In anticipation of the 2019 CHEST Foundation grants cycle, opening in late February, CHEST Foundation staff sat down with 2017 CHEST Foundation Community Service grant winner, Sharon Armstead, RRT, Director of Clinical Education & Clinical Assistant Professor for the Department of Respiratory Care at Texas State University, to learn more about her project supporting respiratory asthma clinics in Guyana.

Ms. Armstead’s program takes respiratory care students from her institution on a study abroad trip to Guyana with aims to educate Guyanese student populations about asthma and teach them self-management skills. Additionally, she and her students work alongside clinicians at Georgetown Public Hospital to host a mobile asthma clinic that provides asthma screenings and education for Guyanese students, the first of its kind at Texas State University.

This passion for supporting clinics in Guyana stems from a deeply personal place. “Guyana is my country of birth. I left when I was 14. I came back many years later realizing that I can give back to the county that gave me so much.” Ms. Armstead shared.

“The CHEST Foundation grant opened doors for me that had never been opened before. Members of the community were very open to hearing what we had to say and receptive to the changes we suggested they make in their daily lives. The financial portion of the award allowed me to purchase additional spirometers for the asthma clinic, allowing for a whole new level of outpatient testing and outreach in the community.”

In addition to the impact she and her students have in Georgetown, Ms. Armstead says opportunity provided to her students was life-changing for them. “To watch my students communicate with people in a different country really helps build their confidence as future clinicians.” Her study program received a significant growth in attendance over the past few years. “When we first started doing this study abroad in Guyana, I only had 2 students interested… We took 14 respiratory care students to Guyana in 2017. It’s really elevated this study abroad program at my institution.”

The CHEST Foundation’s grants cycle opens in late February. Visit our grants page to view the RFPs for our 2019 offerings and see a step-by-step walkthrough of how simple it is to apply for funding! Be a champion of lung health, and secure your research award today!

In anticipation of the 2019 CHEST Foundation grants cycle, opening in late February, CHEST Foundation staff sat down with 2017 CHEST Foundation Community Service grant winner, Sharon Armstead, RRT, Director of Clinical Education & Clinical Assistant Professor for the Department of Respiratory Care at Texas State University, to learn more about her project supporting respiratory asthma clinics in Guyana.

Ms. Armstead’s program takes respiratory care students from her institution on a study abroad trip to Guyana with aims to educate Guyanese student populations about asthma and teach them self-management skills. Additionally, she and her students work alongside clinicians at Georgetown Public Hospital to host a mobile asthma clinic that provides asthma screenings and education for Guyanese students, the first of its kind at Texas State University.

This passion for supporting clinics in Guyana stems from a deeply personal place. “Guyana is my country of birth. I left when I was 14. I came back many years later realizing that I can give back to the county that gave me so much.” Ms. Armstead shared.

“The CHEST Foundation grant opened doors for me that had never been opened before. Members of the community were very open to hearing what we had to say and receptive to the changes we suggested they make in their daily lives. The financial portion of the award allowed me to purchase additional spirometers for the asthma clinic, allowing for a whole new level of outpatient testing and outreach in the community.”

In addition to the impact she and her students have in Georgetown, Ms. Armstead says opportunity provided to her students was life-changing for them. “To watch my students communicate with people in a different country really helps build their confidence as future clinicians.” Her study program received a significant growth in attendance over the past few years. “When we first started doing this study abroad in Guyana, I only had 2 students interested… We took 14 respiratory care students to Guyana in 2017. It’s really elevated this study abroad program at my institution.”

The CHEST Foundation’s grants cycle opens in late February. Visit our grants page to view the RFPs for our 2019 offerings and see a step-by-step walkthrough of how simple it is to apply for funding! Be a champion of lung health, and secure your research award today!

In anticipation of the 2019 CHEST Foundation grants cycle, opening in late February, CHEST Foundation staff sat down with 2017 CHEST Foundation Community Service grant winner, Sharon Armstead, RRT, Director of Clinical Education & Clinical Assistant Professor for the Department of Respiratory Care at Texas State University, to learn more about her project supporting respiratory asthma clinics in Guyana.

Ms. Armstead’s program takes respiratory care students from her institution on a study abroad trip to Guyana with aims to educate Guyanese student populations about asthma and teach them self-management skills. Additionally, she and her students work alongside clinicians at Georgetown Public Hospital to host a mobile asthma clinic that provides asthma screenings and education for Guyanese students, the first of its kind at Texas State University.

This passion for supporting clinics in Guyana stems from a deeply personal place. “Guyana is my country of birth. I left when I was 14. I came back many years later realizing that I can give back to the county that gave me so much.” Ms. Armstead shared.

“The CHEST Foundation grant opened doors for me that had never been opened before. Members of the community were very open to hearing what we had to say and receptive to the changes we suggested they make in their daily lives. The financial portion of the award allowed me to purchase additional spirometers for the asthma clinic, allowing for a whole new level of outpatient testing and outreach in the community.”

In addition to the impact she and her students have in Georgetown, Ms. Armstead says opportunity provided to her students was life-changing for them. “To watch my students communicate with people in a different country really helps build their confidence as future clinicians.” Her study program received a significant growth in attendance over the past few years. “When we first started doing this study abroad in Guyana, I only had 2 students interested… We took 14 respiratory care students to Guyana in 2017. It’s really elevated this study abroad program at my institution.”

The CHEST Foundation’s grants cycle opens in late February. Visit our grants page to view the RFPs for our 2019 offerings and see a step-by-step walkthrough of how simple it is to apply for funding! Be a champion of lung health, and secure your research award today!

One year ago, I wrote in these pages with regard to my two main goals for CHEST Physician for 2018, namely allowing more space in our pages for leaders and members to express their views, and improving interactivity between the staff here and our readership to help us better craft a publication that met your needs.

While I think we’ve met the first goal quite well, with a greater number of educational write-ups from our NetWork leadership and high-quality editorials and commentaries from other CHEST dignitaries, we have not yet heard much from the most important resource we have, our readers. So for the coming year, I would welcome you to drop us a line every now and then. See something in our pages that you like, or with which you disagree? Is there something in the news relevant to pulmonary, critical care, or sleep medicine that you think we should have covered but did not? Send us an email at chestphysiciannews@chestnet.org

I look forward to closer contact with you over the coming year. Let’s make CHEST Physician even better together!

David

One year ago, I wrote in these pages with regard to my two main goals for CHEST Physician for 2018, namely allowing more space in our pages for leaders and members to express their views, and improving interactivity between the staff here and our readership to help us better craft a publication that met your needs.

While I think we’ve met the first goal quite well, with a greater number of educational write-ups from our NetWork leadership and high-quality editorials and commentaries from other CHEST dignitaries, we have not yet heard much from the most important resource we have, our readers. So for the coming year, I would welcome you to drop us a line every now and then. See something in our pages that you like, or with which you disagree? Is there something in the news relevant to pulmonary, critical care, or sleep medicine that you think we should have covered but did not? Send us an email at chestphysiciannews@chestnet.org

I look forward to closer contact with you over the coming year. Let’s make CHEST Physician even better together!

David

One year ago, I wrote in these pages with regard to my two main goals for CHEST Physician for 2018, namely allowing more space in our pages for leaders and members to express their views, and improving interactivity between the staff here and our readership to help us better craft a publication that met your needs.

While I think we’ve met the first goal quite well, with a greater number of educational write-ups from our NetWork leadership and high-quality editorials and commentaries from other CHEST dignitaries, we have not yet heard much from the most important resource we have, our readers. So for the coming year, I would welcome you to drop us a line every now and then. See something in our pages that you like, or with which you disagree? Is there something in the news relevant to pulmonary, critical care, or sleep medicine that you think we should have covered but did not? Send us an email at chestphysiciannews@chestnet.org

I look forward to closer contact with you over the coming year. Let’s make CHEST Physician even better together!

David

Intensity of BCL2 expression, and to a lesser extent expression of t(14;18), may help distinguish common and indolent cutaneous lymphomas from poorer-prognosis cutaneous lesions secondary to systemic follicular lymphomas, results of a recent investigation show.

Strong expression of BCL2 was almost always associated with secondary cutaneous follicular lymphoma (SCFL), and infrequently associated with primary cutaneous follicular center-cell lymphoma (PCFCL), according to the study results.

The translocation t(14;18) was likewise linked to secondary lesions, occurring less frequently in PCFCL in the study, reported recently in the Journal of Cutaneous Pathology.

“BCL2 expression intensity is the single most valuable clue in differentiating PCFCL from SCFL cases on histopathological grounds,” said Ramon M. Pujol, MD, PhD, of Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain, and colleagues.

One of the main cutaneous B-cell lymphoma subtypes, PCFCL is marked by frequent relapses, but little incidence of systemic spread, meaning that conservative, skin-based therapies are usually warranted. By contrast, patients with SCFLs have a poor prognosis and may require systemic therapy, the investigators noted in their report.

Previous investigations have yielded conflicting results on the role of BCL2 expression, CD10 expression, and presence of t(14;18) translocation in distinguishing PCFCL from SCFL.

