TIPP the scales in managing stress

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 05/10/2021 - 15:08

The past year presented unprecedented challenges for many. In addition, mental health services have also been stretched to capacity. Anecdotally, some hospitals and emergency departments note that more youth have been presenting in mental health crises, and the severity of symptoms has also been higher. Safety planning is important, including working with patients to identify skills they can use in distress. Even those who do not experience suicidal thoughts may struggle with dysregulation or may use coping strategies that may not be the healthiest in the long term.

Dr. Maya P. Strange, assistant professor in the department of psychiatry at the University of Vermont Medical Center and University of Vermont Robert Larner College of Medicine, both in Burlington.
Dr. Maya P. Strange

Within my practice, I see some families who are still waiting for an available therapist, or some may not wish to participate in therapy despite its being recommended. For these families, supporting them in using strategies that they may be willing and able to use in the moment to help them get through the moment of crisis can been helpful:
 

Case example (identifying details have been changed)

Emily is a 17-year-old girl who has a history of generalized anxiety disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder. She has had multiple medication trials and a course of cognitive behavioral therapy when younger, with significant improvement in symptoms. She returns to clinic because of increased anxiety related to stressors of the pandemic. She wishes to not return to therapy because of feeling that she received maximal benefit and that further sessions would not be fruitful. However, she struggles with identifying what skills she can use, and her anxiety heightens significantly to near-panic and hyperventilating with even cursory exploration of triggers for her symptoms. Medications are also discussed during this appointment, and it is noted that it may take some time to see therapeutic effect. Of note, she reports no acute safety concerns. She has engaged in skin picking. No reported substance use. As she hyperventilates, she was asked to identify items in the room matching the colors of the rainbow in order. She was able to quickly do this, and then was asked to do it again. Afterward, she noted feeling much less anxious because it distracted her from her thoughts.

Distress tolerance skills can be very helpful to navigate getting through a crisis. When under stress, some may be more likely to engage in behaviors that are not helpful in the long term such as using avoidance; procrastinating; consuming tobacco, alcohol, or other substances; spending too much time on screens; or engaging in self-harm behaviors. While some of these activities may be okay in moderation, others are always harmful. At times, when encouraging patients to use skills with which they may be more familiar, e.g., deep breathing, progressive muscle relaxation, the response may be, “these don’t work!” It can be important to distinguish that the function of these skills is not to make someone feel good or to eliminate the stressor, but to “take some of the edge off” so they are less likely to slide into problematic behaviors. It can be beneficial to have multiple tools at one’s disposal because not all skills will always be effective or available.

TIPP skills (temperature, intense exercise, paced breathing, progressive muscle relaxation) are distress tolerance skills from dialectical behavioral therapy (DBT),1 which was initially developed to treat individuals with borderline personality disorder. More recently, the therapy modality has been applied to individuals who may struggle with emotion regulation for a variety of reasons. TIPP skills work quickly (within seconds to minutes) with the aim to decrease physiological arousal. They do not require a lot of thinking, and many are portable or easy to use. Given the speed of effect, these skills can also be used in lieu of p.r.n. medications or patients can be counseled about trying these instead of turning to substance use. The effect is brief (5-20 minutes), although this may lower the affective temperature sufficiently for someone to get through the intense moment or to be able to then utilize other skills that may require more cognitive reserves.
 

 

 

T – Temperature

Holding one’s breath and placing one’s face in cold water (above 50°) for 10-20 seconds to stimulate the diving response and decrease heart rate. Patients can repeat this up to 3 times. Alternatively, cold compresses or gel eye masks can be used.

I – Intense exercise

Aerobic exercise for 10-20 minutes. This can include running, jumping jacks, dancing to loud music in a way that feels intense. The parasympathetic nervous system (PNS) is activated for approximately 20 minutes after cessation of intense exercise.

P – Paced breathing

Decreasing rate of breathing, with each inhalation/exhalation cycle lasting 10-12 seconds and the exhale being longer than the inhale also activates the PNS.

P – Progressive muscle relaxation (PMR)

Sequentially tensing and relaxing muscles from head to toes. Having at least 5-10 minutes to perform this exercise is preferred.2 Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia offerssample PMR recordings.

Body scans can also be helpful. This practice differs from PMR in that it is a mindfulness practice noting body sensations without trying to change them. The University of Vermont offers some sample exercises.3

These skills were described to Emily. She noted that dunking her face in cold water was effective and it was reassuring knowing she had a tool to help her anxiety. She started to push herself to go outside to exercise. We additionally incorporated other distraction techniques such as identifying items from colors of the rainbow that were around her. She appreciated that she could even do this discreetly while at school. At times she had to do a couple of rounds, but this could help stop her repetitive thoughts so she could use other skills.

Helping patients identify skills that can help in the moment can help them feel supported and gain traction in other areas.
 

Dr. Strange is an assistant professor in the department of psychiatry at the University of Vermont Medical Center and University of Vermont Robert Larner College of Medicine, both in Burlington. She works with children and adolescents. She has no relevant financial disclosures

References

1. Rathus JH, Miller AL. DBT® Skills manual for adolescents. 2015. Guilford Press.

2. Guided Relaxation Exercises, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.

3. Vermont Center for Children, Youth, and Families: Staying Close While Keeping Your Distance.
 

Publications
Topics
Sections

The past year presented unprecedented challenges for many. In addition, mental health services have also been stretched to capacity. Anecdotally, some hospitals and emergency departments note that more youth have been presenting in mental health crises, and the severity of symptoms has also been higher. Safety planning is important, including working with patients to identify skills they can use in distress. Even those who do not experience suicidal thoughts may struggle with dysregulation or may use coping strategies that may not be the healthiest in the long term.

Dr. Maya P. Strange, assistant professor in the department of psychiatry at the University of Vermont Medical Center and University of Vermont Robert Larner College of Medicine, both in Burlington.
Dr. Maya P. Strange

Within my practice, I see some families who are still waiting for an available therapist, or some may not wish to participate in therapy despite its being recommended. For these families, supporting them in using strategies that they may be willing and able to use in the moment to help them get through the moment of crisis can been helpful:
 

Case example (identifying details have been changed)

Emily is a 17-year-old girl who has a history of generalized anxiety disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder. She has had multiple medication trials and a course of cognitive behavioral therapy when younger, with significant improvement in symptoms. She returns to clinic because of increased anxiety related to stressors of the pandemic. She wishes to not return to therapy because of feeling that she received maximal benefit and that further sessions would not be fruitful. However, she struggles with identifying what skills she can use, and her anxiety heightens significantly to near-panic and hyperventilating with even cursory exploration of triggers for her symptoms. Medications are also discussed during this appointment, and it is noted that it may take some time to see therapeutic effect. Of note, she reports no acute safety concerns. She has engaged in skin picking. No reported substance use. As she hyperventilates, she was asked to identify items in the room matching the colors of the rainbow in order. She was able to quickly do this, and then was asked to do it again. Afterward, she noted feeling much less anxious because it distracted her from her thoughts.

Distress tolerance skills can be very helpful to navigate getting through a crisis. When under stress, some may be more likely to engage in behaviors that are not helpful in the long term such as using avoidance; procrastinating; consuming tobacco, alcohol, or other substances; spending too much time on screens; or engaging in self-harm behaviors. While some of these activities may be okay in moderation, others are always harmful. At times, when encouraging patients to use skills with which they may be more familiar, e.g., deep breathing, progressive muscle relaxation, the response may be, “these don’t work!” It can be important to distinguish that the function of these skills is not to make someone feel good or to eliminate the stressor, but to “take some of the edge off” so they are less likely to slide into problematic behaviors. It can be beneficial to have multiple tools at one’s disposal because not all skills will always be effective or available.

TIPP skills (temperature, intense exercise, paced breathing, progressive muscle relaxation) are distress tolerance skills from dialectical behavioral therapy (DBT),1 which was initially developed to treat individuals with borderline personality disorder. More recently, the therapy modality has been applied to individuals who may struggle with emotion regulation for a variety of reasons. TIPP skills work quickly (within seconds to minutes) with the aim to decrease physiological arousal. They do not require a lot of thinking, and many are portable or easy to use. Given the speed of effect, these skills can also be used in lieu of p.r.n. medications or patients can be counseled about trying these instead of turning to substance use. The effect is brief (5-20 minutes), although this may lower the affective temperature sufficiently for someone to get through the intense moment or to be able to then utilize other skills that may require more cognitive reserves.
 

 

 

T – Temperature

Holding one’s breath and placing one’s face in cold water (above 50°) for 10-20 seconds to stimulate the diving response and decrease heart rate. Patients can repeat this up to 3 times. Alternatively, cold compresses or gel eye masks can be used.

I – Intense exercise

Aerobic exercise for 10-20 minutes. This can include running, jumping jacks, dancing to loud music in a way that feels intense. The parasympathetic nervous system (PNS) is activated for approximately 20 minutes after cessation of intense exercise.

P – Paced breathing

Decreasing rate of breathing, with each inhalation/exhalation cycle lasting 10-12 seconds and the exhale being longer than the inhale also activates the PNS.

