Andrew D. Bowser

SAN ANTONIO – While septic shock mortality has decreased since the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines were introduced, discharge trends for survivors have not changed significantly over time, a recent analysis suggests.

invisioner/Thinkstock

The percentage of survivors discharged to subacute rehab or long-term facilities did not change appreciably over time, according to the 10-year retrospective analysis, presented at the annual meeting of the American College of Chest Physicians.

However, average length of stay did significantly trend downward over the decade analyzed, while total charge per septic shock admission significantly increased, according to investigator Di Pan, DO, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, and his colleagues.

This is one of few studies looking at outcomes in survivors of septic shock, as most analyses have primarily focused on mortality outcomes, the investigators said.

Their analysis was based on the 2004 to 2014 National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample databases and included patients with a primary diagnosis of septic shock at discharge.

Out of nearly 1.8 million patients with septic shock in that cohort, about 1 million survived, according to data Dr. Pan and colleagues provided in an abstract of the presentation.

In-hospital mortality decreased from 51.7% in 2004 to 39.3% in 2014 (P less than .001), the investigators reported.

The proportion of survivors discharged to subacute rehab or long-term acute care facilities was 61.9% in 2004, and similarly, 62.4% in 2014 (P = .1), while the percentage discharged home was 17.1% in 2004 and 15.1% in 2014 (P = 0.55).

However, there was a small but statistically significant downtick in mean length of stay, from 12.6 days in 2004 to 11.05 days in 2014, the investigators said. Meanwhile, total hospitalization charges surged from $105,776 in 2004 to $134,394 over the same time period.

The first edition of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock was published in March 2004 in Critical Care Medicine.

Future studies and clinical trials should look beyond mortality outcomes to additionally evaluate morbidity outcomes in septic shock survivors, Dr. Pan and coauthors said in their report.

The researchers had no relationships to disclose relevant to the presented study.

SOURCE: Pan D et al. CHEST 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.08.339.

SAN ANTONIO – While septic shock mortality has decreased since the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines were introduced, discharge trends for survivors have not changed significantly over time, a recent analysis suggests.

invisioner/Thinkstock

The percentage of survivors discharged to subacute rehab or long-term facilities did not change appreciably over time, according to the 10-year retrospective analysis, presented at the annual meeting of the American College of Chest Physicians.

However, average length of stay did significantly trend downward over the decade analyzed, while total charge per septic shock admission significantly increased, according to investigator Di Pan, DO, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, and his colleagues.

This is one of few studies looking at outcomes in survivors of septic shock, as most analyses have primarily focused on mortality outcomes, the investigators said.

Their analysis was based on the 2004 to 2014 National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample databases and included patients with a primary diagnosis of septic shock at discharge.

Out of nearly 1.8 million patients with septic shock in that cohort, about 1 million survived, according to data Dr. Pan and colleagues provided in an abstract of the presentation.

In-hospital mortality decreased from 51.7% in 2004 to 39.3% in 2014 (P less than .001), the investigators reported.

The proportion of survivors discharged to subacute rehab or long-term acute care facilities was 61.9% in 2004, and similarly, 62.4% in 2014 (P = .1), while the percentage discharged home was 17.1% in 2004 and 15.1% in 2014 (P = 0.55).

However, there was a small but statistically significant downtick in mean length of stay, from 12.6 days in 2004 to 11.05 days in 2014, the investigators said. Meanwhile, total hospitalization charges surged from $105,776 in 2004 to $134,394 over the same time period.

The first edition of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock was published in March 2004 in Critical Care Medicine.

Future studies and clinical trials should look beyond mortality outcomes to additionally evaluate morbidity outcomes in septic shock survivors, Dr. Pan and coauthors said in their report.

The researchers had no relationships to disclose relevant to the presented study.

SOURCE: Pan D et al. CHEST 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.08.339.

SAN ANTONIO – While septic shock mortality has decreased since the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines were introduced, discharge trends for survivors have not changed significantly over time, a recent analysis suggests.

invisioner/Thinkstock

The percentage of survivors discharged to subacute rehab or long-term facilities did not change appreciably over time, according to the 10-year retrospective analysis, presented at the annual meeting of the American College of Chest Physicians.

However, average length of stay did significantly trend downward over the decade analyzed, while total charge per septic shock admission significantly increased, according to investigator Di Pan, DO, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, and his colleagues.

This is one of few studies looking at outcomes in survivors of septic shock, as most analyses have primarily focused on mortality outcomes, the investigators said.

Their analysis was based on the 2004 to 2014 National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample databases and included patients with a primary diagnosis of septic shock at discharge.

Out of nearly 1.8 million patients with septic shock in that cohort, about 1 million survived, according to data Dr. Pan and colleagues provided in an abstract of the presentation.

In-hospital mortality decreased from 51.7% in 2004 to 39.3% in 2014 (P less than .001), the investigators reported.

The proportion of survivors discharged to subacute rehab or long-term acute care facilities was 61.9% in 2004, and similarly, 62.4% in 2014 (P = .1), while the percentage discharged home was 17.1% in 2004 and 15.1% in 2014 (P = 0.55).

However, there was a small but statistically significant downtick in mean length of stay, from 12.6 days in 2004 to 11.05 days in 2014, the investigators said. Meanwhile, total hospitalization charges surged from $105,776 in 2004 to $134,394 over the same time period.

The first edition of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock was published in March 2004 in Critical Care Medicine.

Future studies and clinical trials should look beyond mortality outcomes to additionally evaluate morbidity outcomes in septic shock survivors, Dr. Pan and coauthors said in their report.

The researchers had no relationships to disclose relevant to the presented study.

SOURCE: Pan D et al. CHEST 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.08.339.

SAN ANTONIO – Chronic liver disease increased mortality risk by up to about 80% in patients with pneumonia, according to an investigator who presented results of a large retrospective analysis.

Andrew Bowser/MDedge News

Liver disease increased the risk of intubation by 39% and increased length of stay by 1 day in the study, presented at the annual meeting of the American College of Chest Physicians.

These findings have implications for clinicians and the scoring systems they use to evaluate patients with pneumonia, according to investigator Zin Mar Htun, MD, internal medicine resident at Louis A. Weiss Memorial Hospital and Presence Saint Joseph Hospital, Chicago.

“We should recognize the importance of chronic liver disease as an independent risk factor for worse outcomes in pneumonia, regardless of the clinical findings or other coexisting comorbidities,” Dr. Htun said in a podium presentation.

Traditional scoring systems for evaluating pneumonia severity do not incorporate hepatic function status, she said.

“We need to come up with a better scoring system that recognizes comorbidities better than the Patient Safety Indicator scoring,” she told attendees at the meeting.

In their study, Dr. Htun and coinvestigator Muhammad Gul, MD, used the 2014 Nationwide Inpatient Sample database to look at pneumonia patients with or without a liver disease diagnosis.

Intubation was done in 14.2% of pneumonia patients with chronic liver disease present, compared with 10.6% of patients with no chronic liver disease (odds ratio [OR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-1.48) in one of their analyses, which included 17,528 pneumonia patients with a liver disease diagnosis and 17,528 pneumonia patients with no such diagnosis, propensity score-matched for age, gender, and Charlson comorbidities.

Length of stay was 8.76 and 7.83 days, respectively, for pneumonia patients with and without chronic liver disease (P less than .001), the propensity score-matched analysis further showed. In-hospital mortality was 10.5% and 6.9% for the liver disease and no liver disease groups in this analysis (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.46-1.70).

In a regression analysis looking at 1.5 million pneumonia patients, of whom about 51,000 had chronic liver disease, the odds ratio for mortality was 1.82 (95% CI, 1.76-1.88; P less than .001), Dr. Htun further reported.

The pathogens causing pneumonia in patients with chronic liver disease were about the same as those in other hospitalized patients, she said in her presentation.

These are “compelling” results that suggest liver disease should considered as a factor in the development of future pneumonia scoring systems, according to Zachary Q. Morris, MD, of Henry Ford Hospital.

Creators of scoring systems may err on the side of making them “simplistic” so they are accessible and easy to analyze, Dr. Morris said in an interview.

“There comes a point in time that maybe you do need to have another layer of complexity to it,” added Dr. Morris, who moderated the original research session where Dr. Htun presented her results.

Both Dr. Htun and Dr. Gul reported that they had no relationships relevant to their study.

SOURCE: Htun ZM, et al. CHEST 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.08.862.

SAN ANTONIO – Chronic liver disease increased mortality risk by up to about 80% in patients with pneumonia, according to an investigator who presented results of a large retrospective analysis.

Andrew Bowser/MDedge News

Liver disease increased the risk of intubation by 39% and increased length of stay by 1 day in the study, presented at the annual meeting of the American College of Chest Physicians.

These findings have implications for clinicians and the scoring systems they use to evaluate patients with pneumonia, according to investigator Zin Mar Htun, MD, internal medicine resident at Louis A. Weiss Memorial Hospital and Presence Saint Joseph Hospital, Chicago.

“We should recognize the importance of chronic liver disease as an independent risk factor for worse outcomes in pneumonia, regardless of the clinical findings or other coexisting comorbidities,” Dr. Htun said in a podium presentation.

Traditional scoring systems for evaluating pneumonia severity do not incorporate hepatic function status, she said.

“We need to come up with a better scoring system that recognizes comorbidities better than the Patient Safety Indicator scoring,” she told attendees at the meeting.

In their study, Dr. Htun and coinvestigator Muhammad Gul, MD, used the 2014 Nationwide Inpatient Sample database to look at pneumonia patients with or without a liver disease diagnosis.

Intubation was done in 14.2% of pneumonia patients with chronic liver disease present, compared with 10.6% of patients with no chronic liver disease (odds ratio [OR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-1.48) in one of their analyses, which included 17,528 pneumonia patients with a liver disease diagnosis and 17,528 pneumonia patients with no such diagnosis, propensity score-matched for age, gender, and Charlson comorbidities.

