Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Hub

Four genetic subtypes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) showed multiple distinct mutations, gene expression signatures, and treatment responses, researchers reported.

The findings “may provide a conceptual edifice on which to develop precision therapies for these aggressive cancers,” Roland Schmitz, PhD, and his associates wrote in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Other DLBCL studies have focused on individual mutations, but therapeutic response probably hinges on “constellations of genetic aberrations,” wrote Dr. Schmitz of the National Cancer Institute and his associates.

Therefore, they used exome and transcriptome sequencing, deep amplicon resequencing of 372 genes, and DNA copy-number analysis to analyze 572 fresh-frozen DLBCL biopsy specimens, nearly all of which were treatment-naïve.

This multiplatform approach yielded four genetic subtypes: MCD, so named for its co-occurring MYD88L265P and CD79B mutations; BN2, which has BCL6 fusions and NOTCH2 mutations; N1, which has NOTCH1 mutations; and EZB, which has EZH2 mutations and BCL2 translocations. Most MCD and N1 specimens were activated B-cell–like (ABC) tumors, EZB specimens were primarily germinal-center B-cell–like (GCB) tumors, and BN2 specimens included ABC, GCB, and unclassified cases.

A closer look at 119 previously untreated patients linked genetic subtypes with significant differences in progression-free survival (P less than .0001) and overall survival (P = .0002) following R-CHOP or CHOP-like chemotherapy.

The BN2 and EZB subtypes “[had] much more favorable outcomes than the MCD and N1 subtypes,” Dr. Schmitz and his associates said. “Analysis of genetic pathways suggested that MCD and BN2 DLBCLs rely on ‘chronic active’ B-cell receptor signaling that is amenable to therapeutic inhibition.”

Genetically subtyping DLBCL could help guide patients into appropriate clinical trials, the investigators wrote. For example, patients with the N1 subtype might be candidates for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, given N1’s prominent T-cell gene expression and poor response to R-CHOP.

Funders included the National Institutes of Health, the National Cancer Institute, the Dr. Mildred Scheel Stiftung fur Krebsforschung (Deutsche Krebshilfe), the Washington University in St. Louis, and the Kay Kendall Leukaemia Fund. Dr. Schmitz disclosed research funding from Dr. Mildred Scheel Stiftung fur Krebsforschung (Deutsche Krebshilfe).

SOURCE: Schmitz et al. New Eng J Med. 2018 Apr 11. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801445.

Four genetic subtypes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) showed multiple distinct mutations, gene expression signatures, and treatment responses, researchers reported.

The findings “may provide a conceptual edifice on which to develop precision therapies for these aggressive cancers,” Roland Schmitz, PhD, and his associates wrote in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Other DLBCL studies have focused on individual mutations, but therapeutic response probably hinges on “constellations of genetic aberrations,” wrote Dr. Schmitz of the National Cancer Institute and his associates.

Therefore, they used exome and transcriptome sequencing, deep amplicon resequencing of 372 genes, and DNA copy-number analysis to analyze 572 fresh-frozen DLBCL biopsy specimens, nearly all of which were treatment-naïve.

This multiplatform approach yielded four genetic subtypes: MCD, so named for its co-occurring MYD88L265P and CD79B mutations; BN2, which has BCL6 fusions and NOTCH2 mutations; N1, which has NOTCH1 mutations; and EZB, which has EZH2 mutations and BCL2 translocations. Most MCD and N1 specimens were activated B-cell–like (ABC) tumors, EZB specimens were primarily germinal-center B-cell–like (GCB) tumors, and BN2 specimens included ABC, GCB, and unclassified cases.

A closer look at 119 previously untreated patients linked genetic subtypes with significant differences in progression-free survival (P less than .0001) and overall survival (P = .0002) following R-CHOP or CHOP-like chemotherapy.

The BN2 and EZB subtypes “[had] much more favorable outcomes than the MCD and N1 subtypes,” Dr. Schmitz and his associates said. “Analysis of genetic pathways suggested that MCD and BN2 DLBCLs rely on ‘chronic active’ B-cell receptor signaling that is amenable to therapeutic inhibition.”

Genetically subtyping DLBCL could help guide patients into appropriate clinical trials, the investigators wrote. For example, patients with the N1 subtype might be candidates for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, given N1’s prominent T-cell gene expression and poor response to R-CHOP.

Funders included the National Institutes of Health, the National Cancer Institute, the Dr. Mildred Scheel Stiftung fur Krebsforschung (Deutsche Krebshilfe), the Washington University in St. Louis, and the Kay Kendall Leukaemia Fund. Dr. Schmitz disclosed research funding from Dr. Mildred Scheel Stiftung fur Krebsforschung (Deutsche Krebshilfe).

SOURCE: Schmitz et al. New Eng J Med. 2018 Apr 11. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801445.

Four genetic subtypes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) showed multiple distinct mutations, gene expression signatures, and treatment responses, researchers reported.

The findings “may provide a conceptual edifice on which to develop precision therapies for these aggressive cancers,” Roland Schmitz, PhD, and his associates wrote in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Other DLBCL studies have focused on individual mutations, but therapeutic response probably hinges on “constellations of genetic aberrations,” wrote Dr. Schmitz of the National Cancer Institute and his associates.

Therefore, they used exome and transcriptome sequencing, deep amplicon resequencing of 372 genes, and DNA copy-number analysis to analyze 572 fresh-frozen DLBCL biopsy specimens, nearly all of which were treatment-naïve.

This multiplatform approach yielded four genetic subtypes: MCD, so named for its co-occurring MYD88L265P and CD79B mutations; BN2, which has BCL6 fusions and NOTCH2 mutations; N1, which has NOTCH1 mutations; and EZB, which has EZH2 mutations and BCL2 translocations. Most MCD and N1 specimens were activated B-cell–like (ABC) tumors, EZB specimens were primarily germinal-center B-cell–like (GCB) tumors, and BN2 specimens included ABC, GCB, and unclassified cases.

A closer look at 119 previously untreated patients linked genetic subtypes with significant differences in progression-free survival (P less than .0001) and overall survival (P = .0002) following R-CHOP or CHOP-like chemotherapy.

The BN2 and EZB subtypes “[had] much more favorable outcomes than the MCD and N1 subtypes,” Dr. Schmitz and his associates said. “Analysis of genetic pathways suggested that MCD and BN2 DLBCLs rely on ‘chronic active’ B-cell receptor signaling that is amenable to therapeutic inhibition.”

Genetically subtyping DLBCL could help guide patients into appropriate clinical trials, the investigators wrote. For example, patients with the N1 subtype might be candidates for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, given N1’s prominent T-cell gene expression and poor response to R-CHOP.

Funders included the National Institutes of Health, the National Cancer Institute, the Dr. Mildred Scheel Stiftung fur Krebsforschung (Deutsche Krebshilfe), the Washington University in St. Louis, and the Kay Kendall Leukaemia Fund. Dr. Schmitz disclosed research funding from Dr. Mildred Scheel Stiftung fur Krebsforschung (Deutsche Krebshilfe).

