User login
Buprenorphine linked to less neonatal abstinence syndrome than methadone
CHICAGO – Methadone was associated with a significantly higher incidence of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS), compared with babies born to mothers who took buprenorphine for opioid maintenance therapy during pregnancy, a retrospective study of 204 neonates revealed.
Interestingly, among babies who developed the syndrome, the duration of treatment and length of stay did not differ significantly between groups.
“We found buprenorphine decreases [the incidence of] NAS,” said Alla Kushnir, MD, an attending neonatologist at Cooper University Hospital in Camden, N.J. The findings also demonstrate that physicians can expect to see “about the same withdrawal once they withdraw,” regardless of whether the mother took methadone or buprenorphine during pregnancy.
“We can’t make it better, but we can prevent some neonatal abstinence syndrome,” Dr. Kushnir said in an interview at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Pediatrics.
The infants in the study were admitted to the neonatal ICU between July 2010 and June 2016. The mothers self-reported prenatal use of methadone, buprenorphine, other opioids and/or various illicit drugs, or tested positive on a urine screen during pregnancy. In the methadone group, 81% of infants developed NAS, compared with 50% of those in the buprenorphine group. The higher likelihood of developing NAS from methadone-treated mothers was statistically significant (P less than .001).
The study population included some women who reported taking additional drugs. Among 65 infants born to women who combined methadone with other agents, 58 (89%) developed NAS. In addition, all seven infants (100%) born to women who took buprenorphine and other drugs developed the syndrome.
“Methadone was the clear bad guy in terms of incidence” between the two drugs, said Ravi Bhavsar, MBBS, a research assistant at the hospital.
Among the infants who developed NAS symptoms, the hospital length of stay and duration of medical treatment – indicators of syndrome severity – did not differ significantly (P = .015).
“This study also tells us that more research needs to be done,” Dr. Bhavsar said. Methadone is a mainstay of opioid maintenance therapy, he added, and additional evidence is warranted before shifting recommendations toward buprenorphine.
Dr. Kushnir and Dr. Bhavsar reported having no relevant financial disclosures.
CHICAGO – Methadone was associated with a significantly higher incidence of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS), compared with babies born to mothers who took buprenorphine for opioid maintenance therapy during pregnancy, a retrospective study of 204 neonates revealed.
Interestingly, among babies who developed the syndrome, the duration of treatment and length of stay did not differ significantly between groups.
“We found buprenorphine decreases [the incidence of] NAS,” said Alla Kushnir, MD, an attending neonatologist at Cooper University Hospital in Camden, N.J. The findings also demonstrate that physicians can expect to see “about the same withdrawal once they withdraw,” regardless of whether the mother took methadone or buprenorphine during pregnancy.
“We can’t make it better, but we can prevent some neonatal abstinence syndrome,” Dr. Kushnir said in an interview at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Pediatrics.
The infants in the study were admitted to the neonatal ICU between July 2010 and June 2016. The mothers self-reported prenatal use of methadone, buprenorphine, other opioids and/or various illicit drugs, or tested positive on a urine screen during pregnancy. In the methadone group, 81% of infants developed NAS, compared with 50% of those in the buprenorphine group. The higher likelihood of developing NAS from methadone-treated mothers was statistically significant (P less than .001).
The study population included some women who reported taking additional drugs. Among 65 infants born to women who combined methadone with other agents, 58 (89%) developed NAS. In addition, all seven infants (100%) born to women who took buprenorphine and other drugs developed the syndrome.
“Methadone was the clear bad guy in terms of incidence” between the two drugs, said Ravi Bhavsar, MBBS, a research assistant at the hospital.
Among the infants who developed NAS symptoms, the hospital length of stay and duration of medical treatment – indicators of syndrome severity – did not differ significantly (P = .015).
“This study also tells us that more research needs to be done,” Dr. Bhavsar said. Methadone is a mainstay of opioid maintenance therapy, he added, and additional evidence is warranted before shifting recommendations toward buprenorphine.
Dr. Kushnir and Dr. Bhavsar reported having no relevant financial disclosures.
CHICAGO – Methadone was associated with a significantly higher incidence of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS), compared with babies born to mothers who took buprenorphine for opioid maintenance therapy during pregnancy, a retrospective study of 204 neonates revealed.
Interestingly, among babies who developed the syndrome, the duration of treatment and length of stay did not differ significantly between groups.
“We found buprenorphine decreases [the incidence of] NAS,” said Alla Kushnir, MD, an attending neonatologist at Cooper University Hospital in Camden, N.J. The findings also demonstrate that physicians can expect to see “about the same withdrawal once they withdraw,” regardless of whether the mother took methadone or buprenorphine during pregnancy.
“We can’t make it better, but we can prevent some neonatal abstinence syndrome,” Dr. Kushnir said in an interview at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Pediatrics.
The infants in the study were admitted to the neonatal ICU between July 2010 and June 2016. The mothers self-reported prenatal use of methadone, buprenorphine, other opioids and/or various illicit drugs, or tested positive on a urine screen during pregnancy. In the methadone group, 81% of infants developed NAS, compared with 50% of those in the buprenorphine group. The higher likelihood of developing NAS from methadone-treated mothers was statistically significant (P less than .001).
The study population included some women who reported taking additional drugs. Among 65 infants born to women who combined methadone with other agents, 58 (89%) developed NAS. In addition, all seven infants (100%) born to women who took buprenorphine and other drugs developed the syndrome.
“Methadone was the clear bad guy in terms of incidence” between the two drugs, said Ravi Bhavsar, MBBS, a research assistant at the hospital.
Among the infants who developed NAS symptoms, the hospital length of stay and duration of medical treatment – indicators of syndrome severity – did not differ significantly (P = .015).
“This study also tells us that more research needs to be done,” Dr. Bhavsar said. Methadone is a mainstay of opioid maintenance therapy, he added, and additional evidence is warranted before shifting recommendations toward buprenorphine.
Dr. Kushnir and Dr. Bhavsar reported having no relevant financial disclosures.
AT AAP 2017
Key clinical point: .
Major finding: 81% of infants in the methadone group developed NAS, compared with 50% of the buprenorphine group.
Data source: Retrospective study of 204 babies admitted to a NICU between July 2010 to June 2016 whose mothers admitted or tested positive for opioid maintenance therapy.
Disclosures: Dr. Kushnir and Dr. Bhaysar reported having no relevant financial disclosures.
Domperidone appears safe galactagogue for mothers and infants
Denver – Prescribing domperidone to support breastfeeding effectively reduced the use of infant formula without significant adverse effects in mothers and infants in a large retrospective study, Mitko Madjunkov, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the Teratology Society.
His study included 985 mothers who began taking domperidone to initiate and support breastfeeding after a visit to the International Breastfeeding Centre in Toronto. Collectively, the women had 1,005 infants.
The study was undertaken because few data exist on the dosing and safety of domperidone during lactation. Additionally, the Food and Drug Administration issued a warning in 2004 regarding the use of domperidone as a galactagogue in response to reports of cardiac arrhythmias and sudden deaths when the drug was prescribed as an antiemetic, explained Dr. Madjunkov of the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto.
The FDA has not approved domperidone for any indication in the United States, though it is available in Canada and other countries.
Domperidone was used by the Toronto women for a median of 20 days. The maximum daily dose was 107 mg. The infants were an average of 38 days old at the time of the visit when domperidone was prescribed and 72 days of age at their last follow-up visit related to the study.
The drug was effective as a galactagogue: 63% of women were using infant formula before going on domperidone; after using the drug, 41% were still using formula, for an absolute 22% reduction. The drug was similarly effective in promoting breastfeeding in infants with or without tongue-tie/lip-tie defects.
In total, 18% of mothers reported minor side effects. Headaches were the most common, reported by 9.2% of domperidone users. Dose reduction was employed in just 0.6% of women in the study; 0.4% of participants discontinued treatment. Rapid heart rate and other minor cardiac side effects were reported by 0.7% of women, uniformly in conjunction with trigger factors such as anxiety or caffeine use, but none of these women discontinued treatment. No treatment-associated adverse effects occurred in the infants.
Dr. Madjunkov reported having no financial conflicts related to his study.
Denver – Prescribing domperidone to support breastfeeding effectively reduced the use of infant formula without significant adverse effects in mothers and infants in a large retrospective study, Mitko Madjunkov, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the Teratology Society.
His study included 985 mothers who began taking domperidone to initiate and support breastfeeding after a visit to the International Breastfeeding Centre in Toronto. Collectively, the women had 1,005 infants.
The study was undertaken because few data exist on the dosing and safety of domperidone during lactation. Additionally, the Food and Drug Administration issued a warning in 2004 regarding the use of domperidone as a galactagogue in response to reports of cardiac arrhythmias and sudden deaths when the drug was prescribed as an antiemetic, explained Dr. Madjunkov of the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto.
The FDA has not approved domperidone for any indication in the United States, though it is available in Canada and other countries.
Domperidone was used by the Toronto women for a median of 20 days. The maximum daily dose was 107 mg. The infants were an average of 38 days old at the time of the visit when domperidone was prescribed and 72 days of age at their last follow-up visit related to the study.
The drug was effective as a galactagogue: 63% of women were using infant formula before going on domperidone; after using the drug, 41% were still using formula, for an absolute 22% reduction. The drug was similarly effective in promoting breastfeeding in infants with or without tongue-tie/lip-tie defects.
In total, 18% of mothers reported minor side effects. Headaches were the most common, reported by 9.2% of domperidone users. Dose reduction was employed in just 0.6% of women in the study; 0.4% of participants discontinued treatment. Rapid heart rate and other minor cardiac side effects were reported by 0.7% of women, uniformly in conjunction with trigger factors such as anxiety or caffeine use, but none of these women discontinued treatment. No treatment-associated adverse effects occurred in the infants.
Dr. Madjunkov reported having no financial conflicts related to his study.
Denver – Prescribing domperidone to support breastfeeding effectively reduced the use of infant formula without significant adverse effects in mothers and infants in a large retrospective study, Mitko Madjunkov, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the Teratology Society.
His study included 985 mothers who began taking domperidone to initiate and support breastfeeding after a visit to the International Breastfeeding Centre in Toronto. Collectively, the women had 1,005 infants.
The study was undertaken because few data exist on the dosing and safety of domperidone during lactation. Additionally, the Food and Drug Administration issued a warning in 2004 regarding the use of domperidone as a galactagogue in response to reports of cardiac arrhythmias and sudden deaths when the drug was prescribed as an antiemetic, explained Dr. Madjunkov of the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto.
The FDA has not approved domperidone for any indication in the United States, though it is available in Canada and other countries.
Domperidone was used by the Toronto women for a median of 20 days. The maximum daily dose was 107 mg. The infants were an average of 38 days old at the time of the visit when domperidone was prescribed and 72 days of age at their last follow-up visit related to the study.
The drug was effective as a galactagogue: 63% of women were using infant formula before going on domperidone; after using the drug, 41% were still using formula, for an absolute 22% reduction. The drug was similarly effective in promoting breastfeeding in infants with or without tongue-tie/lip-tie defects.
In total, 18% of mothers reported minor side effects. Headaches were the most common, reported by 9.2% of domperidone users. Dose reduction was employed in just 0.6% of women in the study; 0.4% of participants discontinued treatment. Rapid heart rate and other minor cardiac side effects were reported by 0.7% of women, uniformly in conjunction with trigger factors such as anxiety or caffeine use, but none of these women discontinued treatment. No treatment-associated adverse effects occurred in the infants.
Dr. Madjunkov reported having no financial conflicts related to his study.
EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM TERATOLOGY SOCIETY 2017
Key clinical point:
Major finding: The use of the domperidone reduced the proportion of women using infant formula by an absolute 22%.
Data source: A retrospective study of 985 women who were prescribed domperidone as a galactagogue at the International Breastfeeding Centre in Toronto.
Disclosures: Dr. Madjunkov reported having no financial conflicts of interest related to the study.
Study: Don’t separate NAS infants from moms
NASHVILLE, TENN. – When newborns withdrawing from opioids stay with their mothers after delivery instead of going to the NICU, they are far less likely to receive morphine and other drugs and leave the hospital days sooner; they also are more likely to go home with their mother, a meta-analysis showed.
The analysis likely is the first to pool results from studies of rooming-in for infants with neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS). A strong case has been building in the literature for several years that newborns do better with rooming-in, instead of the traditional approach for NAS – NICU housing and opioid dosing based on a symptom checklist.
“We found consistent emerging evidence that rooming-in is more effective than standard care in the NICU for infants with NAS. Based on these findings, we believe rooming-in should be established as the new evidence-based standard of care for this patient population,” said investigator Kanak Verma, a medical student at Dartmouth College, Hanover, N.H.
Rooming-in was associated with a 63% reduction in the need for pharmacotherapy, a decrease in hospital length of stay by more than 10 days, and a substantial, statistically significant decrease in cost from – in one study – a mean of almost $45,000 per NAS infant stay to just over $10,000.
“We were worried that by rooming-in we would be undertreating infants with NAS, and that they would be at increased risk for readmission, but there was no statistically significant increase in readmission rates for infants rooming in with their mothers,” Ms. Verma said at the Pediatric Hospital Medical annual meeting.
Infants also were more likely to go home with their mother or a family member. “Mothers who use opioid replacements have decreased ability to bond” with their infants. Rooming-in helps create that bond, and probably made discharge with a family member more likely, said coinvestigator Cassandra Rendon, also a Dartmouth medical student.
It’s unclear what exactly accounts for the better results, but “having a baby stay with [its] mom creates an opportunity for a lot of things that we know are effective,” including skin-to-skin contact, breastfeeding, and involvement of mothers in the care and monitoring of their infants, Ms. Rendon said.
Also, “we know that in babies with NAS, a low-stimulation environment is ideal,” Ms. Verma said at the meeting, sponsored by the Society of Hospital Medicine, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the Academic Pediatric Association. That’s a challenge in a busy NICU, but “we can create that in an isolated room with just the mother,” she added.
At least one of the studies used a new, more holistic approach to assess the need for pharmacologic management in NAS. Symptom scores still are considered, but how well the infant is eating, sleeping, and able to be consoled are considered as well. With the traditional symptom checklist, “we end up just treating the number, instead of treating the baby. What Dartmouth and other facilities are doing is looking at” how well the baby is doing overall, Ms. Rendon said.
If the baby is otherwise doing well, providers are less likely to give opioids for a little jitteriness or sweating. The decreased use of opioids leads, in turn, to shorter hospital stays.
Dartmouth is collaborating with Yale University in New Haven , Conn., and the Boston Medical Center to integrate the new treatment model into standard practice. For other centers interested in doing the same, Ms. Verma noted that nursery staff buy-in is essential. Nurses and others have to be comfortable “taking these patients out of the NICU” and treating them in a new way.
The investigators had no relevant financial disclosures.
NASHVILLE, TENN. – When newborns withdrawing from opioids stay with their mothers after delivery instead of going to the NICU, they are far less likely to receive morphine and other drugs and leave the hospital days sooner; they also are more likely to go home with their mother, a meta-analysis showed.
The analysis likely is the first to pool results from studies of rooming-in for infants with neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS). A strong case has been building in the literature for several years that newborns do better with rooming-in, instead of the traditional approach for NAS – NICU housing and opioid dosing based on a symptom checklist.
“We found consistent emerging evidence that rooming-in is more effective than standard care in the NICU for infants with NAS. Based on these findings, we believe rooming-in should be established as the new evidence-based standard of care for this patient population,” said investigator Kanak Verma, a medical student at Dartmouth College, Hanover, N.H.
Rooming-in was associated with a 63% reduction in the need for pharmacotherapy, a decrease in hospital length of stay by more than 10 days, and a substantial, statistically significant decrease in cost from – in one study – a mean of almost $45,000 per NAS infant stay to just over $10,000.
“We were worried that by rooming-in we would be undertreating infants with NAS, and that they would be at increased risk for readmission, but there was no statistically significant increase in readmission rates for infants rooming in with their mothers,” Ms. Verma said at the Pediatric Hospital Medical annual meeting.
Infants also were more likely to go home with their mother or a family member. “Mothers who use opioid replacements have decreased ability to bond” with their infants. Rooming-in helps create that bond, and probably made discharge with a family member more likely, said coinvestigator Cassandra Rendon, also a Dartmouth medical student.
It’s unclear what exactly accounts for the better results, but “having a baby stay with [its] mom creates an opportunity for a lot of things that we know are effective,” including skin-to-skin contact, breastfeeding, and involvement of mothers in the care and monitoring of their infants, Ms. Rendon said.
Also, “we know that in babies with NAS, a low-stimulation environment is ideal,” Ms. Verma said at the meeting, sponsored by the Society of Hospital Medicine, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the Academic Pediatric Association. That’s a challenge in a busy NICU, but “we can create that in an isolated room with just the mother,” she added.
At least one of the studies used a new, more holistic approach to assess the need for pharmacologic management in NAS. Symptom scores still are considered, but how well the infant is eating, sleeping, and able to be consoled are considered as well. With the traditional symptom checklist, “we end up just treating the number, instead of treating the baby. What Dartmouth and other facilities are doing is looking at” how well the baby is doing overall, Ms. Rendon said.
If the baby is otherwise doing well, providers are less likely to give opioids for a little jitteriness or sweating. The decreased use of opioids leads, in turn, to shorter hospital stays.
Dartmouth is collaborating with Yale University in New Haven , Conn., and the Boston Medical Center to integrate the new treatment model into standard practice. For other centers interested in doing the same, Ms. Verma noted that nursery staff buy-in is essential. Nurses and others have to be comfortable “taking these patients out of the NICU” and treating them in a new way.
The investigators had no relevant financial disclosures.
NASHVILLE, TENN. – When newborns withdrawing from opioids stay with their mothers after delivery instead of going to the NICU, they are far less likely to receive morphine and other drugs and leave the hospital days sooner; they also are more likely to go home with their mother, a meta-analysis showed.
The analysis likely is the first to pool results from studies of rooming-in for infants with neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS). A strong case has been building in the literature for several years that newborns do better with rooming-in, instead of the traditional approach for NAS – NICU housing and opioid dosing based on a symptom checklist.
“We found consistent emerging evidence that rooming-in is more effective than standard care in the NICU for infants with NAS. Based on these findings, we believe rooming-in should be established as the new evidence-based standard of care for this patient population,” said investigator Kanak Verma, a medical student at Dartmouth College, Hanover, N.H.
Rooming-in was associated with a 63% reduction in the need for pharmacotherapy, a decrease in hospital length of stay by more than 10 days, and a substantial, statistically significant decrease in cost from – in one study – a mean of almost $45,000 per NAS infant stay to just over $10,000.
“We were worried that by rooming-in we would be undertreating infants with NAS, and that they would be at increased risk for readmission, but there was no statistically significant increase in readmission rates for infants rooming in with their mothers,” Ms. Verma said at the Pediatric Hospital Medical annual meeting.
Infants also were more likely to go home with their mother or a family member. “Mothers who use opioid replacements have decreased ability to bond” with their infants. Rooming-in helps create that bond, and probably made discharge with a family member more likely, said coinvestigator Cassandra Rendon, also a Dartmouth medical student.
It’s unclear what exactly accounts for the better results, but “having a baby stay with [its] mom creates an opportunity for a lot of things that we know are effective,” including skin-to-skin contact, breastfeeding, and involvement of mothers in the care and monitoring of their infants, Ms. Rendon said.
Also, “we know that in babies with NAS, a low-stimulation environment is ideal,” Ms. Verma said at the meeting, sponsored by the Society of Hospital Medicine, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the Academic Pediatric Association. That’s a challenge in a busy NICU, but “we can create that in an isolated room with just the mother,” she added.
At least one of the studies used a new, more holistic approach to assess the need for pharmacologic management in NAS. Symptom scores still are considered, but how well the infant is eating, sleeping, and able to be consoled are considered as well. With the traditional symptom checklist, “we end up just treating the number, instead of treating the baby. What Dartmouth and other facilities are doing is looking at” how well the baby is doing overall, Ms. Rendon said.
If the baby is otherwise doing well, providers are less likely to give opioids for a little jitteriness or sweating. The decreased use of opioids leads, in turn, to shorter hospital stays.
Dartmouth is collaborating with Yale University in New Haven , Conn., and the Boston Medical Center to integrate the new treatment model into standard practice. For other centers interested in doing the same, Ms. Verma noted that nursery staff buy-in is essential. Nurses and others have to be comfortable “taking these patients out of the NICU” and treating them in a new way.
The investigators had no relevant financial disclosures.
AT PHM 2017
Key clinical point:
Major finding: Rooming-in was associated with a 63% reduction in the need for pharmacotherapy, a decrease in hospital length of stay by more than 10 days, and a substantial, statistically significant decrease in cost from, in one study, a mean of almost $45,000 per NAS infant stay to just over $10,000.
Data source: A meta-analysis of six studies.
Disclosures: The investigators had no relevant financial disclosures.
Postpartum depression screening in well-child care appears promising
, according to results of a study from the Netherlands.
“This promising finding warrants wider implementation of screening for postpartum depression,” said Dr. Angarath I. Van der Zee-van den Berg of the University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands, and associates. 
Results showed significantly fewer mothers in the intervention group were depressed at 9 months post partum, compared with the CAU group (0.6% of 1,843 vs. 2.5% 1,246 for major depression), with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.28 (95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.63). The difference also was significant for minor and major depression, with 3.0% of the intervention group affected vs. 8.4% of the CAU group, and the adjusted odds ratio was 0.40 (95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.58). For parenting, anxiety symptoms, and mental health functioning, the intervention resulted in effect sizes ranging from 0.23 to 0.27.
“We found screening for postpartum depression to have a negligible effect on socioemotional development of the child with no former evidence to compare with,” Dr. Van der Zee-van den Berg and his associates said. “Attention for the mother-child interaction in the trajectory after screening may improve child outcomes; this evidently requires further study.”
To find out more information see Pediatrics (2017;140[4]:e20170110).
, according to results of a study from the Netherlands.
“This promising finding warrants wider implementation of screening for postpartum depression,” said Dr. Angarath I. Van der Zee-van den Berg of the University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands, and associates.
Results showed significantly fewer mothers in the intervention group were depressed at 9 months post partum, compared with the CAU group (0.6% of 1,843 vs. 2.5% 1,246 for major depression), with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.28 (95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.63). The difference also was significant for minor and major depression, with 3.0% of the intervention group affected vs. 8.4% of the CAU group, and the adjusted odds ratio was 0.40 (95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.58). For parenting, anxiety symptoms, and mental health functioning, the intervention resulted in effect sizes ranging from 0.23 to 0.27.
“We found screening for postpartum depression to have a negligible effect on socioemotional development of the child with no former evidence to compare with,” Dr. Van der Zee-van den Berg and his associates said. “Attention for the mother-child interaction in the trajectory after screening may improve child outcomes; this evidently requires further study.”
To find out more information see Pediatrics (2017;140[4]:e20170110).
, according to results of a study from the Netherlands.
“This promising finding warrants wider implementation of screening for postpartum depression,” said Dr. Angarath I. Van der Zee-van den Berg of the University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands, and associates.
Results showed significantly fewer mothers in the intervention group were depressed at 9 months post partum, compared with the CAU group (0.6% of 1,843 vs. 2.5% 1,246 for major depression), with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.28 (95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.63). The difference also was significant for minor and major depression, with 3.0% of the intervention group affected vs. 8.4% of the CAU group, and the adjusted odds ratio was 0.40 (95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.58). For parenting, anxiety symptoms, and mental health functioning, the intervention resulted in effect sizes ranging from 0.23 to 0.27.
“We found screening for postpartum depression to have a negligible effect on socioemotional development of the child with no former evidence to compare with,” Dr. Van der Zee-van den Berg and his associates said. “Attention for the mother-child interaction in the trajectory after screening may improve child outcomes; this evidently requires further study.”
To find out more information see Pediatrics (2017;140[4]:e20170110).
FROM PEDIATRICS
AAP recommends hepatitis B vaccine within 24 hours of birth for all infants
All newborns with a birth weight of at least 2,000 grams (4.4 pounds) should receive the hepatitis B vaccine within 24 hours of birth, according to a new policy statement by the American Academy of Pediatrics that brings its recommendations in line with those of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
“The birth dose can prevent infection of infants born to infected mothers in situations in which the mother’s results are never obtained, are misinterpreted, are falsely negative, are transcribed or reported to the infant care team inaccurately, or simply not communicated to the nursery,” announced the new statement from the AAP Committee on Infectious Diseases and the Committee on Fetus and Newborn (Pediatrics. 2017 Aug 28. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-1870).
A dose of the hepatitis B vaccine within 24 hours of birth is 75%-95% effective at preventing perinatal hepatitis B transmission. “When postexposure prophylaxis with both hepatitis B vaccine and hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) is given, is timed appropriately, and is followed by completion of the infant hepatitis B immunization series, perinatal infection rates range from 0.7% to 1.1%,” according to the statement.
Approximately 1,000 newborns still contract perinatal hepatitis B infections every year. Of these, 90% will develop chronic hepatitis B infections, and a quarter of those who don’t receive treatment will die from liver cirrhosis or cancer. There has been an increase in the incidence of new hepatitis B infections in some states because of opioid epidemic in the United States, according to MMWR reports.
The cost effectiveness of preventing hepatitis B with the vaccine and, when necessary, HBIG, is estimated at $2,600 per quality-adjusted year of life. The most common side effects reported after hepatitis B administration are pain (3%-29%), erythema (3%), swelling (3%), fever (1%-6%) and headache (3%).
There has been extensive analysis of the safety of hepatitis B vaccines, the policy statement indicated. Analysis of Vaccine Safety Datalink data has found no causal link between administration of the hepatitis B vaccine and the following: neonatal sepsis or death, rheumatoid arthritis, Bell’s palsy, autoimmune thyroid disease, hemolytic anemia in children, anaphylaxis, optic neuritis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, sudden-onset sensorineural hearing loss, or other chronic illnesses.
Specific recommendations
• Infants born to mothers who test positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg): Administer the hepatitis B vaccine and HBIG within 12 hours of birth.
• Infants weighing at least 2,000 g and born to mothers who are HBsAg negative: Administer the hepatitis B vaccine within 24 hours of birth.
• Infants weighing less than 2,000 g and born to mothers who are HBsAg negative: Administer the hepatitis B vaccine at hospital discharge or at age 1 month (whichever is first).
• Infants weighing at least 2,000 g and born to mothers with an unknown HBsAg status: Administer the hepatitis B vaccine within 12 hours of birth and HBIG by hospital discharge or age 7 days (whichever is first) if HBsAg status remains unknown or is confirmed positive.
• Infants weighing less than 2,000 g and born to mothers with an unknown HBsAg status: Administer the hepatitis B vaccine within 12 hours of birth and then HBIG within 12 hours unless the mother tests negative for HBsAg by then.
All newborns with a birth weight of at least 2,000 grams (4.4 pounds) should receive the hepatitis B vaccine within 24 hours of birth, according to a new policy statement by the American Academy of Pediatrics that brings its recommendations in line with those of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
“The birth dose can prevent infection of infants born to infected mothers in situations in which the mother’s results are never obtained, are misinterpreted, are falsely negative, are transcribed or reported to the infant care team inaccurately, or simply not communicated to the nursery,” announced the new statement from the AAP Committee on Infectious Diseases and the Committee on Fetus and Newborn (Pediatrics. 2017 Aug 28. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-1870).
A dose of the hepatitis B vaccine within 24 hours of birth is 75%-95% effective at preventing perinatal hepatitis B transmission. “When postexposure prophylaxis with both hepatitis B vaccine and hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) is given, is timed appropriately, and is followed by completion of the infant hepatitis B immunization series, perinatal infection rates range from 0.7% to 1.1%,” according to the statement.
Approximately 1,000 newborns still contract perinatal hepatitis B infections every year. Of these, 90% will develop chronic hepatitis B infections, and a quarter of those who don’t receive treatment will die from liver cirrhosis or cancer. There has been an increase in the incidence of new hepatitis B infections in some states because of opioid epidemic in the United States, according to MMWR reports.
The cost effectiveness of preventing hepatitis B with the vaccine and, when necessary, HBIG, is estimated at $2,600 per quality-adjusted year of life. The most common side effects reported after hepatitis B administration are pain (3%-29%), erythema (3%), swelling (3%), fever (1%-6%) and headache (3%).
There has been extensive analysis of the safety of hepatitis B vaccines, the policy statement indicated. Analysis of Vaccine Safety Datalink data has found no causal link between administration of the hepatitis B vaccine and the following: neonatal sepsis or death, rheumatoid arthritis, Bell’s palsy, autoimmune thyroid disease, hemolytic anemia in children, anaphylaxis, optic neuritis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, sudden-onset sensorineural hearing loss, or other chronic illnesses.
Specific recommendations
• Infants born to mothers who test positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg): Administer the hepatitis B vaccine and HBIG within 12 hours of birth.
• Infants weighing at least 2,000 g and born to mothers who are HBsAg negative: Administer the hepatitis B vaccine within 24 hours of birth.
• Infants weighing less than 2,000 g and born to mothers who are HBsAg negative: Administer the hepatitis B vaccine at hospital discharge or at age 1 month (whichever is first).
• Infants weighing at least 2,000 g and born to mothers with an unknown HBsAg status: Administer the hepatitis B vaccine within 12 hours of birth and HBIG by hospital discharge or age 7 days (whichever is first) if HBsAg status remains unknown or is confirmed positive.
• Infants weighing less than 2,000 g and born to mothers with an unknown HBsAg status: Administer the hepatitis B vaccine within 12 hours of birth and then HBIG within 12 hours unless the mother tests negative for HBsAg by then.
All newborns with a birth weight of at least 2,000 grams (4.4 pounds) should receive the hepatitis B vaccine within 24 hours of birth, according to a new policy statement by the American Academy of Pediatrics that brings its recommendations in line with those of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
“The birth dose can prevent infection of infants born to infected mothers in situations in which the mother’s results are never obtained, are misinterpreted, are falsely negative, are transcribed or reported to the infant care team inaccurately, or simply not communicated to the nursery,” announced the new statement from the AAP Committee on Infectious Diseases and the Committee on Fetus and Newborn (Pediatrics. 2017 Aug 28. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-1870).
A dose of the hepatitis B vaccine within 24 hours of birth is 75%-95% effective at preventing perinatal hepatitis B transmission. “When postexposure prophylaxis with both hepatitis B vaccine and hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) is given, is timed appropriately, and is followed by completion of the infant hepatitis B immunization series, perinatal infection rates range from 0.7% to 1.1%,” according to the statement.
Approximately 1,000 newborns still contract perinatal hepatitis B infections every year. Of these, 90% will develop chronic hepatitis B infections, and a quarter of those who don’t receive treatment will die from liver cirrhosis or cancer. There has been an increase in the incidence of new hepatitis B infections in some states because of opioid epidemic in the United States, according to MMWR reports.
The cost effectiveness of preventing hepatitis B with the vaccine and, when necessary, HBIG, is estimated at $2,600 per quality-adjusted year of life. The most common side effects reported after hepatitis B administration are pain (3%-29%), erythema (3%), swelling (3%), fever (1%-6%) and headache (3%).
There has been extensive analysis of the safety of hepatitis B vaccines, the policy statement indicated. Analysis of Vaccine Safety Datalink data has found no causal link between administration of the hepatitis B vaccine and the following: neonatal sepsis or death, rheumatoid arthritis, Bell’s palsy, autoimmune thyroid disease, hemolytic anemia in children, anaphylaxis, optic neuritis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, sudden-onset sensorineural hearing loss, or other chronic illnesses.
Specific recommendations
• Infants born to mothers who test positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg): Administer the hepatitis B vaccine and HBIG within 12 hours of birth.
• Infants weighing at least 2,000 g and born to mothers who are HBsAg negative: Administer the hepatitis B vaccine within 24 hours of birth.
• Infants weighing less than 2,000 g and born to mothers who are HBsAg negative: Administer the hepatitis B vaccine at hospital discharge or at age 1 month (whichever is first).
• Infants weighing at least 2,000 g and born to mothers with an unknown HBsAg status: Administer the hepatitis B vaccine within 12 hours of birth and HBIG by hospital discharge or age 7 days (whichever is first) if HBsAg status remains unknown or is confirmed positive.
• Infants weighing less than 2,000 g and born to mothers with an unknown HBsAg status: Administer the hepatitis B vaccine within 12 hours of birth and then HBIG within 12 hours unless the mother tests negative for HBsAg by then.
FROM PEDIATRICS
Key clinical point: All infants should receive hepatitis B vaccine within 24 hours of birth.
Major finding: Hepatitis B vaccine prevents 75%-95% of perinatal hepatitis B infections.
Data source: A literature review of data on hepatitis B epidemiology in the United States.
Disclosures: The statement did not receive external funding, and the authors stated that they have no conflicts of interest.
How to reduce NICU transfers for asymptomatic hypoglycemia
NASHVILLE, TENN. – At the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, many infants who would previously have been transferred to the NICU for asymptomatic hypoglycemia now are staying with their moms, thanks to a new protocol that holds off on blood glucose testing until infants are fed for the first time and glucose homeostasis can begin.
Not too long ago, the university realized it had a problem that’s probably familiar to other institutions: Its system to monitor newborns at risk for hypoglycemia – those born to diabetic mothers, or who are small or large for gestational age – put too many infants with asymptomatic hypoglycemia into the NICU when they didn’t really need to be there.
Nurse practitioners “were tired of transferring babies they felt were responsive to feeding and did not actually require NICU care,” and “a growing number of families were unhappy with being separated from infants that were well-appearing and feeding well at a time when moms were trying to establish breast feeding and bonding. There was frustration with our protocol,” which “seemed rigid and outdated,” said Ashley Sutton, MD, a pediatric hospitalist at the university.
To fix the problem, Dr. Sutton and others on a multidisciplinary team implemented the American Academy of Pediatrics’ 2011 guidelines for monitoring glucose homeostasis in late-preterm and term newborns at-risk for hypoglycemia, with an additional mandate to initiate immediate, continual skin-to-skin contact at delivery (Pediatrics. 2011 Mar;127[3]:575-9).
Under the new system, children are fed with either their mom’s or a donor’s breast milk within an hour of birth, and the initial glucose check comes at 90 minutes; infants are transferred if blood glucose remains below 25 mg/dL after the second feeding. After 4 hours of life, glucose levels below 35 mg/dL trigger an evaluation for symptoms, not necessarily an automatic NICU transfer.
Labor and delivery nurses also are empowered “to immediately feed the baby no matter what number [they are] seeing,” Dr. Sutton said at the meeting, sponsored by the Society of Hospital Medicine, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the Academic Pediatric Association.
The efforts have made a difference. The transfer rate for at-risk infants has fallen from 17% to 3%, and skin-to-skin contact is initiated within the first hour of life in 64%, up from 45%. Feeding of at-risk infants within the first hour has increased from 43% to 61%, and the first glucose check comes at an average of 97 minutes. The number of unnecessary NICU transfers of at-risk infants has fallen sharply.
Meanwhile, there’s been no increase in sepsis evaluations, adverse events, readmissions, and the rates of symptomatic hypoglycemia.
Dr. Sutton and her colleagues had no industry disclosures. The work was funded by the National Institutes of Health.
NASHVILLE, TENN. – At the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, many infants who would previously have been transferred to the NICU for asymptomatic hypoglycemia now are staying with their moms, thanks to a new protocol that holds off on blood glucose testing until infants are fed for the first time and glucose homeostasis can begin.
Not too long ago, the university realized it had a problem that’s probably familiar to other institutions: Its system to monitor newborns at risk for hypoglycemia – those born to diabetic mothers, or who are small or large for gestational age – put too many infants with asymptomatic hypoglycemia into the NICU when they didn’t really need to be there.
Nurse practitioners “were tired of transferring babies they felt were responsive to feeding and did not actually require NICU care,” and “a growing number of families were unhappy with being separated from infants that were well-appearing and feeding well at a time when moms were trying to establish breast feeding and bonding. There was frustration with our protocol,” which “seemed rigid and outdated,” said Ashley Sutton, MD, a pediatric hospitalist at the university.
To fix the problem, Dr. Sutton and others on a multidisciplinary team implemented the American Academy of Pediatrics’ 2011 guidelines for monitoring glucose homeostasis in late-preterm and term newborns at-risk for hypoglycemia, with an additional mandate to initiate immediate, continual skin-to-skin contact at delivery (Pediatrics. 2011 Mar;127[3]:575-9).
Under the new system, children are fed with either their mom’s or a donor’s breast milk within an hour of birth, and the initial glucose check comes at 90 minutes; infants are transferred if blood glucose remains below 25 mg/dL after the second feeding. After 4 hours of life, glucose levels below 35 mg/dL trigger an evaluation for symptoms, not necessarily an automatic NICU transfer.
Labor and delivery nurses also are empowered “to immediately feed the baby no matter what number [they are] seeing,” Dr. Sutton said at the meeting, sponsored by the Society of Hospital Medicine, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the Academic Pediatric Association.
The efforts have made a difference. The transfer rate for at-risk infants has fallen from 17% to 3%, and skin-to-skin contact is initiated within the first hour of life in 64%, up from 45%. Feeding of at-risk infants within the first hour has increased from 43% to 61%, and the first glucose check comes at an average of 97 minutes. The number of unnecessary NICU transfers of at-risk infants has fallen sharply.
Meanwhile, there’s been no increase in sepsis evaluations, adverse events, readmissions, and the rates of symptomatic hypoglycemia.
Dr. Sutton and her colleagues had no industry disclosures. The work was funded by the National Institutes of Health.
NASHVILLE, TENN. – At the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, many infants who would previously have been transferred to the NICU for asymptomatic hypoglycemia now are staying with their moms, thanks to a new protocol that holds off on blood glucose testing until infants are fed for the first time and glucose homeostasis can begin.
Not too long ago, the university realized it had a problem that’s probably familiar to other institutions: Its system to monitor newborns at risk for hypoglycemia – those born to diabetic mothers, or who are small or large for gestational age – put too many infants with asymptomatic hypoglycemia into the NICU when they didn’t really need to be there.
Nurse practitioners “were tired of transferring babies they felt were responsive to feeding and did not actually require NICU care,” and “a growing number of families were unhappy with being separated from infants that were well-appearing and feeding well at a time when moms were trying to establish breast feeding and bonding. There was frustration with our protocol,” which “seemed rigid and outdated,” said Ashley Sutton, MD, a pediatric hospitalist at the university.
To fix the problem, Dr. Sutton and others on a multidisciplinary team implemented the American Academy of Pediatrics’ 2011 guidelines for monitoring glucose homeostasis in late-preterm and term newborns at-risk for hypoglycemia, with an additional mandate to initiate immediate, continual skin-to-skin contact at delivery (Pediatrics. 2011 Mar;127[3]:575-9).
Under the new system, children are fed with either their mom’s or a donor’s breast milk within an hour of birth, and the initial glucose check comes at 90 minutes; infants are transferred if blood glucose remains below 25 mg/dL after the second feeding. After 4 hours of life, glucose levels below 35 mg/dL trigger an evaluation for symptoms, not necessarily an automatic NICU transfer.
Labor and delivery nurses also are empowered “to immediately feed the baby no matter what number [they are] seeing,” Dr. Sutton said at the meeting, sponsored by the Society of Hospital Medicine, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the Academic Pediatric Association.
The efforts have made a difference. The transfer rate for at-risk infants has fallen from 17% to 3%, and skin-to-skin contact is initiated within the first hour of life in 64%, up from 45%. Feeding of at-risk infants within the first hour has increased from 43% to 61%, and the first glucose check comes at an average of 97 minutes. The number of unnecessary NICU transfers of at-risk infants has fallen sharply.
Meanwhile, there’s been no increase in sepsis evaluations, adverse events, readmissions, and the rates of symptomatic hypoglycemia.
Dr. Sutton and her colleagues had no industry disclosures. The work was funded by the National Institutes of Health.
AT PHM 2017
Key clinical point:
Major finding: After making that and other changes, the transfer rate for at-risk infants at a major academic center fell from 17% to 3%, without an increase in rates of symptomatic hypoglycemia and adverse events.
Data source: Quality improvement project at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Disclosures: The investigators had no financial disclosures. The work was funded by the National Institutes of Health.
Axillary thermometry is the best choice for newborns
NASHVILLE, TENN. – Axillary thermometry outperformed both rectal and temporal artery thermometry in 205 newborns aged 12-72 hours in a study performed at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
The infants had two temperatures taken by each method over a period of 15 minutes, for a total of six readings per child and 1,230 measurements overall. Axillary thermometry proved both accurate and reliable. Rectal thermometry was accurate but less reliable, and temporal thermometry was reliable but less accurate.
Lead investigator Ketan Nadkarni, MD, a 3rd-year pediatrics resident, and his colleagues wanted to compare the three methods head-to-head to make sure axillary thermometers were okay to use in the nursery, and to see if it really was necessary to tell parents to use rectal thermometers; many are reluctant to use them. Plus, “there’s been a lot of controversy” in pediatrics “over the best way to measure temperature,” Dr. Nadkarni said at the Pediatric Hospital Medicine annual meeting.
“With our data, we think axillary is what we should continue to use in the newborn nursery,” he said. Some attending physicians still are hesitant to recommend axillary thermometers to new parents, but “all of the nurses are aware of” the study findings “and a lot of the residents are, too, so I think we are starting to move” in that direction.
The study had some unexpected findings as well: “The biggest surprise was how wide the distribution of rectal temperatures was. The distribution” around the mean “was way larger than we had thought, so [rectal thermometry was] not very reliable at all. Our study surprisingly exhibited suboptimal performance in terms of reliability,” for rectal thermometry, he said at the meeting, which was sponsored by the Society of Hospital Medicine, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the Academic Pediatric Association.
Specifically, the average distance of any given rectal measurement from the mean rectal temperature of 98.3º F was 0.45º F. The second rectal temperature in the study sometimes varied a half a degree or more from the first taken shortly before, in the same infant.
The average distance of an axillary temperature from the axillary mean of 98.32º F was 0.32º F; for temporal thermometry it was 0.34º F from a mean of 98.55º F.
Another surprise was that temporal thermometry overestimated temperature by an average of about a quarter of a degree, compared with rectal readings. Even small overestimates could lead to unnecessary sepsis work-ups; “the last thing we want is to hospitalize these kids when they don’t need to be,” Dr. Nadkarni said.
The mean axillary and rectal temperatures, meanwhile, were only 0.02º F apart, which was not statistically significant. “Axillary was absolutely interchangeable with rectal in terms of accuracy,” he said.
The children were born at 37 weeks’ gestation or later, and were excluded if they had a temperature of 100.4º F or higher by any method. Rectal and axillary temperatures were taken with a Welch Allyn SureTemp Plus 690. Temple temperatures were taken with an Exergen TAT-2000c.
The investigators plan to run a similar trial in the ED with children up to 3 months old.
There was no external funding for the work, and Dr. Nadkarni had no relevant financial disclosures.
NASHVILLE, TENN. – Axillary thermometry outperformed both rectal and temporal artery thermometry in 205 newborns aged 12-72 hours in a study performed at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
The infants had two temperatures taken by each method over a period of 15 minutes, for a total of six readings per child and 1,230 measurements overall. Axillary thermometry proved both accurate and reliable. Rectal thermometry was accurate but less reliable, and temporal thermometry was reliable but less accurate.
Lead investigator Ketan Nadkarni, MD, a 3rd-year pediatrics resident, and his colleagues wanted to compare the three methods head-to-head to make sure axillary thermometers were okay to use in the nursery, and to see if it really was necessary to tell parents to use rectal thermometers; many are reluctant to use them. Plus, “there’s been a lot of controversy” in pediatrics “over the best way to measure temperature,” Dr. Nadkarni said at the Pediatric Hospital Medicine annual meeting.
“With our data, we think axillary is what we should continue to use in the newborn nursery,” he said. Some attending physicians still are hesitant to recommend axillary thermometers to new parents, but “all of the nurses are aware of” the study findings “and a lot of the residents are, too, so I think we are starting to move” in that direction.
The study had some unexpected findings as well: “The biggest surprise was how wide the distribution of rectal temperatures was. The distribution” around the mean “was way larger than we had thought, so [rectal thermometry was] not very reliable at all. Our study surprisingly exhibited suboptimal performance in terms of reliability,” for rectal thermometry, he said at the meeting, which was sponsored by the Society of Hospital Medicine, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the Academic Pediatric Association.
Specifically, the average distance of any given rectal measurement from the mean rectal temperature of 98.3º F was 0.45º F. The second rectal temperature in the study sometimes varied a half a degree or more from the first taken shortly before, in the same infant.
The average distance of an axillary temperature from the axillary mean of 98.32º F was 0.32º F; for temporal thermometry it was 0.34º F from a mean of 98.55º F.
Another surprise was that temporal thermometry overestimated temperature by an average of about a quarter of a degree, compared with rectal readings. Even small overestimates could lead to unnecessary sepsis work-ups; “the last thing we want is to hospitalize these kids when they don’t need to be,” Dr. Nadkarni said.
The mean axillary and rectal temperatures, meanwhile, were only 0.02º F apart, which was not statistically significant. “Axillary was absolutely interchangeable with rectal in terms of accuracy,” he said.
The children were born at 37 weeks’ gestation or later, and were excluded if they had a temperature of 100.4º F or higher by any method. Rectal and axillary temperatures were taken with a Welch Allyn SureTemp Plus 690. Temple temperatures were taken with an Exergen TAT-2000c.
The investigators plan to run a similar trial in the ED with children up to 3 months old.
There was no external funding for the work, and Dr. Nadkarni had no relevant financial disclosures.
NASHVILLE, TENN. – Axillary thermometry outperformed both rectal and temporal artery thermometry in 205 newborns aged 12-72 hours in a study performed at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
The infants had two temperatures taken by each method over a period of 15 minutes, for a total of six readings per child and 1,230 measurements overall. Axillary thermometry proved both accurate and reliable. Rectal thermometry was accurate but less reliable, and temporal thermometry was reliable but less accurate.
Lead investigator Ketan Nadkarni, MD, a 3rd-year pediatrics resident, and his colleagues wanted to compare the three methods head-to-head to make sure axillary thermometers were okay to use in the nursery, and to see if it really was necessary to tell parents to use rectal thermometers; many are reluctant to use them. Plus, “there’s been a lot of controversy” in pediatrics “over the best way to measure temperature,” Dr. Nadkarni said at the Pediatric Hospital Medicine annual meeting.
“With our data, we think axillary is what we should continue to use in the newborn nursery,” he said. Some attending physicians still are hesitant to recommend axillary thermometers to new parents, but “all of the nurses are aware of” the study findings “and a lot of the residents are, too, so I think we are starting to move” in that direction.
The study had some unexpected findings as well: “The biggest surprise was how wide the distribution of rectal temperatures was. The distribution” around the mean “was way larger than we had thought, so [rectal thermometry was] not very reliable at all. Our study surprisingly exhibited suboptimal performance in terms of reliability,” for rectal thermometry, he said at the meeting, which was sponsored by the Society of Hospital Medicine, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the Academic Pediatric Association.
Specifically, the average distance of any given rectal measurement from the mean rectal temperature of 98.3º F was 0.45º F. The second rectal temperature in the study sometimes varied a half a degree or more from the first taken shortly before, in the same infant.
The average distance of an axillary temperature from the axillary mean of 98.32º F was 0.32º F; for temporal thermometry it was 0.34º F from a mean of 98.55º F.
Another surprise was that temporal thermometry overestimated temperature by an average of about a quarter of a degree, compared with rectal readings. Even small overestimates could lead to unnecessary sepsis work-ups; “the last thing we want is to hospitalize these kids when they don’t need to be,” Dr. Nadkarni said.
The mean axillary and rectal temperatures, meanwhile, were only 0.02º F apart, which was not statistically significant. “Axillary was absolutely interchangeable with rectal in terms of accuracy,” he said.
The children were born at 37 weeks’ gestation or later, and were excluded if they had a temperature of 100.4º F or higher by any method. Rectal and axillary temperatures were taken with a Welch Allyn SureTemp Plus 690. Temple temperatures were taken with an Exergen TAT-2000c.
The investigators plan to run a similar trial in the ED with children up to 3 months old.
There was no external funding for the work, and Dr. Nadkarni had no relevant financial disclosures.
AT PHM 2017
Key clinical point:
Major finding: The average distance of an axillary temperature from the axillary mean of 98.32º F was only 0.32º F, while the average distance of any given rectal measurement from the mean rectal temperature of 98.3º F was 0.45º F, and for temporal thermometry it was 0.34º F from a mean of 98.55º F.
Data source: Head-to-head thermometry study in more than 200 infants aged 12-72 hours.
Disclosures: There was no outside funding, and Dr. Nadkarni had no relevant financial disclosures.
Cerebral palsy rate down in children born very or moderately preterm
, even in children who were born moderately preterm.
The researchers gathered data for cerebral palsy from the medical questionnaire, including information on head control, sitting, standing, walking, and quality of gait; trunk and limb tone; and any abnormal neurologic signs. Development was assessed using the second version of the 24-month Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ), which is completed by parents.
Of 4,199 neonates born between 22 and 34 weeks’ gestation in 2011 enrolled in the EPIPAGE-2 study who lived until a median of 24.2 months corrected age, the rate of cerebral palsy dropped from 7% to 4% in those born between 24-26 and 27-31 weeks’ gestation, reported Véronique Pierrat, MD, PhD, of the Epidemiology and Biostatistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Research Center, INSERM, in Paris, and her associates. At 32-34 weeks’ gestation, the cerebral palsy rate was 1%. Only one child born at 22-23 weeks’ gestation lived beyond the neonatal period. Fewer than 1% of the children overall had severe auditory or visual impairment.
ASQ analysis was considered for 2,506 children, after excluding children with cerebral palsy, deafness or blindness, or severe congenital brain malformations. ASQ scores were below threshold in 50%, 41%, and 36% of children born at 24-26, 27-31, and 32-34 weeks’ gestation, respectively. “The domains most frequently scoring below threshold were communication and personal-social in all gestational age groups. Proportions of children scoring below the threshold in either of these domains decreased with increasing gestational age but still were 18% and 13%, respectively, at 32-34 weeks’ gestation,” the investigators said.
Only 1% or fewer of the children in this cohort had severe gastrointestinal or respiratory disabilities.
In a comparison of 1997 data and this 2011 data after adjustment for baseline characteristics in children born at 22-31 weeks’ gestation, survival increased by a mean 6% , and survival without neuromotor or sensory impairment by 7%; in children born at 24-31 weeks’ gestation, cerebral palsy decreased by a mean 3%. No statistically significant changes were found between the two periods for survival, survival without neuromotor or sensory disabilities, and rates of cerebral palsy in children born at 24 weeks’ gestation, but “noticeable improvements were seen at 25-26 weeks and, to a lesser extent, at 27-31 weeks,” Dr. Pierrat and her associates said. At 32-34 weeks’ gestation, the cerebral palsy rate dropped by 3%, but survival and survival without severe neuromotor or sensory impairment were similar between the two time periods.
In regard to the 2011 data, “the proportion of infants at risk of developmental delay was high, even for those born at 32-34 weeks’ gestation. Our results invite questioning perinatal strategies in France, and in countries with similar recommendations. However, improving outcomes at extremely low gestational age requires a complex change in philosophy of care and close cooperation not only between obstetricians and neonatologists, but also developmental specialists, parent associations, and policy makers,” Dr. Pierrat and her associates concluded.
The investigators said they had no relevant financial disclosures. The study was funded by the French Institute of Public Health Research/Institute of Public Health and several of its partners, the PREMUP Foundation, Fondation de France, and Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale.
, even in children who were born moderately preterm.
The researchers gathered data for cerebral palsy from the medical questionnaire, including information on head control, sitting, standing, walking, and quality of gait; trunk and limb tone; and any abnormal neurologic signs. Development was assessed using the second version of the 24-month Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ), which is completed by parents.
Of 4,199 neonates born between 22 and 34 weeks’ gestation in 2011 enrolled in the EPIPAGE-2 study who lived until a median of 24.2 months corrected age, the rate of cerebral palsy dropped from 7% to 4% in those born between 24-26 and 27-31 weeks’ gestation, reported Véronique Pierrat, MD, PhD, of the Epidemiology and Biostatistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Research Center, INSERM, in Paris, and her associates. At 32-34 weeks’ gestation, the cerebral palsy rate was 1%. Only one child born at 22-23 weeks’ gestation lived beyond the neonatal period. Fewer than 1% of the children overall had severe auditory or visual impairment.
ASQ analysis was considered for 2,506 children, after excluding children with cerebral palsy, deafness or blindness, or severe congenital brain malformations. ASQ scores were below threshold in 50%, 41%, and 36% of children born at 24-26, 27-31, and 32-34 weeks’ gestation, respectively. “The domains most frequently scoring below threshold were communication and personal-social in all gestational age groups. Proportions of children scoring below the threshold in either of these domains decreased with increasing gestational age but still were 18% and 13%, respectively, at 32-34 weeks’ gestation,” the investigators said.
Only 1% or fewer of the children in this cohort had severe gastrointestinal or respiratory disabilities.
In a comparison of 1997 data and this 2011 data after adjustment for baseline characteristics in children born at 22-31 weeks’ gestation, survival increased by a mean 6% , and survival without neuromotor or sensory impairment by 7%; in children born at 24-31 weeks’ gestation, cerebral palsy decreased by a mean 3%. No statistically significant changes were found between the two periods for survival, survival without neuromotor or sensory disabilities, and rates of cerebral palsy in children born at 24 weeks’ gestation, but “noticeable improvements were seen at 25-26 weeks and, to a lesser extent, at 27-31 weeks,” Dr. Pierrat and her associates said. At 32-34 weeks’ gestation, the cerebral palsy rate dropped by 3%, but survival and survival without severe neuromotor or sensory impairment were similar between the two time periods.
In regard to the 2011 data, “the proportion of infants at risk of developmental delay was high, even for those born at 32-34 weeks’ gestation. Our results invite questioning perinatal strategies in France, and in countries with similar recommendations. However, improving outcomes at extremely low gestational age requires a complex change in philosophy of care and close cooperation not only between obstetricians and neonatologists, but also developmental specialists, parent associations, and policy makers,” Dr. Pierrat and her associates concluded.
The investigators said they had no relevant financial disclosures. The study was funded by the French Institute of Public Health Research/Institute of Public Health and several of its partners, the PREMUP Foundation, Fondation de France, and Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale.
, even in children who were born moderately preterm.
The researchers gathered data for cerebral palsy from the medical questionnaire, including information on head control, sitting, standing, walking, and quality of gait; trunk and limb tone; and any abnormal neurologic signs. Development was assessed using the second version of the 24-month Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ), which is completed by parents.
Of 4,199 neonates born between 22 and 34 weeks’ gestation in 2011 enrolled in the EPIPAGE-2 study who lived until a median of 24.2 months corrected age, the rate of cerebral palsy dropped from 7% to 4% in those born between 24-26 and 27-31 weeks’ gestation, reported Véronique Pierrat, MD, PhD, of the Epidemiology and Biostatistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Research Center, INSERM, in Paris, and her associates. At 32-34 weeks’ gestation, the cerebral palsy rate was 1%. Only one child born at 22-23 weeks’ gestation lived beyond the neonatal period. Fewer than 1% of the children overall had severe auditory or visual impairment.
ASQ analysis was considered for 2,506 children, after excluding children with cerebral palsy, deafness or blindness, or severe congenital brain malformations. ASQ scores were below threshold in 50%, 41%, and 36% of children born at 24-26, 27-31, and 32-34 weeks’ gestation, respectively. “The domains most frequently scoring below threshold were communication and personal-social in all gestational age groups. Proportions of children scoring below the threshold in either of these domains decreased with increasing gestational age but still were 18% and 13%, respectively, at 32-34 weeks’ gestation,” the investigators said.
Only 1% or fewer of the children in this cohort had severe gastrointestinal or respiratory disabilities.
In a comparison of 1997 data and this 2011 data after adjustment for baseline characteristics in children born at 22-31 weeks’ gestation, survival increased by a mean 6% , and survival without neuromotor or sensory impairment by 7%; in children born at 24-31 weeks’ gestation, cerebral palsy decreased by a mean 3%. No statistically significant changes were found between the two periods for survival, survival without neuromotor or sensory disabilities, and rates of cerebral palsy in children born at 24 weeks’ gestation, but “noticeable improvements were seen at 25-26 weeks and, to a lesser extent, at 27-31 weeks,” Dr. Pierrat and her associates said. At 32-34 weeks’ gestation, the cerebral palsy rate dropped by 3%, but survival and survival without severe neuromotor or sensory impairment were similar between the two time periods.
In regard to the 2011 data, “the proportion of infants at risk of developmental delay was high, even for those born at 32-34 weeks’ gestation. Our results invite questioning perinatal strategies in France, and in countries with similar recommendations. However, improving outcomes at extremely low gestational age requires a complex change in philosophy of care and close cooperation not only between obstetricians and neonatologists, but also developmental specialists, parent associations, and policy makers,” Dr. Pierrat and her associates concluded.
The investigators said they had no relevant financial disclosures. The study was funded by the French Institute of Public Health Research/Institute of Public Health and several of its partners, the PREMUP Foundation, Fondation de France, and Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale.
FROM BMJ
Key clinical point: Cerebral palsy rates are down in children born very and moderately preterm, but the risk of developmental delay remains high.
Major finding: ASQ scores were below threshold in 50%, 41%, and 36% of children born at 24-26, 27-31, and 32-34 weeks’ gestation, respectively.
Data source: A national population study of 4,199 French neonates born between 22 and 34 weeks’ gestation in 2011.
Disclosures: The investigators said they had no relevant financial disclosures. The study was funded by the French Institute of Public Health Research/Institute of Public Health and several of its partners, the PREMUP Foundation, Fondation de France, and Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale.
Recommendations for infant sleep position are not being followed
Despite the American Academy of Pediatrics recommendation that parents place infants supine for sleeping, many mothers do not do so, according to the results of the Study of Attitudes and Factors Affecting Infant Care.
In 32 hospitals, 3,297 mothers were surveyed to determine their intentions, the actual infant sleeping position used, and the factors that affected their behaviors. Of those, 2,491 (77%) reported that they usually place their infants in supine position, but only 49% reported that they exclusively place their infants supine. In addition, 14% reported that they place infants on their sides and 8% prone, reported Eve R. Colson, MD, of the department of pediatrics at Yale University, New Haven, Conn., and her coauthors (Pediatrics. 2017. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-0596).
Several other discrepancies in compliance with the AAP recommendation also were noted. African American mothers were more likely to intend to use prone position, compared with white mothers (adjusted odds ratio, 2.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.57-3.85). Those who did not complete high school were also more likely to intend to use the prone position (aOR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.16-3.73). On the other hand, those who received recommendation-compliant advice from a doctor were less likely to place their infants in the prone (aOR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.39-0.93) or side (aOR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.36-0.67) positions.
“Of particular note, those who reported that their social norms supported placing the infant in the prone position were much more likely to do so, compared with those who felt that their social norms supported using only the supine position (aOR, 11.6; 95% CI, 7.24-18.7). And, most remarkably, those who had positive attitudes about the prone sleep position ... were more likely to choose the prone position (aOR, 130; 95% CI, 71.8-236),” the researchers wrote. These findings indicate that choices in infant sleeping position are directly influenced by attitudes toward the choice, subjective social norms, and perceptions about control.
“These beliefs persist and are potentially modifiable, so they should be considered an important part of any intervention to change practice,” Dr. Colson and her colleagues wrote.
The study was a nationally representative sample of mothers of infants aged 2-6 months. Although the data were taken from patient surveys, which could have been misreported, they are supported by the findings of other studies.
[polldaddy:{"method":"iframe","type":"survey","src":"//newspolls2017.polldaddy.com/s/recommendations-for-infant-sleep-position-are-not-being-followed?iframe=1"}]
“Maternal race and education continue to be factors associated with choice of infant sleeping position as does advice from a doctor. Factors that appear to be of equal or greater importance are those related to attitudes, subjective social norms, and perceived control, all of which can potentially be altered through educational interventions,” Dr. Colson and her colleagues concluded.
The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the National Institutes of Health funded the study. The authors reported no financial disclosures.
Over the 10 years spanning 1994-2004, the sudden infant death syndrome rate in the United States fell by 53%, correlating with an increase in exclusive supine sleep from less than 10% to 78%. However, since then, rates of both supine sleep and SIDS death have remained stagnant.
To make progress in these areas, current data are needed on supine sleep to enhance understanding of how families make these decisions. Colson et al. provide exactly the kind of information we need to guide providers and public health officials in their efforts to help families maintain the safest sleep environments for their infants.
As a start, mothers who want to practice safe sleep need to be empowered to insist that other caregivers in their lives support their parenting decisions, because the study shows that mothers who feel that they have more control are more likely to use the recommended position. We also must look at how we can help change personal attitudes and societal norms in favor of supine sleep because these issues were found to be some of the strongest predictors of prone sleep position.
We, as health care providers, need to provide clear and consistent messaging in both word and behavior to help mothers make safe decisions for their infants.
Michael H. Goodstein, MD, is a neonatologist at WellSpan York (Pa.) Hospital. Barbara M. Ostfeld, PhD, is the program director of the SIDS Center of New Jersey at Rutgers University, New Brunswick. Their remarks accompanied the article by Colson et al. (Pediatrics 2017 Aug 21. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-2068). Neither author reported any financial disclosures.
Over the 10 years spanning 1994-2004, the sudden infant death syndrome rate in the United States fell by 53%, correlating with an increase in exclusive supine sleep from less than 10% to 78%. However, since then, rates of both supine sleep and SIDS death have remained stagnant.
To make progress in these areas, current data are needed on supine sleep to enhance understanding of how families make these decisions. Colson et al. provide exactly the kind of information we need to guide providers and public health officials in their efforts to help families maintain the safest sleep environments for their infants.
As a start, mothers who want to practice safe sleep need to be empowered to insist that other caregivers in their lives support their parenting decisions, because the study shows that mothers who feel that they have more control are more likely to use the recommended position. We also must look at how we can help change personal attitudes and societal norms in favor of supine sleep because these issues were found to be some of the strongest predictors of prone sleep position.
We, as health care providers, need to provide clear and consistent messaging in both word and behavior to help mothers make safe decisions for their infants.
Michael H. Goodstein, MD, is a neonatologist at WellSpan York (Pa.) Hospital. Barbara M. Ostfeld, PhD, is the program director of the SIDS Center of New Jersey at Rutgers University, New Brunswick. Their remarks accompanied the article by Colson et al. (Pediatrics 2017 Aug 21. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-2068). Neither author reported any financial disclosures.
Over the 10 years spanning 1994-2004, the sudden infant death syndrome rate in the United States fell by 53%, correlating with an increase in exclusive supine sleep from less than 10% to 78%. However, since then, rates of both supine sleep and SIDS death have remained stagnant.
To make progress in these areas, current data are needed on supine sleep to enhance understanding of how families make these decisions. Colson et al. provide exactly the kind of information we need to guide providers and public health officials in their efforts to help families maintain the safest sleep environments for their infants.
As a start, mothers who want to practice safe sleep need to be empowered to insist that other caregivers in their lives support their parenting decisions, because the study shows that mothers who feel that they have more control are more likely to use the recommended position. We also must look at how we can help change personal attitudes and societal norms in favor of supine sleep because these issues were found to be some of the strongest predictors of prone sleep position.
We, as health care providers, need to provide clear and consistent messaging in both word and behavior to help mothers make safe decisions for their infants.
Michael H. Goodstein, MD, is a neonatologist at WellSpan York (Pa.) Hospital. Barbara M. Ostfeld, PhD, is the program director of the SIDS Center of New Jersey at Rutgers University, New Brunswick. Their remarks accompanied the article by Colson et al. (Pediatrics 2017 Aug 21. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-2068). Neither author reported any financial disclosures.
Despite the American Academy of Pediatrics recommendation that parents place infants supine for sleeping, many mothers do not do so, according to the results of the Study of Attitudes and Factors Affecting Infant Care.
In 32 hospitals, 3,297 mothers were surveyed to determine their intentions, the actual infant sleeping position used, and the factors that affected their behaviors. Of those, 2,491 (77%) reported that they usually place their infants in supine position, but only 49% reported that they exclusively place their infants supine. In addition, 14% reported that they place infants on their sides and 8% prone, reported Eve R. Colson, MD, of the department of pediatrics at Yale University, New Haven, Conn., and her coauthors (Pediatrics. 2017. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-0596).
Several other discrepancies in compliance with the AAP recommendation also were noted. African American mothers were more likely to intend to use prone position, compared with white mothers (adjusted odds ratio, 2.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.57-3.85). Those who did not complete high school were also more likely to intend to use the prone position (aOR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.16-3.73). On the other hand, those who received recommendation-compliant advice from a doctor were less likely to place their infants in the prone (aOR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.39-0.93) or side (aOR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.36-0.67) positions.
“Of particular note, those who reported that their social norms supported placing the infant in the prone position were much more likely to do so, compared with those who felt that their social norms supported using only the supine position (aOR, 11.6; 95% CI, 7.24-18.7). And, most remarkably, those who had positive attitudes about the prone sleep position ... were more likely to choose the prone position (aOR, 130; 95% CI, 71.8-236),” the researchers wrote. These findings indicate that choices in infant sleeping position are directly influenced by attitudes toward the choice, subjective social norms, and perceptions about control.
“These beliefs persist and are potentially modifiable, so they should be considered an important part of any intervention to change practice,” Dr. Colson and her colleagues wrote.
The study was a nationally representative sample of mothers of infants aged 2-6 months. Although the data were taken from patient surveys, which could have been misreported, they are supported by the findings of other studies.
[polldaddy:{"method":"iframe","type":"survey","src":"//newspolls2017.polldaddy.com/s/recommendations-for-infant-sleep-position-are-not-being-followed?iframe=1"}]
“Maternal race and education continue to be factors associated with choice of infant sleeping position as does advice from a doctor. Factors that appear to be of equal or greater importance are those related to attitudes, subjective social norms, and perceived control, all of which can potentially be altered through educational interventions,” Dr. Colson and her colleagues concluded.
The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the National Institutes of Health funded the study. The authors reported no financial disclosures.
Despite the American Academy of Pediatrics recommendation that parents place infants supine for sleeping, many mothers do not do so, according to the results of the Study of Attitudes and Factors Affecting Infant Care.
In 32 hospitals, 3,297 mothers were surveyed to determine their intentions, the actual infant sleeping position used, and the factors that affected their behaviors. Of those, 2,491 (77%) reported that they usually place their infants in supine position, but only 49% reported that they exclusively place their infants supine. In addition, 14% reported that they place infants on their sides and 8% prone, reported Eve R. Colson, MD, of the department of pediatrics at Yale University, New Haven, Conn., and her coauthors (Pediatrics. 2017. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-0596).
Several other discrepancies in compliance with the AAP recommendation also were noted. African American mothers were more likely to intend to use prone position, compared with white mothers (adjusted odds ratio, 2.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.57-3.85). Those who did not complete high school were also more likely to intend to use the prone position (aOR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.16-3.73). On the other hand, those who received recommendation-compliant advice from a doctor were less likely to place their infants in the prone (aOR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.39-0.93) or side (aOR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.36-0.67) positions.
“Of particular note, those who reported that their social norms supported placing the infant in the prone position were much more likely to do so, compared with those who felt that their social norms supported using only the supine position (aOR, 11.6; 95% CI, 7.24-18.7). And, most remarkably, those who had positive attitudes about the prone sleep position ... were more likely to choose the prone position (aOR, 130; 95% CI, 71.8-236),” the researchers wrote. These findings indicate that choices in infant sleeping position are directly influenced by attitudes toward the choice, subjective social norms, and perceptions about control.
“These beliefs persist and are potentially modifiable, so they should be considered an important part of any intervention to change practice,” Dr. Colson and her colleagues wrote.
The study was a nationally representative sample of mothers of infants aged 2-6 months. Although the data were taken from patient surveys, which could have been misreported, they are supported by the findings of other studies.
[polldaddy:{"method":"iframe","type":"survey","src":"//newspolls2017.polldaddy.com/s/recommendations-for-infant-sleep-position-are-not-being-followed?iframe=1"}]
“Maternal race and education continue to be factors associated with choice of infant sleeping position as does advice from a doctor. Factors that appear to be of equal or greater importance are those related to attitudes, subjective social norms, and perceived control, all of which can potentially be altered through educational interventions,” Dr. Colson and her colleagues concluded.
The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the National Institutes of Health funded the study. The authors reported no financial disclosures.
FROM PEDIATRICS
Key clinical point:
Major finding: Of the 3,297 mothers surveyed, 2,491 (77%) reported that they usually place their infants in supine position, but only 49% reported that they exclusively place their infants supine.
Data source: The Study of Attitudes and Factors Affecting Infant Care, involving 3,297 mothers.
Disclosures: The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the National Institutes of Health funded the study. The authors reported no financial disclosures.
Alternative birthing practices increase risk of infection
All three have been associated with sporadic, serious neonatal infections.
The U.S. prevalence of water births – delivering a baby underwater – is currently unknown, but in the United Kingdom the practice is common. According to a 2015 National Health Service maternity survey, approximately 9% of women who underwent vaginal delivery opted for water birth (Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016 Jul;101[4]:F357-65). Both the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and the Royal College of Midwives endorse this practice for healthy women with uncomplicated term pregnancies. According to a 2009 Cochrane Review, immersion during the first phase of labor reduces the use of epidural/spinal analgesia (Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000111.pub3). The maternal benefits of delivery under water, though, have not been clearly defined.
Legionella pneumophila is an uncommon pathogen in children, but cases of neonatal Legionnaires’ disease have been reported after water birth. Two affected babies born in Arizona in 2016 were successfully treated and survived (MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6622a4). A baby born in Texas in 2014 died of sepsis and respiratory failure (Emerg Infect Dis. 2015. doi: 10.3201/eid2101.140846). Canadian investigators have reported fatal disseminated herpes simplex virus infection in an infant after water birth; the mother had herpetic whitlow and a recent blister concerning for HSV on her thigh (J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2017 May 16. doi: 10.1093/jpids/pix035).
Admittedly, each of these cases might have been prevented by adherence to recommended infection control practices, and the absolute risk of infection after water birth is unknown and likely to be small. Still, neither the American Academy of Pediatrics nor the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists currently recommend the practice. ACOG suggests that “births occur on land, not in water” and has called for well-designed, prospective studies of the maternal and perinatal benefits and risks associated with immersion during labor and delivery (Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128:1198-9).
Placentophagia – consuming the placenta after birth – has been promoted by celebrity moms, including Katherine Heigl and Kourtney Kardashian. Placenta can be cooked, blended raw into a smoothie, or dehydrated and encapsulated.
Proponents of placentophagia claim health benefits of this practice, including improved mood and energy, and increased breast milk production. There are few published data to support these claims. A recent case report suggests the practice has the potential to harm the baby. In June 2017, Oregon public health authorities described a neonate with recurrent episodes of group B streptococcal (GBS) bacteremia. An identical strain of GBS was cultured from capsules containing the mother’s dehydrated placenta – she had consumed six of the capsules daily beginning a few days after the baby’s birth. According to the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report communication, “no standards exist for processing placenta for consumption” and the “placenta encapsulation process does not eradicate infectious pathogens per se. … Placenta capsule ingestion should be avoided”(MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017;66:677-8. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6625a4).
Finally, the ritual practice of umbilical cord nonseverance or lotus birth deserves a mention. In a lotus birth, the umbilical cord is left uncut, allowing the placenta to remain attached to the baby until the cord dries and naturally separates, generally 3-10 days after delivery. Describing a spiritual connection between the baby and the placenta, proponents claim lotus birth promotes bonding and allows for a gentler transition between intra- and extrauterine life.
A review of PubMed turned up no formal studies of this practice, but case reports describe complications such as neonatal idiopathic hepatitis and neonatal sepsis. The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists has issued a warning about lotus births, advising that babies be monitored closely for infection. RCOG spokesperson Dr. Patrick O’Brien said in a 2008 statement, “If left for a period of time after the birth, there is a risk of infection in the placenta which can consequently spread to the baby. The placenta is particularly prone to infection as it contains blood. Within a short time after birth, once the umbilical cord has stopped pulsating, the placenta has no circulation and is essentially dead tissue.”
Interestingly, a quick scan of Etsy, the popular e-commerce website, turned up a number of lotus birth kits for sale. These generally contain a decorative cloth bag as well as an herb mix containing lavender and eucalyptus to promote drying and mask the smell of the decomposing placenta.
In contrast, many pediatricians, me included, are not well informed about these practices and don’t routinely ask expectant moms about their plans. I propose that we can advocate for our patients-to-be by learning about these practices so that we can engage in an honest, respectful discussion about potential risks and benefits. For me, for now, the risks outweigh the benefits.
Dr. Bryant is a pediatrician specializing in infectious diseases at the University of Louisville (Ky.) and Norton Children’s Hospital, also in Louisville. She said she had no relevant financial disclosures. Email her at pdnews@frontlinemedcom.com.
All three have been associated with sporadic, serious neonatal infections.
The U.S. prevalence of water births – delivering a baby underwater – is currently unknown, but in the United Kingdom the practice is common. According to a 2015 National Health Service maternity survey, approximately 9% of women who underwent vaginal delivery opted for water birth (Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016 Jul;101[4]:F357-65). Both the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and the Royal College of Midwives endorse this practice for healthy women with uncomplicated term pregnancies. According to a 2009 Cochrane Review, immersion during the first phase of labor reduces the use of epidural/spinal analgesia (Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000111.pub3). The maternal benefits of delivery under water, though, have not been clearly defined.
Legionella pneumophila is an uncommon pathogen in children, but cases of neonatal Legionnaires’ disease have been reported after water birth. Two affected babies born in Arizona in 2016 were successfully treated and survived (MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6622a4). A baby born in Texas in 2014 died of sepsis and respiratory failure (Emerg Infect Dis. 2015. doi: 10.3201/eid2101.140846). Canadian investigators have reported fatal disseminated herpes simplex virus infection in an infant after water birth; the mother had herpetic whitlow and a recent blister concerning for HSV on her thigh (J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2017 May 16. doi: 10.1093/jpids/pix035).
Admittedly, each of these cases might have been prevented by adherence to recommended infection control practices, and the absolute risk of infection after water birth is unknown and likely to be small. Still, neither the American Academy of Pediatrics nor the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists currently recommend the practice. ACOG suggests that “births occur on land, not in water” and has called for well-designed, prospective studies of the maternal and perinatal benefits and risks associated with immersion during labor and delivery (Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128:1198-9).
Placentophagia – consuming the placenta after birth – has been promoted by celebrity moms, including Katherine Heigl and Kourtney Kardashian. Placenta can be cooked, blended raw into a smoothie, or dehydrated and encapsulated.
Proponents of placentophagia claim health benefits of this practice, including improved mood and energy, and increased breast milk production. There are few published data to support these claims. A recent case report suggests the practice has the potential to harm the baby. In June 2017, Oregon public health authorities described a neonate with recurrent episodes of group B streptococcal (GBS) bacteremia. An identical strain of GBS was cultured from capsules containing the mother’s dehydrated placenta – she had consumed six of the capsules daily beginning a few days after the baby’s birth. According to the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report communication, “no standards exist for processing placenta for consumption” and the “placenta encapsulation process does not eradicate infectious pathogens per se. … Placenta capsule ingestion should be avoided”(MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017;66:677-8. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6625a4).
Finally, the ritual practice of umbilical cord nonseverance or lotus birth deserves a mention. In a lotus birth, the umbilical cord is left uncut, allowing the placenta to remain attached to the baby until the cord dries and naturally separates, generally 3-10 days after delivery. Describing a spiritual connection between the baby and the placenta, proponents claim lotus birth promotes bonding and allows for a gentler transition between intra- and extrauterine life.
A review of PubMed turned up no formal studies of this practice, but case reports describe complications such as neonatal idiopathic hepatitis and neonatal sepsis. The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists has issued a warning about lotus births, advising that babies be monitored closely for infection. RCOG spokesperson Dr. Patrick O’Brien said in a 2008 statement, “If left for a period of time after the birth, there is a risk of infection in the placenta which can consequently spread to the baby. The placenta is particularly prone to infection as it contains blood. Within a short time after birth, once the umbilical cord has stopped pulsating, the placenta has no circulation and is essentially dead tissue.”
Interestingly, a quick scan of Etsy, the popular e-commerce website, turned up a number of lotus birth kits for sale. These generally contain a decorative cloth bag as well as an herb mix containing lavender and eucalyptus to promote drying and mask the smell of the decomposing placenta.
In contrast, many pediatricians, me included, are not well informed about these practices and don’t routinely ask expectant moms about their plans. I propose that we can advocate for our patients-to-be by learning about these practices so that we can engage in an honest, respectful discussion about potential risks and benefits. For me, for now, the risks outweigh the benefits.
Dr. Bryant is a pediatrician specializing in infectious diseases at the University of Louisville (Ky.) and Norton Children’s Hospital, also in Louisville. She said she had no relevant financial disclosures. Email her at pdnews@frontlinemedcom.com.
All three have been associated with sporadic, serious neonatal infections.
The U.S. prevalence of water births – delivering a baby underwater – is currently unknown, but in the United Kingdom the practice is common. According to a 2015 National Health Service maternity survey, approximately 9% of women who underwent vaginal delivery opted for water birth (Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016 Jul;101[4]:F357-65). Both the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and the Royal College of Midwives endorse this practice for healthy women with uncomplicated term pregnancies. According to a 2009 Cochrane Review, immersion during the first phase of labor reduces the use of epidural/spinal analgesia (Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000111.pub3). The maternal benefits of delivery under water, though, have not been clearly defined.
Legionella pneumophila is an uncommon pathogen in children, but cases of neonatal Legionnaires’ disease have been reported after water birth. Two affected babies born in Arizona in 2016 were successfully treated and survived (MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6622a4). A baby born in Texas in 2014 died of sepsis and respiratory failure (Emerg Infect Dis. 2015. doi: 10.3201/eid2101.140846). Canadian investigators have reported fatal disseminated herpes simplex virus infection in an infant after water birth; the mother had herpetic whitlow and a recent blister concerning for HSV on her thigh (J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2017 May 16. doi: 10.1093/jpids/pix035).
Admittedly, each of these cases might have been prevented by adherence to recommended infection control practices, and the absolute risk of infection after water birth is unknown and likely to be small. Still, neither the American Academy of Pediatrics nor the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists currently recommend the practice. ACOG suggests that “births occur on land, not in water” and has called for well-designed, prospective studies of the maternal and perinatal benefits and risks associated with immersion during labor and delivery (Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128:1198-9).
Placentophagia – consuming the placenta after birth – has been promoted by celebrity moms, including Katherine Heigl and Kourtney Kardashian. Placenta can be cooked, blended raw into a smoothie, or dehydrated and encapsulated.
Proponents of placentophagia claim health benefits of this practice, including improved mood and energy, and increased breast milk production. There are few published data to support these claims. A recent case report suggests the practice has the potential to harm the baby. In June 2017, Oregon public health authorities described a neonate with recurrent episodes of group B streptococcal (GBS) bacteremia. An identical strain of GBS was cultured from capsules containing the mother’s dehydrated placenta – she had consumed six of the capsules daily beginning a few days after the baby’s birth. According to the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report communication, “no standards exist for processing placenta for consumption” and the “placenta encapsulation process does not eradicate infectious pathogens per se. … Placenta capsule ingestion should be avoided”(MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017;66:677-8. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6625a4).
Finally, the ritual practice of umbilical cord nonseverance or lotus birth deserves a mention. In a lotus birth, the umbilical cord is left uncut, allowing the placenta to remain attached to the baby until the cord dries and naturally separates, generally 3-10 days after delivery. Describing a spiritual connection between the baby and the placenta, proponents claim lotus birth promotes bonding and allows for a gentler transition between intra- and extrauterine life.
A review of PubMed turned up no formal studies of this practice, but case reports describe complications such as neonatal idiopathic hepatitis and neonatal sepsis. The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists has issued a warning about lotus births, advising that babies be monitored closely for infection. RCOG spokesperson Dr. Patrick O’Brien said in a 2008 statement, “If left for a period of time after the birth, there is a risk of infection in the placenta which can consequently spread to the baby. The placenta is particularly prone to infection as it contains blood. Within a short time after birth, once the umbilical cord has stopped pulsating, the placenta has no circulation and is essentially dead tissue.”
Interestingly, a quick scan of Etsy, the popular e-commerce website, turned up a number of lotus birth kits for sale. These generally contain a decorative cloth bag as well as an herb mix containing lavender and eucalyptus to promote drying and mask the smell of the decomposing placenta.
In contrast, many pediatricians, me included, are not well informed about these practices and don’t routinely ask expectant moms about their plans. I propose that we can advocate for our patients-to-be by learning about these practices so that we can engage in an honest, respectful discussion about potential risks and benefits. For me, for now, the risks outweigh the benefits.
Dr. Bryant is a pediatrician specializing in infectious diseases at the University of Louisville (Ky.) and Norton Children’s Hospital, also in Louisville. She said she had no relevant financial disclosures. Email her at pdnews@frontlinemedcom.com.