P – Progressive muscle relaxation (PMR)

Sequentially tensing and relaxing muscles from head to toes. Having at least 5-10 minutes to perform this exercise is preferred.2 Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia offerssample PMR recordings.

Body scans can also be helpful. This practice differs from PMR in that it is a mindfulness practice noting body sensations without trying to change them. The University of Vermont offers some sample exercises.3

These skills were described to Emily. She noted that dunking her face in cold water was effective and it was reassuring knowing she had a tool to help her anxiety. She started to push herself to go outside to exercise. We additionally incorporated other distraction techniques such as identifying items from colors of the rainbow that were around her. She appreciated that she could even do this discreetly while at school. At times she had to do a couple of rounds, but this could help stop her repetitive thoughts so she could use other skills.

Helping patients identify skills that can help in the moment can help them feel supported and gain traction in other areas.
 

Dr. Strange is an assistant professor in the department of psychiatry at the University of Vermont Medical Center and University of Vermont Robert Larner College of Medicine, both in Burlington. She works with children and adolescents. She has no relevant financial disclosures

References

1. Rathus JH, Miller AL. DBT® Skills manual for adolescents. 2015. Guilford Press.

2. Guided Relaxation Exercises, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.

3. Vermont Center for Children, Youth, and Families: Staying Close While Keeping Your Distance.
 

The past year presented unprecedented challenges for many. In addition, mental health services have also been stretched to capacity. Anecdotally, some hospitals and emergency departments note that more youth have been presenting in mental health crises, and the severity of symptoms has also been higher. Safety planning is important, including working with patients to identify skills they can use in distress. Even those who do not experience suicidal thoughts may struggle with dysregulation or may use coping strategies that may not be the healthiest in the long term.

Dr. Maya P. Strange, assistant professor in the department of psychiatry at the University of Vermont Medical Center and University of Vermont Robert Larner College of Medicine, both in Burlington.
Dr. Maya P. Strange

Within my practice, I see some families who are still waiting for an available therapist, or some may not wish to participate in therapy despite its being recommended. For these families, supporting them in using strategies that they may be willing and able to use in the moment to help them get through the moment of crisis can been helpful:
 

Case example (identifying details have been changed)

Emily is a 17-year-old girl who has a history of generalized anxiety disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder. She has had multiple medication trials and a course of cognitive behavioral therapy when younger, with significant improvement in symptoms. She returns to clinic because of increased anxiety related to stressors of the pandemic. She wishes to not return to therapy because of feeling that she received maximal benefit and that further sessions would not be fruitful. However, she struggles with identifying what skills she can use, and her anxiety heightens significantly to near-panic and hyperventilating with even cursory exploration of triggers for her symptoms. Medications are also discussed during this appointment, and it is noted that it may take some time to see therapeutic effect. Of note, she reports no acute safety concerns. She has engaged in skin picking. No reported substance use. As she hyperventilates, she was asked to identify items in the room matching the colors of the rainbow in order. She was able to quickly do this, and then was asked to do it again. Afterward, she noted feeling much less anxious because it distracted her from her thoughts.

Distress tolerance skills can be very helpful to navigate getting through a crisis. When under stress, some may be more likely to engage in behaviors that are not helpful in the long term such as using avoidance; procrastinating; consuming tobacco, alcohol, or other substances; spending too much time on screens; or engaging in self-harm behaviors. While some of these activities may be okay in moderation, others are always harmful. At times, when encouraging patients to use skills with which they may be more familiar, e.g., deep breathing, progressive muscle relaxation, the response may be, “these don’t work!” It can be important to distinguish that the function of these skills is not to make someone feel good or to eliminate the stressor, but to “take some of the edge off” so they are less likely to slide into problematic behaviors. It can be beneficial to have multiple tools at one’s disposal because not all skills will always be effective or available.

TIPP skills (temperature, intense exercise, paced breathing, progressive muscle relaxation) are distress tolerance skills from dialectical behavioral therapy (DBT),1 which was initially developed to treat individuals with borderline personality disorder. More recently, the therapy modality has been applied to individuals who may struggle with emotion regulation for a variety of reasons. TIPP skills work quickly (within seconds to minutes) with the aim to decrease physiological arousal. They do not require a lot of thinking, and many are portable or easy to use. Given the speed of effect, these skills can also be used in lieu of p.r.n. medications or patients can be counseled about trying these instead of turning to substance use. The effect is brief (5-20 minutes), although this may lower the affective temperature sufficiently for someone to get through the intense moment or to be able to then utilize other skills that may require more cognitive reserves.
 

 

 

T – Temperature

Holding one’s breath and placing one’s face in cold water (above 50°) for 10-20 seconds to stimulate the diving response and decrease heart rate. Patients can repeat this up to 3 times. Alternatively, cold compresses or gel eye masks can be used.

I – Intense exercise

Aerobic exercise for 10-20 minutes. This can include running, jumping jacks, dancing to loud music in a way that feels intense. The parasympathetic nervous system (PNS) is activated for approximately 20 minutes after cessation of intense exercise.

P – Paced breathing

Decreasing rate of breathing, with each inhalation/exhalation cycle lasting 10-12 seconds and the exhale being longer than the inhale also activates the PNS.

P – Progressive muscle relaxation (PMR)

Sequentially tensing and relaxing muscles from head to toes. Having at least 5-10 minutes to perform this exercise is preferred.2 Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia offerssample PMR recordings.

Body scans can also be helpful. This practice differs from PMR in that it is a mindfulness practice noting body sensations without trying to change them. The University of Vermont offers some sample exercises.3

These skills were described to Emily. She noted that dunking her face in cold water was effective and it was reassuring knowing she had a tool to help her anxiety. She started to push herself to go outside to exercise. We additionally incorporated other distraction techniques such as identifying items from colors of the rainbow that were around her. She appreciated that she could even do this discreetly while at school. At times she had to do a couple of rounds, but this could help stop her repetitive thoughts so she could use other skills.

Helping patients identify skills that can help in the moment can help them feel supported and gain traction in other areas.
 

Dr. Strange is an assistant professor in the department of psychiatry at the University of Vermont Medical Center and University of Vermont Robert Larner College of Medicine, both in Burlington. She works with children and adolescents. She has no relevant financial disclosures

References

1. Rathus JH, Miller AL. DBT® Skills manual for adolescents. 2015. Guilford Press.

2. Guided Relaxation Exercises, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.

3. Vermont Center for Children, Youth, and Families: Staying Close While Keeping Your Distance.
 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

Provide support in uncertain times

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 02/14/2023 - 13:01

A sense of safety and stability, both emotional and physical, is crucial in promoting the healthy development of youth. Between the global pandemic, need for social distancing, economic downturn, and increased awareness of racial disparities, for many this sense of stability has been rattled.

A mother talking to her daughter
Ryan McVay/ThinkStock

School closures have led to a loss of social interaction, challenges to continued academic growth, and, for some students, lack of access to nutrition and increased food insecurity. For students with learning or mental health challenges, closures may have eliminated or significantly reduced desperately needed supports received in school.1 While these trying circumstances have been difficult for many, the transition back to school in the fall also may be challenging because of the uncertainty about what this will look like and possible change in routine. Some students or their families may have anxiety about returning, either because of a history of adverse experiences at school such as bullying, or because of fears about exposure for themselves or others to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).

The past several months also brought about greater awareness of systemic racial disparities, whether as reflected in health care, education, or the criminal justice system. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data, Latinx and African-American individuals in the United States have had a threefold greater chance of contracting SARS-CoV-2 and have a twofold greater risk of death, compared with white people in the same communities.2 Other social determinants of health – economic stability, education, social factors such as incarceration and discrimination, and neighborhood factors including access to healthy food – play a role in this vulnerability.

Dr. Maya P. Strange, assistant professor in the department of psychiatry at the University of Vermont Medical Center and University of Vermont Robert Larner College of Medicine, both in Burlington.
Dr. Maya P. Strange

The pandemic has resulted in a need for social distancing, and as a result, isolation. Children and teens exposed to the news may have anxiety about what they see or hear. Additional pressures in the family can include economic uncertainty, loss of employment for the primary wage earner of the household, or stress related to family members being first responders.

Any one of these factors is a potentially significant stressor, so how do we best support youth to help them survive and hopefully thrive during this time?
 

