Greetings! My name is Robert Musacchio; I am proud to introduce myself as the new Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President of CHEST. I am honored to join this team of distinguished clinicians as we spearhead progress in the fight against lung disease.

I have had the pleasure of working at CHEST for the last 4 years, first joining CHEST Enterprises as Senior Vice President of Business Development. In that role, I focused on revenue growth and product diversification before becoming COO of CHEST. As COO, I dedicated myself to strengthening our team by mentoring staff and collaborating with senior leadership, a challenge that I have deeply enjoyed.

Before joining CHEST, I worked at the American Medical Association for 35 years in roles encompassing research, advocacy, membership, and publishing. I also worked with boards and membership groups as a member of the AMA’s CPT® Editorial Panel and as a publisher for JAMA.

As CEO, I hope to leverage those experiences to support CHEST in its mission, which is to improve lung health not just for 1 year but for the next 25 years. For that reason, our leadership team has outlined an organizational culture that fosters short-term success and long-term innovation, focusing on four key areas:



People: How do we attract and retain the right people?

Strategy: How do we create a truly differentiated strategy?

Execution: How do we improve our process to drive flawless execution?

Resources: How do we ensure that we have sufficient resources to invest in our mission?



Those questions in mind, we have established several standards that guide the way we work. We are focusing on leading with integrity, cultivating passion and innovation, honoring our team, and having fun while we deliver cutting-edge education and create community for our members. With these norms, we can continue to foster an environment that generates results. This, in turn, will enable CHEST to fulfill its core purpose of crushing lung disease.

We can crush lung disease by arming our members with industry-leading education offerings—including simulation experiences and live lab courses—and expanding them worldwide to Thailand and Greece in 2019. We can crush lung disease by using cutting-edge technologies—including interactive gaming platforms—to glean further insights. We can crush lung disease by connecting our membership of nearly 20,000 pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine professionals to innovative education tools, along with a network of prestigious colleagues to deliver the highest quality patient care.

Most importantly, we can crush lung disease by empowering our members in their work—if you care about lung disease, we care about you!

And, if you care about lung disease, I am excited to partner with you in this cause. I am thankful for this opportunity to lead CHEST and the CHEST Foundation into the future and look forward to working with you.

Greetings! My name is Robert Musacchio; I am proud to introduce myself as the new Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President of CHEST. I am honored to join this team of distinguished clinicians as we spearhead progress in the fight against lung disease.

I have had the pleasure of working at CHEST for the last 4 years, first joining CHEST Enterprises as Senior Vice President of Business Development. In that role, I focused on revenue growth and product diversification before becoming COO of CHEST. As COO, I dedicated myself to strengthening our team by mentoring staff and collaborating with senior leadership, a challenge that I have deeply enjoyed.

Before joining CHEST, I worked at the American Medical Association for 35 years in roles encompassing research, advocacy, membership, and publishing. I also worked with boards and membership groups as a member of the AMA’s CPT® Editorial Panel and as a publisher for JAMA.

As CEO, I hope to leverage those experiences to support CHEST in its mission, which is to improve lung health not just for 1 year but for the next 25 years. For that reason, our leadership team has outlined an organizational culture that fosters short-term success and long-term innovation, focusing on four key areas:



People: How do we attract and retain the right people?

Strategy: How do we create a truly differentiated strategy?

Execution: How do we improve our process to drive flawless execution?

Resources: How do we ensure that we have sufficient resources to invest in our mission?



Those questions in mind, we have established several standards that guide the way we work. We are focusing on leading with integrity, cultivating passion and innovation, honoring our team, and having fun while we deliver cutting-edge education and create community for our members. With these norms, we can continue to foster an environment that generates results. This, in turn, will enable CHEST to fulfill its core purpose of crushing lung disease.

We can crush lung disease by arming our members with industry-leading education offerings—including simulation experiences and live lab courses—and expanding them worldwide to Thailand and Greece in 2019. We can crush lung disease by using cutting-edge technologies—including interactive gaming platforms—to glean further insights. We can crush lung disease by connecting our membership of nearly 20,000 pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine professionals to innovative education tools, along with a network of prestigious colleagues to deliver the highest quality patient care.

Most importantly, we can crush lung disease by empowering our members in their work—if you care about lung disease, we care about you!

And, if you care about lung disease, I am excited to partner with you in this cause. I am thankful for this opportunity to lead CHEST and the CHEST Foundation into the future and look forward to working with you.

Greetings! My name is Robert Musacchio; I am proud to introduce myself as the new Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President of CHEST. I am honored to join this team of distinguished clinicians as we spearhead progress in the fight against lung disease.

I have had the pleasure of working at CHEST for the last 4 years, first joining CHEST Enterprises as Senior Vice President of Business Development. In that role, I focused on revenue growth and product diversification before becoming COO of CHEST. As COO, I dedicated myself to strengthening our team by mentoring staff and collaborating with senior leadership, a challenge that I have deeply enjoyed.

Before joining CHEST, I worked at the American Medical Association for 35 years in roles encompassing research, advocacy, membership, and publishing. I also worked with boards and membership groups as a member of the AMA’s CPT® Editorial Panel and as a publisher for JAMA.

As CEO, I hope to leverage those experiences to support CHEST in its mission, which is to improve lung health not just for 1 year but for the next 25 years. For that reason, our leadership team has outlined an organizational culture that fosters short-term success and long-term innovation, focusing on four key areas:



People: How do we attract and retain the right people?

Strategy: How do we create a truly differentiated strategy?

Execution: How do we improve our process to drive flawless execution?

Resources: How do we ensure that we have sufficient resources to invest in our mission?



Those questions in mind, we have established several standards that guide the way we work. We are focusing on leading with integrity, cultivating passion and innovation, honoring our team, and having fun while we deliver cutting-edge education and create community for our members. With these norms, we can continue to foster an environment that generates results. This, in turn, will enable CHEST to fulfill its core purpose of crushing lung disease.

We can crush lung disease by arming our members with industry-leading education offerings—including simulation experiences and live lab courses—and expanding them worldwide to Thailand and Greece in 2019. We can crush lung disease by using cutting-edge technologies—including interactive gaming platforms—to glean further insights. We can crush lung disease by connecting our membership of nearly 20,000 pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine professionals to innovative education tools, along with a network of prestigious colleagues to deliver the highest quality patient care.

Most importantly, we can crush lung disease by empowering our members in their work—if you care about lung disease, we care about you!

And, if you care about lung disease, I am excited to partner with you in this cause. I am thankful for this opportunity to lead CHEST and the CHEST Foundation into the future and look forward to working with you.

SAN DIEGO – Ixazomib improved progression-free survival following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, according to results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

Andrew Bowser/MDedge News

Treatment with the oral proteasome inhibitor for 24 months was well tolerated, had a low discontinuation rate, and improved progression-free survival by 39% versus placebo, according to Meletios A. Dimopoulos, MD, of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens.

These findings suggest ixazomib (Ninlaro) represents a “new treatment option for maintenance after transplantation,” Dr. Dimopoulos said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

The trial, known as TOURMALINE-MM3, is the first-ever randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of a proteasome inhibitor used as maintenance after ASCT, according to Dr. Dimopoulos. Lenalidomide is approved in that setting, but 29% of patients who start the treatment discontinue because of treatment-related adverse events.

“Proteasome inhibitors have a different mechanism of action and may provide an alternative to lenalidomide,” Dr. Dimopoulos said at an oral abstract session. Ixazomib has a manageable toxicity profile and “convenient” weekly oral dosing, making it “well suited” for maintenance.

When asked by an attendee whether ixazomib would become “the standard of care” for younger patients with myeloma in this setting, Dr. Dimopoulos replied the results show that ixazomib “is an option for patients, especially for those where a physician may believe that a proteasome inhibitor may be indicated.”

However, when pressed by an attendee to comment on how ixazomib compares with lenalidomide for maintenance, Dr. Dimopoulos remarked that current maintenance studies are moving in the direction of combining therapies.

“I think that instead of saying, ‘is ixazomib better than lenalidomide?’ or vice versa, it is better to see how one may combine those drugs in subsets of patients, or even combine these drugs with other agents,” he said.

The TOURMALINE-MM3 study included 656 patients randomized posttransplantation to receive weekly ixazomib or placebo for up to 2 years.

The median progression-free survival was 26.5 months for ixazomib versus 21.3 months for placebo (P = .002; hazard ratio, 0.720; 95% confidence interval, 0.582-0.890). Median overall survival had not been reached in either ixazomib or placebo arms as of this report, with a median follow-up of 31 months.

The discontinuation rate was 7% for ixazomib versus 5% for placebo, according to the investigator. Moreover, ixazomib was associated with “low toxicity” and no difference in the rates of new primary malignancies, at 3% in both arms.

A manuscript describing results of the TOURMALINE-MM3 study is in press in the Lancet, with an expected online publication date of Dec. 10, Dr. Dimopoulos told attendees. Other studies are ongoing to evaluate ixazomib combinations and treatment to progression in this setting.

