Clinical Psychiatry News is pleased to announce that Andrea Murru, MD, PhD, has joined the Editorial Advisory Board.

Dr. Murru is senior clinician in the bipolar disorder and sleep disorder units of the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona in Spain, and is a postdoctoral researcher of the Spanish Network of Research in Mental Health, which is led by Eduard Vieta, MD, PhD.

In addition, Dr. Murru is author of several scientific books and chapters and more than 70 peer-reviewed articles on the treatment of bipolar disorder. His research focuses on using, long-term treatments, and implementing clinical guidelines in daily practice. He also researches tolerability in patients with bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, and sleep-related disorders and biomarkers.

He earned his medical degree from the University of Cagliari (Italy).
 

Clinical Psychiatry News is pleased to announce that Andrea Murru, MD, PhD, has joined the Editorial Advisory Board.

Dr. Murru is senior clinician in the bipolar disorder and sleep disorder units of the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona in Spain, and is a postdoctoral researcher of the Spanish Network of Research in Mental Health, which is led by Eduard Vieta, MD, PhD.

In addition, Dr. Murru is author of several scientific books and chapters and more than 70 peer-reviewed articles on the treatment of bipolar disorder. His research focuses on using, long-term treatments, and implementing clinical guidelines in daily practice. He also researches tolerability in patients with bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, and sleep-related disorders and biomarkers.

He earned his medical degree from the University of Cagliari (Italy).
 

Clinical Psychiatry News is pleased to announce that Andrea Murru, MD, PhD, has joined the Editorial Advisory Board.

Dr. Murru is senior clinician in the bipolar disorder and sleep disorder units of the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona in Spain, and is a postdoctoral researcher of the Spanish Network of Research in Mental Health, which is led by Eduard Vieta, MD, PhD.

In addition, Dr. Murru is author of several scientific books and chapters and more than 70 peer-reviewed articles on the treatment of bipolar disorder. His research focuses on using, long-term treatments, and implementing clinical guidelines in daily practice. He also researches tolerability in patients with bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, and sleep-related disorders and biomarkers.

He earned his medical degree from the University of Cagliari (Italy).
 

CHICAGO – Patients who meet the criteria for interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features are more than 14 times more likely to progress to a systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease than are those with idiopathic interstitial lung disease who don’t meet the criteria, Michail Alevizos, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology.

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

“We think this is a very novel finding. It means that patients with IPAF [interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features] should be followed and evaluated by rheumatologists over time,” said Dr. Alevizos, who was a rheumatology fellow at Columbia University in New York at the time of the study.

Interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) is a term proposed by a joint task force of the American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society in 2015 to describe patients diagnosed with idiopathic interstitial lung disease who possess some features of autoimmunity without meeting formal criteria for a full-blown rheumatic disease. The designation requires the presence of interstitial lung disease by imaging or biopsy, exclusion of all other etiologies, and at least one feature from within at least two of three domains: clinical, serologic, and morphologic.

The clinical domain includes Raynaud’s, palmar telangiectasias, distal digital tip ulceration, and other entities. The serologic criteria include any of a dozen possible autoantibodies. And the morphologic domain encompasses a radiographic or histopathologic pattern suggestive of organizing pneumonia, nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, or other specific abnormalities (Eur Respir J. 2015 Oct;46[4]:976-87).

The natural history of IPAF is largely unknown, which was the impetus for Dr. Alevizos’ study. He presented a single-center, retrospective study of 697 patients diagnosed with interstitial lung disease, 174 of whom had idiopathic interstitial lung disease at baseline. Fifty of the 174 met criteria for IPAF, while the other 124 did not.

During a median follow-up of 5.2 years, 8 of the 50 patients with IPAF (16%) were diagnosed with a systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease, as were 2 of the 124 non-IPAF group (1.6%). The average time to diagnosis of a formal rheumatic disease was 3.4 years in the IPAF group and 7.8 years in the comparator arm. The rheumatic diseases that arose in the IPAF group consisted of two cases of rheumatoid arthritis, two of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody–associated vasculitis, three of systemic sclerosis, and one of polymyositis.

In an analysis adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, and immunosuppressive therapy at baseline, patients with IPAF were 14.1 times more likely to progress to an autoimmune rheumatic disease.

In terms of distinguishing features, the IPAF patients were on average 10 years younger at baseline and more commonly female. On high-resolution CT, 82% of them displayed a pattern of nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, compared with only 15% of the non-IPAF group. Also, 96% of the IPAF patients were on immunosuppressive therapy at baseline, as were 52% of the non-IPAF group. Usual interstitial pneumonia was evident on high-resolution CT in 18% of the IPAF group, compared with 75% of patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia without IPAF.

Dr. Alevizos said he hopes to validate these findings in a prospective study. He reported having no financial conflicts regarding the study, which was conducted free of commercial support.

bjancin@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Alevizos M et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70(Suppl 10), Abstract 1305.

CHICAGO – Patients who meet the criteria for interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features are more than 14 times more likely to progress to a systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease than are those with idiopathic interstitial lung disease who don’t meet the criteria, Michail Alevizos, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology.

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

“We think this is a very novel finding. It means that patients with IPAF [interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features] should be followed and evaluated by rheumatologists over time,” said Dr. Alevizos, who was a rheumatology fellow at Columbia University in New York at the time of the study.

Interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) is a term proposed by a joint task force of the American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society in 2015 to describe patients diagnosed with idiopathic interstitial lung disease who possess some features of autoimmunity without meeting formal criteria for a full-blown rheumatic disease. The designation requires the presence of interstitial lung disease by imaging or biopsy, exclusion of all other etiologies, and at least one feature from within at least two of three domains: clinical, serologic, and morphologic.

The clinical domain includes Raynaud’s, palmar telangiectasias, distal digital tip ulceration, and other entities. The serologic criteria include any of a dozen possible autoantibodies. And the morphologic domain encompasses a radiographic or histopathologic pattern suggestive of organizing pneumonia, nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, or other specific abnormalities (Eur Respir J. 2015 Oct;46[4]:976-87).

The natural history of IPAF is largely unknown, which was the impetus for Dr. Alevizos’ study. He presented a single-center, retrospective study of 697 patients diagnosed with interstitial lung disease, 174 of whom had idiopathic interstitial lung disease at baseline. Fifty of the 174 met criteria for IPAF, while the other 124 did not.

During a median follow-up of 5.2 years, 8 of the 50 patients with IPAF (16%) were diagnosed with a systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease, as were 2 of the 124 non-IPAF group (1.6%). The average time to diagnosis of a formal rheumatic disease was 3.4 years in the IPAF group and 7.8 years in the comparator arm. The rheumatic diseases that arose in the IPAF group consisted of two cases of rheumatoid arthritis, two of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody–associated vasculitis, three of systemic sclerosis, and one of polymyositis.

In an analysis adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, and immunosuppressive therapy at baseline, patients with IPAF were 14.1 times more likely to progress to an autoimmune rheumatic disease.

In terms of distinguishing features, the IPAF patients were on average 10 years younger at baseline and more commonly female. On high-resolution CT, 82% of them displayed a pattern of nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, compared with only 15% of the non-IPAF group. Also, 96% of the IPAF patients were on immunosuppressive therapy at baseline, as were 52% of the non-IPAF group. Usual interstitial pneumonia was evident on high-resolution CT in 18% of the IPAF group, compared with 75% of patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia without IPAF.

Dr. Alevizos said he hopes to validate these findings in a prospective study. He reported having no financial conflicts regarding the study, which was conducted free of commercial support.

bjancin@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Alevizos M et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70(Suppl 10), Abstract 1305.

CHICAGO – Patients who meet the criteria for interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features are more than 14 times more likely to progress to a systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease than are those with idiopathic interstitial lung disease who don’t meet the criteria, Michail Alevizos, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology.

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

“We think this is a very novel finding. It means that patients with IPAF [interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features] should be followed and evaluated by rheumatologists over time,” said Dr. Alevizos, who was a rheumatology fellow at Columbia University in New York at the time of the study.

Interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) is a term proposed by a joint task force of the American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society in 2015 to describe patients diagnosed with idiopathic interstitial lung disease who possess some features of autoimmunity without meeting formal criteria for a full-blown rheumatic disease. The designation requires the presence of interstitial lung disease by imaging or biopsy, exclusion of all other etiologies, and at least one feature from within at least two of three domains: clinical, serologic, and morphologic.

The clinical domain includes Raynaud’s, palmar telangiectasias, distal digital tip ulceration, and other entities. The serologic criteria include any of a dozen possible autoantibodies. And the morphologic domain encompasses a radiographic or histopathologic pattern suggestive of organizing pneumonia, nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, or other specific abnormalities (Eur Respir J. 2015 Oct;46[4]:976-87).

The natural history of IPAF is largely unknown, which was the impetus for Dr. Alevizos’ study. He presented a single-center, retrospective study of 697 patients diagnosed with interstitial lung disease, 174 of whom had idiopathic interstitial lung disease at baseline. Fifty of the 174 met criteria for IPAF, while the other 124 did not.

During a median follow-up of 5.2 years, 8 of the 50 patients with IPAF (16%) were diagnosed with a systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease, as were 2 of the 124 non-IPAF group (1.6%). The average time to diagnosis of a formal rheumatic disease was 3.4 years in the IPAF group and 7.8 years in the comparator arm. The rheumatic diseases that arose in the IPAF group consisted of two cases of rheumatoid arthritis, two of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody–associated vasculitis, three of systemic sclerosis, and one of polymyositis.

In an analysis adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, and immunosuppressive therapy at baseline, patients with IPAF were 14.1 times more likely to progress to an autoimmune rheumatic disease.

In terms of distinguishing features, the IPAF patients were on average 10 years younger at baseline and more commonly female. On high-resolution CT, 82% of them displayed a pattern of nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, compared with only 15% of the non-IPAF group. Also, 96% of the IPAF patients were on immunosuppressive therapy at baseline, as were 52% of the non-IPAF group. Usual interstitial pneumonia was evident on high-resolution CT in 18% of the IPAF group, compared with 75% of patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia without IPAF.

Dr. Alevizos said he hopes to validate these findings in a prospective study. He reported having no financial conflicts regarding the study, which was conducted free of commercial support.

bjancin@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Alevizos M et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70(Suppl 10), Abstract 1305.

CHICAGO – Chronic use of proton pump inhibitors is widespread among patients with rheumatoid arthritis or systemic lupus erythematosus, posing a distinct danger of unwelcome drug-drug interactions affecting the rate and extent of absorption of selected oral antirheumatic drugs, Nicholas Jones, PharmD, said at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology.

Of particular interest is the fact that the oral Janus kinase inhibitors – a drug class that’s a red hot research topic now in rheumatology – are weak bases whose absorption can be greatly affected by pH-dependent solubility, according to Dr. Jones, a research scientist at Genentech in South San Francisco.

Other commonly prescribed oral antirheumatic drugs whose solubility is affected by the level of stomach acidity include azathioprine, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, and sulfasalazine. On the other hand, solubility is not pH-dependent for apremilast, chloroquine, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, hydroxychloroquine, leflunomide, or tacrolimus.

Dr. Jones presented a retrospective analysis of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) utilization patterns during 2012-2015 in 77,034 rheumatoid arthritis and 2,224 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients included in the national Truven Health MarketScan database.

Thirty-five percent of the rheumatoid arthritis patients and 34% of SLE patients were chronic users of PPIs as defined by continuous daily use for more than a month during 2 years of follow-up. Among the SLE cohort, chronic utilization of PPIs increased stepwise with disease severity: The rate was 27% in those with mild SLE, 39% with moderate disease, and 54% among those with severe SLE.

Omeprazole was far and away the most widely used PPI. It was the one used by 53% of the RA patients who were chronic users of PPIs, followed by pantoprazole at 20% and esomeprazole at 15%. The PPI distribution pattern closely followed suit in SLE patients who were chronic users.

Esomeprazole is 60% more potent and pantoprazole 77% less potent than omeprazole, Dr. Jones noted. The pharmacokinetic clearance routes for omeprazole and esomeprazole involve CYP2C19 and CYP3A4. Clearance of pantoprazole is by those two mechanisms as well as by CYP2D6 and CYP2C9.

Dr. Jones recommended that physicians who treat rheumatoid arthritis and SLE patients be sure to ask them about concomitant use of PPIs, including OTC formulations. And clinical trialists need to be attentive to PPI usage in potential study participants.

Genentech sponsored the study.

bjancin@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Keebler D et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70(Suppl 10): Abstract 228

CHICAGO – Chronic use of proton pump inhibitors is widespread among patients with rheumatoid arthritis or systemic lupus erythematosus, posing a distinct danger of unwelcome drug-drug interactions affecting the rate and extent of absorption of selected oral antirheumatic drugs, Nicholas Jones, PharmD, said at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology.

Of particular interest is the fact that the oral Janus kinase inhibitors – a drug class that’s a red hot research topic now in rheumatology – are weak bases whose absorption can be greatly affected by pH-dependent solubility, according to Dr. Jones, a research scientist at Genentech in South San Francisco.

Other commonly prescribed oral antirheumatic drugs whose solubility is affected by the level of stomach acidity include azathioprine, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, and sulfasalazine. On the other hand, solubility is not pH-dependent for apremilast, chloroquine, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, hydroxychloroquine, leflunomide, or tacrolimus.

Dr. Jones presented a retrospective analysis of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) utilization patterns during 2012-2015 in 77,034 rheumatoid arthritis and 2,224 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients included in the national Truven Health MarketScan database.

Thirty-five percent of the rheumatoid arthritis patients and 34% of SLE patients were chronic users of PPIs as defined by continuous daily use for more than a month during 2 years of follow-up. Among the SLE cohort, chronic utilization of PPIs increased stepwise with disease severity: The rate was 27% in those with mild SLE, 39% with moderate disease, and 54% among those with severe SLE.

Omeprazole was far and away the most widely used PPI. It was the one used by 53% of the RA patients who were chronic users of PPIs, followed by pantoprazole at 20% and esomeprazole at 15%. The PPI distribution pattern closely followed suit in SLE patients who were chronic users.

Esomeprazole is 60% more potent and pantoprazole 77% less potent than omeprazole, Dr. Jones noted. The pharmacokinetic clearance routes for omeprazole and esomeprazole involve CYP2C19 and CYP3A4. Clearance of pantoprazole is by those two mechanisms as well as by CYP2D6 and CYP2C9.

Dr. Jones recommended that physicians who treat rheumatoid arthritis and SLE patients be sure to ask them about concomitant use of PPIs, including OTC formulations. And clinical trialists need to be attentive to PPI usage in potential study participants.

Genentech sponsored the study.

bjancin@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Keebler D et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70(Suppl 10): Abstract 228

CHICAGO – Chronic use of proton pump inhibitors is widespread among patients with rheumatoid arthritis or systemic lupus erythematosus, posing a distinct danger of unwelcome drug-drug interactions affecting the rate and extent of absorption of selected oral antirheumatic drugs, Nicholas Jones, PharmD, said at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology.

Of particular interest is the fact that the oral Janus kinase inhibitors – a drug class that’s a red hot research topic now in rheumatology – are weak bases whose absorption can be greatly affected by pH-dependent solubility, according to Dr. Jones, a research scientist at Genentech in South San Francisco.

Other commonly prescribed oral antirheumatic drugs whose solubility is affected by the level of stomach acidity include azathioprine, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, and sulfasalazine. On the other hand, solubility is not pH-dependent for apremilast, chloroquine, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, hydroxychloroquine, leflunomide, or tacrolimus.

Dr. Jones presented a retrospective analysis of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) utilization patterns during 2012-2015 in 77,034 rheumatoid arthritis and 2,224 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients included in the national Truven Health MarketScan database.

Thirty-five percent of the rheumatoid arthritis patients and 34% of SLE patients were chronic users of PPIs as defined by continuous daily use for more than a month during 2 years of follow-up. Among the SLE cohort, chronic utilization of PPIs increased stepwise with disease severity: The rate was 27% in those with mild SLE, 39% with moderate disease, and 54% among those with severe SLE.

Omeprazole was far and away the most widely used PPI. It was the one used by 53% of the RA patients who were chronic users of PPIs, followed by pantoprazole at 20% and esomeprazole at 15%. The PPI distribution pattern closely followed suit in SLE patients who were chronic users.

Esomeprazole is 60% more potent and pantoprazole 77% less potent than omeprazole, Dr. Jones noted. The pharmacokinetic clearance routes for omeprazole and esomeprazole involve CYP2C19 and CYP3A4. Clearance of pantoprazole is by those two mechanisms as well as by CYP2D6 and CYP2C9.

Dr. Jones recommended that physicians who treat rheumatoid arthritis and SLE patients be sure to ask them about concomitant use of PPIs, including OTC formulations. And clinical trialists need to be attentive to PPI usage in potential study participants.

Genentech sponsored the study.

bjancin@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Keebler D et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70(Suppl 10): Abstract 228

The Diagnosis: Blaschkitis

A punch biopsy from the right lateral hip was performed. Histopathologic examination revealed orthokeratosis overlying mild psoriasiform epidermal hyperplasia associated with a lichenoid infiltrate composed almost entirely of lymphocytes (Figure). The infiltrate did not entirely obscure the dermoepidermal junction and spared the adnexal structures. The clinical presentation along with histopathologic analysis confirmed a diagnosis of blaschkitis. The lesions were treated with triamcinolone ointment twice daily as needed, and the patient reported symptomatic and clinical improvement with this intervention at 4-week follow-up.

