Social distancing comes to the medicine wards

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 08/26/2021 - 16:14

As the coronavirus pandemic has swept across America, so have advisories for social distancing. As of April 2, stay-at-home orders had been given in 38 states and parts of 7 more, affecting about 300 million people. Most of these people have been asked to maintain 6 feet of separation to anyone outside their immediate family and to avoid all avoidable contacts.

Dr. Ian Jenkins is professor and chair of the Patient Safety Committee in the Division of Hospital Medicine at the University of California, San Diego.
Dr. Ian Jenkins

Typical hospital medicine patients at an academic hospital, however, traditionally receive visits from their hospitalist, an intern, a resident, and sometimes several medical students, pharmacists, and case managers. At University of California, San Diego, Health, many of these visits would occur during Focused Interdisciplinary Team rounds, with providers moving together in close proximity.

Asymptomatic and presymptomatic spread of coronavirus have been documented, which means distancing is a good idea for everyone. The risks of traditional patient visits during the coronavirus pandemic include spread to both patients (at high risk of complications) and staff (taken out of the workforce during surge times). Even if coronavirus were not a risk, visits to isolation rooms consume PPE, which is in short supply.

Dr. Greg Seymann, clinical professor and vice chief for academic affairs, UCSD Division of Hospital Medicine
Dr. Greg Seymann

In response to the pandemic, UCSD Hospital Medicine drafted guidelines for the reduction of patient contacts. Our slide presentations and written guidelines were then distributed to physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and other staff by our pandemic response command center. Key points include the following:

  • Target one in-person MD visit per day for stable patients. This means that attending reexaminations of patients seen by residents, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and so on would not be done for billing or teaching purposes, only when clinically necessary.
  • Use phone or video conferencing for follow-up discussions unless direct patient contact is needed.
  • Consider skipping daily exams on patients who do not require them, such as patients awaiting placement or stably receiving long courses of antibiotics. Interview them remotely or from the door instead.
  • Conduct team rounds, patient discussions, and handoffs with all members 6 feet apart or by telephone or video. Avoid shared work rooms. Substitute video conferences for in-person meetings. Use EMR embedded messaging to reduce face-to-face discussions.
  • Check if a patient is ready for a visit before donning PPE to avoid waste.
  • Explain to patients that distancing is being conducted to protect them. In our experience, when patients are asked about distancing, they welcome the changes.

Dr. Sarah Horman, a hospitalist and assistant professor of medicine at UC San Diego Health
Dr. Sarah Horman

We have also considered that most patient visits are generated by nurses and assistants. To increase distancing and reduce PPE waste, we have encouraged nurses and pharmacists to maximize their use of remote communication with patients and to suggest changes to care plans and come up with creative solutions to reduce traffic. We specifically suggested the following changes to routine care:

  • Reduce frequency of taking vital signs, such as just daily or as needed, in stable patients (for example, those awaiting placement).
  • Reduce checks for alcohol withdrawal and neurologic status as soon as possible, and stop fingersticks in patients with well-controlled diabetes not receiving insulin.
  • Substitute less frequently administered medications where appropriate if doing so would reduce room traffic (such as enoxaparin for heparin, ceftriaxone for cefazolin, naproxen for ibuprofen, or patient-controlled analgesia for as needed morphine).
  • Place intravenous pumps in halls if needed – luckily, our situation has not required these measures in San Diego.
  • Explore the possibility of increased patient self-management (self-dosed insulin or inhalers) where medically appropriate.
  • Eliminate food service and janitorial trips to isolation rooms unless requested by registered nurse.

Dr. John Bell, division of hospital medicine, University of California, San Diego Medical Center
Dr. John Bell

There are clear downsides to medical distancing for hospital medicine patients. Patients might have delayed diagnosis of new conditions or inadequate management of conditions requiring frequent assessment, such as alcohol withdrawal. Opportunities for miscommunication (either patient-provider or provider-provider) may be increased with distancing. Isolation also comes with emotional costs such as stress and feelings of isolation or abandonment. Given the dynamic nature of the pandemic response, we are continually reevaluating our distancing guidelines to administer the safest and most effective hospital care possible as we approach California’s expected peak coronavirus infection period.

Dr. Jenkins is professor and chair of the Patient Safety Committee in the Division of Hospital Medicine at UCSD. Dr. Seymann is clinical professor and vice chief for academic affairs, UCSD division of hospital medicine. Dr. Horman and Dr. Bell are hospitalists and associate professors of medicine at UC San Diego Health.

Publications
Topics
Sections

As the coronavirus pandemic has swept across America, so have advisories for social distancing. As of April 2, stay-at-home orders had been given in 38 states and parts of 7 more, affecting about 300 million people. Most of these people have been asked to maintain 6 feet of separation to anyone outside their immediate family and to avoid all avoidable contacts.

Dr. Ian Jenkins is professor and chair of the Patient Safety Committee in the Division of Hospital Medicine at the University of California, San Diego.
Dr. Ian Jenkins

Typical hospital medicine patients at an academic hospital, however, traditionally receive visits from their hospitalist, an intern, a resident, and sometimes several medical students, pharmacists, and case managers. At University of California, San Diego, Health, many of these visits would occur during Focused Interdisciplinary Team rounds, with providers moving together in close proximity.

Asymptomatic and presymptomatic spread of coronavirus have been documented, which means distancing is a good idea for everyone. The risks of traditional patient visits during the coronavirus pandemic include spread to both patients (at high risk of complications) and staff (taken out of the workforce during surge times). Even if coronavirus were not a risk, visits to isolation rooms consume PPE, which is in short supply.

