Eating disorders affect nearly 1% of US adults,¹ and disordered eating, or unspecified eating disorder, affects at least 1% of all pregnancies.² Among 739 pregnant women assessed with the Eating Disorder Diagnostic scale, 7.5% of patients met criteria for an eating disorder, with 8.8% of women reporting binge eating and 2.3% of pregnant women engaging in regular compensatory behaviors. In fact, 23.4% of the study population expressed concerns about pregnancy-related weight gain and body shape.³ Eating disorders during pregnancy are more common than previously thought, and they create unique clinical challenges for obstetric providers.

Types of eating disorders

There are 3 major types of eating disorders: anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge eating disorder, with significant fluidity existing between all 3 conditions.

Anorexia nervosa is a condition in which an individual believes he or she is significantly overweight despite being underweight. Patients with anorexia nervosa often restrict food intake and have compulsive rituals around eating and exercise, leading to weight loss and starvation.⁴

Bulimia nervosa is marked by intensive dieting, uncontrolled episodes of overeating, and compensatory behaviors.⁴ Compensatory behaviors include self-induced vomiting; excessive exercise; and misuse of laxatives, diuretics, or other medications.

Binge eating disorder is classified as recurrent episodes of uncontrolled overeating without compensatory purging behaviors, leading to excessive weight gain.⁴

Eating disorders and pregnancy

Pregnancy can impact the course of pre­existing eating disorders, and women also can develop symptoms of eating disorders for the first time during pregnancy. This is clinically significant as there are both maternal and fetal consequences to a mother’s disordered eating.

The risks of anorexia nervosa include vitamin deficiencies (vitamin B12/folate), dehydration leading to renal injury and electrolyte imbalances, hypoglycemia, abnormal lipid profiles, cardiac arrhythmia, and even death. The mortality rate of patients with anorexia nervosa may approach 10%; however, death during pregnancy is quite rare.² Bulimia nervosa also carries the risks of protein and vitamin deficiencies, hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia, and death, with mortality estimated at 7% for those with a 5-year history of the illness. However, death in pregnancy due to the condition is again quite rare.⁵

Eating disorders can cause significant maternal and fetal complications during pregnancy and postpartum.

Maternal complications. When women with eating disorders become pregnant, they have increased risks of some pregnancy complications. Approximately 10% to 25% of pregnant women with eating disorders develop hyperemesis gravidarum.⁶ The nausea can serve as a trigger for a woman with an eating disorder, particularly among women with a history of purging behaviors.

Cesarean delivery is more common among women with eating disorders, which may be due to preexisting fetal compromise, leading to poor tolerance of labor, or to clinicians perceiving these pregnancies as higher risk.⁷

It is well known that eating disorders are highly comorbid with depression and other psychiatric conditions. In fact, 30% to 40% of women with an eating disorder develop symptoms of postpartum depression.⁸

Continue to: Fetal risks and complications...

Fetal risks and complications. Excessive caloric restriction and dieting can lead to folate deficiency, which in turn increases the risk of neural tube defects. Such defects are more common among women with eating disorders.⁹ Intrauterine growth restriction also can be a concern, most likely because of maternal malnutrition and poor maternal weight gain.¹⁰ In addition, women with eating disorders are more likely to have a preterm delivery or experience perinatal mortality or stillbirth.¹⁰

Bulimia nervosa is associated with low birthweight, while anorexia nervosa is associated with the very premature birth, low birthweight, and perinatal death.¹¹ Eating disorders during pregnancy can have long-term psychological impacts on children, including increased likelihood of childhood hyperactivity, conduct, and adjustment disorder.¹²

Assessing patients for an eating disorder

Diagnosis of eating disorders is an interview-guided process using clinical criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition.⁴ The Eating Disorder Examination is a semi-structured interview composed of 4 subsections (restraint, eating concern, shape concern, and weight concern). The interview’s aim is to assess the psychopathology associated with eating disorders, and it is used in research settings rather than clinically.

1. Do you make yourself sick because you feel uncomfortably full?
2. Do you worry that you have lost control over how much you eat?
3. Have you recently lost more than one stone (14 lb) in a 3-month period?
4. Do you believe yourself to be fat when others say you are too thin?
5. Would you say that food dominates your life?

Referral. Patients for whom you have a concern for any eating disorder should be referred to a psychiatrist for formal diagnosis. Integrated multidisciplinary care of pregnant patients with eating disorders is necessary to improve maternal and fetal outcomes. Care teams should include obstetricians or maternal-fetal medicine clinicians experienced in caring for patients with eating disorders, psychiatrists, psychologists, nutritionists, and social workers. General treatment principles require an assessment for appropriate setting of intervention, which depends on presentation severity, assessment of nutritional status, treatment of psychiatric comorbidity, and psychotherapeutic intervention.

Overall management strategy

The initial treatment strategy for pregnant women with eating disorders should involve evaluating for severe illness and life-threatening complications of the specific disorder. All patients should be screened for suicidal ideation, severe malnutrition, electrolyte abnormalities, dehydration, hemodynamic instability, and cardiac arrhythmia. Patients with any of these severe features should be admitted for medical hospitalization and psychiatric evaluation.¹⁴ Patients that are hospitalized should be watched closely for refeeding syndrome—potentially life threatening metabolic disturbances that occur when nutrition is reinstituted to patients who are severely malnourished.

Patients without severe features or acute life-threatening complications can be managed safely on an outpatient basis with close medical monitoring. Psychiatric providers should be involved to assess for treatment needs including psychotherapy and psychotropic medications. There are numerous pharmacologic options available for patients, with the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) most common. While SSRI use has been controversial in pregnancy in the past, the risks of untreated illness carry risk to the mother and unborn child that outweigh the small risks associated with SSRI exposure in pregnancy.¹⁵

Women should have established care with a nutritionist or dietician who can ensure adequate counseling regarding meal planning and multivitamin supplementation. The numerous food restrictions in pregnancy, such as avoidance of unpasteurized cheese or deli meats, may be triggering for many patients with a history of restrictive eating.

One of the greatest difficulties for women with disordered eating in pregnancy revolves around weight gain. Many patients find the various measurements of pregnancy (maternal weight gain, fetal weight, fetal heart rate, and fundal height) triggering, which can make appropriate maternal and fetal weight gain in pregnancy very challenging. One strategy for managing this includes using fetal weight and growth as a surrogate for appropriate maternal gestational weight gain. One other strategy involves blind weights, where the woman is turned away from the scale so her weight is not disclosed to her. Patients often will not be able to achieve the expected 28 to 40 lb of pregnancy weight gain. It is best to have an open, honest conversation in early pregnancy to discuss how she would like to address weight in her pregnancy.

Continue to: Postpregnancy concerns...

Postpregnancy concerns

Patients with eating disorders are at high risk of relapse in the postpartum period, even if they are able to achieve full remission in pregnancy. Rapid postpartum weight loss may be a sign of disordered eating. Postpartum depression also is a concern, and women should be followed closely for surveillance of symptoms. Finally, postpartum contraception is extremely important. The menstrual irregularities that are common among women with eating disorders along with common misconceptions regarding fertility in the postpartum period increase the risk of unplanned pregnancy.

Remain cognizant of eating disorders

A clear surveillance plan early in the pregnancy that is developed in conjunction with the patient and her care team is crucial in improving maternal and fetal outcomes among women with an eating disorder. Clinician knowledge of complications and risks specific to disordered eating and pregnancy can affect outcomes for both mother and baby.

Eating disorders affect nearly 1% of US adults,¹ and disordered eating, or unspecified eating disorder, affects at least 1% of all pregnancies.² Among 739 pregnant women assessed with the Eating Disorder Diagnostic scale, 7.5% of patients met criteria for an eating disorder, with 8.8% of women reporting binge eating and 2.3% of pregnant women engaging in regular compensatory behaviors. In fact, 23.4% of the study population expressed concerns about pregnancy-related weight gain and body shape.³ Eating disorders during pregnancy are more common than previously thought, and they create unique clinical challenges for obstetric providers.

Types of eating disorders

There are 3 major types of eating disorders: anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge eating disorder, with significant fluidity existing between all 3 conditions.

Anorexia nervosa is a condition in which an individual believes he or she is significantly overweight despite being underweight. Patients with anorexia nervosa often restrict food intake and have compulsive rituals around eating and exercise, leading to weight loss and starvation.⁴

Bulimia nervosa is marked by intensive dieting, uncontrolled episodes of overeating, and compensatory behaviors.⁴ Compensatory behaviors include self-induced vomiting; excessive exercise; and misuse of laxatives, diuretics, or other medications.

Binge eating disorder is classified as recurrent episodes of uncontrolled overeating without compensatory purging behaviors, leading to excessive weight gain.⁴

Eating disorders and pregnancy

Pregnancy can impact the course of pre­existing eating disorders, and women also can develop symptoms of eating disorders for the first time during pregnancy. This is clinically significant as there are both maternal and fetal consequences to a mother’s disordered eating.

The risks of anorexia nervosa include vitamin deficiencies (vitamin B12/folate), dehydration leading to renal injury and electrolyte imbalances, hypoglycemia, abnormal lipid profiles, cardiac arrhythmia, and even death. The mortality rate of patients with anorexia nervosa may approach 10%; however, death during pregnancy is quite rare.² Bulimia nervosa also carries the risks of protein and vitamin deficiencies, hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia, and death, with mortality estimated at 7% for those with a 5-year history of the illness. However, death in pregnancy due to the condition is again quite rare.⁵

Eating disorders can cause significant maternal and fetal complications during pregnancy and postpartum.

Maternal complications. When women with eating disorders become pregnant, they have increased risks of some pregnancy complications. Approximately 10% to 25% of pregnant women with eating disorders develop hyperemesis gravidarum.⁶ The nausea can serve as a trigger for a woman with an eating disorder, particularly among women with a history of purging behaviors.

Cesarean delivery is more common among women with eating disorders, which may be due to preexisting fetal compromise, leading to poor tolerance of labor, or to clinicians perceiving these pregnancies as higher risk.⁷

It is well known that eating disorders are highly comorbid with depression and other psychiatric conditions. In fact, 30% to 40% of women with an eating disorder develop symptoms of postpartum depression.⁸

Continue to: Fetal risks and complications...

Fetal risks and complications. Excessive caloric restriction and dieting can lead to folate deficiency, which in turn increases the risk of neural tube defects. Such defects are more common among women with eating disorders.⁹ Intrauterine growth restriction also can be a concern, most likely because of maternal malnutrition and poor maternal weight gain.¹⁰ In addition, women with eating disorders are more likely to have a preterm delivery or experience perinatal mortality or stillbirth.¹⁰

Bulimia nervosa is associated with low birthweight, while anorexia nervosa is associated with the very premature birth, low birthweight, and perinatal death.¹¹ Eating disorders during pregnancy can have long-term psychological impacts on children, including increased likelihood of childhood hyperactivity, conduct, and adjustment disorder.¹²

Assessing patients for an eating disorder

Diagnosis of eating disorders is an interview-guided process using clinical criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition.⁴ The Eating Disorder Examination is a semi-structured interview composed of 4 subsections (restraint, eating concern, shape concern, and weight concern). The interview’s aim is to assess the psychopathology associated with eating disorders, and it is used in research settings rather than clinically.

1. Do you make yourself sick because you feel uncomfortably full?
2. Do you worry that you have lost control over how much you eat?
3. Have you recently lost more than one stone (14 lb) in a 3-month period?
4. Do you believe yourself to be fat when others say you are too thin?
5. Would you say that food dominates your life?

Referral. Patients for whom you have a concern for any eating disorder should be referred to a psychiatrist for formal diagnosis. Integrated multidisciplinary care of pregnant patients with eating disorders is necessary to improve maternal and fetal outcomes. Care teams should include obstetricians or maternal-fetal medicine clinicians experienced in caring for patients with eating disorders, psychiatrists, psychologists, nutritionists, and social workers. General treatment principles require an assessment for appropriate setting of intervention, which depends on presentation severity, assessment of nutritional status, treatment of psychiatric comorbidity, and psychotherapeutic intervention.

Overall management strategy

The initial treatment strategy for pregnant women with eating disorders should involve evaluating for severe illness and life-threatening complications of the specific disorder. All patients should be screened for suicidal ideation, severe malnutrition, electrolyte abnormalities, dehydration, hemodynamic instability, and cardiac arrhythmia. Patients with any of these severe features should be admitted for medical hospitalization and psychiatric evaluation.¹⁴ Patients that are hospitalized should be watched closely for refeeding syndrome—potentially life threatening metabolic disturbances that occur when nutrition is reinstituted to patients who are severely malnourished.

Patients without severe features or acute life-threatening complications can be managed safely on an outpatient basis with close medical monitoring. Psychiatric providers should be involved to assess for treatment needs including psychotherapy and psychotropic medications. There are numerous pharmacologic options available for patients, with the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) most common. While SSRI use has been controversial in pregnancy in the past, the risks of untreated illness carry risk to the mother and unborn child that outweigh the small risks associated with SSRI exposure in pregnancy.¹⁵

Women should have established care with a nutritionist or dietician who can ensure adequate counseling regarding meal planning and multivitamin supplementation. The numerous food restrictions in pregnancy, such as avoidance of unpasteurized cheese or deli meats, may be triggering for many patients with a history of restrictive eating.

One of the greatest difficulties for women with disordered eating in pregnancy revolves around weight gain. Many patients find the various measurements of pregnancy (maternal weight gain, fetal weight, fetal heart rate, and fundal height) triggering, which can make appropriate maternal and fetal weight gain in pregnancy very challenging. One strategy for managing this includes using fetal weight and growth as a surrogate for appropriate maternal gestational weight gain. One other strategy involves blind weights, where the woman is turned away from the scale so her weight is not disclosed to her. Patients often will not be able to achieve the expected 28 to 40 lb of pregnancy weight gain. It is best to have an open, honest conversation in early pregnancy to discuss how she would like to address weight in her pregnancy.

Continue to: Postpregnancy concerns...

Postpregnancy concerns

Patients with eating disorders are at high risk of relapse in the postpartum period, even if they are able to achieve full remission in pregnancy. Rapid postpartum weight loss may be a sign of disordered eating. Postpartum depression also is a concern, and women should be followed closely for surveillance of symptoms. Finally, postpartum contraception is extremely important. The menstrual irregularities that are common among women with eating disorders along with common misconceptions regarding fertility in the postpartum period increase the risk of unplanned pregnancy.

Remain cognizant of eating disorders

A clear surveillance plan early in the pregnancy that is developed in conjunction with the patient and her care team is crucial in improving maternal and fetal outcomes among women with an eating disorder. Clinician knowledge of complications and risks specific to disordered eating and pregnancy can affect outcomes for both mother and baby.