Described by Grosshans and Marot¹ in 1990, blaschkitis is an acquired inflammatory dermatosis following the lines of Blaschko. It predominantly is seen on the trunk and typically presents with pruritic papules and vesicles. It frequently has a relapsing course and is more commonly found in adults. Blaschkitis is considered a form of cutaneous mosaicism representing somatic mutations affecting epidermal cell growth and migration during embryogenesis. It has been proposed that these aberrant cells are not clinically apparent at birth; however, viral infection and drug or other environmental triggers can induce antigen presentation of the clone cells activating a T cell–mediated inflammatory response.^2-4

The differential diagnosis includes other acquired Blaschko-linear dermatoses such as lichen striatus, inflammatory linear verrucous epidermal nevus, unilateral lichen planus, linear lichen sclerosus, linear psoriasis, linear fixed drug reaction, lichen nitidus, and others.^1,4 Given the overlap in clinical and histopathological presentations of the entities in the differential, it often is difficult to discern the etiology of the papular and vesicular eruption in question. Discrimination of one etiology from the others is further confounded by the fact that these lesions can all be pruritic and initially are treated with topical corticosteroids. A degree of clinical suspicion for blaschkitis coupled with prior understanding of lesional manifestations is helpful in this circumstance. Although classic lichen planus often affects the arms, legs, flexor surfaces, and occasionally the oral mucosa, blaschkitis generally is limited to the trunk. The lesions of lichen planus generally are violaceous, flattopped, polygonal papules that tend to coalesce. They often have a thin, transparent, and adherent scale overlying the papular lesions, and they occasionally demonstrate Wickham striae, which are faint white reticulated networks typically seen in oral mucosal lesions. In the case of lichen nitidus, lesions often follow a geometric line due to the Köbner response, whereas physical trauma from scratching or injury causes lesions to form along the line of insult. Assessing patients for any newly initiated medications can help eliminate lichenoid drug eruptions. Lichen striatus perhaps has the most overlap with blaschkitis, having been described as also following the lines of Blaschko but occurring in children rather than adults. Inflammatory linear verrucous epidermal nevi also can be distinguished from blaschkitis on this premise, as these lesions arise during the first 5 years of life and generally affect the lower extremities.^4,5

Histopathology is somewhat variable but generally includes spongiotic dermatitis with concomitant interface
dermatitis characterized by T-cell infiltration. Spongiosis is a feature less commonly seen in lichen striatus. Lesions can progress over time from spongiotic dermatitis to spongiotic psoriasiform dermatitis and later to spongiotic psoriasiform lichenoid dermatitis.⁴ Treatment of blaschkitis should begin with reassurance of the benign nature of the dermatosis. Pruritic symptoms can be managed with a course of topical steroids.

Blaschkitis is a rare and self-limiting acquired dermatosis that should be incorporated into the differential diagnosis of Blaschko-linear dermatoses. Further investigation is needed to determine if blaschkitis and lichen striatus represent the ends of a disease spectrum or completely distinct entities.

The Diagnosis: Blaschkitis

A punch biopsy from the right lateral hip was performed. Histopathologic examination revealed orthokeratosis overlying mild psoriasiform epidermal hyperplasia associated with a lichenoid infiltrate composed almost entirely of lymphocytes (Figure). The infiltrate did not entirely obscure the dermoepidermal junction and spared the adnexal structures. The clinical presentation along with histopathologic analysis confirmed a diagnosis of blaschkitis. The lesions were treated with triamcinolone ointment twice daily as needed, and the patient reported symptomatic and clinical improvement with this intervention at 4-week follow-up.

Described by Grosshans and Marot¹ in 1990, blaschkitis is an acquired inflammatory dermatosis following the lines of Blaschko. It predominantly is seen on the trunk and typically presents with pruritic papules and vesicles. It frequently has a relapsing course and is more commonly found in adults. Blaschkitis is considered a form of cutaneous mosaicism representing somatic mutations affecting epidermal cell growth and migration during embryogenesis. It has been proposed that these aberrant cells are not clinically apparent at birth; however, viral infection and drug or other environmental triggers can induce antigen presentation of the clone cells activating a T cell–mediated inflammatory response.^2-4

The differential diagnosis includes other acquired Blaschko-linear dermatoses such as lichen striatus, inflammatory linear verrucous epidermal nevus, unilateral lichen planus, linear lichen sclerosus, linear psoriasis, linear fixed drug reaction, lichen nitidus, and others.^1,4 Given the overlap in clinical and histopathological presentations of the entities in the differential, it often is difficult to discern the etiology of the papular and vesicular eruption in question. Discrimination of one etiology from the others is further confounded by the fact that these lesions can all be pruritic and initially are treated with topical corticosteroids. A degree of clinical suspicion for blaschkitis coupled with prior understanding of lesional manifestations is helpful in this circumstance. Although classic lichen planus often affects the arms, legs, flexor surfaces, and occasionally the oral mucosa, blaschkitis generally is limited to the trunk. The lesions of lichen planus generally are violaceous, flattopped, polygonal papules that tend to coalesce. They often have a thin, transparent, and adherent scale overlying the papular lesions, and they occasionally demonstrate Wickham striae, which are faint white reticulated networks typically seen in oral mucosal lesions. In the case of lichen nitidus, lesions often follow a geometric line due to the Köbner response, whereas physical trauma from scratching or injury causes lesions to form along the line of insult. Assessing patients for any newly initiated medications can help eliminate lichenoid drug eruptions. Lichen striatus perhaps has the most overlap with blaschkitis, having been described as also following the lines of Blaschko but occurring in children rather than adults. Inflammatory linear verrucous epidermal nevi also can be distinguished from blaschkitis on this premise, as these lesions arise during the first 5 years of life and generally affect the lower extremities.^4,5

Histopathology is somewhat variable but generally includes spongiotic dermatitis with concomitant interface
dermatitis characterized by T-cell infiltration. Spongiosis is a feature less commonly seen in lichen striatus. Lesions can progress over time from spongiotic dermatitis to spongiotic psoriasiform dermatitis and later to spongiotic psoriasiform lichenoid dermatitis.⁴ Treatment of blaschkitis should begin with reassurance of the benign nature of the dermatosis. Pruritic symptoms can be managed with a course of topical steroids.

Blaschkitis is a rare and self-limiting acquired dermatosis that should be incorporated into the differential diagnosis of Blaschko-linear dermatoses. Further investigation is needed to determine if blaschkitis and lichen striatus represent the ends of a disease spectrum or completely distinct entities.

The Diagnosis: Blaschkitis

A punch biopsy from the right lateral hip was performed. Histopathologic examination revealed orthokeratosis overlying mild psoriasiform epidermal hyperplasia associated with a lichenoid infiltrate composed almost entirely of lymphocytes (Figure). The infiltrate did not entirely obscure the dermoepidermal junction and spared the adnexal structures. The clinical presentation along with histopathologic analysis confirmed a diagnosis of blaschkitis. The lesions were treated with triamcinolone ointment twice daily as needed, and the patient reported symptomatic and clinical improvement with this intervention at 4-week follow-up.

Described by Grosshans and Marot¹ in 1990, blaschkitis is an acquired inflammatory dermatosis following the lines of Blaschko. It predominantly is seen on the trunk and typically presents with pruritic papules and vesicles. It frequently has a relapsing course and is more commonly found in adults. Blaschkitis is considered a form of cutaneous mosaicism representing somatic mutations affecting epidermal cell growth and migration during embryogenesis. It has been proposed that these aberrant cells are not clinically apparent at birth; however, viral infection and drug or other environmental triggers can induce antigen presentation of the clone cells activating a T cell–mediated inflammatory response.^2-4

The differential diagnosis includes other acquired Blaschko-linear dermatoses such as lichen striatus, inflammatory linear verrucous epidermal nevus, unilateral lichen planus, linear lichen sclerosus, linear psoriasis, linear fixed drug reaction, lichen nitidus, and others.^1,4 Given the overlap in clinical and histopathological presentations of the entities in the differential, it often is difficult to discern the etiology of the papular and vesicular eruption in question. Discrimination of one etiology from the others is further confounded by the fact that these lesions can all be pruritic and initially are treated with topical corticosteroids. A degree of clinical suspicion for blaschkitis coupled with prior understanding of lesional manifestations is helpful in this circumstance. Although classic lichen planus often affects the arms, legs, flexor surfaces, and occasionally the oral mucosa, blaschkitis generally is limited to the trunk. The lesions of lichen planus generally are violaceous, flattopped, polygonal papules that tend to coalesce. They often have a thin, transparent, and adherent scale overlying the papular lesions, and they occasionally demonstrate Wickham striae, which are faint white reticulated networks typically seen in oral mucosal lesions. In the case of lichen nitidus, lesions often follow a geometric line due to the Köbner response, whereas physical trauma from scratching or injury causes lesions to form along the line of insult. Assessing patients for any newly initiated medications can help eliminate lichenoid drug eruptions. Lichen striatus perhaps has the most overlap with blaschkitis, having been described as also following the lines of Blaschko but occurring in children rather than adults. Inflammatory linear verrucous epidermal nevi also can be distinguished from blaschkitis on this premise, as these lesions arise during the first 5 years of life and generally affect the lower extremities.^4,5

Histopathology is somewhat variable but generally includes spongiotic dermatitis with concomitant interface
dermatitis characterized by T-cell infiltration. Spongiosis is a feature less commonly seen in lichen striatus. Lesions can progress over time from spongiotic dermatitis to spongiotic psoriasiform dermatitis and later to spongiotic psoriasiform lichenoid dermatitis.⁴ Treatment of blaschkitis should begin with reassurance of the benign nature of the dermatosis. Pruritic symptoms can be managed with a course of topical steroids.

Blaschkitis is a rare and self-limiting acquired dermatosis that should be incorporated into the differential diagnosis of Blaschko-linear dermatoses. Further investigation is needed to determine if blaschkitis and lichen striatus represent the ends of a disease spectrum or completely distinct entities.

SAN ANTONIO – Data continue to underscore the benefits of lifestyle interventions in women with breast cancer, but questions remain about their effects on recurrence, according to Jennifer Ligibel, MD.

Findings from the EBBA-II trial as presented at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, for example, showed that exercise improves cardiorespiratory fitness in women with early breast cancer, and findings from the SUCCESS C study showed that breast cancer patients who completed a weight-loss intervention showed some improvements, compared with those who did not, said Dr. Ligibel of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, who was the discussant for those and other lifestyle-intervention studies at the symposium.

SUCCESS C failed to show an overall reduction in breast cancer recurrence or survival, but weight loss among intervention-group participants was modest, and more than half of the participants dropped out of the study, so it’s hard to make any firm conclusions, she said.

Overall, the findings – in the context of what is already known about lifestyle interventions among women with breast cancer – provide “yet another reason to tell women that it’s important to exercise during treatment,” she said.

Vidyard Video

In this video interview, Dr. Ligibel discussed the studies and the implications of the findings, and also mentioned an ongoing study for which she is an investigator. In that study – the Breast Cancer Weight Loss study (BWEL) – adherence among the approximately 1,700 women enrolled has been high. “So we’re hoping that this study in a few years will give us a bit more information about the power of weight loss to potentially reduce recurrence.”

For now, the available data show that there are “lots of concrete benefits” associated with improving lifestyle in women with breast cancer, she said, noting that she tells all of her patients to live as healthy a lifestyle as possible, and especially to exercise.

sworcester@mdedge.com

SAN ANTONIO – Data continue to underscore the benefits of lifestyle interventions in women with breast cancer, but questions remain about their effects on recurrence, according to Jennifer Ligibel, MD.

Findings from the EBBA-II trial as presented at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, for example, showed that exercise improves cardiorespiratory fitness in women with early breast cancer, and findings from the SUCCESS C study showed that breast cancer patients who completed a weight-loss intervention showed some improvements, compared with those who did not, said Dr. Ligibel of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, who was the discussant for those and other lifestyle-intervention studies at the symposium.

SUCCESS C failed to show an overall reduction in breast cancer recurrence or survival, but weight loss among intervention-group participants was modest, and more than half of the participants dropped out of the study, so it’s hard to make any firm conclusions, she said.

Overall, the findings – in the context of what is already known about lifestyle interventions among women with breast cancer – provide “yet another reason to tell women that it’s important to exercise during treatment,” she said.

Vidyard Video

In this video interview, Dr. Ligibel discussed the studies and the implications of the findings, and also mentioned an ongoing study for which she is an investigator. In that study – the Breast Cancer Weight Loss study (BWEL) – adherence among the approximately 1,700 women enrolled has been high. “So we’re hoping that this study in a few years will give us a bit more information about the power of weight loss to potentially reduce recurrence.”

For now, the available data show that there are “lots of concrete benefits” associated with improving lifestyle in women with breast cancer, she said, noting that she tells all of her patients to live as healthy a lifestyle as possible, and especially to exercise.

sworcester@mdedge.com

SAN ANTONIO – Data continue to underscore the benefits of lifestyle interventions in women with breast cancer, but questions remain about their effects on recurrence, according to Jennifer Ligibel, MD.

Findings from the EBBA-II trial as presented at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, for example, showed that exercise improves cardiorespiratory fitness in women with early breast cancer, and findings from the SUCCESS C study showed that breast cancer patients who completed a weight-loss intervention showed some improvements, compared with those who did not, said Dr. Ligibel of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, who was the discussant for those and other lifestyle-intervention studies at the symposium.

SUCCESS C failed to show an overall reduction in breast cancer recurrence or survival, but weight loss among intervention-group participants was modest, and more than half of the participants dropped out of the study, so it’s hard to make any firm conclusions, she said.

Overall, the findings – in the context of what is already known about lifestyle interventions among women with breast cancer – provide “yet another reason to tell women that it’s important to exercise during treatment,” she said.

Vidyard Video

In this video interview, Dr. Ligibel discussed the studies and the implications of the findings, and also mentioned an ongoing study for which she is an investigator. In that study – the Breast Cancer Weight Loss study (BWEL) – adherence among the approximately 1,700 women enrolled has been high. “So we’re hoping that this study in a few years will give us a bit more information about the power of weight loss to potentially reduce recurrence.”

For now, the available data show that there are “lots of concrete benefits” associated with improving lifestyle in women with breast cancer, she said, noting that she tells all of her patients to live as healthy a lifestyle as possible, and especially to exercise.

sworcester@mdedge.com

ABSTRACT

Soccer players recovering from anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries have better options for treatment today than they did 25 years ago. Surgical techniques have improved, and rehabilitation protocols have evolved considerably. Although the rehabilitation community is doing a better job of treating this patient population, the evidence does demonstrate that both re-injury and return- to-play (RTP) rates are still suboptimal. Most protocols focus on normalizing strength and range of motion (ROM) and achieving limb symmetry with soccer-specific movements. While these factors are certainly prerequisites for returning to the field, their inclusion does not provide a complete picture of the athlete’s presentation. An additional factor that should be prioritized with this patient population is the central nervous system (CNS). Advanced imaging has shown that peripheral deafferentation does occur with musculoskeletal injuries; this ultimately results in cortical reorganization, which makes movement planning more difficult for the player, since simpler tasks must now be processed at higher levels in the CNS. The evidence also shows that the CNS demonstrates plasticity in these cases, so that through focused neuromotor rehabilitation techniques, it is possible to bring movement planning back down to a sub-cortical level. Cognitive issues may also be a factor in preventing the player from returning. Fear of re-injury and diminished confidence can influence the way the player moves on the field, and diminish ability to demonstrate protective kinematics with all soccer-specific tasks. We believe that an approach incorporating traditional musculoskeletal rehabilitation, CNS neuro-motor training, and consideration for cognitive factors, may define an improved paradigm for treating the soccer player and assessing readiness for RTP following ACL injury.

Continue to: Although anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)...

Although anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rehabilitation has evolved considerably over the past 2 decades, the basic paradigm has remained consistent: normalize strength and range of motion, reduce swelling and pain, achieve limb symmetry with functional tasks, and return to sport-specific activities gradually over a 6 to 12-month period. There have been some slight additions to this basic premise, such as evaluating knee and hip mechanics in the frontal plane, but the requirements here are vaguely defined and are typically only evaluated within the context of controlled clinical testing.

It is interesting to note that the typical ACL injury pattern occurs during a normal sport-specific movement, yet most rehabilitation protocols fail to recognize the potential causes of the aberrant movement pattern and how to best modify it so that the risk of repeated stress to the ACL can be minimized. It should be understood that movement occurs through the interaction of 3 discrete factors: the individual, the task being performed, and the environment in which it is performed.¹ All of these factors will play a role in how the final movement pattern is produced. For example, a soccer player (individual) may backpedal and pivot to the left 60° and accelerate to sprint after a player moving towards the touchline (task) while receiving instructions from teammates and monitoring the movements of opposing players (environment). A small variance in any 1 of these factors could significantly impact the movement pattern as the player completes the task.

In most rehabilitation programs, each of these factors may be treated in a singular, non-specific manner, but if these factors are not coordinated effectively throughout the program to produce the desired sport-specific movement, a faulty pattern may persist, leaving the player at risk for injury. Current rehabilitation programs seem to have a strong focus on creating stability, mobility, and strength, but these are trained in silos, with an internal focus of control, which only solves the biomechanical equation. Often, it is difficult for the player to coordinate good biomechanics into an efficient, protective movement pattern that is specific to the tasks performed on the field during the normal course of play. The missing link here is the central nervous system (CNS).

Limitations to the current ACL protocols may be that they rely heavily on musculoskeletal rehabilitation and that they have limited emphasis on neurological rehabilitation. As will be discussed later, the CNS has a large impact on the final movement selected by the player. In fact, cognition, perception, and action are the three factors that comprise the individual’s part of the movement paradigm,¹ yet rarely are these factors addressed in most ACL rehabilitation programs. These elements are a large part of the movement equation, so it is easy to understand how failing to address these features can lead to poor movement quality and subsequent ACL re-injury.

In addition to central neurological factors, cognitive issues may play a role in the player’s ability to return to sport. Determining optimal readiness for return to play is a difficult task for the medical community, with many variables to consider. Previous research studies have assessed the variability in return to play for various sports, including football, rugby, soccer, skiing, running, and tennis, with return-to-play rates ranging from 18% to 100%.^2,3,4-10 The risk of secondary injury may cast doubt and fear on athletes as they contemplate their successful return to play.^8,11 Although robust functional testing has become commonplace for determining athlete readiness after injury,^12-20 the assessment of psychological readiness, persistent fear, and loss of confidence are often neglected and not as commonly integrated into the return-to-play algorithm.^21-24 The purpose of this paper is to assess the various cognitive and central neural factors affecting a soccer player’s ability to recover from an ACL injury and offer suggestions for integrating treatments into the protocols to address these issues.

Continue to: CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM NEUROPLASTICITY... 

 

 

CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM NEUROPLASTICITY

Despite the vast amount of attention and research focused on the ACL, the re-injury rate still remains quite high. It has been reported that rehabilitation programs that employ traditional neuromotor training produce a re-injury rate as high as 30% after the athlete returns to sport.^25-28 The overall rate of sustaining a second ACL injury is 15%11 in all patient populations. For the general population <25 years of age, the re-injury rate is 21%, and for athletes <25 years of age, the re-injury rate rises to 23%.¹¹ With re-injury rates at this level, it is certainly fair to consider and be critical of the current rehabilitation methods being used with this population. One opportunity for improvement lies in the general approach used to rehabilitate ACL-injured patients. Therapy for this injury is protocol-driven, and the fact remains that most protocols prioritize restoration of peripheral systems, with minimal thought given to the cortical control necessary to manage those systems.^29,30 When neural factors are considered, it is usually within the context of increasing strength, balance, power, and biomechanical control,^31-34 which are certainly important but peripheral factors nonetheless. The missing element in many ACL protocols may be how to best manage the central neural components and cognitive factors associated with this injury.

