To the Editor:

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling pathway plays a role in the differentiation, proliferation, and survival of several cell types.¹ Erlotinib is an EGFR inhibitor that targets aberrant cells that overexpress this receptor and has been used in the treatment of various solid malignant tumors.^2,3 Common dermatologic side effects associated with EGFR inhibitors include papulopustular rash, xeroderma, and paronychia.^2,3 We present a unique finding of subungual hemorrhage of the thumbnails in a patient taking erlotinib.

A 50-year-old man presented with acute-onset tenderness and discoloration of the thumbnails of 1 week’s duration. There was no preceding trauma or history of similar symptoms. His medical history was notable for recurrent lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR L858R mutation. Erlotinib therapy was initiated 5 weeks prior to symptom onset. He developed notable xeroderma of the palms and soles that preceded nail changes by a few days. He completed treatment with carboplatin and pemetrexed 16 months prior to relapse after paclitaxel failed due to a severe allergic reaction. There were no nail symptoms during that time. The patient did not have a documented coagulation disorder and was not on any known medications that would predispose him to bleeding. Physical examination demonstrated subungual hemorrhage of the thumbnails with tenderness on palpation (Figure). There was no evidence of periungual changes or nail plate abnormality. All other nails appeared normal. Laboratory test results showed normal platelets. Supportive therapeutic measures were recommended, and the patient was advised to avoid trauma to the nails.

Incidence of nail changes secondary to anti-EGFR drugs are likely underestimated and underreported.³ Subungual hemorrhage should be considered as an additional, less common nail side effect of EGFR inhibitors that clinicians and patients may encounter. Improved awareness and understanding of nail toxicities associated with EGFR inhibitors may offer better insight into the pathogenesis of these side effects and management options.

To the Editor:

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling pathway plays a role in the differentiation, proliferation, and survival of several cell types.¹ Erlotinib is an EGFR inhibitor that targets aberrant cells that overexpress this receptor and has been used in the treatment of various solid malignant tumors.^2,3 Common dermatologic side effects associated with EGFR inhibitors include papulopustular rash, xeroderma, and paronychia.^2,3 We present a unique finding of subungual hemorrhage of the thumbnails in a patient taking erlotinib.

A 50-year-old man presented with acute-onset tenderness and discoloration of the thumbnails of 1 week’s duration. There was no preceding trauma or history of similar symptoms. His medical history was notable for recurrent lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR L858R mutation. Erlotinib therapy was initiated 5 weeks prior to symptom onset. He developed notable xeroderma of the palms and soles that preceded nail changes by a few days. He completed treatment with carboplatin and pemetrexed 16 months prior to relapse after paclitaxel failed due to a severe allergic reaction. There were no nail symptoms during that time. The patient did not have a documented coagulation disorder and was not on any known medications that would predispose him to bleeding. Physical examination demonstrated subungual hemorrhage of the thumbnails with tenderness on palpation (Figure). There was no evidence of periungual changes or nail plate abnormality. All other nails appeared normal. Laboratory test results showed normal platelets. Supportive therapeutic measures were recommended, and the patient was advised to avoid trauma to the nails.

Incidence of nail changes secondary to anti-EGFR drugs are likely underestimated and underreported.³ Subungual hemorrhage should be considered as an additional, less common nail side effect of EGFR inhibitors that clinicians and patients may encounter. Improved awareness and understanding of nail toxicities associated with EGFR inhibitors may offer better insight into the pathogenesis of these side effects and management options.

To the Editor:

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling pathway plays a role in the differentiation, proliferation, and survival of several cell types.¹ Erlotinib is an EGFR inhibitor that targets aberrant cells that overexpress this receptor and has been used in the treatment of various solid malignant tumors.^2,3 Common dermatologic side effects associated with EGFR inhibitors include papulopustular rash, xeroderma, and paronychia.^2,3 We present a unique finding of subungual hemorrhage of the thumbnails in a patient taking erlotinib.

A 50-year-old man presented with acute-onset tenderness and discoloration of the thumbnails of 1 week’s duration. There was no preceding trauma or history of similar symptoms. His medical history was notable for recurrent lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR L858R mutation. Erlotinib therapy was initiated 5 weeks prior to symptom onset. He developed notable xeroderma of the palms and soles that preceded nail changes by a few days. He completed treatment with carboplatin and pemetrexed 16 months prior to relapse after paclitaxel failed due to a severe allergic reaction. There were no nail symptoms during that time. The patient did not have a documented coagulation disorder and was not on any known medications that would predispose him to bleeding. Physical examination demonstrated subungual hemorrhage of the thumbnails with tenderness on palpation (Figure). There was no evidence of periungual changes or nail plate abnormality. All other nails appeared normal. Laboratory test results showed normal platelets. Supportive therapeutic measures were recommended, and the patient was advised to avoid trauma to the nails.

Incidence of nail changes secondary to anti-EGFR drugs are likely underestimated and underreported.³ Subungual hemorrhage should be considered as an additional, less common nail side effect of EGFR inhibitors that clinicians and patients may encounter. Improved awareness and understanding of nail toxicities associated with EGFR inhibitors may offer better insight into the pathogenesis of these side effects and management options.

Clinical Psychiatry News is pleased to welcome Alice W. Lee, MD, to its editorial advisory board.

Dr. Lee, who works with children, adolescents and adults, specializes in integrative and holistic psychiatry. In her private practice in Gaithersburg, Md., she integrates functional/orthomolecular medicine and mind–body/energy medicine in her work with patients.

She also writes and publishes weekly newsletters, and produces YouTube videos to an audience of more than 3,000 subscribers, followers, and website visitors per month. In addition, Dr. Lee is a Reiki master who integrates the biochemistry of chemistry with the quantum physics of healing. One of her specialties is helping patients withdraw from their psychiatric medications safely.

Dr. Lee is a member of the Academy of Integrative Health & Medicine, the Association for Comprehensive Energy Psychology, the Integrative Healthcare Symposium, and the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine.

Clinical Psychiatry News is pleased to welcome Alice W. Lee, MD, to its editorial advisory board.

Dr. Lee, who works with children, adolescents and adults, specializes in integrative and holistic psychiatry. In her private practice in Gaithersburg, Md., she integrates functional/orthomolecular medicine and mind–body/energy medicine in her work with patients.

She also writes and publishes weekly newsletters, and produces YouTube videos to an audience of more than 3,000 subscribers, followers, and website visitors per month. In addition, Dr. Lee is a Reiki master who integrates the biochemistry of chemistry with the quantum physics of healing. One of her specialties is helping patients withdraw from their psychiatric medications safely.

Dr. Lee is a member of the Academy of Integrative Health & Medicine, the Association for Comprehensive Energy Psychology, the Integrative Healthcare Symposium, and the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine.

Clinical Psychiatry News is pleased to welcome Alice W. Lee, MD, to its editorial advisory board.

Dr. Lee, who works with children, adolescents and adults, specializes in integrative and holistic psychiatry. In her private practice in Gaithersburg, Md., she integrates functional/orthomolecular medicine and mind–body/energy medicine in her work with patients.

She also writes and publishes weekly newsletters, and produces YouTube videos to an audience of more than 3,000 subscribers, followers, and website visitors per month. In addition, Dr. Lee is a Reiki master who integrates the biochemistry of chemistry with the quantum physics of healing. One of her specialties is helping patients withdraw from their psychiatric medications safely.

Dr. Lee is a member of the Academy of Integrative Health & Medicine, the Association for Comprehensive Energy Psychology, the Integrative Healthcare Symposium, and the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine.

Calciphylaxis, otherwise known as calcific uremic arteriolopathy, is characterized by calcification of the tunica media of the small- to medium-sized blood vessels of the dermis and subcutis, leading to ischemia and necrosis.¹ It is a deadly disease with a 1-year mortality rate of more than 50%.² End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is the most common risk factor for calciphylaxis, with a prevalence of 1% to 4% of hemodialysis patients with calciphylaxis in the United States.^2-5 However, nonuremic calciphylaxis (NUC) has been increasingly reported in the literature and has risk factors other than ESRD, including but not limited to obesity, alcoholic liver disease, primary hyperparathyroidism, connective tissue disease, and underlying malignancy.^3,6-9 Triggers for calciphylaxis in at-risk patients include use of corticosteroids or warfarin, iron or albumin infusions, and rapid weight loss.^3,6,9-11 We report an unusual case of NUC that most likely was triggered by rapid weight loss and hypotension in a patient with multiple risk factors for calciphylaxis.

Case Report

A 75-year-old white woman with history of morbid obesity (body mass index, 40 kg/m²), unexplained weight loss of 70 lb over the last year, and polymyalgia rheumatica requiring chronic prednisone therapy presented with painful lesions on the thighs, buttocks, and right shoulder of 4 months’ duration. She had multiple hospital admissions preceding the onset of lesions for severe infections resulting in sepsis with hypotension, including Enterococcus faecalis endocarditis, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase bacteremia, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia. Physical examination revealed large well-demarcated ulcers and necrotic eschars with surrounding violaceous induration and stellate erythema on the anterior, medial, and posterior thighs and buttocks that were exquisitely tender (Figures 1 and 2).

Notable laboratory results included hypoalbuminemia (1.3 g/dL [reference range, 3.5–5.0 g/dL]) with normal renal function, a corrected calcium level of 9.7 mg/dL (reference range, 8.2–10.2 mg/dL), a serum phosphorus level of 3.5 mg/dL (reference range, 2.3–4.7 mg/dL), a calcium-phosphate product of 27.3 mg²/dL² (reference range, <55 mg²/dL²), and a parathyroid hormone level of 49.3 pg/mL (reference range, 10–65 pg/mL). Antinuclear antibodies were negative. A hypercoagulability evaluation showed normal protein C and S levels, negative lupus anticoagulant, and negative anticardiolipin antibodies.

Telescoping punch biopsies of the indurated borders of the eschars showed prominent calcification of the small- and medium-sized vessels in the mid and deep dermis, intravascular thrombi, and necrosis of the epidermis and subcutaneous fat consistent with calciphylaxis (Figure 3).

Comment

Background on Calciphylaxis
Calciphylaxis is a rare but deadly disease that affects both ESRD patients receiving dialysis and patients without ESRD who have known risk factors for calciphylaxis, including female gender, white race, obesity, alcoholic liver disease, primary hyperparathyroidism, connective tissue disease, underlying malignancy, protein C or S deficiency, corticosteroid use, warfarin use, diabetes, iron or albumin infusions, and rapid weight loss.^3,6-9,11 Although the molecular pathogenesis of calciphylaxis is not completely understood, it is believed to be caused by local deposition of calcium in the tunica media of small- to medium-sized arterioles and venules in the skin.¹² This deposition leads to intimal proliferation and progressive narrowing of the vessels with resultant thrombosis, ischemia, and necrosis. The cutaneous manifestations and histopathology of calciphylaxis classically follow its pathogenesis. Calciphylaxis typically presents with livedo reticularis as vessels narrow and then progresses to purpura, bullae, necrosis, and eschar formation with the onset of acute thrombosis and ischemia. Histopathology is characterized by small- and medium-sized vessel calcification and thrombus, dermal necrosis, and septal panniculitis, though the histology can be highly variable.¹² Unfortunately, the already poor prognosis for calciphylaxis worsens when lesions become either ulcerative or present on the proximal extremities and trunk.^4,13 Sepsis is the leading cause of death in calciphylaxis patients, affecting more than 50% of patients.^2,3,14 The differential diagnoses for calciphylactic-appearing lesions include warfarin-induced skin necrosis, disseminated intravascular coagulation, pyoderma gangrenosum, cholesterol emboli, and various vasculitides and coagulopathies.

Risk Factors
Our case demonstrates the importance of risk factor minimization, trigger avoidance, and early intervention due to the high mortality rate of calciphylaxis. Selye et al¹⁵ coined the term calciphylaxis in 1961 based on experiments that induced calciphylaxis in rat models. Their research concluded that there were certain sensitizers (ie, risk factors) that predisposed patients to medial calcium deposition in blood vessels and other challengers (ie, triggers) that acted as inciting events to calcium deposition. Our patient presented with multiple known risk factors for calciphylaxis, including obesity (body mass index, 40 kg/m²), female gender, white race, hypoalbuminemia, and chronic corticosteroid use.¹⁶ In the presence of a milieu of risk factors, the patient’s rapid weight loss and episodes of hypotension likely were triggers for calciphylaxis.

Other case reports in the literature have suggested weight loss as a trigger for NUC. One morbidly obese patient with inactive rheumatoid arthritis had onset of calciphylaxis lesions after unintentional weight loss of approximately 50% body weight in 1 year¹⁷; however, the weight loss does not have to be drastic to trigger calciphylaxis. Another study of 16 patients with uremic calciphylaxis found that 7 of 16 (44%) patients lost 10 to 50 kg in the 6 months prior to calciphylaxis onset.¹⁴ One proposed mechanism by Munavalli et al¹⁰ is that elevated levels of matrix metalloproteinases during catabolic weight loss states enhance the deposition of calcium into elastic fibers of small vessels. The authors found elevated serum levels of matrix metalloproteinases in their patients with NUC induced by rapid weight loss.¹⁰

A meta-analysis by Nigwekar et al³ found a history of prior corticosteroid use in 61% (22/36) of NUC cases reviewed. However, it is unclear whether it is the use of corticosteroids or chronic inflammation that is implicated in NUC pathogenesis. Chronic inflammation causes downregulation of anticalcification signaling pathways.^18-20 The role of 2 vascular calcification inhibitors has been evaluated in the pathogenesis of calciphylaxis: fetuin-A and matrix gla protein (MGP).²¹ The activity of these proteins is decreased not only in calciphylaxis but also in other inflammatory states and chronic renal failure.^18-20 One study found lower fetuin-A levels in 312 hemodialysis patients compared to healthy controls and an association between low fetuin-A levels and increased C-reactive protein levels.²² Reduced fetuin-A and MGP levels may be the result of several calciphylaxis risk factors. Warfarin is believed to trigger calciphylaxis via inhibition of gamma-carboxylation of MGP, which is necessary for its anticalcification activity.²³ Hypoalbuminemia and alcoholic liver disease also are risk factors that may be explained by the fact that fetuin-A is synthesized in the liver.²⁴ Therefore, liver disease results in decreased production of fetuin-A that is permissive to vascular calcification in calciphylaxis patients.

