. Sumner, MD, in a discussant presentation at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology. “The data teaches us that this drug is efficacious.”
However, Dr. Sumner, professor of neurology and neuroscience at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, cautioned that the drug is tremendously expensive, challenging to administer, and there are several questions about its use that remain unanswered.
SMA is most often caused by mutations in the SMN1 gene, leading to a loss of the protein called survival motor neuron (SMN), which is essential for the survival of motor neurons, except for a small amount produced from the SMN2 gene. The loss of motor neurons in the spinal cord and brainstem leads to weakness and atrophy of muscles used for crawling, walking, sitting up, controlling head movement, and in severe cases, breathing and swallowing. It affects an estimated 1 in 6,000 newborns and is the most common genetic cause of death in infants. Nusinersen is a antisense oligonucleotide that promotes transcription of the full-length SMN protein from the SMN2 gene.
At the AAN meeting, investigators presented the final results of two nusinersen phase III studies as well as interim data from a separate phase II trial.
The ENDEAR trial, a randomized, double-blind, sham-procedure controlled study, assigned 80 patients to 12-mg scaled equivalent doses of nusinersen delivered intrathecally (four doses over 2 months, then one every 4 months) and 41 to a sham procedure (a needle prick in the lower back). The subjects, aged 30-252 days at first dose, underwent 13 months of treatment and follow-up.
Researchers presented an end-of-study analysis of 110 subjects. They found that 51% of those who received the drug were “motor milestone responders” – meaning they had more modified Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination Section 2 categories with improvement than worsening – compared with 41% at the interim analysis (P less than .0001). None of the sham group patients improved.
The patients treated with nusinersen lived longer: 39% of those in the sham procedure group died, compared with 16% of those in the nusinersen group (hazard ratio, 0.372; P = .0041). Event-free survival (survival without permanent ventilation) was also better in those who received the drugs: 61% in those who took nusinersen, compared with 32% in those who did not (HR, 0.53; P = .0046)
Also, 71% of those treated with the drug were considered responders at day 183 onward based on an improvement of 4 or more points on the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test of Neuromuscular Disorders scale, whereas the response rate was only 3% in the sham group (P less than .0001).
The study authors report that nusinersen was well tolerated with adverse events that “were consistent with those expected in the general population of infants with SMA.” No adverse events were linked to the nusinersen treatment.
Researchers also presented the end-of-study results of the phase III CHERISH trial of 126 patients aged 2-12 years with later-onset SMA who could sit up but not walk. All participants were believed to have a life expectancy of at least 2 years.
The trial is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-procedure controlled study. The 84 subjects who received the drug improved an average of 3.9 points by the end of study (15 months) on the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded score, a measurement of motor function in children with SMA (P = .0000001). The 42 children who received the sham treatment (a small needle prick on the lower back) declined by an average of 1.0 point.
Researchers report that children taking the drug had fewer adverse events, and most were not related to the drug itself.
All surviving participants who completed nusinersen investigational studies are being enrolled in the SHINE open-label extension trial.
Also at the AAN meeting, researchers released interim phase II results from the NURTURE trial, an open-label study of nusinersen in patients with diagnosed but presymptomatic SMA. The study, which is expected to be completed in 2022, recruited participants up to the age of 6 weeks.
The 20 enrolled infants were all alive at a median study period of 317.5 days, and none required assistance with respiration.
In terms of motor function and growth, most were making gains “generally consistent with normal development such as head control, independent sitting, standing and walking independently, as measured by validated scales,” according to a statement released by Biogen.
Three patients developed adverse events that may have been drug related, but the events were resolved and they remained in the trial.
In Dr. Sumner’s discussant presentation on the ENDEAR study, she cautioned that it’s still not known how much older patients with SMA will benefit from the drug treatment. It’s possible that younger patients may gain motor function while older patients will maintain what they have, she said.
In addition, it seems that “certain body segments may respond more robustly than some others. It’s possible that an infant may improve limb strength quite robustly but not lumbar strength.”
She pointed out other questions: Can the drug, which is difficult to administer, be stopped at some point? “We do think of SMA as a disease of development,” she said. “Maybe after development is finished we can withdraw the drug.”
Then there’s the issue of cost and whether insurers are willing to cover the drug. As Dr. Sumner pointed out, the drug is $125,000 per dose and $750,000 over the first year, then $325,000 a year.