If the CNS were to receive more consideration in ACL protocols, the opportunity for improved outcomes could be substantial because the CNS has been proven to be a very malleable system, as long as it receives the correct input. The CNS demonstrates neuroplasticity,³⁵ which means that it is capable of reorganization, based on the stimuli that it receives, whether internal or external.³⁶

This is an important consideration in ACL rehabilitation because the ACL graft, while restoring the biomechanical properties to the knee, is not fully capable of producing the same neurosensory properties of the original ACL.^37-42This is an important concept to understand because an ACL tear does indeed cause deafferentation in the ascending pathways to the brain.^37-40,42-46 This can lead to CNS reorganization and subsequent alterations in efferent output to the periphery.^37-40,42-46 Therefore, if a protocol with traditional musculoskeletal principles was used, then the mechanical function of the knee may certainly be remediated, but the neurosensory function will remain in a maladaptive state,^47-50 potentially leading to aberrant, non-protective movement strategies and a higher risk of re-injury.

The process of CNS reorganization may begin with the initial ACL injury. A peripheral musculoskeletal injury creates an inflammatory response that results in the arrival of chemical mediators such as histamine, substance P, calcitonin, and calcitonin gene-related peptide at the site of injury.⁵¹ As edema accumulates in the joint, tension is applied to the capsule, which may adversely affect proprioception from the receptors located within.⁴⁵ The interruption of consistent input from the peripheral mechanoreceptors may lead to long-term differentiation of the ascending pathways.⁵² This information is synthesized at 3 different levels of the CNS (spinal cord, brain stem, and motor cortex) to produce motor output.^53-56 Differentiation in the ascending circuitry can cause inhibition of motor neurons at the spinal cord.⁴⁵Animal research has shown that this differentiation can cause a breakdown in the cuneate nucleus of the brainstem,⁵⁷which provides sensory information from the upper body, while the gracile nucleus does the same for the lower body. These structures transfer proprioceptive input to the ventral posterior lateral nucleus in the thalamus, where it is then sent to the primary somatosensory cortex.⁵⁷ In general, the somatosensory, visual, and vestibular systems interpret afferent inputs to control movement, balance, and stability.^58,59 In a sport like soccer, where the movement tasks are dynamic and unpredictable, it is easy to see why even a slight deficit in somatosensory processing could disrupt a movement. Valeriani and colleagues^42,46 showed that somatosensory-evoked potentials were indeed altered in a cohort of ACL reconstruction (ACLR) subjects, indicating reorganization within the CNS.  Additionally, the deafferentation could not be changed by other afferent input coming from the knee or by the new ACL graft placed in the knee.^42,46The primary motor cortex has been found to have a substantial network of connectivity with the primary somatosensory cortex, which supports the theory that the motor cortex has a very strong linkage with the peripheral receptors in the joint.⁶⁰  The ligaments in the joint contain Ruffini, Pacinian, and Golgi receptors, all of which react to changes in the collagen fibers and send information regarding tension, length, speed, acceleration, position, and movement back to the CNS.^61-64 Unfortunately, the ascending pathway deafferentation can cause reorganization within the CNS, which makes the feedback provided from the periphery less effective in motor planning.

Ward and colleagues⁶⁵ have reported that reorganization within the motor cortex is the primary cause of chronic neuromuscular movement deficits in peripheral joint injuries. Researchers have used functional magnetic resonance imaging, transcranial magnetic stimulation, and electroencephalography in ACL patients to demonstrate changes in cortical activity and subsequent CNS reorganization.⁶⁵ Kapreli and colleagues⁴¹ reported that subjects with an ACL injury demonstrated higher cortical activation in the pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA). This is a region that is responsible for more complex motor planning.^66,67 This area becomes active before the primary motor cortex and is responsible for preparing the final movement pattern that the motor cortex executes.⁴¹ As the task becomes more complex, activity in the pre-SMA will increase.⁴¹ Additionally, they found that the posterior secondary somatosensory area and posterior inferior temporal gyrus showed increased cortical activity compared with controls.⁴¹ Visual planning is processed in the posterior inferior temporal gyrus, and so, it appears that the difficulty in processing somatosensory information due to ascending pathway deafferentation places an increased reliance on the visual system for movement planning.^68-70 This was observed while ACL-injured subjects performed a simple knee flexion-extension movement encompassing 40°, indicating the need to incorporate higher central levels of planning for a very simple movement pattern.⁴¹ Baumeister and colleagues^37,38 also showed that subjects with ACLR had higher levels of cortical activation in the areas of the brain that require attention and that process sensory input. They theorized that this occurred because of reduced efficiency of neural processing at lower levels in the CNS. Despite the higher levels of cortical activity observed, they found that subjects with an ACLR demonstrated proprioceptive testing that was deficient compared with that of controls. Heroux and Tremblay⁷¹ also demonstrated that subjects with an ACLR had increased resting motor cortex activity. They believed that this occurred as the motor cortex attempted to maintain neuromotor output to the periphery in the face of diminished afferent input.

Continue to: The reorganization that results in movement planning...

 

 

The reorganization that results in movement planning, transitioning from subcortical levels to cortical levels, is a phenomenon that researchers believe can lead to deficiencies even as the athlete has returned to sport. Grooms et al⁷²revealed in a case report that a subject with an ACLR showed higher levels of activity in the crus region of the cerebellum. This area contains corticobulbar and corticospinal tracts that transmit neural input to maintain balance and coordination.⁷³ These changes in the cerebellum, combined with increased motor cortex activity, are thought to be indicative of a global neural strategy that uses higher levels of the CNS, as opposed to subcortical processing.⁷²

The current research makes a clear and compelling argument for the importance of CNS reorganization after an ACL injury, placing increased reliance on higher cortical levels of control, as well as the visual system to coordinate balance and movement. It is thought that this reorganized method of neural transmission can then become imprinted within the CNS, if not corrected.^35,74 If this is the case, then traditional strength programs may not be sufficient to restore these connections to their pre-injury level. If the CNS has the ability to reorganize based on the aberrant input that it receives from the periphery, then it also certainly has the potential to adapt to more specific structured input via the ascending afferent pathways.^41,45 The rehabilitation program, however, needs to be structured specifically to target the reorganized regions of the brain. There needs to be an emphasis on rehabilitating not only the peripheral neuromotor structures but also the CNS.⁷⁵

CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM REHABILITATION PRINCIPLES

For a neurological rehabilitation to be successful, the interventions need to be repetitive and task-specific, involve learning, employ whole and part practice, and transition from using an internal to an external focus of control.⁷⁶Movements that are repetitive, but which lack structured learning and skill, have been shown to have no effect on inducing neuroplastic changes in the primary motor cortex.^77,78 However, using neurological rehabilitation techniques that facilitate the acquisition of new motor skills by the CNS have been shown to cause neuroplastic adaptation in the motor cortex.^79-85 This occurs because neuroplasticity is determined by experience and practice.⁷⁸ The CNS operates on cues received in the ascending tracts by mechanoreceptors in the joint. If a new movement pattern is being learned by the athlete, then this new afferent input received from the periphery will start to initiate reorganization in the higher learning centers. If this occurs with optimal repetition and precision, then a positive reorganization can take place within the CNS that results in a higher percentage of motor planning and control being filtered down to a subcortical level. Essentially, the movements become instinctive, which is crucial in athletics, where attention in higher cortical areas is frequently diverted to external aspects of the competition and not solely used to focus on movement.

This is why shifting neurological rehabilitation from an internal focus of control to an external focus of control is paramount. While using an internal focus of control is required early in rehabilitation to enable the athlete to understand the specific tasks required in a composite movement, a gradual transition to an external focus of control is necessary as the athlete begins to perform tasks that are more soccer-specific. This autonomous stage of motor learning is crucial because it transfers the burden of motor planning from higher to lower levels of the CNS and frees up the pre-SMA and primary motor cortex to handle more complex patterns.^58,86-88

Continue to: ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RISK POTENTIAL IN SOCCER PLAYERS...

 

 

ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RISK POTENTIAL IN SOCCER PLAYERS

If a comprehensive neuromotor rehabilitation program is to be used effectively with soccer athletes, then the first priority is to define how the players should move, so that they can demonstrate protective kinematics with all soccer-specific tasks and minimize stress to the ACL. As the ideal movement pattern becomes autonomous, then it should be trained within the context of a dynamic environment; remembering that environmental changes have a large impact on the final movement pattern selected by the individual. Brophy et al⁸⁹ evaluated videos of non-contact ACL injuries in male and female soccer players and determined that 45% occurred while cutting, 25% while landing, and 16% during deceleration. These 3 patterns represent 86% of the ACL injuries observed and offer an opportunity for evaluation and treatment with specific central neuromotor rehabilitation techniques.

The foundational movement patterns for the soccer player should focus on producing leverage that minimizes stress to the ACL during the 3 primary tasks outlined above. To achieve this, it is necessary to reduce posterior ground reaction forces at the hip and knee joint during these movements. There is a high correlation between the magnitude of the posterior ground reaction force, and anterior tibial shear, and subsequent displacement.^90,91 This stress can be reduced by increasing the hip and knee flexion angles during soccer-specific movements that involve pivoting, decelerating, and landing from a jump in a unipedal stance.⁹²

This phenomenon can be explained by observing changes in the ACL elevation angle, hamstring insertion angle, and patella tendon-tibial tuberosity insertion angle. As the knee moves into flexion, the ACL takes on a more parallel orientation to the tibia, and its fibers are better able to resist elastic deformation accompanied by a posterior ground reaction force.^93,94 The quadriceps will produce less anterior translation on the tibia because the patella tendon insertion angle is reduced relative to the longitudinal axis of the tibia, and the mechanical advantage of the quadriceps is decreased.⁹⁵ Lastly, the hamstrings will be able to provide better leverage posteriorly because the resultant force trends toward a more parallel orientation to the tibial plateau, which enables the player to counter, more effectively, the posterior ground reaction force and the anterior pull directed by the quadriceps.⁹⁵

This theory is supported by the work of Li and colleagues,⁹⁶ who showed that there is an inverse relationship between knee flexion angle and ACL loading. In their study, they applied a constant quadriceps force of 200 N at 15°, 30°, and 60° angles. The anterior shear force was obviously the highest at 15° and reduced by 20% at 30° and 60% at 60°. When hamstrings co-contraction was added, there was an additional 30% reduction in anterior shear at 15° and 50% at 30° and 60°. From a more flexed position, the hamstrings can increase joint compression and reduce the anterior translation by allowing the concave medial tibial plateau to limit the anterior drawer effect and absorb the forces that occur with excessive anterior shear, internal rotation, and valgus loads.⁹⁷ As the knee flexion angle approximates 60°, the hamstring leverage is increased, and the quadriceps leverage is diminished to the point where its ability to produce anterior tibial translation is neutralized.⁹⁸ Daniel and colleagues98 referred to this as the quadriceps neutral angle.

For soccer-specific movements that are potentially injurious to the ACL, it may then be beneficial to create a default movement pattern at the knee that approximates this value. In keeping with the information presented in this paper, it will be important to have the player reproduce this angle consistently during activities that involve pivoting, decelerating, and landing from a jump within the context of match play. This will certainly require that segments located both proximal and distal to the knee are able to function within specific parameters so that a cohesive protective synergy is produced throughout the lower quarter which minimizes posterior ground reaction forces and is protective of the ACL. This is where structured neuromotor training that is able to modulate networks within the CNS may be beneficial.

Continue to: CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM TREATMENT TECHNIQUES FOR THE SOCCER PLAYER...

 

 

CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM TREATMENT TECHNIQUES FOR THE SOCCER PLAYER

The ultimate goal is to create a foundational movement pattern that optimizes leverage and is protective of the ACL during decelerating, pivoting, and landing in a unipedal stance from a jump. The composite segments that are necessary to achieve this include local core stability to create lumbopelvic stiffness, and global core activation to enhance posterior chain stability. This should enable the player to feel more balanced when placing the pelvis in a more posterior and inferior position while still maintaining the trunk in a position that is parallel with the tibia, as the knee is flexed to an approximate 60° angle (Figure 1). From a frontal plane perspective, the acetabulum should bisect the malleoli of the stance leg, with a neutral tibiofemoral joint alignment (Figure 1).

The neuromotor training for the composite segments of this movement can begin in the “acute postoperative phase” (Table 1).   Because the surgical repair will limit the player’s capabilities in this stage, this is a good time to break down the foundational movement pattern into its component parts and ensure that the CNS receives a high number of quality repetitions of parts. In this phase, the player may begin an isolated training for the transversus abdominis, multifidus, and pubococcygeus. This can start in a supine position using biofeedback with an isometric contraction, progress to a standing position, and incorporate deep core activation with stance-phase gait training, mini squats, and lunge variations. This phase will require an abundance of visual and verbal feedback with an internal focus of control as the player gets used to activating the deep core and quad/hip synergy during functional lower extremity movements. Even in this early phase, the player should look to minimize anterior and/or posterior pelvic tilting and maintain a stiff thoracolumbar segment that remains parallel with the tibia during all functional movements.

Table 1. Adjunct CNS Treatment Principles for ACL Reconstruction in Soccer Athletes

Phase	Goal	CNS Rehabilitation Techniques
Acute postoperative	Local core activation with weightbearing exercise. Produce trunk stiffness with lower extremity movements.	High repetitions. Verbal or tactile cues. Internal focus of control. Partial practice.
Subacute postoperative	Lumbopelvic, foot or ankle, and posterior chain segments learn to participate in movement effectively.	Requires higher levels of cortical planning. Internal focus of control. CIMT.
Static stability	Able to adopt foundational movement pattern consistently with vision eliminated.	Somatosensory vs visual processing. Partial-to-whole practice. Use internal and/or external focus of control.
Dynamic stability	Able to perform plyometrics in a single-leg position using foundational movement pattern with subcortical processing.	Increase velocity with movement challenges. Occlude or eliminate vision. Heavy reliance on an external focus of control. Prioritize movement quality.
Dynamic agility	Pivoting, decelerating, and landing are performed with hip flexion/knee flexion synergy, trunk stiffness, and posterior chain activation.	Unanticipated movement challenges. Whole practice. Ball reaction drills with vision obstructed or occluded. Contact drills with vision obstructed or occluded. Use external focus of control to include soccer-specific tasks.

Abbreviations: ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; CNS, central nervous system; CIMT, constraint-induced movement therapy.

As the player moves into the “subacute postoperative phase” (Table 1).   He or she will continue to use an internal focus of control to activate the local/global core synergy with functional movements progressing from double-leg, to single-leg positions. Partial practice, instead of whole practice, is still the predominant theme of the neural training process. In this phase, the knee and hip flexion angles can increase, and the player’s trunk and pelvic position should be critiqued in a single-leg position so that the trunk remains parallel with the tibia in the sagittal plane with a slight forward hip hinge. The pelvis should remain level throughout single-leg stance to ensure adequate activation of the lateral hip stabilizers. This is the stage where the player can learn to isolate closed kinetic chain hip rotation for pivoting, and so, single-leg hip internal and external rotation drills are useful, both with and without resistance. Skill acquisition is crucial in this phase because the patterns that the CNS adopts will form the foundation for more dynamic patterns that will occur in the later soccer-specific stages. Higher levels of cortical planning are still needed in this phase. For this reason, it is important that poor quality repetitions are recognized by the player and clinician so that he or she can learn to perform them correctly, albeit still with an internal focus of control. This is also a good time to begin to employ constraint-induced movement therapy as the player is able to replicate the desired pattern with more precision. For example, by eliminating the use of the upper extremities as a source of balance, the CNS is forced to program alternate synergies such as the lumbopelvic, and foot and ankle segments to maintain the desired alignment.

The “lower quarter static stability phase” (Table 1) marks a point where it may be useful to use direct strategies that have the capability to change CNS efferent owutput from a primary reliance on the visual processing areas in the posterior-inferior temporal gyrus back to the somatosensory area. It is critical that the player is able to make this transition in cortical reorganization and control, because ACL-injured subjects have been shown to have balance scores similar to healthy controls when they are able to use their vision, but this is reduced when vision is taken away.^99-105  Their balance will diminish even further if vision is modulated during more complex landing and pivoting maneuvers.^99-105 This may certainly explain why defending is a riskier task for ACL-injured players⁸⁹ as their visual system is focused more on tracking a player than attending to precision with movement planning.

To enhance this cortical reorganization within the context of soccer-specific movements, it is useful to start from a foundational single-leg position, with the knee approximating 60° of flexion and the trunk parallel to the tibia. In the frontal plane, the pelvis should be level, the trunk vertical, and the acetabulum bisecting the malleoli of the stance leg (Figure 1).   The player may initially work on getting into this foundational position with vision either partially obstructed using stroboscopic eyewear or completely obstructed if this equipment is unavailable.^106-108 The pattern can be progressed by constraining the upper extremities to force reliance on the lumbopelvic and foot/ankle strategies for balance. Head and/or trunk turns can be added to simulate the external focus of control that is required with movement in soccer. These should progress from slow to fast and anticipated to unanticipated as the player demonstrates competence in maintaining stability at each segment within the foundational stance position. Once this is in play, a ball should be introduced into the drills. As the player maintains the foundational position with vision diminished and upper extremities constrained, they should attempt to reach for or trap a ball from this position. If vision is completely obstructed, then the player can be instructed to open his/her eyes just as the ball arrives to induce a reactive response. Again, quality repetitions are essential for learning to occur, and subsequent skill acquisition to take place in the CNS; thus, close scrutiny should be paid to the qualitative essence of the movement patterns to ensure pristine biomechanics during this phase.

The “lower quarter dynamic stability phase” (Table 1) should continue with the same neuromotor training principles employed in the previous phase, except that the drills will now involve plyometrics. The player should ultimately progress from double-leg, to single-leg jumps and then linear to diagonal. Vision should still be obstructed and upper extremities constrained to channel the lumbopelvic region for force production and balance. Movement quality in the foundational position remains paramount with these drills to ensure that skill acquisition is occurring and injury risk is being mitigated. An external focus of control can be introduced by applying an unanticipated perturbation during a jump. Additional learning opportunities should include unanticipated head and trunk turns while landing in a unipedal stance from a jump. The task can be made more specific by having the player trap a pass while doing linear or diagonal single-leg hop progressions. In this manner, the player’s CNS can become reorganized to program the requisite synergies to maintain a protective foundational position on the stance leg, as the contralateral limb is required to perform work that is far outside the player’s base of support.

Continue to: The final segment of the CNS neuromotor rehabilitation program...