Length of stay was 8.76 and 7.83 days, respectively, for pneumonia patients with and without chronic liver disease (P less than .001), the propensity score-matched analysis further showed. In-hospital mortality was 10.5% and 6.9% for the liver disease and no liver disease groups in this analysis (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.46-1.70).

In a regression analysis looking at 1.5 million pneumonia patients, of whom about 51,000 had chronic liver disease, the odds ratio for mortality was 1.82 (95% CI, 1.76-1.88; P less than .001), Dr. Htun further reported.

The pathogens causing pneumonia in patients with chronic liver disease were about the same as those in other hospitalized patients, she said in her presentation.

These are “compelling” results that suggest liver disease should considered as a factor in the development of future pneumonia scoring systems, according to Zachary Q. Morris, MD, of Henry Ford Hospital.

Creators of scoring systems may err on the side of making them “simplistic” so they are accessible and easy to analyze, Dr. Morris said in an interview.

“There comes a point in time that maybe you do need to have another layer of complexity to it,” added Dr. Morris, who moderated the original research session where Dr. Htun presented her results.

Both Dr. Htun and Dr. Gul reported that they had no relationships relevant to their study.

SOURCE: Htun ZM, et al. CHEST 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.08.862.

SAN ANTONIO – Chronic liver disease increased mortality risk by up to about 80% in patients with pneumonia, according to an investigator who presented results of a large retrospective analysis.

Andrew Bowser/MDedge News

Liver disease increased the risk of intubation by 39% and increased length of stay by 1 day in the study, presented at the annual meeting of the American College of Chest Physicians.

These findings have implications for clinicians and the scoring systems they use to evaluate patients with pneumonia, according to investigator Zin Mar Htun, MD, internal medicine resident at Louis A. Weiss Memorial Hospital and Presence Saint Joseph Hospital, Chicago.

“We should recognize the importance of chronic liver disease as an independent risk factor for worse outcomes in pneumonia, regardless of the clinical findings or other coexisting comorbidities,” Dr. Htun said in a podium presentation.

Traditional scoring systems for evaluating pneumonia severity do not incorporate hepatic function status, she said.

“We need to come up with a better scoring system that recognizes comorbidities better than the Patient Safety Indicator scoring,” she told attendees at the meeting.

In their study, Dr. Htun and coinvestigator Muhammad Gul, MD, used the 2014 Nationwide Inpatient Sample database to look at pneumonia patients with or without a liver disease diagnosis.

Intubation was done in 14.2% of pneumonia patients with chronic liver disease present, compared with 10.6% of patients with no chronic liver disease (odds ratio [OR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-1.48) in one of their analyses, which included 17,528 pneumonia patients with a liver disease diagnosis and 17,528 pneumonia patients with no such diagnosis, propensity score-matched for age, gender, and Charlson comorbidities.

Length of stay was 8.76 and 7.83 days, respectively, for pneumonia patients with and without chronic liver disease (P less than .001), the propensity score-matched analysis further showed. In-hospital mortality was 10.5% and 6.9% for the liver disease and no liver disease groups in this analysis (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.46-1.70).

In a regression analysis looking at 1.5 million pneumonia patients, of whom about 51,000 had chronic liver disease, the odds ratio for mortality was 1.82 (95% CI, 1.76-1.88; P less than .001), Dr. Htun further reported.

The pathogens causing pneumonia in patients with chronic liver disease were about the same as those in other hospitalized patients, she said in her presentation.

These are “compelling” results that suggest liver disease should considered as a factor in the development of future pneumonia scoring systems, according to Zachary Q. Morris, MD, of Henry Ford Hospital.

Creators of scoring systems may err on the side of making them “simplistic” so they are accessible and easy to analyze, Dr. Morris said in an interview.

“There comes a point in time that maybe you do need to have another layer of complexity to it,” added Dr. Morris, who moderated the original research session where Dr. Htun presented her results.

Both Dr. Htun and Dr. Gul reported that they had no relationships relevant to their study.

SOURCE: Htun ZM, et al. CHEST 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.08.862.

Photo courtesy of NCCN

New York—Although the data set is small and not yet mature, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy appears to be a promising approach for Hodgkin lymphoma, according to Philippe Armand, MD, PhD, of Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center and the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center.

While based on a handful of patients, the data do suggest this approach may play a role either by targeting CD30 or Epstein Barr virus (EBV), Dr. Armand said in a presentation at the NCCN 13^th Annual Congress: Hematologic Malignancies.

“Most importantly perhaps, like it's experience outside of Hodgkin lymphoma, it may really have curative potential, based on the long CR rates that have been already exhibited,” he told attendees at the NCCN conference.

Much of the published clinical experience to date is with CD30-directed CAR Ts, Dr. Armand said, noting that in Hodgkin lymphoma, results so far show promise for this particular approach.

In a recent phase 1 dose escalation study, 9 patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma or anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL) received infusions of autologous T cells modified to express CD30-specific CAR T cells encoding the CD28 costimulatory domain, with no conditioning regimen.

Out of 7 relapsed Hodgkin patients, one had a complete response (CR) lasting beyond 2.5 years following a second infusion. Another had a CR persisting almost 2 years and 3 had transient stable disease.

One of the 2 ALCL patients had a CR lasting 9 months after a fourth infusion. No toxicities attributable to the therapy were seen, according to investigators.

The CD30 CAR T cells are being evaluated with a conditioning regimen in the phase 1 RELY-30 trial. According to Dr. Armand, preliminary results presented at the EBMT 2018 meeting showed better expansion of CAR T cells and responses in 3 out of 5 patients, including 2 CRs.

A CD30-directed CAR T-cell therapy with a 4-1bb costimulatory domain has also been tested in a small group of Hodgkin patients with a response rate of 35%, including some CRs. Response rates were lower in patients with extranodal involvement, although that needs to be validated with further study, according to Dr. Armand.

A considerable amount of active research is ongoing in China, Dr. Armand said, while a phase 1 study of T cells expressing a fully human anti-CD30 CAR is being evaluated in the United States in CD30-expressing lymphomas, he added.

Among non-CD30-targeted products, a CD19 CAR-T approach has been tried in Hodgkin lymphoma, though preliminary results suggest only transient activity.

An interesting approach has been the targeting of EBV, Dr. Armand noted. Recently reported results showed that two doses of T cells with specificity for EBV-derived tumor antigens induced clinical responses in patients with EBV-positive Hodgkin lymphoma.

The cells were engineered to express dominant-negative TGF-β receptor type 2 (DNRII).

“We know that TGF-β provides a strong immunosuppressant signal in the tumor microenvironment,” Dr. Armand said, noting that some of the responses in the 7 evaluable patients lasted 4 years or more. 

Photo courtesy of NCCN

New York—Although the data set is small and not yet mature, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy appears to be a promising approach for Hodgkin lymphoma, according to Philippe Armand, MD, PhD, of Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center and the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center.

While based on a handful of patients, the data do suggest this approach may play a role either by targeting CD30 or Epstein Barr virus (EBV), Dr. Armand said in a presentation at the NCCN 13^th Annual Congress: Hematologic Malignancies.

“Most importantly perhaps, like it's experience outside of Hodgkin lymphoma, it may really have curative potential, based on the long CR rates that have been already exhibited,” he told attendees at the NCCN conference.

Much of the published clinical experience to date is with CD30-directed CAR Ts, Dr. Armand said, noting that in Hodgkin lymphoma, results so far show promise for this particular approach.

In a recent phase 1 dose escalation study, 9 patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma or anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL) received infusions of autologous T cells modified to express CD30-specific CAR T cells encoding the CD28 costimulatory domain, with no conditioning regimen.

Out of 7 relapsed Hodgkin patients, one had a complete response (CR) lasting beyond 2.5 years following a second infusion. Another had a CR persisting almost 2 years and 3 had transient stable disease.

One of the 2 ALCL patients had a CR lasting 9 months after a fourth infusion. No toxicities attributable to the therapy were seen, according to investigators.

The CD30 CAR T cells are being evaluated with a conditioning regimen in the phase 1 RELY-30 trial. According to Dr. Armand, preliminary results presented at the EBMT 2018 meeting showed better expansion of CAR T cells and responses in 3 out of 5 patients, including 2 CRs.

A CD30-directed CAR T-cell therapy with a 4-1bb costimulatory domain has also been tested in a small group of Hodgkin patients with a response rate of 35%, including some CRs. Response rates were lower in patients with extranodal involvement, although that needs to be validated with further study, according to Dr. Armand.

A considerable amount of active research is ongoing in China, Dr. Armand said, while a phase 1 study of T cells expressing a fully human anti-CD30 CAR is being evaluated in the United States in CD30-expressing lymphomas, he added.

Among non-CD30-targeted products, a CD19 CAR-T approach has been tried in Hodgkin lymphoma, though preliminary results suggest only transient activity.

An interesting approach has been the targeting of EBV, Dr. Armand noted. Recently reported results showed that two doses of T cells with specificity for EBV-derived tumor antigens induced clinical responses in patients with EBV-positive Hodgkin lymphoma.

The cells were engineered to express dominant-negative TGF-β receptor type 2 (DNRII).

“We know that TGF-β provides a strong immunosuppressant signal in the tumor microenvironment,” Dr. Armand said, noting that some of the responses in the 7 evaluable patients lasted 4 years or more. 

Photo courtesy of NCCN

New York—Although the data set is small and not yet mature, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy appears to be a promising approach for Hodgkin lymphoma, according to Philippe Armand, MD, PhD, of Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center and the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center.

While based on a handful of patients, the data do suggest this approach may play a role either by targeting CD30 or Epstein Barr virus (EBV), Dr. Armand said in a presentation at the NCCN 13^th Annual Congress: Hematologic Malignancies.

“Most importantly perhaps, like it's experience outside of Hodgkin lymphoma, it may really have curative potential, based on the long CR rates that have been already exhibited,” he told attendees at the NCCN conference.

Much of the published clinical experience to date is with CD30-directed CAR Ts, Dr. Armand said, noting that in Hodgkin lymphoma, results so far show promise for this particular approach.