There have been other reports of calciphylaxis patients who were originally hospitalized due to hypotension, which may serve as a trigger for calciphylaxis onset.²⁵ Because calciphylaxis lesions are more likely to occur in the fatty areas of the abdomen and proximal thighs where blood flow is slower, hypotension likely accentuates the slowing of blood flow and subsequent blood vessel calcification. This theory is supported by studies showing that established calciphylactic lesions worsen more quickly in the presence of systemic hypotension.²⁶ One patient with ESRD and calciphylaxis of the breasts had consistent systolic blood pressure readings in the high 60s to low 70s between dialysis sessions.²⁷ Due to this association, we recommend that patients with calciphylaxis have close blood pressure monitoring to aid in preventing disease progression.²⁸

Management
Calciphylaxis treatment has not yet been standardized, as it is an uncommon disease whose pathogenesis is not fully understood. Current management strategies aim to normalize metabolic abnormalities such as hypercalcemia if they are present and remove inciting agents such as warfarin and corticosteroids.²⁹ Other medical treatments that have been successfully used include sodium thiosulfate, oral steroids, and adjunctive bisphosphonates.^29-31 Sodium thiosulfate is known to cause metabolic acidosis by generating thiosulfuric acid in vivo in patients with or without renal disease; therefore, patients on sodium thiosulfate therapy should be monitored for development of metabolic acidosis and treated with oral sodium bicarbonate or dialysis as needed.^30,32 Wound care also is an important element of calciphylaxis treatment; however, the debridement of wounds is controversial. Some argue that dry intact eschars serve to protect against sepsis, which is the leading cause of death in calciphylaxis.^2,14,33 In contrast, a retrospective study of 63 calciphylaxis patients found a 1-year survival rate of 61.6% in 17 patients receiving wound debridement vs 27.4% in 46 patients who did not.² The current consensus is that debridement should be considered on a case-by-case basis, factoring in the presence of wound infection, size of wounds, stability of eschars, and treatment goals of the patient.³⁴ Future studies should be aimed at this issue, with special focus on how these factors and the decision to debride or not impact patient outcomes.

Conclusion

Calciphylaxis is a potentially fatal disease that impacts both patients with ESRD and those with nonuremic risk factors. The term calcific uremic arteriolopathy should be disregarded, as nonuremic causes are being reported with increased frequency in the literature. In such cases, patients often have multiple risk factors, including obesity, primary hyperparathyroidism, alcoholic liver disease, and underlying malignancy, among others. Certain triggers for onset of calciphylaxis should be avoided in at-risk patients, including the use of corticosteroids or warfarin; iron and albumin infusions; hypotension; and rapid weight loss. Our fatal case of NUC is a reminder to dermatologists treating at-risk patients to avoid these triggers and to keep calciphylaxis in the differential diagnosis when encountering early lesions such as livedo reticularis, as progression of these lesions has a 1-year mortality rate of more than 50% with the therapies being utilized at this time.

Calciphylaxis, otherwise known as calcific uremic arteriolopathy, is characterized by calcification of the tunica media of the small- to medium-sized blood vessels of the dermis and subcutis, leading to ischemia and necrosis.¹ It is a deadly disease with a 1-year mortality rate of more than 50%.² End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is the most common risk factor for calciphylaxis, with a prevalence of 1% to 4% of hemodialysis patients with calciphylaxis in the United States.^2-5 However, nonuremic calciphylaxis (NUC) has been increasingly reported in the literature and has risk factors other than ESRD, including but not limited to obesity, alcoholic liver disease, primary hyperparathyroidism, connective tissue disease, and underlying malignancy.^3,6-9 Triggers for calciphylaxis in at-risk patients include use of corticosteroids or warfarin, iron or albumin infusions, and rapid weight loss.^3,6,9-11 We report an unusual case of NUC that most likely was triggered by rapid weight loss and hypotension in a patient with multiple risk factors for calciphylaxis.

Case Report

A 75-year-old white woman with history of morbid obesity (body mass index, 40 kg/m²), unexplained weight loss of 70 lb over the last year, and polymyalgia rheumatica requiring chronic prednisone therapy presented with painful lesions on the thighs, buttocks, and right shoulder of 4 months’ duration. She had multiple hospital admissions preceding the onset of lesions for severe infections resulting in sepsis with hypotension, including Enterococcus faecalis endocarditis, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase bacteremia, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia. Physical examination revealed large well-demarcated ulcers and necrotic eschars with surrounding violaceous induration and stellate erythema on the anterior, medial, and posterior thighs and buttocks that were exquisitely tender (Figures 1 and 2).

Notable laboratory results included hypoalbuminemia (1.3 g/dL [reference range, 3.5–5.0 g/dL]) with normal renal function, a corrected calcium level of 9.7 mg/dL (reference range, 8.2–10.2 mg/dL), a serum phosphorus level of 3.5 mg/dL (reference range, 2.3–4.7 mg/dL), a calcium-phosphate product of 27.3 mg²/dL² (reference range, <55 mg²/dL²), and a parathyroid hormone level of 49.3 pg/mL (reference range, 10–65 pg/mL). Antinuclear antibodies were negative. A hypercoagulability evaluation showed normal protein C and S levels, negative lupus anticoagulant, and negative anticardiolipin antibodies.

Telescoping punch biopsies of the indurated borders of the eschars showed prominent calcification of the small- and medium-sized vessels in the mid and deep dermis, intravascular thrombi, and necrosis of the epidermis and subcutaneous fat consistent with calciphylaxis (Figure 3).

Comment

Background on Calciphylaxis
Calciphylaxis is a rare but deadly disease that affects both ESRD patients receiving dialysis and patients without ESRD who have known risk factors for calciphylaxis, including female gender, white race, obesity, alcoholic liver disease, primary hyperparathyroidism, connective tissue disease, underlying malignancy, protein C or S deficiency, corticosteroid use, warfarin use, diabetes, iron or albumin infusions, and rapid weight loss.^3,6-9,11 Although the molecular pathogenesis of calciphylaxis is not completely understood, it is believed to be caused by local deposition of calcium in the tunica media of small- to medium-sized arterioles and venules in the skin.¹² This deposition leads to intimal proliferation and progressive narrowing of the vessels with resultant thrombosis, ischemia, and necrosis. The cutaneous manifestations and histopathology of calciphylaxis classically follow its pathogenesis. Calciphylaxis typically presents with livedo reticularis as vessels narrow and then progresses to purpura, bullae, necrosis, and eschar formation with the onset of acute thrombosis and ischemia. Histopathology is characterized by small- and medium-sized vessel calcification and thrombus, dermal necrosis, and septal panniculitis, though the histology can be highly variable.¹² Unfortunately, the already poor prognosis for calciphylaxis worsens when lesions become either ulcerative or present on the proximal extremities and trunk.^4,13 Sepsis is the leading cause of death in calciphylaxis patients, affecting more than 50% of patients.^2,3,14 The differential diagnoses for calciphylactic-appearing lesions include warfarin-induced skin necrosis, disseminated intravascular coagulation, pyoderma gangrenosum, cholesterol emboli, and various vasculitides and coagulopathies.

Risk Factors
Our case demonstrates the importance of risk factor minimization, trigger avoidance, and early intervention due to the high mortality rate of calciphylaxis. Selye et al¹⁵ coined the term calciphylaxis in 1961 based on experiments that induced calciphylaxis in rat models. Their research concluded that there were certain sensitizers (ie, risk factors) that predisposed patients to medial calcium deposition in blood vessels and other challengers (ie, triggers) that acted as inciting events to calcium deposition. Our patient presented with multiple known risk factors for calciphylaxis, including obesity (body mass index, 40 kg/m²), female gender, white race, hypoalbuminemia, and chronic corticosteroid use.¹⁶ In the presence of a milieu of risk factors, the patient’s rapid weight loss and episodes of hypotension likely were triggers for calciphylaxis.

Other case reports in the literature have suggested weight loss as a trigger for NUC. One morbidly obese patient with inactive rheumatoid arthritis had onset of calciphylaxis lesions after unintentional weight loss of approximately 50% body weight in 1 year¹⁷; however, the weight loss does not have to be drastic to trigger calciphylaxis. Another study of 16 patients with uremic calciphylaxis found that 7 of 16 (44%) patients lost 10 to 50 kg in the 6 months prior to calciphylaxis onset.¹⁴ One proposed mechanism by Munavalli et al¹⁰ is that elevated levels of matrix metalloproteinases during catabolic weight loss states enhance the deposition of calcium into elastic fibers of small vessels. The authors found elevated serum levels of matrix metalloproteinases in their patients with NUC induced by rapid weight loss.¹⁰

A meta-analysis by Nigwekar et al³ found a history of prior corticosteroid use in 61% (22/36) of NUC cases reviewed. However, it is unclear whether it is the use of corticosteroids or chronic inflammation that is implicated in NUC pathogenesis. Chronic inflammation causes downregulation of anticalcification signaling pathways.^18-20 The role of 2 vascular calcification inhibitors has been evaluated in the pathogenesis of calciphylaxis: fetuin-A and matrix gla protein (MGP).²¹ The activity of these proteins is decreased not only in calciphylaxis but also in other inflammatory states and chronic renal failure.^18-20 One study found lower fetuin-A levels in 312 hemodialysis patients compared to healthy controls and an association between low fetuin-A levels and increased C-reactive protein levels.²² Reduced fetuin-A and MGP levels may be the result of several calciphylaxis risk factors. Warfarin is believed to trigger calciphylaxis via inhibition of gamma-carboxylation of MGP, which is necessary for its anticalcification activity.²³ Hypoalbuminemia and alcoholic liver disease also are risk factors that may be explained by the fact that fetuin-A is synthesized in the liver.²⁴ Therefore, liver disease results in decreased production of fetuin-A that is permissive to vascular calcification in calciphylaxis patients.

There have been other reports of calciphylaxis patients who were originally hospitalized due to hypotension, which may serve as a trigger for calciphylaxis onset.²⁵ Because calciphylaxis lesions are more likely to occur in the fatty areas of the abdomen and proximal thighs where blood flow is slower, hypotension likely accentuates the slowing of blood flow and subsequent blood vessel calcification. This theory is supported by studies showing that established calciphylactic lesions worsen more quickly in the presence of systemic hypotension.²⁶ One patient with ESRD and calciphylaxis of the breasts had consistent systolic blood pressure readings in the high 60s to low 70s between dialysis sessions.²⁷ Due to this association, we recommend that patients with calciphylaxis have close blood pressure monitoring to aid in preventing disease progression.²⁸

Management
Calciphylaxis treatment has not yet been standardized, as it is an uncommon disease whose pathogenesis is not fully understood. Current management strategies aim to normalize metabolic abnormalities such as hypercalcemia if they are present and remove inciting agents such as warfarin and corticosteroids.²⁹ Other medical treatments that have been successfully used include sodium thiosulfate, oral steroids, and adjunctive bisphosphonates.^29-31 Sodium thiosulfate is known to cause metabolic acidosis by generating thiosulfuric acid in vivo in patients with or without renal disease; therefore, patients on sodium thiosulfate therapy should be monitored for development of metabolic acidosis and treated with oral sodium bicarbonate or dialysis as needed.^30,32 Wound care also is an important element of calciphylaxis treatment; however, the debridement of wounds is controversial. Some argue that dry intact eschars serve to protect against sepsis, which is the leading cause of death in calciphylaxis.^2,14,33 In contrast, a retrospective study of 63 calciphylaxis patients found a 1-year survival rate of 61.6% in 17 patients receiving wound debridement vs 27.4% in 46 patients who did not.² The current consensus is that debridement should be considered on a case-by-case basis, factoring in the presence of wound infection, size of wounds, stability of eschars, and treatment goals of the patient.³⁴ Future studies should be aimed at this issue, with special focus on how these factors and the decision to debride or not impact patient outcomes.

Conclusion

Calciphylaxis is a potentially fatal disease that impacts both patients with ESRD and those with nonuremic risk factors. The term calcific uremic arteriolopathy should be disregarded, as nonuremic causes are being reported with increased frequency in the literature. In such cases, patients often have multiple risk factors, including obesity, primary hyperparathyroidism, alcoholic liver disease, and underlying malignancy, among others. Certain triggers for onset of calciphylaxis should be avoided in at-risk patients, including the use of corticosteroids or warfarin; iron and albumin infusions; hypotension; and rapid weight loss. Our fatal case of NUC is a reminder to dermatologists treating at-risk patients to avoid these triggers and to keep calciphylaxis in the differential diagnosis when encountering early lesions such as livedo reticularis, as progression of these lesions has a 1-year mortality rate of more than 50% with the therapies being utilized at this time.

Calciphylaxis, otherwise known as calcific uremic arteriolopathy, is characterized by calcification of the tunica media of the small- to medium-sized blood vessels of the dermis and subcutis, leading to ischemia and necrosis.¹ It is a deadly disease with a 1-year mortality rate of more than 50%.² End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is the most common risk factor for calciphylaxis, with a prevalence of 1% to 4% of hemodialysis patients with calciphylaxis in the United States.^2-5 However, nonuremic calciphylaxis (NUC) has been increasingly reported in the literature and has risk factors other than ESRD, including but not limited to obesity, alcoholic liver disease, primary hyperparathyroidism, connective tissue disease, and underlying malignancy.^3,6-9 Triggers for calciphylaxis in at-risk patients include use of corticosteroids or warfarin, iron or albumin infusions, and rapid weight loss.^3,6,9-11 We report an unusual case of NUC that most likely was triggered by rapid weight loss and hypotension in a patient with multiple risk factors for calciphylaxis.

