Cardiorenal syndrome

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 05/21/2018 - 09:42
Display Headline
Cardiorenal syndrome

To the Editor: I read with interest the thoughtful review of cardiorenal syndrome by Drs. Thind, Loehrke, and Wilt1 and the accompanying editorial by Dr. Grodin.2 These articles certainly add to our growing knowledge of the syndrome and the importance of treating volume overload in these complex patients.

Indeed, we and others have stressed the primary importance of renal dysfunction in patients with volume overload and acute decompensated heart failure.3,4 We have learned that even small rises in serum creatinine predict poor outcomes in these patients. And even if the serum creatinine level comes back down during hospitalization, acute kidney injury (AKI) is still associated with risk.5

Nevertheless, clinicians remain frustrated with the practical management of patients with volume overload and worsening AKI. When faced with a rising serum creatinine level in a patient being treated for decompensated heart failure with signs or symptoms of volume overload, I suggest the following:

Perform careful bedside and chart review searching for evidence of AKI related to causes other than cardiorenal syndrome. Ask whether the rise in serum creatinine could be caused by new obstruction (eg, urinary retention, upper urinary tract obstruction), a nephrotoxin (eg, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), a primary tubulointerstitial or glomerular process (eg, drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis, acute glomerulonephritis), acute tubular necrosis, or a new hemodynamic event threatening renal perfusion (eg, hypotension, a new arrhythmia). It is often best to arrive at a diagnosis of AKI due to cardiorenal dysfunction by exclusion, much like the working definitions of hepatorenal syndrome.6 This requires review of the urine sediment (looking for evidence of granular casts of acute tubular necrosis, or evidence of glomerulonephritis or interstitial nephritis), electronic medical record, vital signs, telemetry, and perhaps renal ultrasonography.

In the absence of frank evidence of “overdiuresis” such as worsening hypernatremia, with dropping blood pressure, clinical hypoperfusion, and contraction alkalosis, avoid the temptation to suspend diuretics. Alternatively, an increase in diuretic dose, or addition of a distal diuretic (ie, metolazone) may be needed to address persistent renal venous congestion as the cause of the AKI.3 In this situation, be sure to monitor electrolytes, volume status, and renal function closely while diuretic treatment is augmented. In many such cases, the serum creatinine may actually start to decrease after a more robust diuresis is generated. In these patients, it may also be prudent to temporarily suspend antagonists of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, although this remains controversial.

Management of such patients should be done collaboratively with cardiologists well versed in the treatment of cardiorenal syndrome. It may be possible that the worsening renal function in these patients represents important changes in cardiac rhythm or function (eg, low cardiac output state, new or worsening valvular disease, ongoing myocardial ischemia, cardiac tamponade, uncontrolled bradycardia or tachyarrythmia). Interventions aimed at reversing such perturbations could be the most important steps in improving cardiorenal function and reversing AKI.

References
  1. Thind GS, Loehrke M, Wilt JL. Acute cardiorenal syndrome: mechanisms and clinical implications. Cleve Clin J Med 2018; 85(3):231–239. doi:10.3949/ccjm.85a.17019
  2. Grodin JL. Hemodynamically, the kidney is at the heart of cardiorenal syndrome. Cleve Clin J Med 2018; 85(3):240–242. doi:10.3949/ccjm.85a.17126
  3. Freda BJ, Slawsky M, Mallidi J, Braden GL. Decongestive treatment of acute decompensated heart failure: cardiorenal implications of ultrafiltration and diuretics. Am J Kid Dis 2011; 58(6):1005–1017. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.07.023
  4. Tang WH, Kitai T. Intrarenal blood flow: a window into the congestive kidney failure phenotype of heart failure? JACC Heart Fail 2016; 4(8):683–686. doi:10.1016/j.jchf.2016.05.009
  5. Freda BJ, Knee AB, Braden GL, Visintainer PF, Thakaer CV. Effect of transient and sustained acute kidney injury on readmissions in acute decompensated heart failure. Am J Cardiol 2017; 119(11):1809–1814. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.02.044
  6. Bucsics T, Krones E. Renal dysfunction in cirrhosis: acute kidney injury and the hepatorenal syndrome. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2017; 5(2):127–137. doi:10.1093/gastro/gox009
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Benjamin J. Freda, DO
Tufts University School of Medicine, Springfield, MA

Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 85(5)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
360-361
Legacy Keywords
cardiorenal syndrome, heart failure, acute kidney injury, AKI, volume overload, serum creatinine, diuretics, Benjamin Freda
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Benjamin J. Freda, DO
Tufts University School of Medicine, Springfield, MA

Author and Disclosure Information

Benjamin J. Freda, DO
Tufts University School of Medicine, Springfield, MA

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

To the Editor: I read with interest the thoughtful review of cardiorenal syndrome by Drs. Thind, Loehrke, and Wilt1 and the accompanying editorial by Dr. Grodin.2 These articles certainly add to our growing knowledge of the syndrome and the importance of treating volume overload in these complex patients.

Indeed, we and others have stressed the primary importance of renal dysfunction in patients with volume overload and acute decompensated heart failure.3,4 We have learned that even small rises in serum creatinine predict poor outcomes in these patients. And even if the serum creatinine level comes back down during hospitalization, acute kidney injury (AKI) is still associated with risk.5

Nevertheless, clinicians remain frustrated with the practical management of patients with volume overload and worsening AKI. When faced with a rising serum creatinine level in a patient being treated for decompensated heart failure with signs or symptoms of volume overload, I suggest the following:

Perform careful bedside and chart review searching for evidence of AKI related to causes other than cardiorenal syndrome. Ask whether the rise in serum creatinine could be caused by new obstruction (eg, urinary retention, upper urinary tract obstruction), a nephrotoxin (eg, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), a primary tubulointerstitial or glomerular process (eg, drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis, acute glomerulonephritis), acute tubular necrosis, or a new hemodynamic event threatening renal perfusion (eg, hypotension, a new arrhythmia). It is often best to arrive at a diagnosis of AKI due to cardiorenal dysfunction by exclusion, much like the working definitions of hepatorenal syndrome.6 This requires review of the urine sediment (looking for evidence of granular casts of acute tubular necrosis, or evidence of glomerulonephritis or interstitial nephritis), electronic medical record, vital signs, telemetry, and perhaps renal ultrasonography.

In the absence of frank evidence of “overdiuresis” such as worsening hypernatremia, with dropping blood pressure, clinical hypoperfusion, and contraction alkalosis, avoid the temptation to suspend diuretics. Alternatively, an increase in diuretic dose, or addition of a distal diuretic (ie, metolazone) may be needed to address persistent renal venous congestion as the cause of the AKI.3 In this situation, be sure to monitor electrolytes, volume status, and renal function closely while diuretic treatment is augmented. In many such cases, the serum creatinine may actually start to decrease after a more robust diuresis is generated. In these patients, it may also be prudent to temporarily suspend antagonists of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, although this remains controversial.

Management of such patients should be done collaboratively with cardiologists well versed in the treatment of cardiorenal syndrome. It may be possible that the worsening renal function in these patients represents important changes in cardiac rhythm or function (eg, low cardiac output state, new or worsening valvular disease, ongoing myocardial ischemia, cardiac tamponade, uncontrolled bradycardia or tachyarrythmia). Interventions aimed at reversing such perturbations could be the most important steps in improving cardiorenal function and reversing AKI.

To the Editor: I read with interest the thoughtful review of cardiorenal syndrome by Drs. Thind, Loehrke, and Wilt1 and the accompanying editorial by Dr. Grodin.2 These articles certainly add to our growing knowledge of the syndrome and the importance of treating volume overload in these complex patients.

Indeed, we and others have stressed the primary importance of renal dysfunction in patients with volume overload and acute decompensated heart failure.3,4 We have learned that even small rises in serum creatinine predict poor outcomes in these patients. And even if the serum creatinine level comes back down during hospitalization, acute kidney injury (AKI) is still associated with risk.5

Nevertheless, clinicians remain frustrated with the practical management of patients with volume overload and worsening AKI. When faced with a rising serum creatinine level in a patient being treated for decompensated heart failure with signs or symptoms of volume overload, I suggest the following:

Perform careful bedside and chart review searching for evidence of AKI related to causes other than cardiorenal syndrome. Ask whether the rise in serum creatinine could be caused by new obstruction (eg, urinary retention, upper urinary tract obstruction), a nephrotoxin (eg, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), a primary tubulointerstitial or glomerular process (eg, drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis, acute glomerulonephritis), acute tubular necrosis, or a new hemodynamic event threatening renal perfusion (eg, hypotension, a new arrhythmia). It is often best to arrive at a diagnosis of AKI due to cardiorenal dysfunction by exclusion, much like the working definitions of hepatorenal syndrome.6 This requires review of the urine sediment (looking for evidence of granular casts of acute tubular necrosis, or evidence of glomerulonephritis or interstitial nephritis), electronic medical record, vital signs, telemetry, and perhaps renal ultrasonography.

In the absence of frank evidence of “overdiuresis” such as worsening hypernatremia, with dropping blood pressure, clinical hypoperfusion, and contraction alkalosis, avoid the temptation to suspend diuretics. Alternatively, an increase in diuretic dose, or addition of a distal diuretic (ie, metolazone) may be needed to address persistent renal venous congestion as the cause of the AKI.3 In this situation, be sure to monitor electrolytes, volume status, and renal function closely while diuretic treatment is augmented. In many such cases, the serum creatinine may actually start to decrease after a more robust diuresis is generated. In these patients, it may also be prudent to temporarily suspend antagonists of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, although this remains controversial.

Management of such patients should be done collaboratively with cardiologists well versed in the treatment of cardiorenal syndrome. It may be possible that the worsening renal function in these patients represents important changes in cardiac rhythm or function (eg, low cardiac output state, new or worsening valvular disease, ongoing myocardial ischemia, cardiac tamponade, uncontrolled bradycardia or tachyarrythmia). Interventions aimed at reversing such perturbations could be the most important steps in improving cardiorenal function and reversing AKI.

References
  1. Thind GS, Loehrke M, Wilt JL. Acute cardiorenal syndrome: mechanisms and clinical implications. Cleve Clin J Med 2018; 85(3):231–239. doi:10.3949/ccjm.85a.17019
  2. Grodin JL. Hemodynamically, the kidney is at the heart of cardiorenal syndrome. Cleve Clin J Med 2018; 85(3):240–242. doi:10.3949/ccjm.85a.17126
  3. Freda BJ, Slawsky M, Mallidi J, Braden GL. Decongestive treatment of acute decompensated heart failure: cardiorenal implications of ultrafiltration and diuretics. Am J Kid Dis 2011; 58(6):1005–1017. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.07.023
  4. Tang WH, Kitai T. Intrarenal blood flow: a window into the congestive kidney failure phenotype of heart failure? JACC Heart Fail 2016; 4(8):683–686. doi:10.1016/j.jchf.2016.05.009
  5. Freda BJ, Knee AB, Braden GL, Visintainer PF, Thakaer CV. Effect of transient and sustained acute kidney injury on readmissions in acute decompensated heart failure. Am J Cardiol 2017; 119(11):1809–1814. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.02.044
  6. Bucsics T, Krones E. Renal dysfunction in cirrhosis: acute kidney injury and the hepatorenal syndrome. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2017; 5(2):127–137. doi:10.1093/gastro/gox009
References
  1. Thind GS, Loehrke M, Wilt JL. Acute cardiorenal syndrome: mechanisms and clinical implications. Cleve Clin J Med 2018; 85(3):231–239. doi:10.3949/ccjm.85a.17019
  2. Grodin JL. Hemodynamically, the kidney is at the heart of cardiorenal syndrome. Cleve Clin J Med 2018; 85(3):240–242. doi:10.3949/ccjm.85a.17126
  3. Freda BJ, Slawsky M, Mallidi J, Braden GL. Decongestive treatment of acute decompensated heart failure: cardiorenal implications of ultrafiltration and diuretics. Am J Kid Dis 2011; 58(6):1005–1017. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.07.023
  4. Tang WH, Kitai T. Intrarenal blood flow: a window into the congestive kidney failure phenotype of heart failure? JACC Heart Fail 2016; 4(8):683–686. doi:10.1016/j.jchf.2016.05.009
  5. Freda BJ, Knee AB, Braden GL, Visintainer PF, Thakaer CV. Effect of transient and sustained acute kidney injury on readmissions in acute decompensated heart failure. Am J Cardiol 2017; 119(11):1809–1814. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.02.044
  6. Bucsics T, Krones E. Renal dysfunction in cirrhosis: acute kidney injury and the hepatorenal syndrome. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2017; 5(2):127–137. doi:10.1093/gastro/gox009
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 85(5)
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 85(5)
Page Number
360-361
Page Number
360-361
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Cardiorenal syndrome
Display Headline
Cardiorenal syndrome
Legacy Keywords
cardiorenal syndrome, heart failure, acute kidney injury, AKI, volume overload, serum creatinine, diuretics, Benjamin Freda
Legacy Keywords
cardiorenal syndrome, heart failure, acute kidney injury, AKI, volume overload, serum creatinine, diuretics, Benjamin Freda
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Thu, 04/26/2018 - 09:00
Un-Gate On Date
Thu, 04/26/2018 - 09:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Thu, 04/26/2018 - 09:00
Article PDF Media

Should N-acetylcysteine be used routinely to prevent contrast-induced acute kidney injury?

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 10/04/2017 - 07:57
Display Headline
Should N-acetylcysteine be used routinely to prevent contrast-induced acute kidney injury?

No. Using N-acetylcysteine (NAC) routinely to prevent contrast-induced acute kidney injury is not supported by the evidence at this time.1,2 However, there is evidence to suggest using it for patients at high risk, ie, those with significant baseline renal dysfunction.3,4

INCIDENCE AND IMPACT OF ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY

Intraarterial use of contrast is associated with a higher risk of acute kidney injury than intravenous use. Most studies of NAC for the prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury have focused on patients receiving contrast intraarterially. The reported rates of contrast-induced acute kidney injury also vary depending on how acute kidney injury was defined.

Although the incidence is low (1% to 2%) in patients with normal renal function, it can be as high as 25% in patients with renal impairment or a chronic condition such as diabetes or congestive heart failure, or in elderly patients.5

The development of acute kidney injury after percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with a longer hospital stay, a higher cost of care, and higher rates of morbidity and death.6

RATIONALE FOR USING N-ACETYLCYSTEINE

Contrast-induced acute kidney injury is thought to involve vasoconstriction and medullary ischemia mediated by reactive oxygen species.5 As an antioxidant and a scavenger of free radicals, NAC showed early promise in reducing the risk of this complication, but subsequent trials raised doubts about its efficacy. 1,2 In clinical practice, the drug is often used to prevent acute kidney injury because it is easy to give, cheap, and has few side effects. Recently, however, there have been suggestions that giving it intravenously may be associated with adverse effects that include anaphylactoid reactions.7

THE POSITIVE TRIALS

Tepel et al3 performed one of the earliest trials that found that NAC prevented contrast-induced acute kidney injury. The trial included 83 patients with stable chronic kidney disease (mean serum creatinine 2.4 mg/dL) who underwent computed tomography with about 75 mL of a nonionic, low-osmolality contrast agent. Participants were randomized to receive either NAC (600 mg orally twice daily) and 0.45% saline intravenously or placebo and saline. Acute kidney injury was defined as an increase of at least 0.5 mg/dL in the serum creatinine level 48 hours after the contrast dye was given.

The rate of acute kidney injury was significantly lower in the treatment group (2% vs 21%, P = .01). None of the patients who developed acute kidney injury needed hemodialysis.

Shyu et al4 studied 121 patients with chronic kidney disease (mean serum creatinine 2.8 mg/dL) who underwent a coronary procedure. Patients were randomized to receive NAC 400 mg orally twice daily or placebo in addition to 0.45% saline in both groups. Two (3.3%) of the 60 patients in the treated group and 15 (24.6%) of the 61 patients in the control group had an increase in creatinine concentration greater than 0.5 mg/dL at 48 hours (P < .001).

Both of these single-center studies were limited by small sample sizes and very short follow-up. Further, the impact of the drug on important clinical outcomes such as death and progression of chronic kidney disease was not reported.

Marenzi et al8 randomized 354 patients undergoing coronary angioplasty as the primary treatment for acute myocardial infarction to one of three treatment groups:

  • NAC in a standard dosage (a 600-mg intravenous bolus before the procedure and then 600 mg orally twice daily for 48 hours afterward)
  • NAC in a high dosage (a 1,200-mg intravenous bolus and then 1,200 mg orally twice daily for 48 hours)
  • Placebo.

The two treatment groups had significantly lower rates of acute kidney injury than the placebo group. In addition, the hospital mortality rate and the rate of a composite end point of death, need for renal replacement therapy, or need for mechanical ventilation were significantly lower in the treated groups. However, the number of events was small, and a beneficial effect on the death rate has not been confirmed by other studies.5

 

 

THE NEGATIVE TRIALS

Several studies found that NAC did not prevent contrast-induced acute kidney injury.1,2,9

The Acetylcysteine for Contrast-induced Nephropathy Trial (ACT), published in 2011,1 was the largest of these trials. It included 2,308 patients undergoing an angiographic procedure who had at least one risk factor for contrast-induced acute kidney injury (age > 70, renal failure, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, or hypotension). Patients were randomly assigned to receive the drug (1,200 mg by mouth) or placebo.

The incidence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury was 12.7% in the treated group and 12.7% in the control group (relative risk 1.00; 95% confidence interval 0.81–1.25; P = .97). The rate of a combined end point of death or need for dialysis at 30 days was also similar in both groups (2.2% with treatment vs 2.3% with placebo).

Importantly, only about 15% of patients had a baseline serum creatinine greater than 1.5 mg/dL. Of these, most had an estimated glomerular filtration rate between 45 and 60 mL/min. Indeed, most patients in the ACT were at low risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury. As a result, there were low event rates and, not surprisingly, no differences between the control and treatment groups.

Subgroup analysis did not suggest a benefit of treatment in those with a baseline serum creatinine greater than 1.5 mg/dL. However, as the authors pointed out, this subgroup was small, so definitive statistically powered conclusions cannot be drawn. There was no significant difference in the primary end point among several other predefined subgroups (age > 70, female sex, diabetes).1

The ACT differed from the “positive” study by Marenzi et al8 in several ways. The ACT patients were at lower risk, the coronary catheterizations were being done mainly for diagnosis rather than intervention, a lower volume of contrast dye was used (100 mL in the ACT vs 250 mL in the Marenzi study), and patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction were excluded. Other weaknesses of the ACT include use of a baseline serum creatinine within 3 months of study entry, variations in the hydration protocol, and the use of a high-osmolar contrast agent in some patients.

