Andrew D. Bowser

Declines in death rates for lung cancer and melanoma have gained momentum in recent years, fueling a record drop in cancer mortality, the American Cancer Society says.

Lung cancer death rates, which were falling by 3% in men and 2% in women annually in 2008 through 2013, dropped by 5% in men and nearly 4% per year in women annually from 2013 to 2017, according to the society’s 2020 statistical report.

Those accelerating reductions in death rates helped fuel the biggest-ever single year decline in overall cancer mortality, of 2.2%, from 2016 to 2017, their report shows.

According to the investigators, the decline in melanoma death rates escalated to 6.9% per year among 20- to 49-year-olds over 2013-2017, compared with a decline of just 2.9% per year during 2006-2010. Likewise, the melanoma death rate decline was 7.2% annually for the more recent time period, compared with just 1.3% annually in the earlier time period. The finding was even more remarkable for those 65 years of age and older, according to investigators, since the declines in melanoma death rates reached 6.2% annually, compared with a 0.9% annual increase in the years before immunotherapy.

Smoking cessation has been the main driver of progress in cutting lung cancer death rates, according to the report, while in melanoma, death rates have dropped after the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies.

By contrast, reductions in death rates have slowed for colorectal cancers and female breast cancers, and have stabilized for prostate cancer, Ms. Siegel and coauthors stated, adding that racial and geographic disparities persist in preventable cancers, including those of the lung and cervix.

“Increased investment in both the equitable application of existing cancer control interventions and basic and clinical research to further advance treatment options would undoubtedly accelerate progress against cancer,” said the investigators. The report appears in CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians.

While the decline in lung cancer death rates is good news, the disease remains a major killer, responsible for more deaths than breast, colorectal, and ovarian cancer combined, said Jacques P. Fontaine, MD, a thoracic surgeon at Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Fla.

“Five-year survival rates are still around the 18%-20% range, which is much lower than breast and prostate cancer,” Dr. Fontaine said in an interview. “Nonetheless, we’ve made a little dent in that, and we’re improving.”

Two other factors that have helped spur that improvement, according to Dr. Fontaine, are the reduced incidence of squamous cell carcinomas, which are linked to smoking, and the increased use of lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography.

Squamous cell carcinomas tend to be a central rather than peripheral, which makes the tumors harder to resect: “Surgery is sometimes not an option, and even to this day in 2020, the single most effective treatment for lung cancer remains surgical resection,” said Dr. Fontaine.

Likewise, centrally located tumors may preclude giving high-dose radiation and may result in more “collateral damage” to healthy tissue, he added.

Landmark studies show that low-dose CT scans reduce lung cancer deaths by 20% or more; however, screening can have false-positive results that lead to unnecessary biopsies and other harms, suggesting that the procedures should be done in centers of excellence that provide high-quality, responsible screening for early lung cancer, Dr. Fontaine said.

While the drop in melanoma death rates is encouraging and, not surprising in light of new cutting-edge therapies, an ongoing unmet treatment need still exists, according to Vishal Anil Patel, MD, director of cutaneous oncology at the George Washington Cancer Center in Washington.

“We still have a lot to learn, and a way to go, because we’ve really just made the first breakthrough,” Dr. Patel said in an interview.

SOURCE: Siegel RL et al. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590.

Declines in death rates for lung cancer and melanoma have gained momentum in recent years, fueling a record drop in cancer mortality, the American Cancer Society says.

Lung cancer death rates, which were falling by 3% in men and 2% in women annually in 2008 through 2013, dropped by 5% in men and nearly 4% per year in women annually from 2013 to 2017, according to the society’s 2020 statistical report.

Those accelerating reductions in death rates helped fuel the biggest-ever single year decline in overall cancer mortality, of 2.2%, from 2016 to 2017, their report shows.

According to the investigators, the decline in melanoma death rates escalated to 6.9% per year among 20- to 49-year-olds over 2013-2017, compared with a decline of just 2.9% per year during 2006-2010. Likewise, the melanoma death rate decline was 7.2% annually for the more recent time period, compared with just 1.3% annually in the earlier time period. The finding was even more remarkable for those 65 years of age and older, according to investigators, since the declines in melanoma death rates reached 6.2% annually, compared with a 0.9% annual increase in the years before immunotherapy.

Smoking cessation has been the main driver of progress in cutting lung cancer death rates, according to the report, while in melanoma, death rates have dropped after the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies.

By contrast, reductions in death rates have slowed for colorectal cancers and female breast cancers, and have stabilized for prostate cancer, Ms. Siegel and coauthors stated, adding that racial and geographic disparities persist in preventable cancers, including those of the lung and cervix.

“Increased investment in both the equitable application of existing cancer control interventions and basic and clinical research to further advance treatment options would undoubtedly accelerate progress against cancer,” said the investigators. The report appears in CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians.

While the decline in lung cancer death rates is good news, the disease remains a major killer, responsible for more deaths than breast, colorectal, and ovarian cancer combined, said Jacques P. Fontaine, MD, a thoracic surgeon at Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Fla.

“Five-year survival rates are still around the 18%-20% range, which is much lower than breast and prostate cancer,” Dr. Fontaine said in an interview. “Nonetheless, we’ve made a little dent in that, and we’re improving.”

Two other factors that have helped spur that improvement, according to Dr. Fontaine, are the reduced incidence of squamous cell carcinomas, which are linked to smoking, and the increased use of lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography.

Squamous cell carcinomas tend to be a central rather than peripheral, which makes the tumors harder to resect: “Surgery is sometimes not an option, and even to this day in 2020, the single most effective treatment for lung cancer remains surgical resection,” said Dr. Fontaine.

Likewise, centrally located tumors may preclude giving high-dose radiation and may result in more “collateral damage” to healthy tissue, he added.

Landmark studies show that low-dose CT scans reduce lung cancer deaths by 20% or more; however, screening can have false-positive results that lead to unnecessary biopsies and other harms, suggesting that the procedures should be done in centers of excellence that provide high-quality, responsible screening for early lung cancer, Dr. Fontaine said.

While the drop in melanoma death rates is encouraging and, not surprising in light of new cutting-edge therapies, an ongoing unmet treatment need still exists, according to Vishal Anil Patel, MD, director of cutaneous oncology at the George Washington Cancer Center in Washington.

“We still have a lot to learn, and a way to go, because we’ve really just made the first breakthrough,” Dr. Patel said in an interview.

SOURCE: Siegel RL et al. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590.

Declines in death rates for lung cancer and melanoma have gained momentum in recent years, fueling a record drop in cancer mortality, the American Cancer Society says.

Lung cancer death rates, which were falling by 3% in men and 2% in women annually in 2008 through 2013, dropped by 5% in men and nearly 4% per year in women annually from 2013 to 2017, according to the society’s 2020 statistical report.

Those accelerating reductions in death rates helped fuel the biggest-ever single year decline in overall cancer mortality, of 2.2%, from 2016 to 2017, their report shows.

According to the investigators, the decline in melanoma death rates escalated to 6.9% per year among 20- to 49-year-olds over 2013-2017, compared with a decline of just 2.9% per year during 2006-2010. Likewise, the melanoma death rate decline was 7.2% annually for the more recent time period, compared with just 1.3% annually in the earlier time period. The finding was even more remarkable for those 65 years of age and older, according to investigators, since the declines in melanoma death rates reached 6.2% annually, compared with a 0.9% annual increase in the years before immunotherapy.

Smoking cessation has been the main driver of progress in cutting lung cancer death rates, according to the report, while in melanoma, death rates have dropped after the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies.

By contrast, reductions in death rates have slowed for colorectal cancers and female breast cancers, and have stabilized for prostate cancer, Ms. Siegel and coauthors stated, adding that racial and geographic disparities persist in preventable cancers, including those of the lung and cervix.

“Increased investment in both the equitable application of existing cancer control interventions and basic and clinical research to further advance treatment options would undoubtedly accelerate progress against cancer,” said the investigators. The report appears in CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians.

While the decline in lung cancer death rates is good news, the disease remains a major killer, responsible for more deaths than breast, colorectal, and ovarian cancer combined, said Jacques P. Fontaine, MD, a thoracic surgeon at Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Fla.

“Five-year survival rates are still around the 18%-20% range, which is much lower than breast and prostate cancer,” Dr. Fontaine said in an interview. “Nonetheless, we’ve made a little dent in that, and we’re improving.”

Two other factors that have helped spur that improvement, according to Dr. Fontaine, are the reduced incidence of squamous cell carcinomas, which are linked to smoking, and the increased use of lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography.

Squamous cell carcinomas tend to be a central rather than peripheral, which makes the tumors harder to resect: “Surgery is sometimes not an option, and even to this day in 2020, the single most effective treatment for lung cancer remains surgical resection,” said Dr. Fontaine.

Likewise, centrally located tumors may preclude giving high-dose radiation and may result in more “collateral damage” to healthy tissue, he added.

Landmark studies show that low-dose CT scans reduce lung cancer deaths by 20% or more; however, screening can have false-positive results that lead to unnecessary biopsies and other harms, suggesting that the procedures should be done in centers of excellence that provide high-quality, responsible screening for early lung cancer, Dr. Fontaine said.

While the drop in melanoma death rates is encouraging and, not surprising in light of new cutting-edge therapies, an ongoing unmet treatment need still exists, according to Vishal Anil Patel, MD, director of cutaneous oncology at the George Washington Cancer Center in Washington.

“We still have a lot to learn, and a way to go, because we’ve really just made the first breakthrough,” Dr. Patel said in an interview.

SOURCE: Siegel RL et al. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590.

Sleeve gastrectomy was associated with significantly fewer postsurgical interventions and operations than was Roux-en-Y gastric bypass over longer-term follow-up in a recent cohort study based on real-world clinical data, according to investigators.

Interventions, operations, and hospitalizations were “relatively common” for both procedures over the 5-year follow-up, though significantly less so with sleeve gastrectomy, which has become the most common bariatric operation, the investigators said in a recent report on the study.

The benefit of sleeve gastrectomy seemed to be most pronounced in patients with lower body mass index and those with fewer comorbidities, according to the authors of the report, led by bariatric and general surgeon Anita Courcoulas, MD, of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

That finding is counterintuitive, since in clinical practice, sleeve gastrectomy is frequently thought of as the preferred procedure for individuals with higher BMI or more comorbidities, though Dr. Courcoulas and colleagues cautioned that the findings were “exploratory” and require further investigation. Historically, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass provided more weight loss.

Safety results from this study, balanced by weight loss and health outcomes data, will “help inform procedure-specific decision making for prospective patients and physicians,” said Dr. Courcoulas and coauthors of the report, which appears in JAMA Surgery.

The study included 33,560 adults who had undergone the Roux-en-Y procedure or sleeve gastrectomy, making it one of the largest bariatric cohort studies ever to be done, according to the investigators.

The majority of patients in the study (54%) underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, though the number of sleeve gastrectomy procedures increased each year in the study, which included patients who underwent a primary bariatric surgery procedure between January 2005 and September 2015 at 1 of 10 sites in the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network.

Most of the patients were female (80%) and white (66%), and 26% were Hispanic, according to the researchers, who said their study was more racially diverse than other bariatric studies, and therefore potentially more generalizable to real-world clinical practice.

