Neuromuscular Disorders

A new classification system that incorporates clinical and serologic data may be useful in the classification of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, results of a recent analysis suggest.

By analyzing the patterns of relationships between 47 variables in this observational, retrospective cohort study, investigators identified 4 clusters of patients that corresponded to known idiopathic inflammatory myopathy subtypes.

Myositis-specific antibodies played a key role in predicting whether a patient belonged in a cluster, according to investigators, who noted that myositis-specific antibodies known to be associated with certain subgroups fell into the corresponding clusters they identified.

“This emphasizes that muscle biopsy may no longer be necessary for diagnosis of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies in patients with [myositis-specific antibodies] and corresponding phenotypes,” said the investigators, led by Kubéraka Mariampillai, PhD, of the Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Paris, France.

The study, described in JAMA Neurology, was based on data for 260 patients in the database of the French Myositis Network. The mean age of the patients was 62 years, and 63% were women.

Investigators conducted a multiple correspondence analysis based on 47 selected variables, including age, race, historical and recent diagnoses, dermatologic changes, creatine kinase levels, myositis-specific antibodies, and pathologic characteristics, among others.

Based on that analysis, they identified four subgroups corresponding to known entities: Dermatomyositis, inclusion body myositis, immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy, and antisynthetase syndrome.

Using decisional algorithm trees, investigators found that myositis-specific antibodies “played a key role in estimating connection to a cluster,” while by contrast, the pathologic data were “dispensable,” Dr. Mariampillai and her associates said.

The best tree omitted variables related to muscle biopsy and had a 78% correct estimation looking just at antisynthetase antibodies, dermatomyositis rash, and finger flexor scores of 3 or less, investigators said.

“The classification quality of the tree was appreciated on the basis of all classification criteria, with an overall sensitivity of 77.0% and a specificity of 92.0%,” the investigators said.

Patients with polymyositis were present in the study data, but fell mainly in the clusters corresponding to immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy and antisynthetase syndrome.

“This finding indicates that patients with polymyositis do not represent a subgroup of patients, and use of this term should probably be discontinued,” Dr. Mariampillai and coinvestigators said.

The study was supported by Association Française contre les Myopathies, and by CSL Behring, which partly funded the development of electronic case report forms. Dr. Mariampillai and colleagues reported no conflicts of interest related to this work.

SOURCE: Mariampillai K, et al. JAMA Neurol. 2018 Sep 10. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.2598.

A new classification system that incorporates clinical and serologic data may be useful in the classification of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, results of a recent analysis suggest.

By analyzing the patterns of relationships between 47 variables in this observational, retrospective cohort study, investigators identified 4 clusters of patients that corresponded to known idiopathic inflammatory myopathy subtypes.

Myositis-specific antibodies played a key role in predicting whether a patient belonged in a cluster, according to investigators, who noted that myositis-specific antibodies known to be associated with certain subgroups fell into the corresponding clusters they identified.

“This emphasizes that muscle biopsy may no longer be necessary for diagnosis of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies in patients with [myositis-specific antibodies] and corresponding phenotypes,” said the investigators, led by Kubéraka Mariampillai, PhD, of the Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Paris, France.

The study, described in JAMA Neurology, was based on data for 260 patients in the database of the French Myositis Network. The mean age of the patients was 62 years, and 63% were women.

Investigators conducted a multiple correspondence analysis based on 47 selected variables, including age, race, historical and recent diagnoses, dermatologic changes, creatine kinase levels, myositis-specific antibodies, and pathologic characteristics, among others.

Based on that analysis, they identified four subgroups corresponding to known entities: Dermatomyositis, inclusion body myositis, immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy, and antisynthetase syndrome.

Using decisional algorithm trees, investigators found that myositis-specific antibodies “played a key role in estimating connection to a cluster,” while by contrast, the pathologic data were “dispensable,” Dr. Mariampillai and her associates said.

The best tree omitted variables related to muscle biopsy and had a 78% correct estimation looking just at antisynthetase antibodies, dermatomyositis rash, and finger flexor scores of 3 or less, investigators said.

“The classification quality of the tree was appreciated on the basis of all classification criteria, with an overall sensitivity of 77.0% and a specificity of 92.0%,” the investigators said.

Patients with polymyositis were present in the study data, but fell mainly in the clusters corresponding to immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy and antisynthetase syndrome.

“This finding indicates that patients with polymyositis do not represent a subgroup of patients, and use of this term should probably be discontinued,” Dr. Mariampillai and coinvestigators said.

The study was supported by Association Française contre les Myopathies, and by CSL Behring, which partly funded the development of electronic case report forms. Dr. Mariampillai and colleagues reported no conflicts of interest related to this work.

SOURCE: Mariampillai K, et al. JAMA Neurol. 2018 Sep 10. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.2598.

A new classification system that incorporates clinical and serologic data may be useful in the classification of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, results of a recent analysis suggest.

By analyzing the patterns of relationships between 47 variables in this observational, retrospective cohort study, investigators identified 4 clusters of patients that corresponded to known idiopathic inflammatory myopathy subtypes.

Myositis-specific antibodies played a key role in predicting whether a patient belonged in a cluster, according to investigators, who noted that myositis-specific antibodies known to be associated with certain subgroups fell into the corresponding clusters they identified.

“This emphasizes that muscle biopsy may no longer be necessary for diagnosis of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies in patients with [myositis-specific antibodies] and corresponding phenotypes,” said the investigators, led by Kubéraka Mariampillai, PhD, of the Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Paris, France.

The study, described in JAMA Neurology, was based on data for 260 patients in the database of the French Myositis Network. The mean age of the patients was 62 years, and 63% were women.

Investigators conducted a multiple correspondence analysis based on 47 selected variables, including age, race, historical and recent diagnoses, dermatologic changes, creatine kinase levels, myositis-specific antibodies, and pathologic characteristics, among others.

Based on that analysis, they identified four subgroups corresponding to known entities: Dermatomyositis, inclusion body myositis, immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy, and antisynthetase syndrome.

Using decisional algorithm trees, investigators found that myositis-specific antibodies “played a key role in estimating connection to a cluster,” while by contrast, the pathologic data were “dispensable,” Dr. Mariampillai and her associates said.

The best tree omitted variables related to muscle biopsy and had a 78% correct estimation looking just at antisynthetase antibodies, dermatomyositis rash, and finger flexor scores of 3 or less, investigators said.

“The classification quality of the tree was appreciated on the basis of all classification criteria, with an overall sensitivity of 77.0% and a specificity of 92.0%,” the investigators said.

Patients with polymyositis were present in the study data, but fell mainly in the clusters corresponding to immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy and antisynthetase syndrome.

“This finding indicates that patients with polymyositis do not represent a subgroup of patients, and use of this term should probably be discontinued,” Dr. Mariampillai and coinvestigators said.

The study was supported by Association Française contre les Myopathies, and by CSL Behring, which partly funded the development of electronic case report forms. Dr. Mariampillai and colleagues reported no conflicts of interest related to this work.

SOURCE: Mariampillai K, et al. JAMA Neurol. 2018 Sep 10. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.2598.

MUNICH – The big news in the field of heart failure at the annual congress of the European Society of Cardiology concerned an obscure form of the disease traditionally considered rare: transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (TAC).

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

It turns out that TAC is far more common than previously recognized; it can now be diagnosed and staged noninvasively; and – most important of all – there is for the first time an effective disease-modifying treatment in the form of a novel oral drug called tafamidis, as demonstrated in the Transthyretin Amyloidosis Cardiomyopathy Clinical Trial (ATTR-ACT) presented at the meeting.

“This is the first phase 3 trial that can offer a chance for people with a terrible, severe disease. And within the last year, while the trial was being conducted, it became clear that this disease is much more underdiagnosed than rare,” said Claudio Rapezzi, MD, ATTR-ACT principal investigator and director of the school of cardiovascular diseases at the University of Bologna, Italy.

ATTR-ACT participants randomized to tafamidis showed significant reductions in all-cause mortality and cardiovascular hospitalizations, compared with placebo-treated controls at 30 months follow-up. They also experienced significantly lesser declines in both quality of life as reflected in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores and in physical function as captured in 6-minute walk distance.

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

Designated discussant Jacob George, MD, was over the moon regarding the results.

“This is a pioneering, game-changing trial that is likely to transform the way we diagnose and treat patients with cardiac amyloidosis,” said Dr. George of Kaplan Medical Center in Rehovot, Israel.

“We’re now in an era that, to my opinion, any patient with nonischemic unexplained heart failure should be screened for the presence of amyloidosis because, first, we now know how to prognosticate these patients, and second, we can offer them a real disease-modifying agent,” he added.
 

An underdiagnosed disease

Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy occurs when transthyretin, a transport protein, becomes destabilized and misfolds, promoting deposition of amyloid fibrils in the myocardium. This results in progressive ventricular wall thickening and stiffness, manifest as restrictive cardiomyopathy and progressive heart failure. The cause of transthyretin destabilization can be either autosomal dominant inheritance of any of more than 100 pathogenic mutations in the transthyretin gene identified to date or a spontaneous wild type protein.

Think of TAC as a sort of dementia of the heart. As Dr. George noted, the cardiac disease bears “remarkable similarities” to Alzheimer’s disease, with both conditions entailing extracellular deposition of amyloid.

In the heritable form of TAC, patients typically present with heart failure symptoms at about age 50-55, while the wild type form becomes symptomatic much later at a mean age of about 75. Average survival from time of diagnosis is only about 3 years.

Recent studies from multiple centers have reported that the prevalence of TAC was 16% in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis, 13% among patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, and 5% in patients who had been presumed to have hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: So, not a rare condition.

“In our clinic, vast and surprising numbers of patients with unexplained nonischemic heart failure are scan positive [for TAC],” according to Dr. George.
 

Breakthroughs in diagnosis and staging

The echocardiographic red flag for TAC in a patient with heart failure symptoms is symmetric hypertrophy with a normal end-diastolic volume and thickened ventricles. The end-diastolic interventricular septal wall thickness is typically about 15 mm. The left ventricular ejection fraction is typically in the normal range, “but the clue is not the preservation of the ejection fraction, it’s the [normal] quality of the volume,” Dr. Rapezzi said.

A clinical clue suggestive of TAC upon physical examination, even in the absence of heart failure symptoms, is development of bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome in an older man. That’s because the same disease process that results in TAC can involve deposition of amyloid fibrils in peripheral nerves. Indeed, tafamidis is already approved in Europe and Japan under the trade name Vyndaqel as a treatment for familial amyloid polyneuropathy. For TAC, however, tafamidis remains investigational with fast-track status provided by both the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency.