While early studies suggested most PCFCLs were negative for these markers, some recent reports suggested BCL positivity in PCFCLs is as high as 86%, the investigators said.

Accordingly, Dr. Pujol and colleagues evaluated clinicopathologic and genetic features in a large series of patients, including 59 with PCFCL and 22 with SCFL.

Significant BCL2 expression was seen in 69% of PCFCLs and in 100% of SCFLs (P = .003) in this patient series; however, when looking at BCL2 intensity, investigators found strong expression almost exclusively in SCFL. Strong expression was seen in 46% of those patients with secondary lymphomas, versus just 4%, or two cases, in the PCFCL group (P = .001).

The t(14;18) translocation was seen in 64% of SCFLs and only 9.1% of PCFCLs (P = .001).

Similar to what was seen for BCL2, expression of CD10 was observed in 66% of PCFCLs and 91% of SCFLs, and again, intensity differences mattered. Strong CD10 expression was seen in 62% of secondary lymphomas and 16% of PCFCLs (P = .01). But the high number of positive PCFCLs made this marker less useful than BCL2, the investigators said.

“We believe that differences in BCL2 and CD10 expression between our results and older previous studies could reflect the improvement of antigen retrieval laboratory techniques,” they said.

The investigators did not report disclosures related to the research.

SOURCE: Servitje O et al. J Cutan Pathol. 2019;46:182-9.

Intensity of BCL2 expression, and to a lesser extent expression of t(14;18), may help distinguish common and indolent cutaneous lymphomas from poorer-prognosis cutaneous lesions secondary to systemic follicular lymphomas, results of a recent investigation show.

Strong expression of BCL2 was almost always associated with secondary cutaneous follicular lymphoma (SCFL), and infrequently associated with primary cutaneous follicular center-cell lymphoma (PCFCL), according to the study results.

The translocation t(14;18) was likewise linked to secondary lesions, occurring less frequently in PCFCL in the study, reported recently in the Journal of Cutaneous Pathology.

“BCL2 expression intensity is the single most valuable clue in differentiating PCFCL from SCFL cases on histopathological grounds,” said Ramon M. Pujol, MD, PhD, of Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain, and colleagues.

One of the main cutaneous B-cell lymphoma subtypes, PCFCL is marked by frequent relapses, but little incidence of systemic spread, meaning that conservative, skin-based therapies are usually warranted. By contrast, patients with SCFLs have a poor prognosis and may require systemic therapy, the investigators noted in their report.

Previous investigations have yielded conflicting results on the role of BCL2 expression, CD10 expression, and presence of t(14;18) translocation in distinguishing PCFCL from SCFL.

While early studies suggested most PCFCLs were negative for these markers, some recent reports suggested BCL positivity in PCFCLs is as high as 86%, the investigators said.

Accordingly, Dr. Pujol and colleagues evaluated clinicopathologic and genetic features in a large series of patients, including 59 with PCFCL and 22 with SCFL.

Significant BCL2 expression was seen in 69% of PCFCLs and in 100% of SCFLs (P = .003) in this patient series; however, when looking at BCL2 intensity, investigators found strong expression almost exclusively in SCFL. Strong expression was seen in 46% of those patients with secondary lymphomas, versus just 4%, or two cases, in the PCFCL group (P = .001).

The t(14;18) translocation was seen in 64% of SCFLs and only 9.1% of PCFCLs (P = .001).

Similar to what was seen for BCL2, expression of CD10 was observed in 66% of PCFCLs and 91% of SCFLs, and again, intensity differences mattered. Strong CD10 expression was seen in 62% of secondary lymphomas and 16% of PCFCLs (P = .01). But the high number of positive PCFCLs made this marker less useful than BCL2, the investigators said.

“We believe that differences in BCL2 and CD10 expression between our results and older previous studies could reflect the improvement of antigen retrieval laboratory techniques,” they said.

The investigators did not report disclosures related to the research.

SOURCE: Servitje O et al. J Cutan Pathol. 2019;46:182-9.

Intensity of BCL2 expression, and to a lesser extent expression of t(14;18), may help distinguish common and indolent cutaneous lymphomas from poorer-prognosis cutaneous lesions secondary to systemic follicular lymphomas, results of a recent investigation show.

Strong expression of BCL2 was almost always associated with secondary cutaneous follicular lymphoma (SCFL), and infrequently associated with primary cutaneous follicular center-cell lymphoma (PCFCL), according to the study results.

The translocation t(14;18) was likewise linked to secondary lesions, occurring less frequently in PCFCL in the study, reported recently in the Journal of Cutaneous Pathology.

“BCL2 expression intensity is the single most valuable clue in differentiating PCFCL from SCFL cases on histopathological grounds,” said Ramon M. Pujol, MD, PhD, of Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain, and colleagues.

One of the main cutaneous B-cell lymphoma subtypes, PCFCL is marked by frequent relapses, but little incidence of systemic spread, meaning that conservative, skin-based therapies are usually warranted. By contrast, patients with SCFLs have a poor prognosis and may require systemic therapy, the investigators noted in their report.

Previous investigations have yielded conflicting results on the role of BCL2 expression, CD10 expression, and presence of t(14;18) translocation in distinguishing PCFCL from SCFL.

While early studies suggested most PCFCLs were negative for these markers, some recent reports suggested BCL positivity in PCFCLs is as high as 86%, the investigators said.

Accordingly, Dr. Pujol and colleagues evaluated clinicopathologic and genetic features in a large series of patients, including 59 with PCFCL and 22 with SCFL.

Significant BCL2 expression was seen in 69% of PCFCLs and in 100% of SCFLs (P = .003) in this patient series; however, when looking at BCL2 intensity, investigators found strong expression almost exclusively in SCFL. Strong expression was seen in 46% of those patients with secondary lymphomas, versus just 4%, or two cases, in the PCFCL group (P = .001).

The t(14;18) translocation was seen in 64% of SCFLs and only 9.1% of PCFCLs (P = .001).

Similar to what was seen for BCL2, expression of CD10 was observed in 66% of PCFCLs and 91% of SCFLs, and again, intensity differences mattered. Strong CD10 expression was seen in 62% of secondary lymphomas and 16% of PCFCLs (P = .01). But the high number of positive PCFCLs made this marker less useful than BCL2, the investigators said.

“We believe that differences in BCL2 and CD10 expression between our results and older previous studies could reflect the improvement of antigen retrieval laboratory techniques,” they said.

The investigators did not report disclosures related to the research.

SOURCE: Servitje O et al. J Cutan Pathol. 2019;46:182-9.

When experienced surgeons are involved, laparoscopic distal gastrectomy is a safe alternative to open surgery in patients with early-stage gastric cancer, results of a randomized trial suggest.

Five-year overall survival exceeded 93% for both laparoscopic and open surgery groups in the multicenter trial, which included 1,416 patients with stage I gastric cancer treated by 15 surgeons who each had performed at least 100 gastrectomies.

Cancer-specific survival and recurrence were not significantly different between groups, while an intent-to-treat analysis confirmed the noninferiority of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus the open procedure, said investigators, led by Hyung-Ho Kim MD, PhD, of the Korean Laparoendoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) group.

“Our trial supports the use of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy as a standard treatment option for clinical stage I distal gastric cancer when it can be performed by surgeons with sufficient experience,” Dr. Kim and his coauthors wrote in JAMA Oncology.

Some had doubted the oncologic safety of the laparoscopic approach because of the potential for inadequate lymphadenectomy leading to an increased risk of locoregional recurrence, said Dr. Kim and his coauthors in the KLASS group, “which includes 15 surgeons from 13 institutes.” However, among patients in this phase 3 randomized trial, known as KLASS-01, the mean number of retrieved lymph nodes was similar for the laparoscopic and open surgery groups, and there was no surgical margin involvement in any patient, investigators reported.

“We thus anticipated comparable long-term oncologic outcomes for overall and cancer-specific survival because these early outcomes indicated the oncologic safety of the laparoscopic procedure,” they said. Moreover, they said, earlier publications on the KLASS-01 study demonstrated that the laparoscopic approach was associated with less blood loss, fewer wound complications, and shorter hospital stays, compared with open distal gastrectomy.

In the current study, Dr. Kim and his coauthors reported that, with a median follow-up of about 100 months, the 5-year overall survival rate was 94.2% for the laparoscopic group and 93.3% for the open group (P = .64), while further statistical analysis confirmed that the laparoscopic approach was noninferior to the open approach. Similarly, the 5-year cancer-specific survival rates were 97.1% and 97.2% for the laparoscopic and open approach, respectively (P = .91), while recurrence was not significantly different at 5.6% and 4.8% (P = .49).

The investigators cited several limitations. One is that the investigators looked only at patients with stage I cancer “suitable for distal subtotal gastrectomy. Applying laparoscopic surgery for more advanced cancers and different operations, such as total gastrectomy, needs to be verified through other clinical trials,” they said.

Nevertheless, they wrote, “These long-term oncologic outcomes of [laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy] support the adoption of this procedure as a standard treatment for clinical stage I gastric cancer.”

Dr. Kim and his coauthors reported no conflicts of interest related to the study, which was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea.

SOURCE: Kim HH et al. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Feb 7. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.6727.

