Adolescents’ past 30-day use of e-cigarettes more than doubled from 2017 to 2019, and in 2019 almost 12% of high school seniors reported that they were vaping every day, according to data from the Monitoring the Future surveys.

Daily use – defined as vaping on 20 or more of the previous 30 days – was reported by 6.9% of 10th-grade and 1.9% of 8th-grade respondents in the 2019 survey, which was the first time use in these age groups was assessed. “The substantial levels of daily vaping suggest the development of nicotine addiction,” Richard Miech, PhD, and associates said Sept. 18 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

From 2017 to 2019, e-cigarette use over the previous 30 days increased from 11.0% to 25.4% among 12th graders, from 8.2% to 20.2% in 10th graders, and from 3.5% to 9.0% of 8th graders, suggesting that “current efforts by the vaping industry, government agencies, and schools have thus far proved insufficient to stop the rapid spread of nicotine vaping among adolescents,” the investigators wrote.

By 2019, over 40% of 12th-grade students reported ever using e-cigarettes, along with more than 36% of 10th graders and almost 21% of 8th graders. Corresponding figures for past 12-month use were 35.1%, 31.1%, and 16.1%, they reported.

“New efforts are needed to protect youth from using nicotine during adolescence, when the developing brain is particularly susceptible to permanent changes from nicotine use and when almost all nicotine addiction is established,” the investigators wrote.

The analysis was funded by a grant from the National Institute on Drug Abuse to Dr. Miech.

rfranki@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Miech R et al. N Engl J Med. 2019 Sep 18. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1910739.

Adolescents’ past 30-day use of e-cigarettes more than doubled from 2017 to 2019, and in 2019 almost 12% of high school seniors reported that they were vaping every day, according to data from the Monitoring the Future surveys.

Daily use – defined as vaping on 20 or more of the previous 30 days – was reported by 6.9% of 10th-grade and 1.9% of 8th-grade respondents in the 2019 survey, which was the first time use in these age groups was assessed. “The substantial levels of daily vaping suggest the development of nicotine addiction,” Richard Miech, PhD, and associates said Sept. 18 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

From 2017 to 2019, e-cigarette use over the previous 30 days increased from 11.0% to 25.4% among 12th graders, from 8.2% to 20.2% in 10th graders, and from 3.5% to 9.0% of 8th graders, suggesting that “current efforts by the vaping industry, government agencies, and schools have thus far proved insufficient to stop the rapid spread of nicotine vaping among adolescents,” the investigators wrote.

By 2019, over 40% of 12th-grade students reported ever using e-cigarettes, along with more than 36% of 10th graders and almost 21% of 8th graders. Corresponding figures for past 12-month use were 35.1%, 31.1%, and 16.1%, they reported.

“New efforts are needed to protect youth from using nicotine during adolescence, when the developing brain is particularly susceptible to permanent changes from nicotine use and when almost all nicotine addiction is established,” the investigators wrote.

The analysis was funded by a grant from the National Institute on Drug Abuse to Dr. Miech.

rfranki@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Miech R et al. N Engl J Med. 2019 Sep 18. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1910739.

Adolescents’ past 30-day use of e-cigarettes more than doubled from 2017 to 2019, and in 2019 almost 12% of high school seniors reported that they were vaping every day, according to data from the Monitoring the Future surveys.

Daily use – defined as vaping on 20 or more of the previous 30 days – was reported by 6.9% of 10th-grade and 1.9% of 8th-grade respondents in the 2019 survey, which was the first time use in these age groups was assessed. “The substantial levels of daily vaping suggest the development of nicotine addiction,” Richard Miech, PhD, and associates said Sept. 18 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

From 2017 to 2019, e-cigarette use over the previous 30 days increased from 11.0% to 25.4% among 12th graders, from 8.2% to 20.2% in 10th graders, and from 3.5% to 9.0% of 8th graders, suggesting that “current efforts by the vaping industry, government agencies, and schools have thus far proved insufficient to stop the rapid spread of nicotine vaping among adolescents,” the investigators wrote.

By 2019, over 40% of 12th-grade students reported ever using e-cigarettes, along with more than 36% of 10th graders and almost 21% of 8th graders. Corresponding figures for past 12-month use were 35.1%, 31.1%, and 16.1%, they reported.

“New efforts are needed to protect youth from using nicotine during adolescence, when the developing brain is particularly susceptible to permanent changes from nicotine use and when almost all nicotine addiction is established,” the investigators wrote.

The analysis was funded by a grant from the National Institute on Drug Abuse to Dr. Miech.

rfranki@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Miech R et al. N Engl J Med. 2019 Sep 18. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1910739.

A daily polypill regimen improved cardiovascular risk factors in a socioeconomically vulnerable minority population, in a randomized controlled trial.

©rasslava/thinkstockphotos.com

Patients at a federally qualified community health center in Alabama who received treatment with a combination pill for 1 year had greater reductions in systolic blood pressure and LDL cholesterol than did patients who received usual care, according to results published online on Sept. 19 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

“The simplicity and low cost of the polypill regimen make this approach attractive” when barriers such as lack of income, underinsurance, and difficulty attending clinic visits are common, said first author Daniel Muñoz, MD, of Vanderbilt University in Nashville, and coinvestigators. The investigators obtained the pills at a cost of $26 per month per participant.
 

People with low socioeconomic status and those who are nonwhite have high cardiovascular mortality, and the southeastern United States and rural areas have disproportionately high levels of cardiovascular disease burden, according to the investigators. The rates at which people with low socioeconomic status receive treatment for hypertension and hypercholesterolemia – leading cardiovascular disease risk factors – “are strikingly low,” Dr. Muñoz and colleagues said.

To assess the effectiveness of a polypill-based strategy in an underserved population with low socioeconomic status, the researchers conducted the randomized trial.

They enrolled 303 adults without cardiovascular disease, and 148 of the patients were randomized to receive the polypill, which contained generic versions of atorvastatin (10 mg), amlodipine (2.5 mg), losartan (25 mg), and hydrochlorothiazide (12.5 mg). The remaining 155 patients received usual care. All participants scheduled 2-month and 12-month follow-up visits.

The participants had an average age of 56 years, 60% were women, and more than 95% were black. More than 70% had an annual household income of less than $15,000. Baseline characteristics of the treatment groups did not significantly differ.

At baseline, the average BP was 140/83 mm Hg, and the average LDL cholesterol level was 113 mg/dL.

In all, 91% of the participants completed the 12-month trial visit. Average systolic BP decreased by 9 mm Hg in the group that received the polypill, compared with 2 mm Hg in the group that received usual care. Average LDL cholesterol level decreased by 15 mg/dL in the polypill group, versus 4 mg/dL in the usual-care group.

Changes in other medications

Clinicians discontinued or reduced doses of other antihypertensive or lipid-lowering medications in 44% of the patients in the polypill group and none in the usual-care group. Clinicians escalated therapy in 2% of the participants in the polypill group and in 10% of the usual-care group.

Side effects in participants who received the polypill included a 1% incidence of myalgias and a 1% incidence of hypotension or light-headedness. Liver function test results were normal.

Five serious adverse events that occurred during the trial – two in the polypill group and three in the usual-care group – were judged to be unrelated to the trial by a data and safety monitoring board.

The authors noted that limitations of the trial include its open-label design and that it was conducted at a single center.

“It is important to emphasize that use of the polypill does not preclude individualized, add-on therapies for residual elevations in blood-pressure or cholesterol levels, as judged by a patient’s physician,” said Dr. Muñoz and colleagues. “We recognize that a ‘one size fits all’ approach to cardiovascular disease prevention runs counter to current trends in precision medicine, in which clinical, genomic, and lifestyle factors are used for the development of individualized treatment strategies. Although the precision approach has clear virtues, a broader approach may benefit patients who face barriers to accessing the full advantages of precision medicine.”

The study was supported by grants from the American Heart Association Strategically Focused Prevention Research Network and the National Institutes of Health. One author disclosed personal fees from Novartis outside the study.

jremaly@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Muñoz D et al. N Engl J Med. 2019 Sep 18;381(12):1114-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1815359.

A daily polypill regimen improved cardiovascular risk factors in a socioeconomically vulnerable minority population, in a randomized controlled trial.

©rasslava/thinkstockphotos.com

Patients at a federally qualified community health center in Alabama who received treatment with a combination pill for 1 year had greater reductions in systolic blood pressure and LDL cholesterol than did patients who received usual care, according to results published online on Sept. 19 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

“The simplicity and low cost of the polypill regimen make this approach attractive” when barriers such as lack of income, underinsurance, and difficulty attending clinic visits are common, said first author Daniel Muñoz, MD, of Vanderbilt University in Nashville, and coinvestigators. The investigators obtained the pills at a cost of $26 per month per participant.
 

People with low socioeconomic status and those who are nonwhite have high cardiovascular mortality, and the southeastern United States and rural areas have disproportionately high levels of cardiovascular disease burden, according to the investigators. The rates at which people with low socioeconomic status receive treatment for hypertension and hypercholesterolemia – leading cardiovascular disease risk factors – “are strikingly low,” Dr. Muñoz and colleagues said.

To assess the effectiveness of a polypill-based strategy in an underserved population with low socioeconomic status, the researchers conducted the randomized trial.

They enrolled 303 adults without cardiovascular disease, and 148 of the patients were randomized to receive the polypill, which contained generic versions of atorvastatin (10 mg), amlodipine (2.5 mg), losartan (25 mg), and hydrochlorothiazide (12.5 mg). The remaining 155 patients received usual care. All participants scheduled 2-month and 12-month follow-up visits.

The participants had an average age of 56 years, 60% were women, and more than 95% were black. More than 70% had an annual household income of less than $15,000. Baseline characteristics of the treatment groups did not significantly differ.

At baseline, the average BP was 140/83 mm Hg, and the average LDL cholesterol level was 113 mg/dL.

In all, 91% of the participants completed the 12-month trial visit. Average systolic BP decreased by 9 mm Hg in the group that received the polypill, compared with 2 mm Hg in the group that received usual care. Average LDL cholesterol level decreased by 15 mg/dL in the polypill group, versus 4 mg/dL in the usual-care group.

Changes in other medications

Clinicians discontinued or reduced doses of other antihypertensive or lipid-lowering medications in 44% of the patients in the polypill group and none in the usual-care group. Clinicians escalated therapy in 2% of the participants in the polypill group and in 10% of the usual-care group.

Side effects in participants who received the polypill included a 1% incidence of myalgias and a 1% incidence of hypotension or light-headedness. Liver function test results were normal.

Five serious adverse events that occurred during the trial – two in the polypill group and three in the usual-care group – were judged to be unrelated to the trial by a data and safety monitoring board.

The authors noted that limitations of the trial include its open-label design and that it was conducted at a single center.