Eating disorders affect nearly 1% of US adults,¹ and disordered eating, or unspecified eating disorder, affects at least 1% of all pregnancies.² Among 739 pregnant women assessed with the Eating Disorder Diagnostic scale, 7.5% of patients met criteria for an eating disorder, with 8.8% of women reporting binge eating and 2.3% of pregnant women engaging in regular compensatory behaviors. In fact, 23.4% of the study population expressed concerns about pregnancy-related weight gain and body shape.³ Eating disorders during pregnancy are more common than previously thought, and they create unique clinical challenges for obstetric providers.

Types of eating disorders

There are 3 major types of eating disorders: anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge eating disorder, with significant fluidity existing between all 3 conditions.

Anorexia nervosa is a condition in which an individual believes he or she is significantly overweight despite being underweight. Patients with anorexia nervosa often restrict food intake and have compulsive rituals around eating and exercise, leading to weight loss and starvation.⁴

Bulimia nervosa is marked by intensive dieting, uncontrolled episodes of overeating, and compensatory behaviors.⁴ Compensatory behaviors include self-induced vomiting; excessive exercise; and misuse of laxatives, diuretics, or other medications.

Binge eating disorder is classified as recurrent episodes of uncontrolled overeating without compensatory purging behaviors, leading to excessive weight gain.⁴

Eating disorders and pregnancy

Pregnancy can impact the course of pre­existing eating disorders, and women also can develop symptoms of eating disorders for the first time during pregnancy. This is clinically significant as there are both maternal and fetal consequences to a mother’s disordered eating.

The risks of anorexia nervosa include vitamin deficiencies (vitamin B12/folate), dehydration leading to renal injury and electrolyte imbalances, hypoglycemia, abnormal lipid profiles, cardiac arrhythmia, and even death. The mortality rate of patients with anorexia nervosa may approach 10%; however, death during pregnancy is quite rare.² Bulimia nervosa also carries the risks of protein and vitamin deficiencies, hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia, and death, with mortality estimated at 7% for those with a 5-year history of the illness. However, death in pregnancy due to the condition is again quite rare.⁵

Eating disorders can cause significant maternal and fetal complications during pregnancy and postpartum.

Maternal complications. When women with eating disorders become pregnant, they have increased risks of some pregnancy complications. Approximately 10% to 25% of pregnant women with eating disorders develop hyperemesis gravidarum.⁶ The nausea can serve as a trigger for a woman with an eating disorder, particularly among women with a history of purging behaviors.

Cesarean delivery is more common among women with eating disorders, which may be due to preexisting fetal compromise, leading to poor tolerance of labor, or to clinicians perceiving these pregnancies as higher risk.⁷

It is well known that eating disorders are highly comorbid with depression and other psychiatric conditions. In fact, 30% to 40% of women with an eating disorder develop symptoms of postpartum depression.⁸

Continue to: Fetal risks and complications...

Fetal risks and complications. Excessive caloric restriction and dieting can lead to folate deficiency, which in turn increases the risk of neural tube defects. Such defects are more common among women with eating disorders.⁹ Intrauterine growth restriction also can be a concern, most likely because of maternal malnutrition and poor maternal weight gain.¹⁰ In addition, women with eating disorders are more likely to have a preterm delivery or experience perinatal mortality or stillbirth.¹⁰

Bulimia nervosa is associated with low birthweight, while anorexia nervosa is associated with the very premature birth, low birthweight, and perinatal death.¹¹ Eating disorders during pregnancy can have long-term psychological impacts on children, including increased likelihood of childhood hyperactivity, conduct, and adjustment disorder.¹²

Assessing patients for an eating disorder

Diagnosis of eating disorders is an interview-guided process using clinical criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition.⁴ The Eating Disorder Examination is a semi-structured interview composed of 4 subsections (restraint, eating concern, shape concern, and weight concern). The interview’s aim is to assess the psychopathology associated with eating disorders, and it is used in research settings rather than clinically.

1. Do you make yourself sick because you feel uncomfortably full?
2. Do you worry that you have lost control over how much you eat?
3. Have you recently lost more than one stone (14 lb) in a 3-month period?
4. Do you believe yourself to be fat when others say you are too thin?
5. Would you say that food dominates your life?

Referral. Patients for whom you have a concern for any eating disorder should be referred to a psychiatrist for formal diagnosis. Integrated multidisciplinary care of pregnant patients with eating disorders is necessary to improve maternal and fetal outcomes. Care teams should include obstetricians or maternal-fetal medicine clinicians experienced in caring for patients with eating disorders, psychiatrists, psychologists, nutritionists, and social workers. General treatment principles require an assessment for appropriate setting of intervention, which depends on presentation severity, assessment of nutritional status, treatment of psychiatric comorbidity, and psychotherapeutic intervention.

Overall management strategy

The initial treatment strategy for pregnant women with eating disorders should involve evaluating for severe illness and life-threatening complications of the specific disorder. All patients should be screened for suicidal ideation, severe malnutrition, electrolyte abnormalities, dehydration, hemodynamic instability, and cardiac arrhythmia. Patients with any of these severe features should be admitted for medical hospitalization and psychiatric evaluation.¹⁴ Patients that are hospitalized should be watched closely for refeeding syndrome—potentially life threatening metabolic disturbances that occur when nutrition is reinstituted to patients who are severely malnourished.

Patients without severe features or acute life-threatening complications can be managed safely on an outpatient basis with close medical monitoring. Psychiatric providers should be involved to assess for treatment needs including psychotherapy and psychotropic medications. There are numerous pharmacologic options available for patients, with the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) most common. While SSRI use has been controversial in pregnancy in the past, the risks of untreated illness carry risk to the mother and unborn child that outweigh the small risks associated with SSRI exposure in pregnancy.¹⁵

Women should have established care with a nutritionist or dietician who can ensure adequate counseling regarding meal planning and multivitamin supplementation. The numerous food restrictions in pregnancy, such as avoidance of unpasteurized cheese or deli meats, may be triggering for many patients with a history of restrictive eating.

One of the greatest difficulties for women with disordered eating in pregnancy revolves around weight gain. Many patients find the various measurements of pregnancy (maternal weight gain, fetal weight, fetal heart rate, and fundal height) triggering, which can make appropriate maternal and fetal weight gain in pregnancy very challenging. One strategy for managing this includes using fetal weight and growth as a surrogate for appropriate maternal gestational weight gain. One other strategy involves blind weights, where the woman is turned away from the scale so her weight is not disclosed to her. Patients often will not be able to achieve the expected 28 to 40 lb of pregnancy weight gain. It is best to have an open, honest conversation in early pregnancy to discuss how she would like to address weight in her pregnancy.

Continue to: Postpregnancy concerns...

Postpregnancy concerns

Patients with eating disorders are at high risk of relapse in the postpartum period, even if they are able to achieve full remission in pregnancy. Rapid postpartum weight loss may be a sign of disordered eating. Postpartum depression also is a concern, and women should be followed closely for surveillance of symptoms. Finally, postpartum contraception is extremely important. The menstrual irregularities that are common among women with eating disorders along with common misconceptions regarding fertility in the postpartum period increase the risk of unplanned pregnancy.

Remain cognizant of eating disorders

A clear surveillance plan early in the pregnancy that is developed in conjunction with the patient and her care team is crucial in improving maternal and fetal outcomes among women with an eating disorder. Clinician knowledge of complications and risks specific to disordered eating and pregnancy can affect outcomes for both mother and baby.

An outbreak of pneumonia of unknown etiology has occurred in Wuhan, China, according to a statement from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

As of Jan. 5, 2020, 59 cases of the disease have been reported by the Wuhan Municipal Health Commission. The cluster of cases is linked to the Wuhan South China Seafood City market where – in addition to seafood – chickens, bats, marmots, and other animals were sold. That market has been closed since Jan. 1, 2020, for cleaning and disinfection.

Wuhan health authorities are closely monitoring over 150 contacts for symptoms. Laboratory results have been negative for influenza, avian influenza, adenovirus, and the viruses that caused SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome) and MERS (Middle East respiratory syndrome). So far, there are no reports of person-to-person transmission or health care worker infection of this pneumonia.

The World Health Organization reported that, as of Dec. 31, 2019, about one-quarter of patients were severely ill with the pneumonia and the rest were stable. Symptoms reported include fever, difficulty breathing, and chest radiographs showing invasive lesions in both lungs. All patients are being treated in isolation and efforts to identify the pathogen are ongoing.

tborden@mdedge.com

An outbreak of pneumonia of unknown etiology has occurred in Wuhan, China, according to a statement from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

As of Jan. 5, 2020, 59 cases of the disease have been reported by the Wuhan Municipal Health Commission. The cluster of cases is linked to the Wuhan South China Seafood City market where – in addition to seafood – chickens, bats, marmots, and other animals were sold. That market has been closed since Jan. 1, 2020, for cleaning and disinfection.

Wuhan health authorities are closely monitoring over 150 contacts for symptoms. Laboratory results have been negative for influenza, avian influenza, adenovirus, and the viruses that caused SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome) and MERS (Middle East respiratory syndrome). So far, there are no reports of person-to-person transmission or health care worker infection of this pneumonia.

The World Health Organization reported that, as of Dec. 31, 2019, about one-quarter of patients were severely ill with the pneumonia and the rest were stable. Symptoms reported include fever, difficulty breathing, and chest radiographs showing invasive lesions in both lungs. All patients are being treated in isolation and efforts to identify the pathogen are ongoing.

tborden@mdedge.com

An outbreak of pneumonia of unknown etiology has occurred in Wuhan, China, according to a statement from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

As of Jan. 5, 2020, 59 cases of the disease have been reported by the Wuhan Municipal Health Commission. The cluster of cases is linked to the Wuhan South China Seafood City market where – in addition to seafood – chickens, bats, marmots, and other animals were sold. That market has been closed since Jan. 1, 2020, for cleaning and disinfection.

Wuhan health authorities are closely monitoring over 150 contacts for symptoms. Laboratory results have been negative for influenza, avian influenza, adenovirus, and the viruses that caused SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome) and MERS (Middle East respiratory syndrome). So far, there are no reports of person-to-person transmission or health care worker infection of this pneumonia.

The World Health Organization reported that, as of Dec. 31, 2019, about one-quarter of patients were severely ill with the pneumonia and the rest were stable. Symptoms reported include fever, difficulty breathing, and chest radiographs showing invasive lesions in both lungs. All patients are being treated in isolation and efforts to identify the pathogen are ongoing.

tborden@mdedge.com

PHILADELPHIA – Two clinical trials of the combination therapy of the neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril and the angiotensin II receptor blocker valsartan in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction found that it lowered rates of all-cause death, compared to a renin-angiotensin-system inhibitor alone.

Furthermore, the treatment produced a more beneficial effect in women, who are more prone to heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), lead investigators reported at the American Heart Association scientific sessions.

A prespecified subgroup analysis of 4,796 patients in the PARAGON-HF trial found that the sacubitril/valsartan, or sac/val, combination had a significantly more beneficial risk reduction of first and recurrent hospitalizations for heart failure, as well as cardiovascular death, in women than men. A prespecified pooled analysis of 13,195 patients in the PARAGON-HF and the PARADIGM-HF trials also found women derived a greater benefit from the combination therapy than men, but also concluded that patients with heart failure and even mildly reduced ejection fraction had better outcomes. The results of both studies were published simultaneously with the presentations on Nov. 17 in Circulation (doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.119.044491; doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.119.044586).

The findings underscore the effectiveness of sac/val combination in patients with HF and EF in the lower ranges, defined as 40% or less, commented discussant Lynne Warner Stevenson, MD, of Vanderbilt Heart and Vascular Institute in Nashville, Tenn. “We all agree now that the use of sacubitril/valsartan is very appropriate to improve outcomes in those patients, even if they’ve never been hospitalized,” she said in an interview.
 

PARAGON-HF subanalysis

John J.V. McMurray, MD, of the University of Glasgow presented the PARAGON-HF subgroup analysis. He said it initially focused on 12 subgroups, but that only two baseline variables showed a modified effect of sac/val: sex and left-ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF). The findings, he said, “stood up in a very robust, multivariable analysis.”

The women in the subgroup analysis were older, had higher baseline New York Heart Association class status, and worse quality of life as measured by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire clinical summary score. At baseline, women also had higher average LVEF (59% vs. 56%), lower N-terminal prohormone brain natriuretic peptide levels, and higher rates of renal dysfunction and chronic kidney disease, but lower incidence of a previous MI and coronary artery disease. Prestudy treatments were similar between the sexes.

In terms of the primary outcome – a composite of total hospitalizations for heart failure and cardiovascular death – “there was an apparent 27% relative risk reduction in women and no overall effect in men,” Dr. McMurray said of the treatment group. “The difference was driven completely by hospitalizations.” Rates of CV death were similar between the valsartan-only and sac/val groups in both men and women, he said.

In the analysis of LVEF, women in the treatment group seemed to cross over to a heightened risk of hospitalization and CV death at an LVEF in the 60%-65% range, Dr. McMurray said, whereas men made that cross over in the 50%-55% range. “It looks as though women might be getting more benefit from this treatment up to a higher EF than in men,” he said.

However, the differences between men and women did not hold up in the analysis of secondary outcomes. At 8 months, women in the sac/val group had a 0.6-point greater decline than did the valsartan-only patients in KCCQ-CSS score, whereas men on sac/val had a 2.8-point lesser decline than did those on valsartan only. Similar differences were seen between the treatment and valsartan-only groups within the sexes, with women showing a noticeable improvement surpassing the men.

Posttreatment hypotension rates in both sexes were higher in the sac/val groups, and the risk of renal dysfunction was a bit less in both treatment groups. Women in the treatment group had significantly higher rates of angioedema than did the valsartan-only group and men in either group.

“Compared to valsartan, it’s important to say that sacubitril/valsartan seemed to reduce the risk of heart failure and hospitalization more in women than men, but we didn’t find a similar differential for other endpoints,” Dr. McMurray said. “Therefore, we’re not sure this is a real effect or a chance finding. It’s very statistically robust, but it could still be a chance finding.”

A possible explanation could be than men may not be responding to sac/val, or that valsartan alone may be more effective in men than women, he said. “This possible effect modification of sac/val vs. valsartan by sex deserves further investigation,” he said.

PARAGON-HF and PARADIGM-HF pooled analysis

Likewise, the prespecified pooled analysis of the PARADIGM-HF and PARAGON-HF trials found a greater benefit of sac/val in women, according to results presented by Scott D. Solomon, MD, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston. Where PARAGON-HF compared combination therapy with valsartan 160 mg twice daily alone, PARADIGM-HF used enalapril 10 mg twice daily alone as the comparator renin-angiotensin-system (RAS) inhibitor.

“These data suggest that the therapeutic effect of sacubitril/valsartan vs. RAS inhibition alone appear to extend to patients with heart failure and mildly reduced EF, with therapeutic benefits that extend to a higher left-ventricle EF range in women compared to men,” Dr. Solomon said.

The pooled analysis divided patients into six different EF groups: up to 22.5%, then in 10-point increments from 22.5% to 62.5%, and 62.5% or greater. PARADIGM-HF enrolled patients age 18 years and older, whereas PARAGON-HF involved those aged 50 years and older.

