Antioxidants plus sunscreens may be two-punch knockout for melasma

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 01/14/2019 - 09:59

– A two-step regimen of high-potency topical antioxidants followed by a mineral-based sunscreen may help repair light-induced skin damage and protect against new damage in patients with melasma.

 

Recent studies suggest that the antioxidants tamp down inflammatory cytokines and damage of oxidative stress, Maria Ivonne Arellano-Mendoza, MD, said during a special focus session on Latino skin held at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.

“Many compounds are being studied for this purpose,” said Dr. Arellano-Mendoza, head of the dermatology department of the General Hospital of Mexico, Mexico City. “One combination is vitamin C, vitamin E, ubiquinone, and grape-seed extract. This effectively prevented infrared-A radiation–induced matrix metalloproteinase-1 messenger RNA expression in human skin. This combination can be found now in some sunscreens and daily care products.”

Another effective combination seems to be a mixture of ferulic acid, tocopherol, and vitamin C, she said.

The two-step process of regularly using a topical product with antioxidants before applying a sunscreen is all there is for now, she added, because so far it’s been impossible to combine the agents in a single product.

“The challenge will be how to create a product that stays on the surface of the skin to protect it from light, while liberating the antioxidants to penetrate the skin,” she commented.

The antioxidants’ benefits, however, will be obliterated by the continued effects of some light wavelengths that aggravate melasma unless they are used in sequence with a light-scattering sunscreen.

Sunscreens are critical components of a melasma treatment regimen, Dr. Arellano-Mendoza said. “Sunscreens are a cornerstone of treatment. We clearly tell our patients that sunscreens have to be used every day, forever, and if they are not used properly, they will have no improvement.”

Patients with hyperpigmentation disorders are susceptible to longer wavelengths that aren’t covered by chemically derived sunscreens. Longer wavelengths, including infrared light and visible light, have been shown to increase expression of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) -1 and -9, decrease expression of type 1 procollagen, and can induce macrophage infiltration. These wavelengths also increase reactive oxygen species and proinflammatory cytokines in vitro, Dr. Arellano-Mendoza noted.

Visible light can cause erythema, transient and long-lasting hyperpigmentation, thermal damage, free radical production, and premature photoaging. It also can stimulate the production of reactive oxygen species that can damage DNA.

Mineral-based, inorganic sunscreens, however – like those with titanium dioxide, zinc oxide, and iron oxide – scatter all wavelengths.

“These micronized forms of metal oxides not only scatter and reflect light, they also absorb ultraviolet radiation. The compounds aren’t new,” she said. In 1991, Dr. Elaine Kaye of Harvard University, Boston, and associates described (Arch Dermatol. 1991;127:351-5) opaque physical sunscreens that were useful blockers of visible light and found that transmittance of light can be lowered by adding iron oxide, Dr. Arellano-Mendoza pointed out.

The inorganic sunscreens have never been widely adopted because they are highly pigmented with white or, in the case of iron oxide, with red. “Not many people accepted [the iron-containing compounds] because of the redness, but now different shades are going to be hitting the market soon,” and the hope is that consumers will find them more appealing, she said.

This is good news, as the data emerging around iron oxide are intriguingly positive. A 2015 study showed that a sunscreen with iron oxides prevented melasma relapse during the summer months. Patients were randomized to the same ultraviolet filter topical sunscreen, but for one group, micronized iron oxide was added to it. After 6 months, the median melasma area severity index score was significantly better in the group using the iron oxide compound (J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015 Jan;72[1]:189-90.e1).

Support for the two-step regimen appeared in 2014, when a small study randomized 30 healthy volunteers to an SPF 30 sunscreen or the same sunscreen supplemented with an antioxidant cocktail of grape seed extract, vitamin E, ubiquinone, and vitamin C. The endpoint was MMP-1 upregulation after exposure to infrared-A light. Skin treated with the combination regimen showed significantly lower MMP-1 activation, leading the authors to conclude that the combination of topical antioxidants conferred protection against the irradiation (Photochem Photobiol. 2015 Jan-Feb;91[1]:248-50).

Those same authors published a companion article (Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2014;30:167-74) suggesting that another antioxidant mixture (ferulic acid, tocopherol, and vitamin C) was similarly effective.

Using a combination of antioxidants is important, Dr. Arellano-Mendoza said, because different antioxidants work differently. Some (catalase, glutathione peroxidase, and superoxide dismutase) are enzymatic, catalyzing reactions that convert free radicals to oxygen and water. Others terminate free radicals by preventing the propagation of oxidative chain reactions (vitamins A and C, flavonoids, uric acid, bilirubin, albumin, and members of the thiol group). A third group consists of metal-binding proteins that sequester free iron or copper to prevent free radical production (ferritin, transferrin, lactoferrin, and ceruloplasmin).

“I think we can now consider antioxidants a part of the tools we use in treating some pigmentary disorders as melasma,” she said. “We need to choose the compounds carefully, and we definitely need more in vivo research, but the findings are very encouraging.”

Dr. Arellano-Mendoza had no relevant financial disclosures.

This article was updated 3/20/17.
 

 

 

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

– A two-step regimen of high-potency topical antioxidants followed by a mineral-based sunscreen may help repair light-induced skin damage and protect against new damage in patients with melasma.

 

Recent studies suggest that the antioxidants tamp down inflammatory cytokines and damage of oxidative stress, Maria Ivonne Arellano-Mendoza, MD, said during a special focus session on Latino skin held at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.

“Many compounds are being studied for this purpose,” said Dr. Arellano-Mendoza, head of the dermatology department of the General Hospital of Mexico, Mexico City. “One combination is vitamin C, vitamin E, ubiquinone, and grape-seed extract. This effectively prevented infrared-A radiation–induced matrix metalloproteinase-1 messenger RNA expression in human skin. This combination can be found now in some sunscreens and daily care products.”

Another effective combination seems to be a mixture of ferulic acid, tocopherol, and vitamin C, she said.

The two-step process of regularly using a topical product with antioxidants before applying a sunscreen is all there is for now, she added, because so far it’s been impossible to combine the agents in a single product.

“The challenge will be how to create a product that stays on the surface of the skin to protect it from light, while liberating the antioxidants to penetrate the skin,” she commented.

The antioxidants’ benefits, however, will be obliterated by the continued effects of some light wavelengths that aggravate melasma unless they are used in sequence with a light-scattering sunscreen.

Sunscreens are critical components of a melasma treatment regimen, Dr. Arellano-Mendoza said. “Sunscreens are a cornerstone of treatment. We clearly tell our patients that sunscreens have to be used every day, forever, and if they are not used properly, they will have no improvement.”

Patients with hyperpigmentation disorders are susceptible to longer wavelengths that aren’t covered by chemically derived sunscreens. Longer wavelengths, including infrared light and visible light, have been shown to increase expression of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) -1 and -9, decrease expression of type 1 procollagen, and can induce macrophage infiltration. These wavelengths also increase reactive oxygen species and proinflammatory cytokines in vitro, Dr. Arellano-Mendoza noted.

Visible light can cause erythema, transient and long-lasting hyperpigmentation, thermal damage, free radical production, and premature photoaging. It also can stimulate the production of reactive oxygen species that can damage DNA.

Mineral-based, inorganic sunscreens, however – like those with titanium dioxide, zinc oxide, and iron oxide – scatter all wavelengths.

“These micronized forms of metal oxides not only scatter and reflect light, they also absorb ultraviolet radiation. The compounds aren’t new,” she said. In 1991, Dr. Elaine Kaye of Harvard University, Boston, and associates described (Arch Dermatol. 1991;127:351-5) opaque physical sunscreens that were useful blockers of visible light and found that transmittance of light can be lowered by adding iron oxide, Dr. Arellano-Mendoza pointed out.

The inorganic sunscreens have never been widely adopted because they are highly pigmented with white or, in the case of iron oxide, with red. “Not many people accepted [the iron-containing compounds] because of the redness, but now different shades are going to be hitting the market soon,” and the hope is that consumers will find them more appealing, she said.

This is good news, as the data emerging around iron oxide are intriguingly positive. A 2015 study showed that a sunscreen with iron oxides prevented melasma relapse during the summer months. Patients were randomized to the same ultraviolet filter topical sunscreen, but for one group, micronized iron oxide was added to it. After 6 months, the median melasma area severity index score was significantly better in the group using the iron oxide compound (J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015 Jan;72[1]:189-90.e1).

Support for the two-step regimen appeared in 2014, when a small study randomized 30 healthy volunteers to an SPF 30 sunscreen or the same sunscreen supplemented with an antioxidant cocktail of grape seed extract, vitamin E, ubiquinone, and vitamin C. The endpoint was MMP-1 upregulation after exposure to infrared-A light. Skin treated with the combination regimen showed significantly lower MMP-1 activation, leading the authors to conclude that the combination of topical antioxidants conferred protection against the irradiation (Photochem Photobiol. 2015 Jan-Feb;91[1]:248-50).