 

 

The final segment of the CNS neuromotor rehabilitation program is the “lower quarter dynamic agility phase” (Table 1), when the player will learn to perform an unanticipated directional change in a foundational position for the pivot leg. The player can begin this phase by initiating sprint-deceleration-pivot efforts, progressing at 45°, 90°, 120°, and 180° turns. This should be trained in both a forward and backpedal position. Close attention should be paid to the deceleration phase of the sprint-pivot effort, as this will set the player up to demonstrate protective kinematics during the pivot phase of the task. In this phase, the center of mass should become lower and move posteriorly, so that a deeper knee and hip flexion angle, supported by posterior chain synergies, can occur at the pivot point. This is an important skill for the player to acquire, as Cortes and colleagues⁹² have reported that female collegiate soccer players tend to perform a pivoting task with a more erect trunk position. In the same cohort, they also measured the mean knee flexion angle at initial contact during pivoting to be 24°.⁹² Movement patterns that reflect an elevated center of mass, with arms abducted away from the trunk, should be discouraged here. The drills can be progressed to have the player react to a command and perform unanticipated pivots within a 5 × 5-meter box to simulate defending. This should be progressed from eyes open and arms unconstrained, to vision disrupted and arms constrained. From here, an external focus of control can be added by playing a ball to the athlete. Vision should be withheld until the instant that the ball arrives at the player, when he/she is required to play the ball to an unanticipated spot. As is the case in all other phases of the neuromotor training, the quality of movement is the most important parameter to critique with each drill. From a qualitative standpoint, the player should demonstrate stiffness throughout the thoracolumbar region and power and control through the pelvis with each directional change. In addition, he or she should maintain a low and posteriorly oriented center of mass to optimize leverage in the hamstrings/gluteals compared with the quadriceps and reduce posterior ground reaction forces.

PSYCHOLOGICAL READINESS FOR RETURN TO PLAY

After an injury is sustained, an athlete is often subjected to a range of psychological responses in addition to the functional impairment, including stress, hesitancy, alterations in self-esteem, depression, fear of re-injury, and anxiety.^43,109-111 The aforementioned responses are often at their height in the time immediately following an injury and generally subside over time during the rehabilitation process.¹¹⁰ The rates at which athletes experience psychological distress following an injury range between 5% and 19%; the levels are comparable with patients receiving treatment for mental health illness.⁴³ However, these elements may persist, or even increase, in the later stages of the rehabilitation process as the topic of return to play is deliberated.^112,113 If these fears are left unresolved, then a significant delay can be incurred during the rehabilitation process, which might ultimately jeopardize the successful return to play.^114,115

When athletes have been cleared to return to sport, fear tends to be the most common reason for their decision to not return to play.^21,116 The persistence of fear has clinical implications and warrants close monitoring to ensure that the athlete feels adequately supported in the decision to return to sport.^117,118 Building the athlete’s confidence by addressing hesitation, lack of confidence, heightened awareness of risk or re-injury, and safe reintegration into athletic participation are important themes identified to encourage a safe return to play.⁴³ A variety of validated tools  can be integrated into an existing return-to-play decision-making algorithm (Table 2).^118-120 

Abbreviations: ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; CNS, central nervous system; CIMT, constraint-induced movement therapy.

 

Table 2. Self-Report Measurement Tools to Integrate into Return-to-Play Decision-Making Algorithm

Self-report Measurement Tools

13-item Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport after Injury Scale (ACL-RSI)

Global Rating Scale (GRS)

International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form

Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)

Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale

Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36)

Subjective Patient Outcome for Return to Sport (SPORTS)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9

By integrating the necessary screening of patients for kinesiophobia and assessing patient expectations after enduring an ACL injury, clinicians may be able to identify patients who are at risk for poorer functional outcomes. A consideration of psychosocial elements such as activity avoidance, fear of movement and re-injury, loss of confidence and expectations/assumptions during the continuum of the rehabilitation process, and the decision to return to play may favorably impact the individual’s ability to safely return to sport. It is critical to address both the physical and psychosocial factors during the rehabilitation process to more optimally transition individuals back to their prior level of athleticism.

CONCLUSION

Psychosocial factors may play a role in determining a player’s readiness to return to sport, as well as a potential for re-injury. A number of tests are available for use with this patient population to identify mental deficits that may impact player performance upon return. Additionally, the CNS should be considered as a source of impairment in players with ACL injuries. Current protocols may not fully appreciate the CNS’ impact on the player’s functional outcome. Therefore, an approach that includes CNS neuromotor training with traditional musculoskeletal rehabilitation, which also incorporates cognitive and psychosocial factors, may define an improved paradigm for treating soccer athletes following an ACL injury and assessing return-to-play capability.

ABSTRACT

Soccer players recovering from anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries have better options for treatment today than they did 25 years ago. Surgical techniques have improved, and rehabilitation protocols have evolved considerably. Although the rehabilitation community is doing a better job of treating this patient population, the evidence does demonstrate that both re-injury and return- to-play (RTP) rates are still suboptimal. Most protocols focus on normalizing strength and range of motion (ROM) and achieving limb symmetry with soccer-specific movements. While these factors are certainly prerequisites for returning to the field, their inclusion does not provide a complete picture of the athlete’s presentation. An additional factor that should be prioritized with this patient population is the central nervous system (CNS). Advanced imaging has shown that peripheral deafferentation does occur with musculoskeletal injuries; this ultimately results in cortical reorganization, which makes movement planning more difficult for the player, since simpler tasks must now be processed at higher levels in the CNS. The evidence also shows that the CNS demonstrates plasticity in these cases, so that through focused neuromotor rehabilitation techniques, it is possible to bring movement planning back down to a sub-cortical level. Cognitive issues may also be a factor in preventing the player from returning. Fear of re-injury and diminished confidence can influence the way the player moves on the field, and diminish ability to demonstrate protective kinematics with all soccer-specific tasks. We believe that an approach incorporating traditional musculoskeletal rehabilitation, CNS neuro-motor training, and consideration for cognitive factors, may define an improved paradigm for treating the soccer player and assessing readiness for RTP following ACL injury.

Continue to: Although anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)...

Although anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rehabilitation has evolved considerably over the past 2 decades, the basic paradigm has remained consistent: normalize strength and range of motion, reduce swelling and pain, achieve limb symmetry with functional tasks, and return to sport-specific activities gradually over a 6 to 12-month period. There have been some slight additions to this basic premise, such as evaluating knee and hip mechanics in the frontal plane, but the requirements here are vaguely defined and are typically only evaluated within the context of controlled clinical testing.

It is interesting to note that the typical ACL injury pattern occurs during a normal sport-specific movement, yet most rehabilitation protocols fail to recognize the potential causes of the aberrant movement pattern and how to best modify it so that the risk of repeated stress to the ACL can be minimized. It should be understood that movement occurs through the interaction of 3 discrete factors: the individual, the task being performed, and the environment in which it is performed.¹ All of these factors will play a role in how the final movement pattern is produced. For example, a soccer player (individual) may backpedal and pivot to the left 60° and accelerate to sprint after a player moving towards the touchline (task) while receiving instructions from teammates and monitoring the movements of opposing players (environment). A small variance in any 1 of these factors could significantly impact the movement pattern as the player completes the task.

In most rehabilitation programs, each of these factors may be treated in a singular, non-specific manner, but if these factors are not coordinated effectively throughout the program to produce the desired sport-specific movement, a faulty pattern may persist, leaving the player at risk for injury. Current rehabilitation programs seem to have a strong focus on creating stability, mobility, and strength, but these are trained in silos, with an internal focus of control, which only solves the biomechanical equation. Often, it is difficult for the player to coordinate good biomechanics into an efficient, protective movement pattern that is specific to the tasks performed on the field during the normal course of play. The missing link here is the central nervous system (CNS).

Limitations to the current ACL protocols may be that they rely heavily on musculoskeletal rehabilitation and that they have limited emphasis on neurological rehabilitation. As will be discussed later, the CNS has a large impact on the final movement selected by the player. In fact, cognition, perception, and action are the three factors that comprise the individual’s part of the movement paradigm,¹ yet rarely are these factors addressed in most ACL rehabilitation programs. These elements are a large part of the movement equation, so it is easy to understand how failing to address these features can lead to poor movement quality and subsequent ACL re-injury.

In addition to central neurological factors, cognitive issues may play a role in the player’s ability to return to sport. Determining optimal readiness for return to play is a difficult task for the medical community, with many variables to consider. Previous research studies have assessed the variability in return to play for various sports, including football, rugby, soccer, skiing, running, and tennis, with return-to-play rates ranging from 18% to 100%.^2,3,4-10 The risk of secondary injury may cast doubt and fear on athletes as they contemplate their successful return to play.^8,11 Although robust functional testing has become commonplace for determining athlete readiness after injury,^12-20 the assessment of psychological readiness, persistent fear, and loss of confidence are often neglected and not as commonly integrated into the return-to-play algorithm.^21-24 The purpose of this paper is to assess the various cognitive and central neural factors affecting a soccer player’s ability to recover from an ACL injury and offer suggestions for integrating treatments into the protocols to address these issues.

Continue to: CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM NEUROPLASTICITY... 

 

 

CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM NEUROPLASTICITY

Despite the vast amount of attention and research focused on the ACL, the re-injury rate still remains quite high. It has been reported that rehabilitation programs that employ traditional neuromotor training produce a re-injury rate as high as 30% after the athlete returns to sport.^25-28 The overall rate of sustaining a second ACL injury is 15%11 in all patient populations. For the general population <25 years of age, the re-injury rate is 21%, and for athletes <25 years of age, the re-injury rate rises to 23%.¹¹ With re-injury rates at this level, it is certainly fair to consider and be critical of the current rehabilitation methods being used with this population. One opportunity for improvement lies in the general approach used to rehabilitate ACL-injured patients. Therapy for this injury is protocol-driven, and the fact remains that most protocols prioritize restoration of peripheral systems, with minimal thought given to the cortical control necessary to manage those systems.^29,30 When neural factors are considered, it is usually within the context of increasing strength, balance, power, and biomechanical control,^31-34 which are certainly important but peripheral factors nonetheless. The missing element in many ACL protocols may be how to best manage the central neural components and cognitive factors associated with this injury.

If the CNS were to receive more consideration in ACL protocols, the opportunity for improved outcomes could be substantial because the CNS has been proven to be a very malleable system, as long as it receives the correct input. The CNS demonstrates neuroplasticity,³⁵ which means that it is capable of reorganization, based on the stimuli that it receives, whether internal or external.³⁶

This is an important consideration in ACL rehabilitation because the ACL graft, while restoring the biomechanical properties to the knee, is not fully capable of producing the same neurosensory properties of the original ACL.^37-42This is an important concept to understand because an ACL tear does indeed cause deafferentation in the ascending pathways to the brain.^37-40,42-46 This can lead to CNS reorganization and subsequent alterations in efferent output to the periphery.^37-40,42-46 Therefore, if a protocol with traditional musculoskeletal principles was used, then the mechanical function of the knee may certainly be remediated, but the neurosensory function will remain in a maladaptive state,^47-50 potentially leading to aberrant, non-protective movement strategies and a higher risk of re-injury.

The process of CNS reorganization may begin with the initial ACL injury. A peripheral musculoskeletal injury creates an inflammatory response that results in the arrival of chemical mediators such as histamine, substance P, calcitonin, and calcitonin gene-related peptide at the site of injury.⁵¹ As edema accumulates in the joint, tension is applied to the capsule, which may adversely affect proprioception from the receptors located within.⁴⁵ The interruption of consistent input from the peripheral mechanoreceptors may lead to long-term differentiation of the ascending pathways.⁵² This information is synthesized at 3 different levels of the CNS (spinal cord, brain stem, and motor cortex) to produce motor output.^53-56 Differentiation in the ascending circuitry can cause inhibition of motor neurons at the spinal cord.⁴⁵Animal research has shown that this differentiation can cause a breakdown in the cuneate nucleus of the brainstem,⁵⁷which provides sensory information from the upper body, while the gracile nucleus does the same for the lower body. These structures transfer proprioceptive input to the ventral posterior lateral nucleus in the thalamus, where it is then sent to the primary somatosensory cortex.⁵⁷ In general, the somatosensory, visual, and vestibular systems interpret afferent inputs to control movement, balance, and stability.^58,59 In a sport like soccer, where the movement tasks are dynamic and unpredictable, it is easy to see why even a slight deficit in somatosensory processing could disrupt a movement. Valeriani and colleagues^42,46 showed that somatosensory-evoked potentials were indeed altered in a cohort of ACL reconstruction (ACLR) subjects, indicating reorganization within the CNS.  Additionally, the deafferentation could not be changed by other afferent input coming from the knee or by the new ACL graft placed in the knee.^42,46The primary motor cortex has been found to have a substantial network of connectivity with the primary somatosensory cortex, which supports the theory that the motor cortex has a very strong linkage with the peripheral receptors in the joint.⁶⁰  The ligaments in the joint contain Ruffini, Pacinian, and Golgi receptors, all of which react to changes in the collagen fibers and send information regarding tension, length, speed, acceleration, position, and movement back to the CNS.^61-64 Unfortunately, the ascending pathway deafferentation can cause reorganization within the CNS, which makes the feedback provided from the periphery less effective in motor planning.

Ward and colleagues⁶⁵ have reported that reorganization within the motor cortex is the primary cause of chronic neuromuscular movement deficits in peripheral joint injuries. Researchers have used functional magnetic resonance imaging, transcranial magnetic stimulation, and electroencephalography in ACL patients to demonstrate changes in cortical activity and subsequent CNS reorganization.⁶⁵ Kapreli and colleagues⁴¹ reported that subjects with an ACL injury demonstrated higher cortical activation in the pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA). This is a region that is responsible for more complex motor planning.^66,67 This area becomes active before the primary motor cortex and is responsible for preparing the final movement pattern that the motor cortex executes.⁴¹ As the task becomes more complex, activity in the pre-SMA will increase.⁴¹ Additionally, they found that the posterior secondary somatosensory area and posterior inferior temporal gyrus showed increased cortical activity compared with controls.⁴¹ Visual planning is processed in the posterior inferior temporal gyrus, and so, it appears that the difficulty in processing somatosensory information due to ascending pathway deafferentation places an increased reliance on the visual system for movement planning.^68-70 This was observed while ACL-injured subjects performed a simple knee flexion-extension movement encompassing 40°, indicating the need to incorporate higher central levels of planning for a very simple movement pattern.⁴¹ Baumeister and colleagues^37,38 also showed that subjects with ACLR had higher levels of cortical activation in the areas of the brain that require attention and that process sensory input. They theorized that this occurred because of reduced efficiency of neural processing at lower levels in the CNS. Despite the higher levels of cortical activity observed, they found that subjects with an ACLR demonstrated proprioceptive testing that was deficient compared with that of controls. Heroux and Tremblay⁷¹ also demonstrated that subjects with an ACLR had increased resting motor cortex activity. They believed that this occurred as the motor cortex attempted to maintain neuromotor output to the periphery in the face of diminished afferent input.

Continue to: The reorganization that results in movement planning...

 

 

The reorganization that results in movement planning, transitioning from subcortical levels to cortical levels, is a phenomenon that researchers believe can lead to deficiencies even as the athlete has returned to sport. Grooms et al⁷²revealed in a case report that a subject with an ACLR showed higher levels of activity in the crus region of the cerebellum. This area contains corticobulbar and corticospinal tracts that transmit neural input to maintain balance and coordination.⁷³ These changes in the cerebellum, combined with increased motor cortex activity, are thought to be indicative of a global neural strategy that uses higher levels of the CNS, as opposed to subcortical processing.⁷²

The current research makes a clear and compelling argument for the importance of CNS reorganization after an ACL injury, placing increased reliance on higher cortical levels of control, as well as the visual system to coordinate balance and movement. It is thought that this reorganized method of neural transmission can then become imprinted within the CNS, if not corrected.^35,74 If this is the case, then traditional strength programs may not be sufficient to restore these connections to their pre-injury level. If the CNS has the ability to reorganize based on the aberrant input that it receives from the periphery, then it also certainly has the potential to adapt to more specific structured input via the ascending afferent pathways.^41,45 The rehabilitation program, however, needs to be structured specifically to target the reorganized regions of the brain. There needs to be an emphasis on rehabilitating not only the peripheral neuromotor structures but also the CNS.⁷⁵

CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM REHABILITATION PRINCIPLES

For a neurological rehabilitation to be successful, the interventions need to be repetitive and task-specific, involve learning, employ whole and part practice, and transition from using an internal to an external focus of control.⁷⁶Movements that are repetitive, but which lack structured learning and skill, have been shown to have no effect on inducing neuroplastic changes in the primary motor cortex.^77,78 However, using neurological rehabilitation techniques that facilitate the acquisition of new motor skills by the CNS have been shown to cause neuroplastic adaptation in the motor cortex.^79-85 This occurs because neuroplasticity is determined by experience and practice.⁷⁸ The CNS operates on cues received in the ascending tracts by mechanoreceptors in the joint. If a new movement pattern is being learned by the athlete, then this new afferent input received from the periphery will start to initiate reorganization in the higher learning centers. If this occurs with optimal repetition and precision, then a positive reorganization can take place within the CNS that results in a higher percentage of motor planning and control being filtered down to a subcortical level. Essentially, the movements become instinctive, which is crucial in athletics, where attention in higher cortical areas is frequently diverted to external aspects of the competition and not solely used to focus on movement.

This is why shifting neurological rehabilitation from an internal focus of control to an external focus of control is paramount. While using an internal focus of control is required early in rehabilitation to enable the athlete to understand the specific tasks required in a composite movement, a gradual transition to an external focus of control is necessary as the athlete begins to perform tasks that are more soccer-specific. This autonomous stage of motor learning is crucial because it transfers the burden of motor planning from higher to lower levels of the CNS and frees up the pre-SMA and primary motor cortex to handle more complex patterns.^58,86-88

Continue to: ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RISK POTENTIAL IN SOCCER PLAYERS...

 

 

ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RISK POTENTIAL IN SOCCER PLAYERS

If a comprehensive neuromotor rehabilitation program is to be used effectively with soccer athletes, then the first priority is to define how the players should move, so that they can demonstrate protective kinematics with all soccer-specific tasks and minimize stress to the ACL. As the ideal movement pattern becomes autonomous, then it should be trained within the context of a dynamic environment; remembering that environmental changes have a large impact on the final movement pattern selected by the individual. Brophy et al⁸⁹ evaluated videos of non-contact ACL injuries in male and female soccer players and determined that 45% occurred while cutting, 25% while landing, and 16% during deceleration. These 3 patterns represent 86% of the ACL injuries observed and offer an opportunity for evaluation and treatment with specific central neuromotor rehabilitation techniques.