The analysis showed that, as LVEF rates increased across the EF groups, the rates of the primary composite outcome – HF hospitalizations, CV death, and all-cause mortality – decreased, but the decline was greatest for CV death and less so for HF hospitalization. And while rates of all-cause mortality decreased as EF increased, rates of non-CV death increased substantially with increasing LVEF.

“For each of these endpoints, there are significant benefits to sacubitril/valsartan in the pooled analysis, and this includes HF hospitalization, CV death, either total or first events, and all-cause mortality, which was reduced overall by 12% in the combination group,” Dr. Solomon said. That benefit was seen in the first five categories of EF, but all but disappeared in the highest category (at least 62.5%), he said.

At the lower end of the EF spectrum, the effect of sac/val is more pronounced and similar for men and women, Dr. Solomon said. “But as EF goes up, we see an attenuation of that effect in both men and women, but it occurs at a different point,” he said. “Women seem to derive a benefit to a higher ejection fraction than men.” As in Dr. McMurray’s research, the benefit seems to extend to LVEF of 55%-60% in men and 65%-70% in women.

“These findings were driven by an observed benefit in patients with chronic heart failure and LVEF below the normal range,” he said. “The benefit in the EF range above the ranking ‘reduced’ but below normal was driven primarily by reduction in HF hospitalization.”

Dr. Stevenson said that these findings indicate that a previous hospitalization for HF with preserved EF may be a telling marker for the effectiveness of sac/val. “As opposed to the patient who has exertional dyspnea but has never decompensated to the level needing hospitalization, if they have pEF, our current analyses would suggest sac/val may not offer them much benefit,” she said.

In real-world practice, cost would be an issue, Dr. Stevenson said. “This drug is very expensive; the majority of patients pay more than $100 a month in out-of-pocket costs, and we have to recognize this is not a therapy that everyone can afford,” she said in an interview. “In many areas, and particularly in the disadvantaged populations, this is not going to be a therapy that we’re going to be able to offer everyone, and that gives me great concern as we move toward trying to treat the whole disease that we’re developing therapies that will be limited by finance rather than by physiology. That’s a major call to action for all of us.”

Novartis sponsored the studies. Dr. McMurray has no disclosures. Dr. Solomon disclosed financial relationships with trial sponsor Novartis along with numerous pharmaceutical companies and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

SOURCE: McMurray JJ and Solomon SD. AHA 2019, Late Breaking Science Session 5.

PHILADELPHIA – Two clinical trials of the combination therapy of the neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril and the angiotensin II receptor blocker valsartan in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction found that it lowered rates of all-cause death, compared to a renin-angiotensin-system inhibitor alone.

Furthermore, the treatment produced a more beneficial effect in women, who are more prone to heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), lead investigators reported at the American Heart Association scientific sessions.

A prespecified subgroup analysis of 4,796 patients in the PARAGON-HF trial found that the sacubitril/valsartan, or sac/val, combination had a significantly more beneficial risk reduction of first and recurrent hospitalizations for heart failure, as well as cardiovascular death, in women than men. A prespecified pooled analysis of 13,195 patients in the PARAGON-HF and the PARADIGM-HF trials also found women derived a greater benefit from the combination therapy than men, but also concluded that patients with heart failure and even mildly reduced ejection fraction had better outcomes. The results of both studies were published simultaneously with the presentations on Nov. 17 in Circulation (doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.119.044491; doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.119.044586).

The findings underscore the effectiveness of sac/val combination in patients with HF and EF in the lower ranges, defined as 40% or less, commented discussant Lynne Warner Stevenson, MD, of Vanderbilt Heart and Vascular Institute in Nashville, Tenn. “We all agree now that the use of sacubitril/valsartan is very appropriate to improve outcomes in those patients, even if they’ve never been hospitalized,” she said in an interview.
 

PARAGON-HF subanalysis

John J.V. McMurray, MD, of the University of Glasgow presented the PARAGON-HF subgroup analysis. He said it initially focused on 12 subgroups, but that only two baseline variables showed a modified effect of sac/val: sex and left-ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF). The findings, he said, “stood up in a very robust, multivariable analysis.”

The women in the subgroup analysis were older, had higher baseline New York Heart Association class status, and worse quality of life as measured by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire clinical summary score. At baseline, women also had higher average LVEF (59% vs. 56%), lower N-terminal prohormone brain natriuretic peptide levels, and higher rates of renal dysfunction and chronic kidney disease, but lower incidence of a previous MI and coronary artery disease. Prestudy treatments were similar between the sexes.

In terms of the primary outcome – a composite of total hospitalizations for heart failure and cardiovascular death – “there was an apparent 27% relative risk reduction in women and no overall effect in men,” Dr. McMurray said of the treatment group. “The difference was driven completely by hospitalizations.” Rates of CV death were similar between the valsartan-only and sac/val groups in both men and women, he said.

In the analysis of LVEF, women in the treatment group seemed to cross over to a heightened risk of hospitalization and CV death at an LVEF in the 60%-65% range, Dr. McMurray said, whereas men made that cross over in the 50%-55% range. “It looks as though women might be getting more benefit from this treatment up to a higher EF than in men,” he said.

However, the differences between men and women did not hold up in the analysis of secondary outcomes. At 8 months, women in the sac/val group had a 0.6-point greater decline than did the valsartan-only patients in KCCQ-CSS score, whereas men on sac/val had a 2.8-point lesser decline than did those on valsartan only. Similar differences were seen between the treatment and valsartan-only groups within the sexes, with women showing a noticeable improvement surpassing the men.

Posttreatment hypotension rates in both sexes were higher in the sac/val groups, and the risk of renal dysfunction was a bit less in both treatment groups. Women in the treatment group had significantly higher rates of angioedema than did the valsartan-only group and men in either group.

“Compared to valsartan, it’s important to say that sacubitril/valsartan seemed to reduce the risk of heart failure and hospitalization more in women than men, but we didn’t find a similar differential for other endpoints,” Dr. McMurray said. “Therefore, we’re not sure this is a real effect or a chance finding. It’s very statistically robust, but it could still be a chance finding.”

A possible explanation could be than men may not be responding to sac/val, or that valsartan alone may be more effective in men than women, he said. “This possible effect modification of sac/val vs. valsartan by sex deserves further investigation,” he said.

PARAGON-HF and PARADIGM-HF pooled analysis

Likewise, the prespecified pooled analysis of the PARADIGM-HF and PARAGON-HF trials found a greater benefit of sac/val in women, according to results presented by Scott D. Solomon, MD, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston. Where PARAGON-HF compared combination therapy with valsartan 160 mg twice daily alone, PARADIGM-HF used enalapril 10 mg twice daily alone as the comparator renin-angiotensin-system (RAS) inhibitor.

“These data suggest that the therapeutic effect of sacubitril/valsartan vs. RAS inhibition alone appear to extend to patients with heart failure and mildly reduced EF, with therapeutic benefits that extend to a higher left-ventricle EF range in women compared to men,” Dr. Solomon said.

The pooled analysis divided patients into six different EF groups: up to 22.5%, then in 10-point increments from 22.5% to 62.5%, and 62.5% or greater. PARADIGM-HF enrolled patients age 18 years and older, whereas PARAGON-HF involved those aged 50 years and older.

The analysis showed that, as LVEF rates increased across the EF groups, the rates of the primary composite outcome – HF hospitalizations, CV death, and all-cause mortality – decreased, but the decline was greatest for CV death and less so for HF hospitalization. And while rates of all-cause mortality decreased as EF increased, rates of non-CV death increased substantially with increasing LVEF.

“For each of these endpoints, there are significant benefits to sacubitril/valsartan in the pooled analysis, and this includes HF hospitalization, CV death, either total or first events, and all-cause mortality, which was reduced overall by 12% in the combination group,” Dr. Solomon said. That benefit was seen in the first five categories of EF, but all but disappeared in the highest category (at least 62.5%), he said.

At the lower end of the EF spectrum, the effect of sac/val is more pronounced and similar for men and women, Dr. Solomon said. “But as EF goes up, we see an attenuation of that effect in both men and women, but it occurs at a different point,” he said. “Women seem to derive a benefit to a higher ejection fraction than men.” As in Dr. McMurray’s research, the benefit seems to extend to LVEF of 55%-60% in men and 65%-70% in women.

“These findings were driven by an observed benefit in patients with chronic heart failure and LVEF below the normal range,” he said. “The benefit in the EF range above the ranking ‘reduced’ but below normal was driven primarily by reduction in HF hospitalization.”

Dr. Stevenson said that these findings indicate that a previous hospitalization for HF with preserved EF may be a telling marker for the effectiveness of sac/val. “As opposed to the patient who has exertional dyspnea but has never decompensated to the level needing hospitalization, if they have pEF, our current analyses would suggest sac/val may not offer them much benefit,” she said.

In real-world practice, cost would be an issue, Dr. Stevenson said. “This drug is very expensive; the majority of patients pay more than $100 a month in out-of-pocket costs, and we have to recognize this is not a therapy that everyone can afford,” she said in an interview. “In many areas, and particularly in the disadvantaged populations, this is not going to be a therapy that we’re going to be able to offer everyone, and that gives me great concern as we move toward trying to treat the whole disease that we’re developing therapies that will be limited by finance rather than by physiology. That’s a major call to action for all of us.”

Novartis sponsored the studies. Dr. McMurray has no disclosures. Dr. Solomon disclosed financial relationships with trial sponsor Novartis along with numerous pharmaceutical companies and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

SOURCE: McMurray JJ and Solomon SD. AHA 2019, Late Breaking Science Session 5.

PHILADELPHIA – Two clinical trials of the combination therapy of the neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril and the angiotensin II receptor blocker valsartan in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction found that it lowered rates of all-cause death, compared to a renin-angiotensin-system inhibitor alone.

Furthermore, the treatment produced a more beneficial effect in women, who are more prone to heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), lead investigators reported at the American Heart Association scientific sessions.

A prespecified subgroup analysis of 4,796 patients in the PARAGON-HF trial found that the sacubitril/valsartan, or sac/val, combination had a significantly more beneficial risk reduction of first and recurrent hospitalizations for heart failure, as well as cardiovascular death, in women than men. A prespecified pooled analysis of 13,195 patients in the PARAGON-HF and the PARADIGM-HF trials also found women derived a greater benefit from the combination therapy than men, but also concluded that patients with heart failure and even mildly reduced ejection fraction had better outcomes. The results of both studies were published simultaneously with the presentations on Nov. 17 in Circulation (doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.119.044491; doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.119.044586).

The findings underscore the effectiveness of sac/val combination in patients with HF and EF in the lower ranges, defined as 40% or less, commented discussant Lynne Warner Stevenson, MD, of Vanderbilt Heart and Vascular Institute in Nashville, Tenn. “We all agree now that the use of sacubitril/valsartan is very appropriate to improve outcomes in those patients, even if they’ve never been hospitalized,” she said in an interview.
 

PARAGON-HF subanalysis

John J.V. McMurray, MD, of the University of Glasgow presented the PARAGON-HF subgroup analysis. He said it initially focused on 12 subgroups, but that only two baseline variables showed a modified effect of sac/val: sex and left-ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF). The findings, he said, “stood up in a very robust, multivariable analysis.”

The women in the subgroup analysis were older, had higher baseline New York Heart Association class status, and worse quality of life as measured by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire clinical summary score. At baseline, women also had higher average LVEF (59% vs. 56%), lower N-terminal prohormone brain natriuretic peptide levels, and higher rates of renal dysfunction and chronic kidney disease, but lower incidence of a previous MI and coronary artery disease. Prestudy treatments were similar between the sexes.

In terms of the primary outcome – a composite of total hospitalizations for heart failure and cardiovascular death – “there was an apparent 27% relative risk reduction in women and no overall effect in men,” Dr. McMurray said of the treatment group. “The difference was driven completely by hospitalizations.” Rates of CV death were similar between the valsartan-only and sac/val groups in both men and women, he said.

In the analysis of LVEF, women in the treatment group seemed to cross over to a heightened risk of hospitalization and CV death at an LVEF in the 60%-65% range, Dr. McMurray said, whereas men made that cross over in the 50%-55% range. “It looks as though women might be getting more benefit from this treatment up to a higher EF than in men,” he said.

However, the differences between men and women did not hold up in the analysis of secondary outcomes. At 8 months, women in the sac/val group had a 0.6-point greater decline than did the valsartan-only patients in KCCQ-CSS score, whereas men on sac/val had a 2.8-point lesser decline than did those on valsartan only. Similar differences were seen between the treatment and valsartan-only groups within the sexes, with women showing a noticeable improvement surpassing the men.

Posttreatment hypotension rates in both sexes were higher in the sac/val groups, and the risk of renal dysfunction was a bit less in both treatment groups. Women in the treatment group had significantly higher rates of angioedema than did the valsartan-only group and men in either group.

“Compared to valsartan, it’s important to say that sacubitril/valsartan seemed to reduce the risk of heart failure and hospitalization more in women than men, but we didn’t find a similar differential for other endpoints,” Dr. McMurray said. “Therefore, we’re not sure this is a real effect or a chance finding. It’s very statistically robust, but it could still be a chance finding.”

A possible explanation could be than men may not be responding to sac/val, or that valsartan alone may be more effective in men than women, he said. “This possible effect modification of sac/val vs. valsartan by sex deserves further investigation,” he said.

PARAGON-HF and PARADIGM-HF pooled analysis

Likewise, the prespecified pooled analysis of the PARADIGM-HF and PARAGON-HF trials found a greater benefit of sac/val in women, according to results presented by Scott D. Solomon, MD, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston. Where PARAGON-HF compared combination therapy with valsartan 160 mg twice daily alone, PARADIGM-HF used enalapril 10 mg twice daily alone as the comparator renin-angiotensin-system (RAS) inhibitor.

“These data suggest that the therapeutic effect of sacubitril/valsartan vs. RAS inhibition alone appear to extend to patients with heart failure and mildly reduced EF, with therapeutic benefits that extend to a higher left-ventricle EF range in women compared to men,” Dr. Solomon said.

The pooled analysis divided patients into six different EF groups: up to 22.5%, then in 10-point increments from 22.5% to 62.5%, and 62.5% or greater. PARADIGM-HF enrolled patients age 18 years and older, whereas PARAGON-HF involved those aged 50 years and older.

The analysis showed that, as LVEF rates increased across the EF groups, the rates of the primary composite outcome – HF hospitalizations, CV death, and all-cause mortality – decreased, but the decline was greatest for CV death and less so for HF hospitalization. And while rates of all-cause mortality decreased as EF increased, rates of non-CV death increased substantially with increasing LVEF.

“For each of these endpoints, there are significant benefits to sacubitril/valsartan in the pooled analysis, and this includes HF hospitalization, CV death, either total or first events, and all-cause mortality, which was reduced overall by 12% in the combination group,” Dr. Solomon said. That benefit was seen in the first five categories of EF, but all but disappeared in the highest category (at least 62.5%), he said.