Those same authors published a companion article (Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2014;30:167-74) suggesting that another antioxidant mixture (ferulic acid, tocopherol, and vitamin C) was similarly effective.

Using a combination of antioxidants is important, Dr. Arellano-Mendoza said, because different antioxidants work differently. Some (catalase, glutathione peroxidase, and superoxide dismutase) are enzymatic, catalyzing reactions that convert free radicals to oxygen and water. Others terminate free radicals by preventing the propagation of oxidative chain reactions (vitamins A and C, flavonoids, uric acid, bilirubin, albumin, and members of the thiol group). A third group consists of metal-binding proteins that sequester free iron or copper to prevent free radical production (ferritin, transferrin, lactoferrin, and ceruloplasmin).

“I think we can now consider antioxidants a part of the tools we use in treating some pigmentary disorders as melasma,” she said. “We need to choose the compounds carefully, and we definitely need more in vivo research, but the findings are very encouraging.”

Dr. Arellano-Mendoza had no relevant financial disclosures.

This article was updated 3/20/17.
 

 

 

– A two-step regimen of high-potency topical antioxidants followed by a mineral-based sunscreen may help repair light-induced skin damage and protect against new damage in patients with melasma.

 

Recent studies suggest that the antioxidants tamp down inflammatory cytokines and damage of oxidative stress, Maria Ivonne Arellano-Mendoza, MD, said during a special focus session on Latino skin held at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.

“Many compounds are being studied for this purpose,” said Dr. Arellano-Mendoza, head of the dermatology department of the General Hospital of Mexico, Mexico City. “One combination is vitamin C, vitamin E, ubiquinone, and grape-seed extract. This effectively prevented infrared-A radiation–induced matrix metalloproteinase-1 messenger RNA expression in human skin. This combination can be found now in some sunscreens and daily care products.”

Another effective combination seems to be a mixture of ferulic acid, tocopherol, and vitamin C, she said.

The two-step process of regularly using a topical product with antioxidants before applying a sunscreen is all there is for now, she added, because so far it’s been impossible to combine the agents in a single product.

“The challenge will be how to create a product that stays on the surface of the skin to protect it from light, while liberating the antioxidants to penetrate the skin,” she commented.

The antioxidants’ benefits, however, will be obliterated by the continued effects of some light wavelengths that aggravate melasma unless they are used in sequence with a light-scattering sunscreen.

Sunscreens are critical components of a melasma treatment regimen, Dr. Arellano-Mendoza said. “Sunscreens are a cornerstone of treatment. We clearly tell our patients that sunscreens have to be used every day, forever, and if they are not used properly, they will have no improvement.”

Patients with hyperpigmentation disorders are susceptible to longer wavelengths that aren’t covered by chemically derived sunscreens. Longer wavelengths, including infrared light and visible light, have been shown to increase expression of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) -1 and -9, decrease expression of type 1 procollagen, and can induce macrophage infiltration. These wavelengths also increase reactive oxygen species and proinflammatory cytokines in vitro, Dr. Arellano-Mendoza noted.

Visible light can cause erythema, transient and long-lasting hyperpigmentation, thermal damage, free radical production, and premature photoaging. It also can stimulate the production of reactive oxygen species that can damage DNA.

Mineral-based, inorganic sunscreens, however – like those with titanium dioxide, zinc oxide, and iron oxide – scatter all wavelengths.

“These micronized forms of metal oxides not only scatter and reflect light, they also absorb ultraviolet radiation. The compounds aren’t new,” she said. In 1991, Dr. Elaine Kaye of Harvard University, Boston, and associates described (Arch Dermatol. 1991;127:351-5) opaque physical sunscreens that were useful blockers of visible light and found that transmittance of light can be lowered by adding iron oxide, Dr. Arellano-Mendoza pointed out.

The inorganic sunscreens have never been widely adopted because they are highly pigmented with white or, in the case of iron oxide, with red. “Not many people accepted [the iron-containing compounds] because of the redness, but now different shades are going to be hitting the market soon,” and the hope is that consumers will find them more appealing, she said.

This is good news, as the data emerging around iron oxide are intriguingly positive. A 2015 study showed that a sunscreen with iron oxides prevented melasma relapse during the summer months. Patients were randomized to the same ultraviolet filter topical sunscreen, but for one group, micronized iron oxide was added to it. After 6 months, the median melasma area severity index score was significantly better in the group using the iron oxide compound (J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015 Jan;72[1]:189-90.e1).

Support for the two-step regimen appeared in 2014, when a small study randomized 30 healthy volunteers to an SPF 30 sunscreen or the same sunscreen supplemented with an antioxidant cocktail of grape seed extract, vitamin E, ubiquinone, and vitamin C. The endpoint was MMP-1 upregulation after exposure to infrared-A light. Skin treated with the combination regimen showed significantly lower MMP-1 activation, leading the authors to conclude that the combination of topical antioxidants conferred protection against the irradiation (Photochem Photobiol. 2015 Jan-Feb;91[1]:248-50).

Those same authors published a companion article (Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2014;30:167-74) suggesting that another antioxidant mixture (ferulic acid, tocopherol, and vitamin C) was similarly effective.

Using a combination of antioxidants is important, Dr. Arellano-Mendoza said, because different antioxidants work differently. Some (catalase, glutathione peroxidase, and superoxide dismutase) are enzymatic, catalyzing reactions that convert free radicals to oxygen and water. Others terminate free radicals by preventing the propagation of oxidative chain reactions (vitamins A and C, flavonoids, uric acid, bilirubin, albumin, and members of the thiol group). A third group consists of metal-binding proteins that sequester free iron or copper to prevent free radical production (ferritin, transferrin, lactoferrin, and ceruloplasmin).

“I think we can now consider antioxidants a part of the tools we use in treating some pigmentary disorders as melasma,” she said. “We need to choose the compounds carefully, and we definitely need more in vivo research, but the findings are very encouraging.”

Dr. Arellano-Mendoza had no relevant financial disclosures.

This article was updated 3/20/17.
 

 

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM AAD 2017

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM AAD 2017

Dupilumab improved eczema scores in children in open label trial

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 16:38

 

– Treatment with dupilumab in children and adolescents with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) reduced severity and pruritus scores from baseline and was well tolerated, in a multicenter, open-label trial of 78 children and adolescents.

Dupilumab’s “powerful ability” to block interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 pathways of inflammation is “especially exciting because AD is even more Th-2 cell driven in children,” said Michael J. Cork, MD, PhD, head of dermatologic research at the University of Sheffield (England), who presented the findings during a late-breaking research session at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.

The study assessed the pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of dupilumab and was conducted with 38 children, aged 6-11 years, and 40 adolescents, aged 12-17 years, with moderate to severe AD. All had failed topical corticosteroid therapy. Some of the children (16%) and adolescents (22.5%) had failed at least one systemic therapy.

Both age groups were given either a 2 mg/kg or a 4 mg/kg dose of dupilumab (administered subcutaneously), nothing for 8 weeks, followed by 4 weekly doses of their respective regimens. Mean Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores at baseline were 31.7 among the adolescents and 35.9 among the children.

At week 12, mean scores in the younger cohort given either 2 mg/kg or 4 mg/kg had improved by 76.2% and 63.4%, respectively, from baseline. In the adolescents, EASI scores at week 12 had improved by a mean of 66.4% in the 2-mg/kg group and 69.7% in the 4-mg/kg group.

Itch also improved “dramatically,” according to Dr. Cork. In the younger children, peak pruritus Numerical Rating Scale scores improved from baseline by a mean of 41.6% in the lower-dose group and 39.6% in the higher-dose group. In the older cohort, pruritus scores improved from baseline by a mean of 30.8% in the lower-dose group and 37.6% in the higher-dose group.

Treatment was well tolerated across the study, and adverse events were “mild, transient, and unrelated,” Dr. Cork said. “I would like to emphasize that these were not related to dupilumab, as they occurred during the period of time after the first dose, in weeks 6 and 7,” he commented. He attributed AD flares experienced in the study to the quick clearance of the drug in the first few weeks.

Dr. Cork reported numerous disclosures, including serving as an adviser, consultant, and investigator for Regeneron, the sponsor of the trial, and Sanofi; the companies developing dupilumab.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

– Treatment with dupilumab in children and adolescents with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) reduced severity and pruritus scores from baseline and was well tolerated, in a multicenter, open-label trial of 78 children and adolescents.

Dupilumab’s “powerful ability” to block interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 pathways of inflammation is “especially exciting because AD is even more Th-2 cell driven in children,” said Michael J. Cork, MD, PhD, head of dermatologic research at the University of Sheffield (England), who presented the findings during a late-breaking research session at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.

The study assessed the pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of dupilumab and was conducted with 38 children, aged 6-11 years, and 40 adolescents, aged 12-17 years, with moderate to severe AD. All had failed topical corticosteroid therapy. Some of the children (16%) and adolescents (22.5%) had failed at least one systemic therapy.