The foundational movement patterns for the soccer player should focus on producing leverage that minimizes stress to the ACL during the 3 primary tasks outlined above. To achieve this, it is necessary to reduce posterior ground reaction forces at the hip and knee joint during these movements. There is a high correlation between the magnitude of the posterior ground reaction force, and anterior tibial shear, and subsequent displacement.^90,91 This stress can be reduced by increasing the hip and knee flexion angles during soccer-specific movements that involve pivoting, decelerating, and landing from a jump in a unipedal stance.⁹²

This phenomenon can be explained by observing changes in the ACL elevation angle, hamstring insertion angle, and patella tendon-tibial tuberosity insertion angle. As the knee moves into flexion, the ACL takes on a more parallel orientation to the tibia, and its fibers are better able to resist elastic deformation accompanied by a posterior ground reaction force.^93,94 The quadriceps will produce less anterior translation on the tibia because the patella tendon insertion angle is reduced relative to the longitudinal axis of the tibia, and the mechanical advantage of the quadriceps is decreased.⁹⁵ Lastly, the hamstrings will be able to provide better leverage posteriorly because the resultant force trends toward a more parallel orientation to the tibial plateau, which enables the player to counter, more effectively, the posterior ground reaction force and the anterior pull directed by the quadriceps.⁹⁵

This theory is supported by the work of Li and colleagues,⁹⁶ who showed that there is an inverse relationship between knee flexion angle and ACL loading. In their study, they applied a constant quadriceps force of 200 N at 15°, 30°, and 60° angles. The anterior shear force was obviously the highest at 15° and reduced by 20% at 30° and 60% at 60°. When hamstrings co-contraction was added, there was an additional 30% reduction in anterior shear at 15° and 50% at 30° and 60°. From a more flexed position, the hamstrings can increase joint compression and reduce the anterior translation by allowing the concave medial tibial plateau to limit the anterior drawer effect and absorb the forces that occur with excessive anterior shear, internal rotation, and valgus loads.⁹⁷ As the knee flexion angle approximates 60°, the hamstring leverage is increased, and the quadriceps leverage is diminished to the point where its ability to produce anterior tibial translation is neutralized.⁹⁸ Daniel and colleagues98 referred to this as the quadriceps neutral angle.

For soccer-specific movements that are potentially injurious to the ACL, it may then be beneficial to create a default movement pattern at the knee that approximates this value. In keeping with the information presented in this paper, it will be important to have the player reproduce this angle consistently during activities that involve pivoting, decelerating, and landing from a jump within the context of match play. This will certainly require that segments located both proximal and distal to the knee are able to function within specific parameters so that a cohesive protective synergy is produced throughout the lower quarter which minimizes posterior ground reaction forces and is protective of the ACL. This is where structured neuromotor training that is able to modulate networks within the CNS may be beneficial.

Continue to: CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM TREATMENT TECHNIQUES FOR THE SOCCER PLAYER...

 

 

CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM TREATMENT TECHNIQUES FOR THE SOCCER PLAYER

The ultimate goal is to create a foundational movement pattern that optimizes leverage and is protective of the ACL during decelerating, pivoting, and landing in a unipedal stance from a jump. The composite segments that are necessary to achieve this include local core stability to create lumbopelvic stiffness, and global core activation to enhance posterior chain stability. This should enable the player to feel more balanced when placing the pelvis in a more posterior and inferior position while still maintaining the trunk in a position that is parallel with the tibia, as the knee is flexed to an approximate 60° angle (Figure 1). From a frontal plane perspective, the acetabulum should bisect the malleoli of the stance leg, with a neutral tibiofemoral joint alignment (Figure 1).

The neuromotor training for the composite segments of this movement can begin in the “acute postoperative phase” (Table 1).   Because the surgical repair will limit the player’s capabilities in this stage, this is a good time to break down the foundational movement pattern into its component parts and ensure that the CNS receives a high number of quality repetitions of parts. In this phase, the player may begin an isolated training for the transversus abdominis, multifidus, and pubococcygeus. This can start in a supine position using biofeedback with an isometric contraction, progress to a standing position, and incorporate deep core activation with stance-phase gait training, mini squats, and lunge variations. This phase will require an abundance of visual and verbal feedback with an internal focus of control as the player gets used to activating the deep core and quad/hip synergy during functional lower extremity movements. Even in this early phase, the player should look to minimize anterior and/or posterior pelvic tilting and maintain a stiff thoracolumbar segment that remains parallel with the tibia during all functional movements.

Table 1. Adjunct CNS Treatment Principles for ACL Reconstruction in Soccer Athletes

Phase	Goal	CNS Rehabilitation Techniques
Acute postoperative	Local core activation with weightbearing exercise. Produce trunk stiffness with lower extremity movements.	High repetitions. Verbal or tactile cues. Internal focus of control. Partial practice.
Subacute postoperative	Lumbopelvic, foot or ankle, and posterior chain segments learn to participate in movement effectively.	Requires higher levels of cortical planning. Internal focus of control. CIMT.
Static stability	Able to adopt foundational movement pattern consistently with vision eliminated.	Somatosensory vs visual processing. Partial-to-whole practice. Use internal and/or external focus of control.
Dynamic stability	Able to perform plyometrics in a single-leg position using foundational movement pattern with subcortical processing.	Increase velocity with movement challenges. Occlude or eliminate vision. Heavy reliance on an external focus of control. Prioritize movement quality.
Dynamic agility	Pivoting, decelerating, and landing are performed with hip flexion/knee flexion synergy, trunk stiffness, and posterior chain activation.	Unanticipated movement challenges. Whole practice. Ball reaction drills with vision obstructed or occluded. Contact drills with vision obstructed or occluded. Use external focus of control to include soccer-specific tasks.

Abbreviations: ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; CNS, central nervous system; CIMT, constraint-induced movement therapy.

As the player moves into the “subacute postoperative phase” (Table 1).   He or she will continue to use an internal focus of control to activate the local/global core synergy with functional movements progressing from double-leg, to single-leg positions. Partial practice, instead of whole practice, is still the predominant theme of the neural training process. In this phase, the knee and hip flexion angles can increase, and the player’s trunk and pelvic position should be critiqued in a single-leg position so that the trunk remains parallel with the tibia in the sagittal plane with a slight forward hip hinge. The pelvis should remain level throughout single-leg stance to ensure adequate activation of the lateral hip stabilizers. This is the stage where the player can learn to isolate closed kinetic chain hip rotation for pivoting, and so, single-leg hip internal and external rotation drills are useful, both with and without resistance. Skill acquisition is crucial in this phase because the patterns that the CNS adopts will form the foundation for more dynamic patterns that will occur in the later soccer-specific stages. Higher levels of cortical planning are still needed in this phase. For this reason, it is important that poor quality repetitions are recognized by the player and clinician so that he or she can learn to perform them correctly, albeit still with an internal focus of control. This is also a good time to begin to employ constraint-induced movement therapy as the player is able to replicate the desired pattern with more precision. For example, by eliminating the use of the upper extremities as a source of balance, the CNS is forced to program alternate synergies such as the lumbopelvic, and foot and ankle segments to maintain the desired alignment.

The “lower quarter static stability phase” (Table 1) marks a point where it may be useful to use direct strategies that have the capability to change CNS efferent owutput from a primary reliance on the visual processing areas in the posterior-inferior temporal gyrus back to the somatosensory area. It is critical that the player is able to make this transition in cortical reorganization and control, because ACL-injured subjects have been shown to have balance scores similar to healthy controls when they are able to use their vision, but this is reduced when vision is taken away.^99-105  Their balance will diminish even further if vision is modulated during more complex landing and pivoting maneuvers.^99-105 This may certainly explain why defending is a riskier task for ACL-injured players⁸⁹ as their visual system is focused more on tracking a player than attending to precision with movement planning.

To enhance this cortical reorganization within the context of soccer-specific movements, it is useful to start from a foundational single-leg position, with the knee approximating 60° of flexion and the trunk parallel to the tibia. In the frontal plane, the pelvis should be level, the trunk vertical, and the acetabulum bisecting the malleoli of the stance leg (Figure 1).   The player may initially work on getting into this foundational position with vision either partially obstructed using stroboscopic eyewear or completely obstructed if this equipment is unavailable.^106-108 The pattern can be progressed by constraining the upper extremities to force reliance on the lumbopelvic and foot/ankle strategies for balance. Head and/or trunk turns can be added to simulate the external focus of control that is required with movement in soccer. These should progress from slow to fast and anticipated to unanticipated as the player demonstrates competence in maintaining stability at each segment within the foundational stance position. Once this is in play, a ball should be introduced into the drills. As the player maintains the foundational position with vision diminished and upper extremities constrained, they should attempt to reach for or trap a ball from this position. If vision is completely obstructed, then the player can be instructed to open his/her eyes just as the ball arrives to induce a reactive response. Again, quality repetitions are essential for learning to occur, and subsequent skill acquisition to take place in the CNS; thus, close scrutiny should be paid to the qualitative essence of the movement patterns to ensure pristine biomechanics during this phase.

The “lower quarter dynamic stability phase” (Table 1) should continue with the same neuromotor training principles employed in the previous phase, except that the drills will now involve plyometrics. The player should ultimately progress from double-leg, to single-leg jumps and then linear to diagonal. Vision should still be obstructed and upper extremities constrained to channel the lumbopelvic region for force production and balance. Movement quality in the foundational position remains paramount with these drills to ensure that skill acquisition is occurring and injury risk is being mitigated. An external focus of control can be introduced by applying an unanticipated perturbation during a jump. Additional learning opportunities should include unanticipated head and trunk turns while landing in a unipedal stance from a jump. The task can be made more specific by having the player trap a pass while doing linear or diagonal single-leg hop progressions. In this manner, the player’s CNS can become reorganized to program the requisite synergies to maintain a protective foundational position on the stance leg, as the contralateral limb is required to perform work that is far outside the player’s base of support.

Continue to: The final segment of the CNS neuromotor rehabilitation program...

 

 

The final segment of the CNS neuromotor rehabilitation program is the “lower quarter dynamic agility phase” (Table 1), when the player will learn to perform an unanticipated directional change in a foundational position for the pivot leg. The player can begin this phase by initiating sprint-deceleration-pivot efforts, progressing at 45°, 90°, 120°, and 180° turns. This should be trained in both a forward and backpedal position. Close attention should be paid to the deceleration phase of the sprint-pivot effort, as this will set the player up to demonstrate protective kinematics during the pivot phase of the task. In this phase, the center of mass should become lower and move posteriorly, so that a deeper knee and hip flexion angle, supported by posterior chain synergies, can occur at the pivot point. This is an important skill for the player to acquire, as Cortes and colleagues⁹² have reported that female collegiate soccer players tend to perform a pivoting task with a more erect trunk position. In the same cohort, they also measured the mean knee flexion angle at initial contact during pivoting to be 24°.⁹² Movement patterns that reflect an elevated center of mass, with arms abducted away from the trunk, should be discouraged here. The drills can be progressed to have the player react to a command and perform unanticipated pivots within a 5 × 5-meter box to simulate defending. This should be progressed from eyes open and arms unconstrained, to vision disrupted and arms constrained. From here, an external focus of control can be added by playing a ball to the athlete. Vision should be withheld until the instant that the ball arrives at the player, when he/she is required to play the ball to an unanticipated spot. As is the case in all other phases of the neuromotor training, the quality of movement is the most important parameter to critique with each drill. From a qualitative standpoint, the player should demonstrate stiffness throughout the thoracolumbar region and power and control through the pelvis with each directional change. In addition, he or she should maintain a low and posteriorly oriented center of mass to optimize leverage in the hamstrings/gluteals compared with the quadriceps and reduce posterior ground reaction forces.

PSYCHOLOGICAL READINESS FOR RETURN TO PLAY

After an injury is sustained, an athlete is often subjected to a range of psychological responses in addition to the functional impairment, including stress, hesitancy, alterations in self-esteem, depression, fear of re-injury, and anxiety.^43,109-111 The aforementioned responses are often at their height in the time immediately following an injury and generally subside over time during the rehabilitation process.¹¹⁰ The rates at which athletes experience psychological distress following an injury range between 5% and 19%; the levels are comparable with patients receiving treatment for mental health illness.⁴³ However, these elements may persist, or even increase, in the later stages of the rehabilitation process as the topic of return to play is deliberated.^112,113 If these fears are left unresolved, then a significant delay can be incurred during the rehabilitation process, which might ultimately jeopardize the successful return to play.^114,115

When athletes have been cleared to return to sport, fear tends to be the most common reason for their decision to not return to play.^21,116 The persistence of fear has clinical implications and warrants close monitoring to ensure that the athlete feels adequately supported in the decision to return to sport.^117,118 Building the athlete’s confidence by addressing hesitation, lack of confidence, heightened awareness of risk or re-injury, and safe reintegration into athletic participation are important themes identified to encourage a safe return to play.⁴³ A variety of validated tools  can be integrated into an existing return-to-play decision-making algorithm (Table 2).^118-120 

Abbreviations: ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; CNS, central nervous system; CIMT, constraint-induced movement therapy.

 

Table 2. Self-Report Measurement Tools to Integrate into Return-to-Play Decision-Making Algorithm

Self-report Measurement Tools

13-item Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport after Injury Scale (ACL-RSI)

Global Rating Scale (GRS)

International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form

Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)

Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale

Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36)

Subjective Patient Outcome for Return to Sport (SPORTS)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9

By integrating the necessary screening of patients for kinesiophobia and assessing patient expectations after enduring an ACL injury, clinicians may be able to identify patients who are at risk for poorer functional outcomes. A consideration of psychosocial elements such as activity avoidance, fear of movement and re-injury, loss of confidence and expectations/assumptions during the continuum of the rehabilitation process, and the decision to return to play may favorably impact the individual’s ability to safely return to sport. It is critical to address both the physical and psychosocial factors during the rehabilitation process to more optimally transition individuals back to their prior level of athleticism.

CONCLUSION

Psychosocial factors may play a role in determining a player’s readiness to return to sport, as well as a potential for re-injury. A number of tests are available for use with this patient population to identify mental deficits that may impact player performance upon return. Additionally, the CNS should be considered as a source of impairment in players with ACL injuries. Current protocols may not fully appreciate the CNS’ impact on the player’s functional outcome. Therefore, an approach that includes CNS neuromotor training with traditional musculoskeletal rehabilitation, which also incorporates cognitive and psychosocial factors, may define an improved paradigm for treating soccer athletes following an ACL injury and assessing return-to-play capability.

ABSTRACT

Soccer players recovering from anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries have better options for treatment today than they did 25 years ago. Surgical techniques have improved, and rehabilitation protocols have evolved considerably. Although the rehabilitation community is doing a better job of treating this patient population, the evidence does demonstrate that both re-injury and return- to-play (RTP) rates are still suboptimal. Most protocols focus on normalizing strength and range of motion (ROM) and achieving limb symmetry with soccer-specific movements. While these factors are certainly prerequisites for returning to the field, their inclusion does not provide a complete picture of the athlete’s presentation. An additional factor that should be prioritized with this patient population is the central nervous system (CNS). Advanced imaging has shown that peripheral deafferentation does occur with musculoskeletal injuries; this ultimately results in cortical reorganization, which makes movement planning more difficult for the player, since simpler tasks must now be processed at higher levels in the CNS. The evidence also shows that the CNS demonstrates plasticity in these cases, so that through focused neuromotor rehabilitation techniques, it is possible to bring movement planning back down to a sub-cortical level. Cognitive issues may also be a factor in preventing the player from returning. Fear of re-injury and diminished confidence can influence the way the player moves on the field, and diminish ability to demonstrate protective kinematics with all soccer-specific tasks. We believe that an approach incorporating traditional musculoskeletal rehabilitation, CNS neuro-motor training, and consideration for cognitive factors, may define an improved paradigm for treating the soccer player and assessing readiness for RTP following ACL injury.

Continue to: Although anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)...

Although anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rehabilitation has evolved considerably over the past 2 decades, the basic paradigm has remained consistent: normalize strength and range of motion, reduce swelling and pain, achieve limb symmetry with functional tasks, and return to sport-specific activities gradually over a 6 to 12-month period. There have been some slight additions to this basic premise, such as evaluating knee and hip mechanics in the frontal plane, but the requirements here are vaguely defined and are typically only evaluated within the context of controlled clinical testing.

It is interesting to note that the typical ACL injury pattern occurs during a normal sport-specific movement, yet most rehabilitation protocols fail to recognize the potential causes of the aberrant movement pattern and how to best modify it so that the risk of repeated stress to the ACL can be minimized. It should be understood that movement occurs through the interaction of 3 discrete factors: the individual, the task being performed, and the environment in which it is performed.¹ All of these factors will play a role in how the final movement pattern is produced. For example, a soccer player (individual) may backpedal and pivot to the left 60° and accelerate to sprint after a player moving towards the touchline (task) while receiving instructions from teammates and monitoring the movements of opposing players (environment). A small variance in any 1 of these factors could significantly impact the movement pattern as the player completes the task.

In most rehabilitation programs, each of these factors may be treated in a singular, non-specific manner, but if these factors are not coordinated effectively throughout the program to produce the desired sport-specific movement, a faulty pattern may persist, leaving the player at risk for injury. Current rehabilitation programs seem to have a strong focus on creating stability, mobility, and strength, but these are trained in silos, with an internal focus of control, which only solves the biomechanical equation. Often, it is difficult for the player to coordinate good biomechanics into an efficient, protective movement pattern that is specific to the tasks performed on the field during the normal course of play. The missing link here is the central nervous system (CNS).

Limitations to the current ACL protocols may be that they rely heavily on musculoskeletal rehabilitation and that they have limited emphasis on neurological rehabilitation. As will be discussed later, the CNS has a large impact on the final movement selected by the player. In fact, cognition, perception, and action are the three factors that comprise the individual’s part of the movement paradigm,¹ yet rarely are these factors addressed in most ACL rehabilitation programs. These elements are a large part of the movement equation, so it is easy to understand how failing to address these features can lead to poor movement quality and subsequent ACL re-injury.

In addition to central neurological factors, cognitive issues may play a role in the player’s ability to return to sport. Determining optimal readiness for return to play is a difficult task for the medical community, with many variables to consider. Previous research studies have assessed the variability in return to play for various sports, including football, rugby, soccer, skiing, running, and tennis, with return-to-play rates ranging from 18% to 100%.^2,3,4-10 The risk of secondary injury may cast doubt and fear on athletes as they contemplate their successful return to play.^8,11 Although robust functional testing has become commonplace for determining athlete readiness after injury,^12-20 the assessment of psychological readiness, persistent fear, and loss of confidence are often neglected and not as commonly integrated into the return-to-play algorithm.^21-24 The purpose of this paper is to assess the various cognitive and central neural factors affecting a soccer player’s ability to recover from an ACL injury and offer suggestions for integrating treatments into the protocols to address these issues.

Continue to: CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM NEUROPLASTICITY... 