When experienced surgeons are involved, laparoscopic distal gastrectomy is a safe alternative to open surgery in patients with early-stage gastric cancer, results of a randomized trial suggest.

Five-year overall survival exceeded 93% for both laparoscopic and open surgery groups in the multicenter trial, which included 1,416 patients with stage I gastric cancer treated by 15 surgeons who each had performed at least 100 gastrectomies.

Cancer-specific survival and recurrence were not significantly different between groups, while an intent-to-treat analysis confirmed the noninferiority of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus the open procedure, said investigators, led by Hyung-Ho Kim MD, PhD, of the Korean Laparoendoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) group.

“Our trial supports the use of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy as a standard treatment option for clinical stage I distal gastric cancer when it can be performed by surgeons with sufficient experience,” Dr. Kim and his coauthors wrote in JAMA Oncology.

Some had doubted the oncologic safety of the laparoscopic approach because of the potential for inadequate lymphadenectomy leading to an increased risk of locoregional recurrence, said Dr. Kim and his coauthors in the KLASS group, “which includes 15 surgeons from 13 institutes.” However, among patients in this phase 3 randomized trial, known as KLASS-01, the mean number of retrieved lymph nodes was similar for the laparoscopic and open surgery groups, and there was no surgical margin involvement in any patient, investigators reported.

“We thus anticipated comparable long-term oncologic outcomes for overall and cancer-specific survival because these early outcomes indicated the oncologic safety of the laparoscopic procedure,” they said. Moreover, they said, earlier publications on the KLASS-01 study demonstrated that the laparoscopic approach was associated with less blood loss, fewer wound complications, and shorter hospital stays, compared with open distal gastrectomy.

In the current study, Dr. Kim and his coauthors reported that, with a median follow-up of about 100 months, the 5-year overall survival rate was 94.2% for the laparoscopic group and 93.3% for the open group (P = .64), while further statistical analysis confirmed that the laparoscopic approach was noninferior to the open approach. Similarly, the 5-year cancer-specific survival rates were 97.1% and 97.2% for the laparoscopic and open approach, respectively (P = .91), while recurrence was not significantly different at 5.6% and 4.8% (P = .49).

The investigators cited several limitations. One is that the investigators looked only at patients with stage I cancer “suitable for distal subtotal gastrectomy. Applying laparoscopic surgery for more advanced cancers and different operations, such as total gastrectomy, needs to be verified through other clinical trials,” they said.

Nevertheless, they wrote, “These long-term oncologic outcomes of [laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy] support the adoption of this procedure as a standard treatment for clinical stage I gastric cancer.”

Dr. Kim and his coauthors reported no conflicts of interest related to the study, which was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea.

SOURCE: Kim HH et al. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Feb 7. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.6727.

When experienced surgeons are involved, laparoscopic distal gastrectomy is a safe alternative to open surgery in patients with early-stage gastric cancer, results of a randomized trial suggest.

Five-year overall survival exceeded 93% for both laparoscopic and open surgery groups in the multicenter trial, which included 1,416 patients with stage I gastric cancer treated by 15 surgeons who each had performed at least 100 gastrectomies.

Cancer-specific survival and recurrence were not significantly different between groups, while an intent-to-treat analysis confirmed the noninferiority of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus the open procedure, said investigators, led by Hyung-Ho Kim MD, PhD, of the Korean Laparoendoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) group.

“Our trial supports the use of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy as a standard treatment option for clinical stage I distal gastric cancer when it can be performed by surgeons with sufficient experience,” Dr. Kim and his coauthors wrote in JAMA Oncology.

Some had doubted the oncologic safety of the laparoscopic approach because of the potential for inadequate lymphadenectomy leading to an increased risk of locoregional recurrence, said Dr. Kim and his coauthors in the KLASS group, “which includes 15 surgeons from 13 institutes.” However, among patients in this phase 3 randomized trial, known as KLASS-01, the mean number of retrieved lymph nodes was similar for the laparoscopic and open surgery groups, and there was no surgical margin involvement in any patient, investigators reported.

“We thus anticipated comparable long-term oncologic outcomes for overall and cancer-specific survival because these early outcomes indicated the oncologic safety of the laparoscopic procedure,” they said. Moreover, they said, earlier publications on the KLASS-01 study demonstrated that the laparoscopic approach was associated with less blood loss, fewer wound complications, and shorter hospital stays, compared with open distal gastrectomy.

In the current study, Dr. Kim and his coauthors reported that, with a median follow-up of about 100 months, the 5-year overall survival rate was 94.2% for the laparoscopic group and 93.3% for the open group (P = .64), while further statistical analysis confirmed that the laparoscopic approach was noninferior to the open approach. Similarly, the 5-year cancer-specific survival rates were 97.1% and 97.2% for the laparoscopic and open approach, respectively (P = .91), while recurrence was not significantly different at 5.6% and 4.8% (P = .49).

The investigators cited several limitations. One is that the investigators looked only at patients with stage I cancer “suitable for distal subtotal gastrectomy. Applying laparoscopic surgery for more advanced cancers and different operations, such as total gastrectomy, needs to be verified through other clinical trials,” they said.

Nevertheless, they wrote, “These long-term oncologic outcomes of [laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy] support the adoption of this procedure as a standard treatment for clinical stage I gastric cancer.”

Dr. Kim and his coauthors reported no conflicts of interest related to the study, which was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea.

SOURCE: Kim HH et al. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Feb 7. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.6727.

SNOWMASS, COLO. – The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis–based 10-year coronary heart disease risk calculator offers significant advantages over the far more widely used Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease risk estimator based upon the pooled cohort equations recommended in the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines, Robert A. Vogel, MD, said at the Annual Cardiovascular Conference at Snowmass.

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

“I don’t use the PCE very much. I use the MESA [Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis]. I like it because it gives me options I don’t have with the PCE [pooled cohort equations],” Dr. Vogel, a preventive cardiology expert at the University of Colorado at Denver, Aurora, said at the meeting sponsored by the American College of Cardiology.

Those added options include, importantly, the ability to plug in a patient’s coronary artery calcium score. MESA, a landmark longitudinal National Institutes of Health–sponsored study, generated a great deal of the data that established the prognostic value of measuring coronary artery calcium.

“You can do the MESA worksheet with or without coronary artery calcium, either way,” Dr. Vogel noted.

Another big advantage for the MESA risk calculator: It asks a yes/no question about family history of heart attack in first-degree relatives. That’s truly risk-altering information, and yet it’s absent from the ACC/AHA ASCVD (Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease) risk calculator, the cardiologist continued.

Plus, the MESA risk calculator includes four ethnic options: Caucasian, African American, Chinese, or Hispanic, while the ACC/AHA’s PCE-based tool includes only the categories of white, African American, or other.

Dr. Vogel offered a case example for purposes of comparison and contrast of the two risk calculators: a 48-year-old white man with no history or symptoms of cardiovascular disease whose father had an MI at age 52. He wants to know whether he should start taking a statin. The patient is a former smoker who quit 3 years ago. His physical exam is normal. He has a body mass index of 29 kg/m^2, an LDL cholesterol of 134 mg/dL, a total cholesterol of 194 mg/dL, a triglyceride level of 92 mg/dL, blood pressure of 128/78 mm Hg, an HDL cholesterol of 42 mg/dL, and a hemoglobin A_1c of 5.9%.

Using the PCE-based risk calculator, the man’s 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease is only 3.3%, which falls below the ACC/AHA guideline-recommended threshold for statin therapy for primary prevention. But with the MESA score, as a result of the additional information regarding the family history of premature cardiovascular disease, the patient’s risk jumps to 4.9%, even without including a coronary artery calcium score.

“This shows you how big a factor the family history is. I think it’s unfortunate that the PCE doesn’t put it in,” Dr. Vogel said.

Indeed, in an analysis from MESA, a 60-year-old man with a lipid and blood pressure profile similar to that of Dr. Vogel’s patient would have a 10-year cardiovascular disease risk of 6% with a negative family history and a 9% risk with a positive history, he noted.

In the 48-year-old patient used as an example by Dr. Vogel, plugging into the MESA risk calculator a coronary artery calcium score of, say, 50, 100, or 150 Agatston units would boost the 10-year cardiovascular disease risk to 7.5%, 8.9%, and 9.9%, respectively.

Both the MESA and the ACC/AHA risk calculators incorporate diabetes as a simple yes/no item. It’s either present or absent. This is too crude a dichotomy for Dr. Vogel’s liking in light of data showing that individuals with impaired glucose tolerance have a cumulative risk of cardiovascular mortality that’s intermediate between diabetic and normoglycemic individuals. And of course, the patient in his case example had a Hb_A1c of 5.9%. So what is a physician to do?

“I fudge the numbers,” he said. “I move the dial a little bit one way or the other depending on whether a patient falls into that impaired glucose tolerance category.”

He also adjusts a former smoker’s estimated 10-year cardiovascular risk based upon how long ago the smoker quit. An ex-smoker’s hazard ratio for coronary heart disease doesn’t drop to that of a never-smoker until 8 years after quitting. And since the patient in this example has been tobacco-free for only 3 years, Dr. Vogel bumps up that individual’s risk level once again. So at this point, even without the additional information that would be provided by a coronary calcium score, the patient’s adjusted MESA 10-year risk is in the 10% range, compared with the 3.3% figure derived using the PCE-based risk calculator.