Case Report

A 75-year-old white woman with history of morbid obesity (body mass index, 40 kg/m²), unexplained weight loss of 70 lb over the last year, and polymyalgia rheumatica requiring chronic prednisone therapy presented with painful lesions on the thighs, buttocks, and right shoulder of 4 months’ duration. She had multiple hospital admissions preceding the onset of lesions for severe infections resulting in sepsis with hypotension, including Enterococcus faecalis endocarditis, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase bacteremia, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia. Physical examination revealed large well-demarcated ulcers and necrotic eschars with surrounding violaceous induration and stellate erythema on the anterior, medial, and posterior thighs and buttocks that were exquisitely tender (Figures 1 and 2).

Notable laboratory results included hypoalbuminemia (1.3 g/dL [reference range, 3.5–5.0 g/dL]) with normal renal function, a corrected calcium level of 9.7 mg/dL (reference range, 8.2–10.2 mg/dL), a serum phosphorus level of 3.5 mg/dL (reference range, 2.3–4.7 mg/dL), a calcium-phosphate product of 27.3 mg²/dL² (reference range, <55 mg²/dL²), and a parathyroid hormone level of 49.3 pg/mL (reference range, 10–65 pg/mL). Antinuclear antibodies were negative. A hypercoagulability evaluation showed normal protein C and S levels, negative lupus anticoagulant, and negative anticardiolipin antibodies.

Telescoping punch biopsies of the indurated borders of the eschars showed prominent calcification of the small- and medium-sized vessels in the mid and deep dermis, intravascular thrombi, and necrosis of the epidermis and subcutaneous fat consistent with calciphylaxis (Figure 3).

Comment

Background on Calciphylaxis
Calciphylaxis is a rare but deadly disease that affects both ESRD patients receiving dialysis and patients without ESRD who have known risk factors for calciphylaxis, including female gender, white race, obesity, alcoholic liver disease, primary hyperparathyroidism, connective tissue disease, underlying malignancy, protein C or S deficiency, corticosteroid use, warfarin use, diabetes, iron or albumin infusions, and rapid weight loss.^3,6-9,11 Although the molecular pathogenesis of calciphylaxis is not completely understood, it is believed to be caused by local deposition of calcium in the tunica media of small- to medium-sized arterioles and venules in the skin.¹² This deposition leads to intimal proliferation and progressive narrowing of the vessels with resultant thrombosis, ischemia, and necrosis. The cutaneous manifestations and histopathology of calciphylaxis classically follow its pathogenesis. Calciphylaxis typically presents with livedo reticularis as vessels narrow and then progresses to purpura, bullae, necrosis, and eschar formation with the onset of acute thrombosis and ischemia. Histopathology is characterized by small- and medium-sized vessel calcification and thrombus, dermal necrosis, and septal panniculitis, though the histology can be highly variable.¹² Unfortunately, the already poor prognosis for calciphylaxis worsens when lesions become either ulcerative or present on the proximal extremities and trunk.^4,13 Sepsis is the leading cause of death in calciphylaxis patients, affecting more than 50% of patients.^2,3,14 The differential diagnoses for calciphylactic-appearing lesions include warfarin-induced skin necrosis, disseminated intravascular coagulation, pyoderma gangrenosum, cholesterol emboli, and various vasculitides and coagulopathies.

Risk Factors
Our case demonstrates the importance of risk factor minimization, trigger avoidance, and early intervention due to the high mortality rate of calciphylaxis. Selye et al¹⁵ coined the term calciphylaxis in 1961 based on experiments that induced calciphylaxis in rat models. Their research concluded that there were certain sensitizers (ie, risk factors) that predisposed patients to medial calcium deposition in blood vessels and other challengers (ie, triggers) that acted as inciting events to calcium deposition. Our patient presented with multiple known risk factors for calciphylaxis, including obesity (body mass index, 40 kg/m²), female gender, white race, hypoalbuminemia, and chronic corticosteroid use.¹⁶ In the presence of a milieu of risk factors, the patient’s rapid weight loss and episodes of hypotension likely were triggers for calciphylaxis.

Other case reports in the literature have suggested weight loss as a trigger for NUC. One morbidly obese patient with inactive rheumatoid arthritis had onset of calciphylaxis lesions after unintentional weight loss of approximately 50% body weight in 1 year¹⁷; however, the weight loss does not have to be drastic to trigger calciphylaxis. Another study of 16 patients with uremic calciphylaxis found that 7 of 16 (44%) patients lost 10 to 50 kg in the 6 months prior to calciphylaxis onset.¹⁴ One proposed mechanism by Munavalli et al¹⁰ is that elevated levels of matrix metalloproteinases during catabolic weight loss states enhance the deposition of calcium into elastic fibers of small vessels. The authors found elevated serum levels of matrix metalloproteinases in their patients with NUC induced by rapid weight loss.¹⁰

A meta-analysis by Nigwekar et al³ found a history of prior corticosteroid use in 61% (22/36) of NUC cases reviewed. However, it is unclear whether it is the use of corticosteroids or chronic inflammation that is implicated in NUC pathogenesis. Chronic inflammation causes downregulation of anticalcification signaling pathways.^18-20 The role of 2 vascular calcification inhibitors has been evaluated in the pathogenesis of calciphylaxis: fetuin-A and matrix gla protein (MGP).²¹ The activity of these proteins is decreased not only in calciphylaxis but also in other inflammatory states and chronic renal failure.^18-20 One study found lower fetuin-A levels in 312 hemodialysis patients compared to healthy controls and an association between low fetuin-A levels and increased C-reactive protein levels.²² Reduced fetuin-A and MGP levels may be the result of several calciphylaxis risk factors. Warfarin is believed to trigger calciphylaxis via inhibition of gamma-carboxylation of MGP, which is necessary for its anticalcification activity.²³ Hypoalbuminemia and alcoholic liver disease also are risk factors that may be explained by the fact that fetuin-A is synthesized in the liver.²⁴ Therefore, liver disease results in decreased production of fetuin-A that is permissive to vascular calcification in calciphylaxis patients.

There have been other reports of calciphylaxis patients who were originally hospitalized due to hypotension, which may serve as a trigger for calciphylaxis onset.²⁵ Because calciphylaxis lesions are more likely to occur in the fatty areas of the abdomen and proximal thighs where blood flow is slower, hypotension likely accentuates the slowing of blood flow and subsequent blood vessel calcification. This theory is supported by studies showing that established calciphylactic lesions worsen more quickly in the presence of systemic hypotension.²⁶ One patient with ESRD and calciphylaxis of the breasts had consistent systolic blood pressure readings in the high 60s to low 70s between dialysis sessions.²⁷ Due to this association, we recommend that patients with calciphylaxis have close blood pressure monitoring to aid in preventing disease progression.²⁸

Management
Calciphylaxis treatment has not yet been standardized, as it is an uncommon disease whose pathogenesis is not fully understood. Current management strategies aim to normalize metabolic abnormalities such as hypercalcemia if they are present and remove inciting agents such as warfarin and corticosteroids.²⁹ Other medical treatments that have been successfully used include sodium thiosulfate, oral steroids, and adjunctive bisphosphonates.^29-31 Sodium thiosulfate is known to cause metabolic acidosis by generating thiosulfuric acid in vivo in patients with or without renal disease; therefore, patients on sodium thiosulfate therapy should be monitored for development of metabolic acidosis and treated with oral sodium bicarbonate or dialysis as needed.^30,32 Wound care also is an important element of calciphylaxis treatment; however, the debridement of wounds is controversial. Some argue that dry intact eschars serve to protect against sepsis, which is the leading cause of death in calciphylaxis.^2,14,33 In contrast, a retrospective study of 63 calciphylaxis patients found a 1-year survival rate of 61.6% in 17 patients receiving wound debridement vs 27.4% in 46 patients who did not.² The current consensus is that debridement should be considered on a case-by-case basis, factoring in the presence of wound infection, size of wounds, stability of eschars, and treatment goals of the patient.³⁴ Future studies should be aimed at this issue, with special focus on how these factors and the decision to debride or not impact patient outcomes.

Conclusion

Calciphylaxis is a potentially fatal disease that impacts both patients with ESRD and those with nonuremic risk factors. The term calcific uremic arteriolopathy should be disregarded, as nonuremic causes are being reported with increased frequency in the literature. In such cases, patients often have multiple risk factors, including obesity, primary hyperparathyroidism, alcoholic liver disease, and underlying malignancy, among others. Certain triggers for onset of calciphylaxis should be avoided in at-risk patients, including the use of corticosteroids or warfarin; iron and albumin infusions; hypotension; and rapid weight loss. Our fatal case of NUC is a reminder to dermatologists treating at-risk patients to avoid these triggers and to keep calciphylaxis in the differential diagnosis when encountering early lesions such as livedo reticularis, as progression of these lesions has a 1-year mortality rate of more than 50% with the therapies being utilized at this time.

Adhering to antimalarial treatment offers some protection to patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) from developing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), according to new research.

Patients who took at least 90% of their prescribed antimalarial doses were 39% less likely to develop T2DM than patients who discontinued antimalarial therapy. Patients who took less than 90% of their prescribed doses but didn’t discontinue treatment were 22% less likely to develop T2DM.

“[O]ur study provides further support for the importance of adherence to antimalarials in SLE by demonstrating protective impacts on T2DM,” Shahrzad Salmasi, PhD, of the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, and colleagues wrote in Arthritis Care & Research.

Dr. Salmasi and colleagues conducted this retrospective study using administrative health data on patients in British Columbia. The researchers analyzed 1,498 patients with SLE. Their mean age was about 44 years, and 91% were women.

The researchers used data on prescription dates and days’ supply to establish antimalarial drug courses and gaps in treatment. A new treatment course occurred when a 90-day gap was exceeded between refills. The researchers calculated the proportion of days covered (PDC) – the total number of days with antimalarials divided by the length of the course – and separated patients into three categories:

• Adherent to treatment – PDC of 0.90 or greater
• Nonadherent – PDC greater than 0 but less than 0.90
• Discontinuer – PDC of 0

The patients had a mean of about 23 antimalarial prescriptions and a mean of about two courses. The mean course duration was 554 days.

At a median follow-up of 4.6 years, there were 140 incident cases of T2DM. The researchers calculated the risk of T2DM among adherent and nonadherent patients, comparing these groups with the discontinuers and adjusting for age, sex, comorbidities, and concomitant medications.

The adjusted hazard ratio for developing T2DM was 0.61 among adherent patients and 0.78 among nonadherent patients.

“This population-based study highlighted that taking less than 90% of the prescribed antimalarials compromises their effect in preventing T2DM in SLE patients,” Dr. Salmasi and colleagues wrote. “Our findings should be used to emphasize the importance of medication adherence in not only treating SLE but also preventing its complications.”

The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.

jensmith@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Salmasi S et al. Arthritis Care Res. 2020 Jan 21. doi: 10.1002/acr.24147.

Adhering to antimalarial treatment offers some protection to patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) from developing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), according to new research.

Patients who took at least 90% of their prescribed antimalarial doses were 39% less likely to develop T2DM than patients who discontinued antimalarial therapy. Patients who took less than 90% of their prescribed doses but didn’t discontinue treatment were 22% less likely to develop T2DM.

“[O]ur study provides further support for the importance of adherence to antimalarials in SLE by demonstrating protective impacts on T2DM,” Shahrzad Salmasi, PhD, of the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, and colleagues wrote in Arthritis Care & Research.

Dr. Salmasi and colleagues conducted this retrospective study using administrative health data on patients in British Columbia. The researchers analyzed 1,498 patients with SLE. Their mean age was about 44 years, and 91% were women.

The researchers used data on prescription dates and days’ supply to establish antimalarial drug courses and gaps in treatment. A new treatment course occurred when a 90-day gap was exceeded between refills. The researchers calculated the proportion of days covered (PDC) – the total number of days with antimalarials divided by the length of the course – and separated patients into three categories:

• Adherent to treatment – PDC of 0.90 or greater
• Nonadherent – PDC greater than 0 but less than 0.90
• Discontinuer – PDC of 0

The patients had a mean of about 23 antimalarial prescriptions and a mean of about two courses. The mean course duration was 554 days.

At a median follow-up of 4.6 years, there were 140 incident cases of T2DM. The researchers calculated the risk of T2DM among adherent and nonadherent patients, comparing these groups with the discontinuers and adjusting for age, sex, comorbidities, and concomitant medications.

The adjusted hazard ratio for developing T2DM was 0.61 among adherent patients and 0.78 among nonadherent patients.

“This population-based study highlighted that taking less than 90% of the prescribed antimalarials compromises their effect in preventing T2DM in SLE patients,” Dr. Salmasi and colleagues wrote. “Our findings should be used to emphasize the importance of medication adherence in not only treating SLE but also preventing its complications.”

The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.

jensmith@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Salmasi S et al. Arthritis Care Res. 2020 Jan 21. doi: 10.1002/acr.24147.

Adhering to antimalarial treatment offers some protection to patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) from developing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), according to new research.

Patients who took at least 90% of their prescribed antimalarial doses were 39% less likely to develop T2DM than patients who discontinued antimalarial therapy. Patients who took less than 90% of their prescribed doses but didn’t discontinue treatment were 22% less likely to develop T2DM.

“[O]ur study provides further support for the importance of adherence to antimalarials in SLE by demonstrating protective impacts on T2DM,” Shahrzad Salmasi, PhD, of the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, and colleagues wrote in Arthritis Care & Research.

Dr. Salmasi and colleagues conducted this retrospective study using administrative health data on patients in British Columbia. The researchers analyzed 1,498 patients with SLE. Their mean age was about 44 years, and 91% were women.