TOURMALINE-MM3 is sponsored by Takeda (Millennium), the maker of ixazomib. Dr. Dimopoulos reported honoraria and consultancy with Janssen, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Celgene.

SOURCE: Dimopoulos MA et al. ASH 2018, Abstract 301.

SAN DIEGO – Ixazomib improved progression-free survival following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, according to results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

Andrew Bowser/MDedge News

Treatment with the oral proteasome inhibitor for 24 months was well tolerated, had a low discontinuation rate, and improved progression-free survival by 39% versus placebo, according to Meletios A. Dimopoulos, MD, of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens.

These findings suggest ixazomib (Ninlaro) represents a “new treatment option for maintenance after transplantation,” Dr. Dimopoulos said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

The trial, known as TOURMALINE-MM3, is the first-ever randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of a proteasome inhibitor used as maintenance after ASCT, according to Dr. Dimopoulos. Lenalidomide is approved in that setting, but 29% of patients who start the treatment discontinue because of treatment-related adverse events.

“Proteasome inhibitors have a different mechanism of action and may provide an alternative to lenalidomide,” Dr. Dimopoulos said at an oral abstract session. Ixazomib has a manageable toxicity profile and “convenient” weekly oral dosing, making it “well suited” for maintenance.

When asked by an attendee whether ixazomib would become “the standard of care” for younger patients with myeloma in this setting, Dr. Dimopoulos replied the results show that ixazomib “is an option for patients, especially for those where a physician may believe that a proteasome inhibitor may be indicated.”

However, when pressed by an attendee to comment on how ixazomib compares with lenalidomide for maintenance, Dr. Dimopoulos remarked that current maintenance studies are moving in the direction of combining therapies.

“I think that instead of saying, ‘is ixazomib better than lenalidomide?’ or vice versa, it is better to see how one may combine those drugs in subsets of patients, or even combine these drugs with other agents,” he said.

The TOURMALINE-MM3 study included 656 patients randomized posttransplantation to receive weekly ixazomib or placebo for up to 2 years.

The median progression-free survival was 26.5 months for ixazomib versus 21.3 months for placebo (P = .002; hazard ratio, 0.720; 95% confidence interval, 0.582-0.890). Median overall survival had not been reached in either ixazomib or placebo arms as of this report, with a median follow-up of 31 months.

The discontinuation rate was 7% for ixazomib versus 5% for placebo, according to the investigator. Moreover, ixazomib was associated with “low toxicity” and no difference in the rates of new primary malignancies, at 3% in both arms.

A manuscript describing results of the TOURMALINE-MM3 study is in press in the Lancet, with an expected online publication date of Dec. 10, Dr. Dimopoulos told attendees. Other studies are ongoing to evaluate ixazomib combinations and treatment to progression in this setting.

TOURMALINE-MM3 is sponsored by Takeda (Millennium), the maker of ixazomib. Dr. Dimopoulos reported honoraria and consultancy with Janssen, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Celgene.

SOURCE: Dimopoulos MA et al. ASH 2018, Abstract 301.

SAN DIEGO – Ixazomib improved progression-free survival following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, according to results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

Andrew Bowser/MDedge News

Treatment with the oral proteasome inhibitor for 24 months was well tolerated, had a low discontinuation rate, and improved progression-free survival by 39% versus placebo, according to Meletios A. Dimopoulos, MD, of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens.

These findings suggest ixazomib (Ninlaro) represents a “new treatment option for maintenance after transplantation,” Dr. Dimopoulos said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

The trial, known as TOURMALINE-MM3, is the first-ever randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of a proteasome inhibitor used as maintenance after ASCT, according to Dr. Dimopoulos. Lenalidomide is approved in that setting, but 29% of patients who start the treatment discontinue because of treatment-related adverse events.

“Proteasome inhibitors have a different mechanism of action and may provide an alternative to lenalidomide,” Dr. Dimopoulos said at an oral abstract session. Ixazomib has a manageable toxicity profile and “convenient” weekly oral dosing, making it “well suited” for maintenance.

When asked by an attendee whether ixazomib would become “the standard of care” for younger patients with myeloma in this setting, Dr. Dimopoulos replied the results show that ixazomib “is an option for patients, especially for those where a physician may believe that a proteasome inhibitor may be indicated.”

However, when pressed by an attendee to comment on how ixazomib compares with lenalidomide for maintenance, Dr. Dimopoulos remarked that current maintenance studies are moving in the direction of combining therapies.

“I think that instead of saying, ‘is ixazomib better than lenalidomide?’ or vice versa, it is better to see how one may combine those drugs in subsets of patients, or even combine these drugs with other agents,” he said.

The TOURMALINE-MM3 study included 656 patients randomized posttransplantation to receive weekly ixazomib or placebo for up to 2 years.

The median progression-free survival was 26.5 months for ixazomib versus 21.3 months for placebo (P = .002; hazard ratio, 0.720; 95% confidence interval, 0.582-0.890). Median overall survival had not been reached in either ixazomib or placebo arms as of this report, with a median follow-up of 31 months.

The discontinuation rate was 7% for ixazomib versus 5% for placebo, according to the investigator. Moreover, ixazomib was associated with “low toxicity” and no difference in the rates of new primary malignancies, at 3% in both arms.

A manuscript describing results of the TOURMALINE-MM3 study is in press in the Lancet, with an expected online publication date of Dec. 10, Dr. Dimopoulos told attendees. Other studies are ongoing to evaluate ixazomib combinations and treatment to progression in this setting.

TOURMALINE-MM3 is sponsored by Takeda (Millennium), the maker of ixazomib. Dr. Dimopoulos reported honoraria and consultancy with Janssen, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Celgene.

SOURCE: Dimopoulos MA et al. ASH 2018, Abstract 301.

SAN DIEGO – Two-thirds of adults with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who had early responses to chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy with tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah) remain in remission with no evidence of minimal residual disease, according to an updated analysis of the JULIET trial.

In the single-arm, open-label trial, the overall response rate after 19 months of follow-up was 54%, including 40% complete remissions and 14% partial remissions. The median duration of response had not been reached at the time of data cutoff, and the median overall survival had not been reached for patients with a complete remission. Overall survival in this heavily pretreated population as a whole (all patients who received CAR T-cell infusions) was 11.1 months.

Adverse events were similar to those previously reported and were manageable, according to investigator Richard Thomas Maziarz, MD, from the Oregon Health & Science Knight Cancer Institute in Portland.

In this video interview at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, Dr. Maziarz discusses the promising results using CAR T cells in this difficult to treat population.

SAN DIEGO – Two-thirds of adults with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who had early responses to chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy with tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah) remain in remission with no evidence of minimal residual disease, according to an updated analysis of the JULIET trial.

In the single-arm, open-label trial, the overall response rate after 19 months of follow-up was 54%, including 40% complete remissions and 14% partial remissions. The median duration of response had not been reached at the time of data cutoff, and the median overall survival had not been reached for patients with a complete remission. Overall survival in this heavily pretreated population as a whole (all patients who received CAR T-cell infusions) was 11.1 months.

Adverse events were similar to those previously reported and were manageable, according to investigator Richard Thomas Maziarz, MD, from the Oregon Health & Science Knight Cancer Institute in Portland.

In this video interview at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, Dr. Maziarz discusses the promising results using CAR T cells in this difficult to treat population.

SAN DIEGO – Two-thirds of adults with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who had early responses to chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy with tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah) remain in remission with no evidence of minimal residual disease, according to an updated analysis of the JULIET trial.

In the single-arm, open-label trial, the overall response rate after 19 months of follow-up was 54%, including 40% complete remissions and 14% partial remissions. The median duration of response had not been reached at the time of data cutoff, and the median overall survival had not been reached for patients with a complete remission. Overall survival in this heavily pretreated population as a whole (all patients who received CAR T-cell infusions) was 11.1 months.

Adverse events were similar to those previously reported and were manageable, according to investigator Richard Thomas Maziarz, MD, from the Oregon Health & Science Knight Cancer Institute in Portland.

In this video interview at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, Dr. Maziarz discusses the promising results using CAR T cells in this difficult to treat population.

SAN DIEGO – Investigators demonstrated the feasibility of delivering genomic results in 7 days in a population of older, newly diagnosed patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

The Beat AML Master Trial is an ongoing umbrella study that harnesses cytogenetic information and next generation sequencing to match patients with targeted therapies across a number of substudies or outside of the trial’s multicenter network.

The researchers chose AML for this precision-medicine study because of its rapid onset and lethal nature, its heterogeneity, and the availability of more-targeted therapies, said Amy Burd, PhD, of the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, which is sponsoring the study.

Initial data from the trial showed that more than 95% of patients were assigned to treatment in 7 days or less, based on their personalized genomic information.