At the lower end of the EF spectrum, the effect of sac/val is more pronounced and similar for men and women, Dr. Solomon said. “But as EF goes up, we see an attenuation of that effect in both men and women, but it occurs at a different point,” he said. “Women seem to derive a benefit to a higher ejection fraction than men.” As in Dr. McMurray’s research, the benefit seems to extend to LVEF of 55%-60% in men and 65%-70% in women.

“These findings were driven by an observed benefit in patients with chronic heart failure and LVEF below the normal range,” he said. “The benefit in the EF range above the ranking ‘reduced’ but below normal was driven primarily by reduction in HF hospitalization.”

Dr. Stevenson said that these findings indicate that a previous hospitalization for HF with preserved EF may be a telling marker for the effectiveness of sac/val. “As opposed to the patient who has exertional dyspnea but has never decompensated to the level needing hospitalization, if they have pEF, our current analyses would suggest sac/val may not offer them much benefit,” she said.

In real-world practice, cost would be an issue, Dr. Stevenson said. “This drug is very expensive; the majority of patients pay more than $100 a month in out-of-pocket costs, and we have to recognize this is not a therapy that everyone can afford,” she said in an interview. “In many areas, and particularly in the disadvantaged populations, this is not going to be a therapy that we’re going to be able to offer everyone, and that gives me great concern as we move toward trying to treat the whole disease that we’re developing therapies that will be limited by finance rather than by physiology. That’s a major call to action for all of us.”

Novartis sponsored the studies. Dr. McMurray has no disclosures. Dr. Solomon disclosed financial relationships with trial sponsor Novartis along with numerous pharmaceutical companies and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

SOURCE: McMurray JJ and Solomon SD. AHA 2019, Late Breaking Science Session 5.

The American College of Physicians has released new clinical guidelines providing practical recommendations for testosterone therapy in adult men with age-related low testosterone.

The evidence-based recommendations target all clinicians and were published online January 6, 2020, in Annals of Internal Medicine, highlighting data from a systematic review of evidence on the efficacy and safety of testosterone treatment in adult men with age-related low testosterone.

Serum testosterone levels drop as men age, starting in their mid-30s, and approximately 20% of American men older than 60 years have low testosterone.

However, no widely accepted testosterone threshold level exists that represents a measure below which symptoms of androgen deficiency and adverse health outcomes occur.

In addition, the role of testosterone therapy in managing this patient population is controversial.

“The purpose of this American College of Physicians guideline is to present recommendations based on the best available evidence on the benefits, harms, and costs of testosterone treatment in adult men with age-related low testosterone,” write Amir Qaseem, MD, PhD, MHA, from the American College of Physicians, Philadelphia, and colleagues.

“This guideline does not address screening or diagnosis of hypogonadism or monitoring of testosterone levels,” the authors note.

In particular, the recommendations suggest that clinicians should initiate testosterone treatment in these patients only to help them improve their sexual function.

According to the authors, moderate-certainty evidence from seven trials involving testosterone treatment in adult men with age-related low testosterone showed a small improvement in global sexual function, whereas low-certainty evidence from seven trials showed a small improvement in erectile function.

By contrast, the guideline emphasizes that clinicians should avoid prescribing testosterone treatment for any other concern in this population. Available evidence demonstrates little to no improvement in physical function, depressive symptoms, energy and vitality, or cognition among these men after receiving testosterone treatment, the authors stress.

ACP recommends that clinicians should reassess men’s symptoms within 12 months of testosterone treatment initiation, with regular reevaluations during subsequent follow up. Clinicians should discontinue treatment in men if sexual function fails to improve.

The guideline also recommends using intramuscular formulations of testosterone treatment for this patient population instead of transdermal ones, because intramuscular formulations cost less and have similar clinical effectiveness and harms.

“The annual cost in 2016 per beneficiary for TRT [testosterone replacement therapy] was $2,135.32 for the transdermal and $156.24 for the intramuscular formulation, according to paid pharmaceutical claims provided in the 2016 Medicare Part D Drug Claims data,” the authors write.

In an accompanying editorial, E. Victor Adlin, MD, of Temple University, Philadelphia, notes that these new ACP guidelines mostly mirror those recently proposed by both the Endocrine Society and the American Urological Association.

However, he predicts that many clinicians will question the ACP’s recommendation to favor use of intramuscular over transdermal formulations of testosterone.

Although Dr. Adlin acknowledges the lower cost of intramuscular preparations as a major consideration, he explains that “the need for an intramuscular injection every 1-4 weeks is a potential barrier to adherence, and some patients require visits to a health care facility for the injections, which may add to the expense.”

Fluctuating blood testosterone levels after each injection may also result in irregular symptom relief and difficulty achieving the desired blood level, he adds. “Individual preference may vary widely in the choice of testosterone therapy.”

Overall, Dr. Adlin stresses that a patient-clinician discussion should serve as the foundation for starting testosterone therapy in men with age-related low testosterone, with the patient playing a central role in treatment decision making.

This guideline was developed with financial support from the American College of Physicians’ operating budget. Study author Carrie Horwitch reports serving as a fiduciary officer for the Washington State Medical Association. Jennifer S. Lin, a member of the ACP Clinical Guidelines Committee, reports being an employee of Kaiser Permanente. Robert McLean, another member of the committee, reports being an employee of Northeast Medical Group. The remaining authors and the editorialist have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

A version of this story appeared on Medscape.com.

The American College of Physicians has released new clinical guidelines providing practical recommendations for testosterone therapy in adult men with age-related low testosterone.

The evidence-based recommendations target all clinicians and were published online January 6, 2020, in Annals of Internal Medicine, highlighting data from a systematic review of evidence on the efficacy and safety of testosterone treatment in adult men with age-related low testosterone.

Serum testosterone levels drop as men age, starting in their mid-30s, and approximately 20% of American men older than 60 years have low testosterone.

However, no widely accepted testosterone threshold level exists that represents a measure below which symptoms of androgen deficiency and adverse health outcomes occur.

In addition, the role of testosterone therapy in managing this patient population is controversial.

“The purpose of this American College of Physicians guideline is to present recommendations based on the best available evidence on the benefits, harms, and costs of testosterone treatment in adult men with age-related low testosterone,” write Amir Qaseem, MD, PhD, MHA, from the American College of Physicians, Philadelphia, and colleagues.

“This guideline does not address screening or diagnosis of hypogonadism or monitoring of testosterone levels,” the authors note.

In particular, the recommendations suggest that clinicians should initiate testosterone treatment in these patients only to help them improve their sexual function.

According to the authors, moderate-certainty evidence from seven trials involving testosterone treatment in adult men with age-related low testosterone showed a small improvement in global sexual function, whereas low-certainty evidence from seven trials showed a small improvement in erectile function.

By contrast, the guideline emphasizes that clinicians should avoid prescribing testosterone treatment for any other concern in this population. Available evidence demonstrates little to no improvement in physical function, depressive symptoms, energy and vitality, or cognition among these men after receiving testosterone treatment, the authors stress.

ACP recommends that clinicians should reassess men’s symptoms within 12 months of testosterone treatment initiation, with regular reevaluations during subsequent follow up. Clinicians should discontinue treatment in men if sexual function fails to improve.

The guideline also recommends using intramuscular formulations of testosterone treatment for this patient population instead of transdermal ones, because intramuscular formulations cost less and have similar clinical effectiveness and harms.

“The annual cost in 2016 per beneficiary for TRT [testosterone replacement therapy] was $2,135.32 for the transdermal and $156.24 for the intramuscular formulation, according to paid pharmaceutical claims provided in the 2016 Medicare Part D Drug Claims data,” the authors write.

In an accompanying editorial, E. Victor Adlin, MD, of Temple University, Philadelphia, notes that these new ACP guidelines mostly mirror those recently proposed by both the Endocrine Society and the American Urological Association.

However, he predicts that many clinicians will question the ACP’s recommendation to favor use of intramuscular over transdermal formulations of testosterone.

Although Dr. Adlin acknowledges the lower cost of intramuscular preparations as a major consideration, he explains that “the need for an intramuscular injection every 1-4 weeks is a potential barrier to adherence, and some patients require visits to a health care facility for the injections, which may add to the expense.”

Fluctuating blood testosterone levels after each injection may also result in irregular symptom relief and difficulty achieving the desired blood level, he adds. “Individual preference may vary widely in the choice of testosterone therapy.”

Overall, Dr. Adlin stresses that a patient-clinician discussion should serve as the foundation for starting testosterone therapy in men with age-related low testosterone, with the patient playing a central role in treatment decision making.

This guideline was developed with financial support from the American College of Physicians’ operating budget. Study author Carrie Horwitch reports serving as a fiduciary officer for the Washington State Medical Association. Jennifer S. Lin, a member of the ACP Clinical Guidelines Committee, reports being an employee of Kaiser Permanente. Robert McLean, another member of the committee, reports being an employee of Northeast Medical Group. The remaining authors and the editorialist have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

A version of this story appeared on Medscape.com.

The American College of Physicians has released new clinical guidelines providing practical recommendations for testosterone therapy in adult men with age-related low testosterone.

The evidence-based recommendations target all clinicians and were published online January 6, 2020, in Annals of Internal Medicine, highlighting data from a systematic review of evidence on the efficacy and safety of testosterone treatment in adult men with age-related low testosterone.

Serum testosterone levels drop as men age, starting in their mid-30s, and approximately 20% of American men older than 60 years have low testosterone.

However, no widely accepted testosterone threshold level exists that represents a measure below which symptoms of androgen deficiency and adverse health outcomes occur.

In addition, the role of testosterone therapy in managing this patient population is controversial.

“The purpose of this American College of Physicians guideline is to present recommendations based on the best available evidence on the benefits, harms, and costs of testosterone treatment in adult men with age-related low testosterone,” write Amir Qaseem, MD, PhD, MHA, from the American College of Physicians, Philadelphia, and colleagues.

“This guideline does not address screening or diagnosis of hypogonadism or monitoring of testosterone levels,” the authors note.

In particular, the recommendations suggest that clinicians should initiate testosterone treatment in these patients only to help them improve their sexual function.

According to the authors, moderate-certainty evidence from seven trials involving testosterone treatment in adult men with age-related low testosterone showed a small improvement in global sexual function, whereas low-certainty evidence from seven trials showed a small improvement in erectile function.

By contrast, the guideline emphasizes that clinicians should avoid prescribing testosterone treatment for any other concern in this population. Available evidence demonstrates little to no improvement in physical function, depressive symptoms, energy and vitality, or cognition among these men after receiving testosterone treatment, the authors stress.

ACP recommends that clinicians should reassess men’s symptoms within 12 months of testosterone treatment initiation, with regular reevaluations during subsequent follow up. Clinicians should discontinue treatment in men if sexual function fails to improve.

The guideline also recommends using intramuscular formulations of testosterone treatment for this patient population instead of transdermal ones, because intramuscular formulations cost less and have similar clinical effectiveness and harms.

“The annual cost in 2016 per beneficiary for TRT [testosterone replacement therapy] was $2,135.32 for the transdermal and $156.24 for the intramuscular formulation, according to paid pharmaceutical claims provided in the 2016 Medicare Part D Drug Claims data,” the authors write.

In an accompanying editorial, E. Victor Adlin, MD, of Temple University, Philadelphia, notes that these new ACP guidelines mostly mirror those recently proposed by both the Endocrine Society and the American Urological Association.

However, he predicts that many clinicians will question the ACP’s recommendation to favor use of intramuscular over transdermal formulations of testosterone.

Although Dr. Adlin acknowledges the lower cost of intramuscular preparations as a major consideration, he explains that “the need for an intramuscular injection every 1-4 weeks is a potential barrier to adherence, and some patients require visits to a health care facility for the injections, which may add to the expense.”

Fluctuating blood testosterone levels after each injection may also result in irregular symptom relief and difficulty achieving the desired blood level, he adds. “Individual preference may vary widely in the choice of testosterone therapy.”

Overall, Dr. Adlin stresses that a patient-clinician discussion should serve as the foundation for starting testosterone therapy in men with age-related low testosterone, with the patient playing a central role in treatment decision making.

This guideline was developed with financial support from the American College of Physicians’ operating budget. Study author Carrie Horwitch reports serving as a fiduciary officer for the Washington State Medical Association. Jennifer S. Lin, a member of the ACP Clinical Guidelines Committee, reports being an employee of Kaiser Permanente. Robert McLean, another member of the committee, reports being an employee of Northeast Medical Group. The remaining authors and the editorialist have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

A version of this story appeared on Medscape.com.

A place for everything

Nerthuz/iStock/Getty Images Plus

Our editor – imagine a combination of Mitch McConnell and SpongeBob SquarePants – is a big fan of the year-in-review list and said we should do one. But he turned down our idea for “Top 10 reasons not to do a year-in-review list,” so we’re doing the next-best thing: reporting on someone else’s.

We came across a list on Vice.com that was right up our alley, so to speak: “What did we get stuck in our rectums last year?”

It’s the latest edition of an annual list compiled by Barry Petchesky, who says he’s “been chronicling our country’s cavity misadventures” for a decade using data from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission’s National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) database.

After you’re done here, we strongly urge you to check out Mr. Petchesky’s full list, which covers all of the major bodily orifices and is not limited to rectums. In the meantime, here are a few highlights, with quotes from the actual NEISS reports when necessary:

• Christmas ornament (ear).
• Egg timer (rectum).
• “Jumped off couch landed on spoon” (vagina).
• Christmas ornament (nose).
• Small shampoo bottle (rectum).
• Large shampoo bottle (rectum).
• Christmas ornament (throat).
• “Was using prostate massager & it got ‘sucked in’ ” (rectum).
• Coaxial cable (penis).
• Christmas ornament (rectum).

The weather stinks today

Pavliha/E+

On the surface, the El Niño–Southern Oscillation isn’t the most impressive phenomenon in the world. The tropical eastern Pacific Ocean isn’t a small area, but there’s a lot of ocean out there, and the temperature difference from the norm during El Niño and its less well-known sister, La Niña, is only a few degrees.

But that blob of water can have massive effects on the world’s climate, causing drought and heat waves in some areas while being responsible for increased storms and massive amounts of rainfall and diarrhea in others.

“Wait, hang on – what was that last one?” you’re probably asking.

Yes, we’re going from “things stuck in our rectums” to “things very much not stuck in our rectums” thanks to a study published in Nature Communications. According to the researchers from Columbia University, La Niña (cooler water) is linked to increased diarrhea in young children in Botswana. During La Niña years, incidence of diarrhea in children aged 5 years or younger is 30% higher than in non–La Niña years.

It does make sense when you think about it. In southern Africa, La Niña is associated with cooler weather, increased rainfall, and more flooding during the rainy season. The aftermath of extreme rainfall events is often a breeding ground for waterborne pathogens. And so the diarrhea flows.

So, if you happen to be reading this from Botswana, pay attention to the news. If the meteorologists start talking about La Niña, you may want to stock up on oral rehydration salts and zinc.
 

Are two DNAs better than one?