“It is important to emphasize that use of the polypill does not preclude individualized, add-on therapies for residual elevations in blood-pressure or cholesterol levels, as judged by a patient’s physician,” said Dr. Muñoz and colleagues. “We recognize that a ‘one size fits all’ approach to cardiovascular disease prevention runs counter to current trends in precision medicine, in which clinical, genomic, and lifestyle factors are used for the development of individualized treatment strategies. Although the precision approach has clear virtues, a broader approach may benefit patients who face barriers to accessing the full advantages of precision medicine.”

The study was supported by grants from the American Heart Association Strategically Focused Prevention Research Network and the National Institutes of Health. One author disclosed personal fees from Novartis outside the study.

jremaly@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Muñoz D et al. N Engl J Med. 2019 Sep 18;381(12):1114-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1815359.

A daily polypill regimen improved cardiovascular risk factors in a socioeconomically vulnerable minority population, in a randomized controlled trial.

©rasslava/thinkstockphotos.com

Patients at a federally qualified community health center in Alabama who received treatment with a combination pill for 1 year had greater reductions in systolic blood pressure and LDL cholesterol than did patients who received usual care, according to results published online on Sept. 19 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

“The simplicity and low cost of the polypill regimen make this approach attractive” when barriers such as lack of income, underinsurance, and difficulty attending clinic visits are common, said first author Daniel Muñoz, MD, of Vanderbilt University in Nashville, and coinvestigators. The investigators obtained the pills at a cost of $26 per month per participant.
 

People with low socioeconomic status and those who are nonwhite have high cardiovascular mortality, and the southeastern United States and rural areas have disproportionately high levels of cardiovascular disease burden, according to the investigators. The rates at which people with low socioeconomic status receive treatment for hypertension and hypercholesterolemia – leading cardiovascular disease risk factors – “are strikingly low,” Dr. Muñoz and colleagues said.

To assess the effectiveness of a polypill-based strategy in an underserved population with low socioeconomic status, the researchers conducted the randomized trial.

They enrolled 303 adults without cardiovascular disease, and 148 of the patients were randomized to receive the polypill, which contained generic versions of atorvastatin (10 mg), amlodipine (2.5 mg), losartan (25 mg), and hydrochlorothiazide (12.5 mg). The remaining 155 patients received usual care. All participants scheduled 2-month and 12-month follow-up visits.

The participants had an average age of 56 years, 60% were women, and more than 95% were black. More than 70% had an annual household income of less than $15,000. Baseline characteristics of the treatment groups did not significantly differ.

At baseline, the average BP was 140/83 mm Hg, and the average LDL cholesterol level was 113 mg/dL.

In all, 91% of the participants completed the 12-month trial visit. Average systolic BP decreased by 9 mm Hg in the group that received the polypill, compared with 2 mm Hg in the group that received usual care. Average LDL cholesterol level decreased by 15 mg/dL in the polypill group, versus 4 mg/dL in the usual-care group.

Changes in other medications

Clinicians discontinued or reduced doses of other antihypertensive or lipid-lowering medications in 44% of the patients in the polypill group and none in the usual-care group. Clinicians escalated therapy in 2% of the participants in the polypill group and in 10% of the usual-care group.

Side effects in participants who received the polypill included a 1% incidence of myalgias and a 1% incidence of hypotension or light-headedness. Liver function test results were normal.

Five serious adverse events that occurred during the trial – two in the polypill group and three in the usual-care group – were judged to be unrelated to the trial by a data and safety monitoring board.

The authors noted that limitations of the trial include its open-label design and that it was conducted at a single center.

“It is important to emphasize that use of the polypill does not preclude individualized, add-on therapies for residual elevations in blood-pressure or cholesterol levels, as judged by a patient’s physician,” said Dr. Muñoz and colleagues. “We recognize that a ‘one size fits all’ approach to cardiovascular disease prevention runs counter to current trends in precision medicine, in which clinical, genomic, and lifestyle factors are used for the development of individualized treatment strategies. Although the precision approach has clear virtues, a broader approach may benefit patients who face barriers to accessing the full advantages of precision medicine.”

The study was supported by grants from the American Heart Association Strategically Focused Prevention Research Network and the National Institutes of Health. One author disclosed personal fees from Novartis outside the study.

jremaly@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Muñoz D et al. N Engl J Med. 2019 Sep 18;381(12):1114-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1815359.

Higher body mass index and moderate – but not heavy – drinking may increase the risk of individuals with psoriasis going on to develop psoriatic arthritis, a study has found.

Around one in five people with psoriasis will develop psoriatic arthritis (PsA), wrote Amelia Green of the University of Bath (England) and coauthors in the British Journal of Dermatology.

Previous studies have explored possible links between obesity, alcohol consumption, or smoking, and an increased risk of developing psoriatic arthritis. However, some of these studies found conflicting results or had limitations such as measuring only a single exposure.

In a cohort study, the Ms. Green and her colleagues examined data from the U.K. Clinical Practice Research Datalink for 90,189 individuals with psoriasis, 1,409 of whom were subsequently also diagnosed with psoriatic arthritis.

The analysis showed a significant association between increasing body mass index (BMI) and increasing odds of developing psoriatic arthritis. Compared with individuals with a BMI below 25 kg/m², those with a BMI of 25.0-29.9 had a 79% greater odds of psoriatic arthritis, those with a BMI of 30.0-34.9 had a 2.10-fold greater odds, and those with a BMI at or above 35 had a 2.68-fold greater odds of developing psoriatic arthritis (P for trend less than .001). Adjustment for potential confounders such as sex, age, duration and severity of psoriasis, diabetes, smoking, and alcohol use slightly attenuated the association, but it remained statistically significant.

Researchers also examined the cumulative effect of lower BMIs over time, and found that over a 10-year period, reductions in BMI were associated with reductions in the risk of developing PsA, compared with remaining at the same BMI over that time.

“Here we have shown for the first time that losing weight over time could reduce the risk of developing PsA in a population with documented psoriasis,” the authors wrote. “As the effect of obesity on the risk of developing PsA may in fact occur with some delay and change over time, our analysis took into account both updated BMI measurements over time and the possible nonlinear and cumulative effects of BMI, which have not previously been investigated.”

Commenting on the mechanisms underlying the association between obesity and the development of PsA, the authors noted that adipose tissue is a source of inflammatory mediators such as adipokines and proinflammatory cytokines, which could lead to the development of PsA. Increasing body weight also could cause microtraumas of the connective tissue between tendon and bone, which may act as an initiating pathogenic event for PsA.

Moderate drinkers – defined as 0.1–3.0 drinks per day ­– had 57% higher odds of developing PsA when compared with nondrinkers, but former drinkers or heavy drinkers did not have an increased risk.

The study also didn’t see any effect of either past or current smoking on the risk of PsA, although there was a nonsignificant interaction with obesity that hinted at increased odds.

“While we found no association between smoking status and the development of PsA in people with psoriasis, further analysis revealed that the effect of smoking on the risk of PsA was possibly mediated through the effect of BMI on PsA; in other words, the protective effect of smoking may be associated with lower BMI among smokers,” the authors wrote.

Patients who developed PsA were also more likely to be younger (mean age of 44.7 years vs. 48.5 years), have severe psoriasis, and have had the disease for a shorter duration.

The study was funded by the National Institute for Health Research, and the authors declared grants from the funder during the conduct of the study. No other conflicts of interest were declared.

SOURCE: Green A et al. Br J Dermatol. 2019 Jun 18. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18227

Higher body mass index and moderate – but not heavy – drinking may increase the risk of individuals with psoriasis going on to develop psoriatic arthritis, a study has found.

Around one in five people with psoriasis will develop psoriatic arthritis (PsA), wrote Amelia Green of the University of Bath (England) and coauthors in the British Journal of Dermatology.

Previous studies have explored possible links between obesity, alcohol consumption, or smoking, and an increased risk of developing psoriatic arthritis. However, some of these studies found conflicting results or had limitations such as measuring only a single exposure.

In a cohort study, the Ms. Green and her colleagues examined data from the U.K. Clinical Practice Research Datalink for 90,189 individuals with psoriasis, 1,409 of whom were subsequently also diagnosed with psoriatic arthritis.

The analysis showed a significant association between increasing body mass index (BMI) and increasing odds of developing psoriatic arthritis. Compared with individuals with a BMI below 25 kg/m², those with a BMI of 25.0-29.9 had a 79% greater odds of psoriatic arthritis, those with a BMI of 30.0-34.9 had a 2.10-fold greater odds, and those with a BMI at or above 35 had a 2.68-fold greater odds of developing psoriatic arthritis (P for trend less than .001). Adjustment for potential confounders such as sex, age, duration and severity of psoriasis, diabetes, smoking, and alcohol use slightly attenuated the association, but it remained statistically significant.

Researchers also examined the cumulative effect of lower BMIs over time, and found that over a 10-year period, reductions in BMI were associated with reductions in the risk of developing PsA, compared with remaining at the same BMI over that time.

“Here we have shown for the first time that losing weight over time could reduce the risk of developing PsA in a population with documented psoriasis,” the authors wrote. “As the effect of obesity on the risk of developing PsA may in fact occur with some delay and change over time, our analysis took into account both updated BMI measurements over time and the possible nonlinear and cumulative effects of BMI, which have not previously been investigated.”

Commenting on the mechanisms underlying the association between obesity and the development of PsA, the authors noted that adipose tissue is a source of inflammatory mediators such as adipokines and proinflammatory cytokines, which could lead to the development of PsA. Increasing body weight also could cause microtraumas of the connective tissue between tendon and bone, which may act as an initiating pathogenic event for PsA.

Moderate drinkers – defined as 0.1–3.0 drinks per day ­– had 57% higher odds of developing PsA when compared with nondrinkers, but former drinkers or heavy drinkers did not have an increased risk.

The study also didn’t see any effect of either past or current smoking on the risk of PsA, although there was a nonsignificant interaction with obesity that hinted at increased odds.

“While we found no association between smoking status and the development of PsA in people with psoriasis, further analysis revealed that the effect of smoking on the risk of PsA was possibly mediated through the effect of BMI on PsA; in other words, the protective effect of smoking may be associated with lower BMI among smokers,” the authors wrote.

Patients who developed PsA were also more likely to be younger (mean age of 44.7 years vs. 48.5 years), have severe psoriasis, and have had the disease for a shorter duration.

The study was funded by the National Institute for Health Research, and the authors declared grants from the funder during the conduct of the study. No other conflicts of interest were declared.

SOURCE: Green A et al. Br J Dermatol. 2019 Jun 18. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18227

Higher body mass index and moderate – but not heavy – drinking may increase the risk of individuals with psoriasis going on to develop psoriatic arthritis, a study has found.

Around one in five people with psoriasis will develop psoriatic arthritis (PsA), wrote Amelia Green of the University of Bath (England) and coauthors in the British Journal of Dermatology.

Previous studies have explored possible links between obesity, alcohol consumption, or smoking, and an increased risk of developing psoriatic arthritis. However, some of these studies found conflicting results or had limitations such as measuring only a single exposure.

In a cohort study, the Ms. Green and her colleagues examined data from the U.K. Clinical Practice Research Datalink for 90,189 individuals with psoriasis, 1,409 of whom were subsequently also diagnosed with psoriatic arthritis.