Overall, 285 patients had usable genomic screening data and were assigned to treatment. Of those patients, 273 were assigned to a treatment within 7 days, Dr. Burd reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

The speed of delivering these results is critical, said Joseph Mikhael, MD, chief medical officer for the International Myeloma Foundation in Phoenix, who moderated a media briefing on personalized medicine.

“One of the greatest challenges we faced in the concept of personalized medicine is by the time you’ve determined what is best for that patient ... the horse is already out of the barn,” Dr. Mikhael said. “You have to have started the patient on treatment already or else their disease could have progressed quite rapidly.”

In the past, genomic results might come back a month after the patient started therapy. “It was really almost academic,” he said.

In the Beat AML study, more than half (146 patients) were treated based on their AML subtype. The remaining patients (139) were not treated: 2.5% of patients died within 7 days, 7% of patients chose an alternative treatment prior to assignment, 20% chose standard of care, 9.1% chose an alternative trial after assignment, 8.1% chose palliative care, and the remainder had a reason that was not specified.

“The treatment decisions are made for what’s best for the patient even if that means a study outside of Beat AML,” Dr. Burd said.

Currently, there are 11 substudies offering treatment to trial participants across 13 clinical sites. There has been promising efficacy in many of the treatment arms, Dr. Burd said.

In the future, the researchers are looking to expand the substudies to look into novel drug combinations for certain AML subtypes, specifically isocitrate dehydrogenase 2–mutated groups.

Dr. Burd is an employee of the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society. Other coinvestigators reported financial relationships with the pharmaceutical industry. Dr. Mikhael reported research funding from AbbVie, Celgene, Onyx Pharmaceuticals, and Sanofi.

mschneider@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Burd A et al. ASH 2018, Abstract 559.

SAN DIEGO – Investigators demonstrated the feasibility of delivering genomic results in 7 days in a population of older, newly diagnosed patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

The Beat AML Master Trial is an ongoing umbrella study that harnesses cytogenetic information and next generation sequencing to match patients with targeted therapies across a number of substudies or outside of the trial’s multicenter network.

The researchers chose AML for this precision-medicine study because of its rapid onset and lethal nature, its heterogeneity, and the availability of more-targeted therapies, said Amy Burd, PhD, of the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, which is sponsoring the study.

Initial data from the trial showed that more than 95% of patients were assigned to treatment in 7 days or less, based on their personalized genomic information.

Overall, 285 patients had usable genomic screening data and were assigned to treatment. Of those patients, 273 were assigned to a treatment within 7 days, Dr. Burd reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

The speed of delivering these results is critical, said Joseph Mikhael, MD, chief medical officer for the International Myeloma Foundation in Phoenix, who moderated a media briefing on personalized medicine.

“One of the greatest challenges we faced in the concept of personalized medicine is by the time you’ve determined what is best for that patient ... the horse is already out of the barn,” Dr. Mikhael said. “You have to have started the patient on treatment already or else their disease could have progressed quite rapidly.”

In the past, genomic results might come back a month after the patient started therapy. “It was really almost academic,” he said.

In the Beat AML study, more than half (146 patients) were treated based on their AML subtype. The remaining patients (139) were not treated: 2.5% of patients died within 7 days, 7% of patients chose an alternative treatment prior to assignment, 20% chose standard of care, 9.1% chose an alternative trial after assignment, 8.1% chose palliative care, and the remainder had a reason that was not specified.

“The treatment decisions are made for what’s best for the patient even if that means a study outside of Beat AML,” Dr. Burd said.

Currently, there are 11 substudies offering treatment to trial participants across 13 clinical sites. There has been promising efficacy in many of the treatment arms, Dr. Burd said.

In the future, the researchers are looking to expand the substudies to look into novel drug combinations for certain AML subtypes, specifically isocitrate dehydrogenase 2–mutated groups.

Dr. Burd is an employee of the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society. Other coinvestigators reported financial relationships with the pharmaceutical industry. Dr. Mikhael reported research funding from AbbVie, Celgene, Onyx Pharmaceuticals, and Sanofi.

mschneider@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Burd A et al. ASH 2018, Abstract 559.

SAN DIEGO – Investigators demonstrated the feasibility of delivering genomic results in 7 days in a population of older, newly diagnosed patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

The Beat AML Master Trial is an ongoing umbrella study that harnesses cytogenetic information and next generation sequencing to match patients with targeted therapies across a number of substudies or outside of the trial’s multicenter network.

The researchers chose AML for this precision-medicine study because of its rapid onset and lethal nature, its heterogeneity, and the availability of more-targeted therapies, said Amy Burd, PhD, of the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, which is sponsoring the study.

Initial data from the trial showed that more than 95% of patients were assigned to treatment in 7 days or less, based on their personalized genomic information.

Overall, 285 patients had usable genomic screening data and were assigned to treatment. Of those patients, 273 were assigned to a treatment within 7 days, Dr. Burd reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

The speed of delivering these results is critical, said Joseph Mikhael, MD, chief medical officer for the International Myeloma Foundation in Phoenix, who moderated a media briefing on personalized medicine.

“One of the greatest challenges we faced in the concept of personalized medicine is by the time you’ve determined what is best for that patient ... the horse is already out of the barn,” Dr. Mikhael said. “You have to have started the patient on treatment already or else their disease could have progressed quite rapidly.”

In the past, genomic results might come back a month after the patient started therapy. “It was really almost academic,” he said.

In the Beat AML study, more than half (146 patients) were treated based on their AML subtype. The remaining patients (139) were not treated: 2.5% of patients died within 7 days, 7% of patients chose an alternative treatment prior to assignment, 20% chose standard of care, 9.1% chose an alternative trial after assignment, 8.1% chose palliative care, and the remainder had a reason that was not specified.

“The treatment decisions are made for what’s best for the patient even if that means a study outside of Beat AML,” Dr. Burd said.

Currently, there are 11 substudies offering treatment to trial participants across 13 clinical sites. There has been promising efficacy in many of the treatment arms, Dr. Burd said.

In the future, the researchers are looking to expand the substudies to look into novel drug combinations for certain AML subtypes, specifically isocitrate dehydrogenase 2–mutated groups.

Dr. Burd is an employee of the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society. Other coinvestigators reported financial relationships with the pharmaceutical industry. Dr. Mikhael reported research funding from AbbVie, Celgene, Onyx Pharmaceuticals, and Sanofi.

mschneider@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Burd A et al. ASH 2018, Abstract 559.

SAN DIEGO – Diversity of the gut microbiome, sampled either before or after an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT), is predictive of overall survival.

A multinational study of intestinal microbiota in the United States, Europe, and Japan showed that in all four geographic regions patients scheduled for HCT had about a 100% lower median diversity of intestinal bacteria, compared with healthy volunteers, and that enterococcal species predominated in the transplant candidates, reported Jonathan U. Peled, MD, PhD, from the bone marrow transplantation service at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York.

The investigators also found that intestinal microbial diversity was significantly associated with overall survival following an HCT.

In a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, Dr. Peled elaborated on the study findings and described potential pre- and posttransplant interventions that could improve results and increase survival following HCT.

Dr. Peled reported current or prior relationships with Seres Therapeutics, the Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, and Merck/Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer.

SAN DIEGO – Diversity of the gut microbiome, sampled either before or after an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT), is predictive of overall survival.

A multinational study of intestinal microbiota in the United States, Europe, and Japan showed that in all four geographic regions patients scheduled for HCT had about a 100% lower median diversity of intestinal bacteria, compared with healthy volunteers, and that enterococcal species predominated in the transplant candidates, reported Jonathan U. Peled, MD, PhD, from the bone marrow transplantation service at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York.

The investigators also found that intestinal microbial diversity was significantly associated with overall survival following an HCT.

In a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, Dr. Peled elaborated on the study findings and described potential pre- and posttransplant interventions that could improve results and increase survival following HCT.

Dr. Peled reported current or prior relationships with Seres Therapeutics, the Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, and Merck/Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer.

SAN DIEGO – Diversity of the gut microbiome, sampled either before or after an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT), is predictive of overall survival.

A multinational study of intestinal microbiota in the United States, Europe, and Japan showed that in all four geographic regions patients scheduled for HCT had about a 100% lower median diversity of intestinal bacteria, compared with healthy volunteers, and that enterococcal species predominated in the transplant candidates, reported Jonathan U. Peled, MD, PhD, from the bone marrow transplantation service at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York.

The investigators also found that intestinal microbial diversity was significantly associated with overall survival following an HCT.

In a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, Dr. Peled elaborated on the study findings and described potential pre- and posttransplant interventions that could improve results and increase survival following HCT.

Dr. Peled reported current or prior relationships with Seres Therapeutics, the Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, and Merck/Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer.

SAN DIEGO – Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy with tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah) is associated with a high rate of durable responses in adults with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, an updated analysis of the JULIET trial showed.