When TAC is suspected, it’s no longer necessary to subject patients to an onerous myocardial biopsy. Total body scintigraphy with bone tracers has been shown to be nearly as sensitive and specific as biopsy for the diagnosis.

Staging can now be done noninvasively as well. Investigators at the U.K. National Amyloidosis Centre recently reported that patients with TAC can be accurately staged using two biomarkers: N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). In their series of 869 patients with TAC, median survival for those with stage I disease as defined by their protocol was 69 months, compared with 47 months for stage II disease and 24 months for those with stage III disease. This simple U.K. staging system was then validated in a separate French cohort of TAC patients (Eur Heart J. 2018 Aug 7;39[30]:2799-806).
 

The ATTR-ACT trial

Dr. Rapezzi reported on 441 patients with TAC who were randomized to oral tafamidis at either 20 mg or 80 mg per day or placebo and followed prospectively for 30 months in the 13-country, double-blind, phase 3 trial. At 30 months, all-cause mortality was 29.5% in patients who received tafamidis, compared with 42.9% in controls, for a 30% relative risk reduction. The rate of cardiovascular hospitalizations was 0.48 per year with tafamidis, compared with 0.70 per year with placebo, for a 38% relative risk reduction. The mortality benefit didn’t achieve significance until 15-18 months into the trial, as to be expected given tafamidis’ mechanism of action, which involves binding to transthyretin, gradually stabilizing it, and curbing amyloid fibril deposition.

Of note, the benefit was similar regardless of the dose used and whether patients had hereditary or wild type TAC.

Tafamidis proved safe and well tolerated, with a side-effect profile similar to placebo. While diarrhea and urinary tract infections have been an issue in tafamidis-treated patients with familial amyloid polyneuropathy, these adverse events were actually less common in TAC patients who received tafamidis than with placebo, according to Dr. Rapezzi.

A key point, the cardiologist emphasized, is that the benefits of active treatment were greatest in patients with earlier-stage disease. Therefore it’s vital that the diagnosis of TAC be made early, with prompt initiation of treatment to follow, in order to catch the disease at a more reversible stage. That could mean there will be a whole lot more bone scintigraphy being done in patients with unexplained nonischemic heart failure.

Dr. Rapezzi reported receiving research grants, speaker honoraria, and consulting fees from Pfizer, which sponsored the ATTR-ACT trial. Simultaneous with his presentation in Munich, the study results were published online at NEJM.org (doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1805689). Dr. George reported no financial conflicts.

bjancin@mdedge.com

MUNICH – The big news in the field of heart failure at the annual congress of the European Society of Cardiology concerned an obscure form of the disease traditionally considered rare: transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (TAC).

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

It turns out that TAC is far more common than previously recognized; it can now be diagnosed and staged noninvasively; and – most important of all – there is for the first time an effective disease-modifying treatment in the form of a novel oral drug called tafamidis, as demonstrated in the Transthyretin Amyloidosis Cardiomyopathy Clinical Trial (ATTR-ACT) presented at the meeting.

“This is the first phase 3 trial that can offer a chance for people with a terrible, severe disease. And within the last year, while the trial was being conducted, it became clear that this disease is much more underdiagnosed than rare,” said Claudio Rapezzi, MD, ATTR-ACT principal investigator and director of the school of cardiovascular diseases at the University of Bologna, Italy.

ATTR-ACT participants randomized to tafamidis showed significant reductions in all-cause mortality and cardiovascular hospitalizations, compared with placebo-treated controls at 30 months follow-up. They also experienced significantly lesser declines in both quality of life as reflected in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores and in physical function as captured in 6-minute walk distance.

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

Designated discussant Jacob George, MD, was over the moon regarding the results.

“This is a pioneering, game-changing trial that is likely to transform the way we diagnose and treat patients with cardiac amyloidosis,” said Dr. George of Kaplan Medical Center in Rehovot, Israel.

“We’re now in an era that, to my opinion, any patient with nonischemic unexplained heart failure should be screened for the presence of amyloidosis because, first, we now know how to prognosticate these patients, and second, we can offer them a real disease-modifying agent,” he added.
 

An underdiagnosed disease

Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy occurs when transthyretin, a transport protein, becomes destabilized and misfolds, promoting deposition of amyloid fibrils in the myocardium. This results in progressive ventricular wall thickening and stiffness, manifest as restrictive cardiomyopathy and progressive heart failure. The cause of transthyretin destabilization can be either autosomal dominant inheritance of any of more than 100 pathogenic mutations in the transthyretin gene identified to date or a spontaneous wild type protein.

Think of TAC as a sort of dementia of the heart. As Dr. George noted, the cardiac disease bears “remarkable similarities” to Alzheimer’s disease, with both conditions entailing extracellular deposition of amyloid.

In the heritable form of TAC, patients typically present with heart failure symptoms at about age 50-55, while the wild type form becomes symptomatic much later at a mean age of about 75. Average survival from time of diagnosis is only about 3 years.

Recent studies from multiple centers have reported that the prevalence of TAC was 16% in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis, 13% among patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, and 5% in patients who had been presumed to have hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: So, not a rare condition.

“In our clinic, vast and surprising numbers of patients with unexplained nonischemic heart failure are scan positive [for TAC],” according to Dr. George.
 

Breakthroughs in diagnosis and staging

The echocardiographic red flag for TAC in a patient with heart failure symptoms is symmetric hypertrophy with a normal end-diastolic volume and thickened ventricles. The end-diastolic interventricular septal wall thickness is typically about 15 mm. The left ventricular ejection fraction is typically in the normal range, “but the clue is not the preservation of the ejection fraction, it’s the [normal] quality of the volume,” Dr. Rapezzi said.

A clinical clue suggestive of TAC upon physical examination, even in the absence of heart failure symptoms, is development of bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome in an older man. That’s because the same disease process that results in TAC can involve deposition of amyloid fibrils in peripheral nerves. Indeed, tafamidis is already approved in Europe and Japan under the trade name Vyndaqel as a treatment for familial amyloid polyneuropathy. For TAC, however, tafamidis remains investigational with fast-track status provided by both the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency.

When TAC is suspected, it’s no longer necessary to subject patients to an onerous myocardial biopsy. Total body scintigraphy with bone tracers has been shown to be nearly as sensitive and specific as biopsy for the diagnosis.

Staging can now be done noninvasively as well. Investigators at the U.K. National Amyloidosis Centre recently reported that patients with TAC can be accurately staged using two biomarkers: N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). In their series of 869 patients with TAC, median survival for those with stage I disease as defined by their protocol was 69 months, compared with 47 months for stage II disease and 24 months for those with stage III disease. This simple U.K. staging system was then validated in a separate French cohort of TAC patients (Eur Heart J. 2018 Aug 7;39[30]:2799-806).
 

The ATTR-ACT trial

Dr. Rapezzi reported on 441 patients with TAC who were randomized to oral tafamidis at either 20 mg or 80 mg per day or placebo and followed prospectively for 30 months in the 13-country, double-blind, phase 3 trial. At 30 months, all-cause mortality was 29.5% in patients who received tafamidis, compared with 42.9% in controls, for a 30% relative risk reduction. The rate of cardiovascular hospitalizations was 0.48 per year with tafamidis, compared with 0.70 per year with placebo, for a 38% relative risk reduction. The mortality benefit didn’t achieve significance until 15-18 months into the trial, as to be expected given tafamidis’ mechanism of action, which involves binding to transthyretin, gradually stabilizing it, and curbing amyloid fibril deposition.

Of note, the benefit was similar regardless of the dose used and whether patients had hereditary or wild type TAC.

Tafamidis proved safe and well tolerated, with a side-effect profile similar to placebo. While diarrhea and urinary tract infections have been an issue in tafamidis-treated patients with familial amyloid polyneuropathy, these adverse events were actually less common in TAC patients who received tafamidis than with placebo, according to Dr. Rapezzi.

A key point, the cardiologist emphasized, is that the benefits of active treatment were greatest in patients with earlier-stage disease. Therefore it’s vital that the diagnosis of TAC be made early, with prompt initiation of treatment to follow, in order to catch the disease at a more reversible stage. That could mean there will be a whole lot more bone scintigraphy being done in patients with unexplained nonischemic heart failure.

Dr. Rapezzi reported receiving research grants, speaker honoraria, and consulting fees from Pfizer, which sponsored the ATTR-ACT trial. Simultaneous with his presentation in Munich, the study results were published online at NEJM.org (doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1805689). Dr. George reported no financial conflicts.

bjancin@mdedge.com

MUNICH – The big news in the field of heart failure at the annual congress of the European Society of Cardiology concerned an obscure form of the disease traditionally considered rare: transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (TAC).

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

It turns out that TAC is far more common than previously recognized; it can now be diagnosed and staged noninvasively; and – most important of all – there is for the first time an effective disease-modifying treatment in the form of a novel oral drug called tafamidis, as demonstrated in the Transthyretin Amyloidosis Cardiomyopathy Clinical Trial (ATTR-ACT) presented at the meeting.

“This is the first phase 3 trial that can offer a chance for people with a terrible, severe disease. And within the last year, while the trial was being conducted, it became clear that this disease is much more underdiagnosed than rare,” said Claudio Rapezzi, MD, ATTR-ACT principal investigator and director of the school of cardiovascular diseases at the University of Bologna, Italy.

ATTR-ACT participants randomized to tafamidis showed significant reductions in all-cause mortality and cardiovascular hospitalizations, compared with placebo-treated controls at 30 months follow-up. They also experienced significantly lesser declines in both quality of life as reflected in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores and in physical function as captured in 6-minute walk distance.

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

Designated discussant Jacob George, MD, was over the moon regarding the results.

“This is a pioneering, game-changing trial that is likely to transform the way we diagnose and treat patients with cardiac amyloidosis,” said Dr. George of Kaplan Medical Center in Rehovot, Israel.

“We’re now in an era that, to my opinion, any patient with nonischemic unexplained heart failure should be screened for the presence of amyloidosis because, first, we now know how to prognosticate these patients, and second, we can offer them a real disease-modifying agent,” he added.
 

An underdiagnosed disease

Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy occurs when transthyretin, a transport protein, becomes destabilized and misfolds, promoting deposition of amyloid fibrils in the myocardium. This results in progressive ventricular wall thickening and stiffness, manifest as restrictive cardiomyopathy and progressive heart failure. The cause of transthyretin destabilization can be either autosomal dominant inheritance of any of more than 100 pathogenic mutations in the transthyretin gene identified to date or a spontaneous wild type protein.