The analysis showed a significant association between increasing body mass index (BMI) and increasing odds of developing psoriatic arthritis. Compared with individuals with a BMI below 25 kg/m², those with a BMI of 25.0-29.9 had a 79% greater odds of psoriatic arthritis, those with a BMI of 30.0-34.9 had a 2.10-fold greater odds, and those with a BMI at or above 35 had a 2.68-fold greater odds of developing psoriatic arthritis (P for trend less than .001). Adjustment for potential confounders such as sex, age, duration and severity of psoriasis, diabetes, smoking, and alcohol use slightly attenuated the association, but it remained statistically significant.

Researchers also examined the cumulative effect of lower BMIs over time, and found that over a 10-year period, reductions in BMI were associated with reductions in the risk of developing PsA, compared with remaining at the same BMI over that time.

“Here we have shown for the first time that losing weight over time could reduce the risk of developing PsA in a population with documented psoriasis,” the authors wrote. “As the effect of obesity on the risk of developing PsA may in fact occur with some delay and change over time, our analysis took into account both updated BMI measurements over time and the possible nonlinear and cumulative effects of BMI, which have not previously been investigated.”

Commenting on the mechanisms underlying the association between obesity and the development of PsA, the authors noted that adipose tissue is a source of inflammatory mediators such as adipokines and proinflammatory cytokines, which could lead to the development of PsA. Increasing body weight also could cause microtraumas of the connective tissue between tendon and bone, which may act as an initiating pathogenic event for PsA.

Moderate drinkers – defined as 0.1–3.0 drinks per day ­– had 57% higher odds of developing PsA when compared with nondrinkers, but former drinkers or heavy drinkers did not have an increased risk.

The study also didn’t see any effect of either past or current smoking on the risk of PsA, although there was a nonsignificant interaction with obesity that hinted at increased odds.

“While we found no association between smoking status and the development of PsA in people with psoriasis, further analysis revealed that the effect of smoking on the risk of PsA was possibly mediated through the effect of BMI on PsA; in other words, the protective effect of smoking may be associated with lower BMI among smokers,” the authors wrote.

Patients who developed PsA were also more likely to be younger (mean age of 44.7 years vs. 48.5 years), have severe psoriasis, and have had the disease for a shorter duration.

The study was funded by the National Institute for Health Research, and the authors declared grants from the funder during the conduct of the study. No other conflicts of interest were declared.

SOURCE: Green A et al. Br J Dermatol. 2019 Jun 18. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18227

Two great tastes that cause cancer together

Spaghetti and meatballs. They go together like chocolate and peanut butter. It almost feels wrong to eat one without the other; but if you’re worried about cancer, you may have to go meatless.

artisteer/iStock/Getty Images

The latest blow to an enjoyable meal comes courtesy of a study published in Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, which tested how lycopene – a carotenoid found in tomatoes that has notable anticancer properties – is absorbed by the body when in the presence of iron, which meat contains plenty of. When the study subjects drank a tomato-based shake infused with iron, lycopene was far less present in the blood and digestive system than in subjects who drank an iron-free tomato shake.

The study authors claim that either the iron is oxidizing with the lycopene or that the iron turns the mix of tomato and fat into something like separated salad dressing, preventing everything from mixing together when it enters the body.
 

Tastes like chicken

It’s an enduring oncologic mystery: How can some cancer cells endure what should be a lethal therapeutic beating, only to bounce off the canvas after an eight-count to deliver a devastating relapse-counterpunch of their own?

royaltystockphoto/iStock/Getty Images

A new study offers an unsavory answer: cannibalism.

Turns out that dining on one’s weaker cancer cell neighbors during a chemotherapy barrage provides just enough energy to rope-a-dope and stage a late-round comeback.

Breast cancer cells with wild-type TP53 genes are particularly prone to revival after taking a beating at the hands of doxorubicin or other chemotherapy drugs. Like many of their cancerous compatriots, they retreat to a corner of the therapy ring during chemo and go gloves up in a state of senescence.

But researchers at Tulane University noticed that, in the midst of that pharmaceutical pummeling, those senescent wild-type TP53 cells start doing something that their other senescent, cancerous neighbors don’t: They engulf other cancer cells. Why? Seems those breast cancer cells with the wild-type TP53 gloves are equipped with gene expression programs similar to macrophages.

What’s more, the cannibals’ appetite for fellow cells appears to confer a survival advantage when the chemo rounds end.

We at the Bureau of LOTME will resist the impulse to ring out this item with a tasteless Donner Party punchline. Instead, we’ll indulge our high-brow inner child by retooling an elementary school comedy classic.

Why don’t cancer-cell cannibals eat cancer-cell comedians? They taste funny.
 

Poop, what is it good for?

One thing you can cross off the list: Cutting meat.

Geerati//iStock/Getty Images

That might seem pretty obvious, but there’s actually a bit of history here. In a book published in 1998, anthropologist Wade Davis shared an account of an elderly Inuit man trapped alone in a storm. He had no tools and no food, so he made a knife out of his own frozen stool and used it to kill and butcher a dog.

That story, which has since become something of an urban legend, directly inspired the career of another anthropologist, Metin Eren, PhD, of Kent State University in Ohio. As director of the school’s laboratory of experimental archaeology, Dr. Eren decided that the time had come to prove or disprove the poop-knife hypothesis.

First, he and his team had to make such a knife. To produce the needed raw materials, Dr. Eren went on an 8-day “Arctic diet” that included lots of beef, turkey, and salmon, with some applesauce and butternut squash risotto thrown in, while a colleague stuck to a more Western diet. Their samples were then frozen to –58° F and sharpened with metal files.

“I was surprised at how hard human feces could get when frozen,” Dr. Eren told Live Science. “I started to think, ‘Oh my gosh, this might actually work!’ ”

The team’s attempts to cut refrigerated pig hide, however, were not successful. “Like a crayon, it just left brown streaks on the meat – no slices at all,” he said.

Today’s lesson? Don’t meat your heroes or their poop knives; they’re sure to disappoint you.

Two great tastes that cause cancer together

Spaghetti and meatballs. They go together like chocolate and peanut butter. It almost feels wrong to eat one without the other; but if you’re worried about cancer, you may have to go meatless.

artisteer/iStock/Getty Images

The latest blow to an enjoyable meal comes courtesy of a study published in Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, which tested how lycopene – a carotenoid found in tomatoes that has notable anticancer properties – is absorbed by the body when in the presence of iron, which meat contains plenty of. When the study subjects drank a tomato-based shake infused with iron, lycopene was far less present in the blood and digestive system than in subjects who drank an iron-free tomato shake.

The study authors claim that either the iron is oxidizing with the lycopene or that the iron turns the mix of tomato and fat into something like separated salad dressing, preventing everything from mixing together when it enters the body.
 

Tastes like chicken

It’s an enduring oncologic mystery: How can some cancer cells endure what should be a lethal therapeutic beating, only to bounce off the canvas after an eight-count to deliver a devastating relapse-counterpunch of their own?

royaltystockphoto/iStock/Getty Images

A new study offers an unsavory answer: cannibalism.

Turns out that dining on one’s weaker cancer cell neighbors during a chemotherapy barrage provides just enough energy to rope-a-dope and stage a late-round comeback.

Breast cancer cells with wild-type TP53 genes are particularly prone to revival after taking a beating at the hands of doxorubicin or other chemotherapy drugs. Like many of their cancerous compatriots, they retreat to a corner of the therapy ring during chemo and go gloves up in a state of senescence.

But researchers at Tulane University noticed that, in the midst of that pharmaceutical pummeling, those senescent wild-type TP53 cells start doing something that their other senescent, cancerous neighbors don’t: They engulf other cancer cells. Why? Seems those breast cancer cells with the wild-type TP53 gloves are equipped with gene expression programs similar to macrophages.

What’s more, the cannibals’ appetite for fellow cells appears to confer a survival advantage when the chemo rounds end.

We at the Bureau of LOTME will resist the impulse to ring out this item with a tasteless Donner Party punchline. Instead, we’ll indulge our high-brow inner child by retooling an elementary school comedy classic.

Why don’t cancer-cell cannibals eat cancer-cell comedians? They taste funny.
 

Poop, what is it good for?

One thing you can cross off the list: Cutting meat.

Geerati//iStock/Getty Images

That might seem pretty obvious, but there’s actually a bit of history here. In a book published in 1998, anthropologist Wade Davis shared an account of an elderly Inuit man trapped alone in a storm. He had no tools and no food, so he made a knife out of his own frozen stool and used it to kill and butcher a dog.

That story, which has since become something of an urban legend, directly inspired the career of another anthropologist, Metin Eren, PhD, of Kent State University in Ohio. As director of the school’s laboratory of experimental archaeology, Dr. Eren decided that the time had come to prove or disprove the poop-knife hypothesis.

First, he and his team had to make such a knife. To produce the needed raw materials, Dr. Eren went on an 8-day “Arctic diet” that included lots of beef, turkey, and salmon, with some applesauce and butternut squash risotto thrown in, while a colleague stuck to a more Western diet. Their samples were then frozen to –58° F and sharpened with metal files.

“I was surprised at how hard human feces could get when frozen,” Dr. Eren told Live Science. “I started to think, ‘Oh my gosh, this might actually work!’ ”

The team’s attempts to cut refrigerated pig hide, however, were not successful. “Like a crayon, it just left brown streaks on the meat – no slices at all,” he said.

Today’s lesson? Don’t meat your heroes or their poop knives; they’re sure to disappoint you.

Two great tastes that cause cancer together

Spaghetti and meatballs. They go together like chocolate and peanut butter. It almost feels wrong to eat one without the other; but if you’re worried about cancer, you may have to go meatless.

artisteer/iStock/Getty Images

The latest blow to an enjoyable meal comes courtesy of a study published in Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, which tested how lycopene – a carotenoid found in tomatoes that has notable anticancer properties – is absorbed by the body when in the presence of iron, which meat contains plenty of. When the study subjects drank a tomato-based shake infused with iron, lycopene was far less present in the blood and digestive system than in subjects who drank an iron-free tomato shake.

The study authors claim that either the iron is oxidizing with the lycopene or that the iron turns the mix of tomato and fat into something like separated salad dressing, preventing everything from mixing together when it enters the body.
 

Tastes like chicken

It’s an enduring oncologic mystery: How can some cancer cells endure what should be a lethal therapeutic beating, only to bounce off the canvas after an eight-count to deliver a devastating relapse-counterpunch of their own?

royaltystockphoto/iStock/Getty Images

A new study offers an unsavory answer: cannibalism.

Turns out that dining on one’s weaker cancer cell neighbors during a chemotherapy barrage provides just enough energy to rope-a-dope and stage a late-round comeback.

Breast cancer cells with wild-type TP53 genes are particularly prone to revival after taking a beating at the hands of doxorubicin or other chemotherapy drugs. Like many of their cancerous compatriots, they retreat to a corner of the therapy ring during chemo and go gloves up in a state of senescence.