Neil Osterweil/MDedge News

After a median follow-up of 19 months, two-thirds of adults with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who had early responses to chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy with tisagenlecleucel remained in remission with no evidence of minimal residual disease, reported Richard Thomas Maziarz, MD, from the Oregon Health & Science Knight Cancer Institute in Portland, at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

“Since the previous report, no new deaths have been reported due to any cause other than patient disease progression. No treatment-related mortality was seen throughout the study, and there were three early deaths, all related to lymphoma that progressed,” he said in a briefing prior to presentation of the data in a scientific poster.

The updated study results were published simultaneously online in the New England Journal of Medicine.

JULIET then

In the phase 2, single-arm trial, investigators enrolled adults with DLBCL that had relapsed or was refractory after two or more prior lines of therapy and who were either ineligible for hematopoietic stem cell transplant or who experienced disease progression after transplant.

Interim results of the study were previously reported at the European Hematology Association Congress in 2017.

At that meeting, Gilles Salles, MD, PhD, from the University of Lyon (France), presented results of an analysis of available efficacy data on 51 patients with at least 3 months of follow-up. In this population, the best overall response rate was 59%. The 3-month overall response rate was 45%, consisting of 37% complete responses and 8% partial responses. Relapse-free survival at 6 months was 79% and all patients who had responses at 3 months continued to have responses at the time of data cutoff.

JULIET now

In the most recent analysis, completed after a median time from infusion to data cutoff of 14 months, the investigators reported on efficacy in 93 patients who received CAR T-cell infusions.

The best overall response rate, the primary endpoint, was 52%, comprising 40% complete responses and 12% partial responses. The response rates were consistent across all prognostic subgroups, including age, sex, previous response status, International Prognostic Index score at enrollment, prior therapy, molecular subtype, and other factors.

Estimated relapse-free survival 12 months after documentation of an initial response was 65%, and was 79% among patients who had complete responses.

The median duration of response had not been reached at the time of data cutoff; the median overall survival had not been reached for patients with a complete remission. Overall survival in this heavily pretreated population as a whole (all patients who received CAR T-cell infusions) was 11.1 months.

Adverse events of special interest included grade 3 or 4 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in 23% of patients, prolonged cytopenia in 34%, infections in 19%, neurologic events in 11%, febrile neutropenia in 15%, and tumor lysis syndrome in 2%.

There were no deaths attributable to CRS or to cerebral edema, a complication of CAR T-cell therapy that appears to be related to the costimulatory molecule used in various constructs.

“Patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL who are not eligible for high-dose therapy and hematopoietic cell transplantation or for whom such therapy was not successful have very few treatment options. For these patients, tisagenlecleucel shows promise that will need to be confirmed through larger studies with longer follow-up,” the investigators wrote in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The JULIET Trial is supported by Novartis. Dr. Maziar reported personal fees from Incyte, Kite Therapeutics, and Athersys.

SOURCE: Maziarz RT et al. N Engl J Med. 2018 Dec 1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1804980.
 

SAN DIEGO – Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy with tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah) is associated with a high rate of durable responses in adults with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, an updated analysis of the JULIET trial showed.

Neil Osterweil/MDedge News

After a median follow-up of 19 months, two-thirds of adults with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who had early responses to chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy with tisagenlecleucel remained in remission with no evidence of minimal residual disease, reported Richard Thomas Maziarz, MD, from the Oregon Health & Science Knight Cancer Institute in Portland, at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

“Since the previous report, no new deaths have been reported due to any cause other than patient disease progression. No treatment-related mortality was seen throughout the study, and there were three early deaths, all related to lymphoma that progressed,” he said in a briefing prior to presentation of the data in a scientific poster.

The updated study results were published simultaneously online in the New England Journal of Medicine.

JULIET then

In the phase 2, single-arm trial, investigators enrolled adults with DLBCL that had relapsed or was refractory after two or more prior lines of therapy and who were either ineligible for hematopoietic stem cell transplant or who experienced disease progression after transplant.

Interim results of the study were previously reported at the European Hematology Association Congress in 2017.

At that meeting, Gilles Salles, MD, PhD, from the University of Lyon (France), presented results of an analysis of available efficacy data on 51 patients with at least 3 months of follow-up. In this population, the best overall response rate was 59%. The 3-month overall response rate was 45%, consisting of 37% complete responses and 8% partial responses. Relapse-free survival at 6 months was 79% and all patients who had responses at 3 months continued to have responses at the time of data cutoff.

JULIET now

In the most recent analysis, completed after a median time from infusion to data cutoff of 14 months, the investigators reported on efficacy in 93 patients who received CAR T-cell infusions.

The best overall response rate, the primary endpoint, was 52%, comprising 40% complete responses and 12% partial responses. The response rates were consistent across all prognostic subgroups, including age, sex, previous response status, International Prognostic Index score at enrollment, prior therapy, molecular subtype, and other factors.

Estimated relapse-free survival 12 months after documentation of an initial response was 65%, and was 79% among patients who had complete responses.

The median duration of response had not been reached at the time of data cutoff; the median overall survival had not been reached for patients with a complete remission. Overall survival in this heavily pretreated population as a whole (all patients who received CAR T-cell infusions) was 11.1 months.

Adverse events of special interest included grade 3 or 4 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in 23% of patients, prolonged cytopenia in 34%, infections in 19%, neurologic events in 11%, febrile neutropenia in 15%, and tumor lysis syndrome in 2%.

There were no deaths attributable to CRS or to cerebral edema, a complication of CAR T-cell therapy that appears to be related to the costimulatory molecule used in various constructs.

“Patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL who are not eligible for high-dose therapy and hematopoietic cell transplantation or for whom such therapy was not successful have very few treatment options. For these patients, tisagenlecleucel shows promise that will need to be confirmed through larger studies with longer follow-up,” the investigators wrote in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The JULIET Trial is supported by Novartis. Dr. Maziar reported personal fees from Incyte, Kite Therapeutics, and Athersys.

SOURCE: Maziarz RT et al. N Engl J Med. 2018 Dec 1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1804980.
 

SAN DIEGO – Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy with tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah) is associated with a high rate of durable responses in adults with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, an updated analysis of the JULIET trial showed.

Neil Osterweil/MDedge News

After a median follow-up of 19 months, two-thirds of adults with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who had early responses to chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy with tisagenlecleucel remained in remission with no evidence of minimal residual disease, reported Richard Thomas Maziarz, MD, from the Oregon Health & Science Knight Cancer Institute in Portland, at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

“Since the previous report, no new deaths have been reported due to any cause other than patient disease progression. No treatment-related mortality was seen throughout the study, and there were three early deaths, all related to lymphoma that progressed,” he said in a briefing prior to presentation of the data in a scientific poster.

The updated study results were published simultaneously online in the New England Journal of Medicine.

JULIET then

In the phase 2, single-arm trial, investigators enrolled adults with DLBCL that had relapsed or was refractory after two or more prior lines of therapy and who were either ineligible for hematopoietic stem cell transplant or who experienced disease progression after transplant.

Interim results of the study were previously reported at the European Hematology Association Congress in 2017.

At that meeting, Gilles Salles, MD, PhD, from the University of Lyon (France), presented results of an analysis of available efficacy data on 51 patients with at least 3 months of follow-up. In this population, the best overall response rate was 59%. The 3-month overall response rate was 45%, consisting of 37% complete responses and 8% partial responses. Relapse-free survival at 6 months was 79% and all patients who had responses at 3 months continued to have responses at the time of data cutoff.

JULIET now

In the most recent analysis, completed after a median time from infusion to data cutoff of 14 months, the investigators reported on efficacy in 93 patients who received CAR T-cell infusions.

The best overall response rate, the primary endpoint, was 52%, comprising 40% complete responses and 12% partial responses. The response rates were consistent across all prognostic subgroups, including age, sex, previous response status, International Prognostic Index score at enrollment, prior therapy, molecular subtype, and other factors.

Estimated relapse-free survival 12 months after documentation of an initial response was 65%, and was 79% among patients who had complete responses.

The median duration of response had not been reached at the time of data cutoff; the median overall survival had not been reached for patients with a complete remission. Overall survival in this heavily pretreated population as a whole (all patients who received CAR T-cell infusions) was 11.1 months.

Adverse events of special interest included grade 3 or 4 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in 23% of patients, prolonged cytopenia in 34%, infections in 19%, neurologic events in 11%, febrile neutropenia in 15%, and tumor lysis syndrome in 2%.

There were no deaths attributable to CRS or to cerebral edema, a complication of CAR T-cell therapy that appears to be related to the costimulatory molecule used in various constructs.

“Patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL who are not eligible for high-dose therapy and hematopoietic cell transplantation or for whom such therapy was not successful have very few treatment options. For these patients, tisagenlecleucel shows promise that will need to be confirmed through larger studies with longer follow-up,” the investigators wrote in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The JULIET Trial is supported by Novartis. Dr. Maziar reported personal fees from Incyte, Kite Therapeutics, and Athersys.

SOURCE: Maziarz RT et al. N Engl J Med. 2018 Dec 1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1804980.
 