Both age groups were given either a 2 mg/kg or a 4 mg/kg dose of dupilumab (administered subcutaneously), nothing for 8 weeks, followed by 4 weekly doses of their respective regimens. Mean Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores at baseline were 31.7 among the adolescents and 35.9 among the children.

At week 12, mean scores in the younger cohort given either 2 mg/kg or 4 mg/kg had improved by 76.2% and 63.4%, respectively, from baseline. In the adolescents, EASI scores at week 12 had improved by a mean of 66.4% in the 2-mg/kg group and 69.7% in the 4-mg/kg group.

Itch also improved “dramatically,” according to Dr. Cork. In the younger children, peak pruritus Numerical Rating Scale scores improved from baseline by a mean of 41.6% in the lower-dose group and 39.6% in the higher-dose group. In the older cohort, pruritus scores improved from baseline by a mean of 30.8% in the lower-dose group and 37.6% in the higher-dose group.

Treatment was well tolerated across the study, and adverse events were “mild, transient, and unrelated,” Dr. Cork said. “I would like to emphasize that these were not related to dupilumab, as they occurred during the period of time after the first dose, in weeks 6 and 7,” he commented. He attributed AD flares experienced in the study to the quick clearance of the drug in the first few weeks.

Dr. Cork reported numerous disclosures, including serving as an adviser, consultant, and investigator for Regeneron, the sponsor of the trial, and Sanofi; the companies developing dupilumab.

 

– Treatment with dupilumab in children and adolescents with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) reduced severity and pruritus scores from baseline and was well tolerated, in a multicenter, open-label trial of 78 children and adolescents.

Dupilumab’s “powerful ability” to block interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 pathways of inflammation is “especially exciting because AD is even more Th-2 cell driven in children,” said Michael J. Cork, MD, PhD, head of dermatologic research at the University of Sheffield (England), who presented the findings during a late-breaking research session at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.

The study assessed the pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of dupilumab and was conducted with 38 children, aged 6-11 years, and 40 adolescents, aged 12-17 years, with moderate to severe AD. All had failed topical corticosteroid therapy. Some of the children (16%) and adolescents (22.5%) had failed at least one systemic therapy.

Both age groups were given either a 2 mg/kg or a 4 mg/kg dose of dupilumab (administered subcutaneously), nothing for 8 weeks, followed by 4 weekly doses of their respective regimens. Mean Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores at baseline were 31.7 among the adolescents and 35.9 among the children.

At week 12, mean scores in the younger cohort given either 2 mg/kg or 4 mg/kg had improved by 76.2% and 63.4%, respectively, from baseline. In the adolescents, EASI scores at week 12 had improved by a mean of 66.4% in the 2-mg/kg group and 69.7% in the 4-mg/kg group.

Itch also improved “dramatically,” according to Dr. Cork. In the younger children, peak pruritus Numerical Rating Scale scores improved from baseline by a mean of 41.6% in the lower-dose group and 39.6% in the higher-dose group. In the older cohort, pruritus scores improved from baseline by a mean of 30.8% in the lower-dose group and 37.6% in the higher-dose group.

Treatment was well tolerated across the study, and adverse events were “mild, transient, and unrelated,” Dr. Cork said. “I would like to emphasize that these were not related to dupilumab, as they occurred during the period of time after the first dose, in weeks 6 and 7,” he commented. He attributed AD flares experienced in the study to the quick clearance of the drug in the first few weeks.

Dr. Cork reported numerous disclosures, including serving as an adviser, consultant, and investigator for Regeneron, the sponsor of the trial, and Sanofi; the companies developing dupilumab.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

AT AAD 17

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Data on dupilumab for treating moderate to severe atopic dermatitis in children and adolescents are promising.

Major finding: At week 12, treatment with dupilumab at 2 mg/kg and 4 mg/kg doses, across 8 weeks in two pediatric cohorts improved baseline EASI scores by 69.7% and pruritus scores by a third and was well tolerated.

Data source: A phase IIa, multicenter, open label pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy trial evaluating two dosing regimens of dupilumab in 78 children with moderate to severe AD.

Disclosures: Dr. Cork reported numerous disclosures, including serving as an adviser, consultant, and investigator for Regeneron, the sponsor of the trial, and Sanofi – the two companies developing dupilumab.

For optimal care, consider all acne in Latinos inflammatory

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 16:38

 

– Postinflammatory hyperpigmentation is a common consequence of acne in Latino skin, and aggressive medical treatments or procedures can aggravate the problem.

In fact, the hyperpigmentation that remains after acne is treated can be even more upsetting than the acne itself, according to Mercedes Florez-White, MD.

“Most of the time, the postinflammatory hyperpigmentation [PIH] has much more impact on the patient’s quality of life even than the disease itself, so you need to be very careful when treating these patients,” said Dr. Florez-White of Florida International University, Miami.

Every Fitzpatrick phototype can be observed in the Latino population, but one feature seems to link them: inflammation linked with all types of acne, even comedonal. “Even patients with very pale skin can show, at the periphery of the comedone, a little darkness signaling inflammation. The skin of a mestizo [a person of mixed Spanish/Native American ancestry] is especially prone to this,” she said at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.

There is a paucity of research on the treatment of acne in people with skin of color, Dr. Florez-White said. Even the most recent acne treatment guidelines, published in 2016 by the AAD, acknowledge the area as a “research gap” that needs to be addressed.

In the meantime, she offered what she called “pearls of acne wisdom” gleaned from 35 years of treating Latino patients in South America and the United States.

Overview and diagnosis

Nodulocystic acne is the most common type in this population, followed by comedonal acne. Although the comedonal type is not generally considered inflammatory acne, it should be in Latino patients, given their sensitivity to skin inflammation and its outcome. “There is inflammation there from the beginning – treat it as an inflammatory disease for the best results.”

• Acne in Latino patients occurs most commonly, but not exclusively, on the lower face. “We have also seen this on the neck and chest,” she noted.

• A thorough history – including a rundown of hair and skin products the patient is using – is critical. “You never know when something you think is acne is really something else,” like an allergic reaction, she said.

Treatment

There are no AAD-generated treatment guidelines for acne in Latino patients. Dr. Florez-White manages her patients according to a treatment algorithm published by the Ibero-Latin American College of Dermatology and a paper published in the Journal of Dermatologic Treatment (2010 May;21[3]:206-11), as well as her own clinical experience.

Topical therapy

• Start topical retinoids at a lower concentration, two to three times a week, and gradually increase the dose and frequency until the desired effect is reached. Also, start benzoyl peroxide at lower doses.

• For a patient with very proinflammatory cystic acne, initiate a short course of corticosteroids to decrease inflammation – this will reduce the risk of PIH.

• Add azelaic acid in a 20% cream or 15% gel. “It’s an anti-inflammatory and antibacterial, and it really does help reduce the chance of PIH. This is used all over Latin American and Asia, but it is an off-label use in the U.S.” she said.

• For adult women, consider 5% dapsone gel, but not in combination with benzoyl peroxide.

Oral therapy

• Doxycycline is first-line treatment for moderate to severe papulopustular or nodulocystic acne. Other primary agents could be minocycline or tetracycline. Second-line antibiotic choices include erythromycin, azithromycin, and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim. Antibiotics should be given with benzoyl peroxide to reduce the chance of bacterial resistance.

• For nonresponsive cases, use oral isotretinoin, started at half the recommended dose. Increase gradually to treatment response.

For women with hormonally mediated acne, give a trial of oral contraceptives with antiandrogen properties, or spironolactone. “I like to combine oral contraceptive pills with isotretinoin. You can give this because the absorption of isotretinoin is very superficial. You won’t have any problems with that,” she noted.

Skin care

Good skin care will help promote healing and generally increase patient compliance with medication, Dr. Florez-White said.

• A noncomedogenic broad-spectrum sunscreen should be used daily. Consider one with mineral oxides, especially iron oxide, as only these preparations scatter both visible light and infrared radiation, which both increase the risk of PIH.

• Cleanse with a synthetic detergent or lipid-free cleanser.

• Recommend daily use of a salicylic, lactic, or glycolic acid.

Camouflage is very important for some patients, especially teens. “I always recommend a noncomedogenic fluid makeup,” she said.

Procedures

• Comedo extraction is an essential part of a comprehensive acne treatment program, but hold off until after a month of retinoid treatment. Removing the lesions significantly decreases the chance of PIH.

• Very superficial chemical peels with salicylic acid alone, or in combination with mandelic acid, may improve outcome faster and decrease PIH that already exists. These can be used in conjunction with oral agents, including isotretinoin.

Dr. Florez-White had no financial disclosures.

 

 

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

– Postinflammatory hyperpigmentation is a common consequence of acne in Latino skin, and aggressive medical treatments or procedures can aggravate the problem.

In fact, the hyperpigmentation that remains after acne is treated can be even more upsetting than the acne itself, according to Mercedes Florez-White, MD.