In a recent phase 1 dose escalation study, 9 patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma or anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL) received infusions of autologous T cells modified to express CD30-specific CAR T cells encoding the CD28 costimulatory domain, with no conditioning regimen.

Out of 7 relapsed Hodgkin patients, one had a complete response (CR) lasting beyond 2.5 years following a second infusion. Another had a CR persisting almost 2 years and 3 had transient stable disease.

One of the 2 ALCL patients had a CR lasting 9 months after a fourth infusion. No toxicities attributable to the therapy were seen, according to investigators.

The CD30 CAR T cells are being evaluated with a conditioning regimen in the phase 1 RELY-30 trial. According to Dr. Armand, preliminary results presented at the EBMT 2018 meeting showed better expansion of CAR T cells and responses in 3 out of 5 patients, including 2 CRs.

A CD30-directed CAR T-cell therapy with a 4-1bb costimulatory domain has also been tested in a small group of Hodgkin patients with a response rate of 35%, including some CRs. Response rates were lower in patients with extranodal involvement, although that needs to be validated with further study, according to Dr. Armand.

A considerable amount of active research is ongoing in China, Dr. Armand said, while a phase 1 study of T cells expressing a fully human anti-CD30 CAR is being evaluated in the United States in CD30-expressing lymphomas, he added.

Among non-CD30-targeted products, a CD19 CAR-T approach has been tried in Hodgkin lymphoma, though preliminary results suggest only transient activity.

An interesting approach has been the targeting of EBV, Dr. Armand noted. Recently reported results showed that two doses of T cells with specificity for EBV-derived tumor antigens induced clinical responses in patients with EBV-positive Hodgkin lymphoma.

The cells were engineered to express dominant-negative TGF-β receptor type 2 (DNRII).

“We know that TGF-β provides a strong immunosuppressant signal in the tumor microenvironment,” Dr. Armand said, noting that some of the responses in the 7 evaluable patients lasted 4 years or more. 

PHOENIX – Opioid use in urologic oncology patients dropped by 46% after one high-volume surgical center introduced changes to order sets and adopted new patient communication strategies, a researcher has reported.

The changes, which promoted opioid-sparing pain regimens, led to a substantial drop in postoperative opioid use with no compromise in pain control, according to Kerri Stevenson, a nurse practitioner with Stanford Health Care.

“Patients can be successfully managed with minimal opioid medication,” Ms. Stevenson said at a symposium on quality care sponsored by the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

However, “it takes a multidisciplinary team for effective change to occur – this cannot be done in silos,” she told attendees at the meeting.

Seeking to reduce their reliance on opioids to manage postoperative pain, Ms. Stevenson and her colleagues set out to reduce opioid use by 50%, from a baseline morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) of 95.1 in June to September 2017 to a target of 47.5 by March 2018.

The actual MEDD at the end of the quality improvement project was 51.5, a 46% reduction that was just shy of that goal, she reported.

Factors fueling opioid use included patient expectations that they would be used and the belief that adjunct medications were not as effective as opioids, Dr. Stevenson found in a team survey.

“We decided to target those,” she said. “Our key drivers were really focused on appropriate prescriptions, increasing patient and provider awareness, standardizing our pathways, and setting expectations.”

To tackle the problem, they revised EMR order sets to default to selection of adjunct medications, educated providers, and introduced new patient communication strategies.

Instead of asking “Would you like me to bring you some oxycodone?” providers would instead start by asking about the patient’s current pain control medications and whether they were working well. When prescribed, opioids should be started at lower doses and escalated only if needed.

“Once we started our interventions, we noticed an immediate effect,” Ms. Stevenson.

The decreases were consistent across a range of surgery types. For example, the MEDD dropped to 55.1 with robotic prostatectomy, a procedure with a 1-day admission and very small incisions, and to 50.6 for open radical cystectomy, which involves a large incision and a stay of approximately 4 days, she said.

To address concerns that they might just be undertreating patients, investigators looked retrospectively at pain scores. They saw no differences pre- and post intervention in pain or anxiety scores within the first 24-48 hours post procedure, Ms. Stevenson reported.

Ms. Stevenson had no disclosures related to the presentation. Coauthor Jay Bakul Shah, MD of Stanford Health Care reported a consulting or advisory role with Pacira Pharmaceuticals.

SOURCE: Stevenson K et al. Quality Care Symposium, Abstract 269.

PHOENIX – Opioid use in urologic oncology patients dropped by 46% after one high-volume surgical center introduced changes to order sets and adopted new patient communication strategies, a researcher has reported.

The changes, which promoted opioid-sparing pain regimens, led to a substantial drop in postoperative opioid use with no compromise in pain control, according to Kerri Stevenson, a nurse practitioner with Stanford Health Care.

“Patients can be successfully managed with minimal opioid medication,” Ms. Stevenson said at a symposium on quality care sponsored by the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

However, “it takes a multidisciplinary team for effective change to occur – this cannot be done in silos,” she told attendees at the meeting.

Seeking to reduce their reliance on opioids to manage postoperative pain, Ms. Stevenson and her colleagues set out to reduce opioid use by 50%, from a baseline morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) of 95.1 in June to September 2017 to a target of 47.5 by March 2018.

The actual MEDD at the end of the quality improvement project was 51.5, a 46% reduction that was just shy of that goal, she reported.

Factors fueling opioid use included patient expectations that they would be used and the belief that adjunct medications were not as effective as opioids, Dr. Stevenson found in a team survey.

“We decided to target those,” she said. “Our key drivers were really focused on appropriate prescriptions, increasing patient and provider awareness, standardizing our pathways, and setting expectations.”

To tackle the problem, they revised EMR order sets to default to selection of adjunct medications, educated providers, and introduced new patient communication strategies.

Instead of asking “Would you like me to bring you some oxycodone?” providers would instead start by asking about the patient’s current pain control medications and whether they were working well. When prescribed, opioids should be started at lower doses and escalated only if needed.

“Once we started our interventions, we noticed an immediate effect,” Ms. Stevenson.

The decreases were consistent across a range of surgery types. For example, the MEDD dropped to 55.1 with robotic prostatectomy, a procedure with a 1-day admission and very small incisions, and to 50.6 for open radical cystectomy, which involves a large incision and a stay of approximately 4 days, she said.

To address concerns that they might just be undertreating patients, investigators looked retrospectively at pain scores. They saw no differences pre- and post intervention in pain or anxiety scores within the first 24-48 hours post procedure, Ms. Stevenson reported.

Ms. Stevenson had no disclosures related to the presentation. Coauthor Jay Bakul Shah, MD of Stanford Health Care reported a consulting or advisory role with Pacira Pharmaceuticals.

SOURCE: Stevenson K et al. Quality Care Symposium, Abstract 269.

PHOENIX – Opioid use in urologic oncology patients dropped by 46% after one high-volume surgical center introduced changes to order sets and adopted new patient communication strategies, a researcher has reported.

The changes, which promoted opioid-sparing pain regimens, led to a substantial drop in postoperative opioid use with no compromise in pain control, according to Kerri Stevenson, a nurse practitioner with Stanford Health Care.

“Patients can be successfully managed with minimal opioid medication,” Ms. Stevenson said at a symposium on quality care sponsored by the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

However, “it takes a multidisciplinary team for effective change to occur – this cannot be done in silos,” she told attendees at the meeting.

Seeking to reduce their reliance on opioids to manage postoperative pain, Ms. Stevenson and her colleagues set out to reduce opioid use by 50%, from a baseline morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) of 95.1 in June to September 2017 to a target of 47.5 by March 2018.

The actual MEDD at the end of the quality improvement project was 51.5, a 46% reduction that was just shy of that goal, she reported.

Factors fueling opioid use included patient expectations that they would be used and the belief that adjunct medications were not as effective as opioids, Dr. Stevenson found in a team survey.

“We decided to target those,” she said. “Our key drivers were really focused on appropriate prescriptions, increasing patient and provider awareness, standardizing our pathways, and setting expectations.”

To tackle the problem, they revised EMR order sets to default to selection of adjunct medications, educated providers, and introduced new patient communication strategies.

Instead of asking “Would you like me to bring you some oxycodone?” providers would instead start by asking about the patient’s current pain control medications and whether they were working well. When prescribed, opioids should be started at lower doses and escalated only if needed.

“Once we started our interventions, we noticed an immediate effect,” Ms. Stevenson.

The decreases were consistent across a range of surgery types. For example, the MEDD dropped to 55.1 with robotic prostatectomy, a procedure with a 1-day admission and very small incisions, and to 50.6 for open radical cystectomy, which involves a large incision and a stay of approximately 4 days, she said.

To address concerns that they might just be undertreating patients, investigators looked retrospectively at pain scores. They saw no differences pre- and post intervention in pain or anxiety scores within the first 24-48 hours post procedure, Ms. Stevenson reported.

Ms. Stevenson had no disclosures related to the presentation. Coauthor Jay Bakul Shah, MD of Stanford Health Care reported a consulting or advisory role with Pacira Pharmaceuticals.

SOURCE: Stevenson K et al. Quality Care Symposium, Abstract 269.

PHOENIX – Metastatic breast cancer care may be a bigger financial burden for uninsured patients, but it’s actually causing more financial distress for the insured, results of a recent survey suggest.

The uninsured more often reported material burdens, such as lack of savings or refusing treatment because of cost, according to survey results reported at a symposium on quality care sponsored by the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

By contrast, the insured reported more worry, distress, and frustration related to financial problems, reported Stephanie B. Wheeler, PhD, MPH, of the Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

That divide suggests increased health insurance coverage is not enough to tackle the problem of cancer-related financial harm, said Dr. Wheeler.

“Health insurance expansion is important,” she said, “but it’s going to be ultimately inadequate in solving the problem of financial distress in our cancer patients. We really need to be thinking about other types of interventions that can do a better job of meeting patients where they are.”