  • It is important to establish a sense of routine; this can help create a sense of stability and safety. Recognizing that circumstances are not the same as they were 5 or 6 months ago, encouraging structure should not come at the cost of preserving connection.
  • Note positive behavior and choices made by children and make sure they know it was observed.
  • Many children have experienced increased screen time with the lack of structure of the traditional school day or summer camp and extracurricular activities. Limiting screen time and being mindful of its potential impact on mood is prudent.
  • Self-care for parents and guardians is important. This is clearly a marathon and not a sprint; parents’ caring for themselves will place them in a better position to support their children. This time is stressful for the adults of the household, let alone children who are learning self-regulation skills.
  • Listen to children’s or teens’ concerns and share information in developmentally appropriate ways. It is okay to not have all of the answers.
  • Balance fostering a sense of gratitude with not invalidating a child’s or teen’s experience. Showing empathy during this time is vital. While there may be other soccer seasons, it is normal to experience grief about the loss of experiences during this time.
  • Parents and guardians know their children best, so it is prudent for them to be mindful of concerning changes such as an increase in sadness, anxiety, or irritability that negatively impacts daily functioning such as sleeping, eating, or relationships with family and friends.
  • Promote social interactions with appropriate safeguards in place. Unfortunately, the number of SARS-CoV-2 infections is increasing in multiple states, and there is the potential to return to some of the previous restrictions. However, encouraging social interaction while following local guidelines and with cautions such as limiting the number of people present, meeting outside, or considering interacting with others who are similarly social distancing can help foster social connection and development.
  • Maintain connection digitally when in-person contact is not an option.3 Social groups, places of worship, and other activities have been agile in developing virtual communities. Communication by voice and/or video is thought to be more powerful than by written communication (text, email) alone.4 However, it is important to consider those who may have limited to no access to electronic methods.
  • Encourage open communication with children about diversity and bias, and consider how our interactions with others may affect our children’s perspectives.5
  • As providers, it is crucial that we address structural and institutional systems that negatively impact the health, safety, and access to care including our Black, indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender/transsexual, queer/questioning, intersex, and allied/asexual/aromantic/agender (LGBTQIA) patients.

Dr. Strange is an assistant professor in the department of psychiatry at the University of Vermont Medical Center and University of Vermont Robert Larner College of Medicine, both in Burlington. She works with children and adolescents. Dr. Strange has no relevant financial disclosures. Email her at pdnews@mdedge.com.

Online resources for parents and families

Hotlines

  • National Suicide Prevention Hotline: 1-800-273-8255
  • GLBT National Hotline: 888-843-4564
  • The California Peer-Run Warm Line: 1-855-845-7415
  • Trevor Project: 866-488-7386 or text TREVOR to 1-202-304-1200
  • Trans Lifeline: 877-565-8860
  • Crisis Text Line: Text HOME to 741741

References

1. JAMA Pediatr. 2020 Apr 14. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.1456.

2. CDC: COVID-19 in Racial and Ethnic Minority Groups.

3. JAMA. 2020 Mar 23. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.4469.

4. JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Apr 10. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.1562.

5. American Psychological Association: Talking with children about discrimination.

Publications
Topics
Sections

A sense of safety and stability, both emotional and physical, is crucial in promoting the healthy development of youth. Between the global pandemic, need for social distancing, economic downturn, and increased awareness of racial disparities, for many this sense of stability has been rattled.

A mother talking to her daughter
Ryan McVay/ThinkStock

School closures have led to a loss of social interaction, challenges to continued academic growth, and, for some students, lack of access to nutrition and increased food insecurity. For students with learning or mental health challenges, closures may have eliminated or significantly reduced desperately needed supports received in school.1 While these trying circumstances have been difficult for many, the transition back to school in the fall also may be challenging because of the uncertainty about what this will look like and possible change in routine. Some students or their families may have anxiety about returning, either because of a history of adverse experiences at school such as bullying, or because of fears about exposure for themselves or others to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).

The past several months also brought about greater awareness of systemic racial disparities, whether as reflected in health care, education, or the criminal justice system. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data, Latinx and African-American individuals in the United States have had a threefold greater chance of contracting SARS-CoV-2 and have a twofold greater risk of death, compared with white people in the same communities.2 Other social determinants of health – economic stability, education, social factors such as incarceration and discrimination, and neighborhood factors including access to healthy food – play a role in this vulnerability.

Dr. Maya P. Strange, assistant professor in the department of psychiatry at the University of Vermont Medical Center and University of Vermont Robert Larner College of Medicine, both in Burlington.
Dr. Maya P. Strange

The pandemic has resulted in a need for social distancing, and as a result, isolation. Children and teens exposed to the news may have anxiety about what they see or hear. Additional pressures in the family can include economic uncertainty, loss of employment for the primary wage earner of the household, or stress related to family members being first responders.

Any one of these factors is a potentially significant stressor, so how do we best support youth to help them survive and hopefully thrive during this time?
 

  • It is important to establish a sense of routine; this can help create a sense of stability and safety. Recognizing that circumstances are not the same as they were 5 or 6 months ago, encouraging structure should not come at the cost of preserving connection.
  • Note positive behavior and choices made by children and make sure they know it was observed.
  • Many children have experienced increased screen time with the lack of structure of the traditional school day or summer camp and extracurricular activities. Limiting screen time and being mindful of its potential impact on mood is prudent.
  • Self-care for parents and guardians is important. This is clearly a marathon and not a sprint; parents’ caring for themselves will place them in a better position to support their children. This time is stressful for the adults of the household, let alone children who are learning self-regulation skills.
  • Listen to children’s or teens’ concerns and share information in developmentally appropriate ways. It is okay to not have all of the answers.
  • Balance fostering a sense of gratitude with not invalidating a child’s or teen’s experience. Showing empathy during this time is vital. While there may be other soccer seasons, it is normal to experience grief about the loss of experiences during this time.
  • Parents and guardians know their children best, so it is prudent for them to be mindful of concerning changes such as an increase in sadness, anxiety, or irritability that negatively impacts daily functioning such as sleeping, eating, or relationships with family and friends.
  • Promote social interactions with appropriate safeguards in place. Unfortunately, the number of SARS-CoV-2 infections is increasing in multiple states, and there is the potential to return to some of the previous restrictions. However, encouraging social interaction while following local guidelines and with cautions such as limiting the number of people present, meeting outside, or considering interacting with others who are similarly social distancing can help foster social connection and development.
  • Maintain connection digitally when in-person contact is not an option.3 Social groups, places of worship, and other activities have been agile in developing virtual communities. Communication by voice and/or video is thought to be more powerful than by written communication (text, email) alone.4 However, it is important to consider those who may have limited to no access to electronic methods.
  • Encourage open communication with children about diversity and bias, and consider how our interactions with others may affect our children’s perspectives.5
  • As providers, it is crucial that we address structural and institutional systems that negatively impact the health, safety, and access to care including our Black, indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender/transsexual, queer/questioning, intersex, and allied/asexual/aromantic/agender (LGBTQIA) patients.

Dr. Strange is an assistant professor in the department of psychiatry at the University of Vermont Medical Center and University of Vermont Robert Larner College of Medicine, both in Burlington. She works with children and adolescents. Dr. Strange has no relevant financial disclosures. Email her at pdnews@mdedge.com.

Online resources for parents and families

Hotlines

  • National Suicide Prevention Hotline: 1-800-273-8255
  • GLBT National Hotline: 888-843-4564
  • The California Peer-Run Warm Line: 1-855-845-7415
  • Trevor Project: 866-488-7386 or text TREVOR to 1-202-304-1200
  • Trans Lifeline: 877-565-8860
  • Crisis Text Line: Text HOME to 741741

References

1. JAMA Pediatr. 2020 Apr 14. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.1456.

2. CDC: COVID-19 in Racial and Ethnic Minority Groups.

3. JAMA. 2020 Mar 23. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.4469.

4. JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Apr 10. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.1562.

5. American Psychological Association: Talking with children about discrimination.

A sense of safety and stability, both emotional and physical, is crucial in promoting the healthy development of youth. Between the global pandemic, need for social distancing, economic downturn, and increased awareness of racial disparities, for many this sense of stability has been rattled.

A mother talking to her daughter
Ryan McVay/ThinkStock

School closures have led to a loss of social interaction, challenges to continued academic growth, and, for some students, lack of access to nutrition and increased food insecurity. For students with learning or mental health challenges, closures may have eliminated or significantly reduced desperately needed supports received in school.1 While these trying circumstances have been difficult for many, the transition back to school in the fall also may be challenging because of the uncertainty about what this will look like and possible change in routine. Some students or their families may have anxiety about returning, either because of a history of adverse experiences at school such as bullying, or because of fears about exposure for themselves or others to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).

The past several months also brought about greater awareness of systemic racial disparities, whether as reflected in health care, education, or the criminal justice system. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data, Latinx and African-American individuals in the United States have had a threefold greater chance of contracting SARS-CoV-2 and have a twofold greater risk of death, compared with white people in the same communities.2 Other social determinants of health – economic stability, education, social factors such as incarceration and discrimination, and neighborhood factors including access to healthy food – play a role in this vulnerability.

Dr. Maya P. Strange, assistant professor in the department of psychiatry at the University of Vermont Medical Center and University of Vermont Robert Larner College of Medicine, both in Burlington.
Dr. Maya P. Strange

The pandemic has resulted in a need for social distancing, and as a result, isolation. Children and teens exposed to the news may have anxiety about what they see or hear. Additional pressures in the family can include economic uncertainty, loss of employment for the primary wage earner of the household, or stress related to family members being first responders.

Any one of these factors is a potentially significant stressor, so how do we best support youth to help them survive and hopefully thrive during this time?
 