But researchers at Tulane University noticed that, in the midst of that pharmaceutical pummeling, those senescent wild-type TP53 cells start doing something that their other senescent, cancerous neighbors don’t: They engulf other cancer cells. Why? Seems those breast cancer cells with the wild-type TP53 gloves are equipped with gene expression programs similar to macrophages.

What’s more, the cannibals’ appetite for fellow cells appears to confer a survival advantage when the chemo rounds end.

We at the Bureau of LOTME will resist the impulse to ring out this item with a tasteless Donner Party punchline. Instead, we’ll indulge our high-brow inner child by retooling an elementary school comedy classic.

Why don’t cancer-cell cannibals eat cancer-cell comedians? They taste funny.
 

Poop, what is it good for?

One thing you can cross off the list: Cutting meat.

Geerati//iStock/Getty Images

That might seem pretty obvious, but there’s actually a bit of history here. In a book published in 1998, anthropologist Wade Davis shared an account of an elderly Inuit man trapped alone in a storm. He had no tools and no food, so he made a knife out of his own frozen stool and used it to kill and butcher a dog.

That story, which has since become something of an urban legend, directly inspired the career of another anthropologist, Metin Eren, PhD, of Kent State University in Ohio. As director of the school’s laboratory of experimental archaeology, Dr. Eren decided that the time had come to prove or disprove the poop-knife hypothesis.

First, he and his team had to make such a knife. To produce the needed raw materials, Dr. Eren went on an 8-day “Arctic diet” that included lots of beef, turkey, and salmon, with some applesauce and butternut squash risotto thrown in, while a colleague stuck to a more Western diet. Their samples were then frozen to –58° F and sharpened with metal files.

“I was surprised at how hard human feces could get when frozen,” Dr. Eren told Live Science. “I started to think, ‘Oh my gosh, this might actually work!’ ”

The team’s attempts to cut refrigerated pig hide, however, were not successful. “Like a crayon, it just left brown streaks on the meat – no slices at all,” he said.

Today’s lesson? Don’t meat your heroes or their poop knives; they’re sure to disappoint you.

COPENHAGEN – Esketamine nasal spray achieved rapid reduction of major depressive disorder symptoms in patients at imminent risk for suicide in a pair of pivotal phase 3 clinical trials known as ASPIRE-1 and ASPIRE-2, Carla M. Canuso, MD, reported at the annual congress of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology.

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

These were groundbreaking studies, which addressed a major unmet need familiar to every mental health professional, given that more than 800,000 suicides per year occur worldwide. Standard antidepressants are of only limited value during the period of acute suicidal crisis because they take 4-6 weeks to work. Moreover, this population of seriously depressed and suicidal patients has been understudied.

“Patients with active suicidal ideation and intent are routinely excluded from antidepressant trials,” observed Dr. Canuso, a psychiatrist who serves as senior director of neuroscience clinical development at Janssen Research and Development in Titusville, N.J.

“This is the first global registration program of patients with major depressive disorder who have active suicidal ideation with intent. It’s very important for the field to know that we can actually study these patients safely and effectively in clinical trials,” she said.

ASPIRE-1 and -2 were identically designed, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational studies conducted in patients with moderate to severe major depressive disorder as evidenced by a baseline Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score of about 40, along with moderate to extreme active suicidal ideation and intent as assessed using the Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Suicidality-Revised (CGI-SS-R).

“These were all patients in psychiatric crisis seeking clinical care,” according to Dr. Canuso.

All 456 participants in the two phase 3 studies underwent an initial 5-14 days of psychiatric hospitalization, during which they began treatment with esketamine nasal spray at 84 mg twice weekly or placebo coupled with comprehensive standard of care, which included a newly initiated and/or optimized oral antidepressant regimen.

The primary endpoint in the two clinical trials was the change in MADRS total score 24 hours after the first dose of study medication. The esketamine-treated patients demonstrated a mean reduction of 16.4 and 15.7 points, respectively, in the two trials, which was 3.82 points greater than in the pooled placebo group. This represents a clinically meaningful and statistically significant between-group difference.

The treatment effect size was even larger in some of the prespecified patient subgroups. Dr. Canuso drew attention to two key groups: In the roughly 60% of ASPIRE participants with a prior suicide attempt, esketamine resulted in a mean 4.81-point greater reduction in MADRS total score than placebo, and in the nearly 30% of participants with a suicide attempt during the past month, the difference was 5.22 points.

A word on the study design: Patients received intranasal esketamine at 84 mg per dose or placebo in double-blind fashion twice weekly for 4 weeks, thereby giving time for their oral antidepressant therapy to kick in, and were then followed on the conventional therapy out to 90 days.

A between-group difference in MADRS total score in favor of the esketamine group was evident as early as 4 hours after the first dose and continued through day 25, the end of the double-blind treatment period, at which point 54% and 47% of the esketamine-plus-conventional-antidepressant groups in the two trials had achieved remission as defined by a MADRS score of 12 or less, as had about one-third of the control group.

The prespecified key secondary efficacy endpoint in ASPIRE-1 and -2 was change in the CGI-SS-R 24 hours after the first dose. Both the esketamine and placebo-treated patients experienced significant improvement in this domain, with a disappointing absence of between-group statistical significance.

“We think that this may be due to the effect of acute hospitalization in diffusing the suicidal crisis,” Dr. Canuso said.

She noted, however, that other suicidality indices did show significant improvement in the esketamine-treated group during assessments at 4 hours, 24 hours, and 25 days after the first dose. For example, the double-blind esketamine-treated patients were 2.62-fold more likely than controls to show a significant improvement in MADRS Suicidal Thoughts at 4 hours after dose number one, and 6.15 times more likely to do so 4 hours after their day-25 dose. The CGI structured physician assessments of suicide risk and frequency of suicidal thinking, as well as patient-reported frequency of suicidal thinking, showed consistent favorable numeric trends for improvement with esketamine, with odds ratios of 1.46-2.11 from 4 hours through 25 days, although those results generally failed to achieve statistical significance.

In terms of safety, the rate of serious adverse events was just under 12% in both the esketamine and placebo arms. As in earlier studies, the most common adverse events associated with the novel antidepressant were dizziness, dissociation, nausea, and sleepiness, all several-fold more frequent than with placebo.

Esketamine is the S-enantiomer of racemic ketamine. It’s a noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist.

Janssen, which already markets intranasal esketamine as Spravato in the United States for treatment-resistant depression, plans to file for an expanded indication on the basis of the ASPIRE-1 and -2 results. The Food and Drug Administration already has granted Breakthrough Therapy designation for research on esketamine for reduction of major depression symptoms in patients with active suicidal ideation.

The ASPIRE studies were funded by Janssen.

bjancin@mdedge.com

COPENHAGEN – Esketamine nasal spray achieved rapid reduction of major depressive disorder symptoms in patients at imminent risk for suicide in a pair of pivotal phase 3 clinical trials known as ASPIRE-1 and ASPIRE-2, Carla M. Canuso, MD, reported at the annual congress of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology.

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

These were groundbreaking studies, which addressed a major unmet need familiar to every mental health professional, given that more than 800,000 suicides per year occur worldwide. Standard antidepressants are of only limited value during the period of acute suicidal crisis because they take 4-6 weeks to work. Moreover, this population of seriously depressed and suicidal patients has been understudied.

“Patients with active suicidal ideation and intent are routinely excluded from antidepressant trials,” observed Dr. Canuso, a psychiatrist who serves as senior director of neuroscience clinical development at Janssen Research and Development in Titusville, N.J.

“This is the first global registration program of patients with major depressive disorder who have active suicidal ideation with intent. It’s very important for the field to know that we can actually study these patients safely and effectively in clinical trials,” she said.

ASPIRE-1 and -2 were identically designed, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational studies conducted in patients with moderate to severe major depressive disorder as evidenced by a baseline Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score of about 40, along with moderate to extreme active suicidal ideation and intent as assessed using the Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Suicidality-Revised (CGI-SS-R).

“These were all patients in psychiatric crisis seeking clinical care,” according to Dr. Canuso.

All 456 participants in the two phase 3 studies underwent an initial 5-14 days of psychiatric hospitalization, during which they began treatment with esketamine nasal spray at 84 mg twice weekly or placebo coupled with comprehensive standard of care, which included a newly initiated and/or optimized oral antidepressant regimen.

The primary endpoint in the two clinical trials was the change in MADRS total score 24 hours after the first dose of study medication. The esketamine-treated patients demonstrated a mean reduction of 16.4 and 15.7 points, respectively, in the two trials, which was 3.82 points greater than in the pooled placebo group. This represents a clinically meaningful and statistically significant between-group difference.

The treatment effect size was even larger in some of the prespecified patient subgroups. Dr. Canuso drew attention to two key groups: In the roughly 60% of ASPIRE participants with a prior suicide attempt, esketamine resulted in a mean 4.81-point greater reduction in MADRS total score than placebo, and in the nearly 30% of participants with a suicide attempt during the past month, the difference was 5.22 points.

A word on the study design: Patients received intranasal esketamine at 84 mg per dose or placebo in double-blind fashion twice weekly for 4 weeks, thereby giving time for their oral antidepressant therapy to kick in, and were then followed on the conventional therapy out to 90 days.

A between-group difference in MADRS total score in favor of the esketamine group was evident as early as 4 hours after the first dose and continued through day 25, the end of the double-blind treatment period, at which point 54% and 47% of the esketamine-plus-conventional-antidepressant groups in the two trials had achieved remission as defined by a MADRS score of 12 or less, as had about one-third of the control group.

The prespecified key secondary efficacy endpoint in ASPIRE-1 and -2 was change in the CGI-SS-R 24 hours after the first dose. Both the esketamine and placebo-treated patients experienced significant improvement in this domain, with a disappointing absence of between-group statistical significance.

“We think that this may be due to the effect of acute hospitalization in diffusing the suicidal crisis,” Dr. Canuso said.

She noted, however, that other suicidality indices did show significant improvement in the esketamine-treated group during assessments at 4 hours, 24 hours, and 25 days after the first dose. For example, the double-blind esketamine-treated patients were 2.62-fold more likely than controls to show a significant improvement in MADRS Suicidal Thoughts at 4 hours after dose number one, and 6.15 times more likely to do so 4 hours after their day-25 dose. The CGI structured physician assessments of suicide risk and frequency of suicidal thinking, as well as patient-reported frequency of suicidal thinking, showed consistent favorable numeric trends for improvement with esketamine, with odds ratios of 1.46-2.11 from 4 hours through 25 days, although those results generally failed to achieve statistical significance.

In terms of safety, the rate of serious adverse events was just under 12% in both the esketamine and placebo arms. As in earlier studies, the most common adverse events associated with the novel antidepressant were dizziness, dissociation, nausea, and sleepiness, all several-fold more frequent than with placebo.

Esketamine is the S-enantiomer of racemic ketamine. It’s a noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist.