Regardless of insurance status, this survey showed an “unprecedented” high level of cancer-related financial harm in metastatic breast cancer patients as compared with previous studies of early-stage cancer patients, Dr. Wheeler said.

The online survey was completed by 1,054 individuals who were members of the Metastatic Breast Cancer Network, a patient advocacy group. Approximately 30% of participants were uninsured, Dr. Wheeler reported.

Overall, 56% of respondents reported not having enough savings to cover costs of care, while 54% stopped or refused treatment because of cost, and 49% said they had been contacted by collection agencies, survey results show.

These material burdens were “perhaps not surprisingly” significantly more often reported by the uninsured respondents, Dr. Wheeler said. What may be surprising, she added, is that psychosocial burdens were more frequently reported by the insured respondents.

The most frequently reported psychosocial burden was worry about cancer-related financial problems, reported by 68% of respondents overall, but nearly 80% of insured and around 45% of uninsured respondents (P less than .001), Dr. Wheeler said.

The least often reported psychosocial issue was worry about the effects of financial stress on the family, at 31% of all respondents. Even so, there was a significant difference in response by insurance status, with the percentage approaching 40% for the insured, but less than 20% for the uninsured (P less than .001).

This high level of worry and distress may indicate that insured cancer patients may be expecting their insurance to cover more that it does, but ultimately, it is inadequate to meet their needs, Dr. Wheeler said.

“It’s also possible that because insured participants are more often affluent – they more often have retirement and other savings to draw down – that they actually have more to lose,” she added, “and when it comes to the legacy that they leave behind for their family, that creates additional stress – not just for them as an individual, but for their entire household.”

Previous research shows that the adverse financial impacts of cancer, also referred to as financial toxicity, affect about 30% of cancer patients, Dr. Wheeler said in her presentation.

Dr. Wheeler had no relationships to disclose. Funding for the project was provided from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and Pfizer Independent Grants for Learning & Change.

SOURCE: Wheeler SB et al. Quality Care Symposium, Abstract 32.

PHOENIX – Metastatic breast cancer care may be a bigger financial burden for uninsured patients, but it’s actually causing more financial distress for the insured, results of a recent survey suggest.

The uninsured more often reported material burdens, such as lack of savings or refusing treatment because of cost, according to survey results reported at a symposium on quality care sponsored by the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

By contrast, the insured reported more worry, distress, and frustration related to financial problems, reported Stephanie B. Wheeler, PhD, MPH, of the Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

That divide suggests increased health insurance coverage is not enough to tackle the problem of cancer-related financial harm, said Dr. Wheeler.

“Health insurance expansion is important,” she said, “but it’s going to be ultimately inadequate in solving the problem of financial distress in our cancer patients. We really need to be thinking about other types of interventions that can do a better job of meeting patients where they are.”

Regardless of insurance status, this survey showed an “unprecedented” high level of cancer-related financial harm in metastatic breast cancer patients as compared with previous studies of early-stage cancer patients, Dr. Wheeler said.

The online survey was completed by 1,054 individuals who were members of the Metastatic Breast Cancer Network, a patient advocacy group. Approximately 30% of participants were uninsured, Dr. Wheeler reported.

Overall, 56% of respondents reported not having enough savings to cover costs of care, while 54% stopped or refused treatment because of cost, and 49% said they had been contacted by collection agencies, survey results show.

These material burdens were “perhaps not surprisingly” significantly more often reported by the uninsured respondents, Dr. Wheeler said. What may be surprising, she added, is that psychosocial burdens were more frequently reported by the insured respondents.

The most frequently reported psychosocial burden was worry about cancer-related financial problems, reported by 68% of respondents overall, but nearly 80% of insured and around 45% of uninsured respondents (P less than .001), Dr. Wheeler said.

The least often reported psychosocial issue was worry about the effects of financial stress on the family, at 31% of all respondents. Even so, there was a significant difference in response by insurance status, with the percentage approaching 40% for the insured, but less than 20% for the uninsured (P less than .001).

This high level of worry and distress may indicate that insured cancer patients may be expecting their insurance to cover more that it does, but ultimately, it is inadequate to meet their needs, Dr. Wheeler said.

“It’s also possible that because insured participants are more often affluent – they more often have retirement and other savings to draw down – that they actually have more to lose,” she added, “and when it comes to the legacy that they leave behind for their family, that creates additional stress – not just for them as an individual, but for their entire household.”

Previous research shows that the adverse financial impacts of cancer, also referred to as financial toxicity, affect about 30% of cancer patients, Dr. Wheeler said in her presentation.

Dr. Wheeler had no relationships to disclose. Funding for the project was provided from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and Pfizer Independent Grants for Learning & Change.

SOURCE: Wheeler SB et al. Quality Care Symposium, Abstract 32.

PHOENIX – Metastatic breast cancer care may be a bigger financial burden for uninsured patients, but it’s actually causing more financial distress for the insured, results of a recent survey suggest.

The uninsured more often reported material burdens, such as lack of savings or refusing treatment because of cost, according to survey results reported at a symposium on quality care sponsored by the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

By contrast, the insured reported more worry, distress, and frustration related to financial problems, reported Stephanie B. Wheeler, PhD, MPH, of the Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

That divide suggests increased health insurance coverage is not enough to tackle the problem of cancer-related financial harm, said Dr. Wheeler.

“Health insurance expansion is important,” she said, “but it’s going to be ultimately inadequate in solving the problem of financial distress in our cancer patients. We really need to be thinking about other types of interventions that can do a better job of meeting patients where they are.”

Regardless of insurance status, this survey showed an “unprecedented” high level of cancer-related financial harm in metastatic breast cancer patients as compared with previous studies of early-stage cancer patients, Dr. Wheeler said.

The online survey was completed by 1,054 individuals who were members of the Metastatic Breast Cancer Network, a patient advocacy group. Approximately 30% of participants were uninsured, Dr. Wheeler reported.

Overall, 56% of respondents reported not having enough savings to cover costs of care, while 54% stopped or refused treatment because of cost, and 49% said they had been contacted by collection agencies, survey results show.

These material burdens were “perhaps not surprisingly” significantly more often reported by the uninsured respondents, Dr. Wheeler said. What may be surprising, she added, is that psychosocial burdens were more frequently reported by the insured respondents.

The most frequently reported psychosocial burden was worry about cancer-related financial problems, reported by 68% of respondents overall, but nearly 80% of insured and around 45% of uninsured respondents (P less than .001), Dr. Wheeler said.

The least often reported psychosocial issue was worry about the effects of financial stress on the family, at 31% of all respondents. Even so, there was a significant difference in response by insurance status, with the percentage approaching 40% for the insured, but less than 20% for the uninsured (P less than .001).

This high level of worry and distress may indicate that insured cancer patients may be expecting their insurance to cover more that it does, but ultimately, it is inadequate to meet their needs, Dr. Wheeler said.

“It’s also possible that because insured participants are more often affluent – they more often have retirement and other savings to draw down – that they actually have more to lose,” she added, “and when it comes to the legacy that they leave behind for their family, that creates additional stress – not just for them as an individual, but for their entire household.”

Previous research shows that the adverse financial impacts of cancer, also referred to as financial toxicity, affect about 30% of cancer patients, Dr. Wheeler said in her presentation.

Dr. Wheeler had no relationships to disclose. Funding for the project was provided from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and Pfizer Independent Grants for Learning & Change.

SOURCE: Wheeler SB et al. Quality Care Symposium, Abstract 32.

Influenza outbreaks in the United States tend to be concentrated and intense in small cities and more evenly spread throughout the season in large cities, results of a recent study show.

Swings in humidity further intensified the influenza spikes in small cities, but didn’t seem to have as much of an effect in large cities, the results suggest.

These findings help explain differences in influenza transmission patterns between cities that have similar climates and virus epidemiology, according to researcher Benjamin D. Dalziel, PhD, of the departments of integrative biology and mathematics at Oregon State University in Corvallis.

“City size and structure can play a role in determining how other factors such as climate affect and influence transmission,” Dr. Dalziel said in a press conference.

“Our results show how metropolises play a disproportionately important role in this process, as epidemic foci, and as potential sentinel hubs, where epidemiological observatories could integrate local strain dynamics to predict larger-scale patterns. As the growth and form of cities affect their function as climate-driven incubators of infectious disease, it may be possible to design smarter cities that better control epidemics in the face of accelerating global change,” the researchers wrote in their study.

Dr. Dalziel and his coauthors analyzed the weekly incidence of influenza-like illness across 603 U.S. ZIP codes using data obtained from medical claims from 2002 to 2008. They used epidemic intensity as a summary statistic to compare cities. By this variable, low epidemic intensity indicated a diffuse spread evenly across weeks of the flu season, whereas high epidemic intensity indicated intensively focused outbreaks on particular weeks.

In small cities, epidemics were more intensely focused on shorter periods at the peak of flu season, they found. In large cities, incidence was more diffuse, according to results published in Science.

Patterns of where people live and work in a city may account for the more diffuse and prolonged outbreaks seen in large cities, the authors wrote. Large cities have organized population movement patterns and crowding. In more highly established work locations, for example, the population density is pronounced during the day.

“We found the structure makes a difference for how the flu spreads at different times of year,” Dr. Dalziel said of the study, which used U.S. Census data to evaluate spatial population distributions. “In large cities with more highly organized patterns, conditions play a relatively smaller role in flu transmission.”

Humidity’s lower impact on outbreaks in large cities might also be explained by population effects: “If an infected person is sitting beside you, it matters less what the specific humidity is,” Dr. Dalziel said, adding that the proximity helps the virus find hosts even when climatic conditions are not at their most favorable.

The study findings may have implications for health care resources in small cities, which could be strained by intense outbreaks, said coinvestigator Cecile Viboud, PhD, of the Division of International Epidemiology and Population Studies, Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.

Intense outbreaks could overload the health care system, making it challenging to respond, especially around the peak of the epidemic. Pressure on the health care system may be less intense in cities such as Miami or New York, where flu epidemics are more diffuse and spread out during the year, she said.