Dr. Greg Seymann, clinical professor and vice chief for academic affairs, UCSD Division of Hospital Medicine
Dr. Greg Seymann

In response to the pandemic, UCSD Hospital Medicine drafted guidelines for the reduction of patient contacts. Our slide presentations and written guidelines were then distributed to physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and other staff by our pandemic response command center. Key points include the following:

  • Target one in-person MD visit per day for stable patients. This means that attending reexaminations of patients seen by residents, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and so on would not be done for billing or teaching purposes, only when clinically necessary.
  • Use phone or video conferencing for follow-up discussions unless direct patient contact is needed.
  • Consider skipping daily exams on patients who do not require them, such as patients awaiting placement or stably receiving long courses of antibiotics. Interview them remotely or from the door instead.
  • Conduct team rounds, patient discussions, and handoffs with all members 6 feet apart or by telephone or video. Avoid shared work rooms. Substitute video conferences for in-person meetings. Use EMR embedded messaging to reduce face-to-face discussions.
  • Check if a patient is ready for a visit before donning PPE to avoid waste.
  • Explain to patients that distancing is being conducted to protect them. In our experience, when patients are asked about distancing, they welcome the changes.

Dr. Sarah Horman, a hospitalist and assistant professor of medicine at UC San Diego Health
Dr. Sarah Horman

We have also considered that most patient visits are generated by nurses and assistants. To increase distancing and reduce PPE waste, we have encouraged nurses and pharmacists to maximize their use of remote communication with patients and to suggest changes to care plans and come up with creative solutions to reduce traffic. We specifically suggested the following changes to routine care:

  • Reduce frequency of taking vital signs, such as just daily or as needed, in stable patients (for example, those awaiting placement).
  • Reduce checks for alcohol withdrawal and neurologic status as soon as possible, and stop fingersticks in patients with well-controlled diabetes not receiving insulin.
  • Substitute less frequently administered medications where appropriate if doing so would reduce room traffic (such as enoxaparin for heparin, ceftriaxone for cefazolin, naproxen for ibuprofen, or patient-controlled analgesia for as needed morphine).
  • Place intravenous pumps in halls if needed – luckily, our situation has not required these measures in San Diego.
  • Explore the possibility of increased patient self-management (self-dosed insulin or inhalers) where medically appropriate.
  • Eliminate food service and janitorial trips to isolation rooms unless requested by registered nurse.

Dr. John Bell, division of hospital medicine, University of California, San Diego Medical Center
Dr. John Bell

There are clear downsides to medical distancing for hospital medicine patients. Patients might have delayed diagnosis of new conditions or inadequate management of conditions requiring frequent assessment, such as alcohol withdrawal. Opportunities for miscommunication (either patient-provider or provider-provider) may be increased with distancing. Isolation also comes with emotional costs such as stress and feelings of isolation or abandonment. Given the dynamic nature of the pandemic response, we are continually reevaluating our distancing guidelines to administer the safest and most effective hospital care possible as we approach California’s expected peak coronavirus infection period.

Dr. Jenkins is professor and chair of the Patient Safety Committee in the Division of Hospital Medicine at UCSD. Dr. Seymann is clinical professor and vice chief for academic affairs, UCSD division of hospital medicine. Dr. Horman and Dr. Bell are hospitalists and associate professors of medicine at UC San Diego Health.

As the coronavirus pandemic has swept across America, so have advisories for social distancing. As of April 2, stay-at-home orders had been given in 38 states and parts of 7 more, affecting about 300 million people. Most of these people have been asked to maintain 6 feet of separation to anyone outside their immediate family and to avoid all avoidable contacts.

Dr. Ian Jenkins is professor and chair of the Patient Safety Committee in the Division of Hospital Medicine at the University of California, San Diego.
Dr. Ian Jenkins

Typical hospital medicine patients at an academic hospital, however, traditionally receive visits from their hospitalist, an intern, a resident, and sometimes several medical students, pharmacists, and case managers. At University of California, San Diego, Health, many of these visits would occur during Focused Interdisciplinary Team rounds, with providers moving together in close proximity.

Asymptomatic and presymptomatic spread of coronavirus have been documented, which means distancing is a good idea for everyone. The risks of traditional patient visits during the coronavirus pandemic include spread to both patients (at high risk of complications) and staff (taken out of the workforce during surge times). Even if coronavirus were not a risk, visits to isolation rooms consume PPE, which is in short supply.

Dr. Greg Seymann, clinical professor and vice chief for academic affairs, UCSD Division of Hospital Medicine
Dr. Greg Seymann

In response to the pandemic, UCSD Hospital Medicine drafted guidelines for the reduction of patient contacts. Our slide presentations and written guidelines were then distributed to physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and other staff by our pandemic response command center. Key points include the following:

  • Target one in-person MD visit per day for stable patients. This means that attending reexaminations of patients seen by residents, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and so on would not be done for billing or teaching purposes, only when clinically necessary.
  • Use phone or video conferencing for follow-up discussions unless direct patient contact is needed.
  • Consider skipping daily exams on patients who do not require them, such as patients awaiting placement or stably receiving long courses of antibiotics. Interview them remotely or from the door instead.
  • Conduct team rounds, patient discussions, and handoffs with all members 6 feet apart or by telephone or video. Avoid shared work rooms. Substitute video conferences for in-person meetings. Use EMR embedded messaging to reduce face-to-face discussions.
  • Check if a patient is ready for a visit before donning PPE to avoid waste.
  • Explain to patients that distancing is being conducted to protect them. In our experience, when patients are asked about distancing, they welcome the changes.

Dr. Sarah Horman, a hospitalist and assistant professor of medicine at UC San Diego Health
Dr. Sarah Horman

We have also considered that most patient visits are generated by nurses and assistants. To increase distancing and reduce PPE waste, we have encouraged nurses and pharmacists to maximize their use of remote communication with patients and to suggest changes to care plans and come up with creative solutions to reduce traffic. We specifically suggested the following changes to routine care:

  • Reduce frequency of taking vital signs, such as just daily or as needed, in stable patients (for example, those awaiting placement).
  • Reduce checks for alcohol withdrawal and neurologic status as soon as possible, and stop fingersticks in patients with well-controlled diabetes not receiving insulin.
  • Substitute less frequently administered medications where appropriate if doing so would reduce room traffic (such as enoxaparin for heparin, ceftriaxone for cefazolin, naproxen for ibuprofen, or patient-controlled analgesia for as needed morphine).
  • Place intravenous pumps in halls if needed – luckily, our situation has not required these measures in San Diego.
  • Explore the possibility of increased patient self-management (self-dosed insulin or inhalers) where medically appropriate.
  • Eliminate food service and janitorial trips to isolation rooms unless requested by registered nurse.