SOURCE: Schmitz et al. New Eng J Med. 2018 Apr 11. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801445.

Duvelisib, a dual inhibitor of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)-delta and PI3K-gamma, is under priority review by the Food and Drug Administration.

The biopharmaceutical company Verastem is seeking full approval for duvelisib for the treatment of relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) and accelerated approval for the treatment of relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma. The FDA has set Oct. 5, 2018, as the target action date, according to Verastem.

mschneider@mdedge.com

Duvelisib, a dual inhibitor of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)-delta and PI3K-gamma, is under priority review by the Food and Drug Administration.

The biopharmaceutical company Verastem is seeking full approval for duvelisib for the treatment of relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) and accelerated approval for the treatment of relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma. The FDA has set Oct. 5, 2018, as the target action date, according to Verastem.

mschneider@mdedge.com

Duvelisib, a dual inhibitor of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)-delta and PI3K-gamma, is under priority review by the Food and Drug Administration.

The biopharmaceutical company Verastem is seeking full approval for duvelisib for the treatment of relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) and accelerated approval for the treatment of relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma. The FDA has set Oct. 5, 2018, as the target action date, according to Verastem.

mschneider@mdedge.com

Updated clinical guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) include new and revised recommendations based on major advances in genomics, targeted therapies, and biomarkers that have occurred since the last iteration in 2008.

The guidelines are an update from a consensus document issued a decade ago by the International Workshop on CLL, focusing on the conduct of clinical trials in patients with CLL. The new guidelines are published in Blood.

Major changes or additions include:

Molecular genetics: The updated guidelines recognize the clinical importance of specific genomic alterations/mutations on response to standard chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy, including the 17p deletion and mutations in TP53.

“Therefore, the assessment of both del(17p) and TP53 mutation has prognostic and predictive value and should guide therapeutic decisions in routine practice. For clinical trials, it is recommended that molecular genetics be performed prior to treating a patient on protocol,” the guidelines state.

IGHV mutational status: The mutational status of immunoglobulin variable heavy chain (IGHV) genes has been demonstrated to offer important prognostic information, according to the guidelines authors led by Michael Hallek, MD of the University of Cologne, Germany.

Specifically, leukemia with IGHV genes without somatic mutations are associated with worse clinical outcomes, compared with leukemia with IGHV mutations. Patients with mutated IGHV and other prognostic factors such as favorable cytogenetics or minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity generally have excellent outcomes with a chemoimmunotherapy regimen consisting of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab, the authors noted.

Updated clinical guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) include new and revised recommendations based on major advances in genomics, targeted therapies, and biomarkers that have occurred since the last iteration in 2008.

The guidelines are an update from a consensus document issued a decade ago by the International Workshop on CLL, focusing on the conduct of clinical trials in patients with CLL. The new guidelines are published in Blood.

Major changes or additions include:

Molecular genetics: The updated guidelines recognize the clinical importance of specific genomic alterations/mutations on response to standard chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy, including the 17p deletion and mutations in TP53.

“Therefore, the assessment of both del(17p) and TP53 mutation has prognostic and predictive value and should guide therapeutic decisions in routine practice. For clinical trials, it is recommended that molecular genetics be performed prior to treating a patient on protocol,” the guidelines state.

IGHV mutational status: The mutational status of immunoglobulin variable heavy chain (IGHV) genes has been demonstrated to offer important prognostic information, according to the guidelines authors led by Michael Hallek, MD of the University of Cologne, Germany.

Specifically, leukemia with IGHV genes without somatic mutations are associated with worse clinical outcomes, compared with leukemia with IGHV mutations. Patients with mutated IGHV and other prognostic factors such as favorable cytogenetics or minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity generally have excellent outcomes with a chemoimmunotherapy regimen consisting of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab, the authors noted.

Updated clinical guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) include new and revised recommendations based on major advances in genomics, targeted therapies, and biomarkers that have occurred since the last iteration in 2008.

The guidelines are an update from a consensus document issued a decade ago by the International Workshop on CLL, focusing on the conduct of clinical trials in patients with CLL. The new guidelines are published in Blood.

Major changes or additions include:

Molecular genetics: The updated guidelines recognize the clinical importance of specific genomic alterations/mutations on response to standard chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy, including the 17p deletion and mutations in TP53.

“Therefore, the assessment of both del(17p) and TP53 mutation has prognostic and predictive value and should guide therapeutic decisions in routine practice. For clinical trials, it is recommended that molecular genetics be performed prior to treating a patient on protocol,” the guidelines state.

IGHV mutational status: The mutational status of immunoglobulin variable heavy chain (IGHV) genes has been demonstrated to offer important prognostic information, according to the guidelines authors led by Michael Hallek, MD of the University of Cologne, Germany.

Specifically, leukemia with IGHV genes without somatic mutations are associated with worse clinical outcomes, compared with leukemia with IGHV mutations. Patients with mutated IGHV and other prognostic factors such as favorable cytogenetics or minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity generally have excellent outcomes with a chemoimmunotherapy regimen consisting of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab, the authors noted.

The oral immunomodulatory drug lenalidomide is active and may provide prolonged responses in certain patients with a rare and aggressive subtype of primary cutaneous lymphoma, according to results of a phase 2 study.

In the study, which comprised 19 patients with primary cutaneous diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, leg type (PCDLBCL, LT), 5 patients (26.3%) had a response at 6 months, and there were still 3 patients in response at 12 months. The findings were reported in the Journal of Investigative Dermatology.

In an exploratory analysis, reducing the dose of lenalidomide was associated with prolonged response and improved survival, noted lead author Marie Beylot-Barry, MD, of the dermatology department, Hôpital Saint-André, CHU Bordeaux, France, and her colleagues.

“Lenalidomide at reduced doses may allow prolonged responses in few patients, and represents a therapeutic option in relapsing/refractory PCDLBCL, LT,” the researchers wrote.

Found mostly on the lower limbs of elderly patients, PCDLBCL, LT exhibits aggressive behavior and is associated with a high rate of skin recurrences. First-line therapy for the cutaneous lymphoma is typically rituximab and chemotherapy, regardless of clinical stage or patient age, the researchers wrote, though primary resistance or recurrence after treatment occurs in about half of patients. “In such relapsing or refractory cases, no treatment has demonstrated a sustained benefit thus far,” they noted.

Lenalidomide has already demonstrated efficacy in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and it induces inhibition of cell signaling, engaging NF-kappaB signaling. PCDLBCL, LT is marked by genetic alterations leading to the NF-kappaB pathway, which represents a therapeutic target.

Dr. Beylot-Barry and her colleagues initiated a multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 trial of 19 patients refractory/relapsing PCDLBCL, LT. Median progression-free survival in the trial was 4.9 months. The 6-month overall response rate – the primary endpoint of the trial – was 26.3%, which was not significantly superior to a prespecified 20% minimal response rate, according to the researchers.