Variations in vaccination coverage were not associated with variations in epidemic intensity at the state level. However, the data period that was analyzed ended in 2008, a time when flu vaccination rates were much lower than they are today, according to Dr. Viboud.

“It would be important to revisit the effect of city structure and humidity on flu transmission in a high vaccination regime in more recent years, especially if there is a lot of interest in developing broadly cross-protective flu vaccines, which might become available in the market in the future,” she said.

The researchers declared no competing interests related to their research, which was supported by a grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the RAPIDD program of the Science and Technology Directorate Department of Homeland Security, and the Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health.

SOURCE: Dalziel BD et al. Science. 2018 Oct 5;362(6410):75-9.

Influenza outbreaks in the United States tend to be concentrated and intense in small cities and more evenly spread throughout the season in large cities, results of a recent study show.

Swings in humidity further intensified the influenza spikes in small cities, but didn’t seem to have as much of an effect in large cities, the results suggest.

These findings help explain differences in influenza transmission patterns between cities that have similar climates and virus epidemiology, according to researcher Benjamin D. Dalziel, PhD, of the departments of integrative biology and mathematics at Oregon State University in Corvallis.

“City size and structure can play a role in determining how other factors such as climate affect and influence transmission,” Dr. Dalziel said in a press conference.

“Our results show how metropolises play a disproportionately important role in this process, as epidemic foci, and as potential sentinel hubs, where epidemiological observatories could integrate local strain dynamics to predict larger-scale patterns. As the growth and form of cities affect their function as climate-driven incubators of infectious disease, it may be possible to design smarter cities that better control epidemics in the face of accelerating global change,” the researchers wrote in their study.

Dr. Dalziel and his coauthors analyzed the weekly incidence of influenza-like illness across 603 U.S. ZIP codes using data obtained from medical claims from 2002 to 2008. They used epidemic intensity as a summary statistic to compare cities. By this variable, low epidemic intensity indicated a diffuse spread evenly across weeks of the flu season, whereas high epidemic intensity indicated intensively focused outbreaks on particular weeks.

In small cities, epidemics were more intensely focused on shorter periods at the peak of flu season, they found. In large cities, incidence was more diffuse, according to results published in Science.

Patterns of where people live and work in a city may account for the more diffuse and prolonged outbreaks seen in large cities, the authors wrote. Large cities have organized population movement patterns and crowding. In more highly established work locations, for example, the population density is pronounced during the day.

“We found the structure makes a difference for how the flu spreads at different times of year,” Dr. Dalziel said of the study, which used U.S. Census data to evaluate spatial population distributions. “In large cities with more highly organized patterns, conditions play a relatively smaller role in flu transmission.”

Humidity’s lower impact on outbreaks in large cities might also be explained by population effects: “If an infected person is sitting beside you, it matters less what the specific humidity is,” Dr. Dalziel said, adding that the proximity helps the virus find hosts even when climatic conditions are not at their most favorable.

The study findings may have implications for health care resources in small cities, which could be strained by intense outbreaks, said coinvestigator Cecile Viboud, PhD, of the Division of International Epidemiology and Population Studies, Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.

Intense outbreaks could overload the health care system, making it challenging to respond, especially around the peak of the epidemic. Pressure on the health care system may be less intense in cities such as Miami or New York, where flu epidemics are more diffuse and spread out during the year, she said.

Variations in vaccination coverage were not associated with variations in epidemic intensity at the state level. However, the data period that was analyzed ended in 2008, a time when flu vaccination rates were much lower than they are today, according to Dr. Viboud.

“It would be important to revisit the effect of city structure and humidity on flu transmission in a high vaccination regime in more recent years, especially if there is a lot of interest in developing broadly cross-protective flu vaccines, which might become available in the market in the future,” she said.

The researchers declared no competing interests related to their research, which was supported by a grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the RAPIDD program of the Science and Technology Directorate Department of Homeland Security, and the Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health.

SOURCE: Dalziel BD et al. Science. 2018 Oct 5;362(6410):75-9.

Influenza outbreaks in the United States tend to be concentrated and intense in small cities and more evenly spread throughout the season in large cities, results of a recent study show.

Swings in humidity further intensified the influenza spikes in small cities, but didn’t seem to have as much of an effect in large cities, the results suggest.

These findings help explain differences in influenza transmission patterns between cities that have similar climates and virus epidemiology, according to researcher Benjamin D. Dalziel, PhD, of the departments of integrative biology and mathematics at Oregon State University in Corvallis.

“City size and structure can play a role in determining how other factors such as climate affect and influence transmission,” Dr. Dalziel said in a press conference.

“Our results show how metropolises play a disproportionately important role in this process, as epidemic foci, and as potential sentinel hubs, where epidemiological observatories could integrate local strain dynamics to predict larger-scale patterns. As the growth and form of cities affect their function as climate-driven incubators of infectious disease, it may be possible to design smarter cities that better control epidemics in the face of accelerating global change,” the researchers wrote in their study.

Dr. Dalziel and his coauthors analyzed the weekly incidence of influenza-like illness across 603 U.S. ZIP codes using data obtained from medical claims from 2002 to 2008. They used epidemic intensity as a summary statistic to compare cities. By this variable, low epidemic intensity indicated a diffuse spread evenly across weeks of the flu season, whereas high epidemic intensity indicated intensively focused outbreaks on particular weeks.

In small cities, epidemics were more intensely focused on shorter periods at the peak of flu season, they found. In large cities, incidence was more diffuse, according to results published in Science.

Patterns of where people live and work in a city may account for the more diffuse and prolonged outbreaks seen in large cities, the authors wrote. Large cities have organized population movement patterns and crowding. In more highly established work locations, for example, the population density is pronounced during the day.

“We found the structure makes a difference for how the flu spreads at different times of year,” Dr. Dalziel said of the study, which used U.S. Census data to evaluate spatial population distributions. “In large cities with more highly organized patterns, conditions play a relatively smaller role in flu transmission.”

Humidity’s lower impact on outbreaks in large cities might also be explained by population effects: “If an infected person is sitting beside you, it matters less what the specific humidity is,” Dr. Dalziel said, adding that the proximity helps the virus find hosts even when climatic conditions are not at their most favorable.

The study findings may have implications for health care resources in small cities, which could be strained by intense outbreaks, said coinvestigator Cecile Viboud, PhD, of the Division of International Epidemiology and Population Studies, Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.

Intense outbreaks could overload the health care system, making it challenging to respond, especially around the peak of the epidemic. Pressure on the health care system may be less intense in cities such as Miami or New York, where flu epidemics are more diffuse and spread out during the year, she said.

Variations in vaccination coverage were not associated with variations in epidemic intensity at the state level. However, the data period that was analyzed ended in 2008, a time when flu vaccination rates were much lower than they are today, according to Dr. Viboud.

“It would be important to revisit the effect of city structure and humidity on flu transmission in a high vaccination regime in more recent years, especially if there is a lot of interest in developing broadly cross-protective flu vaccines, which might become available in the market in the future,” she said.

The researchers declared no competing interests related to their research, which was supported by a grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the RAPIDD program of the Science and Technology Directorate Department of Homeland Security, and the Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health.

SOURCE: Dalziel BD et al. Science. 2018 Oct 5;362(6410):75-9.

PHOENIX – By starting supportive measures early in the care of cancer patients undergoing curative treatment, a cancer center cut costs, emergency department visits, and admissions, a researcher said at symposium on quality care sponsored by the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

The supportive care pathway resulted in double-digit decreases in admissions and an opportunity cost savings of $1,500 per patient, reported Christopher D. Koprowski, MD, MBA, of Helen F. Graham Cancer Center & Research Institute, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, Del.

Although satisfaction hasn’t been measured yet, anecdotal reports suggest the patient experience has improved because of the multidisciplinary program, which included mandatory supportive care screening and enhancements to computer systems, said Dr. Koprowski, who is director of quality and safety at the cancer center.

“From all outward signs, the patients are extraordinarily grateful in this program,” Dr. Koprowski said in an interview. “I just had one who said that being seen at the same time by all these people just makes things so much easier.”

The Supportive Care of Oncology Patients (SCOOP) clinical pathway, introduced in November 2016, includes palliative and supportive care service screening that occurs during the multidisciplinary visit. The pathway incorporates a checklist integrated into a nurse navigator information system to support care standardization, according to Dr. Koprowski.

Also added were “flags” in the inpatient information system that trigger alerts to navigators, oncologists, and the supportive care service whenever a patient in the SCOOP pathway is admitted, discharged, or seen in the emergency room, he said.

Enrollment in SCOOP was limited to lung, esophageal, head and neck, and colorectal cancer patients receiving concurrent radiation and chemotherapy. Out of approximately 200 eligible patients in the first year, about half entered the clinical pathway, according to Dr. Koprowski.

For that first year, 32% of SCOOP patients had ED visits, compared with 54% of combined modality patients who did not enter the pathway, Dr. Koprowski reported.

Similarly, admissions were 25% for the SCOOP patients and 34% of non-SCOOP patients, and readmissions were seen in 20% versus 32% of those groups, respectively.

These findings are much like what has been seen when early supportive care is introduced in patients with more advanced disease, according to Dr. Koprowski.

He said the SCOOP program was partly inspired by a study in the New England Journal of Medicine showing that patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer who received early palliative care had longer survival despite less-aggressive care, including reduced use of chemotherapy, at the end of life.

“Early-stage patients aren’t that much different if they are being treated very aggressively with combined modality chemotherapy and radiation,” he said. “The treatment is very, very tough on people.”

Dr. Koprowski and his coinvestigators had no relationships to disclose relevant to the research presented at the ASCO symposium.

SOURCE: Koprowski CD et al. 2018 ASCO Quality Care Symposium, Abstract 142.

