User login
What I learned from Navy SEALs about resilience
In 2017, the National Academy of Medicine recognized the urgent need to address burnout, wellness, and resilience in physicians. A consortium was subsequently put together comprising many cosponsoring organizations, including the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), and the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS). One of many outputs of this consortium was a discussion paper, “A Journey to Construct an All-Encompassing Conceptual Model of Factors Affecting Clinician Well-Being and Resilience.”
The authors conceptually divided wellness and resilience drivers into external and individual factors. It turns out that a large portion of clinician well-being and resilience is related to individual factors that include personal factors, skills, and abilities. Taking personal responsibility and ownership of developing these individual factors is important, but many do not know where to begin.
My journey in this area began 5 years ago. This was a time when organizational resources were sparse and there was little local or national attention to addressing physician wellness. My life was horribly out of balance. While this should have been obvious, the “hit-on-the-head” moment was weighing myself one day and realizing that I was 30 pounds overweight. This was the ultimate sign to me that there was a problem because throughout my entire life, I was always very athletic, even during residency and fellowship training. I was using food as a reward system for several years which, in combination with a dramatic decrease in physical activity due to prioritizing everything related to work, led to this problem. A slowing metabolism that we all face as we age certainly accentuated it.
I was taking care of everybody else, but not myself. Many family members, friends, and even patients told me this over the years, which I conveniently ignored. For several years, my patients were asking me, “How are you doing?” at the end of their office visits. As a surgeon with a busy cancer practice, this should have been a signal for me – my cancer patients asking me how I am doing!
I started to think more about why this was happening. I realized that I was a victim of my own passions. In terms of my clinical practice, I cherished and absolutely loved every aspect of my practice and taking care of patients. I loved educating our next generation and thrived on conducting research, presenting at meetings, and publishing papers. And as I was accumulating more administrative roles and responsibilities at the department, hospital, and medical school levels, I realized I had a growing passion for administrative work. I found that the administrative work was uniquely challenging and allowed me to meaningfully serve others in a very special way.
In all of these areas for which I had a deep passion, I was committed to nothing short of excellence in everything I did. That is what I expected of myself. Self-compassion was almost absent. In addition, I have a people-pleasing personality and find it difficult to say no to people. As I have come to realize, this characteristic can be self-destructive.
I began to recognize that I fell into an acceptance (and almost expectation) that every 6-8 months I’d experience an episode of burnout that lasted 3-4 days. My burnout trigger was feeling a sense of helplessness. Everything seemed to come down all at once, and I felt helpless to dig out of it.
I realized I wanted to change, but I had no idea what resources were available or how to go about making a change. One day, I was talking to a colleague about these issues, and he asked, “Have you read the book, ‘Lone Survivor?’ ” I hadn’t heard of it, but I picked it up and started reading. Looking back, this was one of the most important decisions I made in my effort to help myself. “Lone Survivor” tells the the story of Marcus Luttrell, a retired U.S. Navy SEAL who received the Navy Cross for his actions facing Taliban fighters during Operation Red Wings.
When I finished reading this book, I realized that this was a remarkable story of resilience. The entirety of his story really connected with me. I then began to think there might be something I could learn from the Navy SEAL community that I could apply to my own civilian life.
Candidates who enter training for Navy SEALs are physically fit to succeed, but only approximately 20% make it through Basic Underwater Demolition/SEAL (BUD/S). Many drop out on request, largely because they don’t have the mental toughness and emotional resilience to tolerate intense stress continuously over a prolonged period of time. The ones who succeed have a deep meaning to their “Why” to become a SEAL.
I then learned about a retired Navy SEAL Commander, Mark Devine, who had a program intended to train civilians in physical fitness, mental toughness, emotional resilience, intuitional awareness, and spiritual consciousness in a manner similar to that of preparing prospective candidates for BUD/S training. The website stated that the defining attribute for enrollees was “a burning desire to better oneself.” I connected with that. After resolving my self-doubts and uncomfortable feelings about doing this, I signed up for the 3-day Fundamentals immersion program.
My 3 days with Coach Divine and his team were truly transformative. This was definitely not a “Navy SEAL Fantasy Camp,” and perhaps were the 3 most difficult days of my life in many regards.
When I got back from this program, I had a framework and toolbox for developing resilience to avoid burnout and improve my personal wellness. I immediately changed several things in my life, in an enduring way for the past 5 years. I started to train regularly. While I could not find a predictable time to do this during the week, I prioritized training during weekends. I improved my nutrition, stopped using food as a reward system, and started getting more sleep. Within 6 months after completing the program, I dropped the 30 pounds by being disciplined, not motivated, to make these changes. I also developed a morning ritual upon awakening. This consists of drinking a glass of water, doing box-breathing exercises, positive self-talk, thinking through my day, prioritizing what needs to be done, doing an ethos check-in to make sure that the priorities of the day correlate with my “Why,” engaging in further positive self-talk, and then engaging in positive visualization. I think this mindfulness activity has been critically important.
With the enduring changes I made, my regular schedule of burnout episodes every 6-8 months stopped, despite some very stressful events in my life. Go figure. My productivity was not affected, and my happiness was certainly improved. I had a definite sense that the changes I made were real and effective. One day a few years later while rounding with an intern, one of my patients said to the resident, “I remember Dr. Nussenbaum when he was fat.” The intern looked at me with a puzzled expression.
Based on my own journey, what advice can I give you to improve your own personal wellness and resilience? Most importantly, know your “Why” and your “3 Ps” (passion, purpose, and principles in life). What’s your personal ethos? Make sure that the job you do and the activities you perform tie into your ethos as much and as often as possible. Engage in mindfulness activities. There are many possibilities. For me, the mindfulness activity is my morning ritual. Talking about failures with trusted friends and colleagues rather than hiding them can also increase your resilience.
Developing and maintaining resilience is still an evolving and ongoing process for me. I consider this a lifelong learning process, rather than a one-time deal. Most difficult has been becoming disciplined and patient to learn new things and incorporate them into my life, and along the way becoming comfortable with being uncomfortable. And taking the necessary time to define a personal ethos, which took much longer than I thought it would.
I’ve continued to learn from several resources available from the Harvard Business Review, and from reading several widely available books. I have taken an academic approach to supplement what I learned from Coach Divine and his team, which is not surprising to those that know me well. Societies also now have many resources, such as The American Medical Association’s Burnout Tip-of-the Week, as one example.
One of the four guiding principles from the recent article, “Charter on Physician Well-Being,” states that physician well-being is a shared responsibility. It’s shared among the organizations we work in, society and its regulatory agencies, and individuals. It’s important to remind ourselves that taking individual responsibility for your wellness and developing resilience will still be a key component even as resources from our organizations and society continue to expand and become more available. Improving physician well-being needs to be a team sport.
Dr. Brian Nussenbaum is executive director of the American Board of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery. He lives in Houston. These remarks were adapted from a presentation that Dr. Nussenbaum gave at the Triological Society’s Combined Sections Meeting in Coronado, Calif., which was jointly sponsored by the Triological Society and the American College of Surgeons.
In 2017, the National Academy of Medicine recognized the urgent need to address burnout, wellness, and resilience in physicians. A consortium was subsequently put together comprising many cosponsoring organizations, including the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), and the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS). One of many outputs of this consortium was a discussion paper, “A Journey to Construct an All-Encompassing Conceptual Model of Factors Affecting Clinician Well-Being and Resilience.”
The authors conceptually divided wellness and resilience drivers into external and individual factors. It turns out that a large portion of clinician well-being and resilience is related to individual factors that include personal factors, skills, and abilities. Taking personal responsibility and ownership of developing these individual factors is important, but many do not know where to begin.
My journey in this area began 5 years ago. This was a time when organizational resources were sparse and there was little local or national attention to addressing physician wellness. My life was horribly out of balance. While this should have been obvious, the “hit-on-the-head” moment was weighing myself one day and realizing that I was 30 pounds overweight. This was the ultimate sign to me that there was a problem because throughout my entire life, I was always very athletic, even during residency and fellowship training. I was using food as a reward system for several years which, in combination with a dramatic decrease in physical activity due to prioritizing everything related to work, led to this problem. A slowing metabolism that we all face as we age certainly accentuated it.
I was taking care of everybody else, but not myself. Many family members, friends, and even patients told me this over the years, which I conveniently ignored. For several years, my patients were asking me, “How are you doing?” at the end of their office visits. As a surgeon with a busy cancer practice, this should have been a signal for me – my cancer patients asking me how I am doing!
I started to think more about why this was happening. I realized that I was a victim of my own passions. In terms of my clinical practice, I cherished and absolutely loved every aspect of my practice and taking care of patients. I loved educating our next generation and thrived on conducting research, presenting at meetings, and publishing papers. And as I was accumulating more administrative roles and responsibilities at the department, hospital, and medical school levels, I realized I had a growing passion for administrative work. I found that the administrative work was uniquely challenging and allowed me to meaningfully serve others in a very special way.
In all of these areas for which I had a deep passion, I was committed to nothing short of excellence in everything I did. That is what I expected of myself. Self-compassion was almost absent. In addition, I have a people-pleasing personality and find it difficult to say no to people. As I have come to realize, this characteristic can be self-destructive.
I began to recognize that I fell into an acceptance (and almost expectation) that every 6-8 months I’d experience an episode of burnout that lasted 3-4 days. My burnout trigger was feeling a sense of helplessness. Everything seemed to come down all at once, and I felt helpless to dig out of it.
I realized I wanted to change, but I had no idea what resources were available or how to go about making a change. One day, I was talking to a colleague about these issues, and he asked, “Have you read the book, ‘Lone Survivor?’ ” I hadn’t heard of it, but I picked it up and started reading. Looking back, this was one of the most important decisions I made in my effort to help myself. “Lone Survivor” tells the the story of Marcus Luttrell, a retired U.S. Navy SEAL who received the Navy Cross for his actions facing Taliban fighters during Operation Red Wings.
When I finished reading this book, I realized that this was a remarkable story of resilience. The entirety of his story really connected with me. I then began to think there might be something I could learn from the Navy SEAL community that I could apply to my own civilian life.
Candidates who enter training for Navy SEALs are physically fit to succeed, but only approximately 20% make it through Basic Underwater Demolition/SEAL (BUD/S). Many drop out on request, largely because they don’t have the mental toughness and emotional resilience to tolerate intense stress continuously over a prolonged period of time. The ones who succeed have a deep meaning to their “Why” to become a SEAL.
I then learned about a retired Navy SEAL Commander, Mark Devine, who had a program intended to train civilians in physical fitness, mental toughness, emotional resilience, intuitional awareness, and spiritual consciousness in a manner similar to that of preparing prospective candidates for BUD/S training. The website stated that the defining attribute for enrollees was “a burning desire to better oneself.” I connected with that. After resolving my self-doubts and uncomfortable feelings about doing this, I signed up for the 3-day Fundamentals immersion program.
My 3 days with Coach Divine and his team were truly transformative. This was definitely not a “Navy SEAL Fantasy Camp,” and perhaps were the 3 most difficult days of my life in many regards.
When I got back from this program, I had a framework and toolbox for developing resilience to avoid burnout and improve my personal wellness. I immediately changed several things in my life, in an enduring way for the past 5 years. I started to train regularly. While I could not find a predictable time to do this during the week, I prioritized training during weekends. I improved my nutrition, stopped using food as a reward system, and started getting more sleep. Within 6 months after completing the program, I dropped the 30 pounds by being disciplined, not motivated, to make these changes. I also developed a morning ritual upon awakening. This consists of drinking a glass of water, doing box-breathing exercises, positive self-talk, thinking through my day, prioritizing what needs to be done, doing an ethos check-in to make sure that the priorities of the day correlate with my “Why,” engaging in further positive self-talk, and then engaging in positive visualization. I think this mindfulness activity has been critically important.
With the enduring changes I made, my regular schedule of burnout episodes every 6-8 months stopped, despite some very stressful events in my life. Go figure. My productivity was not affected, and my happiness was certainly improved. I had a definite sense that the changes I made were real and effective. One day a few years later while rounding with an intern, one of my patients said to the resident, “I remember Dr. Nussenbaum when he was fat.” The intern looked at me with a puzzled expression.
Based on my own journey, what advice can I give you to improve your own personal wellness and resilience? Most importantly, know your “Why” and your “3 Ps” (passion, purpose, and principles in life). What’s your personal ethos? Make sure that the job you do and the activities you perform tie into your ethos as much and as often as possible. Engage in mindfulness activities. There are many possibilities. For me, the mindfulness activity is my morning ritual. Talking about failures with trusted friends and colleagues rather than hiding them can also increase your resilience.
Developing and maintaining resilience is still an evolving and ongoing process for me. I consider this a lifelong learning process, rather than a one-time deal. Most difficult has been becoming disciplined and patient to learn new things and incorporate them into my life, and along the way becoming comfortable with being uncomfortable. And taking the necessary time to define a personal ethos, which took much longer than I thought it would.
I’ve continued to learn from several resources available from the Harvard Business Review, and from reading several widely available books. I have taken an academic approach to supplement what I learned from Coach Divine and his team, which is not surprising to those that know me well. Societies also now have many resources, such as The American Medical Association’s Burnout Tip-of-the Week, as one example.
One of the four guiding principles from the recent article, “Charter on Physician Well-Being,” states that physician well-being is a shared responsibility. It’s shared among the organizations we work in, society and its regulatory agencies, and individuals. It’s important to remind ourselves that taking individual responsibility for your wellness and developing resilience will still be a key component even as resources from our organizations and society continue to expand and become more available. Improving physician well-being needs to be a team sport.
Dr. Brian Nussenbaum is executive director of the American Board of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery. He lives in Houston. These remarks were adapted from a presentation that Dr. Nussenbaum gave at the Triological Society’s Combined Sections Meeting in Coronado, Calif., which was jointly sponsored by the Triological Society and the American College of Surgeons.
In 2017, the National Academy of Medicine recognized the urgent need to address burnout, wellness, and resilience in physicians. A consortium was subsequently put together comprising many cosponsoring organizations, including the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), and the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS). One of many outputs of this consortium was a discussion paper, “A Journey to Construct an All-Encompassing Conceptual Model of Factors Affecting Clinician Well-Being and Resilience.”
The authors conceptually divided wellness and resilience drivers into external and individual factors. It turns out that a large portion of clinician well-being and resilience is related to individual factors that include personal factors, skills, and abilities. Taking personal responsibility and ownership of developing these individual factors is important, but many do not know where to begin.