  • It is important to establish a sense of routine; this can help create a sense of stability and safety. Recognizing that circumstances are not the same as they were 5 or 6 months ago, encouraging structure should not come at the cost of preserving connection.
  • Note positive behavior and choices made by children and make sure they know it was observed.
  • Many children have experienced increased screen time with the lack of structure of the traditional school day or summer camp and extracurricular activities. Limiting screen time and being mindful of its potential impact on mood is prudent.
  • Self-care for parents and guardians is important. This is clearly a marathon and not a sprint; parents’ caring for themselves will place them in a better position to support their children. This time is stressful for the adults of the household, let alone children who are learning self-regulation skills.
  • Listen to children’s or teens’ concerns and share information in developmentally appropriate ways. It is okay to not have all of the answers.
  • Balance fostering a sense of gratitude with not invalidating a child’s or teen’s experience. Showing empathy during this time is vital. While there may be other soccer seasons, it is normal to experience grief about the loss of experiences during this time.
  • Parents and guardians know their children best, so it is prudent for them to be mindful of concerning changes such as an increase in sadness, anxiety, or irritability that negatively impacts daily functioning such as sleeping, eating, or relationships with family and friends.
  • Promote social interactions with appropriate safeguards in place. Unfortunately, the number of SARS-CoV-2 infections is increasing in multiple states, and there is the potential to return to some of the previous restrictions. However, encouraging social interaction while following local guidelines and with cautions such as limiting the number of people present, meeting outside, or considering interacting with others who are similarly social distancing can help foster social connection and development.
  • Maintain connection digitally when in-person contact is not an option.3 Social groups, places of worship, and other activities have been agile in developing virtual communities. Communication by voice and/or video is thought to be more powerful than by written communication (text, email) alone.4 However, it is important to consider those who may have limited to no access to electronic methods.
  • Encourage open communication with children about diversity and bias, and consider how our interactions with others may affect our children’s perspectives.5
  • As providers, it is crucial that we address structural and institutional systems that negatively impact the health, safety, and access to care including our Black, indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender/transsexual, queer/questioning, intersex, and allied/asexual/aromantic/agender (LGBTQIA) patients.

Dr. Strange is an assistant professor in the department of psychiatry at the University of Vermont Medical Center and University of Vermont Robert Larner College of Medicine, both in Burlington. She works with children and adolescents. Dr. Strange has no relevant financial disclosures. Email her at pdnews@mdedge.com.

Online resources for parents and families

Hotlines

  • National Suicide Prevention Hotline: 1-800-273-8255
  • GLBT National Hotline: 888-843-4564
  • The California Peer-Run Warm Line: 1-855-845-7415
  • Trevor Project: 866-488-7386 or text TREVOR to 1-202-304-1200
  • Trans Lifeline: 877-565-8860
  • Crisis Text Line: Text HOME to 741741

References

1. JAMA Pediatr. 2020 Apr 14. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.1456.

2. CDC: COVID-19 in Racial and Ethnic Minority Groups.

3. JAMA. 2020 Mar 23. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.4469.

4. JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Apr 10. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.1562.

5. American Psychological Association: Talking with children about discrimination.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article

CBD for sleep and anxiety – A brief review of the evidence

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 09/13/2019 - 11:52

Grace is a 15-year-old girl in the 10th grade whom you have been treating for anxiety. Family history also is notable for her father having an anxiety disorder. She has been taking an SSRI and is engaged in therapy, which has resulted in some improvement in symptoms. She can become overwhelmed when taking tests, and she has breakthrough anxiety in social situations and occasional difficulties with sleep. She denies using any substances. Her parents, who have come to her appointment with her, noted that while they see some progress, they would like to try more natural interventions. They had done some research on cannabidiol (CBD), and Grace’s father said that using it has tremendously helped his sleep. They inquired about Grace using it as well.

A sad teenaged girl sits on her bed
Bhupi/Getty Images

Discussion

CBD use has dramatically increased over the past few years, and in many places can be found in gummies, chocolate, tinctures, and other forms at grocery and convenience stores, in addition to being widely available online. It is a nonpsychoactive compound (versus tetrahydrocannabinol or THC) found in the Cannabis sativa plant. The Farm Bill, which was passed in 2018, legalized production of hemp or the cannabis plant with a THC concentration less than 0.3%. This bill additionally maintained the Food and Drug Administration’s oversight with CBD. States may have laws that are more restrictive about use. CBD was approved in 2018 by the FDA for treatment of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and Dravet syndrome in individuals 2 years of age and older, and is categorized as a schedule I substance due to its being derived from the cannabis plant.

Dr. Maya P. Strange, assistant professor in the department of psychiatry at the University of Vermont Medical Center and University of Vermont Robert Larner College of Medicine, both in Burlington.
Dr. Maya P. Strange

In randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials leading to CBD’s approval, the most common side effects were drowsiness, insomnia, disrupted sleep, sedation, malaise, weakness, decreased appetite, diarrhea, elevated liver enzymes, rash, and infections. CBD also carries a warning about the potential for suicidal ideation, agitation, new or worsening depression, aggression, and panic attacks.1 In in vitro and animal studies, CBD has been found to affect growth of tumor cell lines, to have no effects on embryonic development, and to potentially cause some drug-drug interactions through inhibition of CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP3A4. However, the clinical relevance currently is unknown. Animal studies also indicate potential efficacy in decreasing anxiety.2

CBD has been promoted as being effective in treating a number of ailments including migraines, chronic pain, insomnia, ADHD, and anxiety. Multiple anecdotal reports tout the benefits. In a study exploring abuse potential, there were no significant findings, and CBD was generally well tolerated in open trials exploring potential clinical benefits. A retrospective feasibility study – conducted in Israel – exploring use of CBD to decrease problematic behaviors in youth with autism spectrum disorder demonstrated improvement in communication, anxiety, disruptive behaviors, and parental stress.3

 

 


While preliminary results are promising, administration of CBD to children and youth in particular still raises some concerns.
  • There is potential lack of clarity regarding legality of use in some states. Based on federal law, it is legal to possess CBD derived from hemp, but state laws may differ.
  • There is lack of oversight regarding monitoring what is in each supplement. Lab testing for CBD to determine contents is not mandatory in every state. The amount of active compound as well as other ingredients may not be consistent or accurate. According to the FDA, CBD-containing products cannot claim to have health benefits, treat disease, or be sold as dietary supplements without its approval.
  • Clear information about appropriate dosing for children is limited.
  • Varying delivery systems could affect absorption and bioavailability of CBD.
  • Information is lacking regarding potential drug-drug interactions.
  • There is a lack of information regarding effects of long-term use.

Use of CBD is an area with significant interest and potential for growth. Although risks are thought to be low overall, there likely is insufficient evidence at this time to actively recommend its use. Additional research in human subjects exploring effective and safe dosing, tolerability, as well as use in special populations (including children, pregnant women, elderly) is needed.
 

Dr. Strange is an assistant professor in the department of psychiatry at the University of Vermont Medical Center and University of Vermont Robert Larner College of Medicine, both in Burlington. She works with children and adolescents. She has no relevant financial disclosures. Email her at pdnews@mdedge.com.

References

1. “FDA approves first drug comprised of an active ingredient derived from marijuana to treat rare, severe forms of epilepsy,” FDA news release, June 25, 2018.

2. Cannabidiol (CBD) Critical Review Report. Expert Committee on Drug Dependence Fortieth Meeting. World Health Organization. Geneva June 4-7, 2018.

3. J Autism Dev Disord. 2019 Mar;49(3):1284-8.

Publications
Topics
Sections

Grace is a 15-year-old girl in the 10th grade whom you have been treating for anxiety. Family history also is notable for her father having an anxiety disorder. She has been taking an SSRI and is engaged in therapy, which has resulted in some improvement in symptoms. She can become overwhelmed when taking tests, and she has breakthrough anxiety in social situations and occasional difficulties with sleep. She denies using any substances. Her parents, who have come to her appointment with her, noted that while they see some progress, they would like to try more natural interventions. They had done some research on cannabidiol (CBD), and Grace’s father said that using it has tremendously helped his sleep. They inquired about Grace using it as well.

A sad teenaged girl sits on her bed
Bhupi/Getty Images

Discussion

CBD use has dramatically increased over the past few years, and in many places can be found in gummies, chocolate, tinctures, and other forms at grocery and convenience stores, in addition to being widely available online. It is a nonpsychoactive compound (versus tetrahydrocannabinol or THC) found in the Cannabis sativa plant. The Farm Bill, which was passed in 2018, legalized production of hemp or the cannabis plant with a THC concentration less than 0.3%. This bill additionally maintained the Food and Drug Administration’s oversight with CBD. States may have laws that are more restrictive about use. CBD was approved in 2018 by the FDA for treatment of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and Dravet syndrome in individuals 2 years of age and older, and is categorized as a schedule I substance due to its being derived from the cannabis plant.