SAN DIEGO – A single infusion of tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah) continues to demonstrate high efficacy a year and a half after pediatric and young adult patients with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) were enrolled in the pivotal ELIANA trial, Stephan A. Grupp, MD, PhD, reported at a press conference at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Neil Osterweil/MDedge News

Of patients in complete remission after receiving the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, 66% were still in remission at 18 months of follow-up and median survival has yet to be reached.

“We think the efficacy is sustained and excellent,” said Dr. Grupp, of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. “These are durable complete responses even without further therapy. We haven’t reached median duration of response or overall survival, and we can manage toxicity, so I think this is clearly an opportunity for us to treat our patients both in America and across the world.”

The results of ELIANA were the basis for the approval of tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah) for relapsed/refractory B-cell ALL in the United States, and for subsequent approvals by health authorities in the European Union, Switzerland, and Canada.

The international, single-arm, open-label, phase 2 ELIANA trial included 97 patients aged 3-24 years with relapsed or refractory B-cell ALL, most of whom had previously undergone a hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Of those patients, 79 patients went on to receive a single infusion of the CAR T-cell therapy.

The rate of overall remission, defined as the rate of complete remission or complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery, was 82% (65 patients). Among those patients, 66% were still in remission at 18 months, while overall survival was “excellent” at 70%, Dr. Grupp said, and the median overall survival was not reached.

Adverse events prevalence remained relatively unchanged since the previous analyses, according to Dr. Grupp, who added that appropriately trained personnel were able to effectively manage those adverse events across study sites. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 77% of patients. All cases were reversible; 39% received tocilizumab for treatment of CRS with or without other anticytokine therapies; 48% required ICU-level care for CRS, with a median ICU stay of 7 days.

The other most common grade 3/4 nonhematologic adverse events were neutropenia with a body temperature exceeding 38.3° C (62% within 8 weeks of infusion), hypoxia (20%), and hypotension (20%). Grade 3 neurologic effects occurred in 13% of patients, and none had cerebral edema. Based on laboratory results, 43% had grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia and 54% had neutropenia not resolved by day 28; most of these events resolved to grade 2 or less by 3 months.

There were 25 postinfusion deaths, with 2 occurring within 30 days (1 because of disease progression, 1 because of cerebral hemorrhage). Of the 23 deaths after 30 days (range, 53-859 days), 18 were caused by disease progression. The other deaths were caused by encephalitis, systemic mycosis, vasoocclusive hepatobiliary disorder related to allogeneic SCT, bacterial lung infection, and an unknown reason after study withdrawal.

Follow-up is ongoing in the ELIANA study, which is supported by Novartis, the maker of Kymriah.

Dr. Grupp reported research funding from Novartis, consultancy with Novartis, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Adaptimmune Therapeutics, and patents or royalties with the University of Pennsylvania.

SOURCE: Grupp SA et al. ASH 2018, Abstract 895.

SAN DIEGO – A single infusion of tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah) continues to demonstrate high efficacy a year and a half after pediatric and young adult patients with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) were enrolled in the pivotal ELIANA trial, Stephan A. Grupp, MD, PhD, reported at a press conference at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Neil Osterweil/MDedge News

Of patients in complete remission after receiving the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, 66% were still in remission at 18 months of follow-up and median survival has yet to be reached.

“We think the efficacy is sustained and excellent,” said Dr. Grupp, of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. “These are durable complete responses even without further therapy. We haven’t reached median duration of response or overall survival, and we can manage toxicity, so I think this is clearly an opportunity for us to treat our patients both in America and across the world.”

The results of ELIANA were the basis for the approval of tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah) for relapsed/refractory B-cell ALL in the United States, and for subsequent approvals by health authorities in the European Union, Switzerland, and Canada.

The international, single-arm, open-label, phase 2 ELIANA trial included 97 patients aged 3-24 years with relapsed or refractory B-cell ALL, most of whom had previously undergone a hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Of those patients, 79 patients went on to receive a single infusion of the CAR T-cell therapy.

The rate of overall remission, defined as the rate of complete remission or complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery, was 82% (65 patients). Among those patients, 66% were still in remission at 18 months, while overall survival was “excellent” at 70%, Dr. Grupp said, and the median overall survival was not reached.

Adverse events prevalence remained relatively unchanged since the previous analyses, according to Dr. Grupp, who added that appropriately trained personnel were able to effectively manage those adverse events across study sites. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 77% of patients. All cases were reversible; 39% received tocilizumab for treatment of CRS with or without other anticytokine therapies; 48% required ICU-level care for CRS, with a median ICU stay of 7 days.

The other most common grade 3/4 nonhematologic adverse events were neutropenia with a body temperature exceeding 38.3° C (62% within 8 weeks of infusion), hypoxia (20%), and hypotension (20%). Grade 3 neurologic effects occurred in 13% of patients, and none had cerebral edema. Based on laboratory results, 43% had grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia and 54% had neutropenia not resolved by day 28; most of these events resolved to grade 2 or less by 3 months.

There were 25 postinfusion deaths, with 2 occurring within 30 days (1 because of disease progression, 1 because of cerebral hemorrhage). Of the 23 deaths after 30 days (range, 53-859 days), 18 were caused by disease progression. The other deaths were caused by encephalitis, systemic mycosis, vasoocclusive hepatobiliary disorder related to allogeneic SCT, bacterial lung infection, and an unknown reason after study withdrawal.

Follow-up is ongoing in the ELIANA study, which is supported by Novartis, the maker of Kymriah.

Dr. Grupp reported research funding from Novartis, consultancy with Novartis, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Adaptimmune Therapeutics, and patents or royalties with the University of Pennsylvania.

SOURCE: Grupp SA et al. ASH 2018, Abstract 895.

SAN DIEGO – A single infusion of tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah) continues to demonstrate high efficacy a year and a half after pediatric and young adult patients with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) were enrolled in the pivotal ELIANA trial, Stephan A. Grupp, MD, PhD, reported at a press conference at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Neil Osterweil/MDedge News

Of patients in complete remission after receiving the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, 66% were still in remission at 18 months of follow-up and median survival has yet to be reached.

“We think the efficacy is sustained and excellent,” said Dr. Grupp, of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. “These are durable complete responses even without further therapy. We haven’t reached median duration of response or overall survival, and we can manage toxicity, so I think this is clearly an opportunity for us to treat our patients both in America and across the world.”

The results of ELIANA were the basis for the approval of tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah) for relapsed/refractory B-cell ALL in the United States, and for subsequent approvals by health authorities in the European Union, Switzerland, and Canada.

The international, single-arm, open-label, phase 2 ELIANA trial included 97 patients aged 3-24 years with relapsed or refractory B-cell ALL, most of whom had previously undergone a hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Of those patients, 79 patients went on to receive a single infusion of the CAR T-cell therapy.

The rate of overall remission, defined as the rate of complete remission or complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery, was 82% (65 patients). Among those patients, 66% were still in remission at 18 months, while overall survival was “excellent” at 70%, Dr. Grupp said, and the median overall survival was not reached.

Adverse events prevalence remained relatively unchanged since the previous analyses, according to Dr. Grupp, who added that appropriately trained personnel were able to effectively manage those adverse events across study sites. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 77% of patients. All cases were reversible; 39% received tocilizumab for treatment of CRS with or without other anticytokine therapies; 48% required ICU-level care for CRS, with a median ICU stay of 7 days.

The other most common grade 3/4 nonhematologic adverse events were neutropenia with a body temperature exceeding 38.3° C (62% within 8 weeks of infusion), hypoxia (20%), and hypotension (20%). Grade 3 neurologic effects occurred in 13% of patients, and none had cerebral edema. Based on laboratory results, 43% had grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia and 54% had neutropenia not resolved by day 28; most of these events resolved to grade 2 or less by 3 months.

There were 25 postinfusion deaths, with 2 occurring within 30 days (1 because of disease progression, 1 because of cerebral hemorrhage). Of the 23 deaths after 30 days (range, 53-859 days), 18 were caused by disease progression. The other deaths were caused by encephalitis, systemic mycosis, vasoocclusive hepatobiliary disorder related to allogeneic SCT, bacterial lung infection, and an unknown reason after study withdrawal.

Follow-up is ongoing in the ELIANA study, which is supported by Novartis, the maker of Kymriah.

Dr. Grupp reported research funding from Novartis, consultancy with Novartis, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Adaptimmune Therapeutics, and patents or royalties with the University of Pennsylvania.

SOURCE: Grupp SA et al. ASH 2018, Abstract 895.

Tanning use disorder is an addiction, and should be added to the DSM-5, Raghav Tripathi and his associates maintained in a letter to the editor of the Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.

Ibrakovic/iStock/Getty Images Plus

“Strong evidence suggests that tanning use disorder should be included in the DSM-5,” they wrote, noting that individuals who show signs of tanning use disorder have problems quitting, and also are more likely to smoke cigarettes, drink alcohol excessively, and engage in other high-risk behaviors.