Over the 5-year follow-up period, patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy were less likely to subsequently undergo operations involving the abdomen, or interventions for enteral access, such as placement of gastrostomy tubes, according to the investigators, who reported a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-0.79; P less than .001).

The estimated cumulative rate of operations or interventions at 5 years was 8.94% (95% CI, 8.23%-9.65%) for the patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy, compared with 12.27% (95% CI, 11.49%-13.05%) for those who underwent the Roux-en-Y procedure, according to the report.

Hospitalization was also less likely for sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, with a hazard ratio of 0.82 and estimated cumulative incidence rates of 32.79% and 38.33%, respectively. Likewise, endoscopy was less likely in the sleeve gastrectomy group.

All-cause mortality did not differ between the groups at this 5-year follow-up, the investigators said.

“The present data were gathered from clinical care in the real world, yet the results are comparable to controlled studies and therefore lend additional support to the findings of these other types of studies that operation and intervention occur less commonly after sleeve gastrectomy than after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for up to 5 years,” Dr. Courcoulas and coauthors noted in a discussion of their results.

This work was funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Dr. Courcoulas reported receiving a grant from Allurion. Coauthors provided disclosures related to the National Institutes of Health, IFSO Latin America Chapter, and the Food and Drug Administration.

*This story was updated on January 16, 2020.

SOURCE: Courcoulas A et al. JAMA Surg. 2020 Jan 15. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.5470.

Sleeve gastrectomy was associated with significantly fewer postsurgical interventions and operations than was Roux-en-Y gastric bypass over longer-term follow-up in a recent cohort study based on real-world clinical data, according to investigators.

Interventions, operations, and hospitalizations were “relatively common” for both procedures over the 5-year follow-up, though significantly less so with sleeve gastrectomy, which has become the most common bariatric operation, the investigators said in a recent report on the study.

The benefit of sleeve gastrectomy seemed to be most pronounced in patients with lower body mass index and those with fewer comorbidities, according to the authors of the report, led by bariatric and general surgeon Anita Courcoulas, MD, of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

That finding is counterintuitive, since in clinical practice, sleeve gastrectomy is frequently thought of as the preferred procedure for individuals with higher BMI or more comorbidities, though Dr. Courcoulas and colleagues cautioned that the findings were “exploratory” and require further investigation. Historically, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass provided more weight loss.

Safety results from this study, balanced by weight loss and health outcomes data, will “help inform procedure-specific decision making for prospective patients and physicians,” said Dr. Courcoulas and coauthors of the report, which appears in JAMA Surgery.

The study included 33,560 adults who had undergone the Roux-en-Y procedure or sleeve gastrectomy, making it one of the largest bariatric cohort studies ever to be done, according to the investigators.

The majority of patients in the study (54%) underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, though the number of sleeve gastrectomy procedures increased each year in the study, which included patients who underwent a primary bariatric surgery procedure between January 2005 and September 2015 at 1 of 10 sites in the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network.

Most of the patients were female (80%) and white (66%), and 26% were Hispanic, according to the researchers, who said their study was more racially diverse than other bariatric studies, and therefore potentially more generalizable to real-world clinical practice.

Over the 5-year follow-up period, patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy were less likely to subsequently undergo operations involving the abdomen, or interventions for enteral access, such as placement of gastrostomy tubes, according to the investigators, who reported a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-0.79; P less than .001).

The estimated cumulative rate of operations or interventions at 5 years was 8.94% (95% CI, 8.23%-9.65%) for the patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy, compared with 12.27% (95% CI, 11.49%-13.05%) for those who underwent the Roux-en-Y procedure, according to the report.

Hospitalization was also less likely for sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, with a hazard ratio of 0.82 and estimated cumulative incidence rates of 32.79% and 38.33%, respectively. Likewise, endoscopy was less likely in the sleeve gastrectomy group.

All-cause mortality did not differ between the groups at this 5-year follow-up, the investigators said.

“The present data were gathered from clinical care in the real world, yet the results are comparable to controlled studies and therefore lend additional support to the findings of these other types of studies that operation and intervention occur less commonly after sleeve gastrectomy than after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for up to 5 years,” Dr. Courcoulas and coauthors noted in a discussion of their results.

This work was funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Dr. Courcoulas reported receiving a grant from Allurion. Coauthors provided disclosures related to the National Institutes of Health, IFSO Latin America Chapter, and the Food and Drug Administration.

*This story was updated on January 16, 2020.

SOURCE: Courcoulas A et al. JAMA Surg. 2020 Jan 15. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.5470.

Sleeve gastrectomy was associated with significantly fewer postsurgical interventions and operations than was Roux-en-Y gastric bypass over longer-term follow-up in a recent cohort study based on real-world clinical data, according to investigators.

Interventions, operations, and hospitalizations were “relatively common” for both procedures over the 5-year follow-up, though significantly less so with sleeve gastrectomy, which has become the most common bariatric operation, the investigators said in a recent report on the study.

The benefit of sleeve gastrectomy seemed to be most pronounced in patients with lower body mass index and those with fewer comorbidities, according to the authors of the report, led by bariatric and general surgeon Anita Courcoulas, MD, of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

That finding is counterintuitive, since in clinical practice, sleeve gastrectomy is frequently thought of as the preferred procedure for individuals with higher BMI or more comorbidities, though Dr. Courcoulas and colleagues cautioned that the findings were “exploratory” and require further investigation. Historically, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass provided more weight loss.

Safety results from this study, balanced by weight loss and health outcomes data, will “help inform procedure-specific decision making for prospective patients and physicians,” said Dr. Courcoulas and coauthors of the report, which appears in JAMA Surgery.

The study included 33,560 adults who had undergone the Roux-en-Y procedure or sleeve gastrectomy, making it one of the largest bariatric cohort studies ever to be done, according to the investigators.

The majority of patients in the study (54%) underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, though the number of sleeve gastrectomy procedures increased each year in the study, which included patients who underwent a primary bariatric surgery procedure between January 2005 and September 2015 at 1 of 10 sites in the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network.

Most of the patients were female (80%) and white (66%), and 26% were Hispanic, according to the researchers, who said their study was more racially diverse than other bariatric studies, and therefore potentially more generalizable to real-world clinical practice.

Over the 5-year follow-up period, patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy were less likely to subsequently undergo operations involving the abdomen, or interventions for enteral access, such as placement of gastrostomy tubes, according to the investigators, who reported a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-0.79; P less than .001).

The estimated cumulative rate of operations or interventions at 5 years was 8.94% (95% CI, 8.23%-9.65%) for the patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy, compared with 12.27% (95% CI, 11.49%-13.05%) for those who underwent the Roux-en-Y procedure, according to the report.

Hospitalization was also less likely for sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, with a hazard ratio of 0.82 and estimated cumulative incidence rates of 32.79% and 38.33%, respectively. Likewise, endoscopy was less likely in the sleeve gastrectomy group.

All-cause mortality did not differ between the groups at this 5-year follow-up, the investigators said.

“The present data were gathered from clinical care in the real world, yet the results are comparable to controlled studies and therefore lend additional support to the findings of these other types of studies that operation and intervention occur less commonly after sleeve gastrectomy than after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for up to 5 years,” Dr. Courcoulas and coauthors noted in a discussion of their results.

This work was funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Dr. Courcoulas reported receiving a grant from Allurion. Coauthors provided disclosures related to the National Institutes of Health, IFSO Latin America Chapter, and the Food and Drug Administration.

*This story was updated on January 16, 2020.

SOURCE: Courcoulas A et al. JAMA Surg. 2020 Jan 15. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.5470.

The recombinant factor VIII turoctocog alfa effectively prevented and stopped bleeds among previously untreated children with hemophilia A enrolled in a multicenter trial, investigators have reported.

©designer491/Thinkstock

Nearly 86% of patients who developed inhibitors and started immune tolerance induction with turoctocog alfa went on to have a negative inhibitor titer, according to investigators in guardian 4, an international, nonrandomized, phase 3 trial.

The treatment was well tolerated in these pediatric patients, and the rate of inhibitor development in the study was “within the expected range” for previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A, wrote the investigators, led by Hassan M. Yaish, MD, of the University of Utah, Salt Lake City.

Turoctocog alfa, a recombinant, B domain–truncated human coagulation factor VIII (FVIII), is known to be safe and effective in previously treated patients with hemophilia A based on results of the guardian 1, 2, and 3 clinical trials, according to Dr. Yaish and coauthors.

“This is the first trial within the guardian clinical trial program to evaluate turoctocog alfa in previously untreated patients, a patient population that is generally at an increased risk of developing antibodies to foreign protein such as exogenous FVIII,” wrote Dr. Yaish and coauthors in their report on guardian 4, which appears in Haemophilia.

The guardian 4 trial included a total of 60 patients aged less than 6 years with severe hemophilia A treated at 1 of 40 sites internationally, including the United States. The investigators noted that 58 of those patients received turoctocog alfa as prophylaxis, and 49 completed the study.

The primary endpoint of the study was the incidence of FVIII inhibitors within the first 50 exposure days, the time period during which inhibitors most frequently occur, investigators wrote.

In all, 25 of the 58 prophylactically treated patients (43.1%) developed FVIII inhibitors in that period, according to Dr. Yaish and colleagues.

The inhibitor incidence rate for other recombinant FVIII products in key studies of previously untreated patients range from 24.4% to 44.5%, they wrote in a discussion of that result.

In the present study, guardian 4, the estimated mean annualized bleed rate was 4.26 bleeds per patient per year, the investigators also reported.

The success rate for treatment of bleeds during prophylaxis was 88.5%. Of 402 bleeds, 227 (56.5%) were controlled with a single injection of turoctocog alfa, according to the report, while 22.6% and 7.5% were controlled with two and three injections, respectively.

Of 21 patients with inhibitors who started immune tolerance induction with turoctocog alfa, 18 (85.7%) had a negative inhibitor titer at the end of the trial, while treatment was withdrawn in 3 (14.3%) because insufficient decline in titer or persistent positivity for titers following 2 years of the therapy, according to the report.

Novo Nordisk sponsored the guardian 4 study. Dr. Yaish reported disclosures related to Novo Nordisk, Shire, Bayer, and Octapharma.

SOURCE: Yaish HM et al. Haemophilia. 2019 Dec 9. doi: 10.1111/hae.13883.

The recombinant factor VIII turoctocog alfa effectively prevented and stopped bleeds among previously untreated children with hemophilia A enrolled in a multicenter trial, investigators have reported.

©designer491/Thinkstock

Nearly 86% of patients who developed inhibitors and started immune tolerance induction with turoctocog alfa went on to have a negative inhibitor titer, according to investigators in guardian 4, an international, nonrandomized, phase 3 trial.

The treatment was well tolerated in these pediatric patients, and the rate of inhibitor development in the study was “within the expected range” for previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A, wrote the investigators, led by Hassan M. Yaish, MD, of the University of Utah, Salt Lake City.