Janssen, which already markets intranasal esketamine as Spravato in the United States for treatment-resistant depression, plans to file for an expanded indication on the basis of the ASPIRE-1 and -2 results. The Food and Drug Administration already has granted Breakthrough Therapy designation for research on esketamine for reduction of major depression symptoms in patients with active suicidal ideation.

The ASPIRE studies were funded by Janssen.

bjancin@mdedge.com

COPENHAGEN – Esketamine nasal spray achieved rapid reduction of major depressive disorder symptoms in patients at imminent risk for suicide in a pair of pivotal phase 3 clinical trials known as ASPIRE-1 and ASPIRE-2, Carla M. Canuso, MD, reported at the annual congress of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology.

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

These were groundbreaking studies, which addressed a major unmet need familiar to every mental health professional, given that more than 800,000 suicides per year occur worldwide. Standard antidepressants are of only limited value during the period of acute suicidal crisis because they take 4-6 weeks to work. Moreover, this population of seriously depressed and suicidal patients has been understudied.

“Patients with active suicidal ideation and intent are routinely excluded from antidepressant trials,” observed Dr. Canuso, a psychiatrist who serves as senior director of neuroscience clinical development at Janssen Research and Development in Titusville, N.J.

“This is the first global registration program of patients with major depressive disorder who have active suicidal ideation with intent. It’s very important for the field to know that we can actually study these patients safely and effectively in clinical trials,” she said.

ASPIRE-1 and -2 were identically designed, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational studies conducted in patients with moderate to severe major depressive disorder as evidenced by a baseline Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score of about 40, along with moderate to extreme active suicidal ideation and intent as assessed using the Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Suicidality-Revised (CGI-SS-R).

“These were all patients in psychiatric crisis seeking clinical care,” according to Dr. Canuso.

All 456 participants in the two phase 3 studies underwent an initial 5-14 days of psychiatric hospitalization, during which they began treatment with esketamine nasal spray at 84 mg twice weekly or placebo coupled with comprehensive standard of care, which included a newly initiated and/or optimized oral antidepressant regimen.

The primary endpoint in the two clinical trials was the change in MADRS total score 24 hours after the first dose of study medication. The esketamine-treated patients demonstrated a mean reduction of 16.4 and 15.7 points, respectively, in the two trials, which was 3.82 points greater than in the pooled placebo group. This represents a clinically meaningful and statistically significant between-group difference.

The treatment effect size was even larger in some of the prespecified patient subgroups. Dr. Canuso drew attention to two key groups: In the roughly 60% of ASPIRE participants with a prior suicide attempt, esketamine resulted in a mean 4.81-point greater reduction in MADRS total score than placebo, and in the nearly 30% of participants with a suicide attempt during the past month, the difference was 5.22 points.

A word on the study design: Patients received intranasal esketamine at 84 mg per dose or placebo in double-blind fashion twice weekly for 4 weeks, thereby giving time for their oral antidepressant therapy to kick in, and were then followed on the conventional therapy out to 90 days.

A between-group difference in MADRS total score in favor of the esketamine group was evident as early as 4 hours after the first dose and continued through day 25, the end of the double-blind treatment period, at which point 54% and 47% of the esketamine-plus-conventional-antidepressant groups in the two trials had achieved remission as defined by a MADRS score of 12 or less, as had about one-third of the control group.

The prespecified key secondary efficacy endpoint in ASPIRE-1 and -2 was change in the CGI-SS-R 24 hours after the first dose. Both the esketamine and placebo-treated patients experienced significant improvement in this domain, with a disappointing absence of between-group statistical significance.

“We think that this may be due to the effect of acute hospitalization in diffusing the suicidal crisis,” Dr. Canuso said.

She noted, however, that other suicidality indices did show significant improvement in the esketamine-treated group during assessments at 4 hours, 24 hours, and 25 days after the first dose. For example, the double-blind esketamine-treated patients were 2.62-fold more likely than controls to show a significant improvement in MADRS Suicidal Thoughts at 4 hours after dose number one, and 6.15 times more likely to do so 4 hours after their day-25 dose. The CGI structured physician assessments of suicide risk and frequency of suicidal thinking, as well as patient-reported frequency of suicidal thinking, showed consistent favorable numeric trends for improvement with esketamine, with odds ratios of 1.46-2.11 from 4 hours through 25 days, although those results generally failed to achieve statistical significance.

In terms of safety, the rate of serious adverse events was just under 12% in both the esketamine and placebo arms. As in earlier studies, the most common adverse events associated with the novel antidepressant were dizziness, dissociation, nausea, and sleepiness, all several-fold more frequent than with placebo.

Esketamine is the S-enantiomer of racemic ketamine. It’s a noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist.

Janssen, which already markets intranasal esketamine as Spravato in the United States for treatment-resistant depression, plans to file for an expanded indication on the basis of the ASPIRE-1 and -2 results. The Food and Drug Administration already has granted Breakthrough Therapy designation for research on esketamine for reduction of major depression symptoms in patients with active suicidal ideation.

The ASPIRE studies were funded by Janssen.

bjancin@mdedge.com

A minority of physician practices and hospitals are screening patients for five key social needs that are associated with health outcomes, a study found.

MarkLevant/iStock/Getty Images Plus

Lead author Taressa K. Fraze, PhD, of the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice in Lebanon, N.H., and colleagues conducted a cross-sectional survey analysis of responses by physician practices and hospitals that participated in the 2017-2018 National Survey of Healthcare Organizations and Systems. The investigators evaluated how many practices and hospitals reported screening of patients for five social needs: food insecurity, housing instability, utility needs, transportation needs, and experience with interpersonal violence. The final analysis included 2,190 physician practices and 739 hospitals.

Of physician practices, 56% reported screening for interpersonal violence, 35% screened for transportation needs, 30% for food insecurity, 28% for housing instability, and 23% for utility needs, according to the study published in JAMA Network Open.

Among hospitals, 75% reported screening for interpersonal violence, 74% for transportation needs, 60% for housing instability, 40% for food insecurity, and 36% for utility needs. Only 16% of physician practices and 24% of hospitals screened for all five social needs, the study found, while 33% of physician practices and 8% of hospitals reported screening for no social needs. The majority of the overall screening activity was driven by interpersonal violence screenings.

Physician practices that served more disadvantaged patients, including federally qualified health centers and those with more Medicaid revenue were more likely to screen for all five social needs. Practices in Medicaid accountable care organization contracts and those in Medicaid expansion states also had higher screening rates. Regionally, practices in the West had the highest screening rates, while practices in the Midwest had the lowest rates.

Among hospitals, the investigators found few significant screening differences based on hospital characteristics. Ownership, critical access status, delivery reform participation, rural status, region, and Medicaid expansion had no significant effects on screening rates, although academic medical centers were more likely to screen patients for all needs compared with nonacademic medical centers.

The study authors wrote that doctors and hospitals may need more resources and additional processes to screen for and/or to address the social needs of patients. They noted that practices and hospitals that did not screen for social needs were more likely to report a lack of financial resources, time, and incentives as major barriers.

To implement better screening protocols and address patients’ needs, the investigators wrote that doctors and hospitals will need financial support. For example, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services should consider expanding care management billing to include managing care for patients who are both at risk or have clinically complex conditions in addition to social needs.

Dr. Fraze and three coauthors reported receiving grants from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality during the conduct of the study. Dr. Fraze also reported receiving grants from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation during the conduct of the study and receiving grants as an investigator from the 6 Foundation Collaborative, Commonwealth Fund, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. One coauthor reported receiving grants from the National Institute on Aging/National Institutes of Health during the conduct of the study.

agallegos@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Fraze TK et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 18. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.11514.

A minority of physician practices and hospitals are screening patients for five key social needs that are associated with health outcomes, a study found.

MarkLevant/iStock/Getty Images Plus

Lead author Taressa K. Fraze, PhD, of the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice in Lebanon, N.H., and colleagues conducted a cross-sectional survey analysis of responses by physician practices and hospitals that participated in the 2017-2018 National Survey of Healthcare Organizations and Systems. The investigators evaluated how many practices and hospitals reported screening of patients for five social needs: food insecurity, housing instability, utility needs, transportation needs, and experience with interpersonal violence. The final analysis included 2,190 physician practices and 739 hospitals.

Of physician practices, 56% reported screening for interpersonal violence, 35% screened for transportation needs, 30% for food insecurity, 28% for housing instability, and 23% for utility needs, according to the study published in JAMA Network Open.

Among hospitals, 75% reported screening for interpersonal violence, 74% for transportation needs, 60% for housing instability, 40% for food insecurity, and 36% for utility needs. Only 16% of physician practices and 24% of hospitals screened for all five social needs, the study found, while 33% of physician practices and 8% of hospitals reported screening for no social needs. The majority of the overall screening activity was driven by interpersonal violence screenings.

Physician practices that served more disadvantaged patients, including federally qualified health centers and those with more Medicaid revenue were more likely to screen for all five social needs. Practices in Medicaid accountable care organization contracts and those in Medicaid expansion states also had higher screening rates. Regionally, practices in the West had the highest screening rates, while practices in the Midwest had the lowest rates.

Among hospitals, the investigators found few significant screening differences based on hospital characteristics. Ownership, critical access status, delivery reform participation, rural status, region, and Medicaid expansion had no significant effects on screening rates, although academic medical centers were more likely to screen patients for all needs compared with nonacademic medical centers.

The study authors wrote that doctors and hospitals may need more resources and additional processes to screen for and/or to address the social needs of patients. They noted that practices and hospitals that did not screen for social needs were more likely to report a lack of financial resources, time, and incentives as major barriers.

To implement better screening protocols and address patients’ needs, the investigators wrote that doctors and hospitals will need financial support. For example, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services should consider expanding care management billing to include managing care for patients who are both at risk or have clinically complex conditions in addition to social needs.

Dr. Fraze and three coauthors reported receiving grants from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality during the conduct of the study. Dr. Fraze also reported receiving grants from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation during the conduct of the study and receiving grants as an investigator from the 6 Foundation Collaborative, Commonwealth Fund, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. One coauthor reported receiving grants from the National Institute on Aging/National Institutes of Health during the conduct of the study.

agallegos@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Fraze TK et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 18. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.11514.

A minority of physician practices and hospitals are screening patients for five key social needs that are associated with health outcomes, a study found.

MarkLevant/iStock/Getty Images Plus

Lead author Taressa K. Fraze, PhD, of the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice in Lebanon, N.H., and colleagues conducted a cross-sectional survey analysis of responses by physician practices and hospitals that participated in the 2017-2018 National Survey of Healthcare Organizations and Systems. The investigators evaluated how many practices and hospitals reported screening of patients for five social needs: food insecurity, housing instability, utility needs, transportation needs, and experience with interpersonal violence. The final analysis included 2,190 physician practices and 739 hospitals.

Of physician practices, 56% reported screening for interpersonal violence, 35% screened for transportation needs, 30% for food insecurity, 28% for housing instability, and 23% for utility needs, according to the study published in JAMA Network Open.