My journey in this area began 5 years ago. This was a time when organizational resources were sparse and there was little local or national attention to addressing physician wellness. My life was horribly out of balance. While this should have been obvious, the “hit-on-the-head” moment was weighing myself one day and realizing that I was 30 pounds overweight. This was the ultimate sign to me that there was a problem because throughout my entire life, I was always very athletic, even during residency and fellowship training. I was using food as a reward system for several years which, in combination with a dramatic decrease in physical activity due to prioritizing everything related to work, led to this problem. A slowing metabolism that we all face as we age certainly accentuated it.
I was taking care of everybody else, but not myself. Many family members, friends, and even patients told me this over the years, which I conveniently ignored. For several years, my patients were asking me, “How are you doing?” at the end of their office visits. As a surgeon with a busy cancer practice, this should have been a signal for me – my cancer patients asking me how I am doing!
I started to think more about why this was happening. I realized that I was a victim of my own passions. In terms of my clinical practice, I cherished and absolutely loved every aspect of my practice and taking care of patients. I loved educating our next generation and thrived on conducting research, presenting at meetings, and publishing papers. And as I was accumulating more administrative roles and responsibilities at the department, hospital, and medical school levels, I realized I had a growing passion for administrative work. I found that the administrative work was uniquely challenging and allowed me to meaningfully serve others in a very special way.
In all of these areas for which I had a deep passion, I was committed to nothing short of excellence in everything I did. That is what I expected of myself. Self-compassion was almost absent. In addition, I have a people-pleasing personality and find it difficult to say no to people. As I have come to realize, this characteristic can be self-destructive.
I began to recognize that I fell into an acceptance (and almost expectation) that every 6-8 months I’d experience an episode of burnout that lasted 3-4 days. My burnout trigger was feeling a sense of helplessness. Everything seemed to come down all at once, and I felt helpless to dig out of it.
I realized I wanted to change, but I had no idea what resources were available or how to go about making a change. One day, I was talking to a colleague about these issues, and he asked, “Have you read the book, ‘Lone Survivor?’ ” I hadn’t heard of it, but I picked it up and started reading. Looking back, this was one of the most important decisions I made in my effort to help myself. “Lone Survivor” tells the the story of Marcus Luttrell, a retired U.S. Navy SEAL who received the Navy Cross for his actions facing Taliban fighters during Operation Red Wings.
When I finished reading this book, I realized that this was a remarkable story of resilience. The entirety of his story really connected with me. I then began to think there might be something I could learn from the Navy SEAL community that I could apply to my own civilian life.
Candidates who enter training for Navy SEALs are physically fit to succeed, but only approximately 20% make it through Basic Underwater Demolition/SEAL (BUD/S). Many drop out on request, largely because they don’t have the mental toughness and emotional resilience to tolerate intense stress continuously over a prolonged period of time. The ones who succeed have a deep meaning to their “Why” to become a SEAL.
I then learned about a retired Navy SEAL Commander, Mark Devine, who had a program intended to train civilians in physical fitness, mental toughness, emotional resilience, intuitional awareness, and spiritual consciousness in a manner similar to that of preparing prospective candidates for BUD/S training. The website stated that the defining attribute for enrollees was “a burning desire to better oneself.” I connected with that. After resolving my self-doubts and uncomfortable feelings about doing this, I signed up for the 3-day Fundamentals immersion program.
My 3 days with Coach Divine and his team were truly transformative. This was definitely not a “Navy SEAL Fantasy Camp,” and perhaps were the 3 most difficult days of my life in many regards.
When I got back from this program, I had a framework and toolbox for developing resilience to avoid burnout and improve my personal wellness. I immediately changed several things in my life, in an enduring way for the past 5 years. I started to train regularly. While I could not find a predictable time to do this during the week, I prioritized training during weekends. I improved my nutrition, stopped using food as a reward system, and started getting more sleep. Within 6 months after completing the program, I dropped the 30 pounds by being disciplined, not motivated, to make these changes. I also developed a morning ritual upon awakening. This consists of drinking a glass of water, doing box-breathing exercises, positive self-talk, thinking through my day, prioritizing what needs to be done, doing an ethos check-in to make sure that the priorities of the day correlate with my “Why,” engaging in further positive self-talk, and then engaging in positive visualization. I think this mindfulness activity has been critically important.
With the enduring changes I made, my regular schedule of burnout episodes every 6-8 months stopped, despite some very stressful events in my life. Go figure. My productivity was not affected, and my happiness was certainly improved. I had a definite sense that the changes I made were real and effective. One day a few years later while rounding with an intern, one of my patients said to the resident, “I remember Dr. Nussenbaum when he was fat.” The intern looked at me with a puzzled expression.
Based on my own journey, what advice can I give you to improve your own personal wellness and resilience? Most importantly, know your “Why” and your “3 Ps” (passion, purpose, and principles in life). What’s your personal ethos? Make sure that the job you do and the activities you perform tie into your ethos as much and as often as possible. Engage in mindfulness activities. There are many possibilities. For me, the mindfulness activity is my morning ritual. Talking about failures with trusted friends and colleagues rather than hiding them can also increase your resilience.
Developing and maintaining resilience is still an evolving and ongoing process for me. I consider this a lifelong learning process, rather than a one-time deal. Most difficult has been becoming disciplined and patient to learn new things and incorporate them into my life, and along the way becoming comfortable with being uncomfortable. And taking the necessary time to define a personal ethos, which took much longer than I thought it would.
I’ve continued to learn from several resources available from the Harvard Business Review, and from reading several widely available books. I have taken an academic approach to supplement what I learned from Coach Divine and his team, which is not surprising to those that know me well. Societies also now have many resources, such as The American Medical Association’s Burnout Tip-of-the Week, as one example.
One of the four guiding principles from the recent article, “Charter on Physician Well-Being,” states that physician well-being is a shared responsibility. It’s shared among the organizations we work in, society and its regulatory agencies, and individuals. It’s important to remind ourselves that taking individual responsibility for your wellness and developing resilience will still be a key component even as resources from our organizations and society continue to expand and become more available. Improving physician well-being needs to be a team sport.
Dr. Brian Nussenbaum is executive director of the American Board of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery. He lives in Houston. These remarks were adapted from a presentation that Dr. Nussenbaum gave at the Triological Society’s Combined Sections Meeting in Coronado, Calif., which was jointly sponsored by the Triological Society and the American College of Surgeons.
Characteristics of mucinous adenocarcinoma highlighted
CORONADO, CALIF. – Head and neck mucinous adenocarcinoma is commonly diagnosed at a low tumor stage with no nodal involvement but with the potential for distant metastases.
The findings come from the largest study of its kind to date, which was presented by Neel R. Sangal at the Triological Society’s Combined Sections Meeting.
“Mucinous carcinoma was previously classified as colloid carcinoma, which leads to increased confusion in the nomenclature,” said Mr. Sangal, a 4th-year student at New Jersey Medical School, Newark.
“This changed in the 1980s, which led to difficulty in characterizing the disease over time. This histology is well studied in the GI system, in the lungs, and in the breast, but the head and neck presentation is extremely rare, and it lacks comprehensive study.
“It commonly presents as a slow-growing, painless, nonulcerated nodule. From case reports, it’s typically low-grade and indolent, but it commonly recurs, and it does have metastatic potential,” he said. “Histologically, it’s characterized by nets of aggressive epithelial cells that are accompanied by significant extracellular mucin.”
In an effort to understand the demographic, clinicopathologic, treatment, and survival characteristics of mucinous adenocarcinoma, the researchers evaluated cases from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database between 1973 and 2014. They selected patients based on their International Classification of Diseases morphological code specific for mucinous adenocarcinoma and ICD primary site code consistent for cancers of the head and neck.
In all, 583 cases met criteria, “which highlights how rare this disease is,” Mr. Sangal said at the meeting, which was jointly sponsored by the Triological Society and the American College of Surgeons.
The mean age at diagnosis was 64.8 years; 55.2% of cases were male, 64.5% were white, 15.4% were black, 8.7% were Hispanic, 6.7% were Asian, and the remaining 5% were from other ethnicities. The four most frequent primary sites were the eyelid (29.8%), followed by skin of the face (22.6%), skin of the scalp and neck (12.2%), and the parotid gland (8.7%). Most of the lesions lacked nodal involvement and metastasis (94.1% and 96.2%, respectively). Histology presented mainly at lower stages. Specifically, 68% had T0-1 disease, 21.5% had T2-3 disease, and 10.5% had T4 disease.
When the researchers stratified treatment frequency by various clinical pathologic characteristics, they found large differences in the type of treatment received by the primary site. “Those on the salivary gland tended to receive radiation at a much higher percentage than those of the skin, which mostly received surgery alone,” Mr. Sangal said. “We also found a linear correlation between T stage and increased use of radiation alongside surgery. Similarly, those with nodal involvement and distant metastasis had increased rates of radiation with surgery.”
Disease-specific survival and overall survival rates were 92.2% and 80.5%, respectively. Advanced age at diagnosis was a significant predictor of survival. In addition, Hispanics had the highest rates of survival, while the white and black patients had similar survival curves. “ Mr. Sangal added. “We also found a linear correlation between T stage and survival. Similarly, those with nodal involvement and distant metastasis also had decreased survival.”
He acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including the potential for inconsistent coding in the SEER database.
Samer T. Elsamna was lead author on the study. None of the researchers reported having financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Elsamna ST et al. Triological CSM 2019, Abstracts.
CORONADO, CALIF. – Head and neck mucinous adenocarcinoma is commonly diagnosed at a low tumor stage with no nodal involvement but with the potential for distant metastases.
The findings come from the largest study of its kind to date, which was presented by Neel R. Sangal at the Triological Society’s Combined Sections Meeting.
“Mucinous carcinoma was previously classified as colloid carcinoma, which leads to increased confusion in the nomenclature,” said Mr. Sangal, a 4th-year student at New Jersey Medical School, Newark.
“This changed in the 1980s, which led to difficulty in characterizing the disease over time. This histology is well studied in the GI system, in the lungs, and in the breast, but the head and neck presentation is extremely rare, and it lacks comprehensive study.
“It commonly presents as a slow-growing, painless, nonulcerated nodule. From case reports, it’s typically low-grade and indolent, but it commonly recurs, and it does have metastatic potential,” he said. “Histologically, it’s characterized by nets of aggressive epithelial cells that are accompanied by significant extracellular mucin.”
In an effort to understand the demographic, clinicopathologic, treatment, and survival characteristics of mucinous adenocarcinoma, the researchers evaluated cases from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database between 1973 and 2014. They selected patients based on their International Classification of Diseases morphological code specific for mucinous adenocarcinoma and ICD primary site code consistent for cancers of the head and neck.
In all, 583 cases met criteria, “which highlights how rare this disease is,” Mr. Sangal said at the meeting, which was jointly sponsored by the Triological Society and the American College of Surgeons.
The mean age at diagnosis was 64.8 years; 55.2% of cases were male, 64.5% were white, 15.4% were black, 8.7% were Hispanic, 6.7% were Asian, and the remaining 5% were from other ethnicities. The four most frequent primary sites were the eyelid (29.8%), followed by skin of the face (22.6%), skin of the scalp and neck (12.2%), and the parotid gland (8.7%). Most of the lesions lacked nodal involvement and metastasis (94.1% and 96.2%, respectively). Histology presented mainly at lower stages. Specifically, 68% had T0-1 disease, 21.5% had T2-3 disease, and 10.5% had T4 disease.
When the researchers stratified treatment frequency by various clinical pathologic characteristics, they found large differences in the type of treatment received by the primary site. “Those on the salivary gland tended to receive radiation at a much higher percentage than those of the skin, which mostly received surgery alone,” Mr. Sangal said. “We also found a linear correlation between T stage and increased use of radiation alongside surgery. Similarly, those with nodal involvement and distant metastasis had increased rates of radiation with surgery.”
Disease-specific survival and overall survival rates were 92.2% and 80.5%, respectively. Advanced age at diagnosis was a significant predictor of survival. In addition, Hispanics had the highest rates of survival, while the white and black patients had similar survival curves. “ Mr. Sangal added. “We also found a linear correlation between T stage and survival. Similarly, those with nodal involvement and distant metastasis also had decreased survival.”
He acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including the potential for inconsistent coding in the SEER database.
Samer T. Elsamna was lead author on the study. None of the researchers reported having financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Elsamna ST et al. Triological CSM 2019, Abstracts.
CORONADO, CALIF. – Head and neck mucinous adenocarcinoma is commonly diagnosed at a low tumor stage with no nodal involvement but with the potential for distant metastases.
The findings come from the largest study of its kind to date, which was presented by Neel R. Sangal at the Triological Society’s Combined Sections Meeting.
“Mucinous carcinoma was previously classified as colloid carcinoma, which leads to increased confusion in the nomenclature,” said Mr. Sangal, a 4th-year student at New Jersey Medical School, Newark.
“This changed in the 1980s, which led to difficulty in characterizing the disease over time. This histology is well studied in the GI system, in the lungs, and in the breast, but the head and neck presentation is extremely rare, and it lacks comprehensive study.
“It commonly presents as a slow-growing, painless, nonulcerated nodule. From case reports, it’s typically low-grade and indolent, but it commonly recurs, and it does have metastatic potential,” he said. “Histologically, it’s characterized by nets of aggressive epithelial cells that are accompanied by significant extracellular mucin.”
In an effort to understand the demographic, clinicopathologic, treatment, and survival characteristics of mucinous adenocarcinoma, the researchers evaluated cases from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database between 1973 and 2014. They selected patients based on their International Classification of Diseases morphological code specific for mucinous adenocarcinoma and ICD primary site code consistent for cancers of the head and neck.
In all, 583 cases met criteria, “which highlights how rare this disease is,” Mr. Sangal said at the meeting, which was jointly sponsored by the Triological Society and the American College of Surgeons.
The mean age at diagnosis was 64.8 years; 55.2% of cases were male, 64.5% were white, 15.4% were black, 8.7% were Hispanic, 6.7% were Asian, and the remaining 5% were from other ethnicities. The four most frequent primary sites were the eyelid (29.8%), followed by skin of the face (22.6%), skin of the scalp and neck (12.2%), and the parotid gland (8.7%). Most of the lesions lacked nodal involvement and metastasis (94.1% and 96.2%, respectively). Histology presented mainly at lower stages. Specifically, 68% had T0-1 disease, 21.5% had T2-3 disease, and 10.5% had T4 disease.