Dr. Maya P. Strange, assistant professor in the department of psychiatry at the University of Vermont Medical Center and University of Vermont Robert Larner College of Medicine, both in Burlington.
Dr. Maya P. Strange

In randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials leading to CBD’s approval, the most common side effects were drowsiness, insomnia, disrupted sleep, sedation, malaise, weakness, decreased appetite, diarrhea, elevated liver enzymes, rash, and infections. CBD also carries a warning about the potential for suicidal ideation, agitation, new or worsening depression, aggression, and panic attacks.1 In in vitro and animal studies, CBD has been found to affect growth of tumor cell lines, to have no effects on embryonic development, and to potentially cause some drug-drug interactions through inhibition of CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP3A4. However, the clinical relevance currently is unknown. Animal studies also indicate potential efficacy in decreasing anxiety.2

CBD has been promoted as being effective in treating a number of ailments including migraines, chronic pain, insomnia, ADHD, and anxiety. Multiple anecdotal reports tout the benefits. In a study exploring abuse potential, there were no significant findings, and CBD was generally well tolerated in open trials exploring potential clinical benefits. A retrospective feasibility study – conducted in Israel – exploring use of CBD to decrease problematic behaviors in youth with autism spectrum disorder demonstrated improvement in communication, anxiety, disruptive behaviors, and parental stress.3

 

 


While preliminary results are promising, administration of CBD to children and youth in particular still raises some concerns.
  • There is potential lack of clarity regarding legality of use in some states. Based on federal law, it is legal to possess CBD derived from hemp, but state laws may differ.
  • There is lack of oversight regarding monitoring what is in each supplement. Lab testing for CBD to determine contents is not mandatory in every state. The amount of active compound as well as other ingredients may not be consistent or accurate. According to the FDA, CBD-containing products cannot claim to have health benefits, treat disease, or be sold as dietary supplements without its approval.
  • Clear information about appropriate dosing for children is limited.
  • Varying delivery systems could affect absorption and bioavailability of CBD.
  • Information is lacking regarding potential drug-drug interactions.
  • There is a lack of information regarding effects of long-term use.

Use of CBD is an area with significant interest and potential for growth. Although risks are thought to be low overall, there likely is insufficient evidence at this time to actively recommend its use. Additional research in human subjects exploring effective and safe dosing, tolerability, as well as use in special populations (including children, pregnant women, elderly) is needed.
 

Dr. Strange is an assistant professor in the department of psychiatry at the University of Vermont Medical Center and University of Vermont Robert Larner College of Medicine, both in Burlington. She works with children and adolescents. She has no relevant financial disclosures. Email her at pdnews@mdedge.com.

References

1. “FDA approves first drug comprised of an active ingredient derived from marijuana to treat rare, severe forms of epilepsy,” FDA news release, June 25, 2018.

2. Cannabidiol (CBD) Critical Review Report. Expert Committee on Drug Dependence Fortieth Meeting. World Health Organization. Geneva June 4-7, 2018.

3. J Autism Dev Disord. 2019 Mar;49(3):1284-8.

Grace is a 15-year-old girl in the 10th grade whom you have been treating for anxiety. Family history also is notable for her father having an anxiety disorder. She has been taking an SSRI and is engaged in therapy, which has resulted in some improvement in symptoms. She can become overwhelmed when taking tests, and she has breakthrough anxiety in social situations and occasional difficulties with sleep. She denies using any substances. Her parents, who have come to her appointment with her, noted that while they see some progress, they would like to try more natural interventions. They had done some research on cannabidiol (CBD), and Grace’s father said that using it has tremendously helped his sleep. They inquired about Grace using it as well.

A sad teenaged girl sits on her bed
Bhupi/Getty Images

Discussion

CBD use has dramatically increased over the past few years, and in many places can be found in gummies, chocolate, tinctures, and other forms at grocery and convenience stores, in addition to being widely available online. It is a nonpsychoactive compound (versus tetrahydrocannabinol or THC) found in the Cannabis sativa plant. The Farm Bill, which was passed in 2018, legalized production of hemp or the cannabis plant with a THC concentration less than 0.3%. This bill additionally maintained the Food and Drug Administration’s oversight with CBD. States may have laws that are more restrictive about use. CBD was approved in 2018 by the FDA for treatment of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and Dravet syndrome in individuals 2 years of age and older, and is categorized as a schedule I substance due to its being derived from the cannabis plant.

Dr. Maya P. Strange, assistant professor in the department of psychiatry at the University of Vermont Medical Center and University of Vermont Robert Larner College of Medicine, both in Burlington.
Dr. Maya P. Strange

In randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials leading to CBD’s approval, the most common side effects were drowsiness, insomnia, disrupted sleep, sedation, malaise, weakness, decreased appetite, diarrhea, elevated liver enzymes, rash, and infections. CBD also carries a warning about the potential for suicidal ideation, agitation, new or worsening depression, aggression, and panic attacks.1 In in vitro and animal studies, CBD has been found to affect growth of tumor cell lines, to have no effects on embryonic development, and to potentially cause some drug-drug interactions through inhibition of CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP3A4. However, the clinical relevance currently is unknown. Animal studies also indicate potential efficacy in decreasing anxiety.2

CBD has been promoted as being effective in treating a number of ailments including migraines, chronic pain, insomnia, ADHD, and anxiety. Multiple anecdotal reports tout the benefits. In a study exploring abuse potential, there were no significant findings, and CBD was generally well tolerated in open trials exploring potential clinical benefits. A retrospective feasibility study – conducted in Israel – exploring use of CBD to decrease problematic behaviors in youth with autism spectrum disorder demonstrated improvement in communication, anxiety, disruptive behaviors, and parental stress.3

 

 


While preliminary results are promising, administration of CBD to children and youth in particular still raises some concerns.
  • There is potential lack of clarity regarding legality of use in some states. Based on federal law, it is legal to possess CBD derived from hemp, but state laws may differ.
  • There is lack of oversight regarding monitoring what is in each supplement. Lab testing for CBD to determine contents is not mandatory in every state. The amount of active compound as well as other ingredients may not be consistent or accurate. According to the FDA, CBD-containing products cannot claim to have health benefits, treat disease, or be sold as dietary supplements without its approval.
  • Clear information about appropriate dosing for children is limited.
  • Varying delivery systems could affect absorption and bioavailability of CBD.
  • Information is lacking regarding potential drug-drug interactions.
  • There is a lack of information regarding effects of long-term use.

Use of CBD is an area with significant interest and potential for growth. Although risks are thought to be low overall, there likely is insufficient evidence at this time to actively recommend its use. Additional research in human subjects exploring effective and safe dosing, tolerability, as well as use in special populations (including children, pregnant women, elderly) is needed.
 

Dr. Strange is an assistant professor in the department of psychiatry at the University of Vermont Medical Center and University of Vermont Robert Larner College of Medicine, both in Burlington. She works with children and adolescents. She has no relevant financial disclosures. Email her at pdnews@mdedge.com.

References

1. “FDA approves first drug comprised of an active ingredient derived from marijuana to treat rare, severe forms of epilepsy,” FDA news release, June 25, 2018.

2. Cannabidiol (CBD) Critical Review Report. Expert Committee on Drug Dependence Fortieth Meeting. World Health Organization. Geneva June 4-7, 2018.

3. J Autism Dev Disord. 2019 Mar;49(3):1284-8.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.

Self-harm

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 17:35

 

Nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) has become more prevalent in youth over recent years and has many inherent risks. In the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), NSSI is a diagnosis suggested for further study, and criteria include engaging in self-injury for 5 or more days without suicidal intent as well as self-injury associated with at least 1 of the following: obtaining relief from negative thoughts or feelings, resolving interpersonal challenges, inducing positive feelings. It is associated with interpersonal difficulties or negative thoughts/feelings. The behavior causes significant impairment in functioning and is not better explained by another condition.1

Estimates of lifetime prevalence in community-based samples of youth range from 15% to 20%. Individuals often start during early adolescence. It can pose many risks including infection, permanent scarring or disfigurement, decreased self-esteem, interpersonal conflict, severe injury, or death. Reasons for engaging in self-harm can vary and include attempts to regulate negative affect, to manage feelings of emptiness/numbness, regain a sense of control over body, feelings, etc., or to provide a consequence for perceived faults. Youth often may start to engage in self-harm covertly, and it may first become apparent in emergency or primary care settings. However, upon discovery, the response given also may affect future behavior.

A girl scratches her right arm, which has cut marks
© iStock / ThinkStockPhotos.com
Risk factors include a history of trauma; mental health disorders such as depression, anxiety, or emerging personality disorder traits; substance use; and a peer milieu that sanctions self-harm. In one study of 1,560 Internet-using youth aged 10-17 years in the United States, 1% reported visiting a website or social media that encouraged self-harm or suicide. These individuals were found to be 7 times more likely to have suicidal ideation and 11 times more likely to harm themselves.2 Regarding interpersonal difficulties, those who engaged in self-harm were more likely to have decreased contact with family or friends, to perceive having less support from friends, and to be less likely to seek out support. In contrast, these individuals tended to have increased contact with a significant other.3

Efforts also have been underway to distinguish between youth who engage in self-harm with and without suicidal ideation. Girls are more likely than are boys to report NSSI, although male NSSI may present differently. In addition to cutting or more stereotypical self-injury, they may punch walls or engage in fights or other risky behaviors as a proxy for self-harm. Risk factors for boys with regard to suicide attempts include hopelessness and history of sexual abuse. Maladaptive eating patterns and hopelessness were the two most significant factors for girls.4

With regard to issues of confidentiality, it will be important to carefully gauge level of safety and to clearly communicate with the patient (and family) limits of confidentiality. This may result in working within shades of gray to help maintain the therapeutic relationship and the patient’s comfort in being able to disclose potentially sensitive information.