Among hospitals, 75% reported screening for interpersonal violence, 74% for transportation needs, 60% for housing instability, 40% for food insecurity, and 36% for utility needs. Only 16% of physician practices and 24% of hospitals screened for all five social needs, the study found, while 33% of physician practices and 8% of hospitals reported screening for no social needs. The majority of the overall screening activity was driven by interpersonal violence screenings.

Physician practices that served more disadvantaged patients, including federally qualified health centers and those with more Medicaid revenue were more likely to screen for all five social needs. Practices in Medicaid accountable care organization contracts and those in Medicaid expansion states also had higher screening rates. Regionally, practices in the West had the highest screening rates, while practices in the Midwest had the lowest rates.

Among hospitals, the investigators found few significant screening differences based on hospital characteristics. Ownership, critical access status, delivery reform participation, rural status, region, and Medicaid expansion had no significant effects on screening rates, although academic medical centers were more likely to screen patients for all needs compared with nonacademic medical centers.

The study authors wrote that doctors and hospitals may need more resources and additional processes to screen for and/or to address the social needs of patients. They noted that practices and hospitals that did not screen for social needs were more likely to report a lack of financial resources, time, and incentives as major barriers.

To implement better screening protocols and address patients’ needs, the investigators wrote that doctors and hospitals will need financial support. For example, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services should consider expanding care management billing to include managing care for patients who are both at risk or have clinically complex conditions in addition to social needs.

Dr. Fraze and three coauthors reported receiving grants from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality during the conduct of the study. Dr. Fraze also reported receiving grants from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation during the conduct of the study and receiving grants as an investigator from the 6 Foundation Collaborative, Commonwealth Fund, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. One coauthor reported receiving grants from the National Institute on Aging/National Institutes of Health during the conduct of the study.

agallegos@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Fraze TK et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 18. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.11514.

ALVAC-HIV vaccine showed immunogenicity across several HIV clades in an early trial involving 100 healthy patients at low risk of HIV infection, according to a study by Glenda E. Gray, MBBCH, FCPaed, of the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa, and colleagues that was published online in the Sep. 18 issue of Science Translational Medicine.

ALVAC-HIV (vCP1521) is a live attenuated recombinant canarypox-derived virus that expresses gene products from the HIV-1 gp120 (92TH023/clade E), Gag (clade B), and Pro (clade B) that is cultured in chicken embryo fibroblast cells.

Four injections of ALVAC-HIV were given at months 0, 1, 3, and 6. At months 3 and 6, two booster injections were given of AIDSVAX/BE, a bivalent HIV glycoprotein 120 (gp120) that was previously studied in the RV144 trial. The HVTN 097 trial examined primary immunogenicity endpoints including the frequency and magnitude of IgG and IgG3 antibody binding, measured in serum specimens obtained at baseline, at a peak time point (2 weeks after second ALVAC/AIDSVAX vaccination), a durability time point (6 months after second ALVAC/AIDSVAX vaccination), and the response rates and magnitudes of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses at the baseline, peak, and durability time points. One hundred healthy adults at low risk for HIV infection were randomized in 3:1:1 ratio to group T1 (HIV vaccines, tetanus vaccine, and hepatitis B vaccine), group T2 (HIV vaccine only), and the placebo group T3 (tetanus vaccine and hepatitis B vaccine). There were no meaningful differences in HIV immune responses between the HIV vaccine recipients with or without the tetanus and hepatitis B vaccines, so the researchers pooled the data from groups T1 and T2 in their analysis.

At the peak immunogenicity time point, the vaccine schedule predominantly induced CD4+ T cells directed to HIV-1 Env; this was measured by expression of interleukin-2 and/or interferon-gamma. The Env-specific CD4+ T-cell response rate was significantly higher in HVTN 097 vaccine recipients than it was in those in the RV144 trial (51.9% vs. 36.4%; P = .043). The HVTN 097 trial also showed significantly higher response rates for CD40L(59.3% for HVTN 097 vs. 33.7% for RV144; P less than .001) and for interferon-gamma (42.6% in HVTN 097 vs. 19.5% in RV144; P = .001).

However, durability at 6 months after the second vaccine injection remained an issue, with the frequency of circulating Env-specific CD4+ T-cell responses among vaccine recipients declining significantly; the response rate dropped from 70.8% to 36.1%.

“These data may indicate that cross-clade immune responses, especially to non-neutralizing epitopes correlated with decreased HIV-1 risk, can be achieved for a globally effective vaccine by using unique HIV Env strains,” Dr. Gray and associates concluded.

The authors declared that they had no competing interests.

mlesney@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Gray GE et al. Sci. Transl. Med. 2019 Sep 18. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aax1880..

ALVAC-HIV vaccine showed immunogenicity across several HIV clades in an early trial involving 100 healthy patients at low risk of HIV infection, according to a study by Glenda E. Gray, MBBCH, FCPaed, of the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa, and colleagues that was published online in the Sep. 18 issue of Science Translational Medicine.

ALVAC-HIV (vCP1521) is a live attenuated recombinant canarypox-derived virus that expresses gene products from the HIV-1 gp120 (92TH023/clade E), Gag (clade B), and Pro (clade B) that is cultured in chicken embryo fibroblast cells.

Four injections of ALVAC-HIV were given at months 0, 1, 3, and 6. At months 3 and 6, two booster injections were given of AIDSVAX/BE, a bivalent HIV glycoprotein 120 (gp120) that was previously studied in the RV144 trial. The HVTN 097 trial examined primary immunogenicity endpoints including the frequency and magnitude of IgG and IgG3 antibody binding, measured in serum specimens obtained at baseline, at a peak time point (2 weeks after second ALVAC/AIDSVAX vaccination), a durability time point (6 months after second ALVAC/AIDSVAX vaccination), and the response rates and magnitudes of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses at the baseline, peak, and durability time points. One hundred healthy adults at low risk for HIV infection were randomized in 3:1:1 ratio to group T1 (HIV vaccines, tetanus vaccine, and hepatitis B vaccine), group T2 (HIV vaccine only), and the placebo group T3 (tetanus vaccine and hepatitis B vaccine). There were no meaningful differences in HIV immune responses between the HIV vaccine recipients with or without the tetanus and hepatitis B vaccines, so the researchers pooled the data from groups T1 and T2 in their analysis.

At the peak immunogenicity time point, the vaccine schedule predominantly induced CD4+ T cells directed to HIV-1 Env; this was measured by expression of interleukin-2 and/or interferon-gamma. The Env-specific CD4+ T-cell response rate was significantly higher in HVTN 097 vaccine recipients than it was in those in the RV144 trial (51.9% vs. 36.4%; P = .043). The HVTN 097 trial also showed significantly higher response rates for CD40L(59.3% for HVTN 097 vs. 33.7% for RV144; P less than .001) and for interferon-gamma (42.6% in HVTN 097 vs. 19.5% in RV144; P = .001).

However, durability at 6 months after the second vaccine injection remained an issue, with the frequency of circulating Env-specific CD4+ T-cell responses among vaccine recipients declining significantly; the response rate dropped from 70.8% to 36.1%.

“These data may indicate that cross-clade immune responses, especially to non-neutralizing epitopes correlated with decreased HIV-1 risk, can be achieved for a globally effective vaccine by using unique HIV Env strains,” Dr. Gray and associates concluded.

The authors declared that they had no competing interests.

mlesney@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Gray GE et al. Sci. Transl. Med. 2019 Sep 18. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aax1880..

ALVAC-HIV vaccine showed immunogenicity across several HIV clades in an early trial involving 100 healthy patients at low risk of HIV infection, according to a study by Glenda E. Gray, MBBCH, FCPaed, of the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa, and colleagues that was published online in the Sep. 18 issue of Science Translational Medicine.

ALVAC-HIV (vCP1521) is a live attenuated recombinant canarypox-derived virus that expresses gene products from the HIV-1 gp120 (92TH023/clade E), Gag (clade B), and Pro (clade B) that is cultured in chicken embryo fibroblast cells.

Four injections of ALVAC-HIV were given at months 0, 1, 3, and 6. At months 3 and 6, two booster injections were given of AIDSVAX/BE, a bivalent HIV glycoprotein 120 (gp120) that was previously studied in the RV144 trial. The HVTN 097 trial examined primary immunogenicity endpoints including the frequency and magnitude of IgG and IgG3 antibody binding, measured in serum specimens obtained at baseline, at a peak time point (2 weeks after second ALVAC/AIDSVAX vaccination), a durability time point (6 months after second ALVAC/AIDSVAX vaccination), and the response rates and magnitudes of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses at the baseline, peak, and durability time points. One hundred healthy adults at low risk for HIV infection were randomized in 3:1:1 ratio to group T1 (HIV vaccines, tetanus vaccine, and hepatitis B vaccine), group T2 (HIV vaccine only), and the placebo group T3 (tetanus vaccine and hepatitis B vaccine). There were no meaningful differences in HIV immune responses between the HIV vaccine recipients with or without the tetanus and hepatitis B vaccines, so the researchers pooled the data from groups T1 and T2 in their analysis.

At the peak immunogenicity time point, the vaccine schedule predominantly induced CD4+ T cells directed to HIV-1 Env; this was measured by expression of interleukin-2 and/or interferon-gamma. The Env-specific CD4+ T-cell response rate was significantly higher in HVTN 097 vaccine recipients than it was in those in the RV144 trial (51.9% vs. 36.4%; P = .043). The HVTN 097 trial also showed significantly higher response rates for CD40L(59.3% for HVTN 097 vs. 33.7% for RV144; P less than .001) and for interferon-gamma (42.6% in HVTN 097 vs. 19.5% in RV144; P = .001).

However, durability at 6 months after the second vaccine injection remained an issue, with the frequency of circulating Env-specific CD4+ T-cell responses among vaccine recipients declining significantly; the response rate dropped from 70.8% to 36.1%.

“These data may indicate that cross-clade immune responses, especially to non-neutralizing epitopes correlated with decreased HIV-1 risk, can be achieved for a globally effective vaccine by using unique HIV Env strains,” Dr. Gray and associates concluded.

The authors declared that they had no competing interests.

mlesney@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Gray GE et al. Sci. Transl. Med. 2019 Sep 18. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aax1880..

NEW ORLEANS – A large portion of maternal pregnancy-related deaths happen in the days or weeks after the baby is delivered, and they’re often related to hypertension, according to Natalie Bello, MD, a cardiologist and assistant professor of medicine at Columbia University in New York.

In medical school, “they told me that you deliver the placenta, and the preeclampsia goes away. Not the case. Postpartum preeclampsia is a real thing. We are seeing a lot of it at our sites, which have a lot of underserved women who hadn’t had great prenatal care” elsewhere, she said.

Headache and visual changes in association with hypertension during what’s been dubbed “the fourth trimester” raise suspicions. Women can progress rapidly to eclampsia and HELLP syndrome (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelet count), but sometimes providers don’t recognize what’s going on because they don’t know women have recently given birth. “We can do better; we should be doing better. Please always ask women if they’ve delivered recently,” Dr. Bello said at the joint scientific sessions of the American Heart Association Council on Hypertension, AHA Council on Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease, and American Society of Hypertension.