When the researchers stratified treatment frequency by various clinical pathologic characteristics, they found large differences in the type of treatment received by the primary site. “Those on the salivary gland tended to receive radiation at a much higher percentage than those of the skin, which mostly received surgery alone,” Mr. Sangal said. “We also found a linear correlation between T stage and increased use of radiation alongside surgery. Similarly, those with nodal involvement and distant metastasis had increased rates of radiation with surgery.”
Disease-specific survival and overall survival rates were 92.2% and 80.5%, respectively. Advanced age at diagnosis was a significant predictor of survival. In addition, Hispanics had the highest rates of survival, while the white and black patients had similar survival curves. “ Mr. Sangal added. “We also found a linear correlation between T stage and survival. Similarly, those with nodal involvement and distant metastasis also had decreased survival.”
He acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including the potential for inconsistent coding in the SEER database.
Samer T. Elsamna was lead author on the study. None of the researchers reported having financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Elsamna ST et al. Triological CSM 2019, Abstracts.
REPORTING FROM TRIOLOGICAL CSM
Key clinical point: Head and neck adenocarcinoma is mostly indolent with a favorable outcome.
Major finding: Disease-specific survival and overall survival rates were 92.2% and 80.5%, respectively.
Study details: An evaluation of 583 head and neck mucinous adenocarcinoma cases from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 1973 and 2014.
Disclosures: The researchers reported having no financial disclosures.
Source: Elsamna ST et al. Triological CSM 2019, Abstracts.
Years in practice, burnout risk linked in otolaryngology
CORONADO, CALIF. – Otolaryngologists and otolaryngology nurse practitioners at the Cleveland Clinic who have been practicing for 6-10 years are at the highest risk for burnout, while those who have been practicing for more than 10 are at the lowest risk.
The finding comes from a cross-sectional survey published in Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery designed to evaluate the presence of burnout among 52 otolaryngology clinicians and to compare results among faculty, trainees, and advanced practice practitioners.
“Other studies have shown that work-life balance can contribute to burnout symptoms, including low spouse support, having young children at home, and a decreased satisfaction with work-life balance,” Michael S. Benninger, MD, said at the Triological Society’s Combined Sections Meeting. “We wanted to know if there was difference within our group among people at different points in their career.”
In a study led by Katie Geelan-Hansen, MD, Dr. Benninger, who chairs the Head and Neck Institute at the Cleveland Clinic, and his colleagues administered the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) and questions regarding work stressors specific to that department to 52 employees (Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;159[2]:254-7). The questions focused on domains of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and a sense of personal accomplishment.
Of the 52 surveys distributed, 42 participants (85%) completed the survey. The researchers found that respondents who had worked for 6-10 years had higher MBI scores on emotional exhaustion, compared with their peers who had worked for 5 years or fewer, and those who had worked for more than 10 years (18.18, compared with 15.78 and 14.68, respectively; P = .63). A similar association was observed for MBI scores on depersonalization (15.14, compared with 14.72 and 9.68; P = .07). MBI scores on personal accomplishment were similar between the two groups (39, compared with 38.33 and 40.84; P = .5).
“People who are more mature in their practice tend to have less burnout,” Dr. Benninger said. “That may be because they’ve found a place of homeostasis. They’ve figured out how to maximize their efficiency, and they may have more support.
“The people who tend to be the biggest concern are those 6 -10 years into the field. I recommend that you focus on that group. It’s a transitional time in their careers. It’s a time when there’s some insecurity; they’re being asked to do a lot more.” It remains unclear if male or female respondents had a higher level of burnout, he added, although other surveys have suggested that female physicians have a higher level of burnout, compared with male physicians.
“Our overall evaluation of burnout was lower than what you see from national statistics,” Dr. Benninger said at the meeting, which was jointly sponsored by the Triological Society and the American College of Surgeons. “We have had a wellness officer [at Cleveland Clinic] for a long time. We have a group of people on our clinic’s board of governors who any staff can go to in order to vent issues on a private basis. All of those things help, but I am seeing an escalating unsatisfaction with the workload and the work environment. We’re looking at other things. Expectation setting and rewarding people are also important.”
He reported having no relevant financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Benninger MS et al. Triological CSM, Abstracts.
CORONADO, CALIF. – Otolaryngologists and otolaryngology nurse practitioners at the Cleveland Clinic who have been practicing for 6-10 years are at the highest risk for burnout, while those who have been practicing for more than 10 are at the lowest risk.
The finding comes from a cross-sectional survey published in Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery designed to evaluate the presence of burnout among 52 otolaryngology clinicians and to compare results among faculty, trainees, and advanced practice practitioners.
“Other studies have shown that work-life balance can contribute to burnout symptoms, including low spouse support, having young children at home, and a decreased satisfaction with work-life balance,” Michael S. Benninger, MD, said at the Triological Society’s Combined Sections Meeting. “We wanted to know if there was difference within our group among people at different points in their career.”
In a study led by Katie Geelan-Hansen, MD, Dr. Benninger, who chairs the Head and Neck Institute at the Cleveland Clinic, and his colleagues administered the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) and questions regarding work stressors specific to that department to 52 employees (Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;159[2]:254-7). The questions focused on domains of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and a sense of personal accomplishment.
Of the 52 surveys distributed, 42 participants (85%) completed the survey. The researchers found that respondents who had worked for 6-10 years had higher MBI scores on emotional exhaustion, compared with their peers who had worked for 5 years or fewer, and those who had worked for more than 10 years (18.18, compared with 15.78 and 14.68, respectively; P = .63). A similar association was observed for MBI scores on depersonalization (15.14, compared with 14.72 and 9.68; P = .07). MBI scores on personal accomplishment were similar between the two groups (39, compared with 38.33 and 40.84; P = .5).
“People who are more mature in their practice tend to have less burnout,” Dr. Benninger said. “That may be because they’ve found a place of homeostasis. They’ve figured out how to maximize their efficiency, and they may have more support.
“The people who tend to be the biggest concern are those 6 -10 years into the field. I recommend that you focus on that group. It’s a transitional time in their careers. It’s a time when there’s some insecurity; they’re being asked to do a lot more.” It remains unclear if male or female respondents had a higher level of burnout, he added, although other surveys have suggested that female physicians have a higher level of burnout, compared with male physicians.
“Our overall evaluation of burnout was lower than what you see from national statistics,” Dr. Benninger said at the meeting, which was jointly sponsored by the Triological Society and the American College of Surgeons. “We have had a wellness officer [at Cleveland Clinic] for a long time. We have a group of people on our clinic’s board of governors who any staff can go to in order to vent issues on a private basis. All of those things help, but I am seeing an escalating unsatisfaction with the workload and the work environment. We’re looking at other things. Expectation setting and rewarding people are also important.”
He reported having no relevant financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Benninger MS et al. Triological CSM, Abstracts.
CORONADO, CALIF. – Otolaryngologists and otolaryngology nurse practitioners at the Cleveland Clinic who have been practicing for 6-10 years are at the highest risk for burnout, while those who have been practicing for more than 10 are at the lowest risk.
The finding comes from a cross-sectional survey published in Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery designed to evaluate the presence of burnout among 52 otolaryngology clinicians and to compare results among faculty, trainees, and advanced practice practitioners.
“Other studies have shown that work-life balance can contribute to burnout symptoms, including low spouse support, having young children at home, and a decreased satisfaction with work-life balance,” Michael S. Benninger, MD, said at the Triological Society’s Combined Sections Meeting. “We wanted to know if there was difference within our group among people at different points in their career.”
In a study led by Katie Geelan-Hansen, MD, Dr. Benninger, who chairs the Head and Neck Institute at the Cleveland Clinic, and his colleagues administered the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) and questions regarding work stressors specific to that department to 52 employees (Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;159[2]:254-7). The questions focused on domains of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and a sense of personal accomplishment.
Of the 52 surveys distributed, 42 participants (85%) completed the survey. The researchers found that respondents who had worked for 6-10 years had higher MBI scores on emotional exhaustion, compared with their peers who had worked for 5 years or fewer, and those who had worked for more than 10 years (18.18, compared with 15.78 and 14.68, respectively; P = .63). A similar association was observed for MBI scores on depersonalization (15.14, compared with 14.72 and 9.68; P = .07). MBI scores on personal accomplishment were similar between the two groups (39, compared with 38.33 and 40.84; P = .5).
“People who are more mature in their practice tend to have less burnout,” Dr. Benninger said. “That may be because they’ve found a place of homeostasis. They’ve figured out how to maximize their efficiency, and they may have more support.
“The people who tend to be the biggest concern are those 6 -10 years into the field. I recommend that you focus on that group. It’s a transitional time in their careers. It’s a time when there’s some insecurity; they’re being asked to do a lot more.” It remains unclear if male or female respondents had a higher level of burnout, he added, although other surveys have suggested that female physicians have a higher level of burnout, compared with male physicians.
“Our overall evaluation of burnout was lower than what you see from national statistics,” Dr. Benninger said at the meeting, which was jointly sponsored by the Triological Society and the American College of Surgeons. “We have had a wellness officer [at Cleveland Clinic] for a long time. We have a group of people on our clinic’s board of governors who any staff can go to in order to vent issues on a private basis. All of those things help, but I am seeing an escalating unsatisfaction with the workload and the work environment. We’re looking at other things. Expectation setting and rewarding people are also important.”
He reported having no relevant financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Benninger MS et al. Triological CSM, Abstracts.
REPORTING FROM TRIOLOGICAL CSM
Socioeconomic status, race found to impact CPAP compliance
SAN DIEGO –
“CPAP is the gold standard treatment for OSA [obstructive sleep apnea] and is very effective, especially for those with severe disease,” researchers led by Philip S. LoSavio, MD, wrote in an abstract presented at the Triological Society’s Combined Sections Meeting. “However, CPAP is a significant challenge for patients for various reasons, with reports of only 46%-80% of OSA patients using CPAP for more than 4 consecutive hours on two out of three nights.”
In an effort to identify and define different factors associated with CPAP compliance, Dr. LoSavio and his colleagues collected data on 578 patients with OSA on CPAP who were treated at Rush University Medical Center, Chicago. The mean patient age was 58 years, 52% were female, 43% were African American, 40% were white, their mean body mass index was 36.91 kg/m2, and their mean apnea-hypopnea index was 37.25 events per hour. The researchers recorded CPAP use at office visits via CPAP module or card, and patients were considered CPAP compliant if their machines logged 4 consecutive hours of use for 70% or more of nights. During the office visits, patients completed a questionnaire asking if they were suffering from different otolaryngology-related diseases, including sinus headaches, gastroesophageal reflex, and enlarged tonsils. Dr. LoSavio, who heads the section of sleep surgery in the department of otorhinolaryngology at Rush University Medical Center, and his colleagues performed logistic regression to ascertain the effects of race and socioeconomic status on CPAP compliance while adjusting for OSA severity. They also analyzed the adjusted association of median income and self-reported symptoms of sinus headaches, GERD, and enlarged tonsils, on CPAP compliance.
They found that African American patients were less compliant with CPAP, compared with their white counterparts (OR 0.42; P less than .01). In addition, patients with mild OSA were less likely to be compliant compared with those who had severe disease (OR 0.57; P less than .03). Self-reported symptoms of sinus headaches, GERD, and enlarged tonsils were associated with significantly lower levels of compliance, while higher median income was positively associated with higher levels of compliance. When the researchers grouped incomes based on the 2018 federal tax classification brackets, they observed a significant association between compliance and median income (P less than .001), with a likelihood ratio of 20.4.
“Previous studies have shown that with increases in OSA disease severity, defined by higher [apnea-hypopnea index], comes increases in CPAP compliance, while other studies have alluded to the fact that lower socioeconomic status can affect CPAP compliance,” Dr. LoSavio and his associates wrote in their abstract. “A novel aspect of our study hoped to shed light on different otolaryngology-related diseases and how they might affect compliance. The patients with comorbid GERD, sinus headaches, and enlarged tonsils were less CPAP compliant in our study. These conditions are relatively easily treated and could therefore provide an avenue to increase CPAP compliance if addressed.” They acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including its single-center design and the self-reported nature of the patient questionnaire.
The researchers reported having no financial disclosures. The meeting was jointly sponsored by the Triological Society and the American College of Surgeons.
SOURCE: LoSavio P et al. Triological CSM 2019, Abstracts.
SAN DIEGO –
“CPAP is the gold standard treatment for OSA [obstructive sleep apnea] and is very effective, especially for those with severe disease,” researchers led by Philip S. LoSavio, MD, wrote in an abstract presented at the Triological Society’s Combined Sections Meeting. “However, CPAP is a significant challenge for patients for various reasons, with reports of only 46%-80% of OSA patients using CPAP for more than 4 consecutive hours on two out of three nights.”
In an effort to identify and define different factors associated with CPAP compliance, Dr. LoSavio and his colleagues collected data on 578 patients with OSA on CPAP who were treated at Rush University Medical Center, Chicago. The mean patient age was 58 years, 52% were female, 43% were African American, 40% were white, their mean body mass index was 36.91 kg/m2, and their mean apnea-hypopnea index was 37.25 events per hour. The researchers recorded CPAP use at office visits via CPAP module or card, and patients were considered CPAP compliant if their machines logged 4 consecutive hours of use for 70% or more of nights. During the office visits, patients completed a questionnaire asking if they were suffering from different otolaryngology-related diseases, including sinus headaches, gastroesophageal reflex, and enlarged tonsils. Dr. LoSavio, who heads the section of sleep surgery in the department of otorhinolaryngology at Rush University Medical Center, and his colleagues performed logistic regression to ascertain the effects of race and socioeconomic status on CPAP compliance while adjusting for OSA severity. They also analyzed the adjusted association of median income and self-reported symptoms of sinus headaches, GERD, and enlarged tonsils, on CPAP compliance.
They found that African American patients were less compliant with CPAP, compared with their white counterparts (OR 0.42; P less than .01). In addition, patients with mild OSA were less likely to be compliant compared with those who had severe disease (OR 0.57; P less than .03). Self-reported symptoms of sinus headaches, GERD, and enlarged tonsils were associated with significantly lower levels of compliance, while higher median income was positively associated with higher levels of compliance. When the researchers grouped incomes based on the 2018 federal tax classification brackets, they observed a significant association between compliance and median income (P less than .001), with a likelihood ratio of 20.4.