The researchers used data on prescription dates and days’ supply to establish antimalarial drug courses and gaps in treatment. A new treatment course occurred when a 90-day gap was exceeded between refills. The researchers calculated the proportion of days covered (PDC) – the total number of days with antimalarials divided by the length of the course – and separated patients into three categories:

• Adherent to treatment – PDC of 0.90 or greater
• Nonadherent – PDC greater than 0 but less than 0.90
• Discontinuer – PDC of 0

The patients had a mean of about 23 antimalarial prescriptions and a mean of about two courses. The mean course duration was 554 days.

At a median follow-up of 4.6 years, there were 140 incident cases of T2DM. The researchers calculated the risk of T2DM among adherent and nonadherent patients, comparing these groups with the discontinuers and adjusting for age, sex, comorbidities, and concomitant medications.

The adjusted hazard ratio for developing T2DM was 0.61 among adherent patients and 0.78 among nonadherent patients.

“This population-based study highlighted that taking less than 90% of the prescribed antimalarials compromises their effect in preventing T2DM in SLE patients,” Dr. Salmasi and colleagues wrote. “Our findings should be used to emphasize the importance of medication adherence in not only treating SLE but also preventing its complications.”

The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.

jensmith@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Salmasi S et al. Arthritis Care Res. 2020 Jan 21. doi: 10.1002/acr.24147.

Clinicians can improve communications with parents during neonatal end-of-life situations by adopting key behaviors such as sitting down to talk to parents and using the infant’s name, according to data from a simulation study.

“Empirical evidence regarding communication with parents during and after a child’s critical instability or death is scarce,” wrote Marie-Hélène Lizotte, MD, of Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montréal, and colleagues. Noting that realistic simulation has been shown to help clinicians improve their communication skills, the investigators recruited clinicians to participate in a simulated unsuccessful neonatal resuscitation to identify behaviors associated with optimal parent communication.

Behaviors associated with high scores for clinicians deemed “good communicators” included introducing themselves to parents, using the infant’s name (if known), sitting down to speak to parents, not leaving the infant alone on the bed after death, and allowing time for silence, the researchers reported in Pediatrics.

The investigators presented the video simulations to evaluators, including clinicians and bereaved parents. In the simulation, a term infant was born after an emergency cesarean delivery for fetal distress and died after an unsuccessful attempt at resuscitation. A manikin infant was programmed to remain pulseless, and two actors played the roles of the parents in the video.

Evaluators scored the videos for overall performance and for communication with the parent actors during and after the resuscitation.

Overall, parent evaluators and parent actors agreed with clinicians on what actions exemplified optimal communication in about 81% of evaluations. Discrepancies were mainly related to the language participants used related to death, as some parent evaluators said they had trouble understanding certain sentences or found them insensitive, such as “her heart never came back” and “allowing natural death.”

A total of 31 participants were recruited for the simulation, including 15 pediatric residents, 5 neonatal fellows, 3 neonatologists, 3 neonatal nurse practitioners, and 5 transport and resuscitation team providers. Videos of the simulations were examined by 21 evaluators, including bereaved parents, the parent actors, a neonatologist, a maternal-fetal medicine specialist, a psychologist, and a respiratory therapist. There were 651 evaluations.

The study findings were limited by several factors including the use of a single center, use of videos for evaluations, and the use of a single infant-resuscitation scenario, the researchers noted. The results were strengthened, however, by the large number of evaluations, and they support the core behaviors as “a skeleton on which to build additional skills with practice and training” with attention to cultural differences in their application, such as recognizing that infants are not named until after birth in some cultures, they said.

The existing literature on strategies for providing empathy and support to parents facing the death of a child is limited, but this simulation study provides a design model to help address this issue, Chris Feudtner, MD, of the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia wrote in an accompanying editorial. “Overall, this study, in terms of design and methodologic rigor, is a great advance toward answering our key question: how to best support parents in such circumstances,” he said.

Dr. Feudtner said that he would divide the clinician behaviors into two groups. The first, “Calm kind politeness,” includes acknowledging the parents, introducing themselves, using the infant’s name, and remaining calm. The second set of behaviors, which he called “Skillful situational leadership,” includes preparing parents for the resuscitation activities and providing verbal milestones that prepared them for the fatal outcome.

“Picking up on a metaphor offered by the authors of the study, training and repetitive drills on these specific behaviors cannot be emphasized enough because they are not only the skeleton of excellent communication; they are likely also the muscles, the heart, and even the soul,” he concluded.

The study was supported by a grant from the Fonds de Recherche en Santé du Québec and the Medical Education Grant from Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine. The researchers and Dr. Feudtner reported no financial conflicts.

SOURCE: Lizotte M-H et al. Pediatrics. 2020 Jan 27. doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-1925; Feudtner C. Pediatrics. 2020 Jan 27. doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-3116.
 

Clinicians can improve communications with parents during neonatal end-of-life situations by adopting key behaviors such as sitting down to talk to parents and using the infant’s name, according to data from a simulation study.

“Empirical evidence regarding communication with parents during and after a child’s critical instability or death is scarce,” wrote Marie-Hélène Lizotte, MD, of Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montréal, and colleagues. Noting that realistic simulation has been shown to help clinicians improve their communication skills, the investigators recruited clinicians to participate in a simulated unsuccessful neonatal resuscitation to identify behaviors associated with optimal parent communication.

Behaviors associated with high scores for clinicians deemed “good communicators” included introducing themselves to parents, using the infant’s name (if known), sitting down to speak to parents, not leaving the infant alone on the bed after death, and allowing time for silence, the researchers reported in Pediatrics.

The investigators presented the video simulations to evaluators, including clinicians and bereaved parents. In the simulation, a term infant was born after an emergency cesarean delivery for fetal distress and died after an unsuccessful attempt at resuscitation. A manikin infant was programmed to remain pulseless, and two actors played the roles of the parents in the video.

Evaluators scored the videos for overall performance and for communication with the parent actors during and after the resuscitation.

Overall, parent evaluators and parent actors agreed with clinicians on what actions exemplified optimal communication in about 81% of evaluations. Discrepancies were mainly related to the language participants used related to death, as some parent evaluators said they had trouble understanding certain sentences or found them insensitive, such as “her heart never came back” and “allowing natural death.”

A total of 31 participants were recruited for the simulation, including 15 pediatric residents, 5 neonatal fellows, 3 neonatologists, 3 neonatal nurse practitioners, and 5 transport and resuscitation team providers. Videos of the simulations were examined by 21 evaluators, including bereaved parents, the parent actors, a neonatologist, a maternal-fetal medicine specialist, a psychologist, and a respiratory therapist. There were 651 evaluations.

The study findings were limited by several factors including the use of a single center, use of videos for evaluations, and the use of a single infant-resuscitation scenario, the researchers noted. The results were strengthened, however, by the large number of evaluations, and they support the core behaviors as “a skeleton on which to build additional skills with practice and training” with attention to cultural differences in their application, such as recognizing that infants are not named until after birth in some cultures, they said.

The existing literature on strategies for providing empathy and support to parents facing the death of a child is limited, but this simulation study provides a design model to help address this issue, Chris Feudtner, MD, of the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia wrote in an accompanying editorial. “Overall, this study, in terms of design and methodologic rigor, is a great advance toward answering our key question: how to best support parents in such circumstances,” he said.

Dr. Feudtner said that he would divide the clinician behaviors into two groups. The first, “Calm kind politeness,” includes acknowledging the parents, introducing themselves, using the infant’s name, and remaining calm. The second set of behaviors, which he called “Skillful situational leadership,” includes preparing parents for the resuscitation activities and providing verbal milestones that prepared them for the fatal outcome.

“Picking up on a metaphor offered by the authors of the study, training and repetitive drills on these specific behaviors cannot be emphasized enough because they are not only the skeleton of excellent communication; they are likely also the muscles, the heart, and even the soul,” he concluded.

The study was supported by a grant from the Fonds de Recherche en Santé du Québec and the Medical Education Grant from Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine. The researchers and Dr. Feudtner reported no financial conflicts.

SOURCE: Lizotte M-H et al. Pediatrics. 2020 Jan 27. doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-1925; Feudtner C. Pediatrics. 2020 Jan 27. doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-3116.
 

Clinicians can improve communications with parents during neonatal end-of-life situations by adopting key behaviors such as sitting down to talk to parents and using the infant’s name, according to data from a simulation study.

“Empirical evidence regarding communication with parents during and after a child’s critical instability or death is scarce,” wrote Marie-Hélène Lizotte, MD, of Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montréal, and colleagues. Noting that realistic simulation has been shown to help clinicians improve their communication skills, the investigators recruited clinicians to participate in a simulated unsuccessful neonatal resuscitation to identify behaviors associated with optimal parent communication.

Behaviors associated with high scores for clinicians deemed “good communicators” included introducing themselves to parents, using the infant’s name (if known), sitting down to speak to parents, not leaving the infant alone on the bed after death, and allowing time for silence, the researchers reported in Pediatrics.

The investigators presented the video simulations to evaluators, including clinicians and bereaved parents. In the simulation, a term infant was born after an emergency cesarean delivery for fetal distress and died after an unsuccessful attempt at resuscitation. A manikin infant was programmed to remain pulseless, and two actors played the roles of the parents in the video.

Evaluators scored the videos for overall performance and for communication with the parent actors during and after the resuscitation.

Overall, parent evaluators and parent actors agreed with clinicians on what actions exemplified optimal communication in about 81% of evaluations. Discrepancies were mainly related to the language participants used related to death, as some parent evaluators said they had trouble understanding certain sentences or found them insensitive, such as “her heart never came back” and “allowing natural death.”

A total of 31 participants were recruited for the simulation, including 15 pediatric residents, 5 neonatal fellows, 3 neonatologists, 3 neonatal nurse practitioners, and 5 transport and resuscitation team providers. Videos of the simulations were examined by 21 evaluators, including bereaved parents, the parent actors, a neonatologist, a maternal-fetal medicine specialist, a psychologist, and a respiratory therapist. There were 651 evaluations.

The study findings were limited by several factors including the use of a single center, use of videos for evaluations, and the use of a single infant-resuscitation scenario, the researchers noted. The results were strengthened, however, by the large number of evaluations, and they support the core behaviors as “a skeleton on which to build additional skills with practice and training” with attention to cultural differences in their application, such as recognizing that infants are not named until after birth in some cultures, they said.

The existing literature on strategies for providing empathy and support to parents facing the death of a child is limited, but this simulation study provides a design model to help address this issue, Chris Feudtner, MD, of the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia wrote in an accompanying editorial. “Overall, this study, in terms of design and methodologic rigor, is a great advance toward answering our key question: how to best support parents in such circumstances,” he said.

Dr. Feudtner said that he would divide the clinician behaviors into two groups. The first, “Calm kind politeness,” includes acknowledging the parents, introducing themselves, using the infant’s name, and remaining calm. The second set of behaviors, which he called “Skillful situational leadership,” includes preparing parents for the resuscitation activities and providing verbal milestones that prepared them for the fatal outcome.

“Picking up on a metaphor offered by the authors of the study, training and repetitive drills on these specific behaviors cannot be emphasized enough because they are not only the skeleton of excellent communication; they are likely also the muscles, the heart, and even the soul,” he concluded.

The study was supported by a grant from the Fonds de Recherche en Santé du Québec and the Medical Education Grant from Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine. The researchers and Dr. Feudtner reported no financial conflicts.

SOURCE: Lizotte M-H et al. Pediatrics. 2020 Jan 27. doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-1925; Feudtner C. Pediatrics. 2020 Jan 27. doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-3116.
 

Patients suffering from chronic pain who take medicinal cannabis to initiate and maintain sleep appear to experience short-term benefit, but long-term use may ultimately disrupt slumber, new research shows.

Investigators found whole-plant medical cannabis use was associated with fewer problems with respect to waking up at night, but they also found that frequent medical cannabis use was associated with more problems initiating and maintaining sleep.

LPETTET/Getty Images

A common problem

Estimates suggest chronic pain affects up to 37% of adults in the developed world. Individuals who suffer chronic pain often experience comorbid insomnia, which includes difficulty initiating sleep, sleep disruption, and early morning wakening.

For its part, medical cannabis to treat chronic pain symptoms and manage sleep problems has been widely reported as a prime motivation for medical cannabis use. Indeed, previous studies have concluded that the endocannabinoid system plays a role in sleep regulation, including sleep promotion and maintenance.

In recent years, investigators have reported the beneficial effects of medical cannabis for sleep. Nevertheless, some preclinical research has also concluded that chronic administration of tetrahydrocannabinol may result in tolerance to the sleep-enhancing effects of cannabis.

With that in mind, the researchers set out to examine the potential impact of whole-plant medicinal cannabis on sleep problems experienced by middle-aged patients suffering from chronic pain.

“People are self-reporting that they’re using cannabis for sleep and that it helps, but as we know, just because people are reporting that it works doesn’t mean that it will hold up in research,” Dr. Sznitman said.

The study included 128 individuals (mean age, 61±6 years; 51% females) with chronic neuropathic pain: 66 were medical cannabis users and 62 were not.

Three indicators of insomnia were measured using the 7-point Likert scale to assess issues with sleep initiation and maintenance.

In addition, investigators collected sociodemographic information, as well as data on daily consumption of tobacco, frequency of alcohol use, and pain severity. Finally, they collected patient data on the use of sleep-aid medications during the past month as well as tricyclic antidepressant use.
 

Frequent use, more sleep problems?

On average, medical cannabis users were 3 years younger than their nonusing counterparts (mean age, 60±6 vs. 63±6 years, respectively, P = .003) and more likely to be male (58% vs 40%, respectively, P = .038). Otherwise, the two groups were comparable.

Medical cannabis users reported taking the drug for an average of 4 years, at an average quantity of 31 g per month. The primary mode of administration was smoking (68.6%), followed by oil extracts (21.4%) and vaporization (20%).

Results showed that, of the total sample, 24.1% reported always waking up early and not falling back to sleep, 20.2% reported always having difficulty falling asleep, and 27.2% reported always waking up during the night.