Turoctocog alfa, a recombinant, B domain–truncated human coagulation factor VIII (FVIII), is known to be safe and effective in previously treated patients with hemophilia A based on results of the guardian 1, 2, and 3 clinical trials, according to Dr. Yaish and coauthors.

“This is the first trial within the guardian clinical trial program to evaluate turoctocog alfa in previously untreated patients, a patient population that is generally at an increased risk of developing antibodies to foreign protein such as exogenous FVIII,” wrote Dr. Yaish and coauthors in their report on guardian 4, which appears in Haemophilia.

The guardian 4 trial included a total of 60 patients aged less than 6 years with severe hemophilia A treated at 1 of 40 sites internationally, including the United States. The investigators noted that 58 of those patients received turoctocog alfa as prophylaxis, and 49 completed the study.

The primary endpoint of the study was the incidence of FVIII inhibitors within the first 50 exposure days, the time period during which inhibitors most frequently occur, investigators wrote.

In all, 25 of the 58 prophylactically treated patients (43.1%) developed FVIII inhibitors in that period, according to Dr. Yaish and colleagues.

The inhibitor incidence rate for other recombinant FVIII products in key studies of previously untreated patients range from 24.4% to 44.5%, they wrote in a discussion of that result.

In the present study, guardian 4, the estimated mean annualized bleed rate was 4.26 bleeds per patient per year, the investigators also reported.

The success rate for treatment of bleeds during prophylaxis was 88.5%. Of 402 bleeds, 227 (56.5%) were controlled with a single injection of turoctocog alfa, according to the report, while 22.6% and 7.5% were controlled with two and three injections, respectively.

Of 21 patients with inhibitors who started immune tolerance induction with turoctocog alfa, 18 (85.7%) had a negative inhibitor titer at the end of the trial, while treatment was withdrawn in 3 (14.3%) because insufficient decline in titer or persistent positivity for titers following 2 years of the therapy, according to the report.

Novo Nordisk sponsored the guardian 4 study. Dr. Yaish reported disclosures related to Novo Nordisk, Shire, Bayer, and Octapharma.

SOURCE: Yaish HM et al. Haemophilia. 2019 Dec 9. doi: 10.1111/hae.13883.

The recombinant factor VIII turoctocog alfa effectively prevented and stopped bleeds among previously untreated children with hemophilia A enrolled in a multicenter trial, investigators have reported.

©designer491/Thinkstock

Nearly 86% of patients who developed inhibitors and started immune tolerance induction with turoctocog alfa went on to have a negative inhibitor titer, according to investigators in guardian 4, an international, nonrandomized, phase 3 trial.

The treatment was well tolerated in these pediatric patients, and the rate of inhibitor development in the study was “within the expected range” for previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A, wrote the investigators, led by Hassan M. Yaish, MD, of the University of Utah, Salt Lake City.

Turoctocog alfa, a recombinant, B domain–truncated human coagulation factor VIII (FVIII), is known to be safe and effective in previously treated patients with hemophilia A based on results of the guardian 1, 2, and 3 clinical trials, according to Dr. Yaish and coauthors.

“This is the first trial within the guardian clinical trial program to evaluate turoctocog alfa in previously untreated patients, a patient population that is generally at an increased risk of developing antibodies to foreign protein such as exogenous FVIII,” wrote Dr. Yaish and coauthors in their report on guardian 4, which appears in Haemophilia.

The guardian 4 trial included a total of 60 patients aged less than 6 years with severe hemophilia A treated at 1 of 40 sites internationally, including the United States. The investigators noted that 58 of those patients received turoctocog alfa as prophylaxis, and 49 completed the study.

The primary endpoint of the study was the incidence of FVIII inhibitors within the first 50 exposure days, the time period during which inhibitors most frequently occur, investigators wrote.

In all, 25 of the 58 prophylactically treated patients (43.1%) developed FVIII inhibitors in that period, according to Dr. Yaish and colleagues.

The inhibitor incidence rate for other recombinant FVIII products in key studies of previously untreated patients range from 24.4% to 44.5%, they wrote in a discussion of that result.

In the present study, guardian 4, the estimated mean annualized bleed rate was 4.26 bleeds per patient per year, the investigators also reported.

The success rate for treatment of bleeds during prophylaxis was 88.5%. Of 402 bleeds, 227 (56.5%) were controlled with a single injection of turoctocog alfa, according to the report, while 22.6% and 7.5% were controlled with two and three injections, respectively.

Of 21 patients with inhibitors who started immune tolerance induction with turoctocog alfa, 18 (85.7%) had a negative inhibitor titer at the end of the trial, while treatment was withdrawn in 3 (14.3%) because insufficient decline in titer or persistent positivity for titers following 2 years of the therapy, according to the report.

Novo Nordisk sponsored the guardian 4 study. Dr. Yaish reported disclosures related to Novo Nordisk, Shire, Bayer, and Octapharma.

SOURCE: Yaish HM et al. Haemophilia. 2019 Dec 9. doi: 10.1111/hae.13883.

A new tool specifically designed to evaluate immune checkpoint inhibitor–related toxicity, developed based on direct patient involvement, picks up on cutaneous and other side effects that would be missed using traditional quality of life questionnaires, investigators say.

The 25-item list represents the first-ever health-related quality of life (HRQOL) toxicity subscale developed for patients receiving checkpoint inhibitors, according to the investigators, led by Aaron R. Hansen, MBBS, of the division of medical oncology and hematology in the department of medicine at the University of Toronto.

The toxicity subscale is combined with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–General (FACT-G), which measures physical, emotional, family and social, and functional domains, to form the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Immune Checkpoint Modulator (FACT-ICM), Dr. Hansen stated in a recent report that describes initial development and early validation efforts.

The FACT-ICM could become an important tool for measuring HRQOL in patients receiving checkpoint inhibitors, depending on results of further investigations including more patients, the authors wrote in that report.

“Currently, we would recommend that our toxicity subscale be validated first before use in clinical care, or in trials with QOL as a primary or secondary endpoint,” wrote Dr. Hansen and colleagues in the report, which appears in Cancer.

The toxicity subscale asks patients to rate items such as “I am bothered by dry skin,” “I feel pain, soreness or aches in some of my muscles,” and “My fatigue keeps me from doing the things I want do” on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much).

Development of the toxicity subscale was based on focus groups and interviews with 37 patients with a variety of cancer types who were being treated with a PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4 immune checkpoint inhibitors. Sixteen physicians were surveyed to evaluate the patient input, while 11 of them also participated in follow-up interviews.

“At every step in this process, the patients were central,” the investigators wrote in their report.

According to the investigators, that approach is in line with guidance from the Food and Drug Administration, which has said that meaningful patient input should be used in the upfront development of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures, rather than obtaining patient endorsement after the fact.

By contrast, an electronic PRO immune-oncology module recently developed, based on 19 immune-related adverse events from drug labels and clinical trial reports, had “no evaluation” of effects on HRQOL, according to Dr. Hansen and coauthors, who added that the tool “did not adhere” to the FDA call for meaningful patient input.

Some previous studies of quality of life in immune checkpoint inhibitor–treated patients have used tumor-specific PROs and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire–Core 30 Items (EORTC-QLQ-C30).

The new, immune checkpoint inhibitor–specific toxicity subscale has “broader coverage” of side effects that reportedly affect HRQOL in patients treated with these agents, including taste disturbance, cough, and fever or chills, according to the investigators.

Moreover, the EORTC-QLQ-C30 and the EORTC head and neck cancer–specific-35 module (EORTC QLQ-H&N35), do not include items related to cutaneous adverse events such as itch, rash, and dry skin that have been seen in some checkpoint inhibitor clinical trials, they noted.

“This represents a clear limitation of such preexisting PRO instruments, which should be addressed with our immune checkpoint moduator–specific tool,” they wrote.

The study was supported by a grant from the University of Toronto. Authors of the study provided disclosures related to Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Karyopharm, Boston Biomedical, Novartis, Genentech, Hoffmann La Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, and others.

SOURCE: Hansen AR et al. Cancer. 2020 Jan 8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32692.

A new tool specifically designed to evaluate immune checkpoint inhibitor–related toxicity, developed based on direct patient involvement, picks up on cutaneous and other side effects that would be missed using traditional quality of life questionnaires, investigators say.

The 25-item list represents the first-ever health-related quality of life (HRQOL) toxicity subscale developed for patients receiving checkpoint inhibitors, according to the investigators, led by Aaron R. Hansen, MBBS, of the division of medical oncology and hematology in the department of medicine at the University of Toronto.

The toxicity subscale is combined with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–General (FACT-G), which measures physical, emotional, family and social, and functional domains, to form the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Immune Checkpoint Modulator (FACT-ICM), Dr. Hansen stated in a recent report that describes initial development and early validation efforts.

The FACT-ICM could become an important tool for measuring HRQOL in patients receiving checkpoint inhibitors, depending on results of further investigations including more patients, the authors wrote in that report.

“Currently, we would recommend that our toxicity subscale be validated first before use in clinical care, or in trials with QOL as a primary or secondary endpoint,” wrote Dr. Hansen and colleagues in the report, which appears in Cancer.

The toxicity subscale asks patients to rate items such as “I am bothered by dry skin,” “I feel pain, soreness or aches in some of my muscles,” and “My fatigue keeps me from doing the things I want do” on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much).

Development of the toxicity subscale was based on focus groups and interviews with 37 patients with a variety of cancer types who were being treated with a PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4 immune checkpoint inhibitors. Sixteen physicians were surveyed to evaluate the patient input, while 11 of them also participated in follow-up interviews.

“At every step in this process, the patients were central,” the investigators wrote in their report.

According to the investigators, that approach is in line with guidance from the Food and Drug Administration, which has said that meaningful patient input should be used in the upfront development of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures, rather than obtaining patient endorsement after the fact.

By contrast, an electronic PRO immune-oncology module recently developed, based on 19 immune-related adverse events from drug labels and clinical trial reports, had “no evaluation” of effects on HRQOL, according to Dr. Hansen and coauthors, who added that the tool “did not adhere” to the FDA call for meaningful patient input.

Some previous studies of quality of life in immune checkpoint inhibitor–treated patients have used tumor-specific PROs and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire–Core 30 Items (EORTC-QLQ-C30).

The new, immune checkpoint inhibitor–specific toxicity subscale has “broader coverage” of side effects that reportedly affect HRQOL in patients treated with these agents, including taste disturbance, cough, and fever or chills, according to the investigators.

Moreover, the EORTC-QLQ-C30 and the EORTC head and neck cancer–specific-35 module (EORTC QLQ-H&N35), do not include items related to cutaneous adverse events such as itch, rash, and dry skin that have been seen in some checkpoint inhibitor clinical trials, they noted.

“This represents a clear limitation of such preexisting PRO instruments, which should be addressed with our immune checkpoint moduator–specific tool,” they wrote.

The study was supported by a grant from the University of Toronto. Authors of the study provided disclosures related to Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Karyopharm, Boston Biomedical, Novartis, Genentech, Hoffmann La Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, and others.

SOURCE: Hansen AR et al. Cancer. 2020 Jan 8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32692.

A new tool specifically designed to evaluate immune checkpoint inhibitor–related toxicity, developed based on direct patient involvement, picks up on cutaneous and other side effects that would be missed using traditional quality of life questionnaires, investigators say.