PHOENIX – By starting supportive measures early in the care of cancer patients undergoing curative treatment, a cancer center cut costs, emergency department visits, and admissions, a researcher said at symposium on quality care sponsored by the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

The supportive care pathway resulted in double-digit decreases in admissions and an opportunity cost savings of $1,500 per patient, reported Christopher D. Koprowski, MD, MBA, of Helen F. Graham Cancer Center & Research Institute, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, Del.

Although satisfaction hasn’t been measured yet, anecdotal reports suggest the patient experience has improved because of the multidisciplinary program, which included mandatory supportive care screening and enhancements to computer systems, said Dr. Koprowski, who is director of quality and safety at the cancer center.

“From all outward signs, the patients are extraordinarily grateful in this program,” Dr. Koprowski said in an interview. “I just had one who said that being seen at the same time by all these people just makes things so much easier.”

The Supportive Care of Oncology Patients (SCOOP) clinical pathway, introduced in November 2016, includes palliative and supportive care service screening that occurs during the multidisciplinary visit. The pathway incorporates a checklist integrated into a nurse navigator information system to support care standardization, according to Dr. Koprowski.

Also added were “flags” in the inpatient information system that trigger alerts to navigators, oncologists, and the supportive care service whenever a patient in the SCOOP pathway is admitted, discharged, or seen in the emergency room, he said.

Enrollment in SCOOP was limited to lung, esophageal, head and neck, and colorectal cancer patients receiving concurrent radiation and chemotherapy. Out of approximately 200 eligible patients in the first year, about half entered the clinical pathway, according to Dr. Koprowski.

For that first year, 32% of SCOOP patients had ED visits, compared with 54% of combined modality patients who did not enter the pathway, Dr. Koprowski reported.

Similarly, admissions were 25% for the SCOOP patients and 34% of non-SCOOP patients, and readmissions were seen in 20% versus 32% of those groups, respectively.

These findings are much like what has been seen when early supportive care is introduced in patients with more advanced disease, according to Dr. Koprowski.

He said the SCOOP program was partly inspired by a study in the New England Journal of Medicine showing that patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer who received early palliative care had longer survival despite less-aggressive care, including reduced use of chemotherapy, at the end of life.

“Early-stage patients aren’t that much different if they are being treated very aggressively with combined modality chemotherapy and radiation,” he said. “The treatment is very, very tough on people.”

Dr. Koprowski and his coinvestigators had no relationships to disclose relevant to the research presented at the ASCO symposium.

SOURCE: Koprowski CD et al. 2018 ASCO Quality Care Symposium, Abstract 142.

PHOENIX – By starting supportive measures early in the care of cancer patients undergoing curative treatment, a cancer center cut costs, emergency department visits, and admissions, a researcher said at symposium on quality care sponsored by the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

The supportive care pathway resulted in double-digit decreases in admissions and an opportunity cost savings of $1,500 per patient, reported Christopher D. Koprowski, MD, MBA, of Helen F. Graham Cancer Center & Research Institute, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, Del.

Although satisfaction hasn’t been measured yet, anecdotal reports suggest the patient experience has improved because of the multidisciplinary program, which included mandatory supportive care screening and enhancements to computer systems, said Dr. Koprowski, who is director of quality and safety at the cancer center.

“From all outward signs, the patients are extraordinarily grateful in this program,” Dr. Koprowski said in an interview. “I just had one who said that being seen at the same time by all these people just makes things so much easier.”

The Supportive Care of Oncology Patients (SCOOP) clinical pathway, introduced in November 2016, includes palliative and supportive care service screening that occurs during the multidisciplinary visit. The pathway incorporates a checklist integrated into a nurse navigator information system to support care standardization, according to Dr. Koprowski.

Also added were “flags” in the inpatient information system that trigger alerts to navigators, oncologists, and the supportive care service whenever a patient in the SCOOP pathway is admitted, discharged, or seen in the emergency room, he said.

Enrollment in SCOOP was limited to lung, esophageal, head and neck, and colorectal cancer patients receiving concurrent radiation and chemotherapy. Out of approximately 200 eligible patients in the first year, about half entered the clinical pathway, according to Dr. Koprowski.

For that first year, 32% of SCOOP patients had ED visits, compared with 54% of combined modality patients who did not enter the pathway, Dr. Koprowski reported.

Similarly, admissions were 25% for the SCOOP patients and 34% of non-SCOOP patients, and readmissions were seen in 20% versus 32% of those groups, respectively.

These findings are much like what has been seen when early supportive care is introduced in patients with more advanced disease, according to Dr. Koprowski.

He said the SCOOP program was partly inspired by a study in the New England Journal of Medicine showing that patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer who received early palliative care had longer survival despite less-aggressive care, including reduced use of chemotherapy, at the end of life.

“Early-stage patients aren’t that much different if they are being treated very aggressively with combined modality chemotherapy and radiation,” he said. “The treatment is very, very tough on people.”

Dr. Koprowski and his coinvestigators had no relationships to disclose relevant to the research presented at the ASCO symposium.

SOURCE: Koprowski CD et al. 2018 ASCO Quality Care Symposium, Abstract 142.

Photo courtesy of NCCN

New York—Four-drug combinations are holding promise for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), although data from additional randomized trials are needed to define their role in clinical practice, according to Natalie S. Callander, MD, of the University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center.

The efficacy of multiple triplet regimens has been well documented, and data are now emerging on the potential of 4-drug combinations.

“Triplet therapy is the standard,” she said during a presentation at the NCCN 13^th Annual Congress: Hematologic Malignancies, “and quad therapy may be in the future.”

The study that set the standard for triplets in myeloma, she said, is SWOG 0777, an open label, phase 3 trial that compared bortezomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRd) to lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma.

Adding bortezomib to lenalidomide and dexamethasone significantly improved both progression-free and overall survival in the 525-patient trial, with a risk-benefit profile that was acceptable. The trial was recently reported in The Lancet.

The median progression free survival (PFS) was 43 months for the triplet, versus 30 months for the two-drug regimen (P=0.0018).

Likewise, median overall survival (OS) was significantly improved, at 75 months versus 64 months for triplet versus doublet therapy (P=0.025).

“Very convincingly, just receiving that short exposure to bortezomib,” she said, “ended up causing a substantial increase of progression-free and overall survival.”

Effective triplet regimens include the combination of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd), cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (CyBorD), and more recently, ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (IRd).

These regimens have “excellent” response rates and survival data, Dr. Callander noted.

Quadruplet data

The combination of elotuzumab plus VRd produced high response rates that were even higher after transplant, with reasonable toxicity, Dr. Callander said of phase 2 trial data presented at ASCO 2017 (abstract 8002).

Similarly, the combination of daratumumab plus KRd had a 100% rate of partial response or better in phase 2 data also presented at ASCO 2017 (abstract 8000), with rates of very good partial response and complete response that improved with successive cycles of therapy, she said.

Even so, “it remains to be seen whether four drugs will be the new standard,” Dr Callander conjectured.

Four versus three drug strategies are being evaluated in ongoing randomized clinical trials including patients with previously untreated myeloma, she said.

These studies include Cassiopeia (NCT02541383), which is evaluating bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone with or without daratumumab, and GRIFFIN (NCT02874742), which is looking at VRd with or without daratumumab.

Daratumumab received an additional indication in myeloma, this time as part of a 4-drug regimen, several months ago, Dr. Callander added in a discussion on treatment options for elderly myeloma patients.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the monoclonal antibody in combination with bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone (VMP) for treatment of newly diagnosed myeloma patients who are transplant ineligible.

That approval was based on results of the multicenter phase 3 ALCYONE (MMY3007) study, published in The New England Journal of Medicine, showing an 18-month PFS of 71.6% for the 4-drug combination versus 50.2% for VMP alone (P<0.001). 

Photo courtesy of NCCN

New York—Four-drug combinations are holding promise for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), although data from additional randomized trials are needed to define their role in clinical practice, according to Natalie S. Callander, MD, of the University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center.

The efficacy of multiple triplet regimens has been well documented, and data are now emerging on the potential of 4-drug combinations.

“Triplet therapy is the standard,” she said during a presentation at the NCCN 13^th Annual Congress: Hematologic Malignancies, “and quad therapy may be in the future.”

The study that set the standard for triplets in myeloma, she said, is SWOG 0777, an open label, phase 3 trial that compared bortezomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRd) to lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma.

Adding bortezomib to lenalidomide and dexamethasone significantly improved both progression-free and overall survival in the 525-patient trial, with a risk-benefit profile that was acceptable. The trial was recently reported in The Lancet.

The median progression free survival (PFS) was 43 months for the triplet, versus 30 months for the two-drug regimen (P=0.0018).

Likewise, median overall survival (OS) was significantly improved, at 75 months versus 64 months for triplet versus doublet therapy (P=0.025).

“Very convincingly, just receiving that short exposure to bortezomib,” she said, “ended up causing a substantial increase of progression-free and overall survival.”

Effective triplet regimens include the combination of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd), cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (CyBorD), and more recently, ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (IRd).

These regimens have “excellent” response rates and survival data, Dr. Callander noted.

Quadruplet data

The combination of elotuzumab plus VRd produced high response rates that were even higher after transplant, with reasonable toxicity, Dr. Callander said of phase 2 trial data presented at ASCO 2017 (abstract 8002).

Similarly, the combination of daratumumab plus KRd had a 100% rate of partial response or better in phase 2 data also presented at ASCO 2017 (abstract 8000), with rates of very good partial response and complete response that improved with successive cycles of therapy, she said.

Even so, “it remains to be seen whether four drugs will be the new standard,” Dr Callander conjectured.

Four versus three drug strategies are being evaluated in ongoing randomized clinical trials including patients with previously untreated myeloma, she said.

These studies include Cassiopeia (NCT02541383), which is evaluating bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone with or without daratumumab, and GRIFFIN (NCT02874742), which is looking at VRd with or without daratumumab.

Daratumumab received an additional indication in myeloma, this time as part of a 4-drug regimen, several months ago, Dr. Callander added in a discussion on treatment options for elderly myeloma patients.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the monoclonal antibody in combination with bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone (VMP) for treatment of newly diagnosed myeloma patients who are transplant ineligible.