“Previous studies have shown that with increases in OSA disease severity, defined by higher [apnea-hypopnea index], comes increases in CPAP compliance, while other studies have alluded to the fact that lower socioeconomic status can affect CPAP compliance,” Dr. LoSavio and his associates wrote in their abstract. “A novel aspect of our study hoped to shed light on different otolaryngology-related diseases and how they might affect compliance. The patients with comorbid GERD, sinus headaches, and enlarged tonsils were less CPAP compliant in our study. These conditions are relatively easily treated and could therefore provide an avenue to increase CPAP compliance if addressed.” They acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including its single-center design and the self-reported nature of the patient questionnaire.
The researchers reported having no financial disclosures. The meeting was jointly sponsored by the Triological Society and the American College of Surgeons.
SOURCE: LoSavio P et al. Triological CSM 2019, Abstracts.
SAN DIEGO –
“CPAP is the gold standard treatment for OSA [obstructive sleep apnea] and is very effective, especially for those with severe disease,” researchers led by Philip S. LoSavio, MD, wrote in an abstract presented at the Triological Society’s Combined Sections Meeting. “However, CPAP is a significant challenge for patients for various reasons, with reports of only 46%-80% of OSA patients using CPAP for more than 4 consecutive hours on two out of three nights.”
In an effort to identify and define different factors associated with CPAP compliance, Dr. LoSavio and his colleagues collected data on 578 patients with OSA on CPAP who were treated at Rush University Medical Center, Chicago. The mean patient age was 58 years, 52% were female, 43% were African American, 40% were white, their mean body mass index was 36.91 kg/m2, and their mean apnea-hypopnea index was 37.25 events per hour. The researchers recorded CPAP use at office visits via CPAP module or card, and patients were considered CPAP compliant if their machines logged 4 consecutive hours of use for 70% or more of nights. During the office visits, patients completed a questionnaire asking if they were suffering from different otolaryngology-related diseases, including sinus headaches, gastroesophageal reflex, and enlarged tonsils. Dr. LoSavio, who heads the section of sleep surgery in the department of otorhinolaryngology at Rush University Medical Center, and his colleagues performed logistic regression to ascertain the effects of race and socioeconomic status on CPAP compliance while adjusting for OSA severity. They also analyzed the adjusted association of median income and self-reported symptoms of sinus headaches, GERD, and enlarged tonsils, on CPAP compliance.
They found that African American patients were less compliant with CPAP, compared with their white counterparts (OR 0.42; P less than .01). In addition, patients with mild OSA were less likely to be compliant compared with those who had severe disease (OR 0.57; P less than .03). Self-reported symptoms of sinus headaches, GERD, and enlarged tonsils were associated with significantly lower levels of compliance, while higher median income was positively associated with higher levels of compliance. When the researchers grouped incomes based on the 2018 federal tax classification brackets, they observed a significant association between compliance and median income (P less than .001), with a likelihood ratio of 20.4.
“Previous studies have shown that with increases in OSA disease severity, defined by higher [apnea-hypopnea index], comes increases in CPAP compliance, while other studies have alluded to the fact that lower socioeconomic status can affect CPAP compliance,” Dr. LoSavio and his associates wrote in their abstract. “A novel aspect of our study hoped to shed light on different otolaryngology-related diseases and how they might affect compliance. The patients with comorbid GERD, sinus headaches, and enlarged tonsils were less CPAP compliant in our study. These conditions are relatively easily treated and could therefore provide an avenue to increase CPAP compliance if addressed.” They acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including its single-center design and the self-reported nature of the patient questionnaire.
The researchers reported having no financial disclosures. The meeting was jointly sponsored by the Triological Society and the American College of Surgeons.
SOURCE: LoSavio P et al. Triological CSM 2019, Abstracts.
REPORTING FROM THE TRIOLOGICAL CSM
Key clinical point: Compliance with continuous positive airway pressure is affected by patient socioeconomic status and race.
Major finding: African American patients were less compliant with CPAP, compared with their white counterparts (OR 0.42; P less than .01).
Study details: A retrospective study of 578 obstructive sleep apnea patients on CPAP.
Disclosures: The researchers reported having no financial disclosures.
Source: LoSavio P et al. Triological CSM 2019, Abstracts.
Nonsurgical OSA treatment ineffective in children with Down syndrome
CORONADO, CALIF. – Resolution of who were treated nonsurgically with either medication, observation, or supplemental oxygen was low, results from a small cohort study showed.
“This suggests that we should consider early treatment options, including multimodal approaches, for children with mild OSA and Down syndrome,” one of the study authors, Javier J.M. Howard, MPH, said at the Triological Society’s Combined Sections Meeting. “Prospective studies with longer follow-up are needed to better understand treatment outcomes in children with Down syndrome and mild OSA.”
An estimated 1%-6% of otherwise healthy children have obstructive sleep apnea, but the prevalence in children with Down syndrome is estimated to be between 30% and 70%, said Mr. Howard, a medical student at the University of Cincinnati. Additionally, those with Down syndrome tend to have more severe phenotypes, including significant hypoxemia and hypoventilation, compared with children without Down syndrome. “Nasal steroids, oral antileukotrienes, and supplemental oxygen have shown efficacy in the treatment of mild OSA in otherwise healthy children,” he said. “Observation is also employed in children with mild OSA, as a proportion of them will resolve spontaneously. The efficacy of these approaches in children with Down syndrome is unknown.”
In a study led by senior author Stacey L. Ishman, MD, MPH, researchers set out to examine the efficacy of single-medication therapy with either montelukast or intransal steroids versus observation versus oxygen on polysomnographic (PSG) outcomes in children with Down syndrome. They conducted a retrospective chart review of 24 children diagnosed with Down syndrome and mild OSA. The children were surgically naive and were treated between 2012 and 2017 with either supplemental oxygen, a single medication, or were observed. They had a follow-up PSG 3-12 months after initiation of treatment. The primary outcome was obstructive apnea hypopnea index (AHI), while secondary outcomes were oxygen saturation nadir, percent of total sleep time in rapid eye movement, and percentage of total sleep time with end-tidal carbon dioxide of greater than 50 mm Hg.
Of the 24 children, 58% were female, 67% were white, 13 were treated with observation, one was treated with oxygen, and 10 were treated with medication. Their baseline obstructive AHIs were 2.9, 3.5, and 3.3 events per hour, respectively. The follow-up PSGs revealed no statistically significant changes in obstructive AHI, oxygen saturation nadir, percentage of total sleep time in rapid eye movement, or percentage of total sleep time with end-tidal carbon dioxide greater than 50 mm Hg for any treatment group. OSA resolved in one patient in the observation group and in two patients in the medication group. At the same time, OSA worsened in two patients each in the medication and observation groups. Resolution of OSA was observed in 20% of patients in the medication group, compared with 7.1% of those in the observation or oxygen group (P = .82).
Mr. Howard acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including the potential for selection bias, its retrospective design, and its small sample size. “Resolution of mild OSA was low for all of our treatment groups after 3-12 months of treatment,” he said. “Resolution with medication was lower in our study, compared to published studies in otherwise healthy children.”
The researchers reported having no financial disclosures. The meeting was jointly sponsored by the Triological Society and the American College of Surgeons.
SOURCE: Howard J et al .Triological CSM, Abstracts.
CORONADO, CALIF. – Resolution of who were treated nonsurgically with either medication, observation, or supplemental oxygen was low, results from a small cohort study showed.
“This suggests that we should consider early treatment options, including multimodal approaches, for children with mild OSA and Down syndrome,” one of the study authors, Javier J.M. Howard, MPH, said at the Triological Society’s Combined Sections Meeting. “Prospective studies with longer follow-up are needed to better understand treatment outcomes in children with Down syndrome and mild OSA.”
An estimated 1%-6% of otherwise healthy children have obstructive sleep apnea, but the prevalence in children with Down syndrome is estimated to be between 30% and 70%, said Mr. Howard, a medical student at the University of Cincinnati. Additionally, those with Down syndrome tend to have more severe phenotypes, including significant hypoxemia and hypoventilation, compared with children without Down syndrome. “Nasal steroids, oral antileukotrienes, and supplemental oxygen have shown efficacy in the treatment of mild OSA in otherwise healthy children,” he said. “Observation is also employed in children with mild OSA, as a proportion of them will resolve spontaneously. The efficacy of these approaches in children with Down syndrome is unknown.”
In a study led by senior author Stacey L. Ishman, MD, MPH, researchers set out to examine the efficacy of single-medication therapy with either montelukast or intransal steroids versus observation versus oxygen on polysomnographic (PSG) outcomes in children with Down syndrome. They conducted a retrospective chart review of 24 children diagnosed with Down syndrome and mild OSA. The children were surgically naive and were treated between 2012 and 2017 with either supplemental oxygen, a single medication, or were observed. They had a follow-up PSG 3-12 months after initiation of treatment. The primary outcome was obstructive apnea hypopnea index (AHI), while secondary outcomes were oxygen saturation nadir, percent of total sleep time in rapid eye movement, and percentage of total sleep time with end-tidal carbon dioxide of greater than 50 mm Hg.
Of the 24 children, 58% were female, 67% were white, 13 were treated with observation, one was treated with oxygen, and 10 were treated with medication. Their baseline obstructive AHIs were 2.9, 3.5, and 3.3 events per hour, respectively. The follow-up PSGs revealed no statistically significant changes in obstructive AHI, oxygen saturation nadir, percentage of total sleep time in rapid eye movement, or percentage of total sleep time with end-tidal carbon dioxide greater than 50 mm Hg for any treatment group. OSA resolved in one patient in the observation group and in two patients in the medication group. At the same time, OSA worsened in two patients each in the medication and observation groups. Resolution of OSA was observed in 20% of patients in the medication group, compared with 7.1% of those in the observation or oxygen group (P = .82).
Mr. Howard acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including the potential for selection bias, its retrospective design, and its small sample size. “Resolution of mild OSA was low for all of our treatment groups after 3-12 months of treatment,” he said. “Resolution with medication was lower in our study, compared to published studies in otherwise healthy children.”
The researchers reported having no financial disclosures. The meeting was jointly sponsored by the Triological Society and the American College of Surgeons.
SOURCE: Howard J et al .Triological CSM, Abstracts.
CORONADO, CALIF. – Resolution of who were treated nonsurgically with either medication, observation, or supplemental oxygen was low, results from a small cohort study showed.
“This suggests that we should consider early treatment options, including multimodal approaches, for children with mild OSA and Down syndrome,” one of the study authors, Javier J.M. Howard, MPH, said at the Triological Society’s Combined Sections Meeting. “Prospective studies with longer follow-up are needed to better understand treatment outcomes in children with Down syndrome and mild OSA.”
An estimated 1%-6% of otherwise healthy children have obstructive sleep apnea, but the prevalence in children with Down syndrome is estimated to be between 30% and 70%, said Mr. Howard, a medical student at the University of Cincinnati. Additionally, those with Down syndrome tend to have more severe phenotypes, including significant hypoxemia and hypoventilation, compared with children without Down syndrome. “Nasal steroids, oral antileukotrienes, and supplemental oxygen have shown efficacy in the treatment of mild OSA in otherwise healthy children,” he said. “Observation is also employed in children with mild OSA, as a proportion of them will resolve spontaneously. The efficacy of these approaches in children with Down syndrome is unknown.”
In a study led by senior author Stacey L. Ishman, MD, MPH, researchers set out to examine the efficacy of single-medication therapy with either montelukast or intransal steroids versus observation versus oxygen on polysomnographic (PSG) outcomes in children with Down syndrome. They conducted a retrospective chart review of 24 children diagnosed with Down syndrome and mild OSA. The children were surgically naive and were treated between 2012 and 2017 with either supplemental oxygen, a single medication, or were observed. They had a follow-up PSG 3-12 months after initiation of treatment. The primary outcome was obstructive apnea hypopnea index (AHI), while secondary outcomes were oxygen saturation nadir, percent of total sleep time in rapid eye movement, and percentage of total sleep time with end-tidal carbon dioxide of greater than 50 mm Hg.
Of the 24 children, 58% were female, 67% were white, 13 were treated with observation, one was treated with oxygen, and 10 were treated with medication. Their baseline obstructive AHIs were 2.9, 3.5, and 3.3 events per hour, respectively. The follow-up PSGs revealed no statistically significant changes in obstructive AHI, oxygen saturation nadir, percentage of total sleep time in rapid eye movement, or percentage of total sleep time with end-tidal carbon dioxide greater than 50 mm Hg for any treatment group. OSA resolved in one patient in the observation group and in two patients in the medication group. At the same time, OSA worsened in two patients each in the medication and observation groups. Resolution of OSA was observed in 20% of patients in the medication group, compared with 7.1% of those in the observation or oxygen group (P = .82).
Mr. Howard acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including the potential for selection bias, its retrospective design, and its small sample size. “Resolution of mild OSA was low for all of our treatment groups after 3-12 months of treatment,” he said. “Resolution with medication was lower in our study, compared to published studies in otherwise healthy children.”
The researchers reported having no financial disclosures. The meeting was jointly sponsored by the Triological Society and the American College of Surgeons.
SOURCE: Howard J et al .Triological CSM, Abstracts.
REPORTING FROM TRIOLOGICAL CSM
Key clinical point: Resolution of mild OSA was low for all treatment groups after 3-12 months of treatment.
Major finding: Resolution of OSA was observed in 20% of patients in the medication group, compared with 7.1% of those in the observation or oxygen group (P = .82).
Study details: A retrospective chart review of 24 children diagnosed with Down syndrome and mild OSA.
Disclosures: The researchers reported having no financial disclosures.
Source: Howard J et al. Triological CSM, Abstracts.
Asthma, obesity, and the risk for severe sleep apnea in children
CORONADO, CALIF. –
“We have a good idea that obesity and asthma independently increase the risk of OSA, but a lot of the time in the pediatric population, these risk factors are found comorbid,” Ajay Narayanan at the Triological Society’s Combined Sections Meeting. “For this study we asked, how does the presence of asthma change the likelihood of having severe OSA in a cohort of obese patients? Knowing that both asthma and obesity independently increase the risk for OSA, we hypothesized that when they were comorbid, asthma would have a synergistic effect with obesity, causing severe OSA.”
Mr. Narayanan, a third-year student at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, and his colleagues performed a retrospective chart review of 367 children aged 9-17 years referred for a full-night polysomnography (PSG) for suspicion of having OSA. Demographic variables recorded included race, body mass index, rhinitis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and tonsillar hypertrophy. Sleep variables recorded included apnea hypopnea index (AHI), sleep efficiency, rapid eye movement, and the peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) nadir. The primary outcome was severe OSA defined as an AHI of 10 or greater on the PSG. They used logistic modeling to determine the association between asthma, obesity, and severe OSA.