After adjusting for patient age, sex, pain level, and use of sleep medications and antidepressants, medical cannabis use was associated with fewer problems with waking up at night, compared with nonmedical cannabis use. No differences were found between groups with respect to problems falling asleep or waking up early without being able to fall back to sleep, Dr. Sznitman and associates reported.

The final analysis of a subsample of patients that only included medical cannabis users showed frequency of medical cannabis use was associated with sleep problems, they said.

Specifically, more frequent cannabis use was associated with more problems related to waking up at night, as well as problems falling asleep.

Sleep problems associated with frequent medical cannabis use may signal the development of tolerance to the agent. However, frequent users of medical cannabis also maybsuffer pain or other comorbidities, which, in turn, may be linked to more sleep problems.

Either way, Dr. Sznitman said the study might open the door to another treatment option for patients suffering from chronic pain who struggle with sleep.

“If future research shows that the effect of medical cannabis on sleep is a consistent one, then we may be adding a new therapy for sleep problems, which are huge in society and especially in chronic pain patients,” she said.
 

Early days

Commenting on the findings in an interview, Ryan G. Vandrey, PhD, who was not involved in the study, said the findings are in line with previous research.

“I think the results make sense with respect to the data I’ve collected and from what I’ve seen,” said Dr. Vandrey, associate professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Johns Hopkins Medicine in Baltimore.

“We typically only want to use sleep medications for short periods of time,” he continued. “When you think about recommended prescribing practices for any hypnotic medication, it’s usually short term, 2 weeks or less. Longer-term use often leads to tolerance, dependence, and withdrawal symptoms when the medication is stopped, which leads to an exacerbation of disordered sleep,” Dr. Vandrey said.

Nevertheless, he urged caution when interpreting the results.

“I think the study warrants caution about long-term daily use of cannabinoids with respect to sleep,” he said. “But we need more detailed evaluations, as the trial wasn’t testing a defined product, specific dose, or dose regimen.

“In addition, this was all done in the context of people with chronic pain and not treating disordered sleep or insomnia, but the study highlights the importance of recognizing that long-term chronic use of cannabis is not likely to fully resolve sleep problems.”

Dr. Sznitman agreed that the research is still in its very early stages.

“We’re still far from saying we have the evidence to support the use of medical cannabis for sleep,” she said. “For in the end it was just a cross-sectional, observational study, so we cannot say anything about cause and effect. But if these results pan out, they could be far-reaching and exciting.”

The study was funded by the University of Haifa and Rambam Hospital in Israel, and by the Evelyn Lipper Foundation. Dr. Sznitman and Dr. Vandrey have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

This article first appeared on Medscape.com.
 

Patients suffering from chronic pain who take medicinal cannabis to initiate and maintain sleep appear to experience short-term benefit, but long-term use may ultimately disrupt slumber, new research shows.

Investigators found whole-plant medical cannabis use was associated with fewer problems with respect to waking up at night, but they also found that frequent medical cannabis use was associated with more problems initiating and maintaining sleep.

LPETTET/Getty Images

A common problem

Estimates suggest chronic pain affects up to 37% of adults in the developed world. Individuals who suffer chronic pain often experience comorbid insomnia, which includes difficulty initiating sleep, sleep disruption, and early morning wakening.

For its part, medical cannabis to treat chronic pain symptoms and manage sleep problems has been widely reported as a prime motivation for medical cannabis use. Indeed, previous studies have concluded that the endocannabinoid system plays a role in sleep regulation, including sleep promotion and maintenance.

In recent years, investigators have reported the beneficial effects of medical cannabis for sleep. Nevertheless, some preclinical research has also concluded that chronic administration of tetrahydrocannabinol may result in tolerance to the sleep-enhancing effects of cannabis.

With that in mind, the researchers set out to examine the potential impact of whole-plant medicinal cannabis on sleep problems experienced by middle-aged patients suffering from chronic pain.

“People are self-reporting that they’re using cannabis for sleep and that it helps, but as we know, just because people are reporting that it works doesn’t mean that it will hold up in research,” Dr. Sznitman said.

The study included 128 individuals (mean age, 61±6 years; 51% females) with chronic neuropathic pain: 66 were medical cannabis users and 62 were not.

Three indicators of insomnia were measured using the 7-point Likert scale to assess issues with sleep initiation and maintenance.

In addition, investigators collected sociodemographic information, as well as data on daily consumption of tobacco, frequency of alcohol use, and pain severity. Finally, they collected patient data on the use of sleep-aid medications during the past month as well as tricyclic antidepressant use.
 

Frequent use, more sleep problems?

On average, medical cannabis users were 3 years younger than their nonusing counterparts (mean age, 60±6 vs. 63±6 years, respectively, P = .003) and more likely to be male (58% vs 40%, respectively, P = .038). Otherwise, the two groups were comparable.

Medical cannabis users reported taking the drug for an average of 4 years, at an average quantity of 31 g per month. The primary mode of administration was smoking (68.6%), followed by oil extracts (21.4%) and vaporization (20%).

Results showed that, of the total sample, 24.1% reported always waking up early and not falling back to sleep, 20.2% reported always having difficulty falling asleep, and 27.2% reported always waking up during the night.

After adjusting for patient age, sex, pain level, and use of sleep medications and antidepressants, medical cannabis use was associated with fewer problems with waking up at night, compared with nonmedical cannabis use. No differences were found between groups with respect to problems falling asleep or waking up early without being able to fall back to sleep, Dr. Sznitman and associates reported.

The final analysis of a subsample of patients that only included medical cannabis users showed frequency of medical cannabis use was associated with sleep problems, they said.

Specifically, more frequent cannabis use was associated with more problems related to waking up at night, as well as problems falling asleep.

Sleep problems associated with frequent medical cannabis use may signal the development of tolerance to the agent. However, frequent users of medical cannabis also maybsuffer pain or other comorbidities, which, in turn, may be linked to more sleep problems.

Either way, Dr. Sznitman said the study might open the door to another treatment option for patients suffering from chronic pain who struggle with sleep.

“If future research shows that the effect of medical cannabis on sleep is a consistent one, then we may be adding a new therapy for sleep problems, which are huge in society and especially in chronic pain patients,” she said.
 

Early days

Commenting on the findings in an interview, Ryan G. Vandrey, PhD, who was not involved in the study, said the findings are in line with previous research.

“I think the results make sense with respect to the data I’ve collected and from what I’ve seen,” said Dr. Vandrey, associate professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Johns Hopkins Medicine in Baltimore.

“We typically only want to use sleep medications for short periods of time,” he continued. “When you think about recommended prescribing practices for any hypnotic medication, it’s usually short term, 2 weeks or less. Longer-term use often leads to tolerance, dependence, and withdrawal symptoms when the medication is stopped, which leads to an exacerbation of disordered sleep,” Dr. Vandrey said.

Nevertheless, he urged caution when interpreting the results.

“I think the study warrants caution about long-term daily use of cannabinoids with respect to sleep,” he said. “But we need more detailed evaluations, as the trial wasn’t testing a defined product, specific dose, or dose regimen.

“In addition, this was all done in the context of people with chronic pain and not treating disordered sleep or insomnia, but the study highlights the importance of recognizing that long-term chronic use of cannabis is not likely to fully resolve sleep problems.”

Dr. Sznitman agreed that the research is still in its very early stages.

“We’re still far from saying we have the evidence to support the use of medical cannabis for sleep,” she said. “For in the end it was just a cross-sectional, observational study, so we cannot say anything about cause and effect. But if these results pan out, they could be far-reaching and exciting.”

The study was funded by the University of Haifa and Rambam Hospital in Israel, and by the Evelyn Lipper Foundation. Dr. Sznitman and Dr. Vandrey have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

This article first appeared on Medscape.com.
 

Patients suffering from chronic pain who take medicinal cannabis to initiate and maintain sleep appear to experience short-term benefit, but long-term use may ultimately disrupt slumber, new research shows.

Investigators found whole-plant medical cannabis use was associated with fewer problems with respect to waking up at night, but they also found that frequent medical cannabis use was associated with more problems initiating and maintaining sleep.

LPETTET/Getty Images

A common problem

Estimates suggest chronic pain affects up to 37% of adults in the developed world. Individuals who suffer chronic pain often experience comorbid insomnia, which includes difficulty initiating sleep, sleep disruption, and early morning wakening.

For its part, medical cannabis to treat chronic pain symptoms and manage sleep problems has been widely reported as a prime motivation for medical cannabis use. Indeed, previous studies have concluded that the endocannabinoid system plays a role in sleep regulation, including sleep promotion and maintenance.

In recent years, investigators have reported the beneficial effects of medical cannabis for sleep. Nevertheless, some preclinical research has also concluded that chronic administration of tetrahydrocannabinol may result in tolerance to the sleep-enhancing effects of cannabis.

With that in mind, the researchers set out to examine the potential impact of whole-plant medicinal cannabis on sleep problems experienced by middle-aged patients suffering from chronic pain.

“People are self-reporting that they’re using cannabis for sleep and that it helps, but as we know, just because people are reporting that it works doesn’t mean that it will hold up in research,” Dr. Sznitman said.

The study included 128 individuals (mean age, 61±6 years; 51% females) with chronic neuropathic pain: 66 were medical cannabis users and 62 were not.

Three indicators of insomnia were measured using the 7-point Likert scale to assess issues with sleep initiation and maintenance.

In addition, investigators collected sociodemographic information, as well as data on daily consumption of tobacco, frequency of alcohol use, and pain severity. Finally, they collected patient data on the use of sleep-aid medications during the past month as well as tricyclic antidepressant use.
 

Frequent use, more sleep problems?

On average, medical cannabis users were 3 years younger than their nonusing counterparts (mean age, 60±6 vs. 63±6 years, respectively, P = .003) and more likely to be male (58% vs 40%, respectively, P = .038). Otherwise, the two groups were comparable.

Medical cannabis users reported taking the drug for an average of 4 years, at an average quantity of 31 g per month. The primary mode of administration was smoking (68.6%), followed by oil extracts (21.4%) and vaporization (20%).

Results showed that, of the total sample, 24.1% reported always waking up early and not falling back to sleep, 20.2% reported always having difficulty falling asleep, and 27.2% reported always waking up during the night.

After adjusting for patient age, sex, pain level, and use of sleep medications and antidepressants, medical cannabis use was associated with fewer problems with waking up at night, compared with nonmedical cannabis use. No differences were found between groups with respect to problems falling asleep or waking up early without being able to fall back to sleep, Dr. Sznitman and associates reported.

The final analysis of a subsample of patients that only included medical cannabis users showed frequency of medical cannabis use was associated with sleep problems, they said.

Specifically, more frequent cannabis use was associated with more problems related to waking up at night, as well as problems falling asleep.

Sleep problems associated with frequent medical cannabis use may signal the development of tolerance to the agent. However, frequent users of medical cannabis also maybsuffer pain or other comorbidities, which, in turn, may be linked to more sleep problems.

Either way, Dr. Sznitman said the study might open the door to another treatment option for patients suffering from chronic pain who struggle with sleep.

“If future research shows that the effect of medical cannabis on sleep is a consistent one, then we may be adding a new therapy for sleep problems, which are huge in society and especially in chronic pain patients,” she said.
 

Early days

Commenting on the findings in an interview, Ryan G. Vandrey, PhD, who was not involved in the study, said the findings are in line with previous research.

“I think the results make sense with respect to the data I’ve collected and from what I’ve seen,” said Dr. Vandrey, associate professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Johns Hopkins Medicine in Baltimore.

“We typically only want to use sleep medications for short periods of time,” he continued. “When you think about recommended prescribing practices for any hypnotic medication, it’s usually short term, 2 weeks or less. Longer-term use often leads to tolerance, dependence, and withdrawal symptoms when the medication is stopped, which leads to an exacerbation of disordered sleep,” Dr. Vandrey said.

Nevertheless, he urged caution when interpreting the results.

“I think the study warrants caution about long-term daily use of cannabinoids with respect to sleep,” he said. “But we need more detailed evaluations, as the trial wasn’t testing a defined product, specific dose, or dose regimen.

“In addition, this was all done in the context of people with chronic pain and not treating disordered sleep or insomnia, but the study highlights the importance of recognizing that long-term chronic use of cannabis is not likely to fully resolve sleep problems.”

Dr. Sznitman agreed that the research is still in its very early stages.

“We’re still far from saying we have the evidence to support the use of medical cannabis for sleep,” she said. “For in the end it was just a cross-sectional, observational study, so we cannot say anything about cause and effect. But if these results pan out, they could be far-reaching and exciting.”

The study was funded by the University of Haifa and Rambam Hospital in Israel, and by the Evelyn Lipper Foundation. Dr. Sznitman and Dr. Vandrey have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

This article first appeared on Medscape.com.
 

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who receive opioids while hospitalized are three times as likely to be prescribed opioids after discharge, based on a retrospective analysis of more than 800 patients.

Awareness of this dose-dependent relationship and IBD-related risks of opioid use should encourage physicians to consider alternative analgesics, according to lead author Rahul S. Dalal, MD, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, and colleagues.

“Recent evidence has demonstrated that opioid use is associated with severe infections and increased mortality among IBD patients,” the investigators wrote in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. “Despite these concerns, opioids are commonly prescribed to IBD patients in the outpatient setting and to as many as 70% of IBD patients who are hospitalized.”

To look for a possible relationship between inpatient and outpatient opioid use, the investigators reviewed electronic medical records of 862 IBD patients who were treated at three urban hospitals in the University of Pennsylvania Health System. The primary outcome was opioid prescription within 12 months of discharge, including prescriptions at time of hospital dismissal.

During hospitalization, about two-thirds (67.6%) of patients received intravenous opioids. Of the total population, slightly more than half (54.6%) received intravenous hydromorphone and about one-quarter (25.9%) received intravenous morphine. Following discharge, almost half of the population (44.7%) was prescribed opioids, and about 3 out of 4 patients (77.9%) received an additional opioid prescription within the same year.