In the letter, Mr. Tripathi, a medical student at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, and his associates also noted that frequent tanners have been found to prefer tanning beds that used UV radiation (UVR) over beds that did not, even though they were blinded to which ones did and did not. Reports of pain relief and improved mood following UVR exposure, withdrawal symptoms upon discontinuation of UVR, and the successful use of opioid antagonists to reduce UVR dependence “underscore the importance of viewing tanning as a use disorder.”

The same “brain circuitry and neurotransmitters involved in the reward pathways of other use disorders” are associated with the addictive characteristics of UVR, they wrote.

In one study, people who were compulsive tanners were found to have an increase in “cerebral blood flow in the mesostriatal reward pathway when exposed to UVR.” In another study, opioid antagonism using naltrexone was found to reduce “UVR preference in frequent tanners.”

Understanding the biologic connections is crucial to advocating for formalization of the condition as a recognized disorder in the DSM-5; classification would not only increase awareness of the condition but also standardize approaches to diagnosis and treatment that are key to improving patient care, the authors wrote. Moreover, inclusion of the disorder in the DSM-5 could help to pave the way for inclusion in the ICD-10, which would have broader implications for limiting the overall harmful effects that tanning poses.

The authors had no relevant financial disclosures to report.

SOURCE: Tripathi R et al. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018 Oct 13. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15286.

Tanning use disorder is an addiction, and should be added to the DSM-5, Raghav Tripathi and his associates maintained in a letter to the editor of the Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.

Ibrakovic/iStock/Getty Images Plus

“Strong evidence suggests that tanning use disorder should be included in the DSM-5,” they wrote, noting that individuals who show signs of tanning use disorder have problems quitting, and also are more likely to smoke cigarettes, drink alcohol excessively, and engage in other high-risk behaviors.

In the letter, Mr. Tripathi, a medical student at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, and his associates also noted that frequent tanners have been found to prefer tanning beds that used UV radiation (UVR) over beds that did not, even though they were blinded to which ones did and did not. Reports of pain relief and improved mood following UVR exposure, withdrawal symptoms upon discontinuation of UVR, and the successful use of opioid antagonists to reduce UVR dependence “underscore the importance of viewing tanning as a use disorder.”

The same “brain circuitry and neurotransmitters involved in the reward pathways of other use disorders” are associated with the addictive characteristics of UVR, they wrote.

In one study, people who were compulsive tanners were found to have an increase in “cerebral blood flow in the mesostriatal reward pathway when exposed to UVR.” In another study, opioid antagonism using naltrexone was found to reduce “UVR preference in frequent tanners.”

Understanding the biologic connections is crucial to advocating for formalization of the condition as a recognized disorder in the DSM-5; classification would not only increase awareness of the condition but also standardize approaches to diagnosis and treatment that are key to improving patient care, the authors wrote. Moreover, inclusion of the disorder in the DSM-5 could help to pave the way for inclusion in the ICD-10, which would have broader implications for limiting the overall harmful effects that tanning poses.

The authors had no relevant financial disclosures to report.

SOURCE: Tripathi R et al. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018 Oct 13. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15286.

Tanning use disorder is an addiction, and should be added to the DSM-5, Raghav Tripathi and his associates maintained in a letter to the editor of the Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.

Ibrakovic/iStock/Getty Images Plus

“Strong evidence suggests that tanning use disorder should be included in the DSM-5,” they wrote, noting that individuals who show signs of tanning use disorder have problems quitting, and also are more likely to smoke cigarettes, drink alcohol excessively, and engage in other high-risk behaviors.

In the letter, Mr. Tripathi, a medical student at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, and his associates also noted that frequent tanners have been found to prefer tanning beds that used UV radiation (UVR) over beds that did not, even though they were blinded to which ones did and did not. Reports of pain relief and improved mood following UVR exposure, withdrawal symptoms upon discontinuation of UVR, and the successful use of opioid antagonists to reduce UVR dependence “underscore the importance of viewing tanning as a use disorder.”

The same “brain circuitry and neurotransmitters involved in the reward pathways of other use disorders” are associated with the addictive characteristics of UVR, they wrote.

In one study, people who were compulsive tanners were found to have an increase in “cerebral blood flow in the mesostriatal reward pathway when exposed to UVR.” In another study, opioid antagonism using naltrexone was found to reduce “UVR preference in frequent tanners.”

Understanding the biologic connections is crucial to advocating for formalization of the condition as a recognized disorder in the DSM-5; classification would not only increase awareness of the condition but also standardize approaches to diagnosis and treatment that are key to improving patient care, the authors wrote. Moreover, inclusion of the disorder in the DSM-5 could help to pave the way for inclusion in the ICD-10, which would have broader implications for limiting the overall harmful effects that tanning poses.

The authors had no relevant financial disclosures to report.

SOURCE: Tripathi R et al. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018 Oct 13. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15286.

CHICAGO – Apixaban outperformed two other direct-acting oral anticoagulants, dabigatran and rivaroxaban, by preventing more thrombotic events and not causing as many major bleeds in patients with atrial fibrillation who were at least 80 years old.

The findings come from an analysis of insurance claims data from more than 50,000 U.S. patients – the largest observational study to date to compare these three direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in octogenarians with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, Steven B. Deitelzweig, MD, said at the American Heart Association scientific sessions.

“The results may help clinicians evaluate the risk-benefit ratio of the DOACs” in this population, said Dr. Deitelzweig, vice president for medical affairs at Ochsner Medical Center in New Orleans.

He noted that the results were consistent with prior reports from observational data and registries, as well as the results in a recent analysis commissioned by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. “We see a consistent message that apixaban always has less risk for major bleeding, and at least comparable efficacy” when compared with other DOACs, he said in a video interview.

And for the foreseeable future, this sort of data will need to suffice for clinicians trying to decide which DOAC to use because “I know of no head-to-head trials, nor do I anticipate any head-to-head trials” that could provide a more definitive comparison of the DOACs, Dr. Deitelzweig said.

The data came from a large number of patients – about 38% of the U.S. population – which boosts the generalizability of the finding. “I think our data are useful” for helping to make treatment decisions, he concluded.

The analysis he reported came from the ARISTOPHANES (Anticoagulants for Reduction in Stroke: Observational Pooled Analysis on Health Outcomes and Experience of Patients) study, which pooled U.S. insurance claims data from several sources. For the octogenarian study, Dr. Deitelzweig and his associates used data from about 123 million U.S. residents collected between January 2012 and September 2015 by Medicare and three different commercial insurance databases. The overall level of beneficiary overlap between these four data sources was less than 0.5%.

The researchers identified patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who started anticoagulant treatment with a DOAC and were at least 80 years old. This included 19,752 patients started on apixaban (Eliquis), 6,741 started on dabigatran (Pradaxa), and 27,217 started on rivaroxaban (Xarelto). A majority of the patients were at least 84 years old.

The analysis used propensity-score matching to compare similar patients and to minimize the impact of potentially confounding differences among the patients in each treatment subgroup. During a median follow-up of 7-9 months, the incidence of stroke or systemic embolism was 35% lower in the apixaban-treated patients, compared with those who received dabigatran, and 28% lower in the apixaban patients, compared with those treated with rivaroxaban, both statistically significant differences, Dr. Deitelzweig reported. The incidence of major bleeding episodes was 40% lower with apixaban than with dabigatran and 50% lower with apixaban, compared with rivaroxaban, also statistically significant differences.

When the analysis compared dabigatran with rivaroxaban it showed no statistically significant difference for the efficacy endpoint, but dabigatran produced 23% fewer major bleeds than rivaroxaban, a statistically significant difference.

These findings jibed with a recently published analysis from Dr. Deitelzweig and his associates that used data from all adults with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation started on an oral anticoagulant in an expanded ARISTOPHANES database for 2012-2015 that included more than 180 million U.S. beneficiaries. After propensity-score matching, this created subgroups of about 58,000 patients started on apixaban, nearly 27,000 started on dabigatran, and more than 83,000 started on rivaroxaban. The patients averaged about 73 years old. Again, with about 7-9 months of follow-up, very similar outcomes occurred. Patients on apixaban had significantly fewer strokes and systemic embolic events as well as significantly fewer major bleeds compared with patients treated with one of the other DOACs (Stroke. 2018 Dec;49[12]:2933-44).

The study was funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer, the companies that market apixaban (Eliquis). Dr. Deitelzweig is a consultant to and speaker on behalf of Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer. He is also a consultant to or speaker on behalf of Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, Janssen, and Portola Pharmaceuticals.

mzoler@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Deitelzweig SB et al. Circulation. 2018 Nov 6;138(suppl 1):A14900.

CHICAGO – Apixaban outperformed two other direct-acting oral anticoagulants, dabigatran and rivaroxaban, by preventing more thrombotic events and not causing as many major bleeds in patients with atrial fibrillation who were at least 80 years old.