Webb et al2 found, in a large, randomized trial, that intravenous NAC did not prevent contrast-induced acute kidney injury. Patients with renal dysfunction (mean serum creatinine around 1.6 mg/dL) undergoing cardiac catheterization were randomly assigned to receive either NAC 500 mg or placebo immediately before the procedure. All patients first received isotonic saline 200 mL, then 1.5 mL/kg per hour for 6 hours, unless contraindicated. The study was terminated early because of a determination of futility.

Gurm et al9 found that a database of 90,578 consecutive patients undergoing nonemergency coronary angiography from 2006 to 2009 did not show differences in the rate of contrast-induced acute kidney injury between patients who received NAC and those who did not (5.5% vs 5.5%, P = .99). There was also no difference in the rate of death or the need for dialysis. These negative findings were consistent across many prespecified subgroups.

MIXED RESULTS IN META-ANALYSES

Results from meta-analyses have been mixed,10,11 mainly because of study heterogeneity (eg, baseline risk, end points, dose of the drug) and publication bias. None of the previous meta-analyses included the recent negative results from the ACT.

CURRENT GUIDELINES

After the publication of the ACT, the joint guidelines of the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association were updated, designating NAC as class III (no benefit) and level of evidence A.12

However, recently published guidelines from the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes Acute Kidney Injury Working Group recommend using the drug together with intravenous isotonic crystalloids in patients at high risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury, although the level of evidence is 2D (2 = suggestion, D = quality of evidence very low).5

WHAT WE RECOMMEND

The routine use of NAC to prevent contrast-induced acute kidney injury is not supported by the current evidence. However, clarification of its efficacy in high-risk patients is needed, especially those with baseline renal dysfunction and diabetes mellitus.

The Prevention of Serious Adverse Events Following Angiography (PRESERVE) study (ClinTrials.gov identifier NCT01467466) may clarify the role of this drug in a high-risk cohort using the important clinical outcomes of death, need for acute dialysis, or persistent decline in kidney function after angiography. This important study was set to begin in July 2012, with an anticipated enrollment of more than 8,000 patients who have glomerular filtration rates of 15 to 59 mL/min/1.73 m2.

In the meantime, we recommend the following in patients at high risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury:

  • Clarify whether contrast is truly needed
  • When possible, limit the volume of contrast, avoid repeated doses over a short time frame, and use an iso-osmolar or low-osmolar contrast agent
  • Discontinue nephrotoxic agents
  • Provide an evidence-based intravenous crystalloid regimen with isotonic sodium bicarbonate or saline
  • Although it is not strictly evidence-based, use NAC in patients with significant baseline renal dysfunction (glomerular filtration rate < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2), multiple concurrent risk factors such as hypotension, diabetes, preexisting kidney injury, or congestive heart failure that limits the use of intravenous fluids, or who need a high volume of contrast dye
  • Avoid using intravenous NAC, given its lack of benefit and risk of anaphylactoid reactions.7,13

We do not yet have clear evidence on the optimal dosing regimen. But based on the limited data, we recommend 600 to 1,200 mg twice a day for 1 day before and 1 day after the dye is given.

References
  1. ACT Investigators. Acetylcysteine for prevention of renal outcomes in patients undergoing coronary and peripheral vascular angiography: main results from the randomized Acetylcysteine for Contrast-induced nephropathy Trial (ACT). Circulation 2011; 124:12501259.
  2. Webb JG, Pate GE, Humphries KH, et al. A randomized controlled trial of intravenous N-acetylcysteine for the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy after cardiac catheterization: lack of effect. Am Heart J 2004; 148:422429.
  3. Tepel M, van der Giet M, Schwarzfeld C, Laufer U, Liermann D, Zidek W. Prevention of radiographic-contrast-agent-induced reductions in renal function by acetylcysteine. N Engl J Med 2000; 343:180184.
  4. Shyu KG, Cheng JJ, Kuan P. Acetylcysteine protects against acute renal damage in patients with abnormal renal function undergoing a coronary procedure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40:13831388.
  5. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Acute Kidney Injury Work Group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. Kidney Int 2012; 2(suppl 1):1138.
  6. Rihal CS, Textor SC, Grill DE, et al. Incidence and prognostic importance of acute renal failure after percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation 2002; 105:22592264.
  7. Baker CS, Wragg A, Kumar S, De Palma R, Baker LR, Knight CJ. A rapid protocol for the prevention of contrast-induced renal dysfunction: the RAPPID study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41:21142118.
  8. Marenzi G, Assanelli E, Marana I, et al. N-acetylcysteine and contrast-induced nephropathy in primary angioplasty. N Engl J Med 2006; 354:27732782.
  9. Gurm HS, Smith DE, Berwanger O, et al; BMC2 (Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium). Contemporary use and effectiveness of N-acetylcysteine in preventing contrast-induced nephropathy among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2012; 5:98104.
  10. Duong MH, MacKenzie TA, Malenka DJ. N-acetylcysteine prophylaxis significantly reduces the risk of radiocontrast-induced nephropathy: comprehensive meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005; 64:471479.
  11. Gonzales DA, Norsworthy KJ, Kern SJ, et al. A meta-analysis of N-acetylcysteine in contrast-induced nephrotoxicity: unsupervised clustering to resolve heterogeneity. BMC Med 2007; 5:32.
  12. Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Circulation 2011; 124:e574e651.
  13. Kanter MZ. Comparison of oral and i.v. acetylcysteine in the treatment of acetaminophen poisoning. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2006; 63:18211827.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Senthil K. Sivalingam, MD
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Baystate Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Springfield, MA

Mini V. Hariharan, MBBS
Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences, Puducherry, India

Gregory L. Braden, MD
Professor of Medicine, Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Baystate Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Springfield, MA

Benjamin J. Freda, DO
Assistant Professor of Medicine, Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Baystate Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Springfield, MA

Address: Benjamin J. Freda, DO, 300 Birnie Avenue, Suite 300, Springfield, MA 01108; e-mail benjamin.freda@bhs.org

Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 79(11)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
746-749
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Senthil K. Sivalingam, MD
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Baystate Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Springfield, MA

Mini V. Hariharan, MBBS
Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences, Puducherry, India

Gregory L. Braden, MD
Professor of Medicine, Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Baystate Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Springfield, MA

Benjamin J. Freda, DO
Assistant Professor of Medicine, Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Baystate Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Springfield, MA

Address: Benjamin J. Freda, DO, 300 Birnie Avenue, Suite 300, Springfield, MA 01108; e-mail benjamin.freda@bhs.org

Author and Disclosure Information

Senthil K. Sivalingam, MD
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Baystate Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Springfield, MA

Mini V. Hariharan, MBBS
Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences, Puducherry, India

Gregory L. Braden, MD
Professor of Medicine, Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Baystate Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Springfield, MA

Benjamin J. Freda, DO
Assistant Professor of Medicine, Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Baystate Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Springfield, MA

Address: Benjamin J. Freda, DO, 300 Birnie Avenue, Suite 300, Springfield, MA 01108; e-mail benjamin.freda@bhs.org

Article PDF
Article PDF

No. Using N-acetylcysteine (NAC) routinely to prevent contrast-induced acute kidney injury is not supported by the evidence at this time.1,2 However, there is evidence to suggest using it for patients at high risk, ie, those with significant baseline renal dysfunction.3,4

INCIDENCE AND IMPACT OF ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY

Intraarterial use of contrast is associated with a higher risk of acute kidney injury than intravenous use. Most studies of NAC for the prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury have focused on patients receiving contrast intraarterially. The reported rates of contrast-induced acute kidney injury also vary depending on how acute kidney injury was defined.

Although the incidence is low (1% to 2%) in patients with normal renal function, it can be as high as 25% in patients with renal impairment or a chronic condition such as diabetes or congestive heart failure, or in elderly patients.5

The development of acute kidney injury after percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with a longer hospital stay, a higher cost of care, and higher rates of morbidity and death.6

RATIONALE FOR USING N-ACETYLCYSTEINE

Contrast-induced acute kidney injury is thought to involve vasoconstriction and medullary ischemia mediated by reactive oxygen species.5 As an antioxidant and a scavenger of free radicals, NAC showed early promise in reducing the risk of this complication, but subsequent trials raised doubts about its efficacy. 1,2 In clinical practice, the drug is often used to prevent acute kidney injury because it is easy to give, cheap, and has few side effects. Recently, however, there have been suggestions that giving it intravenously may be associated with adverse effects that include anaphylactoid reactions.7

THE POSITIVE TRIALS

Tepel et al3 performed one of the earliest trials that found that NAC prevented contrast-induced acute kidney injury. The trial included 83 patients with stable chronic kidney disease (mean serum creatinine 2.4 mg/dL) who underwent computed tomography with about 75 mL of a nonionic, low-osmolality contrast agent. Participants were randomized to receive either NAC (600 mg orally twice daily) and 0.45% saline intravenously or placebo and saline. Acute kidney injury was defined as an increase of at least 0.5 mg/dL in the serum creatinine level 48 hours after the contrast dye was given.

The rate of acute kidney injury was significantly lower in the treatment group (2% vs 21%, P = .01). None of the patients who developed acute kidney injury needed hemodialysis.

Shyu et al4 studied 121 patients with chronic kidney disease (mean serum creatinine 2.8 mg/dL) who underwent a coronary procedure. Patients were randomized to receive NAC 400 mg orally twice daily or placebo in addition to 0.45% saline in both groups. Two (3.3%) of the 60 patients in the treated group and 15 (24.6%) of the 61 patients in the control group had an increase in creatinine concentration greater than 0.5 mg/dL at 48 hours (P < .001).

Both of these single-center studies were limited by small sample sizes and very short follow-up. Further, the impact of the drug on important clinical outcomes such as death and progression of chronic kidney disease was not reported.

Marenzi et al8 randomized 354 patients undergoing coronary angioplasty as the primary treatment for acute myocardial infarction to one of three treatment groups:

  • NAC in a standard dosage (a 600-mg intravenous bolus before the procedure and then 600 mg orally twice daily for 48 hours afterward)
  • NAC in a high dosage (a 1,200-mg intravenous bolus and then 1,200 mg orally twice daily for 48 hours)
  • Placebo.

The two treatment groups had significantly lower rates of acute kidney injury than the placebo group. In addition, the hospital mortality rate and the rate of a composite end point of death, need for renal replacement therapy, or need for mechanical ventilation were significantly lower in the treated groups. However, the number of events was small, and a beneficial effect on the death rate has not been confirmed by other studies.5

 

 

THE NEGATIVE TRIALS

Several studies found that NAC did not prevent contrast-induced acute kidney injury.1,2,9

The Acetylcysteine for Contrast-induced Nephropathy Trial (ACT), published in 2011,1 was the largest of these trials. It included 2,308 patients undergoing an angiographic procedure who had at least one risk factor for contrast-induced acute kidney injury (age > 70, renal failure, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, or hypotension). Patients were randomly assigned to receive the drug (1,200 mg by mouth) or placebo.

The incidence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury was 12.7% in the treated group and 12.7% in the control group (relative risk 1.00; 95% confidence interval 0.81–1.25; P = .97). The rate of a combined end point of death or need for dialysis at 30 days was also similar in both groups (2.2% with treatment vs 2.3% with placebo).

Importantly, only about 15% of patients had a baseline serum creatinine greater than 1.5 mg/dL. Of these, most had an estimated glomerular filtration rate between 45 and 60 mL/min. Indeed, most patients in the ACT were at low risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury. As a result, there were low event rates and, not surprisingly, no differences between the control and treatment groups.

Subgroup analysis did not suggest a benefit of treatment in those with a baseline serum creatinine greater than 1.5 mg/dL. However, as the authors pointed out, this subgroup was small, so definitive statistically powered conclusions cannot be drawn. There was no significant difference in the primary end point among several other predefined subgroups (age > 70, female sex, diabetes).1

The ACT differed from the “positive” study by Marenzi et al8 in several ways. The ACT patients were at lower risk, the coronary catheterizations were being done mainly for diagnosis rather than intervention, a lower volume of contrast dye was used (100 mL in the ACT vs 250 mL in the Marenzi study), and patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction were excluded. Other weaknesses of the ACT include use of a baseline serum creatinine within 3 months of study entry, variations in the hydration protocol, and the use of a high-osmolar contrast agent in some patients.

Webb et al2 found, in a large, randomized trial, that intravenous NAC did not prevent contrast-induced acute kidney injury. Patients with renal dysfunction (mean serum creatinine around 1.6 mg/dL) undergoing cardiac catheterization were randomly assigned to receive either NAC 500 mg or placebo immediately before the procedure. All patients first received isotonic saline 200 mL, then 1.5 mL/kg per hour for 6 hours, unless contraindicated. The study was terminated early because of a determination of futility.

Gurm et al9 found that a database of 90,578 consecutive patients undergoing nonemergency coronary angiography from 2006 to 2009 did not show differences in the rate of contrast-induced acute kidney injury between patients who received NAC and those who did not (5.5% vs 5.5%, P = .99). There was also no difference in the rate of death or the need for dialysis. These negative findings were consistent across many prespecified subgroups.

MIXED RESULTS IN META-ANALYSES

Results from meta-analyses have been mixed,10,11 mainly because of study heterogeneity (eg, baseline risk, end points, dose of the drug) and publication bias. None of the previous meta-analyses included the recent negative results from the ACT.

CURRENT GUIDELINES

After the publication of the ACT, the joint guidelines of the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association were updated, designating NAC as class III (no benefit) and level of evidence A.12

However, recently published guidelines from the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes Acute Kidney Injury Working Group recommend using the drug together with intravenous isotonic crystalloids in patients at high risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury, although the level of evidence is 2D (2 = suggestion, D = quality of evidence very low).5

WHAT WE RECOMMEND

The routine use of NAC to prevent contrast-induced acute kidney injury is not supported by the current evidence. However, clarification of its efficacy in high-risk patients is needed, especially those with baseline renal dysfunction and diabetes mellitus.

The Prevention of Serious Adverse Events Following Angiography (PRESERVE) study (ClinTrials.gov identifier NCT01467466) may clarify the role of this drug in a high-risk cohort using the important clinical outcomes of death, need for acute dialysis, or persistent decline in kidney function after angiography. This important study was set to begin in July 2012, with an anticipated enrollment of more than 8,000 patients who have glomerular filtration rates of 15 to 59 mL/min/1.73 m2.

In the meantime, we recommend the following in patients at high risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury:

  • Clarify whether contrast is truly needed
  • When possible, limit the volume of contrast, avoid repeated doses over a short time frame, and use an iso-osmolar or low-osmolar contrast agent
  • Discontinue nephrotoxic agents
  • Provide an evidence-based intravenous crystalloid regimen with isotonic sodium bicarbonate or saline
  • Although it is not strictly evidence-based, use NAC in patients with significant baseline renal dysfunction (glomerular filtration rate < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2), multiple concurrent risk factors such as hypotension, diabetes, preexisting kidney injury, or congestive heart failure that limits the use of intravenous fluids, or who need a high volume of contrast dye
  • Avoid using intravenous NAC, given its lack of benefit and risk of anaphylactoid reactions.7,13

We do not yet have clear evidence on the optimal dosing regimen. But based on the limited data, we recommend 600 to 1,200 mg twice a day for 1 day before and 1 day after the dye is given.

No. Using N-acetylcysteine (NAC) routinely to prevent contrast-induced acute kidney injury is not supported by the evidence at this time.1,2 However, there is evidence to suggest using it for patients at high risk, ie, those with significant baseline renal dysfunction.3,4

INCIDENCE AND IMPACT OF ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY

Intraarterial use of contrast is associated with a higher risk of acute kidney injury than intravenous use. Most studies of NAC for the prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury have focused on patients receiving contrast intraarterially. The reported rates of contrast-induced acute kidney injury also vary depending on how acute kidney injury was defined.

Although the incidence is low (1% to 2%) in patients with normal renal function, it can be as high as 25% in patients with renal impairment or a chronic condition such as diabetes or congestive heart failure, or in elderly patients.5

The development of acute kidney injury after percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with a longer hospital stay, a higher cost of care, and higher rates of morbidity and death.6

RATIONALE FOR USING N-ACETYLCYSTEINE

Contrast-induced acute kidney injury is thought to involve vasoconstriction and medullary ischemia mediated by reactive oxygen species.5 As an antioxidant and a scavenger of free radicals, NAC showed early promise in reducing the risk of this complication, but subsequent trials raised doubts about its efficacy. 1,2 In clinical practice, the drug is often used to prevent acute kidney injury because it is easy to give, cheap, and has few side effects. Recently, however, there have been suggestions that giving it intravenously may be associated with adverse effects that include anaphylactoid reactions.7

THE POSITIVE TRIALS

Tepel et al3 performed one of the earliest trials that found that NAC prevented contrast-induced acute kidney injury. The trial included 83 patients with stable chronic kidney disease (mean serum creatinine 2.4 mg/dL) who underwent computed tomography with about 75 mL of a nonionic, low-osmolality contrast agent. Participants were randomized to receive either NAC (600 mg orally twice daily) and 0.45% saline intravenously or placebo and saline. Acute kidney injury was defined as an increase of at least 0.5 mg/dL in the serum creatinine level 48 hours after the contrast dye was given.

The rate of acute kidney injury was significantly lower in the treatment group (2% vs 21%, P = .01). None of the patients who developed acute kidney injury needed hemodialysis.

Shyu et al4 studied 121 patients with chronic kidney disease (mean serum creatinine 2.8 mg/dL) who underwent a coronary procedure. Patients were randomized to receive NAC 400 mg orally twice daily or placebo in addition to 0.45% saline in both groups. Two (3.3%) of the 60 patients in the treated group and 15 (24.6%) of the 61 patients in the control group had an increase in creatinine concentration greater than 0.5 mg/dL at 48 hours (P < .001).

Both of these single-center studies were limited by small sample sizes and very short follow-up. Further, the impact of the drug on important clinical outcomes such as death and progression of chronic kidney disease was not reported.

Marenzi et al8 randomized 354 patients undergoing coronary angioplasty as the primary treatment for acute myocardial infarction to one of three treatment groups:

  • NAC in a standard dosage (a 600-mg intravenous bolus before the procedure and then 600 mg orally twice daily for 48 hours afterward)
  • NAC in a high dosage (a 1,200-mg intravenous bolus and then 1,200 mg orally twice daily for 48 hours)
  • Placebo.