Dr. Maya P. Strange, assistant professor in the department of psychiatry at the University of Vermont Medical Center and University of Vermont Robert Larner College of Medicine, both in Burlington.
Dr. Maya P. Strange
In assessing youth for self-harm, maintaining a nonjudgmental stance in eliciting information is important. Screening for precipitants, intent of self-harm, experience of self-harm (Does the patient dissociate? Does the patient feel pain?), extent of self-injury, methods used, access to other potentially unsafe items, and suicidality is important. In addition, assessing the patient’s perspective about self-harm can be helpful, and distinguishing between patients who tried it and felt it was not helpful versus those who feel it is their most effective tool for coping. Establishing a strong therapeutic alliance is critical.

Families can struggle with how to manage this, and it can generate fear as well as other strong emotions.

 

 

Tips for parents and guardians

  • Validate the underlying emotions while not validating the behavior. Self-injury is a coping strategy. Focus on the driving forces for the actions rather than the actions themselves.
  • Approach your child from a nonjudgmental stance.
  • Recognize that change may not happen overnight, and that there may be periods of regression.
  • Acknowledge successes when they occur.
  • Make yourself available for open communication. Open-ended questions may facilitate more dialogue.
  • Take care of yourself as well. Ensure you use your supports and are engaging in healthy self-care.
  • Take the behavior seriously. While this behavior is relatively common, do not assume it is “just a phase.”
  • While remaining supportive, it is important to maintain a parental role and to keep expectations rather than “walking on eggshells.”
  • Involve the child in identifying what can be of support.
  • Become aware of local crisis resources in your community. National resources include Call 1-800-273-TALK for the national suicide hotline or Text 741741 to connect with a crisis counselor.

Things to avoid

  • Avoid taking a punitive stance. While the behavior can be provocative, most likely the primary purpose is not for attention.
  • Avoid engaging in power struggles.
  • Avoid creating increased isolation for the child. This can be a delicate balance with regard to peer groups, but encouraging healthy social interactions and activities is a way to help build resilience.
  • Avoid taking the behavior personally.5
 

 


In working with youth who engage in self-harm, it is important to work within a team, which may include family, primary care, mental health support, school, and potentially other community supports. Treatment evidence is relatively limited, but there is some evidence to support use of cognitive behavioral therapy, dialectical behavior therapy, and mentalization-based therapy. Regardless, work will likely be long term and at times intensive in addressing the problems leading to self-harm behavior.6
 

Dr. Strange is an assistant professor in the department of psychiatry at the University of Vermont Medical Center and University of Vermont Robert Larner College of Medicine, both in Burlington. She works with children and adolescents. She has no relevant financial disclosures.

References

1. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (Arlington, Va.: American Psychiatric Association Publishing, 2013)

2. J Adolesc. 2014 Dec;37(8):1335-44.

3. Behav Ther. 2017 May; 48(3):366-79.

4. Acad Pediatr. 2012 May-Jun;12(3):205-13.

5. “Information for parents: What you need to know about self-injury.” The Fact Sheet Series, Cornell Research Program on Self-Injury and Recovery. 2009.

6. Clin Pediatr. 2016 Sep 13;55(11):1012-9.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) has become more prevalent in youth over recent years and has many inherent risks. In the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), NSSI is a diagnosis suggested for further study, and criteria include engaging in self-injury for 5 or more days without suicidal intent as well as self-injury associated with at least 1 of the following: obtaining relief from negative thoughts or feelings, resolving interpersonal challenges, inducing positive feelings. It is associated with interpersonal difficulties or negative thoughts/feelings. The behavior causes significant impairment in functioning and is not better explained by another condition.1

Estimates of lifetime prevalence in community-based samples of youth range from 15% to 20%. Individuals often start during early adolescence. It can pose many risks including infection, permanent scarring or disfigurement, decreased self-esteem, interpersonal conflict, severe injury, or death. Reasons for engaging in self-harm can vary and include attempts to regulate negative affect, to manage feelings of emptiness/numbness, regain a sense of control over body, feelings, etc., or to provide a consequence for perceived faults. Youth often may start to engage in self-harm covertly, and it may first become apparent in emergency or primary care settings. However, upon discovery, the response given also may affect future behavior.

A girl scratches her right arm, which has cut marks
© iStock / ThinkStockPhotos.com
Risk factors include a history of trauma; mental health disorders such as depression, anxiety, or emerging personality disorder traits; substance use; and a peer milieu that sanctions self-harm. In one study of 1,560 Internet-using youth aged 10-17 years in the United States, 1% reported visiting a website or social media that encouraged self-harm or suicide. These individuals were found to be 7 times more likely to have suicidal ideation and 11 times more likely to harm themselves.2 Regarding interpersonal difficulties, those who engaged in self-harm were more likely to have decreased contact with family or friends, to perceive having less support from friends, and to be less likely to seek out support. In contrast, these individuals tended to have increased contact with a significant other.3

Efforts also have been underway to distinguish between youth who engage in self-harm with and without suicidal ideation. Girls are more likely than are boys to report NSSI, although male NSSI may present differently. In addition to cutting or more stereotypical self-injury, they may punch walls or engage in fights or other risky behaviors as a proxy for self-harm. Risk factors for boys with regard to suicide attempts include hopelessness and history of sexual abuse. Maladaptive eating patterns and hopelessness were the two most significant factors for girls.4

With regard to issues of confidentiality, it will be important to carefully gauge level of safety and to clearly communicate with the patient (and family) limits of confidentiality. This may result in working within shades of gray to help maintain the therapeutic relationship and the patient’s comfort in being able to disclose potentially sensitive information.

Dr. Maya P. Strange, assistant professor in the department of psychiatry at the University of Vermont Medical Center and University of Vermont Robert Larner College of Medicine, both in Burlington.
Dr. Maya P. Strange
In assessing youth for self-harm, maintaining a nonjudgmental stance in eliciting information is important. Screening for precipitants, intent of self-harm, experience of self-harm (Does the patient dissociate? Does the patient feel pain?), extent of self-injury, methods used, access to other potentially unsafe items, and suicidality is important. In addition, assessing the patient’s perspective about self-harm can be helpful, and distinguishing between patients who tried it and felt it was not helpful versus those who feel it is their most effective tool for coping. Establishing a strong therapeutic alliance is critical.

Families can struggle with how to manage this, and it can generate fear as well as other strong emotions.

 

 

Tips for parents and guardians

  • Validate the underlying emotions while not validating the behavior. Self-injury is a coping strategy. Focus on the driving forces for the actions rather than the actions themselves.
  • Approach your child from a nonjudgmental stance.
  • Recognize that change may not happen overnight, and that there may be periods of regression.
  • Acknowledge successes when they occur.
  • Make yourself available for open communication. Open-ended questions may facilitate more dialogue.
  • Take care of yourself as well. Ensure you use your supports and are engaging in healthy self-care.
  • Take the behavior seriously. While this behavior is relatively common, do not assume it is “just a phase.”
  • While remaining supportive, it is important to maintain a parental role and to keep expectations rather than “walking on eggshells.”
  • Involve the child in identifying what can be of support.
  • Become aware of local crisis resources in your community. National resources include Call 1-800-273-TALK for the national suicide hotline or Text 741741 to connect with a crisis counselor.

Things to avoid

  • Avoid taking a punitive stance. While the behavior can be provocative, most likely the primary purpose is not for attention.
  • Avoid engaging in power struggles.
  • Avoid creating increased isolation for the child. This can be a delicate balance with regard to peer groups, but encouraging healthy social interactions and activities is a way to help build resilience.
  • Avoid taking the behavior personally.5
 

 


In working with youth who engage in self-harm, it is important to work within a team, which may include family, primary care, mental health support, school, and potentially other community supports. Treatment evidence is relatively limited, but there is some evidence to support use of cognitive behavioral therapy, dialectical behavior therapy, and mentalization-based therapy. Regardless, work will likely be long term and at times intensive in addressing the problems leading to self-harm behavior.6
 

Dr. Strange is an assistant professor in the department of psychiatry at the University of Vermont Medical Center and University of Vermont Robert Larner College of Medicine, both in Burlington. She works with children and adolescents. She has no relevant financial disclosures.

References

1. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (Arlington, Va.: American Psychiatric Association Publishing, 2013)

2. J Adolesc. 2014 Dec;37(8):1335-44.

3. Behav Ther. 2017 May; 48(3):366-79.

4. Acad Pediatr. 2012 May-Jun;12(3):205-13.

5. “Information for parents: What you need to know about self-injury.” The Fact Sheet Series, Cornell Research Program on Self-Injury and Recovery. 2009.

6. Clin Pediatr. 2016 Sep 13;55(11):1012-9.

 

Nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) has become more prevalent in youth over recent years and has many inherent risks. In the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), NSSI is a diagnosis suggested for further study, and criteria include engaging in self-injury for 5 or more days without suicidal intent as well as self-injury associated with at least 1 of the following: obtaining relief from negative thoughts or feelings, resolving interpersonal challenges, inducing positive feelings. It is associated with interpersonal difficulties or negative thoughts/feelings. The behavior causes significant impairment in functioning and is not better explained by another condition.1

Estimates of lifetime prevalence in community-based samples of youth range from 15% to 20%. Individuals often start during early adolescence. It can pose many risks including infection, permanent scarring or disfigurement, decreased self-esteem, interpersonal conflict, severe injury, or death. Reasons for engaging in self-harm can vary and include attempts to regulate negative affect, to manage feelings of emptiness/numbness, regain a sense of control over body, feelings, etc., or to provide a consequence for perceived faults. Youth often may start to engage in self-harm covertly, and it may first become apparent in emergency or primary care settings. However, upon discovery, the response given also may affect future behavior.