He reported serving as a paid consultant to the National Football League and the Pritikin Longevity Center, receiving research grants from Sanofi, and serving on speakers bureaus for Regeneron and Sanofi.

bjancin@mdedge.com

SNOWMASS, COLO. – The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis–based 10-year coronary heart disease risk calculator offers significant advantages over the far more widely used Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease risk estimator based upon the pooled cohort equations recommended in the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines, Robert A. Vogel, MD, said at the Annual Cardiovascular Conference at Snowmass.

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

“I don’t use the PCE very much. I use the MESA [Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis]. I like it because it gives me options I don’t have with the PCE [pooled cohort equations],” Dr. Vogel, a preventive cardiology expert at the University of Colorado at Denver, Aurora, said at the meeting sponsored by the American College of Cardiology.

Those added options include, importantly, the ability to plug in a patient’s coronary artery calcium score. MESA, a landmark longitudinal National Institutes of Health–sponsored study, generated a great deal of the data that established the prognostic value of measuring coronary artery calcium.

“You can do the MESA worksheet with or without coronary artery calcium, either way,” Dr. Vogel noted.

Another big advantage for the MESA risk calculator: It asks a yes/no question about family history of heart attack in first-degree relatives. That’s truly risk-altering information, and yet it’s absent from the ACC/AHA ASCVD (Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease) risk calculator, the cardiologist continued.

Plus, the MESA risk calculator includes four ethnic options: Caucasian, African American, Chinese, or Hispanic, while the ACC/AHA’s PCE-based tool includes only the categories of white, African American, or other.

Dr. Vogel offered a case example for purposes of comparison and contrast of the two risk calculators: a 48-year-old white man with no history or symptoms of cardiovascular disease whose father had an MI at age 52. He wants to know whether he should start taking a statin. The patient is a former smoker who quit 3 years ago. His physical exam is normal. He has a body mass index of 29 kg/m^2, an LDL cholesterol of 134 mg/dL, a total cholesterol of 194 mg/dL, a triglyceride level of 92 mg/dL, blood pressure of 128/78 mm Hg, an HDL cholesterol of 42 mg/dL, and a hemoglobin A_1c of 5.9%.

Using the PCE-based risk calculator, the man’s 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease is only 3.3%, which falls below the ACC/AHA guideline-recommended threshold for statin therapy for primary prevention. But with the MESA score, as a result of the additional information regarding the family history of premature cardiovascular disease, the patient’s risk jumps to 4.9%, even without including a coronary artery calcium score.

“This shows you how big a factor the family history is. I think it’s unfortunate that the PCE doesn’t put it in,” Dr. Vogel said.

Indeed, in an analysis from MESA, a 60-year-old man with a lipid and blood pressure profile similar to that of Dr. Vogel’s patient would have a 10-year cardiovascular disease risk of 6% with a negative family history and a 9% risk with a positive history, he noted.

In the 48-year-old patient used as an example by Dr. Vogel, plugging into the MESA risk calculator a coronary artery calcium score of, say, 50, 100, or 150 Agatston units would boost the 10-year cardiovascular disease risk to 7.5%, 8.9%, and 9.9%, respectively.

Both the MESA and the ACC/AHA risk calculators incorporate diabetes as a simple yes/no item. It’s either present or absent. This is too crude a dichotomy for Dr. Vogel’s liking in light of data showing that individuals with impaired glucose tolerance have a cumulative risk of cardiovascular mortality that’s intermediate between diabetic and normoglycemic individuals. And of course, the patient in his case example had a Hb_A1c of 5.9%. So what is a physician to do?

“I fudge the numbers,” he said. “I move the dial a little bit one way or the other depending on whether a patient falls into that impaired glucose tolerance category.”

He also adjusts a former smoker’s estimated 10-year cardiovascular risk based upon how long ago the smoker quit. An ex-smoker’s hazard ratio for coronary heart disease doesn’t drop to that of a never-smoker until 8 years after quitting. And since the patient in this example has been tobacco-free for only 3 years, Dr. Vogel bumps up that individual’s risk level once again. So at this point, even without the additional information that would be provided by a coronary calcium score, the patient’s adjusted MESA 10-year risk is in the 10% range, compared with the 3.3% figure derived using the PCE-based risk calculator.

He reported serving as a paid consultant to the National Football League and the Pritikin Longevity Center, receiving research grants from Sanofi, and serving on speakers bureaus for Regeneron and Sanofi.

bjancin@mdedge.com

SNOWMASS, COLO. – The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis–based 10-year coronary heart disease risk calculator offers significant advantages over the far more widely used Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease risk estimator based upon the pooled cohort equations recommended in the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines, Robert A. Vogel, MD, said at the Annual Cardiovascular Conference at Snowmass.

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

“I don’t use the PCE very much. I use the MESA [Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis]. I like it because it gives me options I don’t have with the PCE [pooled cohort equations],” Dr. Vogel, a preventive cardiology expert at the University of Colorado at Denver, Aurora, said at the meeting sponsored by the American College of Cardiology.

Those added options include, importantly, the ability to plug in a patient’s coronary artery calcium score. MESA, a landmark longitudinal National Institutes of Health–sponsored study, generated a great deal of the data that established the prognostic value of measuring coronary artery calcium.

“You can do the MESA worksheet with or without coronary artery calcium, either way,” Dr. Vogel noted.

Another big advantage for the MESA risk calculator: It asks a yes/no question about family history of heart attack in first-degree relatives. That’s truly risk-altering information, and yet it’s absent from the ACC/AHA ASCVD (Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease) risk calculator, the cardiologist continued.

Plus, the MESA risk calculator includes four ethnic options: Caucasian, African American, Chinese, or Hispanic, while the ACC/AHA’s PCE-based tool includes only the categories of white, African American, or other.

Dr. Vogel offered a case example for purposes of comparison and contrast of the two risk calculators: a 48-year-old white man with no history or symptoms of cardiovascular disease whose father had an MI at age 52. He wants to know whether he should start taking a statin. The patient is a former smoker who quit 3 years ago. His physical exam is normal. He has a body mass index of 29 kg/m^2, an LDL cholesterol of 134 mg/dL, a total cholesterol of 194 mg/dL, a triglyceride level of 92 mg/dL, blood pressure of 128/78 mm Hg, an HDL cholesterol of 42 mg/dL, and a hemoglobin A_1c of 5.9%.

Using the PCE-based risk calculator, the man’s 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease is only 3.3%, which falls below the ACC/AHA guideline-recommended threshold for statin therapy for primary prevention. But with the MESA score, as a result of the additional information regarding the family history of premature cardiovascular disease, the patient’s risk jumps to 4.9%, even without including a coronary artery calcium score.

“This shows you how big a factor the family history is. I think it’s unfortunate that the PCE doesn’t put it in,” Dr. Vogel said.

Indeed, in an analysis from MESA, a 60-year-old man with a lipid and blood pressure profile similar to that of Dr. Vogel’s patient would have a 10-year cardiovascular disease risk of 6% with a negative family history and a 9% risk with a positive history, he noted.

In the 48-year-old patient used as an example by Dr. Vogel, plugging into the MESA risk calculator a coronary artery calcium score of, say, 50, 100, or 150 Agatston units would boost the 10-year cardiovascular disease risk to 7.5%, 8.9%, and 9.9%, respectively.

Both the MESA and the ACC/AHA risk calculators incorporate diabetes as a simple yes/no item. It’s either present or absent. This is too crude a dichotomy for Dr. Vogel’s liking in light of data showing that individuals with impaired glucose tolerance have a cumulative risk of cardiovascular mortality that’s intermediate between diabetic and normoglycemic individuals. And of course, the patient in his case example had a Hb_A1c of 5.9%. So what is a physician to do?

“I fudge the numbers,” he said. “I move the dial a little bit one way or the other depending on whether a patient falls into that impaired glucose tolerance category.”

He also adjusts a former smoker’s estimated 10-year cardiovascular risk based upon how long ago the smoker quit. An ex-smoker’s hazard ratio for coronary heart disease doesn’t drop to that of a never-smoker until 8 years after quitting. And since the patient in this example has been tobacco-free for only 3 years, Dr. Vogel bumps up that individual’s risk level once again. So at this point, even without the additional information that would be provided by a coronary calcium score, the patient’s adjusted MESA 10-year risk is in the 10% range, compared with the 3.3% figure derived using the PCE-based risk calculator.

He reported serving as a paid consultant to the National Football League and the Pritikin Longevity Center, receiving research grants from Sanofi, and serving on speakers bureaus for Regeneron and Sanofi.

bjancin@mdedge.com

Treatment with biologic therapy significantly improves coronary plaque profiles in patients with severe psoriasis, based on data from 121 adult patients who completed a year of follow-up.

A previous study showed a reduced rate of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and cardiovascular death among individuals treated with biologic therapies, wrote Youssef A. Elnabawi, MD, of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute in Bethesda, Md., and his colleagues.