 

 

CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM NEUROPLASTICITY

Despite the vast amount of attention and research focused on the ACL, the re-injury rate still remains quite high. It has been reported that rehabilitation programs that employ traditional neuromotor training produce a re-injury rate as high as 30% after the athlete returns to sport.^25-28 The overall rate of sustaining a second ACL injury is 15%11 in all patient populations. For the general population <25 years of age, the re-injury rate is 21%, and for athletes <25 years of age, the re-injury rate rises to 23%.¹¹ With re-injury rates at this level, it is certainly fair to consider and be critical of the current rehabilitation methods being used with this population. One opportunity for improvement lies in the general approach used to rehabilitate ACL-injured patients. Therapy for this injury is protocol-driven, and the fact remains that most protocols prioritize restoration of peripheral systems, with minimal thought given to the cortical control necessary to manage those systems.^29,30 When neural factors are considered, it is usually within the context of increasing strength, balance, power, and biomechanical control,^31-34 which are certainly important but peripheral factors nonetheless. The missing element in many ACL protocols may be how to best manage the central neural components and cognitive factors associated with this injury.

If the CNS were to receive more consideration in ACL protocols, the opportunity for improved outcomes could be substantial because the CNS has been proven to be a very malleable system, as long as it receives the correct input. The CNS demonstrates neuroplasticity,³⁵ which means that it is capable of reorganization, based on the stimuli that it receives, whether internal or external.³⁶

This is an important consideration in ACL rehabilitation because the ACL graft, while restoring the biomechanical properties to the knee, is not fully capable of producing the same neurosensory properties of the original ACL.^37-42This is an important concept to understand because an ACL tear does indeed cause deafferentation in the ascending pathways to the brain.^37-40,42-46 This can lead to CNS reorganization and subsequent alterations in efferent output to the periphery.^37-40,42-46 Therefore, if a protocol with traditional musculoskeletal principles was used, then the mechanical function of the knee may certainly be remediated, but the neurosensory function will remain in a maladaptive state,^47-50 potentially leading to aberrant, non-protective movement strategies and a higher risk of re-injury.

The process of CNS reorganization may begin with the initial ACL injury. A peripheral musculoskeletal injury creates an inflammatory response that results in the arrival of chemical mediators such as histamine, substance P, calcitonin, and calcitonin gene-related peptide at the site of injury.⁵¹ As edema accumulates in the joint, tension is applied to the capsule, which may adversely affect proprioception from the receptors located within.⁴⁵ The interruption of consistent input from the peripheral mechanoreceptors may lead to long-term differentiation of the ascending pathways.⁵² This information is synthesized at 3 different levels of the CNS (spinal cord, brain stem, and motor cortex) to produce motor output.^53-56 Differentiation in the ascending circuitry can cause inhibition of motor neurons at the spinal cord.⁴⁵Animal research has shown that this differentiation can cause a breakdown in the cuneate nucleus of the brainstem,⁵⁷which provides sensory information from the upper body, while the gracile nucleus does the same for the lower body. These structures transfer proprioceptive input to the ventral posterior lateral nucleus in the thalamus, where it is then sent to the primary somatosensory cortex.⁵⁷ In general, the somatosensory, visual, and vestibular systems interpret afferent inputs to control movement, balance, and stability.^58,59 In a sport like soccer, where the movement tasks are dynamic and unpredictable, it is easy to see why even a slight deficit in somatosensory processing could disrupt a movement. Valeriani and colleagues^42,46 showed that somatosensory-evoked potentials were indeed altered in a cohort of ACL reconstruction (ACLR) subjects, indicating reorganization within the CNS.  Additionally, the deafferentation could not be changed by other afferent input coming from the knee or by the new ACL graft placed in the knee.^42,46The primary motor cortex has been found to have a substantial network of connectivity with the primary somatosensory cortex, which supports the theory that the motor cortex has a very strong linkage with the peripheral receptors in the joint.⁶⁰  The ligaments in the joint contain Ruffini, Pacinian, and Golgi receptors, all of which react to changes in the collagen fibers and send information regarding tension, length, speed, acceleration, position, and movement back to the CNS.^61-64 Unfortunately, the ascending pathway deafferentation can cause reorganization within the CNS, which makes the feedback provided from the periphery less effective in motor planning.

Ward and colleagues⁶⁵ have reported that reorganization within the motor cortex is the primary cause of chronic neuromuscular movement deficits in peripheral joint injuries. Researchers have used functional magnetic resonance imaging, transcranial magnetic stimulation, and electroencephalography in ACL patients to demonstrate changes in cortical activity and subsequent CNS reorganization.⁶⁵ Kapreli and colleagues⁴¹ reported that subjects with an ACL injury demonstrated higher cortical activation in the pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA). This is a region that is responsible for more complex motor planning.^66,67 This area becomes active before the primary motor cortex and is responsible for preparing the final movement pattern that the motor cortex executes.⁴¹ As the task becomes more complex, activity in the pre-SMA will increase.⁴¹ Additionally, they found that the posterior secondary somatosensory area and posterior inferior temporal gyrus showed increased cortical activity compared with controls.⁴¹ Visual planning is processed in the posterior inferior temporal gyrus, and so, it appears that the difficulty in processing somatosensory information due to ascending pathway deafferentation places an increased reliance on the visual system for movement planning.^68-70 This was observed while ACL-injured subjects performed a simple knee flexion-extension movement encompassing 40°, indicating the need to incorporate higher central levels of planning for a very simple movement pattern.⁴¹ Baumeister and colleagues^37,38 also showed that subjects with ACLR had higher levels of cortical activation in the areas of the brain that require attention and that process sensory input. They theorized that this occurred because of reduced efficiency of neural processing at lower levels in the CNS. Despite the higher levels of cortical activity observed, they found that subjects with an ACLR demonstrated proprioceptive testing that was deficient compared with that of controls. Heroux and Tremblay⁷¹ also demonstrated that subjects with an ACLR had increased resting motor cortex activity. They believed that this occurred as the motor cortex attempted to maintain neuromotor output to the periphery in the face of diminished afferent input.

Continue to: The reorganization that results in movement planning...

 

 

The reorganization that results in movement planning, transitioning from subcortical levels to cortical levels, is a phenomenon that researchers believe can lead to deficiencies even as the athlete has returned to sport. Grooms et al⁷²revealed in a case report that a subject with an ACLR showed higher levels of activity in the crus region of the cerebellum. This area contains corticobulbar and corticospinal tracts that transmit neural input to maintain balance and coordination.⁷³ These changes in the cerebellum, combined with increased motor cortex activity, are thought to be indicative of a global neural strategy that uses higher levels of the CNS, as opposed to subcortical processing.⁷²

The current research makes a clear and compelling argument for the importance of CNS reorganization after an ACL injury, placing increased reliance on higher cortical levels of control, as well as the visual system to coordinate balance and movement. It is thought that this reorganized method of neural transmission can then become imprinted within the CNS, if not corrected.^35,74 If this is the case, then traditional strength programs may not be sufficient to restore these connections to their pre-injury level. If the CNS has the ability to reorganize based on the aberrant input that it receives from the periphery, then it also certainly has the potential to adapt to more specific structured input via the ascending afferent pathways.^41,45 The rehabilitation program, however, needs to be structured specifically to target the reorganized regions of the brain. There needs to be an emphasis on rehabilitating not only the peripheral neuromotor structures but also the CNS.⁷⁵

CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM REHABILITATION PRINCIPLES

For a neurological rehabilitation to be successful, the interventions need to be repetitive and task-specific, involve learning, employ whole and part practice, and transition from using an internal to an external focus of control.⁷⁶Movements that are repetitive, but which lack structured learning and skill, have been shown to have no effect on inducing neuroplastic changes in the primary motor cortex.^77,78 However, using neurological rehabilitation techniques that facilitate the acquisition of new motor skills by the CNS have been shown to cause neuroplastic adaptation in the motor cortex.^79-85 This occurs because neuroplasticity is determined by experience and practice.⁷⁸ The CNS operates on cues received in the ascending tracts by mechanoreceptors in the joint. If a new movement pattern is being learned by the athlete, then this new afferent input received from the periphery will start to initiate reorganization in the higher learning centers. If this occurs with optimal repetition and precision, then a positive reorganization can take place within the CNS that results in a higher percentage of motor planning and control being filtered down to a subcortical level. Essentially, the movements become instinctive, which is crucial in athletics, where attention in higher cortical areas is frequently diverted to external aspects of the competition and not solely used to focus on movement.

This is why shifting neurological rehabilitation from an internal focus of control to an external focus of control is paramount. While using an internal focus of control is required early in rehabilitation to enable the athlete to understand the specific tasks required in a composite movement, a gradual transition to an external focus of control is necessary as the athlete begins to perform tasks that are more soccer-specific. This autonomous stage of motor learning is crucial because it transfers the burden of motor planning from higher to lower levels of the CNS and frees up the pre-SMA and primary motor cortex to handle more complex patterns.^58,86-88

Continue to: ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RISK POTENTIAL IN SOCCER PLAYERS...

 

 

ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RISK POTENTIAL IN SOCCER PLAYERS

If a comprehensive neuromotor rehabilitation program is to be used effectively with soccer athletes, then the first priority is to define how the players should move, so that they can demonstrate protective kinematics with all soccer-specific tasks and minimize stress to the ACL. As the ideal movement pattern becomes autonomous, then it should be trained within the context of a dynamic environment; remembering that environmental changes have a large impact on the final movement pattern selected by the individual. Brophy et al⁸⁹ evaluated videos of non-contact ACL injuries in male and female soccer players and determined that 45% occurred while cutting, 25% while landing, and 16% during deceleration. These 3 patterns represent 86% of the ACL injuries observed and offer an opportunity for evaluation and treatment with specific central neuromotor rehabilitation techniques.

The foundational movement patterns for the soccer player should focus on producing leverage that minimizes stress to the ACL during the 3 primary tasks outlined above. To achieve this, it is necessary to reduce posterior ground reaction forces at the hip and knee joint during these movements. There is a high correlation between the magnitude of the posterior ground reaction force, and anterior tibial shear, and subsequent displacement.^90,91 This stress can be reduced by increasing the hip and knee flexion angles during soccer-specific movements that involve pivoting, decelerating, and landing from a jump in a unipedal stance.⁹²

This phenomenon can be explained by observing changes in the ACL elevation angle, hamstring insertion angle, and patella tendon-tibial tuberosity insertion angle. As the knee moves into flexion, the ACL takes on a more parallel orientation to the tibia, and its fibers are better able to resist elastic deformation accompanied by a posterior ground reaction force.^93,94 The quadriceps will produce less anterior translation on the tibia because the patella tendon insertion angle is reduced relative to the longitudinal axis of the tibia, and the mechanical advantage of the quadriceps is decreased.⁹⁵ Lastly, the hamstrings will be able to provide better leverage posteriorly because the resultant force trends toward a more parallel orientation to the tibial plateau, which enables the player to counter, more effectively, the posterior ground reaction force and the anterior pull directed by the quadriceps.⁹⁵

This theory is supported by the work of Li and colleagues,⁹⁶ who showed that there is an inverse relationship between knee flexion angle and ACL loading. In their study, they applied a constant quadriceps force of 200 N at 15°, 30°, and 60° angles. The anterior shear force was obviously the highest at 15° and reduced by 20% at 30° and 60% at 60°. When hamstrings co-contraction was added, there was an additional 30% reduction in anterior shear at 15° and 50% at 30° and 60°. From a more flexed position, the hamstrings can increase joint compression and reduce the anterior translation by allowing the concave medial tibial plateau to limit the anterior drawer effect and absorb the forces that occur with excessive anterior shear, internal rotation, and valgus loads.⁹⁷ As the knee flexion angle approximates 60°, the hamstring leverage is increased, and the quadriceps leverage is diminished to the point where its ability to produce anterior tibial translation is neutralized.⁹⁸ Daniel and colleagues98 referred to this as the quadriceps neutral angle.

For soccer-specific movements that are potentially injurious to the ACL, it may then be beneficial to create a default movement pattern at the knee that approximates this value. In keeping with the information presented in this paper, it will be important to have the player reproduce this angle consistently during activities that involve pivoting, decelerating, and landing from a jump within the context of match play. This will certainly require that segments located both proximal and distal to the knee are able to function within specific parameters so that a cohesive protective synergy is produced throughout the lower quarter which minimizes posterior ground reaction forces and is protective of the ACL. This is where structured neuromotor training that is able to modulate networks within the CNS may be beneficial.

Continue to: CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM TREATMENT TECHNIQUES FOR THE SOCCER PLAYER...

 

 

CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM TREATMENT TECHNIQUES FOR THE SOCCER PLAYER

The ultimate goal is to create a foundational movement pattern that optimizes leverage and is protective of the ACL during decelerating, pivoting, and landing in a unipedal stance from a jump. The composite segments that are necessary to achieve this include local core stability to create lumbopelvic stiffness, and global core activation to enhance posterior chain stability. This should enable the player to feel more balanced when placing the pelvis in a more posterior and inferior position while still maintaining the trunk in a position that is parallel with the tibia, as the knee is flexed to an approximate 60° angle (Figure 1). From a frontal plane perspective, the acetabulum should bisect the malleoli of the stance leg, with a neutral tibiofemoral joint alignment (Figure 1).

The neuromotor training for the composite segments of this movement can begin in the “acute postoperative phase” (Table 1).   Because the surgical repair will limit the player’s capabilities in this stage, this is a good time to break down the foundational movement pattern into its component parts and ensure that the CNS receives a high number of quality repetitions of parts. In this phase, the player may begin an isolated training for the transversus abdominis, multifidus, and pubococcygeus. This can start in a supine position using biofeedback with an isometric contraction, progress to a standing position, and incorporate deep core activation with stance-phase gait training, mini squats, and lunge variations. This phase will require an abundance of visual and verbal feedback with an internal focus of control as the player gets used to activating the deep core and quad/hip synergy during functional lower extremity movements. Even in this early phase, the player should look to minimize anterior and/or posterior pelvic tilting and maintain a stiff thoracolumbar segment that remains parallel with the tibia during all functional movements.

Table 1. Adjunct CNS Treatment Principles for ACL Reconstruction in Soccer Athletes

Phase	Goal	CNS Rehabilitation Techniques
Acute postoperative	Local core activation with weightbearing exercise. Produce trunk stiffness with lower extremity movements.	High repetitions. Verbal or tactile cues. Internal focus of control. Partial practice.
Subacute postoperative	Lumbopelvic, foot or ankle, and posterior chain segments learn to participate in movement effectively.	Requires higher levels of cortical planning. Internal focus of control. CIMT.
Static stability	Able to adopt foundational movement pattern consistently with vision eliminated.	Somatosensory vs visual processing. Partial-to-whole practice. Use internal and/or external focus of control.
Dynamic stability	Able to perform plyometrics in a single-leg position using foundational movement pattern with subcortical processing.	Increase velocity with movement challenges. Occlude or eliminate vision. Heavy reliance on an external focus of control. Prioritize movement quality.
Dynamic agility	Pivoting, decelerating, and landing are performed with hip flexion/knee flexion synergy, trunk stiffness, and posterior chain activation.	Unanticipated movement challenges. Whole practice. Ball reaction drills with vision obstructed or occluded. Contact drills with vision obstructed or occluded. Use external focus of control to include soccer-specific tasks.

Abbreviations: ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; CNS, central nervous system; CIMT, constraint-induced movement therapy.

As the player moves into the “subacute postoperative phase” (Table 1).   He or she will continue to use an internal focus of control to activate the local/global core synergy with functional movements progressing from double-leg, to single-leg positions. Partial practice, instead of whole practice, is still the predominant theme of the neural training process. In this phase, the knee and hip flexion angles can increase, and the player’s trunk and pelvic position should be critiqued in a single-leg position so that the trunk remains parallel with the tibia in the sagittal plane with a slight forward hip hinge. The pelvis should remain level throughout single-leg stance to ensure adequate activation of the lateral hip stabilizers. This is the stage where the player can learn to isolate closed kinetic chain hip rotation for pivoting, and so, single-leg hip internal and external rotation drills are useful, both with and without resistance. Skill acquisition is crucial in this phase because the patterns that the CNS adopts will form the foundation for more dynamic patterns that will occur in the later soccer-specific stages. Higher levels of cortical planning are still needed in this phase. For this reason, it is important that poor quality repetitions are recognized by the player and clinician so that he or she can learn to perform them correctly, albeit still with an internal focus of control. This is also a good time to begin to employ constraint-induced movement therapy as the player is able to replicate the desired pattern with more precision. For example, by eliminating the use of the upper extremities as a source of balance, the CNS is forced to program alternate synergies such as the lumbopelvic, and foot and ankle segments to maintain the desired alignment.

The “lower quarter static stability phase” (Table 1) marks a point where it may be useful to use direct strategies that have the capability to change CNS efferent owutput from a primary reliance on the visual processing areas in the posterior-inferior temporal gyrus back to the somatosensory area. It is critical that the player is able to make this transition in cortical reorganization and control, because ACL-injured subjects have been shown to have balance scores similar to healthy controls when they are able to use their vision, but this is reduced when vision is taken away.^99-105  Their balance will diminish even further if vision is modulated during more complex landing and pivoting maneuvers.^99-105 This may certainly explain why defending is a riskier task for ACL-injured players⁸⁹ as their visual system is focused more on tracking a player than attending to precision with movement planning.

To enhance this cortical reorganization within the context of soccer-specific movements, it is useful to start from a foundational single-leg position, with the knee approximating 60° of flexion and the trunk parallel to the tibia. In the frontal plane, the pelvis should be level, the trunk vertical, and the acetabulum bisecting the malleoli of the stance leg (Figure 1).   The player may initially work on getting into this foundational position with vision either partially obstructed using stroboscopic eyewear or completely obstructed if this equipment is unavailable.^106-108 The pattern can be progressed by constraining the upper extremities to force reliance on the lumbopelvic and foot/ankle strategies for balance. Head and/or trunk turns can be added to simulate the external focus of control that is required with movement in soccer. These should progress from slow to fast and anticipated to unanticipated as the player demonstrates competence in maintaining stability at each segment within the foundational stance position. Once this is in play, a ball should be introduced into the drills. As the player maintains the foundational position with vision diminished and upper extremities constrained, they should attempt to reach for or trap a ball from this position. If vision is completely obstructed, then the player can be instructed to open his/her eyes just as the ball arrives to induce a reactive response. Again, quality repetitions are essential for learning to occur, and subsequent skill acquisition to take place in the CNS; thus, close scrutiny should be paid to the qualitative essence of the movement patterns to ensure pristine biomechanics during this phase.

The “lower quarter dynamic stability phase” (Table 1) should continue with the same neuromotor training principles employed in the previous phase, except that the drills will now involve plyometrics. The player should ultimately progress from double-leg, to single-leg jumps and then linear to diagonal. Vision should still be obstructed and upper extremities constrained to channel the lumbopelvic region for force production and balance. Movement quality in the foundational position remains paramount with these drills to ensure that skill acquisition is occurring and injury risk is being mitigated. An external focus of control can be introduced by applying an unanticipated perturbation during a jump. Additional learning opportunities should include unanticipated head and trunk turns while landing in a unipedal stance from a jump. The task can be made more specific by having the player trap a pass while doing linear or diagonal single-leg hop progressions. In this manner, the player’s CNS can become reorganized to program the requisite synergies to maintain a protective foundational position on the stance leg, as the contralateral limb is required to perform work that is far outside the player’s base of support.