SOURCE: Beylot-Barry M et al. J Invest Dermatol. 2018 Mar 26. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2018.03.1516.

The oral immunomodulatory drug lenalidomide is active and may provide prolonged responses in certain patients with a rare and aggressive subtype of primary cutaneous lymphoma, according to results of a phase 2 study.

In the study, which comprised 19 patients with primary cutaneous diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, leg type (PCDLBCL, LT), 5 patients (26.3%) had a response at 6 months, and there were still 3 patients in response at 12 months. The findings were reported in the Journal of Investigative Dermatology.

In an exploratory analysis, reducing the dose of lenalidomide was associated with prolonged response and improved survival, noted lead author Marie Beylot-Barry, MD, of the dermatology department, Hôpital Saint-André, CHU Bordeaux, France, and her colleagues.

“Lenalidomide at reduced doses may allow prolonged responses in few patients, and represents a therapeutic option in relapsing/refractory PCDLBCL, LT,” the researchers wrote.

Found mostly on the lower limbs of elderly patients, PCDLBCL, LT exhibits aggressive behavior and is associated with a high rate of skin recurrences. First-line therapy for the cutaneous lymphoma is typically rituximab and chemotherapy, regardless of clinical stage or patient age, the researchers wrote, though primary resistance or recurrence after treatment occurs in about half of patients. “In such relapsing or refractory cases, no treatment has demonstrated a sustained benefit thus far,” they noted.

Lenalidomide has already demonstrated efficacy in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and it induces inhibition of cell signaling, engaging NF-kappaB signaling. PCDLBCL, LT is marked by genetic alterations leading to the NF-kappaB pathway, which represents a therapeutic target.

Dr. Beylot-Barry and her colleagues initiated a multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 trial of 19 patients refractory/relapsing PCDLBCL, LT. Median progression-free survival in the trial was 4.9 months. The 6-month overall response rate – the primary endpoint of the trial – was 26.3%, which was not significantly superior to a prespecified 20% minimal response rate, according to the researchers.

SOURCE: Beylot-Barry M et al. J Invest Dermatol. 2018 Mar 26. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2018.03.1516.

The oral immunomodulatory drug lenalidomide is active and may provide prolonged responses in certain patients with a rare and aggressive subtype of primary cutaneous lymphoma, according to results of a phase 2 study.

In the study, which comprised 19 patients with primary cutaneous diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, leg type (PCDLBCL, LT), 5 patients (26.3%) had a response at 6 months, and there were still 3 patients in response at 12 months. The findings were reported in the Journal of Investigative Dermatology.

In an exploratory analysis, reducing the dose of lenalidomide was associated with prolonged response and improved survival, noted lead author Marie Beylot-Barry, MD, of the dermatology department, Hôpital Saint-André, CHU Bordeaux, France, and her colleagues.

“Lenalidomide at reduced doses may allow prolonged responses in few patients, and represents a therapeutic option in relapsing/refractory PCDLBCL, LT,” the researchers wrote.

Found mostly on the lower limbs of elderly patients, PCDLBCL, LT exhibits aggressive behavior and is associated with a high rate of skin recurrences. First-line therapy for the cutaneous lymphoma is typically rituximab and chemotherapy, regardless of clinical stage or patient age, the researchers wrote, though primary resistance or recurrence after treatment occurs in about half of patients. “In such relapsing or refractory cases, no treatment has demonstrated a sustained benefit thus far,” they noted.

Lenalidomide has already demonstrated efficacy in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and it induces inhibition of cell signaling, engaging NF-kappaB signaling. PCDLBCL, LT is marked by genetic alterations leading to the NF-kappaB pathway, which represents a therapeutic target.

Dr. Beylot-Barry and her colleagues initiated a multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 trial of 19 patients refractory/relapsing PCDLBCL, LT. Median progression-free survival in the trial was 4.9 months. The 6-month overall response rate – the primary endpoint of the trial – was 26.3%, which was not significantly superior to a prespecified 20% minimal response rate, according to the researchers.

SOURCE: Beylot-Barry M et al. J Invest Dermatol. 2018 Mar 26. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2018.03.1516.

In mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), ibrutinib plus venetoclax significantly improved the complete response rate, compared with what has been previously reported for ibrutinib alone, according to results of a phase 2 study.

Clinical outcomes with the combination seem superior to previously reported results for either treatment alone, said lead investigator Constantine S. Tam, MBBS, MD, of the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, and his coinvestigators.

“The results of our study, which used a historical cohort as a control, are consistent with the notion that the combination of ibrutinib and venetoclax is highly effective in mantle-cell lymphoma,” the investigators wrote in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The BTK inhibitor ibrutinib and the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax are two of the most active agents for this B-cell cancer, investigators reported. The rationale for combining the agents is “compelling” because they affect different critical pathways in the malignant B cell.

Both agents have demonstrated complete response rates of 21% in previous studies of relapsed or refractory MCL, and preclinical studies suggest the combination of ibrutinib and venetoclax would be synergistic.

In the present single-group, phase 2 study, 24 patients with MCL (23 relapsed or refractory, 1 previously untreated) started ibrutinib 560 mg daily; at 4 weeks, venetoclax was started at a low dose and increased to 400 mg daily.

The study primary end point – complete response rate at week 16 assessed by CT – was 42%, compared with 9% for ibrutinib monotherapy in the phase 2 PCYC-1104-CA study (P less than .001).

Computed tomography assessment was used for the primary end point to allow comparison to the ibrutinib monotherapy study, which did not use positron emission tomography for restaging. “Our study was designed to have 80% power to reject a complete response rate of 9% (at a one-sided alpha level of 0.05) if the rate of complete response was at least 30%,” the investigators noted.

Complete response rate assessed by positron emission tomography at week 16 was 62%, and was 71% overall.

In all, 67% of patients had absence of minimal residual disease by flow cytometry. At 15 months, 78% of the responses were ongoing, and at 18 months, 57% of patients were alive and progression free.

“Such outcomes appear to be substantially better than those that have been reported for ibrutinib or venetoclax monotherapy,” the investigators wrote.

The combination had side effects that are “acceptable to both patients and physicians,” investigators wrote. Side effects, usually low grade, included diarrhea in 83% of patients, fatigue in 75%, and nausea or vomiting in 71%. Tumor lysis syndrome was seen in two patients.

Whether ibrutinib plus venetoclax is superior to ibrutinib alone is being formally evaluated in an ongoing phase 3 study.

Janssen and AbbVie partially funded the current phase 2 study. Dr. Tam reported financial ties to Janssen, AbbVie, and Pharmacyclics. Other study authors reported financial ties to various pharmaceutical companies.

SOURCE: Tam C et al. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:1211-23.

In mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), ibrutinib plus venetoclax significantly improved the complete response rate, compared with what has been previously reported for ibrutinib alone, according to results of a phase 2 study.