Psoriasis “provides a reliable model to study inflammatory atherogenesis and the longitudinal impact of modulating specific cytokines on vascular behavior, while treating the primary skin disease with [Food and Drug Administration]–approved biologic therapies,” the researchers said.

In a study published in Cardiovascular Research, patients given biologics showed a 5% reduction in total coronary plaque burden after 1 year, as well as a 64% improvement in Psoriasis Area Severity Index scores. In addition, the decrease in noncalcified plaque burden in the biologics group was significantly greater, compared with the nonbiologics group (P =.03), and remained significant after controlling for standard cardiovascular risk factors.

When broken down by biologic, “we observed the greatest percent reduction of noncalcified plaque burden in patients on [anti-interleukin (IL)–17] therapy with a reduction in necrotic core suggesting a potential role for IL-17 in atherosclerotic pathways,” Dr. Elnabawi and his colleagues wrote.

The researchers also noted improvement in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels in the biologics group after 1 year (from 2.0 mg/dL to 1.4 mg/dL), but no change in the nonbiologics group.

The study population included patients naive to biologic or systemic psoriasis therapies who were assessed via clinical and laboratory data and coronary computed tomography angiography at baseline and after 1 year. A total of 89 participants with moderate to severe psoriasis received biologics, including adalimumab, etanercept, ustekinumab, secukinumab, and ixekizumab; 32 psoriasis patients received no biologics and served as a reference group. The average age of the patients was 50 years, and 58% were male. At baseline, patients had low cardiovascular risk based on Framingham scores, and moderate to severe skin disease.

The findings were limited by several factors, including the observational nature of the study, small study population, and the open-label use of biologics, as well as the use of coronary indices, rather than actual cardiovascular events, to assess cardiovascular disease risk, the researchers noted.

However, the results, combined with results from previous studies in animal models, “support further investigation of IL-17 blockade on coronary disease in humans,” they said.

The study was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, with additional support from the National Institutes of Health Medical Research Scholars Program, the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, the American Association for Dental Research, the Colgate-Palmolive Company, Genentech, Elsevier, and other private donors. Dr. Elnabawi had no financial conflicts to disclose.

SOURCE: Elnabawi YA et al. Cardiovasc Res. 2019. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvz009.

Treatment with biologic therapy significantly improves coronary plaque profiles in patients with severe psoriasis, based on data from 121 adult patients who completed a year of follow-up.

A previous study showed a reduced rate of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and cardiovascular death among individuals treated with biologic therapies, wrote Youssef A. Elnabawi, MD, of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute in Bethesda, Md., and his colleagues.

Psoriasis “provides a reliable model to study inflammatory atherogenesis and the longitudinal impact of modulating specific cytokines on vascular behavior, while treating the primary skin disease with [Food and Drug Administration]–approved biologic therapies,” the researchers said.

In a study published in Cardiovascular Research, patients given biologics showed a 5% reduction in total coronary plaque burden after 1 year, as well as a 64% improvement in Psoriasis Area Severity Index scores. In addition, the decrease in noncalcified plaque burden in the biologics group was significantly greater, compared with the nonbiologics group (P =.03), and remained significant after controlling for standard cardiovascular risk factors.

When broken down by biologic, “we observed the greatest percent reduction of noncalcified plaque burden in patients on [anti-interleukin (IL)–17] therapy with a reduction in necrotic core suggesting a potential role for IL-17 in atherosclerotic pathways,” Dr. Elnabawi and his colleagues wrote.

The researchers also noted improvement in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels in the biologics group after 1 year (from 2.0 mg/dL to 1.4 mg/dL), but no change in the nonbiologics group.

The study population included patients naive to biologic or systemic psoriasis therapies who were assessed via clinical and laboratory data and coronary computed tomography angiography at baseline and after 1 year. A total of 89 participants with moderate to severe psoriasis received biologics, including adalimumab, etanercept, ustekinumab, secukinumab, and ixekizumab; 32 psoriasis patients received no biologics and served as a reference group. The average age of the patients was 50 years, and 58% were male. At baseline, patients had low cardiovascular risk based on Framingham scores, and moderate to severe skin disease.

The findings were limited by several factors, including the observational nature of the study, small study population, and the open-label use of biologics, as well as the use of coronary indices, rather than actual cardiovascular events, to assess cardiovascular disease risk, the researchers noted.

However, the results, combined with results from previous studies in animal models, “support further investigation of IL-17 blockade on coronary disease in humans,” they said.

The study was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, with additional support from the National Institutes of Health Medical Research Scholars Program, the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, the American Association for Dental Research, the Colgate-Palmolive Company, Genentech, Elsevier, and other private donors. Dr. Elnabawi had no financial conflicts to disclose.

SOURCE: Elnabawi YA et al. Cardiovasc Res. 2019. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvz009.

Treatment with biologic therapy significantly improves coronary plaque profiles in patients with severe psoriasis, based on data from 121 adult patients who completed a year of follow-up.

A previous study showed a reduced rate of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and cardiovascular death among individuals treated with biologic therapies, wrote Youssef A. Elnabawi, MD, of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute in Bethesda, Md., and his colleagues.

Psoriasis “provides a reliable model to study inflammatory atherogenesis and the longitudinal impact of modulating specific cytokines on vascular behavior, while treating the primary skin disease with [Food and Drug Administration]–approved biologic therapies,” the researchers said.

In a study published in Cardiovascular Research, patients given biologics showed a 5% reduction in total coronary plaque burden after 1 year, as well as a 64% improvement in Psoriasis Area Severity Index scores. In addition, the decrease in noncalcified plaque burden in the biologics group was significantly greater, compared with the nonbiologics group (P =.03), and remained significant after controlling for standard cardiovascular risk factors.

When broken down by biologic, “we observed the greatest percent reduction of noncalcified plaque burden in patients on [anti-interleukin (IL)–17] therapy with a reduction in necrotic core suggesting a potential role for IL-17 in atherosclerotic pathways,” Dr. Elnabawi and his colleagues wrote.

The researchers also noted improvement in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels in the biologics group after 1 year (from 2.0 mg/dL to 1.4 mg/dL), but no change in the nonbiologics group.

The study population included patients naive to biologic or systemic psoriasis therapies who were assessed via clinical and laboratory data and coronary computed tomography angiography at baseline and after 1 year. A total of 89 participants with moderate to severe psoriasis received biologics, including adalimumab, etanercept, ustekinumab, secukinumab, and ixekizumab; 32 psoriasis patients received no biologics and served as a reference group. The average age of the patients was 50 years, and 58% were male. At baseline, patients had low cardiovascular risk based on Framingham scores, and moderate to severe skin disease.

The findings were limited by several factors, including the observational nature of the study, small study population, and the open-label use of biologics, as well as the use of coronary indices, rather than actual cardiovascular events, to assess cardiovascular disease risk, the researchers noted.

However, the results, combined with results from previous studies in animal models, “support further investigation of IL-17 blockade on coronary disease in humans,” they said.

The study was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, with additional support from the National Institutes of Health Medical Research Scholars Program, the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, the American Association for Dental Research, the Colgate-Palmolive Company, Genentech, Elsevier, and other private donors. Dr. Elnabawi had no financial conflicts to disclose.

SOURCE: Elnabawi YA et al. Cardiovasc Res. 2019. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvz009.

Lymphomas appear to be up to four times more likely in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa than among the general population, Rachel Tannenbaum and her colleagues reported in a Research Letter in JAMA Dermatology.

The risks of Hodgkin (HL), non-Hodgkin (NHL), and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) all were significantly higher among patients with HS, wrote Ms. Tannenbaum, Andrew Strunk, and Amit Garg, MD. Males and older patients carried higher risks than females and younger patients, they found.

The team members, of Hofstra University, Hempstead, N.Y., conducted a health care database study comprising 55 million patients included in 27 integrated U.S. health care systems. All the subjects were at least 18 years old; records indicated active HS during the study period of 2013-2018. A regression analysis controlled for age and sex.

The database contained 62,690 patients with HS. The majority (74%) were female and were aged 44 years or younger (57%).

All three lymphomas were more common among HS patients than patients without HS, including non-Hodgkin lymphoma (0.40% vs. 0.35%,) Hodgkin lymphoma (0.17% vs. 0.09%), and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (0.06% vs. 0.02%).

The multivariate analysis determined that HS patients were twice as likely to develop both non-Hodgkin and Hodgkin lymphoma (odds ratio, 2.0 and 2.21, respectively). They were four times more likely to develop cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (OR, 4.31).

All three lymphomas were more common among males than females: NHL, 0.62% vs. 0.32%; HL, 0.28% vs. 0.13%; and CTCL, 0.09% vs. 0.04%. This translated into significantly increased HS-associated risks, Ms. Tannenbaum and her coauthors noted. “For example, the [odds ratios] for the association between HS and HL were higher in males (OR, 2.97; 95% confidence interval, 2.22-3.99) than in females (OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.44-2.39) (P = .02),” they wrote.