Continue to: The final segment of the CNS neuromotor rehabilitation program...

 

 

The final segment of the CNS neuromotor rehabilitation program is the “lower quarter dynamic agility phase” (Table 1), when the player will learn to perform an unanticipated directional change in a foundational position for the pivot leg. The player can begin this phase by initiating sprint-deceleration-pivot efforts, progressing at 45°, 90°, 120°, and 180° turns. This should be trained in both a forward and backpedal position. Close attention should be paid to the deceleration phase of the sprint-pivot effort, as this will set the player up to demonstrate protective kinematics during the pivot phase of the task. In this phase, the center of mass should become lower and move posteriorly, so that a deeper knee and hip flexion angle, supported by posterior chain synergies, can occur at the pivot point. This is an important skill for the player to acquire, as Cortes and colleagues⁹² have reported that female collegiate soccer players tend to perform a pivoting task with a more erect trunk position. In the same cohort, they also measured the mean knee flexion angle at initial contact during pivoting to be 24°.⁹² Movement patterns that reflect an elevated center of mass, with arms abducted away from the trunk, should be discouraged here. The drills can be progressed to have the player react to a command and perform unanticipated pivots within a 5 × 5-meter box to simulate defending. This should be progressed from eyes open and arms unconstrained, to vision disrupted and arms constrained. From here, an external focus of control can be added by playing a ball to the athlete. Vision should be withheld until the instant that the ball arrives at the player, when he/she is required to play the ball to an unanticipated spot. As is the case in all other phases of the neuromotor training, the quality of movement is the most important parameter to critique with each drill. From a qualitative standpoint, the player should demonstrate stiffness throughout the thoracolumbar region and power and control through the pelvis with each directional change. In addition, he or she should maintain a low and posteriorly oriented center of mass to optimize leverage in the hamstrings/gluteals compared with the quadriceps and reduce posterior ground reaction forces.

PSYCHOLOGICAL READINESS FOR RETURN TO PLAY

After an injury is sustained, an athlete is often subjected to a range of psychological responses in addition to the functional impairment, including stress, hesitancy, alterations in self-esteem, depression, fear of re-injury, and anxiety.^43,109-111 The aforementioned responses are often at their height in the time immediately following an injury and generally subside over time during the rehabilitation process.¹¹⁰ The rates at which athletes experience psychological distress following an injury range between 5% and 19%; the levels are comparable with patients receiving treatment for mental health illness.⁴³ However, these elements may persist, or even increase, in the later stages of the rehabilitation process as the topic of return to play is deliberated.^112,113 If these fears are left unresolved, then a significant delay can be incurred during the rehabilitation process, which might ultimately jeopardize the successful return to play.^114,115

When athletes have been cleared to return to sport, fear tends to be the most common reason for their decision to not return to play.^21,116 The persistence of fear has clinical implications and warrants close monitoring to ensure that the athlete feels adequately supported in the decision to return to sport.^117,118 Building the athlete’s confidence by addressing hesitation, lack of confidence, heightened awareness of risk or re-injury, and safe reintegration into athletic participation are important themes identified to encourage a safe return to play.⁴³ A variety of validated tools  can be integrated into an existing return-to-play decision-making algorithm (Table 2).^118-120 

Abbreviations: ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; CNS, central nervous system; CIMT, constraint-induced movement therapy.

 

Table 2. Self-Report Measurement Tools to Integrate into Return-to-Play Decision-Making Algorithm

Self-report Measurement Tools

13-item Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport after Injury Scale (ACL-RSI)

Global Rating Scale (GRS)

International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form

Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)

Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale

Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36)

Subjective Patient Outcome for Return to Sport (SPORTS)

Patient Health Questionnaire-9

By integrating the necessary screening of patients for kinesiophobia and assessing patient expectations after enduring an ACL injury, clinicians may be able to identify patients who are at risk for poorer functional outcomes. A consideration of psychosocial elements such as activity avoidance, fear of movement and re-injury, loss of confidence and expectations/assumptions during the continuum of the rehabilitation process, and the decision to return to play may favorably impact the individual’s ability to safely return to sport. It is critical to address both the physical and psychosocial factors during the rehabilitation process to more optimally transition individuals back to their prior level of athleticism.

CONCLUSION

Psychosocial factors may play a role in determining a player’s readiness to return to sport, as well as a potential for re-injury. A number of tests are available for use with this patient population to identify mental deficits that may impact player performance upon return. Additionally, the CNS should be considered as a source of impairment in players with ACL injuries. Current protocols may not fully appreciate the CNS’ impact on the player’s functional outcome. Therefore, an approach that includes CNS neuromotor training with traditional musculoskeletal rehabilitation, which also incorporates cognitive and psychosocial factors, may define an improved paradigm for treating soccer athletes following an ACL injury and assessing return-to-play capability.

Teenage use of vaping devices jumped significantly in the past year, with 37% of 12th-grade students reporting any vaping in 2018, compared with 28% in 2017, data announced Dec. 17 from the 2018 Monitoring the Future survey show.

LiudmylaSupynska/Thinkstock

In particular, nicotine vaping use in the 30 days prior to the survey nearly doubled among high school seniors, from approximately 11% in 2017 to 21% in 2018. Nicotine vaping also increased by 7.9% (from 8.2% to 16.1%) among 10th graders and by 2.6% (from 3.5% to 6.1%) among 8th graders, according to the survey results.

Vaping involves using a device such as an e-cigarette to inhale a heated aerosol product that usually contains nicotine but can be used to administer other types of drugs, said Nora D. Volkow, MD, director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse at the National Institutes of Health, in a press conference announcing the findings.

The increased prevalence of nicotine vaping in 10th and 12th graders is the largest annual increase in use of any substance recorded by Monitoring the Future, said Richard A. Miech, PhD, MPH, of the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, and the principal survey investigator. “Something about this delivery device of vaping seems to really appeal to kids,” he said. The flavorings, concealability of the devices (which can be about the size of a flash drive), and ease of use seem to be contributing to the popularity of vaping, Dr. Miech added.

In addition, marijuana vaping increased significantly across all three grade levels in 2018 from 2017. Within 30 days of the survey, marijuana vaping increased from 4.9% to 7.5% in 12th graders, from 4.3% to 7.0% in 10th graders, and from 1.6% to 2.6% in 8th graders.

A take-home message for clinicians is the need to emphasize to teens that “vaping is not innocuous and not harmless,” said Dr. Miech in a question-and-answer session. Of note, data from multiple studies show that children who vape are about five times more likely to smoke cigarettes, he said.

The vaping devices are manufactured to deliver drugs into the lungs and ultimately high concentrations into the brain – which suggests the use of vaping devices to deliver other types of drugs might increase in the future, Dr. Volkow added.

Use of most other substances, including inhalants, heroin, cocaine, ecstasy, overall marijuana use, alcohol use, and extreme binge drinking remained stable, the researchers said. Cigarette smoking declined slightly among 12th graders but did not change significantly among 8th or 10th graders. Use of prescription opioids and tranquilizers declined in 2018 across all age groups.

“Vaping is reversing hard-fought declines in the number of adolescents who use nicotine,” Dr. Miech said in the news release announcing the results. “These results suggest that vaping is leading youth into nicotine use and nicotine addiction, not away from it.”

The data on vaping and nicotine use among American teens were published in a letter (N Engl J Med. 2018 Dec 17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1814130) – with a warning. “These results indicate that the policies in place as of the 2017-2018 school year were not sufficient to stop the spread of nicotine vaping among adolescents,” wrote the authors, led by Dr. Miech. “The rapid entry of new vaping devices on the market ... will require continual updates and modification strategies to keep adolescents from vaping and its associated negative health effects.”

The Monitoring the Future survey tracks annual drug use and drug use attitudes in a nationally representative sample of U.S. students in 8th, 10th, and 12th grades. This year’s survey included 44,482 participants. The survey is funded by a government grant to the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, from the NIH’s NIDA.

Teenage use of vaping devices jumped significantly in the past year, with 37% of 12th-grade students reporting any vaping in 2018, compared with 28% in 2017, data announced Dec. 17 from the 2018 Monitoring the Future survey show.

LiudmylaSupynska/Thinkstock

In particular, nicotine vaping use in the 30 days prior to the survey nearly doubled among high school seniors, from approximately 11% in 2017 to 21% in 2018. Nicotine vaping also increased by 7.9% (from 8.2% to 16.1%) among 10th graders and by 2.6% (from 3.5% to 6.1%) among 8th graders, according to the survey results.

Vaping involves using a device such as an e-cigarette to inhale a heated aerosol product that usually contains nicotine but can be used to administer other types of drugs, said Nora D. Volkow, MD, director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse at the National Institutes of Health, in a press conference announcing the findings.

The increased prevalence of nicotine vaping in 10th and 12th graders is the largest annual increase in use of any substance recorded by Monitoring the Future, said Richard A. Miech, PhD, MPH, of the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, and the principal survey investigator. “Something about this delivery device of vaping seems to really appeal to kids,” he said. The flavorings, concealability of the devices (which can be about the size of a flash drive), and ease of use seem to be contributing to the popularity of vaping, Dr. Miech added.

In addition, marijuana vaping increased significantly across all three grade levels in 2018 from 2017. Within 30 days of the survey, marijuana vaping increased from 4.9% to 7.5% in 12th graders, from 4.3% to 7.0% in 10th graders, and from 1.6% to 2.6% in 8th graders.

A take-home message for clinicians is the need to emphasize to teens that “vaping is not innocuous and not harmless,” said Dr. Miech in a question-and-answer session. Of note, data from multiple studies show that children who vape are about five times more likely to smoke cigarettes, he said.

The vaping devices are manufactured to deliver drugs into the lungs and ultimately high concentrations into the brain – which suggests the use of vaping devices to deliver other types of drugs might increase in the future, Dr. Volkow added.

Use of most other substances, including inhalants, heroin, cocaine, ecstasy, overall marijuana use, alcohol use, and extreme binge drinking remained stable, the researchers said. Cigarette smoking declined slightly among 12th graders but did not change significantly among 8th or 10th graders. Use of prescription opioids and tranquilizers declined in 2018 across all age groups.

“Vaping is reversing hard-fought declines in the number of adolescents who use nicotine,” Dr. Miech said in the news release announcing the results. “These results suggest that vaping is leading youth into nicotine use and nicotine addiction, not away from it.”

The data on vaping and nicotine use among American teens were published in a letter (N Engl J Med. 2018 Dec 17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1814130) – with a warning. “These results indicate that the policies in place as of the 2017-2018 school year were not sufficient to stop the spread of nicotine vaping among adolescents,” wrote the authors, led by Dr. Miech. “The rapid entry of new vaping devices on the market ... will require continual updates and modification strategies to keep adolescents from vaping and its associated negative health effects.”

The Monitoring the Future survey tracks annual drug use and drug use attitudes in a nationally representative sample of U.S. students in 8th, 10th, and 12th grades. This year’s survey included 44,482 participants. The survey is funded by a government grant to the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, from the NIH’s NIDA.

Teenage use of vaping devices jumped significantly in the past year, with 37% of 12th-grade students reporting any vaping in 2018, compared with 28% in 2017, data announced Dec. 17 from the 2018 Monitoring the Future survey show.

LiudmylaSupynska/Thinkstock

In particular, nicotine vaping use in the 30 days prior to the survey nearly doubled among high school seniors, from approximately 11% in 2017 to 21% in 2018. Nicotine vaping also increased by 7.9% (from 8.2% to 16.1%) among 10th graders and by 2.6% (from 3.5% to 6.1%) among 8th graders, according to the survey results.

Vaping involves using a device such as an e-cigarette to inhale a heated aerosol product that usually contains nicotine but can be used to administer other types of drugs, said Nora D. Volkow, MD, director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse at the National Institutes of Health, in a press conference announcing the findings.

The increased prevalence of nicotine vaping in 10th and 12th graders is the largest annual increase in use of any substance recorded by Monitoring the Future, said Richard A. Miech, PhD, MPH, of the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, and the principal survey investigator. “Something about this delivery device of vaping seems to really appeal to kids,” he said. The flavorings, concealability of the devices (which can be about the size of a flash drive), and ease of use seem to be contributing to the popularity of vaping, Dr. Miech added.

In addition, marijuana vaping increased significantly across all three grade levels in 2018 from 2017. Within 30 days of the survey, marijuana vaping increased from 4.9% to 7.5% in 12th graders, from 4.3% to 7.0% in 10th graders, and from 1.6% to 2.6% in 8th graders.

A take-home message for clinicians is the need to emphasize to teens that “vaping is not innocuous and not harmless,” said Dr. Miech in a question-and-answer session. Of note, data from multiple studies show that children who vape are about five times more likely to smoke cigarettes, he said.

The vaping devices are manufactured to deliver drugs into the lungs and ultimately high concentrations into the brain – which suggests the use of vaping devices to deliver other types of drugs might increase in the future, Dr. Volkow added.

Use of most other substances, including inhalants, heroin, cocaine, ecstasy, overall marijuana use, alcohol use, and extreme binge drinking remained stable, the researchers said. Cigarette smoking declined slightly among 12th graders but did not change significantly among 8th or 10th graders. Use of prescription opioids and tranquilizers declined in 2018 across all age groups.

“Vaping is reversing hard-fought declines in the number of adolescents who use nicotine,” Dr. Miech said in the news release announcing the results. “These results suggest that vaping is leading youth into nicotine use and nicotine addiction, not away from it.”

The data on vaping and nicotine use among American teens were published in a letter (N Engl J Med. 2018 Dec 17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1814130) – with a warning. “These results indicate that the policies in place as of the 2017-2018 school year were not sufficient to stop the spread of nicotine vaping among adolescents,” wrote the authors, led by Dr. Miech. “The rapid entry of new vaping devices on the market ... will require continual updates and modification strategies to keep adolescents from vaping and its associated negative health effects.”

The Monitoring the Future survey tracks annual drug use and drug use attitudes in a nationally representative sample of U.S. students in 8th, 10th, and 12th grades. This year’s survey included 44,482 participants. The survey is funded by a government grant to the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, from the NIH’s NIDA.

A negative colonoscopy result is associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer for more than 12 years after the examination, compared with an unscreened population, new research has found.

In a retrospective cohort study published in JAMA Internal Medicine, researchers analyzed data from 1,251,318 individuals at average risk of colorectal cancer who were eligible to participate in screening over more than 9 million person-years of follow-up.

They found that screened individuals with a negative result had an adjusted 46%-95% lower risk of colorectal cancer and 29%-96% lower risk of colorectal cancer mortality than unscreened individuals across more than 12 years of follow-up.

At 10 years post colonoscopy, participants who had a negative colonoscopy result still had a significant 46% lower risk of colorectal cancer (hazard ratio [HR], 0.54; 95% [confidence interval] CI: 0.31-0.94) and 88% lower risk of colorectal cancer mortality (HR, 0.12; 95% CI: 0.02-0.82). After more than 12 years, there was still a nonsignificant trend toward a lower risk of colorectal cancer incidence and mortality.

Jeffrey K. Lee, MD, of Kaiser Permanente San Francisco, and his coauthors suggested that their findings have implications for the timing of rescreening after a negative colonoscopy result.

“The current guideline-recommended 10-year rescreening interval is not based on a predetermined risk threshold, and while we observed a reduced risk of colorectal cancer and related deaths throughout the more than 12-year follow-up period, an examination of absolute risk [incidence] could provide another justification for the timing for rescreening,” they wrote. “Additional research is needed to evaluate the costs and benefits of earlier versus later rescreening, optimal rescreening tests following a negative colonoscopy result [e.g., another colonoscopy versus annual fecal immunochemical testing], and whether the benefits of rescreening vary between subgroups.”

The study showed that the rate of repeat endoscopic procedures increased at year 10, largely because of screening colonoscopies which are recommended at 10-year intervals. However, in a separate analysis, the authors excluded colonoscopies for a screening indication and still found a similar reduction in the risk of colorectal cancer, compared with the unscreened group.

The data also showed a 22%-87% lower risk of proximal colorectal cancer, a 50%-99% lower risk of distal cancer, a 31%-95% lower risk of early-stage colorectal cancer, and a 56%-96% reduced risk of advanced-stage colorectal cancer among those who had a negative result, compared with those who did not undergo screening.

The authors wrote that this pattern of greater risk reductions in the distal versus proximal cancer had been seen in previous studies and could be the result of incomplete examinations, inadequate bowel cleansing, challenges in identifying right colon polyps and sessile serrated adenomas, or differences in polyp biology in the proximal versus distal colon.

The incidence rates of colorectal cancer among those who had a negative result from colonoscopy ranged from 16.6 per 100,000 person-years (95% CI: 8.2-12.8) at 1 year after screening to 133.2 per 100,000 person-years (95% CI: 70.9-227.8) at the 10-year mark. In comparison, the incidence rates among the unscreened population increased from 62.9 per 100,000 person-years (95% CI: 55.7-70.0) at year 1 to 224.8 per 100,000 person-years (95% CI: 202.5-247.0) after year 12.

Mortality rates from colorectal cancer at year 1 were 6.8 per 100,000 person-years (95% CI: 0.8-12.7) in the negative results group and 10.5 (95% CI: 8.2-12.8) in the unscreened cohort. At year 12, that figure was 92.2 per 100,000 person-years (95% CI: 19.0-165.4) in the negative results cohort, while after year 12 in the unscreened cohort, colorectal cancer mortality rates increased to 192 per 100,000 person years (95% CI: 7-214.3).

While the study made use of a validated cancer registry to ensure they accurately captured cancers and mortality, the authors acknowledged that they weren’t able to adjust for residual confounding factors such as red-meat intake or smoking.

The study was supported by the National Cancer Institute, the American Gastroenterological Association, and the Sylvia Allison Kaplan Foundation. No conflicts of interest were reported.

The AGA GI Patient Center provides education materials that can help your patients better understand their colorectal cancer risk and prepare for a colonoscopy. Visit patient.gastro.org to review and download.

SOURCE: Lee JK et al. JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Dec 17. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5565.

A negative colonoscopy result is associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer for more than 12 years after the examination, compared with an unscreened population, new research has found.

In a retrospective cohort study published in JAMA Internal Medicine, researchers analyzed data from 1,251,318 individuals at average risk of colorectal cancer who were eligible to participate in screening over more than 9 million person-years of follow-up.

They found that screened individuals with a negative result had an adjusted 46%-95% lower risk of colorectal cancer and 29%-96% lower risk of colorectal cancer mortality than unscreened individuals across more than 12 years of follow-up.