“Most of the time, the postinflammatory hyperpigmentation [PIH] has much more impact on the patient’s quality of life even than the disease itself, so you need to be very careful when treating these patients,” said Dr. Florez-White of Florida International University, Miami.

Every Fitzpatrick phototype can be observed in the Latino population, but one feature seems to link them: inflammation linked with all types of acne, even comedonal. “Even patients with very pale skin can show, at the periphery of the comedone, a little darkness signaling inflammation. The skin of a mestizo [a person of mixed Spanish/Native American ancestry] is especially prone to this,” she said at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.

There is a paucity of research on the treatment of acne in people with skin of color, Dr. Florez-White said. Even the most recent acne treatment guidelines, published in 2016 by the AAD, acknowledge the area as a “research gap” that needs to be addressed.

In the meantime, she offered what she called “pearls of acne wisdom” gleaned from 35 years of treating Latino patients in South America and the United States.

Overview and diagnosis

Nodulocystic acne is the most common type in this population, followed by comedonal acne. Although the comedonal type is not generally considered inflammatory acne, it should be in Latino patients, given their sensitivity to skin inflammation and its outcome. “There is inflammation there from the beginning – treat it as an inflammatory disease for the best results.”

• Acne in Latino patients occurs most commonly, but not exclusively, on the lower face. “We have also seen this on the neck and chest,” she noted.

• A thorough history – including a rundown of hair and skin products the patient is using – is critical. “You never know when something you think is acne is really something else,” like an allergic reaction, she said.

Treatment

There are no AAD-generated treatment guidelines for acne in Latino patients. Dr. Florez-White manages her patients according to a treatment algorithm published by the Ibero-Latin American College of Dermatology and a paper published in the Journal of Dermatologic Treatment (2010 May;21[3]:206-11), as well as her own clinical experience.

Topical therapy

• Start topical retinoids at a lower concentration, two to three times a week, and gradually increase the dose and frequency until the desired effect is reached. Also, start benzoyl peroxide at lower doses.

• For a patient with very proinflammatory cystic acne, initiate a short course of corticosteroids to decrease inflammation – this will reduce the risk of PIH.

• Add azelaic acid in a 20% cream or 15% gel. “It’s an anti-inflammatory and antibacterial, and it really does help reduce the chance of PIH. This is used all over Latin American and Asia, but it is an off-label use in the U.S.” she said.

• For adult women, consider 5% dapsone gel, but not in combination with benzoyl peroxide.

Oral therapy

• Doxycycline is first-line treatment for moderate to severe papulopustular or nodulocystic acne. Other primary agents could be minocycline or tetracycline. Second-line antibiotic choices include erythromycin, azithromycin, and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim. Antibiotics should be given with benzoyl peroxide to reduce the chance of bacterial resistance.

• For nonresponsive cases, use oral isotretinoin, started at half the recommended dose. Increase gradually to treatment response.

For women with hormonally mediated acne, give a trial of oral contraceptives with antiandrogen properties, or spironolactone. “I like to combine oral contraceptive pills with isotretinoin. You can give this because the absorption of isotretinoin is very superficial. You won’t have any problems with that,” she noted.

Skin care

Good skin care will help promote healing and generally increase patient compliance with medication, Dr. Florez-White said.

• A noncomedogenic broad-spectrum sunscreen should be used daily. Consider one with mineral oxides, especially iron oxide, as only these preparations scatter both visible light and infrared radiation, which both increase the risk of PIH.

• Cleanse with a synthetic detergent or lipid-free cleanser.

• Recommend daily use of a salicylic, lactic, or glycolic acid.

Camouflage is very important for some patients, especially teens. “I always recommend a noncomedogenic fluid makeup,” she said.

Procedures

• Comedo extraction is an essential part of a comprehensive acne treatment program, but hold off until after a month of retinoid treatment. Removing the lesions significantly decreases the chance of PIH.

• Very superficial chemical peels with salicylic acid alone, or in combination with mandelic acid, may improve outcome faster and decrease PIH that already exists. These can be used in conjunction with oral agents, including isotretinoin.

Dr. Florez-White had no financial disclosures.

 

 

 

– Postinflammatory hyperpigmentation is a common consequence of acne in Latino skin, and aggressive medical treatments or procedures can aggravate the problem.

In fact, the hyperpigmentation that remains after acne is treated can be even more upsetting than the acne itself, according to Mercedes Florez-White, MD.

“Most of the time, the postinflammatory hyperpigmentation [PIH] has much more impact on the patient’s quality of life even than the disease itself, so you need to be very careful when treating these patients,” said Dr. Florez-White of Florida International University, Miami.

Every Fitzpatrick phototype can be observed in the Latino population, but one feature seems to link them: inflammation linked with all types of acne, even comedonal. “Even patients with very pale skin can show, at the periphery of the comedone, a little darkness signaling inflammation. The skin of a mestizo [a person of mixed Spanish/Native American ancestry] is especially prone to this,” she said at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.

There is a paucity of research on the treatment of acne in people with skin of color, Dr. Florez-White said. Even the most recent acne treatment guidelines, published in 2016 by the AAD, acknowledge the area as a “research gap” that needs to be addressed.

In the meantime, she offered what she called “pearls of acne wisdom” gleaned from 35 years of treating Latino patients in South America and the United States.

Overview and diagnosis

Nodulocystic acne is the most common type in this population, followed by comedonal acne. Although the comedonal type is not generally considered inflammatory acne, it should be in Latino patients, given their sensitivity to skin inflammation and its outcome. “There is inflammation there from the beginning – treat it as an inflammatory disease for the best results.”

• Acne in Latino patients occurs most commonly, but not exclusively, on the lower face. “We have also seen this on the neck and chest,” she noted.

• A thorough history – including a rundown of hair and skin products the patient is using – is critical. “You never know when something you think is acne is really something else,” like an allergic reaction, she said.

Treatment

There are no AAD-generated treatment guidelines for acne in Latino patients. Dr. Florez-White manages her patients according to a treatment algorithm published by the Ibero-Latin American College of Dermatology and a paper published in the Journal of Dermatologic Treatment (2010 May;21[3]:206-11), as well as her own clinical experience.

Topical therapy

• Start topical retinoids at a lower concentration, two to three times a week, and gradually increase the dose and frequency until the desired effect is reached. Also, start benzoyl peroxide at lower doses.

• For a patient with very proinflammatory cystic acne, initiate a short course of corticosteroids to decrease inflammation – this will reduce the risk of PIH.

• Add azelaic acid in a 20% cream or 15% gel. “It’s an anti-inflammatory and antibacterial, and it really does help reduce the chance of PIH. This is used all over Latin American and Asia, but it is an off-label use in the U.S.” she said.

• For adult women, consider 5% dapsone gel, but not in combination with benzoyl peroxide.

Oral therapy

• Doxycycline is first-line treatment for moderate to severe papulopustular or nodulocystic acne. Other primary agents could be minocycline or tetracycline. Second-line antibiotic choices include erythromycin, azithromycin, and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim. Antibiotics should be given with benzoyl peroxide to reduce the chance of bacterial resistance.

• For nonresponsive cases, use oral isotretinoin, started at half the recommended dose. Increase gradually to treatment response.

For women with hormonally mediated acne, give a trial of oral contraceptives with antiandrogen properties, or spironolactone. “I like to combine oral contraceptive pills with isotretinoin. You can give this because the absorption of isotretinoin is very superficial. You won’t have any problems with that,” she noted.

Skin care

Good skin care will help promote healing and generally increase patient compliance with medication, Dr. Florez-White said.

• A noncomedogenic broad-spectrum sunscreen should be used daily. Consider one with mineral oxides, especially iron oxide, as only these preparations scatter both visible light and infrared radiation, which both increase the risk of PIH.

• Cleanse with a synthetic detergent or lipid-free cleanser.

• Recommend daily use of a salicylic, lactic, or glycolic acid.

Camouflage is very important for some patients, especially teens. “I always recommend a noncomedogenic fluid makeup,” she said.

Procedures

• Comedo extraction is an essential part of a comprehensive acne treatment program, but hold off until after a month of retinoid treatment. Removing the lesions significantly decreases the chance of PIH.

• Very superficial chemical peels with salicylic acid alone, or in combination with mandelic acid, may improve outcome faster and decrease PIH that already exists. These can be used in conjunction with oral agents, including isotretinoin.

Dr. Florez-White had no financial disclosures.

 

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM AAD 17

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME

Adalimumab for psoriasis: Blocking TNF-alpha had no effect on vascular inflammation

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 02/07/2023 - 16:57

 

– Vascular inflammation was no different in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis after 16 weeks of treatment with adalimumab than in untreated controls, according to a study that evaluated the impact of blocking tumor necrosis factor–alpha on vascular inflammation.