After accounting for confounders such as IBD severity, preadmission opioid use, pain scores, and psychiatric conditions, data analysis showed that inpatients who received intravenous opioids had a threefold (odds ratio [OR], 3.3) increased likelihood of receiving postdischarge opioid prescription, compared with patients who received no opioids while hospitalized. This association was stronger among those who had IBD flares (OR, 5.4). Furthermore, intravenous dose was positively correlated with postdischarge opioid prescription.

Avoiding intravenous opioids had no impact on the relationship between inpatient and outpatient opioid use. Among inpatients who received only oral or transdermal opioids, a similarly increased likelihood of postdischarge opioid prescription was observed (OR, 4.2), although this was a small cohort (n = 67).

Compared with other physicians, gastroenterologists were the least likely to prescribe opioids. Considering that gastroenterologists were also most likely aware of IBD-related risks of opioid use, the investigators concluded that more interdisciplinary communication and education are needed.

“Alternative analgesics such as acetaminophen, dicyclomine, hyoscyamine, and celecoxib could be advised, as many of these therapies have been deemed relatively safe and effective in this population,” they wrote.The investigators disclosed relationships with Abbott, Gilead, Romark, and others.

SOURCE: Dalal RS et al. Clin Gastro Hepatol. 2019 Dec 27. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.12.024.

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who receive opioids while hospitalized are three times as likely to be prescribed opioids after discharge, based on a retrospective analysis of more than 800 patients.

Awareness of this dose-dependent relationship and IBD-related risks of opioid use should encourage physicians to consider alternative analgesics, according to lead author Rahul S. Dalal, MD, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, and colleagues.

“Recent evidence has demonstrated that opioid use is associated with severe infections and increased mortality among IBD patients,” the investigators wrote in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. “Despite these concerns, opioids are commonly prescribed to IBD patients in the outpatient setting and to as many as 70% of IBD patients who are hospitalized.”

To look for a possible relationship between inpatient and outpatient opioid use, the investigators reviewed electronic medical records of 862 IBD patients who were treated at three urban hospitals in the University of Pennsylvania Health System. The primary outcome was opioid prescription within 12 months of discharge, including prescriptions at time of hospital dismissal.

During hospitalization, about two-thirds (67.6%) of patients received intravenous opioids. Of the total population, slightly more than half (54.6%) received intravenous hydromorphone and about one-quarter (25.9%) received intravenous morphine. Following discharge, almost half of the population (44.7%) was prescribed opioids, and about 3 out of 4 patients (77.9%) received an additional opioid prescription within the same year.

After accounting for confounders such as IBD severity, preadmission opioid use, pain scores, and psychiatric conditions, data analysis showed that inpatients who received intravenous opioids had a threefold (odds ratio [OR], 3.3) increased likelihood of receiving postdischarge opioid prescription, compared with patients who received no opioids while hospitalized. This association was stronger among those who had IBD flares (OR, 5.4). Furthermore, intravenous dose was positively correlated with postdischarge opioid prescription.

Avoiding intravenous opioids had no impact on the relationship between inpatient and outpatient opioid use. Among inpatients who received only oral or transdermal opioids, a similarly increased likelihood of postdischarge opioid prescription was observed (OR, 4.2), although this was a small cohort (n = 67).

Compared with other physicians, gastroenterologists were the least likely to prescribe opioids. Considering that gastroenterologists were also most likely aware of IBD-related risks of opioid use, the investigators concluded that more interdisciplinary communication and education are needed.

“Alternative analgesics such as acetaminophen, dicyclomine, hyoscyamine, and celecoxib could be advised, as many of these therapies have been deemed relatively safe and effective in this population,” they wrote.The investigators disclosed relationships with Abbott, Gilead, Romark, and others.

SOURCE: Dalal RS et al. Clin Gastro Hepatol. 2019 Dec 27. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.12.024.

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who receive opioids while hospitalized are three times as likely to be prescribed opioids after discharge, based on a retrospective analysis of more than 800 patients.

Awareness of this dose-dependent relationship and IBD-related risks of opioid use should encourage physicians to consider alternative analgesics, according to lead author Rahul S. Dalal, MD, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, and colleagues.

“Recent evidence has demonstrated that opioid use is associated with severe infections and increased mortality among IBD patients,” the investigators wrote in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. “Despite these concerns, opioids are commonly prescribed to IBD patients in the outpatient setting and to as many as 70% of IBD patients who are hospitalized.”

To look for a possible relationship between inpatient and outpatient opioid use, the investigators reviewed electronic medical records of 862 IBD patients who were treated at three urban hospitals in the University of Pennsylvania Health System. The primary outcome was opioid prescription within 12 months of discharge, including prescriptions at time of hospital dismissal.

During hospitalization, about two-thirds (67.6%) of patients received intravenous opioids. Of the total population, slightly more than half (54.6%) received intravenous hydromorphone and about one-quarter (25.9%) received intravenous morphine. Following discharge, almost half of the population (44.7%) was prescribed opioids, and about 3 out of 4 patients (77.9%) received an additional opioid prescription within the same year.

After accounting for confounders such as IBD severity, preadmission opioid use, pain scores, and psychiatric conditions, data analysis showed that inpatients who received intravenous opioids had a threefold (odds ratio [OR], 3.3) increased likelihood of receiving postdischarge opioid prescription, compared with patients who received no opioids while hospitalized. This association was stronger among those who had IBD flares (OR, 5.4). Furthermore, intravenous dose was positively correlated with postdischarge opioid prescription.

Avoiding intravenous opioids had no impact on the relationship between inpatient and outpatient opioid use. Among inpatients who received only oral or transdermal opioids, a similarly increased likelihood of postdischarge opioid prescription was observed (OR, 4.2), although this was a small cohort (n = 67).

Compared with other physicians, gastroenterologists were the least likely to prescribe opioids. Considering that gastroenterologists were also most likely aware of IBD-related risks of opioid use, the investigators concluded that more interdisciplinary communication and education are needed.

“Alternative analgesics such as acetaminophen, dicyclomine, hyoscyamine, and celecoxib could be advised, as many of these therapies have been deemed relatively safe and effective in this population,” they wrote.The investigators disclosed relationships with Abbott, Gilead, Romark, and others.

SOURCE: Dalal RS et al. Clin Gastro Hepatol. 2019 Dec 27. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.12.024.

LAS VEGAS – Researchers have devised a risk calculator for patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes that can estimate their 10-year risk for death and cardiovascular disease events if their clinical status continues relatively unchanged, or if they opt to undergo bariatric surgery.

Mitchel L. Zoler/MDedge News

The Individualized Diabetes Complications risk score “can provide personalized, evidence-based risk information for patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity about their future cardiovascular disease outcomes and mortality with and without metabolic surgery,” Ali Aminian, MD, said at a meeting presented by the Obesity Society and the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery.

Although the calculator needs validation in a prospective, randomized study to document its impact on practice, it is now available on two separate websites and as a downloadable app, said Dr. Aminian, a surgeon at the Cleveland Clinic.

The calculator inputs data for 26 distinct, “readily available” demographic and clinical entries, and based on that, estimates the patient’s 10-year risk for all-cause death, diabetic kidney disease, cerebrovascular disease, heart failure, and coronary artery disease if no surgery occurs or after some type of metabolic or bariatric surgery. The calculator does not currently have the ability to individualize predicted risks based on the specific type of metabolic surgery performed, but that is planned as a future refinement of the score.

“We validated the model in the nonsurgical patients, which showed it was very accurate. The next step is to run a randomized trial to see how useful the calculator is” for assisting in patients’ decision making, Dr. Aminian said.

The data for deriving the risk calculator, and for a preliminary validation of it, came from 13,722 patients with obesity (body mass index, 30 kg/m² or greater) and type 2 diabetes, who were managed at the Cleveland Clinic during 1998-2017, drawn from more than 287,000 such patients in the clinic’s database. The study focused on 2,287 patients who underwent metabolic (bariatric) surgery and 11,435 patients from the same database who did not have surgery and matched by propensity scoring on a 5:1 basis with those who had surgery. The two cohorts this created matched well for age (about 54 years), sex (about two-thirds women), BMI (about 44 kg/m²), and the prevalence of various comorbidities at baseline.

Dr. Aminian and associates then analyzed the incidence of all-cause mortality and various cardiovascular disease endpoints, as well as nephropathy during follow-up, through December 2018. Patients who had undergone metabolic surgery showed statistically significant reductions in the incidence of each of those events, compared with patients who did not have surgery (JAMA. 2019;322[13]:1271-82).The investigators used these findings to create their model for calculating a patient’s risk score. For example, to calculate an estimate for the 10-year risk from all-cause mortality, the results showed that the most powerful risk factors were age, baseline body mass index, heart failure, need for insulin, and smoking status. For the endpoint of nephropathy, the most important factors were estimated glomerular filtration rate at baseline and age. Identified risk factors could account for about 80% of the 10-year risk for all-cause death and for about 75% of the risk for developing nephropathy during 10 years, based on the area-under-the-curve values the model produced.

The calculator is available at a website maintained by the Cleveland Clinic, at a site of the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, and in app stores, he said.

The work was partially funded by Medtronic. Dr. Aminian has received grants from Medtronic.

The AGA Practice guide on Obesity and Weight management, Education and Resources (POWER) white paper provides physicians with a comprehensive, multidisciplinary process to guide and personalize innovative obesity care for safe and effective weight management. Learn more at www.gastro.org/obesity.

mzoler@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Aminian A et al. Obesity Week 2019, Abstract A101.

LAS VEGAS – Researchers have devised a risk calculator for patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes that can estimate their 10-year risk for death and cardiovascular disease events if their clinical status continues relatively unchanged, or if they opt to undergo bariatric surgery.

Mitchel L. Zoler/MDedge News

The Individualized Diabetes Complications risk score “can provide personalized, evidence-based risk information for patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity about their future cardiovascular disease outcomes and mortality with and without metabolic surgery,” Ali Aminian, MD, said at a meeting presented by the Obesity Society and the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery.

Although the calculator needs validation in a prospective, randomized study to document its impact on practice, it is now available on two separate websites and as a downloadable app, said Dr. Aminian, a surgeon at the Cleveland Clinic.

The calculator inputs data for 26 distinct, “readily available” demographic and clinical entries, and based on that, estimates the patient’s 10-year risk for all-cause death, diabetic kidney disease, cerebrovascular disease, heart failure, and coronary artery disease if no surgery occurs or after some type of metabolic or bariatric surgery. The calculator does not currently have the ability to individualize predicted risks based on the specific type of metabolic surgery performed, but that is planned as a future refinement of the score.

“We validated the model in the nonsurgical patients, which showed it was very accurate. The next step is to run a randomized trial to see how useful the calculator is” for assisting in patients’ decision making, Dr. Aminian said.

The data for deriving the risk calculator, and for a preliminary validation of it, came from 13,722 patients with obesity (body mass index, 30 kg/m² or greater) and type 2 diabetes, who were managed at the Cleveland Clinic during 1998-2017, drawn from more than 287,000 such patients in the clinic’s database. The study focused on 2,287 patients who underwent metabolic (bariatric) surgery and 11,435 patients from the same database who did not have surgery and matched by propensity scoring on a 5:1 basis with those who had surgery. The two cohorts this created matched well for age (about 54 years), sex (about two-thirds women), BMI (about 44 kg/m²), and the prevalence of various comorbidities at baseline.

Dr. Aminian and associates then analyzed the incidence of all-cause mortality and various cardiovascular disease endpoints, as well as nephropathy during follow-up, through December 2018. Patients who had undergone metabolic surgery showed statistically significant reductions in the incidence of each of those events, compared with patients who did not have surgery (JAMA. 2019;322[13]:1271-82).The investigators used these findings to create their model for calculating a patient’s risk score. For example, to calculate an estimate for the 10-year risk from all-cause mortality, the results showed that the most powerful risk factors were age, baseline body mass index, heart failure, need for insulin, and smoking status. For the endpoint of nephropathy, the most important factors were estimated glomerular filtration rate at baseline and age. Identified risk factors could account for about 80% of the 10-year risk for all-cause death and for about 75% of the risk for developing nephropathy during 10 years, based on the area-under-the-curve values the model produced.

The calculator is available at a website maintained by the Cleveland Clinic, at a site of the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, and in app stores, he said.

The work was partially funded by Medtronic. Dr. Aminian has received grants from Medtronic.

The AGA Practice guide on Obesity and Weight management, Education and Resources (POWER) white paper provides physicians with a comprehensive, multidisciplinary process to guide and personalize innovative obesity care for safe and effective weight management. Learn more at www.gastro.org/obesity.

mzoler@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Aminian A et al. Obesity Week 2019, Abstract A101.

LAS VEGAS – Researchers have devised a risk calculator for patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes that can estimate their 10-year risk for death and cardiovascular disease events if their clinical status continues relatively unchanged, or if they opt to undergo bariatric surgery.

Mitchel L. Zoler/MDedge News

The Individualized Diabetes Complications risk score “can provide personalized, evidence-based risk information for patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity about their future cardiovascular disease outcomes and mortality with and without metabolic surgery,” Ali Aminian, MD, said at a meeting presented by the Obesity Society and the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery.

Although the calculator needs validation in a prospective, randomized study to document its impact on practice, it is now available on two separate websites and as a downloadable app, said Dr. Aminian, a surgeon at the Cleveland Clinic.

The calculator inputs data for 26 distinct, “readily available” demographic and clinical entries, and based on that, estimates the patient’s 10-year risk for all-cause death, diabetic kidney disease, cerebrovascular disease, heart failure, and coronary artery disease if no surgery occurs or after some type of metabolic or bariatric surgery. The calculator does not currently have the ability to individualize predicted risks based on the specific type of metabolic surgery performed, but that is planned as a future refinement of the score.