Hypertension should resolve within 6 weeks of delivery, and blood pressure should be back to baseline by 3 months. To make sure that happens, BP should be checked within a few days of birth and regularly thereafter. It can be tough to get busy and tired new moms back into the office, but “they’ll do whatever it takes” to get their baby to a pediatric appointment, so maybe having pediatricians involved in checking blood pressure would help, she said.

The cutoff point for hypertension in pregnancy is 140/90 mm Hg, and it’s considered severe when values hit 160/110 mm Hg or higher. Evidence is strong for treating severe hypertension to reduce strokes, placental abruptions, and other problems, but the data for treating nonsevere hypertension are less clear, Dr. Bello explained.

The Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy (CHAP) trial is expected to fill the evidence gap in a few years; women are being randomized to start treatment at either 140/90 mm Hg or 160/105 mm Hg. Meanwhile, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recently suggested that treatment of nonsevere hypertension might be appropriate in the setting of comorbidities and renal dysfunction (Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;133[1]:e26-e50).

Dr. Bello prefers treating with extended-release calcium channel blocker nifedipine over the beta-blocker labetalol. “We think it is a little more effective,” and the once daily dosing, instead of two or three times a day, helps with compliance. Thiazide diuretics and hydralazine are also in her arsenal, but hydralazine shouldn’t be used in isolation because of its reflex tachycardia risk. The old standby, the antiadrenergic methyldopa, has fallen out of favor because of depression and other concerns. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, renin inhibitors, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists shouldn’t be used in pregnancy, she said.

Intravenous labetalol and short-acting oral nifedipine are the mainstays for urgent, severe hypertension, along with high-dose intravenous magnesium, especially for seizure control. IV hydralazine or nitroglycerin are other options, the latter particularly for pulmonary edema. “Be careful of synergistic hypotension with magnesium and nifedipine,” Dr. Bello said.

Dr. Bello didn’t have any industry disclosures.

aotto@mdedge.com

NEW ORLEANS – A large portion of maternal pregnancy-related deaths happen in the days or weeks after the baby is delivered, and they’re often related to hypertension, according to Natalie Bello, MD, a cardiologist and assistant professor of medicine at Columbia University in New York.

In medical school, “they told me that you deliver the placenta, and the preeclampsia goes away. Not the case. Postpartum preeclampsia is a real thing. We are seeing a lot of it at our sites, which have a lot of underserved women who hadn’t had great prenatal care” elsewhere, she said.

Headache and visual changes in association with hypertension during what’s been dubbed “the fourth trimester” raise suspicions. Women can progress rapidly to eclampsia and HELLP syndrome (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelet count), but sometimes providers don’t recognize what’s going on because they don’t know women have recently given birth. “We can do better; we should be doing better. Please always ask women if they’ve delivered recently,” Dr. Bello said at the joint scientific sessions of the American Heart Association Council on Hypertension, AHA Council on Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease, and American Society of Hypertension.

Hypertension should resolve within 6 weeks of delivery, and blood pressure should be back to baseline by 3 months. To make sure that happens, BP should be checked within a few days of birth and regularly thereafter. It can be tough to get busy and tired new moms back into the office, but “they’ll do whatever it takes” to get their baby to a pediatric appointment, so maybe having pediatricians involved in checking blood pressure would help, she said.

The cutoff point for hypertension in pregnancy is 140/90 mm Hg, and it’s considered severe when values hit 160/110 mm Hg or higher. Evidence is strong for treating severe hypertension to reduce strokes, placental abruptions, and other problems, but the data for treating nonsevere hypertension are less clear, Dr. Bello explained.

The Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy (CHAP) trial is expected to fill the evidence gap in a few years; women are being randomized to start treatment at either 140/90 mm Hg or 160/105 mm Hg. Meanwhile, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recently suggested that treatment of nonsevere hypertension might be appropriate in the setting of comorbidities and renal dysfunction (Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;133[1]:e26-e50).

Dr. Bello prefers treating with extended-release calcium channel blocker nifedipine over the beta-blocker labetalol. “We think it is a little more effective,” and the once daily dosing, instead of two or three times a day, helps with compliance. Thiazide diuretics and hydralazine are also in her arsenal, but hydralazine shouldn’t be used in isolation because of its reflex tachycardia risk. The old standby, the antiadrenergic methyldopa, has fallen out of favor because of depression and other concerns. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, renin inhibitors, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists shouldn’t be used in pregnancy, she said.

Intravenous labetalol and short-acting oral nifedipine are the mainstays for urgent, severe hypertension, along with high-dose intravenous magnesium, especially for seizure control. IV hydralazine or nitroglycerin are other options, the latter particularly for pulmonary edema. “Be careful of synergistic hypotension with magnesium and nifedipine,” Dr. Bello said.

Dr. Bello didn’t have any industry disclosures.

aotto@mdedge.com

NEW ORLEANS – A large portion of maternal pregnancy-related deaths happen in the days or weeks after the baby is delivered, and they’re often related to hypertension, according to Natalie Bello, MD, a cardiologist and assistant professor of medicine at Columbia University in New York.

In medical school, “they told me that you deliver the placenta, and the preeclampsia goes away. Not the case. Postpartum preeclampsia is a real thing. We are seeing a lot of it at our sites, which have a lot of underserved women who hadn’t had great prenatal care” elsewhere, she said.

Headache and visual changes in association with hypertension during what’s been dubbed “the fourth trimester” raise suspicions. Women can progress rapidly to eclampsia and HELLP syndrome (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelet count), but sometimes providers don’t recognize what’s going on because they don’t know women have recently given birth. “We can do better; we should be doing better. Please always ask women if they’ve delivered recently,” Dr. Bello said at the joint scientific sessions of the American Heart Association Council on Hypertension, AHA Council on Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease, and American Society of Hypertension.

Hypertension should resolve within 6 weeks of delivery, and blood pressure should be back to baseline by 3 months. To make sure that happens, BP should be checked within a few days of birth and regularly thereafter. It can be tough to get busy and tired new moms back into the office, but “they’ll do whatever it takes” to get their baby to a pediatric appointment, so maybe having pediatricians involved in checking blood pressure would help, she said.

The cutoff point for hypertension in pregnancy is 140/90 mm Hg, and it’s considered severe when values hit 160/110 mm Hg or higher. Evidence is strong for treating severe hypertension to reduce strokes, placental abruptions, and other problems, but the data for treating nonsevere hypertension are less clear, Dr. Bello explained.

The Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy (CHAP) trial is expected to fill the evidence gap in a few years; women are being randomized to start treatment at either 140/90 mm Hg or 160/105 mm Hg. Meanwhile, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recently suggested that treatment of nonsevere hypertension might be appropriate in the setting of comorbidities and renal dysfunction (Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;133[1]:e26-e50).

Dr. Bello prefers treating with extended-release calcium channel blocker nifedipine over the beta-blocker labetalol. “We think it is a little more effective,” and the once daily dosing, instead of two or three times a day, helps with compliance. Thiazide diuretics and hydralazine are also in her arsenal, but hydralazine shouldn’t be used in isolation because of its reflex tachycardia risk. The old standby, the antiadrenergic methyldopa, has fallen out of favor because of depression and other concerns. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, renin inhibitors, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists shouldn’t be used in pregnancy, she said.

Intravenous labetalol and short-acting oral nifedipine are the mainstays for urgent, severe hypertension, along with high-dose intravenous magnesium, especially for seizure control. IV hydralazine or nitroglycerin are other options, the latter particularly for pulmonary edema. “Be careful of synergistic hypotension with magnesium and nifedipine,” Dr. Bello said.

Dr. Bello didn’t have any industry disclosures.

aotto@mdedge.com

“Fast MRI,” which allows scans to be taken quickly without sedation, is a “reasonable alternative” to screen certain younger children for traumatic brain injury, a new study found.

gorodenkoff/Getty Images

The fast MRI option has “the potential to eliminate ionizing radiation exposure for thousands of children each year,” the study authors wrote in Pediatrics. “The ability to complete imaging in about 6 minutes, without the need for anesthesia or sedation, suggests that fast MRI is appropriate even in acute settings, where patient throughput is a priority.”

Daniel M. Lindberg, MD, of the University of Colorado at Denver, Aurora, and associates wrote that children make between 600,000 and 1.6 million ED visits in the United States each year for evaluation of possible traumatic brain injury (TBI). While the incidence of clinically significant injury from TBI is low, 20%-70% of these children are exposed to potentially dangerous radiation as they undergo CT.

The new study focuses on fast MRI. Unlike traditional MRI, it doesn’t require children to remain motionless – typically with the help of sedation – to be scanned.

The researchers performed fast MRI in 223 children aged younger than 6 years (median age, 12.6 months; interquartile range, 4.7-32.6) who sought emergency care at a level 1 pediatric trauma center from 2015 to 2018. They had all had CT scans performed.

CT identified TBI in 111 (50%) of the subjects, while fast MRI identified it in 103 (sensitivity, 92.8%; 95% confidence interval, 86.3-96.8). Fast MRI missed six participants with isolated skull fractures and two with subarachnoid hemorrhage; CT missed five participants with subdural hematomas, parenchymal contusions, and subarachnoid hemorrhage.

While the researchers hoped for a higher sensitivity level, they wrote that “we feel that the benefit of avoiding radiation exposure outweighs the concern for missed injury.”

In a commentary, Brett Burstein, MDCM, PhD, MPH, and Christine Saint-Martin, MDCM, MSc, of Montreal Children’s Hospital and McGill University Health Center, also in Montreal, wrote that the study is “well conducted.”

However, they noted that “the reported feasibility reflects a highly selected cohort of stable patients in whom fast MRI is already likely to succeed. Feasibility results in a more generalizable population of head-injured children cannot be extrapolated.”

And, they added, “fast MRI was unavailable for 65 of 299 consenting, eligible patients because of lack of overnight staffing. Although not included among the outcome definitions of imaging time, this would be an important ‘feasibility’ consideration in most centers.”

Dr. Burstein and Dr. Saint-Martin wrote that “centers migrating toward this modality for neuroimaging children with head injuries should still use clinical judgment and highly sensitive, validated clinical decision rules when determining the need for any neuroimaging for head-injured children.”

The study was funded by the Colorado Traumatic Brain Injury Trust Fund (MindSource) and the Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute. The study and commentary authors reported no relevant financial disclosures.

SOURCES: Lindberg DM et al. Pediatrics. 2019 Sep 18. doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-0419; Burstein B, Saint-Martin C. Pediatrics. 2019 Sep 18. doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-2387.

“Fast MRI,” which allows scans to be taken quickly without sedation, is a “reasonable alternative” to screen certain younger children for traumatic brain injury, a new study found.

gorodenkoff/Getty Images

The fast MRI option has “the potential to eliminate ionizing radiation exposure for thousands of children each year,” the study authors wrote in Pediatrics. “The ability to complete imaging in about 6 minutes, without the need for anesthesia or sedation, suggests that fast MRI is appropriate even in acute settings, where patient throughput is a priority.”