The two treatment groups had significantly lower rates of acute kidney injury than the placebo group. In addition, the hospital mortality rate and the rate of a composite end point of death, need for renal replacement therapy, or need for mechanical ventilation were significantly lower in the treated groups. However, the number of events was small, and a beneficial effect on the death rate has not been confirmed by other studies.5

 

 

THE NEGATIVE TRIALS

Several studies found that NAC did not prevent contrast-induced acute kidney injury.1,2,9

The Acetylcysteine for Contrast-induced Nephropathy Trial (ACT), published in 2011,1 was the largest of these trials. It included 2,308 patients undergoing an angiographic procedure who had at least one risk factor for contrast-induced acute kidney injury (age > 70, renal failure, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, or hypotension). Patients were randomly assigned to receive the drug (1,200 mg by mouth) or placebo.

The incidence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury was 12.7% in the treated group and 12.7% in the control group (relative risk 1.00; 95% confidence interval 0.81–1.25; P = .97). The rate of a combined end point of death or need for dialysis at 30 days was also similar in both groups (2.2% with treatment vs 2.3% with placebo).

Importantly, only about 15% of patients had a baseline serum creatinine greater than 1.5 mg/dL. Of these, most had an estimated glomerular filtration rate between 45 and 60 mL/min. Indeed, most patients in the ACT were at low risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury. As a result, there were low event rates and, not surprisingly, no differences between the control and treatment groups.

Subgroup analysis did not suggest a benefit of treatment in those with a baseline serum creatinine greater than 1.5 mg/dL. However, as the authors pointed out, this subgroup was small, so definitive statistically powered conclusions cannot be drawn. There was no significant difference in the primary end point among several other predefined subgroups (age > 70, female sex, diabetes).1

The ACT differed from the “positive” study by Marenzi et al8 in several ways. The ACT patients were at lower risk, the coronary catheterizations were being done mainly for diagnosis rather than intervention, a lower volume of contrast dye was used (100 mL in the ACT vs 250 mL in the Marenzi study), and patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction were excluded. Other weaknesses of the ACT include use of a baseline serum creatinine within 3 months of study entry, variations in the hydration protocol, and the use of a high-osmolar contrast agent in some patients.

Webb et al2 found, in a large, randomized trial, that intravenous NAC did not prevent contrast-induced acute kidney injury. Patients with renal dysfunction (mean serum creatinine around 1.6 mg/dL) undergoing cardiac catheterization were randomly assigned to receive either NAC 500 mg or placebo immediately before the procedure. All patients first received isotonic saline 200 mL, then 1.5 mL/kg per hour for 6 hours, unless contraindicated. The study was terminated early because of a determination of futility.

Gurm et al9 found that a database of 90,578 consecutive patients undergoing nonemergency coronary angiography from 2006 to 2009 did not show differences in the rate of contrast-induced acute kidney injury between patients who received NAC and those who did not (5.5% vs 5.5%, P = .99). There was also no difference in the rate of death or the need for dialysis. These negative findings were consistent across many prespecified subgroups.

MIXED RESULTS IN META-ANALYSES

Results from meta-analyses have been mixed,10,11 mainly because of study heterogeneity (eg, baseline risk, end points, dose of the drug) and publication bias. None of the previous meta-analyses included the recent negative results from the ACT.

CURRENT GUIDELINES

After the publication of the ACT, the joint guidelines of the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association were updated, designating NAC as class III (no benefit) and level of evidence A.12

However, recently published guidelines from the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes Acute Kidney Injury Working Group recommend using the drug together with intravenous isotonic crystalloids in patients at high risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury, although the level of evidence is 2D (2 = suggestion, D = quality of evidence very low).5

WHAT WE RECOMMEND

The routine use of NAC to prevent contrast-induced acute kidney injury is not supported by the current evidence. However, clarification of its efficacy in high-risk patients is needed, especially those with baseline renal dysfunction and diabetes mellitus.

The Prevention of Serious Adverse Events Following Angiography (PRESERVE) study (ClinTrials.gov identifier NCT01467466) may clarify the role of this drug in a high-risk cohort using the important clinical outcomes of death, need for acute dialysis, or persistent decline in kidney function after angiography. This important study was set to begin in July 2012, with an anticipated enrollment of more than 8,000 patients who have glomerular filtration rates of 15 to 59 mL/min/1.73 m2.

In the meantime, we recommend the following in patients at high risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury:

  • Clarify whether contrast is truly needed
  • When possible, limit the volume of contrast, avoid repeated doses over a short time frame, and use an iso-osmolar or low-osmolar contrast agent
  • Discontinue nephrotoxic agents
  • Provide an evidence-based intravenous crystalloid regimen with isotonic sodium bicarbonate or saline
  • Although it is not strictly evidence-based, use NAC in patients with significant baseline renal dysfunction (glomerular filtration rate < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2), multiple concurrent risk factors such as hypotension, diabetes, preexisting kidney injury, or congestive heart failure that limits the use of intravenous fluids, or who need a high volume of contrast dye
  • Avoid using intravenous NAC, given its lack of benefit and risk of anaphylactoid reactions.7,13

We do not yet have clear evidence on the optimal dosing regimen. But based on the limited data, we recommend 600 to 1,200 mg twice a day for 1 day before and 1 day after the dye is given.

References
  1. ACT Investigators. Acetylcysteine for prevention of renal outcomes in patients undergoing coronary and peripheral vascular angiography: main results from the randomized Acetylcysteine for Contrast-induced nephropathy Trial (ACT). Circulation 2011; 124:12501259.
  2. Webb JG, Pate GE, Humphries KH, et al. A randomized controlled trial of intravenous N-acetylcysteine for the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy after cardiac catheterization: lack of effect. Am Heart J 2004; 148:422429.
  3. Tepel M, van der Giet M, Schwarzfeld C, Laufer U, Liermann D, Zidek W. Prevention of radiographic-contrast-agent-induced reductions in renal function by acetylcysteine. N Engl J Med 2000; 343:180184.
  4. Shyu KG, Cheng JJ, Kuan P. Acetylcysteine protects against acute renal damage in patients with abnormal renal function undergoing a coronary procedure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40:13831388.
  5. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Acute Kidney Injury Work Group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. Kidney Int 2012; 2(suppl 1):1138.
  6. Rihal CS, Textor SC, Grill DE, et al. Incidence and prognostic importance of acute renal failure after percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation 2002; 105:22592264.
  7. Baker CS, Wragg A, Kumar S, De Palma R, Baker LR, Knight CJ. A rapid protocol for the prevention of contrast-induced renal dysfunction: the RAPPID study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41:21142118.
  8. Marenzi G, Assanelli E, Marana I, et al. N-acetylcysteine and contrast-induced nephropathy in primary angioplasty. N Engl J Med 2006; 354:27732782.
  9. Gurm HS, Smith DE, Berwanger O, et al; BMC2 (Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium). Contemporary use and effectiveness of N-acetylcysteine in preventing contrast-induced nephropathy among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2012; 5:98104.
  10. Duong MH, MacKenzie TA, Malenka DJ. N-acetylcysteine prophylaxis significantly reduces the risk of radiocontrast-induced nephropathy: comprehensive meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005; 64:471479.
  11. Gonzales DA, Norsworthy KJ, Kern SJ, et al. A meta-analysis of N-acetylcysteine in contrast-induced nephrotoxicity: unsupervised clustering to resolve heterogeneity. BMC Med 2007; 5:32.
  12. Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Circulation 2011; 124:e574e651.
  13. Kanter MZ. Comparison of oral and i.v. acetylcysteine in the treatment of acetaminophen poisoning. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2006; 63:18211827.
References
  1. ACT Investigators. Acetylcysteine for prevention of renal outcomes in patients undergoing coronary and peripheral vascular angiography: main results from the randomized Acetylcysteine for Contrast-induced nephropathy Trial (ACT). Circulation 2011; 124:12501259.
  2. Webb JG, Pate GE, Humphries KH, et al. A randomized controlled trial of intravenous N-acetylcysteine for the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy after cardiac catheterization: lack of effect. Am Heart J 2004; 148:422429.
  3. Tepel M, van der Giet M, Schwarzfeld C, Laufer U, Liermann D, Zidek W. Prevention of radiographic-contrast-agent-induced reductions in renal function by acetylcysteine. N Engl J Med 2000; 343:180184.
  4. Shyu KG, Cheng JJ, Kuan P. Acetylcysteine protects against acute renal damage in patients with abnormal renal function undergoing a coronary procedure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40:13831388.
  5. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Acute Kidney Injury Work Group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. Kidney Int 2012; 2(suppl 1):1138.
  6. Rihal CS, Textor SC, Grill DE, et al. Incidence and prognostic importance of acute renal failure after percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation 2002; 105:22592264.
  7. Baker CS, Wragg A, Kumar S, De Palma R, Baker LR, Knight CJ. A rapid protocol for the prevention of contrast-induced renal dysfunction: the RAPPID study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41:21142118.
  8. Marenzi G, Assanelli E, Marana I, et al. N-acetylcysteine and contrast-induced nephropathy in primary angioplasty. N Engl J Med 2006; 354:27732782.
  9. Gurm HS, Smith DE, Berwanger O, et al; BMC2 (Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium). Contemporary use and effectiveness of N-acetylcysteine in preventing contrast-induced nephropathy among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2012; 5:98104.
  10. Duong MH, MacKenzie TA, Malenka DJ. N-acetylcysteine prophylaxis significantly reduces the risk of radiocontrast-induced nephropathy: comprehensive meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005; 64:471479.
  11. Gonzales DA, Norsworthy KJ, Kern SJ, et al. A meta-analysis of N-acetylcysteine in contrast-induced nephrotoxicity: unsupervised clustering to resolve heterogeneity. BMC Med 2007; 5:32.
  12. Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Circulation 2011; 124:e574e651.
  13. Kanter MZ. Comparison of oral and i.v. acetylcysteine in the treatment of acetaminophen poisoning. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2006; 63:18211827.
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 79(11)
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 79(11)
Page Number
746-749
Page Number
746-749
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Should N-acetylcysteine be used routinely to prevent contrast-induced acute kidney injury?
Display Headline
Should N-acetylcysteine be used routinely to prevent contrast-induced acute kidney injury?
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Article PDF Media

Management of hyponatremia: Providing treatment and avoiding harm

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 01/18/2018 - 08:25
Display Headline
Management of hyponatremia: Providing treatment and avoiding harm

Hyponatremia, defined as a serum sodium concentration below 135 mmol/L, is one of the most frequently encountered electrolyte disorders. In 1981, Flear et al1 reported that 15% of their hospitalized patients had plasma sodium concentrations lower than 134 mmol/L, the cutoff they were using at that time.

Hyponatremia is sometimes merely a laboratory artifact or a result of improper blood collection. If real, it can be due to excessive water intake or, most often, the inability of the kidney to excrete water coupled with continued water intake. Patients with significant underlying cardiac, hepatic, or renal dysfunction are at greatest risk of developing hyponatremia, secondary to the nonosmotic release of antidiuretic hormone (ADH). Others at risk include postoperative patients (especially menstruating women), older patients on thiazide diuretics, patients with malignant or psychiatric illness, and endurance athletes.

In this article, we review the treatment of acute and chronic hyponatremia, emphasizing the importance of basing the therapy on the severity of symptoms and taking care not to raise the serum sodium level too rapidly, which can cause neurologic dysfunction.

Guidelines for managing hyponatremia2 are based mostly on retrospective studies and expert opinion, since few prospective studies have been done. Despite the paucity of evidence-based recommendations, we will attempt to incorporate findings from important human and animal studies and consensus guidelines from expert panels. We will focus initially on the critical diagnostic considerations necessary to initiate treatment.

SYMPTOMATIC VS ASYMPTOMATIC

Subsequent sections will address therapeutic approaches in two clinical settings:

Symptomatic hyponatremia, ie, with severe signs or symptoms of cerebral edema—a medical emergency; and

Asymptomatic hyponatremia, ie, without serious signs or symptoms of cerebral edema.

KEY DIAGNOSTIC STEPS WHEN STARTING TREATMENT

The treatment of hyponatremia begins by confirming a truly hypo-osmolar state, assessing its clinical significance, and determining its cause (Table 1).

The clinical and laboratory evaluations form the foundation of a proper approach to any patient with hyponatremia. The rationale behind making several important diagnostic distinctions will be discussed here briefly and then expanded on in the remaining text. The reader is referred to another review on the diagnostic evaluation of hyponatremia.3

Confirm that the patient truly has hypo-osmolar hyponatremia

The serum osmolality should be measured to confirm that it is low (ie, < 275 mOsm/kg). In addition, the arterial serum sodium concentration can be measured using a blood gas device if pseudohyponatremia (see below) is suspected. This method uses direct potentiometry and bypasses the dilutional step in the processing of venous samples.4

Rationale. The clinical consequences of hyponatremia are due to water moving from hypo-osmolar extracellular fluid into the relatively hyperosmolar interior of the cell. This water movement can cause progressive cerebral edema, resulting in a spectrum of signs and symptoms from headache and ataxia to seizures and coma. But significant fluid shifts and cerebral edema occur only if the extracellular fluid is hypo-osmolar relative to the intracellular fluid.

In fact, hyponatremia can occur in several situations in which the extracellular fluid is not hypo-osmolar. An increase in effective plasma osmoles (substances in the extracellular fluid that do not readily move across the plasma membrane) can cause water to move out of cells, resulting in translocational hyponatremia. This may be seen in hyperglycemia or when mannitol or contrast dye has been given. In these situations, the plasma is either isotonic or even hypertonic to the intracellular fluid, resulting in no movement of water into the cells and therefore no clinical consequences relating to the hyponatremia. Importantly, no therapy is required for the hyponatremia.

Other situations in which hyponatremia is present but not associated with true hypotonicity include states of excess protein or lipid in the blood (pseudohyponatremia). Also, if an infusion of hypotonic fluid is running, clinicians must be sure that blood samples are not drawn proximally in the same vein.

Are there significant signs or symptoms of cerebral edema?

Hyponatremia can cause brain swelling within the confined space of the skull as water shifts from the extracellular fluid into the cells. Depending on underlying risk factors (Table 2)5 and the severity and duration of hyponatremia (see below), this may result in signs or symptoms of cerebral edema, including visual changes, focal neurologic changes, encephalopathy, respiratory depression, and seizures. Ultimately, brain herniation can occur.

Patients need to be assessed quickly because those with serious neurologic signs or symptoms thought to be related to hyponatremia require urgent treatment with hypertonic saline to increase the serum sodium concentration, regardless of the underlying volume status, the cause of hyponatremia, or the time of onset.

 

 

Determine the duration of hyponatremia

One should try to ascertain when the hyponatremia started, as its duration is important in determining the proper pace of correction.

Figure 1.
The brain begins to adapt to hyponatremia within minutes, and the cerebral adaptation is maximal within 2 to 3 days (Figure 1).6

At the onset of hyponatremia, water moves from the extracellular fluid into cells, pulled in by osmosis. The brain can decrease the net amount of water entering into the neurons (and thus regulate its volume) by increasing the flow of water from the interstitium into the cerebrospinal fluid via increased interstitial hydraulic pressure.7

Over the next several days, inorganic solutes (eg, potassium and sodium salts) and various organic solutes are transported out of the cells. In patients in whom this process has had time to occur, treatment of hyponatremia with hypertonic fluids raises the plasma osmolality faster than the cells can recapture the previously transported osmoles. In this situation, overly rapid correction can cause excessive loss of intracellular water, resulting in cell shrinkage and osmotic demyelination syndrome. Osmotic demyelination usually presents during treatment of hyponatremia after an initial improvement in mental status, with worsening neurologic function and various neurologic signs, including paresis and ultimately even death.6

In patients with acute-onset hyponatremia (ie, with onset within the past 48 hours), in whom the above cerebral adaptations have not had time to occur completely, rapid correction is unlikely to result in osmotic demyelination.

In view of the serious risk of osmotic demyelination, if the timing of development of hyponatremia cannot be determined, one should assume it is chronic (> 48 hours) and avoid rapid overcorrection (see discussion below on the rate of correction).

On the other hand, patients who have severe neurologic signs or symptoms initially need their serum sodium increased urgently to safer levels, regardless of the timing of onset (see below for suggested approach). Subsequent treatment of hyponatremia—after the serum sodium level has been raised enough to reverse neurologic symptoms—will be influenced by the duration of the hyponatremia, with careful avoidance of overly rapid correction, especially in patients with chronic hyponatremia.

Assess the patient’s volume status to determine the proper initial treatment

In patients with hypo-osmolar hyponatremia who do not need urgent therapy with hypertonic saline, the initial treatment is based on clinical and laboratory assessment of extracellular fluid volume status, including spot urine sodium measurement (Table 3).3 This will be discussed further below.

Check urine osmolality to assess for hyponatremic states in which urinary dilution is intact

Measuring urine osmolality is useful in ascertaining whether hyponatremic patients are making appropriately dilute urine (< 100 mOsm/kg). If they are, the cause of the hyponatremia may be excessive water intake, a reset osmostat, or low solute intake. In addition, patients with hypovolemic hyponatremia may have appropriately dilute urine soon after treatment with isotonic intravenous fluids.

The serum sodium concentration often returns to normal if the underlying cause is eliminated (eg, if excessive fluid intake is stopped). If there are no serious signs or symptoms, this can usually be accomplished without additional therapy with intravenous fluids or medications, thereby avoiding the risk of overcorrection.

Search for causes of rapidly correctable hyponatremia

If hyponatremia is due to one of several important underlying causes, it may reverse rapidly once the underlying cause has been eliminated (Table 4). Examples: restricting water intake in patients with psychogenic polydipsia, discontinuing thiazide diuretics, replenishing depleted fluid volume, stopping desmopressin (DDAVP), and giving glucocorticoid replacement to those who are glucocorticoid-deficient.

TREATING HYPONATREMIC PATIENTS WITH SERIOUS SIGNS OR SYMPTOMS

Patients with hypo-osmolar hyponatremia and serious signs or symptoms of cerebral edema (lethargy, respiratory depression, seizures) need rapid initial correction of the serum sodium level, as this is a true medical emergency.

Certain patients are at greater risk of developing cerebral edema from hyponatremia (Table 2).