Clinical outcomes with the combination seem superior to previously reported results for either treatment alone, said lead investigator Constantine S. Tam, MBBS, MD, of the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, and his coinvestigators.

“The results of our study, which used a historical cohort as a control, are consistent with the notion that the combination of ibrutinib and venetoclax is highly effective in mantle-cell lymphoma,” the investigators wrote in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The BTK inhibitor ibrutinib and the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax are two of the most active agents for this B-cell cancer, investigators reported. The rationale for combining the agents is “compelling” because they affect different critical pathways in the malignant B cell.

Both agents have demonstrated complete response rates of 21% in previous studies of relapsed or refractory MCL, and preclinical studies suggest the combination of ibrutinib and venetoclax would be synergistic.

In the present single-group, phase 2 study, 24 patients with MCL (23 relapsed or refractory, 1 previously untreated) started ibrutinib 560 mg daily; at 4 weeks, venetoclax was started at a low dose and increased to 400 mg daily.

The study primary end point – complete response rate at week 16 assessed by CT – was 42%, compared with 9% for ibrutinib monotherapy in the phase 2 PCYC-1104-CA study (P less than .001).

Computed tomography assessment was used for the primary end point to allow comparison to the ibrutinib monotherapy study, which did not use positron emission tomography for restaging. “Our study was designed to have 80% power to reject a complete response rate of 9% (at a one-sided alpha level of 0.05) if the rate of complete response was at least 30%,” the investigators noted.

Complete response rate assessed by positron emission tomography at week 16 was 62%, and was 71% overall.

In all, 67% of patients had absence of minimal residual disease by flow cytometry. At 15 months, 78% of the responses were ongoing, and at 18 months, 57% of patients were alive and progression free.

“Such outcomes appear to be substantially better than those that have been reported for ibrutinib or venetoclax monotherapy,” the investigators wrote.

The combination had side effects that are “acceptable to both patients and physicians,” investigators wrote. Side effects, usually low grade, included diarrhea in 83% of patients, fatigue in 75%, and nausea or vomiting in 71%. Tumor lysis syndrome was seen in two patients.

Whether ibrutinib plus venetoclax is superior to ibrutinib alone is being formally evaluated in an ongoing phase 3 study.

Janssen and AbbVie partially funded the current phase 2 study. Dr. Tam reported financial ties to Janssen, AbbVie, and Pharmacyclics. Other study authors reported financial ties to various pharmaceutical companies.

SOURCE: Tam C et al. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:1211-23.

In mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), ibrutinib plus venetoclax significantly improved the complete response rate, compared with what has been previously reported for ibrutinib alone, according to results of a phase 2 study.

Clinical outcomes with the combination seem superior to previously reported results for either treatment alone, said lead investigator Constantine S. Tam, MBBS, MD, of the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, and his coinvestigators.

“The results of our study, which used a historical cohort as a control, are consistent with the notion that the combination of ibrutinib and venetoclax is highly effective in mantle-cell lymphoma,” the investigators wrote in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The BTK inhibitor ibrutinib and the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax are two of the most active agents for this B-cell cancer, investigators reported. The rationale for combining the agents is “compelling” because they affect different critical pathways in the malignant B cell.

Both agents have demonstrated complete response rates of 21% in previous studies of relapsed or refractory MCL, and preclinical studies suggest the combination of ibrutinib and venetoclax would be synergistic.

In the present single-group, phase 2 study, 24 patients with MCL (23 relapsed or refractory, 1 previously untreated) started ibrutinib 560 mg daily; at 4 weeks, venetoclax was started at a low dose and increased to 400 mg daily.

The study primary end point – complete response rate at week 16 assessed by CT – was 42%, compared with 9% for ibrutinib monotherapy in the phase 2 PCYC-1104-CA study (P less than .001).

Computed tomography assessment was used for the primary end point to allow comparison to the ibrutinib monotherapy study, which did not use positron emission tomography for restaging. “Our study was designed to have 80% power to reject a complete response rate of 9% (at a one-sided alpha level of 0.05) if the rate of complete response was at least 30%,” the investigators noted.

Complete response rate assessed by positron emission tomography at week 16 was 62%, and was 71% overall.

In all, 67% of patients had absence of minimal residual disease by flow cytometry. At 15 months, 78% of the responses were ongoing, and at 18 months, 57% of patients were alive and progression free.

“Such outcomes appear to be substantially better than those that have been reported for ibrutinib or venetoclax monotherapy,” the investigators wrote.

The combination had side effects that are “acceptable to both patients and physicians,” investigators wrote. Side effects, usually low grade, included diarrhea in 83% of patients, fatigue in 75%, and nausea or vomiting in 71%. Tumor lysis syndrome was seen in two patients.

Whether ibrutinib plus venetoclax is superior to ibrutinib alone is being formally evaluated in an ongoing phase 3 study.

Janssen and AbbVie partially funded the current phase 2 study. Dr. Tam reported financial ties to Janssen, AbbVie, and Pharmacyclics. Other study authors reported financial ties to various pharmaceutical companies.

SOURCE: Tam C et al. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:1211-23.

LA JOLLA, CALIF. – In patients with relapsed peripheral T-cell lymphoma, the goal before moving to transplant is achieving complete or near-complete remission, according to Steven M. Horwitz, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York.

“If you’re really trying to go to transplant, you want a complete remission or close to it. So that’s often been combination chemotherapy. But I think what we’re learning is, when some of the newer agents are combined, we’re seeing higher complete response rates. And we’re doing a better job at picking subtype specific approaches,” Dr. Horwitz said in a video interview at the annual T-cell Lymphoma Forum.

Dr. Horwitz also explored the role for reduced-intensity regimens in older patients, the use of radiation conditioning, and which new agents look most promising in peripheral T-cell lymphoma.

Dr. Horwitz had previously disclosed financial relationships with Celgene, Forty Seven, Huya Bioscience International, Infinity, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Millennium, Seattle Genetics, and Takeda. The T-Cell Lymphoma Forum is held by Jonathan Wood & Associates, which is owned by the same company as this news organization.

mschneider@frontlinemedcom.com

SOURCE: Horwitz SM. TCLF 2018.

LA JOLLA, CALIF. – In patients with relapsed peripheral T-cell lymphoma, the goal before moving to transplant is achieving complete or near-complete remission, according to Steven M. Horwitz, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York.

“If you’re really trying to go to transplant, you want a complete remission or close to it. So that’s often been combination chemotherapy. But I think what we’re learning is, when some of the newer agents are combined, we’re seeing higher complete response rates. And we’re doing a better job at picking subtype specific approaches,” Dr. Horwitz said in a video interview at the annual T-cell Lymphoma Forum.

Dr. Horwitz also explored the role for reduced-intensity regimens in older patients, the use of radiation conditioning, and which new agents look most promising in peripheral T-cell lymphoma.