Think of TAC as a sort of dementia of the heart. As Dr. George noted, the cardiac disease bears “remarkable similarities” to Alzheimer’s disease, with both conditions entailing extracellular deposition of amyloid.

In the heritable form of TAC, patients typically present with heart failure symptoms at about age 50-55, while the wild type form becomes symptomatic much later at a mean age of about 75. Average survival from time of diagnosis is only about 3 years.

Recent studies from multiple centers have reported that the prevalence of TAC was 16% in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis, 13% among patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, and 5% in patients who had been presumed to have hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: So, not a rare condition.

“In our clinic, vast and surprising numbers of patients with unexplained nonischemic heart failure are scan positive [for TAC],” according to Dr. George.
 

Breakthroughs in diagnosis and staging

The echocardiographic red flag for TAC in a patient with heart failure symptoms is symmetric hypertrophy with a normal end-diastolic volume and thickened ventricles. The end-diastolic interventricular septal wall thickness is typically about 15 mm. The left ventricular ejection fraction is typically in the normal range, “but the clue is not the preservation of the ejection fraction, it’s the [normal] quality of the volume,” Dr. Rapezzi said.

A clinical clue suggestive of TAC upon physical examination, even in the absence of heart failure symptoms, is development of bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome in an older man. That’s because the same disease process that results in TAC can involve deposition of amyloid fibrils in peripheral nerves. Indeed, tafamidis is already approved in Europe and Japan under the trade name Vyndaqel as a treatment for familial amyloid polyneuropathy. For TAC, however, tafamidis remains investigational with fast-track status provided by both the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency.

When TAC is suspected, it’s no longer necessary to subject patients to an onerous myocardial biopsy. Total body scintigraphy with bone tracers has been shown to be nearly as sensitive and specific as biopsy for the diagnosis.

Staging can now be done noninvasively as well. Investigators at the U.K. National Amyloidosis Centre recently reported that patients with TAC can be accurately staged using two biomarkers: N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). In their series of 869 patients with TAC, median survival for those with stage I disease as defined by their protocol was 69 months, compared with 47 months for stage II disease and 24 months for those with stage III disease. This simple U.K. staging system was then validated in a separate French cohort of TAC patients (Eur Heart J. 2018 Aug 7;39[30]:2799-806).
 

The ATTR-ACT trial

Dr. Rapezzi reported on 441 patients with TAC who were randomized to oral tafamidis at either 20 mg or 80 mg per day or placebo and followed prospectively for 30 months in the 13-country, double-blind, phase 3 trial. At 30 months, all-cause mortality was 29.5% in patients who received tafamidis, compared with 42.9% in controls, for a 30% relative risk reduction. The rate of cardiovascular hospitalizations was 0.48 per year with tafamidis, compared with 0.70 per year with placebo, for a 38% relative risk reduction. The mortality benefit didn’t achieve significance until 15-18 months into the trial, as to be expected given tafamidis’ mechanism of action, which involves binding to transthyretin, gradually stabilizing it, and curbing amyloid fibril deposition.

Of note, the benefit was similar regardless of the dose used and whether patients had hereditary or wild type TAC.

Tafamidis proved safe and well tolerated, with a side-effect profile similar to placebo. While diarrhea and urinary tract infections have been an issue in tafamidis-treated patients with familial amyloid polyneuropathy, these adverse events were actually less common in TAC patients who received tafamidis than with placebo, according to Dr. Rapezzi.

A key point, the cardiologist emphasized, is that the benefits of active treatment were greatest in patients with earlier-stage disease. Therefore it’s vital that the diagnosis of TAC be made early, with prompt initiation of treatment to follow, in order to catch the disease at a more reversible stage. That could mean there will be a whole lot more bone scintigraphy being done in patients with unexplained nonischemic heart failure.

Dr. Rapezzi reported receiving research grants, speaker honoraria, and consulting fees from Pfizer, which sponsored the ATTR-ACT trial. Simultaneous with his presentation in Munich, the study results were published online at NEJM.org (doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1805689). Dr. George reported no financial conflicts.

bjancin@mdedge.com

Treatment with nusinersen (Spinraza) produced significant improvements in motor function in children with spinal muscular atrophy type 1 even if treatment was initiated at a later age, new research has suggested.

In a paper published online Aug. 29 in Neurology, researchers presented the results of a prospective cohort study in 33 children who ranged in age from 8.3 months to 9.4 years and had spinal muscular atrophy type 1. In this study, the children were treated with the antisense oligonucleotide nusinersen, which increases production of functional survival motor neuron (SMN) protein. The patients participated in the trial as a part of an Expanded Access Program for nusinersen that’s operated by its manufacturer, Biogen.

FamVeld/Thinkstock

All previous trials of nusinersen have enrolled patients younger than 7 months, wrote Karolina Aragon-Gawinska, MD, of the Institute I-motion at Armand Trousseau Hospital, Paris, and her coauthors. The benefits of the drug in older patients were unknown.

The disease has a median survival of 8-13.5 months of age, yet all patients in the study were alive at 6 months after starting the treatment. Researchers saw a 1.5-point median improvement in motor milestones – measured using the Hammersmith Infant Neurologic Examination (HINE) Part 2 – and five patients were able to sit up without support for more than 30 seconds.

On the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test of Neuromuscular Disorders scale, which assesses the motor skills of infants with spinal muscular atrophy, there was a median improvement of four points at 6 months.

There were no significant changes in the need for nutritional support. However, eight patients showed worsening respiratory condition at 6 months, compared with baseline. Three patients – all of whom had a more severe form of the disease by virtue of only having two copies of the nearly identical SMN2 gene – showed no significant motor progress and were placed on full-time ventilation.

Overall, the number of copies of SMN2 gene did not appear to affect the need for ventilator or nutritional support.

“The response to treatment was highly variable, but new motor acquisitions were attained even in 8-year-old patients,” the authors wrote. “In some patients, respiratory worsening was observed despite motor improvement, suggesting a slower action of nusinersen on the respiratory symptoms and the possible intercurrent infections that might destabilize these weak patients.”

They noted that while previous studies had included patients with only two copies of the SMN2 gene – and hence more severe disease – around half the patients in this study had three copies, which may explain why even older patients showed significant responses to treatment.

“Patients with three SMN2 copies were older and had a longer disease duration than patients with two SMN2 copies, which may partially explain the absence of copy number effect.”

The study was funded by the Institute of Myology and AFM-Telethon. Eight authors reported involvement with pharmaceutical-sponsored trials, consultancies, or other funding from the pharmaceutical industry, including Biogen. No other conflicts of interest were declared.

SOURCE: Aragon-Gawinska K et al. Neurology. 2018 Aug 29. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006281.

Treatment with nusinersen (Spinraza) produced significant improvements in motor function in children with spinal muscular atrophy type 1 even if treatment was initiated at a later age, new research has suggested.

In a paper published online Aug. 29 in Neurology, researchers presented the results of a prospective cohort study in 33 children who ranged in age from 8.3 months to 9.4 years and had spinal muscular atrophy type 1. In this study, the children were treated with the antisense oligonucleotide nusinersen, which increases production of functional survival motor neuron (SMN) protein. The patients participated in the trial as a part of an Expanded Access Program for nusinersen that’s operated by its manufacturer, Biogen.

FamVeld/Thinkstock

All previous trials of nusinersen have enrolled patients younger than 7 months, wrote Karolina Aragon-Gawinska, MD, of the Institute I-motion at Armand Trousseau Hospital, Paris, and her coauthors. The benefits of the drug in older patients were unknown.

The disease has a median survival of 8-13.5 months of age, yet all patients in the study were alive at 6 months after starting the treatment. Researchers saw a 1.5-point median improvement in motor milestones – measured using the Hammersmith Infant Neurologic Examination (HINE) Part 2 – and five patients were able to sit up without support for more than 30 seconds.

On the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test of Neuromuscular Disorders scale, which assesses the motor skills of infants with spinal muscular atrophy, there was a median improvement of four points at 6 months.

There were no significant changes in the need for nutritional support. However, eight patients showed worsening respiratory condition at 6 months, compared with baseline. Three patients – all of whom had a more severe form of the disease by virtue of only having two copies of the nearly identical SMN2 gene – showed no significant motor progress and were placed on full-time ventilation.

Overall, the number of copies of SMN2 gene did not appear to affect the need for ventilator or nutritional support.

“The response to treatment was highly variable, but new motor acquisitions were attained even in 8-year-old patients,” the authors wrote. “In some patients, respiratory worsening was observed despite motor improvement, suggesting a slower action of nusinersen on the respiratory symptoms and the possible intercurrent infections that might destabilize these weak patients.”

They noted that while previous studies had included patients with only two copies of the SMN2 gene – and hence more severe disease – around half the patients in this study had three copies, which may explain why even older patients showed significant responses to treatment.

“Patients with three SMN2 copies were older and had a longer disease duration than patients with two SMN2 copies, which may partially explain the absence of copy number effect.”

The study was funded by the Institute of Myology and AFM-Telethon. Eight authors reported involvement with pharmaceutical-sponsored trials, consultancies, or other funding from the pharmaceutical industry, including Biogen. No other conflicts of interest were declared.

SOURCE: Aragon-Gawinska K et al. Neurology. 2018 Aug 29. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006281.

Treatment with nusinersen (Spinraza) produced significant improvements in motor function in children with spinal muscular atrophy type 1 even if treatment was initiated at a later age, new research has suggested.

In a paper published online Aug. 29 in Neurology, researchers presented the results of a prospective cohort study in 33 children who ranged in age from 8.3 months to 9.4 years and had spinal muscular atrophy type 1. In this study, the children were treated with the antisense oligonucleotide nusinersen, which increases production of functional survival motor neuron (SMN) protein. The patients participated in the trial as a part of an Expanded Access Program for nusinersen that’s operated by its manufacturer, Biogen.

FamVeld/Thinkstock

All previous trials of nusinersen have enrolled patients younger than 7 months, wrote Karolina Aragon-Gawinska, MD, of the Institute I-motion at Armand Trousseau Hospital, Paris, and her coauthors. The benefits of the drug in older patients were unknown.

The disease has a median survival of 8-13.5 months of age, yet all patients in the study were alive at 6 months after starting the treatment. Researchers saw a 1.5-point median improvement in motor milestones – measured using the Hammersmith Infant Neurologic Examination (HINE) Part 2 – and five patients were able to sit up without support for more than 30 seconds.

On the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test of Neuromuscular Disorders scale, which assesses the motor skills of infants with spinal muscular atrophy, there was a median improvement of four points at 6 months.