On the other hand, patients with chronic hyponatremia are very unlikely to present with signs or symptoms of cerebral edema. In fact, in a patient with chronic hyponatremia, care must be taken to avoid overcorrection beyond that needed to reverse severe signs and symptoms. In the rare case in which a patient with chronic hyponatremia presents with signs or symptoms of cerebral edema, the hypertonic saline infusion must be stopped as soon as the signs or symptoms have resolved. Further rapid changes in serum sodium must be avoided.

During correction of hyponatremia, some patients are at particularly high risk of osmotic demyelination syndrome secondary to underlying abnormalities in cerebral osmotic regulation. These include patients with alcoholism, malnutrition, hypokalemia, and burns, and elderly women on thiazide diuretics.8 These patients should be monitored vigilantly for overly rapid correction during treatment.

INITIAL TREATMENT: REVERSE CEREBRAL EDEMA WITH 3% SALINE

The goal of the initial, rapid phase of correction is to reverse cerebral edema.

Patients with serious signs or symptoms should receive hypertonic (3%) saline at a rate of about 1 mL/kg/hour for the first several hours.8 Those with concomitant hypervolemia (as in congestive heart failure) or underlying cardiovascular disease should also receive a loop diuretic to aid in free-water excretion and to prevent volume overload from the saline infusion. This regimen usually raises the serum sodium concentration enough (usually by about 1 mmol/L/hour) to decrease cerebral edema and improve symptoms.

In patients having active seizures or showing signs of brain herniation, 3% saline can be given initially at a higher rate of about 2 to 3 mL/kg/hour over the first few hours. An alternative approach is an initial 50-mL bolus of 3% saline and an additional 200 mL given over the subsequent 4 to 6 hours.9

No study has compared the efficacy and safety of these approaches, and clinicians should always monitor extracellular fluid volume status, neurologic status, and serum sodium levels closely in any patient treated with hypertonic saline.

After severe signs and symptoms have resolved, 3% saline is promptly discontinued and appropriate therapy is initiated based on the patient’s volume status and underlying cause of hyponatremia (see discussion below).

 

 

NEXT, FIND THE APPROPRIATE RATE OF CORRECTION

After the initial serious signs or symptoms have been addressed with hypertonic saline, management should focus on limiting the rate of correction in patients with chronic hyponatremia or hyponatremia of unknown duration.

Animal studies and retrospective human studies have suggested certain guidelines on the appropriate pace and magnitude of correction during treatment of hyponatremia to avoid osmotic demyelination syndrome.2

Clinicians must not attempt to correct the serum sodium to “normal” values. Although patients with acute hyponatremia may tolerate complete correction, there is little evidence that raising the serum sodium concentration acutely by more than 5 to 8 mmol/L is advantageous. Therefore, correction should be judicious in all patients.

Appropriate rates of correction

A recent expert consensus panel suggested that the serum sodium level be raised by no more than 10 to 12 mmol/L during the first 24 hours of treatment, and by less than 18 mmol/L over 48 hours.2

Patients with chronic hyponatremia and signs or symptoms of cerebral edema should have their sodium level raised at an even slower rate—some recommend less than 10 mmol/L in the first 24 hours.10 Aggressive initial correction at the rate of 1.5 to 2 mmol/hour for the first 3 to 4 hours with 3% saline is indicated until serious symptoms (seizure, obtundation) resolve, but correction beyond 10 to 12 mmol/L in the first 24 hours should be avoided. Hypertonic saline therapy should usually be discontinued well before the serum sodium level has risen this much, to avoid a continuing rise in the sodium level after the infusion has stopped.

While hypertonic saline is being infused, serum sodium levels should be checked every 1 to 2 hours. In a study in 56 patients with severe hyponatremia (serum sodium ≤ 105 mmol/L),11 no neurologic complications were observed in patients with chronic hyponatremia whose serum sodium was corrected by less than 12 mmol/L in 24 hours or by less than 18 mmol/L in 48 hours or in whom the average rate of correction to a serum sodium of 120 mmol/L was less than or equal to 0.55 mmol/L per hour.

If the serum sodium concentration has been overcorrected

Desmopressin is effective in preventing and reversing inadvertent overcorrection of hyponatremia. 12 In one study, desmopressin lowered the sodium concentration by 2 to 9 mmol/L in 14 of 20 patients. None of the patients developed any serious adverse consequences.

In addition, intravenous water (dextrose 5%) can be given alone or in combination with desmopressin to prevent or reverse an excessive increase in serum sodium.13 Such therapy may be considered in patients who continue to excrete hypotonic urine and have already reached a serum sodium concentration that meets or exceeds the recommended rate or magnitude of change.

Formulas for estimating the rate of correction

Various formulas have been devised for estimating the change in serum sodium concentration during treatment of hyponatremia.14

The Adrogué-Madias formula, one of the most commonly used, gives an estimate of how much the serum sodium concentration will rise when 1 L of various intravenous fluids is given (Table 5).15 This formula also accounts for the increase in serum sodium that takes place during concomitant correction of hypokalemia with potassium. Recently, however, a retrospective study16 found that this formula underestimated the change in serum sodium in 23 (74.2%) of 31 patients with hyponatremia treated with hypertonic saline.

An alternative is the Barsoum-Levine equation, which takes into account ongoing urinary losses. Although it is more cumbersome to calculate, it may be more precise.17

Alternatively, in patients without hypovolemia, the clinician can calculate the amount of urinary excretion of free water required to achieve a specific target serum sodium and then measure hourly urinary water excretion during aquaresis induced by furosemide (Lasix).8 Although more physiologic, this method can be clinically cumbersome, requiring timely handling of urine specimens, accurate recording of urine output, and rapid reporting of laboratory results.

Ultimately, these methods serve only as estimates of the change in serum sodium and do not replace careful monitoring of electrolytes (every 1 to 2 hours during acute therapy) and fastidious assessment for clinical signs or symptoms of osmotic demyelination syndrome.

PATIENTS WITH HYPONATREMIA AND NO SERIOUS SIGNS OR SYMPTOMS

General approach

Hyponatremic patients without serious signs or symptoms of cerebral edema do not require urgent therapy to raise the serum sodium.

Patients with chronic asymptomatic hyponatremia are commonly encountered in clinical practice. As a result of cerebral adaptation, they can appear to have no symptoms despite serum sodium levels as low as 115 to 120 mmol/L. However, even if they have no serious signs or symptoms of cerebral edema, some patients may complain of fatigue, lethargy, nausea, gait abnormalities, and muscle cramps and have evidence of milder forms of neurocognitive impairment.18

In a recent case-control study,18 elderly patients with chronic hyponatremia (mean serum sodium concentration 126 ± 5 mmol/L) were more likely to present to the hospital with falls compared with age-matched controls. Further analysis suggested these patients had marked impairments in gait and attention, which improved in some as the serum sodium increased.

Another recent study19 reported that mild hyponatremia (mean serum sodium concentration 132 mmol/L) was independently associated with the risk of fracture, even after adjustment for known osteoporotic risk factors.

Even when there is no need for acute therapy to raise the serum sodium level, the clinician should scrutinize the medical regimen and available clinical data to rule out reversible causes of water excess. These may include ongoing administration of hypotonic fluids (eg, parenteral nutrition or dextrose 5% to “keep the vein open”) or of medications that cause inappropriate release of ADH (eg, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors) or that impair water excretion (eg, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs). The clinician should also search for an underlying diagnosis that predisposes to water retention, such as hypothyroidism, adrenal insufficiency, congestive heart failure, or hepatic or renal failure. If hyponatremia is due to endocrine disease, correction of hypothyroidism or adrenal insufficiency should result in water excretion and improvement in the serum sodium.

If the cause of the hyponatremia is not immediately apparent, treatment can be started on the basis of assessment of the patient’s extracellular fluid volume status using clinical examination and supplementary laboratory data such as the serum uric acid concentration and urinary sodium concentration.3 Table 3 outlines general treatment options for hypoosmolar hyponatremia according to extracellular fluid volume status.

Of note, physical examination alone has poor sensitivity and specificity in assessing extracellular fluid volume status in patients with hyponatremia.20,21 This highlights the importance of spot measurements of urine sodium and serum uric acid and, when appropriate, isotonic intravenous saline challenge to detect occult hypovolemia.

In general, patients with euvolemia are treated with fluid restriction, and patients with hypovolemia are given isotonic saline. Patients with hypervolemia can be difficult to treat, but in general they are prescribed both sodium and fluid restriction. Loop diuretics can be given to promote excretion of water and sodium. Thiazide diuretics are avoided, as they impair urinary dilution and worsen hyponatremia. Attempts should be made to optimize the treatment of the underlying hypervolemic disorder (congestive heart failure, cirrhosis, advanced renal failure). Vasopressin receptor antagonists can also be used in selected cases of hypervolemic or euvolemic hyponatremia (see discussion below).

 

 

How to prescribe fluid restriction rationally

Ideally, patients should not ingest any more fluid than they can excrete in urine and insensible losses—otherwise, the serum sodium can continue to decrease.

Water excretion can be estimated from solute intake and urine osmolarity. In theory, a 70-kg person with a typical daily solute intake of about 10 mOsm/kg and intact urinary dilution to a urine osmolarity of 50 mOsm/L can excrete up to 14 L of urine (700 mOsm/50 mOsm/L) per day. However, a patient with the syndrome of inappropriate ADH secretion (SIADH) and a fixed urine osmolality of 700 mOsm/kg would excrete a similar solute load in only 1 L of urine. Thus, any fluid intake in excess of this volume could worsen hyponatremia.

To excrete free water, urinary sodium plus urinary potassium must be less than the serum sodium concentration. In this regard, the necessary degree of fluid restriction can also be estimated made on the basis of the patient’s urinary electrolytes.22

Increased solute intake to augment water excretion

In patients without hypervolemia, solute intake can be increased to augment water excretion. 22 This can be achieved with salt tablets or oral urea. Although urea can be effective, it is not commonly used because it is not available the United States and it has poor gastrointestinal tolerability. In patients whose nutritional intake is limited and who continue to ingest fluids (such as, for example, an elderly patient subsisting on tea and toast) every effort should be made to increase solute intake with high-protein foods or supplements.

DRUGS TO INHIBIT VASOPRESSIN

Unfortunately, patients often do not adhere to these strategies, as fluid restriction and unpalatable salt tablets or urea can become too burdensome. In such instances, pharmacologic inhibition of vasopressin-mediated water reabsorption can be considered using the following agents.

Demeclocycline (Declomycin) and lithium inhibit the kidney’s response to vasopressin. Because lithium may be nephrotoxic and has unwanted effects on the central nervous system, demeclocycline has become the preferred agent. Given in doses of 300 to 600 mg twice daily, demeclocycline promotes free water excretion, but often takes 1 to 2 weeks of therapy to begin working.

Renal failure due to demeclocycline has been reported in patients with concomitant liver disease.23 Demeclocycline can also cause photosensitivity and is contraindicated in children and pregnant women due to abnormalities in bone and enamel formation. In addition, it can be expensive and may not be covered fully by some prescription plans.

Vasopressin receptor antagonists (‘vaptans’)

ADH, also called vasopressin, interacts with various receptor subtypes, including V1a (causing vasoconstriction, platelet aggregation, inotropic stimulation, myocardial protein synthesis), V1b (causing secretion of adrenocorticotropic hormone), and V2 (causing water reabsorption and release of von Willebrand factor and factor VIII).

Drugs that block V2 receptors in the renal tubule increase water excretion, making them attractive as therapy for some hyponatremic states (Table 6).24,25 These drugs exert their aquaretic effect by causing a decrease in transcription and insertion of aquaporin-2 channels (“water pores”) into the apical collecting duct membrane. As a result, the water permeability of the collecting duct is decreased even in the presence of circulating ADH.

Conivaptan (Vaprisol) is a combined V1a-V2 antagonist that has been approved for the treatment of euvolemic and hypervolemic hyponatremia. Conivaptan inhibits the cytochrome P450 3A4 system and thus may interact with other drugs; therefore, its use has been limited to no more than 4 days of intravenous administration in the hospital setting. The recommended dosage is an initial 20-mg infusion over 30 minutes, followed by continuous infusions of 20 to 40 mg/day. Dosing adjustments in renal and hepatic impairment have not been well defined.

Tolvaptan (Samsca) is an oral selective V2 antagonist that has been studied in patients with euvolemic and hypervolemic hyponatremia. 26 Studies have included patients with congestive heart failure, cirrhosis, and SIADH. Although tolvaptan has not been shown to reduce rates of rehospitalization or death in congestive heart failure, it improves serum sodium, overall fluid balance, and congestive symptoms.27 Tolvaptan has recently been approved for the treatment of euvolemic and hypervolemic hyponatremia.

A recent study has confirmed the longterm efficacy of tolvaptan in 111 patients over a mean duration of treatment greater than 700 days.28 While the clinical benefits of chronic tolvaptan therapy have yet to be clearly demonstrated, this study shows that tolvaptan therapy can result in a sustained improvement in serum sodium concentration without an unacceptable increase in adverse events.29

Lixivaptan (VPA-985), another oral selective V2 receptor antagonist, is being studied in patients with euvolemic and hypervolemic hyponatremia.

Current role of vasopressin antagonists

Current studies of vasopressin antagonists in the treatment of hyponatremia are promising, though definite recommendations are needed to ensure slow, careful correction of hyponatremia. Most studies suggest that these agents provide slow, reliable increases in serum sodium. In one large study of patients with congestive heart failure, serum sodium rose by more than 12 mmol/L in 24 hours in fewer than 2% of patients.26

Notably, no cases of osmotic demyelination syndrome have been reported in these studies. However, it should be noted that therapy was started in the hospital with close monitoring of serum sodium levels and discontinuation of fluid restriction; the incidence of overly rapid correction of sodium may be higher outside of carefully done clinical studies. Clinicians should adopt monitoring strategies similar to those used in these rigorous studies.

At present, there is little experience with vasopressin antagonists in hyponatremic patients with serious signs or symptoms of cerebral edema, and most clinicians still view 3% saline as the gold standard for these patients.

Vasopressin antagonists should not be used in patients with hypovolemic hyponatremia, due to concerns about V1a blockade causing hypotension and about V2 blockade producing water excretion and a worsening of the volume-depleted state.

Recent clinical trials have reported that patients often experience increased thirst while taking these agents. This highlights the need to monitor serum sodium during treatment.

These agents are expensive. Tolvaptan costs about $250 per tablet; conivaptan, which is administered intravenously, may cost a little more per treatment course.

 

 

THERAPY IN SPECIFIC DISEASE STATES

Patients with hyponatremia and cirrhosis

The focus of treatment remains water and salt restriction and judicious use of loop diuretics and aldosterone antagonists such as spironolactone (Aldactone).

Tolvaptan has been effective at raising the serum sodium level in patients with cirrhosis, 26 while conivaptan should be avoided at present because of vasodilation from V1a receptor antagonism and its potential effects on systemic hemodynamics and risk of variceal bleeding.30

As the severity of cirrhosis increases, the only effective treatment of hyponatremia is liver transplantation.

Patients with SIADH

In most cases, water restriction is the mainstay of therapy. Adequate nutritional intake should also be stressed so that enough solute is available for ongoing water excretion. Although fluid restriction is usually effective, many patients cannot adhere to the level of restriction required.

In cases in which fluid restriction is not effective on its own, demeclocyline can be used to antagonize ADH action and increase water excretion. Sodium tablets and loop diuretics can also be used, taking care to avoid hypovolemia from diuretic-induced sodium losses. The use of tolvaptan in patients with SIADH has resulted in short-term increases in serum sodium.26 A recent study has suggested that this effect can be sustained with longer-term treatment,28 but further studies are needed to show a complementary clinical benefit (eg, improved neurocognition) to guide the use of these costly agents in clinical practice.

Patients with diuretic-induced hyponatremia

Thiazide diuretics should be discontinued and hypovolemia and hypokalemia should be corrected with isotonic saline and potassium supplementation. As the hypokalemia is corrected and the diuretic effect and hypovolemic stimulus to ADH dissipates, water excretion can increase rapidly, resulting in a brisk change in serum sodium.

Serum sodium levels should be closely monitored during therapy to avoid overcorrection. For this reason, use of hypertonic saline should generally be avoided. Hypotonic fluid— eg, half-normal (0.45%) or quarter-normal (0.22%) saline or even desmopressin—may become necessary in the later stages of therapy to avoid overly rapid correction.

Patients with exercise-associated hyponatremia

Patients at highest risk of exercise-associated hyponatremia include those who drink too much fluid during a long-distance race, who have low body weight, who are female, who exercise longer than 4 hours, and who use nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.31 The cause of hyponatremia is likely multifactorial, with excessive water intake coupled with sodium losses and impaired renal excretion of water due to ADH action and impaired renal dilution. To prevent exercise-associated hyponatremia, fluid intake should be limited to 400 to 800 mL/hour, with the higher end recommended for larger athletes and hotter climates.