Dr. John Bell, division of hospital medicine, University of California, San Diego Medical Center
Dr. John Bell

There are clear downsides to medical distancing for hospital medicine patients. Patients might have delayed diagnosis of new conditions or inadequate management of conditions requiring frequent assessment, such as alcohol withdrawal. Opportunities for miscommunication (either patient-provider or provider-provider) may be increased with distancing. Isolation also comes with emotional costs such as stress and feelings of isolation or abandonment. Given the dynamic nature of the pandemic response, we are continually reevaluating our distancing guidelines to administer the safest and most effective hospital care possible as we approach California’s expected peak coronavirus infection period.

Dr. Jenkins is professor and chair of the Patient Safety Committee in the Division of Hospital Medicine at UCSD. Dr. Seymann is clinical professor and vice chief for academic affairs, UCSD division of hospital medicine. Dr. Horman and Dr. Bell are hospitalists and associate professors of medicine at UC San Diego Health.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.

A novel communication framework for inpatient pain management

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 12/20/2019 - 11:43

Introducing the VIEW Framework

Case

A 55-year-old male with a history of diabetes mellitus, lumbar degenerative disc disease, and chronic low back pain was admitted overnight with right lower extremity cellulitis. He reported taking oral hydromorphone for chronic pain, but review of the Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) revealed multiple short-term prescriptions from various ED providers, as well as monthly prescriptions from a variety of primary care providers.

A doctor listens to a patient
DMEPhotography/Getty Images

Throughout the EHR, he is described as manipulative and narcotic-seeking with notation of multiple ED visits for pain. Multiple discharges against medical advice were noted. He was given two doses of IV hydromorphone in the ED and requested that this be continued. He was admitted for IV antibiotics for severe leg pain that he rated 15/10.
 

Background

The Society of Hospital Medicine published a consensus statement in the Journal of Hospital Medicine in 2018 that included 16 clinical recommendations on the safe use of opioids for the treatment of acute pain in hospitalized adults.1 In regard to communication about pain, clinicians are encouraged to set realistic goals and expectations of opioid therapy, closely monitor response to opioid therapy, and provide education about the side effects and potential risks of opioid therapy for patients and their families.

However, even when these strategies are employed, the social and behavioral complexities of individual patients can contribute to unsatisfactory interactions with health care staff. Because difficult encounters have been linked to provider burnout, enhanced communication strategies can benefit both the patient and physician.2

SHM’s Patient Experience Committee saw an opportunity to provide complementary evidence-based best-practice tips for communication about pain. Specifically, the committee worked collectively to develop a framework that can be applied to more challenging encounters.
 

The VIEW Framework

VISIT the patient’s chart and your own mental state.

First, visit the patient’s chart to review information relevant to the patient’s pain history. The EHR can be leveraged through filters and search functions to identify encounters, consultations, and notes relevant to pain management.

Look at the prior to admission medication list and active medication list and see if there are discrepancies. The medication administration record (MAR) can help identify adjunctive medications that the patient may be refusing. PDMP data should be screened for signs of aberrant use, including multiple pharmacies, multiple prescribers, short intervals between prescriptions, and serially prescribed, multiple, low-quantity prescriptions.

Dr. Sarah Horman, a hospitalist and assistant professor of medicine at UC San Diego Health
Dr. Sarah Horman

While documented pain scores can be a marker of patient distress, objective aspects of the patient’s functional status can shed light on how much his/her discomfort impairs day-to-day living. Examples of these measures include nutritional intake, sleep cycle, out of bed activity, and participation with therapy. Lastly, assess for opioid-related side-effects including constipation, decreased respiratory rate, and any notation of over sedation in narrative documentation from ancillary services.

Once this information has been accrued, it is important to take a moment of mindfulness before meeting with the patient. Take steps to minimize interruptions with electronic devices by silencing your pager/cell phone and disengaging from computers/tablets. Some examples of mindfulness-based practices include taking cycles of deep breathing, going for a short walk to appreciate hospital artwork or view points, or focusing on the sensory aspects of washing your hands prior to seeing the patient. Self-reflection on prior meaningful encounters can also help reset your state of mind. These activities can help clear prior subconscious thoughts and frustrations and prepare for the task ahead of you.3

Intense focus and awareness can enhance your recognition of patient distress, increase your ability to engage in active listening, and enable you to be more receptive to verbal and nonverbal cues.2 Additionally, mindful behaviors have been shown to contribute to decreased burnout and improved empathy.4,5
 

INTERVIEW the patient.

Once you enter the room, introduce yourself to the patient and others who are present. Interview the patient by eliciting subjective information. Use open-ended and nonjudgmental language, and take moments to summarize the patient’s perspective.

Inquire about the patient’s home baseline pain scores and past levels of acceptable function. Further explore the patient’s performance goals related to activities of daily living and quality of life. Ask about any prior history of addiction to any substance, and if needed, discuss your specific concerns related to substance misuse and abuse.
 

EMPATHIZE with the patient.

Integrate empathy into your interview by validating any frustrations and experience of pain. Identifying with loss of function and quality of life can help you connect with the patient and initiate a therapeutic relationship. Observe both verbal and nonverbal behaviors that reveal signs of emotional discomfort.6 Use open-ended questions to create space and trust for patients to share their feelings.

Pause to summarize the patient’s perspective while acknowledging and validating emotions that he or she may be experiencing such as anxiety, fear, frustration and anger.6 Statements such as “ I know it is frustrating to ... ” or “I can’t imagine what it must feel like to ... ” can help convey empathy. Multiple studies have suggested that enhanced provider empathy and positive messaging can also reduce patient pain and anxiety and increase quality of life.7,8 Empathic responses to negative emotional expressions from patients have also been associated with higher ratings of communication.9
 

WRAP UP.