Jezperklauzen/ThinkStock

Before you read any further, you need to find the X-Files theme to set the mood, so use this link and get it started.

Okay, is it on? No? That’s fine, we can wait.

Now are you ready? Good, here goes.

What happens after you receive a bone marrow transplant to treat acute myeloid leukemia? Many years of life, hopefully. But what if you survived and then started to turn into someone else? What if the DNA from the bone marrow donor started to replace your DNA?

Now you know why we needed the X-Files music.

Chris Long, who works at the Washoe County (Nev.) Sheriff’s Department, underwent a bone marrow transplant several years ago. Just before the procedure, a friend and colleague in the department, who just happened to run the crime lab, asked him for DNA samples.

Say, isn’t Area 51 in Nevada? Hmm, interesting.

A few months later, the lab determined that all of the DNA in his blood had been replaced by that of the bone marrow donor, the New York Times reported. And over the years, “swabs collected from his lip, cheek and tongue showed that these also contained his donor’s DNA, with the percentages rising and falling.”

Even more surprising? After 4 years, Mr. Long’s colleagues in the crime lab found that all of the DNA in his semen belonged to the donor, the Times said.

Mr. Long, it seems, has become a chimera, a combination of two people.

Guess what? There was an X-Files episode called “Chimera.”

Now, we’re not saying that all this proves aliens were involved, but … well … you know.

A place for everything

Nerthuz/iStock/Getty Images Plus

Our editor – imagine a combination of Mitch McConnell and SpongeBob SquarePants – is a big fan of the year-in-review list and said we should do one. But he turned down our idea for “Top 10 reasons not to do a year-in-review list,” so we’re doing the next-best thing: reporting on someone else’s.

We came across a list on Vice.com that was right up our alley, so to speak: “What did we get stuck in our rectums last year?”

It’s the latest edition of an annual list compiled by Barry Petchesky, who says he’s “been chronicling our country’s cavity misadventures” for a decade using data from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission’s National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) database.

After you’re done here, we strongly urge you to check out Mr. Petchesky’s full list, which covers all of the major bodily orifices and is not limited to rectums. In the meantime, here are a few highlights, with quotes from the actual NEISS reports when necessary:

• Christmas ornament (ear).
• Egg timer (rectum).
• “Jumped off couch landed on spoon” (vagina).
• Christmas ornament (nose).
• Small shampoo bottle (rectum).
• Large shampoo bottle (rectum).
• Christmas ornament (throat).
• “Was using prostate massager & it got ‘sucked in’ ” (rectum).
• Coaxial cable (penis).
• Christmas ornament (rectum).

The weather stinks today

Pavliha/E+

On the surface, the El Niño–Southern Oscillation isn’t the most impressive phenomenon in the world. The tropical eastern Pacific Ocean isn’t a small area, but there’s a lot of ocean out there, and the temperature difference from the norm during El Niño and its less well-known sister, La Niña, is only a few degrees.

But that blob of water can have massive effects on the world’s climate, causing drought and heat waves in some areas while being responsible for increased storms and massive amounts of rainfall and diarrhea in others.

“Wait, hang on – what was that last one?” you’re probably asking.

Yes, we’re going from “things stuck in our rectums” to “things very much not stuck in our rectums” thanks to a study published in Nature Communications. According to the researchers from Columbia University, La Niña (cooler water) is linked to increased diarrhea in young children in Botswana. During La Niña years, incidence of diarrhea in children aged 5 years or younger is 30% higher than in non–La Niña years.

It does make sense when you think about it. In southern Africa, La Niña is associated with cooler weather, increased rainfall, and more flooding during the rainy season. The aftermath of extreme rainfall events is often a breeding ground for waterborne pathogens. And so the diarrhea flows.

So, if you happen to be reading this from Botswana, pay attention to the news. If the meteorologists start talking about La Niña, you may want to stock up on oral rehydration salts and zinc.
 

Are two DNAs better than one?

Jezperklauzen/ThinkStock

Before you read any further, you need to find the X-Files theme to set the mood, so use this link and get it started.

Okay, is it on? No? That’s fine, we can wait.

Now are you ready? Good, here goes.

What happens after you receive a bone marrow transplant to treat acute myeloid leukemia? Many years of life, hopefully. But what if you survived and then started to turn into someone else? What if the DNA from the bone marrow donor started to replace your DNA?

Now you know why we needed the X-Files music.

Chris Long, who works at the Washoe County (Nev.) Sheriff’s Department, underwent a bone marrow transplant several years ago. Just before the procedure, a friend and colleague in the department, who just happened to run the crime lab, asked him for DNA samples.

Say, isn’t Area 51 in Nevada? Hmm, interesting.

A few months later, the lab determined that all of the DNA in his blood had been replaced by that of the bone marrow donor, the New York Times reported. And over the years, “swabs collected from his lip, cheek and tongue showed that these also contained his donor’s DNA, with the percentages rising and falling.”

Even more surprising? After 4 years, Mr. Long’s colleagues in the crime lab found that all of the DNA in his semen belonged to the donor, the Times said.

Mr. Long, it seems, has become a chimera, a combination of two people.

Guess what? There was an X-Files episode called “Chimera.”

Now, we’re not saying that all this proves aliens were involved, but … well … you know.

A place for everything

Nerthuz/iStock/Getty Images Plus

Our editor – imagine a combination of Mitch McConnell and SpongeBob SquarePants – is a big fan of the year-in-review list and said we should do one. But he turned down our idea for “Top 10 reasons not to do a year-in-review list,” so we’re doing the next-best thing: reporting on someone else’s.

We came across a list on Vice.com that was right up our alley, so to speak: “What did we get stuck in our rectums last year?”

It’s the latest edition of an annual list compiled by Barry Petchesky, who says he’s “been chronicling our country’s cavity misadventures” for a decade using data from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission’s National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) database.

After you’re done here, we strongly urge you to check out Mr. Petchesky’s full list, which covers all of the major bodily orifices and is not limited to rectums. In the meantime, here are a few highlights, with quotes from the actual NEISS reports when necessary:

• Christmas ornament (ear).
• Egg timer (rectum).
• “Jumped off couch landed on spoon” (vagina).
• Christmas ornament (nose).
• Small shampoo bottle (rectum).
• Large shampoo bottle (rectum).
• Christmas ornament (throat).
• “Was using prostate massager & it got ‘sucked in’ ” (rectum).
• Coaxial cable (penis).
• Christmas ornament (rectum).

The weather stinks today

Pavliha/E+

On the surface, the El Niño–Southern Oscillation isn’t the most impressive phenomenon in the world. The tropical eastern Pacific Ocean isn’t a small area, but there’s a lot of ocean out there, and the temperature difference from the norm during El Niño and its less well-known sister, La Niña, is only a few degrees.

But that blob of water can have massive effects on the world’s climate, causing drought and heat waves in some areas while being responsible for increased storms and massive amounts of rainfall and diarrhea in others.

“Wait, hang on – what was that last one?” you’re probably asking.

Yes, we’re going from “things stuck in our rectums” to “things very much not stuck in our rectums” thanks to a study published in Nature Communications. According to the researchers from Columbia University, La Niña (cooler water) is linked to increased diarrhea in young children in Botswana. During La Niña years, incidence of diarrhea in children aged 5 years or younger is 30% higher than in non–La Niña years.

It does make sense when you think about it. In southern Africa, La Niña is associated with cooler weather, increased rainfall, and more flooding during the rainy season. The aftermath of extreme rainfall events is often a breeding ground for waterborne pathogens. And so the diarrhea flows.

So, if you happen to be reading this from Botswana, pay attention to the news. If the meteorologists start talking about La Niña, you may want to stock up on oral rehydration salts and zinc.
 

Are two DNAs better than one?

Jezperklauzen/ThinkStock

Before you read any further, you need to find the X-Files theme to set the mood, so use this link and get it started.

Okay, is it on? No? That’s fine, we can wait.

Now are you ready? Good, here goes.

What happens after you receive a bone marrow transplant to treat acute myeloid leukemia? Many years of life, hopefully. But what if you survived and then started to turn into someone else? What if the DNA from the bone marrow donor started to replace your DNA?

Now you know why we needed the X-Files music.

Chris Long, who works at the Washoe County (Nev.) Sheriff’s Department, underwent a bone marrow transplant several years ago. Just before the procedure, a friend and colleague in the department, who just happened to run the crime lab, asked him for DNA samples.

Say, isn’t Area 51 in Nevada? Hmm, interesting.

A few months later, the lab determined that all of the DNA in his blood had been replaced by that of the bone marrow donor, the New York Times reported. And over the years, “swabs collected from his lip, cheek and tongue showed that these also contained his donor’s DNA, with the percentages rising and falling.”

Even more surprising? After 4 years, Mr. Long’s colleagues in the crime lab found that all of the DNA in his semen belonged to the donor, the Times said.

Mr. Long, it seems, has become a chimera, a combination of two people.

Guess what? There was an X-Files episode called “Chimera.”

Now, we’re not saying that all this proves aliens were involved, but … well … you know.

SAN ANTONIO – Eluxadoline proved highly effective for alleviation of a multitude of symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea in patients for whom loperamide was ineffective in the phase 4 RELIEF trial, Darren M. Brenner, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Gastroenterology.

“From the totality of the clinical trials data we have now, we believe that eluxadoline can be effective both in patients who are naive to other treatments and in patients who have failed loperamide therapy,” concluded Dr. Brenner, a gastroenterologist at Northwestern University, Chicago.

Eluxadoline (Viberzi) is a novel mixed mu- and kappa-opioid receptor agonist and delta-opioid receptor antagonist approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D) in adults. In contrast, loperamide, a mu-opioid receptor agonist, is not approved for that indication. Yet loperamide is widely prescribed for this purpose, despite the fact that both the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology and the ACG now recommend against this practice.

“There is a lack of conclusive evidence to support the use of loperamide for the relief of global IBS-D symptoms. It works on the stool symptoms – stool frequency and texture – but has never been shown to be beneficial for the abdominal pain symptoms or discomfort or bloating. That being said, as practitioners we continue to see loperamide used as a first-line agent,” Dr. Brenner noted.

RELIEF was a multicenter, prospective, double-blind study which randomized 346 patients with moderate to severe IBS-D to eluxadoline at 100 mg twice daily or placebo for 12 weeks. All participants were required to have an intact gallbladder as per the drug’s labeling guidance, and all had a self-reported recent inadequate response to loperamide.

The primary composite endpoint in the RELIEF trial was a 40% or greater improvement from baseline in the 11-point Daily Worst Abdominal Pain score plus a Bristol Stool Form score below 5 on the same day for at least 50% of study days. At baseline, participants had an average Worst Abdominal Pain score of 6.2 on the 0-10 scale and a Bristol score of 6.2. The primary endpoint was achieved at week 12 in 23% of the eluxadoline group, significantly better than the 10% rate in controls. The eluxadoline group also showed significantly greater improvement on the many secondary endpoints having to do with urgency-free days, stool consistency, bowel movement frequency, abdominal discomfort, bloating, and the experience of adequate relief of symptoms.

The safety profile of eluxadoline mirrored that of placebo, with no serious adverse events recorded in either study arm and a 2.9% study discontinuation rate because of treatment-emergent adverse events in the eluxadoline group. Asked why he thinks eluxadoline was effective in improving the full range of IBS-D symptoms when loperamide wasn’t, even though both drugs are mu-opioid receptor agonists, Dr. Brenner replied, “The problem is mu receptors line the entire GI tract, so you can actually push somebody from diarrhea to opioid-induced constipation – and that’s not the goal. What delta does is alleviate some of the adverse events by binding to the receptor, which results in increased transit time, reduced secretion, and increased absorption. Delta brings things back towards the center. We also believe antagonism of delta potentiates analgesic effects at the mu receptor, improves the pain component, gut symptoms, and stool symptoms.”

Dr. Brenner reported serving as a consultant to and member of a speaker’s bureau for Allergan, which markets eluxadoline and sponsored the RELIEF trial.

bjancin@mdedge.com

SAN ANTONIO – Eluxadoline proved highly effective for alleviation of a multitude of symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea in patients for whom loperamide was ineffective in the phase 4 RELIEF trial, Darren M. Brenner, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Gastroenterology.

“From the totality of the clinical trials data we have now, we believe that eluxadoline can be effective both in patients who are naive to other treatments and in patients who have failed loperamide therapy,” concluded Dr. Brenner, a gastroenterologist at Northwestern University, Chicago.

Eluxadoline (Viberzi) is a novel mixed mu- and kappa-opioid receptor agonist and delta-opioid receptor antagonist approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D) in adults. In contrast, loperamide, a mu-opioid receptor agonist, is not approved for that indication. Yet loperamide is widely prescribed for this purpose, despite the fact that both the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology and the ACG now recommend against this practice.

“There is a lack of conclusive evidence to support the use of loperamide for the relief of global IBS-D symptoms. It works on the stool symptoms – stool frequency and texture – but has never been shown to be beneficial for the abdominal pain symptoms or discomfort or bloating. That being said, as practitioners we continue to see loperamide used as a first-line agent,” Dr. Brenner noted.

RELIEF was a multicenter, prospective, double-blind study which randomized 346 patients with moderate to severe IBS-D to eluxadoline at 100 mg twice daily or placebo for 12 weeks. All participants were required to have an intact gallbladder as per the drug’s labeling guidance, and all had a self-reported recent inadequate response to loperamide.

The primary composite endpoint in the RELIEF trial was a 40% or greater improvement from baseline in the 11-point Daily Worst Abdominal Pain score plus a Bristol Stool Form score below 5 on the same day for at least 50% of study days. At baseline, participants had an average Worst Abdominal Pain score of 6.2 on the 0-10 scale and a Bristol score of 6.2. The primary endpoint was achieved at week 12 in 23% of the eluxadoline group, significantly better than the 10% rate in controls. The eluxadoline group also showed significantly greater improvement on the many secondary endpoints having to do with urgency-free days, stool consistency, bowel movement frequency, abdominal discomfort, bloating, and the experience of adequate relief of symptoms.

The safety profile of eluxadoline mirrored that of placebo, with no serious adverse events recorded in either study arm and a 2.9% study discontinuation rate because of treatment-emergent adverse events in the eluxadoline group. Asked why he thinks eluxadoline was effective in improving the full range of IBS-D symptoms when loperamide wasn’t, even though both drugs are mu-opioid receptor agonists, Dr. Brenner replied, “The problem is mu receptors line the entire GI tract, so you can actually push somebody from diarrhea to opioid-induced constipation – and that’s not the goal. What delta does is alleviate some of the adverse events by binding to the receptor, which results in increased transit time, reduced secretion, and increased absorption. Delta brings things back towards the center. We also believe antagonism of delta potentiates analgesic effects at the mu receptor, improves the pain component, gut symptoms, and stool symptoms.”