A girl scratches her right arm, which has cut marks
© iStock / ThinkStockPhotos.com
Risk factors include a history of trauma; mental health disorders such as depression, anxiety, or emerging personality disorder traits; substance use; and a peer milieu that sanctions self-harm. In one study of 1,560 Internet-using youth aged 10-17 years in the United States, 1% reported visiting a website or social media that encouraged self-harm or suicide. These individuals were found to be 7 times more likely to have suicidal ideation and 11 times more likely to harm themselves.2 Regarding interpersonal difficulties, those who engaged in self-harm were more likely to have decreased contact with family or friends, to perceive having less support from friends, and to be less likely to seek out support. In contrast, these individuals tended to have increased contact with a significant other.3

Efforts also have been underway to distinguish between youth who engage in self-harm with and without suicidal ideation. Girls are more likely than are boys to report NSSI, although male NSSI may present differently. In addition to cutting or more stereotypical self-injury, they may punch walls or engage in fights or other risky behaviors as a proxy for self-harm. Risk factors for boys with regard to suicide attempts include hopelessness and history of sexual abuse. Maladaptive eating patterns and hopelessness were the two most significant factors for girls.4

With regard to issues of confidentiality, it will be important to carefully gauge level of safety and to clearly communicate with the patient (and family) limits of confidentiality. This may result in working within shades of gray to help maintain the therapeutic relationship and the patient’s comfort in being able to disclose potentially sensitive information.

Dr. Maya P. Strange, assistant professor in the department of psychiatry at the University of Vermont Medical Center and University of Vermont Robert Larner College of Medicine, both in Burlington.
Dr. Maya P. Strange
In assessing youth for self-harm, maintaining a nonjudgmental stance in eliciting information is important. Screening for precipitants, intent of self-harm, experience of self-harm (Does the patient dissociate? Does the patient feel pain?), extent of self-injury, methods used, access to other potentially unsafe items, and suicidality is important. In addition, assessing the patient’s perspective about self-harm can be helpful, and distinguishing between patients who tried it and felt it was not helpful versus those who feel it is their most effective tool for coping. Establishing a strong therapeutic alliance is critical.

Families can struggle with how to manage this, and it can generate fear as well as other strong emotions.

 

 

Tips for parents and guardians

  • Validate the underlying emotions while not validating the behavior. Self-injury is a coping strategy. Focus on the driving forces for the actions rather than the actions themselves.
  • Approach your child from a nonjudgmental stance.
  • Recognize that change may not happen overnight, and that there may be periods of regression.
  • Acknowledge successes when they occur.
  • Make yourself available for open communication. Open-ended questions may facilitate more dialogue.
  • Take care of yourself as well. Ensure you use your supports and are engaging in healthy self-care.
  • Take the behavior seriously. While this behavior is relatively common, do not assume it is “just a phase.”
  • While remaining supportive, it is important to maintain a parental role and to keep expectations rather than “walking on eggshells.”
  • Involve the child in identifying what can be of support.
  • Become aware of local crisis resources in your community. National resources include Call 1-800-273-TALK for the national suicide hotline or Text 741741 to connect with a crisis counselor.

Things to avoid

  • Avoid taking a punitive stance. While the behavior can be provocative, most likely the primary purpose is not for attention.
  • Avoid engaging in power struggles.
  • Avoid creating increased isolation for the child. This can be a delicate balance with regard to peer groups, but encouraging healthy social interactions and activities is a way to help build resilience.
  • Avoid taking the behavior personally.5
 

 


In working with youth who engage in self-harm, it is important to work within a team, which may include family, primary care, mental health support, school, and potentially other community supports. Treatment evidence is relatively limited, but there is some evidence to support use of cognitive behavioral therapy, dialectical behavior therapy, and mentalization-based therapy. Regardless, work will likely be long term and at times intensive in addressing the problems leading to self-harm behavior.6
 

Dr. Strange is an assistant professor in the department of psychiatry at the University of Vermont Medical Center and University of Vermont Robert Larner College of Medicine, both in Burlington. She works with children and adolescents. She has no relevant financial disclosures.

References

1. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (Arlington, Va.: American Psychiatric Association Publishing, 2013)

2. J Adolesc. 2014 Dec;37(8):1335-44.

3. Behav Ther. 2017 May; 48(3):366-79.

4. Acad Pediatr. 2012 May-Jun;12(3):205-13.

5. “Information for parents: What you need to know about self-injury.” The Fact Sheet Series, Cornell Research Program on Self-Injury and Recovery. 2009.

6. Clin Pediatr. 2016 Sep 13;55(11):1012-9.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Potential pitfalls of social media

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 16:58

 

Cassandra presents to the office anxious because of social media posts her peers have made regarding current events that she feels are inflammatory.

Jenna expresses suicidal thoughts in response to comments made by peers from several schools in the area about the nature of her friendship with a boy.

Social media was developed to increase connections between people, even despite geographic distances. It has helped create communities of people with similar interests or beliefs, as well as to help reconnect us with people. It can provide educational opportunities and enhance technical skills. These are all potential benefits, but risks exist as well.

A teenager in bed looks at her mobile phone.
maewjpho/Thinkstock
Whereas television formerly was the primary concern with regard to media exposure, social media poses additional risks. Media exposure as a whole can become quite encompassing, with one study indicating that the average 8- to 10-year-old spends almost 8 hours per day on media, while preteens and teenagers spend more than 11 hours per day.1 This can have a negative impact on sleep, as well as engagement in other activities. A Pew Center study from 2015 indicated that 92% of teens state that they go online daily, 24% report being online “almost constantly,” 56% use social media several times per day, and 12% use it daily.2 This column will explore some of the risks of social media exposure.

Cyberbullying and harassment

Cyberbullying is defined as “willful and repeated harm inflicted through the use of computers, cell phones, or other electronic devices,” and can include sending denigrating messages or images.3 Studies have shown varying rates of victimization from cyberbullying, ranging from 6% to 72%, and perpetration ranging from 3% to 44%.4 Bullying in general has been associated with increased school drop-out rates, suicidal ideation, bringing weapons to school, and aggression. The sizable audience that social media can reach can amplify bullying’s impact.

Privacy concerns

Determining the appropriate amount of information to share and knowing that it is truly being shared with the person identified on the other end also can be a challenge. In addition, the digital footprint left by navigating different social media sites may have unforeseen effects on youth regarding inappropriate posts. They also may be particularly vulnerable to other predatory individuals. Other privacy concerns involve what information parents, guardians, or other family members may share online.

Addiction

While social media has the possible benefit of creating a broader social network, particularly for someone who may be anxious in more traditional settings, it also can reinforce isolation from “real-world” experiences and the sense that no one else “gets” him or her. Without knowing who is on the other end of the keyboard, tablet, or smartphone, it can be difficult to ascertain if others in the community are reinforcing maladaptive behaviors and further withdrawal.

Self esteem

Images promulgated online often are highly idealized and edited, and are meant to exhibit a specific point of view. Exposure to these images can have a negative impact on self-esteem.

Another study of preteen girls (10- to 12-year-olds) indicated that increased time spent on social media sites such as MySpace and Facebook led to greater internalization of a thin ideal, increased body image concerns, and decreased self-esteem.5 Further data suggest that youth who are in need of more mental health support may engage in increased amounts of social media use. In a Canadian study, daily use of more than 2 hours per day was associated with increased reports of emotional distress as well as suicidal ideation.6

So, given all of this information, how to address this in an appointment?

Dr. Maya P. Strange, assistant professor in the department of psychiatry at the University of Vermont Medical Center and University of Vermont Robert Larner College of Medicine, both in Burlington.
Dr. Maya P. Strange
First, it is important to screen about social media use, both the time spent and types of sites visited. Encourage parents to actively monitor usage and set limits on time used (such as maximum time allowed during the day, or shutting off/removing electronics from rooms after a certain time). It is important to encourage youth and their families to maintain an open dialogue about what one may encounter online, as well as openly discussing values and clear expectations about what types of sites are and are not considered acceptable. Families should model healthy social media usage, being mindful of what they share about the youth online and what they may choose to post as well. Limiting total screen time to less than 1-2 hours per day and encouraging families to not allow electronics in children’s rooms also is recommended.
 

 

 

Dr. Strange is an assistant professor in the department of psychiatry at the University of Vermont Medical Center and University of Vermont Robert Larner College of Medicine, both in Burlington. She works with children and adolescents. She has no relevant financial disclosures.

Resources:

1. The Kaiser Family Foundation: Generation M2: Media in the Lives of 8- to 18-Year-Olds

2. The Pew Research Center: Internet & Technology, “Teens, Social Media and Technology Overview 2015.”

3. The Cyberbullying Research Center. Cyberbullying Fact Sheet 2009.

4. Cyberbullying: An Update and Synthesis of the Research, in “Cyberbullying Prevention and Response: Expert Perspectives,” (New York: Routledge, 2012, pp. 13-35).