There were no significant changes in the need for nutritional support. However, eight patients showed worsening respiratory condition at 6 months, compared with baseline. Three patients – all of whom had a more severe form of the disease by virtue of only having two copies of the nearly identical SMN2 gene – showed no significant motor progress and were placed on full-time ventilation.

Overall, the number of copies of SMN2 gene did not appear to affect the need for ventilator or nutritional support.

“The response to treatment was highly variable, but new motor acquisitions were attained even in 8-year-old patients,” the authors wrote. “In some patients, respiratory worsening was observed despite motor improvement, suggesting a slower action of nusinersen on the respiratory symptoms and the possible intercurrent infections that might destabilize these weak patients.”

They noted that while previous studies had included patients with only two copies of the SMN2 gene – and hence more severe disease – around half the patients in this study had three copies, which may explain why even older patients showed significant responses to treatment.

“Patients with three SMN2 copies were older and had a longer disease duration than patients with two SMN2 copies, which may partially explain the absence of copy number effect.”

The study was funded by the Institute of Myology and AFM-Telethon. Eight authors reported involvement with pharmaceutical-sponsored trials, consultancies, or other funding from the pharmaceutical industry, including Biogen. No other conflicts of interest were declared.

SOURCE: Aragon-Gawinska K et al. Neurology. 2018 Aug 29. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006281.

John B. Bodensteiner, MD

Dr. Bodensteiner is Director of the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology, Founding Editor and Senior Associate Editor of Seminars in Pediatric Neurology, and Senior Associate Editor of the Journal of Child Neurology.

The impetus for this article is the celebration of 25 years of publication of Neurology Reviews. Child neurology has advanced so much in these years that it is hardly recognizable from the previous state of our understanding. Many components of the discipline include, but are not limited to, epilepsy, headache, demyelinating diseases, autoimmune diseases, neoplastic, neonatal, neuromuscular disease, and developmental conditions. My interest has been related to the neuromuscular diseases of childhood. Thus, I have chosen to describe some of the ways the advances in basic medical science and our understanding of the genetic and molecular mechanisms of disease have altered the way we think about these conditions. For the first time, this knowledge has allowed us to identify targets and techniques for effective intervention and disease modification.

Myotonic Muscular Dystrophy

One example of how the advancement in the discipline of genetics has changed our understanding of disease would be myotonic muscular dystrophy (MyoD1). When I started seeing patients in the mid 1960s, MyoD1, particularly as seen in children, was recognized as an example of autosomal dominant inheritance. The tendency for subsequent generations to be more severely affected than their parents is a phenomenon known as anticipation. Anticipation was recognized, though not explained, with the understanding of the genetic mechanisms of the time. The fact that when the disease affected an infant or newborn it was almost always inherited from the mother was also well established, though the reason for this was also not understood. Actually, during the late 1970s and early 1980s the existence of the phenomenon of anticipation was widely questioned and some publications proposed that anticipation was just an artifact of observation due to the fact that we (medical clinicians) were getting better and thus identifying the disease earlier than in past years. The recognition of the importance of repeated segments of DNA in the pathogenesis of human disease and the subsequent development of the technology to study the phenomenon allowed recognition of this previously unappreciated mechanism of genetic disease causation. This new genetic mechanism explained how anticipation could occur and confirmed it as a real phenomenon. Expanded numbers of tandem repeats probably allowed the explanation of the difference in gene transmission related to the parental gender as well.¹

Genetic Insights

Advancements in the understanding of genetic mechanisms of disease have made it possible to begin to identify the molecular mechanisms operating in many previously incomprehensible diseases. The development of laboratory techniques necessary for the identification of these genetic abnormalities has brought the recognition of these disease mechanisms into clinical practice. Twenty-five years ago, the ability to identify alterations in DNA sequences, the presence of deletions/duplications and expansion of trinucleotide repeats, as well as the determination (and recognition of the significance) of gene copy number, was not available to the clinician. This advancement in genetic understanding has, in turn, allowed the identification of therapeutic targets in the hope of being able to moderate or eliminate the consequence of the defective gene.

Spinal Muscular Atrophy

In the last few years, the use of relatively small molecules such as oligonucleotides to alter the transcription of mutated RNA to produce a functioning protein has been developed. Because they are small molecules, they can be delivered with relative ease to the desired site. This technology has been applied to the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) with considerable success.

Survival motor neuron gene product is essential for the health of the anterior horn cells of the spinal cord of the central nervous system. In the human genome there are two copies of the survival motor neuron gene, labeled SMN1 and SMN2. SMN1 normally produces a functional protein that is stable and necessary for the anterior horn survival. All patients with SMA have mutations in SMN1 that result in the gene being inactive. The protein product of SMN2 is usually truncated and not very stable, though it has some function. The severity of the resulting disease is influenced by the number of copies of the SMN2 gene present, and thus the available amount of partially functional SMN2 product. The oligonucleotide, in this case delivered via lumbar puncture, serves to alter the splicing of the protein product from SMN2, allowing the production of the more effective and stable protein with properties more similar to the SMN1 protein, thus ameliorating the effect of the SMN1 mutation. The patient, however, requires the administration of the therapeutic oligonucleotide indefinitely.

Gene Editing

The Gold Ring of therapeutic intervention, being able to actually correct the gene defect in any given disease, is still a goal of medical science. For the first time, this is a realistic aspiration due to the identification, development, and application of the gene editing tool Cas9 and CRISPR-Cas9 techniques.² This new technology allows the production of a custom piece of DNA (cassette) that can repair the defective gene if incorporated into the DNA sequence of the host. The techniques necessary to introduce the therapeutic cassette to the affected cell and encourage the incorporation of the new material into the DNA have largely been developed already. The hurdle has always been the difficulty producing the therapeutic cassette for the given defect. The application of the CRISPR-Cas9 technology offers the promise of being able to produce a custom cassette specific for the given mutation, and thus potentially correcting the mutation involved in a wide variety of diseases.

The last quarter century has seen the expansion of the genetic techniques to allow the recognition and diagnosis of diseases that had resisted definitive diagnosis up to this time. These techniques have also led to the uncovering of disease mechanisms previously opaque to our understanding. The next quarter century promises to produce an explosion of therapeutic possibilities on a scale previously unimaginable. Despite the considerable initial expense of these new therapies, I believe they will be of incalculable value going forward.

References

1. de Koning AP, Gu W, Castoe TA, et al. Repetitive elements may comprise over two-thirds of the human genome. PLoS Genet. 2011;7(12):e1002384.

2. Adli M. The CRISPR tool kit for genome editing and beyond. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1911.

John B. Bodensteiner, MD

Dr. Bodensteiner is Director of the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology, Founding Editor and Senior Associate Editor of Seminars in Pediatric Neurology, and Senior Associate Editor of the Journal of Child Neurology.

The impetus for this article is the celebration of 25 years of publication of Neurology Reviews. Child neurology has advanced so much in these years that it is hardly recognizable from the previous state of our understanding. Many components of the discipline include, but are not limited to, epilepsy, headache, demyelinating diseases, autoimmune diseases, neoplastic, neonatal, neuromuscular disease, and developmental conditions. My interest has been related to the neuromuscular diseases of childhood. Thus, I have chosen to describe some of the ways the advances in basic medical science and our understanding of the genetic and molecular mechanisms of disease have altered the way we think about these conditions. For the first time, this knowledge has allowed us to identify targets and techniques for effective intervention and disease modification.

Myotonic Muscular Dystrophy

One example of how the advancement in the discipline of genetics has changed our understanding of disease would be myotonic muscular dystrophy (MyoD1). When I started seeing patients in the mid 1960s, MyoD1, particularly as seen in children, was recognized as an example of autosomal dominant inheritance. The tendency for subsequent generations to be more severely affected than their parents is a phenomenon known as anticipation. Anticipation was recognized, though not explained, with the understanding of the genetic mechanisms of the time. The fact that when the disease affected an infant or newborn it was almost always inherited from the mother was also well established, though the reason for this was also not understood. Actually, during the late 1970s and early 1980s the existence of the phenomenon of anticipation was widely questioned and some publications proposed that anticipation was just an artifact of observation due to the fact that we (medical clinicians) were getting better and thus identifying the disease earlier than in past years. The recognition of the importance of repeated segments of DNA in the pathogenesis of human disease and the subsequent development of the technology to study the phenomenon allowed recognition of this previously unappreciated mechanism of genetic disease causation. This new genetic mechanism explained how anticipation could occur and confirmed it as a real phenomenon. Expanded numbers of tandem repeats probably allowed the explanation of the difference in gene transmission related to the parental gender as well.¹

Genetic Insights

Advancements in the understanding of genetic mechanisms of disease have made it possible to begin to identify the molecular mechanisms operating in many previously incomprehensible diseases. The development of laboratory techniques necessary for the identification of these genetic abnormalities has brought the recognition of these disease mechanisms into clinical practice. Twenty-five years ago, the ability to identify alterations in DNA sequences, the presence of deletions/duplications and expansion of trinucleotide repeats, as well as the determination (and recognition of the significance) of gene copy number, was not available to the clinician. This advancement in genetic understanding has, in turn, allowed the identification of therapeutic targets in the hope of being able to moderate or eliminate the consequence of the defective gene.

Spinal Muscular Atrophy

In the last few years, the use of relatively small molecules such as oligonucleotides to alter the transcription of mutated RNA to produce a functioning protein has been developed. Because they are small molecules, they can be delivered with relative ease to the desired site. This technology has been applied to the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) with considerable success.

Survival motor neuron gene product is essential for the health of the anterior horn cells of the spinal cord of the central nervous system. In the human genome there are two copies of the survival motor neuron gene, labeled SMN1 and SMN2. SMN1 normally produces a functional protein that is stable and necessary for the anterior horn survival. All patients with SMA have mutations in SMN1 that result in the gene being inactive. The protein product of SMN2 is usually truncated and not very stable, though it has some function. The severity of the resulting disease is influenced by the number of copies of the SMN2 gene present, and thus the available amount of partially functional SMN2 product. The oligonucleotide, in this case delivered via lumbar puncture, serves to alter the splicing of the protein product from SMN2, allowing the production of the more effective and stable protein with properties more similar to the SMN1 protein, thus ameliorating the effect of the SMN1 mutation. The patient, however, requires the administration of the therapeutic oligonucleotide indefinitely.