Dr. Sarah Richards, a hospitalist and assistant professor of medicine at the University of Nebraska Medical Center in Omaha
Dr. Sarah Richards

Finally, wrap up by aligning expectations with the patient for pain control and summarize your management recommendations. Educate the patient and his/her family on the risks and benefits of recommended therapy as well as the expected course of recovery. Setting shared goals for functionality relevant to the patient’s personal values and quality of life can build connection between you and your patient.

While handing over the patient to the next provider, refrain from using stereotypical language such as “narcotic-seeking patient.” Clearly communicate the management plan and milestones to other team members, such as nurses, physical therapists, and oncoming hospitalists, to maintain consistency. This will help align patients and their care team and may stave off maladaptive patient behaviors such as splitting.
 

Applying the VIEW framework to the case

Visit

Upon visiting the medical chart, the physician realized that the patient’s opioid use began in his 20s when he injured his back in a traumatic motor vehicle accident. His successful athletic career came to a halt after this injury and opioid dependence ensued.

While reviewing past notes and prescription data via the PDMP, the physician noted that the patient had been visiting many different providers in order to get more pain medications. The most recent prescription was for oral hydromorphone 4 mg every 4 hours as needed, filled 1 week prior to this presentation.

She reviewed his vital signs and found that he had been persistently hypertensive and tachycardic. His nurse mentioned that he appeared to be in severe pain because of facial grimacing with standing and walking.

Prior to entering the patient’s room, the physician took a moment of mindfulness to become aware of her emotional state because she recognized that she was worried this could be a difficult encounter. She considered how hard his life has been and how much emotional and physical pain he might be experiencing. She took a deep breath, silenced her phone, and entered the room.
 

Interview

The physician sat at the bedside and interviewed the patient using a calm and nonjudgmental tone. It was quickly obvious to her that he was experiencing real pain. His cellulitis appeared severe and was tender to even minimal palpation. She learned that the pain in his leg had been worsening over the past week to the point that it was becoming difficult to ambulate, sleep and perform his daily hygiene routine. He was taking 4 mg tablets of hydromorphone every 2 hours, and he had run out a few days ago. He added that his mood was increasingly depressed, and he had even admitted to occasional suicidal thoughts because the pain was so unbearable.

When asked directly, he admitted that he was worried he was addicted to hydromorphone. He had first received it for low back pain after the motor vehicle accident, and it been refilled multiple times for ongoing pain over the course of a year. Importantly, she also learned that he felt he was often treated as an addict by medical professionals and felt that doctors no longer listened to him or believed him.
 

Empathize

As the conversation went on, the physician offered empathetic statements, recognizing the way it might feel to have your pain ignored or minimized by doctors. She expressed how frustrating it is to not be able to perform basic functions and how difficult it must be to constantly live in pain.

She said, “I don’t want you to suffer in pain. I care about you and my goal is to treat your pain so that you can return to doing the things in life that you find meaningful.” She also recognized the severity of his depression and discussed with him the role and importance of psychiatric consultation.
 

Wrap Up

The physician wrapped up the encounter by summarizing her plan to treat the infection and work together with him to treat his pain with the goal that he could ambulate and perform activities of daily living.

She reviewed the side effects of both acute and long-term use of opioids and discussed the risks and benefits. Given the fact that patient was on chronic baseline opioids and also had objective signs of acute pain, she started an initial regimen of hydromorphone 6 mg tablets every 4 hours as needed (a 50% increase over his home dose) and added acetaminophen 1000 mg every 6 hours and ibuprofen 600 mg every 8 hours.

She informed him that she would check on him in the afternoon and that the ultimate plan would be to taper down on his hydromorphone dose each day as his cellulitis improved. She also communicated that bidirectional respect between the patient and care team members was critical to a successful pain management.

Finally, she explained that there was going to be a different doctor covering at night and major changes to the prescription regimen would be deferred to daytime hours.

When she left the room, she summarized the plan with the patient’s nurse and shared a few details about the patient’s difficult past. At the end of the shift, the physician signed out to the overnight team that the patient had objective signs of pain and recommended a visit to the bedside if the patient’s symptoms were reported as worsening.

During his hospital stay, she monitored the patient’s nonverbal responses to movement, participation in physical therapy, and ability to sleep. She tapered the hydromorphone down each day as the patient’s cellulitis improved. At discharge, he was prescribed a 3-day supply of his home dose of hydromorphone and the same acetaminophen and ibuprofen regimen he had been on in the hospital with instructions for tapering. Finally, after coming to an agreement with the patient, she arranged for follow-up in the opioid taper clinic and communicated the plan with the patient’s primary care provider.

Dr. Horman is a hospitalist and assistant professor of medicine at UC San Diego Health. Dr. Richards is a hospitalist and assistant professor of medicine at the University of Nebraska Medical Center in Omaha. Dr. Horman and Dr. Richards note that they wrote this article in collaboration with the Society of Hospital Medicine Patient Experience Committee.

Key points

  • Spend adequate time to fully visit patients’ history as it relates to their current pain complaints.
  • Review notes and prescription data to better understand past and current pain regimen.
  • Be vigilant about taking a mindful moment to visit your thoughts and potential biases.
  • Interview patients using a calm tone and nonjudgmental, reassuring words.
  • Empathize with patients and validate any frustrations and experience of pain.
  • Wrap-up by summarizing your recommendations with patients, their families, the care team, and subsequent providers.

References

1. Herzig SJ et al. Safe opioid prescribing for acute noncancer pain in hospitalized adults: A Systematic Review of Existing Guidelines. J Hosp Med. 2018;13(4):256-62.

2. An PG et al. (MEM Investigators). Burden of difficult encounters in primary care: data from the minimizing error, maximizing outcomes study. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(4):410-4.