Consensus recommendations suggest that most patients with mild hyponatremia (serum sodium 130 to 135 mmol/L) should be treated with fluid restriction and clinical observation, as spontaneous water diuresis leads to improvement in the serum sodium level. Importantly, the reflex to provide isotonic saline infusions should be avoided unless clear signs of volume depletion are present. Intravenous saline has the potential to worsen hyponatremia in the presence of ADH. In addition, some athletes will have retained water in the gastrointestinal tract that may be mobilized after the race, resulting in worsening of hyponatremia.32

In athletes with severe hyponatremia (serum sodium < 120 mmol/L) or symptomatic exercise-associated hyponatremia (lethargy, respiratory depression, seizures), hypertonic saline is the treatment of choice. One protocol suggests giving 100 mL of 3% saline over 10 minutes in the field, followed by prompt transportation to hospital.33

SUMMARY POINTS

  • Hyponatremia is a common electrolyte disorder that in its most severe form requires urgent therapy with hypertonic saline to correct cerebral edema.
  • In patients without serious signs or symptoms of cerebral edema, recent observations suggest there may be clinically important symptomatology relating to mild neurocognitive dysfunction and an association with risk of bone fracture.
  • Multiple treatment strategies are available according to the underlying extracellular fluid volume status and cause of hyponatremia. These include fluid and sodium restriction and augmentation of urinary water excretion with various nutritional and pharmacologic strategies. The most novel therapy includes antagonism of the vasopressin V2 receptor with a class of aquaretic agents known as vaptans.
  • There can be serious neurologic injury associated with overly rapid correction of chronic hyponatremia or undercorrection of acute symptomatic hyponatremia.
  • Clinicians must be familiar with the details of each of the treatments and have an appreciation of the importance of careful monitoring during treatment.
References
  1. Flear CTG, Gill GV, Burn J. Hyponatremia: mechanisms and management. Lancet 1981; 2:2631.
  2. Verbalis JG, Goldsmith SR, Greenberg A, Schrier RW, Sterns RH. Hyponatremia treatment guidelines 2007: expert panel recommendations. Am J Med 2007; 120(suppl 1):S1S21.
  3. Freda BJ, Davidson MB, Hall PM. Evaluation of hyponatremia: a little physiology goes a long way. Cleve Clin J Med 2004; 71:639650.
  4. Weisberg LS. Pseudohyponatremia: a reappraisal. Am J Med 1989; 86:315318.
  5. Moritz L, Ayus JC. The pathophysiology and treatment of hyponatraemic encephalopathy: an update. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003; 18:24862491.
  6. Widdess-Walsh P, Sabharwal V, Demirjian S, DeGeorgia M. Neurologic effects of hyponatremia and its treatment. Cleve Clin J Med 2007; 74:377383.
  7. Melton JE, Patlak CS, Pettigrew KD, Cserr HF. Volume regulatory loss of Na, Cl, and K from rat brain during acute hyponatremia. Am J Physiol 1987; 252:F661F669.
  8. Lauriat SM, Berl T. The hyponatremic patient: practical focus on therapy. J Am Soc Nephrol 1997; 8:15991607.
  9. Kokko JP. Symptomatic hyponatremia with hypoxia is a medical emergency. Kidney Int 2006; 69:12911293.
  10. Ellis SJ. Severe hyponatraemia: complications and treatment. QJM 1995; 88:905909.
  11. Sterns RH, Cappuccio JD, Silver SM, Cohen EP. Neurologic sequelae after treatment of severe hyponatremia: a multicenter perspective. J Am Soc Nephrol 1994; 4:15221530.
  12. Perianayagam A, Sterns RH, Silver SM, et al. DDAVP is effective in preventing and reversing inadvertent overcorrection of hyponatremia. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008; 3:331336.
  13. Sterns RH, Hix JK. Overcorrection of hyponatremia is a medical emergency. Kidney Int 2009; 76:587589.
  14. Nguyen MK, Kurtz I. Analysis of current formulas used for treatment of the dysnatremias. Clin Exp Nephrol 2004; 8:1216.
  15. Adrogué HJ, Madias NE. Hyponatremia. N Engl J Med 2000; 342:15811589.
  16. Mohmand HK, Issa D, Ahmad Z, Cappuccio JD, Kouides RW, Sterns RH. Hypertonic saline for hyponatremia: risk of inadvertent overcorrection. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2007; 2:11101117.
  17. Ellison DH, Berl T. Clinical practice. The syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:20642072.
  18. Renneboog B, Musch W, Vandemergel X, Manto MU, Decaux G. Mild chronic hyponatremia is associated with falls, unsteadiness, and attention deficits. Am J Med 2006; 119:71.e1e8.
  19. Kinsella S, Moran S, Sullivan MO, Molloy MG, Eustace JA. Hyponatremia independent of osteoporosis is associated with fracture occurrence. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010; 5:275280.
  20. Chung HM, Kluge R, Schrier RW, Anderson RJ. Clinical assessment of extracellular fluid volume in hyponatremia. Am J Med 1987; 83:905988.
  21. Hoorn EJ, Halperin ML, Zietse R. Diagnostic approach to a patient with hyponatraemia: traditional versus physiology-based options. QJM 2005; 98:529540.
  22. Berl T. Impact of solute intake on urine flow and water excretion. J Am Soc Nephrol 2008; 19:10761078.
  23. Carrilho F, Bosch J, Arroyo V, Mas A, Viver J, Rodes J. Renal failure associated with demeclocycline in cirrhosis. Ann Intern Med 1977; 87:195197.
  24. Lehrich RW, Greenberg A. When is it appropriate to use vasopressin receptor antagonists? J Am Soc Nephrol 2008; 19:10541058.
  25. Decaux G, Soupart A, Vassart G. Non-peptide arginine-vasopressin antagonists: the vaptans. Lancet 2008; 371:16241632.
  26. Schrier RW, Gross P, Gheorghiade M, et al; SALT Investigators. Tolvaptan, a selective oral vasopressin V2-receptor antagonist, for hyponatremia. N Engl J Med 2006; 355:20992112.
  27. Konstam MA, Gheorghiade M, Burnett JC, et al; Efficacy of Vasopressin Antagonism in Heart Failure Outcome Study With Tolvaptan (EVEREST) Investigators. Effects of oral tolvaptan in patients hospitalized for worsening heart failure: the EVEREST Outcome Trial. JAMA 2007; 297:13191331.
  28. Berl T, Quittnat-Pelletier F, Verbalis JG, et al; SALTWATER Investigators. Oral tolvaptan is safe and effective in chronic hyponatremia. J Am Soc Nephrol 2010; 21:705712.
  29. Greenberg A, Lehrich RW. Treatment of chronic hyponatremia: now we know how, but do we know when or if? J Am Soc Nephrol 2010; 21:552555.
  30. Greenberg A, Verbalis JG. Vasopressin receptor antagonists. Kidney Int 2006; 69:21242130.
  31. Rosner MH, Kirven J. Exercise-associated hyponatremia. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2007; 2:151161.
  32. Halperin ML, Kamel KS, Sterns R. Hyponatremia in marathon runners. N Engl J Med 2005; 353:427428.
  33. Hew-Butler T, Almond C, Ayus JC, et al; Exercise-Associated Hyponatremia (EAH) Consensus Panel. Consensus statement of the 1st International Exercise-Associated Hyponatremia Consensus Development Conference, Cape Town, South Africa 2005. Clin J Sport Med 2005; 15:208213.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Chirag Vaidya, MD
Tufts University School of Medicine; Renal Division, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, MA

Warren Ho, MD
Nephrologist/Hospitalist, Franklin Square Hospital, Baltimore, MD

Benjamin J. Freda, DO
Assistant Professor of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Renal Division, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, MA

Address: Benjamin J. Freda, DO, Renal Division, Baystate Medical Center, 100 Wason Avenue, Suite 200, Springfield, MA 01108; e-mail benjamin.freda@bhs.org

Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 77(10)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
715-726
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Chirag Vaidya, MD
Tufts University School of Medicine; Renal Division, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, MA

Warren Ho, MD
Nephrologist/Hospitalist, Franklin Square Hospital, Baltimore, MD

Benjamin J. Freda, DO
Assistant Professor of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Renal Division, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, MA

Address: Benjamin J. Freda, DO, Renal Division, Baystate Medical Center, 100 Wason Avenue, Suite 200, Springfield, MA 01108; e-mail benjamin.freda@bhs.org

Author and Disclosure Information

Chirag Vaidya, MD
Tufts University School of Medicine; Renal Division, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, MA

Warren Ho, MD
Nephrologist/Hospitalist, Franklin Square Hospital, Baltimore, MD

Benjamin J. Freda, DO
Assistant Professor of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Renal Division, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, MA

Address: Benjamin J. Freda, DO, Renal Division, Baystate Medical Center, 100 Wason Avenue, Suite 200, Springfield, MA 01108; e-mail benjamin.freda@bhs.org

Article PDF
Article PDF

Hyponatremia, defined as a serum sodium concentration below 135 mmol/L, is one of the most frequently encountered electrolyte disorders. In 1981, Flear et al1 reported that 15% of their hospitalized patients had plasma sodium concentrations lower than 134 mmol/L, the cutoff they were using at that time.

Hyponatremia is sometimes merely a laboratory artifact or a result of improper blood collection. If real, it can be due to excessive water intake or, most often, the inability of the kidney to excrete water coupled with continued water intake. Patients with significant underlying cardiac, hepatic, or renal dysfunction are at greatest risk of developing hyponatremia, secondary to the nonosmotic release of antidiuretic hormone (ADH). Others at risk include postoperative patients (especially menstruating women), older patients on thiazide diuretics, patients with malignant or psychiatric illness, and endurance athletes.

In this article, we review the treatment of acute and chronic hyponatremia, emphasizing the importance of basing the therapy on the severity of symptoms and taking care not to raise the serum sodium level too rapidly, which can cause neurologic dysfunction.

Guidelines for managing hyponatremia2 are based mostly on retrospective studies and expert opinion, since few prospective studies have been done. Despite the paucity of evidence-based recommendations, we will attempt to incorporate findings from important human and animal studies and consensus guidelines from expert panels. We will focus initially on the critical diagnostic considerations necessary to initiate treatment.

SYMPTOMATIC VS ASYMPTOMATIC

Subsequent sections will address therapeutic approaches in two clinical settings:

Symptomatic hyponatremia, ie, with severe signs or symptoms of cerebral edema—a medical emergency; and

Asymptomatic hyponatremia, ie, without serious signs or symptoms of cerebral edema.

KEY DIAGNOSTIC STEPS WHEN STARTING TREATMENT

The treatment of hyponatremia begins by confirming a truly hypo-osmolar state, assessing its clinical significance, and determining its cause (Table 1).

The clinical and laboratory evaluations form the foundation of a proper approach to any patient with hyponatremia. The rationale behind making several important diagnostic distinctions will be discussed here briefly and then expanded on in the remaining text. The reader is referred to another review on the diagnostic evaluation of hyponatremia.3

Confirm that the patient truly has hypo-osmolar hyponatremia

The serum osmolality should be measured to confirm that it is low (ie, < 275 mOsm/kg). In addition, the arterial serum sodium concentration can be measured using a blood gas device if pseudohyponatremia (see below) is suspected. This method uses direct potentiometry and bypasses the dilutional step in the processing of venous samples.4

Rationale. The clinical consequences of hyponatremia are due to water moving from hypo-osmolar extracellular fluid into the relatively hyperosmolar interior of the cell. This water movement can cause progressive cerebral edema, resulting in a spectrum of signs and symptoms from headache and ataxia to seizures and coma. But significant fluid shifts and cerebral edema occur only if the extracellular fluid is hypo-osmolar relative to the intracellular fluid.

In fact, hyponatremia can occur in several situations in which the extracellular fluid is not hypo-osmolar. An increase in effective plasma osmoles (substances in the extracellular fluid that do not readily move across the plasma membrane) can cause water to move out of cells, resulting in translocational hyponatremia. This may be seen in hyperglycemia or when mannitol or contrast dye has been given. In these situations, the plasma is either isotonic or even hypertonic to the intracellular fluid, resulting in no movement of water into the cells and therefore no clinical consequences relating to the hyponatremia. Importantly, no therapy is required for the hyponatremia.

Other situations in which hyponatremia is present but not associated with true hypotonicity include states of excess protein or lipid in the blood (pseudohyponatremia). Also, if an infusion of hypotonic fluid is running, clinicians must be sure that blood samples are not drawn proximally in the same vein.

Are there significant signs or symptoms of cerebral edema?

Hyponatremia can cause brain swelling within the confined space of the skull as water shifts from the extracellular fluid into the cells. Depending on underlying risk factors (Table 2)5 and the severity and duration of hyponatremia (see below), this may result in signs or symptoms of cerebral edema, including visual changes, focal neurologic changes, encephalopathy, respiratory depression, and seizures. Ultimately, brain herniation can occur.

Patients need to be assessed quickly because those with serious neurologic signs or symptoms thought to be related to hyponatremia require urgent treatment with hypertonic saline to increase the serum sodium concentration, regardless of the underlying volume status, the cause of hyponatremia, or the time of onset.

 

 

Determine the duration of hyponatremia

One should try to ascertain when the hyponatremia started, as its duration is important in determining the proper pace of correction.

Figure 1.
The brain begins to adapt to hyponatremia within minutes, and the cerebral adaptation is maximal within 2 to 3 days (Figure 1).6

At the onset of hyponatremia, water moves from the extracellular fluid into cells, pulled in by osmosis. The brain can decrease the net amount of water entering into the neurons (and thus regulate its volume) by increasing the flow of water from the interstitium into the cerebrospinal fluid via increased interstitial hydraulic pressure.7

Over the next several days, inorganic solutes (eg, potassium and sodium salts) and various organic solutes are transported out of the cells. In patients in whom this process has had time to occur, treatment of hyponatremia with hypertonic fluids raises the plasma osmolality faster than the cells can recapture the previously transported osmoles. In this situation, overly rapid correction can cause excessive loss of intracellular water, resulting in cell shrinkage and osmotic demyelination syndrome. Osmotic demyelination usually presents during treatment of hyponatremia after an initial improvement in mental status, with worsening neurologic function and various neurologic signs, including paresis and ultimately even death.6

In patients with acute-onset hyponatremia (ie, with onset within the past 48 hours), in whom the above cerebral adaptations have not had time to occur completely, rapid correction is unlikely to result in osmotic demyelination.

In view of the serious risk of osmotic demyelination, if the timing of development of hyponatremia cannot be determined, one should assume it is chronic (> 48 hours) and avoid rapid overcorrection (see discussion below on the rate of correction).

On the other hand, patients who have severe neurologic signs or symptoms initially need their serum sodium increased urgently to safer levels, regardless of the timing of onset (see below for suggested approach). Subsequent treatment of hyponatremia—after the serum sodium level has been raised enough to reverse neurologic symptoms—will be influenced by the duration of the hyponatremia, with careful avoidance of overly rapid correction, especially in patients with chronic hyponatremia.

Assess the patient’s volume status to determine the proper initial treatment

In patients with hypo-osmolar hyponatremia who do not need urgent therapy with hypertonic saline, the initial treatment is based on clinical and laboratory assessment of extracellular fluid volume status, including spot urine sodium measurement (Table 3).3 This will be discussed further below.

Check urine osmolality to assess for hyponatremic states in which urinary dilution is intact

Measuring urine osmolality is useful in ascertaining whether hyponatremic patients are making appropriately dilute urine (< 100 mOsm/kg). If they are, the cause of the hyponatremia may be excessive water intake, a reset osmostat, or low solute intake. In addition, patients with hypovolemic hyponatremia may have appropriately dilute urine soon after treatment with isotonic intravenous fluids.

The serum sodium concentration often returns to normal if the underlying cause is eliminated (eg, if excessive fluid intake is stopped). If there are no serious signs or symptoms, this can usually be accomplished without additional therapy with intravenous fluids or medications, thereby avoiding the risk of overcorrection.

Search for causes of rapidly correctable hyponatremia

If hyponatremia is due to one of several important underlying causes, it may reverse rapidly once the underlying cause has been eliminated (Table 4). Examples: restricting water intake in patients with psychogenic polydipsia, discontinuing thiazide diuretics, replenishing depleted fluid volume, stopping desmopressin (DDAVP), and giving glucocorticoid replacement to those who are glucocorticoid-deficient.

TREATING HYPONATREMIC PATIENTS WITH SERIOUS SIGNS OR SYMPTOMS

Patients with hypo-osmolar hyponatremia and serious signs or symptoms of cerebral edema (lethargy, respiratory depression, seizures) need rapid initial correction of the serum sodium level, as this is a true medical emergency.

Certain patients are at greater risk of developing cerebral edema from hyponatremia (Table 2).

On the other hand, patients with chronic hyponatremia are very unlikely to present with signs or symptoms of cerebral edema. In fact, in a patient with chronic hyponatremia, care must be taken to avoid overcorrection beyond that needed to reverse severe signs and symptoms. In the rare case in which a patient with chronic hyponatremia presents with signs or symptoms of cerebral edema, the hypertonic saline infusion must be stopped as soon as the signs or symptoms have resolved. Further rapid changes in serum sodium must be avoided.

During correction of hyponatremia, some patients are at particularly high risk of osmotic demyelination syndrome secondary to underlying abnormalities in cerebral osmotic regulation. These include patients with alcoholism, malnutrition, hypokalemia, and burns, and elderly women on thiazide diuretics.8 These patients should be monitored vigilantly for overly rapid correction during treatment.

INITIAL TREATMENT: REVERSE CEREBRAL EDEMA WITH 3% SALINE

The goal of the initial, rapid phase of correction is to reverse cerebral edema.

Patients with serious signs or symptoms should receive hypertonic (3%) saline at a rate of about 1 mL/kg/hour for the first several hours.8 Those with concomitant hypervolemia (as in congestive heart failure) or underlying cardiovascular disease should also receive a loop diuretic to aid in free-water excretion and to prevent volume overload from the saline infusion. This regimen usually raises the serum sodium concentration enough (usually by about 1 mmol/L/hour) to decrease cerebral edema and improve symptoms.

In patients having active seizures or showing signs of brain herniation, 3% saline can be given initially at a higher rate of about 2 to 3 mL/kg/hour over the first few hours. An alternative approach is an initial 50-mL bolus of 3% saline and an additional 200 mL given over the subsequent 4 to 6 hours.9

No study has compared the efficacy and safety of these approaches, and clinicians should always monitor extracellular fluid volume status, neurologic status, and serum sodium levels closely in any patient treated with hypertonic saline.

After severe signs and symptoms have resolved, 3% saline is promptly discontinued and appropriate therapy is initiated based on the patient’s volume status and underlying cause of hyponatremia (see discussion below).

 

 

NEXT, FIND THE APPROPRIATE RATE OF CORRECTION

After the initial serious signs or symptoms have been addressed with hypertonic saline, management should focus on limiting the rate of correction in patients with chronic hyponatremia or hyponatremia of unknown duration.

Animal studies and retrospective human studies have suggested certain guidelines on the appropriate pace and magnitude of correction during treatment of hyponatremia to avoid osmotic demyelination syndrome.2

Clinicians must not attempt to correct the serum sodium to “normal” values. Although patients with acute hyponatremia may tolerate complete correction, there is little evidence that raising the serum sodium concentration acutely by more than 5 to 8 mmol/L is advantageous. Therefore, correction should be judicious in all patients.

Appropriate rates of correction

A recent expert consensus panel suggested that the serum sodium level be raised by no more than 10 to 12 mmol/L during the first 24 hours of treatment, and by less than 18 mmol/L over 48 hours.2

Patients with chronic hyponatremia and signs or symptoms of cerebral edema should have their sodium level raised at an even slower rate—some recommend less than 10 mmol/L in the first 24 hours.10 Aggressive initial correction at the rate of 1.5 to 2 mmol/hour for the first 3 to 4 hours with 3% saline is indicated until serious symptoms (seizure, obtundation) resolve, but correction beyond 10 to 12 mmol/L in the first 24 hours should be avoided. Hypertonic saline therapy should usually be discontinued well before the serum sodium level has risen this much, to avoid a continuing rise in the sodium level after the infusion has stopped.