The findings come from an analysis of insurance claims data from more than 50,000 U.S. patients – the largest observational study to date to compare these three direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in octogenarians with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, Steven B. Deitelzweig, MD, said at the American Heart Association scientific sessions.

“The results may help clinicians evaluate the risk-benefit ratio of the DOACs” in this population, said Dr. Deitelzweig, vice president for medical affairs at Ochsner Medical Center in New Orleans.

He noted that the results were consistent with prior reports from observational data and registries, as well as the results in a recent analysis commissioned by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. “We see a consistent message that apixaban always has less risk for major bleeding, and at least comparable efficacy” when compared with other DOACs, he said in a video interview.

And for the foreseeable future, this sort of data will need to suffice for clinicians trying to decide which DOAC to use because “I know of no head-to-head trials, nor do I anticipate any head-to-head trials” that could provide a more definitive comparison of the DOACs, Dr. Deitelzweig said.

The data came from a large number of patients – about 38% of the U.S. population – which boosts the generalizability of the finding. “I think our data are useful” for helping to make treatment decisions, he concluded.

The analysis he reported came from the ARISTOPHANES (Anticoagulants for Reduction in Stroke: Observational Pooled Analysis on Health Outcomes and Experience of Patients) study, which pooled U.S. insurance claims data from several sources. For the octogenarian study, Dr. Deitelzweig and his associates used data from about 123 million U.S. residents collected between January 2012 and September 2015 by Medicare and three different commercial insurance databases. The overall level of beneficiary overlap between these four data sources was less than 0.5%.

The researchers identified patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who started anticoagulant treatment with a DOAC and were at least 80 years old. This included 19,752 patients started on apixaban (Eliquis), 6,741 started on dabigatran (Pradaxa), and 27,217 started on rivaroxaban (Xarelto). A majority of the patients were at least 84 years old.

The analysis used propensity-score matching to compare similar patients and to minimize the impact of potentially confounding differences among the patients in each treatment subgroup. During a median follow-up of 7-9 months, the incidence of stroke or systemic embolism was 35% lower in the apixaban-treated patients, compared with those who received dabigatran, and 28% lower in the apixaban patients, compared with those treated with rivaroxaban, both statistically significant differences, Dr. Deitelzweig reported. The incidence of major bleeding episodes was 40% lower with apixaban than with dabigatran and 50% lower with apixaban, compared with rivaroxaban, also statistically significant differences.

When the analysis compared dabigatran with rivaroxaban it showed no statistically significant difference for the efficacy endpoint, but dabigatran produced 23% fewer major bleeds than rivaroxaban, a statistically significant difference.

These findings jibed with a recently published analysis from Dr. Deitelzweig and his associates that used data from all adults with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation started on an oral anticoagulant in an expanded ARISTOPHANES database for 2012-2015 that included more than 180 million U.S. beneficiaries. After propensity-score matching, this created subgroups of about 58,000 patients started on apixaban, nearly 27,000 started on dabigatran, and more than 83,000 started on rivaroxaban. The patients averaged about 73 years old. Again, with about 7-9 months of follow-up, very similar outcomes occurred. Patients on apixaban had significantly fewer strokes and systemic embolic events as well as significantly fewer major bleeds compared with patients treated with one of the other DOACs (Stroke. 2018 Dec;49[12]:2933-44).

The study was funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer, the companies that market apixaban (Eliquis). Dr. Deitelzweig is a consultant to and speaker on behalf of Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer. He is also a consultant to or speaker on behalf of Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, Janssen, and Portola Pharmaceuticals.

mzoler@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Deitelzweig SB et al. Circulation. 2018 Nov 6;138(suppl 1):A14900.

CHICAGO – Apixaban outperformed two other direct-acting oral anticoagulants, dabigatran and rivaroxaban, by preventing more thrombotic events and not causing as many major bleeds in patients with atrial fibrillation who were at least 80 years old.

The findings come from an analysis of insurance claims data from more than 50,000 U.S. patients – the largest observational study to date to compare these three direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in octogenarians with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, Steven B. Deitelzweig, MD, said at the American Heart Association scientific sessions.

“The results may help clinicians evaluate the risk-benefit ratio of the DOACs” in this population, said Dr. Deitelzweig, vice president for medical affairs at Ochsner Medical Center in New Orleans.

He noted that the results were consistent with prior reports from observational data and registries, as well as the results in a recent analysis commissioned by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. “We see a consistent message that apixaban always has less risk for major bleeding, and at least comparable efficacy” when compared with other DOACs, he said in a video interview.

And for the foreseeable future, this sort of data will need to suffice for clinicians trying to decide which DOAC to use because “I know of no head-to-head trials, nor do I anticipate any head-to-head trials” that could provide a more definitive comparison of the DOACs, Dr. Deitelzweig said.

The data came from a large number of patients – about 38% of the U.S. population – which boosts the generalizability of the finding. “I think our data are useful” for helping to make treatment decisions, he concluded.

The analysis he reported came from the ARISTOPHANES (Anticoagulants for Reduction in Stroke: Observational Pooled Analysis on Health Outcomes and Experience of Patients) study, which pooled U.S. insurance claims data from several sources. For the octogenarian study, Dr. Deitelzweig and his associates used data from about 123 million U.S. residents collected between January 2012 and September 2015 by Medicare and three different commercial insurance databases. The overall level of beneficiary overlap between these four data sources was less than 0.5%.

The researchers identified patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who started anticoagulant treatment with a DOAC and were at least 80 years old. This included 19,752 patients started on apixaban (Eliquis), 6,741 started on dabigatran (Pradaxa), and 27,217 started on rivaroxaban (Xarelto). A majority of the patients were at least 84 years old.

The analysis used propensity-score matching to compare similar patients and to minimize the impact of potentially confounding differences among the patients in each treatment subgroup. During a median follow-up of 7-9 months, the incidence of stroke or systemic embolism was 35% lower in the apixaban-treated patients, compared with those who received dabigatran, and 28% lower in the apixaban patients, compared with those treated with rivaroxaban, both statistically significant differences, Dr. Deitelzweig reported. The incidence of major bleeding episodes was 40% lower with apixaban than with dabigatran and 50% lower with apixaban, compared with rivaroxaban, also statistically significant differences.

When the analysis compared dabigatran with rivaroxaban it showed no statistically significant difference for the efficacy endpoint, but dabigatran produced 23% fewer major bleeds than rivaroxaban, a statistically significant difference.

These findings jibed with a recently published analysis from Dr. Deitelzweig and his associates that used data from all adults with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation started on an oral anticoagulant in an expanded ARISTOPHANES database for 2012-2015 that included more than 180 million U.S. beneficiaries. After propensity-score matching, this created subgroups of about 58,000 patients started on apixaban, nearly 27,000 started on dabigatran, and more than 83,000 started on rivaroxaban. The patients averaged about 73 years old. Again, with about 7-9 months of follow-up, very similar outcomes occurred. Patients on apixaban had significantly fewer strokes and systemic embolic events as well as significantly fewer major bleeds compared with patients treated with one of the other DOACs (Stroke. 2018 Dec;49[12]:2933-44).

The study was funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer, the companies that market apixaban (Eliquis). Dr. Deitelzweig is a consultant to and speaker on behalf of Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer. He is also a consultant to or speaker on behalf of Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, Janssen, and Portola Pharmaceuticals.

mzoler@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Deitelzweig SB et al. Circulation. 2018 Nov 6;138(suppl 1):A14900.

NEW ORLEANS – A self-management program that focused on medication adherence, sleep, nutrition, and stress reduction was associated with decreased seizures and improved quality of life for adults with epilepsy.

Michele Sullivan/MDedge News

SMART (Self‐management for people with epilepsy and a history of negative health events) also was associated with improved depression scores and overall quality of life measures in participants, compared with a wait-listed control group, Martha Sajatovic, MD, said at the annual meeting of the American Epilepsy Society.

“I believe what we’re seeing is a result of improved self-management,” said Dr. Sajatovic, the Willard Brown Chair in Neurological Outcomes Research at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland. “This is multimodal, including better medication adherence, which in turn is related to better communication with the clinician. For example, if patients are not sleeping well or their medicine makes them nauseated or they experience sexual dysfunction, we encourage them to talk to their docs about what they can live with, and what they can’t.”

Presented as a poster during the meeting, the SMART study was also published in Epilepsia.

SMART is an 8-week online educational program delivered by a nurse educator and a “peer educator,” a person with epilepsy who has had at least three negative health events. The first session is an in-person visit during which the team gets acquainted and discusses goals. The remaining sessions are self-paced and delivered on computer tablets provided by the investigators.

SMART didn’t just focus on the physical issues of living with epilepsy, Dr. Sajatovic said in an interview. Sessions also discussed the stigma still associated with the disorder, and myths that unnecessarily inflate perceptions. Discussions include goal setting, epilepsy complications and how to manage them, the importance of good sleep hygiene, problem-solving skills, nutrition and substance abuse, exercise, and how to deal with medication side effects.