Dr. Brenner reported serving as a consultant to and member of a speaker’s bureau for Allergan, which markets eluxadoline and sponsored the RELIEF trial.

bjancin@mdedge.com

SAN ANTONIO – Eluxadoline proved highly effective for alleviation of a multitude of symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea in patients for whom loperamide was ineffective in the phase 4 RELIEF trial, Darren M. Brenner, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Gastroenterology.

“From the totality of the clinical trials data we have now, we believe that eluxadoline can be effective both in patients who are naive to other treatments and in patients who have failed loperamide therapy,” concluded Dr. Brenner, a gastroenterologist at Northwestern University, Chicago.

Eluxadoline (Viberzi) is a novel mixed mu- and kappa-opioid receptor agonist and delta-opioid receptor antagonist approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D) in adults. In contrast, loperamide, a mu-opioid receptor agonist, is not approved for that indication. Yet loperamide is widely prescribed for this purpose, despite the fact that both the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology and the ACG now recommend against this practice.

“There is a lack of conclusive evidence to support the use of loperamide for the relief of global IBS-D symptoms. It works on the stool symptoms – stool frequency and texture – but has never been shown to be beneficial for the abdominal pain symptoms or discomfort or bloating. That being said, as practitioners we continue to see loperamide used as a first-line agent,” Dr. Brenner noted.

RELIEF was a multicenter, prospective, double-blind study which randomized 346 patients with moderate to severe IBS-D to eluxadoline at 100 mg twice daily or placebo for 12 weeks. All participants were required to have an intact gallbladder as per the drug’s labeling guidance, and all had a self-reported recent inadequate response to loperamide.

The primary composite endpoint in the RELIEF trial was a 40% or greater improvement from baseline in the 11-point Daily Worst Abdominal Pain score plus a Bristol Stool Form score below 5 on the same day for at least 50% of study days. At baseline, participants had an average Worst Abdominal Pain score of 6.2 on the 0-10 scale and a Bristol score of 6.2. The primary endpoint was achieved at week 12 in 23% of the eluxadoline group, significantly better than the 10% rate in controls. The eluxadoline group also showed significantly greater improvement on the many secondary endpoints having to do with urgency-free days, stool consistency, bowel movement frequency, abdominal discomfort, bloating, and the experience of adequate relief of symptoms.

The safety profile of eluxadoline mirrored that of placebo, with no serious adverse events recorded in either study arm and a 2.9% study discontinuation rate because of treatment-emergent adverse events in the eluxadoline group. Asked why he thinks eluxadoline was effective in improving the full range of IBS-D symptoms when loperamide wasn’t, even though both drugs are mu-opioid receptor agonists, Dr. Brenner replied, “The problem is mu receptors line the entire GI tract, so you can actually push somebody from diarrhea to opioid-induced constipation – and that’s not the goal. What delta does is alleviate some of the adverse events by binding to the receptor, which results in increased transit time, reduced secretion, and increased absorption. Delta brings things back towards the center. We also believe antagonism of delta potentiates analgesic effects at the mu receptor, improves the pain component, gut symptoms, and stool symptoms.”

Dr. Brenner reported serving as a consultant to and member of a speaker’s bureau for Allergan, which markets eluxadoline and sponsored the RELIEF trial.

bjancin@mdedge.com

LAS VEGAS – More than half the patients seeking laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy at a pair of large U.S. programs tested positive for thrombophilia, and for most of these patients, their thrombophilia stemmed from an abnormally elevated level of clotting factor VIII. This thrombophilia seemed to link with a small, but potentially meaningful, excess of portomesenteric venous thrombosis that could warrant treating patients with an anticoagulation regimen for an extended, 30-day period post surgery, Manish S. Parikh, MD, said at a meeting presented by The Obesity Society and the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery.

Mitchel L. Zoler/MDedge News

Although measurement of factor VIII excess can be done with a test that costs about $25, Dr. Parikh suggested that giving extended, 30-day anticoagulant prophylaxis to all patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a reasonable alternative to screening all patients first. “You could use our data to support 30-day prophylaxis for all LSG patients,” said Dr. Parikh, a metabolic and bariatric surgeon at NYU Langone Health in New York. He acknowledged that some logistic barriers can hamper the efficacy of extended prophylaxis.

The factor VIII elevations seen in many of these obese patients seeking metabolic surgery seems to be inherent and independent of their current weight. Although Dr. Parikh and his associates do not have long-term follow-up for all their LSG patients, “we’ve followed some patients, and their factor VIII is still elevated years later, after they’ve lost weight. We encourage lifelong anticoagulation [for these patients] because of their high risk for recurrent clot. This reflects their factor VIII and is independent of weight,” he said.

For their study, the researchers considered a factor VIII level above 150% of the normal level as abnormally elevated and prothrombotic.

The increased rate of portomesenteric venous thrombosis (PMVT) seen in the thrombophilic patients after LSG “is strongly related to the sleeve specifically,” added Dr. Parikh. He suggested that “something related to redirection of blood flow by taking the branches of the gastroepiploic arcade may lead to this.”

The interest of Dr. Parikh and his associates in thrombophilia and factor VIII excess began with a review they ran of more than 25,000 patients who underwent bariatric surgery at six U.S. centers during 2006-2016 that identified 40 patients who developed PMVT, all from the subgroup of nearly 10,000 patients who had LSG for their bariatric procedure. The prevalence of thrombophilia among those 40 patients with PMVT was 92%, with 76% having excess factor VIII (Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13[11]:1835-9).

Based on those findings, the researchers began a practice of prospectively testing for thrombophilia in all patients who were assessed for LSG at two New York centers during August 2018–March 2019, a total of 1,075 patients, of whom 745 subsequently underwent the procedure. They tested the patients for factor VIII and four additional proteins in the clotting cascade that flag thrombophilia, a test panel that cost $103 per patient. That identified 563 surgery candidates (52%) with any thrombophilia, of whom 92% had excess factor VIII (48% of the total cohort of 1,075). Those patients received an extended, 30-day anticoagulant regimen.

To estimate the impact of this approach, the researchers compared the incidence of PMVT among the recent 745 patients who underwent LSG with a historic control group of 4,228 patients who underwent LSG at the two centers during the 4.5 years before routine thrombophilia screening. None of those 4,228 controls received extended anticoagulation.

During 30-day follow-up, 1 patient in the recent group of 745 patients (0.1%) developed PMVT, whereas 18 of the controls (0.4%) had PMVT. The incidence of bleeding was 0.6% in the recent patients and 0.4% in the controls. The researchers did not report a statistical analysis of these data, because the number of PMVT episodes was too small to allow reliable calculations, Dr. Parikh said. He also cautioned that the generalizability of the finding of thrombophilia prevalence is uncertain because the study population of 1,075 patients considering LSG was 84% Hispanic and 15% non-Hispanic African American.

Dr. Parikh had no disclosures.

mzoler@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Parikh MS et al. Obesity Week 2019, Abstract A109.

LAS VEGAS – More than half the patients seeking laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy at a pair of large U.S. programs tested positive for thrombophilia, and for most of these patients, their thrombophilia stemmed from an abnormally elevated level of clotting factor VIII. This thrombophilia seemed to link with a small, but potentially meaningful, excess of portomesenteric venous thrombosis that could warrant treating patients with an anticoagulation regimen for an extended, 30-day period post surgery, Manish S. Parikh, MD, said at a meeting presented by The Obesity Society and the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery.

Mitchel L. Zoler/MDedge News

Although measurement of factor VIII excess can be done with a test that costs about $25, Dr. Parikh suggested that giving extended, 30-day anticoagulant prophylaxis to all patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a reasonable alternative to screening all patients first. “You could use our data to support 30-day prophylaxis for all LSG patients,” said Dr. Parikh, a metabolic and bariatric surgeon at NYU Langone Health in New York. He acknowledged that some logistic barriers can hamper the efficacy of extended prophylaxis.

The factor VIII elevations seen in many of these obese patients seeking metabolic surgery seems to be inherent and independent of their current weight. Although Dr. Parikh and his associates do not have long-term follow-up for all their LSG patients, “we’ve followed some patients, and their factor VIII is still elevated years later, after they’ve lost weight. We encourage lifelong anticoagulation [for these patients] because of their high risk for recurrent clot. This reflects their factor VIII and is independent of weight,” he said.

For their study, the researchers considered a factor VIII level above 150% of the normal level as abnormally elevated and prothrombotic.

The increased rate of portomesenteric venous thrombosis (PMVT) seen in the thrombophilic patients after LSG “is strongly related to the sleeve specifically,” added Dr. Parikh. He suggested that “something related to redirection of blood flow by taking the branches of the gastroepiploic arcade may lead to this.”

The interest of Dr. Parikh and his associates in thrombophilia and factor VIII excess began with a review they ran of more than 25,000 patients who underwent bariatric surgery at six U.S. centers during 2006-2016 that identified 40 patients who developed PMVT, all from the subgroup of nearly 10,000 patients who had LSG for their bariatric procedure. The prevalence of thrombophilia among those 40 patients with PMVT was 92%, with 76% having excess factor VIII (Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13[11]:1835-9).

Based on those findings, the researchers began a practice of prospectively testing for thrombophilia in all patients who were assessed for LSG at two New York centers during August 2018–March 2019, a total of 1,075 patients, of whom 745 subsequently underwent the procedure. They tested the patients for factor VIII and four additional proteins in the clotting cascade that flag thrombophilia, a test panel that cost $103 per patient. That identified 563 surgery candidates (52%) with any thrombophilia, of whom 92% had excess factor VIII (48% of the total cohort of 1,075). Those patients received an extended, 30-day anticoagulant regimen.

To estimate the impact of this approach, the researchers compared the incidence of PMVT among the recent 745 patients who underwent LSG with a historic control group of 4,228 patients who underwent LSG at the two centers during the 4.5 years before routine thrombophilia screening. None of those 4,228 controls received extended anticoagulation.

During 30-day follow-up, 1 patient in the recent group of 745 patients (0.1%) developed PMVT, whereas 18 of the controls (0.4%) had PMVT. The incidence of bleeding was 0.6% in the recent patients and 0.4% in the controls. The researchers did not report a statistical analysis of these data, because the number of PMVT episodes was too small to allow reliable calculations, Dr. Parikh said. He also cautioned that the generalizability of the finding of thrombophilia prevalence is uncertain because the study population of 1,075 patients considering LSG was 84% Hispanic and 15% non-Hispanic African American.

Dr. Parikh had no disclosures.

mzoler@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Parikh MS et al. Obesity Week 2019, Abstract A109.

LAS VEGAS – More than half the patients seeking laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy at a pair of large U.S. programs tested positive for thrombophilia, and for most of these patients, their thrombophilia stemmed from an abnormally elevated level of clotting factor VIII. This thrombophilia seemed to link with a small, but potentially meaningful, excess of portomesenteric venous thrombosis that could warrant treating patients with an anticoagulation regimen for an extended, 30-day period post surgery, Manish S. Parikh, MD, said at a meeting presented by The Obesity Society and the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery.

Mitchel L. Zoler/MDedge News

Although measurement of factor VIII excess can be done with a test that costs about $25, Dr. Parikh suggested that giving extended, 30-day anticoagulant prophylaxis to all patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a reasonable alternative to screening all patients first. “You could use our data to support 30-day prophylaxis for all LSG patients,” said Dr. Parikh, a metabolic and bariatric surgeon at NYU Langone Health in New York. He acknowledged that some logistic barriers can hamper the efficacy of extended prophylaxis.

The factor VIII elevations seen in many of these obese patients seeking metabolic surgery seems to be inherent and independent of their current weight. Although Dr. Parikh and his associates do not have long-term follow-up for all their LSG patients, “we’ve followed some patients, and their factor VIII is still elevated years later, after they’ve lost weight. We encourage lifelong anticoagulation [for these patients] because of their high risk for recurrent clot. This reflects their factor VIII and is independent of weight,” he said.

For their study, the researchers considered a factor VIII level above 150% of the normal level as abnormally elevated and prothrombotic.

The increased rate of portomesenteric venous thrombosis (PMVT) seen in the thrombophilic patients after LSG “is strongly related to the sleeve specifically,” added Dr. Parikh. He suggested that “something related to redirection of blood flow by taking the branches of the gastroepiploic arcade may lead to this.”

The interest of Dr. Parikh and his associates in thrombophilia and factor VIII excess began with a review they ran of more than 25,000 patients who underwent bariatric surgery at six U.S. centers during 2006-2016 that identified 40 patients who developed PMVT, all from the subgroup of nearly 10,000 patients who had LSG for their bariatric procedure. The prevalence of thrombophilia among those 40 patients with PMVT was 92%, with 76% having excess factor VIII (Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13[11]:1835-9).

Based on those findings, the researchers began a practice of prospectively testing for thrombophilia in all patients who were assessed for LSG at two New York centers during August 2018–March 2019, a total of 1,075 patients, of whom 745 subsequently underwent the procedure. They tested the patients for factor VIII and four additional proteins in the clotting cascade that flag thrombophilia, a test panel that cost $103 per patient. That identified 563 surgery candidates (52%) with any thrombophilia, of whom 92% had excess factor VIII (48% of the total cohort of 1,075). Those patients received an extended, 30-day anticoagulant regimen.

To estimate the impact of this approach, the researchers compared the incidence of PMVT among the recent 745 patients who underwent LSG with a historic control group of 4,228 patients who underwent LSG at the two centers during the 4.5 years before routine thrombophilia screening. None of those 4,228 controls received extended anticoagulation.

During 30-day follow-up, 1 patient in the recent group of 745 patients (0.1%) developed PMVT, whereas 18 of the controls (0.4%) had PMVT. The incidence of bleeding was 0.6% in the recent patients and 0.4% in the controls. The researchers did not report a statistical analysis of these data, because the number of PMVT episodes was too small to allow reliable calculations, Dr. Parikh said. He also cautioned that the generalizability of the finding of thrombophilia prevalence is uncertain because the study population of 1,075 patients considering LSG was 84% Hispanic and 15% non-Hispanic African American.

Dr. Parikh had no disclosures.

mzoler@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Parikh MS et al. Obesity Week 2019, Abstract A109.

LAS VEGAS – Researchers have devised a risk calculator for patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes that can estimate their 10-year risk for death and cardiovascular disease events if their clinical status continues relatively unchanged, or if they opt to undergo bariatric surgery.

Mitchel L. Zoler/MDedge News

The Individualized Diabetes Complications risk score “can provide personalized, evidence-based risk information for patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity about their future cardiovascular disease outcomes and mortality with and without metabolic surgery,” Ali Aminian, MD, said at a meeting presented by the Obesity Society and the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery.

Although the calculator needs validation in a prospective, randomized study to document its impact on practice, it is now available on two separate websites and as a downloadable app, said Dr. Aminian, a surgeon at the Cleveland Clinic.

The calculator inputs data for 26 distinct, “readily available” demographic and clinical entries, and based on that, estimates the patient’s 10-year risk for all-cause death, diabetic kidney disease, cerebrovascular disease, heart failure, and coronary artery disease if no surgery occurs or after some type of metabolic or bariatric surgery. The calculator does not currently have the ability to individualize predicted risks based on the specific type of metabolic surgery performed, but that is planned as a future refinement of the score.