While hypertonic saline is being infused, serum sodium levels should be checked every 1 to 2 hours. In a study in 56 patients with severe hyponatremia (serum sodium ≤ 105 mmol/L),11 no neurologic complications were observed in patients with chronic hyponatremia whose serum sodium was corrected by less than 12 mmol/L in 24 hours or by less than 18 mmol/L in 48 hours or in whom the average rate of correction to a serum sodium of 120 mmol/L was less than or equal to 0.55 mmol/L per hour.

If the serum sodium concentration has been overcorrected

Desmopressin is effective in preventing and reversing inadvertent overcorrection of hyponatremia. 12 In one study, desmopressin lowered the sodium concentration by 2 to 9 mmol/L in 14 of 20 patients. None of the patients developed any serious adverse consequences.

In addition, intravenous water (dextrose 5%) can be given alone or in combination with desmopressin to prevent or reverse an excessive increase in serum sodium.13 Such therapy may be considered in patients who continue to excrete hypotonic urine and have already reached a serum sodium concentration that meets or exceeds the recommended rate or magnitude of change.

Formulas for estimating the rate of correction

Various formulas have been devised for estimating the change in serum sodium concentration during treatment of hyponatremia.14

The Adrogué-Madias formula, one of the most commonly used, gives an estimate of how much the serum sodium concentration will rise when 1 L of various intravenous fluids is given (Table 5).15 This formula also accounts for the increase in serum sodium that takes place during concomitant correction of hypokalemia with potassium. Recently, however, a retrospective study16 found that this formula underestimated the change in serum sodium in 23 (74.2%) of 31 patients with hyponatremia treated with hypertonic saline.

An alternative is the Barsoum-Levine equation, which takes into account ongoing urinary losses. Although it is more cumbersome to calculate, it may be more precise.17

Alternatively, in patients without hypovolemia, the clinician can calculate the amount of urinary excretion of free water required to achieve a specific target serum sodium and then measure hourly urinary water excretion during aquaresis induced by furosemide (Lasix).8 Although more physiologic, this method can be clinically cumbersome, requiring timely handling of urine specimens, accurate recording of urine output, and rapid reporting of laboratory results.

Ultimately, these methods serve only as estimates of the change in serum sodium and do not replace careful monitoring of electrolytes (every 1 to 2 hours during acute therapy) and fastidious assessment for clinical signs or symptoms of osmotic demyelination syndrome.

PATIENTS WITH HYPONATREMIA AND NO SERIOUS SIGNS OR SYMPTOMS

General approach

Hyponatremic patients without serious signs or symptoms of cerebral edema do not require urgent therapy to raise the serum sodium.

Patients with chronic asymptomatic hyponatremia are commonly encountered in clinical practice. As a result of cerebral adaptation, they can appear to have no symptoms despite serum sodium levels as low as 115 to 120 mmol/L. However, even if they have no serious signs or symptoms of cerebral edema, some patients may complain of fatigue, lethargy, nausea, gait abnormalities, and muscle cramps and have evidence of milder forms of neurocognitive impairment.18

In a recent case-control study,18 elderly patients with chronic hyponatremia (mean serum sodium concentration 126 ± 5 mmol/L) were more likely to present to the hospital with falls compared with age-matched controls. Further analysis suggested these patients had marked impairments in gait and attention, which improved in some as the serum sodium increased.

Another recent study19 reported that mild hyponatremia (mean serum sodium concentration 132 mmol/L) was independently associated with the risk of fracture, even after adjustment for known osteoporotic risk factors.

Even when there is no need for acute therapy to raise the serum sodium level, the clinician should scrutinize the medical regimen and available clinical data to rule out reversible causes of water excess. These may include ongoing administration of hypotonic fluids (eg, parenteral nutrition or dextrose 5% to “keep the vein open”) or of medications that cause inappropriate release of ADH (eg, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors) or that impair water excretion (eg, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs). The clinician should also search for an underlying diagnosis that predisposes to water retention, such as hypothyroidism, adrenal insufficiency, congestive heart failure, or hepatic or renal failure. If hyponatremia is due to endocrine disease, correction of hypothyroidism or adrenal insufficiency should result in water excretion and improvement in the serum sodium.

If the cause of the hyponatremia is not immediately apparent, treatment can be started on the basis of assessment of the patient’s extracellular fluid volume status using clinical examination and supplementary laboratory data such as the serum uric acid concentration and urinary sodium concentration.3 Table 3 outlines general treatment options for hypoosmolar hyponatremia according to extracellular fluid volume status.

Of note, physical examination alone has poor sensitivity and specificity in assessing extracellular fluid volume status in patients with hyponatremia.20,21 This highlights the importance of spot measurements of urine sodium and serum uric acid and, when appropriate, isotonic intravenous saline challenge to detect occult hypovolemia.

In general, patients with euvolemia are treated with fluid restriction, and patients with hypovolemia are given isotonic saline. Patients with hypervolemia can be difficult to treat, but in general they are prescribed both sodium and fluid restriction. Loop diuretics can be given to promote excretion of water and sodium. Thiazide diuretics are avoided, as they impair urinary dilution and worsen hyponatremia. Attempts should be made to optimize the treatment of the underlying hypervolemic disorder (congestive heart failure, cirrhosis, advanced renal failure). Vasopressin receptor antagonists can also be used in selected cases of hypervolemic or euvolemic hyponatremia (see discussion below).

 

 

How to prescribe fluid restriction rationally

Ideally, patients should not ingest any more fluid than they can excrete in urine and insensible losses—otherwise, the serum sodium can continue to decrease.

Water excretion can be estimated from solute intake and urine osmolarity. In theory, a 70-kg person with a typical daily solute intake of about 10 mOsm/kg and intact urinary dilution to a urine osmolarity of 50 mOsm/L can excrete up to 14 L of urine (700 mOsm/50 mOsm/L) per day. However, a patient with the syndrome of inappropriate ADH secretion (SIADH) and a fixed urine osmolality of 700 mOsm/kg would excrete a similar solute load in only 1 L of urine. Thus, any fluid intake in excess of this volume could worsen hyponatremia.

To excrete free water, urinary sodium plus urinary potassium must be less than the serum sodium concentration. In this regard, the necessary degree of fluid restriction can also be estimated made on the basis of the patient’s urinary electrolytes.22

Increased solute intake to augment water excretion

In patients without hypervolemia, solute intake can be increased to augment water excretion. 22 This can be achieved with salt tablets or oral urea. Although urea can be effective, it is not commonly used because it is not available the United States and it has poor gastrointestinal tolerability. In patients whose nutritional intake is limited and who continue to ingest fluids (such as, for example, an elderly patient subsisting on tea and toast) every effort should be made to increase solute intake with high-protein foods or supplements.

DRUGS TO INHIBIT VASOPRESSIN

Unfortunately, patients often do not adhere to these strategies, as fluid restriction and unpalatable salt tablets or urea can become too burdensome. In such instances, pharmacologic inhibition of vasopressin-mediated water reabsorption can be considered using the following agents.

Demeclocycline (Declomycin) and lithium inhibit the kidney’s response to vasopressin. Because lithium may be nephrotoxic and has unwanted effects on the central nervous system, demeclocycline has become the preferred agent. Given in doses of 300 to 600 mg twice daily, demeclocycline promotes free water excretion, but often takes 1 to 2 weeks of therapy to begin working.

Renal failure due to demeclocycline has been reported in patients with concomitant liver disease.23 Demeclocycline can also cause photosensitivity and is contraindicated in children and pregnant women due to abnormalities in bone and enamel formation. In addition, it can be expensive and may not be covered fully by some prescription plans.

Vasopressin receptor antagonists (‘vaptans’)

ADH, also called vasopressin, interacts with various receptor subtypes, including V1a (causing vasoconstriction, platelet aggregation, inotropic stimulation, myocardial protein synthesis), V1b (causing secretion of adrenocorticotropic hormone), and V2 (causing water reabsorption and release of von Willebrand factor and factor VIII).

Drugs that block V2 receptors in the renal tubule increase water excretion, making them attractive as therapy for some hyponatremic states (Table 6).24,25 These drugs exert their aquaretic effect by causing a decrease in transcription and insertion of aquaporin-2 channels (“water pores”) into the apical collecting duct membrane. As a result, the water permeability of the collecting duct is decreased even in the presence of circulating ADH.

Conivaptan (Vaprisol) is a combined V1a-V2 antagonist that has been approved for the treatment of euvolemic and hypervolemic hyponatremia. Conivaptan inhibits the cytochrome P450 3A4 system and thus may interact with other drugs; therefore, its use has been limited to no more than 4 days of intravenous administration in the hospital setting. The recommended dosage is an initial 20-mg infusion over 30 minutes, followed by continuous infusions of 20 to 40 mg/day. Dosing adjustments in renal and hepatic impairment have not been well defined.

Tolvaptan (Samsca) is an oral selective V2 antagonist that has been studied in patients with euvolemic and hypervolemic hyponatremia. 26 Studies have included patients with congestive heart failure, cirrhosis, and SIADH. Although tolvaptan has not been shown to reduce rates of rehospitalization or death in congestive heart failure, it improves serum sodium, overall fluid balance, and congestive symptoms.27 Tolvaptan has recently been approved for the treatment of euvolemic and hypervolemic hyponatremia.

A recent study has confirmed the longterm efficacy of tolvaptan in 111 patients over a mean duration of treatment greater than 700 days.28 While the clinical benefits of chronic tolvaptan therapy have yet to be clearly demonstrated, this study shows that tolvaptan therapy can result in a sustained improvement in serum sodium concentration without an unacceptable increase in adverse events.29

Lixivaptan (VPA-985), another oral selective V2 receptor antagonist, is being studied in patients with euvolemic and hypervolemic hyponatremia.

Current role of vasopressin antagonists

Current studies of vasopressin antagonists in the treatment of hyponatremia are promising, though definite recommendations are needed to ensure slow, careful correction of hyponatremia. Most studies suggest that these agents provide slow, reliable increases in serum sodium. In one large study of patients with congestive heart failure, serum sodium rose by more than 12 mmol/L in 24 hours in fewer than 2% of patients.26

Notably, no cases of osmotic demyelination syndrome have been reported in these studies. However, it should be noted that therapy was started in the hospital with close monitoring of serum sodium levels and discontinuation of fluid restriction; the incidence of overly rapid correction of sodium may be higher outside of carefully done clinical studies. Clinicians should adopt monitoring strategies similar to those used in these rigorous studies.

At present, there is little experience with vasopressin antagonists in hyponatremic patients with serious signs or symptoms of cerebral edema, and most clinicians still view 3% saline as the gold standard for these patients.

Vasopressin antagonists should not be used in patients with hypovolemic hyponatremia, due to concerns about V1a blockade causing hypotension and about V2 blockade producing water excretion and a worsening of the volume-depleted state.

Recent clinical trials have reported that patients often experience increased thirst while taking these agents. This highlights the need to monitor serum sodium during treatment.

These agents are expensive. Tolvaptan costs about $250 per tablet; conivaptan, which is administered intravenously, may cost a little more per treatment course.

 

 

THERAPY IN SPECIFIC DISEASE STATES

Patients with hyponatremia and cirrhosis

The focus of treatment remains water and salt restriction and judicious use of loop diuretics and aldosterone antagonists such as spironolactone (Aldactone).

Tolvaptan has been effective at raising the serum sodium level in patients with cirrhosis, 26 while conivaptan should be avoided at present because of vasodilation from V1a receptor antagonism and its potential effects on systemic hemodynamics and risk of variceal bleeding.30

As the severity of cirrhosis increases, the only effective treatment of hyponatremia is liver transplantation.

Patients with SIADH

In most cases, water restriction is the mainstay of therapy. Adequate nutritional intake should also be stressed so that enough solute is available for ongoing water excretion. Although fluid restriction is usually effective, many patients cannot adhere to the level of restriction required.

In cases in which fluid restriction is not effective on its own, demeclocyline can be used to antagonize ADH action and increase water excretion. Sodium tablets and loop diuretics can also be used, taking care to avoid hypovolemia from diuretic-induced sodium losses. The use of tolvaptan in patients with SIADH has resulted in short-term increases in serum sodium.26 A recent study has suggested that this effect can be sustained with longer-term treatment,28 but further studies are needed to show a complementary clinical benefit (eg, improved neurocognition) to guide the use of these costly agents in clinical practice.

Patients with diuretic-induced hyponatremia

Thiazide diuretics should be discontinued and hypovolemia and hypokalemia should be corrected with isotonic saline and potassium supplementation. As the hypokalemia is corrected and the diuretic effect and hypovolemic stimulus to ADH dissipates, water excretion can increase rapidly, resulting in a brisk change in serum sodium.

Serum sodium levels should be closely monitored during therapy to avoid overcorrection. For this reason, use of hypertonic saline should generally be avoided. Hypotonic fluid— eg, half-normal (0.45%) or quarter-normal (0.22%) saline or even desmopressin—may become necessary in the later stages of therapy to avoid overly rapid correction.

Patients with exercise-associated hyponatremia

Patients at highest risk of exercise-associated hyponatremia include those who drink too much fluid during a long-distance race, who have low body weight, who are female, who exercise longer than 4 hours, and who use nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.31 The cause of hyponatremia is likely multifactorial, with excessive water intake coupled with sodium losses and impaired renal excretion of water due to ADH action and impaired renal dilution. To prevent exercise-associated hyponatremia, fluid intake should be limited to 400 to 800 mL/hour, with the higher end recommended for larger athletes and hotter climates.

Consensus recommendations suggest that most patients with mild hyponatremia (serum sodium 130 to 135 mmol/L) should be treated with fluid restriction and clinical observation, as spontaneous water diuresis leads to improvement in the serum sodium level. Importantly, the reflex to provide isotonic saline infusions should be avoided unless clear signs of volume depletion are present. Intravenous saline has the potential to worsen hyponatremia in the presence of ADH. In addition, some athletes will have retained water in the gastrointestinal tract that may be mobilized after the race, resulting in worsening of hyponatremia.32

In athletes with severe hyponatremia (serum sodium < 120 mmol/L) or symptomatic exercise-associated hyponatremia (lethargy, respiratory depression, seizures), hypertonic saline is the treatment of choice. One protocol suggests giving 100 mL of 3% saline over 10 minutes in the field, followed by prompt transportation to hospital.33

SUMMARY POINTS

  • Hyponatremia is a common electrolyte disorder that in its most severe form requires urgent therapy with hypertonic saline to correct cerebral edema.
  • In patients without serious signs or symptoms of cerebral edema, recent observations suggest there may be clinically important symptomatology relating to mild neurocognitive dysfunction and an association with risk of bone fracture.
  • Multiple treatment strategies are available according to the underlying extracellular fluid volume status and cause of hyponatremia. These include fluid and sodium restriction and augmentation of urinary water excretion with various nutritional and pharmacologic strategies. The most novel therapy includes antagonism of the vasopressin V2 receptor with a class of aquaretic agents known as vaptans.
  • There can be serious neurologic injury associated with overly rapid correction of chronic hyponatremia or undercorrection of acute symptomatic hyponatremia.
  • Clinicians must be familiar with the details of each of the treatments and have an appreciation of the importance of careful monitoring during treatment.

Hyponatremia, defined as a serum sodium concentration below 135 mmol/L, is one of the most frequently encountered electrolyte disorders. In 1981, Flear et al1 reported that 15% of their hospitalized patients had plasma sodium concentrations lower than 134 mmol/L, the cutoff they were using at that time.

Hyponatremia is sometimes merely a laboratory artifact or a result of improper blood collection. If real, it can be due to excessive water intake or, most often, the inability of the kidney to excrete water coupled with continued water intake. Patients with significant underlying cardiac, hepatic, or renal dysfunction are at greatest risk of developing hyponatremia, secondary to the nonosmotic release of antidiuretic hormone (ADH). Others at risk include postoperative patients (especially menstruating women), older patients on thiazide diuretics, patients with malignant or psychiatric illness, and endurance athletes.

In this article, we review the treatment of acute and chronic hyponatremia, emphasizing the importance of basing the therapy on the severity of symptoms and taking care not to raise the serum sodium level too rapidly, which can cause neurologic dysfunction.

Guidelines for managing hyponatremia2 are based mostly on retrospective studies and expert opinion, since few prospective studies have been done. Despite the paucity of evidence-based recommendations, we will attempt to incorporate findings from important human and animal studies and consensus guidelines from expert panels. We will focus initially on the critical diagnostic considerations necessary to initiate treatment.

SYMPTOMATIC VS ASYMPTOMATIC

Subsequent sections will address therapeutic approaches in two clinical settings:

Symptomatic hyponatremia, ie, with severe signs or symptoms of cerebral edema—a medical emergency; and

Asymptomatic hyponatremia, ie, without serious signs or symptoms of cerebral edema.

KEY DIAGNOSTIC STEPS WHEN STARTING TREATMENT

The treatment of hyponatremia begins by confirming a truly hypo-osmolar state, assessing its clinical significance, and determining its cause (Table 1).

The clinical and laboratory evaluations form the foundation of a proper approach to any patient with hyponatremia. The rationale behind making several important diagnostic distinctions will be discussed here briefly and then expanded on in the remaining text. The reader is referred to another review on the diagnostic evaluation of hyponatremia.3

Confirm that the patient truly has hypo-osmolar hyponatremia

The serum osmolality should be measured to confirm that it is low (ie, < 275 mOsm/kg). In addition, the arterial serum sodium concentration can be measured using a blood gas device if pseudohyponatremia (see below) is suspected. This method uses direct potentiometry and bypasses the dilutional step in the processing of venous samples.4

Rationale. The clinical consequences of hyponatremia are due to water moving from hypo-osmolar extracellular fluid into the relatively hyperosmolar interior of the cell. This water movement can cause progressive cerebral edema, resulting in a spectrum of signs and symptoms from headache and ataxia to seizures and coma. But significant fluid shifts and cerebral edema occur only if the extracellular fluid is hypo-osmolar relative to the intracellular fluid.

In fact, hyponatremia can occur in several situations in which the extracellular fluid is not hypo-osmolar. An increase in effective plasma osmoles (substances in the extracellular fluid that do not readily move across the plasma membrane) can cause water to move out of cells, resulting in translocational hyponatremia. This may be seen in hyperglycemia or when mannitol or contrast dye has been given. In these situations, the plasma is either isotonic or even hypertonic to the intracellular fluid, resulting in no movement of water into the cells and therefore no clinical consequences relating to the hyponatremia. Importantly, no therapy is required for the hyponatremia.