3. Sanyer O, Fortenberry K. Using Mindfulness Techniques to improve difficult clinical encounters. Am Fam Physician. 2013;87(6):402.

4. Beckman HB et al. The impact of a program in mindful communication on primary care physicians. Acad Med. 2012;87(6):815-8.

5. Krasner MS et al. Association of an educational program in mindful communication with burnout, empathy, and attitudes among primary care physicians. JAMA. 2009;302(12):1284-93.

6. Dean M, Street R. A 3-Stage model of patient centered communication for addressing cancer patients’ emotional distress. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;94(2):143-8.

7. Howick J et al. Effects of empathic and positive communication in healthcare consultations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J R Soc Med. 2018;111(7):240-52.

8. Mistiaen P et al. The effect of patient-practitioner communication on pain: A systematic review. Eur J Pain. 2016;20:675-88.

9. Weiss R et al. Associations of physician empathy with patient anxiety and ratings of communication in hospital admission encounters. J Hosp Med. 2017;12(10):805-10.

Publications
Topics
Sections

Introducing the VIEW Framework

Introducing the VIEW Framework

Case

A 55-year-old male with a history of diabetes mellitus, lumbar degenerative disc disease, and chronic low back pain was admitted overnight with right lower extremity cellulitis. He reported taking oral hydromorphone for chronic pain, but review of the Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) revealed multiple short-term prescriptions from various ED providers, as well as monthly prescriptions from a variety of primary care providers.

A doctor listens to a patient
DMEPhotography/Getty Images

Throughout the EHR, he is described as manipulative and narcotic-seeking with notation of multiple ED visits for pain. Multiple discharges against medical advice were noted. He was given two doses of IV hydromorphone in the ED and requested that this be continued. He was admitted for IV antibiotics for severe leg pain that he rated 15/10.
 

Background

The Society of Hospital Medicine published a consensus statement in the Journal of Hospital Medicine in 2018 that included 16 clinical recommendations on the safe use of opioids for the treatment of acute pain in hospitalized adults.1 In regard to communication about pain, clinicians are encouraged to set realistic goals and expectations of opioid therapy, closely monitor response to opioid therapy, and provide education about the side effects and potential risks of opioid therapy for patients and their families.

However, even when these strategies are employed, the social and behavioral complexities of individual patients can contribute to unsatisfactory interactions with health care staff. Because difficult encounters have been linked to provider burnout, enhanced communication strategies can benefit both the patient and physician.2

SHM’s Patient Experience Committee saw an opportunity to provide complementary evidence-based best-practice tips for communication about pain. Specifically, the committee worked collectively to develop a framework that can be applied to more challenging encounters.
 

The VIEW Framework

VISIT the patient’s chart and your own mental state.

First, visit the patient’s chart to review information relevant to the patient’s pain history. The EHR can be leveraged through filters and search functions to identify encounters, consultations, and notes relevant to pain management.

Look at the prior to admission medication list and active medication list and see if there are discrepancies. The medication administration record (MAR) can help identify adjunctive medications that the patient may be refusing. PDMP data should be screened for signs of aberrant use, including multiple pharmacies, multiple prescribers, short intervals between prescriptions, and serially prescribed, multiple, low-quantity prescriptions.

Dr. Sarah Horman, a hospitalist and assistant professor of medicine at UC San Diego Health
Dr. Sarah Horman

While documented pain scores can be a marker of patient distress, objective aspects of the patient’s functional status can shed light on how much his/her discomfort impairs day-to-day living. Examples of these measures include nutritional intake, sleep cycle, out of bed activity, and participation with therapy. Lastly, assess for opioid-related side-effects including constipation, decreased respiratory rate, and any notation of over sedation in narrative documentation from ancillary services.

Once this information has been accrued, it is important to take a moment of mindfulness before meeting with the patient. Take steps to minimize interruptions with electronic devices by silencing your pager/cell phone and disengaging from computers/tablets. Some examples of mindfulness-based practices include taking cycles of deep breathing, going for a short walk to appreciate hospital artwork or view points, or focusing on the sensory aspects of washing your hands prior to seeing the patient. Self-reflection on prior meaningful encounters can also help reset your state of mind. These activities can help clear prior subconscious thoughts and frustrations and prepare for the task ahead of you.3

Intense focus and awareness can enhance your recognition of patient distress, increase your ability to engage in active listening, and enable you to be more receptive to verbal and nonverbal cues.2 Additionally, mindful behaviors have been shown to contribute to decreased burnout and improved empathy.4,5
 

INTERVIEW the patient.

Once you enter the room, introduce yourself to the patient and others who are present. Interview the patient by eliciting subjective information. Use open-ended and nonjudgmental language, and take moments to summarize the patient’s perspective.

Inquire about the patient’s home baseline pain scores and past levels of acceptable function. Further explore the patient’s performance goals related to activities of daily living and quality of life. Ask about any prior history of addiction to any substance, and if needed, discuss your specific concerns related to substance misuse and abuse.
 

EMPATHIZE with the patient.

Integrate empathy into your interview by validating any frustrations and experience of pain. Identifying with loss of function and quality of life can help you connect with the patient and initiate a therapeutic relationship. Observe both verbal and nonverbal behaviors that reveal signs of emotional discomfort.6 Use open-ended questions to create space and trust for patients to share their feelings.

Pause to summarize the patient’s perspective while acknowledging and validating emotions that he or she may be experiencing such as anxiety, fear, frustration and anger.6 Statements such as “ I know it is frustrating to ... ” or “I can’t imagine what it must feel like to ... ” can help convey empathy. Multiple studies have suggested that enhanced provider empathy and positive messaging can also reduce patient pain and anxiety and increase quality of life.7,8 Empathic responses to negative emotional expressions from patients have also been associated with higher ratings of communication.9
 

WRAP UP.

Dr. Sarah Richards, a hospitalist and assistant professor of medicine at the University of Nebraska Medical Center in Omaha
Dr. Sarah Richards

Finally, wrap up by aligning expectations with the patient for pain control and summarize your management recommendations. Educate the patient and his/her family on the risks and benefits of recommended therapy as well as the expected course of recovery. Setting shared goals for functionality relevant to the patient’s personal values and quality of life can build connection between you and your patient.