At 10 years post colonoscopy, participants who had a negative colonoscopy result still had a significant 46% lower risk of colorectal cancer (hazard ratio [HR], 0.54; 95% [confidence interval] CI: 0.31-0.94) and 88% lower risk of colorectal cancer mortality (HR, 0.12; 95% CI: 0.02-0.82). After more than 12 years, there was still a nonsignificant trend toward a lower risk of colorectal cancer incidence and mortality.

Jeffrey K. Lee, MD, of Kaiser Permanente San Francisco, and his coauthors suggested that their findings have implications for the timing of rescreening after a negative colonoscopy result.

“The current guideline-recommended 10-year rescreening interval is not based on a predetermined risk threshold, and while we observed a reduced risk of colorectal cancer and related deaths throughout the more than 12-year follow-up period, an examination of absolute risk [incidence] could provide another justification for the timing for rescreening,” they wrote. “Additional research is needed to evaluate the costs and benefits of earlier versus later rescreening, optimal rescreening tests following a negative colonoscopy result [e.g., another colonoscopy versus annual fecal immunochemical testing], and whether the benefits of rescreening vary between subgroups.”

The study showed that the rate of repeat endoscopic procedures increased at year 10, largely because of screening colonoscopies which are recommended at 10-year intervals. However, in a separate analysis, the authors excluded colonoscopies for a screening indication and still found a similar reduction in the risk of colorectal cancer, compared with the unscreened group.

The data also showed a 22%-87% lower risk of proximal colorectal cancer, a 50%-99% lower risk of distal cancer, a 31%-95% lower risk of early-stage colorectal cancer, and a 56%-96% reduced risk of advanced-stage colorectal cancer among those who had a negative result, compared with those who did not undergo screening.

The authors wrote that this pattern of greater risk reductions in the distal versus proximal cancer had been seen in previous studies and could be the result of incomplete examinations, inadequate bowel cleansing, challenges in identifying right colon polyps and sessile serrated adenomas, or differences in polyp biology in the proximal versus distal colon.

The incidence rates of colorectal cancer among those who had a negative result from colonoscopy ranged from 16.6 per 100,000 person-years (95% CI: 8.2-12.8) at 1 year after screening to 133.2 per 100,000 person-years (95% CI: 70.9-227.8) at the 10-year mark. In comparison, the incidence rates among the unscreened population increased from 62.9 per 100,000 person-years (95% CI: 55.7-70.0) at year 1 to 224.8 per 100,000 person-years (95% CI: 202.5-247.0) after year 12.

Mortality rates from colorectal cancer at year 1 were 6.8 per 100,000 person-years (95% CI: 0.8-12.7) in the negative results group and 10.5 (95% CI: 8.2-12.8) in the unscreened cohort. At year 12, that figure was 92.2 per 100,000 person-years (95% CI: 19.0-165.4) in the negative results cohort, while after year 12 in the unscreened cohort, colorectal cancer mortality rates increased to 192 per 100,000 person years (95% CI: 7-214.3).

While the study made use of a validated cancer registry to ensure they accurately captured cancers and mortality, the authors acknowledged that they weren’t able to adjust for residual confounding factors such as red-meat intake or smoking.

The study was supported by the National Cancer Institute, the American Gastroenterological Association, and the Sylvia Allison Kaplan Foundation. No conflicts of interest were reported.

The AGA GI Patient Center provides education materials that can help your patients better understand their colorectal cancer risk and prepare for a colonoscopy. Visit patient.gastro.org to review and download.

SOURCE: Lee JK et al. JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Dec 17. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5565.

A negative colonoscopy result is associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer for more than 12 years after the examination, compared with an unscreened population, new research has found.

In a retrospective cohort study published in JAMA Internal Medicine, researchers analyzed data from 1,251,318 individuals at average risk of colorectal cancer who were eligible to participate in screening over more than 9 million person-years of follow-up.

They found that screened individuals with a negative result had an adjusted 46%-95% lower risk of colorectal cancer and 29%-96% lower risk of colorectal cancer mortality than unscreened individuals across more than 12 years of follow-up.

At 10 years post colonoscopy, participants who had a negative colonoscopy result still had a significant 46% lower risk of colorectal cancer (hazard ratio [HR], 0.54; 95% [confidence interval] CI: 0.31-0.94) and 88% lower risk of colorectal cancer mortality (HR, 0.12; 95% CI: 0.02-0.82). After more than 12 years, there was still a nonsignificant trend toward a lower risk of colorectal cancer incidence and mortality.

Jeffrey K. Lee, MD, of Kaiser Permanente San Francisco, and his coauthors suggested that their findings have implications for the timing of rescreening after a negative colonoscopy result.

“The current guideline-recommended 10-year rescreening interval is not based on a predetermined risk threshold, and while we observed a reduced risk of colorectal cancer and related deaths throughout the more than 12-year follow-up period, an examination of absolute risk [incidence] could provide another justification for the timing for rescreening,” they wrote. “Additional research is needed to evaluate the costs and benefits of earlier versus later rescreening, optimal rescreening tests following a negative colonoscopy result [e.g., another colonoscopy versus annual fecal immunochemical testing], and whether the benefits of rescreening vary between subgroups.”

The study showed that the rate of repeat endoscopic procedures increased at year 10, largely because of screening colonoscopies which are recommended at 10-year intervals. However, in a separate analysis, the authors excluded colonoscopies for a screening indication and still found a similar reduction in the risk of colorectal cancer, compared with the unscreened group.

The data also showed a 22%-87% lower risk of proximal colorectal cancer, a 50%-99% lower risk of distal cancer, a 31%-95% lower risk of early-stage colorectal cancer, and a 56%-96% reduced risk of advanced-stage colorectal cancer among those who had a negative result, compared with those who did not undergo screening.

The authors wrote that this pattern of greater risk reductions in the distal versus proximal cancer had been seen in previous studies and could be the result of incomplete examinations, inadequate bowel cleansing, challenges in identifying right colon polyps and sessile serrated adenomas, or differences in polyp biology in the proximal versus distal colon.

The incidence rates of colorectal cancer among those who had a negative result from colonoscopy ranged from 16.6 per 100,000 person-years (95% CI: 8.2-12.8) at 1 year after screening to 133.2 per 100,000 person-years (95% CI: 70.9-227.8) at the 10-year mark. In comparison, the incidence rates among the unscreened population increased from 62.9 per 100,000 person-years (95% CI: 55.7-70.0) at year 1 to 224.8 per 100,000 person-years (95% CI: 202.5-247.0) after year 12.

Mortality rates from colorectal cancer at year 1 were 6.8 per 100,000 person-years (95% CI: 0.8-12.7) in the negative results group and 10.5 (95% CI: 8.2-12.8) in the unscreened cohort. At year 12, that figure was 92.2 per 100,000 person-years (95% CI: 19.0-165.4) in the negative results cohort, while after year 12 in the unscreened cohort, colorectal cancer mortality rates increased to 192 per 100,000 person years (95% CI: 7-214.3).

While the study made use of a validated cancer registry to ensure they accurately captured cancers and mortality, the authors acknowledged that they weren’t able to adjust for residual confounding factors such as red-meat intake or smoking.

The study was supported by the National Cancer Institute, the American Gastroenterological Association, and the Sylvia Allison Kaplan Foundation. No conflicts of interest were reported.

The AGA GI Patient Center provides education materials that can help your patients better understand their colorectal cancer risk and prepare for a colonoscopy. Visit patient.gastro.org to review and download.

SOURCE: Lee JK et al. JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Dec 17. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5565.

CHICAGO – A physician’s baseline opioid prescribing rate strongly predicts future chronic opioid use in rheumatoid arthritis patients, an analysis of data from the Consortium of Rheumatology Researchers of North America (Corrona) Rheumatoid Arthritis Registry suggests.

sdominick/iStock/Getty Images

The baseline 12-month opioid prescribing rate of 148 physicians in the initial cohort varied widely from 0% to 70% (median, 27%), and among 9,337 patients in the registry beyond the baseline 12 months, physician opioid prescribing rates during the baseline period were significantly associated with risk for chronic opioid use, Yvonne C. Lee, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology. She and her colleagues defined chronic opioid use as any opioid use during at least two consecutive study visits.

“It is important to understand the relative contributions of patient vs. physician characteristics on chronic opioid use,” said Dr. Lee of Northwestern University, Chicago. She that the goals of the current study were to identify the extent to which rheumatologists in the United States varied in baseline opioid prescribing rates and to determine the implications of baseline prescribing rates with respect to future chronic opioid use.

Compared with the lowest quartile of baseline opioid prescribing (rate of 18% or less), the second, third, and fourth quartiles of prescribing were associated with increasing odds of chronic opioid use (odds ratios of 1.16, 1.89, and 2.01 for the quartiles, respectively) during the study period, she said.

The researchers saw similar relationships when they used a stricter definition of opioid use and when they extended the cutoff between the baseline and study periods to 18 months. The relationships persisted after adjusting for numerous patient characteristics, such as age, sex, race, insurance status, RA duration, and treatments used, she said.

Subgroup analyses were also conducted to examine heterogeneity across clinical characteristics, including Clinical Disease Activity Index score (10 or less vs. greater than 10), pain intensity (scores of 40 or less, greater than 40 to 60, and greater than 60 out of 100), and use vs. nonuse of antidepressant medication. The relationships between physician baseline prescribing and chronic opioid use were similar across subgroups, she noted.

The findings help to characterize the role of rheumatologists’ prescribing rates in the ongoing opioid crisis even though the conclusions that can be reached are limited by the fact that some patients may receive opioid prescriptions from physicians outside the registry, by a lack of data on specific opioid types and doses, and by a lack of detailed information about physician characteristics, Dr. Lee said.

Physicians were included in the analysis only if they had contributed at least 10 RA patients to the registry within their first year of participation, and patients were included if they were patients of those physicians, if they had at least 12 months of follow-up data available, and if they were not prevalent opioid users at study entry.

A long-term goal is to target interventions to appropriate subgroups, she said, noting that 21%-29% of patients who are prescribed opioids for chronic pain misuse them, and more than 33,000 Americans die of opioid overdoses each year.

“Implications [of the findings] are that, in addition to targeting patients, we may also really want to consider interventions that target high-intensity prescribers. This may be useful for helping to decrease chronic opioid use in patients,” she concluded.

Dr. Lee has an investigator-initiated grant from Pfizer and owns stock in Express Scripts.

sworcester@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Lee Y et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70(Suppl 10), Abstract 1917

CHICAGO – A physician’s baseline opioid prescribing rate strongly predicts future chronic opioid use in rheumatoid arthritis patients, an analysis of data from the Consortium of Rheumatology Researchers of North America (Corrona) Rheumatoid Arthritis Registry suggests.

sdominick/iStock/Getty Images

The baseline 12-month opioid prescribing rate of 148 physicians in the initial cohort varied widely from 0% to 70% (median, 27%), and among 9,337 patients in the registry beyond the baseline 12 months, physician opioid prescribing rates during the baseline period were significantly associated with risk for chronic opioid use, Yvonne C. Lee, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology. She and her colleagues defined chronic opioid use as any opioid use during at least two consecutive study visits.

“It is important to understand the relative contributions of patient vs. physician characteristics on chronic opioid use,” said Dr. Lee of Northwestern University, Chicago. She that the goals of the current study were to identify the extent to which rheumatologists in the United States varied in baseline opioid prescribing rates and to determine the implications of baseline prescribing rates with respect to future chronic opioid use.

Compared with the lowest quartile of baseline opioid prescribing (rate of 18% or less), the second, third, and fourth quartiles of prescribing were associated with increasing odds of chronic opioid use (odds ratios of 1.16, 1.89, and 2.01 for the quartiles, respectively) during the study period, she said.

The researchers saw similar relationships when they used a stricter definition of opioid use and when they extended the cutoff between the baseline and study periods to 18 months. The relationships persisted after adjusting for numerous patient characteristics, such as age, sex, race, insurance status, RA duration, and treatments used, she said.

Subgroup analyses were also conducted to examine heterogeneity across clinical characteristics, including Clinical Disease Activity Index score (10 or less vs. greater than 10), pain intensity (scores of 40 or less, greater than 40 to 60, and greater than 60 out of 100), and use vs. nonuse of antidepressant medication. The relationships between physician baseline prescribing and chronic opioid use were similar across subgroups, she noted.

The findings help to characterize the role of rheumatologists’ prescribing rates in the ongoing opioid crisis even though the conclusions that can be reached are limited by the fact that some patients may receive opioid prescriptions from physicians outside the registry, by a lack of data on specific opioid types and doses, and by a lack of detailed information about physician characteristics, Dr. Lee said.

Physicians were included in the analysis only if they had contributed at least 10 RA patients to the registry within their first year of participation, and patients were included if they were patients of those physicians, if they had at least 12 months of follow-up data available, and if they were not prevalent opioid users at study entry.

A long-term goal is to target interventions to appropriate subgroups, she said, noting that 21%-29% of patients who are prescribed opioids for chronic pain misuse them, and more than 33,000 Americans die of opioid overdoses each year.

“Implications [of the findings] are that, in addition to targeting patients, we may also really want to consider interventions that target high-intensity prescribers. This may be useful for helping to decrease chronic opioid use in patients,” she concluded.

Dr. Lee has an investigator-initiated grant from Pfizer and owns stock in Express Scripts.

sworcester@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Lee Y et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70(Suppl 10), Abstract 1917

CHICAGO – A physician’s baseline opioid prescribing rate strongly predicts future chronic opioid use in rheumatoid arthritis patients, an analysis of data from the Consortium of Rheumatology Researchers of North America (Corrona) Rheumatoid Arthritis Registry suggests.

sdominick/iStock/Getty Images

The baseline 12-month opioid prescribing rate of 148 physicians in the initial cohort varied widely from 0% to 70% (median, 27%), and among 9,337 patients in the registry beyond the baseline 12 months, physician opioid prescribing rates during the baseline period were significantly associated with risk for chronic opioid use, Yvonne C. Lee, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology. She and her colleagues defined chronic opioid use as any opioid use during at least two consecutive study visits.

“It is important to understand the relative contributions of patient vs. physician characteristics on chronic opioid use,” said Dr. Lee of Northwestern University, Chicago. She that the goals of the current study were to identify the extent to which rheumatologists in the United States varied in baseline opioid prescribing rates and to determine the implications of baseline prescribing rates with respect to future chronic opioid use.

Compared with the lowest quartile of baseline opioid prescribing (rate of 18% or less), the second, third, and fourth quartiles of prescribing were associated with increasing odds of chronic opioid use (odds ratios of 1.16, 1.89, and 2.01 for the quartiles, respectively) during the study period, she said.

The researchers saw similar relationships when they used a stricter definition of opioid use and when they extended the cutoff between the baseline and study periods to 18 months. The relationships persisted after adjusting for numerous patient characteristics, such as age, sex, race, insurance status, RA duration, and treatments used, she said.

Subgroup analyses were also conducted to examine heterogeneity across clinical characteristics, including Clinical Disease Activity Index score (10 or less vs. greater than 10), pain intensity (scores of 40 or less, greater than 40 to 60, and greater than 60 out of 100), and use vs. nonuse of antidepressant medication. The relationships between physician baseline prescribing and chronic opioid use were similar across subgroups, she noted.

The findings help to characterize the role of rheumatologists’ prescribing rates in the ongoing opioid crisis even though the conclusions that can be reached are limited by the fact that some patients may receive opioid prescriptions from physicians outside the registry, by a lack of data on specific opioid types and doses, and by a lack of detailed information about physician characteristics, Dr. Lee said.

Physicians were included in the analysis only if they had contributed at least 10 RA patients to the registry within their first year of participation, and patients were included if they were patients of those physicians, if they had at least 12 months of follow-up data available, and if they were not prevalent opioid users at study entry.

A long-term goal is to target interventions to appropriate subgroups, she said, noting that 21%-29% of patients who are prescribed opioids for chronic pain misuse them, and more than 33,000 Americans die of opioid overdoses each year.

“Implications [of the findings] are that, in addition to targeting patients, we may also really want to consider interventions that target high-intensity prescribers. This may be useful for helping to decrease chronic opioid use in patients,” she concluded.

Dr. Lee has an investigator-initiated grant from Pfizer and owns stock in Express Scripts.

sworcester@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Lee Y et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70(Suppl 10), Abstract 1917

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force posted a draft research plan on opioid use disorder prevention for public comment on Dec. 13, according to a USPSTF bulletin.

An estimated 2.1 million persons aged 12 years and older had an opioid use disorder in 2017, and opioids were involved in nearly two-thirds of more than 70,000 fatal drug overdoses, according to the task force. Prevention of unnecessary opioid use, opioid misuse, and opioid use disorder in primary care settings is necessary to effectively respond to the ongoing crisis.

In an extensive literature review, an independent research team will look for evidence on strategies for people not currently receiving opioids that can be implemented on the primary care level. The public is invited to submit comments on the research plan that will help focus and guide the literature review.

The USPSTF also will be updating the current 2008 recommendation statement on screening for illicit drugs and nonmedical prescription drugs in adolescents and young adults, including pregnant and postpartum women.

Comments can be submitted until Jan. 16, 2019, on the USPSTF website.

lfranki@mdedge.com

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force posted a draft research plan on opioid use disorder prevention for public comment on Dec. 13, according to a USPSTF bulletin.

An estimated 2.1 million persons aged 12 years and older had an opioid use disorder in 2017, and opioids were involved in nearly two-thirds of more than 70,000 fatal drug overdoses, according to the task force. Prevention of unnecessary opioid use, opioid misuse, and opioid use disorder in primary care settings is necessary to effectively respond to the ongoing crisis.

In an extensive literature review, an independent research team will look for evidence on strategies for people not currently receiving opioids that can be implemented on the primary care level. The public is invited to submit comments on the research plan that will help focus and guide the literature review.

The USPSTF also will be updating the current 2008 recommendation statement on screening for illicit drugs and nonmedical prescription drugs in adolescents and young adults, including pregnant and postpartum women.

Comments can be submitted until Jan. 16, 2019, on the USPSTF website.

lfranki@mdedge.com

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force posted a draft research plan on opioid use disorder prevention for public comment on Dec. 13, according to a USPSTF bulletin.

An estimated 2.1 million persons aged 12 years and older had an opioid use disorder in 2017, and opioids were involved in nearly two-thirds of more than 70,000 fatal drug overdoses, according to the task force. Prevention of unnecessary opioid use, opioid misuse, and opioid use disorder in primary care settings is necessary to effectively respond to the ongoing crisis.

In an extensive literature review, an independent research team will look for evidence on strategies for people not currently receiving opioids that can be implemented on the primary care level. The public is invited to submit comments on the research plan that will help focus and guide the literature review.

The USPSTF also will be updating the current 2008 recommendation statement on screening for illicit drugs and nonmedical prescription drugs in adolescents and young adults, including pregnant and postpartum women.

Comments can be submitted until Jan. 16, 2019, on the USPSTF website.

lfranki@mdedge.com