Other situations in which hyponatremia is present but not associated with true hypotonicity include states of excess protein or lipid in the blood (pseudohyponatremia). Also, if an infusion of hypotonic fluid is running, clinicians must be sure that blood samples are not drawn proximally in the same vein.

Are there significant signs or symptoms of cerebral edema?

Hyponatremia can cause brain swelling within the confined space of the skull as water shifts from the extracellular fluid into the cells. Depending on underlying risk factors (Table 2)5 and the severity and duration of hyponatremia (see below), this may result in signs or symptoms of cerebral edema, including visual changes, focal neurologic changes, encephalopathy, respiratory depression, and seizures. Ultimately, brain herniation can occur.

Patients need to be assessed quickly because those with serious neurologic signs or symptoms thought to be related to hyponatremia require urgent treatment with hypertonic saline to increase the serum sodium concentration, regardless of the underlying volume status, the cause of hyponatremia, or the time of onset.

 

 

Determine the duration of hyponatremia

One should try to ascertain when the hyponatremia started, as its duration is important in determining the proper pace of correction.

Figure 1.
The brain begins to adapt to hyponatremia within minutes, and the cerebral adaptation is maximal within 2 to 3 days (Figure 1).6

At the onset of hyponatremia, water moves from the extracellular fluid into cells, pulled in by osmosis. The brain can decrease the net amount of water entering into the neurons (and thus regulate its volume) by increasing the flow of water from the interstitium into the cerebrospinal fluid via increased interstitial hydraulic pressure.7

Over the next several days, inorganic solutes (eg, potassium and sodium salts) and various organic solutes are transported out of the cells. In patients in whom this process has had time to occur, treatment of hyponatremia with hypertonic fluids raises the plasma osmolality faster than the cells can recapture the previously transported osmoles. In this situation, overly rapid correction can cause excessive loss of intracellular water, resulting in cell shrinkage and osmotic demyelination syndrome. Osmotic demyelination usually presents during treatment of hyponatremia after an initial improvement in mental status, with worsening neurologic function and various neurologic signs, including paresis and ultimately even death.6

In patients with acute-onset hyponatremia (ie, with onset within the past 48 hours), in whom the above cerebral adaptations have not had time to occur completely, rapid correction is unlikely to result in osmotic demyelination.

In view of the serious risk of osmotic demyelination, if the timing of development of hyponatremia cannot be determined, one should assume it is chronic (> 48 hours) and avoid rapid overcorrection (see discussion below on the rate of correction).

On the other hand, patients who have severe neurologic signs or symptoms initially need their serum sodium increased urgently to safer levels, regardless of the timing of onset (see below for suggested approach). Subsequent treatment of hyponatremia—after the serum sodium level has been raised enough to reverse neurologic symptoms—will be influenced by the duration of the hyponatremia, with careful avoidance of overly rapid correction, especially in patients with chronic hyponatremia.

Assess the patient’s volume status to determine the proper initial treatment

In patients with hypo-osmolar hyponatremia who do not need urgent therapy with hypertonic saline, the initial treatment is based on clinical and laboratory assessment of extracellular fluid volume status, including spot urine sodium measurement (Table 3).3 This will be discussed further below.

Check urine osmolality to assess for hyponatremic states in which urinary dilution is intact

Measuring urine osmolality is useful in ascertaining whether hyponatremic patients are making appropriately dilute urine (< 100 mOsm/kg). If they are, the cause of the hyponatremia may be excessive water intake, a reset osmostat, or low solute intake. In addition, patients with hypovolemic hyponatremia may have appropriately dilute urine soon after treatment with isotonic intravenous fluids.

The serum sodium concentration often returns to normal if the underlying cause is eliminated (eg, if excessive fluid intake is stopped). If there are no serious signs or symptoms, this can usually be accomplished without additional therapy with intravenous fluids or medications, thereby avoiding the risk of overcorrection.

Search for causes of rapidly correctable hyponatremia

If hyponatremia is due to one of several important underlying causes, it may reverse rapidly once the underlying cause has been eliminated (Table 4). Examples: restricting water intake in patients with psychogenic polydipsia, discontinuing thiazide diuretics, replenishing depleted fluid volume, stopping desmopressin (DDAVP), and giving glucocorticoid replacement to those who are glucocorticoid-deficient.

TREATING HYPONATREMIC PATIENTS WITH SERIOUS SIGNS OR SYMPTOMS

Patients with hypo-osmolar hyponatremia and serious signs or symptoms of cerebral edema (lethargy, respiratory depression, seizures) need rapid initial correction of the serum sodium level, as this is a true medical emergency.

Certain patients are at greater risk of developing cerebral edema from hyponatremia (Table 2).

On the other hand, patients with chronic hyponatremia are very unlikely to present with signs or symptoms of cerebral edema. In fact, in a patient with chronic hyponatremia, care must be taken to avoid overcorrection beyond that needed to reverse severe signs and symptoms. In the rare case in which a patient with chronic hyponatremia presents with signs or symptoms of cerebral edema, the hypertonic saline infusion must be stopped as soon as the signs or symptoms have resolved. Further rapid changes in serum sodium must be avoided.

During correction of hyponatremia, some patients are at particularly high risk of osmotic demyelination syndrome secondary to underlying abnormalities in cerebral osmotic regulation. These include patients with alcoholism, malnutrition, hypokalemia, and burns, and elderly women on thiazide diuretics.8 These patients should be monitored vigilantly for overly rapid correction during treatment.

INITIAL TREATMENT: REVERSE CEREBRAL EDEMA WITH 3% SALINE

The goal of the initial, rapid phase of correction is to reverse cerebral edema.

Patients with serious signs or symptoms should receive hypertonic (3%) saline at a rate of about 1 mL/kg/hour for the first several hours.8 Those with concomitant hypervolemia (as in congestive heart failure) or underlying cardiovascular disease should also receive a loop diuretic to aid in free-water excretion and to prevent volume overload from the saline infusion. This regimen usually raises the serum sodium concentration enough (usually by about 1 mmol/L/hour) to decrease cerebral edema and improve symptoms.

In patients having active seizures or showing signs of brain herniation, 3% saline can be given initially at a higher rate of about 2 to 3 mL/kg/hour over the first few hours. An alternative approach is an initial 50-mL bolus of 3% saline and an additional 200 mL given over the subsequent 4 to 6 hours.9

No study has compared the efficacy and safety of these approaches, and clinicians should always monitor extracellular fluid volume status, neurologic status, and serum sodium levels closely in any patient treated with hypertonic saline.

After severe signs and symptoms have resolved, 3% saline is promptly discontinued and appropriate therapy is initiated based on the patient’s volume status and underlying cause of hyponatremia (see discussion below).

 

 

NEXT, FIND THE APPROPRIATE RATE OF CORRECTION

After the initial serious signs or symptoms have been addressed with hypertonic saline, management should focus on limiting the rate of correction in patients with chronic hyponatremia or hyponatremia of unknown duration.

Animal studies and retrospective human studies have suggested certain guidelines on the appropriate pace and magnitude of correction during treatment of hyponatremia to avoid osmotic demyelination syndrome.2

Clinicians must not attempt to correct the serum sodium to “normal” values. Although patients with acute hyponatremia may tolerate complete correction, there is little evidence that raising the serum sodium concentration acutely by more than 5 to 8 mmol/L is advantageous. Therefore, correction should be judicious in all patients.

Appropriate rates of correction

A recent expert consensus panel suggested that the serum sodium level be raised by no more than 10 to 12 mmol/L during the first 24 hours of treatment, and by less than 18 mmol/L over 48 hours.2

Patients with chronic hyponatremia and signs or symptoms of cerebral edema should have their sodium level raised at an even slower rate—some recommend less than 10 mmol/L in the first 24 hours.10 Aggressive initial correction at the rate of 1.5 to 2 mmol/hour for the first 3 to 4 hours with 3% saline is indicated until serious symptoms (seizure, obtundation) resolve, but correction beyond 10 to 12 mmol/L in the first 24 hours should be avoided. Hypertonic saline therapy should usually be discontinued well before the serum sodium level has risen this much, to avoid a continuing rise in the sodium level after the infusion has stopped.

While hypertonic saline is being infused, serum sodium levels should be checked every 1 to 2 hours. In a study in 56 patients with severe hyponatremia (serum sodium ≤ 105 mmol/L),11 no neurologic complications were observed in patients with chronic hyponatremia whose serum sodium was corrected by less than 12 mmol/L in 24 hours or by less than 18 mmol/L in 48 hours or in whom the average rate of correction to a serum sodium of 120 mmol/L was less than or equal to 0.55 mmol/L per hour.

If the serum sodium concentration has been overcorrected

Desmopressin is effective in preventing and reversing inadvertent overcorrection of hyponatremia. 12 In one study, desmopressin lowered the sodium concentration by 2 to 9 mmol/L in 14 of 20 patients. None of the patients developed any serious adverse consequences.

In addition, intravenous water (dextrose 5%) can be given alone or in combination with desmopressin to prevent or reverse an excessive increase in serum sodium.13 Such therapy may be considered in patients who continue to excrete hypotonic urine and have already reached a serum sodium concentration that meets or exceeds the recommended rate or magnitude of change.

Formulas for estimating the rate of correction

Various formulas have been devised for estimating the change in serum sodium concentration during treatment of hyponatremia.14

The Adrogué-Madias formula, one of the most commonly used, gives an estimate of how much the serum sodium concentration will rise when 1 L of various intravenous fluids is given (Table 5).15 This formula also accounts for the increase in serum sodium that takes place during concomitant correction of hypokalemia with potassium. Recently, however, a retrospective study16 found that this formula underestimated the change in serum sodium in 23 (74.2%) of 31 patients with hyponatremia treated with hypertonic saline.

An alternative is the Barsoum-Levine equation, which takes into account ongoing urinary losses. Although it is more cumbersome to calculate, it may be more precise.17

Alternatively, in patients without hypovolemia, the clinician can calculate the amount of urinary excretion of free water required to achieve a specific target serum sodium and then measure hourly urinary water excretion during aquaresis induced by furosemide (Lasix).8 Although more physiologic, this method can be clinically cumbersome, requiring timely handling of urine specimens, accurate recording of urine output, and rapid reporting of laboratory results.

Ultimately, these methods serve only as estimates of the change in serum sodium and do not replace careful monitoring of electrolytes (every 1 to 2 hours during acute therapy) and fastidious assessment for clinical signs or symptoms of osmotic demyelination syndrome.

PATIENTS WITH HYPONATREMIA AND NO SERIOUS SIGNS OR SYMPTOMS

General approach

Hyponatremic patients without serious signs or symptoms of cerebral edema do not require urgent therapy to raise the serum sodium.

Patients with chronic asymptomatic hyponatremia are commonly encountered in clinical practice. As a result of cerebral adaptation, they can appear to have no symptoms despite serum sodium levels as low as 115 to 120 mmol/L. However, even if they have no serious signs or symptoms of cerebral edema, some patients may complain of fatigue, lethargy, nausea, gait abnormalities, and muscle cramps and have evidence of milder forms of neurocognitive impairment.18

In a recent case-control study,18 elderly patients with chronic hyponatremia (mean serum sodium concentration 126 ± 5 mmol/L) were more likely to present to the hospital with falls compared with age-matched controls. Further analysis suggested these patients had marked impairments in gait and attention, which improved in some as the serum sodium increased.

Another recent study19 reported that mild hyponatremia (mean serum sodium concentration 132 mmol/L) was independently associated with the risk of fracture, even after adjustment for known osteoporotic risk factors.

Even when there is no need for acute therapy to raise the serum sodium level, the clinician should scrutinize the medical regimen and available clinical data to rule out reversible causes of water excess. These may include ongoing administration of hypotonic fluids (eg, parenteral nutrition or dextrose 5% to “keep the vein open”) or of medications that cause inappropriate release of ADH (eg, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors) or that impair water excretion (eg, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs). The clinician should also search for an underlying diagnosis that predisposes to water retention, such as hypothyroidism, adrenal insufficiency, congestive heart failure, or hepatic or renal failure. If hyponatremia is due to endocrine disease, correction of hypothyroidism or adrenal insufficiency should result in water excretion and improvement in the serum sodium.

If the cause of the hyponatremia is not immediately apparent, treatment can be started on the basis of assessment of the patient’s extracellular fluid volume status using clinical examination and supplementary laboratory data such as the serum uric acid concentration and urinary sodium concentration.3 Table 3 outlines general treatment options for hypoosmolar hyponatremia according to extracellular fluid volume status.

Of note, physical examination alone has poor sensitivity and specificity in assessing extracellular fluid volume status in patients with hyponatremia.20,21 This highlights the importance of spot measurements of urine sodium and serum uric acid and, when appropriate, isotonic intravenous saline challenge to detect occult hypovolemia.

In general, patients with euvolemia are treated with fluid restriction, and patients with hypovolemia are given isotonic saline. Patients with hypervolemia can be difficult to treat, but in general they are prescribed both sodium and fluid restriction. Loop diuretics can be given to promote excretion of water and sodium. Thiazide diuretics are avoided, as they impair urinary dilution and worsen hyponatremia. Attempts should be made to optimize the treatment of the underlying hypervolemic disorder (congestive heart failure, cirrhosis, advanced renal failure). Vasopressin receptor antagonists can also be used in selected cases of hypervolemic or euvolemic hyponatremia (see discussion below).

 

 

How to prescribe fluid restriction rationally

Ideally, patients should not ingest any more fluid than they can excrete in urine and insensible losses—otherwise, the serum sodium can continue to decrease.

Water excretion can be estimated from solute intake and urine osmolarity. In theory, a 70-kg person with a typical daily solute intake of about 10 mOsm/kg and intact urinary dilution to a urine osmolarity of 50 mOsm/L can excrete up to 14 L of urine (700 mOsm/50 mOsm/L) per day. However, a patient with the syndrome of inappropriate ADH secretion (SIADH) and a fixed urine osmolality of 700 mOsm/kg would excrete a similar solute load in only 1 L of urine. Thus, any fluid intake in excess of this volume could worsen hyponatremia.

To excrete free water, urinary sodium plus urinary potassium must be less than the serum sodium concentration. In this regard, the necessary degree of fluid restriction can also be estimated made on the basis of the patient’s urinary electrolytes.22

Increased solute intake to augment water excretion

In patients without hypervolemia, solute intake can be increased to augment water excretion. 22 This can be achieved with salt tablets or oral urea. Although urea can be effective, it is not commonly used because it is not available the United States and it has poor gastrointestinal tolerability. In patients whose nutritional intake is limited and who continue to ingest fluids (such as, for example, an elderly patient subsisting on tea and toast) every effort should be made to increase solute intake with high-protein foods or supplements.

DRUGS TO INHIBIT VASOPRESSIN

Unfortunately, patients often do not adhere to these strategies, as fluid restriction and unpalatable salt tablets or urea can become too burdensome. In such instances, pharmacologic inhibition of vasopressin-mediated water reabsorption can be considered using the following agents.

Demeclocycline (Declomycin) and lithium inhibit the kidney’s response to vasopressin. Because lithium may be nephrotoxic and has unwanted effects on the central nervous system, demeclocycline has become the preferred agent. Given in doses of 300 to 600 mg twice daily, demeclocycline promotes free water excretion, but often takes 1 to 2 weeks of therapy to begin working.

Renal failure due to demeclocycline has been reported in patients with concomitant liver disease.23 Demeclocycline can also cause photosensitivity and is contraindicated in children and pregnant women due to abnormalities in bone and enamel formation. In addition, it can be expensive and may not be covered fully by some prescription plans.

Vasopressin receptor antagonists (‘vaptans’)

ADH, also called vasopressin, interacts with various receptor subtypes, including V1a (causing vasoconstriction, platelet aggregation, inotropic stimulation, myocardial protein synthesis), V1b (causing secretion of adrenocorticotropic hormone), and V2 (causing water reabsorption and release of von Willebrand factor and factor VIII).

Drugs that block V2 receptors in the renal tubule increase water excretion, making them attractive as therapy for some hyponatremic states (Table 6).24,25 These drugs exert their aquaretic effect by causing a decrease in transcription and insertion of aquaporin-2 channels (“water pores”) into the apical collecting duct membrane. As a result, the water permeability of the collecting duct is decreased even in the presence of circulating ADH.

Conivaptan (Vaprisol) is a combined V1a-V2 antagonist that has been approved for the treatment of euvolemic and hypervolemic hyponatremia. Conivaptan inhibits the cytochrome P450 3A4 system and thus may interact with other drugs; therefore, its use has been limited to no more than 4 days of intravenous administration in the hospital setting. The recommended dosage is an initial 20-mg infusion over 30 minutes, followed by continuous infusions of 20 to 40 mg/day. Dosing adjustments in renal and hepatic impairment have not been well defined.

Tolvaptan (Samsca) is an oral selective V2 antagonist that has been studied in patients with euvolemic and hypervolemic hyponatremia. 26 Studies have included patients with congestive heart failure, cirrhosis, and SIADH. Although tolvaptan has not been shown to reduce rates of rehospitalization or death in congestive heart failure, it improves serum sodium, overall fluid balance, and congestive symptoms.27 Tolvaptan has recently been approved for the treatment of euvolemic and hypervolemic hyponatremia.

A recent study has confirmed the longterm efficacy of tolvaptan in 111 patients over a mean duration of treatment greater than 700 days.28 While the clinical benefits of chronic tolvaptan therapy have yet to be clearly demonstrated, this study shows that tolvaptan therapy can result in a sustained improvement in serum sodium concentration without an unacceptable increase in adverse events.29

Lixivaptan (VPA-985), another oral selective V2 receptor antagonist, is being studied in patients with euvolemic and hypervolemic hyponatremia.

Current role of vasopressin antagonists

Current studies of vasopressin antagonists in the treatment of hyponatremia are promising, though definite recommendations are needed to ensure slow, careful correction of hyponatremia. Most studies suggest that these agents provide slow, reliable increases in serum sodium. In one large study of patients with congestive heart failure, serum sodium rose by more than 12 mmol/L in 24 hours in fewer than 2% of patients.26

Notably, no cases of osmotic demyelination syndrome have been reported in these studies. However, it should be noted that therapy was started in the hospital with close monitoring of serum sodium levels and discontinuation of fluid restriction; the incidence of overly rapid correction of sodium may be higher outside of carefully done clinical studies. Clinicians should adopt monitoring strategies similar to those used in these rigorous studies.

At present, there is little experience with vasopressin antagonists in hyponatremic patients with serious signs or symptoms of cerebral edema, and most clinicians still view 3% saline as the gold standard for these patients.

Vasopressin antagonists should not be used in patients with hypovolemic hyponatremia, due to concerns about V1a blockade causing hypotension and about V2 blockade producing water excretion and a worsening of the volume-depleted state.

Recent clinical trials have reported that patients often experience increased thirst while taking these agents. This highlights the need to monitor serum sodium during treatment.

These agents are expensive. Tolvaptan costs about $250 per tablet; conivaptan, which is administered intravenously, may cost a little more per treatment course.

 

 

THERAPY IN SPECIFIC DISEASE STATES

Patients with hyponatremia and cirrhosis

The focus of treatment remains water and salt restriction and judicious use of loop diuretics and aldosterone antagonists such as spironolactone (Aldactone).

Tolvaptan has been effective at raising the serum sodium level in patients with cirrhosis, 26 while conivaptan should be avoided at present because of vasodilation from V1a receptor antagonism and its potential effects on systemic hemodynamics and risk of variceal bleeding.30

As the severity of cirrhosis increases, the only effective treatment of hyponatremia is liver transplantation.

Patients with SIADH

In most cases, water restriction is the mainstay of therapy. Adequate nutritional intake should also be stressed so that enough solute is available for ongoing water excretion. Although fluid restriction is usually effective, many patients cannot adhere to the level of restriction required.

In cases in which fluid restriction is not effective on its own, demeclocyline can be used to antagonize ADH action and increase water excretion. Sodium tablets and loop diuretics can also be used, taking care to avoid hypovolemia from diuretic-induced sodium losses. The use of tolvaptan in patients with SIADH has resulted in short-term increases in serum sodium.26 A recent study has suggested that this effect can be sustained with longer-term treatment,28 but further studies are needed to show a complementary clinical benefit (eg, improved neurocognition) to guide the use of these costly agents in clinical practice.

Patients with diuretic-induced hyponatremia

Thiazide diuretics should be discontinued and hypovolemia and hypokalemia should be corrected with isotonic saline and potassium supplementation. As the hypokalemia is corrected and the diuretic effect and hypovolemic stimulus to ADH dissipates, water excretion can increase rapidly, resulting in a brisk change in serum sodium.

Serum sodium levels should be closely monitored during therapy to avoid overcorrection. For this reason, use of hypertonic saline should generally be avoided. Hypotonic fluid— eg, half-normal (0.45%) or quarter-normal (0.22%) saline or even desmopressin—may become necessary in the later stages of therapy to avoid overly rapid correction.

Patients with exercise-associated hyponatremia

Patients at highest risk of exercise-associated hyponatremia include those who drink too much fluid during a long-distance race, who have low body weight, who are female, who exercise longer than 4 hours, and who use nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.31 The cause of hyponatremia is likely multifactorial, with excessive water intake coupled with sodium losses and impaired renal excretion of water due to ADH action and impaired renal dilution. To prevent exercise-associated hyponatremia, fluid intake should be limited to 400 to 800 mL/hour, with the higher end recommended for larger athletes and hotter climates.

Consensus recommendations suggest that most patients with mild hyponatremia (serum sodium 130 to 135 mmol/L) should be treated with fluid restriction and clinical observation, as spontaneous water diuresis leads to improvement in the serum sodium level. Importantly, the reflex to provide isotonic saline infusions should be avoided unless clear signs of volume depletion are present. Intravenous saline has the potential to worsen hyponatremia in the presence of ADH. In addition, some athletes will have retained water in the gastrointestinal tract that may be mobilized after the race, resulting in worsening of hyponatremia.32

In athletes with severe hyponatremia (serum sodium < 120 mmol/L) or symptomatic exercise-associated hyponatremia (lethargy, respiratory depression, seizures), hypertonic saline is the treatment of choice. One protocol suggests giving 100 mL of 3% saline over 10 minutes in the field, followed by prompt transportation to hospital.33

SUMMARY POINTS

  • Hyponatremia is a common electrolyte disorder that in its most severe form requires urgent therapy with hypertonic saline to correct cerebral edema.
  • In patients without serious signs or symptoms of cerebral edema, recent observations suggest there may be clinically important symptomatology relating to mild neurocognitive dysfunction and an association with risk of bone fracture.
  • Multiple treatment strategies are available according to the underlying extracellular fluid volume status and cause of hyponatremia. These include fluid and sodium restriction and augmentation of urinary water excretion with various nutritional and pharmacologic strategies. The most novel therapy includes antagonism of the vasopressin V2 receptor with a class of aquaretic agents known as vaptans.
  • There can be serious neurologic injury associated with overly rapid correction of chronic hyponatremia or undercorrection of acute symptomatic hyponatremia.
  • Clinicians must be familiar with the details of each of the treatments and have an appreciation of the importance of careful monitoring during treatment.
References
  1. Flear CTG, Gill GV, Burn J. Hyponatremia: mechanisms and management. Lancet 1981; 2:2631.
  2. Verbalis JG, Goldsmith SR, Greenberg A, Schrier RW, Sterns RH. Hyponatremia treatment guidelines 2007: expert panel recommendations. Am J Med 2007; 120(suppl 1):S1S21.
  3. Freda BJ, Davidson MB, Hall PM. Evaluation of hyponatremia: a little physiology goes a long way. Cleve Clin J Med 2004; 71:639650.
  4. Weisberg LS. Pseudohyponatremia: a reappraisal. Am J Med 1989; 86:315318.
  5. Moritz L, Ayus JC. The pathophysiology and treatment of hyponatraemic encephalopathy: an update. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003; 18:24862491.
  6. Widdess-Walsh P, Sabharwal V, Demirjian S, DeGeorgia M. Neurologic effects of hyponatremia and its treatment. Cleve Clin J Med 2007; 74:377383.
  7. Melton JE, Patlak CS, Pettigrew KD, Cserr HF. Volume regulatory loss of Na, Cl, and K from rat brain during acute hyponatremia. Am J Physiol 1987; 252:F661F669.
  8. Lauriat SM, Berl T. The hyponatremic patient: practical focus on therapy. J Am Soc Nephrol 1997; 8:15991607.
  9. Kokko JP. Symptomatic hyponatremia with hypoxia is a medical emergency. Kidney Int 2006; 69:12911293.
  10. Ellis SJ. Severe hyponatraemia: complications and treatment. QJM 1995; 88:905909.
  11. Sterns RH, Cappuccio JD, Silver SM, Cohen EP. Neurologic sequelae after treatment of severe hyponatremia: a multicenter perspective. J Am Soc Nephrol 1994; 4:15221530.
  12. Perianayagam A, Sterns RH, Silver SM, et al. DDAVP is effective in preventing and reversing inadvertent overcorrection of hyponatremia. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008; 3:331336.
  13. Sterns RH, Hix JK. Overcorrection of hyponatremia is a medical emergency. Kidney Int 2009; 76:587589.
  14. Nguyen MK, Kurtz I. Analysis of current formulas used for treatment of the dysnatremias. Clin Exp Nephrol 2004; 8:1216.
  15. Adrogué HJ, Madias NE. Hyponatremia. N Engl J Med 2000; 342:15811589.
  16. Mohmand HK, Issa D, Ahmad Z, Cappuccio JD, Kouides RW, Sterns RH. Hypertonic saline for hyponatremia: risk of inadvertent overcorrection. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2007; 2:11101117.
  17. Ellison DH, Berl T. Clinical practice. The syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:20642072.
  18. Renneboog B, Musch W, Vandemergel X, Manto MU, Decaux G. Mild chronic hyponatremia is associated with falls, unsteadiness, and attention deficits. Am J Med 2006; 119:71.e1e8.
  19. Kinsella S, Moran S, Sullivan MO, Molloy MG, Eustace JA. Hyponatremia independent of osteoporosis is associated with fracture occurrence. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010; 5:275280.
  20. Chung HM, Kluge R, Schrier RW, Anderson RJ. Clinical assessment of extracellular fluid volume in hyponatremia. Am J Med 1987; 83:905988.
  21. Hoorn EJ, Halperin ML, Zietse R. Diagnostic approach to a patient with hyponatraemia: traditional versus physiology-based options. QJM 2005; 98:529540.
  22. Berl T. Impact of solute intake on urine flow and water excretion. J Am Soc Nephrol 2008; 19:10761078.
  23. Carrilho F, Bosch J, Arroyo V, Mas A, Viver J, Rodes J. Renal failure associated with demeclocycline in cirrhosis. Ann Intern Med 1977; 87:195197.
  24. Lehrich RW, Greenberg A. When is it appropriate to use vasopressin receptor antagonists? J Am Soc Nephrol 2008; 19:10541058.
  25. Decaux G, Soupart A, Vassart G. Non-peptide arginine-vasopressin antagonists: the vaptans. Lancet 2008; 371:16241632.
  26. Schrier RW, Gross P, Gheorghiade M, et al; SALT Investigators. Tolvaptan, a selective oral vasopressin V2-receptor antagonist, for hyponatremia. N Engl J Med 2006; 355:20992112.
  27. Konstam MA, Gheorghiade M, Burnett JC, et al; Efficacy of Vasopressin Antagonism in Heart Failure Outcome Study With Tolvaptan (EVEREST) Investigators. Effects of oral tolvaptan in patients hospitalized for worsening heart failure: the EVEREST Outcome Trial. JAMA 2007; 297:13191331.
  28. Berl T, Quittnat-Pelletier F, Verbalis JG, et al; SALTWATER Investigators. Oral tolvaptan is safe and effective in chronic hyponatremia. J Am Soc Nephrol 2010; 21:705712.
  29. Greenberg A, Lehrich RW. Treatment of chronic hyponatremia: now we know how, but do we know when or if? J Am Soc Nephrol 2010; 21:552555.
  30. Greenberg A, Verbalis JG. Vasopressin receptor antagonists. Kidney Int 2006; 69:21242130.
  31. Rosner MH, Kirven J. Exercise-associated hyponatremia. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2007; 2:151161.
  32. Halperin ML, Kamel KS, Sterns R. Hyponatremia in marathon runners. N Engl J Med 2005; 353:427428.
  33. Hew-Butler T, Almond C, Ayus JC, et al; Exercise-Associated Hyponatremia (EAH) Consensus Panel. Consensus statement of the 1st International Exercise-Associated Hyponatremia Consensus Development Conference, Cape Town, South Africa 2005. Clin J Sport Med 2005; 15:208213.
References
  1. Flear CTG, Gill GV, Burn J. Hyponatremia: mechanisms and management. Lancet 1981; 2:2631.
  2. Verbalis JG, Goldsmith SR, Greenberg A, Schrier RW, Sterns RH. Hyponatremia treatment guidelines 2007: expert panel recommendations. Am J Med 2007; 120(suppl 1):S1S21.
  3. Freda BJ, Davidson MB, Hall PM. Evaluation of hyponatremia: a little physiology goes a long way. Cleve Clin J Med 2004; 71:639650.
  4. Weisberg LS. Pseudohyponatremia: a reappraisal. Am J Med 1989; 86:315318.
  5. Moritz L, Ayus JC. The pathophysiology and treatment of hyponatraemic encephalopathy: an update. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003; 18:24862491.
  6. Widdess-Walsh P, Sabharwal V, Demirjian S, DeGeorgia M. Neurologic effects of hyponatremia and its treatment. Cleve Clin J Med 2007; 74:377383.
  7. Melton JE, Patlak CS, Pettigrew KD, Cserr HF. Volume regulatory loss of Na, Cl, and K from rat brain during acute hyponatremia. Am J Physiol 1987; 252:F661F669.
  8. Lauriat SM, Berl T. The hyponatremic patient: practical focus on therapy. J Am Soc Nephrol 1997; 8:15991607.
  9. Kokko JP. Symptomatic hyponatremia with hypoxia is a medical emergency. Kidney Int 2006; 69:12911293.
  10. Ellis SJ. Severe hyponatraemia: complications and treatment. QJM 1995; 88:905909.
  11. Sterns RH, Cappuccio JD, Silver SM, Cohen EP. Neurologic sequelae after treatment of severe hyponatremia: a multicenter perspective. J Am Soc Nephrol 1994; 4:15221530.
  12. Perianayagam A, Sterns RH, Silver SM, et al. DDAVP is effective in preventing and reversing inadvertent overcorrection of hyponatremia. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008; 3:331336.
  13. Sterns RH, Hix JK. Overcorrection of hyponatremia is a medical emergency. Kidney Int 2009; 76:587589.
  14. Nguyen MK, Kurtz I. Analysis of current formulas used for treatment of the dysnatremias. Clin Exp Nephrol 2004; 8:1216.
  15. Adrogué HJ, Madias NE. Hyponatremia. N Engl J Med 2000; 342:15811589.
  16. Mohmand HK, Issa D, Ahmad Z, Cappuccio JD, Kouides RW, Sterns RH. Hypertonic saline for hyponatremia: risk of inadvertent overcorrection. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2007; 2:11101117.
  17. Ellison DH, Berl T. Clinical practice. The syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:20642072.
  18. Renneboog B, Musch W, Vandemergel X, Manto MU, Decaux G. Mild chronic hyponatremia is associated with falls, unsteadiness, and attention deficits. Am J Med 2006; 119:71.e1e8.
  19. Kinsella S, Moran S, Sullivan MO, Molloy MG, Eustace JA. Hyponatremia independent of osteoporosis is associated with fracture occurrence. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010; 5:275280.
  20. Chung HM, Kluge R, Schrier RW, Anderson RJ. Clinical assessment of extracellular fluid volume in hyponatremia. Am J Med 1987; 83:905988.
  21. Hoorn EJ, Halperin ML, Zietse R. Diagnostic approach to a patient with hyponatraemia: traditional versus physiology-based options. QJM 2005; 98:529540.
  22. Berl T. Impact of solute intake on urine flow and water excretion. J Am Soc Nephrol 2008; 19:10761078.
  23. Carrilho F, Bosch J, Arroyo V, Mas A, Viver J, Rodes J. Renal failure associated with demeclocycline in cirrhosis. Ann Intern Med 1977; 87:195197.
  24. Lehrich RW, Greenberg A. When is it appropriate to use vasopressin receptor antagonists? J Am Soc Nephrol 2008; 19:10541058.
  25. Decaux G, Soupart A, Vassart G. Non-peptide arginine-vasopressin antagonists: the vaptans. Lancet 2008; 371:16241632.
  26. Schrier RW, Gross P, Gheorghiade M, et al; SALT Investigators. Tolvaptan, a selective oral vasopressin V2-receptor antagonist, for hyponatremia. N Engl J Med 2006; 355:20992112.
  27. Konstam MA, Gheorghiade M, Burnett JC, et al; Efficacy of Vasopressin Antagonism in Heart Failure Outcome Study With Tolvaptan (EVEREST) Investigators. Effects of oral tolvaptan in patients hospitalized for worsening heart failure: the EVEREST Outcome Trial. JAMA 2007; 297:13191331.
  28. Berl T, Quittnat-Pelletier F, Verbalis JG, et al; SALTWATER Investigators. Oral tolvaptan is safe and effective in chronic hyponatremia. J Am Soc Nephrol 2010; 21:705712.
  29. Greenberg A, Lehrich RW. Treatment of chronic hyponatremia: now we know how, but do we know when or if? J Am Soc Nephrol 2010; 21:552555.
  30. Greenberg A, Verbalis JG. Vasopressin receptor antagonists. Kidney Int 2006; 69:21242130.
  31. Rosner MH, Kirven J. Exercise-associated hyponatremia. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2007; 2:151161.
  32. Halperin ML, Kamel KS, Sterns R. Hyponatremia in marathon runners. N Engl J Med 2005; 353:427428.
  33. Hew-Butler T, Almond C, Ayus JC, et al; Exercise-Associated Hyponatremia (EAH) Consensus Panel. Consensus statement of the 1st International Exercise-Associated Hyponatremia Consensus Development Conference, Cape Town, South Africa 2005. Clin J Sport Med 2005; 15:208213.
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 77(10)
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 77(10)
Page Number
715-726
Page Number
715-726
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Management of hyponatremia: Providing treatment and avoiding harm
Display Headline
Management of hyponatremia: Providing treatment and avoiding harm
Sections
Inside the Article

KEY POINTS

  • Some hyponatremic patients present with acute, life-threatening cerebral edema due to severe hyponatremia. In others, the hyponatremia may be chronic and less severe, causing relatively few symptoms, but representing an important, independent marker of poor prognosis due to an underlying disease (eg, heart failure).
  • Even patients with chronic, less severe hyponatremia may have subtle symptoms of neurocognitive dysfunction and a higher risk of bone fractures.
  • Overly rapid correction of chronic hyponatremia or undercorrection of acute symptomatic hyponatremia can lead to serious neurologic injury.
  • Treatment strategies vary depending on the extracellular fluid volume status and the cause of hyponatremia.
  • Vasopressin antagonists (“vaptans”), a new class of aquaretic agents, specifically target the mechanism driving hyponatremia in some patients.
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Article PDF Media

Evaluation of hyponatremia: A little physiology goes a long way

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 10/08/2018 - 11:05
Display Headline
Evaluation of hyponatremia: A little physiology goes a long way
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Benjamin J. Freda, DO
Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Michael B. Davidson, DO
Department of Internal Medicine, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Phillip M. Hall, MD
Staff Consultant, Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Address: Phillip M. Hall, MD, Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, A51, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195; e-mail hallp@ccf.org

Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 71(8)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
639-650
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Benjamin J. Freda, DO
Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Michael B. Davidson, DO
Department of Internal Medicine, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Phillip M. Hall, MD
Staff Consultant, Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Address: Phillip M. Hall, MD, Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, A51, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195; e-mail hallp@ccf.org

Author and Disclosure Information

Benjamin J. Freda, DO
Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Michael B. Davidson, DO
Department of Internal Medicine, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Phillip M. Hall, MD
Staff Consultant, Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Address: Phillip M. Hall, MD, Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, A51, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195; e-mail hallp@ccf.org

Article PDF
Article PDF
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 71(8)
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 71(8)
Page Number
639-650
Page Number
639-650
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Evaluation of hyponatremia: A little physiology goes a long way
Display Headline
Evaluation of hyponatremia: A little physiology goes a long way
Sections
PURLs Copyright

Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Use ProPublica
Article PDF Media