Further, there was a modest increase in vascular inflammation in carotid arteries after 52 weeks of treatment with the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha-antagonist adalimumab, Robert Bissonnette, MD, president of Innovaderm Research, Montreal, reported in a late-breaking session at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.

Dr. Joel Gelfand, professor of dermatology and epidemiology at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Whitney McKnight/FrontlineMedicalNews
Joel Gelfand, MD
In the double-blind multicenter study, 107 adults with psoriasis were randomized to either the adalimumab (80 mg followed by 40 mg at week 1 and 40 mg every other week for 52 weeks), or to placebo for 16 weeks, followed by adalimumab (80 mg at week 16, 40 mg at week 17, and 40 mg every other week until week 52). The mean Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) score among the patients was about 10.All patients were evaluated for vascular inflammation at baseline and at 2 weeks with positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET-CT) scans of the ascending aorta and the carotid arteries.

At 16 weeks, there were no significant differences in vascular inflammation between the treatment and control arms, based on the change from baseline in the vessel wall target to background ratio from the ascending aorta (the primary endpoint). In the carotid arteries at 16 weeks, differences in vascular inflammation between the adalimumab group and control group were also not significant.

At 52 weeks, there was no significant change in target to background ratio from the ascending aorta between baseline and the start of adalimumab, although in the carotid arteries, there was a modest increase in vascular inflammation.

Several previous studies have suggested that reducing inflammation in psoriasis can also reduce the risk of some cardiovascular events. As to why this study did not demonstrate a correlation between vascular inflammation and treatment, Dr. Bissonnette said during the question and answer portion of the presentation that “either the dose of adalimumab that is used for psoriasis has no impact on vascular inflammation or it may be possible that levels of interleukin-6, a key cytokine correlated with vascular inflammation, were very low in our study.”

Interleukin-6 typically is increased in patients with psoriatic arthritis, he explained, noting that in this study, only 7.5% of patients in the treatment group and about 10% of those in the control group had a history of psoriatic arthritis.

Additionally, at baseline, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels were significantly higher in controls: 5.32, compared with 2.72 in the treatment arm (P = .003).

Another possible reason for the results could be the molecule size of adalimumab, session comoderator Joel Gelfand, MD, noted in an interview. “The drug may not penetrate the aorta. These are large molecules. It also might be that [TNF–alpha] is not the main driver of aortic inflammation in people with psoriasis. Increasingly, we think of people with psoriasis as an IL-23 and IL-17 disease, so maybe that is part of it,” said Dr. Gelfand, professor of dermatology and epidemiology at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. He also directs the psoriasis and phototherapy treatment center at the university.

In addition to being presented at the meeting, the results were published in the Journal of Investigative Dermatology (2017 Feb 7. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2017.02.977).

Adalimumab is marketed as Humira by Abbvie; a biosimilar version, adalimumab-atto (Amjevita), was approved in the United States in 2016.

Dr. Bissonnette’s disclosures included serving as an adviser and consultant to Abbvie, which sponsored the study, as well as relationships with other companies, including Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, and Novartis. Dr. Gelfand’s disclosures included serving as a consultant and investigator for Abbvie, and serving as an investigator, speaker, and/or consultant for other companies, including Eli Lilly, Janssen, and Novartis.

wmcknight@frontlinemedcom.com

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

– Vascular inflammation was no different in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis after 16 weeks of treatment with adalimumab than in untreated controls, according to a study that evaluated the impact of blocking tumor necrosis factor–alpha on vascular inflammation.

Further, there was a modest increase in vascular inflammation in carotid arteries after 52 weeks of treatment with the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha-antagonist adalimumab, Robert Bissonnette, MD, president of Innovaderm Research, Montreal, reported in a late-breaking session at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.

Dr. Joel Gelfand, professor of dermatology and epidemiology at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Whitney McKnight/FrontlineMedicalNews
Joel Gelfand, MD
In the double-blind multicenter study, 107 adults with psoriasis were randomized to either the adalimumab (80 mg followed by 40 mg at week 1 and 40 mg every other week for 52 weeks), or to placebo for 16 weeks, followed by adalimumab (80 mg at week 16, 40 mg at week 17, and 40 mg every other week until week 52). The mean Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) score among the patients was about 10.All patients were evaluated for vascular inflammation at baseline and at 2 weeks with positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET-CT) scans of the ascending aorta and the carotid arteries.

At 16 weeks, there were no significant differences in vascular inflammation between the treatment and control arms, based on the change from baseline in the vessel wall target to background ratio from the ascending aorta (the primary endpoint). In the carotid arteries at 16 weeks, differences in vascular inflammation between the adalimumab group and control group were also not significant.

At 52 weeks, there was no significant change in target to background ratio from the ascending aorta between baseline and the start of adalimumab, although in the carotid arteries, there was a modest increase in vascular inflammation.

Several previous studies have suggested that reducing inflammation in psoriasis can also reduce the risk of some cardiovascular events. As to why this study did not demonstrate a correlation between vascular inflammation and treatment, Dr. Bissonnette said during the question and answer portion of the presentation that “either the dose of adalimumab that is used for psoriasis has no impact on vascular inflammation or it may be possible that levels of interleukin-6, a key cytokine correlated with vascular inflammation, were very low in our study.”

Interleukin-6 typically is increased in patients with psoriatic arthritis, he explained, noting that in this study, only 7.5% of patients in the treatment group and about 10% of those in the control group had a history of psoriatic arthritis.

Additionally, at baseline, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels were significantly higher in controls: 5.32, compared with 2.72 in the treatment arm (P = .003).

Another possible reason for the results could be the molecule size of adalimumab, session comoderator Joel Gelfand, MD, noted in an interview. “The drug may not penetrate the aorta. These are large molecules. It also might be that [TNF–alpha] is not the main driver of aortic inflammation in people with psoriasis. Increasingly, we think of people with psoriasis as an IL-23 and IL-17 disease, so maybe that is part of it,” said Dr. Gelfand, professor of dermatology and epidemiology at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. He also directs the psoriasis and phototherapy treatment center at the university.

In addition to being presented at the meeting, the results were published in the Journal of Investigative Dermatology (2017 Feb 7. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2017.02.977).

Adalimumab is marketed as Humira by Abbvie; a biosimilar version, adalimumab-atto (Amjevita), was approved in the United States in 2016.

Dr. Bissonnette’s disclosures included serving as an adviser and consultant to Abbvie, which sponsored the study, as well as relationships with other companies, including Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, and Novartis. Dr. Gelfand’s disclosures included serving as a consultant and investigator for Abbvie, and serving as an investigator, speaker, and/or consultant for other companies, including Eli Lilly, Janssen, and Novartis.

wmcknight@frontlinemedcom.com

 

– Vascular inflammation was no different in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis after 16 weeks of treatment with adalimumab than in untreated controls, according to a study that evaluated the impact of blocking tumor necrosis factor–alpha on vascular inflammation.

Further, there was a modest increase in vascular inflammation in carotid arteries after 52 weeks of treatment with the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha-antagonist adalimumab, Robert Bissonnette, MD, president of Innovaderm Research, Montreal, reported in a late-breaking session at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.

Dr. Joel Gelfand, professor of dermatology and epidemiology at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Whitney McKnight/FrontlineMedicalNews
Joel Gelfand, MD
In the double-blind multicenter study, 107 adults with psoriasis were randomized to either the adalimumab (80 mg followed by 40 mg at week 1 and 40 mg every other week for 52 weeks), or to placebo for 16 weeks, followed by adalimumab (80 mg at week 16, 40 mg at week 17, and 40 mg every other week until week 52). The mean Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) score among the patients was about 10.All patients were evaluated for vascular inflammation at baseline and at 2 weeks with positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET-CT) scans of the ascending aorta and the carotid arteries.

At 16 weeks, there were no significant differences in vascular inflammation between the treatment and control arms, based on the change from baseline in the vessel wall target to background ratio from the ascending aorta (the primary endpoint). In the carotid arteries at 16 weeks, differences in vascular inflammation between the adalimumab group and control group were also not significant.

At 52 weeks, there was no significant change in target to background ratio from the ascending aorta between baseline and the start of adalimumab, although in the carotid arteries, there was a modest increase in vascular inflammation.

Several previous studies have suggested that reducing inflammation in psoriasis can also reduce the risk of some cardiovascular events. As to why this study did not demonstrate a correlation between vascular inflammation and treatment, Dr. Bissonnette said during the question and answer portion of the presentation that “either the dose of adalimumab that is used for psoriasis has no impact on vascular inflammation or it may be possible that levels of interleukin-6, a key cytokine correlated with vascular inflammation, were very low in our study.”

Interleukin-6 typically is increased in patients with psoriatic arthritis, he explained, noting that in this study, only 7.5% of patients in the treatment group and about 10% of those in the control group had a history of psoriatic arthritis.

Additionally, at baseline, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels were significantly higher in controls: 5.32, compared with 2.72 in the treatment arm (P = .003).