The mean age of the study population was 14 years, 56% were male, and 43% were Hispanic. Of the 367 patients, 77 were neither obese nor asthmatic, 93 were nonobese but were asthmatic, 102 were obese but were nonasthmatic, and 95 were both obese and asthmatic. PSG results confirmed that obesity was associated with more signs of sleep apnea. For example, the nonobese, nonasthmatic group had a mean AHI of 11 events per hour, while the obese, nonasthmatic group had a mean AHI of 19 events per hour. “We observed a similar trend amongst our asthmatic population,” Mr. Narayanan said. “We observed an increase in the mean AHI amongst our asthmatic kids when we added obesity to the picture. Surprisingly, we found that asthma was associated with having fewer signs of sleep apnea.” Specifically, while the nonobese, nonasthmatic group had a mean AHI of 11 events per hour, those in the nonobese, asthmatic group had a mean of 5.6 events per hour (P = .005). “The finding was similar amongst our obese kids,” he said. “We saw a decrease in the mean AHI of our obese kids when we added asthma to the picture.”
On logistic regression analysis using obesity and asthma as independent variables, the researchers found that obesity increased the risk of severe OSA by 2.4-fold, but asthma decreased the odds of having severe OSA by about half (0.55). On multiple logistic regression controlling for commonly associated factors such as tonsillar hypertrophy, black race, and Hispanic ethnicity, obesity increased the risk of severe OSA by 2.2-fold, while asthma decreased the odds of having severe OSA by about half (0.51).
“In trying to explain this finding, we can turn to how these diseases are treated,” Mr. Narayanan said. “I say this because of the proven association between preexisting asthma and new onset OSA. Some of the reasons for this association include the tendency for airway collapsibility and systemwide inflammation seen in asthma, which then might contribute to the development of OSA. If we treat asthma symptoms early on, it might prevent the progression to sleep apnea down the line.”
Considering how prevalent comorbid asthma and OSA is, he continued, “we need to confirm that it is in fact well-controlled asthma that is associated with lowering the risk of severe OSA. Once we do this, we can ask the question: Can we use asthma pharmacotherapy to treat OSA? Some studies have shown that inhaled corticosteroids and montelukast (Singulair) may be effective treatment options for kids with OSA, but there’s definitely room for more research in this field, [such as determining] which patients would most benefit from this pharmacotherapy.” The researchers reported having no financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Narayanan A et al. Triological CSM, Abstracts.
CORONADO, CALIF. –
“We have a good idea that obesity and asthma independently increase the risk of OSA, but a lot of the time in the pediatric population, these risk factors are found comorbid,” Ajay Narayanan at the Triological Society’s Combined Sections Meeting. “For this study we asked, how does the presence of asthma change the likelihood of having severe OSA in a cohort of obese patients? Knowing that both asthma and obesity independently increase the risk for OSA, we hypothesized that when they were comorbid, asthma would have a synergistic effect with obesity, causing severe OSA.”
Mr. Narayanan, a third-year student at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, and his colleagues performed a retrospective chart review of 367 children aged 9-17 years referred for a full-night polysomnography (PSG) for suspicion of having OSA. Demographic variables recorded included race, body mass index, rhinitis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and tonsillar hypertrophy. Sleep variables recorded included apnea hypopnea index (AHI), sleep efficiency, rapid eye movement, and the peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) nadir. The primary outcome was severe OSA defined as an AHI of 10 or greater on the PSG. They used logistic modeling to determine the association between asthma, obesity, and severe OSA.
The mean age of the study population was 14 years, 56% were male, and 43% were Hispanic. Of the 367 patients, 77 were neither obese nor asthmatic, 93 were nonobese but were asthmatic, 102 were obese but were nonasthmatic, and 95 were both obese and asthmatic. PSG results confirmed that obesity was associated with more signs of sleep apnea. For example, the nonobese, nonasthmatic group had a mean AHI of 11 events per hour, while the obese, nonasthmatic group had a mean AHI of 19 events per hour. “We observed a similar trend amongst our asthmatic population,” Mr. Narayanan said. “We observed an increase in the mean AHI amongst our asthmatic kids when we added obesity to the picture. Surprisingly, we found that asthma was associated with having fewer signs of sleep apnea.” Specifically, while the nonobese, nonasthmatic group had a mean AHI of 11 events per hour, those in the nonobese, asthmatic group had a mean of 5.6 events per hour (P = .005). “The finding was similar amongst our obese kids,” he said. “We saw a decrease in the mean AHI of our obese kids when we added asthma to the picture.”
On logistic regression analysis using obesity and asthma as independent variables, the researchers found that obesity increased the risk of severe OSA by 2.4-fold, but asthma decreased the odds of having severe OSA by about half (0.55). On multiple logistic regression controlling for commonly associated factors such as tonsillar hypertrophy, black race, and Hispanic ethnicity, obesity increased the risk of severe OSA by 2.2-fold, while asthma decreased the odds of having severe OSA by about half (0.51).
“In trying to explain this finding, we can turn to how these diseases are treated,” Mr. Narayanan said. “I say this because of the proven association between preexisting asthma and new onset OSA. Some of the reasons for this association include the tendency for airway collapsibility and systemwide inflammation seen in asthma, which then might contribute to the development of OSA. If we treat asthma symptoms early on, it might prevent the progression to sleep apnea down the line.”
Considering how prevalent comorbid asthma and OSA is, he continued, “we need to confirm that it is in fact well-controlled asthma that is associated with lowering the risk of severe OSA. Once we do this, we can ask the question: Can we use asthma pharmacotherapy to treat OSA? Some studies have shown that inhaled corticosteroids and montelukast (Singulair) may be effective treatment options for kids with OSA, but there’s definitely room for more research in this field, [such as determining] which patients would most benefit from this pharmacotherapy.” The researchers reported having no financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Narayanan A et al. Triological CSM, Abstracts.
CORONADO, CALIF. –
“We have a good idea that obesity and asthma independently increase the risk of OSA, but a lot of the time in the pediatric population, these risk factors are found comorbid,” Ajay Narayanan at the Triological Society’s Combined Sections Meeting. “For this study we asked, how does the presence of asthma change the likelihood of having severe OSA in a cohort of obese patients? Knowing that both asthma and obesity independently increase the risk for OSA, we hypothesized that when they were comorbid, asthma would have a synergistic effect with obesity, causing severe OSA.”
Mr. Narayanan, a third-year student at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, and his colleagues performed a retrospective chart review of 367 children aged 9-17 years referred for a full-night polysomnography (PSG) for suspicion of having OSA. Demographic variables recorded included race, body mass index, rhinitis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and tonsillar hypertrophy. Sleep variables recorded included apnea hypopnea index (AHI), sleep efficiency, rapid eye movement, and the peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) nadir. The primary outcome was severe OSA defined as an AHI of 10 or greater on the PSG. They used logistic modeling to determine the association between asthma, obesity, and severe OSA.
The mean age of the study population was 14 years, 56% were male, and 43% were Hispanic. Of the 367 patients, 77 were neither obese nor asthmatic, 93 were nonobese but were asthmatic, 102 were obese but were nonasthmatic, and 95 were both obese and asthmatic. PSG results confirmed that obesity was associated with more signs of sleep apnea. For example, the nonobese, nonasthmatic group had a mean AHI of 11 events per hour, while the obese, nonasthmatic group had a mean AHI of 19 events per hour. “We observed a similar trend amongst our asthmatic population,” Mr. Narayanan said. “We observed an increase in the mean AHI amongst our asthmatic kids when we added obesity to the picture. Surprisingly, we found that asthma was associated with having fewer signs of sleep apnea.” Specifically, while the nonobese, nonasthmatic group had a mean AHI of 11 events per hour, those in the nonobese, asthmatic group had a mean of 5.6 events per hour (P = .005). “The finding was similar amongst our obese kids,” he said. “We saw a decrease in the mean AHI of our obese kids when we added asthma to the picture.”
On logistic regression analysis using obesity and asthma as independent variables, the researchers found that obesity increased the risk of severe OSA by 2.4-fold, but asthma decreased the odds of having severe OSA by about half (0.55). On multiple logistic regression controlling for commonly associated factors such as tonsillar hypertrophy, black race, and Hispanic ethnicity, obesity increased the risk of severe OSA by 2.2-fold, while asthma decreased the odds of having severe OSA by about half (0.51).
“In trying to explain this finding, we can turn to how these diseases are treated,” Mr. Narayanan said. “I say this because of the proven association between preexisting asthma and new onset OSA. Some of the reasons for this association include the tendency for airway collapsibility and systemwide inflammation seen in asthma, which then might contribute to the development of OSA. If we treat asthma symptoms early on, it might prevent the progression to sleep apnea down the line.”
Considering how prevalent comorbid asthma and OSA is, he continued, “we need to confirm that it is in fact well-controlled asthma that is associated with lowering the risk of severe OSA. Once we do this, we can ask the question: Can we use asthma pharmacotherapy to treat OSA? Some studies have shown that inhaled corticosteroids and montelukast (Singulair) may be effective treatment options for kids with OSA, but there’s definitely room for more research in this field, [such as determining] which patients would most benefit from this pharmacotherapy.” The researchers reported having no financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Narayanan A et al. Triological CSM, Abstracts.
REPORTING FROM THE TRIOLOGICAL CSM
Key clinical point: In children, having asthma could decrease the risk of having severe obstructive sleep apnea, regardless of their obesity status.
Major finding: On multiple logistic regression, obesity increased the risk of severe OSA by 2.2-fold, while asthma decreased the odds of having severe OSA by about half.
Study details: A retrospective review of 367 children referred for a full-night polysomnography for suspicion of having OSA.
Disclosures: The researchers reported having no financial disclosures.
Source: Narayanan A et al. Triological CSM, Abstracts.
Michigan Medicine launches effort to make wellness a cultural norm
CORONADO, CALIF. – Officials at staff, and learners.
“If you look long and hard at your hospitals, health centers, and medical schools, you would find incidences of depression, near-miss suicide, opioid addiction, substance abuse addictions, and suicide,” Carol R. Bradford, MD, said at the Triological Society’s Combined Sections Meeting. “Another component of this is that we all struggle with our work or learning communities where people don’t take care of each other. People don’t treat each other with respect and civility. Promoting a healthy and civil work environment are essential components of a supportive environment.”
According to Dr. Bradford, executive vice dean for academic affairs at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, the complexities and stress of the health care environment compromises the well-being of its workforce with a myriad of time-consuming tasks, including navigating electronic records and ever-populating email inboxes. “We are all connected to devices 24/7, and it has become more and more difficult to maintain a healthy work-life balance,” Dr. Bradford said. “The more accepted term now is integration, because it’s almost impossible to achieve balance. Burnout and other physical and health problems are the result of all of these challenges.”
In late 2017, she and her colleagues used two different validated survey questionnaires to assess the health of Michigan Medicine faculty physicians. They found that about 40% of faculty members in both clinical and basic science departments met criteria for burnout. The top 10 stressors based on the survey were email, clerical activity, time worked outside of regular hours, workload time pressure, work expectations, insufficient time for meaningful activities, in-basket messages, lack of decisional transparency, inadequate compensation, and too many work hours. The top 10 coping strategies were finding meaning in work, using all vacation time, paying attention to healthy/balanced eating, engaging in exercise, seek personal/professional balance, protecting time away from work, protecting sleep time, using a social support network, nurturing spiritual aspects, and engaging in recreation or hobbies.
Results of the survey prompted development of a task force to examine wellness and civility at Michigan Medicine, and to devise strategies and tactics to conquer these challenges. “The goal is to help all human beings who are suffering in our work environment,” said Dr. Bradford, who is also chief academic officer for Michigan Medicine. “What we learned initially is that there is a bit of an overlap. Some lack of wellness is due to a lack of civility, but there are wellness issues and civility issues that are independent of one another.”
Members of the task force formulated several recommendations, the first being to create a Michigan Medicine Wellness Office. Dr. Bradford is currently negotiating with a finalist to serve as its faculty director. She characterized the office as a “hub and spoke” model that will partner with existing entities, including human resources, the office of medical student education, the program in biological sciences, graduate medical education, the office of health equality and inclusion, the office of clinical affairs, and the office of counseling and workplace resilience. “The idea is to create a strategic wellness plan,” said Dr. Bradford, who is also a professor of otolaryngology–head and neck surgery. “One key strategy is to endorse the health and well-being of our faculty, staff, and learners as a core value and cultural norm of Michigan Medicine. In other words, the leadership has to make health and well-being a priority and a value.”
Another goal of the office is to improve the overall workplace environment and experience of Michigan Medicine’s faculty, staff, and learners. “You’re not going to have a well workplace if people are not treating each other with respect,” she said at the meeting, jointly sponsored by the Triological Society and the American College of Surgeons. “One of the many challenges is that there is great stigma in our profession for those who are suffering from mental health challenges such as stress, anxiety, depression, and perhaps substance abuse. We need to reduce the stigma, because it’s very dangerous if people who are struggling are unwilling to seek help. We don’t ask people that we supervise or work with how they’re doing, so we have adopted an optional wellness check-in that is incorporated into mid-year and annual evaluations for faculty, staff, and learners to enable leaders to address any challenges that may arise.” In addition, a group of residents is piloting the use of meditation and mindfulness applications such as MoodGym and Headspace to see if they affect resident wellness.
Ultimately, Dr. Bradford and her associates plan to use a standardized benchmark instrument to measure well-being, and include the measure in the institutional performance dashboard. “Administrative burden is a growing problem,” she said. “We’re going to address this for health care professionals, particularly as it relates to the electronic medical record. Our primary care colleagues sometimes spend as many hours outside of clinic documenting as they do in clinic. We want to develop and implement strategies to lessen or remove this burden in order to improve provider efficiency and satisfaction.”
In the course of helping to develop the wellness initiative, Dr. Bradford said that she learned the importance of addressing moral distress in the workplace. “We sort of lose our humanity if we don’t show emotion when tragedies happen. There is really good literature around terminal event debriefings, so if somebody dies unexpectedly in the operating room or in the CT scanner, rather than just walking away and pretending nothing happened, we’re supposed to pause and gather, and reflect on the sadness of the loss. Because if we don’t grieve our losses we become more like machines than human beings. It’s important to provide emotional support for all individuals involved.”