Dr. Horwitz had previously disclosed financial relationships with Celgene, Forty Seven, Huya Bioscience International, Infinity, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Millennium, Seattle Genetics, and Takeda. The T-Cell Lymphoma Forum is held by Jonathan Wood & Associates, which is owned by the same company as this news organization.

mschneider@frontlinemedcom.com

SOURCE: Horwitz SM. TCLF 2018.

LA JOLLA, CALIF. – In patients with relapsed peripheral T-cell lymphoma, the goal before moving to transplant is achieving complete or near-complete remission, according to Steven M. Horwitz, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York.

“If you’re really trying to go to transplant, you want a complete remission or close to it. So that’s often been combination chemotherapy. But I think what we’re learning is, when some of the newer agents are combined, we’re seeing higher complete response rates. And we’re doing a better job at picking subtype specific approaches,” Dr. Horwitz said in a video interview at the annual T-cell Lymphoma Forum.

Dr. Horwitz also explored the role for reduced-intensity regimens in older patients, the use of radiation conditioning, and which new agents look most promising in peripheral T-cell lymphoma.

Dr. Horwitz had previously disclosed financial relationships with Celgene, Forty Seven, Huya Bioscience International, Infinity, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Millennium, Seattle Genetics, and Takeda. The T-Cell Lymphoma Forum is held by Jonathan Wood & Associates, which is owned by the same company as this news organization.

mschneider@frontlinemedcom.com

SOURCE: Horwitz SM. TCLF 2018.

Voxtalisib, an investigational agent that targets both mTOR and multiple isoforms of PI3K, showed “promising” efficacy with acceptable safety in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (FL), results of a phase 2 trial indicate.

Among 46 patients with FL, the overall response rate was 41.3%, including five (10.9%) complete responses. The median progression-free survival in this group was 58 weeks, reported Jennifer R. Brown, MD, PhD, of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, and her colleagues.

“The observed activity of voxtalisib in relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma, notable for inducing complete responses in 10.9% of patients, warrants further study,” the investigators wrote in a study published in the Lancet Haematology.

Efficacy of the drug was limited, however, against aggressive malignancies, including mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), or chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL).

Voxtalisib (XL765) is a potent inhibitor of all four class I PI3Ks, as well as a less robust inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). In contrast, idelalisib (Zydelig) – which is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of relapsed/refractory FL or for CLL, in combination with rituximab – inhibits only the delta isoform of PI3K, and does not have marked anti–mTOR properties.

The investigators conducted an open-label, nonrandomized trial of voxtalisib in 30 centers in the United States, Belgium, France, Germany, the Netherlands, and Australia.

Adults 18 years or older with relapsed or refractory MCL, FL, DLBCL or CLL/SLL with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or less were enrolled. All patients received voxtalisib 50 mg orally twice daily in 28-day continuous dosing cycles until progression or unacceptable toxicity.

All patients who received more the 4 weeks of treatment and had both a baseline and one or more on-treatment tumor assessments were included in the efficacy analysis. Patients with lymphoma had received a median of three prior lines of therapy, and those with CLL had received a median of four prior lines.

The overall response rate in the entire study population was 18.3% (30 patients), including 22 partial and 8 complete responses. ORR rates were as follows:

• FL: 41.3% (19 of 46 patients).
• MCL: 11.9% (5 of 42 patients).
• DLBCL: 4.9% (2 of 41 patients).
• CLL/SLL: 11.4% (4 of 35 patients).

The safety analysis, which included all 167 patients enrolled, was consistent with that of previous studies of voxtalisib, the investigators said. The most frequently reported adverse events of any grade or type were diarrhea in 35% of patients, fatigue in 32%, nausea in 27%, pyrexia in 26%, cough 24%, and decreased appetite in 21%.

Grade 3 or greater adverse events include anemia in 12%, and pneumonia and thrombocytopenia in 8% each. Slightly more than half of all patients (58.1%) had a serious adverse event.

The investigators noted that voxtalisib’s short plasma half-life may explain the drug’s lack of efficacy against the aggressive lymphomas and CLL/SLL. Longer-acting formulations of the drug or more frequent dosing might address this problem, although the latter solution could be challenging for patients to follow, the investigators acknowledged.

In light of the results, no further studies of voxtalisib in CLL are planned, thought investigation of the drug alone or in combination with chemoimmunotherapy is warranted for patients with follicular lymphoma, the investigators wrote.

The study was funded by Sanofi. Dr. Brown reported consulting for Janssen, Gilead, Celgene, Sun BioPharma, Novartis, AbbVie, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Astellas, RedX, Pharmacyclics, Genentech/Roche, Verastem, and TG Therapeutics, and grants from Gilead and Sun BioPharma.

SOURCE: Brown J et al. Lancet Haematol. 2018 Mar 14. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(18)30030-9.
 

Voxtalisib, an investigational agent that targets both mTOR and multiple isoforms of PI3K, showed “promising” efficacy with acceptable safety in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (FL), results of a phase 2 trial indicate.

Among 46 patients with FL, the overall response rate was 41.3%, including five (10.9%) complete responses. The median progression-free survival in this group was 58 weeks, reported Jennifer R. Brown, MD, PhD, of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, and her colleagues.

“The observed activity of voxtalisib in relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma, notable for inducing complete responses in 10.9% of patients, warrants further study,” the investigators wrote in a study published in the Lancet Haematology.

Efficacy of the drug was limited, however, against aggressive malignancies, including mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), or chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL).

Voxtalisib (XL765) is a potent inhibitor of all four class I PI3Ks, as well as a less robust inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). In contrast, idelalisib (Zydelig) – which is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of relapsed/refractory FL or for CLL, in combination with rituximab – inhibits only the delta isoform of PI3K, and does not have marked anti–mTOR properties.

The investigators conducted an open-label, nonrandomized trial of voxtalisib in 30 centers in the United States, Belgium, France, Germany, the Netherlands, and Australia.

Adults 18 years or older with relapsed or refractory MCL, FL, DLBCL or CLL/SLL with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or less were enrolled. All patients received voxtalisib 50 mg orally twice daily in 28-day continuous dosing cycles until progression or unacceptable toxicity.

All patients who received more the 4 weeks of treatment and had both a baseline and one or more on-treatment tumor assessments were included in the efficacy analysis. Patients with lymphoma had received a median of three prior lines of therapy, and those with CLL had received a median of four prior lines.

The overall response rate in the entire study population was 18.3% (30 patients), including 22 partial and 8 complete responses. ORR rates were as follows:

• FL: 41.3% (19 of 46 patients).
• MCL: 11.9% (5 of 42 patients).
• DLBCL: 4.9% (2 of 41 patients).
• CLL/SLL: 11.4% (4 of 35 patients).

The safety analysis, which included all 167 patients enrolled, was consistent with that of previous studies of voxtalisib, the investigators said. The most frequently reported adverse events of any grade or type were diarrhea in 35% of patients, fatigue in 32%, nausea in 27%, pyrexia in 26%, cough 24%, and decreased appetite in 21%.

Grade 3 or greater adverse events include anemia in 12%, and pneumonia and thrombocytopenia in 8% each. Slightly more than half of all patients (58.1%) had a serious adverse event.

The investigators noted that voxtalisib’s short plasma half-life may explain the drug’s lack of efficacy against the aggressive lymphomas and CLL/SLL. Longer-acting formulations of the drug or more frequent dosing might address this problem, although the latter solution could be challenging for patients to follow, the investigators acknowledged.

In light of the results, no further studies of voxtalisib in CLL are planned, thought investigation of the drug alone or in combination with chemoimmunotherapy is warranted for patients with follicular lymphoma, the investigators wrote.

The study was funded by Sanofi. Dr. Brown reported consulting for Janssen, Gilead, Celgene, Sun BioPharma, Novartis, AbbVie, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Astellas, RedX, Pharmacyclics, Genentech/Roche, Verastem, and TG Therapeutics, and grants from Gilead and Sun BioPharma.

SOURCE: Brown J et al. Lancet Haematol. 2018 Mar 14. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(18)30030-9.
 

Voxtalisib, an investigational agent that targets both mTOR and multiple isoforms of PI3K, showed “promising” efficacy with acceptable safety in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (FL), results of a phase 2 trial indicate.

Among 46 patients with FL, the overall response rate was 41.3%, including five (10.9%) complete responses. The median progression-free survival in this group was 58 weeks, reported Jennifer R. Brown, MD, PhD, of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, and her colleagues.

“The observed activity of voxtalisib in relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma, notable for inducing complete responses in 10.9% of patients, warrants further study,” the investigators wrote in a study published in the Lancet Haematology.

Efficacy of the drug was limited, however, against aggressive malignancies, including mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), or chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL).

Voxtalisib (XL765) is a potent inhibitor of all four class I PI3Ks, as well as a less robust inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). In contrast, idelalisib (Zydelig) – which is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of relapsed/refractory FL or for CLL, in combination with rituximab – inhibits only the delta isoform of PI3K, and does not have marked anti–mTOR properties.

The investigators conducted an open-label, nonrandomized trial of voxtalisib in 30 centers in the United States, Belgium, France, Germany, the Netherlands, and Australia.

Adults 18 years or older with relapsed or refractory MCL, FL, DLBCL or CLL/SLL with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or less were enrolled. All patients received voxtalisib 50 mg orally twice daily in 28-day continuous dosing cycles until progression or unacceptable toxicity.

All patients who received more the 4 weeks of treatment and had both a baseline and one or more on-treatment tumor assessments were included in the efficacy analysis. Patients with lymphoma had received a median of three prior lines of therapy, and those with CLL had received a median of four prior lines.

The overall response rate in the entire study population was 18.3% (30 patients), including 22 partial and 8 complete responses. ORR rates were as follows:

• FL: 41.3% (19 of 46 patients).
• MCL: 11.9% (5 of 42 patients).
• DLBCL: 4.9% (2 of 41 patients).
• CLL/SLL: 11.4% (4 of 35 patients).

The safety analysis, which included all 167 patients enrolled, was consistent with that of previous studies of voxtalisib, the investigators said. The most frequently reported adverse events of any grade or type were diarrhea in 35% of patients, fatigue in 32%, nausea in 27%, pyrexia in 26%, cough 24%, and decreased appetite in 21%.

Grade 3 or greater adverse events include anemia in 12%, and pneumonia and thrombocytopenia in 8% each. Slightly more than half of all patients (58.1%) had a serious adverse event.

The investigators noted that voxtalisib’s short plasma half-life may explain the drug’s lack of efficacy against the aggressive lymphomas and CLL/SLL. Longer-acting formulations of the drug or more frequent dosing might address this problem, although the latter solution could be challenging for patients to follow, the investigators acknowledged.

In light of the results, no further studies of voxtalisib in CLL are planned, thought investigation of the drug alone or in combination with chemoimmunotherapy is warranted for patients with follicular lymphoma, the investigators wrote.

The study was funded by Sanofi. Dr. Brown reported consulting for Janssen, Gilead, Celgene, Sun BioPharma, Novartis, AbbVie, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Astellas, RedX, Pharmacyclics, Genentech/Roche, Verastem, and TG Therapeutics, and grants from Gilead and Sun BioPharma.

SOURCE: Brown J et al. Lancet Haematol. 2018 Mar 14. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(18)30030-9.
 

The Food and Drug Administration has received 414 reports of cases of breast implant–associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL), including nine deaths.

This figure includes all medical device reports received by the agency between 2011 and September 2017. The FDA recently provided an update on ALCL linked to breast implants and an estimate of lifetime risk of developing ALCL.

Based on available medical literature, the lifetime risk of developing BIA-ALCL for patients with textured breast implants ranges from 1 in 3,817 to 1 in 30,000, according to the update.

Of the 272 reports with data on surface type, 242 were textured implants and 30 were smooth implants. In addition, 413 reports include information on the implant fill type: 234 used silicone gel and 179 were saline filled.

“The FDA has been closely tracking the relationship between breast implants and a rare type of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma since we first identified this possible association. We’ve been working to gather additional information to better characterize and quantify the risk so that patients and providers can have more informed discussions about breast implants,” said Binita Ashar, MD, director of the division of surgical devices in the FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health. “As part of that effort, we are working to update and enhance the information we have on this association, including updating the total number of known cases of BIA-ALCL and the lifetime risk of developing BIA-ALCL as reported in medical literature.”

The possible association between breast implants and the development of anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) was first identified in 2011. At that time, there were not enough cases of to determine what factors increased a patient’s risk of developing the disease. As more information became available, the World Health Organization designated BIA-ALCL as a T-cell lymphoma that can develop following breast implants.

ilacy@mdedge.com

The Food and Drug Administration has received 414 reports of cases of breast implant–associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL), including nine deaths.

This figure includes all medical device reports received by the agency between 2011 and September 2017. The FDA recently provided an update on ALCL linked to breast implants and an estimate of lifetime risk of developing ALCL.

Based on available medical literature, the lifetime risk of developing BIA-ALCL for patients with textured breast implants ranges from 1 in 3,817 to 1 in 30,000, according to the update.

Of the 272 reports with data on surface type, 242 were textured implants and 30 were smooth implants. In addition, 413 reports include information on the implant fill type: 234 used silicone gel and 179 were saline filled.

“The FDA has been closely tracking the relationship between breast implants and a rare type of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma since we first identified this possible association. We’ve been working to gather additional information to better characterize and quantify the risk so that patients and providers can have more informed discussions about breast implants,” said Binita Ashar, MD, director of the division of surgical devices in the FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health. “As part of that effort, we are working to update and enhance the information we have on this association, including updating the total number of known cases of BIA-ALCL and the lifetime risk of developing BIA-ALCL as reported in medical literature.”

The possible association between breast implants and the development of anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) was first identified in 2011. At that time, there were not enough cases of to determine what factors increased a patient’s risk of developing the disease. As more information became available, the World Health Organization designated BIA-ALCL as a T-cell lymphoma that can develop following breast implants.

ilacy@mdedge.com

The Food and Drug Administration has received 414 reports of cases of breast implant–associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL), including nine deaths.