Another possible reason for the results could be the molecule size of adalimumab, session comoderator Joel Gelfand, MD, noted in an interview. “The drug may not penetrate the aorta. These are large molecules. It also might be that [TNF–alpha] is not the main driver of aortic inflammation in people with psoriasis. Increasingly, we think of people with psoriasis as an IL-23 and IL-17 disease, so maybe that is part of it,” said Dr. Gelfand, professor of dermatology and epidemiology at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. He also directs the psoriasis and phototherapy treatment center at the university.

In addition to being presented at the meeting, the results were published in the Journal of Investigative Dermatology (2017 Feb 7. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2017.02.977).

Adalimumab is marketed as Humira by Abbvie; a biosimilar version, adalimumab-atto (Amjevita), was approved in the United States in 2016.

Dr. Bissonnette’s disclosures included serving as an adviser and consultant to Abbvie, which sponsored the study, as well as relationships with other companies, including Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, and Novartis. Dr. Gelfand’s disclosures included serving as a consultant and investigator for Abbvie, and serving as an investigator, speaker, and/or consultant for other companies, including Eli Lilly, Janssen, and Novartis.

wmcknight@frontlinemedcom.com

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Treatment with a tumor necrosis factor alpha-antagonist may not reduce vascular inflammation.

Major finding: At 16 weeks, there were no significant differences in aortic and carotid inflammation in the change from baseline in moderate psoriasis patients given adalimumab and controls.

Data source: A randomized, double-blind multicenter study that used PET-CT scans to evaluate the impact of treatment on vascular inflammation in 107 adults with moderate to severe psoriasis.

Disclosures: Dr. Bissonnette’s disclosures included serving as an adviser and consultant to Abbvie, which sponsored the study, as well as relationships with other companies, including Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, and Novartis. Dr. Gelfand’s disclosures included serving as a consultant and investigator for Abbvie, and serving as an investigator, speaker, and/or consultant for other companies, including Eli Lilly, Janssen, and Novartis.
 

VIDEO: Stress alleviation strategies boost inflammatory skin treatment regimens

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 07/01/2019 - 11:13

– “Consider the effects of the mind on the skin when treating patients with some skin diseases.” That was the message of several speakers during a session titled “The Skin and the Mind” at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.

“I certainly believe that the time has come to use stress alleviation techniques, at least for selected patients, and this should certainly be part of our armamentarium in the clinic,” said Richard D. Granstein, MD, George W. Hambrick Jr. professor and chairman of the department of dermatology, Cornell University, New York. During the session, he spoke about the emerging science of stress in dermatology.

 

While it has long been believed that stress exacerbates different skin diseases, the connection has been difficult to prove scientifically, he pointed out. However, “the overwhelming number of reports and studies indicate that stress probably does exacerbate a number of inflammatory skin diseases,” he added.

In a video interview at the meeting, Dr. Granstein notes that a number of pathways that help explain this link have now been identified and discusses one of those pathways, which involves neuropeptides and future directions in understanding the relationship between stress and inflammatory skin diseases.

The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel

Dr. Granstein disclosed serving as an advisor to Castle Biosciences, Elysium Health, Galderma Laboratories, and Velius.
Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

– “Consider the effects of the mind on the skin when treating patients with some skin diseases.” That was the message of several speakers during a session titled “The Skin and the Mind” at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.

“I certainly believe that the time has come to use stress alleviation techniques, at least for selected patients, and this should certainly be part of our armamentarium in the clinic,” said Richard D. Granstein, MD, George W. Hambrick Jr. professor and chairman of the department of dermatology, Cornell University, New York. During the session, he spoke about the emerging science of stress in dermatology.

 

While it has long been believed that stress exacerbates different skin diseases, the connection has been difficult to prove scientifically, he pointed out. However, “the overwhelming number of reports and studies indicate that stress probably does exacerbate a number of inflammatory skin diseases,” he added.

In a video interview at the meeting, Dr. Granstein notes that a number of pathways that help explain this link have now been identified and discusses one of those pathways, which involves neuropeptides and future directions in understanding the relationship between stress and inflammatory skin diseases.

The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel

Dr. Granstein disclosed serving as an advisor to Castle Biosciences, Elysium Health, Galderma Laboratories, and Velius.

– “Consider the effects of the mind on the skin when treating patients with some skin diseases.” That was the message of several speakers during a session titled “The Skin and the Mind” at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.

“I certainly believe that the time has come to use stress alleviation techniques, at least for selected patients, and this should certainly be part of our armamentarium in the clinic,” said Richard D. Granstein, MD, George W. Hambrick Jr. professor and chairman of the department of dermatology, Cornell University, New York. During the session, he spoke about the emerging science of stress in dermatology.

 

While it has long been believed that stress exacerbates different skin diseases, the connection has been difficult to prove scientifically, he pointed out. However, “the overwhelming number of reports and studies indicate that stress probably does exacerbate a number of inflammatory skin diseases,” he added.

In a video interview at the meeting, Dr. Granstein notes that a number of pathways that help explain this link have now been identified and discusses one of those pathways, which involves neuropeptides and future directions in understanding the relationship between stress and inflammatory skin diseases.

The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel

Dr. Granstein disclosed serving as an advisor to Castle Biosciences, Elysium Health, Galderma Laboratories, and Velius.
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

AT AAD 17

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME

VIDEO: Consider alopecia ‘camouflage kits’ to boost patients’ self-esteem

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 01/14/2019 - 09:58

– The hair loss encounter – which can be challenging for both physicians and patients – should address the negative psychological effects of hair loss, including ways to camouflage hair loss, advised Adriana N. Schmidt, MD, a dermatologist in Santa Monica, Calif.

Dermatologists may spend so much time on the work-up – reviewing history regarding medication, lab values, and hair care practices – that they do not spend time to simply say to patients, “I want to help you feel better about yourself, and here’s how,” she said in a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.

 

“What we can do is offer them a way to camouflage the hair loss,” Dr. Schmidt said. She shared tips that include creating a kit to keep in the office filled with lists of reputable hairpiece vendors and tattoo specialists in the community, as well as sample wigs, cosmetic powders, and other items to show to patients during hair loss consultations. She also offers thoughts on working with new hair styles and stylists to help improve the self-esteem of alopecia patients.

The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel

Dr. Schmidt had no relevant disclosures.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

– The hair loss encounter – which can be challenging for both physicians and patients – should address the negative psychological effects of hair loss, including ways to camouflage hair loss, advised Adriana N. Schmidt, MD, a dermatologist in Santa Monica, Calif.

Dermatologists may spend so much time on the work-up – reviewing history regarding medication, lab values, and hair care practices – that they do not spend time to simply say to patients, “I want to help you feel better about yourself, and here’s how,” she said in a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.

 

“What we can do is offer them a way to camouflage the hair loss,” Dr. Schmidt said. She shared tips that include creating a kit to keep in the office filled with lists of reputable hairpiece vendors and tattoo specialists in the community, as well as sample wigs, cosmetic powders, and other items to show to patients during hair loss consultations. She also offers thoughts on working with new hair styles and stylists to help improve the self-esteem of alopecia patients.

The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel

Dr. Schmidt had no relevant disclosures.

– The hair loss encounter – which can be challenging for both physicians and patients – should address the negative psychological effects of hair loss, including ways to camouflage hair loss, advised Adriana N. Schmidt, MD, a dermatologist in Santa Monica, Calif.

Dermatologists may spend so much time on the work-up – reviewing history regarding medication, lab values, and hair care practices – that they do not spend time to simply say to patients, “I want to help you feel better about yourself, and here’s how,” she said in a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.

 

“What we can do is offer them a way to camouflage the hair loss,” Dr. Schmidt said. She shared tips that include creating a kit to keep in the office filled with lists of reputable hairpiece vendors and tattoo specialists in the community, as well as sample wigs, cosmetic powders, and other items to show to patients during hair loss consultations. She also offers thoughts on working with new hair styles and stylists to help improve the self-esteem of alopecia patients.

The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel

Dr. Schmidt had no relevant disclosures.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

AT AAD 2017

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME

New 52-week EASI, pruritus data strengthen case for dupilumab in adult atopic dermatitis

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 16:36

 

– Treatment with dupilumab was associated with significantly improved measures of disease severity, including in quality of life and pruritus symptoms, at 16 and 52 weeks in adults with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in the phase III CHRONOS trial.

In the CHRONOS study of adults with uncontrolled, moderate to severe AD, patients were treated with the investigational biologic dupilumab (Dupixent), an interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 pathway blocker administered in subcutaneous injections, in combination with topical corticosteroids. At 52 weeks, they had achieved significantly improved measures of overall disease severity, compared with those who received corticosteroids alone, according to Andrew Blauvelt, MD, MBA, president of Oregon Medical Research Center, Portland, who presented the new data from the study in a late-breaking clinical session at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.