She reported having no relevant financial disclosures.
CORONADO, CALIF. – Officials at staff, and learners.
“If you look long and hard at your hospitals, health centers, and medical schools, you would find incidences of depression, near-miss suicide, opioid addiction, substance abuse addictions, and suicide,” Carol R. Bradford, MD, said at the Triological Society’s Combined Sections Meeting. “Another component of this is that we all struggle with our work or learning communities where people don’t take care of each other. People don’t treat each other with respect and civility. Promoting a healthy and civil work environment are essential components of a supportive environment.”
According to Dr. Bradford, executive vice dean for academic affairs at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, the complexities and stress of the health care environment compromises the well-being of its workforce with a myriad of time-consuming tasks, including navigating electronic records and ever-populating email inboxes. “We are all connected to devices 24/7, and it has become more and more difficult to maintain a healthy work-life balance,” Dr. Bradford said. “The more accepted term now is integration, because it’s almost impossible to achieve balance. Burnout and other physical and health problems are the result of all of these challenges.”
In late 2017, she and her colleagues used two different validated survey questionnaires to assess the health of Michigan Medicine faculty physicians. They found that about 40% of faculty members in both clinical and basic science departments met criteria for burnout. The top 10 stressors based on the survey were email, clerical activity, time worked outside of regular hours, workload time pressure, work expectations, insufficient time for meaningful activities, in-basket messages, lack of decisional transparency, inadequate compensation, and too many work hours. The top 10 coping strategies were finding meaning in work, using all vacation time, paying attention to healthy/balanced eating, engaging in exercise, seek personal/professional balance, protecting time away from work, protecting sleep time, using a social support network, nurturing spiritual aspects, and engaging in recreation or hobbies.
Results of the survey prompted development of a task force to examine wellness and civility at Michigan Medicine, and to devise strategies and tactics to conquer these challenges. “The goal is to help all human beings who are suffering in our work environment,” said Dr. Bradford, who is also chief academic officer for Michigan Medicine. “What we learned initially is that there is a bit of an overlap. Some lack of wellness is due to a lack of civility, but there are wellness issues and civility issues that are independent of one another.”
Members of the task force formulated several recommendations, the first being to create a Michigan Medicine Wellness Office. Dr. Bradford is currently negotiating with a finalist to serve as its faculty director. She characterized the office as a “hub and spoke” model that will partner with existing entities, including human resources, the office of medical student education, the program in biological sciences, graduate medical education, the office of health equality and inclusion, the office of clinical affairs, and the office of counseling and workplace resilience. “The idea is to create a strategic wellness plan,” said Dr. Bradford, who is also a professor of otolaryngology–head and neck surgery. “One key strategy is to endorse the health and well-being of our faculty, staff, and learners as a core value and cultural norm of Michigan Medicine. In other words, the leadership has to make health and well-being a priority and a value.”
Another goal of the office is to improve the overall workplace environment and experience of Michigan Medicine’s faculty, staff, and learners. “You’re not going to have a well workplace if people are not treating each other with respect,” she said at the meeting, jointly sponsored by the Triological Society and the American College of Surgeons. “One of the many challenges is that there is great stigma in our profession for those who are suffering from mental health challenges such as stress, anxiety, depression, and perhaps substance abuse. We need to reduce the stigma, because it’s very dangerous if people who are struggling are unwilling to seek help. We don’t ask people that we supervise or work with how they’re doing, so we have adopted an optional wellness check-in that is incorporated into mid-year and annual evaluations for faculty, staff, and learners to enable leaders to address any challenges that may arise.” In addition, a group of residents is piloting the use of meditation and mindfulness applications such as MoodGym and Headspace to see if they affect resident wellness.
Ultimately, Dr. Bradford and her associates plan to use a standardized benchmark instrument to measure well-being, and include the measure in the institutional performance dashboard. “Administrative burden is a growing problem,” she said. “We’re going to address this for health care professionals, particularly as it relates to the electronic medical record. Our primary care colleagues sometimes spend as many hours outside of clinic documenting as they do in clinic. We want to develop and implement strategies to lessen or remove this burden in order to improve provider efficiency and satisfaction.”
In the course of helping to develop the wellness initiative, Dr. Bradford said that she learned the importance of addressing moral distress in the workplace. “We sort of lose our humanity if we don’t show emotion when tragedies happen. There is really good literature around terminal event debriefings, so if somebody dies unexpectedly in the operating room or in the CT scanner, rather than just walking away and pretending nothing happened, we’re supposed to pause and gather, and reflect on the sadness of the loss. Because if we don’t grieve our losses we become more like machines than human beings. It’s important to provide emotional support for all individuals involved.”
She reported having no relevant financial disclosures.
CORONADO, CALIF. – Officials at staff, and learners.
“If you look long and hard at your hospitals, health centers, and medical schools, you would find incidences of depression, near-miss suicide, opioid addiction, substance abuse addictions, and suicide,” Carol R. Bradford, MD, said at the Triological Society’s Combined Sections Meeting. “Another component of this is that we all struggle with our work or learning communities where people don’t take care of each other. People don’t treat each other with respect and civility. Promoting a healthy and civil work environment are essential components of a supportive environment.”
According to Dr. Bradford, executive vice dean for academic affairs at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, the complexities and stress of the health care environment compromises the well-being of its workforce with a myriad of time-consuming tasks, including navigating electronic records and ever-populating email inboxes. “We are all connected to devices 24/7, and it has become more and more difficult to maintain a healthy work-life balance,” Dr. Bradford said. “The more accepted term now is integration, because it’s almost impossible to achieve balance. Burnout and other physical and health problems are the result of all of these challenges.”
In late 2017, she and her colleagues used two different validated survey questionnaires to assess the health of Michigan Medicine faculty physicians. They found that about 40% of faculty members in both clinical and basic science departments met criteria for burnout. The top 10 stressors based on the survey were email, clerical activity, time worked outside of regular hours, workload time pressure, work expectations, insufficient time for meaningful activities, in-basket messages, lack of decisional transparency, inadequate compensation, and too many work hours. The top 10 coping strategies were finding meaning in work, using all vacation time, paying attention to healthy/balanced eating, engaging in exercise, seek personal/professional balance, protecting time away from work, protecting sleep time, using a social support network, nurturing spiritual aspects, and engaging in recreation or hobbies.
Results of the survey prompted development of a task force to examine wellness and civility at Michigan Medicine, and to devise strategies and tactics to conquer these challenges. “The goal is to help all human beings who are suffering in our work environment,” said Dr. Bradford, who is also chief academic officer for Michigan Medicine. “What we learned initially is that there is a bit of an overlap. Some lack of wellness is due to a lack of civility, but there are wellness issues and civility issues that are independent of one another.”
Members of the task force formulated several recommendations, the first being to create a Michigan Medicine Wellness Office. Dr. Bradford is currently negotiating with a finalist to serve as its faculty director. She characterized the office as a “hub and spoke” model that will partner with existing entities, including human resources, the office of medical student education, the program in biological sciences, graduate medical education, the office of health equality and inclusion, the office of clinical affairs, and the office of counseling and workplace resilience. “The idea is to create a strategic wellness plan,” said Dr. Bradford, who is also a professor of otolaryngology–head and neck surgery. “One key strategy is to endorse the health and well-being of our faculty, staff, and learners as a core value and cultural norm of Michigan Medicine. In other words, the leadership has to make health and well-being a priority and a value.”
Another goal of the office is to improve the overall workplace environment and experience of Michigan Medicine’s faculty, staff, and learners. “You’re not going to have a well workplace if people are not treating each other with respect,” she said at the meeting, jointly sponsored by the Triological Society and the American College of Surgeons. “One of the many challenges is that there is great stigma in our profession for those who are suffering from mental health challenges such as stress, anxiety, depression, and perhaps substance abuse. We need to reduce the stigma, because it’s very dangerous if people who are struggling are unwilling to seek help. We don’t ask people that we supervise or work with how they’re doing, so we have adopted an optional wellness check-in that is incorporated into mid-year and annual evaluations for faculty, staff, and learners to enable leaders to address any challenges that may arise.” In addition, a group of residents is piloting the use of meditation and mindfulness applications such as MoodGym and Headspace to see if they affect resident wellness.
Ultimately, Dr. Bradford and her associates plan to use a standardized benchmark instrument to measure well-being, and include the measure in the institutional performance dashboard. “Administrative burden is a growing problem,” she said. “We’re going to address this for health care professionals, particularly as it relates to the electronic medical record. Our primary care colleagues sometimes spend as many hours outside of clinic documenting as they do in clinic. We want to develop and implement strategies to lessen or remove this burden in order to improve provider efficiency and satisfaction.”
In the course of helping to develop the wellness initiative, Dr. Bradford said that she learned the importance of addressing moral distress in the workplace. “We sort of lose our humanity if we don’t show emotion when tragedies happen. There is really good literature around terminal event debriefings, so if somebody dies unexpectedly in the operating room or in the CT scanner, rather than just walking away and pretending nothing happened, we’re supposed to pause and gather, and reflect on the sadness of the loss. Because if we don’t grieve our losses we become more like machines than human beings. It’s important to provide emotional support for all individuals involved.”
She reported having no relevant financial disclosures.
EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM THE TRIOLOGICAL CSM
Pulmonary hypertension linked to complications after head and neck procedures
SAN DIEGO – Patients with , compared with their counterparts who do not have the condition. They also face an increase in total charges and length of stay.
The findings come from what is believed to be the first study of its kind to investigate the impact of pulmonary hypertension (PHTN) on major head and neck procedures. “PHTN is a common condition which affects the caliber of lung vasculature, with varied symptom presentation from shortness of breath to syncope, with an estimated prevalence of 2.5 to 7.1 million new cases each year worldwide,” one of the study authors, Nirali M. Patel, said at the Triological Society’s Combined Sections Meeting. “Due to improved therapeutic options, there is an enhanced survival of PHTN patients and higher prevalence of this disease. PHTN has some significant systemic implications. Therefore, cardiopulmonary clearance and a clear understanding of postoperative complications are very important.”
Previous studies have shown PHTN to be an independent predictor of morbidity and mortality in noncardiac procedures, said Ms. Patel, a fourth-year medical student at New Jersey Medical School, Newark. Furthermore, the rate of pulmonary complications is reported to be between 11% and 44.8% following radical head and neck cancer resection. “Despite these findings, there is currently a lack of information regarding perioperative morbidity and mortality of patients with PHTN undergoing major head and neck procedures,” she said.
The researchers queried the National Inpatient Survey from 2002 to 2013 for all cases of major head and neck surgery based on the ICD-9 codes for esophagectomy, glossectomy, laryngectomy, mandibulectomy, and pharyngectomy. They divided patients into two groups: those who had PHTN and those who did not, and performed demographic analyses as well as univariate and multivariate regression analyses.
Ms. Patel reported findings from a cohort of 46,311 patients. Of these, 46,073 had PHTN and 238 did not. The two groups were similar in age (a mean of 69 vs. 60 years in those with and without PHTN, respectively) and race (80% white vs. 79% white, respectively), but there were significantly fewer male patients in the PHTN group (57% vs. 70%; P less than .0001).
Several patient comorbidities were increased in the PHTN group, compared with the non-PHTN group, including coagulopathy (8.4% vs. 3.1%; P less than .0001), chronic heart failure (22.4% vs. 4.1%; P less than .0001), complicated diabetes (4.6% vs. 1.2%; P less than .0001), fluid and electrolyte disorders (30% vs. 18.3%; P less than .0001), and hypertension (63.3% vs. 43.7%; P less than .0001).
Postoperatively, patients with PHTN had a longer length of stay (a mean of 15.80 vs. 11.50 days, respectively; P less than .0001) as well as significantly higher total charges (a mean of $162,021.06 vs. $107,309.46, respectively; P less than .0001). When the researchers evaluated postoperative outcomes between the two cohorts, patients with PHTN had significantly higher rates of cardiac complications (9.2% vs. 3.5%; P less than .0001), iatrogenic pulmonary embolism (2.1% vs. 0.3%; P = .001), pulmonary edema (2.1% vs. 0.4%; P = .003), venous thrombotic events (4.6% vs. 1%; P less than. 0001), pulmonary insufficiency (17.2% vs. 9.7%; P less than .0001), and pneumonia (9.7% vs. 6%; P = .027), as well as higher rates of postoperative tracheostomy (8.4% vs. 4.5%; P = .007).
Multivariate analysis revealed that the following factors predicted in-hospital mortality: coagulopathy, chronic heart failure, fluid and electrolyte disorders, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, hypothyroidism, liver disease, obesity, paralysis, and renal failure. Despite these findings, there was no significant change in overall hospital mortality for those with PHTN, with an odds ratio of 1.055.
“Our study is not without its limitations, many of which are inherent to the use of a database, which is subject to errors in coding and sampling,” Ms. Patel noted at the meeting, which was jointly sponsored by the Triological Society and the American College of Surgeons. “Despite these limitations, the study provides valuable information on the impact of PHTN on major head and neck procedures.
She reported having no financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Patel N et al. Triological CSM, Abstracts.
SAN DIEGO – Patients with , compared with their counterparts who do not have the condition. They also face an increase in total charges and length of stay.
The findings come from what is believed to be the first study of its kind to investigate the impact of pulmonary hypertension (PHTN) on major head and neck procedures. “PHTN is a common condition which affects the caliber of lung vasculature, with varied symptom presentation from shortness of breath to syncope, with an estimated prevalence of 2.5 to 7.1 million new cases each year worldwide,” one of the study authors, Nirali M. Patel, said at the Triological Society’s Combined Sections Meeting. “Due to improved therapeutic options, there is an enhanced survival of PHTN patients and higher prevalence of this disease. PHTN has some significant systemic implications. Therefore, cardiopulmonary clearance and a clear understanding of postoperative complications are very important.”
Previous studies have shown PHTN to be an independent predictor of morbidity and mortality in noncardiac procedures, said Ms. Patel, a fourth-year medical student at New Jersey Medical School, Newark. Furthermore, the rate of pulmonary complications is reported to be between 11% and 44.8% following radical head and neck cancer resection. “Despite these findings, there is currently a lack of information regarding perioperative morbidity and mortality of patients with PHTN undergoing major head and neck procedures,” she said.
The researchers queried the National Inpatient Survey from 2002 to 2013 for all cases of major head and neck surgery based on the ICD-9 codes for esophagectomy, glossectomy, laryngectomy, mandibulectomy, and pharyngectomy. They divided patients into two groups: those who had PHTN and those who did not, and performed demographic analyses as well as univariate and multivariate regression analyses.
Ms. Patel reported findings from a cohort of 46,311 patients. Of these, 46,073 had PHTN and 238 did not. The two groups were similar in age (a mean of 69 vs. 60 years in those with and without PHTN, respectively) and race (80% white vs. 79% white, respectively), but there were significantly fewer male patients in the PHTN group (57% vs. 70%; P less than .0001).
Several patient comorbidities were increased in the PHTN group, compared with the non-PHTN group, including coagulopathy (8.4% vs. 3.1%; P less than .0001), chronic heart failure (22.4% vs. 4.1%; P less than .0001), complicated diabetes (4.6% vs. 1.2%; P less than .0001), fluid and electrolyte disorders (30% vs. 18.3%; P less than .0001), and hypertension (63.3% vs. 43.7%; P less than .0001).
Postoperatively, patients with PHTN had a longer length of stay (a mean of 15.80 vs. 11.50 days, respectively; P less than .0001) as well as significantly higher total charges (a mean of $162,021.06 vs. $107,309.46, respectively; P less than .0001). When the researchers evaluated postoperative outcomes between the two cohorts, patients with PHTN had significantly higher rates of cardiac complications (9.2% vs. 3.5%; P less than .0001), iatrogenic pulmonary embolism (2.1% vs. 0.3%; P = .001), pulmonary edema (2.1% vs. 0.4%; P = .003), venous thrombotic events (4.6% vs. 1%; P less than. 0001), pulmonary insufficiency (17.2% vs. 9.7%; P less than .0001), and pneumonia (9.7% vs. 6%; P = .027), as well as higher rates of postoperative tracheostomy (8.4% vs. 4.5%; P = .007).
Multivariate analysis revealed that the following factors predicted in-hospital mortality: coagulopathy, chronic heart failure, fluid and electrolyte disorders, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, hypothyroidism, liver disease, obesity, paralysis, and renal failure. Despite these findings, there was no significant change in overall hospital mortality for those with PHTN, with an odds ratio of 1.055.
“Our study is not without its limitations, many of which are inherent to the use of a database, which is subject to errors in coding and sampling,” Ms. Patel noted at the meeting, which was jointly sponsored by the Triological Society and the American College of Surgeons. “Despite these limitations, the study provides valuable information on the impact of PHTN on major head and neck procedures.
She reported having no financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Patel N et al. Triological CSM, Abstracts.
SAN DIEGO – Patients with , compared with their counterparts who do not have the condition. They also face an increase in total charges and length of stay.
The findings come from what is believed to be the first study of its kind to investigate the impact of pulmonary hypertension (PHTN) on major head and neck procedures. “PHTN is a common condition which affects the caliber of lung vasculature, with varied symptom presentation from shortness of breath to syncope, with an estimated prevalence of 2.5 to 7.1 million new cases each year worldwide,” one of the study authors, Nirali M. Patel, said at the Triological Society’s Combined Sections Meeting. “Due to improved therapeutic options, there is an enhanced survival of PHTN patients and higher prevalence of this disease. PHTN has some significant systemic implications. Therefore, cardiopulmonary clearance and a clear understanding of postoperative complications are very important.”
Previous studies have shown PHTN to be an independent predictor of morbidity and mortality in noncardiac procedures, said Ms. Patel, a fourth-year medical student at New Jersey Medical School, Newark. Furthermore, the rate of pulmonary complications is reported to be between 11% and 44.8% following radical head and neck cancer resection. “Despite these findings, there is currently a lack of information regarding perioperative morbidity and mortality of patients with PHTN undergoing major head and neck procedures,” she said.
The researchers queried the National Inpatient Survey from 2002 to 2013 for all cases of major head and neck surgery based on the ICD-9 codes for esophagectomy, glossectomy, laryngectomy, mandibulectomy, and pharyngectomy. They divided patients into two groups: those who had PHTN and those who did not, and performed demographic analyses as well as univariate and multivariate regression analyses.
Ms. Patel reported findings from a cohort of 46,311 patients. Of these, 46,073 had PHTN and 238 did not. The two groups were similar in age (a mean of 69 vs. 60 years in those with and without PHTN, respectively) and race (80% white vs. 79% white, respectively), but there were significantly fewer male patients in the PHTN group (57% vs. 70%; P less than .0001).
Several patient comorbidities were increased in the PHTN group, compared with the non-PHTN group, including coagulopathy (8.4% vs. 3.1%; P less than .0001), chronic heart failure (22.4% vs. 4.1%; P less than .0001), complicated diabetes (4.6% vs. 1.2%; P less than .0001), fluid and electrolyte disorders (30% vs. 18.3%; P less than .0001), and hypertension (63.3% vs. 43.7%; P less than .0001).
Postoperatively, patients with PHTN had a longer length of stay (a mean of 15.80 vs. 11.50 days, respectively; P less than .0001) as well as significantly higher total charges (a mean of $162,021.06 vs. $107,309.46, respectively; P less than .0001). When the researchers evaluated postoperative outcomes between the two cohorts, patients with PHTN had significantly higher rates of cardiac complications (9.2% vs. 3.5%; P less than .0001), iatrogenic pulmonary embolism (2.1% vs. 0.3%; P = .001), pulmonary edema (2.1% vs. 0.4%; P = .003), venous thrombotic events (4.6% vs. 1%; P less than. 0001), pulmonary insufficiency (17.2% vs. 9.7%; P less than .0001), and pneumonia (9.7% vs. 6%; P = .027), as well as higher rates of postoperative tracheostomy (8.4% vs. 4.5%; P = .007).
Multivariate analysis revealed that the following factors predicted in-hospital mortality: coagulopathy, chronic heart failure, fluid and electrolyte disorders, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, hypothyroidism, liver disease, obesity, paralysis, and renal failure. Despite these findings, there was no significant change in overall hospital mortality for those with PHTN, with an odds ratio of 1.055.
“Our study is not without its limitations, many of which are inherent to the use of a database, which is subject to errors in coding and sampling,” Ms. Patel noted at the meeting, which was jointly sponsored by the Triological Society and the American College of Surgeons. “Despite these limitations, the study provides valuable information on the impact of PHTN on major head and neck procedures.
She reported having no financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Patel N et al. Triological CSM, Abstracts.
REPORTING FROM THE TRIOLOGICAL CSM
Key clinical point: Pulmonary hypertension (PHTN) is linked with certain head and neck surgical complications.
Major finding: For patients undergoing head and neck surgery, PHTN is associated with an increased risk of cardiac complications (9.2% vs. 3.5%) and iatrogenic pulmonary embolism (2.1% vs. 0.3%).
Study details: A retrospective analysis of 46,311 patient records from the National Inpatient Survey.
Disclosures: The researchers reported having no financial disclosures.
Source: Patel N et al. Triological CSM, Abstracts.
Mild OSA spontaneously resolves in about one-third of young children
CORONADO, CALIF. – results from a single-center study showed.
“OSA affects up to 6% of the pediatric population, and diagnosis of young children can be particularly challenging due to the heterogeneity of presenting symptoms,” Douglas C. von Allmen, MD, said at the Triological Society’s Combined Sections Meeting. “While school-age children may present with snoring, that’s less common in the younger population. Up to one-quarter of infants may have noisy breathing, which may mimic obstructive events throughout the first 3 years of life. Additionally, long-term clinical implications of mild sleep apnea in very young children is unclear.”
According to Dr. von Allmen, a fifth-year otolaryngology resident at the University of Cincinnati, management strategies of children with OSA can include a period of observation, particularly when there’s an absence of concerning findings on polysomnography (PSG), such as hypoventilation or significant hypoxia, or when the primary etiology of the OSA is unknown. “Additionally, few studies at this point have attempted to characterize the natural history of mild OSA in pediatric patients under 3 years of age,” he said.
In an effort to assess the effects of observation on the PSG outcomes of children under 3 years with mild OSA, Dr. Von Allmen and his colleagues performed a retrospective review of 26 children who had an overnight PSG with a follow-up PSG performed 3-12 months later. They excluded patients with neuromuscular disease, tracheostomy, or interstitial lung disease. All PSGs were performed at the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center between 2012 and 2017 and were scored by a board-certified sleep physician. The researchers defined mild OSA as at least one, but fewer than five, events per hour. The mean age of the 26 patients was 7 months, 65% were male, 92% were white, and their median body mass index was in the 39th percentile. Comorbidities include laryngomalacia (40%), cardiac disease (40%), allergies (34%), asthma (23%), and Down syndrome (11%).
Between baseline and follow-up, the apnea-hypoapnea index (AHI) trended downward from 4.3 to 3.4 events per hour (P = .19), the obstructive AHI decreased significantly from 2.7 to 1.3 events per hour (P = .013), while the central apnea index also trended downward from 1.4 to 1.2 events per hour (P = .60). The oxyhemoglobin nadir and sleep efficiency did not change significantly, but there was a decrease in the arousal index (from 14.7 to 13 events per hour; P = .027) and in the percentage of REM sleep (from 33% to 30%; P = .008).
As for postobservation OSA severity outcomes, eight patients (31%) resolved spontaneously, one patient progressed from mild to moderate OSA, and the rest remained in their mild OSA state. Subanalysis revealed that OSA resolution rate was 36% in patients with laryngomalacia, compared with 27% in those with no laryngomalacia, a difference that did not reach statistical significance (P = .98).
Dr. von Allmen pointed out that the study cohort had comorbidities which may have contributed to the persistence of OSA. He also acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including its retrospective nature, the potential for selection bias, the small sample size, and the fact that it did not include a control sample of normal children. “The presence of laryngomalacia did not affect the resolution rate in our cohort, but we’ll need larger studies to better elucidate the factors that do affect persistent disease and to identify the optimal timing of intervention in children with mild OSA,” he said.
Dr. von Allmen reported having no financial disclosures. The study received a resident research award at the meeting, which was jointly sponsored by the Triological Society and the American College of Surgeons.
SOURCE: von Allmen DC et al. Triological CSM, Abstracts.
CORONADO, CALIF. – results from a single-center study showed.
“OSA affects up to 6% of the pediatric population, and diagnosis of young children can be particularly challenging due to the heterogeneity of presenting symptoms,” Douglas C. von Allmen, MD, said at the Triological Society’s Combined Sections Meeting. “While school-age children may present with snoring, that’s less common in the younger population. Up to one-quarter of infants may have noisy breathing, which may mimic obstructive events throughout the first 3 years of life. Additionally, long-term clinical implications of mild sleep apnea in very young children is unclear.”
According to Dr. von Allmen, a fifth-year otolaryngology resident at the University of Cincinnati, management strategies of children with OSA can include a period of observation, particularly when there’s an absence of concerning findings on polysomnography (PSG), such as hypoventilation or significant hypoxia, or when the primary etiology of the OSA is unknown. “Additionally, few studies at this point have attempted to characterize the natural history of mild OSA in pediatric patients under 3 years of age,” he said.
In an effort to assess the effects of observation on the PSG outcomes of children under 3 years with mild OSA, Dr. Von Allmen and his colleagues performed a retrospective review of 26 children who had an overnight PSG with a follow-up PSG performed 3-12 months later. They excluded patients with neuromuscular disease, tracheostomy, or interstitial lung disease. All PSGs were performed at the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center between 2012 and 2017 and were scored by a board-certified sleep physician. The researchers defined mild OSA as at least one, but fewer than five, events per hour. The mean age of the 26 patients was 7 months, 65% were male, 92% were white, and their median body mass index was in the 39th percentile. Comorbidities include laryngomalacia (40%), cardiac disease (40%), allergies (34%), asthma (23%), and Down syndrome (11%).
Between baseline and follow-up, the apnea-hypoapnea index (AHI) trended downward from 4.3 to 3.4 events per hour (P = .19), the obstructive AHI decreased significantly from 2.7 to 1.3 events per hour (P = .013), while the central apnea index also trended downward from 1.4 to 1.2 events per hour (P = .60). The oxyhemoglobin nadir and sleep efficiency did not change significantly, but there was a decrease in the arousal index (from 14.7 to 13 events per hour; P = .027) and in the percentage of REM sleep (from 33% to 30%; P = .008).
As for postobservation OSA severity outcomes, eight patients (31%) resolved spontaneously, one patient progressed from mild to moderate OSA, and the rest remained in their mild OSA state. Subanalysis revealed that OSA resolution rate was 36% in patients with laryngomalacia, compared with 27% in those with no laryngomalacia, a difference that did not reach statistical significance (P = .98).
Dr. von Allmen pointed out that the study cohort had comorbidities which may have contributed to the persistence of OSA. He also acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including its retrospective nature, the potential for selection bias, the small sample size, and the fact that it did not include a control sample of normal children. “The presence of laryngomalacia did not affect the resolution rate in our cohort, but we’ll need larger studies to better elucidate the factors that do affect persistent disease and to identify the optimal timing of intervention in children with mild OSA,” he said.
Dr. von Allmen reported having no financial disclosures. The study received a resident research award at the meeting, which was jointly sponsored by the Triological Society and the American College of Surgeons.
SOURCE: von Allmen DC et al. Triological CSM, Abstracts.
CORONADO, CALIF. – results from a single-center study showed.
“OSA affects up to 6% of the pediatric population, and diagnosis of young children can be particularly challenging due to the heterogeneity of presenting symptoms,” Douglas C. von Allmen, MD, said at the Triological Society’s Combined Sections Meeting. “While school-age children may present with snoring, that’s less common in the younger population. Up to one-quarter of infants may have noisy breathing, which may mimic obstructive events throughout the first 3 years of life. Additionally, long-term clinical implications of mild sleep apnea in very young children is unclear.”
According to Dr. von Allmen, a fifth-year otolaryngology resident at the University of Cincinnati, management strategies of children with OSA can include a period of observation, particularly when there’s an absence of concerning findings on polysomnography (PSG), such as hypoventilation or significant hypoxia, or when the primary etiology of the OSA is unknown. “Additionally, few studies at this point have attempted to characterize the natural history of mild OSA in pediatric patients under 3 years of age,” he said.