Lymphomas were more common among HS patients in every age group. Those aged 18-44 years were 3.64 times more likely to develop NHL than those without HS. Patients with HS aged 45-64 years were 38% more likely to develop NHL, and those older than 65, about twice as likely (OR, 1.99).

“To our knowledge, this is the first investigation to systematically evaluate this association in a U.S. population of patients with HS,” the research team concluded.

The study was supported by a grant from AbbVie. Ms. Tannenbaum and Mr. Strunk reported no disclosures. Dr. Garg reported financial relationships with AbbVie and several other pharmaceutical companies.

msullivan@mdege.com

SOURCE: Tannenbaum R et al. JAMA Dermatol. 2019 Jan 30. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.5230.

Lymphomas appear to be up to four times more likely in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa than among the general population, Rachel Tannenbaum and her colleagues reported in a Research Letter in JAMA Dermatology.

The risks of Hodgkin (HL), non-Hodgkin (NHL), and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) all were significantly higher among patients with HS, wrote Ms. Tannenbaum, Andrew Strunk, and Amit Garg, MD. Males and older patients carried higher risks than females and younger patients, they found.

The team members, of Hofstra University, Hempstead, N.Y., conducted a health care database study comprising 55 million patients included in 27 integrated U.S. health care systems. All the subjects were at least 18 years old; records indicated active HS during the study period of 2013-2018. A regression analysis controlled for age and sex.

The database contained 62,690 patients with HS. The majority (74%) were female and were aged 44 years or younger (57%).

All three lymphomas were more common among HS patients than patients without HS, including non-Hodgkin lymphoma (0.40% vs. 0.35%,) Hodgkin lymphoma (0.17% vs. 0.09%), and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (0.06% vs. 0.02%).

The multivariate analysis determined that HS patients were twice as likely to develop both non-Hodgkin and Hodgkin lymphoma (odds ratio, 2.0 and 2.21, respectively). They were four times more likely to develop cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (OR, 4.31).

All three lymphomas were more common among males than females: NHL, 0.62% vs. 0.32%; HL, 0.28% vs. 0.13%; and CTCL, 0.09% vs. 0.04%. This translated into significantly increased HS-associated risks, Ms. Tannenbaum and her coauthors noted. “For example, the [odds ratios] for the association between HS and HL were higher in males (OR, 2.97; 95% confidence interval, 2.22-3.99) than in females (OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.44-2.39) (P = .02),” they wrote.

Lymphomas were more common among HS patients in every age group. Those aged 18-44 years were 3.64 times more likely to develop NHL than those without HS. Patients with HS aged 45-64 years were 38% more likely to develop NHL, and those older than 65, about twice as likely (OR, 1.99).

“To our knowledge, this is the first investigation to systematically evaluate this association in a U.S. population of patients with HS,” the research team concluded.

The study was supported by a grant from AbbVie. Ms. Tannenbaum and Mr. Strunk reported no disclosures. Dr. Garg reported financial relationships with AbbVie and several other pharmaceutical companies.

msullivan@mdege.com

SOURCE: Tannenbaum R et al. JAMA Dermatol. 2019 Jan 30. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.5230.

Lymphomas appear to be up to four times more likely in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa than among the general population, Rachel Tannenbaum and her colleagues reported in a Research Letter in JAMA Dermatology.

The risks of Hodgkin (HL), non-Hodgkin (NHL), and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) all were significantly higher among patients with HS, wrote Ms. Tannenbaum, Andrew Strunk, and Amit Garg, MD. Males and older patients carried higher risks than females and younger patients, they found.

The team members, of Hofstra University, Hempstead, N.Y., conducted a health care database study comprising 55 million patients included in 27 integrated U.S. health care systems. All the subjects were at least 18 years old; records indicated active HS during the study period of 2013-2018. A regression analysis controlled for age and sex.

The database contained 62,690 patients with HS. The majority (74%) were female and were aged 44 years or younger (57%).

All three lymphomas were more common among HS patients than patients without HS, including non-Hodgkin lymphoma (0.40% vs. 0.35%,) Hodgkin lymphoma (0.17% vs. 0.09%), and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (0.06% vs. 0.02%).

The multivariate analysis determined that HS patients were twice as likely to develop both non-Hodgkin and Hodgkin lymphoma (odds ratio, 2.0 and 2.21, respectively). They were four times more likely to develop cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (OR, 4.31).

All three lymphomas were more common among males than females: NHL, 0.62% vs. 0.32%; HL, 0.28% vs. 0.13%; and CTCL, 0.09% vs. 0.04%. This translated into significantly increased HS-associated risks, Ms. Tannenbaum and her coauthors noted. “For example, the [odds ratios] for the association between HS and HL were higher in males (OR, 2.97; 95% confidence interval, 2.22-3.99) than in females (OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.44-2.39) (P = .02),” they wrote.

Lymphomas were more common among HS patients in every age group. Those aged 18-44 years were 3.64 times more likely to develop NHL than those without HS. Patients with HS aged 45-64 years were 38% more likely to develop NHL, and those older than 65, about twice as likely (OR, 1.99).

“To our knowledge, this is the first investigation to systematically evaluate this association in a U.S. population of patients with HS,” the research team concluded.

The study was supported by a grant from AbbVie. Ms. Tannenbaum and Mr. Strunk reported no disclosures. Dr. Garg reported financial relationships with AbbVie and several other pharmaceutical companies.

msullivan@mdege.com

SOURCE: Tannenbaum R et al. JAMA Dermatol. 2019 Jan 30. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.5230.

Preoperative intravenous acetaminophen does not appear to reduce postoperative pain in women undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse, new research suggests.

“Owing to its lack of clinical benefit, routine use of IV acetaminophen as the sole preemptive analgesia agent is not supported by this study,” reported Lindsay C. Turner, MD, of the department of obstetrics and gynecology at the Allegheny Health Network in Pittsburgh, and her coauthors.

In a double-blind placebo-controlled trial, published in Obstetrics & Gynecology, Dr. Turner and her coauthors randomized 202 women undergoing laparoscopic or vaginal surgery to either 1,000 mg intravenous acetaminophen or saline.

Among the 162 patients for whom pain score data were available at baseline and 24 hours after surgery, there were no significant differences in the mean change in pain scores from baseline to 24 hours between the acetaminophen group and the placebo group, or at any other time point in the 24 hours, regardless of surgical route.

Acetaminophen administration also failed to have any significant effect on total 24-hour use of narcotic and nonnarcotic pain relief, which was similar between the intervention and placebo groups, irrespective of surgical route.

The women in the study also were asked to complete pain diaries for the 7 days after their operation. This revealed no significant difference between the acetaminophen and placebo groups in narcotic pain relief use during that week. Patients used a median of 30 of the narcotic tablets prescribed at discharge, which represented less than one-quarter of the total tablets prescribed.

“Although preoperative IV acetaminophen is included in many extended recovery pathways owing to its improvement in pain scores and reduction in narcotic use after many other types of procedures, the use of IV acetaminophen alone before surgery for [pelvic organ prolapse] is not supported,” wrote Dr. Turner and her coauthors.

The rates of side effects, such as nausea, drowsiness, itching, or dizziness also were similar between the two groups. However, Dr. Turner and her coauthors noted a significantly higher rate of urinary retention among women who underwent surgery by the vaginal route and received intravenous acetaminophen, compared with those who received placebo (59.2% vs. 33.3%; P = .01).

“The increased rates of urinary retention with IV acetaminophen in women undergoing vaginal surgery are surprising, because more women in the placebo group underwent posterior repair, which historically has been thought to increase risks of postoperative urinary retention,” the authors wrote. They suggested that the medium in which the IV acetaminophen was suspended might have had a diuretic effect but said that further study was needed to explore the observation.

Dr. Turner and her coauthors cited as a limitation the absence of primary outcome data for 40 of the patients. They said the inconsistency found in the patients’ completion of postoperative and pain diaries was a limitation.

The study was supported by the American Urogynecologic Society Pelvic Floor Disorders Research Foundation. No conflicts of interest were declared.

SOURCE: Turner LC et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133:492-502.

Preoperative intravenous acetaminophen does not appear to reduce postoperative pain in women undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse, new research suggests.

“Owing to its lack of clinical benefit, routine use of IV acetaminophen as the sole preemptive analgesia agent is not supported by this study,” reported Lindsay C. Turner, MD, of the department of obstetrics and gynecology at the Allegheny Health Network in Pittsburgh, and her coauthors.

In a double-blind placebo-controlled trial, published in Obstetrics & Gynecology, Dr. Turner and her coauthors randomized 202 women undergoing laparoscopic or vaginal surgery to either 1,000 mg intravenous acetaminophen or saline.

Among the 162 patients for whom pain score data were available at baseline and 24 hours after surgery, there were no significant differences in the mean change in pain scores from baseline to 24 hours between the acetaminophen group and the placebo group, or at any other time point in the 24 hours, regardless of surgical route.

Acetaminophen administration also failed to have any significant effect on total 24-hour use of narcotic and nonnarcotic pain relief, which was similar between the intervention and placebo groups, irrespective of surgical route.