“One thing we really stressed was sharing information in a way that was accessible to all patients and fostered self-motivation,” she said. “Most of our participants had never been in a program like this before. It was very empowering for many.”

The researchers chose participants who were socioeconomically challenged for this project; 88% made less than $25,000 per year and 74% were unemployed. The mean age of participants was 41 years, 70% were black, and most had been living with epilepsy at least half of their life. About 70% lived alone, and 70% had experienced at least one seizure within the month before enrolling. Mental health comorbidities were common; 69% had depression, 32% had anxiety, and 13% had PTSD.

The study enrolled 120 people, who were evenly divided between the intervention group and the wait-list group. The primary outcome was the change in total negative health events from baseline to the study’s end. Negative health events were seizures and ED or hospital admissions for any other causes including attempts at self-harm, falls, and accidents.

Secondary outcomes included changes in depression scores as measured by the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale and the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire. Quality of life was measured using the 10-item Quality of Life in Epilepsy; functional status was measured using the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey.

At baseline, the total mean 6-month negative health events count was 15, with 13 events being seizures. The other events were hospital or ED visits for other reasons.

At the end of the study, the intervention group experienced a significant mean decrease of 10 fewer negative health events, compared with a decrease of 2 in the wait-listed group. This was largely driven by a mean of 7.8 fewer seizures in the active group, compared with a decrease of about 1.0 in the wait-listed group. The 6-month ER and hospitalization counts did not significantly change.

Among the secondary outcomes, depression, overall health, and quality of life all improved significantly in the intervention group, compared with the wait-listed group. The intervention group also had significant decreases in depression measures and improvements in daily function measures, Dr. Sajatovic said.

“It was so gratifying to see this. Most of our participants had never been in a program like this before. It was a chance for them to take control of their epilepsy, instead of simply having it control them,” she said.

This study was supported by a grant from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Dr. Sajatovic had no financial disclosures related to this presentation.

msullivan@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Sajatovic M et al. AES 2018, Abstract 1.218.

NEW ORLEANS – A self-management program that focused on medication adherence, sleep, nutrition, and stress reduction was associated with decreased seizures and improved quality of life for adults with epilepsy.

Michele Sullivan/MDedge News

SMART (Self‐management for people with epilepsy and a history of negative health events) also was associated with improved depression scores and overall quality of life measures in participants, compared with a wait-listed control group, Martha Sajatovic, MD, said at the annual meeting of the American Epilepsy Society.

“I believe what we’re seeing is a result of improved self-management,” said Dr. Sajatovic, the Willard Brown Chair in Neurological Outcomes Research at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland. “This is multimodal, including better medication adherence, which in turn is related to better communication with the clinician. For example, if patients are not sleeping well or their medicine makes them nauseated or they experience sexual dysfunction, we encourage them to talk to their docs about what they can live with, and what they can’t.”

Presented as a poster during the meeting, the SMART study was also published in Epilepsia.

SMART is an 8-week online educational program delivered by a nurse educator and a “peer educator,” a person with epilepsy who has had at least three negative health events. The first session is an in-person visit during which the team gets acquainted and discusses goals. The remaining sessions are self-paced and delivered on computer tablets provided by the investigators.

SMART didn’t just focus on the physical issues of living with epilepsy, Dr. Sajatovic said in an interview. Sessions also discussed the stigma still associated with the disorder, and myths that unnecessarily inflate perceptions. Discussions include goal setting, epilepsy complications and how to manage them, the importance of good sleep hygiene, problem-solving skills, nutrition and substance abuse, exercise, and how to deal with medication side effects.

“One thing we really stressed was sharing information in a way that was accessible to all patients and fostered self-motivation,” she said. “Most of our participants had never been in a program like this before. It was very empowering for many.”

The researchers chose participants who were socioeconomically challenged for this project; 88% made less than $25,000 per year and 74% were unemployed. The mean age of participants was 41 years, 70% were black, and most had been living with epilepsy at least half of their life. About 70% lived alone, and 70% had experienced at least one seizure within the month before enrolling. Mental health comorbidities were common; 69% had depression, 32% had anxiety, and 13% had PTSD.

The study enrolled 120 people, who were evenly divided between the intervention group and the wait-list group. The primary outcome was the change in total negative health events from baseline to the study’s end. Negative health events were seizures and ED or hospital admissions for any other causes including attempts at self-harm, falls, and accidents.

Secondary outcomes included changes in depression scores as measured by the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale and the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire. Quality of life was measured using the 10-item Quality of Life in Epilepsy; functional status was measured using the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey.

At baseline, the total mean 6-month negative health events count was 15, with 13 events being seizures. The other events were hospital or ED visits for other reasons.

At the end of the study, the intervention group experienced a significant mean decrease of 10 fewer negative health events, compared with a decrease of 2 in the wait-listed group. This was largely driven by a mean of 7.8 fewer seizures in the active group, compared with a decrease of about 1.0 in the wait-listed group. The 6-month ER and hospitalization counts did not significantly change.

Among the secondary outcomes, depression, overall health, and quality of life all improved significantly in the intervention group, compared with the wait-listed group. The intervention group also had significant decreases in depression measures and improvements in daily function measures, Dr. Sajatovic said.

“It was so gratifying to see this. Most of our participants had never been in a program like this before. It was a chance for them to take control of their epilepsy, instead of simply having it control them,” she said.

This study was supported by a grant from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Dr. Sajatovic had no financial disclosures related to this presentation.

msullivan@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Sajatovic M et al. AES 2018, Abstract 1.218.

NEW ORLEANS – A self-management program that focused on medication adherence, sleep, nutrition, and stress reduction was associated with decreased seizures and improved quality of life for adults with epilepsy.

Michele Sullivan/MDedge News

SMART (Self‐management for people with epilepsy and a history of negative health events) also was associated with improved depression scores and overall quality of life measures in participants, compared with a wait-listed control group, Martha Sajatovic, MD, said at the annual meeting of the American Epilepsy Society.

“I believe what we’re seeing is a result of improved self-management,” said Dr. Sajatovic, the Willard Brown Chair in Neurological Outcomes Research at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland. “This is multimodal, including better medication adherence, which in turn is related to better communication with the clinician. For example, if patients are not sleeping well or their medicine makes them nauseated or they experience sexual dysfunction, we encourage them to talk to their docs about what they can live with, and what they can’t.”

Presented as a poster during the meeting, the SMART study was also published in Epilepsia.

SMART is an 8-week online educational program delivered by a nurse educator and a “peer educator,” a person with epilepsy who has had at least three negative health events. The first session is an in-person visit during which the team gets acquainted and discusses goals. The remaining sessions are self-paced and delivered on computer tablets provided by the investigators.

SMART didn’t just focus on the physical issues of living with epilepsy, Dr. Sajatovic said in an interview. Sessions also discussed the stigma still associated with the disorder, and myths that unnecessarily inflate perceptions. Discussions include goal setting, epilepsy complications and how to manage them, the importance of good sleep hygiene, problem-solving skills, nutrition and substance abuse, exercise, and how to deal with medication side effects.

“One thing we really stressed was sharing information in a way that was accessible to all patients and fostered self-motivation,” she said. “Most of our participants had never been in a program like this before. It was very empowering for many.”

The researchers chose participants who were socioeconomically challenged for this project; 88% made less than $25,000 per year and 74% were unemployed. The mean age of participants was 41 years, 70% were black, and most had been living with epilepsy at least half of their life. About 70% lived alone, and 70% had experienced at least one seizure within the month before enrolling. Mental health comorbidities were common; 69% had depression, 32% had anxiety, and 13% had PTSD.

The study enrolled 120 people, who were evenly divided between the intervention group and the wait-list group. The primary outcome was the change in total negative health events from baseline to the study’s end. Negative health events were seizures and ED or hospital admissions for any other causes including attempts at self-harm, falls, and accidents.

Secondary outcomes included changes in depression scores as measured by the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale and the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire. Quality of life was measured using the 10-item Quality of Life in Epilepsy; functional status was measured using the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey.

At baseline, the total mean 6-month negative health events count was 15, with 13 events being seizures. The other events were hospital or ED visits for other reasons.

At the end of the study, the intervention group experienced a significant mean decrease of 10 fewer negative health events, compared with a decrease of 2 in the wait-listed group. This was largely driven by a mean of 7.8 fewer seizures in the active group, compared with a decrease of about 1.0 in the wait-listed group. The 6-month ER and hospitalization counts did not significantly change.

Among the secondary outcomes, depression, overall health, and quality of life all improved significantly in the intervention group, compared with the wait-listed group. The intervention group also had significant decreases in depression measures and improvements in daily function measures, Dr. Sajatovic said.

“It was so gratifying to see this. Most of our participants had never been in a program like this before. It was a chance for them to take control of their epilepsy, instead of simply having it control them,” she said.

This study was supported by a grant from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Dr. Sajatovic had no financial disclosures related to this presentation.

msullivan@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Sajatovic M et al. AES 2018, Abstract 1.218.