“We validated the model in the nonsurgical patients, which showed it was very accurate. The next step is to run a randomized trial to see how useful the calculator is” for assisting in patients’ decision making, Dr. Aminian said.

The data for deriving the risk calculator, and for a preliminary validation of it, came from 13,722 patients with obesity (body mass index, 30 kg/m² or greater) and type 2 diabetes, who were managed at the Cleveland Clinic during 1998-2017, drawn from more than 287,000 such patients in the clinic’s database. The study focused on 2,287 patients who underwent metabolic (bariatric) surgery and 11,435 patients from the same database who did not have surgery and matched by propensity scoring on a 5:1 basis with those who had surgery. The two cohorts this created matched well for age (about 54 years), sex (about two-thirds women), body mass index (about 44 kg/m²), and the prevalence of various comorbidities at baseline.

Dr. Aminian and associates then analyzed the incidence of all-cause mortality and various cardiovascular disease endpoints, as well as nephropathy during follow-up, through December 2018. Patients who had undergone metabolic surgery showed statistically significant reductions in the incidence of each of those events, compared with patients who did not have surgery (JAMA. 2019;322[13]:1271-82).

The investigators used these findings to create their model for calculating a patient’s risk score. For example, to calculate an estimate for the 10-year risk from all-cause mortality, the results showed that the most powerful risk factors were age; baseline body mass index, heart failure, and need for insulin; and smoking status. For the endpoint of nephropathy, the most important factors were estimated glomerular filtration rate at baseline and age. Identified risk factors could account for about 80% of the 10-year risk for all-cause death and for about 75% of the risk for developing nephropathy during 10 years, based on the area-under-the-curve values the model produced.

The risk score may help patients better understand the potential role that metabolic surgery can have in reducing their future event risk, thereby helping them better appreciate the benefit they stand to gain from undergoing surgery, Dr. Aminian said.

The calculator is available at a website maintained by the Cleveland Clinic, at a site of the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, and in app stores, he said.

The work was partially funded by Medtronic. Dr. Aminian has received grants from Medtronic.

mzoler@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Aminian A et al. Obesity Week 2019, Abstract A101.

LAS VEGAS – Researchers have devised a risk calculator for patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes that can estimate their 10-year risk for death and cardiovascular disease events if their clinical status continues relatively unchanged, or if they opt to undergo bariatric surgery.

Mitchel L. Zoler/MDedge News

The Individualized Diabetes Complications risk score “can provide personalized, evidence-based risk information for patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity about their future cardiovascular disease outcomes and mortality with and without metabolic surgery,” Ali Aminian, MD, said at a meeting presented by the Obesity Society and the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery.

Although the calculator needs validation in a prospective, randomized study to document its impact on practice, it is now available on two separate websites and as a downloadable app, said Dr. Aminian, a surgeon at the Cleveland Clinic.

The calculator inputs data for 26 distinct, “readily available” demographic and clinical entries, and based on that, estimates the patient’s 10-year risk for all-cause death, diabetic kidney disease, cerebrovascular disease, heart failure, and coronary artery disease if no surgery occurs or after some type of metabolic or bariatric surgery. The calculator does not currently have the ability to individualize predicted risks based on the specific type of metabolic surgery performed, but that is planned as a future refinement of the score.

“We validated the model in the nonsurgical patients, which showed it was very accurate. The next step is to run a randomized trial to see how useful the calculator is” for assisting in patients’ decision making, Dr. Aminian said.

The data for deriving the risk calculator, and for a preliminary validation of it, came from 13,722 patients with obesity (body mass index, 30 kg/m² or greater) and type 2 diabetes, who were managed at the Cleveland Clinic during 1998-2017, drawn from more than 287,000 such patients in the clinic’s database. The study focused on 2,287 patients who underwent metabolic (bariatric) surgery and 11,435 patients from the same database who did not have surgery and matched by propensity scoring on a 5:1 basis with those who had surgery. The two cohorts this created matched well for age (about 54 years), sex (about two-thirds women), body mass index (about 44 kg/m²), and the prevalence of various comorbidities at baseline.

Dr. Aminian and associates then analyzed the incidence of all-cause mortality and various cardiovascular disease endpoints, as well as nephropathy during follow-up, through December 2018. Patients who had undergone metabolic surgery showed statistically significant reductions in the incidence of each of those events, compared with patients who did not have surgery (JAMA. 2019;322[13]:1271-82).

The investigators used these findings to create their model for calculating a patient’s risk score. For example, to calculate an estimate for the 10-year risk from all-cause mortality, the results showed that the most powerful risk factors were age; baseline body mass index, heart failure, and need for insulin; and smoking status. For the endpoint of nephropathy, the most important factors were estimated glomerular filtration rate at baseline and age. Identified risk factors could account for about 80% of the 10-year risk for all-cause death and for about 75% of the risk for developing nephropathy during 10 years, based on the area-under-the-curve values the model produced.

The risk score may help patients better understand the potential role that metabolic surgery can have in reducing their future event risk, thereby helping them better appreciate the benefit they stand to gain from undergoing surgery, Dr. Aminian said.

The calculator is available at a website maintained by the Cleveland Clinic, at a site of the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, and in app stores, he said.

The work was partially funded by Medtronic. Dr. Aminian has received grants from Medtronic.

mzoler@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Aminian A et al. Obesity Week 2019, Abstract A101.

LAS VEGAS – Researchers have devised a risk calculator for patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes that can estimate their 10-year risk for death and cardiovascular disease events if their clinical status continues relatively unchanged, or if they opt to undergo bariatric surgery.

Mitchel L. Zoler/MDedge News

The Individualized Diabetes Complications risk score “can provide personalized, evidence-based risk information for patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity about their future cardiovascular disease outcomes and mortality with and without metabolic surgery,” Ali Aminian, MD, said at a meeting presented by the Obesity Society and the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery.

Although the calculator needs validation in a prospective, randomized study to document its impact on practice, it is now available on two separate websites and as a downloadable app, said Dr. Aminian, a surgeon at the Cleveland Clinic.

The calculator inputs data for 26 distinct, “readily available” demographic and clinical entries, and based on that, estimates the patient’s 10-year risk for all-cause death, diabetic kidney disease, cerebrovascular disease, heart failure, and coronary artery disease if no surgery occurs or after some type of metabolic or bariatric surgery. The calculator does not currently have the ability to individualize predicted risks based on the specific type of metabolic surgery performed, but that is planned as a future refinement of the score.

“We validated the model in the nonsurgical patients, which showed it was very accurate. The next step is to run a randomized trial to see how useful the calculator is” for assisting in patients’ decision making, Dr. Aminian said.

The data for deriving the risk calculator, and for a preliminary validation of it, came from 13,722 patients with obesity (body mass index, 30 kg/m² or greater) and type 2 diabetes, who were managed at the Cleveland Clinic during 1998-2017, drawn from more than 287,000 such patients in the clinic’s database. The study focused on 2,287 patients who underwent metabolic (bariatric) surgery and 11,435 patients from the same database who did not have surgery and matched by propensity scoring on a 5:1 basis with those who had surgery. The two cohorts this created matched well for age (about 54 years), sex (about two-thirds women), body mass index (about 44 kg/m²), and the prevalence of various comorbidities at baseline.

Dr. Aminian and associates then analyzed the incidence of all-cause mortality and various cardiovascular disease endpoints, as well as nephropathy during follow-up, through December 2018. Patients who had undergone metabolic surgery showed statistically significant reductions in the incidence of each of those events, compared with patients who did not have surgery (JAMA. 2019;322[13]:1271-82).

The investigators used these findings to create their model for calculating a patient’s risk score. For example, to calculate an estimate for the 10-year risk from all-cause mortality, the results showed that the most powerful risk factors were age; baseline body mass index, heart failure, and need for insulin; and smoking status. For the endpoint of nephropathy, the most important factors were estimated glomerular filtration rate at baseline and age. Identified risk factors could account for about 80% of the 10-year risk for all-cause death and for about 75% of the risk for developing nephropathy during 10 years, based on the area-under-the-curve values the model produced.

The risk score may help patients better understand the potential role that metabolic surgery can have in reducing their future event risk, thereby helping them better appreciate the benefit they stand to gain from undergoing surgery, Dr. Aminian said.

The calculator is available at a website maintained by the Cleveland Clinic, at a site of the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, and in app stores, he said.

The work was partially funded by Medtronic. Dr. Aminian has received grants from Medtronic.

mzoler@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Aminian A et al. Obesity Week 2019, Abstract A101.

ORLANDO – For adults with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia positive for the Philadelphia chromosome (Ph+ALL), the combination of hyper-CVAD chemotherapy and ponatinib is associated with high complete molecular response and 5-year overall survival rates, investigators reported.

Neil Osterweil/MDedge News

Long-term follow-up of 86 adults with Ph+ALL treated in the front line with chemotherapy plus ponatinib (Iclusig), a third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), showed a complete remission (CR) rate of 100%, complete molecular remission (CMR) rate of 86%, and a 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of 74%, reported Nicholas J. Short, MD, from the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

“Although we observed two treatment-related cardiovascular deaths with the original trial design, with almost 50 patients treated since instituting a risk-adapted dosing schedule with lower doses of ponatinib, no additional ponatinib-related deaths have been observed,” he said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

The standard of care for adults with Ph+ALL is chemotherapy plus a TKI. With a first- or second-generation TKI plus chemotherapy, reported 5-year OS rates range from 35% to 50%.

“However, relapses are still common, and these are usually driven by the development of new resistance mutations in the ABL gene, particularly the T315I gatekeeper mutation which has been reported in up to 75% of patients at the time of relapse,” he said.

Ponatinib is a pan-BCR-ABL TKI with activity against ALL with T315I mutations, and the combination of this agent with hyper-CVAD chemotherapy (hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone) has been associated with higher response rates than those seen with earlier-generation TKIs, as well as higher levels of minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity, he noted.

Dr. Short and colleagues hypothesized that, compared with the standard of care, hyper-CVAD plus ponatinib would be associated with higher MRD levels, low relapse rates by suppression of T315I subclones, decreased reliance on stem cell transplantation in first remission, and improved long-term survival.

To test this, they treated 86 adults with newly diagnosed Ph+ALL, including those who had undergone one or two previous courses of chemotherapy with a TKI other than ponatinib. The patients had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2, adequate organ function, and no clinically significant cardiovascular disease.

The patients underwent eight cycles of hyper-CVAD alternating with high-dose methotrexate/cytarabine approximately every 21 days. The first 37 patients were treated with, ponatinib 45 mg daily for the first 14 days of cycle 1, then continuously for subsequent cycles. Patients with CD20 expression of 20% or greater also received rituximab during the first four cycles. CNS prophylaxis was also administered with 12 doses of intrathecal chemotherapy with alternating methotrexate and cytarabine.

Patients who had a CR received maintenance with ponatinib and vincristine/prednisone monthly for 2 years, followed by ponatinib indefinitely.

Out of concern for vascular toxicity with long-term use of high-dose ponatinib, including the two deaths mentioned before, the protocol was amended after the first 37 patients were treated. The amended protocol reduced ponatinib to 30 mg starting at cycle 2, with further reduction to 15 mg once a CMR (absence of BCR-ABL on polymerase chain reaction) was achieved.

At a median follow-up of 44 months, the event-free survival rates – the primary endpoint – were 71% at 3 years and 68% at 5 years. The 3-year OS rate was 78%, and the 5-year OS rate was 74%.

All patients had complete remission and complete cytogenetic remission as assessed by conventional karyotyping. Additionally, 73 of 85 evaluable patients (86%) achieved a CMR at some point during therapy.

“We had previously reported that achievement of a complete molecular response by 3 months is associated with superior outcomes. Approximately three quarters of patients achieved this milestone,” Dr. Short said.

Grade 3 or greater adverse events of particular concern included transaminase elevations in 29% of patients, elevated bilirubin and pancreatitis in 15% each, and hypertension in 14%.

Four patients had grade 3 or greater venous thromboembolic or arterial events, including the two previously noted deaths from myocardial infarction, both of which occurred prior to the protocol amendment.

At the most recent follow-up, 11 patients had experienced relapse (no CNS-only relapses), and of this group, 5 died and 6 were still alive. Nineteen patients underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplant, and of this group, 13 were still alive and 6 died.

Causes of death in the nine patients who died while in CR included the two myocardial infarction deaths on study, three deaths from sepsis during consolidation, one from lung cancer, one from a head injury after a fall, one from myocardial infarction in a 79-year-old patient 4 years after stopping ponatinib (off study), and one from preexisting congestive heart failure in a 74-year-old patient.

In all, 47 patients were either in ongoing therapy or observation at last follow-up, including three patients who were transitioned to MRD-directed therapy including blinatumomab (Blincyto).

“As a next step, we are now evaluating lower-intensity regimens with ponatinib and blinatumomab in both the frontline and relapsed/refractory settings, with the goals of decreased chemotherapy-related toxicity, increased MRD-negativity rates, further decreased reliance on transplant, and improved long-term outcomes,” Dr. Short said.

The study was sponsored by MD Anderson with support from the National Cancer Institute. Dr. Short reported consulting for AstraZenca, honoraria from Amgen, and consulting and receiving research funding from Takeda Oncology.

SOURCE: Short NJ et al. ASH 2019, Abstract 283.

ORLANDO – For adults with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia positive for the Philadelphia chromosome (Ph+ALL), the combination of hyper-CVAD chemotherapy and ponatinib is associated with high complete molecular response and 5-year overall survival rates, investigators reported.

Neil Osterweil/MDedge News

Long-term follow-up of 86 adults with Ph+ALL treated in the front line with chemotherapy plus ponatinib (Iclusig), a third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), showed a complete remission (CR) rate of 100%, complete molecular remission (CMR) rate of 86%, and a 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of 74%, reported Nicholas J. Short, MD, from the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

“Although we observed two treatment-related cardiovascular deaths with the original trial design, with almost 50 patients treated since instituting a risk-adapted dosing schedule with lower doses of ponatinib, no additional ponatinib-related deaths have been observed,” he said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

The standard of care for adults with Ph+ALL is chemotherapy plus a TKI. With a first- or second-generation TKI plus chemotherapy, reported 5-year OS rates range from 35% to 50%.

“However, relapses are still common, and these are usually driven by the development of new resistance mutations in the ABL gene, particularly the T315I gatekeeper mutation which has been reported in up to 75% of patients at the time of relapse,” he said.

Ponatinib is a pan-BCR-ABL TKI with activity against ALL with T315I mutations, and the combination of this agent with hyper-CVAD chemotherapy (hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone) has been associated with higher response rates than those seen with earlier-generation TKIs, as well as higher levels of minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity, he noted.

Dr. Short and colleagues hypothesized that, compared with the standard of care, hyper-CVAD plus ponatinib would be associated with higher MRD levels, low relapse rates by suppression of T315I subclones, decreased reliance on stem cell transplantation in first remission, and improved long-term survival.

To test this, they treated 86 adults with newly diagnosed Ph+ALL, including those who had undergone one or two previous courses of chemotherapy with a TKI other than ponatinib. The patients had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2, adequate organ function, and no clinically significant cardiovascular disease.

The patients underwent eight cycles of hyper-CVAD alternating with high-dose methotrexate/cytarabine approximately every 21 days. The first 37 patients were treated with, ponatinib 45 mg daily for the first 14 days of cycle 1, then continuously for subsequent cycles. Patients with CD20 expression of 20% or greater also received rituximab during the first four cycles. CNS prophylaxis was also administered with 12 doses of intrathecal chemotherapy with alternating methotrexate and cytarabine.

Patients who had a CR received maintenance with ponatinib and vincristine/prednisone monthly for 2 years, followed by ponatinib indefinitely.

Out of concern for vascular toxicity with long-term use of high-dose ponatinib, including the two deaths mentioned before, the protocol was amended after the first 37 patients were treated. The amended protocol reduced ponatinib to 30 mg starting at cycle 2, with further reduction to 15 mg once a CMR (absence of BCR-ABL on polymerase chain reaction) was achieved.

At a median follow-up of 44 months, the event-free survival rates – the primary endpoint – were 71% at 3 years and 68% at 5 years. The 3-year OS rate was 78%, and the 5-year OS rate was 74%.

All patients had complete remission and complete cytogenetic remission as assessed by conventional karyotyping. Additionally, 73 of 85 evaluable patients (86%) achieved a CMR at some point during therapy.

“We had previously reported that achievement of a complete molecular response by 3 months is associated with superior outcomes. Approximately three quarters of patients achieved this milestone,” Dr. Short said.

Grade 3 or greater adverse events of particular concern included transaminase elevations in 29% of patients, elevated bilirubin and pancreatitis in 15% each, and hypertension in 14%.

Four patients had grade 3 or greater venous thromboembolic or arterial events, including the two previously noted deaths from myocardial infarction, both of which occurred prior to the protocol amendment.

At the most recent follow-up, 11 patients had experienced relapse (no CNS-only relapses), and of this group, 5 died and 6 were still alive. Nineteen patients underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplant, and of this group, 13 were still alive and 6 died.

Causes of death in the nine patients who died while in CR included the two myocardial infarction deaths on study, three deaths from sepsis during consolidation, one from lung cancer, one from a head injury after a fall, one from myocardial infarction in a 79-year-old patient 4 years after stopping ponatinib (off study), and one from preexisting congestive heart failure in a 74-year-old patient.

In all, 47 patients were either in ongoing therapy or observation at last follow-up, including three patients who were transitioned to MRD-directed therapy including blinatumomab (Blincyto).

“As a next step, we are now evaluating lower-intensity regimens with ponatinib and blinatumomab in both the frontline and relapsed/refractory settings, with the goals of decreased chemotherapy-related toxicity, increased MRD-negativity rates, further decreased reliance on transplant, and improved long-term outcomes,” Dr. Short said.

The study was sponsored by MD Anderson with support from the National Cancer Institute. Dr. Short reported consulting for AstraZenca, honoraria from Amgen, and consulting and receiving research funding from Takeda Oncology.

SOURCE: Short NJ et al. ASH 2019, Abstract 283.

ORLANDO – For adults with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia positive for the Philadelphia chromosome (Ph+ALL), the combination of hyper-CVAD chemotherapy and ponatinib is associated with high complete molecular response and 5-year overall survival rates, investigators reported.

Neil Osterweil/MDedge News

Long-term follow-up of 86 adults with Ph+ALL treated in the front line with chemotherapy plus ponatinib (Iclusig), a third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), showed a complete remission (CR) rate of 100%, complete molecular remission (CMR) rate of 86%, and a 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of 74%, reported Nicholas J. Short, MD, from the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

“Although we observed two treatment-related cardiovascular deaths with the original trial design, with almost 50 patients treated since instituting a risk-adapted dosing schedule with lower doses of ponatinib, no additional ponatinib-related deaths have been observed,” he said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

The standard of care for adults with Ph+ALL is chemotherapy plus a TKI. With a first- or second-generation TKI plus chemotherapy, reported 5-year OS rates range from 35% to 50%.

“However, relapses are still common, and these are usually driven by the development of new resistance mutations in the ABL gene, particularly the T315I gatekeeper mutation which has been reported in up to 75% of patients at the time of relapse,” he said.

Ponatinib is a pan-BCR-ABL TKI with activity against ALL with T315I mutations, and the combination of this agent with hyper-CVAD chemotherapy (hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone) has been associated with higher response rates than those seen with earlier-generation TKIs, as well as higher levels of minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity, he noted.

Dr. Short and colleagues hypothesized that, compared with the standard of care, hyper-CVAD plus ponatinib would be associated with higher MRD levels, low relapse rates by suppression of T315I subclones, decreased reliance on stem cell transplantation in first remission, and improved long-term survival.

To test this, they treated 86 adults with newly diagnosed Ph+ALL, including those who had undergone one or two previous courses of chemotherapy with a TKI other than ponatinib. The patients had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2, adequate organ function, and no clinically significant cardiovascular disease.

The patients underwent eight cycles of hyper-CVAD alternating with high-dose methotrexate/cytarabine approximately every 21 days. The first 37 patients were treated with, ponatinib 45 mg daily for the first 14 days of cycle 1, then continuously for subsequent cycles. Patients with CD20 expression of 20% or greater also received rituximab during the first four cycles. CNS prophylaxis was also administered with 12 doses of intrathecal chemotherapy with alternating methotrexate and cytarabine.

Patients who had a CR received maintenance with ponatinib and vincristine/prednisone monthly for 2 years, followed by ponatinib indefinitely.

Out of concern for vascular toxicity with long-term use of high-dose ponatinib, including the two deaths mentioned before, the protocol was amended after the first 37 patients were treated. The amended protocol reduced ponatinib to 30 mg starting at cycle 2, with further reduction to 15 mg once a CMR (absence of BCR-ABL on polymerase chain reaction) was achieved.

At a median follow-up of 44 months, the event-free survival rates – the primary endpoint – were 71% at 3 years and 68% at 5 years. The 3-year OS rate was 78%, and the 5-year OS rate was 74%.

All patients had complete remission and complete cytogenetic remission as assessed by conventional karyotyping. Additionally, 73 of 85 evaluable patients (86%) achieved a CMR at some point during therapy.

“We had previously reported that achievement of a complete molecular response by 3 months is associated with superior outcomes. Approximately three quarters of patients achieved this milestone,” Dr. Short said.

Grade 3 or greater adverse events of particular concern included transaminase elevations in 29% of patients, elevated bilirubin and pancreatitis in 15% each, and hypertension in 14%.

Four patients had grade 3 or greater venous thromboembolic or arterial events, including the two previously noted deaths from myocardial infarction, both of which occurred prior to the protocol amendment.

At the most recent follow-up, 11 patients had experienced relapse (no CNS-only relapses), and of this group, 5 died and 6 were still alive. Nineteen patients underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplant, and of this group, 13 were still alive and 6 died.

Causes of death in the nine patients who died while in CR included the two myocardial infarction deaths on study, three deaths from sepsis during consolidation, one from lung cancer, one from a head injury after a fall, one from myocardial infarction in a 79-year-old patient 4 years after stopping ponatinib (off study), and one from preexisting congestive heart failure in a 74-year-old patient.

In all, 47 patients were either in ongoing therapy or observation at last follow-up, including three patients who were transitioned to MRD-directed therapy including blinatumomab (Blincyto).

“As a next step, we are now evaluating lower-intensity regimens with ponatinib and blinatumomab in both the frontline and relapsed/refractory settings, with the goals of decreased chemotherapy-related toxicity, increased MRD-negativity rates, further decreased reliance on transplant, and improved long-term outcomes,” Dr. Short said.

The study was sponsored by MD Anderson with support from the National Cancer Institute. Dr. Short reported consulting for AstraZenca, honoraria from Amgen, and consulting and receiving research funding from Takeda Oncology.

SOURCE: Short NJ et al. ASH 2019, Abstract 283.

Whether or not women experience symptoms from uterine fibroid(s) can be dependent on a fibroid’s size and location. Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is the most common symptom resulting from fibroids, and it occurs in up to one-third of women with fibroids. For fibroids that are large (>10 cm), “bulk” symptoms may occur, including pelvic pressure, urinary urgency or frequency, incontinence, constipation, abdominal protrusion, etc.¹

Elagolix, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor antagonist, was US Food and Drug Administration–approved in 2018 to treat moderate to severe pain caused by endometriosis. ² Elagolix is being evaluated in 2 phase 3 randomized, double-blind trials for the additional treatment of HMB associated with uterine fibroids. The results of these studies were presented at the 2019 AAGL meeting on November 12, in Vancouver, Canada.
 

Phase 3 study details

Premenopausal women aged 18 to 51 years were included in the Elaris UF-1 and UF-2 studies if they had HMB (defined using the alkaline hematin methodology as menstrual blood loss [MBL] >80 mL/cycle) and uterine fibroids as confirmed through ultrasound. Because elagolix suppresses estrogen and progesterone, treatment results in dose- and duration-dependent decreases in bone mineral density (BMD),² and add-back therapy can lessen these adverse effects. Subsequently, participants were randomly assigned 1:1:2 to placebo, elagolix 300 mg twice daily, or elagolix 300 mg twice daily with add-back therapy (1 mg estradiol/0.5 mg norethidrone acetate [E2/NETA]) once daily. Uterine volume and size and location of uterine fibroid(s) were assessed by ultrasound. Subgroups were defined by baseline FIGO categories, grouped FIGO 0-3, FIGO 4, or FIGO 5-8.³

Over the 6-month studies, 72.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 67.65–76.73) of the 395 women who received elagolix plus E2/NETA achieved < 80 mL MBL during the final month and ≥ 50% MBL reduction from baseline to the final month. When stratified by FIGO classification, the results were similar for all subgroups: FIGO 0-3, 77.7% (95% CI, 67.21–80.85). Similar results were seen in women with a primary fibroid volume of either greater or less than 36.2 cm³ (median).³



The most frequently reported adverse events among women taking elagolix plus E2/NETA were hot flushes, night sweats, nausea, and headache. Changes in BMD among these women were not significant compared with women taking placebo.³

The Elaris UF-1 and UF-2 studies are funded by AbbVie Inc.

Whether or not women experience symptoms from uterine fibroid(s) can be dependent on a fibroid’s size and location. Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is the most common symptom resulting from fibroids, and it occurs in up to one-third of women with fibroids. For fibroids that are large (>10 cm), “bulk” symptoms may occur, including pelvic pressure, urinary urgency or frequency, incontinence, constipation, abdominal protrusion, etc.¹

Elagolix, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor antagonist, was US Food and Drug Administration–approved in 2018 to treat moderate to severe pain caused by endometriosis. ² Elagolix is being evaluated in 2 phase 3 randomized, double-blind trials for the additional treatment of HMB associated with uterine fibroids. The results of these studies were presented at the 2019 AAGL meeting on November 12, in Vancouver, Canada.
 

Phase 3 study details

Premenopausal women aged 18 to 51 years were included in the Elaris UF-1 and UF-2 studies if they had HMB (defined using the alkaline hematin methodology as menstrual blood loss [MBL] >80 mL/cycle) and uterine fibroids as confirmed through ultrasound. Because elagolix suppresses estrogen and progesterone, treatment results in dose- and duration-dependent decreases in bone mineral density (BMD),² and add-back therapy can lessen these adverse effects. Subsequently, participants were randomly assigned 1:1:2 to placebo, elagolix 300 mg twice daily, or elagolix 300 mg twice daily with add-back therapy (1 mg estradiol/0.5 mg norethidrone acetate [E2/NETA]) once daily. Uterine volume and size and location of uterine fibroid(s) were assessed by ultrasound. Subgroups were defined by baseline FIGO categories, grouped FIGO 0-3, FIGO 4, or FIGO 5-8.³

Over the 6-month studies, 72.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 67.65–76.73) of the 395 women who received elagolix plus E2/NETA achieved < 80 mL MBL during the final month and ≥ 50% MBL reduction from baseline to the final month. When stratified by FIGO classification, the results were similar for all subgroups: FIGO 0-3, 77.7% (95% CI, 67.21–80.85). Similar results were seen in women with a primary fibroid volume of either greater or less than 36.2 cm³ (median).³



The most frequently reported adverse events among women taking elagolix plus E2/NETA were hot flushes, night sweats, nausea, and headache. Changes in BMD among these women were not significant compared with women taking placebo.³

The Elaris UF-1 and UF-2 studies are funded by AbbVie Inc.

Whether or not women experience symptoms from uterine fibroid(s) can be dependent on a fibroid’s size and location. Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is the most common symptom resulting from fibroids, and it occurs in up to one-third of women with fibroids. For fibroids that are large (>10 cm), “bulk” symptoms may occur, including pelvic pressure, urinary urgency or frequency, incontinence, constipation, abdominal protrusion, etc.¹

Elagolix, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor antagonist, was US Food and Drug Administration–approved in 2018 to treat moderate to severe pain caused by endometriosis. ² Elagolix is being evaluated in 2 phase 3 randomized, double-blind trials for the additional treatment of HMB associated with uterine fibroids. The results of these studies were presented at the 2019 AAGL meeting on November 12, in Vancouver, Canada.
 

Phase 3 study details

Premenopausal women aged 18 to 51 years were included in the Elaris UF-1 and UF-2 studies if they had HMB (defined using the alkaline hematin methodology as menstrual blood loss [MBL] >80 mL/cycle) and uterine fibroids as confirmed through ultrasound. Because elagolix suppresses estrogen and progesterone, treatment results in dose- and duration-dependent decreases in bone mineral density (BMD),² and add-back therapy can lessen these adverse effects. Subsequently, participants were randomly assigned 1:1:2 to placebo, elagolix 300 mg twice daily, or elagolix 300 mg twice daily with add-back therapy (1 mg estradiol/0.5 mg norethidrone acetate [E2/NETA]) once daily. Uterine volume and size and location of uterine fibroid(s) were assessed by ultrasound. Subgroups were defined by baseline FIGO categories, grouped FIGO 0-3, FIGO 4, or FIGO 5-8.³

Over the 6-month studies, 72.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 67.65–76.73) of the 395 women who received elagolix plus E2/NETA achieved < 80 mL MBL during the final month and ≥ 50% MBL reduction from baseline to the final month. When stratified by FIGO classification, the results were similar for all subgroups: FIGO 0-3, 77.7% (95% CI, 67.21–80.85). Similar results were seen in women with a primary fibroid volume of either greater or less than 36.2 cm³ (median).³



The most frequently reported adverse events among women taking elagolix plus E2/NETA were hot flushes, night sweats, nausea, and headache. Changes in BMD among these women were not significant compared with women taking placebo.³

The Elaris UF-1 and UF-2 studies are funded by AbbVie Inc.