Dr. Andrew Blauvelt, Oregon Medical Research Center
Dr. Andrew Blauvelt
In the study, 740 mostly male patients in their mid-30s or 40s, who had moderate to severe AD for an average of 26 years, were randomized 3:1:3, respectively, to 300 mg dupilumab once weekly, 300 mg dupilumab biweekly, or placebo. All three groups received topical corticosteroids. Results from the trial, reported in 2016, showed significantly higher rates of clear or almost clear skin (Investigator Global Assessment of 0 or 1) and significantly higher rates of EASI 75 (at least a 75% reduction in the Eczema Assessment Severity Index)*. scores achieved at 16 and 52 weeks among those treated with dupilumab every week or every 2 weeks plus topical corticosteroids, compared with those treated with topical corticosteroids alone.

The new 52-week data presented at AAD show that the mean improvement in the EASI score from baseline was 80% in the 300 mg dupilumab every week plus corticosteroid group (group 1) and 78% in the group treated every 2 weeks (group 2), compared with 46% in the placebo plus corticosteroids group (control) (P less than .0001).

The mean improvement in self-reported itch from baseline, as measured by the Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale, was 54% in the first group, 56% in the second group, compared with 27% in controls (P less than .0001).

In the first group, 65% achieved a 4-point or greater improvement in their Patient Oriented Eczema Measure scores, as did 76% of the second group, compared with 26% of controls (P less than .0001).

At least a 4-point improvement over baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index scores was seen in 63% of group 1, 80% of group 2, and 30% of controls (P less than .0001).

Adverse events across the study were similar, although the treatment groups had higher incidences of injection site reactions: 19% in group 1 and 15% in group 2, compared with 8% in controls. The treatment groups also had higher rates of conjunctivitis: 19% in group 1 and 14% in group 2, compared with 8% in controls.

Dr. Blauvelt said that patients who were “exited from the trial were continued for follow-up” and that rescue therapies such as cyclosporine, and other systemic agents, were also available. The rate of rescue therapy was about 15% in the first two groups, while half of controls needed rescue therapy. “We considered those patients who needed rescue nonresponders,” he noted.

The dropout rate at week 52 was about 15% across the treatment groups, compared with twice that in controls.

“Atopic dermatitis is the new psoriasis. We’re in an exciting area now, and we’ll be seeing more biologic therapies for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. We have a tremendous need for this,” Dr. Blauvelt commented.

The Food and Drug Administration is expected to make a decision on approval of dupilumab by March 29, 2017. Dupilumab was designated by the FDA as a breakthrough therapy for uncontrolled, moderate to severe AD in 2014.

Dr. Blauvelt disclosed many pharmaceutical industry relationships, including with Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi, which are developing dupilumab. (If approved, Regeneron and Sanofi Genzyme, part of Sanofi, will commercialize dupilumab).

CORRECTION 3/10/17: An earlier version of this article misstated the rates of clear or nearly clear skin.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

– Treatment with dupilumab was associated with significantly improved measures of disease severity, including in quality of life and pruritus symptoms, at 16 and 52 weeks in adults with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in the phase III CHRONOS trial.

In the CHRONOS study of adults with uncontrolled, moderate to severe AD, patients were treated with the investigational biologic dupilumab (Dupixent), an interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 pathway blocker administered in subcutaneous injections, in combination with topical corticosteroids. At 52 weeks, they had achieved significantly improved measures of overall disease severity, compared with those who received corticosteroids alone, according to Andrew Blauvelt, MD, MBA, president of Oregon Medical Research Center, Portland, who presented the new data from the study in a late-breaking clinical session at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.

Dr. Andrew Blauvelt, Oregon Medical Research Center
Dr. Andrew Blauvelt
In the study, 740 mostly male patients in their mid-30s or 40s, who had moderate to severe AD for an average of 26 years, were randomized 3:1:3, respectively, to 300 mg dupilumab once weekly, 300 mg dupilumab biweekly, or placebo. All three groups received topical corticosteroids. Results from the trial, reported in 2016, showed significantly higher rates of clear or almost clear skin (Investigator Global Assessment of 0 or 1) and significantly higher rates of EASI 75 (at least a 75% reduction in the Eczema Assessment Severity Index)*. scores achieved at 16 and 52 weeks among those treated with dupilumab every week or every 2 weeks plus topical corticosteroids, compared with those treated with topical corticosteroids alone.

The new 52-week data presented at AAD show that the mean improvement in the EASI score from baseline was 80% in the 300 mg dupilumab every week plus corticosteroid group (group 1) and 78% in the group treated every 2 weeks (group 2), compared with 46% in the placebo plus corticosteroids group (control) (P less than .0001).

The mean improvement in self-reported itch from baseline, as measured by the Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale, was 54% in the first group, 56% in the second group, compared with 27% in controls (P less than .0001).

In the first group, 65% achieved a 4-point or greater improvement in their Patient Oriented Eczema Measure scores, as did 76% of the second group, compared with 26% of controls (P less than .0001).

At least a 4-point improvement over baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index scores was seen in 63% of group 1, 80% of group 2, and 30% of controls (P less than .0001).

Adverse events across the study were similar, although the treatment groups had higher incidences of injection site reactions: 19% in group 1 and 15% in group 2, compared with 8% in controls. The treatment groups also had higher rates of conjunctivitis: 19% in group 1 and 14% in group 2, compared with 8% in controls.

Dr. Blauvelt said that patients who were “exited from the trial were continued for follow-up” and that rescue therapies such as cyclosporine, and other systemic agents, were also available. The rate of rescue therapy was about 15% in the first two groups, while half of controls needed rescue therapy. “We considered those patients who needed rescue nonresponders,” he noted.

The dropout rate at week 52 was about 15% across the treatment groups, compared with twice that in controls.

“Atopic dermatitis is the new psoriasis. We’re in an exciting area now, and we’ll be seeing more biologic therapies for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. We have a tremendous need for this,” Dr. Blauvelt commented.

The Food and Drug Administration is expected to make a decision on approval of dupilumab by March 29, 2017. Dupilumab was designated by the FDA as a breakthrough therapy for uncontrolled, moderate to severe AD in 2014.

Dr. Blauvelt disclosed many pharmaceutical industry relationships, including with Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi, which are developing dupilumab. (If approved, Regeneron and Sanofi Genzyme, part of Sanofi, will commercialize dupilumab).

CORRECTION 3/10/17: An earlier version of this article misstated the rates of clear or nearly clear skin.

 

– Treatment with dupilumab was associated with significantly improved measures of disease severity, including in quality of life and pruritus symptoms, at 16 and 52 weeks in adults with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in the phase III CHRONOS trial.

In the CHRONOS study of adults with uncontrolled, moderate to severe AD, patients were treated with the investigational biologic dupilumab (Dupixent), an interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 pathway blocker administered in subcutaneous injections, in combination with topical corticosteroids. At 52 weeks, they had achieved significantly improved measures of overall disease severity, compared with those who received corticosteroids alone, according to Andrew Blauvelt, MD, MBA, president of Oregon Medical Research Center, Portland, who presented the new data from the study in a late-breaking clinical session at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.

Dr. Andrew Blauvelt, Oregon Medical Research Center
Dr. Andrew Blauvelt
In the study, 740 mostly male patients in their mid-30s or 40s, who had moderate to severe AD for an average of 26 years, were randomized 3:1:3, respectively, to 300 mg dupilumab once weekly, 300 mg dupilumab biweekly, or placebo. All three groups received topical corticosteroids. Results from the trial, reported in 2016, showed significantly higher rates of clear or almost clear skin (Investigator Global Assessment of 0 or 1) and significantly higher rates of EASI 75 (at least a 75% reduction in the Eczema Assessment Severity Index)*. scores achieved at 16 and 52 weeks among those treated with dupilumab every week or every 2 weeks plus topical corticosteroids, compared with those treated with topical corticosteroids alone.

The new 52-week data presented at AAD show that the mean improvement in the EASI score from baseline was 80% in the 300 mg dupilumab every week plus corticosteroid group (group 1) and 78% in the group treated every 2 weeks (group 2), compared with 46% in the placebo plus corticosteroids group (control) (P less than .0001).

The mean improvement in self-reported itch from baseline, as measured by the Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale, was 54% in the first group, 56% in the second group, compared with 27% in controls (P less than .0001).

In the first group, 65% achieved a 4-point or greater improvement in their Patient Oriented Eczema Measure scores, as did 76% of the second group, compared with 26% of controls (P less than .0001).

At least a 4-point improvement over baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index scores was seen in 63% of group 1, 80% of group 2, and 30% of controls (P less than .0001).

Adverse events across the study were similar, although the treatment groups had higher incidences of injection site reactions: 19% in group 1 and 15% in group 2, compared with 8% in controls. The treatment groups also had higher rates of conjunctivitis: 19% in group 1 and 14% in group 2, compared with 8% in controls.

Dr. Blauvelt said that patients who were “exited from the trial were continued for follow-up” and that rescue therapies such as cyclosporine, and other systemic agents, were also available. The rate of rescue therapy was about 15% in the first two groups, while half of controls needed rescue therapy. “We considered those patients who needed rescue nonresponders,” he noted.