Gene Editing

The Gold Ring of therapeutic intervention, being able to actually correct the gene defect in any given disease, is still a goal of medical science. For the first time, this is a realistic aspiration due to the identification, development, and application of the gene editing tool Cas9 and CRISPR-Cas9 techniques.² This new technology allows the production of a custom piece of DNA (cassette) that can repair the defective gene if incorporated into the DNA sequence of the host. The techniques necessary to introduce the therapeutic cassette to the affected cell and encourage the incorporation of the new material into the DNA have largely been developed already. The hurdle has always been the difficulty producing the therapeutic cassette for the given defect. The application of the CRISPR-Cas9 technology offers the promise of being able to produce a custom cassette specific for the given mutation, and thus potentially correcting the mutation involved in a wide variety of diseases.

The last quarter century has seen the expansion of the genetic techniques to allow the recognition and diagnosis of diseases that had resisted definitive diagnosis up to this time. These techniques have also led to the uncovering of disease mechanisms previously opaque to our understanding. The next quarter century promises to produce an explosion of therapeutic possibilities on a scale previously unimaginable. Despite the considerable initial expense of these new therapies, I believe they will be of incalculable value going forward.

References

1. de Koning AP, Gu W, Castoe TA, et al. Repetitive elements may comprise over two-thirds of the human genome. PLoS Genet. 2011;7(12):e1002384.

2. Adli M. The CRISPR tool kit for genome editing and beyond. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1911.

John B. Bodensteiner, MD

Dr. Bodensteiner is Director of the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology, Founding Editor and Senior Associate Editor of Seminars in Pediatric Neurology, and Senior Associate Editor of the Journal of Child Neurology.

The impetus for this article is the celebration of 25 years of publication of Neurology Reviews. Child neurology has advanced so much in these years that it is hardly recognizable from the previous state of our understanding. Many components of the discipline include, but are not limited to, epilepsy, headache, demyelinating diseases, autoimmune diseases, neoplastic, neonatal, neuromuscular disease, and developmental conditions. My interest has been related to the neuromuscular diseases of childhood. Thus, I have chosen to describe some of the ways the advances in basic medical science and our understanding of the genetic and molecular mechanisms of disease have altered the way we think about these conditions. For the first time, this knowledge has allowed us to identify targets and techniques for effective intervention and disease modification.

Myotonic Muscular Dystrophy

One example of how the advancement in the discipline of genetics has changed our understanding of disease would be myotonic muscular dystrophy (MyoD1). When I started seeing patients in the mid 1960s, MyoD1, particularly as seen in children, was recognized as an example of autosomal dominant inheritance. The tendency for subsequent generations to be more severely affected than their parents is a phenomenon known as anticipation. Anticipation was recognized, though not explained, with the understanding of the genetic mechanisms of the time. The fact that when the disease affected an infant or newborn it was almost always inherited from the mother was also well established, though the reason for this was also not understood. Actually, during the late 1970s and early 1980s the existence of the phenomenon of anticipation was widely questioned and some publications proposed that anticipation was just an artifact of observation due to the fact that we (medical clinicians) were getting better and thus identifying the disease earlier than in past years. The recognition of the importance of repeated segments of DNA in the pathogenesis of human disease and the subsequent development of the technology to study the phenomenon allowed recognition of this previously unappreciated mechanism of genetic disease causation. This new genetic mechanism explained how anticipation could occur and confirmed it as a real phenomenon. Expanded numbers of tandem repeats probably allowed the explanation of the difference in gene transmission related to the parental gender as well.¹

Genetic Insights

Advancements in the understanding of genetic mechanisms of disease have made it possible to begin to identify the molecular mechanisms operating in many previously incomprehensible diseases. The development of laboratory techniques necessary for the identification of these genetic abnormalities has brought the recognition of these disease mechanisms into clinical practice. Twenty-five years ago, the ability to identify alterations in DNA sequences, the presence of deletions/duplications and expansion of trinucleotide repeats, as well as the determination (and recognition of the significance) of gene copy number, was not available to the clinician. This advancement in genetic understanding has, in turn, allowed the identification of therapeutic targets in the hope of being able to moderate or eliminate the consequence of the defective gene.

Spinal Muscular Atrophy

In the last few years, the use of relatively small molecules such as oligonucleotides to alter the transcription of mutated RNA to produce a functioning protein has been developed. Because they are small molecules, they can be delivered with relative ease to the desired site. This technology has been applied to the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) with considerable success.

Survival motor neuron gene product is essential for the health of the anterior horn cells of the spinal cord of the central nervous system. In the human genome there are two copies of the survival motor neuron gene, labeled SMN1 and SMN2. SMN1 normally produces a functional protein that is stable and necessary for the anterior horn survival. All patients with SMA have mutations in SMN1 that result in the gene being inactive. The protein product of SMN2 is usually truncated and not very stable, though it has some function. The severity of the resulting disease is influenced by the number of copies of the SMN2 gene present, and thus the available amount of partially functional SMN2 product. The oligonucleotide, in this case delivered via lumbar puncture, serves to alter the splicing of the protein product from SMN2, allowing the production of the more effective and stable protein with properties more similar to the SMN1 protein, thus ameliorating the effect of the SMN1 mutation. The patient, however, requires the administration of the therapeutic oligonucleotide indefinitely.

Gene Editing

The Gold Ring of therapeutic intervention, being able to actually correct the gene defect in any given disease, is still a goal of medical science. For the first time, this is a realistic aspiration due to the identification, development, and application of the gene editing tool Cas9 and CRISPR-Cas9 techniques.² This new technology allows the production of a custom piece of DNA (cassette) that can repair the defective gene if incorporated into the DNA sequence of the host. The techniques necessary to introduce the therapeutic cassette to the affected cell and encourage the incorporation of the new material into the DNA have largely been developed already. The hurdle has always been the difficulty producing the therapeutic cassette for the given defect. The application of the CRISPR-Cas9 technology offers the promise of being able to produce a custom cassette specific for the given mutation, and thus potentially correcting the mutation involved in a wide variety of diseases.

The last quarter century has seen the expansion of the genetic techniques to allow the recognition and diagnosis of diseases that had resisted definitive diagnosis up to this time. These techniques have also led to the uncovering of disease mechanisms previously opaque to our understanding. The next quarter century promises to produce an explosion of therapeutic possibilities on a scale previously unimaginable. Despite the considerable initial expense of these new therapies, I believe they will be of incalculable value going forward.

References

1. de Koning AP, Gu W, Castoe TA, et al. Repetitive elements may comprise over two-thirds of the human genome. PLoS Genet. 2011;7(12):e1002384.

2. Adli M. The CRISPR tool kit for genome editing and beyond. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1911.

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is now among the disorders officially included in the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP), which is used by state public health departments to screen newborns for genetic disorders.

Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services Alex M. Azar II formally added SMA to the panel July 2 on the recommendation of the Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children.

AngelIce/Thinkstock

“Adding SMA to the list will help ensure that babies born with SMA are identified, so that they have the opportunity to benefit from early treatment and intervention,” according to a statement from the Muscular Dystrophy Association about the decision. “This testing can also provide families with a genetic diagnosis – information that often is required to determine whether their child is eligible to participate in clinical trials.”

Adding SMA to the RUSP does not mean states must screen newborns for the disorder. Each state’s public health apparatus decides independently whether to accept the recommendation and which disorders on the RUSP to screen for. Most states screen for most disorders on the RUSP. Evidence compiled by the advisory committee suggested wide variation in resources, infrastructure, funding, and time to implementation among states.

An estimated 1 in 11,000 newborns have SMA, a disorder caused by mutations in the survival motor neuron 1 (SMN1) gene. SMA affects motor neurons in the brain stem and spinal cord leading to motor weakness and atrophy. The only treatment for SMA had been palliative care until the Food and Drug Administration approved nusinersen (Spinraza) for the disorder in December 2016, although the drug’s approval has raised some ethical questions.^1-3

After reviewing the evidence at their February 8, 2018 meeting, the advisory committee recommended the addition of spinal muscular atrophy screening to the RUSP in a March 8, 2018, letter from committee chair Joseph A. Bocchini Jr., MD, who is a professor and the chairman of the department of pediatrics at Louisiana State University Health in Shreveport.

Secretary Azar accepted the recommendation based on the evidence the committee provided; he also requested a follow-up report within 2 years “describing the status of implementing newborn screening for SMA and clinical outcomes of early treatment, including any potential harms, for infants diagnosed with SMA.”

The advisory committee makes its recommendations to the HHS on which heritable disorders to include in the RUSP after they have assessed a systematic, evidence-based review assigned by the committee to an external independent group. Alex R. Kemper, MD, MPH, a professor of pediatrics at the Ohio State University and division chief of ambulatory pediatrics at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, both in Columbus, led the review group for SMA. Dr. Kemper is also deputy editor of the journal Pediatrics and a member of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Wikimedia Commons/WWsgConnect/CC-SA 4.0

According to Secretary Azar’s summary in his July 2, 2018, letter of acceptance, the evidence review suggested that “early screening and treatment can lead to decreased mortality for individuals with SMA and improved motor milestones.”

Dr. Kemper elaborated in an interview that, “SMA can be detected through newborn screening, and treatment is now available that can not only reduce the risk of death but decrease the development of neurologic impairment. As with adding any condition to newborn screening, public health laboratories will need to develop strategies to incorporate the screening test. The current FDA-approved treatment, nusinersen, is delivered by lumbar puncture into the spinal fluid. In addition, there are exciting advances in gene therapy leading to new treatment approaches.”

Approximately 95% of SMA cases result from the deletion of exon 7 from both alleles of SMN1. (Other rarer cases are caused by mutations in different genes.) Without the SMN protein produced by SMN1, a person gradually loses muscle function.

A similar gene, SMN2, also can produce the SMN protein but in much lower amounts, typically less than 10% of what a person needs. People can, however, have multiple copies of SMN2, which can produce slightly more SMN protein for a slower disease process.

The five types of spinal muscular atrophy are determined according to symptom onset, which directly correlates with disorder severity and prognosis. Just over half (54%) of SMA cases are Type I, in which progressive weakness occurs over the first 6 months of life and results in early death. Only 18% of children with Type I live past age 4 years, and 68% die by age 2 years. Type 0 is rarer but more severe, usually causing fetal loss or early infant death.

Type II represents 18% of SMA cases and causes progressive weakness by age 15 months. Most people with Type II survive to their 30s but then experience respiratory failure and rarely reach their fourth decade. Individuals with Types III and IV typically have a normal lifespan and only begin to see progressive muscle weakness after 1 year old or in adulthood.

Dr. Kemper’s group focused on the three types diagnosed in infancy: types I, II, and III.

Dr. Kemper emphasized in an interview that “it will be critical to make sure that infants diagnosed with SMA through newborn screening receive follow-up shortly afterward to determine whether they would benefit from nusinersen. More information is needed about the long-term outcomes of those infants who begin treatment following newborn screening so we not only know about outcomes in later childhood and adolescence but treatment approaches can be further refined and personalized.”

Nusinersen works by altering the splicing of precursor messenger RNA in SMN2 so that the mRNA strands are longer, which thereby increases how much SMN protein is produced. Concerns about the medication, however, have included its cost – $750,000 in the first year and $375,000 every following year for life – and potential adverse events from repeated administration. Nusinersen is injected into the spinal canal four times in the first year and then once annually, and the painful injections require patient immobilization. Potential adverse events include thrombocytopenia and nephrotoxicity, along with potential complications from repeated lumbar punctures over time.²

Other concerns about the drug include its limited evidence base, lack of long-term data, associated costs with administration (for example, travel costs), the potential for patients taking nusinersen to be excluded from future clinical trials on other treatments, and ensuring parents have enough information on the drug’s limitations and potential risks to provide adequate informed consent.²

Yet evidence to date is favorable in children with early onset. Dr. Bocchini wrote in the letter to Secretary Azar that “limited data suggest that treatment effect is greater when the treatment is initiated before symptoms develop and when the individual has more copies of SMN2.”

Dr. Kemper’s group concluded that screening can detect SMA in newborns and that treatment can modify disease course. “Grey literature suggests those with total disease duration less than or equal to 12 weeks before nusinersen treatment were more likely to have better outcomes than those with longer periods of disease duration.”

“Presymptomatic treatment alters the natural history” of the disorder, the group found, although outcome data past 1 year of age are not yet available. Based on findings from a New York pilot program, they predicted that nationwide newborn screening would avert 33 deaths and 48 cases of children who were dependent on a ventilator among an annual cohort of 4 million births.

At the time of the evidence review, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, New York, Utah, and Wisconsin initiated pilot programs or whole-population mandated screening for SMA. Of the three states that reported costs, all reported costs at $1 or less per screen.

The research for the evidence review was funded by a Health Resources and Services Administration grant to Duke University, Durham, N.C. No disclosures were provided for evidence review group members.
 

References

1. Gene Ther. 2017 Sep;24(9):534-8.

2. JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jun 1;178(6):743-44.

3. JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Feb 1;172(2):188-92.

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is now among the disorders officially included in the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP), which is used by state public health departments to screen newborns for genetic disorders.

Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services Alex M. Azar II formally added SMA to the panel July 2 on the recommendation of the Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children.

AngelIce/Thinkstock

“Adding SMA to the list will help ensure that babies born with SMA are identified, so that they have the opportunity to benefit from early treatment and intervention,” according to a statement from the Muscular Dystrophy Association about the decision. “This testing can also provide families with a genetic diagnosis – information that often is required to determine whether their child is eligible to participate in clinical trials.”

Adding SMA to the RUSP does not mean states must screen newborns for the disorder. Each state’s public health apparatus decides independently whether to accept the recommendation and which disorders on the RUSP to screen for. Most states screen for most disorders on the RUSP. Evidence compiled by the advisory committee suggested wide variation in resources, infrastructure, funding, and time to implementation among states.

An estimated 1 in 11,000 newborns have SMA, a disorder caused by mutations in the survival motor neuron 1 (SMN1) gene. SMA affects motor neurons in the brain stem and spinal cord leading to motor weakness and atrophy. The only treatment for SMA had been palliative care until the Food and Drug Administration approved nusinersen (Spinraza) for the disorder in December 2016, although the drug’s approval has raised some ethical questions.^1-3

After reviewing the evidence at their February 8, 2018 meeting, the advisory committee recommended the addition of spinal muscular atrophy screening to the RUSP in a March 8, 2018, letter from committee chair Joseph A. Bocchini Jr., MD, who is a professor and the chairman of the department of pediatrics at Louisiana State University Health in Shreveport.

Secretary Azar accepted the recommendation based on the evidence the committee provided; he also requested a follow-up report within 2 years “describing the status of implementing newborn screening for SMA and clinical outcomes of early treatment, including any potential harms, for infants diagnosed with SMA.”

The advisory committee makes its recommendations to the HHS on which heritable disorders to include in the RUSP after they have assessed a systematic, evidence-based review assigned by the committee to an external independent group. Alex R. Kemper, MD, MPH, a professor of pediatrics at the Ohio State University and division chief of ambulatory pediatrics at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, both in Columbus, led the review group for SMA. Dr. Kemper is also deputy editor of the journal Pediatrics and a member of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Wikimedia Commons/WWsgConnect/CC-SA 4.0

According to Secretary Azar’s summary in his July 2, 2018, letter of acceptance, the evidence review suggested that “early screening and treatment can lead to decreased mortality for individuals with SMA and improved motor milestones.”

Dr. Kemper elaborated in an interview that, “SMA can be detected through newborn screening, and treatment is now available that can not only reduce the risk of death but decrease the development of neurologic impairment. As with adding any condition to newborn screening, public health laboratories will need to develop strategies to incorporate the screening test. The current FDA-approved treatment, nusinersen, is delivered by lumbar puncture into the spinal fluid. In addition, there are exciting advances in gene therapy leading to new treatment approaches.”

Approximately 95% of SMA cases result from the deletion of exon 7 from both alleles of SMN1. (Other rarer cases are caused by mutations in different genes.) Without the SMN protein produced by SMN1, a person gradually loses muscle function.

A similar gene, SMN2, also can produce the SMN protein but in much lower amounts, typically less than 10% of what a person needs. People can, however, have multiple copies of SMN2, which can produce slightly more SMN protein for a slower disease process.

The five types of spinal muscular atrophy are determined according to symptom onset, which directly correlates with disorder severity and prognosis. Just over half (54%) of SMA cases are Type I, in which progressive weakness occurs over the first 6 months of life and results in early death. Only 18% of children with Type I live past age 4 years, and 68% die by age 2 years. Type 0 is rarer but more severe, usually causing fetal loss or early infant death.

Type II represents 18% of SMA cases and causes progressive weakness by age 15 months. Most people with Type II survive to their 30s but then experience respiratory failure and rarely reach their fourth decade. Individuals with Types III and IV typically have a normal lifespan and only begin to see progressive muscle weakness after 1 year old or in adulthood.

Dr. Kemper’s group focused on the three types diagnosed in infancy: types I, II, and III.

Dr. Kemper emphasized in an interview that “it will be critical to make sure that infants diagnosed with SMA through newborn screening receive follow-up shortly afterward to determine whether they would benefit from nusinersen. More information is needed about the long-term outcomes of those infants who begin treatment following newborn screening so we not only know about outcomes in later childhood and adolescence but treatment approaches can be further refined and personalized.”

Nusinersen works by altering the splicing of precursor messenger RNA in SMN2 so that the mRNA strands are longer, which thereby increases how much SMN protein is produced. Concerns about the medication, however, have included its cost – $750,000 in the first year and $375,000 every following year for life – and potential adverse events from repeated administration. Nusinersen is injected into the spinal canal four times in the first year and then once annually, and the painful injections require patient immobilization. Potential adverse events include thrombocytopenia and nephrotoxicity, along with potential complications from repeated lumbar punctures over time.²

Other concerns about the drug include its limited evidence base, lack of long-term data, associated costs with administration (for example, travel costs), the potential for patients taking nusinersen to be excluded from future clinical trials on other treatments, and ensuring parents have enough information on the drug’s limitations and potential risks to provide adequate informed consent.²

Yet evidence to date is favorable in children with early onset. Dr. Bocchini wrote in the letter to Secretary Azar that “limited data suggest that treatment effect is greater when the treatment is initiated before symptoms develop and when the individual has more copies of SMN2.”

Dr. Kemper’s group concluded that screening can detect SMA in newborns and that treatment can modify disease course. “Grey literature suggests those with total disease duration less than or equal to 12 weeks before nusinersen treatment were more likely to have better outcomes than those with longer periods of disease duration.”

“Presymptomatic treatment alters the natural history” of the disorder, the group found, although outcome data past 1 year of age are not yet available. Based on findings from a New York pilot program, they predicted that nationwide newborn screening would avert 33 deaths and 48 cases of children who were dependent on a ventilator among an annual cohort of 4 million births.

At the time of the evidence review, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, New York, Utah, and Wisconsin initiated pilot programs or whole-population mandated screening for SMA. Of the three states that reported costs, all reported costs at $1 or less per screen.

The research for the evidence review was funded by a Health Resources and Services Administration grant to Duke University, Durham, N.C. No disclosures were provided for evidence review group members.
 

References

1. Gene Ther. 2017 Sep;24(9):534-8.

2. JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jun 1;178(6):743-44.

3. JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Feb 1;172(2):188-92.

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is now among the disorders officially included in the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP), which is used by state public health departments to screen newborns for genetic disorders.

Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services Alex M. Azar II formally added SMA to the panel July 2 on the recommendation of the Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children.

AngelIce/Thinkstock

“Adding SMA to the list will help ensure that babies born with SMA are identified, so that they have the opportunity to benefit from early treatment and intervention,” according to a statement from the Muscular Dystrophy Association about the decision. “This testing can also provide families with a genetic diagnosis – information that often is required to determine whether their child is eligible to participate in clinical trials.”

Adding SMA to the RUSP does not mean states must screen newborns for the disorder. Each state’s public health apparatus decides independently whether to accept the recommendation and which disorders on the RUSP to screen for. Most states screen for most disorders on the RUSP. Evidence compiled by the advisory committee suggested wide variation in resources, infrastructure, funding, and time to implementation among states.

An estimated 1 in 11,000 newborns have SMA, a disorder caused by mutations in the survival motor neuron 1 (SMN1) gene. SMA affects motor neurons in the brain stem and spinal cord leading to motor weakness and atrophy. The only treatment for SMA had been palliative care until the Food and Drug Administration approved nusinersen (Spinraza) for the disorder in December 2016, although the drug’s approval has raised some ethical questions.^1-3

After reviewing the evidence at their February 8, 2018 meeting, the advisory committee recommended the addition of spinal muscular atrophy screening to the RUSP in a March 8, 2018, letter from committee chair Joseph A. Bocchini Jr., MD, who is a professor and the chairman of the department of pediatrics at Louisiana State University Health in Shreveport.

Secretary Azar accepted the recommendation based on the evidence the committee provided; he also requested a follow-up report within 2 years “describing the status of implementing newborn screening for SMA and clinical outcomes of early treatment, including any potential harms, for infants diagnosed with SMA.”

The advisory committee makes its recommendations to the HHS on which heritable disorders to include in the RUSP after they have assessed a systematic, evidence-based review assigned by the committee to an external independent group. Alex R. Kemper, MD, MPH, a professor of pediatrics at the Ohio State University and division chief of ambulatory pediatrics at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, both in Columbus, led the review group for SMA. Dr. Kemper is also deputy editor of the journal Pediatrics and a member of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Wikimedia Commons/WWsgConnect/CC-SA 4.0

According to Secretary Azar’s summary in his July 2, 2018, letter of acceptance, the evidence review suggested that “early screening and treatment can lead to decreased mortality for individuals with SMA and improved motor milestones.”

Dr. Kemper elaborated in an interview that, “SMA can be detected through newborn screening, and treatment is now available that can not only reduce the risk of death but decrease the development of neurologic impairment. As with adding any condition to newborn screening, public health laboratories will need to develop strategies to incorporate the screening test. The current FDA-approved treatment, nusinersen, is delivered by lumbar puncture into the spinal fluid. In addition, there are exciting advances in gene therapy leading to new treatment approaches.”

Approximately 95% of SMA cases result from the deletion of exon 7 from both alleles of SMN1. (Other rarer cases are caused by mutations in different genes.) Without the SMN protein produced by SMN1, a person gradually loses muscle function.

A similar gene, SMN2, also can produce the SMN protein but in much lower amounts, typically less than 10% of what a person needs. People can, however, have multiple copies of SMN2, which can produce slightly more SMN protein for a slower disease process.

The five types of spinal muscular atrophy are determined according to symptom onset, which directly correlates with disorder severity and prognosis. Just over half (54%) of SMA cases are Type I, in which progressive weakness occurs over the first 6 months of life and results in early death. Only 18% of children with Type I live past age 4 years, and 68% die by age 2 years. Type 0 is rarer but more severe, usually causing fetal loss or early infant death.

Type II represents 18% of SMA cases and causes progressive weakness by age 15 months. Most people with Type II survive to their 30s but then experience respiratory failure and rarely reach their fourth decade. Individuals with Types III and IV typically have a normal lifespan and only begin to see progressive muscle weakness after 1 year old or in adulthood.

Dr. Kemper’s group focused on the three types diagnosed in infancy: types I, II, and III.

Dr. Kemper emphasized in an interview that “it will be critical to make sure that infants diagnosed with SMA through newborn screening receive follow-up shortly afterward to determine whether they would benefit from nusinersen. More information is needed about the long-term outcomes of those infants who begin treatment following newborn screening so we not only know about outcomes in later childhood and adolescence but treatment approaches can be further refined and personalized.”

Nusinersen works by altering the splicing of precursor messenger RNA in SMN2 so that the mRNA strands are longer, which thereby increases how much SMN protein is produced. Concerns about the medication, however, have included its cost – $750,000 in the first year and $375,000 every following year for life – and potential adverse events from repeated administration. Nusinersen is injected into the spinal canal four times in the first year and then once annually, and the painful injections require patient immobilization. Potential adverse events include thrombocytopenia and nephrotoxicity, along with potential complications from repeated lumbar punctures over time.²

Other concerns about the drug include its limited evidence base, lack of long-term data, associated costs with administration (for example, travel costs), the potential for patients taking nusinersen to be excluded from future clinical trials on other treatments, and ensuring parents have enough information on the drug’s limitations and potential risks to provide adequate informed consent.²

Yet evidence to date is favorable in children with early onset. Dr. Bocchini wrote in the letter to Secretary Azar that “limited data suggest that treatment effect is greater when the treatment is initiated before symptoms develop and when the individual has more copies of SMN2.”

Dr. Kemper’s group concluded that screening can detect SMA in newborns and that treatment can modify disease course. “Grey literature suggests those with total disease duration less than or equal to 12 weeks before nusinersen treatment were more likely to have better outcomes than those with longer periods of disease duration.”

“Presymptomatic treatment alters the natural history” of the disorder, the group found, although outcome data past 1 year of age are not yet available. Based on findings from a New York pilot program, they predicted that nationwide newborn screening would avert 33 deaths and 48 cases of children who were dependent on a ventilator among an annual cohort of 4 million births.

At the time of the evidence review, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, New York, Utah, and Wisconsin initiated pilot programs or whole-population mandated screening for SMA. Of the three states that reported costs, all reported costs at $1 or less per screen.

The research for the evidence review was funded by a Health Resources and Services Administration grant to Duke University, Durham, N.C. No disclosures were provided for evidence review group members.
 

References

1. Gene Ther. 2017 Sep;24(9):534-8.

2. JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jun 1;178(6):743-44.

3. JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Feb 1;172(2):188-92.

LOS ANGELES – There’s substantially higher risk of relapse and epilepsy after acute disseminated encephalomyelitis when children present with serum antibodies against myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein, according to British investigators.

“Traditionally, we told parents that ADEM [acute disseminated encephalomyelitis] is typically monophasic. I do tell parents now that the risk of relapse is higher if we see” myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies (MOG-Ab), said senior investigator Yael Hacohen, MBBS, DPhil, a pediatric neurology lecturer at University College London.

There was also a strong trend for relapsing disease when children presented with seizures, and an increased risk of post-ADEM epilepsy with oligoclonal bands on cerebrospinal fluid analysis, a marker of inflammation.

ADEM is an acute CNS demyelinating disorder primarily affecting young children, often after upper respiratory tract infections and occasionally after measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination. Signs can include limb weakness, stumbling, and coma. Many children recover without incident, but some don’t.

There’s been an increasing number of reports of children – and adults – presenting with antibodies against MOG, a glycoprotein on the outermost layer of the myelin sheath. Its exact function is unknown, but antibodies have been found in a number of inflammatory CNS conditions, and its role in pathogenesis is being explored. Testing is available for clinical use, but it isn’t standardized. For now, titer levels aren’t being used to guide treatment at University College London, Dr. Hacohen said at the American Academy of Neurology annual meeting.

M. Alexander Otto/MDedge News

aotto@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Rossor T et al. Neurology. 2018 Apr 90(15 Suppl.):S35.004.

LOS ANGELES – There’s substantially higher risk of relapse and epilepsy after acute disseminated encephalomyelitis when children present with serum antibodies against myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein, according to British investigators.

“Traditionally, we told parents that ADEM [acute disseminated encephalomyelitis] is typically monophasic. I do tell parents now that the risk of relapse is higher if we see” myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies (MOG-Ab), said senior investigator Yael Hacohen, MBBS, DPhil, a pediatric neurology lecturer at University College London.

There was also a strong trend for relapsing disease when children presented with seizures, and an increased risk of post-ADEM epilepsy with oligoclonal bands on cerebrospinal fluid analysis, a marker of inflammation.

ADEM is an acute CNS demyelinating disorder primarily affecting young children, often after upper respiratory tract infections and occasionally after measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination. Signs can include limb weakness, stumbling, and coma. Many children recover without incident, but some don’t.

There’s been an increasing number of reports of children – and adults – presenting with antibodies against MOG, a glycoprotein on the outermost layer of the myelin sheath. Its exact function is unknown, but antibodies have been found in a number of inflammatory CNS conditions, and its role in pathogenesis is being explored. Testing is available for clinical use, but it isn’t standardized. For now, titer levels aren’t being used to guide treatment at University College London, Dr. Hacohen said at the American Academy of Neurology annual meeting.

M. Alexander Otto/MDedge News

aotto@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Rossor T et al. Neurology. 2018 Apr 90(15 Suppl.):S35.004.

LOS ANGELES – There’s substantially higher risk of relapse and epilepsy after acute disseminated encephalomyelitis when children present with serum antibodies against myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein, according to British investigators.

“Traditionally, we told parents that ADEM [acute disseminated encephalomyelitis] is typically monophasic. I do tell parents now that the risk of relapse is higher if we see” myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies (MOG-Ab), said senior investigator Yael Hacohen, MBBS, DPhil, a pediatric neurology lecturer at University College London.

There was also a strong trend for relapsing disease when children presented with seizures, and an increased risk of post-ADEM epilepsy with oligoclonal bands on cerebrospinal fluid analysis, a marker of inflammation.

ADEM is an acute CNS demyelinating disorder primarily affecting young children, often after upper respiratory tract infections and occasionally after measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination. Signs can include limb weakness, stumbling, and coma. Many children recover without incident, but some don’t.

There’s been an increasing number of reports of children – and adults – presenting with antibodies against MOG, a glycoprotein on the outermost layer of the myelin sheath. Its exact function is unknown, but antibodies have been found in a number of inflammatory CNS conditions, and its role in pathogenesis is being explored. Testing is available for clinical use, but it isn’t standardized. For now, titer levels aren’t being used to guide treatment at University College London, Dr. Hacohen said at the American Academy of Neurology annual meeting.

M. Alexander Otto/MDedge News

aotto@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Rossor T et al. Neurology. 2018 Apr 90(15 Suppl.):S35.004.

LOS ANGELES – Neurologists can play an important role in helping patients gain access to high-cost, breakthrough drugs, while at the same time guiding patients to lower-cost options whenever possible, speakers said at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

The use of the Orphan Drug approval pathway established in 1983 has gained a great deal of steam for rare neurologic diseases in recent years with the approval of a number of drugs, such as nusinersen (Spinraza) for spinal muscular atrophy, eteplirsen (Exondys 51) for Duchenne muscular dystrophy, and edaravone (Radicava) for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, said Nicholas Johnson, MD, a pediatric neuromuscular disease specialist at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City.

But given that only 2% of U.S. physicians are neurologists, yet 18% of rare diseases are neurologic and 11% of drugs in development overall are for neurologic diseases, there are a great deal of challenges arising for neurologists in getting access to these new high-priced drugs for their patients, said Dr. Johnson, who leads the AAN’s Neurology Drug Pricing Task Force and is also chair of the AAN Government Relations Committee.

These challenges range from increased administrative burden on staff, getting insurance approval, finding administration sites, and the ability to perform special patient assessments, he said in an interview.

Dr. Nicholas Johnson’s interview:
 

Dr. Brian Callaghan’s interview:
 

Many high-priced drugs commonly prescribed for chronic neurologic conditions and diagnostic tests also have high out-of-pocket costs for patients, but it is remarkably hard even for well-informed experts to find the actual costs that patients will pay out of pocket for such drugs and tests, according to Brian Callaghan, MD, a neuromuscular disease specialist at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

jevans@mdedge.com

LOS ANGELES – Neurologists can play an important role in helping patients gain access to high-cost, breakthrough drugs, while at the same time guiding patients to lower-cost options whenever possible, speakers said at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

The use of the Orphan Drug approval pathway established in 1983 has gained a great deal of steam for rare neurologic diseases in recent years with the approval of a number of drugs, such as nusinersen (Spinraza) for spinal muscular atrophy, eteplirsen (Exondys 51) for Duchenne muscular dystrophy, and edaravone (Radicava) for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, said Nicholas Johnson, MD, a pediatric neuromuscular disease specialist at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City.

But given that only 2% of U.S. physicians are neurologists, yet 18% of rare diseases are neurologic and 11% of drugs in development overall are for neurologic diseases, there are a great deal of challenges arising for neurologists in getting access to these new high-priced drugs for their patients, said Dr. Johnson, who leads the AAN’s Neurology Drug Pricing Task Force and is also chair of the AAN Government Relations Committee.

These challenges range from increased administrative burden on staff, getting insurance approval, finding administration sites, and the ability to perform special patient assessments, he said in an interview.

Dr. Nicholas Johnson’s interview:
 

Dr. Brian Callaghan’s interview:
 

Many high-priced drugs commonly prescribed for chronic neurologic conditions and diagnostic tests also have high out-of-pocket costs for patients, but it is remarkably hard even for well-informed experts to find the actual costs that patients will pay out of pocket for such drugs and tests, according to Brian Callaghan, MD, a neuromuscular disease specialist at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

jevans@mdedge.com

LOS ANGELES – Neurologists can play an important role in helping patients gain access to high-cost, breakthrough drugs, while at the same time guiding patients to lower-cost options whenever possible, speakers said at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

The use of the Orphan Drug approval pathway established in 1983 has gained a great deal of steam for rare neurologic diseases in recent years with the approval of a number of drugs, such as nusinersen (Spinraza) for spinal muscular atrophy, eteplirsen (Exondys 51) for Duchenne muscular dystrophy, and edaravone (Radicava) for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, said Nicholas Johnson, MD, a pediatric neuromuscular disease specialist at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City.

But given that only 2% of U.S. physicians are neurologists, yet 18% of rare diseases are neurologic and 11% of drugs in development overall are for neurologic diseases, there are a great deal of challenges arising for neurologists in getting access to these new high-priced drugs for their patients, said Dr. Johnson, who leads the AAN’s Neurology Drug Pricing Task Force and is also chair of the AAN Government Relations Committee.

These challenges range from increased administrative burden on staff, getting insurance approval, finding administration sites, and the ability to perform special patient assessments, he said in an interview.

Dr. Nicholas Johnson’s interview:
 

Dr. Brian Callaghan’s interview:
 

Many high-priced drugs commonly prescribed for chronic neurologic conditions and diagnostic tests also have high out-of-pocket costs for patients, but it is remarkably hard even for well-informed experts to find the actual costs that patients will pay out of pocket for such drugs and tests, according to Brian Callaghan, MD, a neuromuscular disease specialist at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

jevans@mdedge.com

The Food and Drug Administration has approved Hizentra as the first subcutaneously administered human immunoglobulin maintenance therapy for adults with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), according to a statement from its manufacturer, CSL Behring.

Immune globulin subcutaneous (human) 20% liquid (Hizentra) was approved at doses of 0.2 and 0.4 g/kg per week because of the strength of the phase 3 PATH (Polyneuropathy and Treatment with Hizentra) clinical trial and the PATH extension study, which is still ongoing. PATH is the largest and longest running randomized study of patients with CIDP. The clinical trial studied the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of the two different doses of the subcutaneous immunoglobulin in 172 patients.

The European Commission also recently granted marketing authorization for Hizentra based on the information from the PATH trial.

Hizentra was initially approved in the United States in 2010 for primary immunodeficiency in patients aged 2 years and older.

Since Hizentra is a self-administered drug, it is important for physicians to teach their patients how to properly inject this treatment without hitting a blood vessel. Apart from issues related to self-administration, the risk of thrombosis is also present, which is not uncommon for immune globulin products.

ilacy@mdedge.com

The Food and Drug Administration has approved Hizentra as the first subcutaneously administered human immunoglobulin maintenance therapy for adults with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), according to a statement from its manufacturer, CSL Behring.

Immune globulin subcutaneous (human) 20% liquid (Hizentra) was approved at doses of 0.2 and 0.4 g/kg per week because of the strength of the phase 3 PATH (Polyneuropathy and Treatment with Hizentra) clinical trial and the PATH extension study, which is still ongoing. PATH is the largest and longest running randomized study of patients with CIDP. The clinical trial studied the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of the two different doses of the subcutaneous immunoglobulin in 172 patients.

The European Commission also recently granted marketing authorization for Hizentra based on the information from the PATH trial.

Hizentra was initially approved in the United States in 2010 for primary immunodeficiency in patients aged 2 years and older.

Since Hizentra is a self-administered drug, it is important for physicians to teach their patients how to properly inject this treatment without hitting a blood vessel. Apart from issues related to self-administration, the risk of thrombosis is also present, which is not uncommon for immune globulin products.

ilacy@mdedge.com

The Food and Drug Administration has approved Hizentra as the first subcutaneously administered human immunoglobulin maintenance therapy for adults with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), according to a statement from its manufacturer, CSL Behring.

Immune globulin subcutaneous (human) 20% liquid (Hizentra) was approved at doses of 0.2 and 0.4 g/kg per week because of the strength of the phase 3 PATH (Polyneuropathy and Treatment with Hizentra) clinical trial and the PATH extension study, which is still ongoing. PATH is the largest and longest running randomized study of patients with CIDP. The clinical trial studied the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of the two different doses of the subcutaneous immunoglobulin in 172 patients.

The European Commission also recently granted marketing authorization for Hizentra based on the information from the PATH trial.

Hizentra was initially approved in the United States in 2010 for primary immunodeficiency in patients aged 2 years and older.

Since Hizentra is a self-administered drug, it is important for physicians to teach their patients how to properly inject this treatment without hitting a blood vessel. Apart from issues related to self-administration, the risk of thrombosis is also present, which is not uncommon for immune globulin products.

ilacy@mdedge.com

LAS VEGAS – Even if you do not believe in medical cannabis, be open to patients who ask you if it might benefit them, Kevin P. Hill, MD, advised.

“Being willing to talk to your patient about it is important,” said Dr. Hill, of the division of addiction psychiatry at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, said at an annual psychopharmacology update held by the Nevada Psychiatric Association. “Because what will happen is, they’ll say, ‘Look. I need medical marijuana to treat my anxiety.’ Then you can say, ‘Well, I have treatments that work for anxiety that we haven’t tried.’ Maybe you can get them into treatment because of that conversation.”

In his opinion, the appropriate candidate for medical cannabis is someone with a debilitating condition who has failed multiple first- and second-line treatments. “The policy of medical cannabis is ahead of the science,” he noted. “It’s not a good place to be, but now the question becomes: How do we give people what they want while addressing the risks? I think we need to do a better job of that. We can provide a service to patients and colleagues by being informed and thoughtful on the topic.”

Food and Drug Administration–approved cannabinoids to date are dronabinol (Marinol) and nabilone (Cesamet). These agents are approved for nausea and vomiting associated with chemotherapy and for appetite stimulation in wasting illnesses such as AIDS. “Your patients may come to you and say, ‘I think I need medical cannabis for condition X,’ ” said Dr. Hill, who authored the book “Marijuana: The Unbiased Truth About the World’s Most Popular Weed” (Center City, Minn.: Hazelden Publishing, 2015). “Maybe the cannabis plant can outperform the two approved agents that we have. I think we have to be open to that possibility. Maybe they offer some things that dronabinol and nabilone don’t.”

LAS VEGAS – Even if you do not believe in medical cannabis, be open to patients who ask you if it might benefit them, Kevin P. Hill, MD, advised.

“Being willing to talk to your patient about it is important,” said Dr. Hill, of the division of addiction psychiatry at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, said at an annual psychopharmacology update held by the Nevada Psychiatric Association. “Because what will happen is, they’ll say, ‘Look. I need medical marijuana to treat my anxiety.’ Then you can say, ‘Well, I have treatments that work for anxiety that we haven’t tried.’ Maybe you can get them into treatment because of that conversation.”

In his opinion, the appropriate candidate for medical cannabis is someone with a debilitating condition who has failed multiple first- and second-line treatments. “The policy of medical cannabis is ahead of the science,” he noted. “It’s not a good place to be, but now the question becomes: How do we give people what they want while addressing the risks? I think we need to do a better job of that. We can provide a service to patients and colleagues by being informed and thoughtful on the topic.”

Food and Drug Administration–approved cannabinoids to date are dronabinol (Marinol) and nabilone (Cesamet). These agents are approved for nausea and vomiting associated with chemotherapy and for appetite stimulation in wasting illnesses such as AIDS. “Your patients may come to you and say, ‘I think I need medical cannabis for condition X,’ ” said Dr. Hill, who authored the book “Marijuana: The Unbiased Truth About the World’s Most Popular Weed” (Center City, Minn.: Hazelden Publishing, 2015). “Maybe the cannabis plant can outperform the two approved agents that we have. I think we have to be open to that possibility. Maybe they offer some things that dronabinol and nabilone don’t.”

LAS VEGAS – Even if you do not believe in medical cannabis, be open to patients who ask you if it might benefit them, Kevin P. Hill, MD, advised.

“Being willing to talk to your patient about it is important,” said Dr. Hill, of the division of addiction psychiatry at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, said at an annual psychopharmacology update held by the Nevada Psychiatric Association. “Because what will happen is, they’ll say, ‘Look. I need medical marijuana to treat my anxiety.’ Then you can say, ‘Well, I have treatments that work for anxiety that we haven’t tried.’ Maybe you can get them into treatment because of that conversation.”

In his opinion, the appropriate candidate for medical cannabis is someone with a debilitating condition who has failed multiple first- and second-line treatments. “The policy of medical cannabis is ahead of the science,” he noted. “It’s not a good place to be, but now the question becomes: How do we give people what they want while addressing the risks? I think we need to do a better job of that. We can provide a service to patients and colleagues by being informed and thoughtful on the topic.”

Food and Drug Administration–approved cannabinoids to date are dronabinol (Marinol) and nabilone (Cesamet). These agents are approved for nausea and vomiting associated with chemotherapy and for appetite stimulation in wasting illnesses such as AIDS. “Your patients may come to you and say, ‘I think I need medical cannabis for condition X,’ ” said Dr. Hill, who authored the book “Marijuana: The Unbiased Truth About the World’s Most Popular Weed” (Center City, Minn.: Hazelden Publishing, 2015). “Maybe the cannabis plant can outperform the two approved agents that we have. I think we have to be open to that possibility. Maybe they offer some things that dronabinol and nabilone don’t.”