The 25-item list represents the first-ever health-related quality of life (HRQOL) toxicity subscale developed for patients receiving checkpoint inhibitors, according to the investigators, led by Aaron R. Hansen, MBBS, of the division of medical oncology and hematology in the department of medicine at the University of Toronto.

The toxicity subscale is combined with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–General (FACT-G), which measures physical, emotional, family and social, and functional domains, to form the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Immune Checkpoint Modulator (FACT-ICM), Dr. Hansen stated in a recent report that describes initial development and early validation efforts.

The FACT-ICM could become an important tool for measuring HRQOL in patients receiving checkpoint inhibitors, depending on results of further investigations including more patients, the authors wrote in that report.

“Currently, we would recommend that our toxicity subscale be validated first before use in clinical care, or in trials with QOL as a primary or secondary endpoint,” wrote Dr. Hansen and colleagues in the report, which appears in Cancer.

The toxicity subscale asks patients to rate items such as “I am bothered by dry skin,” “I feel pain, soreness or aches in some of my muscles,” and “My fatigue keeps me from doing the things I want do” on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much).

Development of the toxicity subscale was based on focus groups and interviews with 37 patients with a variety of cancer types who were being treated with a PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4 immune checkpoint inhibitors. Sixteen physicians were surveyed to evaluate the patient input, while 11 of them also participated in follow-up interviews.

“At every step in this process, the patients were central,” the investigators wrote in their report.

According to the investigators, that approach is in line with guidance from the Food and Drug Administration, which has said that meaningful patient input should be used in the upfront development of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures, rather than obtaining patient endorsement after the fact.

By contrast, an electronic PRO immune-oncology module recently developed, based on 19 immune-related adverse events from drug labels and clinical trial reports, had “no evaluation” of effects on HRQOL, according to Dr. Hansen and coauthors, who added that the tool “did not adhere” to the FDA call for meaningful patient input.

Some previous studies of quality of life in immune checkpoint inhibitor–treated patients have used tumor-specific PROs and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire–Core 30 Items (EORTC-QLQ-C30).

The new, immune checkpoint inhibitor–specific toxicity subscale has “broader coverage” of side effects that reportedly affect HRQOL in patients treated with these agents, including taste disturbance, cough, and fever or chills, according to the investigators.

Moreover, the EORTC-QLQ-C30 and the EORTC head and neck cancer–specific-35 module (EORTC QLQ-H&N35), do not include items related to cutaneous adverse events such as itch, rash, and dry skin that have been seen in some checkpoint inhibitor clinical trials, they noted.

“This represents a clear limitation of such preexisting PRO instruments, which should be addressed with our immune checkpoint moduator–specific tool,” they wrote.

The study was supported by a grant from the University of Toronto. Authors of the study provided disclosures related to Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Karyopharm, Boston Biomedical, Novartis, Genentech, Hoffmann La Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, and others.

SOURCE: Hansen AR et al. Cancer. 2020 Jan 8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32692.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tissue contains several unique populations of tumor infiltrating cells, including some exhausted effector T cells that regain normal function when treated with the immunotherapy drug nivolumab, according to researchers.

The unique populations of recently activated CD4+, CD8+, and CD4-CD8 double-negative cells identified in the tumors expressed specific activation markers and inhibitor receptors, according to investigators, who have published the results of their immune profiling analyses in Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

“Importantly, these cells expressed markers of activation and tissue residence, possibly suggesting activation within the tumor,” said Daniela Di Blasi, PhD, and the others researchers, of the University of Basel in Switzerland.

A further look at tumor histology revealed an accumulation of those activated T cells in immune-inflamed HCC, according to the investigators, who added that enumeration of specific tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes could represent “a prognostic indicator of therapy responsiveness.”

However, they advised caution in interpreting the results to date: “We are aware that the analysis described here is based on a small number of patients and that validation of its prognostic value requires ad hoc prospective studies that include more patients,” they said in their report.

The researcher’s findings were based on analysis of HCC biopsies before and after treatment with the immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab, nontumor liver tissue biopsies, and peripheral blood samples from 36 patients, most of whom were male, and about half of whom had cirrhosis. Investigators used multiparametric flow cytometry to characterize expression of activation markers including CD137, CD150, and ICOS, among others, as well as expression of inhibitory receptors including TIGIT and PD1.

Compared with nonneoplastic liver tissue, tumor tissue was enriched with T cells expressing the activation marker CD137 and the inhibitory receptor ICOS, indicating that HCC tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes “are different from liver-resident T cells and might have immunologic relevance,” Dr. Di Blasi and coauthors said in their report.

Further analysis revealed several cell populations unique to HCC samples, the authors said, including CD4+ T cells coexpressing ICOS and TIGIT, which tended to accumulate in tumor tissue, compared with nontumor tissue and peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Those CD4+ tumor-infiltrating T cells were functionally impaired, they added, as shown by a lack of cytokine production.

Activated CD8+ T cells likewise preferentially accumulated in tumor tissue, and most of those tumor-infiltrating cells expressed CD38 and PD1. The presence of these proliferating and functional cells may contribute to local inflammation and antitumor response, according to the investigators, who also identified two unique populations of double-negative T cells, including some that expressed CD137, which they said was a marker of recent T-cell activation.

The investigators also looked at the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes correlated to the presence of mononuclear cell infiltrate in tumor tissue. They found that immune-inflamed tumors had significantly increased proliferation of unique CD4+, CD8+, and double-negative T cell populations.

Nivolumab treatment appeared to substantially reduce the proportion of impaired CD4+ T cells, while increasing the percentage of interferon gamma–producing CD38+ CD4+ T cells and also promoting enrichment of interferon gamma–producing CD38+ CD8+ cells. Those increases in release of interferon gamma may have a positive influence on antitumor immunity via modulation of immune and tumor cell functions, according to the investigators.

Not all immune-inflamed tumors responded to nivolumab treatment, suggesting that an immune-inflamed profile is “necessary but not sufficient” for clinical response to an anti-PD1 agent, noted Dr. Di Blasi and colleagues.

Taken together, the researchers said their investigations suggest the presence of unique populations of T cells that might be providing effective anti-tumor immunity.

“These studies set the point for the identification of the tumor antigens stimulating these T cells and their possible exploitation as immunotherapeutic targets in HCC,” they concluded in the report.

The study was supported by grants from the European Research Council and the Swiss Initiative in Systems Biology, among others. Dr. Di Blasi and coauthors disclosed no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Di Blasi D et al. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Aug 22. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2019.08.004.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tissue contains several unique populations of tumor infiltrating cells, including some exhausted effector T cells that regain normal function when treated with the immunotherapy drug nivolumab, according to researchers.

The unique populations of recently activated CD4+, CD8+, and CD4-CD8 double-negative cells identified in the tumors expressed specific activation markers and inhibitor receptors, according to investigators, who have published the results of their immune profiling analyses in Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

“Importantly, these cells expressed markers of activation and tissue residence, possibly suggesting activation within the tumor,” said Daniela Di Blasi, PhD, and the others researchers, of the University of Basel in Switzerland.

A further look at tumor histology revealed an accumulation of those activated T cells in immune-inflamed HCC, according to the investigators, who added that enumeration of specific tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes could represent “a prognostic indicator of therapy responsiveness.”

However, they advised caution in interpreting the results to date: “We are aware that the analysis described here is based on a small number of patients and that validation of its prognostic value requires ad hoc prospective studies that include more patients,” they said in their report.

The researcher’s findings were based on analysis of HCC biopsies before and after treatment with the immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab, nontumor liver tissue biopsies, and peripheral blood samples from 36 patients, most of whom were male, and about half of whom had cirrhosis. Investigators used multiparametric flow cytometry to characterize expression of activation markers including CD137, CD150, and ICOS, among others, as well as expression of inhibitory receptors including TIGIT and PD1.

Compared with nonneoplastic liver tissue, tumor tissue was enriched with T cells expressing the activation marker CD137 and the inhibitory receptor ICOS, indicating that HCC tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes “are different from liver-resident T cells and might have immunologic relevance,” Dr. Di Blasi and coauthors said in their report.

Further analysis revealed several cell populations unique to HCC samples, the authors said, including CD4+ T cells coexpressing ICOS and TIGIT, which tended to accumulate in tumor tissue, compared with nontumor tissue and peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Those CD4+ tumor-infiltrating T cells were functionally impaired, they added, as shown by a lack of cytokine production.

Activated CD8+ T cells likewise preferentially accumulated in tumor tissue, and most of those tumor-infiltrating cells expressed CD38 and PD1. The presence of these proliferating and functional cells may contribute to local inflammation and antitumor response, according to the investigators, who also identified two unique populations of double-negative T cells, including some that expressed CD137, which they said was a marker of recent T-cell activation.

The investigators also looked at the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes correlated to the presence of mononuclear cell infiltrate in tumor tissue. They found that immune-inflamed tumors had significantly increased proliferation of unique CD4+, CD8+, and double-negative T cell populations.

Nivolumab treatment appeared to substantially reduce the proportion of impaired CD4+ T cells, while increasing the percentage of interferon gamma–producing CD38+ CD4+ T cells and also promoting enrichment of interferon gamma–producing CD38+ CD8+ cells. Those increases in release of interferon gamma may have a positive influence on antitumor immunity via modulation of immune and tumor cell functions, according to the investigators.

Not all immune-inflamed tumors responded to nivolumab treatment, suggesting that an immune-inflamed profile is “necessary but not sufficient” for clinical response to an anti-PD1 agent, noted Dr. Di Blasi and colleagues.

Taken together, the researchers said their investigations suggest the presence of unique populations of T cells that might be providing effective anti-tumor immunity.

“These studies set the point for the identification of the tumor antigens stimulating these T cells and their possible exploitation as immunotherapeutic targets in HCC,” they concluded in the report.

The study was supported by grants from the European Research Council and the Swiss Initiative in Systems Biology, among others. Dr. Di Blasi and coauthors disclosed no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Di Blasi D et al. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Aug 22. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2019.08.004.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tissue contains several unique populations of tumor infiltrating cells, including some exhausted effector T cells that regain normal function when treated with the immunotherapy drug nivolumab, according to researchers.

The unique populations of recently activated CD4+, CD8+, and CD4-CD8 double-negative cells identified in the tumors expressed specific activation markers and inhibitor receptors, according to investigators, who have published the results of their immune profiling analyses in Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

“Importantly, these cells expressed markers of activation and tissue residence, possibly suggesting activation within the tumor,” said Daniela Di Blasi, PhD, and the others researchers, of the University of Basel in Switzerland.

A further look at tumor histology revealed an accumulation of those activated T cells in immune-inflamed HCC, according to the investigators, who added that enumeration of specific tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes could represent “a prognostic indicator of therapy responsiveness.”

However, they advised caution in interpreting the results to date: “We are aware that the analysis described here is based on a small number of patients and that validation of its prognostic value requires ad hoc prospective studies that include more patients,” they said in their report.