“We validated the model in the nonsurgical patients, which showed it was very accurate. The next step is to run a randomized trial to see how useful the calculator is” for assisting in patients’ decision making, Dr. Aminian said.

The data for deriving the risk calculator, and for a preliminary validation of it, came from 13,722 patients with obesity (body mass index, 30 kg/m² or greater) and type 2 diabetes, who were managed at the Cleveland Clinic during 1998-2017, drawn from more than 287,000 such patients in the clinic’s database. The study focused on 2,287 patients who underwent metabolic (bariatric) surgery and 11,435 patients from the same database who did not have surgery and matched by propensity scoring on a 5:1 basis with those who had surgery. The two cohorts this created matched well for age (about 54 years), sex (about two-thirds women), BMI (about 44 kg/m²), and the prevalence of various comorbidities at baseline.

Dr. Aminian and associates then analyzed the incidence of all-cause mortality and various cardiovascular disease endpoints, as well as nephropathy during follow-up, through December 2018. Patients who had undergone metabolic surgery showed statistically significant reductions in the incidence of each of those events, compared with patients who did not have surgery (JAMA. 2019;322[13]:1271-82).The investigators used these findings to create their model for calculating a patient’s risk score. For example, to calculate an estimate for the 10-year risk from all-cause mortality, the results showed that the most powerful risk factors were age, baseline body mass index, heart failure, need for insulin, and smoking status. For the endpoint of nephropathy, the most important factors were estimated glomerular filtration rate at baseline and age. Identified risk factors could account for about 80% of the 10-year risk for all-cause death and for about 75% of the risk for developing nephropathy during 10 years, based on the area-under-the-curve values the model produced.

The calculator is available at a website maintained by the Cleveland Clinic, at a site of the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, and in app stores, he said.

The work was partially funded by Medtronic. Dr. Aminian has received grants from Medtronic.

The AGA Practice guide on Obesity and Weight management, Education and Resources (POWER) white paper provides physicians with a comprehensive, multidisciplinary process to guide and personalize innovative obesity care for safe and effective weight management. Learn more at www.gastro.org/obesity.

mzoler@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Aminian A et al. Obesity Week 2019, Abstract A101.

Young people treated with bariatric surgery for severe obesity did not experience better mental health in the 5 years following their procedures, Swedish researchers said, and indeed fared worse than their nontreated peers on certain measures.

The results of this study do not necessarily argue “that metabolic and bariatric surgery during adolescence causes mental health problems,” the investigators wrote in the Lancet Child and Adolescent Health, but “it is reasonable to conclude that metabolic and bariatric surgery does not result in a substantial alleviation of mental health problems in adolescents with severe obesity,” and that “long-term mental health support should be required in programs providing adolescent metabolic and bariatric surgery.”

Kajsa Järvholm, PhD, of Skåne University Hospital, in Malmö, Sweden, and colleagues reported results from a prospective nonrandomized study that recruited 81 adolescents in Sweden aged 13-18 years (mean age, 16.5) who had a body mass index of 40 or higher, or BMI of 35 with obesity-related comorbidities and who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for weight loss. Subjects were matched by age, sex, and BMI to 80 controls (mean age, 15.8 years) who were assigned to conventional nonsurgical treatment. All patients were assessed at 1, 2, and 5 years.

Although mental health treatment, including use of psychiatric drugs, did not differ between the groups at baseline, during the follow-up period the subjects who underwent surgery saw 15% more impatient and outpatient mental health treatment, compared with controls, a significant difference. About a quarter of patients in the surgically treated group required specialized mental health treatment for the first time after their surgeries.

Though the surgical group lost much more weight – mean BMI was 32.3 at 5 years, compared with 41.7 for controls – none of the mental health changes from baseline were significantly associated with percentage change of BMI at 5 years.

The findings from the study are consistent with results from studies in adults in which bariatric surgery improves many health outcomes but does not alter the need for mental health treatment. Although 5 years is a longer follow-up than in previous studies in young patients – a key strength of the study – Dr. Järvholm and colleagues acknowledged some weaknesses, including a nonrandomized design, lack of a comparison group of nonobese youths for mental health measures, a small sample size, and a surgical procedure that is now out of favor in adolescents.

The study was funded by Swedish government and health foundations. Dr. Järvholm disclosed pharmaceutical industry funding not related to the study, and three coauthors also disclosed industry relationships.

SOURCE: Järvholm K et al. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020. doi: 10.1016/s2352-4642(20)30024-9.

Young people treated with bariatric surgery for severe obesity did not experience better mental health in the 5 years following their procedures, Swedish researchers said, and indeed fared worse than their nontreated peers on certain measures.

The results of this study do not necessarily argue “that metabolic and bariatric surgery during adolescence causes mental health problems,” the investigators wrote in the Lancet Child and Adolescent Health, but “it is reasonable to conclude that metabolic and bariatric surgery does not result in a substantial alleviation of mental health problems in adolescents with severe obesity,” and that “long-term mental health support should be required in programs providing adolescent metabolic and bariatric surgery.”

Kajsa Järvholm, PhD, of Skåne University Hospital, in Malmö, Sweden, and colleagues reported results from a prospective nonrandomized study that recruited 81 adolescents in Sweden aged 13-18 years (mean age, 16.5) who had a body mass index of 40 or higher, or BMI of 35 with obesity-related comorbidities and who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for weight loss. Subjects were matched by age, sex, and BMI to 80 controls (mean age, 15.8 years) who were assigned to conventional nonsurgical treatment. All patients were assessed at 1, 2, and 5 years.

Although mental health treatment, including use of psychiatric drugs, did not differ between the groups at baseline, during the follow-up period the subjects who underwent surgery saw 15% more impatient and outpatient mental health treatment, compared with controls, a significant difference. About a quarter of patients in the surgically treated group required specialized mental health treatment for the first time after their surgeries.

Though the surgical group lost much more weight – mean BMI was 32.3 at 5 years, compared with 41.7 for controls – none of the mental health changes from baseline were significantly associated with percentage change of BMI at 5 years.

The findings from the study are consistent with results from studies in adults in which bariatric surgery improves many health outcomes but does not alter the need for mental health treatment. Although 5 years is a longer follow-up than in previous studies in young patients – a key strength of the study – Dr. Järvholm and colleagues acknowledged some weaknesses, including a nonrandomized design, lack of a comparison group of nonobese youths for mental health measures, a small sample size, and a surgical procedure that is now out of favor in adolescents.

The study was funded by Swedish government and health foundations. Dr. Järvholm disclosed pharmaceutical industry funding not related to the study, and three coauthors also disclosed industry relationships.

SOURCE: Järvholm K et al. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020. doi: 10.1016/s2352-4642(20)30024-9.

Young people treated with bariatric surgery for severe obesity did not experience better mental health in the 5 years following their procedures, Swedish researchers said, and indeed fared worse than their nontreated peers on certain measures.

The results of this study do not necessarily argue “that metabolic and bariatric surgery during adolescence causes mental health problems,” the investigators wrote in the Lancet Child and Adolescent Health, but “it is reasonable to conclude that metabolic and bariatric surgery does not result in a substantial alleviation of mental health problems in adolescents with severe obesity,” and that “long-term mental health support should be required in programs providing adolescent metabolic and bariatric surgery.”

Kajsa Järvholm, PhD, of Skåne University Hospital, in Malmö, Sweden, and colleagues reported results from a prospective nonrandomized study that recruited 81 adolescents in Sweden aged 13-18 years (mean age, 16.5) who had a body mass index of 40 or higher, or BMI of 35 with obesity-related comorbidities and who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for weight loss. Subjects were matched by age, sex, and BMI to 80 controls (mean age, 15.8 years) who were assigned to conventional nonsurgical treatment. All patients were assessed at 1, 2, and 5 years.

Although mental health treatment, including use of psychiatric drugs, did not differ between the groups at baseline, during the follow-up period the subjects who underwent surgery saw 15% more impatient and outpatient mental health treatment, compared with controls, a significant difference. About a quarter of patients in the surgically treated group required specialized mental health treatment for the first time after their surgeries.

Though the surgical group lost much more weight – mean BMI was 32.3 at 5 years, compared with 41.7 for controls – none of the mental health changes from baseline were significantly associated with percentage change of BMI at 5 years.

The findings from the study are consistent with results from studies in adults in which bariatric surgery improves many health outcomes but does not alter the need for mental health treatment. Although 5 years is a longer follow-up than in previous studies in young patients – a key strength of the study – Dr. Järvholm and colleagues acknowledged some weaknesses, including a nonrandomized design, lack of a comparison group of nonobese youths for mental health measures, a small sample size, and a surgical procedure that is now out of favor in adolescents.

The study was funded by Swedish government and health foundations. Dr. Järvholm disclosed pharmaceutical industry funding not related to the study, and three coauthors also disclosed industry relationships.

SOURCE: Järvholm K et al. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020. doi: 10.1016/s2352-4642(20)30024-9.

2020 has begun and therefore so has a new year of quality reporting requirements. Quality reporting under the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) may seem like a burden, but it doesn’t need to be. You can likely get credit for the things you are already doing in your practice with little to no augmentation needed.

First, there are a few pieces of information to keep in mind when tracking your data and preparing your staff for their 2020 strategy.

1. Group Participation – For 2020 there is an increase in the MIPS participation threshold for those participating as part of a group. At least 50% of the MIPS eligible clinicians in the reporting group must participate in the same continuous 90-day period to receive credit for a quality improvement activity. That’s a significant increase from 2019 when only one (1) MIPS eligible clinician in a group was required to participate. Connect with your staff now to make sure your group meets the new 50% participation requirement.

2. Improvement Activities for Group Participation – Improvement Activities that are approved for credit by CMS are given a weight based on their requirements. Approved activities are weighted as either medium or high, and this impacts how many activities a practitioner must report on. In 2020, CMS increased the participation threshold for group reporting from a single clinician to 50% of the clinicians in the practice for the Improvement Activities category along with other changes such as modifying the definition of rural area to mean a ZIP code designated as rural by the Federal Office of Rural Health Policy using the most recent file available, updating the improvement activities and removing some criteria for Patient-Centered Medical Home designation. Work with your staff now to make sure at least 50% of the MIPS-eligible clinicians in your group are participating in the same Improvement Activities.

3. Quantity of Improvement Activities Required – CMS requires most individuals or groups report on any of the following options during any continuous 90-day period (or as specified in the activity description) in the same performance year, provided that all participating clinicians are reporting on the same activities:
a. 2 high-weighted activities, or
b. 1 high-weighted and 2 medium-weighted activities, or
c. 4 medium-weighted activities

Be sure to pay attention to the weight of the activity you (if you’re reporting as an individual) or your group is reporting so you don’t have any surprises at the end of the reporting period.

There are a variety of options for activities you can report on and some may be a lower lift than you expect.

Does your practice treat Medicaid patients? If so, do you know their average wait time for an initial visit? If that number is 10 days or less, you can report on this activity. If you aren’t quite hitting this benchmark, then consider implementing a scheduling protocol for this population of your patients in the new year.

Engagement of new Medicaid patients and follow-up

Seeing new and follow-up Medicaid patients in a timely manner, including individuals dually eligible for Medicaid and Medicare. A timely manner is defined as within 10 business days for this activity.
Subcategory name: Achieving Health Equity
Activity weighting: High

Are you responsible for onboarding and training new clinicians to your rural practice? If so, you could report on the next activity. Eligible clinicians would be responsible for training of new clinicians including physicians, advanced practice providers and clinical nursing specialists. These clinicians must practice in small, underserved, or rural areas. What is considered a small, rural, or underserved practice for the purpose of MIPS?

Small practice

• Defined as a practice with 15 or fewer eligible clinicians-based billing under the same TIN

Rural/underserved practice

• Defined as a practice in a zip code included in the most recent set of Health Professional Shortage Areas (HPSAs), as determined by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA).
• HPSAs are designations that indicate health care provider shortages in primary care, dental health or mental health can be geographic population based or facility based.

Provide education opportunities for new clinicians

MIPS-eligible clinicians acting as a preceptor for clinicians-in-training (such as medical residents/fellows, medical students, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, or clinical nurse specialists) and accepting such clinicians for clinical rotations in community practices in small, underserved, or rural areas.
Subcategory name: Achieving Health Equity
Activity weighting: High
There are also activities you can report on under the beneficiary engagement category that you may already be doing in your practice. First, the collection of patient experience and satisfaction data and the development of an improvement plan as necessary counts as one activity. Second, the engagement of the patient’s support team in the development of a plan of care, which needs to include goals and be documented in the electronic health record.

Collection and follow-up on patient experience and satisfaction data on beneficiary engagement

Collection and follow-up on patient experience and satisfaction data on beneficiary engagement, including development of improvement plan.
Subcategory name: Beneficiary Engagement
Activity weighting: High

Engagement of Patients, Family, and Caregivers in Developing a Plan of Care

Engage patients, family, and caregivers in developing a plan of care and prioritizing their goals for action, documented in the electronic health record (EHR) technology.
Subcategory name: Beneficiary Engagement
Activity weighting: Medium
Another data collection category is patient access to care. If you collect and use patient data on their satisfaction and experience related to access to care and commit to developing an improvement plan as necessary, you can receive credit for this reporting category.

Collection and use of patient experience and satisfaction data on access

Collection of patient experience and satisfaction data on access to care and development of an improvement plan, such as outlining steps for improving communications with patients to help understanding of urgent access needs.
Subcategory name: Expanded Practice Access
Activity weighting: Medium

One of the hallmarks of a medical practice in any specialty is improvement. We are always striving to improve something, whether it be the patient experience, patient outcomes, the bottom line, or the education of clinical staff. You can leverage the practice improvement plans you have put into place for credit.