While handing over the patient to the next provider, refrain from using stereotypical language such as “narcotic-seeking patient.” Clearly communicate the management plan and milestones to other team members, such as nurses, physical therapists, and oncoming hospitalists, to maintain consistency. This will help align patients and their care team and may stave off maladaptive patient behaviors such as splitting.
 

Applying the VIEW framework to the case

Visit

Upon visiting the medical chart, the physician realized that the patient’s opioid use began in his 20s when he injured his back in a traumatic motor vehicle accident. His successful athletic career came to a halt after this injury and opioid dependence ensued.

While reviewing past notes and prescription data via the PDMP, the physician noted that the patient had been visiting many different providers in order to get more pain medications. The most recent prescription was for oral hydromorphone 4 mg every 4 hours as needed, filled 1 week prior to this presentation.

She reviewed his vital signs and found that he had been persistently hypertensive and tachycardic. His nurse mentioned that he appeared to be in severe pain because of facial grimacing with standing and walking.

Prior to entering the patient’s room, the physician took a moment of mindfulness to become aware of her emotional state because she recognized that she was worried this could be a difficult encounter. She considered how hard his life has been and how much emotional and physical pain he might be experiencing. She took a deep breath, silenced her phone, and entered the room.
 

Interview

The physician sat at the bedside and interviewed the patient using a calm and nonjudgmental tone. It was quickly obvious to her that he was experiencing real pain. His cellulitis appeared severe and was tender to even minimal palpation. She learned that the pain in his leg had been worsening over the past week to the point that it was becoming difficult to ambulate, sleep and perform his daily hygiene routine. He was taking 4 mg tablets of hydromorphone every 2 hours, and he had run out a few days ago. He added that his mood was increasingly depressed, and he had even admitted to occasional suicidal thoughts because the pain was so unbearable.

When asked directly, he admitted that he was worried he was addicted to hydromorphone. He had first received it for low back pain after the motor vehicle accident, and it been refilled multiple times for ongoing pain over the course of a year. Importantly, she also learned that he felt he was often treated as an addict by medical professionals and felt that doctors no longer listened to him or believed him.
 

Empathize

As the conversation went on, the physician offered empathetic statements, recognizing the way it might feel to have your pain ignored or minimized by doctors. She expressed how frustrating it is to not be able to perform basic functions and how difficult it must be to constantly live in pain.

She said, “I don’t want you to suffer in pain. I care about you and my goal is to treat your pain so that you can return to doing the things in life that you find meaningful.” She also recognized the severity of his depression and discussed with him the role and importance of psychiatric consultation.
 

Wrap Up

The physician wrapped up the encounter by summarizing her plan to treat the infection and work together with him to treat his pain with the goal that he could ambulate and perform activities of daily living.

She reviewed the side effects of both acute and long-term use of opioids and discussed the risks and benefits. Given the fact that patient was on chronic baseline opioids and also had objective signs of acute pain, she started an initial regimen of hydromorphone 6 mg tablets every 4 hours as needed (a 50% increase over his home dose) and added acetaminophen 1000 mg every 6 hours and ibuprofen 600 mg every 8 hours.

She informed him that she would check on him in the afternoon and that the ultimate plan would be to taper down on his hydromorphone dose each day as his cellulitis improved. She also communicated that bidirectional respect between the patient and care team members was critical to a successful pain management.

Finally, she explained that there was going to be a different doctor covering at night and major changes to the prescription regimen would be deferred to daytime hours.

When she left the room, she summarized the plan with the patient’s nurse and shared a few details about the patient’s difficult past. At the end of the shift, the physician signed out to the overnight team that the patient had objective signs of pain and recommended a visit to the bedside if the patient’s symptoms were reported as worsening.

During his hospital stay, she monitored the patient’s nonverbal responses to movement, participation in physical therapy, and ability to sleep. She tapered the hydromorphone down each day as the patient’s cellulitis improved. At discharge, he was prescribed a 3-day supply of his home dose of hydromorphone and the same acetaminophen and ibuprofen regimen he had been on in the hospital with instructions for tapering. Finally, after coming to an agreement with the patient, she arranged for follow-up in the opioid taper clinic and communicated the plan with the patient’s primary care provider.

Dr. Horman is a hospitalist and assistant professor of medicine at UC San Diego Health. Dr. Richards is a hospitalist and assistant professor of medicine at the University of Nebraska Medical Center in Omaha. Dr. Horman and Dr. Richards note that they wrote this article in collaboration with the Society of Hospital Medicine Patient Experience Committee.

Key points

  • Spend adequate time to fully visit patients’ history as it relates to their current pain complaints.
  • Review notes and prescription data to better understand past and current pain regimen.
  • Be vigilant about taking a mindful moment to visit your thoughts and potential biases.
  • Interview patients using a calm tone and nonjudgmental, reassuring words.
  • Empathize with patients and validate any frustrations and experience of pain.
  • Wrap-up by summarizing your recommendations with patients, their families, the care team, and subsequent providers.

References

1. Herzig SJ et al. Safe opioid prescribing for acute noncancer pain in hospitalized adults: A Systematic Review of Existing Guidelines. J Hosp Med. 2018;13(4):256-62.

2. An PG et al. (MEM Investigators). Burden of difficult encounters in primary care: data from the minimizing error, maximizing outcomes study. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(4):410-4.

3. Sanyer O, Fortenberry K. Using Mindfulness Techniques to improve difficult clinical encounters. Am Fam Physician. 2013;87(6):402.

4. Beckman HB et al. The impact of a program in mindful communication on primary care physicians. Acad Med. 2012;87(6):815-8.

5. Krasner MS et al. Association of an educational program in mindful communication with burnout, empathy, and attitudes among primary care physicians. JAMA. 2009;302(12):1284-93.

6. Dean M, Street R. A 3-Stage model of patient centered communication for addressing cancer patients’ emotional distress. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;94(2):143-8.

7. Howick J et al. Effects of empathic and positive communication in healthcare consultations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J R Soc Med. 2018;111(7):240-52.

8. Mistiaen P et al. The effect of patient-practitioner communication on pain: A systematic review. Eur J Pain. 2016;20:675-88.

9. Weiss R et al. Associations of physician empathy with patient anxiety and ratings of communication in hospital admission encounters. J Hosp Med. 2017;12(10):805-10.

Case

A 55-year-old male with a history of diabetes mellitus, lumbar degenerative disc disease, and chronic low back pain was admitted overnight with right lower extremity cellulitis. He reported taking oral hydromorphone for chronic pain, but review of the Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) revealed multiple short-term prescriptions from various ED providers, as well as monthly prescriptions from a variety of primary care providers.

A doctor listens to a patient
DMEPhotography/Getty Images

Throughout the EHR, he is described as manipulative and narcotic-seeking with notation of multiple ED visits for pain. Multiple discharges against medical advice were noted. He was given two doses of IV hydromorphone in the ED and requested that this be continued. He was admitted for IV antibiotics for severe leg pain that he rated 15/10.
 

Background

The Society of Hospital Medicine published a consensus statement in the Journal of Hospital Medicine in 2018 that included 16 clinical recommendations on the safe use of opioids for the treatment of acute pain in hospitalized adults.1 In regard to communication about pain, clinicians are encouraged to set realistic goals and expectations of opioid therapy, closely monitor response to opioid therapy, and provide education about the side effects and potential risks of opioid therapy for patients and their families.

However, even when these strategies are employed, the social and behavioral complexities of individual patients can contribute to unsatisfactory interactions with health care staff. Because difficult encounters have been linked to provider burnout, enhanced communication strategies can benefit both the patient and physician.2

SHM’s Patient Experience Committee saw an opportunity to provide complementary evidence-based best-practice tips for communication about pain. Specifically, the committee worked collectively to develop a framework that can be applied to more challenging encounters.
 

The VIEW Framework

VISIT the patient’s chart and your own mental state.

First, visit the patient’s chart to review information relevant to the patient’s pain history. The EHR can be leveraged through filters and search functions to identify encounters, consultations, and notes relevant to pain management.

Look at the prior to admission medication list and active medication list and see if there are discrepancies. The medication administration record (MAR) can help identify adjunctive medications that the patient may be refusing. PDMP data should be screened for signs of aberrant use, including multiple pharmacies, multiple prescribers, short intervals between prescriptions, and serially prescribed, multiple, low-quantity prescriptions.

Dr. Sarah Horman, a hospitalist and assistant professor of medicine at UC San Diego Health
Dr. Sarah Horman

While documented pain scores can be a marker of patient distress, objective aspects of the patient’s functional status can shed light on how much his/her discomfort impairs day-to-day living. Examples of these measures include nutritional intake, sleep cycle, out of bed activity, and participation with therapy. Lastly, assess for opioid-related side-effects including constipation, decreased respiratory rate, and any notation of over sedation in narrative documentation from ancillary services.

Once this information has been accrued, it is important to take a moment of mindfulness before meeting with the patient. Take steps to minimize interruptions with electronic devices by silencing your pager/cell phone and disengaging from computers/tablets. Some examples of mindfulness-based practices include taking cycles of deep breathing, going for a short walk to appreciate hospital artwork or view points, or focusing on the sensory aspects of washing your hands prior to seeing the patient. Self-reflection on prior meaningful encounters can also help reset your state of mind. These activities can help clear prior subconscious thoughts and frustrations and prepare for the task ahead of you.3

Intense focus and awareness can enhance your recognition of patient distress, increase your ability to engage in active listening, and enable you to be more receptive to verbal and nonverbal cues.2 Additionally, mindful behaviors have been shown to contribute to decreased burnout and improved empathy.4,5
 

INTERVIEW the patient.

Once you enter the room, introduce yourself to the patient and others who are present. Interview the patient by eliciting subjective information. Use open-ended and nonjudgmental language, and take moments to summarize the patient’s perspective.

Inquire about the patient’s home baseline pain scores and past levels of acceptable function. Further explore the patient’s performance goals related to activities of daily living and quality of life. Ask about any prior history of addiction to any substance, and if needed, discuss your specific concerns related to substance misuse and abuse.
 

EMPATHIZE with the patient.

Integrate empathy into your interview by validating any frustrations and experience of pain. Identifying with loss of function and quality of life can help you connect with the patient and initiate a therapeutic relationship. Observe both verbal and nonverbal behaviors that reveal signs of emotional discomfort.6 Use open-ended questions to create space and trust for patients to share their feelings.

Pause to summarize the patient’s perspective while acknowledging and validating emotions that he or she may be experiencing such as anxiety, fear, frustration and anger.6 Statements such as “ I know it is frustrating to ... ” or “I can’t imagine what it must feel like to ... ” can help convey empathy. Multiple studies have suggested that enhanced provider empathy and positive messaging can also reduce patient pain and anxiety and increase quality of life.7,8 Empathic responses to negative emotional expressions from patients have also been associated with higher ratings of communication.9
 

WRAP UP.

Dr. Sarah Richards, a hospitalist and assistant professor of medicine at the University of Nebraska Medical Center in Omaha
Dr. Sarah Richards

Finally, wrap up by aligning expectations with the patient for pain control and summarize your management recommendations. Educate the patient and his/her family on the risks and benefits of recommended therapy as well as the expected course of recovery. Setting shared goals for functionality relevant to the patient’s personal values and quality of life can build connection between you and your patient.

While handing over the patient to the next provider, refrain from using stereotypical language such as “narcotic-seeking patient.” Clearly communicate the management plan and milestones to other team members, such as nurses, physical therapists, and oncoming hospitalists, to maintain consistency. This will help align patients and their care team and may stave off maladaptive patient behaviors such as splitting.
 

Applying the VIEW framework to the case

Visit

Upon visiting the medical chart, the physician realized that the patient’s opioid use began in his 20s when he injured his back in a traumatic motor vehicle accident. His successful athletic career came to a halt after this injury and opioid dependence ensued.

While reviewing past notes and prescription data via the PDMP, the physician noted that the patient had been visiting many different providers in order to get more pain medications. The most recent prescription was for oral hydromorphone 4 mg every 4 hours as needed, filled 1 week prior to this presentation.

She reviewed his vital signs and found that he had been persistently hypertensive and tachycardic. His nurse mentioned that he appeared to be in severe pain because of facial grimacing with standing and walking.

Prior to entering the patient’s room, the physician took a moment of mindfulness to become aware of her emotional state because she recognized that she was worried this could be a difficult encounter. She considered how hard his life has been and how much emotional and physical pain he might be experiencing. She took a deep breath, silenced her phone, and entered the room.
 

Interview

The physician sat at the bedside and interviewed the patient using a calm and nonjudgmental tone. It was quickly obvious to her that he was experiencing real pain. His cellulitis appeared severe and was tender to even minimal palpation. She learned that the pain in his leg had been worsening over the past week to the point that it was becoming difficult to ambulate, sleep and perform his daily hygiene routine. He was taking 4 mg tablets of hydromorphone every 2 hours, and he had run out a few days ago. He added that his mood was increasingly depressed, and he had even admitted to occasional suicidal thoughts because the pain was so unbearable.

When asked directly, he admitted that he was worried he was addicted to hydromorphone. He had first received it for low back pain after the motor vehicle accident, and it been refilled multiple times for ongoing pain over the course of a year. Importantly, she also learned that he felt he was often treated as an addict by medical professionals and felt that doctors no longer listened to him or believed him.
 

Empathize

As the conversation went on, the physician offered empathetic statements, recognizing the way it might feel to have your pain ignored or minimized by doctors. She expressed how frustrating it is to not be able to perform basic functions and how difficult it must be to constantly live in pain.

She said, “I don’t want you to suffer in pain. I care about you and my goal is to treat your pain so that you can return to doing the things in life that you find meaningful.” She also recognized the severity of his depression and discussed with him the role and importance of psychiatric consultation.
 

Wrap Up

The physician wrapped up the encounter by summarizing her plan to treat the infection and work together with him to treat his pain with the goal that he could ambulate and perform activities of daily living.

She reviewed the side effects of both acute and long-term use of opioids and discussed the risks and benefits. Given the fact that patient was on chronic baseline opioids and also had objective signs of acute pain, she started an initial regimen of hydromorphone 6 mg tablets every 4 hours as needed (a 50% increase over his home dose) and added acetaminophen 1000 mg every 6 hours and ibuprofen 600 mg every 8 hours.

She informed him that she would check on him in the afternoon and that the ultimate plan would be to taper down on his hydromorphone dose each day as his cellulitis improved. She also communicated that bidirectional respect between the patient and care team members was critical to a successful pain management.

Finally, she explained that there was going to be a different doctor covering at night and major changes to the prescription regimen would be deferred to daytime hours.

When she left the room, she summarized the plan with the patient’s nurse and shared a few details about the patient’s difficult past. At the end of the shift, the physician signed out to the overnight team that the patient had objective signs of pain and recommended a visit to the bedside if the patient’s symptoms were reported as worsening.

During his hospital stay, she monitored the patient’s nonverbal responses to movement, participation in physical therapy, and ability to sleep. She tapered the hydromorphone down each day as the patient’s cellulitis improved. At discharge, he was prescribed a 3-day supply of his home dose of hydromorphone and the same acetaminophen and ibuprofen regimen he had been on in the hospital with instructions for tapering. Finally, after coming to an agreement with the patient, she arranged for follow-up in the opioid taper clinic and communicated the plan with the patient’s primary care provider.

Dr. Horman is a hospitalist and assistant professor of medicine at UC San Diego Health. Dr. Richards is a hospitalist and assistant professor of medicine at the University of Nebraska Medical Center in Omaha. Dr. Horman and Dr. Richards note that they wrote this article in collaboration with the Society of Hospital Medicine Patient Experience Committee.

Key points

  • Spend adequate time to fully visit patients’ history as it relates to their current pain complaints.
  • Review notes and prescription data to better understand past and current pain regimen.
  • Be vigilant about taking a mindful moment to visit your thoughts and potential biases.
  • Interview patients using a calm tone and nonjudgmental, reassuring words.
  • Empathize with patients and validate any frustrations and experience of pain.
  • Wrap-up by summarizing your recommendations with patients, their families, the care team, and subsequent providers.

References

1. Herzig SJ et al. Safe opioid prescribing for acute noncancer pain in hospitalized adults: A Systematic Review of Existing Guidelines. J Hosp Med. 2018;13(4):256-62.

2. An PG et al. (MEM Investigators). Burden of difficult encounters in primary care: data from the minimizing error, maximizing outcomes study. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(4):410-4.

3. Sanyer O, Fortenberry K. Using Mindfulness Techniques to improve difficult clinical encounters. Am Fam Physician. 2013;87(6):402.

4. Beckman HB et al. The impact of a program in mindful communication on primary care physicians. Acad Med. 2012;87(6):815-8.

5. Krasner MS et al. Association of an educational program in mindful communication with burnout, empathy, and attitudes among primary care physicians. JAMA. 2009;302(12):1284-93.

6. Dean M, Street R. A 3-Stage model of patient centered communication for addressing cancer patients’ emotional distress. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;94(2):143-8.

7. Howick J et al. Effects of empathic and positive communication in healthcare consultations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J R Soc Med. 2018;111(7):240-52.

8. Mistiaen P et al. The effect of patient-practitioner communication on pain: A systematic review. Eur J Pain. 2016;20:675-88.

9. Weiss R et al. Associations of physician empathy with patient anxiety and ratings of communication in hospital admission encounters. J Hosp Med. 2017;12(10):805-10.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.