In an effort to assess the effects of observation on the PSG outcomes of children under 3 years with mild OSA, Dr. Von Allmen and his colleagues performed a retrospective review of 26 children who had an overnight PSG with a follow-up PSG performed 3-12 months later. They excluded patients with neuromuscular disease, tracheostomy, or interstitial lung disease. All PSGs were performed at the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center between 2012 and 2017 and were scored by a board-certified sleep physician. The researchers defined mild OSA as at least one, but fewer than five, events per hour. The mean age of the 26 patients was 7 months, 65% were male, 92% were white, and their median body mass index was in the 39th percentile. Comorbidities include laryngomalacia (40%), cardiac disease (40%), allergies (34%), asthma (23%), and Down syndrome (11%).
Between baseline and follow-up, the apnea-hypoapnea index (AHI) trended downward from 4.3 to 3.4 events per hour (P = .19), the obstructive AHI decreased significantly from 2.7 to 1.3 events per hour (P = .013), while the central apnea index also trended downward from 1.4 to 1.2 events per hour (P = .60). The oxyhemoglobin nadir and sleep efficiency did not change significantly, but there was a decrease in the arousal index (from 14.7 to 13 events per hour; P = .027) and in the percentage of REM sleep (from 33% to 30%; P = .008).
As for postobservation OSA severity outcomes, eight patients (31%) resolved spontaneously, one patient progressed from mild to moderate OSA, and the rest remained in their mild OSA state. Subanalysis revealed that OSA resolution rate was 36% in patients with laryngomalacia, compared with 27% in those with no laryngomalacia, a difference that did not reach statistical significance (P = .98).
Dr. von Allmen pointed out that the study cohort had comorbidities which may have contributed to the persistence of OSA. He also acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including its retrospective nature, the potential for selection bias, the small sample size, and the fact that it did not include a control sample of normal children. “The presence of laryngomalacia did not affect the resolution rate in our cohort, but we’ll need larger studies to better elucidate the factors that do affect persistent disease and to identify the optimal timing of intervention in children with mild OSA,” he said.
Dr. von Allmen reported having no financial disclosures. The study received a resident research award at the meeting, which was jointly sponsored by the Triological Society and the American College of Surgeons.
SOURCE: von Allmen DC et al. Triological CSM, Abstracts.
REPORTING FROM THE TRIOLOGICAL CSM
Key clinical point: Comorbidities may contribute to the persistence of OSA in young children.
Major finding: OSA spontaneously resolved in 31% of patients.
Study details: A retrospective analysis of 26 children under age 3 years.
Disclosures: The researchers reported having no financial disclosures.
Source: Von Allmen et al. Triological CSM, Abstracts.
Asthma patients with sinusitis, polyps fare poorly after sinus surgery
CORONADO, CALIF. – Eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis decreases quality of life improvement after sinus surgery in patients with concurrent asthma, results from a retrospective study demonstrated.
They also have significantly higher Lund-Kennedy endoscopy and Lund-McKay CT scores, compared with control groups.
“Patients with concurrent asthma and chronic sinusitis require more aggressive management than nonasthmatics,” one of the study authors, Aykut A. Unsal, DO, said in an interview in advance of the Triological Society’s Combined Sections Meeting. “Additionally, the degree of improvement of not only their sinusitis but possibly their asthma following medical/surgical treatment will also be limited if that patient also suffers from nasal polyps and/or eosinophilia. These patients will ultimately become more difficult to manage.”
In order to examine the relationship of eosinophilia and nasal polyps on quality of life (QOL) in patients with asthma who have chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) who were treated with surgery, Dr. Unsal and his associates reviewed the records of 457 patients with a diagnosis of CRS who underwent sinus surgery in the department of otolaryngology at the Medical College of Georgia, Augusta. The researchers subdivided patients based on the presence or absence of an asthma diagnosis and further subdivided them based on tissue eosinophilia and nasal polyposis. Next, they compared the Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), Lund-Kennedy endoscopy scores, and Lund-McKay CT scores preoperatively and postoperatively at 6 months – 1 year and at 2, 3, 4, and 5 years. They performed a T-test analysis to determine statistical significance.
Of the 457 patients included in the analysis, 92 had asthma and eosinophilic CRS with nasal polyps (eCRScNP), 20 had asthma and eosinophilic CRS without nasal polyps (eCRSsNP), 8 had asthma and noneosinophilic CRS with nasal polyps (neCRScNP), and 16 had asthma and noneosinophilic CRS without nasal polyps (neCRSsNP). The researchers observed that patients in the eCRScNP group showed no difference in QOL preoperatively, but their QOL declined significantly at the 1- and 2-year analysis (P less than .03). No significant QOL improvement appeared in the eCRSsNP group until 4 years (P less than .008), and there was no significant QOL difference among the neCRS groups regardless of nasal polyposis. A statistical difference in endoscopy scores was seen among patients in the preoperative neCRScNP group (P less than .001) and in the eCRScNP group from preoperatively until 5 years postoperatively (P less than .03). Finally, statistical significance appeared in preoperative CT scores analysis among patients in the eCRScNP group (P less than .001).
Dr. Unsal and his associates launched the study expecting that all patients with asthma were not only going to have worse symptoms scores, but also more recalcitrant disease. “This is based on our clinical experience, as well as previous literature that has shown that patients with exacerbations of asthma or sinusitis can worsen the symptoms of the other comorbid disease,” he said. “The opposite is also true; effective treatment of chronic sinusitis has been shown to also improve asthma symptoms. Our findings partially validated what we expected, as asthma patients were typically worse by symptom, endoscopy, and CT scores across the board.
“What we discovered, however, was there was one population of patients where no differences demonstrated between the two groups preoperatively and postoperatively: Patients who were negative for both polyp disease and eosinophilia, considered the least severe sinus disease. Additionally, generally no statistical differences in disease and symptom severity were identified following surgery between the two groups if they had a moderately severe form of chronic sinusitis [patients who were either positive for polyps or positive for eosinophilia],” Dr. Unsal said.
He and his colleagues also found that the group with the most severe form (positive eosinophila and positive polyps) fared worse symptomatically and objectively both preoperatively and postoperatively, compared with the other groups.
Dr. Unsal acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including that the type of asthma each patient had (whether they were controlled intermittent or whether they had moderate or persistent asthma) was not recorded, “so we don’t actually know to what degree asthma severity played a role in sinus disease, nor the improvement in asthma severity following sinus surgery/medical therapy,” he said. “Lastly, we did lose several patients to follow-up in the later years so the data is not as robust in the very long term.”
The researchers reported having no financial disclosures.
The meeting was jointly sponsored by the Triological Society and the American College of Surgeons.
CORONADO, CALIF. – Eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis decreases quality of life improvement after sinus surgery in patients with concurrent asthma, results from a retrospective study demonstrated.
They also have significantly higher Lund-Kennedy endoscopy and Lund-McKay CT scores, compared with control groups.
“Patients with concurrent asthma and chronic sinusitis require more aggressive management than nonasthmatics,” one of the study authors, Aykut A. Unsal, DO, said in an interview in advance of the Triological Society’s Combined Sections Meeting. “Additionally, the degree of improvement of not only their sinusitis but possibly their asthma following medical/surgical treatment will also be limited if that patient also suffers from nasal polyps and/or eosinophilia. These patients will ultimately become more difficult to manage.”
In order to examine the relationship of eosinophilia and nasal polyps on quality of life (QOL) in patients with asthma who have chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) who were treated with surgery, Dr. Unsal and his associates reviewed the records of 457 patients with a diagnosis of CRS who underwent sinus surgery in the department of otolaryngology at the Medical College of Georgia, Augusta. The researchers subdivided patients based on the presence or absence of an asthma diagnosis and further subdivided them based on tissue eosinophilia and nasal polyposis. Next, they compared the Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), Lund-Kennedy endoscopy scores, and Lund-McKay CT scores preoperatively and postoperatively at 6 months – 1 year and at 2, 3, 4, and 5 years. They performed a T-test analysis to determine statistical significance.
Of the 457 patients included in the analysis, 92 had asthma and eosinophilic CRS with nasal polyps (eCRScNP), 20 had asthma and eosinophilic CRS without nasal polyps (eCRSsNP), 8 had asthma and noneosinophilic CRS with nasal polyps (neCRScNP), and 16 had asthma and noneosinophilic CRS without nasal polyps (neCRSsNP). The researchers observed that patients in the eCRScNP group showed no difference in QOL preoperatively, but their QOL declined significantly at the 1- and 2-year analysis (P less than .03). No significant QOL improvement appeared in the eCRSsNP group until 4 years (P less than .008), and there was no significant QOL difference among the neCRS groups regardless of nasal polyposis. A statistical difference in endoscopy scores was seen among patients in the preoperative neCRScNP group (P less than .001) and in the eCRScNP group from preoperatively until 5 years postoperatively (P less than .03). Finally, statistical significance appeared in preoperative CT scores analysis among patients in the eCRScNP group (P less than .001).
Dr. Unsal and his associates launched the study expecting that all patients with asthma were not only going to have worse symptoms scores, but also more recalcitrant disease. “This is based on our clinical experience, as well as previous literature that has shown that patients with exacerbations of asthma or sinusitis can worsen the symptoms of the other comorbid disease,” he said. “The opposite is also true; effective treatment of chronic sinusitis has been shown to also improve asthma symptoms. Our findings partially validated what we expected, as asthma patients were typically worse by symptom, endoscopy, and CT scores across the board.
“What we discovered, however, was there was one population of patients where no differences demonstrated between the two groups preoperatively and postoperatively: Patients who were negative for both polyp disease and eosinophilia, considered the least severe sinus disease. Additionally, generally no statistical differences in disease and symptom severity were identified following surgery between the two groups if they had a moderately severe form of chronic sinusitis [patients who were either positive for polyps or positive for eosinophilia],” Dr. Unsal said.
He and his colleagues also found that the group with the most severe form (positive eosinophila and positive polyps) fared worse symptomatically and objectively both preoperatively and postoperatively, compared with the other groups.
Dr. Unsal acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including that the type of asthma each patient had (whether they were controlled intermittent or whether they had moderate or persistent asthma) was not recorded, “so we don’t actually know to what degree asthma severity played a role in sinus disease, nor the improvement in asthma severity following sinus surgery/medical therapy,” he said. “Lastly, we did lose several patients to follow-up in the later years so the data is not as robust in the very long term.”
The researchers reported having no financial disclosures.
The meeting was jointly sponsored by the Triological Society and the American College of Surgeons.
CORONADO, CALIF. – Eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis decreases quality of life improvement after sinus surgery in patients with concurrent asthma, results from a retrospective study demonstrated.
They also have significantly higher Lund-Kennedy endoscopy and Lund-McKay CT scores, compared with control groups.
“Patients with concurrent asthma and chronic sinusitis require more aggressive management than nonasthmatics,” one of the study authors, Aykut A. Unsal, DO, said in an interview in advance of the Triological Society’s Combined Sections Meeting. “Additionally, the degree of improvement of not only their sinusitis but possibly their asthma following medical/surgical treatment will also be limited if that patient also suffers from nasal polyps and/or eosinophilia. These patients will ultimately become more difficult to manage.”
In order to examine the relationship of eosinophilia and nasal polyps on quality of life (QOL) in patients with asthma who have chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) who were treated with surgery, Dr. Unsal and his associates reviewed the records of 457 patients with a diagnosis of CRS who underwent sinus surgery in the department of otolaryngology at the Medical College of Georgia, Augusta. The researchers subdivided patients based on the presence or absence of an asthma diagnosis and further subdivided them based on tissue eosinophilia and nasal polyposis. Next, they compared the Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), Lund-Kennedy endoscopy scores, and Lund-McKay CT scores preoperatively and postoperatively at 6 months – 1 year and at 2, 3, 4, and 5 years. They performed a T-test analysis to determine statistical significance.
Of the 457 patients included in the analysis, 92 had asthma and eosinophilic CRS with nasal polyps (eCRScNP), 20 had asthma and eosinophilic CRS without nasal polyps (eCRSsNP), 8 had asthma and noneosinophilic CRS with nasal polyps (neCRScNP), and 16 had asthma and noneosinophilic CRS without nasal polyps (neCRSsNP). The researchers observed that patients in the eCRScNP group showed no difference in QOL preoperatively, but their QOL declined significantly at the 1- and 2-year analysis (P less than .03). No significant QOL improvement appeared in the eCRSsNP group until 4 years (P less than .008), and there was no significant QOL difference among the neCRS groups regardless of nasal polyposis. A statistical difference in endoscopy scores was seen among patients in the preoperative neCRScNP group (P less than .001) and in the eCRScNP group from preoperatively until 5 years postoperatively (P less than .03). Finally, statistical significance appeared in preoperative CT scores analysis among patients in the eCRScNP group (P less than .001).
Dr. Unsal and his associates launched the study expecting that all patients with asthma were not only going to have worse symptoms scores, but also more recalcitrant disease. “This is based on our clinical experience, as well as previous literature that has shown that patients with exacerbations of asthma or sinusitis can worsen the symptoms of the other comorbid disease,” he said. “The opposite is also true; effective treatment of chronic sinusitis has been shown to also improve asthma symptoms. Our findings partially validated what we expected, as asthma patients were typically worse by symptom, endoscopy, and CT scores across the board.
“What we discovered, however, was there was one population of patients where no differences demonstrated between the two groups preoperatively and postoperatively: Patients who were negative for both polyp disease and eosinophilia, considered the least severe sinus disease. Additionally, generally no statistical differences in disease and symptom severity were identified following surgery between the two groups if they had a moderately severe form of chronic sinusitis [patients who were either positive for polyps or positive for eosinophilia],” Dr. Unsal said.
He and his colleagues also found that the group with the most severe form (positive eosinophila and positive polyps) fared worse symptomatically and objectively both preoperatively and postoperatively, compared with the other groups.
Dr. Unsal acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including that the type of asthma each patient had (whether they were controlled intermittent or whether they had moderate or persistent asthma) was not recorded, “so we don’t actually know to what degree asthma severity played a role in sinus disease, nor the improvement in asthma severity following sinus surgery/medical therapy,” he said. “Lastly, we did lose several patients to follow-up in the later years so the data is not as robust in the very long term.”
The researchers reported having no financial disclosures.
The meeting was jointly sponsored by the Triological Society and the American College of Surgeons.
REPORTING FROM THE TRIOLOGICAL CSWM
Key clinical point: Patients with asthma and the most severe form of chronic rhinosinusitis fare poorly on quality of life measures following sinus surgery.
Major finding: QOL in patients who had asthma and eosinophilic CRS with nasal polyps declined significantly at the 1- and 2-year analysis (P less than .03).
Study details: A single-center review of 457 patients with CRS who underwent sinus surgery.
Disclosures: The researchers reported having no financial disclosures.