Daniel M. Lindberg, MD, of the University of Colorado at Denver, Aurora, and associates wrote that children make between 600,000 and 1.6 million ED visits in the United States each year for evaluation of possible traumatic brain injury (TBI). While the incidence of clinically significant injury from TBI is low, 20%-70% of these children are exposed to potentially dangerous radiation as they undergo CT.

The new study focuses on fast MRI. Unlike traditional MRI, it doesn’t require children to remain motionless – typically with the help of sedation – to be scanned.

The researchers performed fast MRI in 223 children aged younger than 6 years (median age, 12.6 months; interquartile range, 4.7-32.6) who sought emergency care at a level 1 pediatric trauma center from 2015 to 2018. They had all had CT scans performed.

CT identified TBI in 111 (50%) of the subjects, while fast MRI identified it in 103 (sensitivity, 92.8%; 95% confidence interval, 86.3-96.8). Fast MRI missed six participants with isolated skull fractures and two with subarachnoid hemorrhage; CT missed five participants with subdural hematomas, parenchymal contusions, and subarachnoid hemorrhage.

While the researchers hoped for a higher sensitivity level, they wrote that “we feel that the benefit of avoiding radiation exposure outweighs the concern for missed injury.”

In a commentary, Brett Burstein, MDCM, PhD, MPH, and Christine Saint-Martin, MDCM, MSc, of Montreal Children’s Hospital and McGill University Health Center, also in Montreal, wrote that the study is “well conducted.”

However, they noted that “the reported feasibility reflects a highly selected cohort of stable patients in whom fast MRI is already likely to succeed. Feasibility results in a more generalizable population of head-injured children cannot be extrapolated.”

And, they added, “fast MRI was unavailable for 65 of 299 consenting, eligible patients because of lack of overnight staffing. Although not included among the outcome definitions of imaging time, this would be an important ‘feasibility’ consideration in most centers.”

Dr. Burstein and Dr. Saint-Martin wrote that “centers migrating toward this modality for neuroimaging children with head injuries should still use clinical judgment and highly sensitive, validated clinical decision rules when determining the need for any neuroimaging for head-injured children.”

The study was funded by the Colorado Traumatic Brain Injury Trust Fund (MindSource) and the Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute. The study and commentary authors reported no relevant financial disclosures.

SOURCES: Lindberg DM et al. Pediatrics. 2019 Sep 18. doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-0419; Burstein B, Saint-Martin C. Pediatrics. 2019 Sep 18. doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-2387.

“Fast MRI,” which allows scans to be taken quickly without sedation, is a “reasonable alternative” to screen certain younger children for traumatic brain injury, a new study found.

gorodenkoff/Getty Images

The fast MRI option has “the potential to eliminate ionizing radiation exposure for thousands of children each year,” the study authors wrote in Pediatrics. “The ability to complete imaging in about 6 minutes, without the need for anesthesia or sedation, suggests that fast MRI is appropriate even in acute settings, where patient throughput is a priority.”

Daniel M. Lindberg, MD, of the University of Colorado at Denver, Aurora, and associates wrote that children make between 600,000 and 1.6 million ED visits in the United States each year for evaluation of possible traumatic brain injury (TBI). While the incidence of clinically significant injury from TBI is low, 20%-70% of these children are exposed to potentially dangerous radiation as they undergo CT.

The new study focuses on fast MRI. Unlike traditional MRI, it doesn’t require children to remain motionless – typically with the help of sedation – to be scanned.

The researchers performed fast MRI in 223 children aged younger than 6 years (median age, 12.6 months; interquartile range, 4.7-32.6) who sought emergency care at a level 1 pediatric trauma center from 2015 to 2018. They had all had CT scans performed.

CT identified TBI in 111 (50%) of the subjects, while fast MRI identified it in 103 (sensitivity, 92.8%; 95% confidence interval, 86.3-96.8). Fast MRI missed six participants with isolated skull fractures and two with subarachnoid hemorrhage; CT missed five participants with subdural hematomas, parenchymal contusions, and subarachnoid hemorrhage.

While the researchers hoped for a higher sensitivity level, they wrote that “we feel that the benefit of avoiding radiation exposure outweighs the concern for missed injury.”

In a commentary, Brett Burstein, MDCM, PhD, MPH, and Christine Saint-Martin, MDCM, MSc, of Montreal Children’s Hospital and McGill University Health Center, also in Montreal, wrote that the study is “well conducted.”

However, they noted that “the reported feasibility reflects a highly selected cohort of stable patients in whom fast MRI is already likely to succeed. Feasibility results in a more generalizable population of head-injured children cannot be extrapolated.”

And, they added, “fast MRI was unavailable for 65 of 299 consenting, eligible patients because of lack of overnight staffing. Although not included among the outcome definitions of imaging time, this would be an important ‘feasibility’ consideration in most centers.”

Dr. Burstein and Dr. Saint-Martin wrote that “centers migrating toward this modality for neuroimaging children with head injuries should still use clinical judgment and highly sensitive, validated clinical decision rules when determining the need for any neuroimaging for head-injured children.”

The study was funded by the Colorado Traumatic Brain Injury Trust Fund (MindSource) and the Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute. The study and commentary authors reported no relevant financial disclosures.

SOURCES: Lindberg DM et al. Pediatrics. 2019 Sep 18. doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-0419; Burstein B, Saint-Martin C. Pediatrics. 2019 Sep 18. doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-2387.

Subchorionic hematomas in the first trimester were not associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes after 20 weeks’ gestation in singleton pregnancies, according to Mackenzie N. Naert of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, and associates.

The investigators conducted a retrospective study, published in Obstetrics & Gynecology, of all women who presented for prenatal care before 14 weeks’ gestation at a single maternal-fetal medicine practice between January 2015 and December 2017. Of the 2,172 women with singleton pregnancies included in the analysis, 389 (18%) had a subchorionic hematoma.

Women with subchorionic hematomas were more likely to have their first ultrasound at an earlier gestational age (8 5/7 weeks vs. 9 6/7 weeks; P less than .001) and to have vaginal bleeding at the time of the ultrasound exam (32% vs. 8%; P less than .001). No other differences in baseline characteristics were observed, and after univariable analysis, subchorionic hematoma was not associated with any of the measured adverse outcomes, such as preterm birth, low birth weight, preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, placental disruption, intrauterine fetal death, cesarean section, blood transfusion, or antepartum admission.

In a regression analysis that included subchorionic hematoma, vaginal bleeding, and gestational age at ultrasound examination, vaginal bleeding had an independent association with preterm birth at less than 37 weeks’ gestation (adjusted odds ratio, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-2.6) and birth weight less than the 10th percentile (aOR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.6). No independent association was found for subchorionic hematoma.

“Most subchorionic hematomas present during the first trimester resolved by the second trimester,” the investigators wrote. “Therefore, women diagnosed with a first-trimester subchorionic hematoma should be reassured that their rate of adverse pregnancy outcomes at more than 20 weeks of gestation is not affected by the presence of the subchorionic hematoma. Additionally, we have previously shown that first-trimester subchorionic hematoma is not associated with pregnancy loss at less than 20 weeks of gestation.”

The authors reported no conflicts of interest.

lfranki@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Naert MN et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Sep 10. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003487.

Subchorionic hematomas in the first trimester were not associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes after 20 weeks’ gestation in singleton pregnancies, according to Mackenzie N. Naert of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, and associates.

The investigators conducted a retrospective study, published in Obstetrics & Gynecology, of all women who presented for prenatal care before 14 weeks’ gestation at a single maternal-fetal medicine practice between January 2015 and December 2017. Of the 2,172 women with singleton pregnancies included in the analysis, 389 (18%) had a subchorionic hematoma.

Women with subchorionic hematomas were more likely to have their first ultrasound at an earlier gestational age (8 5/7 weeks vs. 9 6/7 weeks; P less than .001) and to have vaginal bleeding at the time of the ultrasound exam (32% vs. 8%; P less than .001). No other differences in baseline characteristics were observed, and after univariable analysis, subchorionic hematoma was not associated with any of the measured adverse outcomes, such as preterm birth, low birth weight, preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, placental disruption, intrauterine fetal death, cesarean section, blood transfusion, or antepartum admission.

In a regression analysis that included subchorionic hematoma, vaginal bleeding, and gestational age at ultrasound examination, vaginal bleeding had an independent association with preterm birth at less than 37 weeks’ gestation (adjusted odds ratio, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-2.6) and birth weight less than the 10th percentile (aOR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.6). No independent association was found for subchorionic hematoma.

“Most subchorionic hematomas present during the first trimester resolved by the second trimester,” the investigators wrote. “Therefore, women diagnosed with a first-trimester subchorionic hematoma should be reassured that their rate of adverse pregnancy outcomes at more than 20 weeks of gestation is not affected by the presence of the subchorionic hematoma. Additionally, we have previously shown that first-trimester subchorionic hematoma is not associated with pregnancy loss at less than 20 weeks of gestation.”

The authors reported no conflicts of interest.

lfranki@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Naert MN et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Sep 10. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003487.

Subchorionic hematomas in the first trimester were not associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes after 20 weeks’ gestation in singleton pregnancies, according to Mackenzie N. Naert of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, and associates.

The investigators conducted a retrospective study, published in Obstetrics & Gynecology, of all women who presented for prenatal care before 14 weeks’ gestation at a single maternal-fetal medicine practice between January 2015 and December 2017. Of the 2,172 women with singleton pregnancies included in the analysis, 389 (18%) had a subchorionic hematoma.

Women with subchorionic hematomas were more likely to have their first ultrasound at an earlier gestational age (8 5/7 weeks vs. 9 6/7 weeks; P less than .001) and to have vaginal bleeding at the time of the ultrasound exam (32% vs. 8%; P less than .001). No other differences in baseline characteristics were observed, and after univariable analysis, subchorionic hematoma was not associated with any of the measured adverse outcomes, such as preterm birth, low birth weight, preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, placental disruption, intrauterine fetal death, cesarean section, blood transfusion, or antepartum admission.

In a regression analysis that included subchorionic hematoma, vaginal bleeding, and gestational age at ultrasound examination, vaginal bleeding had an independent association with preterm birth at less than 37 weeks’ gestation (adjusted odds ratio, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-2.6) and birth weight less than the 10th percentile (aOR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.6). No independent association was found for subchorionic hematoma.

“Most subchorionic hematomas present during the first trimester resolved by the second trimester,” the investigators wrote. “Therefore, women diagnosed with a first-trimester subchorionic hematoma should be reassured that their rate of adverse pregnancy outcomes at more than 20 weeks of gestation is not affected by the presence of the subchorionic hematoma. Additionally, we have previously shown that first-trimester subchorionic hematoma is not associated with pregnancy loss at less than 20 weeks of gestation.”

The authors reported no conflicts of interest.

lfranki@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Naert MN et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Sep 10. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003487.