The women in the study also were asked to complete pain diaries for the 7 days after their operation. This revealed no significant difference between the acetaminophen and placebo groups in narcotic pain relief use during that week. Patients used a median of 30 of the narcotic tablets prescribed at discharge, which represented less than one-quarter of the total tablets prescribed.

“Although preoperative IV acetaminophen is included in many extended recovery pathways owing to its improvement in pain scores and reduction in narcotic use after many other types of procedures, the use of IV acetaminophen alone before surgery for [pelvic organ prolapse] is not supported,” wrote Dr. Turner and her coauthors.

The rates of side effects, such as nausea, drowsiness, itching, or dizziness also were similar between the two groups. However, Dr. Turner and her coauthors noted a significantly higher rate of urinary retention among women who underwent surgery by the vaginal route and received intravenous acetaminophen, compared with those who received placebo (59.2% vs. 33.3%; P = .01).

“The increased rates of urinary retention with IV acetaminophen in women undergoing vaginal surgery are surprising, because more women in the placebo group underwent posterior repair, which historically has been thought to increase risks of postoperative urinary retention,” the authors wrote. They suggested that the medium in which the IV acetaminophen was suspended might have had a diuretic effect but said that further study was needed to explore the observation.

Dr. Turner and her coauthors cited as a limitation the absence of primary outcome data for 40 of the patients. They said the inconsistency found in the patients’ completion of postoperative and pain diaries was a limitation.

The study was supported by the American Urogynecologic Society Pelvic Floor Disorders Research Foundation. No conflicts of interest were declared.

SOURCE: Turner LC et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133:492-502.

Preoperative intravenous acetaminophen does not appear to reduce postoperative pain in women undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse, new research suggests.

“Owing to its lack of clinical benefit, routine use of IV acetaminophen as the sole preemptive analgesia agent is not supported by this study,” reported Lindsay C. Turner, MD, of the department of obstetrics and gynecology at the Allegheny Health Network in Pittsburgh, and her coauthors.

In a double-blind placebo-controlled trial, published in Obstetrics & Gynecology, Dr. Turner and her coauthors randomized 202 women undergoing laparoscopic or vaginal surgery to either 1,000 mg intravenous acetaminophen or saline.

Among the 162 patients for whom pain score data were available at baseline and 24 hours after surgery, there were no significant differences in the mean change in pain scores from baseline to 24 hours between the acetaminophen group and the placebo group, or at any other time point in the 24 hours, regardless of surgical route.

Acetaminophen administration also failed to have any significant effect on total 24-hour use of narcotic and nonnarcotic pain relief, which was similar between the intervention and placebo groups, irrespective of surgical route.

The women in the study also were asked to complete pain diaries for the 7 days after their operation. This revealed no significant difference between the acetaminophen and placebo groups in narcotic pain relief use during that week. Patients used a median of 30 of the narcotic tablets prescribed at discharge, which represented less than one-quarter of the total tablets prescribed.

“Although preoperative IV acetaminophen is included in many extended recovery pathways owing to its improvement in pain scores and reduction in narcotic use after many other types of procedures, the use of IV acetaminophen alone before surgery for [pelvic organ prolapse] is not supported,” wrote Dr. Turner and her coauthors.

The rates of side effects, such as nausea, drowsiness, itching, or dizziness also were similar between the two groups. However, Dr. Turner and her coauthors noted a significantly higher rate of urinary retention among women who underwent surgery by the vaginal route and received intravenous acetaminophen, compared with those who received placebo (59.2% vs. 33.3%; P = .01).

“The increased rates of urinary retention with IV acetaminophen in women undergoing vaginal surgery are surprising, because more women in the placebo group underwent posterior repair, which historically has been thought to increase risks of postoperative urinary retention,” the authors wrote. They suggested that the medium in which the IV acetaminophen was suspended might have had a diuretic effect but said that further study was needed to explore the observation.

Dr. Turner and her coauthors cited as a limitation the absence of primary outcome data for 40 of the patients. They said the inconsistency found in the patients’ completion of postoperative and pain diaries was a limitation.

The study was supported by the American Urogynecologic Society Pelvic Floor Disorders Research Foundation. No conflicts of interest were declared.

SOURCE: Turner LC et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133:492-502.

Navneet Majhail, MD, president-elect of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (ASBMT), will assume the office of ASBMT president at the end of February 2019.

Current ASBMT President John F. DiPersio, MD, recently announced he will be “handing over the baton” to Dr. Majhail at the Transplantation & Cellular Therapy Meetings (formerly BMT Tandem Meetings), scheduled to take place Feb. 20-24, 2019.

Dr. Majhail is director of the Cleveland Clinic’s Blood & Marrow Transplant Program, a staff physician in the department of hematology and oncology at the Taussig Cancer Institute, and a professor of medicine at the Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine.

In other news, Girish Dhall, MD, has been named division director for the Hematology-Oncology and Blood Marrow Transplantation program at the University of Alabama at Birmingham department of pediatrics and Children’s of Alabama.

Dr. Dhall is currently a pediatric hematologist-oncologist and director of the Neuro-oncology Program at Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles. He is also an associate professor of clinical pediatrics at Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California. Dr. Dhall is slated to assume his new position at the end of May 2019.

Courtesy the Princess Margaret Cancer Foundation

Dr. Scola, an oncologist/hematologist, has been appointed director of the Atlantic Thrombosis Center, a program focused on thrombotic risk, events, and disorders. Dr. Farber, an oncologist specializing in malignant hematology, has been appointed medical director of Oncology Research Network Development for Atlantic Health System.

Movers in Medicine highlights career moves and personal achievements by hematologists and oncologists. Did you switch jobs, take on a new role, climb a mountain? Tell us all about it at hematologynews@mdedge.com , and you could be featured in Movers in Medicine.

jensmith@mdedge.com

Navneet Majhail, MD, president-elect of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (ASBMT), will assume the office of ASBMT president at the end of February 2019.

Current ASBMT President John F. DiPersio, MD, recently announced he will be “handing over the baton” to Dr. Majhail at the Transplantation & Cellular Therapy Meetings (formerly BMT Tandem Meetings), scheduled to take place Feb. 20-24, 2019.

Dr. Majhail is director of the Cleveland Clinic’s Blood & Marrow Transplant Program, a staff physician in the department of hematology and oncology at the Taussig Cancer Institute, and a professor of medicine at the Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine.

In other news, Girish Dhall, MD, has been named division director for the Hematology-Oncology and Blood Marrow Transplantation program at the University of Alabama at Birmingham department of pediatrics and Children’s of Alabama.

Dr. Dhall is currently a pediatric hematologist-oncologist and director of the Neuro-oncology Program at Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles. He is also an associate professor of clinical pediatrics at Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California. Dr. Dhall is slated to assume his new position at the end of May 2019.

Courtesy the Princess Margaret Cancer Foundation

Dr. Scola, an oncologist/hematologist, has been appointed director of the Atlantic Thrombosis Center, a program focused on thrombotic risk, events, and disorders. Dr. Farber, an oncologist specializing in malignant hematology, has been appointed medical director of Oncology Research Network Development for Atlantic Health System.

Movers in Medicine highlights career moves and personal achievements by hematologists and oncologists. Did you switch jobs, take on a new role, climb a mountain? Tell us all about it at hematologynews@mdedge.com , and you could be featured in Movers in Medicine.

jensmith@mdedge.com

Navneet Majhail, MD, president-elect of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (ASBMT), will assume the office of ASBMT president at the end of February 2019.

Current ASBMT President John F. DiPersio, MD, recently announced he will be “handing over the baton” to Dr. Majhail at the Transplantation & Cellular Therapy Meetings (formerly BMT Tandem Meetings), scheduled to take place Feb. 20-24, 2019.

Dr. Majhail is director of the Cleveland Clinic’s Blood & Marrow Transplant Program, a staff physician in the department of hematology and oncology at the Taussig Cancer Institute, and a professor of medicine at the Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine.

In other news, Girish Dhall, MD, has been named division director for the Hematology-Oncology and Blood Marrow Transplantation program at the University of Alabama at Birmingham department of pediatrics and Children’s of Alabama.

Dr. Dhall is currently a pediatric hematologist-oncologist and director of the Neuro-oncology Program at Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles. He is also an associate professor of clinical pediatrics at Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California. Dr. Dhall is slated to assume his new position at the end of May 2019.

Courtesy the Princess Margaret Cancer Foundation

Dr. Scola, an oncologist/hematologist, has been appointed director of the Atlantic Thrombosis Center, a program focused on thrombotic risk, events, and disorders. Dr. Farber, an oncologist specializing in malignant hematology, has been appointed medical director of Oncology Research Network Development for Atlantic Health System.

Movers in Medicine highlights career moves and personal achievements by hematologists and oncologists. Did you switch jobs, take on a new role, climb a mountain? Tell us all about it at hematologynews@mdedge.com , and you could be featured in Movers in Medicine.

jensmith@mdedge.com

CORONADO, CALIF. – Head and neck mucinous adenocarcinoma is commonly diagnosed at a low tumor stage with no nodal involvement but with the potential for distant metastases.

The findings come from the largest study of its kind to date, which was presented by Neel R. Sangal at the Triological Society’s Combined Sections Meeting.