This figure includes all medical device reports received by the agency between 2011 and September 2017. The FDA recently provided an update on ALCL linked to breast implants and an estimate of lifetime risk of developing ALCL.

Based on available medical literature, the lifetime risk of developing BIA-ALCL for patients with textured breast implants ranges from 1 in 3,817 to 1 in 30,000, according to the update.

Of the 272 reports with data on surface type, 242 were textured implants and 30 were smooth implants. In addition, 413 reports include information on the implant fill type: 234 used silicone gel and 179 were saline filled.

“The FDA has been closely tracking the relationship between breast implants and a rare type of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma since we first identified this possible association. We’ve been working to gather additional information to better characterize and quantify the risk so that patients and providers can have more informed discussions about breast implants,” said Binita Ashar, MD, director of the division of surgical devices in the FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health. “As part of that effort, we are working to update and enhance the information we have on this association, including updating the total number of known cases of BIA-ALCL and the lifetime risk of developing BIA-ALCL as reported in medical literature.”

The possible association between breast implants and the development of anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) was first identified in 2011. At that time, there were not enough cases of to determine what factors increased a patient’s risk of developing the disease. As more information became available, the World Health Organization designated BIA-ALCL as a T-cell lymphoma that can develop following breast implants.

ilacy@mdedge.com

Classic mantle cell lymphoma (cMCL) has long been treated as a uniformly aggressive disease in need of similarly aggressive treatment, but that approach may be leading to overtreatment, according to one expert.

“The cMCL encompasses a broad category of lymphomas with highly variable clinical behaviors. A contemporary categorization of cMCL as a predominantly aggressive entity is misleading, as only an estimated 20% to 25% of patients with cMCL present with a symptomatic or aggressively behaving disease,” Leonid L. Yavorkovsky, MD, PhD, of the Kaiser Permanente San Jose Medical Center (Calif.), wrote in a commentary in JAMA Oncology.

Wikimedia Commons/TexasPathologistMSW/CC-ASA 4.0 International

While groups like the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the European Society for Medical Oncology recommend that only older patients and those with significant comorbidities should be exempted from intensive therapy, Dr. Yavorkovsky said cMCL should be evaluated on an individual basis, looking closely at the prognostic markers Ki-67, SOX-11, and TP53 to identify asymptomatic patients who might be able to safely delay aggressive treatment. He also called for more risk-adapted patient assignment to cMCL clinical trials.

“The failure to recognize the erratic nature of cMCL in clinical studies may confound the outcome gains and, ultimately, undermine the ensuing treatment recommendations,” Dr. Yavorkovsky wrote.

Read his full commentary in JAMA Oncology.

mschneider@frontlinemedcom.com

SOURCE: Yavorkovsky L, JAMA Oncology. 2018 Mar 1. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.5685.

Classic mantle cell lymphoma (cMCL) has long been treated as a uniformly aggressive disease in need of similarly aggressive treatment, but that approach may be leading to overtreatment, according to one expert.

“The cMCL encompasses a broad category of lymphomas with highly variable clinical behaviors. A contemporary categorization of cMCL as a predominantly aggressive entity is misleading, as only an estimated 20% to 25% of patients with cMCL present with a symptomatic or aggressively behaving disease,” Leonid L. Yavorkovsky, MD, PhD, of the Kaiser Permanente San Jose Medical Center (Calif.), wrote in a commentary in JAMA Oncology.

Wikimedia Commons/TexasPathologistMSW/CC-ASA 4.0 International

While groups like the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the European Society for Medical Oncology recommend that only older patients and those with significant comorbidities should be exempted from intensive therapy, Dr. Yavorkovsky said cMCL should be evaluated on an individual basis, looking closely at the prognostic markers Ki-67, SOX-11, and TP53 to identify asymptomatic patients who might be able to safely delay aggressive treatment. He also called for more risk-adapted patient assignment to cMCL clinical trials.

“The failure to recognize the erratic nature of cMCL in clinical studies may confound the outcome gains and, ultimately, undermine the ensuing treatment recommendations,” Dr. Yavorkovsky wrote.

Read his full commentary in JAMA Oncology.

mschneider@frontlinemedcom.com

SOURCE: Yavorkovsky L, JAMA Oncology. 2018 Mar 1. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.5685.

Classic mantle cell lymphoma (cMCL) has long been treated as a uniformly aggressive disease in need of similarly aggressive treatment, but that approach may be leading to overtreatment, according to one expert.

“The cMCL encompasses a broad category of lymphomas with highly variable clinical behaviors. A contemporary categorization of cMCL as a predominantly aggressive entity is misleading, as only an estimated 20% to 25% of patients with cMCL present with a symptomatic or aggressively behaving disease,” Leonid L. Yavorkovsky, MD, PhD, of the Kaiser Permanente San Jose Medical Center (Calif.), wrote in a commentary in JAMA Oncology.

Wikimedia Commons/TexasPathologistMSW/CC-ASA 4.0 International

While groups like the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the European Society for Medical Oncology recommend that only older patients and those with significant comorbidities should be exempted from intensive therapy, Dr. Yavorkovsky said cMCL should be evaluated on an individual basis, looking closely at the prognostic markers Ki-67, SOX-11, and TP53 to identify asymptomatic patients who might be able to safely delay aggressive treatment. He also called for more risk-adapted patient assignment to cMCL clinical trials.

“The failure to recognize the erratic nature of cMCL in clinical studies may confound the outcome gains and, ultimately, undermine the ensuing treatment recommendations,” Dr. Yavorkovsky wrote.

Read his full commentary in JAMA Oncology.

mschneider@frontlinemedcom.com

SOURCE: Yavorkovsky L, JAMA Oncology. 2018 Mar 1. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.5685.

SALT LAKE CITY – Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy may be an effective bridge to hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) for high-risk B-cell malignancies, according to a systematic analysis of patient data from the National Cancer Institute.

Additionally, patients who have received CAR T-cell therapy are likely to enter HCT with a minimal residual disease (MRD)–negative complete response, which raises the possibility of a significantly less intense conditioning regimen that could omit total body irradiation (TBI), Haneen Shalabi, DO, said at the combined annual meetings of the Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research and the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

“Patients who underwent HCT post–CAR T therapy did not have increased transplant-related morbidity or mortality,” said Dr. Shalabi, a pediatric oncologist in the hematologic diseases division of the National Cancer Institute’s pediatric oncology branch.

The combined approach also overcomes the frequent relapses seen after CAR T-cell therapy in this population. Of the 45 patients who received CAR T-cell therapy and achieved MRD-negative complete response as measured by flow cytometry, 20 did not go on to receive HCT. Of the 20 who didn’t receive HCT, 16 (80%) relapsed; 19 of the 20 (95%) had received prior HCT, said Dr. Shalabi.