5. J. Early Adolesc. 2014. Vol 34(5) 606-20.

6. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2015 Jul;18(7):380-5.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Cassandra presents to the office anxious because of social media posts her peers have made regarding current events that she feels are inflammatory.

Jenna expresses suicidal thoughts in response to comments made by peers from several schools in the area about the nature of her friendship with a boy.

Social media was developed to increase connections between people, even despite geographic distances. It has helped create communities of people with similar interests or beliefs, as well as to help reconnect us with people. It can provide educational opportunities and enhance technical skills. These are all potential benefits, but risks exist as well.

A teenager in bed looks at her mobile phone.
maewjpho/Thinkstock
Whereas television formerly was the primary concern with regard to media exposure, social media poses additional risks. Media exposure as a whole can become quite encompassing, with one study indicating that the average 8- to 10-year-old spends almost 8 hours per day on media, while preteens and teenagers spend more than 11 hours per day.1 This can have a negative impact on sleep, as well as engagement in other activities. A Pew Center study from 2015 indicated that 92% of teens state that they go online daily, 24% report being online “almost constantly,” 56% use social media several times per day, and 12% use it daily.2 This column will explore some of the risks of social media exposure.

Cyberbullying and harassment

Cyberbullying is defined as “willful and repeated harm inflicted through the use of computers, cell phones, or other electronic devices,” and can include sending denigrating messages or images.3 Studies have shown varying rates of victimization from cyberbullying, ranging from 6% to 72%, and perpetration ranging from 3% to 44%.4 Bullying in general has been associated with increased school drop-out rates, suicidal ideation, bringing weapons to school, and aggression. The sizable audience that social media can reach can amplify bullying’s impact.

Privacy concerns

Determining the appropriate amount of information to share and knowing that it is truly being shared with the person identified on the other end also can be a challenge. In addition, the digital footprint left by navigating different social media sites may have unforeseen effects on youth regarding inappropriate posts. They also may be particularly vulnerable to other predatory individuals. Other privacy concerns involve what information parents, guardians, or other family members may share online.

Addiction

While social media has the possible benefit of creating a broader social network, particularly for someone who may be anxious in more traditional settings, it also can reinforce isolation from “real-world” experiences and the sense that no one else “gets” him or her. Without knowing who is on the other end of the keyboard, tablet, or smartphone, it can be difficult to ascertain if others in the community are reinforcing maladaptive behaviors and further withdrawal.

Self esteem

Images promulgated online often are highly idealized and edited, and are meant to exhibit a specific point of view. Exposure to these images can have a negative impact on self-esteem.

Another study of preteen girls (10- to 12-year-olds) indicated that increased time spent on social media sites such as MySpace and Facebook led to greater internalization of a thin ideal, increased body image concerns, and decreased self-esteem.5 Further data suggest that youth who are in need of more mental health support may engage in increased amounts of social media use. In a Canadian study, daily use of more than 2 hours per day was associated with increased reports of emotional distress as well as suicidal ideation.6

So, given all of this information, how to address this in an appointment?

Dr. Maya P. Strange, assistant professor in the department of psychiatry at the University of Vermont Medical Center and University of Vermont Robert Larner College of Medicine, both in Burlington.
Dr. Maya P. Strange
First, it is important to screen about social media use, both the time spent and types of sites visited. Encourage parents to actively monitor usage and set limits on time used (such as maximum time allowed during the day, or shutting off/removing electronics from rooms after a certain time). It is important to encourage youth and their families to maintain an open dialogue about what one may encounter online, as well as openly discussing values and clear expectations about what types of sites are and are not considered acceptable. Families should model healthy social media usage, being mindful of what they share about the youth online and what they may choose to post as well. Limiting total screen time to less than 1-2 hours per day and encouraging families to not allow electronics in children’s rooms also is recommended.
 

 

 

Dr. Strange is an assistant professor in the department of psychiatry at the University of Vermont Medical Center and University of Vermont Robert Larner College of Medicine, both in Burlington. She works with children and adolescents. She has no relevant financial disclosures.

Resources:

1. The Kaiser Family Foundation: Generation M2: Media in the Lives of 8- to 18-Year-Olds

2. The Pew Research Center: Internet & Technology, “Teens, Social Media and Technology Overview 2015.”

3. The Cyberbullying Research Center. Cyberbullying Fact Sheet 2009.

4. Cyberbullying: An Update and Synthesis of the Research, in “Cyberbullying Prevention and Response: Expert Perspectives,” (New York: Routledge, 2012, pp. 13-35).

5. J. Early Adolesc. 2014. Vol 34(5) 606-20.

6. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2015 Jul;18(7):380-5.

 

Cassandra presents to the office anxious because of social media posts her peers have made regarding current events that she feels are inflammatory.

Jenna expresses suicidal thoughts in response to comments made by peers from several schools in the area about the nature of her friendship with a boy.

Social media was developed to increase connections between people, even despite geographic distances. It has helped create communities of people with similar interests or beliefs, as well as to help reconnect us with people. It can provide educational opportunities and enhance technical skills. These are all potential benefits, but risks exist as well.

A teenager in bed looks at her mobile phone.
maewjpho/Thinkstock
Whereas television formerly was the primary concern with regard to media exposure, social media poses additional risks. Media exposure as a whole can become quite encompassing, with one study indicating that the average 8- to 10-year-old spends almost 8 hours per day on media, while preteens and teenagers spend more than 11 hours per day.1 This can have a negative impact on sleep, as well as engagement in other activities. A Pew Center study from 2015 indicated that 92% of teens state that they go online daily, 24% report being online “almost constantly,” 56% use social media several times per day, and 12% use it daily.2 This column will explore some of the risks of social media exposure.

Cyberbullying and harassment

Cyberbullying is defined as “willful and repeated harm inflicted through the use of computers, cell phones, or other electronic devices,” and can include sending denigrating messages or images.3 Studies have shown varying rates of victimization from cyberbullying, ranging from 6% to 72%, and perpetration ranging from 3% to 44%.4 Bullying in general has been associated with increased school drop-out rates, suicidal ideation, bringing weapons to school, and aggression. The sizable audience that social media can reach can amplify bullying’s impact.

Privacy concerns

Determining the appropriate amount of information to share and knowing that it is truly being shared with the person identified on the other end also can be a challenge. In addition, the digital footprint left by navigating different social media sites may have unforeseen effects on youth regarding inappropriate posts. They also may be particularly vulnerable to other predatory individuals. Other privacy concerns involve what information parents, guardians, or other family members may share online.

Addiction

While social media has the possible benefit of creating a broader social network, particularly for someone who may be anxious in more traditional settings, it also can reinforce isolation from “real-world” experiences and the sense that no one else “gets” him or her. Without knowing who is on the other end of the keyboard, tablet, or smartphone, it can be difficult to ascertain if others in the community are reinforcing maladaptive behaviors and further withdrawal.

Self esteem

Images promulgated online often are highly idealized and edited, and are meant to exhibit a specific point of view. Exposure to these images can have a negative impact on self-esteem.

Another study of preteen girls (10- to 12-year-olds) indicated that increased time spent on social media sites such as MySpace and Facebook led to greater internalization of a thin ideal, increased body image concerns, and decreased self-esteem.5 Further data suggest that youth who are in need of more mental health support may engage in increased amounts of social media use. In a Canadian study, daily use of more than 2 hours per day was associated with increased reports of emotional distress as well as suicidal ideation.6

So, given all of this information, how to address this in an appointment?

Dr. Maya P. Strange, assistant professor in the department of psychiatry at the University of Vermont Medical Center and University of Vermont Robert Larner College of Medicine, both in Burlington.
Dr. Maya P. Strange
First, it is important to screen about social media use, both the time spent and types of sites visited. Encourage parents to actively monitor usage and set limits on time used (such as maximum time allowed during the day, or shutting off/removing electronics from rooms after a certain time). It is important to encourage youth and their families to maintain an open dialogue about what one may encounter online, as well as openly discussing values and clear expectations about what types of sites are and are not considered acceptable. Families should model healthy social media usage, being mindful of what they share about the youth online and what they may choose to post as well. Limiting total screen time to less than 1-2 hours per day and encouraging families to not allow electronics in children’s rooms also is recommended.
 

 

 

Dr. Strange is an assistant professor in the department of psychiatry at the University of Vermont Medical Center and University of Vermont Robert Larner College of Medicine, both in Burlington. She works with children and adolescents. She has no relevant financial disclosures.

Resources:

1. The Kaiser Family Foundation: Generation M2: Media in the Lives of 8- to 18-Year-Olds

2. The Pew Research Center: Internet & Technology, “Teens, Social Media and Technology Overview 2015.”

3. The Cyberbullying Research Center. Cyberbullying Fact Sheet 2009.

4. Cyberbullying: An Update and Synthesis of the Research, in “Cyberbullying Prevention and Response: Expert Perspectives,” (New York: Routledge, 2012, pp. 13-35).

5. J. Early Adolesc. 2014. Vol 34(5) 606-20.

6. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2015 Jul;18(7):380-5.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default