The researcher’s findings were based on analysis of HCC biopsies before and after treatment with the immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab, nontumor liver tissue biopsies, and peripheral blood samples from 36 patients, most of whom were male, and about half of whom had cirrhosis. Investigators used multiparametric flow cytometry to characterize expression of activation markers including CD137, CD150, and ICOS, among others, as well as expression of inhibitory receptors including TIGIT and PD1.

Compared with nonneoplastic liver tissue, tumor tissue was enriched with T cells expressing the activation marker CD137 and the inhibitory receptor ICOS, indicating that HCC tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes “are different from liver-resident T cells and might have immunologic relevance,” Dr. Di Blasi and coauthors said in their report.

Further analysis revealed several cell populations unique to HCC samples, the authors said, including CD4+ T cells coexpressing ICOS and TIGIT, which tended to accumulate in tumor tissue, compared with nontumor tissue and peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Those CD4+ tumor-infiltrating T cells were functionally impaired, they added, as shown by a lack of cytokine production.

Activated CD8+ T cells likewise preferentially accumulated in tumor tissue, and most of those tumor-infiltrating cells expressed CD38 and PD1. The presence of these proliferating and functional cells may contribute to local inflammation and antitumor response, according to the investigators, who also identified two unique populations of double-negative T cells, including some that expressed CD137, which they said was a marker of recent T-cell activation.

The investigators also looked at the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes correlated to the presence of mononuclear cell infiltrate in tumor tissue. They found that immune-inflamed tumors had significantly increased proliferation of unique CD4+, CD8+, and double-negative T cell populations.

Nivolumab treatment appeared to substantially reduce the proportion of impaired CD4+ T cells, while increasing the percentage of interferon gamma–producing CD38+ CD4+ T cells and also promoting enrichment of interferon gamma–producing CD38+ CD8+ cells. Those increases in release of interferon gamma may have a positive influence on antitumor immunity via modulation of immune and tumor cell functions, according to the investigators.

Not all immune-inflamed tumors responded to nivolumab treatment, suggesting that an immune-inflamed profile is “necessary but not sufficient” for clinical response to an anti-PD1 agent, noted Dr. Di Blasi and colleagues.

Taken together, the researchers said their investigations suggest the presence of unique populations of T cells that might be providing effective anti-tumor immunity.

“These studies set the point for the identification of the tumor antigens stimulating these T cells and their possible exploitation as immunotherapeutic targets in HCC,” they concluded in the report.

The study was supported by grants from the European Research Council and the Swiss Initiative in Systems Biology, among others. Dr. Di Blasi and coauthors disclosed no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Di Blasi D et al. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Aug 22. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2019.08.004.

ORLANDO – Lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel), a CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, has demonstrated manageable toxicity and promising clinical activity in the phase 1 portion of a trial enrolling heavily pretreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, according to an investigator.

Andrew D. Bowser/MDedge News

The overall response rate exceeded 80%, and most patients in response at 6 months had maintained that response at the 9-month mark, said Tanya Siddiqi, MD, of City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, Calif.

“Clinical responses were rapid, improved with time, and were deep and durable,” Dr. Siddiqi said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

These findings have provided justification for conducting the phase 2 portion of the study, which is currently enrolling at the higher of two dose levels evaluated in phase 1, she added.

Dr. Siddiqi reported on a total of 23 patients enrolled in the study, known as TRANSCEND CLL 004. All patients had relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL), and had received at least two prior therapies, including ibrutinib, while about one-third had failed venetoclax as well.

The median patient age was 66 years, and 83% had high-risk features, according to Dr. Siddiqi, who said patients had received a median of five prior lines of therapy.

Nine patients were treated at dose level 1, or 50 x 10⁶ CAR+ T cells, while 14 were treated at dose level 2, or 100 x 10⁶ CAR+ T cells. Two patients experienced grade 3 or 4 dose-limiting toxicities at the second level, including hypertension in one patient, and encephalopathy, muscle weakness, and tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) in the other.

Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 17 patients, though only two cases reached grade 3. Neurologic adverse events were seen in nine patients, of which five were grade 3 or 4.

SOURCE: Siddiqi T et al. ASH 2019, Abstract 503.

ORLANDO – Lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel), a CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, has demonstrated manageable toxicity and promising clinical activity in the phase 1 portion of a trial enrolling heavily pretreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, according to an investigator.

Andrew D. Bowser/MDedge News

The overall response rate exceeded 80%, and most patients in response at 6 months had maintained that response at the 9-month mark, said Tanya Siddiqi, MD, of City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, Calif.

“Clinical responses were rapid, improved with time, and were deep and durable,” Dr. Siddiqi said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

These findings have provided justification for conducting the phase 2 portion of the study, which is currently enrolling at the higher of two dose levels evaluated in phase 1, she added.

Dr. Siddiqi reported on a total of 23 patients enrolled in the study, known as TRANSCEND CLL 004. All patients had relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL), and had received at least two prior therapies, including ibrutinib, while about one-third had failed venetoclax as well.

The median patient age was 66 years, and 83% had high-risk features, according to Dr. Siddiqi, who said patients had received a median of five prior lines of therapy.

Nine patients were treated at dose level 1, or 50 x 10⁶ CAR+ T cells, while 14 were treated at dose level 2, or 100 x 10⁶ CAR+ T cells. Two patients experienced grade 3 or 4 dose-limiting toxicities at the second level, including hypertension in one patient, and encephalopathy, muscle weakness, and tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) in the other.

Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 17 patients, though only two cases reached grade 3. Neurologic adverse events were seen in nine patients, of which five were grade 3 or 4.

SOURCE: Siddiqi T et al. ASH 2019, Abstract 503.

ORLANDO – Lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel), a CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, has demonstrated manageable toxicity and promising clinical activity in the phase 1 portion of a trial enrolling heavily pretreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, according to an investigator.

Andrew D. Bowser/MDedge News

The overall response rate exceeded 80%, and most patients in response at 6 months had maintained that response at the 9-month mark, said Tanya Siddiqi, MD, of City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, Calif.

“Clinical responses were rapid, improved with time, and were deep and durable,” Dr. Siddiqi said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

These findings have provided justification for conducting the phase 2 portion of the study, which is currently enrolling at the higher of two dose levels evaluated in phase 1, she added.

Dr. Siddiqi reported on a total of 23 patients enrolled in the study, known as TRANSCEND CLL 004. All patients had relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL), and had received at least two prior therapies, including ibrutinib, while about one-third had failed venetoclax as well.

The median patient age was 66 years, and 83% had high-risk features, according to Dr. Siddiqi, who said patients had received a median of five prior lines of therapy.

Nine patients were treated at dose level 1, or 50 x 10⁶ CAR+ T cells, while 14 were treated at dose level 2, or 100 x 10⁶ CAR+ T cells. Two patients experienced grade 3 or 4 dose-limiting toxicities at the second level, including hypertension in one patient, and encephalopathy, muscle weakness, and tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) in the other.

Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 17 patients, though only two cases reached grade 3. Neurologic adverse events were seen in nine patients, of which five were grade 3 or 4.

SOURCE: Siddiqi T et al. ASH 2019, Abstract 503.

ORLANDO – A phase 1 trial of the next-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor LOXO-305 has demonstrated safety and provided evidence of its efficacy in heavily pretreated patients with B-cell malignancies, including some with acquired resistance to other BTK inhibitors and venetoclax, according to an investigator.

Andrew D. Bowser/MDedge News

The antitumor activity of this highly selective investigational oral BTK inhibitor was significant in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), with a rapid onset of action and resolution of lymphocytosis “consistent with effective BTK target inhibition,” said Anthony R. Mato, MD, of the Center for CLL at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York.

Responses were also seen in patients with BTK C481 mutations, the primary cause of progressive CLL after BTK inhibitor use, Dr. Mato said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

The safety and tolerability profile of LOXO-305 is “consistent with highly selective drug design,” with no evidence of off-target effects, he said. “Collectively, these data demonstrate that BTK remains a highly actionable target despite progression on covalent BTK inhibitors.”

While BTK inhibitors have transformed treatment of B-cell malignancies, resistance remains a major problem, said Dr. Mato, citing 5-year ibrutinib discontinuation rates of 41% in the front line setting and 53.7% in the relapsed/refractory setting.

Key reasons for discontinuation are intolerance, events such as atrial fibrillation and major bleeding, progression of disease, and the appearance of BTK C481 mutations, which prevent covalent BTK inhibitors from achieving effective target inhibition, he said. In contrast, LOXO-305 is designed to non-covalently bind to BTK, regardless of C481 status.

Dr. Mato described results of the phase 1 BRUIN trial, in which 28 adult patients with CLL or B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas received once daily oral LOXO-305 at doses ranging from 25 mg to 200 mg. All patients had received at least two lines of prior therapy and had active disease in need of treatment.

For 13 evaluable CLL patients, the overall response rate was 77% (10 patients), Dr. Mato reported. Overall response rates for MCL and other B-cell malignancies were 50%, or three out of six MCL patients and two of four patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, or marginal zone lymphoma.

Though only a small subset of CLL patients have had multiple response assessments, the available data suggest that responses “deepen over time” with continued LOXO-305 treatment, Dr. Mato said.

With the median follow-up of 2.7 months, 24 of 28 patients remain on therapy, including all responders. “Some of the responses appear to be quite durable,” Dr. Mato said.

There have been no dose-limiting toxicities, the maximum tolerated dose has not been reached, and there have been no notable adverse events characteristic of covalent BTK inhibitors – namely atrial fibrillation or major bleeding – despite frequent monitoring, according to Dr. Mato.

There were two grade 3 events (leukocytosis and neutropenia), but the remaining treatment-emergent adverse events have been grade 1-2. “Having managed many of these patients, I can tell you that these adverse events were quite manageable,” Dr. Mato told attendees.

BRUIN is a global trial that continues to enroll patients at 18 sites in 3 countries, with a plan in 2020 to incorporate “rational combinations” of agents, according to the investigator.

Dr. Mato reported disclosures related to Gilead, Pharmacyclics, AstraZeneca, AbbVie, Sunesis, Johnson & Johnson, TG Therapeutics, LOXO, DTRM Biopharma, Genentech, Janssen, Acerta, Pharmacyclics, and Celgene.

SOURCE: Mato AR et al. ASH 2019, Abstract 501.

ORLANDO – A phase 1 trial of the next-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor LOXO-305 has demonstrated safety and provided evidence of its efficacy in heavily pretreated patients with B-cell malignancies, including some with acquired resistance to other BTK inhibitors and venetoclax, according to an investigator.

Andrew D. Bowser/MDedge News

The antitumor activity of this highly selective investigational oral BTK inhibitor was significant in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), with a rapid onset of action and resolution of lymphocytosis “consistent with effective BTK target inhibition,” said Anthony R. Mato, MD, of the Center for CLL at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York.

Responses were also seen in patients with BTK C481 mutations, the primary cause of progressive CLL after BTK inhibitor use, Dr. Mato said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

The safety and tolerability profile of LOXO-305 is “consistent with highly selective drug design,” with no evidence of off-target effects, he said. “Collectively, these data demonstrate that BTK remains a highly actionable target despite progression on covalent BTK inhibitors.”

While BTK inhibitors have transformed treatment of B-cell malignancies, resistance remains a major problem, said Dr. Mato, citing 5-year ibrutinib discontinuation rates of 41% in the front line setting and 53.7% in the relapsed/refractory setting.

Key reasons for discontinuation are intolerance, events such as atrial fibrillation and major bleeding, progression of disease, and the appearance of BTK C481 mutations, which prevent covalent BTK inhibitors from achieving effective target inhibition, he said. In contrast, LOXO-305 is designed to non-covalently bind to BTK, regardless of C481 status.

Dr. Mato described results of the phase 1 BRUIN trial, in which 28 adult patients with CLL or B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas received once daily oral LOXO-305 at doses ranging from 25 mg to 200 mg. All patients had received at least two lines of prior therapy and had active disease in need of treatment.

For 13 evaluable CLL patients, the overall response rate was 77% (10 patients), Dr. Mato reported. Overall response rates for MCL and other B-cell malignancies were 50%, or three out of six MCL patients and two of four patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, or marginal zone lymphoma.

Though only a small subset of CLL patients have had multiple response assessments, the available data suggest that responses “deepen over time” with continued LOXO-305 treatment, Dr. Mato said.

With the median follow-up of 2.7 months, 24 of 28 patients remain on therapy, including all responders. “Some of the responses appear to be quite durable,” Dr. Mato said.

There have been no dose-limiting toxicities, the maximum tolerated dose has not been reached, and there have been no notable adverse events characteristic of covalent BTK inhibitors – namely atrial fibrillation or major bleeding – despite frequent monitoring, according to Dr. Mato.

There were two grade 3 events (leukocytosis and neutropenia), but the remaining treatment-emergent adverse events have been grade 1-2. “Having managed many of these patients, I can tell you that these adverse events were quite manageable,” Dr. Mato told attendees.

BRUIN is a global trial that continues to enroll patients at 18 sites in 3 countries, with a plan in 2020 to incorporate “rational combinations” of agents, according to the investigator.

Dr. Mato reported disclosures related to Gilead, Pharmacyclics, AstraZeneca, AbbVie, Sunesis, Johnson & Johnson, TG Therapeutics, LOXO, DTRM Biopharma, Genentech, Janssen, Acerta, Pharmacyclics, and Celgene.

SOURCE: Mato AR et al. ASH 2019, Abstract 501.

ORLANDO – A phase 1 trial of the next-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor LOXO-305 has demonstrated safety and provided evidence of its efficacy in heavily pretreated patients with B-cell malignancies, including some with acquired resistance to other BTK inhibitors and venetoclax, according to an investigator.

Andrew D. Bowser/MDedge News

The antitumor activity of this highly selective investigational oral BTK inhibitor was significant in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), with a rapid onset of action and resolution of lymphocytosis “consistent with effective BTK target inhibition,” said Anthony R. Mato, MD, of the Center for CLL at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York.

Responses were also seen in patients with BTK C481 mutations, the primary cause of progressive CLL after BTK inhibitor use, Dr. Mato said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

The safety and tolerability profile of LOXO-305 is “consistent with highly selective drug design,” with no evidence of off-target effects, he said. “Collectively, these data demonstrate that BTK remains a highly actionable target despite progression on covalent BTK inhibitors.”

While BTK inhibitors have transformed treatment of B-cell malignancies, resistance remains a major problem, said Dr. Mato, citing 5-year ibrutinib discontinuation rates of 41% in the front line setting and 53.7% in the relapsed/refractory setting.

Key reasons for discontinuation are intolerance, events such as atrial fibrillation and major bleeding, progression of disease, and the appearance of BTK C481 mutations, which prevent covalent BTK inhibitors from achieving effective target inhibition, he said. In contrast, LOXO-305 is designed to non-covalently bind to BTK, regardless of C481 status.

Dr. Mato described results of the phase 1 BRUIN trial, in which 28 adult patients with CLL or B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas received once daily oral LOXO-305 at doses ranging from 25 mg to 200 mg. All patients had received at least two lines of prior therapy and had active disease in need of treatment.

For 13 evaluable CLL patients, the overall response rate was 77% (10 patients), Dr. Mato reported. Overall response rates for MCL and other B-cell malignancies were 50%, or three out of six MCL patients and two of four patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, or marginal zone lymphoma.

Though only a small subset of CLL patients have had multiple response assessments, the available data suggest that responses “deepen over time” with continued LOXO-305 treatment, Dr. Mato said.

With the median follow-up of 2.7 months, 24 of 28 patients remain on therapy, including all responders. “Some of the responses appear to be quite durable,” Dr. Mato said.

There have been no dose-limiting toxicities, the maximum tolerated dose has not been reached, and there have been no notable adverse events characteristic of covalent BTK inhibitors – namely atrial fibrillation or major bleeding – despite frequent monitoring, according to Dr. Mato.

There were two grade 3 events (leukocytosis and neutropenia), but the remaining treatment-emergent adverse events have been grade 1-2. “Having managed many of these patients, I can tell you that these adverse events were quite manageable,” Dr. Mato told attendees.

BRUIN is a global trial that continues to enroll patients at 18 sites in 3 countries, with a plan in 2020 to incorporate “rational combinations” of agents, according to the investigator.

Dr. Mato reported disclosures related to Gilead, Pharmacyclics, AstraZeneca, AbbVie, Sunesis, Johnson & Johnson, TG Therapeutics, LOXO, DTRM Biopharma, Genentech, Janssen, Acerta, Pharmacyclics, and Celgene.

SOURCE: Mato AR et al. ASH 2019, Abstract 501.

ORLANDO – While the benefit of daratumumab added to lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (D-RVd) continues to improve with longer follow-up of the GRIFFIN trial, even early adopters may want to wait for additional data before declaring the combination a first-line standard for transplant-eligible multiple myeloma, according to an investigator on the trial.

Andrew D. Bowser/MDedge News

D-RVd has significantly improved both response rates and depth of response, compared with RVd alone, Peter M. Voorhees, MD, of Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, N.C., reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Additionally, rates of response and minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity with D-RVd have increased with longer follow-up beyond posttransplant consolidation, in the ongoing randomized phase 2 trial, Dr. Voorhees said.

“Those of you that are early adopters have good ammunition based on this result, but I would argue that we do need to confirm that the increased MRD-negative rate that we’re seeing translates into a sustained improvement in MRD negativity,” said Dr. Voorhees while presenting the updated results.

Most importantly, it needs to be confirmed that improved depth of response with D-RVd translates into an improvement in progression-free survival, not only in GRIFFIN, he said, but in PERSEUS, a large, randomized European phase 3 trial of subcutaneous daratumumab plus RVd versus RVd alone.

In the GRIFFIN trial, a total of 207 patients with transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma were randomized to intravenous daratumumab plus RVd versus RVd alone, with a primary endpoint of stringent complete response (sCR) by the end of consolidation.

Primary findings, presented in September at the 17th International Myeloma Workshop (IMW) meeting in Boston, indicated an sCR of 42.4% for D-RVd versus 32.0% for RVd at a median follow-up of 13.5 months, a difference that Dr. Voorhees said was statistically significant as defined by the protocol (1-sided P = .068), with an odds ratio of 1.57 (95% confidence interval, 0.87-2.82) in favor of the D-RVd arm.

With longer follow-up data, which Dr. Voorhees reported at ASH, the responses have “deepened over time” in both arms of the study, though he said the daratumumab arm continues to perform better. The sCR with 22.1 months of follow-up was 62.6% for D-RVd versus 45.4% for RVd.

The rates of MRD negativity at this clinical cutoff were 51.0% versus 20.4% for the D-RVd and RVd arms, respectively (P less than .0001), while the 24-month PFS rates were 95.8% for D-RVd and 89.8% for RVd. “Suffice it to say that both groups of patients are doing incredibly well at 2 years,” Dr. Voorhees said.

Rates of grade 3 and 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were higher in the D-RVd arm, and there were more infections, though this was largely driven by an increased incidence of grade 1 or 2 upper respiratory tract infections, according to Dr. Voorhees.

Daratumumab did not impact time to engraftment, with a median CD34+ cell yield of 8.2 x 10⁶ cells/kg for D-RVd and 9.4 x 10⁶ cells/kg for RVd, a difference that Dr. Voorhees said was “not of clinical significance.”

Dr. Voorhees reported disclosures related to Takeda, Oncopeptides, Novartis, GSK, Janssen, Celgene, BMS, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Amgen, and TeneBio.

SOURCE: Voorhees PM et al. ASH 2019, Abstract 691.

ORLANDO – While the benefit of daratumumab added to lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (D-RVd) continues to improve with longer follow-up of the GRIFFIN trial, even early adopters may want to wait for additional data before declaring the combination a first-line standard for transplant-eligible multiple myeloma, according to an investigator on the trial.

Andrew D. Bowser/MDedge News

D-RVd has significantly improved both response rates and depth of response, compared with RVd alone, Peter M. Voorhees, MD, of Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, N.C., reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Additionally, rates of response and minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity with D-RVd have increased with longer follow-up beyond posttransplant consolidation, in the ongoing randomized phase 2 trial, Dr. Voorhees said.

“Those of you that are early adopters have good ammunition based on this result, but I would argue that we do need to confirm that the increased MRD-negative rate that we’re seeing translates into a sustained improvement in MRD negativity,” said Dr. Voorhees while presenting the updated results.

Most importantly, it needs to be confirmed that improved depth of response with D-RVd translates into an improvement in progression-free survival, not only in GRIFFIN, he said, but in PERSEUS, a large, randomized European phase 3 trial of subcutaneous daratumumab plus RVd versus RVd alone.

In the GRIFFIN trial, a total of 207 patients with transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma were randomized to intravenous daratumumab plus RVd versus RVd alone, with a primary endpoint of stringent complete response (sCR) by the end of consolidation.

Primary findings, presented in September at the 17th International Myeloma Workshop (IMW) meeting in Boston, indicated an sCR of 42.4% for D-RVd versus 32.0% for RVd at a median follow-up of 13.5 months, a difference that Dr. Voorhees said was statistically significant as defined by the protocol (1-sided P = .068), with an odds ratio of 1.57 (95% confidence interval, 0.87-2.82) in favor of the D-RVd arm.

With longer follow-up data, which Dr. Voorhees reported at ASH, the responses have “deepened over time” in both arms of the study, though he said the daratumumab arm continues to perform better. The sCR with 22.1 months of follow-up was 62.6% for D-RVd versus 45.4% for RVd.

The rates of MRD negativity at this clinical cutoff were 51.0% versus 20.4% for the D-RVd and RVd arms, respectively (P less than .0001), while the 24-month PFS rates were 95.8% for D-RVd and 89.8% for RVd. “Suffice it to say that both groups of patients are doing incredibly well at 2 years,” Dr. Voorhees said.

Rates of grade 3 and 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were higher in the D-RVd arm, and there were more infections, though this was largely driven by an increased incidence of grade 1 or 2 upper respiratory tract infections, according to Dr. Voorhees.

Daratumumab did not impact time to engraftment, with a median CD34+ cell yield of 8.2 x 10⁶ cells/kg for D-RVd and 9.4 x 10⁶ cells/kg for RVd, a difference that Dr. Voorhees said was “not of clinical significance.”

Dr. Voorhees reported disclosures related to Takeda, Oncopeptides, Novartis, GSK, Janssen, Celgene, BMS, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Amgen, and TeneBio.

SOURCE: Voorhees PM et al. ASH 2019, Abstract 691.

ORLANDO – While the benefit of daratumumab added to lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (D-RVd) continues to improve with longer follow-up of the GRIFFIN trial, even early adopters may want to wait for additional data before declaring the combination a first-line standard for transplant-eligible multiple myeloma, according to an investigator on the trial.

Andrew D. Bowser/MDedge News

D-RVd has significantly improved both response rates and depth of response, compared with RVd alone, Peter M. Voorhees, MD, of Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, N.C., reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Additionally, rates of response and minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity with D-RVd have increased with longer follow-up beyond posttransplant consolidation, in the ongoing randomized phase 2 trial, Dr. Voorhees said.

“Those of you that are early adopters have good ammunition based on this result, but I would argue that we do need to confirm that the increased MRD-negative rate that we’re seeing translates into a sustained improvement in MRD negativity,” said Dr. Voorhees while presenting the updated results.

Most importantly, it needs to be confirmed that improved depth of response with D-RVd translates into an improvement in progression-free survival, not only in GRIFFIN, he said, but in PERSEUS, a large, randomized European phase 3 trial of subcutaneous daratumumab plus RVd versus RVd alone.

In the GRIFFIN trial, a total of 207 patients with transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma were randomized to intravenous daratumumab plus RVd versus RVd alone, with a primary endpoint of stringent complete response (sCR) by the end of consolidation.

Primary findings, presented in September at the 17th International Myeloma Workshop (IMW) meeting in Boston, indicated an sCR of 42.4% for D-RVd versus 32.0% for RVd at a median follow-up of 13.5 months, a difference that Dr. Voorhees said was statistically significant as defined by the protocol (1-sided P = .068), with an odds ratio of 1.57 (95% confidence interval, 0.87-2.82) in favor of the D-RVd arm.

With longer follow-up data, which Dr. Voorhees reported at ASH, the responses have “deepened over time” in both arms of the study, though he said the daratumumab arm continues to perform better. The sCR with 22.1 months of follow-up was 62.6% for D-RVd versus 45.4% for RVd.

The rates of MRD negativity at this clinical cutoff were 51.0% versus 20.4% for the D-RVd and RVd arms, respectively (P less than .0001), while the 24-month PFS rates were 95.8% for D-RVd and 89.8% for RVd. “Suffice it to say that both groups of patients are doing incredibly well at 2 years,” Dr. Voorhees said.

Rates of grade 3 and 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were higher in the D-RVd arm, and there were more infections, though this was largely driven by an increased incidence of grade 1 or 2 upper respiratory tract infections, according to Dr. Voorhees.

Daratumumab did not impact time to engraftment, with a median CD34+ cell yield of 8.2 x 10⁶ cells/kg for D-RVd and 9.4 x 10⁶ cells/kg for RVd, a difference that Dr. Voorhees said was “not of clinical significance.”

Dr. Voorhees reported disclosures related to Takeda, Oncopeptides, Novartis, GSK, Janssen, Celgene, BMS, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Amgen, and TeneBio.

SOURCE: Voorhees PM et al. ASH 2019, Abstract 691.

ORLANDO – Zanubrutinib has produced a high overall response rate in one the largest cohorts of patients with treatment-naive 17p-deletion chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) studied to date.

Andrew D. Bowser/MDedge News

An overall response rate of nearly 93% was seen in this 109-patient, high-risk cohort, enrolled as part of the phase 3 SEQUOIA study (BGB-3111-304), said Constantine S. Tam, MBBS, MD, of St. Vincent’s Hospital and Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre in Melbourne.

Tolerability of zanubrutinib was essentially consistent with previous reports of the agent as used in other B-cell malignancies, Dr. Tam said in an oral presentation of the results at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Deletion of chromosome 17p13.1, or del(17p), is a marker of poor prognosis and poor response to chemotherapy in patients with CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). For patients with del(17p) CLL, the first-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor ibrutinib has become a standard of care, Dr. Tam said.

Zanubrutinib, a next-generation BTK inhibitor, was developed to improve BTK occupancy and minimize off-target inhibition of TEC and epidermal growth factor receptor kinases. “What this effectively means is that we are able to dose this drug at levels much higher than that achievable with ibrutinib, and not get intolerable side effects,” Dr. Tam said.

Zanubrutinib has been approved in the United States for previously treated mantle cell lymphoma, and generated durable responses among CLL/SLL patients with or without del(17p) in a phase 1/2 study, according to Dr. Tam.

In the present study, which exclusively enrolled patients with del(17p) CLL/SLL, patients received 160 mg twice daily of zanubrutinib, Dr. Tam said. Out of 109 patients enrolled, 10 (9.2%) had SLL. All patients were aged at least 65 years or were deemed unsuitable for treatment with the combination of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab.

Of 109 patients enrolled, 104 received on-study treatment. The median age was 70 years, Dr. Tam reported, and a number of patients had other high-risk markers beyond del(17p), including unmutated IgVH status in 61.5% of patients.

With a median follow-up of 10 months, the overall response rate was 92.7%, including 1.9% complete responses and 78.9% partial responses. “Only one patient had primary progressive disease after starting this drug,” Dr. Tam said.

Time to response was rapid, according to the investigator, at about 2.8 months; after 6 months, 95% of responders remained in response.

Further analysis showed that the response rate was consistent across subgroups. “There was not a single group that did not respond with a high response rate, including poor prognostic groups,” Dr. Tam said.

Most adverse events were grade 1-2 in severity, and the most common events included confusion and upper respiratory tract infection. The only common grade 3 event, according to Dr. Tam, was neutropenia. Rates of grade 3 major bleeding were low, he said, and the rate of grade 3 atrial fibrillation was 0.9%. One patient died due to pneumonia.

The ongoing SEQUOIA study, designed to compare zanubrutinib to the combination of bendamustine and rituximab in patients with previously untreated CLL or SLL, is sponsored by BeiGene. Dr. Tam reported disclosures related to Novartis, Pharmacyclics, AbbVie, BeiGene, Janssen, and Roche.

SOURCE: Tam C et al. ASH 2019, Abstract 499.

ORLANDO – Zanubrutinib has produced a high overall response rate in one the largest cohorts of patients with treatment-naive 17p-deletion chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) studied to date.

Andrew D. Bowser/MDedge News

An overall response rate of nearly 93% was seen in this 109-patient, high-risk cohort, enrolled as part of the phase 3 SEQUOIA study (BGB-3111-304), said Constantine S. Tam, MBBS, MD, of St. Vincent’s Hospital and Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre in Melbourne.

Tolerability of zanubrutinib was essentially consistent with previous reports of the agent as used in other B-cell malignancies, Dr. Tam said in an oral presentation of the results at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Deletion of chromosome 17p13.1, or del(17p), is a marker of poor prognosis and poor response to chemotherapy in patients with CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). For patients with del(17p) CLL, the first-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor ibrutinib has become a standard of care, Dr. Tam said.

Zanubrutinib, a next-generation BTK inhibitor, was developed to improve BTK occupancy and minimize off-target inhibition of TEC and epidermal growth factor receptor kinases. “What this effectively means is that we are able to dose this drug at levels much higher than that achievable with ibrutinib, and not get intolerable side effects,” Dr. Tam said.

Zanubrutinib has been approved in the United States for previously treated mantle cell lymphoma, and generated durable responses among CLL/SLL patients with or without del(17p) in a phase 1/2 study, according to Dr. Tam.

In the present study, which exclusively enrolled patients with del(17p) CLL/SLL, patients received 160 mg twice daily of zanubrutinib, Dr. Tam said. Out of 109 patients enrolled, 10 (9.2%) had SLL. All patients were aged at least 65 years or were deemed unsuitable for treatment with the combination of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab.

Of 109 patients enrolled, 104 received on-study treatment. The median age was 70 years, Dr. Tam reported, and a number of patients had other high-risk markers beyond del(17p), including unmutated IgVH status in 61.5% of patients.

With a median follow-up of 10 months, the overall response rate was 92.7%, including 1.9% complete responses and 78.9% partial responses. “Only one patient had primary progressive disease after starting this drug,” Dr. Tam said.

Time to response was rapid, according to the investigator, at about 2.8 months; after 6 months, 95% of responders remained in response.

Further analysis showed that the response rate was consistent across subgroups. “There was not a single group that did not respond with a high response rate, including poor prognostic groups,” Dr. Tam said.

Most adverse events were grade 1-2 in severity, and the most common events included confusion and upper respiratory tract infection. The only common grade 3 event, according to Dr. Tam, was neutropenia. Rates of grade 3 major bleeding were low, he said, and the rate of grade 3 atrial fibrillation was 0.9%. One patient died due to pneumonia.

The ongoing SEQUOIA study, designed to compare zanubrutinib to the combination of bendamustine and rituximab in patients with previously untreated CLL or SLL, is sponsored by BeiGene. Dr. Tam reported disclosures related to Novartis, Pharmacyclics, AbbVie, BeiGene, Janssen, and Roche.

SOURCE: Tam C et al. ASH 2019, Abstract 499.

ORLANDO – Zanubrutinib has produced a high overall response rate in one the largest cohorts of patients with treatment-naive 17p-deletion chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) studied to date.

Andrew D. Bowser/MDedge News

An overall response rate of nearly 93% was seen in this 109-patient, high-risk cohort, enrolled as part of the phase 3 SEQUOIA study (BGB-3111-304), said Constantine S. Tam, MBBS, MD, of St. Vincent’s Hospital and Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre in Melbourne.

Tolerability of zanubrutinib was essentially consistent with previous reports of the agent as used in other B-cell malignancies, Dr. Tam said in an oral presentation of the results at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Deletion of chromosome 17p13.1, or del(17p), is a marker of poor prognosis and poor response to chemotherapy in patients with CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). For patients with del(17p) CLL, the first-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor ibrutinib has become a standard of care, Dr. Tam said.

Zanubrutinib, a next-generation BTK inhibitor, was developed to improve BTK occupancy and minimize off-target inhibition of TEC and epidermal growth factor receptor kinases. “What this effectively means is that we are able to dose this drug at levels much higher than that achievable with ibrutinib, and not get intolerable side effects,” Dr. Tam said.

Zanubrutinib has been approved in the United States for previously treated mantle cell lymphoma, and generated durable responses among CLL/SLL patients with or without del(17p) in a phase 1/2 study, according to Dr. Tam.

In the present study, which exclusively enrolled patients with del(17p) CLL/SLL, patients received 160 mg twice daily of zanubrutinib, Dr. Tam said. Out of 109 patients enrolled, 10 (9.2%) had SLL. All patients were aged at least 65 years or were deemed unsuitable for treatment with the combination of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab.

Of 109 patients enrolled, 104 received on-study treatment. The median age was 70 years, Dr. Tam reported, and a number of patients had other high-risk markers beyond del(17p), including unmutated IgVH status in 61.5% of patients.

With a median follow-up of 10 months, the overall response rate was 92.7%, including 1.9% complete responses and 78.9% partial responses. “Only one patient had primary progressive disease after starting this drug,” Dr. Tam said.

Time to response was rapid, according to the investigator, at about 2.8 months; after 6 months, 95% of responders remained in response.

Further analysis showed that the response rate was consistent across subgroups. “There was not a single group that did not respond with a high response rate, including poor prognostic groups,” Dr. Tam said.

Most adverse events were grade 1-2 in severity, and the most common events included confusion and upper respiratory tract infection. The only common grade 3 event, according to Dr. Tam, was neutropenia. Rates of grade 3 major bleeding were low, he said, and the rate of grade 3 atrial fibrillation was 0.9%. One patient died due to pneumonia.

The ongoing SEQUOIA study, designed to compare zanubrutinib to the combination of bendamustine and rituximab in patients with previously untreated CLL or SLL, is sponsored by BeiGene. Dr. Tam reported disclosures related to Novartis, Pharmacyclics, AbbVie, BeiGene, Janssen, and Roche.

SOURCE: Tam C et al. ASH 2019, Abstract 499.

ORLANDO – A gene therapy approach that targets a major repressor of fetal hemoglobin appears to be acceptably safe and to mitigate the pathology of sickle cell disease among the five patients infused so far, an investigator reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Andrew D. Bowser/MDedge News

Knocking down BCL11A using a lentiviral vector-based approach resulted in effective induction of fetal hemoglobin and significant attenuation of the sickling phenotype, with no vector-related adverse events, investigator Erica B. Esrick, MD, of Children’s Hospital Boston, said during the meeting’s late-breaking abstracts session.

The single-center pilot and feasibility study, originally designed to include a total of seven patients, now has an expanded enrollment goal of 15 patients, and a multicenter phase 2/3 study is planned that will enroll a larger group of patients with sickle cell disease, according to Dr. Esrick.

BCL11A represents a promising target in sickle cell disease because of its regulation of the fetal-adult hemoglobin switch at the gamma-globin locus, investigators said in their late-breaking study abstract.

Dr. Esrick described BCH-BB694, a lentiviral vector encoding a BCL11A-targeting small hairpin RNA embedded in a microRNA scaffold (shmiR). “The advantage of this approach is that it harnesses the physiologic switch machinery, simultaneously increasing fetal hemoglobin and decreasing sickle hemoglobin, thus maintaining the alpha to beta globin ratio in the cell,” she said.

The results of the pilot study of the shmiR vector approach, although preliminary and in need of longer follow-up, contribute to a larger body of research showing that multiple gene therapy approaches hold promise in this disease, said Robert Brodsky, MD, professor of medicine and director of the division of hematology at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore.

“The exciting thing is that there are now multiple ways of going at this previously incurable disease,” Dr. Brodsky, who was not involved in the research, said during a press conference.

Development of the gene therapy described by Dr. Esrick involves mobilization of the patient’s peripheral stem cells using plerixafor, followed by selection of CD34+ cells that were transduced with the shmiR lentiviral vector, followed by infusion of gene modified cells into the patient after a busulfan conditioning regimen.

“In our treated patients, we’ve seen a consistent and substantial induction in fetal hemoglobin,” Dr. Esrick said, noting that the longest follow-up to date for the five treated patients is now 18 months.

The patients, who range in age from 12 to 26 years, are producing and maintaining very high numbers of F cells, or erythrocytes with measurable fetal hemoglobin, she said.

Total fetal hemoglobin has increased and remained stable at between 23% and 43% for the five patients, who are producing “stably high” average amounts of fetal hemoglobin per F cell, at 10 to 16 picograms of fetal hemoglobin per cell, while 37% to 62% of the F cells’ total hemoglobin is fetal hemoglobin, she added.

Following gene therapy, treated patients have had no instances of vaso-occlusive pain crises, respiratory events, or neurologic events. No patients have required transfusion, except one with severe underlying vascular disease for whom post–gene therapy transfusions were planned, she said.

Validated assays at the single-cell level are needed to better understand the effect of this gene therapy and eventually compare it to other therapeutic approaches in sickle cell disease, according to Dr. Esrick.

“We’re collaborating with several colleagues on exploratory assays to accomplish this,” she said, adding that the work is ongoing.

Dr. Esrick reported having no disclosures. Her coauthors reported disclosures related to Alerion Biosciences, Novartis, Orchard Therapeutics, Roche, AstraZeneca, and bluebird bio, among others.

SOURCE: Esrick EB et al. ASH 2019. Abstract LBA-5.

ORLANDO – A gene therapy approach that targets a major repressor of fetal hemoglobin appears to be acceptably safe and to mitigate the pathology of sickle cell disease among the five patients infused so far, an investigator reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Andrew D. Bowser/MDedge News

Knocking down BCL11A using a lentiviral vector-based approach resulted in effective induction of fetal hemoglobin and significant attenuation of the sickling phenotype, with no vector-related adverse events, investigator Erica B. Esrick, MD, of Children’s Hospital Boston, said during the meeting’s late-breaking abstracts session.

The single-center pilot and feasibility study, originally designed to include a total of seven patients, now has an expanded enrollment goal of 15 patients, and a multicenter phase 2/3 study is planned that will enroll a larger group of patients with sickle cell disease, according to Dr. Esrick.

BCL11A represents a promising target in sickle cell disease because of its regulation of the fetal-adult hemoglobin switch at the gamma-globin locus, investigators said in their late-breaking study abstract.

Dr. Esrick described BCH-BB694, a lentiviral vector encoding a BCL11A-targeting small hairpin RNA embedded in a microRNA scaffold (shmiR). “The advantage of this approach is that it harnesses the physiologic switch machinery, simultaneously increasing fetal hemoglobin and decreasing sickle hemoglobin, thus maintaining the alpha to beta globin ratio in the cell,” she said.

The results of the pilot study of the shmiR vector approach, although preliminary and in need of longer follow-up, contribute to a larger body of research showing that multiple gene therapy approaches hold promise in this disease, said Robert Brodsky, MD, professor of medicine and director of the division of hematology at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore.

“The exciting thing is that there are now multiple ways of going at this previously incurable disease,” Dr. Brodsky, who was not involved in the research, said during a press conference.

Development of the gene therapy described by Dr. Esrick involves mobilization of the patient’s peripheral stem cells using plerixafor, followed by selection of CD34+ cells that were transduced with the shmiR lentiviral vector, followed by infusion of gene modified cells into the patient after a busulfan conditioning regimen.

“In our treated patients, we’ve seen a consistent and substantial induction in fetal hemoglobin,” Dr. Esrick said, noting that the longest follow-up to date for the five treated patients is now 18 months.

The patients, who range in age from 12 to 26 years, are producing and maintaining very high numbers of F cells, or erythrocytes with measurable fetal hemoglobin, she said.

Total fetal hemoglobin has increased and remained stable at between 23% and 43% for the five patients, who are producing “stably high” average amounts of fetal hemoglobin per F cell, at 10 to 16 picograms of fetal hemoglobin per cell, while 37% to 62% of the F cells’ total hemoglobin is fetal hemoglobin, she added.

Following gene therapy, treated patients have had no instances of vaso-occlusive pain crises, respiratory events, or neurologic events. No patients have required transfusion, except one with severe underlying vascular disease for whom post–gene therapy transfusions were planned, she said.

Validated assays at the single-cell level are needed to better understand the effect of this gene therapy and eventually compare it to other therapeutic approaches in sickle cell disease, according to Dr. Esrick.

“We’re collaborating with several colleagues on exploratory assays to accomplish this,” she said, adding that the work is ongoing.

Dr. Esrick reported having no disclosures. Her coauthors reported disclosures related to Alerion Biosciences, Novartis, Orchard Therapeutics, Roche, AstraZeneca, and bluebird bio, among others.

SOURCE: Esrick EB et al. ASH 2019. Abstract LBA-5.

ORLANDO – A gene therapy approach that targets a major repressor of fetal hemoglobin appears to be acceptably safe and to mitigate the pathology of sickle cell disease among the five patients infused so far, an investigator reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Andrew D. Bowser/MDedge News

Knocking down BCL11A using a lentiviral vector-based approach resulted in effective induction of fetal hemoglobin and significant attenuation of the sickling phenotype, with no vector-related adverse events, investigator Erica B. Esrick, MD, of Children’s Hospital Boston, said during the meeting’s late-breaking abstracts session.

The single-center pilot and feasibility study, originally designed to include a total of seven patients, now has an expanded enrollment goal of 15 patients, and a multicenter phase 2/3 study is planned that will enroll a larger group of patients with sickle cell disease, according to Dr. Esrick.

BCL11A represents a promising target in sickle cell disease because of its regulation of the fetal-adult hemoglobin switch at the gamma-globin locus, investigators said in their late-breaking study abstract.

Dr. Esrick described BCH-BB694, a lentiviral vector encoding a BCL11A-targeting small hairpin RNA embedded in a microRNA scaffold (shmiR). “The advantage of this approach is that it harnesses the physiologic switch machinery, simultaneously increasing fetal hemoglobin and decreasing sickle hemoglobin, thus maintaining the alpha to beta globin ratio in the cell,” she said.

The results of the pilot study of the shmiR vector approach, although preliminary and in need of longer follow-up, contribute to a larger body of research showing that multiple gene therapy approaches hold promise in this disease, said Robert Brodsky, MD, professor of medicine and director of the division of hematology at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore.

“The exciting thing is that there are now multiple ways of going at this previously incurable disease,” Dr. Brodsky, who was not involved in the research, said during a press conference.

Development of the gene therapy described by Dr. Esrick involves mobilization of the patient’s peripheral stem cells using plerixafor, followed by selection of CD34+ cells that were transduced with the shmiR lentiviral vector, followed by infusion of gene modified cells into the patient after a busulfan conditioning regimen.

“In our treated patients, we’ve seen a consistent and substantial induction in fetal hemoglobin,” Dr. Esrick said, noting that the longest follow-up to date for the five treated patients is now 18 months.

The patients, who range in age from 12 to 26 years, are producing and maintaining very high numbers of F cells, or erythrocytes with measurable fetal hemoglobin, she said.

Total fetal hemoglobin has increased and remained stable at between 23% and 43% for the five patients, who are producing “stably high” average amounts of fetal hemoglobin per F cell, at 10 to 16 picograms of fetal hemoglobin per cell, while 37% to 62% of the F cells’ total hemoglobin is fetal hemoglobin, she added.

Following gene therapy, treated patients have had no instances of vaso-occlusive pain crises, respiratory events, or neurologic events. No patients have required transfusion, except one with severe underlying vascular disease for whom post–gene therapy transfusions were planned, she said.

Validated assays at the single-cell level are needed to better understand the effect of this gene therapy and eventually compare it to other therapeutic approaches in sickle cell disease, according to Dr. Esrick.

“We’re collaborating with several colleagues on exploratory assays to accomplish this,” she said, adding that the work is ongoing.

Dr. Esrick reported having no disclosures. Her coauthors reported disclosures related to Alerion Biosciences, Novartis, Orchard Therapeutics, Roche, AstraZeneca, and bluebird bio, among others.

SOURCE: Esrick EB et al. ASH 2019. Abstract LBA-5.