However, of the 25 patients who proceeded on to receive HCT, 15 (60%) were in ongoing remission, with a median duration of 35 months (range, 11-55 months). Six patients (24%) experienced transplant-related mortality; four of these patients had no prior HCT. Ten patients (40%) experienced acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD); two of these patients experienced grade 4 GVHD, and one experienced grade 3 GVHD.

Of the 25 patients who went on to HCT, 19 were receiving their first transplant, with a median time to transplant after CAR T-cell therapy of 57 days. Five patients (20%) had primary refractory disease. Most patients (n = 18; 72%) had TBI-based conditioning prior to their post–CAR T-cell therapy HCT. The median patient age was 15 (range, 5-30) years.

The systematic review included patients from two phase 1 studies; one was of CD19-28z CAR T-cell therapy for children and young adults with B-cell leukemia or lymphoma, and the other was of CD22-41BB CAR T-cell therapy for children and young adults with recurrent or refractory B-cell malignancies expressing CD22.

To weigh the benefit of the combined CAR T-cell therapy/HCT approach, Dr. Shalabi and her colleagues used a competing risk analysis to determine the risk of relapse post-HCT versus the risk of transplant-related mortality. Among patients undergoing their first HCT, the researchers found a 12-month cumulative incidence of relapse of 5.3% with the combined CAR T-cell therapy/HCT approach (95% confidence interval, 0.3%-22.1%). The 24-month cumulative incidence of relapse was 11.3% (95% CI, 1.7%-31.1%).

koakes@frontlinemedcom.com

SOURCE: Shalabi H et al. 2018 BMT Tandem Meetings, Abstract 6.

SALT LAKE CITY – Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy may be an effective bridge to hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) for high-risk B-cell malignancies, according to a systematic analysis of patient data from the National Cancer Institute.

Additionally, patients who have received CAR T-cell therapy are likely to enter HCT with a minimal residual disease (MRD)–negative complete response, which raises the possibility of a significantly less intense conditioning regimen that could omit total body irradiation (TBI), Haneen Shalabi, DO, said at the combined annual meetings of the Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research and the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

“Patients who underwent HCT post–CAR T therapy did not have increased transplant-related morbidity or mortality,” said Dr. Shalabi, a pediatric oncologist in the hematologic diseases division of the National Cancer Institute’s pediatric oncology branch.

The combined approach also overcomes the frequent relapses seen after CAR T-cell therapy in this population. Of the 45 patients who received CAR T-cell therapy and achieved MRD-negative complete response as measured by flow cytometry, 20 did not go on to receive HCT. Of the 20 who didn’t receive HCT, 16 (80%) relapsed; 19 of the 20 (95%) had received prior HCT, said Dr. Shalabi.

However, of the 25 patients who proceeded on to receive HCT, 15 (60%) were in ongoing remission, with a median duration of 35 months (range, 11-55 months). Six patients (24%) experienced transplant-related mortality; four of these patients had no prior HCT. Ten patients (40%) experienced acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD); two of these patients experienced grade 4 GVHD, and one experienced grade 3 GVHD.

Of the 25 patients who went on to HCT, 19 were receiving their first transplant, with a median time to transplant after CAR T-cell therapy of 57 days. Five patients (20%) had primary refractory disease. Most patients (n = 18; 72%) had TBI-based conditioning prior to their post–CAR T-cell therapy HCT. The median patient age was 15 (range, 5-30) years.

The systematic review included patients from two phase 1 studies; one was of CD19-28z CAR T-cell therapy for children and young adults with B-cell leukemia or lymphoma, and the other was of CD22-41BB CAR T-cell therapy for children and young adults with recurrent or refractory B-cell malignancies expressing CD22.

To weigh the benefit of the combined CAR T-cell therapy/HCT approach, Dr. Shalabi and her colleagues used a competing risk analysis to determine the risk of relapse post-HCT versus the risk of transplant-related mortality. Among patients undergoing their first HCT, the researchers found a 12-month cumulative incidence of relapse of 5.3% with the combined CAR T-cell therapy/HCT approach (95% confidence interval, 0.3%-22.1%). The 24-month cumulative incidence of relapse was 11.3% (95% CI, 1.7%-31.1%).

koakes@frontlinemedcom.com

SOURCE: Shalabi H et al. 2018 BMT Tandem Meetings, Abstract 6.

SALT LAKE CITY – Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy may be an effective bridge to hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) for high-risk B-cell malignancies, according to a systematic analysis of patient data from the National Cancer Institute.

Additionally, patients who have received CAR T-cell therapy are likely to enter HCT with a minimal residual disease (MRD)–negative complete response, which raises the possibility of a significantly less intense conditioning regimen that could omit total body irradiation (TBI), Haneen Shalabi, DO, said at the combined annual meetings of the Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research and the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

“Patients who underwent HCT post–CAR T therapy did not have increased transplant-related morbidity or mortality,” said Dr. Shalabi, a pediatric oncologist in the hematologic diseases division of the National Cancer Institute’s pediatric oncology branch.

The combined approach also overcomes the frequent relapses seen after CAR T-cell therapy in this population. Of the 45 patients who received CAR T-cell therapy and achieved MRD-negative complete response as measured by flow cytometry, 20 did not go on to receive HCT. Of the 20 who didn’t receive HCT, 16 (80%) relapsed; 19 of the 20 (95%) had received prior HCT, said Dr. Shalabi.

However, of the 25 patients who proceeded on to receive HCT, 15 (60%) were in ongoing remission, with a median duration of 35 months (range, 11-55 months). Six patients (24%) experienced transplant-related mortality; four of these patients had no prior HCT. Ten patients (40%) experienced acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD); two of these patients experienced grade 4 GVHD, and one experienced grade 3 GVHD.

Of the 25 patients who went on to HCT, 19 were receiving their first transplant, with a median time to transplant after CAR T-cell therapy of 57 days. Five patients (20%) had primary refractory disease. Most patients (n = 18; 72%) had TBI-based conditioning prior to their post–CAR T-cell therapy HCT. The median patient age was 15 (range, 5-30) years.

The systematic review included patients from two phase 1 studies; one was of CD19-28z CAR T-cell therapy for children and young adults with B-cell leukemia or lymphoma, and the other was of CD22-41BB CAR T-cell therapy for children and young adults with recurrent or refractory B-cell malignancies expressing CD22.

To weigh the benefit of the combined CAR T-cell therapy/HCT approach, Dr. Shalabi and her colleagues used a competing risk analysis to determine the risk of relapse post-HCT versus the risk of transplant-related mortality. Among patients undergoing their first HCT, the researchers found a 12-month cumulative incidence of relapse of 5.3% with the combined CAR T-cell therapy/HCT approach (95% confidence interval, 0.3%-22.1%). The 24-month cumulative incidence of relapse was 11.3% (95% CI, 1.7%-31.1%).

koakes@frontlinemedcom.com

SOURCE: Shalabi H et al. 2018 BMT Tandem Meetings, Abstract 6.