That approval was based on results of the multicenter phase 3 ALCYONE (MMY3007) study, published in The New England Journal of Medicine, showing an 18-month PFS of 71.6% for the 4-drug combination versus 50.2% for VMP alone (P<0.001). 

Photo courtesy of NCCN

New York—Four-drug combinations are holding promise for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), although data from additional randomized trials are needed to define their role in clinical practice, according to Natalie S. Callander, MD, of the University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center.

The efficacy of multiple triplet regimens has been well documented, and data are now emerging on the potential of 4-drug combinations.

“Triplet therapy is the standard,” she said during a presentation at the NCCN 13^th Annual Congress: Hematologic Malignancies, “and quad therapy may be in the future.”

The study that set the standard for triplets in myeloma, she said, is SWOG 0777, an open label, phase 3 trial that compared bortezomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRd) to lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma.

Adding bortezomib to lenalidomide and dexamethasone significantly improved both progression-free and overall survival in the 525-patient trial, with a risk-benefit profile that was acceptable. The trial was recently reported in The Lancet.

The median progression free survival (PFS) was 43 months for the triplet, versus 30 months for the two-drug regimen (P=0.0018).

Likewise, median overall survival (OS) was significantly improved, at 75 months versus 64 months for triplet versus doublet therapy (P=0.025).

“Very convincingly, just receiving that short exposure to bortezomib,” she said, “ended up causing a substantial increase of progression-free and overall survival.”

Effective triplet regimens include the combination of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd), cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (CyBorD), and more recently, ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (IRd).

These regimens have “excellent” response rates and survival data, Dr. Callander noted.

Quadruplet data

The combination of elotuzumab plus VRd produced high response rates that were even higher after transplant, with reasonable toxicity, Dr. Callander said of phase 2 trial data presented at ASCO 2017 (abstract 8002).

Similarly, the combination of daratumumab plus KRd had a 100% rate of partial response or better in phase 2 data also presented at ASCO 2017 (abstract 8000), with rates of very good partial response and complete response that improved with successive cycles of therapy, she said.

Even so, “it remains to be seen whether four drugs will be the new standard,” Dr Callander conjectured.

Four versus three drug strategies are being evaluated in ongoing randomized clinical trials including patients with previously untreated myeloma, she said.

These studies include Cassiopeia (NCT02541383), which is evaluating bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone with or without daratumumab, and GRIFFIN (NCT02874742), which is looking at VRd with or without daratumumab.

Daratumumab received an additional indication in myeloma, this time as part of a 4-drug regimen, several months ago, Dr. Callander added in a discussion on treatment options for elderly myeloma patients.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the monoclonal antibody in combination with bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone (VMP) for treatment of newly diagnosed myeloma patients who are transplant ineligible.

That approval was based on results of the multicenter phase 3 ALCYONE (MMY3007) study, published in The New England Journal of Medicine, showing an 18-month PFS of 71.6% for the 4-drug combination versus 50.2% for VMP alone (P<0.001). 

NEW YORK – Despite initial concerns that stopping tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment would be ill-advised in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), clinical trial data suggest it is a safe and reasonable strategy, according to a leading expert.

“About 95% of people in all of these trials will regain their original response when they start off on therapy again,” said Jerald P. Radich, MD, of Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance.

“There’s been a few that don’t, but blast crisis has been very, very rare, thank goodness, so it looks to be fairly safe for now,” Dr. Radich said at the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Hematologic Malignancies Annual Congress.

That being said, careful follow up is still required, Dr. Radich cautioned, noting that there was still an excess of CML in Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bomb survivors evident decades after radiation exposure.

“CML is a very strange disease,” he said. “You can’t eliminate the possibility of some slow-growing clone that, once you take [a patient] off tyrosine kinase therapy, is going into an accelerated phase and might take years to manifest itself.”

In one of the latest reports to shed light on what happens after discontinuation, investigators for the ENESTop study reported that treatment-free remission “seems achievable” in patients who have sustained, deep remissions after discontinuing nilotinib second-line therapy (Ann Intern Med. 2018 Apr 3;168[7]:461-70).

In ENESTop, chronic phase CML patients on tyrosine kinase inhibitors for at least 3 years were eligible to discontinue therapy if they achieved MR^4.5 (BCR-ABL1IS of 0.0032% or less) and maintained that response level during a 1-year consolidation phase.

Out of 163 patients in the study, 126 met the criteria to enter the treatment-free remission phase; of that subset, 58% maintained treatment-free remission at 48 weeks, while 53% maintained it at 96 weeks, investigators said.

For 56 patients who restarted nilotinib, 55 regained at least major molecular response (MMR), and 52 regained MR^4.5, while none had progression to accelerated phase or blast crisis, according to the report.

Similarly, earlier reported results from the ENESTfreedom trial showed that, of 190 patients entering the treatment-free remission phase after a median duration of 43.5 months on nilotinib, more than half remained in MMR or better at 48 weeks (Leukemia. 2017 Jul;31[7]:1525-31).

Of 86 patients who started nilotinib again after losing MMR, 98.8% regained MMR and 88.4% regained MR^4.5 by the data cutoff date for the trial.

Duration and depth of response may make a “little bit of difference” in likelihood of relapse, Dr. Radich added.

In an interim analysis of a prospective multicenter, nonrandomized European discontinuation trial (EURO-SKI), investigators found that patients achieving deep molecular responses had good molecular relapse-free survival (Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jun;19[6]:747-57).

Based on that, investigators suggested that patients with deep molecular responses should be considered for discontinuation to spare them from side effects and to reduce health expenditures.

Results of these and other trials are “pretty much unbelievable,” Dr. Radich said. That’s in part because mathematical modeling – extrapolated from early trials – had suggested it could take nearly 50 years to completely eradicate minimal residual disease with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and that the cumulative cure rate after 30 years of treatment could be as low as 31%.

Dr. Radich reported financial disclosures related to Amgen, Novartis, and Seattle Genetics.

NEW YORK – Despite initial concerns that stopping tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment would be ill-advised in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), clinical trial data suggest it is a safe and reasonable strategy, according to a leading expert.

“About 95% of people in all of these trials will regain their original response when they start off on therapy again,” said Jerald P. Radich, MD, of Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance.

“There’s been a few that don’t, but blast crisis has been very, very rare, thank goodness, so it looks to be fairly safe for now,” Dr. Radich said at the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Hematologic Malignancies Annual Congress.

That being said, careful follow up is still required, Dr. Radich cautioned, noting that there was still an excess of CML in Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bomb survivors evident decades after radiation exposure.

“CML is a very strange disease,” he said. “You can’t eliminate the possibility of some slow-growing clone that, once you take [a patient] off tyrosine kinase therapy, is going into an accelerated phase and might take years to manifest itself.”

In one of the latest reports to shed light on what happens after discontinuation, investigators for the ENESTop study reported that treatment-free remission “seems achievable” in patients who have sustained, deep remissions after discontinuing nilotinib second-line therapy (Ann Intern Med. 2018 Apr 3;168[7]:461-70).

In ENESTop, chronic phase CML patients on tyrosine kinase inhibitors for at least 3 years were eligible to discontinue therapy if they achieved MR^4.5 (BCR-ABL1IS of 0.0032% or less) and maintained that response level during a 1-year consolidation phase.

Out of 163 patients in the study, 126 met the criteria to enter the treatment-free remission phase; of that subset, 58% maintained treatment-free remission at 48 weeks, while 53% maintained it at 96 weeks, investigators said.

For 56 patients who restarted nilotinib, 55 regained at least major molecular response (MMR), and 52 regained MR^4.5, while none had progression to accelerated phase or blast crisis, according to the report.

Similarly, earlier reported results from the ENESTfreedom trial showed that, of 190 patients entering the treatment-free remission phase after a median duration of 43.5 months on nilotinib, more than half remained in MMR or better at 48 weeks (Leukemia. 2017 Jul;31[7]:1525-31).

Of 86 patients who started nilotinib again after losing MMR, 98.8% regained MMR and 88.4% regained MR^4.5 by the data cutoff date for the trial.

Duration and depth of response may make a “little bit of difference” in likelihood of relapse, Dr. Radich added.

In an interim analysis of a prospective multicenter, nonrandomized European discontinuation trial (EURO-SKI), investigators found that patients achieving deep molecular responses had good molecular relapse-free survival (Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jun;19[6]:747-57).

Based on that, investigators suggested that patients with deep molecular responses should be considered for discontinuation to spare them from side effects and to reduce health expenditures.

Results of these and other trials are “pretty much unbelievable,” Dr. Radich said. That’s in part because mathematical modeling – extrapolated from early trials – had suggested it could take nearly 50 years to completely eradicate minimal residual disease with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and that the cumulative cure rate after 30 years of treatment could be as low as 31%.

Dr. Radich reported financial disclosures related to Amgen, Novartis, and Seattle Genetics.

NEW YORK – Despite initial concerns that stopping tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment would be ill-advised in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), clinical trial data suggest it is a safe and reasonable strategy, according to a leading expert.

“About 95% of people in all of these trials will regain their original response when they start off on therapy again,” said Jerald P. Radich, MD, of Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance.

“There’s been a few that don’t, but blast crisis has been very, very rare, thank goodness, so it looks to be fairly safe for now,” Dr. Radich said at the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Hematologic Malignancies Annual Congress.

That being said, careful follow up is still required, Dr. Radich cautioned, noting that there was still an excess of CML in Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bomb survivors evident decades after radiation exposure.

“CML is a very strange disease,” he said. “You can’t eliminate the possibility of some slow-growing clone that, once you take [a patient] off tyrosine kinase therapy, is going into an accelerated phase and might take years to manifest itself.”

In one of the latest reports to shed light on what happens after discontinuation, investigators for the ENESTop study reported that treatment-free remission “seems achievable” in patients who have sustained, deep remissions after discontinuing nilotinib second-line therapy (Ann Intern Med. 2018 Apr 3;168[7]:461-70).

In ENESTop, chronic phase CML patients on tyrosine kinase inhibitors for at least 3 years were eligible to discontinue therapy if they achieved MR^4.5 (BCR-ABL1IS of 0.0032% or less) and maintained that response level during a 1-year consolidation phase.

Out of 163 patients in the study, 126 met the criteria to enter the treatment-free remission phase; of that subset, 58% maintained treatment-free remission at 48 weeks, while 53% maintained it at 96 weeks, investigators said.

For 56 patients who restarted nilotinib, 55 regained at least major molecular response (MMR), and 52 regained MR^4.5, while none had progression to accelerated phase or blast crisis, according to the report.

Similarly, earlier reported results from the ENESTfreedom trial showed that, of 190 patients entering the treatment-free remission phase after a median duration of 43.5 months on nilotinib, more than half remained in MMR or better at 48 weeks (Leukemia. 2017 Jul;31[7]:1525-31).

Of 86 patients who started nilotinib again after losing MMR, 98.8% regained MMR and 88.4% regained MR^4.5 by the data cutoff date for the trial.

Duration and depth of response may make a “little bit of difference” in likelihood of relapse, Dr. Radich added.

In an interim analysis of a prospective multicenter, nonrandomized European discontinuation trial (EURO-SKI), investigators found that patients achieving deep molecular responses had good molecular relapse-free survival (Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jun;19[6]:747-57).

Based on that, investigators suggested that patients with deep molecular responses should be considered for discontinuation to spare them from side effects and to reduce health expenditures.

Results of these and other trials are “pretty much unbelievable,” Dr. Radich said. That’s in part because mathematical modeling – extrapolated from early trials – had suggested it could take nearly 50 years to completely eradicate minimal residual disease with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and that the cumulative cure rate after 30 years of treatment could be as low as 31%.

Dr. Radich reported financial disclosures related to Amgen, Novartis, and Seattle Genetics.

NEW YORK – Four-drug combinations are looking promising for the treatment of multiple myeloma, though data from additional randomized trials are needed to define their role in clinical practice, according to Natalie S. Callander, MD, of the University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison.

“The outlook for myeloma patients is quite good,” Dr. Callander said at the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Hematologic Malignancies Annual Congress.

“Triplet therapy is the standard, and quad therapy may be in the future.”

The study that set the standard for triplets in myeloma, according to Dr. Callander, is SWOG 0777, an open-label, phase 3 trial that compared bortezomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRd) to lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma.

Adding bortezomib to lenalidomide and dexamethasone significantly improved both progression-free and overall survival in the 525-patient trial, with a risk-benefit profile that was acceptable (Lancet. 2017 Feb 4;389[10068]:519-27).

The median progression-free survival was 43 months for the triplet, versus 30 months for the two-drug regimen (P = .0018); likewise, median overall survival was significantly improved, at 75 months versus 64 months for triplet versus doublet therapy (P = .025).

“Very convincingly, just receiving that short exposure to bortezomib ended up causing a substantial increase of progression-free and overall survival,” Dr. Callander said.

The efficacy of multiple triplet regimens has been documented, including the combination of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd); cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (CyBorD); and more recently, ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (IRd). These regimens have “excellent” response rates and survival data, Dr. Callander said.

Data is now emerging on the potential role of four-drug combinations, she added. The combination of elotuzumab plus VRd produced high response rates that were even higher after transplant, with reasonable toxicity, Dr. Callander said of phase 2 trial data presented at the 2017 annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Similarly, the combination of daratumumab plus KRd had a 100% rate of partial response or better in phase 2 data presented at ASCO in 2017, with rates of very good partial response and complete response that improved with successive cycles of therapy, she said.

Even so, “it remains to be seen whether four drugs will be the new standard,” Dr. Callander told the NCCN attendees.

Four- versus three-drug strategies are being evaluated in ongoing randomized clinical trials, including patients with previously untreated myeloma, she said. Those studies include Cassiopeia, which is evaluating bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (with or without daratumumab), and GRIFFIN, which is looking at VRd (with or without daratumumab).

Daratumumab recently received an additional indication in the treatment of myeloma, this time as part of a four-drug regimen, Dr. Callander added in a discussion on treatment options for elderly myeloma patients.

The Food and Drug Administration approved the monoclonal antibody in combination with bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone (VMP) for treatment of newly diagnosed myeloma patients who are transplant ineligible.

That approval was based on results of the multicenter phase 3 ALCYONE study, showing an 18-month progression-free survival rate of 71.6% for the four-drug combination versus 50.2% for VMP alone (N Engl J Med. 2018;378:518-28).

Dr. Callander reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

NEW YORK – Four-drug combinations are looking promising for the treatment of multiple myeloma, though data from additional randomized trials are needed to define their role in clinical practice, according to Natalie S. Callander, MD, of the University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison.

“The outlook for myeloma patients is quite good,” Dr. Callander said at the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Hematologic Malignancies Annual Congress.

“Triplet therapy is the standard, and quad therapy may be in the future.”

The study that set the standard for triplets in myeloma, according to Dr. Callander, is SWOG 0777, an open-label, phase 3 trial that compared bortezomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRd) to lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma.

Adding bortezomib to lenalidomide and dexamethasone significantly improved both progression-free and overall survival in the 525-patient trial, with a risk-benefit profile that was acceptable (Lancet. 2017 Feb 4;389[10068]:519-27).

The median progression-free survival was 43 months for the triplet, versus 30 months for the two-drug regimen (P = .0018); likewise, median overall survival was significantly improved, at 75 months versus 64 months for triplet versus doublet therapy (P = .025).

“Very convincingly, just receiving that short exposure to bortezomib ended up causing a substantial increase of progression-free and overall survival,” Dr. Callander said.

The efficacy of multiple triplet regimens has been documented, including the combination of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd); cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (CyBorD); and more recently, ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (IRd). These regimens have “excellent” response rates and survival data, Dr. Callander said.

Data is now emerging on the potential role of four-drug combinations, she added. The combination of elotuzumab plus VRd produced high response rates that were even higher after transplant, with reasonable toxicity, Dr. Callander said of phase 2 trial data presented at the 2017 annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Similarly, the combination of daratumumab plus KRd had a 100% rate of partial response or better in phase 2 data presented at ASCO in 2017, with rates of very good partial response and complete response that improved with successive cycles of therapy, she said.

Even so, “it remains to be seen whether four drugs will be the new standard,” Dr. Callander told the NCCN attendees.

Four- versus three-drug strategies are being evaluated in ongoing randomized clinical trials, including patients with previously untreated myeloma, she said. Those studies include Cassiopeia, which is evaluating bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (with or without daratumumab), and GRIFFIN, which is looking at VRd (with or without daratumumab).

Daratumumab recently received an additional indication in the treatment of myeloma, this time as part of a four-drug regimen, Dr. Callander added in a discussion on treatment options for elderly myeloma patients.

The Food and Drug Administration approved the monoclonal antibody in combination with bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone (VMP) for treatment of newly diagnosed myeloma patients who are transplant ineligible.

That approval was based on results of the multicenter phase 3 ALCYONE study, showing an 18-month progression-free survival rate of 71.6% for the four-drug combination versus 50.2% for VMP alone (N Engl J Med. 2018;378:518-28).

Dr. Callander reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

NEW YORK – Four-drug combinations are looking promising for the treatment of multiple myeloma, though data from additional randomized trials are needed to define their role in clinical practice, according to Natalie S. Callander, MD, of the University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison.

“The outlook for myeloma patients is quite good,” Dr. Callander said at the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Hematologic Malignancies Annual Congress.

“Triplet therapy is the standard, and quad therapy may be in the future.”

The study that set the standard for triplets in myeloma, according to Dr. Callander, is SWOG 0777, an open-label, phase 3 trial that compared bortezomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRd) to lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma.

Adding bortezomib to lenalidomide and dexamethasone significantly improved both progression-free and overall survival in the 525-patient trial, with a risk-benefit profile that was acceptable (Lancet. 2017 Feb 4;389[10068]:519-27).

The median progression-free survival was 43 months for the triplet, versus 30 months for the two-drug regimen (P = .0018); likewise, median overall survival was significantly improved, at 75 months versus 64 months for triplet versus doublet therapy (P = .025).

“Very convincingly, just receiving that short exposure to bortezomib ended up causing a substantial increase of progression-free and overall survival,” Dr. Callander said.

The efficacy of multiple triplet regimens has been documented, including the combination of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd); cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (CyBorD); and more recently, ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (IRd). These regimens have “excellent” response rates and survival data, Dr. Callander said.

Data is now emerging on the potential role of four-drug combinations, she added. The combination of elotuzumab plus VRd produced high response rates that were even higher after transplant, with reasonable toxicity, Dr. Callander said of phase 2 trial data presented at the 2017 annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Similarly, the combination of daratumumab plus KRd had a 100% rate of partial response or better in phase 2 data presented at ASCO in 2017, with rates of very good partial response and complete response that improved with successive cycles of therapy, she said.

Even so, “it remains to be seen whether four drugs will be the new standard,” Dr. Callander told the NCCN attendees.

Four- versus three-drug strategies are being evaluated in ongoing randomized clinical trials, including patients with previously untreated myeloma, she said. Those studies include Cassiopeia, which is evaluating bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (with or without daratumumab), and GRIFFIN, which is looking at VRd (with or without daratumumab).

Daratumumab recently received an additional indication in the treatment of myeloma, this time as part of a four-drug regimen, Dr. Callander added in a discussion on treatment options for elderly myeloma patients.

The Food and Drug Administration approved the monoclonal antibody in combination with bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone (VMP) for treatment of newly diagnosed myeloma patients who are transplant ineligible.

That approval was based on results of the multicenter phase 3 ALCYONE study, showing an 18-month progression-free survival rate of 71.6% for the four-drug combination versus 50.2% for VMP alone (N Engl J Med. 2018;378:518-28).

Dr. Callander reported having no relevant financial disclosures.