The dropout rate at week 52 was about 15% across the treatment groups, compared with twice that in controls.

“Atopic dermatitis is the new psoriasis. We’re in an exciting area now, and we’ll be seeing more biologic therapies for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. We have a tremendous need for this,” Dr. Blauvelt commented.

The Food and Drug Administration is expected to make a decision on approval of dupilumab by March 29, 2017. Dupilumab was designated by the FDA as a breakthrough therapy for uncontrolled, moderate to severe AD in 2014.

Dr. Blauvelt disclosed many pharmaceutical industry relationships, including with Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi, which are developing dupilumab. (If approved, Regeneron and Sanofi Genzyme, part of Sanofi, will commercialize dupilumab).

CORRECTION 3/10/17: An earlier version of this article misstated the rates of clear or nearly clear skin.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

AT AAD 2017

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Treatment with the interleukin-4 and -13 inhibitor dupilumab results in significant clearing and reduced itching of disease, as well as reduces severity of disease, in patients with moderate to severe AD.

Major finding: At 52 weeks, dupilumab 300 mg administered in a subcutaneous injection once a week or every two weeks plus topical corticosteroids resulted in significantly more clearing compared with topical corticosteroids alone (P less than .0001). Self-reported measures of itch and quality-of-life measures were also higher across treatment groups.

Data source: A phase III trial of 740 adults with moderate to severe AD, randomized to treatment with one of the two regimens or corticosteroids alone.

Disclosures: Dr. Blauvelt disclosed many pharmaceutical industry relationships, including with Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi, which are developing dupilumab. (If approved, Regeneron and Sanofi Genzyme, part of Sanofi, will commercialize dupilumab).

VIDEO: Tips, tricks, and pearls for keloid scar steroid injections

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 04/26/2019 - 10:51

– What are the best ways to avoid atrophy when treating keloid scars with steroid injections? When should a keloid be treated with smaller amounts, but with a stronger steroid concentration? What is the most effective way to avoid precipitation in the syringe?

The answers to these questions – along with other tips, tricks, and pearls for treating keloids, both in patients with skin of color and those with white skin – are provided by Temitayo Ogunleye, MD, of the department of dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, in a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.

Dr. Ogunleye had no relevant disclosures.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

– What are the best ways to avoid atrophy when treating keloid scars with steroid injections? When should a keloid be treated with smaller amounts, but with a stronger steroid concentration? What is the most effective way to avoid precipitation in the syringe?

The answers to these questions – along with other tips, tricks, and pearls for treating keloids, both in patients with skin of color and those with white skin – are provided by Temitayo Ogunleye, MD, of the department of dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, in a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.

Dr. Ogunleye had no relevant disclosures.

– What are the best ways to avoid atrophy when treating keloid scars with steroid injections? When should a keloid be treated with smaller amounts, but with a stronger steroid concentration? What is the most effective way to avoid precipitation in the syringe?

The answers to these questions – along with other tips, tricks, and pearls for treating keloids, both in patients with skin of color and those with white skin – are provided by Temitayo Ogunleye, MD, of the department of dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, in a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.

Dr. Ogunleye had no relevant disclosures.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

AT AAD 17

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.

VIDEO: Working with alopecia patients’ insurers when using novel therapies

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 16:36

 

– Janus kinase inhibitors are “currently the most promising treatments” for alopecia areata, but they are expensive, are not approved for this indication, and so getting insurance coverage for these treatments can be difficult, Carolyn Goh, MD, said at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.

In a video interview at the meeting, Dr. Goh of the department of dermatology, University of California, Los Angeles, shares the latest treatment algorithms that include these novel therapies, and thoughts on how to work with patients to increase their likelihood of getting insurance coverage for these treatments. Referring to the Janus kinase inhibitors, also known as JAK inhibitors, she said, “I think they would be very helpful for all patients with alopecia areata, but really given their side effect profile and risks involved, they should be reserved for more extensive disease.”

In the interview, Dr. Goh also discusses screening for thyroid disease in this patient population.

She had no disclosures.

The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

– Janus kinase inhibitors are “currently the most promising treatments” for alopecia areata, but they are expensive, are not approved for this indication, and so getting insurance coverage for these treatments can be difficult, Carolyn Goh, MD, said at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.

In a video interview at the meeting, Dr. Goh of the department of dermatology, University of California, Los Angeles, shares the latest treatment algorithms that include these novel therapies, and thoughts on how to work with patients to increase their likelihood of getting insurance coverage for these treatments. Referring to the Janus kinase inhibitors, also known as JAK inhibitors, she said, “I think they would be very helpful for all patients with alopecia areata, but really given their side effect profile and risks involved, they should be reserved for more extensive disease.”

In the interview, Dr. Goh also discusses screening for thyroid disease in this patient population.

She had no disclosures.

The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel

 

– Janus kinase inhibitors are “currently the most promising treatments” for alopecia areata, but they are expensive, are not approved for this indication, and so getting insurance coverage for these treatments can be difficult, Carolyn Goh, MD, said at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.

In a video interview at the meeting, Dr. Goh of the department of dermatology, University of California, Los Angeles, shares the latest treatment algorithms that include these novel therapies, and thoughts on how to work with patients to increase their likelihood of getting insurance coverage for these treatments. Referring to the Janus kinase inhibitors, also known as JAK inhibitors, she said, “I think they would be very helpful for all patients with alopecia areata, but really given their side effect profile and risks involved, they should be reserved for more extensive disease.”

In the interview, Dr. Goh also discusses screening for thyroid disease in this patient population.

She had no disclosures.

The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

AT AAD 17

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME

VIDEO: Grading tools help set alopecia treatment expectations and monitor progress

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 01/14/2019 - 09:58

– Two hair loss clinical grading tools can help physicians and their female androgenetic alopecia patients set medical treatment expectations, and make tracking progress both easier and more accurate, according to the dermatologist who developed the scales.

The five-point clinical grading scale helps physicians with diagnosing female pattern hair loss and grading the severity, Rodney Sinclair, MD, said in a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology. “And you can use that clinical grading scale to monitor the response to treatment” and show patients what to expect with treatment, added Dr. Sinclair, professor and chairman, department of dermatology, Epworth Hospital, Melbourne.

 

He also discussed a validated hair shedding scale, “a really simple and easy test to use,” with six photographs to help patients determine how much hair they are shedding on a daily basis. “Most women don’t know what’s a normal amount of hair to shed,” he said. In the interview, Dr. Sinclair explains more about the two scales, and how they can be used to obtain clinically relevant information to help guide treatment – and shares his tips for how to work with women who are anxious about their hair loss improvement.

Dr. Sinclair owns the copyrights for the Sinclair Severity Scale. He has no other relevant disclosures.

The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

– Two hair loss clinical grading tools can help physicians and their female androgenetic alopecia patients set medical treatment expectations, and make tracking progress both easier and more accurate, according to the dermatologist who developed the scales.

The five-point clinical grading scale helps physicians with diagnosing female pattern hair loss and grading the severity, Rodney Sinclair, MD, said in a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology. “And you can use that clinical grading scale to monitor the response to treatment” and show patients what to expect with treatment, added Dr. Sinclair, professor and chairman, department of dermatology, Epworth Hospital, Melbourne.

 

He also discussed a validated hair shedding scale, “a really simple and easy test to use,” with six photographs to help patients determine how much hair they are shedding on a daily basis. “Most women don’t know what’s a normal amount of hair to shed,” he said. In the interview, Dr. Sinclair explains more about the two scales, and how they can be used to obtain clinically relevant information to help guide treatment – and shares his tips for how to work with women who are anxious about their hair loss improvement.

Dr. Sinclair owns the copyrights for the Sinclair Severity Scale. He has no other relevant disclosures.

The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel

– Two hair loss clinical grading tools can help physicians and their female androgenetic alopecia patients set medical treatment expectations, and make tracking progress both easier and more accurate, according to the dermatologist who developed the scales.

The five-point clinical grading scale helps physicians with diagnosing female pattern hair loss and grading the severity, Rodney Sinclair, MD, said in a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology. “And you can use that clinical grading scale to monitor the response to treatment” and show patients what to expect with treatment, added Dr. Sinclair, professor and chairman, department of dermatology, Epworth Hospital, Melbourne.

 

He also discussed a validated hair shedding scale, “a really simple and easy test to use,” with six photographs to help patients determine how much hair they are shedding on a daily basis. “Most women don’t know what’s a normal amount of hair to shed,” he said. In the interview, Dr. Sinclair explains more about the two scales, and how they can be used to obtain clinically relevant information to help guide treatment – and shares his tips for how to work with women who are anxious about their hair loss improvement.

Dr. Sinclair owns the copyrights for the Sinclair Severity Scale. He has no other relevant disclosures.

The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

AT AAD 17

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME