Violaceous Papule With an Erythematous Rim

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 02/10/2021 - 15:58

The Diagnosis: Targetoid Hemosiderotic Hemangioma 

Targetoid hemosiderotic hemangioma (THH), also known as hobnail hemangioma, is a benign vascular tumor that usually occurs in young or middle-aged adults. It most commonly presents on the extremities or trunk as an isolated red-brown plaque or papule.1,2 Histologically, THH is characterized by superficial dilated ectatic vessels with underlying proliferating vascular channels lined by plump hobnail endothelial cells.1 Targetoid hemosiderotic hemangioma typically involves the dermis and spares the subcutis. The vascular channels may contain erythrocytes as well as pale eosinophilic lymph, as seen in our patient (quiz image). The deeper dermis contains vascular spaces that are more angulated and smaller and appear to be dissecting through the collagen bundles or collapsed.1,3 A variable amount of hemosiderin deposition and extravasated erythrocytes are seen.2,3 Histologic features evolve with the age of the lesion. Increasing amounts of hemosiderin deposition and erythrocyte extravasation may correspond histologically to the recent clinical color change reported by the patient.  

Verrucous hemangioma is a rare congenital vascular abnormality that is characterized by dilated vessels in the papillary dermis along with acanthosis, hyperkeratosis, and irregular papillomatosis, as seen in angiokeratoma.4 However, the vascular proliferation composed of variably sized, thin-walled capillaries extends into the deep dermis as well as the subcutis (Figure 1). Verrucous hemangioma most commonly is reported on the legs and generally starts as a violaceous patch that progresses into a hyperkeratotic verrucous plaque or nodule.5,6  

Figure 1. Verrucous hemangioma. A proliferation of dilated vascular spaces filling the papillary dermis and extending deep into the reticular dermis and subcutaneous adipose tissue (H&E, original magnification ×20).

Angiokeratoma is characterized by superficial vascular ectasia of the papillary dermis in association with overlying acanthosis, hyperkeratosis, and rete elongation.7 The dilated vascular spaces appear encircled by the epidermis (Figure 2). Intravascular thrombosis can be seen within the ectatic vessels.7 In contrast to verrucous hemangioma, angiokeratoma is limited to the papillary dermis. Therefore, obtaining a biopsy of sufficient depth is necessary for differentiation.8 There are 5 clinical presentations of angiokeratoma: sporadic, angiokeratoma of Mibelli, angiokeratoma of Fordyce, angiokeratoma circumscriptum, and angiokeratoma corporis diffusum (Fabry disease). Angiokeratomas may present on the lower extremities, tongue, trunk, and scrotum as hyperkeratotic, dark red to purple or black papules.7 

Figure 2. Angiokeratoma. Dilated vascular spaces within the papillary dermis of an acanthotic epidermis with hyperkeratosis (H&E, original magnification ×100).

There are 3 clinical stages of Kaposi sarcoma: patch, plaque, and nodular stages. The patch stage is characterized histologically by vascular channels that dissect through the dermis and extend around native vessels (the promontory sign)(Figure 3).9,10 These features can show histologic overlap with THH. The plaque stage shows a more diffuse dermal vascular proliferation, increased cellularity of spindle cells, and possible extension into the subcutis.9,10 Focal plasma cells, hemosiderin, and extravasated red blood cells can be seen. The nodular stage is characterized by a proliferation of spindle cells with red blood cells squeezed between slitlike vascular spaces, hyaline globules, and scattered mitotic figures, but not atypical forms.10 In this stage, plasma cells and hemosiderin are more readily identifiable. A biopsy from the nodular stage is unlikely to enter the histologic differential diagnosis with THH. Clinically, there are 4 variants of Kaposi sarcoma: the classic or sporadic form, an endemic form, iatrogenic, and AIDS associated. Overall, it is more common in males and can occur at any age.10 Human herpesvirus 8 is seen in all forms, and infected cells can be highlighted by the immunohistochemical stain for latent nuclear antigen 1.9,10 

Figure 3. Kaposi sarcoma. Slitlike dilated vascular channels dissecting through reticular dermal collagen and around native vessels (promontory sign)(H&E, original magnification ×200).

Angiosarcoma is a malignant endothelial tumor of soft tissue, skin, bone, and visceral organs.11,12 Clinically, cutaneous angiosarcoma can present in a variety of ways, including single or multiple bluish red lesions that can ulcerate or bleed; violaceous nodules or plaques; and hematomalike lesions that can mimic epithelial neoplasms including squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, and malignant melanoma.11,13,14 The cutaneous lesions most commonly occur on sun-exposed skin, particularly on the face and scalp.12 Other clinical variants that are important to recognize are postradiation angiosarcoma, characterized by MYC gene amplification, and lymphedema-associated angiosarcoma (Stewart-Treves syndrome). Angiosarcoma can have a variety of morphologic features, ranging from well to poorly differentiated. Classically, angiosarcoma is characterized by infiltrating vascular spaces lined by atypical endothelial cells (Figure 4). Poorly differentiated angiosarcoma can demonstrate spindle, epithelioid, or polygonal cells with increased mitotic activity, pleomorphism, and irregular vascular spaces.11 Endothelial markers such as ERG (erythroblast transformation specific-related gene)(nuclear) and CD31 (membranous) can be used to aid in the diagnosis of a poorly differentiated lesion. Epithelioid angiosarcoma also occasionally stains with cytokeratins.13,14  

Figure 4. Angiosarcoma. Vascular spaces lined by hyperchromatic and markedly atypical endothelial cells dissecting through the collagen (H&E, original magnification ×200)

References
  1. Joyce JC, Keith PJ, Szabo S, et al. Superficial hemosiderotic lymphovascular malformation (hobnail hemangioma): a report of six cases. Pediatr Dermatol. 2014;31:281-285.  
  2. Sahin MT, Demir MA, Gunduz K, et al. Targetoid haemosiderotic haemangioma: dermoscopic monitoring of three cases and review of the literature. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2005;30:672-676.  
  3. Kakizaki P, Valente NY, Paiva DL, et al. Targetoid hemosiderotic hemangioma--case report. An Bras Dermatol. 2014;89:956-959. 
  4. Oppermann K, Boff AL, Bonamigo RR. Verrucous hemangioma and histopathological differential diagnosis with angiokeratoma circumscriptum neviforme. An Bras Dermatol. 2018;93:712-715.  
  5. Boccara, O, Ariche-Maman, S, Hadj-Rabia, S, et al. Verrucous hemangioma (also known as verrucous venous malformation): a vascular anomaly frequently misdiagnosed as a lymphatic malformation. Pediatr Dermatol. 2018;35:E378-E381. 
  6. Mestre T, Amaro C, Freitas I. Verrucous haemangioma: a diagnosis to consider [published online June 4, 2014]. BMJ Case Rep. doi:10.1136/bcr-2014-204612 
  7. Ivy H, Julian CA. Angiokeratoma circumscriptum. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2019. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK549769/ 
  8. Shetty S, Geetha V, Rao R, et al. Verrucous hemangioma: importance of a deeper biopsy. Indian J Dermatopathol Diagn Dermatol. 2014;1:99-100. 
  9. Bishop BN, Lynch DT. Cancer, Kaposi sarcoma. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2019. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK534839/ 
  10. Grayson W, Pantanowitz L. Histological variants of cutaneous Kaposi sarcoma. Diagn Pathol. 2008;3:31.  
  11. Cao J, Wang J, He C, et al. Angiosarcoma: a review of diagnosis and current treatment. Am J Cancer Res. 2019;9:2303-2313. 
  12. Papke DJ Jr, Hornick JL. What is new in endothelial neoplasia? Virchows Arch. 2020;476:17-28. 
  13. Ambujam S, Audhya M, Reddy A, et al. Cutaneous angiosarcoma of the head, neck, and face of the elderly in type 5 skin. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2013;6:45-47.  
  14. Shustef E, Kazlouskaya V, Prieto VG, et al. Cutaneous angiosarcoma: a current update. J Clin Pathol. 2017;70:917-925.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Henning is from the Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Summa Health System, Akron City, Ohio. Drs. Powell and Ferringer are from the Department of Dermatopathology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Ania Henning, MD (aniahenning@gmail.com). 

Issue
Cutis - 107(2)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
67, 72-73
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Henning is from the Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Summa Health System, Akron City, Ohio. Drs. Powell and Ferringer are from the Department of Dermatopathology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Ania Henning, MD (aniahenning@gmail.com). 

Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Henning is from the Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Summa Health System, Akron City, Ohio. Drs. Powell and Ferringer are from the Department of Dermatopathology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Ania Henning, MD (aniahenning@gmail.com). 

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

The Diagnosis: Targetoid Hemosiderotic Hemangioma 

Targetoid hemosiderotic hemangioma (THH), also known as hobnail hemangioma, is a benign vascular tumor that usually occurs in young or middle-aged adults. It most commonly presents on the extremities or trunk as an isolated red-brown plaque or papule.1,2 Histologically, THH is characterized by superficial dilated ectatic vessels with underlying proliferating vascular channels lined by plump hobnail endothelial cells.1 Targetoid hemosiderotic hemangioma typically involves the dermis and spares the subcutis. The vascular channels may contain erythrocytes as well as pale eosinophilic lymph, as seen in our patient (quiz image). The deeper dermis contains vascular spaces that are more angulated and smaller and appear to be dissecting through the collagen bundles or collapsed.1,3 A variable amount of hemosiderin deposition and extravasated erythrocytes are seen.2,3 Histologic features evolve with the age of the lesion. Increasing amounts of hemosiderin deposition and erythrocyte extravasation may correspond histologically to the recent clinical color change reported by the patient.  

Verrucous hemangioma is a rare congenital vascular abnormality that is characterized by dilated vessels in the papillary dermis along with acanthosis, hyperkeratosis, and irregular papillomatosis, as seen in angiokeratoma.4 However, the vascular proliferation composed of variably sized, thin-walled capillaries extends into the deep dermis as well as the subcutis (Figure 1). Verrucous hemangioma most commonly is reported on the legs and generally starts as a violaceous patch that progresses into a hyperkeratotic verrucous plaque or nodule.5,6  

Figure 1. Verrucous hemangioma. A proliferation of dilated vascular spaces filling the papillary dermis and extending deep into the reticular dermis and subcutaneous adipose tissue (H&E, original magnification ×20).

Angiokeratoma is characterized by superficial vascular ectasia of the papillary dermis in association with overlying acanthosis, hyperkeratosis, and rete elongation.7 The dilated vascular spaces appear encircled by the epidermis (Figure 2). Intravascular thrombosis can be seen within the ectatic vessels.7 In contrast to verrucous hemangioma, angiokeratoma is limited to the papillary dermis. Therefore, obtaining a biopsy of sufficient depth is necessary for differentiation.8 There are 5 clinical presentations of angiokeratoma: sporadic, angiokeratoma of Mibelli, angiokeratoma of Fordyce, angiokeratoma circumscriptum, and angiokeratoma corporis diffusum (Fabry disease). Angiokeratomas may present on the lower extremities, tongue, trunk, and scrotum as hyperkeratotic, dark red to purple or black papules.7 

Figure 2. Angiokeratoma. Dilated vascular spaces within the papillary dermis of an acanthotic epidermis with hyperkeratosis (H&E, original magnification ×100).

There are 3 clinical stages of Kaposi sarcoma: patch, plaque, and nodular stages. The patch stage is characterized histologically by vascular channels that dissect through the dermis and extend around native vessels (the promontory sign)(Figure 3).9,10 These features can show histologic overlap with THH. The plaque stage shows a more diffuse dermal vascular proliferation, increased cellularity of spindle cells, and possible extension into the subcutis.9,10 Focal plasma cells, hemosiderin, and extravasated red blood cells can be seen. The nodular stage is characterized by a proliferation of spindle cells with red blood cells squeezed between slitlike vascular spaces, hyaline globules, and scattered mitotic figures, but not atypical forms.10 In this stage, plasma cells and hemosiderin are more readily identifiable. A biopsy from the nodular stage is unlikely to enter the histologic differential diagnosis with THH. Clinically, there are 4 variants of Kaposi sarcoma: the classic or sporadic form, an endemic form, iatrogenic, and AIDS associated. Overall, it is more common in males and can occur at any age.10 Human herpesvirus 8 is seen in all forms, and infected cells can be highlighted by the immunohistochemical stain for latent nuclear antigen 1.9,10 

Figure 3. Kaposi sarcoma. Slitlike dilated vascular channels dissecting through reticular dermal collagen and around native vessels (promontory sign)(H&E, original magnification ×200).

Angiosarcoma is a malignant endothelial tumor of soft tissue, skin, bone, and visceral organs.11,12 Clinically, cutaneous angiosarcoma can present in a variety of ways, including single or multiple bluish red lesions that can ulcerate or bleed; violaceous nodules or plaques; and hematomalike lesions that can mimic epithelial neoplasms including squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, and malignant melanoma.11,13,14 The cutaneous lesions most commonly occur on sun-exposed skin, particularly on the face and scalp.12 Other clinical variants that are important to recognize are postradiation angiosarcoma, characterized by MYC gene amplification, and lymphedema-associated angiosarcoma (Stewart-Treves syndrome). Angiosarcoma can have a variety of morphologic features, ranging from well to poorly differentiated. Classically, angiosarcoma is characterized by infiltrating vascular spaces lined by atypical endothelial cells (Figure 4). Poorly differentiated angiosarcoma can demonstrate spindle, epithelioid, or polygonal cells with increased mitotic activity, pleomorphism, and irregular vascular spaces.11 Endothelial markers such as ERG (erythroblast transformation specific-related gene)(nuclear) and CD31 (membranous) can be used to aid in the diagnosis of a poorly differentiated lesion. Epithelioid angiosarcoma also occasionally stains with cytokeratins.13,14  

Figure 4. Angiosarcoma. Vascular spaces lined by hyperchromatic and markedly atypical endothelial cells dissecting through the collagen (H&E, original magnification ×200)

The Diagnosis: Targetoid Hemosiderotic Hemangioma 

Targetoid hemosiderotic hemangioma (THH), also known as hobnail hemangioma, is a benign vascular tumor that usually occurs in young or middle-aged adults. It most commonly presents on the extremities or trunk as an isolated red-brown plaque or papule.1,2 Histologically, THH is characterized by superficial dilated ectatic vessels with underlying proliferating vascular channels lined by plump hobnail endothelial cells.1 Targetoid hemosiderotic hemangioma typically involves the dermis and spares the subcutis. The vascular channels may contain erythrocytes as well as pale eosinophilic lymph, as seen in our patient (quiz image). The deeper dermis contains vascular spaces that are more angulated and smaller and appear to be dissecting through the collagen bundles or collapsed.1,3 A variable amount of hemosiderin deposition and extravasated erythrocytes are seen.2,3 Histologic features evolve with the age of the lesion. Increasing amounts of hemosiderin deposition and erythrocyte extravasation may correspond histologically to the recent clinical color change reported by the patient.  

Verrucous hemangioma is a rare congenital vascular abnormality that is characterized by dilated vessels in the papillary dermis along with acanthosis, hyperkeratosis, and irregular papillomatosis, as seen in angiokeratoma.4 However, the vascular proliferation composed of variably sized, thin-walled capillaries extends into the deep dermis as well as the subcutis (Figure 1). Verrucous hemangioma most commonly is reported on the legs and generally starts as a violaceous patch that progresses into a hyperkeratotic verrucous plaque or nodule.5,6  

Figure 1. Verrucous hemangioma. A proliferation of dilated vascular spaces filling the papillary dermis and extending deep into the reticular dermis and subcutaneous adipose tissue (H&E, original magnification ×20).

Angiokeratoma is characterized by superficial vascular ectasia of the papillary dermis in association with overlying acanthosis, hyperkeratosis, and rete elongation.7 The dilated vascular spaces appear encircled by the epidermis (Figure 2). Intravascular thrombosis can be seen within the ectatic vessels.7 In contrast to verrucous hemangioma, angiokeratoma is limited to the papillary dermis. Therefore, obtaining a biopsy of sufficient depth is necessary for differentiation.8 There are 5 clinical presentations of angiokeratoma: sporadic, angiokeratoma of Mibelli, angiokeratoma of Fordyce, angiokeratoma circumscriptum, and angiokeratoma corporis diffusum (Fabry disease). Angiokeratomas may present on the lower extremities, tongue, trunk, and scrotum as hyperkeratotic, dark red to purple or black papules.7 

Figure 2. Angiokeratoma. Dilated vascular spaces within the papillary dermis of an acanthotic epidermis with hyperkeratosis (H&E, original magnification ×100).

There are 3 clinical stages of Kaposi sarcoma: patch, plaque, and nodular stages. The patch stage is characterized histologically by vascular channels that dissect through the dermis and extend around native vessels (the promontory sign)(Figure 3).9,10 These features can show histologic overlap with THH. The plaque stage shows a more diffuse dermal vascular proliferation, increased cellularity of spindle cells, and possible extension into the subcutis.9,10 Focal plasma cells, hemosiderin, and extravasated red blood cells can be seen. The nodular stage is characterized by a proliferation of spindle cells with red blood cells squeezed between slitlike vascular spaces, hyaline globules, and scattered mitotic figures, but not atypical forms.10 In this stage, plasma cells and hemosiderin are more readily identifiable. A biopsy from the nodular stage is unlikely to enter the histologic differential diagnosis with THH. Clinically, there are 4 variants of Kaposi sarcoma: the classic or sporadic form, an endemic form, iatrogenic, and AIDS associated. Overall, it is more common in males and can occur at any age.10 Human herpesvirus 8 is seen in all forms, and infected cells can be highlighted by the immunohistochemical stain for latent nuclear antigen 1.9,10 

Figure 3. Kaposi sarcoma. Slitlike dilated vascular channels dissecting through reticular dermal collagen and around native vessels (promontory sign)(H&E, original magnification ×200).

Angiosarcoma is a malignant endothelial tumor of soft tissue, skin, bone, and visceral organs.11,12 Clinically, cutaneous angiosarcoma can present in a variety of ways, including single or multiple bluish red lesions that can ulcerate or bleed; violaceous nodules or plaques; and hematomalike lesions that can mimic epithelial neoplasms including squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, and malignant melanoma.11,13,14 The cutaneous lesions most commonly occur on sun-exposed skin, particularly on the face and scalp.12 Other clinical variants that are important to recognize are postradiation angiosarcoma, characterized by MYC gene amplification, and lymphedema-associated angiosarcoma (Stewart-Treves syndrome). Angiosarcoma can have a variety of morphologic features, ranging from well to poorly differentiated. Classically, angiosarcoma is characterized by infiltrating vascular spaces lined by atypical endothelial cells (Figure 4). Poorly differentiated angiosarcoma can demonstrate spindle, epithelioid, or polygonal cells with increased mitotic activity, pleomorphism, and irregular vascular spaces.11 Endothelial markers such as ERG (erythroblast transformation specific-related gene)(nuclear) and CD31 (membranous) can be used to aid in the diagnosis of a poorly differentiated lesion. Epithelioid angiosarcoma also occasionally stains with cytokeratins.13,14  

Figure 4. Angiosarcoma. Vascular spaces lined by hyperchromatic and markedly atypical endothelial cells dissecting through the collagen (H&E, original magnification ×200)

References
  1. Joyce JC, Keith PJ, Szabo S, et al. Superficial hemosiderotic lymphovascular malformation (hobnail hemangioma): a report of six cases. Pediatr Dermatol. 2014;31:281-285.  
  2. Sahin MT, Demir MA, Gunduz K, et al. Targetoid haemosiderotic haemangioma: dermoscopic monitoring of three cases and review of the literature. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2005;30:672-676.  
  3. Kakizaki P, Valente NY, Paiva DL, et al. Targetoid hemosiderotic hemangioma--case report. An Bras Dermatol. 2014;89:956-959. 
  4. Oppermann K, Boff AL, Bonamigo RR. Verrucous hemangioma and histopathological differential diagnosis with angiokeratoma circumscriptum neviforme. An Bras Dermatol. 2018;93:712-715.  
  5. Boccara, O, Ariche-Maman, S, Hadj-Rabia, S, et al. Verrucous hemangioma (also known as verrucous venous malformation): a vascular anomaly frequently misdiagnosed as a lymphatic malformation. Pediatr Dermatol. 2018;35:E378-E381. 
  6. Mestre T, Amaro C, Freitas I. Verrucous haemangioma: a diagnosis to consider [published online June 4, 2014]. BMJ Case Rep. doi:10.1136/bcr-2014-204612 
  7. Ivy H, Julian CA. Angiokeratoma circumscriptum. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2019. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK549769/ 
  8. Shetty S, Geetha V, Rao R, et al. Verrucous hemangioma: importance of a deeper biopsy. Indian J Dermatopathol Diagn Dermatol. 2014;1:99-100. 
  9. Bishop BN, Lynch DT. Cancer, Kaposi sarcoma. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2019. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK534839/ 
  10. Grayson W, Pantanowitz L. Histological variants of cutaneous Kaposi sarcoma. Diagn Pathol. 2008;3:31.  
  11. Cao J, Wang J, He C, et al. Angiosarcoma: a review of diagnosis and current treatment. Am J Cancer Res. 2019;9:2303-2313. 
  12. Papke DJ Jr, Hornick JL. What is new in endothelial neoplasia? Virchows Arch. 2020;476:17-28. 
  13. Ambujam S, Audhya M, Reddy A, et al. Cutaneous angiosarcoma of the head, neck, and face of the elderly in type 5 skin. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2013;6:45-47.  
  14. Shustef E, Kazlouskaya V, Prieto VG, et al. Cutaneous angiosarcoma: a current update. J Clin Pathol. 2017;70:917-925.
References
  1. Joyce JC, Keith PJ, Szabo S, et al. Superficial hemosiderotic lymphovascular malformation (hobnail hemangioma): a report of six cases. Pediatr Dermatol. 2014;31:281-285.  
  2. Sahin MT, Demir MA, Gunduz K, et al. Targetoid haemosiderotic haemangioma: dermoscopic monitoring of three cases and review of the literature. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2005;30:672-676.  
  3. Kakizaki P, Valente NY, Paiva DL, et al. Targetoid hemosiderotic hemangioma--case report. An Bras Dermatol. 2014;89:956-959. 
  4. Oppermann K, Boff AL, Bonamigo RR. Verrucous hemangioma and histopathological differential diagnosis with angiokeratoma circumscriptum neviforme. An Bras Dermatol. 2018;93:712-715.  
  5. Boccara, O, Ariche-Maman, S, Hadj-Rabia, S, et al. Verrucous hemangioma (also known as verrucous venous malformation): a vascular anomaly frequently misdiagnosed as a lymphatic malformation. Pediatr Dermatol. 2018;35:E378-E381. 
  6. Mestre T, Amaro C, Freitas I. Verrucous haemangioma: a diagnosis to consider [published online June 4, 2014]. BMJ Case Rep. doi:10.1136/bcr-2014-204612 
  7. Ivy H, Julian CA. Angiokeratoma circumscriptum. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2019. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK549769/ 
  8. Shetty S, Geetha V, Rao R, et al. Verrucous hemangioma: importance of a deeper biopsy. Indian J Dermatopathol Diagn Dermatol. 2014;1:99-100. 
  9. Bishop BN, Lynch DT. Cancer, Kaposi sarcoma. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2019. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK534839/ 
  10. Grayson W, Pantanowitz L. Histological variants of cutaneous Kaposi sarcoma. Diagn Pathol. 2008;3:31.  
  11. Cao J, Wang J, He C, et al. Angiosarcoma: a review of diagnosis and current treatment. Am J Cancer Res. 2019;9:2303-2313. 
  12. Papke DJ Jr, Hornick JL. What is new in endothelial neoplasia? Virchows Arch. 2020;476:17-28. 
  13. Ambujam S, Audhya M, Reddy A, et al. Cutaneous angiosarcoma of the head, neck, and face of the elderly in type 5 skin. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2013;6:45-47.  
  14. Shustef E, Kazlouskaya V, Prieto VG, et al. Cutaneous angiosarcoma: a current update. J Clin Pathol. 2017;70:917-925.
Issue
Cutis - 107(2)
Issue
Cutis - 107(2)
Page Number
67, 72-73
Page Number
67, 72-73
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Questionnaire Body

A 35-year-old man presented with a reddish brown papule on the left upper chest of 1 year’s duration that had changed color to reddish purple. Physical examination revealed a 6-mm violaceous papule with an erythematous rim.

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Fri, 02/05/2021 - 12:45
Un-Gate On Date
Fri, 02/05/2021 - 12:45
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Fri, 02/05/2021 - 12:45
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Article PDF Media

Purpuric Bullae on the Lower Extremities

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 07/20/2020 - 15:35
Display Headline
Purpuric Bullae on the Lower Extremities

The Diagnosis: Bullous Leukocytoclastic Vasculitis  

Histopathology with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stain showed a perivascular neutrophilic infiltrate, karyorrhexis, red blood cell extravasation, and fibrin deposition in the vessel wall (quiz images). Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) showed fibrin surrounding the vasculature, consistent with vasculitis. The clinical and histopathological evaluation supported the diagnosis of bullous leukocytoclastic vasculitis (LCV). The patient had a full LCV workup including antinuclear antibody, rheumatoid factor, hepatitis B and hepatitis C screening, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, and C3/C4/total complement level, which were all within reference range. The patient denied that she had taken any medications prior to the onset of the rash. She was started on a 12-day prednisone taper starting at 60 mg, and the rash resolved in 1 week.  

Although the incidence of LCV is estimated to be 30 cases per million individuals per year,1 bullous LCV is a rarer entity with only a few cases reported in the literature.2,3 As in our patient's case, up to 50% of LCV cases are idiopathic or the etiology cannot be determined despite laboratory workup and medication review. Other cases can be secondary to medication, infection, collagen vascular disease, or malignancy.3 Despite the exact pathogenesis of bullous LCV being unknown,4 it likely is related to a type III hypersensitivity reaction with immune complex deposition in postcapillary venules leading to endothelial injury, activation of the complement cascade, and development of intraepidermal or subepidermal blister formation depending on location of inflammation and edema.2 Clinically, an intraepidermal split would be more flaccid, similar to pemphigus vulgaris, while a subepidermal split, as in our patient, would be taut bullae. The subepidermal split more commonly is seen in bullous LCV.2  

Leukocytoclastic vasculitis on H&E staining characteristically has a perivascular inflammatory infiltrate, neutrophilic fragments called leukocytoclasis, and blood extravasation.3 Extravasated blood presents clinically as petechiae. In this case, the petechiae helped distinguish this entity from the differential diagnosis. Furthermore, DIF would be helpful in distinguishing bullous diseases such as bullous pemphigoid (BP) and pemphigus vulgaris from LCV.2 Direct immunofluorescence in bullous LCV would have fibrinogen surrounding the vasculature without C3 and IgG deposition (intraepidermal or subepidermal).  

Mild cases of LCV often resolve with supportive measures including elevation of the legs, ice packs applied to the affected area, and removal of the inciting drug or event.4 In the few cases reported in the literature, bullous LCV presented more diffusely than classic LCV with bullous lesions on the forearms and the lower extremities. Oral steroids are efficacious for extensive bullous LCV.4 

The differential diagnosis of bullous LCV includes bullous diseases with subepidermal split including BP and linear IgA bullous dermatosis (LABD). Bullous pemphigoid is an autoimmune subepidermal blistering disease typically affecting patients older than 60 years.5 The pathogenesis of BP is related to development of autoantibodies directed against hemidesmosome components, bullous pemphigoid antigen (BPAG) 1 or BPAG2.5 Bullous pemphigoid presents clinically as widespread, generally pruritic, erythematous, urticarial plaques with bullae. Histologically, BP characteristically has a subepidermal split with superficial dermal edema and eosinophils at the dermoepidermal junction (Figure 1). Direct immunofluorescence confirms the diagnosis with IgG and C3 deposition in an n-serrated pattern at the dermoepidermal junction.6 Bullous pemphigoid can be distinguished from bullous LCV by the older age of presentation, DIF findings, and the absence of purpura.  

Figure 1. Bullous pemphigoid. Subepidermal bulla with eosinophils and neutrophils within the bulla as well as numerous dermal eosinophils (H&E, original magnification ×200).

Linear IgA bullous dermatosis represents a rare subepidermal vesiculobullous disease occurring in patients in their 60s.7 Clinically, this entity presents as tense bullae often located on the periphery of an urticarial plaque, classically called the "string of pearls sign." Histologically, LABD also presents with subepidermal split; however, neutrophils are the predominant cell type vs eosinophils in BP (Figure 2).7 Direct immunofluorescence is specific with a linear deposition of IgA at the dermoepidermal junction. Linear IgA bullous dermatosis most commonly is induced by vancomycin. Unlike bullous LCV, the bullae of LABD have an annular peripheral pattern on an erythematous base and lack purpura.  

Figure 2. Linear IgA bullous dermatosis. Subepidermal bulla with numerous neutrophils within the bulla and sparse dermal eosinophils and neutrophils (H&E, original magnification ×200).

Stasis dermatitis is inflammation of the dermis due to venous insufficiency that often is present in the bilateral lower extremities. The disorder affects approximately 7% of adults older than 50 years, but it also can occur in younger patients.8 The pathophysiology of stasis dermatitis is caused by edema, which leads to extracellular fluid, plasma proteins, macrophages, and erythrocytes passing into the interstitial space. Patients with stasis dermatitis present with scaly erythematous papules and plaques or edematous blisters on the lower extremities. Diagnosis usually can be made clinically; however, a skin biopsy also can be helpful. Hematoxylin and eosin shows a pauci-inflammatory subepidermal bulla with fibrin (Figure 3).8 The overlying epidermis is intact. The dermis has cannon ball angiomatosis, red blood cell extravasation, and fibrosis typical of stasis dermatitis. Stasis dermatitis with bullae is cell poor and lacks the perivascular inflammatory infiltrate and neutrophilic fragments that often are present in LCV, making the 2 entities distinguishable. 

Figure 3. Stasis dermatitis. Pauci-inflammatory subepidermal bulla with fibrin. The overlying epidermis is intact. The dermis shows cannon ball angiomatosis, red blood cell extravasation, and fibrosis (H&E, original magnification ×200).

Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) lies on a spectrum of severe cutaneous drug reactions involving the skin and mucous membranes. Cutaneous involvement typically begins on the trunk and face and later can involve the palms and soles.9 Similar drugs have been implicated in bullous LCV and SJS/TEN, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and antibiotics. Histologically, SJS/TEN has full-thickness epidermal necrolysis, vacuolar interface, and keratinocyte apoptosis (Figure 4).9 The clinical presentation of sloughing of skin with positive Nikolsky sign, oral involvement, and H&E and DIF findings can help differentiate this entity from bullous LCV.  

Figure 4. Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis. Pauci-inflammatory subepidermal separation with acute epidermal necrosis. There is minimal dermal inflammation and pigment incontinence (H&E, original magnification ×200).

References
  1. Einhorn J, Levis JT. Dermatologic diagnosis: leukocytoclastic vasculitis. Perm J. 2015;19:77-78. 
  2. Davidson KA, Ringpfeil F, Lee JB. Ibuprofen-induced bullous leukocytoclastic vasculitis. Cutis. 2001;67:303-307.  
  3. Lazic T, Fonder M, Robinson-Bostom L, et al. Orlistat-induced bullous leukocytoclastic vasculitis. Cutis. 2013;91:148-149. 
  4. Mericliler M, Shnawa A, Al-Qaysi D, et al. Oxacillin-induced leukocytoclastic vasculitis. IDCases. 2019;17:E00539.  
  5. Bernard P, Antonicelli F. Bullous pemphigoid: a review of its diagnosis, associations and treatment. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2017;18:513-528.  
  6. High WA. Blistering disorders. In: Elston DM, Ferringer T, Ko C, et al, eds. Dermatopathology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2019:161-171.  
  7. Visentainer L, Massuda JY, Cintra ML, et al. Vancomycin-induced linear IgA bullous dermatosis (LABD)--an atypical presentation. Clin Case Rep. 2019;7:1091-1093.  
  8. Hyman DA, Cohen PR. Stasis dermatitis as a complication of recurrent levofloxacin-associated bilateral leg edema. Dermatol Online J. 2013;19:20399. 
  9. Harr T, French LE. Toxic epidermal necrolysis and Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2010;5:39. 
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Drs. Grandhi and Powell are from the Department of Dermatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania. Dr. Shamloul is from Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Radhika Grandhi, MD, MPH, Department of Dermatology, Geisinger Medical Center, 115 Woodbine Ln, Danville, PA 17822 (rrgrandhi@geisinger.edu).

Issue
Cutis - 105(6)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
282, 286-287
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Drs. Grandhi and Powell are from the Department of Dermatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania. Dr. Shamloul is from Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Radhika Grandhi, MD, MPH, Department of Dermatology, Geisinger Medical Center, 115 Woodbine Ln, Danville, PA 17822 (rrgrandhi@geisinger.edu).

Author and Disclosure Information

Drs. Grandhi and Powell are from the Department of Dermatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania. Dr. Shamloul is from Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Radhika Grandhi, MD, MPH, Department of Dermatology, Geisinger Medical Center, 115 Woodbine Ln, Danville, PA 17822 (rrgrandhi@geisinger.edu).

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

The Diagnosis: Bullous Leukocytoclastic Vasculitis  

Histopathology with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stain showed a perivascular neutrophilic infiltrate, karyorrhexis, red blood cell extravasation, and fibrin deposition in the vessel wall (quiz images). Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) showed fibrin surrounding the vasculature, consistent with vasculitis. The clinical and histopathological evaluation supported the diagnosis of bullous leukocytoclastic vasculitis (LCV). The patient had a full LCV workup including antinuclear antibody, rheumatoid factor, hepatitis B and hepatitis C screening, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, and C3/C4/total complement level, which were all within reference range. The patient denied that she had taken any medications prior to the onset of the rash. She was started on a 12-day prednisone taper starting at 60 mg, and the rash resolved in 1 week.  

Although the incidence of LCV is estimated to be 30 cases per million individuals per year,1 bullous LCV is a rarer entity with only a few cases reported in the literature.2,3 As in our patient's case, up to 50% of LCV cases are idiopathic or the etiology cannot be determined despite laboratory workup and medication review. Other cases can be secondary to medication, infection, collagen vascular disease, or malignancy.3 Despite the exact pathogenesis of bullous LCV being unknown,4 it likely is related to a type III hypersensitivity reaction with immune complex deposition in postcapillary venules leading to endothelial injury, activation of the complement cascade, and development of intraepidermal or subepidermal blister formation depending on location of inflammation and edema.2 Clinically, an intraepidermal split would be more flaccid, similar to pemphigus vulgaris, while a subepidermal split, as in our patient, would be taut bullae. The subepidermal split more commonly is seen in bullous LCV.2  

Leukocytoclastic vasculitis on H&E staining characteristically has a perivascular inflammatory infiltrate, neutrophilic fragments called leukocytoclasis, and blood extravasation.3 Extravasated blood presents clinically as petechiae. In this case, the petechiae helped distinguish this entity from the differential diagnosis. Furthermore, DIF would be helpful in distinguishing bullous diseases such as bullous pemphigoid (BP) and pemphigus vulgaris from LCV.2 Direct immunofluorescence in bullous LCV would have fibrinogen surrounding the vasculature without C3 and IgG deposition (intraepidermal or subepidermal).  

Mild cases of LCV often resolve with supportive measures including elevation of the legs, ice packs applied to the affected area, and removal of the inciting drug or event.4 In the few cases reported in the literature, bullous LCV presented more diffusely than classic LCV with bullous lesions on the forearms and the lower extremities. Oral steroids are efficacious for extensive bullous LCV.4 

The differential diagnosis of bullous LCV includes bullous diseases with subepidermal split including BP and linear IgA bullous dermatosis (LABD). Bullous pemphigoid is an autoimmune subepidermal blistering disease typically affecting patients older than 60 years.5 The pathogenesis of BP is related to development of autoantibodies directed against hemidesmosome components, bullous pemphigoid antigen (BPAG) 1 or BPAG2.5 Bullous pemphigoid presents clinically as widespread, generally pruritic, erythematous, urticarial plaques with bullae. Histologically, BP characteristically has a subepidermal split with superficial dermal edema and eosinophils at the dermoepidermal junction (Figure 1). Direct immunofluorescence confirms the diagnosis with IgG and C3 deposition in an n-serrated pattern at the dermoepidermal junction.6 Bullous pemphigoid can be distinguished from bullous LCV by the older age of presentation, DIF findings, and the absence of purpura.  

Figure 1. Bullous pemphigoid. Subepidermal bulla with eosinophils and neutrophils within the bulla as well as numerous dermal eosinophils (H&E, original magnification ×200).

Linear IgA bullous dermatosis represents a rare subepidermal vesiculobullous disease occurring in patients in their 60s.7 Clinically, this entity presents as tense bullae often located on the periphery of an urticarial plaque, classically called the "string of pearls sign." Histologically, LABD also presents with subepidermal split; however, neutrophils are the predominant cell type vs eosinophils in BP (Figure 2).7 Direct immunofluorescence is specific with a linear deposition of IgA at the dermoepidermal junction. Linear IgA bullous dermatosis most commonly is induced by vancomycin. Unlike bullous LCV, the bullae of LABD have an annular peripheral pattern on an erythematous base and lack purpura.  

Figure 2. Linear IgA bullous dermatosis. Subepidermal bulla with numerous neutrophils within the bulla and sparse dermal eosinophils and neutrophils (H&E, original magnification ×200).

Stasis dermatitis is inflammation of the dermis due to venous insufficiency that often is present in the bilateral lower extremities. The disorder affects approximately 7% of adults older than 50 years, but it also can occur in younger patients.8 The pathophysiology of stasis dermatitis is caused by edema, which leads to extracellular fluid, plasma proteins, macrophages, and erythrocytes passing into the interstitial space. Patients with stasis dermatitis present with scaly erythematous papules and plaques or edematous blisters on the lower extremities. Diagnosis usually can be made clinically; however, a skin biopsy also can be helpful. Hematoxylin and eosin shows a pauci-inflammatory subepidermal bulla with fibrin (Figure 3).8 The overlying epidermis is intact. The dermis has cannon ball angiomatosis, red blood cell extravasation, and fibrosis typical of stasis dermatitis. Stasis dermatitis with bullae is cell poor and lacks the perivascular inflammatory infiltrate and neutrophilic fragments that often are present in LCV, making the 2 entities distinguishable. 

Figure 3. Stasis dermatitis. Pauci-inflammatory subepidermal bulla with fibrin. The overlying epidermis is intact. The dermis shows cannon ball angiomatosis, red blood cell extravasation, and fibrosis (H&E, original magnification ×200).

Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) lies on a spectrum of severe cutaneous drug reactions involving the skin and mucous membranes. Cutaneous involvement typically begins on the trunk and face and later can involve the palms and soles.9 Similar drugs have been implicated in bullous LCV and SJS/TEN, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and antibiotics. Histologically, SJS/TEN has full-thickness epidermal necrolysis, vacuolar interface, and keratinocyte apoptosis (Figure 4).9 The clinical presentation of sloughing of skin with positive Nikolsky sign, oral involvement, and H&E and DIF findings can help differentiate this entity from bullous LCV.  

Figure 4. Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis. Pauci-inflammatory subepidermal separation with acute epidermal necrosis. There is minimal dermal inflammation and pigment incontinence (H&E, original magnification ×200).

The Diagnosis: Bullous Leukocytoclastic Vasculitis  

Histopathology with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stain showed a perivascular neutrophilic infiltrate, karyorrhexis, red blood cell extravasation, and fibrin deposition in the vessel wall (quiz images). Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) showed fibrin surrounding the vasculature, consistent with vasculitis. The clinical and histopathological evaluation supported the diagnosis of bullous leukocytoclastic vasculitis (LCV). The patient had a full LCV workup including antinuclear antibody, rheumatoid factor, hepatitis B and hepatitis C screening, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, and C3/C4/total complement level, which were all within reference range. The patient denied that she had taken any medications prior to the onset of the rash. She was started on a 12-day prednisone taper starting at 60 mg, and the rash resolved in 1 week.  

Although the incidence of LCV is estimated to be 30 cases per million individuals per year,1 bullous LCV is a rarer entity with only a few cases reported in the literature.2,3 As in our patient's case, up to 50% of LCV cases are idiopathic or the etiology cannot be determined despite laboratory workup and medication review. Other cases can be secondary to medication, infection, collagen vascular disease, or malignancy.3 Despite the exact pathogenesis of bullous LCV being unknown,4 it likely is related to a type III hypersensitivity reaction with immune complex deposition in postcapillary venules leading to endothelial injury, activation of the complement cascade, and development of intraepidermal or subepidermal blister formation depending on location of inflammation and edema.2 Clinically, an intraepidermal split would be more flaccid, similar to pemphigus vulgaris, while a subepidermal split, as in our patient, would be taut bullae. The subepidermal split more commonly is seen in bullous LCV.2  

Leukocytoclastic vasculitis on H&E staining characteristically has a perivascular inflammatory infiltrate, neutrophilic fragments called leukocytoclasis, and blood extravasation.3 Extravasated blood presents clinically as petechiae. In this case, the petechiae helped distinguish this entity from the differential diagnosis. Furthermore, DIF would be helpful in distinguishing bullous diseases such as bullous pemphigoid (BP) and pemphigus vulgaris from LCV.2 Direct immunofluorescence in bullous LCV would have fibrinogen surrounding the vasculature without C3 and IgG deposition (intraepidermal or subepidermal).  

Mild cases of LCV often resolve with supportive measures including elevation of the legs, ice packs applied to the affected area, and removal of the inciting drug or event.4 In the few cases reported in the literature, bullous LCV presented more diffusely than classic LCV with bullous lesions on the forearms and the lower extremities. Oral steroids are efficacious for extensive bullous LCV.4 

The differential diagnosis of bullous LCV includes bullous diseases with subepidermal split including BP and linear IgA bullous dermatosis (LABD). Bullous pemphigoid is an autoimmune subepidermal blistering disease typically affecting patients older than 60 years.5 The pathogenesis of BP is related to development of autoantibodies directed against hemidesmosome components, bullous pemphigoid antigen (BPAG) 1 or BPAG2.5 Bullous pemphigoid presents clinically as widespread, generally pruritic, erythematous, urticarial plaques with bullae. Histologically, BP characteristically has a subepidermal split with superficial dermal edema and eosinophils at the dermoepidermal junction (Figure 1). Direct immunofluorescence confirms the diagnosis with IgG and C3 deposition in an n-serrated pattern at the dermoepidermal junction.6 Bullous pemphigoid can be distinguished from bullous LCV by the older age of presentation, DIF findings, and the absence of purpura.  

Figure 1. Bullous pemphigoid. Subepidermal bulla with eosinophils and neutrophils within the bulla as well as numerous dermal eosinophils (H&E, original magnification ×200).

Linear IgA bullous dermatosis represents a rare subepidermal vesiculobullous disease occurring in patients in their 60s.7 Clinically, this entity presents as tense bullae often located on the periphery of an urticarial plaque, classically called the "string of pearls sign." Histologically, LABD also presents with subepidermal split; however, neutrophils are the predominant cell type vs eosinophils in BP (Figure 2).7 Direct immunofluorescence is specific with a linear deposition of IgA at the dermoepidermal junction. Linear IgA bullous dermatosis most commonly is induced by vancomycin. Unlike bullous LCV, the bullae of LABD have an annular peripheral pattern on an erythematous base and lack purpura.  

Figure 2. Linear IgA bullous dermatosis. Subepidermal bulla with numerous neutrophils within the bulla and sparse dermal eosinophils and neutrophils (H&E, original magnification ×200).

Stasis dermatitis is inflammation of the dermis due to venous insufficiency that often is present in the bilateral lower extremities. The disorder affects approximately 7% of adults older than 50 years, but it also can occur in younger patients.8 The pathophysiology of stasis dermatitis is caused by edema, which leads to extracellular fluid, plasma proteins, macrophages, and erythrocytes passing into the interstitial space. Patients with stasis dermatitis present with scaly erythematous papules and plaques or edematous blisters on the lower extremities. Diagnosis usually can be made clinically; however, a skin biopsy also can be helpful. Hematoxylin and eosin shows a pauci-inflammatory subepidermal bulla with fibrin (Figure 3).8 The overlying epidermis is intact. The dermis has cannon ball angiomatosis, red blood cell extravasation, and fibrosis typical of stasis dermatitis. Stasis dermatitis with bullae is cell poor and lacks the perivascular inflammatory infiltrate and neutrophilic fragments that often are present in LCV, making the 2 entities distinguishable. 

Figure 3. Stasis dermatitis. Pauci-inflammatory subepidermal bulla with fibrin. The overlying epidermis is intact. The dermis shows cannon ball angiomatosis, red blood cell extravasation, and fibrosis (H&E, original magnification ×200).

Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) lies on a spectrum of severe cutaneous drug reactions involving the skin and mucous membranes. Cutaneous involvement typically begins on the trunk and face and later can involve the palms and soles.9 Similar drugs have been implicated in bullous LCV and SJS/TEN, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and antibiotics. Histologically, SJS/TEN has full-thickness epidermal necrolysis, vacuolar interface, and keratinocyte apoptosis (Figure 4).9 The clinical presentation of sloughing of skin with positive Nikolsky sign, oral involvement, and H&E and DIF findings can help differentiate this entity from bullous LCV.  

Figure 4. Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis. Pauci-inflammatory subepidermal separation with acute epidermal necrosis. There is minimal dermal inflammation and pigment incontinence (H&E, original magnification ×200).

References
  1. Einhorn J, Levis JT. Dermatologic diagnosis: leukocytoclastic vasculitis. Perm J. 2015;19:77-78. 
  2. Davidson KA, Ringpfeil F, Lee JB. Ibuprofen-induced bullous leukocytoclastic vasculitis. Cutis. 2001;67:303-307.  
  3. Lazic T, Fonder M, Robinson-Bostom L, et al. Orlistat-induced bullous leukocytoclastic vasculitis. Cutis. 2013;91:148-149. 
  4. Mericliler M, Shnawa A, Al-Qaysi D, et al. Oxacillin-induced leukocytoclastic vasculitis. IDCases. 2019;17:E00539.  
  5. Bernard P, Antonicelli F. Bullous pemphigoid: a review of its diagnosis, associations and treatment. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2017;18:513-528.  
  6. High WA. Blistering disorders. In: Elston DM, Ferringer T, Ko C, et al, eds. Dermatopathology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2019:161-171.  
  7. Visentainer L, Massuda JY, Cintra ML, et al. Vancomycin-induced linear IgA bullous dermatosis (LABD)--an atypical presentation. Clin Case Rep. 2019;7:1091-1093.  
  8. Hyman DA, Cohen PR. Stasis dermatitis as a complication of recurrent levofloxacin-associated bilateral leg edema. Dermatol Online J. 2013;19:20399. 
  9. Harr T, French LE. Toxic epidermal necrolysis and Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2010;5:39. 
References
  1. Einhorn J, Levis JT. Dermatologic diagnosis: leukocytoclastic vasculitis. Perm J. 2015;19:77-78. 
  2. Davidson KA, Ringpfeil F, Lee JB. Ibuprofen-induced bullous leukocytoclastic vasculitis. Cutis. 2001;67:303-307.  
  3. Lazic T, Fonder M, Robinson-Bostom L, et al. Orlistat-induced bullous leukocytoclastic vasculitis. Cutis. 2013;91:148-149. 
  4. Mericliler M, Shnawa A, Al-Qaysi D, et al. Oxacillin-induced leukocytoclastic vasculitis. IDCases. 2019;17:E00539.  
  5. Bernard P, Antonicelli F. Bullous pemphigoid: a review of its diagnosis, associations and treatment. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2017;18:513-528.  
  6. High WA. Blistering disorders. In: Elston DM, Ferringer T, Ko C, et al, eds. Dermatopathology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2019:161-171.  
  7. Visentainer L, Massuda JY, Cintra ML, et al. Vancomycin-induced linear IgA bullous dermatosis (LABD)--an atypical presentation. Clin Case Rep. 2019;7:1091-1093.  
  8. Hyman DA, Cohen PR. Stasis dermatitis as a complication of recurrent levofloxacin-associated bilateral leg edema. Dermatol Online J. 2013;19:20399. 
  9. Harr T, French LE. Toxic epidermal necrolysis and Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2010;5:39. 
Issue
Cutis - 105(6)
Issue
Cutis - 105(6)
Page Number
282, 286-287
Page Number
282, 286-287
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Purpuric Bullae on the Lower Extremities
Display Headline
Purpuric Bullae on the Lower Extremities
Sections
Questionnaire Body

H&E, original magnification ×100.

H&E, original magnification ×200.

A 30-year-old woman with a medical history of uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus and morbid obesity presented to the dermatology clinic with a painful blistering rash on the lower extremities with scattered red-purple papules of 1 week's duration. The rash began on the left dorsal foot. Physical examination showed nonblanching, 2- to 4-mm, violaceous papules with numerous vesiculopustular bullae on the lower extremities from the dorsal feet to the proximal knee. A shave biopsy with hematoxylin and eosin stain and a punch biopsy for direct immunofluorescence were performed.  

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Mon, 06/08/2020 - 10:15
Un-Gate On Date
Mon, 06/08/2020 - 10:15
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Mon, 06/08/2020 - 10:15
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Article PDF Media

How should you manage children born to hepatitis C-positive women?

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 01/14/2019 - 11:27
Display Headline
How should you manage children born to hepatitis C-positive women?
EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

FOR STARTERS, don’t be overly concerned with the mode of delivery; it doesn’t influence the rate of transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV), except in women who are also infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (strength of recommendation [SOR]: B, consistent retrospective cohort studies).

Avoid internal fetal monitoring and prolonged rupture of membranes (SOR: B, single retrospective cohort study).

Advise patients that it’s OK to breastfeed. Breastfeeding doesn’t affect transmission (SOR: B, consistent prospective cohort studies).

Check HCV RNA and serum anti-HCV on 2 occasions between 2 and 6 months of age and 18 and 24 months of age (SOR: B, consistent prospective cohort studies).

 

Evidence summary

Perinatal transmission of HCV is rare. It occurs only when serum HCV RNA is detectable; transmission rates may be related to higher levels (>106 copies/mL).1 HCV is transmitted to 2% of infants of anti-HCV seropositive women and 4% to 7% of infants born to mothers who are HCV RNA-positive at delivery.1

Spontaneous clearance of the virus occurs in approximately 20% of infants. Most remain asymptomatic if HCV persists, but have mild elevation of liver function tests.2

Routine screening for HCV in mothers is not recommended, but pregnant women at high risk for HCV infection should be screened for anti-HCV.

Route of delivery: Only a concern for HIV-positive mothers
The mode of delivery doesn’t influence the rate of HCV transmission, except in mothers with HIV. Retrospective analysis of 503 HCV-positive mothers coinfected with HIV showed a decreased risk of transmission during cesarean delivery (odds ratio [OR]=0.36; P=.01; number needed to treat [NNT]=10).3

One study suggested an increased rate of vertical HCV transmission during vaginal delivery compared with cesarean delivery (32% vs 6%; P<.05). The study didn’t account for the percent of mothers coinfected with HIV, however.4

A meta-analysis of 11 studies showed similar rates of transmission for vaginal and cesarean delivery: adjusted rates were 4.3% and 3%, respectively.1

Internal monitoring is an issue
Avoid internal fetal monitoring to minimize HCV transmission, based on a single retrospective cohort of 244 infants born to HCV-positive mothers (relative risk [RR]= 7.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-31.6; number needed to harm [NNH]=6).7 The same study showed an increased risk with membrane rupture longer than 6 hours (RR=9.9; 95% CI, 1.2-81; NNH=13).5

Breastfeeding doesn’t significantly affect HCV transmission. Transmission rates for breastfed and nonbreastfed infants are 3.7% and 3.9%, respectively.1

 

 

 

Defer postpartum lab testing
Because about 20% of infants exposed to HCV clear the virus spontaneously, and maternal antibodies can confound laboratory results, deferring postpartum diagnostic testing is appropriate. A study of 1104 children in whom vertical transmission didn’t occur after exposure to HCV showed that 95% of the children were anti-HCV antibody negative by 12 months age.6 A prospective study of 23 infants documented spontaneous clearance of HCV RNA by 6 months in all patients.7

Recommendations

The National Institutes of Health 2002 Consensus Statement recommends:8

  • avoiding fetal scalp electrodes and prolonged rupture of membranes
  • serum testing for HCV RNA at 2 months and 6 months of age
  • anti-HCV antibody testing after 15 months of age.

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists supports breastfeeding, recommends against routine HCV screening, and recommends that cesarean delivery be reserved for obstetric indications.9

The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases recommends serum testing and liver biopsy on the same schedule as adult patients and endorses considering treatment after 3 years of age.6

The US Food and Drug Administration has approved treatment after 3 years of age for children with detectable HCV RNA levels higher than 50 IU/mL and who have had a liver biopsy with portal or bridging fibrosis and at least moderate inflammation and necrosis.

The American Gastroenterological Association recommends considering treatment with PEG-interferon and ribavirin after 3 years of age.10

Acknowledgements
The opinions and assertions contained herein are the private view of the authors and not to be construed as official, or as reflecting the view of the US Air Force Medical Service or the US Air Force at large.

References

1. Yeung LT, King SM, Roberts EA. Mother-to-infant transmission of hepatitis C virus. Hepatology. 2001;34:223-229.

2. European Paediatric Hepatitis C Virus Network. Three broad modalities in the natural history of vertically acquired hepatitis C virus infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41:45-51.

3. European Paediatric Hepatitis C Virus Network. Effects of mode of delivery and infant feeding on the risk of mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis C virus. BJOG. 2001;108:371-377.

4. Paccagnini S, Principi N, Massironi E, et al. Perinatal transmission and manifestation of hepatitis C virus infection in a high risk population. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1995;14:195-199.

5. Mast EE, Hwang LY, Seto DS, et al. Risk factors for perinatal transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) and the natural history of HCV infection acquired in infancy. J Infect Dis. 2005;192:1880-1889.

6. England K, Pembrey L, Tovo P, et al. European Paediatric Hepatitis C Virus Network. Excluding hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection by serology in young infants of HCV-infected mothers. Acta Paediatr. 2005;94:444-450.

7. Ketzinel-Gilad M, Colodner SL, Hadary R, et al. Transient transmission of hepatitis C virus from mothers to newborns. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2000;19:267-274.

8. Management of Hepatitis C: 2002. National Institutes of Health Consensus Conference Statement, June 10-12, 2002. Available at: http://consensus.nih.gov/2002/2002HepatitisC2002116html.htm. Accessed August 23, 2009.

9. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 86. Viral hepatitis in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110:941-956.

10. Dienstag JL, McHutchison JG. American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement on the management of hepatitis C. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:225-230.Available at: www.gastrojournal.org/article/PIIS0016508505022717/fulltext. Accessed on August 23, 2009.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

 

Matthew Powell, MD
Justin Bailey, MD
David Grant Medical Center, United States Air Force, Travis Air Force Base, Calif

Lauren A. Maggio, MS(LIS), MA, AHIP
Lane Library, Stanford, University, Palo Alto, Calif

Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 59(5)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
289-290
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

 

Matthew Powell, MD
Justin Bailey, MD
David Grant Medical Center, United States Air Force, Travis Air Force Base, Calif

Lauren A. Maggio, MS(LIS), MA, AHIP
Lane Library, Stanford, University, Palo Alto, Calif

Author and Disclosure Information

 

Matthew Powell, MD
Justin Bailey, MD
David Grant Medical Center, United States Air Force, Travis Air Force Base, Calif

Lauren A. Maggio, MS(LIS), MA, AHIP
Lane Library, Stanford, University, Palo Alto, Calif

Article PDF
Article PDF
EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

FOR STARTERS, don’t be overly concerned with the mode of delivery; it doesn’t influence the rate of transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV), except in women who are also infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (strength of recommendation [SOR]: B, consistent retrospective cohort studies).

Avoid internal fetal monitoring and prolonged rupture of membranes (SOR: B, single retrospective cohort study).

Advise patients that it’s OK to breastfeed. Breastfeeding doesn’t affect transmission (SOR: B, consistent prospective cohort studies).

Check HCV RNA and serum anti-HCV on 2 occasions between 2 and 6 months of age and 18 and 24 months of age (SOR: B, consistent prospective cohort studies).

 

Evidence summary

Perinatal transmission of HCV is rare. It occurs only when serum HCV RNA is detectable; transmission rates may be related to higher levels (>106 copies/mL).1 HCV is transmitted to 2% of infants of anti-HCV seropositive women and 4% to 7% of infants born to mothers who are HCV RNA-positive at delivery.1

Spontaneous clearance of the virus occurs in approximately 20% of infants. Most remain asymptomatic if HCV persists, but have mild elevation of liver function tests.2

Routine screening for HCV in mothers is not recommended, but pregnant women at high risk for HCV infection should be screened for anti-HCV.

Route of delivery: Only a concern for HIV-positive mothers
The mode of delivery doesn’t influence the rate of HCV transmission, except in mothers with HIV. Retrospective analysis of 503 HCV-positive mothers coinfected with HIV showed a decreased risk of transmission during cesarean delivery (odds ratio [OR]=0.36; P=.01; number needed to treat [NNT]=10).3

One study suggested an increased rate of vertical HCV transmission during vaginal delivery compared with cesarean delivery (32% vs 6%; P<.05). The study didn’t account for the percent of mothers coinfected with HIV, however.4

A meta-analysis of 11 studies showed similar rates of transmission for vaginal and cesarean delivery: adjusted rates were 4.3% and 3%, respectively.1

Internal monitoring is an issue
Avoid internal fetal monitoring to minimize HCV transmission, based on a single retrospective cohort of 244 infants born to HCV-positive mothers (relative risk [RR]= 7.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-31.6; number needed to harm [NNH]=6).7 The same study showed an increased risk with membrane rupture longer than 6 hours (RR=9.9; 95% CI, 1.2-81; NNH=13).5

Breastfeeding doesn’t significantly affect HCV transmission. Transmission rates for breastfed and nonbreastfed infants are 3.7% and 3.9%, respectively.1

 

 

 

Defer postpartum lab testing
Because about 20% of infants exposed to HCV clear the virus spontaneously, and maternal antibodies can confound laboratory results, deferring postpartum diagnostic testing is appropriate. A study of 1104 children in whom vertical transmission didn’t occur after exposure to HCV showed that 95% of the children were anti-HCV antibody negative by 12 months age.6 A prospective study of 23 infants documented spontaneous clearance of HCV RNA by 6 months in all patients.7

Recommendations

The National Institutes of Health 2002 Consensus Statement recommends:8

  • avoiding fetal scalp electrodes and prolonged rupture of membranes
  • serum testing for HCV RNA at 2 months and 6 months of age
  • anti-HCV antibody testing after 15 months of age.

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists supports breastfeeding, recommends against routine HCV screening, and recommends that cesarean delivery be reserved for obstetric indications.9

The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases recommends serum testing and liver biopsy on the same schedule as adult patients and endorses considering treatment after 3 years of age.6

The US Food and Drug Administration has approved treatment after 3 years of age for children with detectable HCV RNA levels higher than 50 IU/mL and who have had a liver biopsy with portal or bridging fibrosis and at least moderate inflammation and necrosis.

The American Gastroenterological Association recommends considering treatment with PEG-interferon and ribavirin after 3 years of age.10

Acknowledgements
The opinions and assertions contained herein are the private view of the authors and not to be construed as official, or as reflecting the view of the US Air Force Medical Service or the US Air Force at large.

EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

FOR STARTERS, don’t be overly concerned with the mode of delivery; it doesn’t influence the rate of transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV), except in women who are also infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (strength of recommendation [SOR]: B, consistent retrospective cohort studies).

Avoid internal fetal monitoring and prolonged rupture of membranes (SOR: B, single retrospective cohort study).

Advise patients that it’s OK to breastfeed. Breastfeeding doesn’t affect transmission (SOR: B, consistent prospective cohort studies).

Check HCV RNA and serum anti-HCV on 2 occasions between 2 and 6 months of age and 18 and 24 months of age (SOR: B, consistent prospective cohort studies).

 

Evidence summary

Perinatal transmission of HCV is rare. It occurs only when serum HCV RNA is detectable; transmission rates may be related to higher levels (>106 copies/mL).1 HCV is transmitted to 2% of infants of anti-HCV seropositive women and 4% to 7% of infants born to mothers who are HCV RNA-positive at delivery.1

Spontaneous clearance of the virus occurs in approximately 20% of infants. Most remain asymptomatic if HCV persists, but have mild elevation of liver function tests.2

Routine screening for HCV in mothers is not recommended, but pregnant women at high risk for HCV infection should be screened for anti-HCV.

Route of delivery: Only a concern for HIV-positive mothers
The mode of delivery doesn’t influence the rate of HCV transmission, except in mothers with HIV. Retrospective analysis of 503 HCV-positive mothers coinfected with HIV showed a decreased risk of transmission during cesarean delivery (odds ratio [OR]=0.36; P=.01; number needed to treat [NNT]=10).3

One study suggested an increased rate of vertical HCV transmission during vaginal delivery compared with cesarean delivery (32% vs 6%; P<.05). The study didn’t account for the percent of mothers coinfected with HIV, however.4

A meta-analysis of 11 studies showed similar rates of transmission for vaginal and cesarean delivery: adjusted rates were 4.3% and 3%, respectively.1

Internal monitoring is an issue
Avoid internal fetal monitoring to minimize HCV transmission, based on a single retrospective cohort of 244 infants born to HCV-positive mothers (relative risk [RR]= 7.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-31.6; number needed to harm [NNH]=6).7 The same study showed an increased risk with membrane rupture longer than 6 hours (RR=9.9; 95% CI, 1.2-81; NNH=13).5

Breastfeeding doesn’t significantly affect HCV transmission. Transmission rates for breastfed and nonbreastfed infants are 3.7% and 3.9%, respectively.1

 

 

 

Defer postpartum lab testing
Because about 20% of infants exposed to HCV clear the virus spontaneously, and maternal antibodies can confound laboratory results, deferring postpartum diagnostic testing is appropriate. A study of 1104 children in whom vertical transmission didn’t occur after exposure to HCV showed that 95% of the children were anti-HCV antibody negative by 12 months age.6 A prospective study of 23 infants documented spontaneous clearance of HCV RNA by 6 months in all patients.7

Recommendations

The National Institutes of Health 2002 Consensus Statement recommends:8

  • avoiding fetal scalp electrodes and prolonged rupture of membranes
  • serum testing for HCV RNA at 2 months and 6 months of age
  • anti-HCV antibody testing after 15 months of age.

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists supports breastfeeding, recommends against routine HCV screening, and recommends that cesarean delivery be reserved for obstetric indications.9

The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases recommends serum testing and liver biopsy on the same schedule as adult patients and endorses considering treatment after 3 years of age.6

The US Food and Drug Administration has approved treatment after 3 years of age for children with detectable HCV RNA levels higher than 50 IU/mL and who have had a liver biopsy with portal or bridging fibrosis and at least moderate inflammation and necrosis.

The American Gastroenterological Association recommends considering treatment with PEG-interferon and ribavirin after 3 years of age.10

Acknowledgements
The opinions and assertions contained herein are the private view of the authors and not to be construed as official, or as reflecting the view of the US Air Force Medical Service or the US Air Force at large.

References

1. Yeung LT, King SM, Roberts EA. Mother-to-infant transmission of hepatitis C virus. Hepatology. 2001;34:223-229.

2. European Paediatric Hepatitis C Virus Network. Three broad modalities in the natural history of vertically acquired hepatitis C virus infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41:45-51.

3. European Paediatric Hepatitis C Virus Network. Effects of mode of delivery and infant feeding on the risk of mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis C virus. BJOG. 2001;108:371-377.

4. Paccagnini S, Principi N, Massironi E, et al. Perinatal transmission and manifestation of hepatitis C virus infection in a high risk population. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1995;14:195-199.

5. Mast EE, Hwang LY, Seto DS, et al. Risk factors for perinatal transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) and the natural history of HCV infection acquired in infancy. J Infect Dis. 2005;192:1880-1889.

6. England K, Pembrey L, Tovo P, et al. European Paediatric Hepatitis C Virus Network. Excluding hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection by serology in young infants of HCV-infected mothers. Acta Paediatr. 2005;94:444-450.

7. Ketzinel-Gilad M, Colodner SL, Hadary R, et al. Transient transmission of hepatitis C virus from mothers to newborns. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2000;19:267-274.

8. Management of Hepatitis C: 2002. National Institutes of Health Consensus Conference Statement, June 10-12, 2002. Available at: http://consensus.nih.gov/2002/2002HepatitisC2002116html.htm. Accessed August 23, 2009.

9. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 86. Viral hepatitis in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110:941-956.

10. Dienstag JL, McHutchison JG. American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement on the management of hepatitis C. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:225-230.Available at: www.gastrojournal.org/article/PIIS0016508505022717/fulltext. Accessed on August 23, 2009.

References

1. Yeung LT, King SM, Roberts EA. Mother-to-infant transmission of hepatitis C virus. Hepatology. 2001;34:223-229.

2. European Paediatric Hepatitis C Virus Network. Three broad modalities in the natural history of vertically acquired hepatitis C virus infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41:45-51.

3. European Paediatric Hepatitis C Virus Network. Effects of mode of delivery and infant feeding on the risk of mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis C virus. BJOG. 2001;108:371-377.

4. Paccagnini S, Principi N, Massironi E, et al. Perinatal transmission and manifestation of hepatitis C virus infection in a high risk population. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1995;14:195-199.

5. Mast EE, Hwang LY, Seto DS, et al. Risk factors for perinatal transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) and the natural history of HCV infection acquired in infancy. J Infect Dis. 2005;192:1880-1889.

6. England K, Pembrey L, Tovo P, et al. European Paediatric Hepatitis C Virus Network. Excluding hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection by serology in young infants of HCV-infected mothers. Acta Paediatr. 2005;94:444-450.

7. Ketzinel-Gilad M, Colodner SL, Hadary R, et al. Transient transmission of hepatitis C virus from mothers to newborns. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2000;19:267-274.

8. Management of Hepatitis C: 2002. National Institutes of Health Consensus Conference Statement, June 10-12, 2002. Available at: http://consensus.nih.gov/2002/2002HepatitisC2002116html.htm. Accessed August 23, 2009.

9. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 86. Viral hepatitis in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110:941-956.

10. Dienstag JL, McHutchison JG. American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement on the management of hepatitis C. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:225-230.Available at: www.gastrojournal.org/article/PIIS0016508505022717/fulltext. Accessed on August 23, 2009.

Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 59(5)
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 59(5)
Page Number
289-290
Page Number
289-290
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
How should you manage children born to hepatitis C-positive women?
Display Headline
How should you manage children born to hepatitis C-positive women?
Sections
PURLs Copyright

Evidence-based answers from the Family Physicians Inquiries Network

Disallow All Ads
Article PDF Media