It is clear, however, that “the early and efficient diagnosis of SMA is really important, particularly for infantile SMA,” she said. “Time is motor function.”
The studies were funded by Ionis Pharmaceuticals and Biogen. Dr. Sumner reports serving as a consultant for Biogen, Ionis, Avexis, and Roche. She has served on scientific advisory boards for the Cure SMA, SMA Foundation, and Muscular Dystrophy Association nonprofit foundations.
BOSTON – Last December, the Food and Drug Administration approved nusinersen (Spinraza) as the only treatment for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) based in part on startling interim results from a study in infants that ended early so all participants could get access to the drug.
Now the final study results are in, and they’re even more impressive: Patients who took the drug were less than half as likely to die as were those in a sham control group, and motor function improved in more than half of infants who took the medication, compared with none in the sham group.
The findings are “incredibly exciting,” said Charlotte J. Sumner, MD, in a discussant presentation at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology. “The data teaches us that this drug is efficacious.”
However, Dr. Sumner, professor of neurology and neuroscience at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, cautioned that the drug is tremendously expensive, challenging to administer, and there are several questions about its use that remain unanswered.
SMA is most often caused by mutations in the SMN1 gene, leading to a loss of the protein called survival motor neuron (SMN), which is essential for the survival of motor neurons, except for a small amount produced from the SMN2 gene. The loss of motor neurons in the spinal cord and brainstem leads to weakness and atrophy of muscles used for crawling, walking, sitting up, controlling head movement, and in severe cases, breathing and swallowing. It affects an estimated 1 in 6,000 newborns and is the most common genetic cause of death in infants. Nusinersen is a antisense oligonucleotide that promotes transcription of the full-length SMN protein from the SMN2 gene.
At the AAN meeting, investigators presented the final results of two nusinersen phase III studies as well as interim data from a separate phase II trial.
The ENDEAR trial, a randomized, double-blind, sham-procedure controlled study, assigned 80 patients to 12-mg scaled equivalent doses of nusinersen delivered intrathecally (four doses over 2 months, then one every 4 months) and 41 to a sham procedure (a needle prick in the lower back). The subjects, aged 30-252 days at first dose, underwent 13 months of treatment and follow-up.
Researchers presented an end-of-study analysis of 110 subjects. They found that 51% of those who received the drug were “motor milestone responders” – meaning they had more modified Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination Section 2 categories with improvement than worsening – compared with 41% at the interim analysis (P less than .0001). None of the sham group patients improved.
The patients treated with nusinersen lived longer: 39% of those in the sham procedure group died, compared with 16% of those in the nusinersen group (hazard ratio, 0.372; P = .0041). Event-free survival (survival without permanent ventilation) was also better in those who received the drugs: 61% in those who took nusinersen, compared with 32% in those who did not (HR, 0.53; P = .0046)
Also, 71% of those treated with the drug were considered responders at day 183 onward based on an improvement of 4 or more points on the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test of Neuromuscular Disorders scale, whereas the response rate was only 3% in the sham group (P less than .0001).
The study authors report that nusinersen was well tolerated with adverse events that “were consistent with those expected in the general population of infants with SMA.” No adverse events were linked to the nusinersen treatment.
Researchers also presented the end-of-study results of the phase III CHERISH trial of 126 patients aged 2-12 years with later-onset SMA who could sit up but not walk. All participants were believed to have a life expectancy of at least 2 years.
The trial is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-procedure controlled study. The 84 subjects who received the drug improved an average of 3.9 points by the end of study (15 months) on the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded score, a measurement of motor function in children with SMA (P = .0000001). The 42 children who received the sham treatment (a small needle prick on the lower back) declined by an average of 1.0 point.
Researchers report that children taking the drug had fewer adverse events, and most were not related to the drug itself.
All surviving participants who completed nusinersen investigational studies are being enrolled in the SHINE open-label extension trial.
Also at the AAN meeting, researchers released interim phase II results from the NURTURE trial, an open-label study of nusinersen in patients with diagnosed but presymptomatic SMA. The study, which is expected to be completed in 2022, recruited participants up to the age of 6 weeks.
The 20 enrolled infants were all alive at a median study period of 317.5 days, and none required assistance with respiration.
In terms of motor function and growth, most were making gains “generally consistent with normal development such as head control, independent sitting, standing and walking independently, as measured by validated scales,” according to a statement released by Biogen.
Three patients developed adverse events that may have been drug related, but the events were resolved and they remained in the trial.
In Dr. Sumner’s discussant presentation on the ENDEAR study, she cautioned that it’s still not known how much older patients with SMA will benefit from the drug treatment. It’s possible that younger patients may gain motor function while older patients will maintain what they have, she said.
In addition, it seems that “certain body segments may respond more robustly than some others. It’s possible that an infant may improve limb strength quite robustly but not lumbar strength.”
She pointed out other questions: Can the drug, which is difficult to administer, be stopped at some point? “We do think of SMA as a disease of development,” she said. “Maybe after development is finished we can withdraw the drug.”
Then there’s the issue of cost and whether insurers are willing to cover the drug. As Dr. Sumner pointed out, the drug is $125,000 per dose and $750,000 over the first year, then $325,000 a year.
It is clear, however, that “the early and efficient diagnosis of SMA is really important, particularly for infantile SMA,” she said. “Time is motor function.”
The studies were funded by Ionis Pharmaceuticals and Biogen. Dr. Sumner reports serving as a consultant for Biogen, Ionis, Avexis, and Roche. She has served on scientific advisory boards for the Cure SMA, SMA Foundation, and Muscular Dystrophy Association nonprofit foundations.
BOSTON – Last December, the Food and Drug Administration approved nusinersen (Spinraza) as the only treatment for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) based in part on startling interim results from a study in infants that ended early so all participants could get access to the drug.
Now the final study results are in, and they’re even more impressive: Patients who took the drug were less than half as likely to die as were those in a sham control group, and motor function improved in more than half of infants who took the medication, compared with none in the sham group.
The findings are “incredibly exciting,” said Charlotte J. Sumner, MD, in a discussant presentation at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology. “The data teaches us that this drug is efficacious.”
However, Dr. Sumner, professor of neurology and neuroscience at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, cautioned that the drug is tremendously expensive, challenging to administer, and there are several questions about its use that remain unanswered.
SMA is most often caused by mutations in the SMN1 gene, leading to a loss of the protein called survival motor neuron (SMN), which is essential for the survival of motor neurons, except for a small amount produced from the SMN2 gene. The loss of motor neurons in the spinal cord and brainstem leads to weakness and atrophy of muscles used for crawling, walking, sitting up, controlling head movement, and in severe cases, breathing and swallowing. It affects an estimated 1 in 6,000 newborns and is the most common genetic cause of death in infants. Nusinersen is a antisense oligonucleotide that promotes transcription of the full-length SMN protein from the SMN2 gene.
At the AAN meeting, investigators presented the final results of two nusinersen phase III studies as well as interim data from a separate phase II trial.
The ENDEAR trial, a randomized, double-blind, sham-procedure controlled study, assigned 80 patients to 12-mg scaled equivalent doses of nusinersen delivered intrathecally (four doses over 2 months, then one every 4 months) and 41 to a sham procedure (a needle prick in the lower back). The subjects, aged 30-252 days at first dose, underwent 13 months of treatment and follow-up.
Researchers presented an end-of-study analysis of 110 subjects. They found that 51% of those who received the drug were “motor milestone responders” – meaning they had more modified Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination Section 2 categories with improvement than worsening – compared with 41% at the interim analysis (P less than .0001). None of the sham group patients improved.
The patients treated with nusinersen lived longer: 39% of those in the sham procedure group died, compared with 16% of those in the nusinersen group (hazard ratio, 0.372; P = .0041). Event-free survival (survival without permanent ventilation) was also better in those who received the drugs: 61% in those who took nusinersen, compared with 32% in those who did not (HR, 0.53; P = .0046)
Also, 71% of those treated with the drug were considered responders at day 183 onward based on an improvement of 4 or more points on the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test of Neuromuscular Disorders scale, whereas the response rate was only 3% in the sham group (P less than .0001).
The study authors report that nusinersen was well tolerated with adverse events that “were consistent with those expected in the general population of infants with SMA.” No adverse events were linked to the nusinersen treatment.
Researchers also presented the end-of-study results of the phase III CHERISH trial of 126 patients aged 2-12 years with later-onset SMA who could sit up but not walk. All participants were believed to have a life expectancy of at least 2 years.
The trial is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-procedure controlled study. The 84 subjects who received the drug improved an average of 3.9 points by the end of study (15 months) on the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded score, a measurement of motor function in children with SMA (P = .0000001). The 42 children who received the sham treatment (a small needle prick on the lower back) declined by an average of 1.0 point.
Researchers report that children taking the drug had fewer adverse events, and most were not related to the drug itself.
All surviving participants who completed nusinersen investigational studies are being enrolled in the SHINE open-label extension trial.
Also at the AAN meeting, researchers released interim phase II results from the NURTURE trial, an open-label study of nusinersen in patients with diagnosed but presymptomatic SMA. The study, which is expected to be completed in 2022, recruited participants up to the age of 6 weeks.
The 20 enrolled infants were all alive at a median study period of 317.5 days, and none required assistance with respiration.
In terms of motor function and growth, most were making gains “generally consistent with normal development such as head control, independent sitting, standing and walking independently, as measured by validated scales,” according to a statement released by Biogen.
Three patients developed adverse events that may have been drug related, but the events were resolved and they remained in the trial.
In Dr. Sumner’s discussant presentation on the ENDEAR study, she cautioned that it’s still not known how much older patients with SMA will benefit from the drug treatment. It’s possible that younger patients may gain motor function while older patients will maintain what they have, she said.
In addition, it seems that “certain body segments may respond more robustly than some others. It’s possible that an infant may improve limb strength quite robustly but not lumbar strength.”
She pointed out other questions: Can the drug, which is difficult to administer, be stopped at some point? “We do think of SMA as a disease of development,” she said. “Maybe after development is finished we can withdraw the drug.”
Then there’s the issue of cost and whether insurers are willing to cover the drug. As Dr. Sumner pointed out, the drug is $125,000 per dose and $750,000 over the first year, then $325,000 a year.
It is clear, however, that “the early and efficient diagnosis of SMA is really important, particularly for infantile SMA,” she said. “Time is motor function.”
The studies were funded by Ionis Pharmaceuticals and Biogen. Dr. Sumner reports serving as a consultant for Biogen, Ionis, Avexis, and Roche. She has served on scientific advisory boards for the Cure SMA, SMA Foundation, and Muscular Dystrophy Association nonprofit foundations.
AT AAN 2017
Key clinical point:
Major finding: 51% of subjects who took the drug were judged to be “motor milestone responders”; none in the sham group improved (P less than .0001).
Data source: Randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, 13-month study of 110 subjects with infantile-onset SMA aged 30-252 days at first dose. They received 12-mg scaled equivalent doses of nusinersen delivered intrathecally (four doses over 2 months then one every 4 months) or a sham procedure (needle prick).
Disclosures: The studies were funded by Ionis Pharmaceuticals and Biogen.
PATH study: Subcutaneous immunoglobulin safe, effective for CIDP maintenance
BOSTON – Subcutaneously administered immunoglobulin was effective, well tolerated, and preferred over intravenous administration as maintenance treatment for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy in the phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled PATH study.
The 172-patient trial tested a high and low dose of subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) over the course of 25 weeks to determine their effect on the primary outcome of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) relapse or withdrawal from treatment for any reason. In this evaluation of using SCIg for maintenance of response, relapses or treatment withdrawal occurred in 63% with placebo, 39% with low dose SCIg (0.2 g/kg weekly), and 33% with high dose (0.4 g/kg weekly), Ivo N. van Schaik, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.
Patients in the trial had received at lease one dose of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) within 8 weeks before screening. They then underwent a screening period first, followed by an IgG dependency period of up to 12 weeks to test for ongoing need for IgG. The patients who experienced CIDP relapse during this test period were administered a standardized IVIG regimen during a 10- to 13-week restabilization period, and those who improved and maintained their Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) score continued to the randomized subcutaneous treatment period of the study.
CIDP relapse occurred in 56% of patients in the placebo group, compared with 33% in the low- and 19% in the high-dose SCIg groups, said Dr. van Schaik of the University of Amsterdam (the Netherlands).
“Both [SCIg] doses were effective in preventing relapse. The higher dose performed better than the lower dose, but the difference was not statistically significant,” he said.
Both doses were significantly more effective than placebo.
Study participants were adults with definite or probable CIDP enrolled from 69 neuromuscular centers worldwide between March 2012 and November 2015. Weekly self-administered subcutaneous infusions of SCIg (IgPro20Hizentra) were performed during 1 or 2 consecutive days in two separate sessions using special infusion pumps. Patients reported that learning the self-administration technique was easy, Dr. van Schaik said.
Adverse effects included mainly local reactions, which occurred in 19% of patients, but these were generally mild and rarely resulted in therapy discontinuation, and local reactions decreased considerably over time, he said, noting that systemic effects are reduced with SCIg vs. IVIg.
Subcutaneous administration of immunoglobulin is not new. In fact, it has been used successfully in patients with immunodeficiency syndromes for more than 2 decades and can increase patient autonomy and reduce costs by reducing hospital and infusion center visits, but this is the first study to assess efficacy, safety, and tolerability of this approach in an adequately powered, randomized, clinical trial, he said.
“Subcutaneous immunoglobulin can be used ... for maintenance treatment of patients with CIDP,” he concluded, adding that weekly doses of 0.2-0.4 g/kg are supported by these data, and that maintenance doses should be individualized based on patient factors and previous IVIg dose and frequency.
The PATH study was sponsored by CSL-Behring. Dr. van Schaik chairs a steering committee for CSL-Behring and received departmental honoraria for serving on scientific advisory boards for CSL-Behring, Baxalta, and UCB. He also received speakers fees from CSL-Behring and Kedrion.
BOSTON – Subcutaneously administered immunoglobulin was effective, well tolerated, and preferred over intravenous administration as maintenance treatment for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy in the phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled PATH study.
The 172-patient trial tested a high and low dose of subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) over the course of 25 weeks to determine their effect on the primary outcome of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) relapse or withdrawal from treatment for any reason. In this evaluation of using SCIg for maintenance of response, relapses or treatment withdrawal occurred in 63% with placebo, 39% with low dose SCIg (0.2 g/kg weekly), and 33% with high dose (0.4 g/kg weekly), Ivo N. van Schaik, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.
Patients in the trial had received at lease one dose of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) within 8 weeks before screening. They then underwent a screening period first, followed by an IgG dependency period of up to 12 weeks to test for ongoing need for IgG. The patients who experienced CIDP relapse during this test period were administered a standardized IVIG regimen during a 10- to 13-week restabilization period, and those who improved and maintained their Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) score continued to the randomized subcutaneous treatment period of the study.
CIDP relapse occurred in 56% of patients in the placebo group, compared with 33% in the low- and 19% in the high-dose SCIg groups, said Dr. van Schaik of the University of Amsterdam (the Netherlands).
“Both [SCIg] doses were effective in preventing relapse. The higher dose performed better than the lower dose, but the difference was not statistically significant,” he said.
Both doses were significantly more effective than placebo.
Study participants were adults with definite or probable CIDP enrolled from 69 neuromuscular centers worldwide between March 2012 and November 2015. Weekly self-administered subcutaneous infusions of SCIg (IgPro20Hizentra) were performed during 1 or 2 consecutive days in two separate sessions using special infusion pumps. Patients reported that learning the self-administration technique was easy, Dr. van Schaik said.
Adverse effects included mainly local reactions, which occurred in 19% of patients, but these were generally mild and rarely resulted in therapy discontinuation, and local reactions decreased considerably over time, he said, noting that systemic effects are reduced with SCIg vs. IVIg.
Subcutaneous administration of immunoglobulin is not new. In fact, it has been used successfully in patients with immunodeficiency syndromes for more than 2 decades and can increase patient autonomy and reduce costs by reducing hospital and infusion center visits, but this is the first study to assess efficacy, safety, and tolerability of this approach in an adequately powered, randomized, clinical trial, he said.
“Subcutaneous immunoglobulin can be used ... for maintenance treatment of patients with CIDP,” he concluded, adding that weekly doses of 0.2-0.4 g/kg are supported by these data, and that maintenance doses should be individualized based on patient factors and previous IVIg dose and frequency.
The PATH study was sponsored by CSL-Behring. Dr. van Schaik chairs a steering committee for CSL-Behring and received departmental honoraria for serving on scientific advisory boards for CSL-Behring, Baxalta, and UCB. He also received speakers fees from CSL-Behring and Kedrion.
BOSTON – Subcutaneously administered immunoglobulin was effective, well tolerated, and preferred over intravenous administration as maintenance treatment for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy in the phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled PATH study.
The 172-patient trial tested a high and low dose of subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) over the course of 25 weeks to determine their effect on the primary outcome of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) relapse or withdrawal from treatment for any reason. In this evaluation of using SCIg for maintenance of response, relapses or treatment withdrawal occurred in 63% with placebo, 39% with low dose SCIg (0.2 g/kg weekly), and 33% with high dose (0.4 g/kg weekly), Ivo N. van Schaik, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.
Patients in the trial had received at lease one dose of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) within 8 weeks before screening. They then underwent a screening period first, followed by an IgG dependency period of up to 12 weeks to test for ongoing need for IgG. The patients who experienced CIDP relapse during this test period were administered a standardized IVIG regimen during a 10- to 13-week restabilization period, and those who improved and maintained their Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) score continued to the randomized subcutaneous treatment period of the study.
CIDP relapse occurred in 56% of patients in the placebo group, compared with 33% in the low- and 19% in the high-dose SCIg groups, said Dr. van Schaik of the University of Amsterdam (the Netherlands).
“Both [SCIg] doses were effective in preventing relapse. The higher dose performed better than the lower dose, but the difference was not statistically significant,” he said.
Both doses were significantly more effective than placebo.
Study participants were adults with definite or probable CIDP enrolled from 69 neuromuscular centers worldwide between March 2012 and November 2015. Weekly self-administered subcutaneous infusions of SCIg (IgPro20Hizentra) were performed during 1 or 2 consecutive days in two separate sessions using special infusion pumps. Patients reported that learning the self-administration technique was easy, Dr. van Schaik said.
Adverse effects included mainly local reactions, which occurred in 19% of patients, but these were generally mild and rarely resulted in therapy discontinuation, and local reactions decreased considerably over time, he said, noting that systemic effects are reduced with SCIg vs. IVIg.
Subcutaneous administration of immunoglobulin is not new. In fact, it has been used successfully in patients with immunodeficiency syndromes for more than 2 decades and can increase patient autonomy and reduce costs by reducing hospital and infusion center visits, but this is the first study to assess efficacy, safety, and tolerability of this approach in an adequately powered, randomized, clinical trial, he said.
“Subcutaneous immunoglobulin can be used ... for maintenance treatment of patients with CIDP,” he concluded, adding that weekly doses of 0.2-0.4 g/kg are supported by these data, and that maintenance doses should be individualized based on patient factors and previous IVIg dose and frequency.
The PATH study was sponsored by CSL-Behring. Dr. van Schaik chairs a steering committee for CSL-Behring and received departmental honoraria for serving on scientific advisory boards for CSL-Behring, Baxalta, and UCB. He also received speakers fees from CSL-Behring and Kedrion.
Key clinical point:
Major finding: CIDP relapse occurred in 56% of patients in the placebo group, compared with 33% in the low- and 19% in the high-dose SCIg groups.
Data source: The randomized, placebo-controlled phase III PATH study of 172 CIDP patients.
Disclosures: The PATH study was sponsored by CSL-Behring. Dr. van Schaik chairs a steering committee for CSL-Behring and received departmental honoraria for serving on scientific advisory boards for CSL-Behring, Baxalta, and UCB. He also received speakers fees from CSL-Behring and Kedrion.
FDA approves first new drug for ALS in decades
The Food and Drug Administration approved the antioxidant drug edaravone on May 5 for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, making it only the second drug ever to be approved by the agency for the motor neuron disease.
The FDA granted approval for edaravone, to be marketed by Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma America under the brand name Radicava, through its orphan drug pathway, which is meant for drugs used to treat rare diseases or conditions. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) affects 12,000-15,000 Americans.
Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma America demonstrated the efficacy of edaravone in a 6-month trial of 137 Japanese ALS patients. At 24 weeks, individuals who received edaravone had less decline on a clinical assessment of daily functioning, the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R), compared with those who received a placebo. The difference in decline between the two groups was 33%, or a total of 2.49 points, on the ALSFRS-R. Most of the patients in the study also received the only other drug approved for ALS, riluzole (Rilutek).
Edaravone is thought to confer neuroprotection in part through its free radical–scavenging activity.
The adverse events most often reported by clinical trial participants who took edaravone included bruising and gait disturbance. The FDA also warned that edaravone is associated with hives, swelling, or shortness of breath, and allergic reactions to an ingredient in the drug, sodium bisulfite, which may cause anaphylactic symptoms that can be life-threatening in people with sulfite sensitivity.
The drug is administered via intravenous infusion with an initial treatment cycle of daily dosing for 14 days, followed by a 14-day drug-free period. Subsequent treatment cycles consist of dosing on 10 of 14 days, followed by 14 days drug-free.
Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma America said in a statement that it has created a patient access program called Searchlight Support for people with ALS who are prescribed the drug. The program provides personal case management, reimbursement support, and 24/7 clinical support.
In 2015, edaravone was approved for use as a treatment for ALS in Japan and South Korea.
The Food and Drug Administration approved the antioxidant drug edaravone on May 5 for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, making it only the second drug ever to be approved by the agency for the motor neuron disease.
The FDA granted approval for edaravone, to be marketed by Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma America under the brand name Radicava, through its orphan drug pathway, which is meant for drugs used to treat rare diseases or conditions. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) affects 12,000-15,000 Americans.
Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma America demonstrated the efficacy of edaravone in a 6-month trial of 137 Japanese ALS patients. At 24 weeks, individuals who received edaravone had less decline on a clinical assessment of daily functioning, the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R), compared with those who received a placebo. The difference in decline between the two groups was 33%, or a total of 2.49 points, on the ALSFRS-R. Most of the patients in the study also received the only other drug approved for ALS, riluzole (Rilutek).
Edaravone is thought to confer neuroprotection in part through its free radical–scavenging activity.
The adverse events most often reported by clinical trial participants who took edaravone included bruising and gait disturbance. The FDA also warned that edaravone is associated with hives, swelling, or shortness of breath, and allergic reactions to an ingredient in the drug, sodium bisulfite, which may cause anaphylactic symptoms that can be life-threatening in people with sulfite sensitivity.
The drug is administered via intravenous infusion with an initial treatment cycle of daily dosing for 14 days, followed by a 14-day drug-free period. Subsequent treatment cycles consist of dosing on 10 of 14 days, followed by 14 days drug-free.
Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma America said in a statement that it has created a patient access program called Searchlight Support for people with ALS who are prescribed the drug. The program provides personal case management, reimbursement support, and 24/7 clinical support.
In 2015, edaravone was approved for use as a treatment for ALS in Japan and South Korea.
The Food and Drug Administration approved the antioxidant drug edaravone on May 5 for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, making it only the second drug ever to be approved by the agency for the motor neuron disease.
The FDA granted approval for edaravone, to be marketed by Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma America under the brand name Radicava, through its orphan drug pathway, which is meant for drugs used to treat rare diseases or conditions. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) affects 12,000-15,000 Americans.
Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma America demonstrated the efficacy of edaravone in a 6-month trial of 137 Japanese ALS patients. At 24 weeks, individuals who received edaravone had less decline on a clinical assessment of daily functioning, the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R), compared with those who received a placebo. The difference in decline between the two groups was 33%, or a total of 2.49 points, on the ALSFRS-R. Most of the patients in the study also received the only other drug approved for ALS, riluzole (Rilutek).
Edaravone is thought to confer neuroprotection in part through its free radical–scavenging activity.
The adverse events most often reported by clinical trial participants who took edaravone included bruising and gait disturbance. The FDA also warned that edaravone is associated with hives, swelling, or shortness of breath, and allergic reactions to an ingredient in the drug, sodium bisulfite, which may cause anaphylactic symptoms that can be life-threatening in people with sulfite sensitivity.
The drug is administered via intravenous infusion with an initial treatment cycle of daily dosing for 14 days, followed by a 14-day drug-free period. Subsequent treatment cycles consist of dosing on 10 of 14 days, followed by 14 days drug-free.
Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma America said in a statement that it has created a patient access program called Searchlight Support for people with ALS who are prescribed the drug. The program provides personal case management, reimbursement support, and 24/7 clinical support.
In 2015, edaravone was approved for use as a treatment for ALS in Japan and South Korea.