Leadership engagement in regular guidance and demonstrated commitment for implementing practice improvement changes

Ensure full engagement of clinical and administrative leadership in practice improvement that could include one or more of the following: Make responsibility for guidance of practice change a component of clinical and administrative leadership roles; Allocate time for clinical and administrative leadership for practice improvement efforts, including participation in regular team meetings; and/or Incorporate population health, quality and patient experience metrics in regular reviews of practice performance.
Subcategory name: Patient Safety and Practice Assessment
Activity weighting: Medium

Prescription drug use is a topic on every providers’ radar right now. Proper prescribing and monitoring of patients are crucial to their safety and quality of care. In the field of gastroenterology, step-therapy adds a new level of complication to the use of prescription drugs. Ensuring the proper medication protocols allows you to provide appropriate and timely treatment for your patients.

Annual registration in the Prescription Drug Monitoring Program

Annual registration by eligible clinician or group in the prescription drug–monitoring program of the state where they practice. Activities that simply involve registration are not sufficient. MIPS-eligible clinicians and groups must participate for a minimum of 6 months.

Subcategory name: Patient Safety and Practice Assessment
Activity weighting: Medium

As you can see, there are a variety of improvement activities that you can report on for 2020. This article has outlined several of them that you may already be doing in your practice, but many more can be found by visiting https://qpp.cms.gov/mips/improvement-activities?py=2020 along with information on how to report and the necessary forms for submission.

Dr. Shah is associate professor, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, member of the AGA Quality Leadership Council. He has no disclosures.

2020 has begun and therefore so has a new year of quality reporting requirements. Quality reporting under the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) may seem like a burden, but it doesn’t need to be. You can likely get credit for the things you are already doing in your practice with little to no augmentation needed.

First, there are a few pieces of information to keep in mind when tracking your data and preparing your staff for their 2020 strategy.

1. Group Participation – For 2020 there is an increase in the MIPS participation threshold for those participating as part of a group. At least 50% of the MIPS eligible clinicians in the reporting group must participate in the same continuous 90-day period to receive credit for a quality improvement activity. That’s a significant increase from 2019 when only one (1) MIPS eligible clinician in a group was required to participate. Connect with your staff now to make sure your group meets the new 50% participation requirement.

2. Improvement Activities for Group Participation – Improvement Activities that are approved for credit by CMS are given a weight based on their requirements. Approved activities are weighted as either medium or high, and this impacts how many activities a practitioner must report on. In 2020, CMS increased the participation threshold for group reporting from a single clinician to 50% of the clinicians in the practice for the Improvement Activities category along with other changes such as modifying the definition of rural area to mean a ZIP code designated as rural by the Federal Office of Rural Health Policy using the most recent file available, updating the improvement activities and removing some criteria for Patient-Centered Medical Home designation. Work with your staff now to make sure at least 50% of the MIPS-eligible clinicians in your group are participating in the same Improvement Activities.

3. Quantity of Improvement Activities Required – CMS requires most individuals or groups report on any of the following options during any continuous 90-day period (or as specified in the activity description) in the same performance year, provided that all participating clinicians are reporting on the same activities:
a. 2 high-weighted activities, or
b. 1 high-weighted and 2 medium-weighted activities, or
c. 4 medium-weighted activities

Be sure to pay attention to the weight of the activity you (if you’re reporting as an individual) or your group is reporting so you don’t have any surprises at the end of the reporting period.

There are a variety of options for activities you can report on and some may be a lower lift than you expect.

Does your practice treat Medicaid patients? If so, do you know their average wait time for an initial visit? If that number is 10 days or less, you can report on this activity. If you aren’t quite hitting this benchmark, then consider implementing a scheduling protocol for this population of your patients in the new year.

Engagement of new Medicaid patients and follow-up

Seeing new and follow-up Medicaid patients in a timely manner, including individuals dually eligible for Medicaid and Medicare. A timely manner is defined as within 10 business days for this activity.
Subcategory name: Achieving Health Equity
Activity weighting: High

Are you responsible for onboarding and training new clinicians to your rural practice? If so, you could report on the next activity. Eligible clinicians would be responsible for training of new clinicians including physicians, advanced practice providers and clinical nursing specialists. These clinicians must practice in small, underserved, or rural areas. What is considered a small, rural, or underserved practice for the purpose of MIPS?

Small practice

• Defined as a practice with 15 or fewer eligible clinicians-based billing under the same TIN

Rural/underserved practice

• Defined as a practice in a zip code included in the most recent set of Health Professional Shortage Areas (HPSAs), as determined by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA).
• HPSAs are designations that indicate health care provider shortages in primary care, dental health or mental health can be geographic population based or facility based.

Provide education opportunities for new clinicians

MIPS-eligible clinicians acting as a preceptor for clinicians-in-training (such as medical residents/fellows, medical students, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, or clinical nurse specialists) and accepting such clinicians for clinical rotations in community practices in small, underserved, or rural areas.
Subcategory name: Achieving Health Equity
Activity weighting: High
There are also activities you can report on under the beneficiary engagement category that you may already be doing in your practice. First, the collection of patient experience and satisfaction data and the development of an improvement plan as necessary counts as one activity. Second, the engagement of the patient’s support team in the development of a plan of care, which needs to include goals and be documented in the electronic health record.

Collection and follow-up on patient experience and satisfaction data on beneficiary engagement

Collection and follow-up on patient experience and satisfaction data on beneficiary engagement, including development of improvement plan.
Subcategory name: Beneficiary Engagement
Activity weighting: High

Engagement of Patients, Family, and Caregivers in Developing a Plan of Care

Engage patients, family, and caregivers in developing a plan of care and prioritizing their goals for action, documented in the electronic health record (EHR) technology.
Subcategory name: Beneficiary Engagement
Activity weighting: Medium
Another data collection category is patient access to care. If you collect and use patient data on their satisfaction and experience related to access to care and commit to developing an improvement plan as necessary, you can receive credit for this reporting category.

Collection and use of patient experience and satisfaction data on access

Collection of patient experience and satisfaction data on access to care and development of an improvement plan, such as outlining steps for improving communications with patients to help understanding of urgent access needs.
Subcategory name: Expanded Practice Access
Activity weighting: Medium

One of the hallmarks of a medical practice in any specialty is improvement. We are always striving to improve something, whether it be the patient experience, patient outcomes, the bottom line, or the education of clinical staff. You can leverage the practice improvement plans you have put into place for credit.

Leadership engagement in regular guidance and demonstrated commitment for implementing practice improvement changes

Ensure full engagement of clinical and administrative leadership in practice improvement that could include one or more of the following: Make responsibility for guidance of practice change a component of clinical and administrative leadership roles; Allocate time for clinical and administrative leadership for practice improvement efforts, including participation in regular team meetings; and/or Incorporate population health, quality and patient experience metrics in regular reviews of practice performance.
Subcategory name: Patient Safety and Practice Assessment
Activity weighting: Medium

Prescription drug use is a topic on every providers’ radar right now. Proper prescribing and monitoring of patients are crucial to their safety and quality of care. In the field of gastroenterology, step-therapy adds a new level of complication to the use of prescription drugs. Ensuring the proper medication protocols allows you to provide appropriate and timely treatment for your patients.

Annual registration in the Prescription Drug Monitoring Program

Annual registration by eligible clinician or group in the prescription drug–monitoring program of the state where they practice. Activities that simply involve registration are not sufficient. MIPS-eligible clinicians and groups must participate for a minimum of 6 months.

Subcategory name: Patient Safety and Practice Assessment
Activity weighting: Medium

As you can see, there are a variety of improvement activities that you can report on for 2020. This article has outlined several of them that you may already be doing in your practice, but many more can be found by visiting https://qpp.cms.gov/mips/improvement-activities?py=2020 along with information on how to report and the necessary forms for submission.

Dr. Shah is associate professor, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, member of the AGA Quality Leadership Council. He has no disclosures.

2020 has begun and therefore so has a new year of quality reporting requirements. Quality reporting under the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) may seem like a burden, but it doesn’t need to be. You can likely get credit for the things you are already doing in your practice with little to no augmentation needed.

First, there are a few pieces of information to keep in mind when tracking your data and preparing your staff for their 2020 strategy.

1. Group Participation – For 2020 there is an increase in the MIPS participation threshold for those participating as part of a group. At least 50% of the MIPS eligible clinicians in the reporting group must participate in the same continuous 90-day period to receive credit for a quality improvement activity. That’s a significant increase from 2019 when only one (1) MIPS eligible clinician in a group was required to participate. Connect with your staff now to make sure your group meets the new 50% participation requirement.

2. Improvement Activities for Group Participation – Improvement Activities that are approved for credit by CMS are given a weight based on their requirements. Approved activities are weighted as either medium or high, and this impacts how many activities a practitioner must report on. In 2020, CMS increased the participation threshold for group reporting from a single clinician to 50% of the clinicians in the practice for the Improvement Activities category along with other changes such as modifying the definition of rural area to mean a ZIP code designated as rural by the Federal Office of Rural Health Policy using the most recent file available, updating the improvement activities and removing some criteria for Patient-Centered Medical Home designation. Work with your staff now to make sure at least 50% of the MIPS-eligible clinicians in your group are participating in the same Improvement Activities.

3. Quantity of Improvement Activities Required – CMS requires most individuals or groups report on any of the following options during any continuous 90-day period (or as specified in the activity description) in the same performance year, provided that all participating clinicians are reporting on the same activities:
a. 2 high-weighted activities, or
b. 1 high-weighted and 2 medium-weighted activities, or
c. 4 medium-weighted activities

Be sure to pay attention to the weight of the activity you (if you’re reporting as an individual) or your group is reporting so you don’t have any surprises at the end of the reporting period.

There are a variety of options for activities you can report on and some may be a lower lift than you expect.

Does your practice treat Medicaid patients? If so, do you know their average wait time for an initial visit? If that number is 10 days or less, you can report on this activity. If you aren’t quite hitting this benchmark, then consider implementing a scheduling protocol for this population of your patients in the new year.

Engagement of new Medicaid patients and follow-up

Seeing new and follow-up Medicaid patients in a timely manner, including individuals dually eligible for Medicaid and Medicare. A timely manner is defined as within 10 business days for this activity.
Subcategory name: Achieving Health Equity
Activity weighting: High

Are you responsible for onboarding and training new clinicians to your rural practice? If so, you could report on the next activity. Eligible clinicians would be responsible for training of new clinicians including physicians, advanced practice providers and clinical nursing specialists. These clinicians must practice in small, underserved, or rural areas. What is considered a small, rural, or underserved practice for the purpose of MIPS?

Small practice

• Defined as a practice with 15 or fewer eligible clinicians-based billing under the same TIN

Rural/underserved practice

• Defined as a practice in a zip code included in the most recent set of Health Professional Shortage Areas (HPSAs), as determined by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA).
• HPSAs are designations that indicate health care provider shortages in primary care, dental health or mental health can be geographic population based or facility based.

Provide education opportunities for new clinicians

MIPS-eligible clinicians acting as a preceptor for clinicians-in-training (such as medical residents/fellows, medical students, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, or clinical nurse specialists) and accepting such clinicians for clinical rotations in community practices in small, underserved, or rural areas.
Subcategory name: Achieving Health Equity
Activity weighting: High
There are also activities you can report on under the beneficiary engagement category that you may already be doing in your practice. First, the collection of patient experience and satisfaction data and the development of an improvement plan as necessary counts as one activity. Second, the engagement of the patient’s support team in the development of a plan of care, which needs to include goals and be documented in the electronic health record.

Collection and follow-up on patient experience and satisfaction data on beneficiary engagement

Collection and follow-up on patient experience and satisfaction data on beneficiary engagement, including development of improvement plan.
Subcategory name: Beneficiary Engagement
Activity weighting: High

Engagement of Patients, Family, and Caregivers in Developing a Plan of Care

Engage patients, family, and caregivers in developing a plan of care and prioritizing their goals for action, documented in the electronic health record (EHR) technology.
Subcategory name: Beneficiary Engagement
Activity weighting: Medium
Another data collection category is patient access to care. If you collect and use patient data on their satisfaction and experience related to access to care and commit to developing an improvement plan as necessary, you can receive credit for this reporting category.

Collection and use of patient experience and satisfaction data on access

Collection of patient experience and satisfaction data on access to care and development of an improvement plan, such as outlining steps for improving communications with patients to help understanding of urgent access needs.
Subcategory name: Expanded Practice Access
Activity weighting: Medium

One of the hallmarks of a medical practice in any specialty is improvement. We are always striving to improve something, whether it be the patient experience, patient outcomes, the bottom line, or the education of clinical staff. You can leverage the practice improvement plans you have put into place for credit.

Leadership engagement in regular guidance and demonstrated commitment for implementing practice improvement changes

Ensure full engagement of clinical and administrative leadership in practice improvement that could include one or more of the following: Make responsibility for guidance of practice change a component of clinical and administrative leadership roles; Allocate time for clinical and administrative leadership for practice improvement efforts, including participation in regular team meetings; and/or Incorporate population health, quality and patient experience metrics in regular reviews of practice performance.
Subcategory name: Patient Safety and Practice Assessment
Activity weighting: Medium

Prescription drug use is a topic on every providers’ radar right now. Proper prescribing and monitoring of patients are crucial to their safety and quality of care. In the field of gastroenterology, step-therapy adds a new level of complication to the use of prescription drugs. Ensuring the proper medication protocols allows you to provide appropriate and timely treatment for your patients.

Annual registration in the Prescription Drug Monitoring Program

Annual registration by eligible clinician or group in the prescription drug–monitoring program of the state where they practice. Activities that simply involve registration are not sufficient. MIPS-eligible clinicians and groups must participate for a minimum of 6 months.

Subcategory name: Patient Safety and Practice Assessment
Activity weighting: Medium

As you can see, there are a variety of improvement activities that you can report on for 2020. This article has outlined several of them that you may already be doing in your practice, but many more can be found by visiting https://qpp.cms.gov/mips/improvement-activities?py=2020 along with information on how to report and the necessary forms for submission.

Dr. Shah is associate professor, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, member of the AGA Quality Leadership Council. He has no disclosures.