“Mucinous carcinoma was previously classified as colloid carcinoma, which leads to increased confusion in the nomenclature,” said Mr. Sangal, a 4th-year student at New Jersey Medical School, Newark.

“This changed in the 1980s, which led to difficulty in characterizing the disease over time. This histology is well studied in the GI system, in the lungs, and in the breast, but the head and neck presentation is extremely rare, and it lacks comprehensive study.

“It commonly presents as a slow-growing, painless, nonulcerated nodule. From case reports, it’s typically low-grade and indolent, but it commonly recurs, and it does have metastatic potential,” he said. “Histologically, it’s characterized by nets of aggressive epithelial cells that are accompanied by significant extracellular mucin.”

In an effort to understand the demographic, clinicopathologic, treatment, and survival characteristics of mucinous adenocarcinoma, the researchers evaluated cases from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database between 1973 and 2014. They selected patients based on their International Classification of Diseases morphological code specific for mucinous adenocarcinoma and ICD primary site code consistent for cancers of the head and neck.

In all, 583 cases met criteria, “which highlights how rare this disease is,” Mr. Sangal said at the meeting, which was jointly sponsored by the Triological Society and the American College of Surgeons.

The mean age at diagnosis was 64.8 years; 55.2% of cases were male, 64.5% were white, 15.4% were black, 8.7% were Hispanic, 6.7% were Asian, and the remaining 5% were from other ethnicities. The four most frequent primary sites were the eyelid (29.8%), followed by skin of the face (22.6%), skin of the scalp and neck (12.2%), and the parotid gland (8.7%). Most of the lesions lacked nodal involvement and metastasis (94.1% and 96.2%, respectively). Histology presented mainly at lower stages. Specifically, 68% had T0-1 disease, 21.5% had T2-3 disease, and 10.5% had T4 disease.

When the researchers stratified treatment frequency by various clinical pathologic characteristics, they found large differences in the type of treatment received by the primary site. “Those on the salivary gland tended to receive radiation at a much higher percentage than those of the skin, which mostly received surgery alone,” Mr. Sangal said. “We also found a linear correlation between T stage and increased use of radiation alongside surgery. Similarly, those with nodal involvement and distant metastasis had increased rates of radiation with surgery.”

Disease-specific survival and overall survival rates were 92.2% and 80.5%, respectively. Advanced age at diagnosis was a significant predictor of survival. In addition, Hispanics had the highest rates of survival, while the white and black patients had similar survival curves. “Tumors of the parotid gland had significantly worse survival outcomes than those of the skin,” Mr. Sangal added. “We also found a linear correlation between T stage and survival. Similarly, those with nodal involvement and distant metastasis also had decreased survival.”

He acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including the potential for inconsistent coding in the SEER database.

Samer T. Elsamna was lead author on the study. None of the researchers reported having financial disclosures.

dbrunk@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Elsamna ST et al. Triological CSM 2019, Abstracts.

CORONADO, CALIF. – Head and neck mucinous adenocarcinoma is commonly diagnosed at a low tumor stage with no nodal involvement but with the potential for distant metastases.

The findings come from the largest study of its kind to date, which was presented by Neel R. Sangal at the Triological Society’s Combined Sections Meeting.

“Mucinous carcinoma was previously classified as colloid carcinoma, which leads to increased confusion in the nomenclature,” said Mr. Sangal, a 4th-year student at New Jersey Medical School, Newark.

“This changed in the 1980s, which led to difficulty in characterizing the disease over time. This histology is well studied in the GI system, in the lungs, and in the breast, but the head and neck presentation is extremely rare, and it lacks comprehensive study.

“It commonly presents as a slow-growing, painless, nonulcerated nodule. From case reports, it’s typically low-grade and indolent, but it commonly recurs, and it does have metastatic potential,” he said. “Histologically, it’s characterized by nets of aggressive epithelial cells that are accompanied by significant extracellular mucin.”

In an effort to understand the demographic, clinicopathologic, treatment, and survival characteristics of mucinous adenocarcinoma, the researchers evaluated cases from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database between 1973 and 2014. They selected patients based on their International Classification of Diseases morphological code specific for mucinous adenocarcinoma and ICD primary site code consistent for cancers of the head and neck.

In all, 583 cases met criteria, “which highlights how rare this disease is,” Mr. Sangal said at the meeting, which was jointly sponsored by the Triological Society and the American College of Surgeons.

The mean age at diagnosis was 64.8 years; 55.2% of cases were male, 64.5% were white, 15.4% were black, 8.7% were Hispanic, 6.7% were Asian, and the remaining 5% were from other ethnicities. The four most frequent primary sites were the eyelid (29.8%), followed by skin of the face (22.6%), skin of the scalp and neck (12.2%), and the parotid gland (8.7%). Most of the lesions lacked nodal involvement and metastasis (94.1% and 96.2%, respectively). Histology presented mainly at lower stages. Specifically, 68% had T0-1 disease, 21.5% had T2-3 disease, and 10.5% had T4 disease.

When the researchers stratified treatment frequency by various clinical pathologic characteristics, they found large differences in the type of treatment received by the primary site. “Those on the salivary gland tended to receive radiation at a much higher percentage than those of the skin, which mostly received surgery alone,” Mr. Sangal said. “We also found a linear correlation between T stage and increased use of radiation alongside surgery. Similarly, those with nodal involvement and distant metastasis had increased rates of radiation with surgery.”

Disease-specific survival and overall survival rates were 92.2% and 80.5%, respectively. Advanced age at diagnosis was a significant predictor of survival. In addition, Hispanics had the highest rates of survival, while the white and black patients had similar survival curves. “Tumors of the parotid gland had significantly worse survival outcomes than those of the skin,” Mr. Sangal added. “We also found a linear correlation between T stage and survival. Similarly, those with nodal involvement and distant metastasis also had decreased survival.”

He acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including the potential for inconsistent coding in the SEER database.

Samer T. Elsamna was lead author on the study. None of the researchers reported having financial disclosures.

dbrunk@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Elsamna ST et al. Triological CSM 2019, Abstracts.

CORONADO, CALIF. – Head and neck mucinous adenocarcinoma is commonly diagnosed at a low tumor stage with no nodal involvement but with the potential for distant metastases.

The findings come from the largest study of its kind to date, which was presented by Neel R. Sangal at the Triological Society’s Combined Sections Meeting.

“Mucinous carcinoma was previously classified as colloid carcinoma, which leads to increased confusion in the nomenclature,” said Mr. Sangal, a 4th-year student at New Jersey Medical School, Newark.

“This changed in the 1980s, which led to difficulty in characterizing the disease over time. This histology is well studied in the GI system, in the lungs, and in the breast, but the head and neck presentation is extremely rare, and it lacks comprehensive study.

“It commonly presents as a slow-growing, painless, nonulcerated nodule. From case reports, it’s typically low-grade and indolent, but it commonly recurs, and it does have metastatic potential,” he said. “Histologically, it’s characterized by nets of aggressive epithelial cells that are accompanied by significant extracellular mucin.”

In an effort to understand the demographic, clinicopathologic, treatment, and survival characteristics of mucinous adenocarcinoma, the researchers evaluated cases from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database between 1973 and 2014. They selected patients based on their International Classification of Diseases morphological code specific for mucinous adenocarcinoma and ICD primary site code consistent for cancers of the head and neck.

In all, 583 cases met criteria, “which highlights how rare this disease is,” Mr. Sangal said at the meeting, which was jointly sponsored by the Triological Society and the American College of Surgeons.

The mean age at diagnosis was 64.8 years; 55.2% of cases were male, 64.5% were white, 15.4% were black, 8.7% were Hispanic, 6.7% were Asian, and the remaining 5% were from other ethnicities. The four most frequent primary sites were the eyelid (29.8%), followed by skin of the face (22.6%), skin of the scalp and neck (12.2%), and the parotid gland (8.7%). Most of the lesions lacked nodal involvement and metastasis (94.1% and 96.2%, respectively). Histology presented mainly at lower stages. Specifically, 68% had T0-1 disease, 21.5% had T2-3 disease, and 10.5% had T4 disease.

When the researchers stratified treatment frequency by various clinical pathologic characteristics, they found large differences in the type of treatment received by the primary site. “Those on the salivary gland tended to receive radiation at a much higher percentage than those of the skin, which mostly received surgery alone,” Mr. Sangal said. “We also found a linear correlation between T stage and increased use of radiation alongside surgery. Similarly, those with nodal involvement and distant metastasis had increased rates of radiation with surgery.”

Disease-specific survival and overall survival rates were 92.2% and 80.5%, respectively. Advanced age at diagnosis was a significant predictor of survival. In addition, Hispanics had the highest rates of survival, while the white and black patients had similar survival curves. “Tumors of the parotid gland had significantly worse survival outcomes than those of the skin,” Mr. Sangal added. “We also found a linear correlation between T stage and survival. Similarly, those with nodal involvement and distant metastasis also had decreased survival.”

He acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including the potential for inconsistent coding in the SEER database.

Samer T. Elsamna was lead author on the study. None of the researchers reported having financial disclosures.

dbrunk@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Elsamna ST et al. Triological CSM 2019, Abstracts.